EP2882328B1 - Cleaner head - Google Patents
Cleaner head Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2882328B1 EP2882328B1 EP13750121.9A EP13750121A EP2882328B1 EP 2882328 B1 EP2882328 B1 EP 2882328B1 EP 13750121 A EP13750121 A EP 13750121A EP 2882328 B1 EP2882328 B1 EP 2882328B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- agitator
- dog
- cleaner head
- head
- starts
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Not-in-force
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A47—FURNITURE; DOMESTIC ARTICLES OR APPLIANCES; COFFEE MILLS; SPICE MILLS; SUCTION CLEANERS IN GENERAL
- A47L—DOMESTIC WASHING OR CLEANING; SUCTION CLEANERS IN GENERAL
- A47L9/00—Details or accessories of suction cleaners, e.g. mechanical means for controlling the suction or for effecting pulsating action; Storing devices specially adapted to suction cleaners or parts thereof; Carrying-vehicles specially adapted for suction cleaners
- A47L9/02—Nozzles
- A47L9/04—Nozzles with driven brushes or agitators
- A47L9/0405—Driving means for the brushes or agitators
- A47L9/0411—Driving means for the brushes or agitators driven by electric motor
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A47—FURNITURE; DOMESTIC ARTICLES OR APPLIANCES; COFFEE MILLS; SPICE MILLS; SUCTION CLEANERS IN GENERAL
- A47L—DOMESTIC WASHING OR CLEANING; SUCTION CLEANERS IN GENERAL
- A47L9/00—Details or accessories of suction cleaners, e.g. mechanical means for controlling the suction or for effecting pulsating action; Storing devices specially adapted to suction cleaners or parts thereof; Carrying-vehicles specially adapted for suction cleaners
- A47L9/02—Nozzles
- A47L9/04—Nozzles with driven brushes or agitators
- A47L9/0461—Dust-loosening tools, e.g. agitators, brushes
- A47L9/0466—Rotating tools
- A47L9/0477—Rolls
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a cleaner head having an agitator and a drive assembly for driving the agitator.
- the cleaner head of an appliance may include an agitator driven by a drive assembly.
- the drive assembly often includes a dog for transmitting torque generated by the drive assembly to the agitator.
- a problem with existing cleaner heads is that there is often a degree of play between the dog and the agitator. Consequently, as the agitator rotates, the agitator vibrates and generates noise.
- DE102010060373 describes a cleaner head having a motor-driven brush body.
- the brush body includes a threaded portion which is inserted into a threaded hollow portion of a drive shaft.
- the present invention provides a cleaner head comprising an agitator and a drive assembly for driving the agitator, the drive assembly comprising a dog for transmitting torque to the agitator, wherein one of the dog and the agitator comprises a tapered head, a shank that extends from the head, and a screw thread formed around the shank, the other of the dog and the agitator comprises a bore having a countersink and a complementary screw thread formed around a wall of the bore, the shank projects into the bore and the two threads mate such that, as the dog rotates, the agitator screws on to the dog and the tapered head mates with the countersink.
- a further problem with existing cleaner heads is that that the agitator may not align concentrically with the dog. As a result, out-of-balance forces place an increased stress on components of the cleaner head, particularly the bearings, which may reduce the lifespan of the cleaner head.
- the mating of the countersink and the tapered head acts to align concentrically the agitator and the dog. As a result, out-of-balance forces are reduced and thus the lifespan of the cleaner head is prolonged.
- Each screw thread may have a lead angle of no more than 60 degrees.
- Each screw thread may have a lead angle of no less than 40 degrees.
- Each screw thread may have a plurality of starts.
- the torque applied by the dog is distributed over a greater number of starts.
- a greater torque may be transmitted to the agitator without failure of the threads.
- a greater number of starts makes it easier for a user to mount the agitator. In particular, it is generally easier to align the thread of the agitator with the thread of the dog.
- Each start may turn through an angle of no less than 120 degrees.
- the length of each start depends on the angle through which the start turns. As the angle decreases, so too does the length of the start. As a result, the start is subjected to a greater load per unit length. Below an angle of 120 degrees, the lengths of the starts may be insufficient to bear the torque required of most cleaner heads.
- Each start may turn through an angle of no more than 360 degrees. This then has the advantage of maintaining a relatively short shank and bore. Additionally, where the agitator is removable from the cleaner head, the agitator can be removed from the dog by rotating the agitator through an angle of no more than 360 degrees, which can generally be achieved with a small number of twists of the agitator.
- Each screw thread may have a buttress thread form.
- a buttress thread form has the advantage of relatively low friction properties. As a result, a greater axial force is exerted by the dog on the agitator for a given torque. Additionally, where the agitator is removable from the cleaner head, a low friction thread makes it easier for the user to unscrew the agitator from the dog. As the load on the agitator varies, so too does the torque generated by the drive assembly. In response to a decrease in torque, the agitator may experience a net axial force in a direction away from the dog. By employing a buttress thread form, the vertical (or near vertical) flanks of the threads act to oppose this negative axial force and thus prevent the agitator and the dog from loosening.
- a buttress thread form has a relatively thick base resulting in a stronger thread. As a result, the threads are able to withstand a greater axial force and thus the agitator may be held more tightly against the dog.
- the agitator may be removable from the cleaner head.
- the agitator may be unscrewed and separated from the dog.
- it is generally difficult to ensure that the agitator is held axially tight within the cleaner head.
- the agitator screws on to and is tightened against the dog so as to prevent or reduce the axial play.
- a removable agitator may be provided without the normally inherent problems of vibration and noise.
- the term 'dog' should be understood to mean a torque-transmission member.
- the term ⁇ start' refers to a ridge of an external thread or a groove of an internal thread.
- the term 'lead angle' refers to the angle formed by the starts of a screw thread relative to a plane perpendicular to the screw axis.
- the term 'thread form' refers to the cross-sectional shape or profile of the starts of a screw thread.
- the cleaner head 1 of Figure 1 comprises a housing 2 within which an agitator 3 and a drive assembly 4 are mounted.
- the agitator 3 comprises an elongate body 5 to which bristles, flicker strips or other means 6 for agitating a cleaning surface are attached.
- the agitator 3 is mounted at one end to a bushing 7 seated within a removable cap 8.
- the opposite end of the agitator 3 is mounted to a dog 12 forming part of the drive assembly 4.
- the drive assembly 4 comprises an electric motor 10 and a transmission 11 for transmitting torque generated by the motor 10 to the agitator 3.
- the transmission 11 comprises, among other things, a dog 12 that engages with the agitator 3.
- the dog 12 is therefore responsible for transmitting the torque generated by the drive assembly 4 to the agitator 3.
- the details of the drive assembly 4 are not pertinent to the present invention, and drive assemblies for driving an agitator of a cleaner head are well known.
- the cleaner heads of the DC24 and DC26 vacuum cleaners sold by Dyson Limited each include a drive assembly suitable for use in the present cleaner head.
- the dog 12 comprises a head 13, a shank 14 that extends from the head 13, and a helical screw thread 15 formed around the shank 14.
- the head 13 tapers in a direction towards the shank 14 and defines a frustoconical surface that is coaxial with the shank 14.
- the shank 14 extends from the head 13 and is generally cylindrical in shape.
- the screw thread 15 is an external thread that comprises four starts 16 that are evenly spaced about the shank 14. Each start 16 turns about the screw axis 18 through an angle of 180 degrees. Consequently, each start 16 completes one half turn only.
- the screw thread 15 also has a lead angle of 50 degrees and a buttress thread form.
- one end of the agitator 3 includes a bore 19 having a countersink 20 and a helical screw thread 21 formed around a wall of the bore 19.
- the countersink 20 has a frustoconical surface that complements the frustoconical surface of the tapered head 13 of the dog 12, i.e. both surfaces have the same or similar taper angle.
- the screw thread 21 is an internal thread that complements the external screw thread 15 of the dog 12. Consequently, the screw thread 21 comprises four starts 22 that are evenly spaced about the bore 19 and turn through an angle of 180 degrees.
- the screw thread 21 also has a lead angle of 50 degrees and a buttress thread form.
- the torque generated by the drive assembly 4 is transmitted to the agitator 3 via the dog 12.
- the torque applied by the dog 12 exerts both an axial force and a rotational force on the agitator 3.
- the rotational force causes the agitator 3 to rotate.
- the axial force causes the agitator 3 to screw on to and tighten against the dog 12.
- the threads 15,21 of the dog 12 and the agitator 3 are oriented (i.e. right-handed or left-handed) such that the axial force acts in a direction towards the dog 12.
- the countersink 20 mates with and tightens against the tapered head 13.
- the play between the agitator 3 and the dog 12 is removed or significantly reduced, and thus vibration of the agitator 3 is reduced.
- the mating of the countersink 20 and the tapered head 13 ensures that the agitator 3 and the dog 12 are aligned concentrically. As a result, out-of balance forces are reduced and thus the lifespan of the cleaner head 1 is prolonged.
- the magnitude of the axial force depends on, among other things, the lead angle of the threads 15,21.
- the threads 15,21 have a lead angle of 50 degrees. This results in an axial force of sufficient magnitude to ensure that the countersink 20 is tightened against the tapered head 13 with sufficient force to absorb the play between the agitator 3 and the dog 12.
- the lead angle increases, the magnitude of the axial force decreases and thus the countersink 20 is held less tightly against the tapered head 13. It was found that, when the lead angle exceeds 60 degrees, the resulting axial force was insufficient to adequately tighten the countersink 20 against the tapered head 13. As a result, vibration and noise were observed to increase.
- the magnitude of the axial force also depends on the torque generated by the drive assembly 4.
- the lead angle decreases, the magnitude of the axial force increases. Although this has the benefit of further tightening the agitator 3 against the dog 12, any further reduction in vibration and noise may be small or insignificant. Moreover, as the axial force increases, the threads 15,21 are required to withstand a greater axial load and may therefore fail prematurely. Over the torque range typically generated by the drive assembly of most conventional cleaner heads, a lead angle less than 40 degrees was found to give no appreciable reduction in vibration and noise beyond that observed at 40 degrees. Nevertheless, where the torque generated by the drive assembly is relatively low, a smaller lead angle may be necessary or desirable in order to generate the required axial force.
- the threads 15,21 have a buttress thread form, which provides three key benefits.
- the magnitude of the axial force exerted on the agitator 3 depends also on the friction between the two threads 15,21.
- a buttress thread form has the advantage of relatively low friction properties. As a result, a greater axial force is generated for a given torque.
- the agitator 3 experiences different loads. As the load on the agitator 3 varies, so too does the torque generated by the drive assembly 4. Should the torque generated by the drive assembly 4 decrease, the axial force exerted by the dog 12 on the agitator 3 will decrease.
- the countersink 20 and the tapered head 13 are under compression and therefore exert an axial force in the opposite direction.
- the agitator 3 experiences a net axial force in a direction away from the dog 12.
- the vertical (or near vertical) flanks 17,23 of the threads 15,21 act to oppose this negative axial force and thus prevent the agitator 3 and the dog 12 from loosening.
- a buttress thread form has a relatively thick base resulting in a stronger thread. The threads 15,21 are therefore able to withstand greater axial forces.
- Each thread 15,21 has four starts 16,22 that each turn through 180 degrees.
- the starts 16,22 are responsible for transmitting the torque generated by the drive assembly 4 to the agitator 3. Each start 16,22 is therefore required to bear a fraction of the total torque. If the number of starts 16,22 were reduced, each start 16,22 would be required to bear a larger load and may therefore fail prematurely. This may be addressed by increasing the size of the thread form so as to increase the strength of the starts 16,22. If the number of starts 16,22 were increased, the available space for each start 16,22 would decrease. Each start 16,22 would then have a smaller thread form which is likely to compromise the strength of the threads 15,21. Consequently, although each start 16,22 would be required to bear a smaller load, the strength of each start 16,22 may be weakened to a point at which failure of the starts 16,22 becomes a potential problem.
- the starts 16,22 would be shorter in length. This has the advantage that a shorter shank 14 and bore 19 may be employed. However, as the length of the starts 16,22 decreases, the starts 16,22 are subjected to a greater load per unit length and may therefore fail if subjected to excessive torque. Conversely, if the starts 16,22 were to turn through a larger angle, the starts 16,22 would be subjected to a smaller load per unit length and may therefore transmit a greater torque. However, a longer shank 14 and bore 19 would then be required.
- the agitator 3 is removable from the cleaner head 1. This is achieved by removing the cap 8 forming part of the housing 2. Removal of the cap 8 creates an aperture in the side of the housing 2 through which the agitator 3 may be removed. In order to remove the agitator 3, a user is required to rotate the agitator 3 relative to the dog 12. This then causes the agitator 3 to unscrew and separate from the dog 12, after which the user may pull the agitator 3 through the aperture. Mounting the agitator 3 within the cleaner head 1 is then the reverse of this process.
- the ends of the starts 16 of the dog 12 are tapered slightly. This then aids the user in mounting the agitator 3 to the dog 12.
- the end of the shank 14 is guided by the countersink 20 towards the centre of the bore 19.
- each thread 15,21 has four starts 16,22. Consequently, a user need only rotate the agitator 3 through a maximum angle of 90 degrees in order to bring the two threads 15,21 into alignment. At 90 degrees, the user can comfortably rotate the agitator 3 whilst maintaining a hold of the agitator 3. If a smaller number of starts 16,22 were employed, the user would be required to rotate the agitator 3 through a larger angle, which the user might find uncomfortable.
- Each start 16,22 turns through an angle of 180 degrees. Consequently, in order to remove and mount the agitator 3, the user is required to rotate the agitator 3 through 180 degrees. This is not overly burdensome and can generally be achieved with one or two short twists of the agitator 3.
- a smaller turn angle may be employed, which has the advantage that the user is required to rotate the agitator 3 through a smaller angle.
- the turn angle decreases, the lengths of the starts 16,22 decrease and thus the starts 16,22 are subjected to a greater load per unit length.
- a turn angle of no less than 120 degrees may be preferable.
- a turn angle greater than 180 degrees may be employed for the starts 16,22. This then has the advantage that the starts 16,22 are longer in length and are therefore able to bear a higher torque. However, as the length of the starts 16,22 increases, so too does the length of the shank 14 and the bore 19.
- the user is required to rotate the agitator 3 through a larger angle. By employing a turn angle of no more than 360 degrees, a relatively short shank 14 and bore 19 may be maintained. Additionally, a user is able to remove and mount the agitator 3 through a small number of twists of the agitator 3.
- Each thread 15,21 has a buttress thread form which, as noted above, has relatively low friction properties. Consequently, in addition to the benefits noted above, the thread form makes it easier for the user to remove and mount the agitator 3.
- the fit between the two threads 15,21 may be relatively loose, which then further aids the user in removing and mounting the agitator 3.
- a relatively loose fit is likely to result in a relatively large degree of play between the agitator 3 and the dog 12.
- the agitator 3 screws on to and tightens against the dog 12, even a relatively large amount of play may be absorbed.
- a conventional cleaner head having a removable agitator it is generally difficult to ensure that the agitator is held axially tight within the cleaner head.
- the cleaner head 1 of the present invention in that, after mounting the agitator 3 within the cleaner head 1, there is a degree of axial play between the agitator 3 and the dog 12.
- the agitator 3 screws on to and is tightened against the dog 12 so as to absorb any axial play.
- a removable agitator may be provided without the normally inherent problems of vibration and noise.
- the thread 15 formed around the shank 14 is an external thread
- the thread 21 formed around the bore 19 is an internal thread
- the thread 15 formed around the shank 14 may be an internal thread
- the thread 21 formed around the bore 19 may be an external thread
- the dog 12 may comprise the bore 19 and the countersink 20
- the agitator 3 may comprise the tapered head 13 and the shank 14. Accordingly, in a more general sense, one of the agitator 3 and the dog 12 may be said to comprise the tapered head 13, the shank 14 and a first screw thread 15, and the other of the agitator 3 and the dog 12 may be said to comprise the bore 19, the countersink 20 and a second screw thread 21 which complements the first screw thread 15.
- each start 16,22 has a buttress thread form
- other thread forms might alternatively be used.
- both square and trapezoidal thread forms have relatively low friction properties.
- the buttress thread form is typically stronger owing to the larger base of each start.
- the cleaner head illustrated in Figure 1 is intended to form part of a vacuum cleaner.
- the agitator 3 and the dog 12 may equally be employed in the cleaner head of other appliances, such floor sweepers or carpet shampoo machines.
- the drive assembly 4 of the embodiment described above comprises an electric motor 10
- the drive assembly 4 might comprise alternative means for generating the torque necessary to drive the agitator 3.
- the drive assembly 4 may comprise an air turbine that is driven by air drawn through the cleaner head 1.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Nozzles For Electric Vacuum Cleaners (AREA)
Description
- The present invention relates to a cleaner head having an agitator and a drive assembly for driving the agitator.
- The cleaner head of an appliance, such as a vacuum cleaner or floor sweeper, may include an agitator driven by a drive assembly. The drive assembly often includes a dog for transmitting torque generated by the drive assembly to the agitator. A problem with existing cleaner heads is that there is often a degree of play between the dog and the agitator. Consequently, as the agitator rotates, the agitator vibrates and generates noise.
-
DE102010060373 describes a cleaner head having a motor-driven brush body. The brush body includes a threaded portion which is inserted into a threaded hollow portion of a drive shaft. - The present invention provides a cleaner head comprising an agitator and a drive assembly for driving the agitator, the drive assembly comprising a dog for transmitting torque to the agitator, wherein one of the dog and the agitator comprises a tapered head, a shank that extends from the head, and a screw thread formed around the shank, the other of the dog and the agitator comprises a bore having a countersink and a complementary screw thread formed around a wall of the bore, the shank projects into the bore and the two threads mate such that, as the dog rotates, the agitator screws on to the dog and the tapered head mates with the countersink.
- As the countersink mates with and tightens against the tapered head, play between the dog and the agitator is removed or reduced. As a result, the agitator vibrates less during rotation and thus noise is reduced.
- A further problem with existing cleaner heads is that that the agitator may not align concentrically with the dog. As a result, out-of-balance forces place an increased stress on components of the cleaner head, particularly the bearings, which may reduce the lifespan of the cleaner head. With the cleaner head of the present invention, the mating of the countersink and the tapered head acts to align concentrically the agitator and the dog. As a result, out-of-balance forces are reduced and thus the lifespan of the cleaner head is prolonged.
- Each screw thread may have a lead angle of no more than 60 degrees. As a result, over the torque range typically generated by the drive assembly of most conventional cleaner heads, the axial force exerted by the dog on the agitator is of a magnitude that ensures that the agitator is held against the tapered head with sufficient force so as to reduce vibration and noise.
- Each screw thread may have a lead angle of no less than 40 degrees. As a result, over the torque range typically generated by the drive assembly of most conventional cleaner heads, the axial force exerted by the dog on the agitator is sufficient to hold the agitator against the dog without being excessive, which might otherwise result in premature failure of the threads.
- Each screw thread may have a plurality of starts. By employing a plurality of starts, the torque applied by the dog is distributed over a greater number of starts. As a result, a greater torque may be transmitted to the agitator without failure of the threads. Additionally, where the agitator is removable from the cleaner head, a greater number of starts makes it easier for a user to mount the agitator. In particular, it is generally easier to align the thread of the agitator with the thread of the dog.
- Each start may turn through an angle of no less than 120 degrees. The length of each start depends on the angle through which the start turns. As the angle decreases, so too does the length of the start. As a result, the start is subjected to a greater load per unit length. Below an angle of 120 degrees, the lengths of the starts may be insufficient to bear the torque required of most cleaner heads.
- Each start may turn through an angle of no more than 360 degrees. This then has the advantage of maintaining a relatively short shank and bore. Additionally, where the agitator is removable from the cleaner head, the agitator can be removed from the dog by rotating the agitator through an angle of no more than 360 degrees, which can generally be achieved with a small number of twists of the agitator.
- Each screw thread may have a buttress thread form. A buttress thread form has the advantage of relatively low friction properties. As a result, a greater axial force is exerted by the dog on the agitator for a given torque. Additionally, where the agitator is removable from the cleaner head, a low friction thread makes it easier for the user to unscrew the agitator from the dog. As the load on the agitator varies, so too does the torque generated by the drive assembly. In response to a decrease in torque, the agitator may experience a net axial force in a direction away from the dog. By employing a buttress thread form, the vertical (or near vertical) flanks of the threads act to oppose this negative axial force and thus prevent the agitator and the dog from loosening. Consequently, as the agitator experiences different loads, the agitator continues to be held tightly against the dog and thus vibration and noise continue to be reduced. Furthermore, in comparison to other thread forms, a buttress thread form has a relatively thick base resulting in a stronger thread. As a result, the threads are able to withstand a greater axial force and thus the agitator may be held more tightly against the dog.
- The agitator may be removable from the cleaner head. In particular, by rotating the agitator relative to the dog, the agitator may be unscrewed and separated from the dog. In a conventional cleaner head having a removable agitator, it is generally difficult to ensure that the agitator is held axially tight within the cleaner head. With the cleaner head of the present invention, the agitator screws on to and is tightened against the dog so as to prevent or reduce the axial play. As a result, a removable agitator may be provided without the normally inherent problems of vibration and noise.
- There are terms employed throughout this document that, in English, are well understood within the field of engineering. It is possible that one or more of these terms may not have a direct equivalent in other languages. Accordingly, for the purposes of clarity, an explanation of some of these terms will now be provided. The term 'dog' should be understood to mean a torque-transmission member. The term `start' refers to a ridge of an external thread or a groove of an internal thread. The term 'lead angle' refers to the angle formed by the starts of a screw thread relative to a plane perpendicular to the screw axis. And the term 'thread form' refers to the cross-sectional shape or profile of the starts of a screw thread.
- In order that the present invention may be more readily understood, an embodiment of the invention will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
-
Figure 1 is an exploded view of a cleaner head in accordance with the present invention; -
Figure 2 is an isometric view of a dog forming part of the cleaner head; -
Figure 3 is a side view of the dog; -
Figure 4 is a side sectional view of the dog; and -
Figure 5 is a side sectional view of one end of an agitator forming part of the cleaner head. - The
cleaner head 1 ofFigure 1 comprises ahousing 2 within which anagitator 3 and adrive assembly 4 are mounted. - The
agitator 3 comprises anelongate body 5 to which bristles, flicker strips orother means 6 for agitating a cleaning surface are attached. Theagitator 3 is mounted at one end to a bushing 7 seated within aremovable cap 8. The opposite end of theagitator 3 is mounted to adog 12 forming part of thedrive assembly 4. - The
drive assembly 4 comprises anelectric motor 10 and atransmission 11 for transmitting torque generated by themotor 10 to theagitator 3. Thetransmission 11 comprises, among other things, adog 12 that engages with theagitator 3. Thedog 12 is therefore responsible for transmitting the torque generated by thedrive assembly 4 to theagitator 3. With the exception of thedog 12, the details of thedrive assembly 4 are not pertinent to the present invention, and drive assemblies for driving an agitator of a cleaner head are well known. By way of example, the cleaner heads of the DC24 and DC26 vacuum cleaners sold by Dyson Limited each include a drive assembly suitable for use in the present cleaner head. - A more detailed explanation will now be provided of the
dog 12, the end of theagitator 3 that engages with thedog 12, and how the two 3,12 engage in order to transmit torque. - As illustrated in
Figures 2 to 4 , thedog 12 comprises ahead 13, ashank 14 that extends from thehead 13, and ahelical screw thread 15 formed around theshank 14. - The
head 13 tapers in a direction towards theshank 14 and defines a frustoconical surface that is coaxial with theshank 14. - The
shank 14 extends from thehead 13 and is generally cylindrical in shape. - The
screw thread 15 is an external thread that comprises four starts 16 that are evenly spaced about theshank 14. Each start 16 turns about thescrew axis 18 through an angle of 180 degrees. Consequently, each start 16 completes one half turn only. Thescrew thread 15 also has a lead angle of 50 degrees and a buttress thread form. - As illustrated in
Figure 5 , one end of theagitator 3 includes abore 19 having acountersink 20 and ahelical screw thread 21 formed around a wall of thebore 19. - The
countersink 20 has a frustoconical surface that complements the frustoconical surface of the taperedhead 13 of thedog 12, i.e. both surfaces have the same or similar taper angle. - The
screw thread 21 is an internal thread that complements theexternal screw thread 15 of thedog 12. Consequently, thescrew thread 21 comprises four starts 22 that are evenly spaced about thebore 19 and turn through an angle of 180 degrees. Thescrew thread 21 also has a lead angle of 50 degrees and a buttress thread form. - With the
agitator 3 mounted to thedog 12, theshank 14 of thedog 12 projects into thebore 19 of theagitator 3, and theexternal thread 15 of thedog 12 mates with theinternal thread 21 of theagitator 3. Owing to tolerances in thecleaner head 1, there is a degree of play or backlash (both axial and radial) between theagitator 3 and thedog 12. - During operation of the
cleaner head 1, the torque generated by thedrive assembly 4 is transmitted to theagitator 3 via thedog 12. As a consequence of thethreads dog 12 exerts both an axial force and a rotational force on theagitator 3. The rotational force causes theagitator 3 to rotate. The axial force, on the other hand, causes theagitator 3 to screw on to and tighten against thedog 12. In this regard, thethreads dog 12 and theagitator 3 are oriented (i.e. right-handed or left-handed) such that the axial force acts in a direction towards thedog 12. As theagitator 3 tightens against thedog 12, thecountersink 20 mates with and tightens against the taperedhead 13. As a result, the play between theagitator 3 and thedog 12 is removed or significantly reduced, and thus vibration of theagitator 3 is reduced. In addition to reducing play, the mating of thecountersink 20 and the taperedhead 13 ensures that theagitator 3 and thedog 12 are aligned concentrically. As a result, out-of balance forces are reduced and thus the lifespan of thecleaner head 1 is prolonged. - The magnitude of the axial force depends on, among other things, the lead angle of the
threads threads countersink 20 is tightened against the taperedhead 13 with sufficient force to absorb the play between theagitator 3 and thedog 12. As the lead angle increases, the magnitude of the axial force decreases and thus thecountersink 20 is held less tightly against the taperedhead 13. It was found that, when the lead angle exceeds 60 degrees, the resulting axial force was insufficient to adequately tighten thecountersink 20 against the taperedhead 13. As a result, vibration and noise were observed to increase. The magnitude of the axial force also depends on the torque generated by thedrive assembly 4. Accordingly, it may be possible or indeed desirable to employ a larger lead angle where a higher torque is generated. However, over the torque range typically generated by the drive assembly of most conventional cleaner heads (e.g. a stall torque of between 100 and 300 Nmm), a lead angle of no more than 60 degrees was found to reduce vibration and noise. - As the lead angle decreases, the magnitude of the axial force increases. Although this has the benefit of further tightening the
agitator 3 against thedog 12, any further reduction in vibration and noise may be small or insignificant. Moreover, as the axial force increases, thethreads - As illustrated in
Figures 4 and 5 , thethreads agitator 3 depends also on the friction between the twothreads cleaner head 1, theagitator 3 experiences different loads. As the load on theagitator 3 varies, so too does the torque generated by thedrive assembly 4. Should the torque generated by thedrive assembly 4 decrease, the axial force exerted by thedog 12 on theagitator 3 will decrease. Thecountersink 20 and the taperedhead 13 are under compression and therefore exert an axial force in the opposite direction. Consequently, in response to a decrease in the torque of thedrive assembly 4, theagitator 3 experiences a net axial force in a direction away from thedog 12. By employing a buttress thread form, the vertical (or near vertical) flanks 17,23 of thethreads agitator 3 and thedog 12 from loosening. - Consequently, as the
agitator 3 experiences different loads, theagitator 3 continues to be held tightly against thedog 12 and thus vibration and noise continue to be reduced. Third, a buttress thread form has a relatively thick base resulting in a stronger thread. Thethreads - Each
thread starts - The starts 16,22 are responsible for transmitting the torque generated by the
drive assembly 4 to theagitator 3. Eachstart starts start start threads starts - If the starts 16,22 were to turn through a smaller angle, the
starts shorter shank 14 and bore 19 may be employed. However, as the length of thestarts starts starts longer shank 14 and bore 19 would then be required. - There is therefore a balance to be struck between the various parameters, e.g. lead angle, number of starts, angle of rotation of the starts, length of dog and bore, stall torque of the drive assembly, material strength of the dog and bore etc.
- The
agitator 3 is removable from thecleaner head 1. This is achieved by removing thecap 8 forming part of thehousing 2. Removal of thecap 8 creates an aperture in the side of thehousing 2 through which theagitator 3 may be removed. In order to remove theagitator 3, a user is required to rotate theagitator 3 relative to thedog 12. This then causes theagitator 3 to unscrew and separate from thedog 12, after which the user may pull theagitator 3 through the aperture. Mounting theagitator 3 within thecleaner head 1 is then the reverse of this process. - The ends of the
starts 16 of thedog 12 are tapered slightly. This then aids the user in mounting theagitator 3 to thedog 12. In particular, the end of theshank 14 is guided by thecountersink 20 towards the centre of thebore 19. - When mounting the
agitator 3 to thedog 12, the twothreads thread starts agitator 3 through a maximum angle of 90 degrees in order to bring the twothreads agitator 3 whilst maintaining a hold of theagitator 3. If a smaller number of starts 16,22 were employed, the user would be required to rotate theagitator 3 through a larger angle, which the user might find uncomfortable. - Each
start agitator 3, the user is required to rotate theagitator 3 through 180 degrees. This is not overly burdensome and can generally be achieved with one or two short twists of theagitator 3. A smaller turn angle may be employed, which has the advantage that the user is required to rotate theagitator 3 through a smaller angle. However, as noted above, as the turn angle decreases, the lengths of thestarts starts - Accordingly, a turn angle of no less than 120 degrees may be preferable. A turn angle greater than 180 degrees may be employed for the
starts starts shank 14 and thebore 19. Moreover, in order to remove and mount theagitator 3, the user is required to rotate theagitator 3 through a larger angle. By employing a turn angle of no more than 360 degrees, a relativelyshort shank 14 and bore 19 may be maintained. Additionally, a user is able to remove and mount theagitator 3 through a small number of twists of theagitator 3. - Each
thread agitator 3. - The fit between the two
threads agitator 3. A relatively loose fit is likely to result in a relatively large degree of play between theagitator 3 and thedog 12. However, since theagitator 3 screws on to and tightens against thedog 12, even a relatively large amount of play may be absorbed. - In a conventional cleaner head having a removable agitator, it is generally difficult to ensure that the agitator is held axially tight within the cleaner head. The same is true of the
cleaner head 1 of the present invention in that, after mounting theagitator 3 within thecleaner head 1, there is a degree of axial play between theagitator 3 and thedog 12. However, during operation of thecleaner head 1, theagitator 3 screws on to and is tightened against thedog 12 so as to absorb any axial play. As a result, a removable agitator may be provided without the normally inherent problems of vibration and noise. - In the embodiment described above, the
thread 15 formed around theshank 14 is an external thread, and thethread 21 formed around thebore 19 is an internal thread. As an alternative, thethread 15 formed around theshank 14 may be an internal thread, and thethread 21 formed around thebore 19 may be an external thread. Furthermore, thedog 12 may comprise thebore 19 and thecountersink 20, and theagitator 3 may comprise the taperedhead 13 and theshank 14. Accordingly, in a more general sense, one of theagitator 3 and thedog 12 may be said to comprise the taperedhead 13, theshank 14 and afirst screw thread 15, and the other of theagitator 3 and thedog 12 may be said to comprise thebore 19, thecountersink 20 and asecond screw thread 21 which complements thefirst screw thread 15. - Although each start 16,22 has a buttress thread form, other thread forms might alternatively be used. For example, both square and trapezoidal thread forms have relatively low friction properties. However, the buttress thread form is typically stronger owing to the larger base of each start.
- The cleaner head illustrated in
Figure 1 is intended to form part of a vacuum cleaner. However, theagitator 3 and thedog 12 may equally be employed in the cleaner head of other appliances, such floor sweepers or carpet shampoo machines. Moreover, although thedrive assembly 4 of the embodiment described above comprises anelectric motor 10, thedrive assembly 4 might comprise alternative means for generating the torque necessary to drive theagitator 3. For example, where thecleaner head 1 is intended to form part of a vacuum cleaner, thedrive assembly 4 may comprise an air turbine that is driven by air drawn through thecleaner head 1.
Claims (8)
- A cleaner head (1) comprising an agitator (3) and a drive assembly (4) for driving the agitator (3), the drive assembly (4) comprising a dog (12) for transmitting torque to the agitator (3), wherein one of the dog (12) and the agitator (3) comprises a tapered head (13), a shank (14) that extends from the head (13), and a screw thread (15) formed around the shank (14), the other of the dog (12) and the agitator (3) comprises a bore (19) having a countersink (20) and a complementary screw thread (21) formed around a wall of the bore (19), the shank (14) projects into the bore (19), and the two threads (15,21) mate such that, as the dog (12) rotates, the agitator (3) screws on to the dog (12) and the tapered head (13) mates with the countersink (20).
- A cleaner head as claimed in claim 1, wherein each screw thread (15,21) has a lead angle of no more than 60 degrees.
- A cleaner head as claimed in claim 1 or 2, wherein each screw thread (15,21) has a lead angle of no less than 40 degrees.
- A cleaner head as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, wherein each screw thread (15,21) has a plurality of starts (16,22).
- A cleaner head as claimed in claim 4, wherein each start (16,22) turns through an angle of no less than 120 degrees.
- A cleaner head as claimed in claim 4 or 5, wherein each start (16,22) turns through an angle of no more than 360 degrees.
- A cleaner head as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, wherein each screw thread (15,21) has a buttress thread form.
- A cleaner head as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, wherein the agitator (3) is removable from the cleaner head (1), and rotation of the agitator (3) relative to the dog (12) causes the agitator (3) to unscrew and separate from the dog (12).
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
GB201214424A GB2504943B (en) | 2012-08-13 | 2012-08-13 | Cleaner head with agitator and drive assembly |
PCT/GB2013/052140 WO2014027186A1 (en) | 2012-08-13 | 2013-08-09 | Cleaner head |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2882328A1 EP2882328A1 (en) | 2015-06-17 |
EP2882328B1 true EP2882328B1 (en) | 2016-06-29 |
Family
ID=46981448
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP13750121.9A Not-in-force EP2882328B1 (en) | 2012-08-13 | 2013-08-09 | Cleaner head |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP2882328B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP5810449B2 (en) |
KR (1) | KR101609287B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN104717912B (en) |
GB (1) | GB2504943B (en) |
WO (1) | WO2014027186A1 (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP3440973A1 (en) | 2017-08-09 | 2019-02-13 | Miele & Cie. KG | Vacuum cleaner and floor nozzle for vacuum cleaner |
US11846937B2 (en) | 2016-05-20 | 2023-12-19 | Lg Electronics Inc. | Autonomous cleaner |
Families Citing this family (18)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP6915957B2 (en) * | 2015-07-17 | 2021-08-11 | 日立グローバルライフソリューションズ株式会社 | A suction tool with a rotating brush and a vacuum cleaner with it |
EP3173002B1 (en) | 2015-11-30 | 2021-08-04 | Black & Decker Inc. | Cleaning head |
WO2017200350A1 (en) | 2016-05-20 | 2017-11-23 | 엘지전자 주식회사 | Robot cleaner |
US10524628B2 (en) | 2016-05-20 | 2020-01-07 | Lg Electronics Inc. | Autonomous cleaner |
WO2017200344A1 (en) | 2016-05-20 | 2017-11-23 | 엘지전자 주식회사 | Robot cleaner |
WO2017200351A1 (en) | 2016-05-20 | 2017-11-23 | 엘지전자 주식회사 | Robot cleaner |
US10420448B2 (en) | 2016-05-20 | 2019-09-24 | Lg Electronics Inc. | Autonomous cleaner |
US10258212B2 (en) | 2016-05-20 | 2019-04-16 | Lg Electronics Inc. | Cleaner |
US10463212B2 (en) | 2016-05-20 | 2019-11-05 | Lg Electronics Inc. | Autonomous cleaner |
WO2017200348A1 (en) | 2016-05-20 | 2017-11-23 | 엘지전자 주식회사 | Robot cleaner |
WO2017200343A1 (en) | 2016-05-20 | 2017-11-23 | 엘지전자 주식회사 | Robot cleaner |
KR101917702B1 (en) | 2017-01-26 | 2018-11-13 | 엘지전자 주식회사 | Cleaner |
WO2017200347A1 (en) | 2016-05-20 | 2017-11-23 | 엘지전자 주식회사 | Robot cleaner |
WO2017200349A1 (en) | 2016-05-20 | 2017-11-23 | 엘지전자 주식회사 | Robot cleaner |
JP7246469B2 (en) * | 2018-08-10 | 2023-03-27 | アモーレパシフィック コーポレーション | Tip applicator and cosmetic applicator including the same |
EP3766398B1 (en) | 2019-07-19 | 2022-04-13 | BSH Hausgeräte GmbH | Brush roller bar for a cleaning device |
IT202100008123A1 (en) * | 2021-03-31 | 2022-10-01 | Diversey Inc | FLOOR CLEANING EQUIPMENT AND CLEANER ROLLER FOR A FLOOR CLEANING EQUIPMENT |
CN115153346A (en) * | 2022-08-04 | 2022-10-11 | 北京顺造科技有限公司 | Scrubbing brush subassembly and surface cleaning equipment |
Family Cites Families (20)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB504058A (en) * | 1938-01-24 | 1939-04-19 | Moses Wheeldon | Improvements in suction sweepers |
NL276763A (en) * | 1961-04-04 | |||
GB1109783A (en) * | 1964-07-16 | 1968-04-18 | Westinghouse Electric Corp | An agitator roll assembly for a suction cleaner |
US4905341A (en) * | 1985-09-20 | 1990-03-06 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Upright-type electric vacuum cleaner |
JPH0382427A (en) * | 1989-08-25 | 1991-04-08 | Sanyo Electric Co Ltd | Suction tool for floor |
JP3308409B2 (en) * | 1994-10-20 | 2002-07-29 | 株式会社コーワ | Manufacturing method of rotor for floor nozzle of vacuum cleaner |
JPH0919388A (en) * | 1995-07-03 | 1997-01-21 | Tec Corp | Blade structure for sucking port part of electric cleaner |
JP2833528B2 (en) * | 1995-07-14 | 1998-12-09 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Suction body of vacuum cleaner and vacuum cleaner having the same |
JP2948145B2 (en) * | 1996-04-17 | 1999-09-13 | 祐子 秋谷 | Press mold for ceramic products |
DE19621301A1 (en) * | 1996-05-28 | 1997-12-04 | Vorwerk Co Interholding | Motorized brushing device |
CN2288018Y (en) * | 1996-08-05 | 1998-08-19 | 刘玄富 | Efficient roller for applying paint |
CN2554929Y (en) * | 2002-06-03 | 2003-06-11 | 姚贵成 | Kernel removing separator for cornus officinalis |
US8117714B2 (en) * | 2005-03-09 | 2012-02-21 | Bissell Homecare, Inc. | Vacuum cleaner with hair collection element |
CN2868167Y (en) * | 2005-10-21 | 2007-02-14 | 林高茂 | Double-brush electric cleaning device |
JP2007152938A (en) | 2005-11-11 | 2007-06-21 | Toray Ind Inc | Member made from frp |
CN2873330Y (en) * | 2006-01-26 | 2007-02-28 | 龙岗南约查尔顿首饰厂 | Automatic cleaner for cleaning device |
DE102006058401A1 (en) * | 2006-12-12 | 2008-06-19 | Vorwerk & Co. Interholding Gmbh | Brush, in particular brush for placement in a vacuum cleaner attachment |
DE102009013475B4 (en) * | 2009-03-19 | 2020-02-20 | Vorwerk & Co. Interholding Gmbh | Object movable by means of a roller |
CN201794050U (en) * | 2010-07-09 | 2011-04-13 | 鞍山森远路桥股份有限公司 | Snow remover with front spiral rolling brushes |
DE102010060373A1 (en) * | 2010-11-05 | 2012-05-10 | Vorwerk & Co. Interholding Gmbh | Replaceable brush body i.e. hollow cylindrical body, for motor-propelled brush apparatus i.e. electric motor-propelled brush apparatus, for cleaning carpet, has drive section extended in region of closure molding part along radial direction |
-
2012
- 2012-08-13 GB GB201214424A patent/GB2504943B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2013
- 2013-08-09 KR KR1020157005698A patent/KR101609287B1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2013-08-09 WO PCT/GB2013/052140 patent/WO2014027186A1/en active Application Filing
- 2013-08-09 EP EP13750121.9A patent/EP2882328B1/en not_active Not-in-force
- 2013-08-09 CN CN201380053498.1A patent/CN104717912B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2013-08-13 JP JP2013168151A patent/JP5810449B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
None * |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US11846937B2 (en) | 2016-05-20 | 2023-12-19 | Lg Electronics Inc. | Autonomous cleaner |
EP3440973A1 (en) | 2017-08-09 | 2019-02-13 | Miele & Cie. KG | Vacuum cleaner and floor nozzle for vacuum cleaner |
DE102017118087A1 (en) | 2017-08-09 | 2019-02-14 | Miele & Cie. Kg | Floor nozzle for vacuum cleaners and vacuum cleaners |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN104717912B (en) | 2016-11-09 |
JP2014036857A (en) | 2014-02-27 |
WO2014027186A1 (en) | 2014-02-20 |
GB2504943A (en) | 2014-02-19 |
GB2504943B (en) | 2014-11-19 |
EP2882328A1 (en) | 2015-06-17 |
KR20150038598A (en) | 2015-04-08 |
GB201214424D0 (en) | 2012-09-26 |
CN104717912A (en) | 2015-06-17 |
JP5810449B2 (en) | 2015-11-11 |
KR101609287B1 (en) | 2016-04-05 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP2882328B1 (en) | Cleaner head | |
US20140041136A1 (en) | Cleaner head | |
US9931741B2 (en) | In-line disposable torque limiting device suitable for power drive | |
US7115028B1 (en) | Coupling structure for grinding members | |
KR20160014602A (en) | Screw | |
US9651078B2 (en) | Torque limiting fastener | |
US20190351534A1 (en) | Power Wrench | |
TWI483856B (en) | Castor and device moveable by means of a castor | |
US20220134446A1 (en) | A Tool Holding Arrangement, Thread Insert, Rotatable Shaft and Drill Unit | |
WO2014027185A1 (en) | Cleaner head | |
EP0118918A1 (en) | Starting device for gasoline engines | |
US20100239384A1 (en) | Molly bolt | |
US20170209943A1 (en) | Tool holder for connecting a diamond drill to a drill bit | |
GB2504942A (en) | A cleaner head with an agitator and drive assembly arrangement | |
GB2504941A (en) | A cleaner head with an agitator and drive assembly arrangement | |
US20180222023A1 (en) | Gearless In-Line Torque Limited Device | |
EP3359065B1 (en) | Gearless in-line torque-limited device | |
KR20090035757A (en) | Bit for removing damaged screws | |
EP3677800A1 (en) | Wood screw | |
CN211923564U (en) | Precession device | |
WO2014126525A1 (en) | A tool holder arrangement | |
JP3036344B2 (en) | Coupling device | |
US20180147703A1 (en) | Screwdriver with rotating lever | |
CN220378662U (en) | High-strength hexagon head bolt | |
CN219152718U (en) | Impact tool |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20150209 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20160415 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
RBV | Designated contracting states (corrected) |
Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 808408 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20160715 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602013008994 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160629 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160929 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160629 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20160629 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160629 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160629 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160629 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160930 Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160629 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160629 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK05 Ref document number: 808408 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20160629 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160831 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160629 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160629 Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160629 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160629 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160629 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161029 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160629 Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160629 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160629 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160629 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160629 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161031 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602013008994 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160629 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160831 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160831 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160629 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20170330 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160809 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 5 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160929 Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160629 Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160809 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20130809 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160629 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160629 Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160831 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 6 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160629 Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160629 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20190722 Year of fee payment: 7 Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20190723 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 602013008994 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210302 Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20200831 |