EP2974865B1 - Method for the localization of a fault on a printing substrate and device for carrying out said method - Google Patents

Method for the localization of a fault on a printing substrate and device for carrying out said method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2974865B1
EP2974865B1 EP15171575.2A EP15171575A EP2974865B1 EP 2974865 B1 EP2974865 B1 EP 2974865B1 EP 15171575 A EP15171575 A EP 15171575A EP 2974865 B1 EP2974865 B1 EP 2974865B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
sheet
deposit device
light source
print
error
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP15171575.2A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2974865A1 (en
Inventor
Frank Soltwedel
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Heidelberger Druckmaschinen AG
Original Assignee
Heidelberger Druckmaschinen AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Heidelberger Druckmaschinen AG filed Critical Heidelberger Druckmaschinen AG
Publication of EP2974865A1 publication Critical patent/EP2974865A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2974865B1 publication Critical patent/EP2974865B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B41PRINTING; LINING MACHINES; TYPEWRITERS; STAMPS
    • B41FPRINTING MACHINES OR PRESSES
    • B41F33/00Indicating, counting, warning, control or safety devices
    • B41F33/0036Devices for scanning or checking the printed matter for quality control

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method and a device for fault location on a printing substrate.
  • the invention lies in the technical field of quality management.
  • a device for image inspection of the printed image of a product of a printing press having an image detection device which provides actual image data from the product, which by means of a comparison circuit with target image data of a error-free subjects are compared.
  • the errors detected during the described inspection are displayed on a monitor, whereby the recorded print image is subdivided into inspection areas and the inspection areas with detected defects are displayed on the monitor.
  • a disadvantage of the disclosed device is that no precise location of the detected errors is possible, since only the corresponding inspection area is marked on the monitor.
  • no simultaneous analysis of the error location and the error itself is possible because only one piece of information can be meaningfully displayed on the monitor at the same time.
  • a color mixer for visual and metrological quality control of printed sheets in which a printed sheet is scanned by a hand-held measuring device and wherein a mounted on the sheet at the desk projection device emits light rays over the entire sheet and wherein a photo sensor is mounted in the meter, which recognizes when it is struck by a light beam, whereby the current position information of the measuring device can be determined on the sheet.
  • the European patent application EP 0 410 253 A2 discloses a device for data acquisition, control and display of measured values in quality monitoring on a printing machine.
  • the integration of workflows and to improve the quality of work and operation of the sheet is recorded with a video camera lying on a Abmusterungstisch.
  • the data is stored in a memory for digital image data.
  • At the Abmusterungstisch measuring devices for detecting quality data of the printed image are arranged and provided with markings.
  • a light source is provided both for displaying data and as a guide device for the measuring devices.
  • Between video camera and light source are one or more systems for Image evaluation, in particular for pattern recognition, provided that use the data of the memory for the image data.
  • measurement devices come colorimeters, register meters or hand-held scanners, ie. small format scanners, which are guided by hand on the surface to be scanned, in question
  • a possible alternative is therefore to shift the display of the fault location information from the monitor to an existing printed test sheet on which the fault location (s) are then displayed by means of projection.
  • Particularly suitable for this type of projection are various forms of projection lasers, in particular laser pointers. These are known from the prior art in various performance classes and colors, as well as in general in a variety of designs.
  • the object of the present invention is thus to describe a device and a method for fault location, which facilitates the user finding fault locations on the sheet.
  • the inventive solution to this problem is a method having the features of main claim 1 and an apparatus having the features of claim 8.
  • the display of the errors found by the inspection on a display device mounted in the viewing and reading range to the depositing device and the fault location made possible by the method according to the invention supplement each other.
  • the user needs information about the error itself as well as about the location of the error in order to assess the errors found.
  • a device for determining fault location on a printed sheet for carrying out a method according to claim 1 is also disclosed.
  • the device consists of a display device, a storage device for a sheet, a control computer and at least one light source in the form of a laser pointer, which is attached to the storage device or integrated into this, that of the computer-controlled at least one light source, each location on the surface one of the depositing device aligned sheet is markable.
  • the function of at least one light source is switched on and off by a foot switch attached to the storage device.
  • the light source marks several fault locations by rapid clocking. For reasons of efficiency, it is appropriate for a light source to display several fault locations. This makes it possible to simultaneously display more errors than light sources are available.
  • a further preferred development is that a plurality of light sources for fault location display are attached to or in the storage device.
  • the multiple light sources can also individually mark multiple fault locations. As a result, the number of errors to be displayed simultaneously by the system is enormous.
  • a preferred development of the inventive method is that the multiple light sources with different colors different errors and / or identify different degrees of severity of the errors.
  • a division of tasks of the light sources by severity or by type of error is made possible by means of different light colors.
  • various projected geometric figures or a combination of the features mentioned are possible
  • a preferred development of the method according to the invention is that the sample sheet is aligned on the storage device on the basis of information from the printing press, such as print format, print start and center offset. If the device does not have automatic adaptation of the fault location projection to the location of the sample sheet, the user must manually align the sample sheet with information from the press, such as print size, print start, and center offset. The information can be made available to the user via the display device.
  • a further preferred development of the method is that a, attached to the storage device, camera determines the edges or the registration marks of the sample sheet based on information on the sample sheet and the one or more light sources are aligned according to the determined edges of the sample sheet.
  • the automatic adaptation of the fault location projection to the position of the test sheet saves time because the user no longer has to manually align the test sheet.
  • a preferred development of the device according to the invention is that on the storage device an angle bar or a coordinate system for the alignment of the sheet is present. If neither an automatic adaptation to the position of the test sheet nor information from the printing press are available, a coordinate cross or an angle strip mounted on the depositing device allow the user to correctly align the sample sheet.
  • the device consists in the main of a storage device on which a test sheet is to be stored, which contains image information, which are examined for errors during an image inspection. Above or next to the storage device one to several light sources are locked. Whether the light sources are firmly fixed and different radiation angles are possible by the design of the light sources, or whether light sources are fixed with a fixed beam angle movable, depends on the embodiment. The decisive factor is that the light sources can be controlled via a control computer in such a way that they can detect the entire area of the stored test sheet.
  • a display device is mounted, via which the image errors determined by the inspection are displayed.
  • the device according to the invention is combined with the operating device of a printing press.
  • the display device is identical to the display device of the control panel of the printing press.
  • the storage device corresponds to the storage console of the operating device for the proofs. In this case, an angle bar and / or a coordinate system are mounted on the storage device so that the user a correct manual alignment of the sample sheet is possible.
  • the light sources which preferably consist of laser pointers, are on a holding device on the filing desk appropriate. They are attached to devices with controllable, movable electric motors, which are controlled by an external control computer or the control computer of the printing press.
  • the individual laser pointers have different colors, so that with each color a different type of error and / or error severity can be displayed. Since the laser pointer, depending on the power class, emit dangerous radiation to the human eye, the device may only be used under the expert control of the user. To ensure this, a footswitch is attached to the bottom of the device that allows the user to turn the laser pointer function on and off.
  • the inventive method is in its preferred embodiment in FIG. 2 shown schematically.
  • a continuous inspection of the printed sheets is carried out.
  • the user places a test sheet of the current print job on the storage device.
  • the sample sheet is to be aligned correctly next. This can be done manually by the user on the basis of an existing on the filing angle bar or a coordinate system.
  • the sheet is detected by a camera and the edges or registration marks of the sample sheet are determined based on information on the sample sheet.
  • the laser pointers are then aligned by the control computer according to the determined edges or registration marks of the sample sheet.
  • the alignment is done on the basis of information from the printing press, such as print format, print start and center offset. If image or printing errors are then found by the inspection, these are displayed by the control computer of the printing press on the display device. This is preferably done in sections and if reasonably enlarged to give the user precise knowledge about the nature of the error.
  • the control computer calculates the position information on the printed sheet of the error (s) found. With the knowledge of the nature and location of the errors found, the computer controls the laser pointer in such a way that they mark the location of the errors found on the sample sheet.
  • the method disclosed in the preferred embodiment allows both the pure marking of the fault location on a fault-free Test sheet, as well as the use of the faulty test specimen, on which then the local errors are displayed.
  • the first variant requires an accurate representation of the error found on the display device. The marking of the fault location is then only the classification of the error found in the image environment.
  • the advantage of this variant is the quick processing of errors found by the user, since one and the same test sheet can be used for a wide variety of errors.
  • the disadvantage is that only the fault location is marked on the sample sheet. The error must be examined to assess the facts on the display device.
  • the second variant involves the removal of the faulty sheet from the printing press, whereby the errors found on the device marked by the device are then also present in real terms.
  • the representation of the error on the display device is only supportive and not mandatory. An assessment of the errors found by the user is thus much easier for this, but the process takes more time. Which procedure is preferred is at the discretion of the user. Device and method allow the use of both variants.

Description

Die vorliegende Erfindung betrifft ein Verfahren und eine Vorrichtung zur Fehlerortbestimmung auf einem Drucksubstrat.The present invention relates to a method and a device for fault location on a printing substrate.

Die Erfindung liegt in dem technischen Gebiet des Qualitätsmanagements.The invention lies in the technical field of quality management.

Aus dem bisherigen Stand der Technik ist aus der Patentschrift DE 102005001417 B4 eine Anzeige- und Bedienvorrichtung zur Steuerung von Maschinen mit einer Projektionsvorrichtung zur Projektion eines Bildes auf eine Projektionsfläche bekannt, mit der es möglich ist die Auswirkungen von an der Bedienvorrichtung vorgenommenen Änderungen zu simulieren. Dazu berechnet der Steuerungsrechner der Maschine die voraussichtlichen Auswirkungen der vorgenommenen Änderungen und projiziert die berechneten Bilddaten auf einen vorliegenden Bedruckstoff. Dessen Bildinhalt ist dem Steuerungsrechner bekannt, so dass die visuelle Überlagerung von projizierten Daten und Bildinhalt des Bedruckstoffes einem hypothetischen, mit den vorgenommenen Änderungen gedruckten, Bildes entspricht. Eine solche Vorrichtung ist hilfreich, um die Leistung des Inspektionssystems zu überprüfen. Dies gibt dem Benutzer eine Rückmeldung, ob er sich noch immer auf das Inspektionssystem verlassen kann, indem er einen Vergleich hat, ob sich das System bzgl. eines vorherigen Zeitpunktes verändert hat; z.B. hinsichtlich Bildqualität, Rechnerleistung, Objektivgüte, Verschmutzung. Was diese Vorrichtung jedoch nicht ermöglicht, ist eine automatische Qualitätsuntersuchung bereits gedruckter Druckprodukte. Zudem ist die beschriebene Vorrichtung sehr aufwändig umzusetzen sowohl hinsichtlich Hardware als auch Software, da Bilddaten erfasst und vorgenommene Änderungen simuliert und projiziert werden müssen.From the prior art is from the patent DE 102005001417 B4 a display and control device for controlling machines with a projection device for projecting an image on a projection surface, with which it is possible to simulate the effects of changes made to the operating device. For this purpose, the control computer of the machine calculates the probable effects of the changes made and projects the calculated image data onto an existing printing material. Its image content is known to the control computer, so that the visual overlay of projected data and image content of the printing material corresponds to a hypothetical image printed with the changes made. Such a device is useful for checking the performance of the inspection system. This gives the user feedback as to whether he can still rely on the inspection system by making a comparison as to whether the system has changed with respect to a previous time; eg with regard to image quality, computer performance, lens quality, contamination. However, what this device does not enable is an automatic quality inspection of already printed printed products. In addition, the device described is very complicated implement both hardware and software, since image data recorded and made changes must be simulated and projected.

Für die automatische Qualitätsuntersuchung ist aus der Patentanmeldung DE 19516352 A1 eine Vorrichtung zur Bildinspektion des Druckbildes eines Produkts einer Druckmaschine bekannt, wobei die Vorrichtung eine Bilderfassungseinrichtung aufweist, die Ist-Bilddaten vom Produkt liefert, welche mittels einer Vergleichsschaltung mit Soll-Bilddaten eines fehlerfreien Sujets verglichen werden. Die im Rahmen der beschriebenen Inspektion erkannten Fehler werden auf einem Monitor angezeigt, wobei das erfasste Druckbild in Inspektionsflächen unterteilt und die Inspektionsflächen mit erkannten Fehlern auf dem Monitor angezeigt werden. Nachteilig an der offenbarten Vorrichtung ist jedoch, dass keine genaue Ortbestimmung der erkannten Fehler möglich ist, da nur die entsprechende Inspektionsfläche auf dem Monitor gekennzeichnet wird. Zudem ist keine gleichzeitige Analyse des Fehlerortes und des Fehlers selber möglich, da nur eine Information gleichzeitig sinnvoll auf dem Monitor angezeigt werden kann.For the automatic quality investigation is from the patent application DE 19516352 A1 a device for image inspection of the printed image of a product of a printing press, the device having an image detection device which provides actual image data from the product, which by means of a comparison circuit with target image data of a error-free subjects are compared. The errors detected during the described inspection are displayed on a monitor, whereby the recorded print image is subdivided into inspection areas and the inspection areas with detected defects are displayed on the monitor. A disadvantage of the disclosed device, however, is that no precise location of the detected errors is possible, since only the corresponding inspection area is marked on the monitor. In addition, no simultaneous analysis of the error location and the error itself is possible because only one piece of information can be meaningfully displayed on the monitor at the same time.

Aus der deutschen Patenanmeldung DE 41 00 170 A1 ist zudem ein Farbstimmpult zur visuellen und messtechnischen Qualitätskontrolle von Druckbogen bekannt, bei welchem ein Druckbogen durch ein Handmessgerät beliebig abtastbar ist und wobei eine über dem Druckbogen am Pult angebrachte Projektionseinrichtung Lichtstrahlen über den gesamten Druckbogen aussendet und wobei im Messgerät ein Fotosensor angebracht ist, welcher erkennt wenn er von einem Lichtstrahl getroffen wird, wodurch die aktuelle Lageinformation des Messgerätes auf dem Bogen ermittelt werden kann.From the German godparent application DE 41 00 170 A1 In addition, a color mixer for visual and metrological quality control of printed sheets is known in which a printed sheet is scanned by a hand-held measuring device and wherein a mounted on the sheet at the desk projection device emits light rays over the entire sheet and wherein a photo sensor is mounted in the meter, which recognizes when it is struck by a light beam, whereby the current position information of the measuring device can be determined on the sheet.

Aus der deutschen Patentanmeldung DE 103 53 868 A1 ist außerdem eine Vorrichtung zur Darstellung bestimmter Daten einer Druckmaschine auf einem Druckbogen bekannt, wobei durch eine Projektionsvorrichtung welche über dem Druckbogen positioniert ist, die Daten auf den Druckbogen projiziert werden können.From the German patent application DE 103 53 868 A1 In addition, a device for displaying certain data of a printing press on a printed sheet is known, wherein by means of a projection device which is positioned above the printed sheet, the data can be projected onto the printed sheet.

Die europäische Patentanmeldung EP 0 410 253 A2 offenbart hingegen eine Vorrichtung für die Datenerfassung, Steuerung und Anzeige von Messwerten bei der Qualitätsüberwachung an einer Druckmaschine. Dabei wird zur Integration von Arbeitsabläufen und zur Verbesserung von Arbeitsqualität und Bedienung der Druckbogen mit einer Videokamera auf einem Abmusterungstisch liegend erfasst. Die Daten werden in einem Speicher für digitale Bilddaten abgelegt. Am Abmusterungstisch sind Messeinrichtungen zur Erfassung von Qualitätsdaten des gedruckten Bildes angeordnet und mit Markierungen versehen. Parallel zur Videokamera ist eine Lichtquelle sowohl zur Darstellung von Daten als auch als Führungseinrichtung für die Messeinrichtungen vorgesehen. Zwischen Videokamera und Lichtquelle sind ein oder mehrere Systeme zur Bildauswertung, insbesondere zur Mustererkennung, vorgesehen, die die Daten des Speichers für die Bilddaten benutzen. Als Messeinrichtungen kommen Farbmessgeräte, Registermessgeräte oder Handscanner, dh. kleinformatige Scanner, die mit der Hand über die abzutastende Fläche geführt werden, in FrageThe European patent application EP 0 410 253 A2 on the other hand discloses a device for data acquisition, control and display of measured values in quality monitoring on a printing machine. In this case, the integration of workflows and to improve the quality of work and operation of the sheet is recorded with a video camera lying on a Abmusterungstisch. The data is stored in a memory for digital image data. At the Abmusterungstisch measuring devices for detecting quality data of the printed image are arranged and provided with markings. Parallel to the video camera, a light source is provided both for displaying data and as a guide device for the measuring devices. Between video camera and light source are one or more systems for Image evaluation, in particular for pattern recognition, provided that use the data of the memory for the image data. As measurement devices come colorimeters, register meters or hand-held scanners, ie. small format scanners, which are guided by hand on the surface to be scanned, in question

Eine mögliche Alternative ist daher, die Anzeige der Fehlerortinformation vom Monitor auf einen vorliegenden gedruckten Probebogen zu verlagern, auf welchem der oder die Fehlerorte dann mittels Projektion angezeigt werden. Besonders zu dieser Art von Projektion geeignet sind, verschiedenste Formen von Projektionslasern, insbesondere Laserpointer. Diese sind aus dem Stand der Technik in verschiedensten Leistungsklassen und Farben, sowie allgemein in verschiedensten Bauformen bekannt.A possible alternative is therefore to shift the display of the fault location information from the monitor to an existing printed test sheet on which the fault location (s) are then displayed by means of projection. Particularly suitable for this type of projection are various forms of projection lasers, in particular laser pointers. These are known from the prior art in various performance classes and colors, as well as in general in a variety of designs.

Die Aufgabe der vorliegenden Erfindung besteht somit darin, eine Vorrichtung sowie ein Verfahren zur Fehlerortbestimmung zu beschreiben, welches dem Anwender das Auffinden von Fehlerorten auf dem Druckbogen erleichtert.The object of the present invention is thus to describe a device and a method for fault location, which facilitates the user finding fault locations on the sheet.

Die erfindungsgemäße Lösung dieser Aufgabe stellt ein Verfahren mit den Merkmalen von Hauptanspruch 1 und eine Vorrichtung mit den Merkmalen von Anspruch 8 dar.The inventive solution to this problem is a method having the features of main claim 1 and an apparatus having the features of claim 8.

Es handelt sich dabei um ein Verfahren zur Fehlerortbestimmung auf einem Druckbogen, das die folgenden Schritte umfasst.

  • Durchführen eines Druckauftrages mit Inspektion der gedruckten Bögen
  • Auflegen eines bedruckten Probebogens auf eine Ablagevorrichtung
  • Markierung der, durch die Inspektion, gefundenen Druckfehler auf dem bedruckten Probebogen mittels Hervorhebung der Fehlerkoordinaten durch eine an oder in der Ablagevorrichtung befestigte Lichtquelle, wobei die Lichtquelle ein Laserpointer ist
  • Anzeige der mittels der automatischen Inspektion gefundenen Fehlerdurch eine über oder an der Ablagevorrichtung angebrachte Anzeigevorrichtung.
It is a method for determining fault location on a printed sheet, which comprises the following steps.
  • Performing a print job with inspection of the printed sheets
  • Placing a printed test sheet on a storage device
  • Marking the printing defects found on the printed sample sheet by the inspection by highlighting the error coordinates by a light source attached to or in the depositing device, the light source being a laser pointer
  • Display of errors found by means of the automatic inspection by means of a display device mounted above or on the storage device.

Die Anzeige der durch die Inspektion gefundenen Fehler auf einer in Sicht- und Lesereichweite zur Ablagevorrichtung angebrachten Anzeigevorrichtung und die vom erfindungsgebenden Verfahren ermöglichte Fehlerortung ergänzen einander. Denn zur Beurteilung der gefundenen Fehler benötigt der Anwender sowohl Informationen über den Fehler selber als auch über den Fehlerort.The display of the errors found by the inspection on a display device mounted in the viewing and reading range to the depositing device and the fault location made possible by the method according to the invention supplement each other. The user needs information about the error itself as well as about the location of the error in order to assess the errors found.

Zur Durchführung des vorgestellten Verfahrens wird zudem eine Vorrichtung zur Fehlerortbestimmung auf einem Druckbogen zur Durchführung eines Verfahrens gemäß Anspruch 1 offenbart. Die Vorrichtung besteht aus einer Anzeigevorrichtung, einer Ablagevorrichtung für einen Bogen, einem Steuerungsrechner und mindestens einer Lichtquelle in Form eines Laserpointers, welche so an der Ablagevorrichtung angebracht oder in diese integriert ist, dass von der vom Rechner gesteuerten mindestens einen Lichtquelle jeder Ort auf der Fläche eines auf der Ablagevorrichtung ausgerichteten Bogens markierbar ist. Zudem ist die Funktion der mindestens einen Lichtquelle durch einen an der Ablagevorrichtung angebrachten Fußschalter ein- und ausschaltbar ist..For carrying out the method presented, a device for determining fault location on a printed sheet for carrying out a method according to claim 1 is also disclosed. The device consists of a display device, a storage device for a sheet, a control computer and at least one light source in the form of a laser pointer, which is attached to the storage device or integrated into this, that of the computer-controlled at least one light source, each location on the surface one of the depositing device aligned sheet is markable. In addition, the function of at least one light source is switched on and off by a foot switch attached to the storage device.

Vorteilhafte und daher bevorzugte Weiterbildungen des Verfahrens ergeben sich aus den zugehörigen Unteransprüchen sowie aus der Beschreibung mit den zugehörigen Zeichnungen.Advantageous and therefore preferred developments of the method will become apparent from the accompanying dependent claims and from the description with the accompanying drawings.

Eine bevorzugte Weiterbildung ist dabei, dass die Lichtquelle durch schnelle Taktung mehrere Fehlerorte markiert. Aus Effizienzgründen ist es angebracht, dass eine Lichtquelle mehrere Fehlerorte anzeigt. Damit wird es ermöglicht, gleichzeitig mehr Fehler anzuzeigen, als Lichtquellen verfügbar sind.A preferred development is that the light source marks several fault locations by rapid clocking. For reasons of efficiency, it is appropriate for a light source to display several fault locations. This makes it possible to simultaneously display more errors than light sources are available.

Eine weitere bevorzugte Weiterbildung ist dabei, dass mehrere Lichtquellen zur Fehlerortanzeige an oder in der Ablagevorrichtung befestigt sind. Die mehreren Lichtquellen können ebenfalls einzeln mehrere Fehlerorte markieren. Dadurch erhöht sind die Anzahl der gleichzeitig vom System anzuzeigenden Fehler enorm.A further preferred development is that a plurality of light sources for fault location display are attached to or in the storage device. The multiple light sources can also individually mark multiple fault locations. As a result, the number of errors to be displayed simultaneously by the system is enormous.

Eine bevorzugte Weiterbildung des erfindungsgebenden Verfahrens ist dabei, dass die mehreren Lichtquellen mit unterschiedlichen Farben unterschiedliche Fehler und/oder unterschiedliche Schweregrade der Fehler kennzeichnen. Im Zusammenspiel miteinander wird eine Aufgabenteilung der Lichtquellen nach Schweregrad oder nach Fehlertypus anhand verschiedener Lichtfarben ermöglicht. Auch verschiedene projizierte geometrische Figuren oder eine Kombination der genannten Merkmale sind möglichA preferred development of the inventive method is that the multiple light sources with different colors different errors and / or identify different degrees of severity of the errors. In interaction with each other, a division of tasks of the light sources by severity or by type of error is made possible by means of different light colors. Also, various projected geometric figures or a combination of the features mentioned are possible

Eine bevorzugte Weiterbildung des erfindungsgebenden Verfahrens ist dabei, dass der Probebogen anhand von Informationen aus der Druckmaschine, wie Druckformat, Druckanfang und Mittenversatz, auf der Ablagevorrichtung ausgerichtet ist. Falls die Vorrichtung keine automatische Anpassung der Fehlerortprojektion an die Lage des Probebogens hat, muss der Probebogen vom Benutzer manuell anhand von Informationen aus Druckmaschine, wie Druckformat, Druckanfang und Mittenversatz ausgerichtet werden. Die Informationen können dem Anwender über die Anzeigevorrichtung zur Verfügung gestellt werden.A preferred development of the method according to the invention is that the sample sheet is aligned on the storage device on the basis of information from the printing press, such as print format, print start and center offset. If the device does not have automatic adaptation of the fault location projection to the location of the sample sheet, the user must manually align the sample sheet with information from the press, such as print size, print start, and center offset. The information can be made available to the user via the display device.

Eine weitere bevorzugte Weiterbildung des Verfahrens ist dabei, dass eine, an der Ablagevorrichtung angebrachte, Kamera die Ränder oder die Passermarken des Probebogens anhand von Informationen auf dem Probebogen ermittelt und die eine oder mehreren Lichtquellen entsprechend der ermittelten Ränder des Probebogens ausgerichtet sind. Die automatische Anpassung der Fehlerortprojektion an die Lage des Probebogens ermöglicht eine Zeitersparnis, da der Anwender den Probebogen nicht mehr manuell ausrichten muss.A further preferred development of the method is that a, attached to the storage device, camera determines the edges or the registration marks of the sample sheet based on information on the sample sheet and the one or more light sources are aligned according to the determined edges of the sample sheet. The automatic adaptation of the fault location projection to the position of the test sheet saves time because the user no longer has to manually align the test sheet.

Eine bevorzugte Weiterbildung der erfindungsgemäßen Vorrichtung ist dabei, dass auf der Ablagevorrichtung eine Winkelleiste oder ein Koordinatenkreuz zur Ausrichtung des Bogens vorhanden ist. Sind weder eine automatische Anpassung an die Lage des Probebogens noch Informationen aus der Druckmaschine verfügbar, ermöglichen es ein auf der Ablagevorrichtung angebrachtes Koordinatenkreuz oder eine Winkelleiste dem Anwender den Probebogen korrekt auszurichten.A preferred development of the device according to the invention is that on the storage device an angle bar or a coordinate system for the alignment of the sheet is present. If neither an automatic adaptation to the position of the test sheet nor information from the printing press are available, a coordinate cross or an angle strip mounted on the depositing device allow the user to correctly align the sample sheet.

Das Verfahren sowie funktionell vorteilhafte Weiterbildungen des Verfahrens werden nachfolgend unter Bezug auf die zugehörigen Zeichnungen anhand wenigstens eines bevorzugten Ausführungsbeispiels näher beschrieben. In den Zeichnungen sind einander entsprechende Elemente mit jeweils denselben Bezugszeichen versehen.The method and functionally advantageous developments of the method will be described below with reference to the accompanying drawings with reference to at least one preferred embodiment described in more detail. In the drawings, corresponding elements are provided with the same reference numerals.

Die Zeichnungen zeigen:

Fig. 1:
die Vorrichtung zur Fehlerortbestimmung auf einem Druckbogen
Fig. 2:
den Ablauf des Verfahrens der Fehlerortbestimmung auf einem Druckbogen
The drawings show:
Fig. 1:
the device for fault location on a sheet
Fig. 2:
the sequence of the method of fault location on a sheet

Die erfindungsgemäße Vorrichtung besteht in der Hauptsache aus einer Ablagevorrichtung auf welcher ein Probebogen abzulegen ist, welcher Bildinformationen beinhaltet, die im Rahmen einer Bildinspektion auf Fehler untersucht werden. Über oder neben der Ablagevorrichtung sind eine bis mehrere Lichtquellen arretiert. Ob die Lichtquellen dabei fest fixiert sind und verschiedene Abstrahlwinkel durch die Bauform der Lichtquellen möglich sind, oder ob Lichtquellen mit starrem Abstrahlwinkel beweglich fixiert sind, hangt von der Ausführungsvariante ab. Entscheidend ist, dass die Lichtquellen über einen Steuerungsrechner so ansteuerbar sind, dass sie die gesamte Fläche des abgelegten Probebogens erfassen können. Neben der Ablagevorrichtung ist eine Anzeigevorrichtung angebracht, über welche die von der Inspektion ermittelten Bildfehler angezeigt werden.The device according to the invention consists in the main of a storage device on which a test sheet is to be stored, which contains image information, which are examined for errors during an image inspection. Above or next to the storage device one to several light sources are locked. Whether the light sources are firmly fixed and different radiation angles are possible by the design of the light sources, or whether light sources are fixed with a fixed beam angle movable, depends on the embodiment. The decisive factor is that the light sources can be controlled via a control computer in such a way that they can detect the entire area of the stored test sheet. In addition to the storage device, a display device is mounted, via which the image errors determined by the inspection are displayed.

In der bevorzugten Ausführungsvariante, wie sie in Figur 1 dargestellt ist, wird die erfindungsgemäße Vorrichtung mit der Bedienvorrichtung einer Druckmaschine kombiniert. Dabei ist die Anzeigevorrichtung mit der Anzeigevorrichtung des Bedienpultes der Druckmaschine identisch. Die Ablagevorrichtung entspricht dem Ablagepult der Bedienvorrichtung für die Probedrucke. Dabei sind auf der Ablagevorrichtung eine Winkelleiste und/oder ein Koordinatenkreuz so angebracht, dass dem Anwender eine korrekte manuelle Ausrichtung des Probebogens möglich ist. Die Lichtquellen, welche bevorzugt aus Laserpointern bestehen, sind an einer Haltevorrichtung über dem Ablagepult angebracht. Sie sind dabei an Vorrichtungen mit steuerbaren, beweglichen Elektromotoren angebracht, welche von einem externen Steuerungsrechner oder dem Steuerungsrechner der Druckmaschine kontrolliert werden. Die einzelnen Laserpointer haben unterschiedliche Farben, so dass mit jeder Farbe ein anderer Fehlertyp und/oder Fehlerschweregrad angezeigt werden kann. Da die Laserpointer, je nach Leistungsklasse, für das menschliche Auge gefährliche Strahlung abgeben, darf die Vorrichtung nur unter fachgemäßer Kontrolle des Anwenders benutzt werden. Um dies sicherzustellen, ist ein Fußschalter am Boden der Vorrichtung angebracht, mit welchem der Anwender die Funktion der Laserpointer ein- und ausschalten kann.In the preferred embodiment, as in FIG. 1 is shown, the device according to the invention is combined with the operating device of a printing press. The display device is identical to the display device of the control panel of the printing press. The storage device corresponds to the storage console of the operating device for the proofs. In this case, an angle bar and / or a coordinate system are mounted on the storage device so that the user a correct manual alignment of the sample sheet is possible. The light sources, which preferably consist of laser pointers, are on a holding device on the filing desk appropriate. They are attached to devices with controllable, movable electric motors, which are controlled by an external control computer or the control computer of the printing press. The individual laser pointers have different colors, so that with each color a different type of error and / or error severity can be displayed. Since the laser pointer, depending on the power class, emit dangerous radiation to the human eye, the device may only be used under the expert control of the user. To ensure this, a footswitch is attached to the bottom of the device that allows the user to turn the laser pointer function on and off.

Das mit dieser Vorrichtung umsetzbare, erfindungsgemäße Verfahren ist in seiner bevorzugten Ausführungsvariante in Figur 2 schematisch abgebildet. Dabei wird im Rahmen der Abarbeitung eines Druckauftrages eine fortlaufende Inspektion der gedruckten Bögen durchgeführt. Während oder auch vor der Inspektion legt der Anwender einen Probebogen des aktuellen Druckauftrages auf die Ablagevorrichtung. Der Probebogen ist als Nächstes korrekt auszurichten. Dies kann manuell vom Anwender anhand einer auf der Ablagevorrichtung vorhandenen Winkelleiste oder eines Koordinatenkreuzes geschehen. In einer alternativen Ausführungsform wird der Bogen von einer Kamera erfasst und die Ränder oder die Passermarken des Probebogens werden anhand von Informationen auf dem Probebogen ermittelt. Die Laserpointer werden dann vom Steuerungsrechner entsprechend der ermittelten Ränder oder Passermarken des Probebogens ausgerichtet. In einer weiteren alternativen Ausführungsform geschieht die Ausrichtung anhand von Informationen aus der Druckmaschine, wie Druckformat, Druckanfang und Mittenversatz. Werden dann von der Inspektion Bild- bzw. Druckfehler gefunden, so werden diese durch den Steuerungsrechner der Druckmaschine auf der Anzeigevorrichtung dargestellt. Dies geschieht bevorzugt ausschnittsweise und wenn sinnvoll vergrößert um dem Anwender genaue Kenntnis über die Art des Fehlers zu geben. Zusätzlich werden vom Steuerungsrechner die Lageinformationen auf dem Druckbogen des bzw. der gefundenen Fehler berechnet. Mit der Kenntnis der Art und Lage der gefundenen Fehler steuert der Rechner die Laserpointer dergestalt an, dass diese den Ort der gefundenen Fehler auf dem Probebogen markieren. Das im bevorzugten Ausführungsbeispiel offenbarte Verfahren ermöglicht dabei sowohl die reine Markierung des Fehlerortes auf einem fehlerfreien Probebogen, als auch die Benutzung des fehlerbehafteten Prüflings, auf welchem dann die auch lokal vorhandenen Fehler angezeigt werden. Die erste Variante erfordert eine genaue Darstellung des gefundenen Fehlers auf der Anzeigevorrichtung. Die Markierung des Fehlerortes dient dann nur noch der Einordnung des gefundenen Fehlers in die Bildumgebung. Vorteil dieser Variante ist die schnelle Abarbeitung gefundener Fehler durch den Anwender, da ein und derselbe Probebogen für verschiedenste Fehler benutzt werden kann. Nachteilig ist dagegen, dass auf dem Probebogen nur der Fehlerort markiert wird. Der Fehler muss zur Beurteilung des Sachverhaltes auf der Anzeigevorrichtung untersucht werden. Die zweite Variante beinhaltet dagegen die Entnahme des fehlerhaften Bogens aus der Druckmaschine, wobei am, von der Vorrichtung markierten Fehlerort, dann auch die gefundenen Fehler real vorhanden sind. Hierbei ist die Darstellung der Fehler auf der Anzeigevorrichtung nur unterstützend und nicht zwingend notwendig. Eine Beurteilung der gefundenen Fehler durch den Anwender ist so für diesen deutlich einfacher, dafür nimmt der Vorgang mehr Zeit in Anspruch. Welche Vorgehensweise bevorzugt wird, liegt im Ermessen des Anwenders. Vorrichtung und Verfahren erlauben die Benutzung beider Varianten.The implementable with this device, the inventive method is in its preferred embodiment in FIG. 2 shown schematically. As part of the processing of a print job, a continuous inspection of the printed sheets is carried out. During or before the inspection, the user places a test sheet of the current print job on the storage device. The sample sheet is to be aligned correctly next. This can be done manually by the user on the basis of an existing on the filing angle bar or a coordinate system. In an alternative embodiment, the sheet is detected by a camera and the edges or registration marks of the sample sheet are determined based on information on the sample sheet. The laser pointers are then aligned by the control computer according to the determined edges or registration marks of the sample sheet. In a further alternative embodiment, the alignment is done on the basis of information from the printing press, such as print format, print start and center offset. If image or printing errors are then found by the inspection, these are displayed by the control computer of the printing press on the display device. This is preferably done in sections and if reasonably enlarged to give the user precise knowledge about the nature of the error. In addition, the control computer calculates the position information on the printed sheet of the error (s) found. With the knowledge of the nature and location of the errors found, the computer controls the laser pointer in such a way that they mark the location of the errors found on the sample sheet. The method disclosed in the preferred embodiment allows both the pure marking of the fault location on a fault-free Test sheet, as well as the use of the faulty test specimen, on which then the local errors are displayed. The first variant requires an accurate representation of the error found on the display device. The marking of the fault location is then only the classification of the error found in the image environment. The advantage of this variant is the quick processing of errors found by the user, since one and the same test sheet can be used for a wide variety of errors. The disadvantage, however, is that only the fault location is marked on the sample sheet. The error must be examined to assess the facts on the display device. On the other hand, the second variant involves the removal of the faulty sheet from the printing press, whereby the errors found on the device marked by the device are then also present in real terms. Here, the representation of the error on the display device is only supportive and not mandatory. An assessment of the errors found by the user is thus much easier for this, but the process takes more time. Which procedure is preferred is at the discretion of the user. Device and method allow the use of both variants.

Verschiedene Fehlertypen und Schweregrade der Fehler werden durch verschiedenfarbige Laserpointer gekennzeichnet. Die Zuordnung von Farben und Fehlertypen, bzw. Schweregrade ist konfigurierbar und wird über die Anzeigevorrichtung dem Anwender mitgeteilt. Eine Unterscheidung von verschiedenen Fehlern und Schweregraden kann auch durch verschiedene geometrische Formen, wie Kreise, Rechtecke etc geschehen, wobei hierzu der Einsatz anderer Lichtquellen als Laserpointer vorteilhafter ist, wie z.B. bestimmter LED-Arrays. Falls im Rahmen einer Untersuchung mehr Fehler gefunden werden, als Laserpointer vorhanden sind, werden durch schnelles Takten, d.h. Umschalten, von mehreren Positionen eines Laserpointers mehrere Fehlerorte abgedeckt. Um zudem eine Gefährdung des Augenlichts von in der Nähe befindlichen Personen auszuschließen, muss der Anwender, während er auf dem die markierten Fehlerorte überprüft einen Fußschalter betätigen, welcher die Funktion der Laserpointer aktiviert. Verlässt der Anwender den Arbeitsplatz, senden die Laserpointer aufgrund des Nichtbetätigens des Fußschalters kein Licht aus.Various types of errors and severity of errors are characterized by differently colored laser pointers. The assignment of colors and error types or severity levels is configurable and is communicated to the user via the display device. A distinction between different errors and degrees of severity can also be done by various geometric shapes, such as circles, rectangles, etc., for this purpose, the use of other light sources as laser pointer is more advantageous, such as certain LED arrays. If more errors are found in the scope of an examination than there are laser pointers, several cycles are covered by fast clocking, ie switching over several positions of a laser pointer. In addition, to preclude any danger to the eyes of nearby people, the user must, while he checked on the marked fault locations operate a footswitch, which activates the function of the laser pointer. If the user leaves the workstation, the laser pointers will not emit light due to the footswitch not operating.

BezugszeichenlisteLIST OF REFERENCE NUMBERS

11
Winkelleisteangle bar
22
Ablagevorrichtungstorage device
33
Probebogentest sheet
44
Lichtquellelight source
55
Anzeigevorrichtungdisplay device
66
Fußschalterfootswitch
77
Rechnercomputer
88th
gefundene FehlerError found
99
Lageinformation des Probebogens 10 BedienpultLocation information of the sample sheet 10 Control panel
1111
Anwenderuser

Claims (8)

  1. Method for locating an error location on a print sheet comprising the steps of
    • carrying out a print job and inspecting the printed sheets
    • placing a sample print sheet on a deposit device
    • marking the print defects found in the inspection on the sample print sheet by highlighting the error coordinates by a light source arranged on or in the deposit device, the light source being a laser pointer
    • displaying the errors found in the automated inspection on a display device arranged above or on the deposit device.
  2. Method according to claim 1,
    characterized in
    that the light source marks multiple error locations due to a short cycle.
  3. Method recited in any one of the preceding claims,
    characterized in
    that multiple light sources for indicating error locations are arranged on or in the deposit device.
  4. Method according to claim 3,
    characterized in
    that the multiple light sources indicate different errors and/or different error degrees in different colours.
  5. Method according to any one of the preceding claims,
    characterized in
    that the sample sheet is aligned on the deposit device in accordance with information from the printing press such as print format, start of the print, centre offset.
  6. Method according to any one of the preceding claims,
    characterized in
    that based on information on the sample sheet, a camera arranged on the deposit device detects the edges or the register marks of the sample sheet and that the one or more light sources are oriented in a way corresponding to the detected edges or register marks of the sample sheet.
  7. Device for implementing a method for locating error locations on a print sheet according to claim 1, consisting of a display device, a deposit device for a sheet, a control unit and at least one light source,
    characterized in
    that the at least one light source is a laser pointer and is disposed on the deposit device or integrated into the latter in such a way that by means of the at least one light source, which is controlled by the control unit, every location on the surface of a sheet aligned on the deposit device is markable and that at least one foot switch is provided on the deposit device to switch the function of the at least one light source on and off.
  8. Device according to claim 7,
    characterized in
    that an angle bar or a coordinate plane is provided on the deposit device to align the sheet.
EP15171575.2A 2014-07-11 2015-06-11 Method for the localization of a fault on a printing substrate and device for carrying out said method Active EP2974865B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102014010344.7A DE102014010344A1 (en) 2014-07-11 2014-07-11 Method for fault location on a printing substrate

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2974865A1 EP2974865A1 (en) 2016-01-20
EP2974865B1 true EP2974865B1 (en) 2017-02-01

Family

ID=53502425

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP15171575.2A Active EP2974865B1 (en) 2014-07-11 2015-06-11 Method for the localization of a fault on a printing substrate and device for carrying out said method

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2974865B1 (en)
CN (1) CN105235385B (en)
DE (1) DE102014010344A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN107478979A (en) * 2017-08-04 2017-12-15 深圳市阿拉玎光电自动化有限公司 A kind of defects detection maintenance system, method and maintenance unit
DE102020118254A1 (en) 2020-07-10 2022-01-13 Koenig & Bauer Ag Control station of a sheet processing machine and method for aligning a sheet on a support surface

Family Cites Families (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE3826385A1 (en) * 1988-08-03 1990-02-08 Roland Man Druckmasch DEVICE FOR EVALUATING PRINT ORIGINALS
DE3924989A1 (en) * 1989-07-28 1991-02-07 Roland Man Druckmasch DEVICE FOR CARRYING OUT A COMPREHENSIVE QUALITY CONTROL ON PRINT SHEETS
DE4100170C2 (en) * 1991-01-05 1994-10-27 Roland Man Druckmasch Color control desk for quality control on printed sheets
JPH05147187A (en) * 1991-11-28 1993-06-15 Gunze Ltd Screen plate tester
DE19516352A1 (en) 1995-05-04 1996-11-07 Heidelberger Druckmasch Ag Image inspection device
DE10353868B4 (en) * 2002-12-12 2014-07-24 Heidelberger Druckmaschinen Ag Representation of data in a substrate processing machine
DE102005001417B4 (en) * 2004-01-29 2009-06-25 Heidelberger Druckmaschinen Ag Projection screen-dependent display / operating device
US7893416B2 (en) * 2008-09-17 2011-02-22 Eastman Kodak Company Detecting printing plate edge alignment
WO2010096896A1 (en) * 2009-02-24 2010-09-02 Exfo Photonic Solutions Inc. System, method and portable controller for programming and calibration of a plurality of light source units for photo-reactive/curing applications
EP2505356A1 (en) * 2011-03-30 2012-10-03 KBA-NotaSys SA Device for offline inspection and color measurement of printed sheets
DE202011050535U1 (en) * 2011-06-22 2012-09-24 Eltromat Gmbh Web inspection system for rotary printing machines

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP2974865A1 (en) 2016-01-20
CN105235385A (en) 2016-01-13
CN105235385B (en) 2019-12-03
DE102014010344A1 (en) 2016-01-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0410253B1 (en) Device for carrying out a comprehensive quality control on printed sheets
DE3347732C2 (en) Method for taking into account material defects or the like in cut material and device for carrying out the method
EP3246161B1 (en) Device for inspecting printed products
EP0295433B1 (en) Register measuring system as used in offset for controlling printing plate position
EP1888338B1 (en) Printing machine and a method for producing a printed product
EP1911588B1 (en) Colour gauge head positioning device
WO2005090907A1 (en) Method for locating defective points and marking system
DE102009019545B4 (en) Method and device for performing an optical comparison between at least two patterns, preferably by comparing selectable sections
WO2019149429A1 (en) Device and method for checking a labeling and/or printing precision
EP2974865B1 (en) Method for the localization of a fault on a printing substrate and device for carrying out said method
DE102007030571A1 (en) Print substrate`s colour measuring device, has one measuring unit simultaneously detecting pixels on surface of print substrate, and other measuring unit color-metrically measuring surface of print substrate
DE19626889A1 (en) Procedure for determining object geometry via multi=position 3d=sensor
EP3328649B1 (en) Method for testing a functional unit for use on a moving material web
DE202015104751U1 (en) Device for inspecting products arranged on a material web
EP1974919A1 (en) Colorimeter with coordinate matching
DE102012207226B4 (en) Apparatus for analyzing a printed copy
DE102016011554B4 (en) Method for displaying defects on workpieces
DE102017122627B4 (en) Optical measuring system and measuring method
EP3889895A1 (en) Method for finding edges of a measuring object
DE102011102452B4 (en) Determination of measuring field widths in color measuring devices
WO2020207841A1 (en) Apparatus for inspecting printed images and method for validating inspection algorithms
DE102009013088B4 (en) Method for measuring and evaluating a marking image quality of a lettering image on an object and measuring device for carrying out the method
DE102019119908A1 (en) Sensor arrangement and method for determining geometric properties of a measurement object
DE102008026905A1 (en) Measurement signal i.e. acoustic signal, detecting and evaluating method, involves performing determination of position of measuring sensor relative to sound emitting object over position of measuring sensor image on display screen

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20160720

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20160923

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 865213

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20170215

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 502015000548

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20170201

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170201

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170501

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170502

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170201

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170201

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170601

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170201

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170201

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170501

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170601

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170201

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170201

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170201

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170201

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170201

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170201

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170201

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170201

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170201

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 502015000548

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170201

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170201

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20171103

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170201

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170201

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20180228

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170611

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170611

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20170630

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170630

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170630

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170201

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180630

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180630

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20150611

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170201

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170201

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20190611

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170201

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190611

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170201

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 865213

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20200611

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200611

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230427

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20230630

Year of fee payment: 9