EP3387565A2 - Procédé et dispositif destinés à tester un ensemble de données d'entrée d'un dispositif de construction par couches génératif - Google Patents

Procédé et dispositif destinés à tester un ensemble de données d'entrée d'un dispositif de construction par couches génératif

Info

Publication number
EP3387565A2
EP3387565A2 EP16815778.2A EP16815778A EP3387565A2 EP 3387565 A2 EP3387565 A2 EP 3387565A2 EP 16815778 A EP16815778 A EP 16815778A EP 3387565 A2 EP3387565 A2 EP 3387565A2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
parameter
parameter value
value
produced
minimum
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
EP16815778.2A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Inventor
Vincent ANTOINE
Andreas KAHLER
Christoph Mair
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
EOS GmbH
Original Assignee
EOS GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from DE102015225012.1A external-priority patent/DE102015225012A1/de
Priority claimed from DE102015225022.9A external-priority patent/DE102015225022A1/de
Application filed by EOS GmbH filed Critical EOS GmbH
Publication of EP3387565A2 publication Critical patent/EP3387565A2/fr
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B33—ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY
    • B33Y—ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, i.e. MANUFACTURING OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL [3-D] OBJECTS BY ADDITIVE DEPOSITION, ADDITIVE AGGLOMERATION OR ADDITIVE LAYERING, e.g. BY 3-D PRINTING, STEREOLITHOGRAPHY OR SELECTIVE LASER SINTERING
    • B33Y50/00—Data acquisition or data processing for additive manufacturing
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
    • G06F30/20—Design optimisation, verification or simulation
    • G06F30/23—Design optimisation, verification or simulation using finite element methods [FEM] or finite difference methods [FDM]
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B22—CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
    • B22F—WORKING METALLIC POWDER; MANUFACTURE OF ARTICLES FROM METALLIC POWDER; MAKING METALLIC POWDER; APPARATUS OR DEVICES SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR METALLIC POWDER
    • B22F10/00—Additive manufacturing of workpieces or articles from metallic powder
    • B22F10/20—Direct sintering or melting
    • B22F10/28—Powder bed fusion, e.g. selective laser melting [SLM] or electron beam melting [EBM]
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B22—CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
    • B22F—WORKING METALLIC POWDER; MANUFACTURE OF ARTICLES FROM METALLIC POWDER; MAKING METALLIC POWDER; APPARATUS OR DEVICES SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR METALLIC POWDER
    • B22F10/00—Additive manufacturing of workpieces or articles from metallic powder
    • B22F10/60—Treatment of workpieces or articles after build-up
    • B22F10/66—Treatment of workpieces or articles after build-up by mechanical means
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B22—CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
    • B22F—WORKING METALLIC POWDER; MANUFACTURE OF ARTICLES FROM METALLIC POWDER; MAKING METALLIC POWDER; APPARATUS OR DEVICES SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR METALLIC POWDER
    • B22F10/00—Additive manufacturing of workpieces or articles from metallic powder
    • B22F10/60—Treatment of workpieces or articles after build-up
    • B22F10/68—Cleaning or washing
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B22—CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
    • B22F—WORKING METALLIC POWDER; MANUFACTURE OF ARTICLES FROM METALLIC POWDER; MAKING METALLIC POWDER; APPARATUS OR DEVICES SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR METALLIC POWDER
    • B22F10/00—Additive manufacturing of workpieces or articles from metallic powder
    • B22F10/80—Data acquisition or data processing
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B29—WORKING OF PLASTICS; WORKING OF SUBSTANCES IN A PLASTIC STATE IN GENERAL
    • B29C—SHAPING OR JOINING OF PLASTICS; SHAPING OF MATERIAL IN A PLASTIC STATE, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; AFTER-TREATMENT OF THE SHAPED PRODUCTS, e.g. REPAIRING
    • B29C64/00—Additive manufacturing, i.e. manufacturing of three-dimensional [3D] objects by additive deposition, additive agglomeration or additive layering, e.g. by 3D printing, stereolithography or selective laser sintering
    • B29C64/10—Processes of additive manufacturing
    • B29C64/106—Processes of additive manufacturing using only liquids or viscous materials, e.g. depositing a continuous bead of viscous material
    • B29C64/124—Processes of additive manufacturing using only liquids or viscous materials, e.g. depositing a continuous bead of viscous material using layers of liquid which are selectively solidified
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B29—WORKING OF PLASTICS; WORKING OF SUBSTANCES IN A PLASTIC STATE IN GENERAL
    • B29C—SHAPING OR JOINING OF PLASTICS; SHAPING OF MATERIAL IN A PLASTIC STATE, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; AFTER-TREATMENT OF THE SHAPED PRODUCTS, e.g. REPAIRING
    • B29C64/00—Additive manufacturing, i.e. manufacturing of three-dimensional [3D] objects by additive deposition, additive agglomeration or additive layering, e.g. by 3D printing, stereolithography or selective laser sintering
    • B29C64/10—Processes of additive manufacturing
    • B29C64/141—Processes of additive manufacturing using only solid materials
    • B29C64/153—Processes of additive manufacturing using only solid materials using layers of powder being selectively joined, e.g. by selective laser sintering or melting
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B29—WORKING OF PLASTICS; WORKING OF SUBSTANCES IN A PLASTIC STATE IN GENERAL
    • B29C—SHAPING OR JOINING OF PLASTICS; SHAPING OF MATERIAL IN A PLASTIC STATE, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; AFTER-TREATMENT OF THE SHAPED PRODUCTS, e.g. REPAIRING
    • B29C64/00—Additive manufacturing, i.e. manufacturing of three-dimensional [3D] objects by additive deposition, additive agglomeration or additive layering, e.g. by 3D printing, stereolithography or selective laser sintering
    • B29C64/30—Auxiliary operations or equipment
    • B29C64/386—Data acquisition or data processing for additive manufacturing
    • B29C64/393—Data acquisition or data processing for additive manufacturing for controlling or regulating additive manufacturing processes
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B33—ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY
    • B33Y—ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, i.e. MANUFACTURING OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL [3-D] OBJECTS BY ADDITIVE DEPOSITION, ADDITIVE AGGLOMERATION OR ADDITIVE LAYERING, e.g. BY 3-D PRINTING, STEREOLITHOGRAPHY OR SELECTIVE LASER SINTERING
    • B33Y10/00—Processes of additive manufacturing
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B33—ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY
    • B33Y—ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, i.e. MANUFACTURING OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL [3-D] OBJECTS BY ADDITIVE DEPOSITION, ADDITIVE AGGLOMERATION OR ADDITIVE LAYERING, e.g. BY 3-D PRINTING, STEREOLITHOGRAPHY OR SELECTIVE LASER SINTERING
    • B33Y40/00—Auxiliary operations or equipment, e.g. for material handling
    • B33Y40/20—Post-treatment, e.g. curing, coating or polishing
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B33—ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY
    • B33Y—ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, i.e. MANUFACTURING OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL [3-D] OBJECTS BY ADDITIVE DEPOSITION, ADDITIVE AGGLOMERATION OR ADDITIVE LAYERING, e.g. BY 3-D PRINTING, STEREOLITHOGRAPHY OR SELECTIVE LASER SINTERING
    • B33Y50/00—Data acquisition or data processing for additive manufacturing
    • B33Y50/02—Data acquisition or data processing for additive manufacturing for controlling or regulating additive manufacturing processes
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
    • G06F30/10—Geometric CAD
    • G06F30/17—Mechanical parametric or variational design
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B22—CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
    • B22F—WORKING METALLIC POWDER; MANUFACTURE OF ARTICLES FROM METALLIC POWDER; MAKING METALLIC POWDER; APPARATUS OR DEVICES SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR METALLIC POWDER
    • B22F12/00—Apparatus or devices specially adapted for additive manufacturing; Auxiliary means for additive manufacturing; Combinations of additive manufacturing apparatus or devices with other processing apparatus or devices
    • B22F12/40—Radiation means
    • B22F12/44—Radiation means characterised by the configuration of the radiation means
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B22—CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
    • B22F—WORKING METALLIC POWDER; MANUFACTURE OF ARTICLES FROM METALLIC POWDER; MAKING METALLIC POWDER; APPARATUS OR DEVICES SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR METALLIC POWDER
    • B22F2999/00—Aspects linked to processes or compositions used in powder metallurgy
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F2113/00—Details relating to the application field
    • G06F2113/10—Additive manufacturing, e.g. 3D printing
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F2119/00—Details relating to the type or aim of the analysis or the optimisation
    • G06F2119/18—Manufacturability analysis or optimisation for manufacturability
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P10/00—Technologies related to metal processing
    • Y02P10/25—Process efficiency
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P90/00—Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
    • Y02P90/02—Total factory control, e.g. smart factories, flexible manufacturing systems [FMS] or integrated manufacturing systems [IMS]

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method and a device for testing an input data set of a generative layer construction device as well as to a generative layer construction device which is suitable for carrying out the layer construction method.
  • Generative layer construction processes such as, for example, laser sintering or melting or stereolithography, are outstandingly suitable for the production of components with complex geometries, and in particular also for the production of components which are individually tailored to a particular user or for a specific application.
  • the components are thereby produced in layers, that is, the component is formed by stacking of cross sections of the component.
  • cross section is formed for cross section and the individual cross sections are connected to the underlying and overlying cross sections.
  • CAD model ie, generally a computer-based model
  • the design of such a CAD model is usually in the hands of a development engineer who is skilled in the art to which the component is associated and who has a thorough knowledge of the environment of use of the component and the technical characteristics that it is intended to have , In the following, such a person skilled in the art is referred to as "CAD Designer".
  • non-generative layer construction method there are also subsequent production steps by means of a generative layer construction process, which can lead to limitations in the design of the model.
  • the cleaning of laser sintered parts after the production process is often done by one Blasting process to remove adhering powder on the component.
  • the effectiveness of such a cleaning process is dependent on the component geometry. Removal of adhering powder from intricately shaped cavities, for example, can be very difficult and may not be feasible at all by the blasting technique.
  • the method according to the invention is a computer-aided method for checking an input data record of a generative layer building apparatus comprising at least the following step:
  • An input data set for a generative layer building apparatus essentially comprises a computer-based model of an object to be produced with the generative layer building apparatus.
  • the method according to the invention can make use, for example, of a database for the comparison of parameter values in the computer-based model with limit parameter values, in which limit parameter values are stored for a method used in the production of the object, that is to say parameter values that can just be achieved by means of this method.
  • a method used in the production of the object can be the generative layer that can be carried out by means of the generative layer construction device
  • a method step is considered in particular as a sub-step in the production of the object, if no meaningful use of the object according to the intended use is possible without this method step. If, for example, the object is a jewelery item, then it can be assumed that no meaningful use is possible without a cleaning of the item after the manufacturing process.
  • the computer-based model is typically a 3D CAD model of an object to be manufactured.
  • the model can also be in STL format or
  • At least one parameter value from the computer-based model is used for a comparison with a limit parameter value of a method used in the production of the object.
  • This limit parameter value refers to the process stability of the process, i. H. it represents a limit beyond which it can no longer be guaranteed that by means of the method the object to be produced is process-stable, i. without the occurrence of mitirregularticianen, can be produced.
  • the method is laminar generative fabrication in a layered fashion of a metal object using a given generative layering device, the following may be considered: for certain dimensions (particularly wall thicknesses or the like) of the metal object, it may change during the manufacturing process due to temperature changes In the metal object, a component distortion occurs, which might have no negative effects on the metal object itself after completion of the manufacturing process. Nevertheless, such a delay can cause the manufacturing process itself to be unstable becomes.
  • a coater in a powder-based layer building apparatus when applying a next powder layer the collision-free part of the previously produced partial metal object is no longer run over collision-free, but abuts locally on it. This can cause further distortion or superficial damage to the coater or metal object; in extreme cases, it can lead to the production process being interrupted and even interrupted.
  • process-stable production refers to whether a method with respect to the at least one parameter value in the computer-based model reaches its production limits (ie, exceeds or falls short of the respective limit parameter value). In fact, in such a case, there is no guarantee that the planned object can be manufactured safely (ie process-stable) by means of the method.
  • the inventive method further comprises the step of outputting information to a user in the event that the result of the comparison is that the parameter value is beyond the extreme value.
  • the CAD designer can be provided with immediate information during the creation of a design as to whether the design meets all requirements for process-stable production, which makes time-consuming consultations with AM experts unnecessary.
  • the parameter taken into consideration will be one dimension. In this case, checking whether a process stability limit is exceeded is very simple.
  • the limit parameter value is preferably an extreme value for the parameter which can be produced by means of the generative layer construction device, in particular a the generative layer construction device process stable produced extreme value for the parameter.
  • limit parameter values may also be extreme values for a parameter that can just be produced by means of the generative layer building apparatus, i. in principle, are feasible. If a parameter value from the computer-based model is not feasible in principle, then certainly no process-stable realization of this parameter is possible. In contrast to this, as already mentioned, even if the parameter value can in principle be realized in principle, it is not inevitable that there will also be process-stable manufacturability.
  • the generative layer construction device may be a very specific generative layer construction device, which is characterized as follows:
  • a very specific generative layer construction device characterized by a serial number, this layer construction device being, for example, specifically optimized,
  • a group of generative layer building devices (which may well have come from different manufacturers) that share a common characteristic (e.g., a minimum space size, etc.),
  • Generative layer construction devices designed to process a specific group of materials (e.g., plastic or metal, possibly even further)
  • Generative layer building devices that are a very specific type of generative Perform layering processes (eg stereolithography devices or SLS (selective laser sintering devices))
  • boundary parameter values relating to a particular group of generative layer construction devices are involved, then the comparison of the respective parameter value with a marginal parameter value is checked for devices of this group of generative layer construction devices.
  • At least one parameter value from the computer-based model is used for a comparison with a limit parameter value of the particular generative layer building apparatus.
  • This limit parameter value relates to the process stability of the particular generative layer building apparatus, i. h, it represents a boundary beyond which it can no longer be guaranteed that this particular generative layer building device is process stable, i.e., stable, for the object to be manufactured. without the occurrence of process irregularities, can produce.
  • Limit parameter values predetermined by a generative layer construction method preferably comprise at least a minimum wall thickness, a minimum hole diameter, a minimum blind hole width and / or a maximum blind hole depth, a minimum hole width and / or depth, in particular a minimum slot width and / or depth, a minimum by the generative Schichtbauvorraum producible detail resolution, a minimum step offset extending obliquely to several layers a maximum wall thickness or a user specified by a user parameter, in particular depending on the underlying data to a provided for the production of the object material and / or command parameters and / or wall thicknesses.
  • a minimum hole diameter will depend on how strong the heat conduction in the build material used is, such as a beam diameter of a laser beam used for solidification, etc.
  • the boundary parameters may depend on the command parameters used for the control of the generative layer building apparatus, for example, by determining the order in which the individual points of an object cross-section are solidified.
  • an adaptation of this parameter value is carried out automatically and / or in interaction with a user. This further simplifies the creation of a suitable computer-aided model for the CAD designer.
  • the parameter value can be set to the limit parameter value.
  • the performance of the generative layer building apparatus is fully exploited. If the limits of manufacturability or process stability are not to be addressed, this can be achieved by correspondingly mitigated limit parameter values.
  • the parameter value can be further modified in such a way that a mechanical property of the manufactured object is modified in a predetermined direction. This makes it possible not only to consider given limits of manufacturability of a component, but at the same time also set desired physical properties of the manufactured component, in particular automatically.
  • a parameter value can be changed so that the weight of the manufactured object is reduced. This can be done, for example, by thinning struts in a lattice structure or by enlarging cavities or by inserting them into the object or else by normally producing massive areas of the building component with a structure inside.
  • the parameter value can be modified so that the stiffness and / or tensile strength and / or elongation at break and / or the transverse contraction number and / or the torsional behavior and / or the fatigue behavior of considered object and / or modified, in particular optimized, is.
  • the above procedure makes the design even easier for the CAD designer since the method optimizes important mechanical parameters of a component based on the current design already at the time of the design. As a result, the development period for a component can be reduced.
  • the change in the parameter value can be determined on the basis of a finite element simulation of a mechanical property of the object to be produced. In this case, information about the material composition of the component, in particular mechanical and physical parameters of the material, ideally flows into the simulation.
  • the limit parameter value may be an extreme value for the parameter that can be produced by means of a second production method other than the first production method, and / or an extreme value that can be processed for the parameter in a method following the first production method.
  • the limit parameter values may in this case relate to a specific post-processing device or second production device (for example a mass-produced device), in other words parameter values which can just be processed by means of this post-processing device or produced by this second production device.
  • any finishing device or second manufacturing device may denote the following different types of devices:
  • a very specific device characterized by a serial number which, for example, is specifically optimized
  • a group of devices (which may well have come from different manufacturers) which share a common characteristic (e.g., a minimum space size or the use of the same abrasive, etc.),
  • Group of materials e.g., plastic or metal, possibly further limited to, for example, PA12
  • Manufacturing devices that perform a very specific type of manufacturing process (for example, injection molding equipment, CNC milling equipment or SLS (selective laser sintering equipment))
  • Boundary parameter values predetermined by a post-processing method or second production method preferably comprise at least one of the following: a minimum wall thickness, a minimum hole diameter, a minimum blind hole width and / or maximum blind hole depth, a minimum hole width and / or depth, in particular a minimum slot width and / or depth, a minimum processable by the device used in the downstream process and / or the second device producible detail resolution, a minimum step offset at obliquely extending to multiple layers surfaces, a maximum wall thickness or predetermined by a user user parameter, in particular depending from underlying data to a material provided for the first and / or second manufacturing method material and / or command parameters and / or wall thicknesses.
  • a minimum hole diameter will depend on how strong the heat conduction is in the build material used, such as e.g. a beam diameter of a laser beam used for solidification, etc.
  • the limit parameters may depend on the type of control of the post-processing device or second manufacturing device.
  • the limit parameter value may, for example, be a minimum value for a dimension determined by a method for the treatment of the surface, in particular a
  • Method for cleaning the surface of the object, in particular after its preparation is machinable. Since generatively manufactured components are in many cases surrounded by build material during their manufacture, cleaning is an important step required in many manufacturing processes. A corresponding consideration according to the invention of the performance of the cleaning process already during the design of a component is important, since it depends on clean component surfaces in many applications. It is conceivable, however also consideration of limit parameter values for other surface treatment methods, eg inking methods. In the latter case, a limit parameter value could be, for example, the minimum diameter of a hole to be inked in the surface.
  • the threshold parameter value may be a minimum value for a dimension that can be processed by a method for blasting the surface of the object after its production. This makes it possible, especially in blasting processes that are frequently used for component cleaning, to gain insights into its machinability already during the design of the component.
  • the radiopacity of its surface is already checked during the design of a computer-based model of the object to be manufactured, this can be done by checking for at least a portion of the surface whether it is another in a direction of a normal to the surface Surface portion of the object and, if so, the distance in the direction of the normal between the at least a portion of the surface and the further surface portion is compared with the limit parameter value.
  • the radiopacity of the surface of the object to be produced can also be checked by checking, for at least a portion of the surface, whether it is within an angular range which includes a direction of a normal to the surface spaced a portion of the surface gives a further surface portion of the object and if so, the distance between the at least a portion of the surface and the further surface portion is compared with the limit parameter value.
  • the method can be adapted to different blasting methods (for example, to the size of the grains used in blasting).
  • a generative layer construction method according to the invention for producing at least one three-dimensional object by means of layered solidification of a powdery or liquid building material is carried out in a generative layer construction device
  • a construction substrate for supporting the at least one object to be produced
  • an application device for applying a layer of the pulverulent or liquid building material to the construction substrate or a previously applied and selectively consolidated layer of the construction material
  • a selective solidification device capable of acting on all locations in the applied layer corresponding to a cross section of the at least one object to be manufactured, such that the building material bonds to a solid at those locations
  • control unit which controls the application device and the selective solidification device such that the object is produced by successive selective solidification of layers of the construction material
  • an input data record which has been tested by means of the previously described inventive method is used to control the layer construction method.
  • a comparison unit which compares at least one parameter value in operation in a computer-based model of an object to be produced by the generative layer construction device with a limit parameter value, which is an extreme value for the parameter which can be realized in a method used in the production of the object, in particular a process-stable, realizable extreme value for the parameter,
  • a storage unit in which a computer-based model of an object to be produced by means of the generative layer building apparatus is stored, optionally a memory unit in which at least one limit parameter value is stored, which is an extreme value for the parameter that can be implemented in a method used in the production of the object, in particular a process-stable, realizable extreme value for the parameter.
  • a comparison unit which, in use, compares at least one parameter value in a computer-based model of an object to be produced by the generative layer construction device with a limit parameter value of the layer construction device, which is an extreme value for a parameter which relates to a process-stable production of the object to be manufactured, optionally a storage unit in which a computer-based model of an object to be produced by means of the generative layer building apparatus is deposited and optionally a storage unit in which at least one limit parameter value of the laminating apparatus is stored, which is an extreme value for a parameter that is based on a process-stable production of the item to be produced Object refers.
  • the comparison unit carries out a comparison with a limit parameter value, which is an extreme value for the parameter that can be produced by the generative layer construction device, in particular an extreme value for the parameter which can be produced by the generative layer construction device in a process-stable manner.
  • the comparison unit may also perform a comparison with a limit parameter value which, if the production of the object by means of the generative layer construction apparatus is a first production method, can produce an extreme value that can be produced by means of a second production method other than the first production method for the parameter is and / or is a processable in a first manufacturing process processable extreme value for the parameter.
  • the test device according to the invention thus allows a reduction in the time from the beginning of the design of a computer-aided model of a component to completion and if necessary, cleaning of the component after a generative layering process or, if necessary, until completion of the component in a mass production process.
  • the test device may be, for example, an independent device that may be integrated into a network or else integrated into an existing computer aided design (CAD), computer aided engineering (CAE), or computer aided manufacturing (CAM) system
  • the test apparatus may include an output device which, in the event that the result of the comparison is that a parameter exceeds or falls short of a parameter threshold, outputs a corresponding information to a user.
  • the corresponding data can also be fed to the test apparatus via at least one input interface designed to receive this data.
  • the inventive testing device may optionally include an input device for manipulating the computer-based model by a user.
  • the memory device can either be contained in the test device according to the invention or else the latter can access the memory device (possibly via a network).
  • a generative layer construction device for producing at least one three-dimensional object by means of stratified solidification of a powdered or liquid construction material has the following merlanals:
  • a building pad for supporting the at least one object to be produced
  • an application device for applying a layer of the powdery or liquid building material to the construction substrate or a previously applied and selectively consolidated layer of the construction material
  • a selective solidification device capable of acting on all the locations in the applied layer corresponding to a cross section of the at least one object to be manufactured, such that the building material bonds to a solid at those locations
  • control unit which controls the application device and the selective solidification device so that the object is produced by successive selective solidification of layers of the construction material
  • the generative layer construction device according to the invention has in particular a test device according to the invention for testing an input data set of a generative layer construction device and / or is connected by signal technology to such a test device.
  • test device for testing an input data set of a generative layer construction device is contained in or connected to the latter, alternatively or additionally to the adaptation of the design to the process stability and, if applicable, additionally manufacturability during the design of a computer-aided model of a component to be produced, Also immediately before the start of a manufacturing process by an AM expert, the process stability and possibly additionally the manufacturability are checked.
  • a review serves to avoid unstable manufacturing operations leading to unusable parts, which is wasteful of time and resources, and on the other hand, it makes it easier for the AM expert to verify process stability, as it allows compliance with marginal parameter values Design does not have to "manually" debug, which avoids errors on its part in checking process stability.
  • the inventive method is expediently realized in the form of a computer program, even if this is not absolutely necessary.
  • a software-supported implementation of the method allows easy integration into a CAD, CAE or CAM System or a generative layer construction device.
  • the software can for example be stored in a memory of the CAD, CAE or CAM system or the generative layer construction device or the CAD, CAE or CAM system or the generative layer construction device can access the software via a network,
  • Fig. 1 shows a schematic representation of a generative layer building apparatus on
  • Example of a laser sintering device Example of a laser sintering device.
  • Fig. 2 shows a schematic representation of a method according to the invention for
  • Fig. 3 shows the structure of a test apparatus according to the present invention.
  • Fig. 4 shows schematically the procedure in an embodiment of a method for verifying the radiopacity of a surface.
  • FIG. 5 shows by way of example a correction of the surface geometry for the production of the
  • Fig. 6 shows schematically the procedure in a further embodiment of a method for verifying the radiopacity of a surface.
  • the device has a building container 1, in which a support 2 is provided for supporting an object 3 to be formed.
  • the carrier 2 can be moved in the building container via a height adjustment device 4 in the vertical direction.
  • the plane in which applied powdered building material is solidified defines a working plane 5.
  • a laser 6 is provided which generates a laser beam 7, which via a deflection 8 and optionally a focusing 9 the working level 5 is focused.
  • a control 10 is provided, which controls the deflection device 8 and optionally the focusing unit 9 in such a way that the laser beam 7 can be directed to any desired position of the working plane 5.
  • the controller 10 is controlled via a control instruction set, which i.a. Contains data containing the structure of the object to be manufactured, in particular a three-dimensional CAD layer model of the object with information about the respective cross-section of the object in each layer of the building material to be solidified, and data defining the precise parameters in solidifying the building material.
  • the data contains accurate information about each layer to be consolidated in the manufacture of the object.
  • a supply device 1 1 is provided, can be supplied with the powdered building material for a subsequent layer.
  • a coater 12 the building material is applied and smoothed in the working plane 5.
  • the carrier 2 is lowered layer by layer by the controller 10, the coater 12 is actuated to apply a new powder layer and the deflection device 8 and optionally also the laser 6 and / or the focusing unit 9 for solidifying the respective layer on the respective object corresponding points by means of the laser beam
  • powdery building material all suitable for the laser sintering powder or powder mixtures can be used.
  • powders include, for.
  • plastic powder such as polyamide or polystyrene, PAEK (polyaryl ether ketones), elastomers such as PEBA (polyether Block Ami de), plastic-coated sand, ceramic powder or metal powder, z.
  • PEBA polyether Block Ami de
  • stainless steel powder or other adapted to the particular purpose metal powder, in particular alloys. The procedure according to the invention will be described below with reference to FIGS. 2 and 3.
  • the model data input unit 101 in the test apparatus 100 for checking an input data set of a specific generative layer construction device (CAD) model data MD of the component to be produced, which describe at least a portion of the component to be produced (step Sl in Fig. 2).
  • the data MD may also include information about the individual layers during the generative manufacturing process. In addition, further information, for example about the materials to be used, may be included.
  • the data MD originating from the CAD design system may be the model data - Input unit 101 are supplied either via a network or read via a mobile data carrier in the model data input unit 101. If the test apparatus 100 is part of the CAD design system, the model data input unit 101 can easily access the location of the data within the design system. Optionally, the model data MD can be stored in a memory unit 103b contained in the test apparatus 100. Now parameter values PI...
  • Pn in the model data MD are determined by means of the parameter determination unit 102, which correspond to parameters for which limit parameter values GP1 to GPn are predetermined (step S2 in FIG. 2).
  • Boundary parameter values GP1 to GPn are extreme values for parameters of the layer-building apparatus that relate to a process-stable production of the object to be manufactured or extreme values for parameters that are used in a method for finishing at least a part of the surface of one by means of generative
  • Laminated device manufactured object, z. B. a cleaning process are just editable and / or parameters in the production of the object by another Device as the generative layer building device are just to produce.
  • the other device may be an injection molding device used for mass production of the components after first prototypes have been produced by means of the generative layer construction device.
  • the set of limit parameter values may include only one limit parameter value PI or a plurality of limit parameter values PI to Pn.
  • the parameters assigned to the parameter values are, for example, wall thicknesses, hole diameters or channel diameters, blind hole depths, etc. in the model data MD.
  • the corresponding limit parameter values would then be, for example, a minimum wall thickness, a minimum hole diameter or channel diameter, a maximum bag depth, etc.
  • parameters and limit parameter values may also relate to parameter-based aspects of a layer construction method which are not associated with a process-stable production of an object stand.
  • the determined parameter values PI. Pn are supplied to the comparison unit 103, which performs a comparison of each of the determined parameter values PI to Pn with the associated limit parameter value GP1 to GPn (step S3 in FIG. 2).
  • the limit parameter values GP1 to GPn can in this case be stored in a memory unit 103a in the test apparatus 100 or, alternatively, the limit parameter values are supplied to the test apparatus 100 via a network or a mobile data carrier. It should be noted that the memory unit 2 0 103a (as well as the memory unit 103b) does not necessarily have to be part of the comparison unit 103, even if this is illustrated in FIG. 3 in this way.
  • step S4 There are several ways to do this in this step:
  • a notification unit 104 shown in FIG. 3 can inform a user about one or more limit value overruns. In this case, the user must
  • the test apparatus 100 may modify the model data to modify the parameter value (s) that exceeded limits.
  • the model data may be modified so that the corresponding parameter values coincide with the respective limit parameter values.
  • the modified model data can then be transmitted to the CAD design system via a model data output unit 105 shown in FIG. This can, for example, again be done via a network or a mobile data carrier or by accessing a storage device to which the CAD design system also has access. If the limit parameter values are not exceeded or fallen below, an optional message can be output to a user. In FIG. 2 this would be the optional step S5.
  • the method can be terminated with a notification to the user when the limit is exceeded or undershot for the first time, or it can be continued until the entire model data received by the model data input unit 101 has been completely checked. In the latter case, the user would receive information about any limit parameter overruns or underruns that have occurred. Even with an automatic change of the model data MD by the test apparatus, it makes sense to check the entire model data received from the model data input unit 101.
  • the method according to the invention can indicate to the CAD designer by means of visual information that there will be a problem in the production.
  • the user is also preferably shown the specific position in the model at which the problem will occur. This could be done, for example, by highlighting in a visualization of the already designed model the position at which a production problem will arise.
  • the user can then adapt the CAD model. for example, increase the wall thickness at the designated location.
  • problems with too thin a wall thickness in the CAD model can result, for example, in a laser melting process, after the melting of the powdery building material in the region of a cross section, a thin wall in the W 201
  • Part intersects, in the region of the thin wall powder in the area adjacent to the molten area area connects so strongly with the molten area, thereby increasing the wall thickness and a minimum wall thickness can not be exceeded.
  • a similar problem can occur when making a very small hole.
  • the hole completely disappear, so that a minimum hole diameter can not be undershot. If the hole is not in the form of a leash, it can (for example in the case of elongated holes) correspondingly not fall below a minimum hole width.
  • a minimum depth of hole may be predetermined by the manufacturing process (e.g., by a gener- ous layering device) or a post-processing process.
  • the method according to the invention can check whether a detail which can be produced minimally by the generative layer construction device is undershot in the designed model.
  • blind holes Another problem is blind holes. Here it must be ensured that after the completion of the manufacturing process, unsolidified building material can be removed from the blind hole again so that it must have a minimum width and / or a maximum depth. In the case of surfaces running diagonally to several layers, there will be a step offset in the case of generative layering processes (staircase character). Here you can
  • the information relating to the limit values which can be realized depends on the material used for the production, since different materials, for example, can behave differently during melting and, for example, conduct different heat.
  • the parameter limit values are also influenced by the control of the production process or post-processing process, that is, for example, by the control commands or command parameters of a generative layer building apparatus used for the production.
  • the laser beam diameter used in a laser melting device plays a role as well as the jet speed, the cooling power, the used layer thickness and possibly even the number of objects to be produced in the installation space.
  • the limit parameter values are long-term empirical values, which were determined, for example, on previous similar components.
  • a wall thickness originally measured at 100 .mu.m can automatically be set to 150 .mu.m.
  • a parameter value that exceeds or falls below a limit parameter value could automatically be set to the limit parameter value.
  • the Grenzparameterwert is 150 ⁇
  • a 100 ⁇ measured wall automatically set to 150 ⁇ .
  • the knowledge of the building material used and of the production parameters used generally also go hand in hand. This makes it possible to simulate its mechanical or physical properties even before the production of the actual component. This, in turn, makes it possible to make adjustments to the model already during the CAD design by which a mechanical or physical property of the component is changed in a desired direction. For example, after a simulation of the component weight, one could modify the model to reduce the weight, for example by reducing wall thicknesses. In the same way, adjustments can be made, for example, to stiffness, tensile strength, tensile elongation at break, transverse contraction number, torsional behavior or fatigue behavior.
  • W stiffness, tensile strength, tensile elongation at break, transverse contraction number, torsional behavior or fatigue behavior.
  • adaptation of mechanical properties of the part is done automatically by adjusting the model after the CAD designer, at the start of the design, has informed the system which mechanical properties to optimize in which way.
  • the method according to the invention can be realized by means of a software which is executed on the CAD system.
  • the software can be present as an additional module that interacts with the CAD program.
  • the model data may be transmitted over a common interface such as
  • the process expedites the process when the software module according to the invention accesses the same model data as the CAD program, in other words, when both on the access same record. This also saves space in particular.
  • test device is realized as a plug-in module for a CAD design system, then it is possible, in particular, for a check for possible limit value overruns or undershoots to be continuously made during the preparation of the design.
  • the CAD designer can immediately be given feedback.
  • the method according to the invention in the background can automatically change parameter values which can not be produced by automatic modification of the design.
  • the inventive method can of course also run as software on a stand-alone computer system. For example, after the completion of the design of a computer-aided model of a component before the manufacture of the component, its manufacturability can be checked again.
  • the data exchange between the CAD system and the system with the software according to the invention can take place by means of mobile data carriers or via a network.
  • an AM expert can then make final adjustments immediately prior to the production of the component in order to avoid any difficulties in the production of the component by means of the generative layer construction device or a production by means of a device other than the generative layer construction device or one of the
  • a data exchange with the generative layer building apparatus can also be carried out with the aid of mobile data carriers or a network.
  • laser melting LLM (cutting out of films and joining)
  • FLM applying a thermoplastic material from a die
  • 3D printing mask sintering and stereolithographic processes
  • the invention is not limited to the design, manufacture and processing of a single component. If several (for example different) components are produced at the same time, then the method according to the invention can be carried out in the same way with all variants, only that then a check of the manufacturability for several components is carried out simultaneously. According to the invention, the manufacturability of the designed model in a mass production process, which is not a generative layer construction process, can also be checked, for example after initial prototypes of the component have been realized by means of a generative layer construction process.
  • An apparatus for producing the component which is based on the same CAD model, which is also the basis of the production by means of a generative layer building apparatus, for example, an injection molding machine, a CNC milling machine, a casting device, an extruding, etc., or even another generative piercing device than that used to make prototypes.
  • a generative layer building apparatus for example, an injection molding machine, a CNC milling machine, a casting device, an extruding, etc., or even another generative piercing device than that used to make prototypes.
  • the radiopacity of the manufactured component based on a CAD model is checked. This is done before the component is produced by means of a generative layer construction device or the production by means of another device in a series production process. The procedure is explained below with reference to FIGS. 4 to 6:
  • the 3D CAD model has to be brought into a format in which the outer surface of the corresponding component is fixed by means of a tessellation, ie an overlapping with partial surfaces, e.g. Polygons such as triangles, squares, pentagons, etc. is described. For example, this is the case in the widely used STL format, where the surface is described by overlapping with contiguous triangles.
  • a plurality of individual polygons or patches are selected which are distributed as evenly as possible (but not necessarily) over the surface. The following procedure is now performed for each polygon:
  • FIG. 4 shows a section through a part of the surface of a component to be radiated with a selected polygon or surface section 401.
  • the center of gravity S of the surface is checked at a defined position on the surface (for example in each of the selected surface sections) whether there is a further surface portion 403 spaced from the surface portion 401 in a direction of the surface normal 402 facing out at this center of gravity. If this is the case, the distance d in the direction of the surface normal 402 between the two surface sections 401, 403 is determined and compared with a limit value (limit parameter value). If the limit value is undershot, it is determined that the irradiability of the initially selected surface portion 401 is not given.
  • limit parameter value limit parameter value
  • the distance to any further surface portion at a defined position of the surface is not checked in the direction of the surface normal 402, but in the direction of at least one Beam 402 ', which includes an angle ⁇ ( ⁇ 90 °) with the surface normal.
  • a distance d ' can also be determined for a plurality of beams 402' which are all within a predetermined angular range around the surface normal 402.
  • the size of the angle range to be used in the latter modification is dependent on the material of the component, the blasting agent and other beam parameters. However, in the last-mentioned modification, it is possible to check the radiation in a more complex manner and to individually determine whether or not radiation is present depending on the beam parameters.
  • Hardware components or mixtures of hardware and software can be realized.
  • the device must then have an input interface through which the CAD model data can be fed and also the limit parameter values can be supplied.
  • Interfaces mentioned in the present application do not necessarily have to be designed as hardware components, but can also be realized as software modules, for example if the data fed in or output therefrom can be taken over by other components already realized on the same device or must be passed to another component only by software.
  • the interfaces could consist of hardware and software components, such as a standard hardware interface specifically configured by software for the specific application.
  • several interfaces can also be combined in a common interface, for example an input-output interface.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Geometry (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Optics & Photonics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
  • Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
  • Mathematical Optimization (AREA)
  • Pure & Applied Mathematics (AREA)
  • Mathematical Analysis (AREA)
  • Computational Mathematics (AREA)
  • Plasma & Fusion (AREA)
  • Forms Removed On Construction Sites Or Auxiliary Members Thereof (AREA)
  • Powder Metallurgy (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne un procédé mis en oeuvre par ordinateur destiné à tester un ensemble de données d'entrée d'un dispositif de construction par couches, comprenant au moins l'étape consistant : - à comparer au moins une valeur de paramètre dans un modèle informatique d'un objet fabriqué au moyen du dispositif de construction par couches génératif avec une valeur de paramètre limite, laquelle est une valeur extrême réalisable pour le paramètre, notamment une valeur extrême réalisable en stabilité de processus pour le paramètre, pendant un procédé utilisé lors de la fabrication de l'objet.
EP16815778.2A 2015-12-11 2016-12-09 Procédé et dispositif destinés à tester un ensemble de données d'entrée d'un dispositif de construction par couches génératif Ceased EP3387565A2 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102015225012.1A DE102015225012A1 (de) 2015-12-11 2015-12-11 Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Prüfung eines Eingangsdatensatzes einer generativen Schichtbauvorrichtung
DE102015225022.9A DE102015225022A1 (de) 2015-12-11 2015-12-11 Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Prüfung eines Eingangsdatensatzes einer generativen Schichtbauvorrichtung
PCT/EP2016/080493 WO2017098003A2 (fr) 2015-12-11 2016-12-09 Procédé et dispositif destinés à tester un ensemble de données d'entrée d'un dispositif de construction par couches génératif

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3387565A2 true EP3387565A2 (fr) 2018-10-17

Family

ID=57588989

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP16815778.2A Ceased EP3387565A2 (fr) 2015-12-11 2016-12-09 Procédé et dispositif destinés à tester un ensemble de données d'entrée d'un dispositif de construction par couches génératif

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (2) US11110517B2 (fr)
EP (1) EP3387565A2 (fr)
CN (1) CN108701162A (fr)
WO (1) WO2017098003A2 (fr)

Families Citing this family (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3387565A2 (fr) * 2015-12-11 2018-10-17 EOS GmbH Electro Optical Systems Procédé et dispositif destinés à tester un ensemble de données d'entrée d'un dispositif de construction par couches génératif
WO2019160526A2 (fr) 2018-01-29 2019-08-22 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Traitement d'une représentation d'objet
CN114025945A (zh) * 2019-07-19 2022-02-08 惠普发展公司，有限责任合伙企业 调整模拟
EP3941724A4 (fr) * 2019-07-25 2022-11-09 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Modification de données de modèle d'objet pour imprimantes tridimensionnelles
IT202000007129A1 (it) * 2020-04-03 2021-10-03 Marco Zani Procedimento di realizzazione di un oggetto mediante un dispositivo di manifattura additiva, dispositivo di manifattura additiva e prodotto informatico corrispondenti
US11733672B2 (en) * 2020-11-26 2023-08-22 Industrial Technology Research Institute Recoater collision prediction and correction method for additive manufacturing and system thereof
EP4036673A1 (fr) * 2021-01-27 2022-08-03 FRONIUS INTERNATIONAL GmbH Procédé et dispositif de détermination automatique des paramétrés d'usinage pour un procédé d'usinage

Family Cites Families (48)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5252264A (en) * 1991-11-08 1993-10-12 Dtm Corporation Apparatus and method for producing parts with multi-directional powder delivery
DE19606128A1 (de) * 1996-02-20 1997-08-21 Eos Electro Optical Syst Vorrichtung und Verfahren zum Herstellen eines dreidimensionalen Objektes
DE19846478C5 (de) * 1998-10-09 2004-10-14 Eos Gmbh Electro Optical Systems Laser-Sintermaschine
DE19918613A1 (de) * 1999-04-23 2000-11-30 Eos Electro Optical Syst Verfahren zur Kalibrierung einer Vorrichtung zum Herstellen eines dreidimensionalen Objektes, Kalibrierungsvorrichtung und Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Herstellung eines dreidimensionalen Objektes
DE19939616C5 (de) * 1999-08-20 2008-05-21 Eos Gmbh Electro Optical Systems Vorrichtung zur generativen Herstellung eines dreidimensionalen Objektes
DE10105504A1 (de) * 2001-02-07 2002-08-14 Eos Electro Optical Syst Vorrichtung zur Behandlung von Pulver für eine Vorrichtung zum Herstellen eines dreidimensionalen Objekts, Vorrichtung zum Herstellen eines dreidimensionalen Objekts und Verfahren zum Herstellen eines dreidimensionalen Objekts
DE10235434A1 (de) * 2002-08-02 2004-02-12 Eos Gmbh Electro Optical Systems Vorrichtung und Verfahren zum Herstellen eins dreidimensionalen Objekts mittels eines generativen Fertigungsverfahrens
US7569174B2 (en) * 2004-12-07 2009-08-04 3D Systems, Inc. Controlled densification of fusible powders in laser sintering
DE102005015870B3 (de) * 2005-04-06 2006-10-26 Eos Gmbh Electro Optical Systems Vorrichtung und Verfahren zum Herstellen eines dreidimensionalen Objekts
DE102005024790A1 (de) * 2005-05-26 2006-12-07 Eos Gmbh Electro Optical Systems Strahlungsheizung zum Heizen des Aufbaumaterials in einer Lasersintervorrichtung
EP2049289B1 (fr) * 2006-07-27 2014-04-30 Arcam Ab Procédé et dispositif pour la fabrication d'objets en trois dimensions
US20080065259A1 (en) * 2006-09-11 2008-03-13 Dietrich David M Method and apparatus for rapidly generating tooling for press machines
DE102006059829A1 (de) 2006-12-15 2008-06-19 Slawomir Suchy Universalcomputer
DE102007056652A1 (de) 2007-11-24 2009-05-28 Looxis Gmbh Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Erzeugung einer dreidimensionalen Nachbildung eines Objektes
US9895842B2 (en) * 2008-05-20 2018-02-20 Eos Gmbh Electro Optical Systems Selective sintering of structurally modified polymers
DE102008045984A1 (de) 2008-09-05 2010-03-11 Mtu Aero Engines Gmbh Verfahren zur Herstellung eines Bauteils und Vorrichtung hierfür
US8666142B2 (en) * 2008-11-18 2014-03-04 Global Filtration Systems System and method for manufacturing
DE102008058177A1 (de) * 2008-11-20 2010-06-24 Eos Gmbh Electro Optical Systems Verfahren zur Identifizierung von Lasersinterpulvern
JP2012515668A (ja) * 2009-01-23 2012-07-12 イーオーエス ゲゼルシャフト ミット ベシュレンクテル ハフツング イレクトロ オプティカル システムズ ３次元物体のラピッドプロトタイピングの装置からの残留粉末を再使用する方法及びシステム
DE102009016585A1 (de) * 2009-04-06 2010-10-07 Eos Gmbh Electro Optical Systems Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Kalibrieren einer Bestrahlungsvorrichtung
DE102010004036A1 (de) * 2010-01-05 2011-07-07 EOS GmbH Electro Optical Systems, 82152 Vorrichtung zum generativen Herstellen eines dreidimensionalen Objekts mit kontinuierlicher Wärmezufuhr
EP2368696B2 (fr) * 2010-03-25 2018-07-18 EOS GmbH Electro Optical Systems Poudre de PA 12 optimisée par enrichissement destinée à l'utilisation dans un procédé de construction à couche génératif
DE102010040261A1 (de) * 2010-09-03 2012-03-08 Eos Gmbh Electro Optical Systems Verfahren zum Herstellen eines dreidimensionalen Objekts mit einer internen Struktur
DE102010042230A1 (de) * 2010-10-08 2012-04-12 Eos Gmbh Electro Optical Systems Verfahren zum Beschichten von Objekten, insbesondere solchen Objekten, die durch ein generatives Fertigungsverfahren hergestellt wurden
EP2786860B1 (fr) * 2011-06-28 2018-05-16 Global Filtration Systems, A DBA of Gulf Filtration Systems Inc. Appareil permettant de former des objets tridimensionnels à l'aide de solidification linéaire
US20130112672A1 (en) * 2011-11-08 2013-05-09 John J. Keremes Laser configuration for additive manufacturing
FR2984779B1 (fr) * 2011-12-23 2015-06-19 Michelin Soc Tech Procede et appareil pour realiser des objets tridimensionnels
DE102012212587A1 (de) * 2012-07-18 2014-01-23 Eos Gmbh Electro Optical Systems Vorrichtung und Verfahren zum schichtweisen Herstellen eines dreidimensionalen Objekts
DE102012018366A1 (de) * 2012-09-18 2014-03-20 Eos Gmbh Electro Optical Systems Vorrichtung zum lagenweisen Herstellen eines dreidimensionalen Gegenstandes
US9718129B2 (en) * 2012-12-17 2017-08-01 Arcam Ab Additive manufacturing method and apparatus
US20140277669A1 (en) 2013-03-15 2014-09-18 Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Additive topology optimized manufacturing for multi-functional components
DE102013208651A1 (de) * 2013-05-10 2014-11-13 Eos Gmbh Electro Optical Systems Verfahren zum automatischen Kalibrieren einer Vorrichtung zum generativen Herstellen eines dreidimensionalen Objekts
US9415443B2 (en) * 2013-05-23 2016-08-16 Arcam Ab Method and apparatus for additive manufacturing
DE102013212803A1 (de) * 2013-07-01 2015-01-08 Eos Gmbh Electro Optical Systems Verfahren zum Herstellen eines dreidimensionalen Objekts
DE102013223411A1 (de) * 2013-11-15 2015-05-21 Eos Gmbh Electro Optical Systems Vorrichtung zum schichtweisen Herstellen eines dreidimensionalen Objekts
DE102013224319A1 (de) * 2013-11-27 2015-06-11 Eos Gmbh Electro Optical Systems Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum generativen Herstellen zumindest eines Bauteilbereichs eines Bauteils
DE102013224693A1 (de) 2013-12-02 2015-06-03 Eos Gmbh Electro Optical Systems Verfahren zur beschleunigten Herstellung von Objekten mittels generativer Fertigung
DE102014201818A1 (de) * 2014-01-31 2015-08-06 Eos Gmbh Electro Optical Systems Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur verbesserten Steuerung des Energieeintrags in einem generativen Schichtbauverfahren
US10061870B2 (en) 2014-03-18 2018-08-28 Palo Alto Research Center Incorporated Automated metrology and model correction for three dimensional (3D) printability
CN105082545B (zh) * 2014-05-10 2018-11-16 芜湖市智行天下工业设计有限公司 液粉同轴喷射增材制造
CN104001915B (zh) * 2014-05-22 2016-07-27 上海电气（集团）总公司 一种高能束增材制造大尺寸金属零部件的设备及其控制方法
JP6316991B2 (ja) * 2014-06-20 2018-04-25 ヴェロ・スリー・ディー・インコーポレイテッド ３次元物体を生成するための方法
US20180272611A1 (en) * 2015-01-07 2018-09-27 Eos Gmbh Electro Optical Systems Device and generative layer-building process for producing a three-dimensional object by multiple beams
DE102015207158A1 (de) * 2015-04-20 2016-10-20 Eos Gmbh Electro Optical Systems Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Herstellen eines dreidimensionalen Objekts
DE102015223719A1 (de) * 2015-11-30 2017-06-01 Eos Gmbh Electro Optical Systems Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Aufbaumaterialbedarfsermittlung
EP3387565A2 (fr) * 2015-12-11 2018-10-17 EOS GmbH Electro Optical Systems Procédé et dispositif destinés à tester un ensemble de données d'entrée d'un dispositif de construction par couches génératif
DE102015225012A1 (de) * 2015-12-11 2017-06-14 Eos Gmbh Electro Optical Systems Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Prüfung eines Eingangsdatensatzes einer generativen Schichtbauvorrichtung
US10766197B2 (en) * 2016-03-31 2020-09-08 Hexcel Corporation Apparatus and method for selective laser sintering an object with a void

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20210346957A1 (en) 2021-11-11
US20180349530A1 (en) 2018-12-06
CN108701162A (zh) 2018-10-23
US11975479B2 (en) 2024-05-07
WO2017098003A3 (fr) 2017-08-10
WO2017098003A2 (fr) 2017-06-15
US11110517B2 (en) 2021-09-07

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP3387565A2 (fr) Procédé et dispositif destinés à tester un ensemble de données d'entrée d'un dispositif de construction par couches génératif
EP3225334B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de fabrication additive d'au moins une partie d'un composant
EP3475018B1 (fr) Procédé permettant de vider les cavités remplies de poudre d'une pièce et appareil pour la mise en oeuvre de ce procédé
WO2016166337A1 (fr) Procédé et unité de génération d'instructions de commande servant à générer automatiquement des instructions de commande d'un dispositif de construction stratifiée génératif
EP3375607A1 (fr) Procédé de détermination des valeurs de paramètre de processus d'impression, procédé de commande d'une imprimante 3d, mémoire lisible par ordinateur et imprimante 3d
EP3528982B1 (fr) Procédé d'élimination sans outil de structure de support pour procédé de fabrication additive de pièces
EP3671373A1 (fr) Méthode de prédiction pour prédire le résultat de l'usinage pour une méthode d'usinage à laser
EP3414036B1 (fr) Procédé de détermination de l'orientation d'un article fabriqué par procédé additif et moyen de lecture informatique
EP2554360A1 (fr) Composé fabriqué de façon générative avec au moins une marque et procédé de développement, réparation et/ou échange d'un composant de ce type
DE102016226159A1 (de) Additives fertigungssystem und validierungsverfahren für additiv gefertigte bauteile
DE102018111517A1 (de) Verfahren zum Steuern der Verzerrung beim 3D-Drucken
WO2018210436A1 (fr) Optimisation de l'introduction d'énergie dans la couche inférieure
WO2019007819A1 (fr) Procédé servant à élaborer des instructions servant à la fabrication additive d'une pièce, produit programme d'ordinateur servant à la mise en œuvre dudit procédé, et procédé servant à fabriquer de manière additive une pièce
EP4076831A1 (fr) Impression 3d d'éléments de moule pour pneus
WO2017153187A1 (fr) Procédé de construction par couches génératif présentant une résolution améliorée des détails et dispositif pour sa réalisation
DE102019104839A1 (de) Steuerung der Mikrostruktur eines ausgewählten Bereichs von Schichten eines Objekts während der Additivherstellung
WO2024104902A1 (fr) Procédé de fourniture d'une instruction de processus pour la fabrication additive, au moyen d'un apprentissage automatique
DE102015011110A1 (de) Systeme und Verfahren zur Optimierung von Kontaktpunkten von Baumstützen in der additiven Fertigung
DE102015225012A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Prüfung eines Eingangsdatensatzes einer generativen Schichtbauvorrichtung
DE102018124569A1 (de) Steuerungsverfahren für eine additive Fertigungsvorrichtung
DE102015207216A1 (de) Generatives Herstellen eines Bauteils
EP3416813B1 (fr) Outil d'usinage et son procédé de fabrication au moyen d'un processus de fabrication par couches génératif
DE102015225022A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Prüfung eines Eingangsdatensatzes einer generativen Schichtbauvorrichtung
DE102015214690A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Herstellung eines dreidimensionalen Objektes mittels eines generativen Schichtbauverfahrens
EP4327171B1 (fr) Procédé de commande de processus sur des machines de traitement de matières plastiques

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: UNKNOWN

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20180711

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

DAV Request for validation of the european patent (deleted)
DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20200430

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R003

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN REFUSED

18R Application refused

Effective date: 20230112