EP3313709B1 - Système et procédé d'alimentation électrique d'unités fonctionnelles décentralisées - Google Patents

Système et procédé d'alimentation électrique d'unités fonctionnelles décentralisées Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3313709B1
EP3313709B1 EP16722583.8A EP16722583A EP3313709B1 EP 3313709 B1 EP3313709 B1 EP 3313709B1 EP 16722583 A EP16722583 A EP 16722583A EP 3313709 B1 EP3313709 B1 EP 3313709B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
network node
snd
units
node unit
bus
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP16722583.8A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP3313709A1 (fr
Inventor
Martin Hediger
Anton Reichlin
Daniel Sigg
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Siemens Mobility AG
Original Assignee
Siemens Mobility AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Siemens Mobility AG filed Critical Siemens Mobility AG
Publication of EP3313709A1 publication Critical patent/EP3313709A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3313709B1 publication Critical patent/EP3313709B1/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B61—RAILWAYS
    • B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
    • B61L19/00—Arrangements for interlocking between points and signals by means of a single interlocking device, e.g. central control
    • B61L19/06—Interlocking devices having electrical operation
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B61—RAILWAYS
    • B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
    • B61L27/00—Central railway traffic control systems; Trackside control; Communication systems specially adapted therefor
    • B61L27/70—Details of trackside communication

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a system and method for supplying decentralized functional units with electrical energy arranged in an industrial plant.
  • Such decentralized functional units are used in particular in rail transport networks such as the railroad, where these are used to control vehicle influencing and / or vehicle monitoring units and to monitor functionality and to record process data and back to a central control and / or Monitoring center, such as a control center or a signal box, to report.
  • a central control and / or Monitoring center such as a control center or a signal box
  • As Switzerlandbeeinu units that give instructions to the driver or even make direct intervention in the vehicle control or directly set a safe track for example, signals, points, balises, line conductors, track magnets and the like, as well as sensors for detecting process variables of the moving train, such as power consumption, speed and the like.
  • train and track section monitoring units can also balise and line conductors, but also axle and track circuits and other train detection systems are called.
  • the present invention relates to all industrial plants in which functional units are distributed over long distances and yet must be centrally controlled.
  • the central controller can be perceived by a stationary control center, but also by
  • European patent application EP 2 549 620 A2 discloses such a data transport network for industrial plants.
  • a digital data transport network can be used for the coupling of the decentralized functional units, which is robust in each case against a simple error event, yet a very skillful use of very widely used in railway engineering copper cables, for example, previously available interlocking cables, and finally requires only a relatively small number of network access points.
  • Such a device is used in a particularly advantageous manner for a rail network for rail transport. Consequently, it is then expedient in a further advantageous embodiment, by means of the decentralized functional units traffic monitoring and traffic control functional units, such as in particular signals, switches, axle counter, track circuits, point and line train control elements to couple to the data transport network.
  • traffic monitoring and traffic control functional units such as in particular signals, switches, axle counter, track circuits, point and line train control elements to couple to the data transport network.
  • the supply of the connected consumers can take place from both supply sides. This creates a previously unavailable redundancy of the energy supply.
  • the decentralized functional units also called element controllers or EC for short
  • EC element controllers
  • SNDs bus couplers
  • the SNDs can interrupt or bypass the power bus, as well as measure currents and voltages in the power bus.
  • the present invention is therefore based on the object of specifying a system and a method for supplying arranged in an industrial plant decentralized functional units with electrical energy, in the interruptions in the power bus or faulty network node units, in particular their switching modules are reliably and quickly detected, so immediately Measures to restore the correct function of the energy bus can be initiated.
  • this object is achieved according to the invention by a method according to claim 8.
  • the voltages of the same network node unit measured for the two inputs of the power bus in a network node unit can be compared. In this way, it can be determined whether the connection to both feed points is intact or whether one of these connections is broken or if one of the switches has a fault.
  • the voltages measured for the two inputs of the power bus in two directly adjacent network node units can be compared. In this way, it can also be determined whether the connection to both feed points is intact or whether one of these connections between the two network node units is interrupted.
  • the voltage values measured on a network node unit can be transmitted via the data bus to an adjacent network node unit and / or the higher-order control system.
  • the data can be accumulated in a suitable manner where their evaluation is provided by means of the evaluation module.
  • the evaluation module is rather an evaluation instance, because the evaluation of the voltage values is carried out by software and therefore the required hardware for this purpose in a suitable location, such as in the parent Control system (eg the interlocking) or else can be arranged on a master network node unit.
  • the parent Control system eg the interlocking
  • a monitoring cycle for the successive opening of the two switches for each network node unit by way of a successive processing of the network node units starting at one of the two feed points can be provided.
  • a monitoring cycle for the successive opening of the two switches for each network node unit may be provided by means of a successive processing of the network node units beginning at the network node unit lying in the voltage center of the power bus and then extending to the feed points on both sides.
  • a typical implementation case for the industrial plant may be a railway network. Accordingly, then by means of the decentralized functional units traffic monitoring and traffic control units, in particular signals, switches (W), axle counter, track circuits, point and line-shaped train control elements controlled.
  • traffic monitoring and traffic control units in particular signals, switches (W), axle counter, track circuits, point and line-shaped train control elements controlled.
  • FIG. 1 schematically shows an interlocking architecture with a system Sys, inter alia, a signal box STW, a redunant degraded data backbone NB1, NB2, a data bus CB and an energy bus EB with two feed points PS1 and PS2 has.
  • the interlocking STW controls the train traffic on a track section G, in which here, for example, signals S, points W, a level crossing Bue and axle counter AC are arranged.
  • These train protection and influencing components each connect to a decentralized functional unit - also called element controller unit E - on the data bus CB and the power bus EB.
  • the decentralized functional units E are connected to the annular data bus CB in such a way that over each side of the annular data bus CB is given access to the data backbones NB1 and NB2.
  • the data bus CB coupled with corresponding routers / switches SW to the respective data backbone NB1, NB2.
  • FIG. 2 now shows schematically the data and power supply connection of the Element Controller Unit E of a train control component, here for example a switch W, to the data bus CB and the power bus EB.
  • a train control component here for example a switch W
  • Such an attachment point comprises a network node unit SND, a communication unit SCU and the actual element controller EC.
  • the communication unit SCU is used for the data exchange over both branches of the data bus CB.
  • the network node unit SND is provided which couples to both branches of the power bus EB.
  • the network node unit SND controls and monitors the power bus EB, detects current violations within the power bus and the connected consumer (SPU with EC).
  • the switching module S In redundant manner, it is always supplied from two sides with electrical energy and therefore has in a switching module S via a left switch S1 and a right switch S2 and a load switch S3 to the supply unit SPU of the element controller EC.
  • the switching module S also includes a control and / or evaluation logic SL that is used, for example, for measuring the voltages and / or currents at the inputs of the power bus EB in the network node unit SND.
  • the network node unit SND also supplies the communication unit SCU with voltage and can also exchange data with it via an Ethernet connection and is thus integrated in the data bus CB (eg for activating the manual operation of the SND via remote access and actuation of the switches S1 to S3, for delivery of diagnostic data to the interlocking or a superordinate service and diagnostic system, query of the current voltages, currents, energy and power values, parameterization of the SND, for the delivery and / or reception of data for the charging / the energy management of an energy storage not shown here or for the notification of a future power requirement) ,
  • the supply unit SPU is integrated via the switch S3, which converts the voltage of the power bus EB to the input voltage required for the element controller EC.
  • a data connection between the switching module S of the network node unit SND and the supply unit SPU, for example in the form of a serial RS 422, is provided.
  • Energy-technically typical here is, for example, a three-phase connection with 400 VAC.
  • the element controller EC controls and supplies in FIG. 2
  • the switch W receives the element controller EC data telegrams from a higher-level interlocking CPU via an Ethernet connection from the communication unit SCU and are via this communication unit SCU feedback to the interlocking computer CPU.
  • the interlocking computer CPU here also represents a corresponding evaluation module that evaluates the received data as intended.
  • the network node units SND1 to SND7 measure both current and voltage at the power bus EB, as well as the current direction in the power bus EB at both bus inputs (bus left, bus right). It is further assumed that in the network node units SND1 to SND7 a switching function is implemented in the switching module S, the switches S1 and S2 being realized by means of unidirectionally or bidirectionally conducting semiconductor components. Thus, in each network node unit SND there is a "switch left”, through which the current I flows from right to left, and a “switch right”, through which the current flows to the right. In the case of the bidirectionally conducting semiconductor element, although there is only one bus switch, which conducts in both directions. In addition, it is assumed here that the connected supply units SPU can bridge a voltage interruption of about 20 ms.
  • the present invention solves the technical problem of monitoring the power bus EB by means of a segment-by-segment check of the network node units SND1 to SND7. It can be revealed with the resources anyway necessary for the function also a hidden redundancy failure. Thus, neither a high-precision current or voltage measurement on the power bus EB has to be implemented, nor does a great amount of circuitry have to be operated in order to apply test signals to the data bus CB or to receive and evaluate them. Of course, all data could be in eg Ways to replace a power line communication via the power bus EB.
  • the existing in the power bus EB network node units SND1 to SND7 can perform the test process autonomously based on a fixed time sequence.
  • the network node units are assigned a fixed point of time on the basis of the position in the energy bus EB, for which they are allowed to carry out the interruption check. It is also possible to run the test procedure in a synchronized manner via the communication between the network node units, for example triggered by a predefined master SND. From the combined measurement of current, current direction and voltage at both switches S1, S2, the network node unit SND can determine the state of the power bus EB by briefly separating the switches S1 and S2.
  • interruption (A) a voltage jump becomes visible in the energy bus.
  • the SND adjacent to the interruption here SND2 and SND3, measure different bus voltages at their bus inputs.
  • this interruption (A) can be easily recognized because the two adjacent network node units SND2 and SND3 measure different voltages at their respectively facing bus inputs.
  • the SND In the event of an interruption (B), the SND, whose switch is defective, measures different bus voltages at the two voltage measuring points at the bus inputs. The difference is greater than the voltage drop across the Switches S1, S2 itself. This case can be seen in operation without much effort.
  • the interruption detection system regularly checks for obvious interruptions according to letters (A) and (B) in the energy bus EB. This can also be realized, for example, by adjacent SNDs exchanging their current / voltage measured values and reporting an interruption in the case of irregularities. If a significant voltage jump is detected between the measured values at the two switches of an SND or between two adjacent SNDs, an interruption in the energy bus EB must be present. In addition, hidden interrupts are searched for periodically.
  • the SND in the case of synchronized interrupt detection is as follows: The SND in the electrical bus center, in this case SND4, separates the switches S1 and S2 for both directions. If at both inputs of the switch module S the voltage does not change significantly, the cables to the two adjacent SND are intact and the next SND can be tested.
  • SND5 disconnects "switch left” which causes SND4 to be powered only from the left and the two inputs on SND5 need to measure different voltage levels. If the voltage on the left input of SND5 completely collapses, or is below the minimum allowed threshold, then "Switch right" of SND4 defective (defect (D)). Otherwise, the next SND can be checked.
  • SND6 disconnects "switch left", which causes SND5 to be powered only from the left and the two inputs of the switch module on SND6 have to measure different voltage values. If the voltage at the input to the left of SND6 completely collapses, "switch right" of SND5 is defective. Otherwise, the next SND can be checked.
  • test routine can continue to work in the left direction.
  • SND3 would open "switch right".
  • Defect (F) would thus be revealed when "switch left” of SND1 is opened.
  • the test routine can also be used with bidirectionally conductive semiconductor elements. Then there is only one bus switch, which conducts in both directions. Accordingly falls in this case, the failure mode "the switch that does not conduct in the energized direction, falls off" away. Only the failures A, B, C and D would have to be considered for this case. F would not exist anymore.
  • this test run is stopped immediately and the error is displayed by the SND by means of data telegrams and reported to the other SND and / or the interlocking STW and / or another related diagnosis device. Until a repair has taken place, manipulations in the energy bus EB are then to be omitted.
  • SND1 would be the first on the Configuration predefined time slot (time synchronization via NTP) received and the "switch right" open (the current flows from left to right, so this rung is interrupted to check the other current direction).
  • SND 2 Next up is SND 2, and so on.
  • the SND which receives power from both sides, opens both switches, the SND, in which the current flows only from the right, open the "switches left”.
  • the interruption detection function works analogously to the sequence described above, but an already existing interruption leads in this case to a brief voltage interruption in the element Controller Units E, which lie between the SND being tested and the interruption. For this reason, the switches must not be left open for more than 10 ms within the scope of the assumption made above for a 20 ms seized power supply. For the exact localization of the interruption, the entire energy bus EB must also be traversed, each SND must briefly open its switches S1 and / or S2. The interruption is reported, and also here, no manipulation except the repair to the power bus EB done.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Remote Monitoring And Control Of Power-Distribution Networks (AREA)

Claims (11)

  1. Système (Sys) d'alimentation en énergie électrique d'unités fonctionnelles décentralisées (E) agencées dans une installation industrielle, dans lequel :
    a) il est prévu un système de commande prioritaire (STW) qui échange des informations avec les unités fonctionnelles décentralisées (E) par l'intermédiaire de télégrammes de données au moyen d'un bus de données (CB, NB1, NB2),
    b) des unités de noeud de réseau (SND) sont agencées en série entre deux points d'alimentation (PS1, PS2) d'un bus d'énergie (EB) à structure annulaire qui fournissent aux unités fonctionnelles décentralisées (E) l'accès au bus d'énergie (EB) et, facultativement, au bus de données (CB, NB1, NB2) également,
    c) les unités de noeud de réseau (SND) disposent d'un module de commutation (S) pilotable qui comprend un premier commutateur (S1) et un second commutateur (S2), les deux commutateurs (S1, S2) pouvant commander respectivement un accès aux deux points d'alimentation (PS1, PS2),
    d) le premier commutateur (S1) et/ou le second commutateur (S2) peut/peuvent être ouvert/s sélectivement et une chute de tension à l'entrée de l'unité de noeud de réseau (SND) est mesurable ; et
    e) il est prévu un module d'analyse (CPU, SL) qui analyse la tension mesurée dans une unité de noeud de réseau (SND) et/ou entre des unités de noeud de réseau (SND) adjacentes pour détecter une coupure du bus d'énergie (EB) et/ou un module de commutation (S) défaillant,
    caractérisé en ce qu'il est prévu
    un cycle de surveillance pour l'ouverture successive et/ou simultanée des deux commutateurs pour chaque unité de noeud de réseau (SND) dans le cadre d'un traitement successif des unités de noeud de réseau, commençant au niveau de l'un des deux points d'alimentation (PS1, PS2) ou commençant au niveau de l'unité de noeud de réseau (SND4) située au point central de la tension du bus d'énergie (EB) et s'étendant ensuite des deux côtés en direction des points d'alimentation (PS1, PS2).
  2. Système selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que les tensions mesurées pour les deux entrées du bus d'énergie (EB) dans une unité de noeud de réseau (SND), pour cette même unité de noeud de réseau (SND), sont comparées.
  3. Système selon la revendication 1 ou 2, caractérisé en ce que
    les tensions mesurées pour les deux entrées du bus d'énergie (EB) dans deux unités de noeud de réseau (SND) directement adjacentes sont comparées.
  4. Système selon l'une des revendications 1 à 3, caractérisé en ce que
    les valeurs de tension mesurées sur une unité de noeud de réseau (SND) peuvent être transmises par le bus de données (CB) à une unité de noeud de réseau (SND) adjacente et/ou au système de commande prioritaire (STW).
  5. Système selon l'une des revendications 1 à 4, caractérisé en ce que
    le cycle de surveillance est exécuté périodiquement ou est déclenché par une des unités de noeud de réseau (SND) ou par le système de commande prioritaire (STW).
  6. Système selon l'une des revendications 1 à 5, caractérisé en ce que
    l'installation industrielle est un réseau ferroviaire.
  7. Système selon la revendication 6, caractérisé en ce que des unités de surveillance du trafic et de commande du trafic, comme par exemple des signaux (S), des aiguillages (W), des compteurs d'essieux (AC), des circuits de voies, des éléments d'influence des trains ponctuels et linéaires, peuvent être commandées au moyen des unités fonctionnelles décentralisées (E).
  8. Procédé d'alimentation en énergie électrique d'unités fonctionnelles décentralisées (E) agencées dans une installation industrielle, dans lequel :
    a) il est prévu un système de commande prioritaire (STW) qui échange des informations avec les unités fonctionnelles décentralisées (E) par l'intermédiaire de télégrammes de données au moyen d'un bus de données (CB, NB1, NB2),
    b) des unités de noeud de réseau (SND) sont agencées en série entre deux points d'alimentation (PS1, PS2) d'un bus d'énergie (EB) à structure annulaire qui fournissent aux unités fonctionnelles décentralisées (E) l'accès au bus d'énergie (EB) et, facultativement, au bus de données (CB) également,
    c) les unités de noeud de réseau (SND) disposent d'un module de commutation (S) pilotable qui comprend un premier commutateur (S1) et un second commutateur (S2), les deux commutateurs (S1, S2) commandant respectivement un accès aux deux points d'alimentation (PS1, PS2),
    d) le premier commutateur (S1) et/ou le second commutateur (S2) est/sont ouvert/s sélectivement et une chute de tension à l'entrée de l'unité de noeud de réseau (SND) est mesurée ; et
    e) il est prévu un module d'analyse (CPU, SL) qui analyse la tension mesurée dans une unité de noeud de réseau (SND) et/ou entre des unités de noeud de réseau (SND) adjacentes pour détecter une coupure du bus d'énergie (EB) et/ou un module de commutation (S) défaillant,
    caractérisé en ce qu'il est prévu
    un cycle de surveillance pour l'ouverture successive et/ou simultanée des deux commutateurs pour chaque unité de noeud de réseau (SND) dans le cadre d'un traitement successif des unités de noeud de réseau, commençant au niveau de l'un des deux points d'alimentation (PS1, PS2) ou commençant au niveau de l'unité de noeud de réseau (SND4) située au point central de la tension du bus d'énergie (EB) et s'étendant ensuite des deux côtés en direction des points d'alimentation (PS1, PS2).
  9. Procédé selon la revendication 8, caractérisé en ce que
    les tensions mesurées pour les deux entrées du bus d'énergie (EB) dans une unité de noeud de réseau (SND), pour cette même unité de noeud de réseau (SND), sont comparées.
  10. Procédé selon la revendication 8 ou 9, caractérisé en ce que
    les tensions mesurées pour les deux entrées du bus d'énergie (EB) dans deux unités de noeud de réseau (SND) directement adjacentes sont comparées.
  11. Procédé selon la revendication 8 à 10, caractérisé en ce que
    les valeurs de tension mesurées sur une unité de noeud de réseau (SND) peuvent être transmises par le bus de données (CB) à une unité de noeud de réseau (SND) adjacente et/ou au système de commande prioritaire (STW).
EP16722583.8A 2015-06-25 2016-05-02 Système et procédé d'alimentation électrique d'unités fonctionnelles décentralisées Active EP3313709B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP15173810.1A EP3109125A1 (fr) 2015-06-25 2015-06-25 Système et procédé d'alimentation d'unités de fonctionnement décentralisées en énergie électrique
PCT/EP2016/059772 WO2016206842A1 (fr) 2015-06-25 2016-05-02 Système et procédé d'alimentation électrique d'unités fonctionnelles décentralisées

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3313709A1 EP3313709A1 (fr) 2018-05-02
EP3313709B1 true EP3313709B1 (fr) 2019-06-26

Family

ID=53488255

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP15173810.1A Withdrawn EP3109125A1 (fr) 2015-06-25 2015-06-25 Système et procédé d'alimentation d'unités de fonctionnement décentralisées en énergie électrique
EP16722583.8A Active EP3313709B1 (fr) 2015-06-25 2016-05-02 Système et procédé d'alimentation électrique d'unités fonctionnelles décentralisées

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP15173810.1A Withdrawn EP3109125A1 (fr) 2015-06-25 2015-06-25 Système et procédé d'alimentation d'unités de fonctionnement décentralisées en énergie électrique

Country Status (2)

Country Link
EP (2) EP3109125A1 (fr)
WO (1) WO2016206842A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
NL2018835B1 (nl) * 2016-05-05 2018-02-14 Volkerrail Nederland Bv Relaishuis of relaiskasthuis met EtherCat systeem.
EP3415399B1 (fr) 2017-06-16 2019-10-23 Siemens Mobility AG Système d'alimentation à sureté intégrée d'un consommateur électrique à l'aide d'un bus d'énergie redondant
CN107499141A (zh) * 2017-09-20 2017-12-22 中国重汽集团济南动力有限公司 一种多轴轮边驱动电动汽车用分布式高压系统
EP3822145B1 (fr) * 2019-11-13 2023-10-04 Siemens Mobility AG Procédé et système pour traiter une chaine d'appareils d'aiguillage

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1995916A1 (fr) 2007-05-24 2008-11-26 Siemens Schweiz AG Dispositif de commande et/ou de surveillance et de demande de données à partir d'unités de fonction décentralisées agencées le long d'un réseau de trafic
EP2549620A3 (fr) 2011-07-22 2013-04-24 Siemens Schweiz AG Dispositif de fonctionnement d'unités de fonction décentralisées et agencées dans une installation industrielle
EP2674346B1 (fr) * 2012-06-13 2014-12-17 Siemens Schweiz AG Procédé et système d'approvisionnement de puissance électrique pour des éléments de voie décentralisés d'un réseau de voies ferrées
EP2821313A3 (fr) * 2013-07-02 2015-05-06 Siemens Schweiz AG Dispositif et procédé de fonctionnement d'unités fonctionnelles disposées de façon décentralisée

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
None *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP3313709A1 (fr) 2018-05-02
EP3109125A1 (fr) 2016-12-28
WO2016206842A1 (fr) 2016-12-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP3313710B1 (fr) Système et procédé d'élimination de court-circuit dans un bus d'alimentation
EP3313709B1 (fr) Système et procédé d'alimentation électrique d'unités fonctionnelles décentralisées
DE102009042368B4 (de) Steuerungssystem zum Steuern von sicherheitskritischen Prozessen
EP2981868B1 (fr) Système de commande et de transmission de données, dispositif de traitement et procédé de commande de processus redondante à redondance décentralisée
DE102016100175B4 (de) Robotersystem, welches mit einer Mehrzahl von Controllern vorgesehen ist, die eine Mehrzahl von Industrierobotern betätigen
EP2857913B1 (fr) Système d'automatisation redondant
EP1860564A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif destinés à l'échange de données sur la base du protocole de communication OPC entre des composants redondants d'un système d'automatisation
EP3017570B1 (fr) Dispositif de controle, noeud de reseau et procede pour l'echange des donnees sur un reseau
EP2675114B1 (fr) Procédé pour expoiter une formation de réseau , un arrangement de réseau et une formation de réseau
EP1672446B1 (fr) Module d'entrée/sortie sécurisé pour un controleur
EP3415399B1 (fr) Système d'alimentation à sureté intégrée d'un consommateur électrique à l'aide d'un bus d'énergie redondant
DE112012005740T5 (de) Duplexsteuerungssystem und dessen Steuerungsverfahren
DE112013002661T5 (de) Segment mit einer Fehlerschutzeinrichtung für ein zweidrahtiges, kombiniert verbundenes Energie- und Datennetzsystem
EP2418580B1 (fr) Procédé destiné au fonctionnement d'un réseau et réseau
EP3470939B1 (fr) Procédé et système de surveillance de l'intégrité de sécurité d'une fonction de sécurité fournie par un système de sécurité
EP3305622A1 (fr) Procédé de diagnostic de composants techniques répartis dans l'espace
EP4160845B1 (fr) Système de démarrage contrôlé et de fonctionnement d'un bus d'énergie redondant
EP3531137B1 (fr) Dispositif d'alimentation en énergie et procédé de fonctionnement d'un dispositif d'alimentation en énergie
EP1692578B1 (fr) Unite peripherique d'un systeme de commande redondant
EP3822145A1 (fr) Procédé et système d'exécution d'un chemin de roulement à aiguillage projeté
EP3281365B1 (fr) Dispositif d'extension d'interface pour un dispositif réseau et procédé de fonctionnement d'un dispositif d'extension d'interface
WO2009026600A1 (fr) Dispositif d'alimentation en énergie décentralisé destiné à un système de commande modulaire sécurisé contre les erreurs
WO2006015651A1 (fr) Procede de surveillance de position fiable
EP3356199A1 (fr) Système et procédé permettant l'élimination automatique d'une tension pertubatrice excessive dans un bus d'alimentation
EP2817923B1 (fr) Réseau de calculateurs avec un bus de liaison de forme annulaire

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20171204

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

DAV Request for validation of the european patent (deleted)
DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20190124

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: SIEMENS MOBILITY AG

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1147941

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20190715

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 502016005265

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20190626

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190626

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190626

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190626

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190926

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190626

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190626

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190927

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190626

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190926

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190626

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190626

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191028

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190626

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190626

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190626

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190626

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190626

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190626

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190626

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191026

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190626

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190626

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190626

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200224

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 502016005265

Country of ref document: DE

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG2D Information on lapse in contracting state deleted

Ref country code: IS

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20200603

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190626

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190626

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20200531

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20200502

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200502

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200502

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200502

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200531

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200531

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190626

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190626

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190626

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20220411

Year of fee payment: 7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20220719

Year of fee payment: 7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20220809

Year of fee payment: 7

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 502016005265

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 1147941

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20230502

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230531

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230531

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20230502

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20231201