EP3290802B1 - Procédé de détermination d'une date d'inspection dans un système de chauffage ainsi qu'unité de commande et système de chauffage - Google Patents

Procédé de détermination d'une date d'inspection dans un système de chauffage ainsi qu'unité de commande et système de chauffage Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3290802B1
EP3290802B1 EP17187719.4A EP17187719A EP3290802B1 EP 3290802 B1 EP3290802 B1 EP 3290802B1 EP 17187719 A EP17187719 A EP 17187719A EP 3290802 B1 EP3290802 B1 EP 3290802B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
calibration value
heating system
determined
inspection time
value
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP17187719.4A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP3290802A1 (fr
Inventor
Danny Leerkes
Mehmet Kapucu
Bram JASPERS
Sjoerd Reijke
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Robert Bosch GmbH
Original Assignee
Robert Bosch GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from DE102017204017.3A external-priority patent/DE102017204017A1/de
Application filed by Robert Bosch GmbH filed Critical Robert Bosch GmbH
Publication of EP3290802A1 publication Critical patent/EP3290802A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3290802B1 publication Critical patent/EP3290802B1/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F23—COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
    • F23N—REGULATING OR CONTROLLING COMBUSTION
    • F23N5/00—Systems for controlling combustion
    • F23N5/02—Systems for controlling combustion using devices responsive to thermal changes or to thermal expansion of a medium
    • F23N5/12—Systems for controlling combustion using devices responsive to thermal changes or to thermal expansion of a medium using ionisation-sensitive elements, i.e. flame rods
    • F23N5/123—Systems for controlling combustion using devices responsive to thermal changes or to thermal expansion of a medium using ionisation-sensitive elements, i.e. flame rods using electronic means
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F23—COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
    • F23N—REGULATING OR CONTROLLING COMBUSTION
    • F23N5/00—Systems for controlling combustion
    • F23N5/18—Systems for controlling combustion using detectors sensitive to rate of flow of air or fuel
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F23—COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
    • F23N—REGULATING OR CONTROLLING COMBUSTION
    • F23N5/00—Systems for controlling combustion
    • F23N5/24—Preventing development of abnormal or undesired conditions, i.e. safety arrangements
    • F23N5/242—Preventing development of abnormal or undesired conditions, i.e. safety arrangements using electronic means
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F23—COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
    • F23N—REGULATING OR CONTROLLING COMBUSTION
    • F23N2227/00—Ignition or checking
    • F23N2227/18—Applying test signals, e.g. periodic
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F23—COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
    • F23N—REGULATING OR CONTROLLING COMBUSTION
    • F23N2227/00—Ignition or checking
    • F23N2227/20—Calibrating devices
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F23—COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
    • F23N—REGULATING OR CONTROLLING COMBUSTION
    • F23N2233/00—Ventilators
    • F23N2233/06—Ventilators at the air intake
    • F23N2233/08—Ventilators at the air intake with variable speed

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method for determining an inspection time in a heating system.
  • the invention also relates to a control unit designed to carry out the method according to the present invention and a heating system with the control unit according to the present invention.
  • a method according to the preamble of claim 1 is out DE102013014379 known.
  • the invention provides a method according to claim 1 for determining an inspection time in a heating system.
  • heating system means at least one device for generating thermal energy, in particular a heater or heating burner, in particular for use in heating a building and/or for generating hot water, preferably by burning a gaseous or liquid fuel.
  • a heating system can also consist of several such devices for generating thermal energy as well as other devices that support the heating operation, such as hot water and fuel storage tanks.
  • Operation of the heating system can be checked using a sensor system that can record a combustion parameter.
  • the heating system can be regulated, if necessary, depending on the combustion parameter recorded.
  • a "combustion parameter" is to be understood in particular as a scalar parameter which is correlated in particular with a combustion, in particular of the mixture, in particular of the combustion air and the fuel.
  • An example of a combustion parameter is an ionization current, which is measured on a flame of the heating system.
  • the presence and/or quality of combustion and/or the presence and/or the Quality of combustion can be determined.
  • the combustion parameter advantageously corresponds to at least one or exactly one measured value that depicts and/or characterizes the combustion, or the combustion parameter can be unambiguously assigned to such a measured value. Examples of a measured value that depicts and/or characterizes the combustion are a combustion signal, in particular a light intensity, pollutant emissions, a temperature and/or advantageously an ionization signal.
  • Measurement of the combustion parameter is to be understood as meaning direct acquisition of a measured value by a sensor system provided for this purpose or reception of a measured value acquired by an external device.
  • a measured combustion parameter is advantageously stored in a memory.
  • the combustion parameter can be measured at specific points in time and/or at time intervals and/or largely continuously.
  • a "calibration value” is intended to be a characteristic value derived from a detected combustion parameter, which is suitable for regulating and/or calibrating the heating system.
  • the calibration value can be the value of the combustion parameter for specific operating parameters and/or operating conditions.
  • the calibration value can also be a value derived from a stored, time profile of the combustion parameter, for example a local maximum of the combustion parameter.
  • "Regulation or calibration of the heating system” means the one-time or repeated, in particular periodic, adjustment of operating parameters of the heating system so that the heating system can largely meet the specified and/or required performance to the full extent, especially under changing internal and external conditions, especially in wear processes and changing boundary and environmental conditions.
  • Operating parameters are to be understood as meaning parameters which are used by a controller of the heating system to control and monitor processes running in the heating system.
  • operating parameters are the fan speed or the fan speed characteristic, a flame ionization characteristic or an opening width of a fuel control valve.
  • Controlling the heating system is to be understood as meaning a setting of operating parameters which is largely possible during normal, intended operation and largely does not interfere with normal, intended operation.
  • regulation of the heating system can be understood to mean a regulation process running in the controller, which adjusts the opening width of the fuel valve as a function of the detected combustion parameter.
  • Calibrating the heating system is to be understood in particular as meaning an at least partially new setting, preferably a largely completely new setting, of a sensor system in the heating system, in particular a sensor system for measuring a fuel/air ratio.
  • the heater can be operated in a special calibration mode, which at least partially restricts or interrupts the normal, intended operation. For example, a performance spectrum of the heater can be run through to test the sensors.
  • the method allows the state of a sensor system determining the combustion parameter to be estimated with the aid of the calibration value.
  • an inspection time can be determined, which at least partially depends on the state of the sensor system determining the combustion parameter. This has the advantage that the inspection time is determined as needed. The procedure avoids unnecessary inspections, especially inspections that are too early.
  • the inspection time is determined depending on whether the calibration value falls below a quality threshold, this is a particularly robust and reliable criterion for a necessary inspection.
  • a calibration value that falls over time can indicate a deterioration in the sensor system that determines the combustion parameter.
  • the method is further improved if the determination of the inspection time depends on at least one calibration value that is provided.
  • a "calibration value provided” is to be understood as meaning a calibration value which is made available to the method according to the main claim.
  • the calibration value provided can, for example, be stored in a memory of the heating device and/or be sent from an external device, in particular from a server or a cloud and/or from a measuring device.
  • the calibration value provided can be a measured value determined directly or indirectly and/or a calculated value and/or a value taken from a table or a characteristic curve.
  • the use of at least one provided calibration value has the advantage that, in addition to the calibration value, a further value is taken into account for determining the inspection time.
  • the calibration value provided allows other influencing parameters on the state of the heating system to be included. In this way, the required inspection time can be determined more precisely.
  • the method according to the present invention is intended to be carried out repeatedly in succession. Will at least one If the calibration value provided is determined in a previous iteration of the method, in particular by measuring the combustion parameter, this allows calibration values determined in the past to be taken into account. In particular, it is possible to take into account a trend over time or a development of the calibration value over time when determining the inspection time. The development of the calibration value over time can be statistically evaluated in particular. This makes it possible, for example, to avoid an early inspection time caused by an outlier in the determination of the calibration value, for example a measurement error or unusual external conditions.
  • the calibration value and/or, if available, the calibration value provided is determined during a test output, characterized by a constant burner output parameter, in particular a constant fan speed, this has the advantage that the calibration value is determined largely under sufficiently similar conditions in each iteration of the method . This makes it easier to determine the inspection time.
  • An additional advantage is that calibration values determined in different iterations of the method can be compared particularly easily.
  • “Burner power parameter” is to be understood in particular as a parameter which is correlated with the power, in particular a heating power, of the heating system.
  • the output, in particular heating output, of the heating system can advantageously be determined, in particular by the control and/or regulating unit of the heating system, at least on the basis of the burner output parameter.
  • the burner output parameter corresponds to at least one or exactly one measured value representing the output or can be unambiguously assigned to such a measured value.
  • a measured value can, for example, temperature, an air flow rate, a fan control signal or a fan speed.
  • the method is further improved if the determination of the inspection time depends on a burner performance parameter, in particular a blower speed, and/or if present, the quality threshold depends on the burner performance parameter, in particular the blower speed.
  • a burner performance parameter in particular a blower speed
  • the quality threshold depends on the burner performance parameter, in particular the blower speed.
  • the calibration value is a maximum combustion parameter, this has the advantage that the calibration value can be determined particularly easily and reliably.
  • the combustion characteristic is an ionization current, which is determined by an ionization current measurement on a flame of the heating system, this has the advantage that the ionization current has a particularly favorable relationship to the fuel-air ratio that can be evaluated.
  • a sensor system provided for measuring the ionization current for example an ionization probe, ages due to the formation of an ionization layer. The growing ionization layer results in an increasing resistance over time. Due to the ionization layer, the measured ionization current decreases over time under otherwise identical conditions. the The ionization layer at least partially restricts regulation or calibration of the heating system over time.
  • a calibration value that falls sufficiently sharply over time, which was determined by measuring the ionization current, is a particularly good and reliable indicator of a required inspection.
  • control unit for a heating system which control unit is set up to carry out the method according to the present invention, has the advantage that the availability and reliability of the heating system is increased by avoiding unnecessary inspections.
  • a heating system with a control unit according to the present invention with at least one metering device for a fuel and/or for combustion air and/or for a mixture of a fuel and combustion air, and with an ionization probe on a flame and with a fan with a variable fan speed has the Advantage that a safe and cost-effective operation of the heating system is made possible.
  • the heating system can be designed for a lower number of calibration processes, which enables cost-effective production.
  • a heater 10 is shown schematically, which is arranged on a memory 12 in the embodiment.
  • the heater 10 has a housing 14 which accommodates different components depending on the degree of equipment.
  • the essential components are a heat cell 16, a control unit 18, one or more pumps 20 and piping 22, cables or bus lines 24 and holding means 26 in the heater 10.
  • the number and complexity of the individual components also depends on the equipment level of the heater 10.
  • the heat cell 16 has a burner 28, a heat exchanger 30, a blower 32, a metering device 34 and an air supply system 36, an exhaust system 38 and, when the heat cell 16 is in operation, a flame 40.
  • An ionization probe 42 projects into the flame 40 .
  • the dosing device 34 is designed as a fuel valve 44 .
  • a fan speed 54 of the fan 32 is variably adjustable.
  • the heater 10 and the memory 12 together form a heating system 46.
  • the control unit 18 has a data memory 48, a computing unit 50 and a communication interface 52. The components of the heating system 46 can be controlled via the communication interface 52 .
  • the communication interface 52 allows data to be exchanged with external devices. External devices are, for example, control devices, thermostats and/or devices with computer functionality, for example smartphones.
  • FIG 1 shows a heating system 46 with a control unit 18.
  • the control unit 18 is located outside the housing 14 of the heater 10.
  • the external control unit 18 is designed as a room controller for the heating system 46 in special variants.
  • the control unit 18 is mobile.
  • the external control unit 18 has a communication link to the heater 10 and/or other components of the heating system 46 .
  • the communication connection can be wired and/or wireless, preferably a radio connection, particularly preferably via WLAN, Z-Wave, Bluetooth and/or ZigBee.
  • the control unit 18 can consist of several components, in particular components that are not physically connected.
  • At least one or more components of the control unit 18 can be present partially or entirely in the form of software that runs on internal or external devices, in particular on mobile computing units, such as smartphones and tablets, or servers, in particular a cloud.
  • the communication connections are then corresponding software interfaces.
  • FIG 2 shows a method 56 for determining an inspection time 58 in a heating system 46.
  • a calibration value 62 is determined in a step 60.
  • the calibration value 62 is determined from a measured maximum 64 combustion parameter.
  • the combustion parameter 64 is an ionization current 66.
  • the ionization current 66 is recorded largely continuously by the ionization probe 42 and stored in the control unit 18.
  • figure 3 illustrates the determination of the calibration value 62.
  • figure 3 shows the relationship between the ionization current 66 and a fuel-air ratio at a constant fan speed 54.
  • the fuel-air ratio is also called the lambda value and describes the ratio of an air quantity to a fuel quantity in a burner 28 supplied fuel-air mixture.
  • the fan speed 54 is a parameter determined by the control unit 18, which determines a fan control signal. The fan control signal is sent from the control unit 18 to the fan 32 and determines a speed of the area 32.
  • the fan speed 54 is a burner performance parameter 70.
  • a burner performance parameter 70 is a measure of a performance of the heating system 46.
  • On a first ordinate axis 72 is the ionization current 66 applied.
  • the fuel/air ratio is shown on a first abscissa axis 74 .
  • the profile of the ionization current 66 has a combustion parameter maximum 76 at a fuel/air ratio of 1.
  • a "combustion parameter maximum” 76 should be understood to mean a maximum possible value of the combustion parameter 64 in at least certain operating states of the heating system with a constant burner output parameter 70 .
  • Advantageous the maximum combustion parameter 76 can be clearly assigned to a well-defined value of the fuel/air ratio.
  • a combustion parameter maximum 76 is a maximum possible value of the combustion parameter 64 with a constant burner output parameter 70.
  • the heating system 46 is preferably operated with excess air, ie with a fuel/air ratio greater than 1, preferably with a fuel/air ratio between 1.2 and 1.4, particularly preferably with a fuel/air ratio of 1.3.
  • the combustion characteristic maximum 76 is determined by performing a fluid supply change.
  • the fluid supply change is a short-term, pulsed change in an opening width of fuel valve 44.
  • heating system 46 is operated with a largely constant or slowly changing opening width of fuel valve 44.
  • the opening width is increased from a control opening width as quickly as possible to a pulse opening width and, after a pulse duration, is reduced to the control opening width as quickly as possible.
  • the pulse duration is short compared to other variations of the opening width that are common in regular operation. Due to the change in fluid supply, the fuel-air mixture is enriched for a short time, ie the proportion of fuel is increased. The fuel/air ratio is briefly lowered.
  • a magnitude of the fluid supply change or the pulse opening width is selected in such a way that the fuel/air ratio is reduced to a value of less than 1 for a short time will.
  • the pulse opening times required for this are stored in a characteristic diagram in the control unit 18, which depends on the burner performance parameter 70 and the desired fuel/air ratio in control operation.
  • the ionization current 66 rises briefly to the maximum 76 combustion parameter.
  • the combustion parameter maximum 76 is determined in the exemplary embodiment by the maximum ionization current 66 being determined in a first time beginning with the fluid supply change and a test time interval ending at a second time.
  • the control unit 18 evaluates a stored course of the ionization current 66 over time. A longer test time interval is determined by the control unit 18 . The length of the test time interval depends on the burner output parameter 70. In this way, a running time of the fuel-air mixture from the fuel valve 44 to the burner 28 or to the ionization probe 42 is taken into account.
  • the maximum 76 of combustion parameters is the calibration value 62.
  • the heating system 46 is regulated as a function of the calibration value 62, if necessary.
  • a target combustion parameter is determined as a function of calibration value 62 .
  • the target combustion parameter is equal to the calibration value 62 multiplied by 0.7.
  • the target combustion parameter is an operating parameter which is used as a target value for a combustion parameter 64 when controlling the heating system in order to achieve the intended or desired fuel/air ratio.
  • the heating system 46 is operated in such a way that the ionization current 66 largely assumes the value of the setpoint combustion parameter in normal operation.
  • the opening width or the control opening width of the fuel valve 44 is set by a control process carried out by the control unit 18 in such a way that the ionization current 66 largely assumes the value of the setpoint combustion parameter.
  • the target combustion characteristic is stored in a target combustion characteristic curve in the control unit 18 .
  • the setpoint combustion parameter characteristic curve allocates the setpoint combustion parameter required for this to the burner output parameter 70 and the desired fuel/air ratio. If necessary, the target combustion characteristic is at least partially updated using the calibration value 62 or the target combustion characteristic determined from the calibration value 62 .
  • the inspection time 58 is determined.
  • the control unit 18 checks whether the calibration value 62 falls below a quality threshold 80 .
  • the quality threshold 80 is a lower limit for the calibration value 62 stored in the control unit 18. If the calibration value 62 falls below the quality threshold 80, the inspection time 58 is determined by adding an inspection time interval to a currently available date. In the exemplary embodiment, the inspection interval is two weeks. An inspection notice is displayed in a display of the heating system 46 in which an operator of the heating system 46 is advised to initiate an inspection by the inspection time 58 .
  • the inspection time interval has any other value. It is conceivable that the inspection time interval depends on operating parameters, in particular on a distance between the calibration value 62 and the quality threshold 80. It is also conceivable that the inspection time 58 largely corresponds to a time at which the calibration value 62 exceeds the quality threshold 80. For example, an inspection notice can be displayed and/or transmitted, in which the operator of the heating system 46 is advised to initiate an inspection as soon as possible.
  • figure 4 shows a time development of the calibration value 62.
  • the calibration value 62 is plotted on a second ordinate axis 81.
  • FIG. An operating time of the heating system is shown on a second abscissa axis 82 .
  • results for the calibration value 62 from many iterations of the method 56 are shown.
  • a time scale of one in figure 4 The course of the calibration value 62 shown is about 3000 operating hours.
  • the course of the calibration value 62 shows noise. The trend is that the calibration value 62 slowly decreases on average.
  • a first calibration value 84 is 79 ⁇ A.
  • a second calibration value 86 is 72 ⁇ A.
  • one reason for the decrease in the calibration value is 62 (see figure 4 ) an oxidation layer slowly forming on the ionization probe 42.
  • the oxidation layer has an insulating effect.
  • figure 5 shows a dependency of the calibration value 62 on an ohmic resistance of the oxidation layer.
  • the calibration value 62 is shown on a third ordinate axis 88 .
  • a third abscissa axis 90 shows the ohmic resistance.
  • different determinations of the calibration value 62 are shown for different ohmic resistances.
  • a first determination 92 has a calibration value 62 of 75 ⁇ A with an ohmic resistance of 0 k ⁇ .
  • the ionization probe 42 has no oxidation layer in the first determination 92 .
  • a second determination 94 has a calibration value 62 of 62 ⁇ A with an oxidation layer with an ohmic resistance of 450 k ⁇ .
  • a strength or a signal strength of the detected combustion parameter 64 is reduced as a result of aging processes.
  • the ionization current 66 decreases as a result of a growing oxidation layer.
  • a measure of the signal strength of the combustion parameter 64, which is restricted over time, is the calibration value 62, which decreases over time.
  • a restricted combustion parameter 64 restricts the functionality of the heating system 46 at least in part. For example, the ionization current 66 stands out weaker from signal noise.
  • a calibration value 62 that is too low makes determination of the target combustion parameter less precise. In this way, the desired fuel-air ratio cannot be set with a desired precision.
  • the quality threshold 80 can be operated as intended by the calibration value 62 at least within the inspection time interval or at least up to the inspection time 58 or can fully meet the intended requirements, in particular with regard to operational safety and emissions.
  • the quality threshold 80 is a value determined in laboratory tests.
  • the inspection time interval depends on a deviation of the calibration value 62 from the quality threshold 80.
  • the deviation can be a relative or absolute difference of the calibration value 62 from the quality threshold 80.
  • the deviation can be the value of the quality threshold 80 minus the calibration value 62.
  • the calibration value 62 is assigned the inspection time 58 with an inspection function.
  • the inspection function assigns an inspection time 58 or an inspection time interval to the calibration value 62 .
  • the inspection function can also depend on other operating parameters, for example an operating time or a burner output parameter 70.
  • the inspection function can be a table or a characteristic map which assigns an inspection time 58 or an inspection time interval to the calibration value 62 at least at intervals.
  • the inspection function can also be an analytical, in particular a rational function.
  • the inspection function or the function parameters that define it can be determined in particular in laboratory tests. It is conceivable that the inspection function is based on a self-learning or intelligent algorithm, for example on an artificial neural network.
  • a provided calibration value 96 is taken into account in step 78 (see FIG figure 6 ).
  • the calibration value 96 provided can be a value provided in particular in the memory 12 of the control unit 18 .
  • the calibration value 96 that is provided can also be a value that can be determined by measuring the combustion parameter 64 .
  • the calibration value 96 provided can be determined using a different method than the calibration value 62 . In this way, the calibration value 96 provided can verify the calibration value 62 .
  • the calibration value 96 provided is determined from an alternative combustion parameter.
  • the calibration value 62 is determined from an operating parameter of the heating system, for example a burner output parameter 70.
  • a resulting calibration value is determined from the calibration value 62 and the at least one provided calibration value 96.
  • the resulting calibration value can be an average of the calibration value 62 and the at least one calibration value 96 provided, in special variants with a weighting.
  • the resulting calibration value is used instead of the calibration value 62 as in the variants of the method 56 described above for determining the inspection time 58 .
  • it can be checked whether the resulting calibration value falls below the quality threshold 80.
  • the inspection time 58 or the inspection time interval is determined using an inspection function. The inspection function assigns an inspection time 58 or an inspection time interval to the resulting calibration value.
  • the inspection time 58 or the inspection time interval is determined using an extended inspection function.
  • the extended inspection function assigns an inspection time 58 or an inspection time interval to the calibration value 62 and the at least one provided calibration value 96 .
  • the inspection function can also depend on other operating parameters, for example an operating time or a Burner output parameters 70.
  • the inspection function can be a table or a characteristic map which assigns an inspection time 58 or an inspection time interval to the calibration value 62 and the at least one calibration value 96 provided, at least at intervals.
  • the inspection function can also be an analytical, in particular a rational function.
  • the inspection function or the function parameters that define it can be determined in particular in laboratory tests. It is conceivable that the inspection function is based on a self-learning or intelligent algorithm, for example on an artificial neural network.
  • FIG 6 12 shows a current iteration 98 of method 56 and a previous iteration 100 of an alternative embodiment.
  • the calibration value 62 from the previous iteration 100 is stored in memory 12 .
  • the calibration value 62 stored in memory from the previous iteration 100 is used as the calibration value 96 provided.
  • further provided calibration values 96 are used, which are determined in previous iterations 100 further back. In this way, the development of the calibration value 62 over time can be taken into account.
  • a resulting calibration value can be determined from the calibration value 62 and the other calibration values 96 provided, in particular in which the calibration values 96 provided are weighted the weaker the further back the point in time at which they were determined.
  • the calibration values 96 provided can be evaluated statistically. For example, statistical departures can be taken into account in this way.
  • the calibration value 62 is determined at a constant fan speed 54 using the value of a test power 102 (see figure 2 ).
  • the test power 102 is a constant value stored in the control unit 18 .
  • the heating system 46 regularly performs calibrations, during which a calibration value 62 is determined.
  • the method 56 is carried out if the fan speed 54 currently present largely corresponds to the test performance 102 .
  • the test power 102 is selected in such a way that the fan speed 54 often assumes the value of the test power 102 in the control mode of the heating system 46 .
  • the test power 102 is determined in a test phase after the heating system 46 has been installed.
  • the heating system 46 In the test phase, a typical operation of the heating system 46 is examined, in particular how long the heating system 46 is operated at which fan speed 54 . A value of the fan speed 54 is selected as the test power 102, with which the heating system 46 was operated long enough in the test phase.
  • the calibration value 62 is determined for a burner output parameter 70 which has the value of the test output 102 .
  • the heating system 46 is repeatedly, preferably regularly, operated in a calibration mode in which the heating system 46 is operated at the test output 102 and the calibration value 62 is determined.
  • calibration value 62 is determined for at least two different combustion parameters 64 .
  • the calibration value 62 can be determined for almost all combustion parameters 64 .
  • the currently present combustion parameter 64 or a combustion parameter 64 present when the calibration value 62 is determined is recorded and taken into account in step 78 when determining the inspection time 58 .
  • the Quality threshold 80 depend on the fan speed 54. It is conceivable that the inspection function and/or the extended inspection function depend on the burner performance parameter 70 .
  • the heating system 46 is regulated as a function of the calibration value 62 .
  • the heating system 46 is calibrated as a function of the calibration value 62, if necessary. If the calibration value 62 deviates too much from the quality threshold 80, the heating system 46 is calibrated.
  • the controlled operation of the heating system 46 is interrupted and the heating system 46 runs through a largely complete power range.
  • the heating system 46 is operated with different values of the burner output parameter 70, which are arranged largely uniformly between a minimum burner output parameter and a maximum burner output parameter.
  • Calibration value 62 is determined for each of these values of burner output parameter 70 and stored in control unit 18 . With the help of the calibration value 62 determined in this way for different burner output parameters 70, the setpoint combustion characteristic curve stored in the control unit 18 is largely completely updated.
  • the calibration value 62 is a combustion parameter maximum 76.
  • the combustion parameter 64 is an ionization current 66. It is known for the ionization current 66 that it has a combustion parameter maximum 76 at a fuel/air ratio with the value 1.
  • the maximum combustion parameter 76 is therefore a suitable calibration value 62.
  • the calibration value 62 is a combustion parameter 64 averaged over time.
  • the combustion parameter 64 is an ionization current 66.
  • the ionization current 66 is determined by an ionization current measurement on a flame 40 of the heating system 46.
  • the ionization current 66 is determined by the ionization probe 42 and transmitted to the control unit 18 .
  • the combustion parameter 64 is a light intensity, a lambda value, pollutant emissions and/or a temperature.
  • the light intensity at the flame 40 is determined by a photodiode.
  • the lambda value is measured with a lambda probe in an exhaust gas.
  • the exhaust system 38 has the lambda probe.
  • the pollutant emission is determined by a sensor device which is located on the flame 40 and/or in the exhaust system 38 .
  • the temperature is determined by a contact thermometer and/or a non-contact thermometer, in particular a pyrometer. The thermometer can be located in the exhaust system 38 and/or the flame 40 can be measured.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Regulation And Control Of Combustion (AREA)

Claims (10)

  1. Procédé (56) permettant de fixer une date d'inspection (58) dans un système de chauffage (46), comprenant les étapes suivantes consistant à :
    • établir une valeur d'étalonnage (62) par une mesure d'une grandeur caractéristique de combustion (64), en particulier d'un courant d'ionisation (66) ;
    • fixer une date d'inspection (58) en fonction de la valeur d'étalonnage (62),
    caractérisé en ce que la valeur d'étalonnage (62) est un maximum de grandeur caractéristique de combustion (76).
  2. Procédé (56) selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que la date d'inspection (58) est fixée en fonction du fait que la valeur d'étalonnage (62) est inférieure à un seuil de qualité (80).
  3. Procédé (56) selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce que la fixation de la date d'inspection (58) dépend au moins d'une valeur d'étalonnage (96) fournie.
  4. Procédé (56) selon la revendication 3, caractérisé en ce que ladite au moins une valeur d'étalonnage (96) fournie est établie dans une itération précédente (100) du procédé (56), en particulier par une mesure de la grandeur caractéristique de combustion (64).
  5. Procédé (56) selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce que la valeur d'étalonnage (62), et/ou le cas échéant, la valeur d'étalonnage (96) fournie, sont établies lors d'une performance d'essai (102), caractérisé par un paramètre de puissance de brûleur constant (70), en particulier une vitesse de rotation de soufflante constante (54).
  6. Procédé (56) selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce que la fixation de la date d'inspection (58) dépend d'un ou du paramètre de puissance de brûleur (70), en particulier d'une ou de la vitesse de rotation de soufflante (54), et/ou le cas échéant, en ce que le seuil de qualité (80) dépend du paramètre de puissance de brûleur (70), en particulier de la vitesse de rotation de soufflante (54).
  7. Procédé (56) selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce que le système de chauffage (46) est étalonné et/ou régulé en fonction de la valeur d'étalonnage (62).
  8. Procédé (56) selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce que la grandeur caractéristique de combustion (64) est un courant d'ionisation (66) qui est déterminé par une mesure de courant d'ionisation au niveau d'une flamme (40) du système de chauffage (46).
  9. Unité de commande (18) pour un système de chauffage (46), l'unité de commande (18) étant aménagée pour permettre l'exécution d'un procédé (56) selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes.
  10. Système de chauffage (46) comprenant une unité de commande (18) selon la revendication 10, comprenant au moins un doseur (34) pour un combustible et/ou pour l'air de combustion et/ou pour un mélange composé d'un combustible et d'air de combustion, ainsi qu'une sonde d'ionisation (42) au niveau d'une flamme (40) et une soufflante (32) à vitesse de rotation de soufflante (54) variable.
EP17187719.4A 2016-09-02 2017-08-24 Procédé de détermination d'une date d'inspection dans un système de chauffage ainsi qu'unité de commande et système de chauffage Active EP3290802B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102016216613 2016-09-02
DE102016216630 2016-09-02
DE102016216625 2016-09-02
DE102017204017.3A DE102017204017A1 (de) 2016-09-02 2017-03-10 Verfahren zum Festlegen eines Inspektionszeitpunktes in einem Heizsystem sowie eine Steuereinheit und ein Heizsystem

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3290802A1 EP3290802A1 (fr) 2018-03-07
EP3290802B1 true EP3290802B1 (fr) 2022-01-19

Family

ID=59699593

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP17187719.4A Active EP3290802B1 (fr) 2016-09-02 2017-08-24 Procédé de détermination d'une date d'inspection dans un système de chauffage ainsi qu'unité de commande et système de chauffage

Country Status (2)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3290802B1 (fr)
ES (1) ES2910172T3 (fr)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102019131577A1 (de) * 2019-11-22 2021-05-27 Vaillant Gmbh Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Messung des Lambda-Wertes in einem fossil befeuerten Brenner, insbesondere für eine Heizungs- und/oder Brauchwasseranlage

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2017531A2 (fr) * 2007-06-11 2009-01-21 Vaillant GmbH Procédé de vérification d'un signal issu d'électrodes d'ionisation pour brûleurs
DE102011079325A1 (de) * 2011-07-18 2013-01-24 Viessmann Werke Gmbh & Co Kg Verfahren zur Luftzahlregelung eines Brenners
DE102013014379A1 (de) * 2013-08-30 2015-03-05 Kübler Gmbh Verfahren zur Bestimmung des Wartungszustands einer Heizungsanlage

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
ATE189301T1 (de) * 1995-10-25 2000-02-15 Stiebel Eltron Gmbh & Co Kg Verfahren und schaltung zur regelung eines gasbrenners
DE10003819C1 (de) * 2000-01-28 2001-05-17 Honeywell Bv Verfahren zum Betreiben eines Gasbrenners
DE10111077C2 (de) * 2001-03-08 2003-11-06 Bosch Gmbh Robert Verfahren zum Regeln eines Brenners eines Gasverbrennungsgeräts
DE102013214610A1 (de) * 2013-07-26 2015-01-29 E.On New Build & Technology Gmbh Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Bestimmung von Kennwerten von Brenngasen

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2017531A2 (fr) * 2007-06-11 2009-01-21 Vaillant GmbH Procédé de vérification d'un signal issu d'électrodes d'ionisation pour brûleurs
DE102011079325A1 (de) * 2011-07-18 2013-01-24 Viessmann Werke Gmbh & Co Kg Verfahren zur Luftzahlregelung eines Brenners
DE102013014379A1 (de) * 2013-08-30 2015-03-05 Kübler Gmbh Verfahren zur Bestimmung des Wartungszustands einer Heizungsanlage

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
ES2910172T3 (es) 2022-05-11
EP3290802A1 (fr) 2018-03-07

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
DE102017204017A1 (de) Verfahren zum Festlegen eines Inspektionszeitpunktes in einem Heizsystem sowie eine Steuereinheit und ein Heizsystem
EP1936290B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif destinés à la détection de l'état hydraulique d'une installation de chauffage
EP1933220B1 (fr) Procédé de détermination de l'état d'alimentation d'un circuit de chauffage ou d'un bâtiment et régulateur d'état d'alimentation
EP2622337B1 (fr) Procédés d'étalonnage, de validation et d'ajustement d'une sonde lambda
EP3290802B1 (fr) Procédé de détermination d'une date d'inspection dans un système de chauffage ainsi qu'unité de commande et système de chauffage
EP3290797B1 (fr) Procédé de détection d'un état de vieillissement d'un système de chauffage ainsi qu'une unité de commande et système de chauffage
EP2182297A2 (fr) Procédé et dispositif d'adaptation orientée vers le besoin en chaleur de la température d'entrée d'une installation de chauffage
DE102015210583A1 (de) Heizgerätevorrichtung und Verfahren zum Betrieb einer Heizgerätevorrichtung
EP2271920B1 (fr) Circuit de commande pour capteur de gaz électrochimique et procédé de réglage d'un tel capteur de gaz électrochimique
EP2009536B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif destinés à l'ajustage de la réserve de puissance de chauffe
EP1075657A1 (fr) PROCEDE POUR LA DETERMINATION DE LA CONCENTRATION EN NO x?
EP3290796B1 (fr) Procédé de commande d'un rapport air-combustible dans un système de chauffage et unité de commande et système de chauffage
EP3152432A1 (fr) Procédé de correction d'une caractéristique lambda de tension
EP1235131B1 (fr) Régulation de la température d'une pièce
EP3290800B1 (fr) Procédé d'actualisation d'une caractéristique dans un système de chauffage ainsi que unité de commande et système de chauffage
EP3290798B1 (fr) Procédé de réglage et de commande d'un rapport air-combustible dans un système de chauffage ainsi qu'unité de commande et système de chauffage
DE102017204012A1 (de) Verfahren zur Kontrolle eines Brennstoff-Luft-Verhältnisses in einem Heizsystem sowie eine Steuereinheit und ein Heizsystem
EP3715716B1 (fr) Procédé de réglage et de commande d'un rapport air-combustible dans un système de chauffage ainsi qu'unité de commande et système de chauffage
DE102017204014A1 (de) Verfahren zur Bestimmung einer Brennstofftypengröße in einem Heizsystem
EP3339735B1 (fr) Procédé de commande d'un rapport air-combustible dans un système de chauffage, unité de commande et système de chauffage
DE102017204003A1 (de) Verfahren zur Einstellung und Regelung eines Brennstoff-Luft-Verhältnisses in einem Heizsystem sowie eine Steuereinheit und ein Heizsystem
EP3290801B1 (fr) Procédé de commande d'un rapport air-combustible dans un système de chauffage et unité de commande et système de chauffage
WO2012139608A1 (fr) Procédé pour faire fonctionner une sonde lambda
EP3889511B1 (fr) Procédé de régulation d'un circuit de chauffage d'un système de chauffage, unité de commande d'un système de chauffage, ainsi que système de chauffage
DE102022126343A1 (de) Verfahren zum Bestimmen einer Durchflussmenge, Verfahren zum Betreiben eines Heizgerätes, Computerprogramm, Regel- und Steuergerät und Heizgerät

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN PUBLISHED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20180907

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: ROBERT BOSCH GMBH

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20200415

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20210830

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 502017012462

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1464005

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20220215

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: FP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG9D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2910172

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

Effective date: 20220511

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220119

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220119

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220519

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220419

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220119

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220119

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220419

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220119

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220119

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220420

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220119

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220519

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 502017012462

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220119

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220119

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220119

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220119

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220119

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220119

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220119

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20221020

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220119

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220119

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20220824

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220824

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220831

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220831

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220119

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220824

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20230823

Year of fee payment: 7

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 1464005

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20220824

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220824

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220824

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20230918

Year of fee payment: 7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20230822

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20230822

Year of fee payment: 7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20231025

Year of fee payment: 7

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20170824

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20220119