EP3018442B1 - Recouvrement de protection d'un élément de protection - Google Patents
Recouvrement de protection d'un élément de protection Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP3018442B1 EP3018442B1 EP15199341.7A EP15199341A EP3018442B1 EP 3018442 B1 EP3018442 B1 EP 3018442B1 EP 15199341 A EP15199341 A EP 15199341A EP 3018442 B1 EP3018442 B1 EP 3018442B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- protective cover
- protective
- protective element
- spikes
- layers
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Not-in-force
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F41—WEAPONS
- F41H—ARMOUR; ARMOURED TURRETS; ARMOURED OR ARMED VEHICLES; MEANS OF ATTACK OR DEFENCE, e.g. CAMOUFLAGE, IN GENERAL
- F41H5/00—Armour; Armour plates
- F41H5/02—Plate construction
- F41H5/023—Armour plate, or auxiliary armour plate mounted at a distance of the main armour plate, having cavities at its outer impact surface, or holes, for deflecting the projectile
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F41—WEAPONS
- F41H—ARMOUR; ARMOURED TURRETS; ARMOURED OR ARMED VEHICLES; MEANS OF ATTACK OR DEFENCE, e.g. CAMOUFLAGE, IN GENERAL
- F41H5/00—Armour; Armour plates
- F41H5/007—Reactive armour; Dynamic armour
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F41—WEAPONS
- F41H—ARMOUR; ARMOURED TURRETS; ARMOURED OR ARMED VEHICLES; MEANS OF ATTACK OR DEFENCE, e.g. CAMOUFLAGE, IN GENERAL
- F41H5/00—Armour; Armour plates
- F41H5/02—Plate construction
- F41H5/04—Plate construction composed of more than one layer
- F41H5/0492—Layered armour containing hard elements, e.g. plates, spheres, rods, separated from each other, the elements being connected to a further flexible layer or being embedded in a plastics or an elastomer matrix
Definitions
- the invention relates to a protective cover, which is designed to be hollow-charged so as to be ground-permeable, for a protective element for protection against shaped charge projectiles.
- the invention further relates to such a protective element against shaped charge projectiles, which can be arranged on an outer side of an object to be protected and a protected against shaped charge projectile objects, in particular a building or a vehicle.
- Hollow charge projectiles have long been a major threat to objects such as armored vehicles or buildings, since shaped charge projectiles have a high penetration capacity.
- a shaped charge bullet for example, in the DE 1 145 522 B described.
- shaped charge projectiles is a simple armor, such as a layer of armor steel, usually not sufficient, so that beyond a simple armor protective measures are to be taken.
- a disadvantage of such reactive armor is, inter alia, the endangerment of the environment of the object to be protected by the reactive armor itself.
- the wire-mesh protective grid serves to affect the firing mechanism of the projectile, which can penetrate through the mesh of the grid, such that the ignition fails.
- the aim here is that the bullet does not hit a wire of the wire mesh frontally, but that it flies through the mesh, which is impaired when flying through the ignition mechanism.
- a disadvantage of the grating design described, however, is that an impairment of the ignition mechanism is not guaranteed with certainty.
- the EP 2 202 478 A1 describes an object protection against shaped charges with matrix-like arranged pins, which protrude from an object to be protected and are covered by polymer layers.
- the DE 198 25 260 A1 discloses an arrangement with baffles for protection against shaped charges, in which the baffles reduce the ballistic efficiency of the charges.
- the bluff bodies are covered in their rest position by a perforated plate on which a thin plate or foil is arranged as an outer cover.
- the invention has for its object to improve a protective cover for protective elements against shaped charge projectiles.
- the invention solves the problem by a protective cover with the features of claim 1.
- a protective element according to the invention is part of claim 9.
- An inventive, protected against shaped charge projectile object is part of claim 10.
- Advantageous developments are part of the dependent claims.
- a preferred protection element for protection against shaped charge projectiles which can be arranged on an outer side of an object to be protected, has outwardly pointing spines.
- the arrangement and design of the spines is chosen so that an approaching shaped charge projectile can first fly through with the narrow tip between the spines, in which case an edge of the dome-like widening portion of the shaped charge projectile abuts against a spiked tip, whereby the ignition mechanism can be impaired.
- the spikes should thus be suitable for penetrating the envelope of a shaped charge projectile. This can be achieved by hard spikes.
- the spikes of the protective element are preferably designed rod-shaped or rod-shaped, in particular with a round, oval or polygonal, preferably rectangular cross-section.
- the spikes are arranged substantially parallel to each other.
- the spikes can be arranged in a grid shape, so that a uniform distribution of the spines can be realized.
- the spikes can preferably be arranged substantially equidistant from each other, this distance is in particular in the range of 30 mm to 100 mm.
- the spikes can have substantially the same length, which is in particular in the range of 150 mm to 400 mm.
- the ratio of the length of the spines to the maximum cross-sectional dimension of the spines is in the range of 1.5 to 20, in particular in the range of 3 to 10.
- the maximum cross-sectional dimension is understood to be the maximum extent of the spikes in a direction perpendicular to the spiked direction. In a round rod-shaped spike, the maximum cross-sectional dimension corresponds to the diameter.
- the spines can be arranged directly on the object to be protected, for example an armored vehicle, in particular welded.
- the spines are connected to each other via a base body, wherein the spikes can be welded to the base body.
- the barbs can be connected in a simple manner to the object to be protected via the base body.
- the base body may have attachment means for attachment to the object to be protected. The spikes of the protective element thus point away from the main body with the fastening means.
- the main body should therefore allow the attachment to the object to be protected and serve as a support for the spines on the one hand.
- the spikes are fixed, in particular in one piece, connected to the base body, which can be realized for example by means of a laser cutting device by cutting out of a metal plate.
- the base body which can be realized for example by means of a laser cutting device by cutting out of a metal plate.
- the basic body can be configured in the form of a lattice, wherein the spikes are arranged on the lattice struts.
- the grid can be, for example, cross-shaped, diamond-shaped or slot-grid-shaped.
- the lattice struts can be constructed like a framework, in particular truss-like.
- the lattice struts thus have recesses.
- the main body can be designed so that it further increases the effectiveness of the spines with respect to the protective effect against shaped charge projectiles.
- At least one sting preferably the majority of the spines, particularly preferably all spines, at the top of a tapering towards the tip.
- the spines can also have a flat face.
- the tip of a spine preferably the plurality of spines, more preferably all spikes, made of an electrically conductive material or provided with an electrically conductive coating, especially if the spikes of a non-conductive material consist.
- an electrically conductive coating especially if the spikes of a non-conductive material consist.
- copper, gold, brass, zinc or chromium can be used as the electrically conductive coating.
- the coating can be applied by coating methods known in the art.
- a particularly simple production method of a spiked tip is designed such that the spiked tip is conical, pyramidal or tetrahedral, in particular with a rounded tip.
- the prick point In order to achieve a penetration of the spike point into the projectile casing - or at least to a crushing of the projectile - the prick point should be made of a hard material. It is thus not necessary that the entire sting is made of such a hard material.
- the spiked tip or a portion of the spiked tip is made of a material that is harder than the material of the spike Sting is.
- a deposit made of a harder material such as steel can be introduced.
- the spikes themselves can be made of a metal, in particular steel, titanium or aluminum and / or of a fiber material, so that a sufficient stability is given.
- window pane areas of the object to be protected should also be provided with spines.
- the spikes are made from this area of a transparent material such as bulletproof glass or plastic.
- the spiked tip can be made of a harder material such as steel.
- the spikes can be moved from a rest position to a guard position.
- means for setting up and / or applying the spikes can be provided.
- the spines can be set up and / or created manually or automatically.
- the rest position can be taken, for example, in the peacekeeping or during transport of the vehicle, so that admissible Verladeritte can be met.
- the spikes are placed.
- the spikes can be configured foldable and / or extended / retracted.
- the means comprise a pyrotechnic device for setting up the spikes.
- the pyrotechnic device may in this case comprise explosive means, so that after ignition of the explosive means a quick placement of the spines can be achieved.
- the protective element may further comprise a sensor for sensing a approaching shaped charge projectile. As soon as an approaching shaped charge bullet is detected, the spikes can be set up manually. This process, in particular the triggering of the establishment of the spines, can also be done automatically.
- the sensors and / or the control for setting up the spines can also be arranged in or on the object to be protected.
- the direction of impact of the approaching shaped charge projectile can be determined, in which case the spines are aligned substantially parallel to this direction, so that the greatest possible protective effect of the protective element can be achieved.
- the spines can be covered by a protective cover against external influences.
- a protective cover according to the invention for a protective element against shaped charge projectiles which has already been described in particular, is designed such that a hollow charge projectile impinging on the protective cover penetrates the protective cover.
- the protective cover thus fulfills no protective function against the shaped charge projectile, since the protective effect is provided by the protective element located under the cover.
- it is designed holladladungsgeunter admirably.
- a protective cover is holladladungsgeunter admirate admirably, the shaped charge projectile pierces the protective cover, in particular without the detonator triggers.
- the protective cover has the advantage that the protective element is protected from the outside against vision and against contamination. For example, when driving off-road, no branches or the like can get caught in the protective element. Furthermore, the protective mechanism of the protective element should remain hidden to an attacker, so that it can not adjust to the protection concept.
- the protective cover can also provide protection against injury to persons who inadvertently knock against the protective element.
- the protective cover should be easily bearable on the one hand so that the impact of the firing tip on the protective cover does not lead to a tripping of the ignition. On the other hand, there should also be sufficient protection against external influences.
- the protective cover can thus be used not only in prickle-shaped protective elements, but also in known from the prior art lattice or mesh-shaped protective elements against shaped charge projectiles.
- the protective element can thus have the largest possible free space through which the projectile, if possible without it striking the front of a portion of the protective element and thereby ignites, can fly through.
- the grid may be, for example, cross, diamond or slot grid.
- a protective element with braided mesh is used for example in the EP 1 944 565 A1 described.
- the stitches can be formed, for example, by wires or ropes.
- An inventive protective element with the protective cover already described can thus be configured lattice, mesh or prickle-shaped.
- Lattice, mesh or spine-shaped protective elements can be referred to as passive protective elements.
- the protective cover should consist of especially thin layers.
- the protective cover comprises at least two interconnected, preferably glued, layers. Due to the layer arrangement, a sufficient stiffness can be achieved with simultaneous passability.
- the layers of the protective cover may consist of different materials, in particular with different hardness. Due to the layer arrangement, a sufficient stiffness can be achieved with simultaneous passability.
- the layers have a different hardness.
- the harder material of metal, plastic, hybrid material or fiber composite material in particular consist of GRP.
- the softer material may be foam or rubber.
- a layer facing the shaped charge layer has a higher hardness than the layer following it.
- the inner, softer layer then serves to achieve a total stiffness of the protective cover, wherein the inner layer does not significantly affect the passability.
- the thickness of a harder layer may be less, in particular at least a factor of 2 less than the thickness of a softer layer.
- the protective cover is sandwiched. It can have at least three layers, with two layers having a larger one Have hardness as an intermediate layer between them.
- the harder layers are designed so thin that a penetration of the shaped charge projectile without ignition is possible.
- They would not be sufficiently stable on their own to provide sufficient protection against external influences.
- the softer interlayer which may be made thicker, does not ignite the shaped charge due to the softness, but may provide support and bonding to the harder layers so that the overall construction is sufficiently stable.
- the total thickness of the protective cover may be in the range of 3 mm to 50 mm.
- the thickness of the harder layers may be in the range of 0.5 mm to 10 mm.
- the thickness of the softer layers may be in the range of 3 mm to 30 mm.
- the protective cover is designed plate-shaped.
- the protective cover creates a flat surface towards the outside.
- the protective cover completely covers the protective element, in particular the spikes.
- the protective cover, in particular the outer layer can be coated, in particular painted, in order to make it resistant to weathering or to chemicals or to achieve a skid resistance.
- the protective cover is connected to the protective element, in particular to a main body of the protective element, for example by means of fixing rods arranged on the basic body, which for example can be designed like a spike.
- An object protected against shaped charge projectiles according to the invention in particular a building or a vehicle, has on the outside of the object outwardly pointing spines. It also preferably comprises a protective element of the type already described, and in particular a protective cover of the type already described. As already described, in a particularly preferred embodiment transparent spines are arranged in a window pane area of the object, so that persons from the interior of the object have a view to the outside is not locked, in addition, also the protective cover can be made transparent.
- the spikes can be arranged offset from each other so that the opening of the doors is not obstructed.
- the spines can be arranged essentially at right angles to the surface of the object to be protected.
- the objects to be protected can be provided all around with the protective elements. In this respect, a modular design of the protection is achieved.
- the protective elements can also be retrofitted to the objects.
- this is designed such that after detection of an approaching shaped charge projectile arranged on the outside of the object arranged spines, in particular unfolded or extended, can be , An increase in the protection can be achieved if the direction of impact of the approaching shaped charge projectile is determined by means of a sensor, in which case the spikes are substantially parallel to this Be aligned direction.
- an appropriately designed control can be used.
- the Fig. 1 shows a protective element 1, which consists of a base body 3 and a plurality of spikes 2, which are covered with a protective cover 5.
- the Fig. 2 shows the protective element 1 with the cover plate removed 5.
- Die Fig. 3 shows the main body 3 without spines 2.
- the Fig. 4 shows the protective element 1 in a side view.
- the protective element 1 has a main body 3. About the main body 3, the spikes 2 are interconnected.
- the base body 3 further serves for attachment to an object to be protected, for example a building ( Fig. 5 ) or an armored vehicle ( Fig. 6 ).
- the main body has according to Fig. 3 a lattice-shaped structure and is designed in a slit grid.
- the individual, mutually parallel grid struts 6 are like a framework, in particular truss-like, constructed with truss struts 11, so that with sufficient stability, the weight of the protective element 1 can be reduced.
- the six lattice struts 6 are end-side connected via two main body crossbars 15.
- Attachment means 18 may be provided in the form of bores on the base body traverses 15 so that a releasable connection with the object to be protected, for example via a screw connection, can be achieved.
- the Basic body traverses 15 can also be welded to the object to be protected.
- the individual spines 2 are firmly connected to the lattice struts 6 of the base body 3, in particular welded.
- fastening rods 14 are further arranged, on which a protective cover 5 by means not shown fastening means 19 can be fastened.
- a protective cover 5 by means not shown fastening means 19 can be fastened.
- the mounting rods 14 for the cover plate 5 are designed spine-shaped and thus contribute to the protective effect of the protective element 1 at.
- the spines 2 are substantially parallel to each other.
- the spikes 2 are also arranged grid-shaped distributed on the protective element 1. According to the Fig. 4 the spines are arranged at substantially the same distance a from each other. The distance is in this case in the range of 30 to 100 mm.
- the tips 4 of the spines 2 may have an angle in the range of 10 ° to 20 °.
- the spines 2 have substantially the same length l, wherein the length is in the range of 150 mm to 400 mm.
- the ratio of the length l of the spines 2 to the maximum cross-sectional dimension d, which corresponds to the diameter in the case of a rod-shaped configuration of the spikes, is in the range from 1.5 to 20, in particular in the range from 3 to 10.
- the spikes 2 have at the top 4 a taper, which is designed conical in the present embodiment.
- the tip of the taper can be rounded to minimize the risk of personal injury.
- the spikes 2 are made of a metal, such as steel, so that they are electrically conductive. Not shown inserts can be arranged in the spiked tips 4, which in particular also consist of hard metals. This can be particularly advantageous if the spikes 2 are made of fiber materials.
- the protective cover 5 is according to Fig. 4 from two layers 16, 17 and is designed such that an impinging hollow charge projectile 7 can penetrate the protective cover 5, although the ignition mechanism 12, which is arranged at the top of the projectile head, initiates no triggering of the shaped charge projectile.
- the two layers 16 and 17 are glued together and consist of a fiber-reinforced plastic material such as fiberglass.
- the two layers 16, 17 may also be made of different materials, such as fiber material, rubber, plastic or metal foils.
- the hollow charge projectile 7 facing outer layer 16 is made of a harder material than the thicker, inner layer 17th
- the protective cover has sufficient rigidity with respect to mechanical damage, but at the same time it is yielding enough that no triggering of the igniter 12 takes place when it strikes the cover.
- the protective cover 5 is further designed such that when a hollow charge projectile 7 hits the pierced region is kept as small as possible. Preferably, only a punched out of the protective cover 5 by the shaped charge projectile 7 should take place. This offers the advantage that after a successful hit the functioning, in particular the privacy of the protective cover 5 remains.
- the shaped charge projectile 7 After the shaped charge projectile 7 has penetrated the protective cover, the shaped charge projectile 7 strikes a prong tip 4 of the protective element 1 with a flank 13 of the double coping.
- the prong tip 4 pierces the projectile casing at the location of the hood flank 13 and thus generates a short circuit of the piezoelement 12, so that upon striking the shaped charge projectile 7 on the base body 3 or on the object to be protected ignition is prevented because the ignition voltage is short-circuited.
- the protective cover 5 is holladladungsgeunter carefully ensured in a bombardment with a conventional shaped charge projectile (eg RPG7 warhead, conventional diameter 70 mm-100 mm) at a conventional impact velocity of about 300 m / s from an average distance of 200 m, without that the detonator triggers.
- a conventional shaped charge projectile eg RPG7 warhead, conventional diameter 70 mm-100 mm
- the Fig. 5 shows a building 8 as an object to be protected, wherein on the outside 8 'of the building 8, a protective element 1 is arranged.
- the spikes 2 of the protective element are in this case substantially perpendicular to the surface 8 'of the building eighth
- the building 8 has a window 10, wherein the spines 2 'located in the region of the window pane 10 are made of a transparent material, for example glass or plastic.
- a protective element 1 is arranged on an armored vehicle 9.
- the protective element 1 is arranged with the spikes 2 on the outside 9 'of the vehicle.
- the in the Fig. 6 illustrated protection device 1 has in a manner not shown on means for setting up the spines 2.
- the unfolding or extending The spikes 2 can be done manually, hydraulically, pneumatically, pyrotechnic and / or electric motor.
- the spikes 2 can be rotatably mounted on the skeleton 3.
- a sensor is also arranged, via which the approach of a shaped charge projectile can be sensed.
- the spikes 2 are automatically unfolded or extended into a protective position.
- the probable angle of incidence can be determined, in which case the spines 2 are aligned in accordance with this angle, so that the spikes lie substantially parallel to the determined direction of incidence R.
- the spikes 2 can be retracted or folded back to comply in this rest position Verladeabele the vehicle.
- the setting up via a pyrotechnic device takes place so quickly that the spikes 2 can be set up automatically when a sensor system has detected an approaching apelooka 7.
- a pyrotechnic device not shown, for example, underlying airbags
- the spikes can be set up very quickly.
- an image evaluation can be used, which is connected to a sensor system and by means of which an approaching and detected apelooka 7 can be evaluated, so that then automatically an ignition signal is sent to the pyrotechnic device.
- the defense spines 2 are thus dimensioned and arranged so that effective damage to the warhead of the shaped charge projectile 7 is ensured at the lowest possible area presented.
- the spikes 2 can also be combined with a grid structure, so that fewer spines 2 are needed and thus reduces the weight.
- the Fig. 7 shows a protective cover 20 with a total thickness g, which is constructed as a sandwich of three layers 16, 17, 21.
- the two outer layers 16 and 21 are made of a harder material than the intermediate, thicker layer 16, which consists of a closed-cell plastic foam.
- the number of layers is not limited.
- a hard, in particular thin, layer alternates with a softer, in particular thicker, layer. It could thus be used in a manner not shown, more than three layers.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Aiming, Guidance, Guns With A Light Source, Armor, Camouflage, And Targets (AREA)
Claims (11)
- Recouvrement de protection (5) d'un élément de protection (1) contre des projectiles à charge creuse (7), qui est réalisé sous forme perméable aux projectiles à charge creuse, caractérisé en ce que le recouvrement de protection comprend au moins deux couches, en ce qu'une couche extérieure (16) tournée vers le projectile à charge creuse présente une dureté plus élevée qu'une couche (17) qui s'y raccorde, et en ce que les couches (16, 17) sont assemblées l'une à l'autre, en particulier collées.
- Recouvrement de protection selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que le matériau plus dur est choisi dans le groupe composé de:a. métalb. matière plastiquec. matériau hybrided. matériau composite renforcé par des fibres, en particulier PRV.
- Recouvrement de protection selon la revendication 1 ou 2, caractérisé en ce que le matériau plus mou est choisi dans le groupe composé de:a. mousseb. caoutchouc.
- Recouvrement de protection selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce que l'épaisseur d'une couche plus dure (16, 21) est inférieure, en particulier inférieure au moins du facteur 2, à l'épaisseur d'une couche plus molle (17).
- Recouvrement de protection selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, caractérisé par une configuration en sandwich.
- Recouvrement de protection selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, caractérisé par au moins trois couches (16, 17, 21), dans lequel deux couches (16, 21) présentent une dureté plus élevée qu'une couche intermédiaire (17) disposée entre elles.
- Recouvrement de protection selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, caractérisé par une configuration en forme de plaque.
- Recouvrement de protection selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce que l'épaisseur totale (g) du recouvrement de protection se situe dans la plage de 3 mm à 50 mm.
- Elément de protection contre des projectiles à charge creuse (7), qui peut être agencé sur un côté extérieur d'un objet à protéger (8, 9), avec un recouvrement de protection (5, 20) selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 8, dans lequel l'élément de protection est réalisé en particulier en forme de grille, en forme de maille ou en forme d'aiguillons.
- Objet protégé contre des projectiles à charge creuse, en particulier bâtiment (8) ou véhicule (9), caractérisé par un élément de protection (1) selon la revendication 9.
- Objet selon la revendication 10, caractérisé en ce que l'élément de protection (1) et/ou le recouvrement de protection (5, 20) sont transparents dans une région de vitre de fenêtre (10).
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE200910052820 DE102009052820B4 (de) | 2009-11-13 | 2009-11-13 | Schutzabdeckung für Schutzelemente zum Schutz gegen Hohlladungsgeschosse, Schutzelement mit einer Schutzabdeckung sowie mit einem Schutzelement geschütztes Objekt |
DE200910052821 DE102009052821B4 (de) | 2009-11-13 | 2009-11-13 | Schutzelement zum Schutz gegen Hohlladungsgeschosse, Schutzabdeckung für ein Schutzelement, geschütztes Objekt sowie Verfahren zum Schutz eines Objektes |
EP10795212A EP2499450A1 (fr) | 2009-11-13 | 2010-11-10 | Élément de protection pour la protection contre des projectiles à charge creuse, recouvrement de protection d'un élément de protection, objet protégé et procédé pour la protection d'un objet |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP10795212A Division EP2499450A1 (fr) | 2009-11-13 | 2010-11-10 | Élément de protection pour la protection contre des projectiles à charge creuse, recouvrement de protection d'un élément de protection, objet protégé et procédé pour la protection d'un objet |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP3018442A1 EP3018442A1 (fr) | 2016-05-11 |
EP3018442B1 true EP3018442B1 (fr) | 2017-06-21 |
Family
ID=43638602
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP10795212A Withdrawn EP2499450A1 (fr) | 2009-11-13 | 2010-11-10 | Élément de protection pour la protection contre des projectiles à charge creuse, recouvrement de protection d'un élément de protection, objet protégé et procédé pour la protection d'un objet |
EP15199341.7A Not-in-force EP3018442B1 (fr) | 2009-11-13 | 2010-11-10 | Recouvrement de protection d'un élément de protection |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP10795212A Withdrawn EP2499450A1 (fr) | 2009-11-13 | 2010-11-10 | Élément de protection pour la protection contre des projectiles à charge creuse, recouvrement de protection d'un élément de protection, objet protégé et procédé pour la protection d'un objet |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (2) | EP2499450A1 (fr) |
WO (1) | WO2011057628A1 (fr) |
Families Citing this family (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP2202478A1 (fr) * | 2008-12-29 | 2010-06-30 | Ruag Land Systems | Protection d'objets contre des charges creuses et procédé de réalisation associé |
US9885543B2 (en) | 2015-10-01 | 2018-02-06 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army | Mechanically-adaptive, armor link/linkage (MAAL) |
US10670375B1 (en) | 2017-08-14 | 2020-06-02 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army | Adaptive armor system with variable-angle suspended armor elements |
Family Cites Families (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
NL257009A (fr) | 1959-11-02 | 1900-01-01 | Energa | |
DE2601562A1 (de) * | 1975-07-02 | 1977-01-13 | Pignal | Panzerplatte |
DE3010917C2 (de) | 1980-03-21 | 1984-03-01 | Messerschmitt-Bölkow-Blohm GmbH, 8000 München | Gefechtskopf mit einer Haupthohlladung und mindestens einer Vorhohlladung |
DE19825260B4 (de) * | 1998-06-05 | 2007-02-08 | Geke Technologie Gmbh | Anordnung zum Schutz von Objekten gegen geformte Ladungen |
IL128441A0 (en) * | 1999-02-09 | 2001-01-28 | Israel State | Ballistic armor panel |
DE19956197C2 (de) | 1999-11-23 | 2003-02-13 | Dynamit Nobel Gmbh | Reaktiver Schutz |
ES2388935T3 (es) | 2007-01-10 | 2012-10-19 | Fatzer Ag Drahtseilfabrik | Dispositivo para defenderse contra proyectiles de carga hueca |
US8011285B2 (en) * | 2008-04-16 | 2011-09-06 | Foster-Miller, Inc. | Vehicle and structure shield |
EP2202478A1 (fr) * | 2008-12-29 | 2010-06-30 | Ruag Land Systems | Protection d'objets contre des charges creuses et procédé de réalisation associé |
-
2010
- 2010-11-10 EP EP10795212A patent/EP2499450A1/fr not_active Withdrawn
- 2010-11-10 EP EP15199341.7A patent/EP3018442B1/fr not_active Not-in-force
- 2010-11-10 WO PCT/DE2010/075129 patent/WO2011057628A1/fr active Application Filing
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP3018442A1 (fr) | 2016-05-11 |
WO2011057628A1 (fr) | 2011-05-19 |
EP2499450A1 (fr) | 2012-09-19 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP2455702B1 (fr) | Protection d'un objet contre les charges creuses | |
DE19643757B4 (de) | Bausatz für eine Aufpanzerung | |
DE69910953T2 (de) | Aktivschutzvorrichtung für Fahrzeuge oder Strukturen | |
DE19505629B4 (de) | Schutzeinrichtung gegen ein anfliegendes Projektil | |
DE2507351A1 (de) | Schutzvorrichtung an gepanzerten kampffahrzeugen o.dgl. | |
EP3018442B1 (fr) | Recouvrement de protection d'un élément de protection | |
DE19707160C1 (de) | Reaktive Panzerungseinheit | |
EP2284474A2 (fr) | Système de protection pour véhicules et autres objets | |
EP0826134B1 (fr) | Materiau de blindage multicouche | |
EP3055639B1 (fr) | Élément de protection équipé d'une couche de découplage | |
WO2001038817A1 (fr) | Protection reactive | |
DE102009051436B4 (de) | Schutzsystem für Fahrzeuge und andere Objekte | |
DE102009052820B4 (de) | Schutzabdeckung für Schutzelemente zum Schutz gegen Hohlladungsgeschosse, Schutzelement mit einer Schutzabdeckung sowie mit einem Schutzelement geschütztes Objekt | |
EP3128283B1 (fr) | Élément de protection pour assurer une protection contre des projectiles balistiques et véhicule militaire | |
DE102009052821B4 (de) | Schutzelement zum Schutz gegen Hohlladungsgeschosse, Schutzabdeckung für ein Schutzelement, geschütztes Objekt sowie Verfahren zum Schutz eines Objektes | |
DE10318492B4 (de) | Vorrichtung zum Schutz eines Objekts | |
DE4114145C1 (de) | Gefechtskopf zur Bekämpfung von reaktiven Panzerungen | |
DE10231607B4 (de) | Panzerungselement | |
DE102008021479A1 (de) | Reaktivpanzerglasscheibe | |
DE3624179B3 (de) | Reaktive Schutzanordnung | |
DE102017102174A1 (de) | Vorsatzschutzelement | |
DE3729212C1 (de) | Reaktiver Panzerschutz | |
DE4018204B3 (de) | Gefechtskopf zur Bekämpfung additiver reaktiver Ziele | |
DE10162461B4 (de) | Beschusshemmender Liner mit Abschirm- bzw. Ablenkwirkung gegen elektromagnetische Strahlung | |
WO2011035841A1 (fr) | Dispositif de protection contre des charges formant des projectiles |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AC | Divisional application: reference to earlier application |
Ref document number: 2499450 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: P |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
RIN1 | Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected) |
Inventor name: MUELLER, MATHIAS Inventor name: EGARTNER, CLAUS |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20161109 |
|
RBV | Designated contracting states (corrected) |
Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20170202 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AC | Divisional application: reference to earlier application |
Ref document number: 2499450 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: P |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 903356 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20170715 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 502010013793 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20170621 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170922 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170621 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170921 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170621 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170621 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170921 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170621 Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170621 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170621 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170621 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170621 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170621 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170621 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170621 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170621 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171021 Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170621 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170621 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170621 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 502010013793 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170621 |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20180322 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170621 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20171130 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20171130 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20171110 Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170621 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20171130 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170621 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20171110 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20171130 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MM01 Ref document number: 903356 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20171110 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20171110 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20101110 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170621 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170621 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170621 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170621 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170621 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20201123 Year of fee payment: 11 Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20201119 Year of fee payment: 11 Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20201130 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 502010013793 Country of ref document: DE |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20211110 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20220601 Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20211110 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20211130 |