EP3592624B1 - Procédé pour faire fonctionner une installation de triage et système de commande conçu pour ladite installation - Google Patents

Procédé pour faire fonctionner une installation de triage et système de commande conçu pour ladite installation Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3592624B1
EP3592624B1 EP18719456.8A EP18719456A EP3592624B1 EP 3592624 B1 EP3592624 B1 EP 3592624B1 EP 18719456 A EP18719456 A EP 18719456A EP 3592624 B1 EP3592624 B1 EP 3592624B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
procedure
humping
hump
unit
predicted
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP18719456.8A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP3592624A1 (fr
Inventor
Thomas Flohr
Peter KUEHS
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Siemens Mobility GmbH
Original Assignee
Siemens Mobility GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Siemens Mobility GmbH filed Critical Siemens Mobility GmbH
Publication of EP3592624A1 publication Critical patent/EP3592624A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3592624B1 publication Critical patent/EP3592624B1/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B61—RAILWAYS
    • B61J—SHIFTING OR SHUNTING OF RAIL VEHICLES
    • B61J3/00—Shunting or short-distance haulage devices; Similar devices for hauling trains on steep gradients or as starting aids; Car propelling devices therefor
    • B61J3/02—Gravity shunting humps
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B61—RAILWAYS
    • B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
    • B61L17/00—Switching systems for classification yards
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B61—RAILWAYS
    • B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
    • B61L17/00—Switching systems for classification yards
    • B61L17/02—Details, e.g. indicating degree of track filling
    • B61L17/026—Brake devices
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B61—RAILWAYS
    • B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
    • B61L25/00—Recording or indicating positions or identities of vehicles or trains or setting of track apparatus
    • B61L25/02—Indicating or recording positions or identities of vehicles or trains
    • B61L25/021—Measuring and recording of train speed

Definitions

  • shunting systems which are also referred to as train formation systems
  • dismantling units in the form of freight trains to be dismantled are pushed over a drainage hill by a push-off locomotive.
  • processes in the form of wagons or groups of wagons are sorted from a mountain track into different directional tracks using the force of gravity acting on the processes.
  • An automatic control system that enables extensive automation of the operation of process plants is, for example, from the company publication " Automation system for train formation systems Trackguard Cargo MSR32 - More efficiency and safety in freight traffic ", order no .: A19100-V100-B898-V2, Siemens AG 2012 , known.
  • the present invention is based on the object of specifying a method for operating a shunting drainage system by means of which the performance of the drainage system is increased.
  • this object is achieved by a method for operating a shunting drainage system, wherein a control device of the drainage system for a first dismantling unit, which is to be pressed over a drainage mountain of the drainage system as part of a first pressure test, predicts a termination time of the first pressure release process, for a second A dismantling unit that is to be pushed by a push-off locomotive in the direction of the discharge mountain as part of a push-off operation and to be pushed over the discharge mountain as part of a second push-off operation following the first push-off operation, taking into account at least the predicted end time of the first push-off operation and a current position of the second dismantling unit Speed curve is determined according to where there is an uninterrupted transition from the approach process to the second push-off process, and the push-pull locomotive is controlled according to the specific speed profile.
  • a control device of the drainage system for a first dismantling unit which is to be pressed over a drainage mountain of the drainage system as part of a first push-off process, predicts a termination time of the first pressure-dropping process.
  • a prognosis is made as to when the first pressing process will be finished and thus the drainage mountain will be free for other use before the first pressing process is completed.
  • the prognosis of the termination time or its specification can be made both absolutely (i.e., for example, of the type "at 3:27:30 p.m.") as well as relatively (i.e., for example, of the type "remaining time 4:30 minutes").
  • a speed profile is determined according to which an uninterrupted transition from the push-off process to the second push-off process takes place.
  • any function is referred to which, based on a given point in time and / or a given waypoint of the approaching process of the second dismantling unit, directly or indirectly specifies the respective speed of the push-off locomotive pushing the second dismantling unit in the direction of the discharge mountain.
  • the push-off locomotive is controlled according to the specific speed profile, so that the second dismantling unit carries out the approaching process in the direction of the drainage mountain in accordance with the specific speed profile.
  • the speed profile is preferably an "optimal" speed profile in that, on the one hand, there is an uninterrupted transition from the approaching operation to the second pushing-off operation, but on the other hand, the second dismantling unit does not arrive too late at the discharge mountain.
  • the second pressing-off process follows the first pressing-off process - possibly taking into account a safety distance or tolerances. This means that the second dismantling unit essentially reaches the discharge mountain at the time of the mountain clearance.
  • the method according to the invention is advantageous in that it enables the performance of the drainage system to be increased by reducing the number of pauses in the press-off operation.
  • dismantling units to be pushed off are pushed by a shunting or push-off locomotive as part of an approaching process in the direction of the discharge mountain or the mountain track of the latter.
  • the situation has hitherto occurred that at a point in time at which a respective dismantling unit has reached the drainage mountain or a Stopping point of the same reached, the drainage mountain is still occupied or blocked by a previous dismantling unit. In this case, the pressing process of the previous dismantling unit has not yet been completed.
  • the fact that an unnecessarily fast approach to the drainage mountain with subsequent braking, stopping and re-acceleration after receiving a mountain or push-off release is also avoided, can also result in reduced material wear and reduced energy costs.
  • the start time of the approaching process of the second dismantling unit can also be specified or selected in a suitable manner.
  • the speed profile of the second dismantling unit is determined in such a way that the second dismantling unit reaches a stopping point of the discharge mountain at the predicted termination time.
  • Shunting drainage systems usually have a stopping point in the area of the drainage hill. This applies to the tip of the respective dismantling unit, the reaching of the stopping point by the respective dismantling unit being detected by a corresponding track contact. If the discharge mountain is still occupied by a previous dismantling unit at the relevant point in time and therefore no mountain clearance is possible with respect to the subsequent dismantling unit, this must be brought to a standstill when the stopping point is reached.
  • the second dismantling unit now reaches the stopping point of the discharge mountain at the predicted termination time, it can be assumed that the discharge mountain has just been released for the second dismantling unit at the given point in time and thus an uninterrupted transition from the approaching process to the second push-off process and, at the same time, an im There is a substantially seamless transition from the first pressing-off process to the second pressing-off process.
  • tolerances are also taken into account in the forecast of the termination time, for example due to running times and braking distances, so that the mountain clearance for the second dismantling unit occurs shortly before it reaches the stopping point.
  • the method according to the invention can preferably also be designed in such a way that the termination time is predicted during the first pressing-off process. This is in that regard It is advantageous that, as a rule, a more precise prognosis of the time of termination will be possible during the first pressing process than before the start of the first pressing process. At the same time, a prognosis of the termination time during the first push-off process allows a timely approaching process of the second dismantling unit in such a way that it has completed the approaching process at the termination time or shortly after this and has reached the drainage mountain.
  • the termination time is predicted taking into account a set power level of the drainage system.
  • Shunting systems or their automatic control systems usually have different performance levels, which are often specified as a percentage of the maximum performance (e.g. 100% or 80%).
  • the respective active or set power level depends on the respective operational boundary conditions.
  • the accuracy of the prognosis is advantageously increased by additionally taking into account the set power level of the drainage system in the prognosis of the termination time.
  • this can advantageously also be developed in such a way that the termination time is forecast taking into account a delay that has occurred or is expected in the course of the first pressing process.
  • both unexpected and expected delays can occur in the course of the pressure relief operation.
  • Expected or foreseeable delays can arise, for example in the context of procedures for handling dangerous goods wagons.
  • Unexpected delays that can only be taken into account after their actual occurrence in the prognosis of the end time of the first pressure release process can be caused, for example, by operational interruptions or technical malfunctions in the operational sequence. Regardless of whether it is a delay that has already occurred in the course of the first pressing process or a delay expected in the course of the further pressing process, taking into account a corresponding delay in the forecast of the termination time also allows an increase in the accuracy of the forecast.
  • the method according to the invention can preferably also be designed in such a way that a simulation of the first pressing-off process is carried out and the termination time is predicted based on the simulation carried out.
  • a simulation of the first pressing process in which properties of the processes, such as the number of axles and weight, as well as expected or measured running characteristics of the processes, are advantageously taken into account, advantageously enables a precise prognosis of the duration of the first pressing process and thus also of the time it ends.
  • the method according to the invention can furthermore be designed in such a way that the simulation of the first pressing-off process is carried out before the first pressing-off process.
  • This is advantageous because a corresponding simulation using detailed mathematical models can also be used as such for planning, optimizing and controlling the first impression process.
  • the simulation carried out for this purpose can thus advantageously be used in the context of the method according to the invention for the prognosis of the time at which the first pressure-release process will end.
  • the method according to the invention can advantageously also be developed in such a way that during the first pressing-off process taking into account current position data of at least one sequence of the first dismantling unit and / or taking into account current operating data of the sequence system, in particular a changed performance level of the sequence system and / or a delay that occurred in sequence operation, an updated speed profile is determined and the breaker locomotive is controlled according to the updated speed profile becomes.
  • the method according to the invention or individual steps thereof can advantageously be repeated or carried out again during the first pressing-off process or during the approaching process of the second dismantling unit.
  • this can be done any number of times and enables the speed profile of the second dismantling unit to be updated in each case and thus also in the event of variations in the pressure-releasing operation, e.g. as a result of delays in the first extraction process or changes in the performance level of the drainage system, the current prognosis of the termination time of the first Pressing-off process or the expected mountain clearance for the second dismantling unit corresponds.
  • current position data of at least one sequence of the first dismantling unit can advantageously also be taken into account, since this current position data can be used, for example, to identify a time shift compared to an original simulation of the first dismantling process and to take it into account by a corresponding adaptation or update of the speed profile of the second dismantling unit.
  • the present invention is also based on the object of specifying a control device for a shunting drainage system, by means of which the performance of the drainage system is increased.
  • this object is achieved by a control device for a shunting system, the control device being designed for a first dismantling unit, which is carried out as part of a first pressing-off process is to be pushed over a drainage mountain of the drainage system, to predict a termination time of the first pressure release process, for a second dismantling unit to be pushed by a pressure locomotive as part of a pushing process in the direction of the drainage mountain and to be pushed over the drainage mountain as part of a second pressure release process following the first pressure release process is to determine, taking into account at least the predicted termination time of the first push-off process and a current position of the second dismantling unit, a speed profile according to which an uninterrupted transition from the push-on process to the second push-off process takes place, and to control the push-pull locomotive according to the determined speed profile.
  • control device corresponds to those of the method according to the invention, so that reference is made in this regard to the corresponding statements above.
  • control device will generally have both hardware components, for example in the form of at least one corresponding microprocessor, controller, calculator or computer, and software components, for example in the form of corresponding program routines.
  • the control device is usually integrated into a corresponding control system during operation of the shunting system, which usually has other components in addition to the control device, for example in the form of corresponding sensors for recording measured values and actuators for controlling push-pull locomotives or track brakes.
  • control device According to a particularly preferred development of the control device according to the invention, it is designed to carry out one of the aforementioned preferred developments of the method according to the invention. Also the advantages of this preferred development of the control device according to the invention correspond to those of the corresponding preferred developments of the method according to the invention, so that reference is also made in this regard to the corresponding explanations above.
  • a first dismantling unit in the form of a freight train to be dismantled is to be pushed over a drainage mountain of the drainage system as part of a first pressing process or is just being pressed off the drainage mountain of the drainage system.
  • a second dismantling unit in the train formation system or the shunting system which is to be pushed by a (further) push-off locomotive in the direction of the discharge mountain as part of an approach process and is or will be pushed over the discharge mountain as part of a second push-off process following the first push-off process .
  • the second dismantling unit traversing the discharge mountain that is to say starting the second dismantling process, requires that the dismantling unit has finished (or interrupted) the dismantling process.
  • the drainage system has only one mountain track, the first pressure release process has to be completed and the pressure release locomotive of the first dismantling unit must also have cleared the drainage mountain or the mountain track of the same, so that it is available for the second dismantling unit.
  • the drainage system has two (or more) mountain tracks, the push-pull locomotive and, if necessary, other processes of the first dismantling unit that are to be removed later can also remain in their mountain track.
  • the approach of the second dismantling unit in the direction of the discharge mountain thus depends on the first dismantling process or its termination with regard to the approach speed of the push-off locomotive, that is, the speed profile of the second dismantling unit. How in this situation an advantageous or, at best, optimal control of the speed profile of the breaker locomotive of the second dismantling unit can take place will now be described in detail with reference to the figures.
  • Figure 1 shows in a first schematic sketch a first time-path diagram to explain a first exemplary embodiment of the method according to the invention.
  • the time t is plotted here as a function of the distance s covered by the tip of the second dismantling unit.
  • a first curve can be seen, which is identified by the reference symbol V AN01.
  • the corresponding identification is caused by the fact that the slope of the curve is a measure of the speed of the second dismantling unit at the respective waypoint s or at the respective point in time t.
  • the curves shown are also referred to as “speed curve” or “speed curve” in the following, although this designation is not completely correct from a mathematical and physical point of view.
  • the speed of the second dismantling unit (or the extraction locomotive) at each point in time determined or determinable.
  • V AN01 the approaching process of the second dismantling unit begins at a comparatively early point in time t 01, starting from a waypoint or location s 0 . Accordingly, the approach of the second dismantling unit to the discharge mountain takes place in this case with a comparatively low speed, which is shown in the illustration of the Figure 1 is reflected in a corresponding, comparatively large slope of the time-distance curve V AN01. In comparison to this, a second speed profile identified with the reference symbol V AN02 (that is to say a corresponding second time-distance curve) is shown, in which the approach process does not begin until a later point in time t 02 .
  • V AN02 that is to say a corresponding second time-distance curve
  • a point s 1 which characterizes the beginning of the runoff mountain, is reached at a point in time t 1 .
  • the approaching process takes place in the second speed curve or the second speed curve V AN02 at a higher speed than in the first case, which is shown in the time-distance illustration in FIG Figure 1 shows in a correspondingly lower slope of the curve.
  • the in Figure 1 The curve shown is achieved in that, during the operation of the shunting drainage system for the first dismantling unit, which is to be pressed over the drainage mountain of the drainage system as part of the first pressure release process, an end time of the first pressure release process is predicted.
  • a simulation of the same can advantageously be carried out before the first pressing-off process and the termination time can be predicted on the basis of this simulation.
  • the predicted termination time in the context of the exemplary embodiment described can be time t 1 or a time shortly before this time t 1 .
  • a speed profile is then determined for the second dismantling unit, according to which an uninterrupted transition from the approaching process to the second push-off process takes place.
  • the corresponding uninterrupted transition from the approaching process to the second pressing process takes place within the scope of the exemplary embodiment in FIG Figure 1 at time t 1 , that is, when the tip of the second dismantling unit has reached location s 1 .
  • the location or point s 1 can be a stopping point of the discharge mountain, that is to say a point for the passage of which through the second dismantling unit a mountain release signal or a mountain release is required.
  • this point is passed without stopping both in the case of the speed curve V AN01 and in the case of the speed curve V AN02, that is, there is an uninterrupted transition from the approaching process to the second push-off process.
  • this applies to both speed curves V AN01 and V AN02 and thus independent of the respective starting time t 01 or t 02 of the approaching process of the second dismantling unit in the direction of the discharge mountain.
  • a suitable or, at best, optimal speed curve is calculated with which the approaching second dismantling unit, i.e. the approaching train, arrives at the discharge mountain at the time the mountain is released or shortly thereafter, so that a transition or a change from the The approaching process in the second push-off process is possible without interruption.
  • the procedure described above results in a reduction in pressure breaks, a reduction in material wear and a reduction in energy costs in relation to the overall operation of the shunting system by avoiding an unnecessarily fast approach to the drainage mountain with subsequent braking, stopping and re-acceleration after receiving the clearance for the mountain or for the footprint.
  • the result thus advantageously results in an increase in the performance of the drainage system as well as a conservation of resources.
  • a speed profile V AN01 or V AN02 is determined in each case, which deviates from a conceivable alternative maxim of the fastest possible arrival at the discharge mountain.
  • the method determines or calculates a respective speed profile V AN01 or V AN02 , which ensures an uninterrupted transition from the approach process to the second push-off process, both in the case of a comparatively early start of the approaching process and in the case of a comparatively late start of the approaching process of the second dismantling unit to the discharge hill allowed.
  • the prognosis of the time of termination is advantageously carried out during the first push-off process.
  • the termination time can be predicted taking into account a set power level of the drainage system and / or a delay that has occurred or is expected in the course of the first pressure release process.
  • Figure 2 shows in a second schematic sketch a second time-distance diagram to explain a second exemplary embodiment of the method according to the invention.
  • the representation of the Figure 2 essentially corresponds to that of Figure 1 , being in contrast to Figure 1 initially only a speed profile v AN0 is shown, the is obtained based on a starting point in time of the approaching process of the second dismantling unit at a point in time t 0 .
  • an updated speed profile is determined at a point in time t n at which the tip of the second dismantling unit has reached a location s n. This is shown in FIG.
  • the updated speed profile V ANn can be determined in particular during the first pressing process, taking into account the current pressing progress of the first dismantling unit, for example using current position data of at least one process of the first dismantling unit, and / or taking into account current operating data of the process system, in particular a changed performance level the sequence system and / or a delay that occurred in sequence operation. From the point in time t n or the location s n , the second dismantling unit or the extraction locomotive of the same is thus controlled according to the new or updated speed profile v ANn.
  • the update of the speed profile can be done using a updated prognosis of the time of termination of the first triggering process or only take into account a delay or delay time that has occurred, without a completely new prognosis of the time of termination being made.
  • the calculation or determination of the speed profile according to which the push-pull locomotive of the second dismantling unit is controlled can in principle be carried out as often as desired during the approach process. Both a regular implementation and, in particular, a situation-dependent repeated implementation of the determination is possible here. In both cases, the result corresponds to the current forecast of the mountain clearance, even if there are variations in the push-off operation, so that there is an uninterrupted transition from the approaching process to the second pushing-off process.
  • this and a corresponding control device for a marshalling process system enable an increase in the performance of the marshalling system.
  • breaks in the push-off operation are reduced or avoided, in particular, by the precise time approaching the drainage mountain at the time of the respective mountain clearance.
  • the described method represents a basis or prerequisite for an approaching process in a fully automatic drainage system and thus enables a further increase in the degree of automation of shunting technology drainage systems.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
  • Processing Of Solid Wastes (AREA)
  • Train Traffic Observation, Control, And Security (AREA)

Claims (10)

  1. Procédé pour faire fonctionner un chantier de triage à la gravité, dans lequel par un dispositif de commande de l'installation de triage
    - pour une première unité de dégroupement, qui est à refouler dans le cadre d'une première opération de refoulement par l'intermédiaire d'une bosse de l'installation de triage, on pronostique un instant (t1) d'achèvement de la première opération de refoulement,
    - pour une deuxième unité de dégroupement, qui doit être déplacée par une locomotive de refoulement dans le cadre d'une opération d'approche en direction de la bosse et qui doit être refoulée par l'intermédiaire de la bosse dans le cadre d'une deuxième opération de refoulement, suivant la première opération de refoulement, on détermine, en tenant compte au moins de l'instant (t1) d'achèvement pronostiqué de la première opération de refoulement, ainsi que d'une position en cours de la deuxième unité de dégroupement, une courbe (VAN01, VAN02) de vitesse suivant laquelle une transition, sans interruption, de l'opération d'approche a lieu dans la deuxième opération de refoulement, et
    - on commande la locomotive de refoulement suivant la courbe (VAN01, VAN02) de vitesse, qui a été déterminée.
  2. Procédé suivant la revendication 1,
    caractérisé en ce que
    on détermine la courbe (VAN01, VAN02) de vitesse de la deuxième unité de dégroupement de manière à ce que la deuxième unité de dégroupement atteigne un point (S1) d'arrêt de la bosse à l'instant (t1) d'achèvement pronostiqué.
  3. Procédé suivant la revendication 1 ou 2,
    caractérisé en ce que
    on pronostique l'instant (t1) d'achèvement pendant la première opération de refoulement.
  4. Procédé suivant l'une des revendications précédentes,
    caractérisé en ce que
    l'on pronostique l'instant (t1) d'achèvement en tenant compte du réglage du degré de performance de l'installation de triage.
  5. Procédé suivant l'une des revendications précédentes,
    caractérisé en ce que
    on pronostique l'instant (t1) d'achèvement en tenant compte d'un retard apparu ou escompté dans le cadre de la première opération de refoulement.
  6. Procédé suivant l'une des revendications précédentes,
    caractérisé en ce que
    - on effectue une simulation de la première opération de refoulement et
    - on pronostique l'instant (t1) d'achèvement sur la base de la simulation effectuée.
  7. Procédé suivant la revendication 6,
    caractérisé en ce que
    on effectue la simulation de la première opération de refoulement dans le temps avant la première opération de refoulement.
  8. Procédé suivant l'une des revendications précédentes,
    caractérisé en ce que
    - pendant la première opération de refoulement, on détermine, en tenant compte de données de position en cours d'au moins un gravitaire de la première unité de dégroupement et/ou en tenant compte de données de fonctionnement en cours de l'installation de triage, notamment d'une modification du degré de performance de l'installation de triage et/ou d'un retard apparu dans le fonctionnement à la gravité, une courbe (VANn) de vitesse mise à jour et
    - on commande la locomotive de refoulement suivant la courbe (VANn) de vitesse mise à jour.
  9. Dispositif de commande d'un chantier de triage à la gravité, dans lequel le dispositif de commande est constitué
    - pour une première unité de dégroupement, qui doit être refoulée dans le cadre d'une première opération de refoulement par l'intermédiaire d'une bosse de l'installation de triage, pour pronostiquer un instant (t1) d'achèvement de la première opération de refoulement,
    - pour une deuxième unité de dégroupement, qui doit être déplacée par une locomotive de refoulement dans le cadre d'une opération d'approche en direction de la bosse et qui doit être refoulée par l'intermédiaire de la bosse dans le cadre d'une deuxième opération de refoulement, suivant la première opération de refoulement, pour déterminer, en tenant compte d'au moins de l'instant (t1) d'achèvement pronostiqué de la première opération de refoulement, ainsi que d'une position en cours de la deuxième unité de dégroupement, une courbe (VAN01, VAN02) de vitesse, suivant laquelle une transition, sans interruption, de l'opération d'approche a lieu dans la deuxième opération de refoulement, et
    - pour commander la locomotive de refoulement suivant la courbe (VAN01, VAN02) de vitesse, qui a été déterminée.
  10. Dispositif de commande suivant la revendication 9,
    caractérisé en ce que
    le dispositif de commande est constitué pour effectuer le procédé suivant l'une des revendications 2 à 8.
EP18719456.8A 2017-05-05 2018-04-05 Procédé pour faire fonctionner une installation de triage et système de commande conçu pour ladite installation Active EP3592624B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102017207646.1A DE102017207646A1 (de) 2017-05-05 2017-05-05 Verfahren zum Betreiben einer rangiertechnischen Ablaufanlage sowie Steuereinrichtung für eine solche Anlage
PCT/EP2018/058669 WO2018202379A1 (fr) 2017-05-05 2018-04-05 Procédé pour faire fonctionner une installation de triage et système de commande conçu pour ladite installation

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3592624A1 EP3592624A1 (fr) 2020-01-15
EP3592624B1 true EP3592624B1 (fr) 2021-05-26

Family

ID=62044659

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP18719456.8A Active EP3592624B1 (fr) 2017-05-05 2018-04-05 Procédé pour faire fonctionner une installation de triage et système de commande conçu pour ladite installation

Country Status (4)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3592624B1 (fr)
DE (1) DE102017207646A1 (fr)
LT (1) LT3592624T (fr)
WO (1) WO2018202379A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN110949410B (zh) * 2019-11-13 2020-12-11 北京交通大学 轨道交通列车编组运行控制方法及控制系统
CN111994135B (zh) * 2020-08-17 2022-06-28 交控科技股份有限公司 一种基于迭代计算的协同编队列车安全防护方法及系统

Family Cites Families (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE1605397B2 (de) * 1967-10-24 1979-06-13 Siemens Ag, 1000 Berlin Und 8000 Muenchen Einrichtung in einem Ablaufstellwerk zum Erhöhen der Leistung der Ablaufanlage
DE2912748C2 (de) * 1979-03-30 1983-11-17 Siemens AG, 1000 Berlin und 8000 München Einrichtung zum Bestimmen der zulässigen Anrückgeschwindigkeit fernsteuerbarer Rangierloks beim Zulauf auf den Ablaufberg einer Rangieranlage
DE2944571C2 (de) * 1979-11-05 1986-06-26 Siemens AG, 1000 Berlin und 8000 München Einrichtung zum Optimieren der Bergleistung einer Ablaufanlage
DE4214541A1 (de) * 1992-04-29 1993-11-04 Siemens Ag Verfahren zum bestimmen des rollwiderstandes von eisenbahnfahrzeugen
DE19526812C1 (de) * 1995-07-12 1996-05-23 Siemens Ag Verfahren zum Ermitteln variabel vorgebbarer Abdrückgeschwindigkeiten
DE19648645C1 (de) * 1996-11-18 1998-01-02 Siemens Ag Verfahren zum Vorgeben der Beidrückweite
DE10107752A1 (de) * 2000-03-03 2004-08-12 Tiefenbach Gmbh Verfahren zur Steuerung des Ablaufs der Wagen eines zu zerlegenden Eisenbahnzuges
DE10219953C1 (de) * 2002-05-03 2003-05-28 Deutsche Bahn Ag Verfahren zur Variation der Abdrückgeschwindigkeit
DE102012203812A1 (de) * 2012-03-12 2013-09-12 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Verfahren zum Steuern einer rangiertechnischen Ablaufanlage

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2018202379A1 (fr) 2018-11-08
EP3592624A1 (fr) 2020-01-15
LT3592624T (lt) 2021-08-25
DE102017207646A1 (de) 2018-11-08

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2718165B1 (fr) Procédé permettant de faire fonctionner une installation de triage technique et dispositif de commande pour une telle installation
EP2421736B1 (fr) Procédé pour le fonctionnement d'un véhicule sur rails
EP3592624B1 (fr) Procédé pour faire fonctionner une installation de triage et système de commande conçu pour ladite installation
EP2720926B1 (fr) Procédé pour faire fonctionner une installation de triage par gravité et système de commande pour une installation de triage par gravité
DE102014226789A1 (de) Verfahren und Manipulatoranordnung zum bedingten Anhalten zumindest eines Manipulators auf einer Bahn
EP3713808B1 (fr) Procédé pour faire fonctionner une installation de triage par gravité et système de commande pour une installation de triage par gravité
EP3230147B1 (fr) Procédé pour faire fonctionner une installation de triage par gravité et système de commande pour une telle installation
WO2013135501A1 (fr) Procédé de commande d'une installation technique de triage
WO2017050770A1 (fr) Procédé de fonctionnement d'un système de commande de frein d'un véhicule ferroviaire équipé d'un système de freinage, systeme de commande de frein, système de freinage et véhicule ferroviaire
EP3230148B1 (fr) Procédé pour faire fonctionner une installation de triage par gravité et système de commande pour une telle installation
EP3990333A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif d'optimisation dynamique d'une distance de freinage de véhicules, en particulier de véhicules ferroviaires
EP3419879B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif pour déterminer une puissance de freinage sûre d'un véhicule ferroviaire
EP3544876B1 (fr) Procédé pour faire fonctionner une installation de triage par gravité et système de commande conçu pour une telle installation
EP4122793A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de sécurisation de train destiné à la détermination assistée par ordinateur de la vitesse maximale de fonctionnement d'un véhicule guidé
DE102010041183A1 (de) Verfahren zum Betreiben einer Ablaufanlage des schienengebundenen Verkehrs sowie Steuer-Einrichtung für eine solche Ablaufanlage
EP3299249B1 (fr) Procédé de fonctionnement d'une installation technique de triage ainsi que dispositif de commande pour une telle installation technique de triage
DE102004048993A1 (de) System und Verfahren zur Steuerung von schienengebundenen Fahrzeugen, insbesondere von Zügen, mittels einer Steuerzentrale, in Abhängigkeit vom Zustand des Fahrwegs, insbesondere des verfügbaren Reibwertes
EP3600945B1 (fr) Dispositif de freinage pour véhicules ferroviaires et procédé de freinage de véhicules ferroviaires
EP4098509A1 (fr) Procédé d'accès optimisé à une section cible par détermination dynamique de la vitesse de libération
EP3778345A1 (fr) Procédé de fonctionnement d'un véhicule et appareil de trafic ferroviaire

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: UNKNOWN

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20191010

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

DAV Request for validation of the european patent (deleted)
DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20210111

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 502018005442

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1395953

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20210615

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: FP

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210826

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210526

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210526

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210526

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210526

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210927

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210526

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210826

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210827

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210926

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210526

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210526

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210526

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210526

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210526

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210526

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210526

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 502018005442

Country of ref document: DE

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20220301

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210926

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210526

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20220414

Year of fee payment: 5

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210526

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20220405

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210526

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220405

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220405

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220430

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220405

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20220620

Year of fee payment: 6

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LV

Payment date: 20230413

Year of fee payment: 6

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20230307

Year of fee payment: 6

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20230419

Year of fee payment: 6

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20230720

Year of fee payment: 6

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20230501

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230501

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Payment date: 20240327

Year of fee payment: 7

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210526

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210526

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20180405