EP3037575B1 - Insertion system of the weft threads in a weaving loom - Google Patents

Insertion system of the weft threads in a weaving loom Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3037575B1
EP3037575B1 EP15201580.6A EP15201580A EP3037575B1 EP 3037575 B1 EP3037575 B1 EP 3037575B1 EP 15201580 A EP15201580 A EP 15201580A EP 3037575 B1 EP3037575 B1 EP 3037575B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
rack
projectiles
motors
weft thread
projectile
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP15201580.6A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP3037575A3 (en
EP3037575A2 (en
Inventor
Massimo Arrigoni
Dario Pezzoni
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Itema SpA
Original Assignee
Itema SpA
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Itema SpA filed Critical Itema SpA
Publication of EP3037575A2 publication Critical patent/EP3037575A2/en
Publication of EP3037575A3 publication Critical patent/EP3037575A3/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3037575B1 publication Critical patent/EP3037575B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D03WEAVING
    • D03DWOVEN FABRICS; METHODS OF WEAVING; LOOMS
    • D03D49/00Details or constructional features not specially adapted for looms of a particular type
    • D03D49/24Mechanisms for inserting shuttle in shed
    • D03D49/26Picking mechanisms, e.g. for propelling gripper shuttles or dummy shuttles
    • D03D49/28Driving mechanisms for the picker stick
    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D03WEAVING
    • D03DWOVEN FABRICS; METHODS OF WEAVING; LOOMS
    • D03D47/00Looms in which bulk supply of weft does not pass through shed, e.g. shuttleless looms, gripper shuttle looms, dummy shuttle looms
    • D03D47/12Looms in which bulk supply of weft does not pass through shed, e.g. shuttleless looms, gripper shuttle looms, dummy shuttle looms wherein single picks of weft thread are inserted, i.e. with shedding between each pick
    • D03D47/24Looms in which bulk supply of weft does not pass through shed, e.g. shuttleless looms, gripper shuttle looms, dummy shuttle looms wherein single picks of weft thread are inserted, i.e. with shedding between each pick by gripper or dummy shuttle
    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D03WEAVING
    • D03DWOVEN FABRICS; METHODS OF WEAVING; LOOMS
    • D03D47/00Looms in which bulk supply of weft does not pass through shed, e.g. shuttleless looms, gripper shuttle looms, dummy shuttle looms
    • D03D47/27Drive or guide mechanisms for weft inserting
    • D03D47/275Drive mechanisms

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to an insertion system of the weft threads in a projectile-type weaving loom and in particular to a projectile-launching device.
  • projectile weaving looms differ from the other types of weaving looms due to the fact that the weft threads are inserted into the shed through a projectile, that is, a tapered metal body of suitable mass and shape, to which - before performing the launch, and hence to a stationary projectile - the end of the weft thread is fastened.
  • a projectile that is, a tapered metal body of suitable mass and shape
  • the projectile At the shed exit (usually in correspondence of the right hand side of the weaving loom, with reference to the weaver's position) the projectile is slowed down and halted by a braking device, the weft thread is unfastened and hence the projectile is caused to return towards the launch side of the weaving loom (usually the left hand side) through a suitable continuous transport system.
  • the single in-coming projectiles are loaded onto a device which progressively brings them in front of the launchings station where they are again fastened to a desired weft thread and launched again into the shed.
  • GB 2,003,198 discloses a conventional launching device wherein a launch member, meant to abut strongly on the rear end of the projectile, is supported on a lever controlled by a torsion bar cyclically loaded through a cam mechanism.
  • cam-loaded torsion bar system represents a rather critical mechanical component, both in terms of the stresses undergone and imparted, and in terms of the opportunity to determine and control the law of motion of the projectile in the launching step.
  • Such device comprises a toothed wheel meshed in corresponding holes formed along the insertion tape - which tape is flexible to allow a sufficiently wide winding arc on the toothed wheel - the toothed wheel being controlled in alternate rotation by the main movement of the loom through a double desmodromic cam connected to an articulated quadrilateral consisting of rocking arm, connecting rod and toothed sector coupled with a pinion which is integral with and concentric to the toothed wheel.
  • the tape is progressively slowed down and caused to go back in, while the projectile continues the travel thereof by inertia, completing the insertion of the weft in the traditional way in use in projectile weaving looms.
  • patent '573 allows, at least from a theoretical point of view, to overcome the above-described drawbacks of projectile weaving looms with torsion-bar launching device.
  • the acceleration induced by such launching device is much more gradual than that of the conventional twisting-bar device and, moreover, the projectile is constantly led by the tape as far as inside a first shed portion and thus acquires a much more stable trajectory than that of the known launching system.
  • the present invention hence lies in the same technical sector which has been described in connection with patent '573, with the object of providing a weft insertion system in a projectile weaving loom which is devoid of the problems highlighted by the known above-illustrated solution as regards the opportunity of reaching a weft insertion speed which is competitive with the known-type weaving looms currently on the market.
  • the projectile insertion member 1 consists of a rack R driven into motion by a plurality of toothed wheels D, arranged in succession along the development of rack R and meshed therewith, each of wheels D being driven by a respective electric servomotor M, for example of the brushless, electronic-control type.
  • Rack R has a rectilinear layout and has a rigidity sufficient to transmit to projectiles 1 the thrust impressed by wheels D without undergoing significant deformations.
  • motors M and the arrangement thereof along rack R may be varied at will depending on the overall desired power, on the maximum power which can be effectively released by a single motor onto the teeth of wheels D simultaneously engaged with corresponding cavities of rack R and, furthermore, on the space available beside the loom.
  • motors M can be arranged aligned on one side only of rack R and below it, as illustrated in fig. 1 , or on both sides or rack R in an alternate or opposite arrangement, or else both above and below rack R in a mutually offset arrangement so as to optimise space use and to reduce the necessary length of rack R, the number of cavities of the same in simultaneous engagement with wheels D being the same.
  • motors M Due to the fact that the power necessary to obtain the desired acceleration of rack R has been divided onto multiple electric motors M, it is possible to use motors M having a very modest rotor size, and hence having each a very low rotation inertia. Motors M having this low inertia hence allow to achieve extremely low motion inversion times and, accordingly, to perform a high number of cycles of weft insertions in the loom.
  • the electronic control of motors M is performed differently between one of motors M which is considered the main motor, and the remaining motors M which are considered motors enslaved to the main motor.
  • said electronic control is performed by controlling the main motor in position, so as to obtain the desired motion curve of rack R within a weft insertion cycle.
  • the torque developed by the main motor as a consequence of such law of motion is read and instantly "copied" onto the remaining enslaved motors, which hence all work with the same torque as the main motor.
  • Fig. 2 shows a weft insertion system on the whole which comprises, in addition to the above-described launching device, and in a way known per se, a weft feeder F which feeds weft W to a weft selector P which displaces the weft of interest onto the launch path of a projectile 1 thrust by rack R.
  • Weft W is fastened in flight by projectile 1 according to the ways already known for the carrying gripper of gripper looms and hence projectile 1 is launched in the shed along guides G by the action of rack R.
  • rack R begins the deceleration, halt and return-to-the-starting-position phase, while the projectile proceeds due to its inertia as far as the exit side of the loom where it goes through a gripper-opening device 2 which releases weft W and a projectile braking device 3.
  • the projectile hence enters a suitable housing of an unloading device 4 - of which, for greater clarity, a front view is also given, in the lower part of fig. 2 - provided with two opposite housings in the illustrated embodiment, actuated by a motor 5 which provides to cause unloading device 4 to rotate by 180° on an axis parallel to the projectile trajectory, bringing the projectile in correspondence of a projectile return device.
  • Such return device - fully similar to the launching one, but provided with a single motor M R and respective toothed wheel D R which actuates a rack R R - provides to cause projectiles 1 to return, launching them along a return track 6 at reduced speed with respect to the forward speed, as far as the launch side of the loom.
  • Projectiles 1 are halted here by a braking device 7 and brought into the chosen drawing position by a cursor moving-back device 8, which causes projectiles 1 to move back up to the working area of a loading device 9.
  • Loading device 9 and the relative actuation motor 10 have a layout, operation and graphic representation fully similar to the ones described above for unloading device 4, with the only difference that the number of housings for the projectiles 1 of loading device 9 is twofold compared to that of unloading device 4 (in the embodiment illustrated there are hence four housings offset by 90°). Said layout allows to receive in loading device 9 up to 4 projectiles, since the time employed by the projectiles to travel the return track is about twice that employed in the forward phase and hence more than one projectile can be simultaneously in transit along return track 6. As a result, in case of machine halt, loading device 9 must be able to house all the projectiles already sent into the return track.
  • a preferred operation cycle of the weft insertion system expressed in angular coordinates for a weft insertion cycle (360°), is illustrated in fig. 3 and provides the following characteristic phases: 0° - projectile acceleration start 60° - weft cut 65° - rack entry into the shed and deceleration start 115° - rack return start - projectile in flight 300° - projectile arrival and rack repositioning 360° - projectile braking and insertion into the unloading device.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Textile Engineering (AREA)
  • Looms (AREA)

Description

  • The present invention relates to an insertion system of the weft threads in a projectile-type weaving loom and in particular to a projectile-launching device.
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • As known, projectile weaving looms differ from the other types of weaving looms due to the fact that the weft threads are inserted into the shed through a projectile, that is, a tapered metal body of suitable mass and shape, to which - before performing the launch, and hence to a stationary projectile - the end of the weft thread is fastened.
  • At the shed exit (usually in correspondence of the right hand side of the weaving loom, with reference to the weaver's position) the projectile is slowed down and halted by a braking device, the weft thread is unfastened and hence the projectile is caused to return towards the launch side of the weaving loom (usually the left hand side) through a suitable continuous transport system. On the launch side, the single in-coming projectiles are loaded onto a device which progressively brings them in front of the launchings station where they are again fastened to a desired weft thread and launched again into the shed.
  • This type of weaving loom, in the light of advantages detectable especially in the weaving of very high fabrics, has some significant drawbacks.
  • STATE OF THE PRIOR ART
  • Firstly there are drawbacks of a mechanical type, directly connected to the high impulse thrust which must be imparted to the projectile. In particular, in addition to the problems determined by the impact which the projectile receives by the launching member, the complication remains of devising a suitable mechanism which produces a sufficiently intense but not excessively invasive impulsive thrust.
  • GB 2,003,198 discloses a conventional launching device wherein a launch member, meant to abut strongly on the rear end of the projectile, is supported on a lever controlled by a torsion bar cyclically loaded through a cam mechanism.
  • As can be easily guessed, the cam-loaded torsion bar system represents a rather critical mechanical component, both in terms of the stresses undergone and imparted, and in terms of the opportunity to determine and control the law of motion of the projectile in the launching step.
  • As a matter of fact, since the projectile is launched through the shed with a very high impulsive acceleration, and is not subsequently controlled by any control member, in the projectile weaving looms some typical weaving problems arise and in particular a high initial stress of the weft threads and a substantially uncontrolled behaviour of the projectile along the entire travel within the shed. In particular, when the thrust impulse does not occur in a perfectly symmetrical manner on the projectile, the projectile trajectory undergoes lateral oscillations which are controlled by the guides within which the projectile slides but which impair launch effectiveness and regularity.
  • EP-1591573 discloses an alternative solution for the projectile launch, wherein the projectile is brought to the maximum set speed no longer due to an impact effect, but rather through the progressive thrust imparted thereto by an insertion tape. Said tape is controlled through a device similar to the one already in use for gripper movement in gripper looms, suitably modified to cause the accelerations which are necessary for launching the projectile. Such device comprises a toothed wheel meshed in corresponding holes formed along the insertion tape - which tape is flexible to allow a sufficiently wide winding arc on the toothed wheel - the toothed wheel being controlled in alternate rotation by the main movement of the loom through a double desmodromic cam connected to an articulated quadrilateral consisting of rocking arm, connecting rod and toothed sector coupled with a pinion which is integral with and concentric to the toothed wheel.
  • After the initial launch step, the tape is progressively slowed down and caused to go back in, while the projectile continues the travel thereof by inertia, completing the insertion of the weft in the traditional way in use in projectile weaving looms.
  • The technical solution disclosed by patent '573 allows, at least from a theoretical point of view, to overcome the above-described drawbacks of projectile weaving looms with torsion-bar launching device. As a matter of fact, the acceleration induced by such launching device is much more gradual than that of the conventional twisting-bar device and, moreover, the projectile is constantly led by the tape as far as inside a first shed portion and thus acquires a much more stable trajectory than that of the known launching system.
  • However, despite these positive features, such launching system of the projectiles has not found so far an effective industrial application due to the fact that the high inertia of the mechanical control of the above-described toothed wheel limits the motion inversion speed thereof to such values which do not allow the building of projectile weaving looms having a suitable weft insertion speed (number of cycles per minute) with respect to that of the other weaving looms found on the market.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention hence lies in the same technical sector which has been described in connection with patent '573, with the object of providing a weft insertion system in a projectile weaving loom which is devoid of the problems highlighted by the known above-illustrated solution as regards the opportunity of reaching a weft insertion speed which is competitive with the known-type weaving looms currently on the market.
  • This object is achieved through a weft insertion system in a projectile weaving loom having the features defined in claim 1. Other preferred features of such weft insertion system are defined in the dependent claims.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • Further features and advantages of the weft insertion system in a projectile weaving loom according to the present invention will anyhow be more evident from the following detailed description of a preferred embodiment of the same, provided as a mere non-limiting example and illustrated in the attached drawings, wherein:
    • fig. 1 is a schematic perspective view of the projectile launching device;
    • fig. 2 is an overall schematic and partly section view of the entire weft insertion system according to the present invention; and
    • fig. 3 is an angular diagram of the characteristic phases of the system of fig. 2, with reference to a weft insertion cycle.
    DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
  • According to the present invention, in order to solve the above-highlighted problem with a solution which is simple from a construction point of view and of immediate application, the projectile insertion member 1 consists of a rack R driven into motion by a plurality of toothed wheels D, arranged in succession along the development of rack R and meshed therewith, each of wheels D being driven by a respective electric servomotor M, for example of the brushless, electronic-control type. Rack R has a rectilinear layout and has a rigidity sufficient to transmit to projectiles 1 the thrust impressed by wheels D without undergoing significant deformations.
  • The number of motors M and the arrangement thereof along rack R may be varied at will depending on the overall desired power, on the maximum power which can be effectively released by a single motor onto the teeth of wheels D simultaneously engaged with corresponding cavities of rack R and, furthermore, on the space available beside the loom. In particular, from this point of view, motors M can be arranged aligned on one side only of rack R and below it, as illustrated in fig. 1, or on both sides or rack R in an alternate or opposite arrangement, or else both above and below rack R in a mutually offset arrangement so as to optimise space use and to reduce the necessary length of rack R, the number of cavities of the same in simultaneous engagement with wheels D being the same.
  • Due to the fact that the power necessary to obtain the desired acceleration of rack R has been divided onto multiple electric motors M, it is possible to use motors M having a very modest rotor size, and hence having each a very low rotation inertia. Motors M having this low inertia hence allow to achieve extremely low motion inversion times and, accordingly, to perform a high number of cycles of weft insertions in the loom.
  • According to a preferred feature of the invention, the electronic control of motors M is performed differently between one of motors M which is considered the main motor, and the remaining motors M which are considered motors enslaved to the main motor. In particular, said electronic control is performed by controlling the main motor in position, so as to obtain the desired motion curve of rack R within a weft insertion cycle. The torque developed by the main motor as a consequence of such law of motion is read and instantly "copied" onto the remaining enslaved motors, which hence all work with the same torque as the main motor.
  • Due to this particular type of electronic control, any possible position misalignment between the different motors M is avoided, which motors, as a matter of fact, all impart the same torque onto rack R, while the position of said rack is controlled by the sole main motor. The thrust expressed by the assembly of motors M is thus perfectly evenly divided among all the teeth of wheels D in engagement with respective cavities of rack R eliminating any possible stress variation on the individual teeth which would instead easily occur if the electronic control were a simple position control on all motors M, considering the difficulties of obtaining a perfect synchronism of such multiple position control.
  • Fig. 2 shows a weft insertion system on the whole which comprises, in addition to the above-described launching device, and in a way known per se, a weft feeder F which feeds weft W to a weft selector P which displaces the weft of interest onto the launch path of a projectile 1 thrust by rack R. Weft W is fastened in flight by projectile 1 according to the ways already known for the carrying gripper of gripper looms and hence projectile 1 is launched in the shed along guides G by the action of rack R.
  • When the speed of projectile 1 has reached the desired value, rack R begins the deceleration, halt and return-to-the-starting-position phase, while the projectile proceeds due to its inertia as far as the exit side of the loom where it goes through a gripper-opening device 2 which releases weft W and a projectile braking device 3. The projectile hence enters a suitable housing of an unloading device 4 - of which, for greater clarity, a front view is also given, in the lower part of fig. 2 - provided with two opposite housings in the illustrated embodiment, actuated by a motor 5 which provides to cause unloading device 4 to rotate by 180° on an axis parallel to the projectile trajectory, bringing the projectile in correspondence of a projectile return device.
  • Here such return device - fully similar to the launching one, but provided with a single motor MR and respective toothed wheel DR which actuates a rack RR - provides to cause projectiles 1 to return, launching them along a return track 6 at reduced speed with respect to the forward speed, as far as the launch side of the loom. Projectiles 1 are halted here by a braking device 7 and brought into the chosen drawing position by a cursor moving-back device 8, which causes projectiles 1 to move back up to the working area of a loading device 9.
  • Loading device 9 and the relative actuation motor 10 have a layout, operation and graphic representation fully similar to the ones described above for unloading device 4, with the only difference that the number of housings for the projectiles 1 of loading device 9 is twofold compared to that of unloading device 4 (in the embodiment illustrated there are hence four housings offset by 90°). Said layout allows to receive in loading device 9 up to 4 projectiles, since the time employed by the projectiles to travel the return track is about twice that employed in the forward phase and hence more than one projectile can be simultaneously in transit along return track 6. As a result, in case of machine halt, loading device 9 must be able to house all the projectiles already sent into the return track.
  • A preferred operation cycle of the weft insertion system, expressed in angular coordinates for a weft insertion cycle (360°), is illustrated in fig. 3 and provides the following characteristic phases:
    - projectile acceleration start
    60° - weft cut
    65° - rack entry into the shed and deceleration start
    115° - rack return start - projectile in flight
    300° - projectile arrival and rack repositioning
    360° - projectile braking and insertion into the unloading device.
  • However, it is understood that the invention must not be considered limited to the special arrangements illustrated above, which are only exemplifying embodiments thereof, but that different variants are possible, all within the reach of a person skilled in the field, without departing from the scope of the invention, which is exclusively defined by the following claims.

Claims (9)

  1. System for the insertion of weft threads in a projectile weaving loom of the type in which the projectiles (1) are launched into the shed due to the mechanic action of a thrust member provided with alternate cyclic movement, characterised in that said thrust member consists of a rack (R) driven into motion by a plurality of toothed gears (D), each driven by a respective electric servomotor (M), arranged in succession along the rack (R) and meshed therewith.
  2. System for weft thread insertion as in claim 1, wherein the rack (R) has a rectilinear shape and sufficient rigidity to transmit to the projectiles (1) the thrust imparted thereto by the wheels (D) without deformations.
  3. System for weft thread insertion as in claim 2, wherein the number of the motors (M) is calculated according to the overall desired power and of the maximum power which can be effectively released by a single motor onto the teeth of the wheels (D) simultaneously engaged with corresponding cavities of the rack (R).
  4. System for weft thread insertion as in claim 3, wherein said motors (M) are arranged in succession on one side or, alternated or opposite, on both sides of the rack (R).
  5. System for weft thread insertion as in claim 3, wherein said motors (M) are arranged alternated above and below the rack (R) and on one or both sides of the same.
  6. System for weft thread insertion as in claim 2, wherein the electronic control of the motors (M) comprises a position control of one of said motors, considered as main motor, for determining the desired movement curve of the rack (R) within a weft insertion cycle, and a torque control of the remaining motors, for adjusting the torque thereof to a value identical to the instantaneous torque value applied to the main motor.
  7. System for weft thread insertion as in any one of the preceding claims, furthermore comprising a loading device (9) and an unloading device (4) arranged upstream and downstream, respectively, of the loom in the direction of the weft thread insertion (W) and each provided with housings for the projectiles (1), respective driving motors (10, 5) being further provided for actuating the rotation of said loading device (9) and unloading device (4) around axes parallel to the projectile launch trajectory between preset angular positions in which said housings for the projectiles (1) are flush with the guides (G) of the projectiles (1) or with a return track (6) of the projectiles (1) which connects the unloading device (4) to the loading device (9).
  8. System for weft thread insertion as in claim 7, wherein the loading device (9) has a number of housings for projectiles (1) equal to or larger than the overall number of projectiles simultaneously in transit on the guides (G) and on the return track (6).
  9. System for weft thread insertion as in claim 7, wherein the projectiles (1) are launched on the return track (6) through a launching device similar to the main launching device and comprising a single motor (MR) and respective toothed wheel (DR) which actuate a rack (RR).
EP15201580.6A 2014-12-22 2015-12-21 Insertion system of the weft threads in a weaving loom Active EP3037575B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
ITMI20142201 2014-12-22

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3037575A2 EP3037575A2 (en) 2016-06-29
EP3037575A3 EP3037575A3 (en) 2016-11-30
EP3037575B1 true EP3037575B1 (en) 2018-04-25

Family

ID=52574290

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP15201580.6A Active EP3037575B1 (en) 2014-12-22 2015-12-21 Insertion system of the weft threads in a weaving loom

Country Status (5)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3037575B1 (en)
JP (1) JP6708405B2 (en)
CN (1) CN105714453B (en)
HK (1) HK1225421B (en)
TR (1) TR201810500T4 (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN105951280B (en) * 2016-07-07 2018-04-13 安徽省兰飞化纤织造有限公司 A kind of gripper shuttle loom for weaving sieve
IT201700080746A1 (en) * 2017-07-17 2019-01-17 Itema Spa BATTERY CONTROLLED BRAKE DEVICE IN A TEXTILE BULLET FRAME
CN111088580B (en) * 2019-12-16 2021-11-23 东台市金华皮件厂 Weft insertion device

Family Cites Families (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB368451A (en) * 1931-01-08 1932-03-10 Hutchinson Hollingworth & Comp Improvements in or relating to looms for weaving tufted pile fabrics
US2072159A (en) * 1932-06-03 1937-03-02 Dewas Raymond Weaving loom for continuous weaving in which the weft is inserted by means of pirnless shuttles
JPS5124610B2 (en) * 1971-10-12 1976-07-26
CS209426B2 (en) * 1975-03-10 1981-12-31 Albatex Ag Facility for the control of needle motion for loading the weft on the weaving machines
CH622836A5 (en) 1977-08-24 1981-04-30 Sulzer Ag
DE4212536C1 (en) * 1992-04-15 1993-04-15 Lindauer Dornier Gmbh, 8990 Lindau, De
JPH0665838A (en) * 1992-08-20 1994-03-08 San M Shokai:Kk Carrier band driving unit in rapier loom
ITMI20040862A1 (en) * 2004-04-29 2004-07-29 Promatech Spa IMPROVED DEVICE FOR INSERTING THE WEFT INTO A PROJECTILE FRAME AND A PROJECTILE FRAME EQUIPPED WITH SUCH DEVICE
ITMI20051471A1 (en) * 2005-07-28 2007-01-29 Mec Trinca Colonel Silvio & Figlio SHIFT MOVEMENT DEVICE FOR TEXTILE MACHINES WITH SHUTTLE
JP2007119951A (en) * 2005-10-28 2007-05-17 Tsudakoma Corp Rapier electric drive for rapier loom and method for controlling the rapier electric drive
CN102252813B (en) * 2011-04-28 2013-01-09 上海交通大学 Large heavy-duty vibration simulator having mechanical fault tolerance function

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
None *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP3037575A3 (en) 2016-11-30
TR201810500T4 (en) 2018-08-27
EP3037575A2 (en) 2016-06-29
JP6708405B2 (en) 2020-06-10
HK1225421B (en) 2017-09-08
CN105714453A (en) 2016-06-29
JP2016128620A (en) 2016-07-14
CN105714453B (en) 2018-08-03

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP3037575B1 (en) Insertion system of the weft threads in a weaving loom
EP3075892B1 (en) Projectile weaving loom with an electromagnetic device for the insertion of the weft yarns
WO2010064708A1 (en) Robot hand
WO1993006279A3 (en) Power loom and insertion brake for power looms
WO2015059664A3 (en) Giver rapier head, giver rapier, rapier weaving machine and method for inserting a weft thread in such a rapier weaving machine using such a giver rapier head
CN108214539A (en) A kind of self-holding spring type mechanical pawl
WO2012130519A3 (en) Method and weaving machine for shedding
US3140633A (en) Laying of yarns or filament by means of a high velocity feed means
CN201040789Y (en) Driving device for rapier loom
US20220176518A1 (en) Clamping or gripping device with extended stroke
EP2553153B1 (en) Drive and method for driving gripper carriers
US4922967A (en) Firing device for a projectile weaving machine and projectile therefor
EP1245707B1 (en) Multi-position front clutch having a locking device of the movable element in a control drive of a weaving loom
US2726685A (en) Weft thread feed device for looms for weaving
CN105500921B (en) Liquid ejection apparatus and liquid ejection method
JPH07316953A (en) Picking condition setting device in rapier loom
US20050016611A1 (en) Assembly for actuating the weaving mechanism for weaving looms
EP1591573A1 (en) Device for weft insertion in a projectile weaving loom and projectile weaving loom equipped with said device
US2179347A (en) Picking motion for looms
EP2341170B1 (en) Drive unit for weaving looms with a high degree of use flexibility, provided with safety controlling device for possible critical phase displacements of the moving mechanical members and weaving process using such unit
EP0086999A1 (en) Device for synchronizing the shedding device in a loom
WO2022096922A1 (en) Motor-driven mechanical selvedge machine
EP1498524A2 (en) Electrically-controlled device for programmable weft cutting in weaving looms
JP2748030B2 (en) Rapier loom safety device
CN103147211A (en) Sword belt wheel wefting insertion speeding mechanism

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: D03D 49/28 20060101AFI20161021BHEP

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20170518

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20171123

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: ARRIGONI, MASSIMO

Inventor name: PEZZONI, DARIO

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 993028

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20180515

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602015010373

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20180425

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180425

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180725

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180425

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180425

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180425

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180425

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180425

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180725

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180425

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180425

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180425

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180726

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 993028

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20180425

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180827

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602015010373

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180425

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180425

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180425

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180425

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180425

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180425

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180425

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20190128

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180425

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20181221

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180425

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20181231

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20181221

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180425

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20181231

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20181231

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20181221

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180425

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180425

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20151221

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180825

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20191221

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20191221

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20231122

Year of fee payment: 9

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20231121

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20231220

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Payment date: 20231219

Year of fee payment: 9