EP3341674B1 - Système de défense contre les menaces - Google Patents

Système de défense contre les menaces Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3341674B1
EP3341674B1 EP16756693.4A EP16756693A EP3341674B1 EP 3341674 B1 EP3341674 B1 EP 3341674B1 EP 16756693 A EP16756693 A EP 16756693A EP 3341674 B1 EP3341674 B1 EP 3341674B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
effectors
threat
lethal
projectiles
countermeasure
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP16756693.4A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP3341674A1 (fr
Inventor
Andreas Blache
Steffen Speer
Frank Heymann
Christian Kniep
Heiko Sand
Hubert Schneider
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Rheinmetall Waffe Munition GmbH
Original Assignee
Rheinmetall Waffe Munition GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Rheinmetall Waffe Munition GmbH filed Critical Rheinmetall Waffe Munition GmbH
Publication of EP3341674A1 publication Critical patent/EP3341674A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3341674B1 publication Critical patent/EP3341674B1/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41—WEAPONS
    • F41H—ARMOUR; ARMOURED TURRETS; ARMOURED OR ARMED VEHICLES; MEANS OF ATTACK OR DEFENCE, e.g. CAMOUFLAGE, IN GENERAL
    • F41H11/00—Defence installations; Defence devices
    • F41H11/02—Anti-aircraft or anti-guided missile or anti-torpedo defence installations or systems
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41—WEAPONS
    • F41A—FUNCTIONAL FEATURES OR DETAILS COMMON TO BOTH SMALLARMS AND ORDNANCE, e.g. CANNONS; MOUNTINGS FOR SMALLARMS OR ORDNANCE
    • F41A9/00—Feeding or loading of ammunition; Magazines; Guiding means for the extracting of cartridges
    • F41A9/35—Feeding multibarrel guns
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41—WEAPONS
    • F41H—ARMOUR; ARMOURED TURRETS; ARMOURED OR ARMED VEHICLES; MEANS OF ATTACK OR DEFENCE, e.g. CAMOUFLAGE, IN GENERAL
    • F41H13/00—Means of attack or defence not otherwise provided for
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41—WEAPONS
    • F41H—ARMOUR; ARMOURED TURRETS; ARMOURED OR ARMED VEHICLES; MEANS OF ATTACK OR DEFENCE, e.g. CAMOUFLAGE, IN GENERAL
    • F41H13/00—Means of attack or defence not otherwise provided for
    • F41H13/0043—Directed energy weapons, i.e. devices that direct a beam of high energy content toward a target for incapacitating or destroying the target
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F42—AMMUNITION; BLASTING
    • F42B—EXPLOSIVE CHARGES, e.g. FOR BLASTING, FIREWORKS, AMMUNITION
    • F42B5/00—Cartridge ammunition, e.g. separately-loaded propellant charges
    • F42B5/26—Cartridge cases
    • F42B5/30—Cartridge cases of plastics, i.e. the cartridge-case tube is of plastics
    • F42B5/307—Cartridge cases of plastics, i.e. the cartridge-case tube is of plastics formed by assembling several elements
    • F42B5/313—Cartridge cases of plastics, i.e. the cartridge-case tube is of plastics formed by assembling several elements all elements made of plastics

Definitions

  • the invention is concerned with a system for repelling a threat, in particular against drones or other undesirable light missiles. It is provided that after detection of a threat and when the same penetrates a defined protection area, this threat is fended off by a preferably non-lethal countermeasure and at least to cause it to crash. Such threats usually have a flat hull. As a result, they can be brought down by a large number of projectiles fired at the same time or with a slight delay. In order to ensure that the measure is non-lethal, the projectiles that have not come into contact with the threat should have used up their energy by the time they fall to the ground.
  • drones can therefore also be misused and / or pose a threat to others and / or buildings, etc.
  • An attack and / or spying is to be suspected in particular if such drones appear around election campaign events, power plants, prisons, port facilities, etc., i.e. if sensitive facilities or especially politically motivated gatherings are targets. It is particularly worrying that these models can also be flown day and night.
  • the drone sensors can provide the drone operator with a stabilized image via a radio link. These drones can also be guided by the operator / pilot without a direct line of sight. There is also the possibility of projecting this image onto the operator's glasses, for example.
  • the drones are also able to load payloads of up to 3 kg. These payloads could increase in the future.
  • the drones can also be linked to form swarms and flown as a swarm.
  • the software required for this is freely available and can be obtained from the Internet, for example.
  • a self-protection system for combat vehicles or other objects to be protected which sets itself the task of detecting a threat and applying suitable countermeasures, such as fog, even before a threat is emitted. Detection is carried out by a warning sensor system, such as laser warner, UV warner, etc.
  • the self-protection system is formed by several launchers, preferably four, which are electrically linked to a common fire control computer. Several detectors attached to the object or vehicle are used for all-round monitoring.
  • Such protection systems are used to deceive and camouflage, but are unsuitable for the destruction or flight impairment of a threat.
  • the US 2012/0222545 A1 discloses a countermeasure against a threat.
  • the defense measure here is a water jet that serves to repel the threat in the form of a missile or to smash it, or at least to avoid a collision or to force the missile to collide with a less sensitive part.
  • the US 2009/0173836 A1 deals with a system, equipment and method for the separation of energy in order to remotely modify and control flight currents along a control surface of an aircraft in order to control its flight path and descent.
  • the invention relates to lasers, acoustic and ablative shock waves, and the non-lethal stopping of vehicles that do not cooperate.
  • the DE 10 2005 038 071 A1 discloses a device and a method for protecting vehicles from ammunition, in particular from shaped charge projectiles.
  • a type of airbag is shot at the ammunition against an approaching warhead by means of intercepting ammunition.
  • the US 2014/0251123 A1 discloses a weapon system for firing air projectiles against unmanned flying objects.
  • the air bullet has a rubber cover.
  • the EP 2 685 206 A2 discloses a countermeasure system in response to the detection of a threat, which may also be non-lethal in nature.
  • the countermeasure is a flexible net, cloth, or net-like material with sufficient strength. This is brought with a so-called interception vehicle against the threat.
  • the invention has the task of providing a secure system for protection against smaller airborne threats, such as drones, which enables an inability to fly up to and including the destruction of the threat.
  • the essential basic idea of the invention is that the defense or firing of the threat with non-lethal projectiles, projectiles etc. which have a destructive effect in / at the target (threat) with a 100% destruction or defense probability of the threat also without a lethal effect on the environment he follows.
  • the non-lethal countermeasure includes projectiles which have a kinetic energy E' ⁇ 0.1 J / mm 2 when the maximum firing distance is reached.
  • the bombardment / combat is always carried out in such a way that projectiles that do not hit the threat reach the maximum flight time in order to reduce the kinetic energy to E' ⁇ 0.1J / mm 2 .
  • the protective system according to the invention comprises at least one effector (weapon, launcher, etc.), but preferably several.
  • effectors consisting of several effectors. However, these also include the use of only one effector. The number of several effectors should be selected depending on the object or infrastructure to be protected or the environment to be protected. All-round protection of 360 ° must be reliably guaranteed.
  • effectors are provided which can fire plastic projectiles, particularly at a high Cd value, with preferably high cadence and a defined position (orientation).
  • the aim is to achieve a (total) cadence of the effectors of up to 3000 rounds / min, which are fired against the threat and can act on it.
  • the caliber of the ammunition is designed so that only special ammunition with plastic projectiles etc. can be loaded into the effectors and no (imported) ammunition with lethal effects.
  • the invention provides a so-called multi-barrel or multi-barrel weapon as a preferred effector.
  • Multi-barrel or multi-barrel weapons have the advantage that the barrels or barrels are not as stressed as known weapons with only one barrel, even with a high rate of fire. Such weapons are already known under the term "Gatling”.
  • a newer type of multi-barrel weapon is used in the DE 10 2010 017 867 A1 described.
  • the belt system can be part of the ammunition and together with it form a cartridge chamber.
  • the ammunition and the belt system are transported by means of a roller lock with stars. Shells of the stars realize a partial chambering of the belt links in the firing position.
  • the DE 10 2011 111 201 B3 refined the idea from the DE 10 2010 017 867 A1 and suggests circumferential slots in the stars of the roller lock, which enables the belt strap or belt links to be transported cleanly.
  • Another associated technical advantage is that multiple feeding of the same as well as different types of ammunition is allowed. This is achieved in that the belt guide is connected to the weapon side and held on the weapon side in such a way that it can be pulled out of the slot of the other star (barrel bundle) of the roller lock. It is also possible to shoot from any of the possible shooting positions at the same time, but slightly offset in time, which increases the rate of fire.
  • WO 01/06197 A1 discloses a multi-barrel weapon.
  • This multi-barreled weapon is supplied with ammunition by two drives with rotating gear rims, which are integrated in the cylinders of an ammunition magazine.
  • the ammunition magazine is formed by the cylinders and bars between them (chain feed mechanism). When the cylinder and barrel are in alignment, the ammunition is ignited.
  • the non-lethal ammunition with the plastic projectiles is defined in such a way that, by the projectiles that hit the threat, this threat is damaged in such a way that at least one fall occurs.
  • Projectiles which do not contribute to defense / crash, systematically reduce their energy on their trajectory to such an extent that the individual projectile falls to the ground with the energy of a hailstone, for example.
  • a firing distance of approximately 10 m or approximately 500 m is provided.
  • This area then represents the area to be protected or the area to be protected from the object or the infrastructure in which the threat is to be fought.
  • the effectors are set up within the area to be protected in such a way that it is always guaranteed that the plastic projectiles can reach a maximum flight range to dissipate their energy in the event that they do not hit the threat themselves, so as not to damage the infrastructure or injure people.
  • the effectors which fire the non-lethal plastic projectiles, especially at high cadence, have their own sensors (sensors), such as their own E / O sensor (e.g. day and IR camera) and their own tracker (follower).
  • sensors such as their own E / O sensor (e.g. day and IR camera) and their own tracker (follower).
  • the effectors can be quickly straightened in elevation and azimuth using their own straightening system.
  • the necessary control signals for the alignment are generated either by a fire control of a command center, the track data of the effector sensors and / or via a manual control.
  • the effectors with their accessories are preferably connected to the command center via cables.
  • the system comprises at least one sensor that is set up in the area to be protected or on the infrastructure to be protected, and preferably continuously tracks the environment can scan approaching threats such as drones.
  • the at least one reconnaissance sensor for detecting a threat and the effectors are set up in such a way that a detection and defense bell (protective bell) is formed around the infrastructure to be protected.
  • the data are used to calculate which effectors are useful to combat in order to be able to combat the threat optimally and effectively. These are then switched on by the fire control, for example.
  • the selected effector or effectors then use their sensors (trackers) to switch to the threat (s) to be fended off (targets).
  • the data from the sensors are transmitted to the command center.
  • the fire is usually released by an operator. Alternatively, the release can also take place automatically, whereby security queries should then also be integrated into the system.
  • the automation level shown can also be installed in a lower automated or semi-automated expansion level.
  • the system is structured in such a way that it can be installed on / on various infrastructures but can also be removed again. This is called a fixed attachment. Fixed installations are not excluded.
  • the modular platforms enable quick and easy installation on an infrastructure.
  • the different types of effectors can also be installed or included on the platform.
  • Each effector has its own platform.
  • Group integration, i.e. several effectors on the platform are also conceivable.
  • Another application is the mobile one.
  • the way it works is the same here.
  • the effectors can be set up quickly using tripods or mobile containers, etc. These are equivalent to a modular platform.
  • the mobile platforms with the effectors can also have a sensor that determines their spatial position and preferably transmits this via cable to a command center with fire control. Such a sensor can also be used in the fixed variant.
  • the mobile application has the charm that the protective bell can vary and a current protective bell can be generated here by moving the mobile platforms / effectors.
  • the energy supply of the fixed as well as the mobile system can be carried out independently in order to be able to work even in the event of malfunctions or to prevent malfunctions by countermeasures.
  • the system or the individual platforms themselves can be brought or transported by vehicles on land, water or air.
  • a protection and defense system is proposed for an infrastructure against an approaching threat to the infrastructure, with several effectors. If a threat is detected, at least one of the effectors takes a non-lethal countermeasure that damages the threat and thus preferably causes it to crash.
  • Visual and target tracking means such as at least one camera and tracker, and at least one directional / actuator drive are assigned to the effectors.
  • the effectors and their visual and target tracking devices are preferably attached to a common modular platform, which in turn can be permanently installed and removed from various infrastructures and can be used as a mobile device.
  • the platforms also have a sensor that determines the spatial position of the effectors.
  • the single FIGURE shows a schematic or sketchy structure of a protection and defense system 1 according to the invention.
  • a number of effectors, here six, are identified by 2 1-n.
  • At least one camera and tracker 3 (3 1-n ) for tracking the respective effector 2 are assigned to the effectors 2.
  • a functional as well as a local separation of the effector sensor system 3 is not excluded.
  • the effectors 2 can be directed in azimuth and elevation via their own straightening / actuating drives 4 (4 1-n).
  • the effectors 2, effector sensors 3 and directional / actuating drives 4 are preferably each installed on a platform (not shown in detail). They are also electrically connected to a central command center 10 with fire control.
  • This command center 10 can be located inside as well as outside an area 100 to be protected and / or a protective bell (not shown in more detail).
  • a wired connection, such as a cable connection, between the command post 10 and the effectors 2 and their accessories is preferred. This can take the form of individual lines and / or bus systems be.
  • the effectors 2 with accessories can for their part be attached or integrated on, inside and / or outside an area 100 to be monitored, for example a building, park, etc.
  • At least one monitoring sensor system 11 with at least one sensor 12 is provided, which enables monitoring of the area 100 to be protected and the detection of a threat within the protective bell.
  • the protective bell can be selected to be identical to the area 100 to be protected, but also larger.
  • the sensor or sensors 12 for detecting the threat are then set up in such a way that they cover / cover the detection and defense bell (protective bell) around the infrastructure to be protected or the area 100 to be protected for monitoring.
  • the effectors 2 are set up in such a way that their countermeasures allow them to sweep over the area 100 to be protected at least at the outer boundaries or completely over them.
  • Multi-barrel weapons are provided here as effectors 2. These in turn can fire plastic projectiles.
  • the monitoring electronics 11 (12) recognize and track at least one approaching, in particular light missile, not shown in detail, for example a remote-controlled drone. This information is forwarded to the command post 10. There it is checked whether it is a threat against which countermeasures are necessary. The check can be carried out by an operator and / or automatically, for example by measuring the speed at which the threat is approaching or moving away.
  • the command center 10 To initiate the countermeasure, it is then determined in the command center 10 from the spatial position of the effectors 2 which or which of the effectors 2 1-n has a promising position for combating the approaching threat or threats. The selection can also be made by the operator. The selected effectors 2 are in turn quickly aligned with the threat (s) in elevation and / or azimuth by means of their own alignment system 4. The fire control system determines the necessary control signals for the alignment and forwards them to the straightening / stall drives 4. Alternatively, the data from the effector sensor system 3 and / or a manual control can also be used for the alignment of the selected effectors 2.
  • the fire is usually released by an operator. Alternatively, the approval can also take place automatically.
  • the projectiles (not shown in more detail) are deployed from the selected and controlled effectors 2 in the direction of the threat or threats when they have reached the area to be protected.
  • the large number of projectiles fired at the same time affects the two-dimensional threat (s) and causes the threat (s) to be destroyed.
  • the non-lethal projectiles that do not hit the threat or the target in turn consume energy over the length of the remaining flight time and fall to the ground like a hailstone.
  • the mass of the non-lethal projectile can be determined on the basis of these values.
  • a software program e.g. PRODAS from Arrow Tech
  • data or various tables for different calibers are stored in a computer, for example for a 9 mm Parabellum.
  • C w values in the ultrasound as well as the volume sizes for projectiles etc. are stored.
  • the mass of the projectile can then be determined.
  • the software can also determine the length of the gun barrel, the required gas pressure and the desired muzzle velocity. At least these values can be estimated.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
  • Remote Sensing (AREA)
  • Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
  • Aiming, Guidance, Guns With A Light Source, Armor, Camouflage, And Targets (AREA)
  • Manipulator (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)

Claims (9)

  1. Système (1) de protection d'une infrastructure (100) et également de défense contre une menace approchant l'infrastructure (100), ledit système comprenant une pluralité d'effecteurs (2) et un poste de commandement (10) comportant une conduite de tir destinée aux effecteurs (2), en cas de détection d'une menace au moins un effecteur (2) prenant une contre-mesure non létale qui endommage la menace et/ou provoque sa chute, la contre-mesure non létale étant des projectiles de matière synthétique non létaux, et des moyens visuels et de poursuite de cible (31-n), ainsi qu'au moins un entraînement directionnel et/ou un actionneur (4) étant associés aux effecteurs (21-n), et une pluralité de plateformes modulaires destinées à la réception des effecteurs (2, 21-n) étant intégrées, ces plateformes pouvant également être utilisées pour recevoir les moyens de visée et de poursuite de cible (3, 31-n), et les plateformes possédant également un capteur qui détermine la position spatiale des effecteurs (2), le poste de commandement (10) étant configuré de manière à pouvoir déterminer à partir de la position spatiale des effecteurs (2) lequel ou lesquels des effecteurs (2) a une position prometteuse pour lutter contre la menace qui approche.
  2. Système (1) selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce qu'un système de capteurs de surveillance (11) comprenant au moins un capteur (12) est intégré.
  3. Système (1) selon l'une des revendications 1 ou 2, caractérisé en ce qu'il peut être installé au niveau de/sur différentes infrastructures (100) et être démonté et utilisé de manière mobile.
  4. Système (1) selon l'une des revendications 1 à 3, caractérisé en ce que les effecteurs (2) avec leur contre-mesure peuvent balayer l'infrastructure (100) entièrement ou au moins au niveau de limites extérieures.
  5. Système (1) selon l'une des revendications 1 à 4, caractérisé en ce que la contre-mesure non létale est le tir de projectiles non létaux à coefficient de traînée élevée.
  6. Système (1) selon l'une des revendications 1 à 5, caractérisé en ce que les projectiles de matière synthétique qui sont tirés ont une énergie cinétique E ≤ 0,1J/mm2 lorsque la distance maximale de tir est atteinte.
  7. Système (1) selon l'une des revendications 1 à 6, caractérisé en ce que les effecteurs (2, 21-n) sont une arme à canons multiples de tir à haute cadence.
  8. Système (1) selon l'une des revendications 1 à 7, caractérisé en ce que le bombardement/combat se déroule toujours de telle manière que les projectiles qui ne touchent pas la menace atteignent le temps de vol maximum afin de réduire l'énergie cinétique à E ≤ 0,1J/mm2.
  9. Système (1) selon l'une des revendications 1 à 8, caractérisé en ce que les menaces sont de petites menaces aptes au vol telles que des drones.
EP16756693.4A 2015-08-27 2016-08-24 Système de défense contre les menaces Active EP3341674B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102015011058.6A DE102015011058A1 (de) 2015-08-27 2015-08-27 System zur Abwehr von Bedrohungen
PCT/EP2016/069939 WO2017032782A1 (fr) 2015-08-27 2016-08-24 Système de défense contre les menaces

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3341674A1 EP3341674A1 (fr) 2018-07-04
EP3341674B1 true EP3341674B1 (fr) 2021-11-10

Family

ID=56799466

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP16756693.4A Active EP3341674B1 (fr) 2015-08-27 2016-08-24 Système de défense contre les menaces

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US10495420B2 (fr)
EP (1) EP3341674B1 (fr)
JP (1) JP6893207B2 (fr)
KR (1) KR20180055814A (fr)
DE (1) DE102015011058A1 (fr)
WO (1) WO2017032782A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102016219457A1 (de) * 2016-10-07 2018-04-12 Mbda Deutschland Gmbh Verfahren und System zur Abwehr von Bedrohungsflugkörpern in Form steuerbarer unbemannter Kleinluftfahrzeuge
CN107071364B (zh) * 2017-05-02 2023-08-18 深圳信息职业技术学院 一种基于多摄像头跟踪定位的反无人机装置及方法
DE102017109874A1 (de) * 2017-05-08 2018-11-08 Rheinmetall Waffe Munition Gmbh Abwehrsystem gegen leichte Flugkörper, wie Drohnen
DE102017011592A1 (de) * 2017-12-14 2019-06-19 Diehl Defence Gmbh & Co. Kg Verfahren zum Steuern eines Drohnenabwehrsystems
CN108413815A (zh) * 2018-01-17 2018-08-17 上海鹰觉科技有限公司 一种反无人机防御装置以及方法
IL258233B (en) * 2018-03-19 2021-04-29 Elbit Systems Electro Optics Elop Ltd System and method for performing flexible transfer between multiple radiation guides
DE102018115023A1 (de) 2018-06-22 2019-12-24 Rheinmetall Landsysteme Gmbh Drohnenabwehr
RU2725662C2 (ru) * 2018-08-24 2020-07-03 Акционерное общество "Ордена Трудового Красного Знамени Всероссийский научно-исследовательский институт радиоаппаратуры" (АО "ВНИИРА") Способ противодействия беспилотным летательным аппаратам
JP7242461B2 (ja) * 2019-07-12 2023-03-20 三菱重工業株式会社 脅威対処システム
RU2751562C1 (ru) * 2020-08-11 2021-07-14 Федеральное государственное бюджетное учреждение "3 Центральный научно-исследовательский институт" Министерства обороны Российской Федерации Беспилотный ударный комплекс

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20090173836A1 (en) * 2007-10-23 2009-07-09 Kevin Kremeyer Laser-based flow modification to remotely conrol air vehicle flight path
EP2685206A2 (fr) * 2012-07-13 2014-01-15 The Boeing Company Procédé et système de contre-mesure déploiée par projectile
US20140251123A1 (en) * 2012-01-22 2014-09-11 Raytheon Company Unmanned range-programmable airburst weapon system for automated tracking and prosecution of close-in targets

Family Cites Families (30)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0175914A1 (fr) * 1984-09-25 1986-04-02 Heinz Piccolruaz Projectile pour intercepter des objets en mouvement libre
JPH0560492A (ja) * 1989-02-09 1993-03-09 General Electric Co <Ge> ガツトリング型砲装置の駆動機構
DE9320382U1 (de) * 1993-07-07 1994-06-01 BST Schutztechnik GmbH, 85521 Ottobrunn Selbstschutzanlage für Gefechtsfeldfahrzeuge
DE4409424C1 (de) * 1994-03-18 1995-08-10 Daimler Benz Aerospace Ag Abfangvorrichtung für Flugobjekte
DE4419788C2 (de) * 1994-06-06 1996-05-30 Daimler Benz Aerospace Ag Vorrichtung zur nichtletalen Bekämpfung von Flugzeugen
DE19910074B4 (de) 1999-03-08 2005-02-10 Buck Neue Technologien Gmbh Abschußvorrichtung für das Verschießen einer Mehrzahl von Wirkkörpern sowie diese verwendende Wurfanlage
AUPQ169699A0 (en) 1999-07-16 1999-09-23 Metal Storm Limited Firearms
DE10024320C2 (de) * 2000-05-17 2002-09-05 Diehl Munitionssysteme Gmbh Radareinrichtung für den Objekt-Selbstschutz
DE10346001B4 (de) 2003-10-02 2006-01-26 Buck Neue Technologien Gmbh Vorrichtung zum Schützen von Schiffen vor endphasengelenkten Flugkörpern
WO2008027023A2 (fr) * 2004-02-05 2008-03-06 Bae Systems Information And Electronic Systems Integration Inc. Systéme et procédé de détection de lancement de menace
US7322268B1 (en) * 2004-10-07 2008-01-29 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Short range, non-explosive, air defense system for urban structures
US7205520B1 (en) * 2005-03-02 2007-04-17 United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Portable air defense ground based launch detection system
DE102005038071A1 (de) * 2005-08-10 2007-02-15 Rheinmetall Waffe Munition Gmbh Vorrichtung sowie Verfahren zum Schutz von Fahrzeugen vor Munition, insbesondere vor Hohlladungsgeschossen
DE102005054275A1 (de) 2005-11-11 2007-05-16 Rheinmetall Waffe Munition Selbstschutzanlage für Gefechtsfahrzeuge oder anderer zu schützender Objekte
US7866250B2 (en) * 2006-02-09 2011-01-11 Foster-Miller, Inc. Vehicle protection system
AU2007237067C1 (en) * 2006-04-10 2012-05-24 Elta Systems Ltd. Distributed jammer system
US20090173250A1 (en) * 2007-03-29 2009-07-09 Mechanical Solutions Inc. System for protection against missiles
US7974814B2 (en) * 2007-06-15 2011-07-05 Raytheon Company Multiple sensor fusion engine
US20090173822A1 (en) * 2008-01-07 2009-07-09 Arnold Kravitz Distributed infrared countermeasure installation for fixed wing aircraft
DE102009006498A1 (de) * 2009-01-28 2010-07-29 Krauss-Maffei Wegmann Gmbh & Co. Kg Cargo-Geschoss
DE102010017867A1 (de) 2009-05-05 2010-11-18 Luk Lamellen Und Kupplungsbau Beteiligungs Kg Sichere Tastpunktermittlung
US8596178B2 (en) * 2011-01-28 2013-12-03 The Boeing Company Expanding countermeasure and launcher system
IL211513A (en) * 2011-03-02 2016-04-21 Israel Aerospace Ind Ltd A system, method, and computerized device for rocket damage reduction
DE102011111201B3 (de) 2011-08-20 2013-01-03 Rheinmetall Waffe Munition Gmbh Munitionszuführung einer Mehrrohrwaffe
DE102012002043C5 (de) * 2012-02-02 2016-05-12 Diehl Bgt Defence Gmbh & Co. Kg Waffenbasierte Schutzeinrichtung für Fahrzeuge
US9714815B2 (en) * 2012-06-19 2017-07-25 Lockheed Martin Corporation Visual disruption network and system, method, and computer program product thereof
JP6025535B2 (ja) * 2012-12-03 2016-11-16 三菱重工業株式会社 指向性エネルギー照射装置
US9715009B1 (en) * 2014-12-19 2017-07-25 Xidrone Systems, Inc. Deterent for unmanned aerial systems
WO2017040254A1 (fr) * 2015-08-28 2017-03-09 Laufer Wind Group Llc Atténuation des menaces sur les petits aéronefs sans équipage
US20180364741A1 (en) * 2016-03-11 2018-12-20 Raytheon Bbn Technologies Corp. Human indication of target drone for interception

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20090173836A1 (en) * 2007-10-23 2009-07-09 Kevin Kremeyer Laser-based flow modification to remotely conrol air vehicle flight path
US20140251123A1 (en) * 2012-01-22 2014-09-11 Raytheon Company Unmanned range-programmable airburst weapon system for automated tracking and prosecution of close-in targets
EP2685206A2 (fr) * 2012-07-13 2014-01-15 The Boeing Company Procédé et système de contre-mesure déploiée par projectile

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
KR20180055814A (ko) 2018-05-25
EP3341674A1 (fr) 2018-07-04
JP6893207B2 (ja) 2021-06-23
JP2018525601A (ja) 2018-09-06
US10495420B2 (en) 2019-12-03
DE102015011058A1 (de) 2017-03-02
US20180238661A1 (en) 2018-08-23
WO2017032782A1 (fr) 2017-03-02

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP3341674B1 (fr) Système de défense contre les menaces
DE10346001B4 (de) Vorrichtung zum Schützen von Schiffen vor endphasengelenkten Flugkörpern
WO2007054278A1 (fr) Systeme de protection automatique pour vehicule de combat ou autres objets a proteger
DE10117007A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Schutz von mobilen militärischen Einrichtungen
DE10230939A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Schutz von Gefechtsfeldfahrzeugen
DE69628759T2 (de) Verfahren zur erhöhung der luftabwehr-trefferwahrscheinlichkeit und danach entworfene waffe
DE19601756C1 (de) Verfahren und Einrichtung zum Schutz gegen die Einwirkung eines schnellen Projektiles
EP3070429B1 (fr) Projectile destiné a intercepter un petit drone
DE102009016147A1 (de) Zerlegendes Geschoss
EP0547391A1 (fr) Procédé pour élever la probabilité de succès pour une défence anti-aérienne utilisant des projectiles à dispersion télé-commandée
DE102012002043B4 (de) Waffenbasierte Schutzeinrichtung für Fahrzeuge
EP1983294B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif destinés à combattre une position de lancement d&#39;une munition d&#39;attaque
EP0715146A1 (fr) Dispositif pour localiser la position des artilleries ou des tireurs embusqués
DE102015015938A1 (de) Autonome, unbemannte Fluggeräte zur Begleitung, Eskortierung und Absicherung von Lutffahrzeugen wie Starr- und Drehflügler
DE19704070C2 (de) Tarn- und/oder Täuscheinrichtung
EP3376154B1 (fr) Procédé de protection d&#39;un missile de croisière
EP3931087A1 (fr) Drone et procédé de lutte contre des cibles
DE202016105245U1 (de) Geschoss zur Abwehr kleiner flugfähiger Objekte, insbesondere Drohnenabwehrgeschoss
EP3622242A1 (fr) Système de défense contre des corps volants légers, tels que des drones
DE102018131524A1 (de) Verfahren zum Schutz von beweglichen oder unbeweglichen Objekten vor sich nähernden lasergelenkten Bedrohungen
DE2527205A1 (de) Einrichtung zum schnellen, moeglichst gleichmaessigen verteilen militaerischer defensiv-elemente, vorzugsweise dueppel
DE102022130560A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Abwehr von Luftfahrzeugen, insbesondere von unbemannten Luftfahrzeugen
WO2013020911A1 (fr) Dispositif et procédé de protection d&#39;objets
EP3943874A1 (fr) Dispositif de luttes contre une cible
DE102007013676A1 (de) Schutzvorrichtung für ein Lager oder dergleichen mit wenigstens einem zu schützenden Objekt und/oder Personen

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20180207

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

DAV Request for validation of the european patent (deleted)
DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20190218

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20210728

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1446459

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20211115

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 502016014133

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG9D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20211110

RAP4 Party data changed (patent owner data changed or rights of a patent transferred)

Owner name: RHEINMETALL WAFFE MUNITION GMBH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 502016014133

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: RHEINMETALL WAFFE MUNITION GMBH, DE

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: RHEINMETALL WAFFE MUNITION GMBH, 29345 UNTERLUESS, DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211110

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211110

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211110

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220210

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220310

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211110

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220310

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211110

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220210

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211110

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211110

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211110

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220211

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211110

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211110

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211110

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211110

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211110

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211110

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211110

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 502016014133

Country of ref document: DE

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20220811

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211110

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211110

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211110

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20220824

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220824

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220831

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220831

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20220831

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211110

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220824

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220831

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220831

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 1446459

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20220824

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220824

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220824

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20230821

Year of fee payment: 8

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20160824

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211110

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211110