EP2882328B1 - Cleaner head - Google Patents

Cleaner head Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2882328B1
EP2882328B1 EP13750121.9A EP13750121A EP2882328B1 EP 2882328 B1 EP2882328 B1 EP 2882328B1 EP 13750121 A EP13750121 A EP 13750121A EP 2882328 B1 EP2882328 B1 EP 2882328B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
agitator
dog
cleaner head
head
starts
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Not-in-force
Application number
EP13750121.9A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2882328A1 (en
Inventor
Will KERR
Alistair Skuse
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Dyson Technology Ltd
Original Assignee
Dyson Technology Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Dyson Technology Ltd filed Critical Dyson Technology Ltd
Publication of EP2882328A1 publication Critical patent/EP2882328A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2882328B1 publication Critical patent/EP2882328B1/en
Not-in-force legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A47FURNITURE; DOMESTIC ARTICLES OR APPLIANCES; COFFEE MILLS; SPICE MILLS; SUCTION CLEANERS IN GENERAL
    • A47LDOMESTIC WASHING OR CLEANING; SUCTION CLEANERS IN GENERAL
    • A47L9/00Details or accessories of suction cleaners, e.g. mechanical means for controlling the suction or for effecting pulsating action; Storing devices specially adapted to suction cleaners or parts thereof; Carrying-vehicles specially adapted for suction cleaners
    • A47L9/02Nozzles
    • A47L9/04Nozzles with driven brushes or agitators
    • A47L9/0405Driving means for the brushes or agitators
    • A47L9/0411Driving means for the brushes or agitators driven by electric motor
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A47FURNITURE; DOMESTIC ARTICLES OR APPLIANCES; COFFEE MILLS; SPICE MILLS; SUCTION CLEANERS IN GENERAL
    • A47LDOMESTIC WASHING OR CLEANING; SUCTION CLEANERS IN GENERAL
    • A47L9/00Details or accessories of suction cleaners, e.g. mechanical means for controlling the suction or for effecting pulsating action; Storing devices specially adapted to suction cleaners or parts thereof; Carrying-vehicles specially adapted for suction cleaners
    • A47L9/02Nozzles
    • A47L9/04Nozzles with driven brushes or agitators
    • A47L9/0461Dust-loosening tools, e.g. agitators, brushes
    • A47L9/0466Rotating tools
    • A47L9/0477Rolls

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a cleaner head having an agitator and a drive assembly for driving the agitator.
  • the cleaner head of an appliance may include an agitator driven by a drive assembly.
  • the drive assembly often includes a dog for transmitting torque generated by the drive assembly to the agitator.
  • a problem with existing cleaner heads is that there is often a degree of play between the dog and the agitator. Consequently, as the agitator rotates, the agitator vibrates and generates noise.
  • DE102010060373 describes a cleaner head having a motor-driven brush body.
  • the brush body includes a threaded portion which is inserted into a threaded hollow portion of a drive shaft.
  • the present invention provides a cleaner head comprising an agitator and a drive assembly for driving the agitator, the drive assembly comprising a dog for transmitting torque to the agitator, wherein one of the dog and the agitator comprises a tapered head, a shank that extends from the head, and a screw thread formed around the shank, the other of the dog and the agitator comprises a bore having a countersink and a complementary screw thread formed around a wall of the bore, the shank projects into the bore and the two threads mate such that, as the dog rotates, the agitator screws on to the dog and the tapered head mates with the countersink.
  • a further problem with existing cleaner heads is that that the agitator may not align concentrically with the dog. As a result, out-of-balance forces place an increased stress on components of the cleaner head, particularly the bearings, which may reduce the lifespan of the cleaner head.
  • the mating of the countersink and the tapered head acts to align concentrically the agitator and the dog. As a result, out-of-balance forces are reduced and thus the lifespan of the cleaner head is prolonged.
  • Each screw thread may have a lead angle of no more than 60 degrees.
  • Each screw thread may have a lead angle of no less than 40 degrees.
  • Each screw thread may have a plurality of starts.
  • the torque applied by the dog is distributed over a greater number of starts.
  • a greater torque may be transmitted to the agitator without failure of the threads.
  • a greater number of starts makes it easier for a user to mount the agitator. In particular, it is generally easier to align the thread of the agitator with the thread of the dog.
  • Each start may turn through an angle of no less than 120 degrees.
  • the length of each start depends on the angle through which the start turns. As the angle decreases, so too does the length of the start. As a result, the start is subjected to a greater load per unit length. Below an angle of 120 degrees, the lengths of the starts may be insufficient to bear the torque required of most cleaner heads.
  • Each start may turn through an angle of no more than 360 degrees. This then has the advantage of maintaining a relatively short shank and bore. Additionally, where the agitator is removable from the cleaner head, the agitator can be removed from the dog by rotating the agitator through an angle of no more than 360 degrees, which can generally be achieved with a small number of twists of the agitator.
  • Each screw thread may have a buttress thread form.
  • a buttress thread form has the advantage of relatively low friction properties. As a result, a greater axial force is exerted by the dog on the agitator for a given torque. Additionally, where the agitator is removable from the cleaner head, a low friction thread makes it easier for the user to unscrew the agitator from the dog. As the load on the agitator varies, so too does the torque generated by the drive assembly. In response to a decrease in torque, the agitator may experience a net axial force in a direction away from the dog. By employing a buttress thread form, the vertical (or near vertical) flanks of the threads act to oppose this negative axial force and thus prevent the agitator and the dog from loosening.
  • a buttress thread form has a relatively thick base resulting in a stronger thread. As a result, the threads are able to withstand a greater axial force and thus the agitator may be held more tightly against the dog.
  • the agitator may be removable from the cleaner head.
  • the agitator may be unscrewed and separated from the dog.
  • it is generally difficult to ensure that the agitator is held axially tight within the cleaner head.
  • the agitator screws on to and is tightened against the dog so as to prevent or reduce the axial play.
  • a removable agitator may be provided without the normally inherent problems of vibration and noise.
  • the term 'dog' should be understood to mean a torque-transmission member.
  • the term ⁇ start' refers to a ridge of an external thread or a groove of an internal thread.
  • the term 'lead angle' refers to the angle formed by the starts of a screw thread relative to a plane perpendicular to the screw axis.
  • the term 'thread form' refers to the cross-sectional shape or profile of the starts of a screw thread.
  • the cleaner head 1 of Figure 1 comprises a housing 2 within which an agitator 3 and a drive assembly 4 are mounted.
  • the agitator 3 comprises an elongate body 5 to which bristles, flicker strips or other means 6 for agitating a cleaning surface are attached.
  • the agitator 3 is mounted at one end to a bushing 7 seated within a removable cap 8.
  • the opposite end of the agitator 3 is mounted to a dog 12 forming part of the drive assembly 4.
  • the drive assembly 4 comprises an electric motor 10 and a transmission 11 for transmitting torque generated by the motor 10 to the agitator 3.
  • the transmission 11 comprises, among other things, a dog 12 that engages with the agitator 3.
  • the dog 12 is therefore responsible for transmitting the torque generated by the drive assembly 4 to the agitator 3.
  • the details of the drive assembly 4 are not pertinent to the present invention, and drive assemblies for driving an agitator of a cleaner head are well known.
  • the cleaner heads of the DC24 and DC26 vacuum cleaners sold by Dyson Limited each include a drive assembly suitable for use in the present cleaner head.
  • the dog 12 comprises a head 13, a shank 14 that extends from the head 13, and a helical screw thread 15 formed around the shank 14.
  • the head 13 tapers in a direction towards the shank 14 and defines a frustoconical surface that is coaxial with the shank 14.
  • the shank 14 extends from the head 13 and is generally cylindrical in shape.
  • the screw thread 15 is an external thread that comprises four starts 16 that are evenly spaced about the shank 14. Each start 16 turns about the screw axis 18 through an angle of 180 degrees. Consequently, each start 16 completes one half turn only.
  • the screw thread 15 also has a lead angle of 50 degrees and a buttress thread form.
  • one end of the agitator 3 includes a bore 19 having a countersink 20 and a helical screw thread 21 formed around a wall of the bore 19.
  • the countersink 20 has a frustoconical surface that complements the frustoconical surface of the tapered head 13 of the dog 12, i.e. both surfaces have the same or similar taper angle.
  • the screw thread 21 is an internal thread that complements the external screw thread 15 of the dog 12. Consequently, the screw thread 21 comprises four starts 22 that are evenly spaced about the bore 19 and turn through an angle of 180 degrees.
  • the screw thread 21 also has a lead angle of 50 degrees and a buttress thread form.
  • the torque generated by the drive assembly 4 is transmitted to the agitator 3 via the dog 12.
  • the torque applied by the dog 12 exerts both an axial force and a rotational force on the agitator 3.
  • the rotational force causes the agitator 3 to rotate.
  • the axial force causes the agitator 3 to screw on to and tighten against the dog 12.
  • the threads 15,21 of the dog 12 and the agitator 3 are oriented (i.e. right-handed or left-handed) such that the axial force acts in a direction towards the dog 12.
  • the countersink 20 mates with and tightens against the tapered head 13.
  • the play between the agitator 3 and the dog 12 is removed or significantly reduced, and thus vibration of the agitator 3 is reduced.
  • the mating of the countersink 20 and the tapered head 13 ensures that the agitator 3 and the dog 12 are aligned concentrically. As a result, out-of balance forces are reduced and thus the lifespan of the cleaner head 1 is prolonged.
  • the magnitude of the axial force depends on, among other things, the lead angle of the threads 15,21.
  • the threads 15,21 have a lead angle of 50 degrees. This results in an axial force of sufficient magnitude to ensure that the countersink 20 is tightened against the tapered head 13 with sufficient force to absorb the play between the agitator 3 and the dog 12.
  • the lead angle increases, the magnitude of the axial force decreases and thus the countersink 20 is held less tightly against the tapered head 13. It was found that, when the lead angle exceeds 60 degrees, the resulting axial force was insufficient to adequately tighten the countersink 20 against the tapered head 13. As a result, vibration and noise were observed to increase.
  • the magnitude of the axial force also depends on the torque generated by the drive assembly 4.
  • the lead angle decreases, the magnitude of the axial force increases. Although this has the benefit of further tightening the agitator 3 against the dog 12, any further reduction in vibration and noise may be small or insignificant. Moreover, as the axial force increases, the threads 15,21 are required to withstand a greater axial load and may therefore fail prematurely. Over the torque range typically generated by the drive assembly of most conventional cleaner heads, a lead angle less than 40 degrees was found to give no appreciable reduction in vibration and noise beyond that observed at 40 degrees. Nevertheless, where the torque generated by the drive assembly is relatively low, a smaller lead angle may be necessary or desirable in order to generate the required axial force.
  • the threads 15,21 have a buttress thread form, which provides three key benefits.
  • the magnitude of the axial force exerted on the agitator 3 depends also on the friction between the two threads 15,21.
  • a buttress thread form has the advantage of relatively low friction properties. As a result, a greater axial force is generated for a given torque.
  • the agitator 3 experiences different loads. As the load on the agitator 3 varies, so too does the torque generated by the drive assembly 4. Should the torque generated by the drive assembly 4 decrease, the axial force exerted by the dog 12 on the agitator 3 will decrease.
  • the countersink 20 and the tapered head 13 are under compression and therefore exert an axial force in the opposite direction.
  • the agitator 3 experiences a net axial force in a direction away from the dog 12.
  • the vertical (or near vertical) flanks 17,23 of the threads 15,21 act to oppose this negative axial force and thus prevent the agitator 3 and the dog 12 from loosening.
  • a buttress thread form has a relatively thick base resulting in a stronger thread. The threads 15,21 are therefore able to withstand greater axial forces.
  • Each thread 15,21 has four starts 16,22 that each turn through 180 degrees.
  • the starts 16,22 are responsible for transmitting the torque generated by the drive assembly 4 to the agitator 3. Each start 16,22 is therefore required to bear a fraction of the total torque. If the number of starts 16,22 were reduced, each start 16,22 would be required to bear a larger load and may therefore fail prematurely. This may be addressed by increasing the size of the thread form so as to increase the strength of the starts 16,22. If the number of starts 16,22 were increased, the available space for each start 16,22 would decrease. Each start 16,22 would then have a smaller thread form which is likely to compromise the strength of the threads 15,21. Consequently, although each start 16,22 would be required to bear a smaller load, the strength of each start 16,22 may be weakened to a point at which failure of the starts 16,22 becomes a potential problem.
  • the starts 16,22 would be shorter in length. This has the advantage that a shorter shank 14 and bore 19 may be employed. However, as the length of the starts 16,22 decreases, the starts 16,22 are subjected to a greater load per unit length and may therefore fail if subjected to excessive torque. Conversely, if the starts 16,22 were to turn through a larger angle, the starts 16,22 would be subjected to a smaller load per unit length and may therefore transmit a greater torque. However, a longer shank 14 and bore 19 would then be required.
  • the agitator 3 is removable from the cleaner head 1. This is achieved by removing the cap 8 forming part of the housing 2. Removal of the cap 8 creates an aperture in the side of the housing 2 through which the agitator 3 may be removed. In order to remove the agitator 3, a user is required to rotate the agitator 3 relative to the dog 12. This then causes the agitator 3 to unscrew and separate from the dog 12, after which the user may pull the agitator 3 through the aperture. Mounting the agitator 3 within the cleaner head 1 is then the reverse of this process.
  • the ends of the starts 16 of the dog 12 are tapered slightly. This then aids the user in mounting the agitator 3 to the dog 12.
  • the end of the shank 14 is guided by the countersink 20 towards the centre of the bore 19.
  • each thread 15,21 has four starts 16,22. Consequently, a user need only rotate the agitator 3 through a maximum angle of 90 degrees in order to bring the two threads 15,21 into alignment. At 90 degrees, the user can comfortably rotate the agitator 3 whilst maintaining a hold of the agitator 3. If a smaller number of starts 16,22 were employed, the user would be required to rotate the agitator 3 through a larger angle, which the user might find uncomfortable.
  • Each start 16,22 turns through an angle of 180 degrees. Consequently, in order to remove and mount the agitator 3, the user is required to rotate the agitator 3 through 180 degrees. This is not overly burdensome and can generally be achieved with one or two short twists of the agitator 3.
  • a smaller turn angle may be employed, which has the advantage that the user is required to rotate the agitator 3 through a smaller angle.
  • the turn angle decreases, the lengths of the starts 16,22 decrease and thus the starts 16,22 are subjected to a greater load per unit length.
  • a turn angle of no less than 120 degrees may be preferable.
  • a turn angle greater than 180 degrees may be employed for the starts 16,22. This then has the advantage that the starts 16,22 are longer in length and are therefore able to bear a higher torque. However, as the length of the starts 16,22 increases, so too does the length of the shank 14 and the bore 19.
  • the user is required to rotate the agitator 3 through a larger angle. By employing a turn angle of no more than 360 degrees, a relatively short shank 14 and bore 19 may be maintained. Additionally, a user is able to remove and mount the agitator 3 through a small number of twists of the agitator 3.
  • Each thread 15,21 has a buttress thread form which, as noted above, has relatively low friction properties. Consequently, in addition to the benefits noted above, the thread form makes it easier for the user to remove and mount the agitator 3.
  • the fit between the two threads 15,21 may be relatively loose, which then further aids the user in removing and mounting the agitator 3.
  • a relatively loose fit is likely to result in a relatively large degree of play between the agitator 3 and the dog 12.
  • the agitator 3 screws on to and tightens against the dog 12, even a relatively large amount of play may be absorbed.
  • a conventional cleaner head having a removable agitator it is generally difficult to ensure that the agitator is held axially tight within the cleaner head.
  • the cleaner head 1 of the present invention in that, after mounting the agitator 3 within the cleaner head 1, there is a degree of axial play between the agitator 3 and the dog 12.
  • the agitator 3 screws on to and is tightened against the dog 12 so as to absorb any axial play.
  • a removable agitator may be provided without the normally inherent problems of vibration and noise.
  • the thread 15 formed around the shank 14 is an external thread
  • the thread 21 formed around the bore 19 is an internal thread
  • the thread 15 formed around the shank 14 may be an internal thread
  • the thread 21 formed around the bore 19 may be an external thread
  • the dog 12 may comprise the bore 19 and the countersink 20
  • the agitator 3 may comprise the tapered head 13 and the shank 14. Accordingly, in a more general sense, one of the agitator 3 and the dog 12 may be said to comprise the tapered head 13, the shank 14 and a first screw thread 15, and the other of the agitator 3 and the dog 12 may be said to comprise the bore 19, the countersink 20 and a second screw thread 21 which complements the first screw thread 15.
  • each start 16,22 has a buttress thread form
  • other thread forms might alternatively be used.
  • both square and trapezoidal thread forms have relatively low friction properties.
  • the buttress thread form is typically stronger owing to the larger base of each start.
  • the cleaner head illustrated in Figure 1 is intended to form part of a vacuum cleaner.
  • the agitator 3 and the dog 12 may equally be employed in the cleaner head of other appliances, such floor sweepers or carpet shampoo machines.
  • the drive assembly 4 of the embodiment described above comprises an electric motor 10
  • the drive assembly 4 might comprise alternative means for generating the torque necessary to drive the agitator 3.
  • the drive assembly 4 may comprise an air turbine that is driven by air drawn through the cleaner head 1.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Nozzles For Electric Vacuum Cleaners (AREA)

Description

  • The present invention relates to a cleaner head having an agitator and a drive assembly for driving the agitator.
  • The cleaner head of an appliance, such as a vacuum cleaner or floor sweeper, may include an agitator driven by a drive assembly. The drive assembly often includes a dog for transmitting torque generated by the drive assembly to the agitator. A problem with existing cleaner heads is that there is often a degree of play between the dog and the agitator. Consequently, as the agitator rotates, the agitator vibrates and generates noise.
  • DE102010060373 describes a cleaner head having a motor-driven brush body. The brush body includes a threaded portion which is inserted into a threaded hollow portion of a drive shaft.
  • The present invention provides a cleaner head comprising an agitator and a drive assembly for driving the agitator, the drive assembly comprising a dog for transmitting torque to the agitator, wherein one of the dog and the agitator comprises a tapered head, a shank that extends from the head, and a screw thread formed around the shank, the other of the dog and the agitator comprises a bore having a countersink and a complementary screw thread formed around a wall of the bore, the shank projects into the bore and the two threads mate such that, as the dog rotates, the agitator screws on to the dog and the tapered head mates with the countersink.
  • As the countersink mates with and tightens against the tapered head, play between the dog and the agitator is removed or reduced. As a result, the agitator vibrates less during rotation and thus noise is reduced.
  • A further problem with existing cleaner heads is that that the agitator may not align concentrically with the dog. As a result, out-of-balance forces place an increased stress on components of the cleaner head, particularly the bearings, which may reduce the lifespan of the cleaner head. With the cleaner head of the present invention, the mating of the countersink and the tapered head acts to align concentrically the agitator and the dog. As a result, out-of-balance forces are reduced and thus the lifespan of the cleaner head is prolonged.
  • Each screw thread may have a lead angle of no more than 60 degrees. As a result, over the torque range typically generated by the drive assembly of most conventional cleaner heads, the axial force exerted by the dog on the agitator is of a magnitude that ensures that the agitator is held against the tapered head with sufficient force so as to reduce vibration and noise.
  • Each screw thread may have a lead angle of no less than 40 degrees. As a result, over the torque range typically generated by the drive assembly of most conventional cleaner heads, the axial force exerted by the dog on the agitator is sufficient to hold the agitator against the dog without being excessive, which might otherwise result in premature failure of the threads.
  • Each screw thread may have a plurality of starts. By employing a plurality of starts, the torque applied by the dog is distributed over a greater number of starts. As a result, a greater torque may be transmitted to the agitator without failure of the threads. Additionally, where the agitator is removable from the cleaner head, a greater number of starts makes it easier for a user to mount the agitator. In particular, it is generally easier to align the thread of the agitator with the thread of the dog.
  • Each start may turn through an angle of no less than 120 degrees. The length of each start depends on the angle through which the start turns. As the angle decreases, so too does the length of the start. As a result, the start is subjected to a greater load per unit length. Below an angle of 120 degrees, the lengths of the starts may be insufficient to bear the torque required of most cleaner heads.
  • Each start may turn through an angle of no more than 360 degrees. This then has the advantage of maintaining a relatively short shank and bore. Additionally, where the agitator is removable from the cleaner head, the agitator can be removed from the dog by rotating the agitator through an angle of no more than 360 degrees, which can generally be achieved with a small number of twists of the agitator.
  • Each screw thread may have a buttress thread form. A buttress thread form has the advantage of relatively low friction properties. As a result, a greater axial force is exerted by the dog on the agitator for a given torque. Additionally, where the agitator is removable from the cleaner head, a low friction thread makes it easier for the user to unscrew the agitator from the dog. As the load on the agitator varies, so too does the torque generated by the drive assembly. In response to a decrease in torque, the agitator may experience a net axial force in a direction away from the dog. By employing a buttress thread form, the vertical (or near vertical) flanks of the threads act to oppose this negative axial force and thus prevent the agitator and the dog from loosening. Consequently, as the agitator experiences different loads, the agitator continues to be held tightly against the dog and thus vibration and noise continue to be reduced. Furthermore, in comparison to other thread forms, a buttress thread form has a relatively thick base resulting in a stronger thread. As a result, the threads are able to withstand a greater axial force and thus the agitator may be held more tightly against the dog.
  • The agitator may be removable from the cleaner head. In particular, by rotating the agitator relative to the dog, the agitator may be unscrewed and separated from the dog. In a conventional cleaner head having a removable agitator, it is generally difficult to ensure that the agitator is held axially tight within the cleaner head. With the cleaner head of the present invention, the agitator screws on to and is tightened against the dog so as to prevent or reduce the axial play. As a result, a removable agitator may be provided without the normally inherent problems of vibration and noise.
  • There are terms employed throughout this document that, in English, are well understood within the field of engineering. It is possible that one or more of these terms may not have a direct equivalent in other languages. Accordingly, for the purposes of clarity, an explanation of some of these terms will now be provided. The term 'dog' should be understood to mean a torque-transmission member. The term `start' refers to a ridge of an external thread or a groove of an internal thread. The term 'lead angle' refers to the angle formed by the starts of a screw thread relative to a plane perpendicular to the screw axis. And the term 'thread form' refers to the cross-sectional shape or profile of the starts of a screw thread.
  • In order that the present invention may be more readily understood, an embodiment of the invention will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
    • Figure 1 is an exploded view of a cleaner head in accordance with the present invention;
    • Figure 2 is an isometric view of a dog forming part of the cleaner head;
    • Figure 3 is a side view of the dog;
    • Figure 4 is a side sectional view of the dog; and
    • Figure 5 is a side sectional view of one end of an agitator forming part of the cleaner head.
  • The cleaner head 1 of Figure 1 comprises a housing 2 within which an agitator 3 and a drive assembly 4 are mounted.
  • The agitator 3 comprises an elongate body 5 to which bristles, flicker strips or other means 6 for agitating a cleaning surface are attached. The agitator 3 is mounted at one end to a bushing 7 seated within a removable cap 8. The opposite end of the agitator 3 is mounted to a dog 12 forming part of the drive assembly 4.
  • The drive assembly 4 comprises an electric motor 10 and a transmission 11 for transmitting torque generated by the motor 10 to the agitator 3. The transmission 11 comprises, among other things, a dog 12 that engages with the agitator 3. The dog 12 is therefore responsible for transmitting the torque generated by the drive assembly 4 to the agitator 3. With the exception of the dog 12, the details of the drive assembly 4 are not pertinent to the present invention, and drive assemblies for driving an agitator of a cleaner head are well known. By way of example, the cleaner heads of the DC24 and DC26 vacuum cleaners sold by Dyson Limited each include a drive assembly suitable for use in the present cleaner head.
  • A more detailed explanation will now be provided of the dog 12, the end of the agitator 3 that engages with the dog 12, and how the two 3,12 engage in order to transmit torque.
  • As illustrated in Figures 2 to 4, the dog 12 comprises a head 13, a shank 14 that extends from the head 13, and a helical screw thread 15 formed around the shank 14.
  • The head 13 tapers in a direction towards the shank 14 and defines a frustoconical surface that is coaxial with the shank 14.
  • The shank 14 extends from the head 13 and is generally cylindrical in shape.
  • The screw thread 15 is an external thread that comprises four starts 16 that are evenly spaced about the shank 14. Each start 16 turns about the screw axis 18 through an angle of 180 degrees. Consequently, each start 16 completes one half turn only. The screw thread 15 also has a lead angle of 50 degrees and a buttress thread form.
  • As illustrated in Figure 5, one end of the agitator 3 includes a bore 19 having a countersink 20 and a helical screw thread 21 formed around a wall of the bore 19.
  • The countersink 20 has a frustoconical surface that complements the frustoconical surface of the tapered head 13 of the dog 12, i.e. both surfaces have the same or similar taper angle.
  • The screw thread 21 is an internal thread that complements the external screw thread 15 of the dog 12. Consequently, the screw thread 21 comprises four starts 22 that are evenly spaced about the bore 19 and turn through an angle of 180 degrees. The screw thread 21 also has a lead angle of 50 degrees and a buttress thread form.
  • With the agitator 3 mounted to the dog 12, the shank 14 of the dog 12 projects into the bore 19 of the agitator 3, and the external thread 15 of the dog 12 mates with the internal thread 21 of the agitator 3. Owing to tolerances in the cleaner head 1, there is a degree of play or backlash (both axial and radial) between the agitator 3 and the dog 12.
  • During operation of the cleaner head 1, the torque generated by the drive assembly 4 is transmitted to the agitator 3 via the dog 12. As a consequence of the threads 15,21, the torque applied by the dog 12 exerts both an axial force and a rotational force on the agitator 3. The rotational force causes the agitator 3 to rotate. The axial force, on the other hand, causes the agitator 3 to screw on to and tighten against the dog 12. In this regard, the threads 15,21 of the dog 12 and the agitator 3 are oriented (i.e. right-handed or left-handed) such that the axial force acts in a direction towards the dog 12. As the agitator 3 tightens against the dog 12, the countersink 20 mates with and tightens against the tapered head 13. As a result, the play between the agitator 3 and the dog 12 is removed or significantly reduced, and thus vibration of the agitator 3 is reduced. In addition to reducing play, the mating of the countersink 20 and the tapered head 13 ensures that the agitator 3 and the dog 12 are aligned concentrically. As a result, out-of balance forces are reduced and thus the lifespan of the cleaner head 1 is prolonged.
  • The magnitude of the axial force depends on, among other things, the lead angle of the threads 15,21. The threads 15,21 have a lead angle of 50 degrees. This results in an axial force of sufficient magnitude to ensure that the countersink 20 is tightened against the tapered head 13 with sufficient force to absorb the play between the agitator 3 and the dog 12. As the lead angle increases, the magnitude of the axial force decreases and thus the countersink 20 is held less tightly against the tapered head 13. It was found that, when the lead angle exceeds 60 degrees, the resulting axial force was insufficient to adequately tighten the countersink 20 against the tapered head 13. As a result, vibration and noise were observed to increase. The magnitude of the axial force also depends on the torque generated by the drive assembly 4. Accordingly, it may be possible or indeed desirable to employ a larger lead angle where a higher torque is generated. However, over the torque range typically generated by the drive assembly of most conventional cleaner heads (e.g. a stall torque of between 100 and 300 Nmm), a lead angle of no more than 60 degrees was found to reduce vibration and noise.
  • As the lead angle decreases, the magnitude of the axial force increases. Although this has the benefit of further tightening the agitator 3 against the dog 12, any further reduction in vibration and noise may be small or insignificant. Moreover, as the axial force increases, the threads 15,21 are required to withstand a greater axial load and may therefore fail prematurely. Over the torque range typically generated by the drive assembly of most conventional cleaner heads, a lead angle less than 40 degrees was found to give no appreciable reduction in vibration and noise beyond that observed at 40 degrees. Nevertheless, where the torque generated by the drive assembly is relatively low, a smaller lead angle may be necessary or desirable in order to generate the required axial force.
  • As illustrated in Figures 4 and 5, the threads 15,21 have a buttress thread form, which provides three key benefits. First, the magnitude of the axial force exerted on the agitator 3 depends also on the friction between the two threads 15,21. A buttress thread form has the advantage of relatively low friction properties. As a result, a greater axial force is generated for a given torque. Second, during use of the cleaner head 1, the agitator 3 experiences different loads. As the load on the agitator 3 varies, so too does the torque generated by the drive assembly 4. Should the torque generated by the drive assembly 4 decrease, the axial force exerted by the dog 12 on the agitator 3 will decrease. The countersink 20 and the tapered head 13 are under compression and therefore exert an axial force in the opposite direction. Consequently, in response to a decrease in the torque of the drive assembly 4, the agitator 3 experiences a net axial force in a direction away from the dog 12. By employing a buttress thread form, the vertical (or near vertical) flanks 17,23 of the threads 15,21 act to oppose this negative axial force and thus prevent the agitator 3 and the dog 12 from loosening.
  • Consequently, as the agitator 3 experiences different loads, the agitator 3 continues to be held tightly against the dog 12 and thus vibration and noise continue to be reduced. Third, a buttress thread form has a relatively thick base resulting in a stronger thread. The threads 15,21 are therefore able to withstand greater axial forces.
  • Each thread 15,21 has four starts 16,22 that each turn through 180 degrees. One could conceivably have a different number of starts and/or starts that turn through a different angle. However, as will now be explained, there are both advantages and disadvantages in changing the number of starts and/or the angle through which the starts turn.
  • The starts 16,22 are responsible for transmitting the torque generated by the drive assembly 4 to the agitator 3. Each start 16,22 is therefore required to bear a fraction of the total torque. If the number of starts 16,22 were reduced, each start 16,22 would be required to bear a larger load and may therefore fail prematurely. This may be addressed by increasing the size of the thread form so as to increase the strength of the starts 16,22. If the number of starts 16,22 were increased, the available space for each start 16,22 would decrease. Each start 16,22 would then have a smaller thread form which is likely to compromise the strength of the threads 15,21. Consequently, although each start 16,22 would be required to bear a smaller load, the strength of each start 16,22 may be weakened to a point at which failure of the starts 16,22 becomes a potential problem.
  • If the starts 16,22 were to turn through a smaller angle, the starts 16,22 would be shorter in length. This has the advantage that a shorter shank 14 and bore 19 may be employed. However, as the length of the starts 16,22 decreases, the starts 16,22 are subjected to a greater load per unit length and may therefore fail if subjected to excessive torque. Conversely, if the starts 16,22 were to turn through a larger angle, the starts 16,22 would be subjected to a smaller load per unit length and may therefore transmit a greater torque. However, a longer shank 14 and bore 19 would then be required.
  • There is therefore a balance to be struck between the various parameters, e.g. lead angle, number of starts, angle of rotation of the starts, length of dog and bore, stall torque of the drive assembly, material strength of the dog and bore etc.
  • The agitator 3 is removable from the cleaner head 1. This is achieved by removing the cap 8 forming part of the housing 2. Removal of the cap 8 creates an aperture in the side of the housing 2 through which the agitator 3 may be removed. In order to remove the agitator 3, a user is required to rotate the agitator 3 relative to the dog 12. This then causes the agitator 3 to unscrew and separate from the dog 12, after which the user may pull the agitator 3 through the aperture. Mounting the agitator 3 within the cleaner head 1 is then the reverse of this process.
  • The ends of the starts 16 of the dog 12 are tapered slightly. This then aids the user in mounting the agitator 3 to the dog 12. In particular, the end of the shank 14 is guided by the countersink 20 towards the centre of the bore 19.
  • When mounting the agitator 3 to the dog 12, the two threads 15,21 are likely to be misaligned. Each thread 15,21 has four starts 16,22. Consequently, a user need only rotate the agitator 3 through a maximum angle of 90 degrees in order to bring the two threads 15,21 into alignment. At 90 degrees, the user can comfortably rotate the agitator 3 whilst maintaining a hold of the agitator 3. If a smaller number of starts 16,22 were employed, the user would be required to rotate the agitator 3 through a larger angle, which the user might find uncomfortable.
  • Each start 16,22 turns through an angle of 180 degrees. Consequently, in order to remove and mount the agitator 3, the user is required to rotate the agitator 3 through 180 degrees. This is not overly burdensome and can generally be achieved with one or two short twists of the agitator 3. A smaller turn angle may be employed, which has the advantage that the user is required to rotate the agitator 3 through a smaller angle. However, as noted above, as the turn angle decreases, the lengths of the starts 16,22 decrease and thus the starts 16,22 are subjected to a greater load per unit length.
  • Accordingly, a turn angle of no less than 120 degrees may be preferable. A turn angle greater than 180 degrees may be employed for the starts 16,22. This then has the advantage that the starts 16,22 are longer in length and are therefore able to bear a higher torque. However, as the length of the starts 16,22 increases, so too does the length of the shank 14 and the bore 19. Moreover, in order to remove and mount the agitator 3, the user is required to rotate the agitator 3 through a larger angle. By employing a turn angle of no more than 360 degrees, a relatively short shank 14 and bore 19 may be maintained. Additionally, a user is able to remove and mount the agitator 3 through a small number of twists of the agitator 3.
  • Each thread 15,21 has a buttress thread form which, as noted above, has relatively low friction properties. Consequently, in addition to the benefits noted above, the thread form makes it easier for the user to remove and mount the agitator 3.
  • The fit between the two threads 15,21 may be relatively loose, which then further aids the user in removing and mounting the agitator 3. A relatively loose fit is likely to result in a relatively large degree of play between the agitator 3 and the dog 12. However, since the agitator 3 screws on to and tightens against the dog 12, even a relatively large amount of play may be absorbed.
  • In a conventional cleaner head having a removable agitator, it is generally difficult to ensure that the agitator is held axially tight within the cleaner head. The same is true of the cleaner head 1 of the present invention in that, after mounting the agitator 3 within the cleaner head 1, there is a degree of axial play between the agitator 3 and the dog 12. However, during operation of the cleaner head 1, the agitator 3 screws on to and is tightened against the dog 12 so as to absorb any axial play. As a result, a removable agitator may be provided without the normally inherent problems of vibration and noise.
  • In the embodiment described above, the thread 15 formed around the shank 14 is an external thread, and the thread 21 formed around the bore 19 is an internal thread. As an alternative, the thread 15 formed around the shank 14 may be an internal thread, and the thread 21 formed around the bore 19 may be an external thread. Furthermore, the dog 12 may comprise the bore 19 and the countersink 20, and the agitator 3 may comprise the tapered head 13 and the shank 14. Accordingly, in a more general sense, one of the agitator 3 and the dog 12 may be said to comprise the tapered head 13, the shank 14 and a first screw thread 15, and the other of the agitator 3 and the dog 12 may be said to comprise the bore 19, the countersink 20 and a second screw thread 21 which complements the first screw thread 15.
  • Although each start 16,22 has a buttress thread form, other thread forms might alternatively be used. For example, both square and trapezoidal thread forms have relatively low friction properties. However, the buttress thread form is typically stronger owing to the larger base of each start.
  • The cleaner head illustrated in Figure 1 is intended to form part of a vacuum cleaner. However, the agitator 3 and the dog 12 may equally be employed in the cleaner head of other appliances, such floor sweepers or carpet shampoo machines. Moreover, although the drive assembly 4 of the embodiment described above comprises an electric motor 10, the drive assembly 4 might comprise alternative means for generating the torque necessary to drive the agitator 3. For example, where the cleaner head 1 is intended to form part of a vacuum cleaner, the drive assembly 4 may comprise an air turbine that is driven by air drawn through the cleaner head 1.

Claims (8)

  1. A cleaner head (1) comprising an agitator (3) and a drive assembly (4) for driving the agitator (3), the drive assembly (4) comprising a dog (12) for transmitting torque to the agitator (3), wherein one of the dog (12) and the agitator (3) comprises a tapered head (13), a shank (14) that extends from the head (13), and a screw thread (15) formed around the shank (14), the other of the dog (12) and the agitator (3) comprises a bore (19) having a countersink (20) and a complementary screw thread (21) formed around a wall of the bore (19), the shank (14) projects into the bore (19), and the two threads (15,21) mate such that, as the dog (12) rotates, the agitator (3) screws on to the dog (12) and the tapered head (13) mates with the countersink (20).
  2. A cleaner head as claimed in claim 1, wherein each screw thread (15,21) has a lead angle of no more than 60 degrees.
  3. A cleaner head as claimed in claim 1 or 2, wherein each screw thread (15,21) has a lead angle of no less than 40 degrees.
  4. A cleaner head as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, wherein each screw thread (15,21) has a plurality of starts (16,22).
  5. A cleaner head as claimed in claim 4, wherein each start (16,22) turns through an angle of no less than 120 degrees.
  6. A cleaner head as claimed in claim 4 or 5, wherein each start (16,22) turns through an angle of no more than 360 degrees.
  7. A cleaner head as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, wherein each screw thread (15,21) has a buttress thread form.
  8. A cleaner head as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, wherein the agitator (3) is removable from the cleaner head (1), and rotation of the agitator (3) relative to the dog (12) causes the agitator (3) to unscrew and separate from the dog (12).
EP13750121.9A 2012-08-13 2013-08-09 Cleaner head Not-in-force EP2882328B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB201214424A GB2504943B (en) 2012-08-13 2012-08-13 Cleaner head with agitator and drive assembly
PCT/GB2013/052140 WO2014027186A1 (en) 2012-08-13 2013-08-09 Cleaner head

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2882328A1 EP2882328A1 (en) 2015-06-17
EP2882328B1 true EP2882328B1 (en) 2016-06-29

Family

ID=46981448

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP13750121.9A Not-in-force EP2882328B1 (en) 2012-08-13 2013-08-09 Cleaner head

Country Status (6)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2882328B1 (en)
JP (1) JP5810449B2 (en)
KR (1) KR101609287B1 (en)
CN (1) CN104717912B (en)
GB (1) GB2504943B (en)
WO (1) WO2014027186A1 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3440973A1 (en) 2017-08-09 2019-02-13 Miele & Cie. KG Vacuum cleaner and floor nozzle for vacuum cleaner
US11846937B2 (en) 2016-05-20 2023-12-19 Lg Electronics Inc. Autonomous cleaner

Families Citing this family (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP6915957B2 (en) * 2015-07-17 2021-08-11 日立グローバルライフソリューションズ株式会社 A suction tool with a rotating brush and a vacuum cleaner with it
EP3173002B1 (en) 2015-11-30 2021-08-04 Black & Decker Inc. Cleaning head
WO2017200350A1 (en) 2016-05-20 2017-11-23 엘지전자 주식회사 Robot cleaner
US10524628B2 (en) 2016-05-20 2020-01-07 Lg Electronics Inc. Autonomous cleaner
WO2017200344A1 (en) 2016-05-20 2017-11-23 엘지전자 주식회사 Robot cleaner
WO2017200351A1 (en) 2016-05-20 2017-11-23 엘지전자 주식회사 Robot cleaner
US10420448B2 (en) 2016-05-20 2019-09-24 Lg Electronics Inc. Autonomous cleaner
US10258212B2 (en) 2016-05-20 2019-04-16 Lg Electronics Inc. Cleaner
US10463212B2 (en) 2016-05-20 2019-11-05 Lg Electronics Inc. Autonomous cleaner
WO2017200348A1 (en) 2016-05-20 2017-11-23 엘지전자 주식회사 Robot cleaner
WO2017200343A1 (en) 2016-05-20 2017-11-23 엘지전자 주식회사 Robot cleaner
KR101917702B1 (en) 2017-01-26 2018-11-13 엘지전자 주식회사 Cleaner
WO2017200347A1 (en) 2016-05-20 2017-11-23 엘지전자 주식회사 Robot cleaner
WO2017200349A1 (en) 2016-05-20 2017-11-23 엘지전자 주식회사 Robot cleaner
JP7246469B2 (en) * 2018-08-10 2023-03-27 アモーレパシフィック コーポレーション Tip applicator and cosmetic applicator including the same
EP3766398B1 (en) 2019-07-19 2022-04-13 BSH Hausgeräte GmbH Brush roller bar for a cleaning device
IT202100008123A1 (en) * 2021-03-31 2022-10-01 Diversey Inc FLOOR CLEANING EQUIPMENT AND CLEANER ROLLER FOR A FLOOR CLEANING EQUIPMENT
CN115153346A (en) * 2022-08-04 2022-10-11 北京顺造科技有限公司 Scrubbing brush subassembly and surface cleaning equipment

Family Cites Families (20)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB504058A (en) * 1938-01-24 1939-04-19 Moses Wheeldon Improvements in suction sweepers
NL276763A (en) * 1961-04-04
GB1109783A (en) * 1964-07-16 1968-04-18 Westinghouse Electric Corp An agitator roll assembly for a suction cleaner
US4905341A (en) * 1985-09-20 1990-03-06 Hitachi, Ltd. Upright-type electric vacuum cleaner
JPH0382427A (en) * 1989-08-25 1991-04-08 Sanyo Electric Co Ltd Suction tool for floor
JP3308409B2 (en) * 1994-10-20 2002-07-29 株式会社コーワ Manufacturing method of rotor for floor nozzle of vacuum cleaner
JPH0919388A (en) * 1995-07-03 1997-01-21 Tec Corp Blade structure for sucking port part of electric cleaner
JP2833528B2 (en) * 1995-07-14 1998-12-09 株式会社日立製作所 Suction body of vacuum cleaner and vacuum cleaner having the same
JP2948145B2 (en) * 1996-04-17 1999-09-13 祐子 秋谷 Press mold for ceramic products
DE19621301A1 (en) * 1996-05-28 1997-12-04 Vorwerk Co Interholding Motorized brushing device
CN2288018Y (en) * 1996-08-05 1998-08-19 刘玄富 Efficient roller for applying paint
CN2554929Y (en) * 2002-06-03 2003-06-11 姚贵成 Kernel removing separator for cornus officinalis
US8117714B2 (en) * 2005-03-09 2012-02-21 Bissell Homecare, Inc. Vacuum cleaner with hair collection element
CN2868167Y (en) * 2005-10-21 2007-02-14 林高茂 Double-brush electric cleaning device
JP2007152938A (en) 2005-11-11 2007-06-21 Toray Ind Inc Member made from frp
CN2873330Y (en) * 2006-01-26 2007-02-28 龙岗南约查尔顿首饰厂 Automatic cleaner for cleaning device
DE102006058401A1 (en) * 2006-12-12 2008-06-19 Vorwerk & Co. Interholding Gmbh Brush, in particular brush for placement in a vacuum cleaner attachment
DE102009013475B4 (en) * 2009-03-19 2020-02-20 Vorwerk & Co. Interholding Gmbh Object movable by means of a roller
CN201794050U (en) * 2010-07-09 2011-04-13 鞍山森远路桥股份有限公司 Snow remover with front spiral rolling brushes
DE102010060373A1 (en) * 2010-11-05 2012-05-10 Vorwerk & Co. Interholding Gmbh Replaceable brush body i.e. hollow cylindrical body, for motor-propelled brush apparatus i.e. electric motor-propelled brush apparatus, for cleaning carpet, has drive section extended in region of closure molding part along radial direction

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
None *

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11846937B2 (en) 2016-05-20 2023-12-19 Lg Electronics Inc. Autonomous cleaner
EP3440973A1 (en) 2017-08-09 2019-02-13 Miele & Cie. KG Vacuum cleaner and floor nozzle for vacuum cleaner
DE102017118087A1 (en) 2017-08-09 2019-02-14 Miele & Cie. Kg Floor nozzle for vacuum cleaners and vacuum cleaners

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN104717912B (en) 2016-11-09
JP2014036857A (en) 2014-02-27
WO2014027186A1 (en) 2014-02-20
GB2504943A (en) 2014-02-19
GB2504943B (en) 2014-11-19
EP2882328A1 (en) 2015-06-17
KR20150038598A (en) 2015-04-08
GB201214424D0 (en) 2012-09-26
CN104717912A (en) 2015-06-17
JP5810449B2 (en) 2015-11-11
KR101609287B1 (en) 2016-04-05

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2882328B1 (en) Cleaner head
US20140041136A1 (en) Cleaner head
US9931741B2 (en) In-line disposable torque limiting device suitable for power drive
US7115028B1 (en) Coupling structure for grinding members
KR20160014602A (en) Screw
US9651078B2 (en) Torque limiting fastener
US20190351534A1 (en) Power Wrench
TWI483856B (en) Castor and device moveable by means of a castor
US20220134446A1 (en) A Tool Holding Arrangement, Thread Insert, Rotatable Shaft and Drill Unit
WO2014027185A1 (en) Cleaner head
EP0118918A1 (en) Starting device for gasoline engines
US20100239384A1 (en) Molly bolt
US20170209943A1 (en) Tool holder for connecting a diamond drill to a drill bit
GB2504942A (en) A cleaner head with an agitator and drive assembly arrangement
GB2504941A (en) A cleaner head with an agitator and drive assembly arrangement
US20180222023A1 (en) Gearless In-Line Torque Limited Device
EP3359065B1 (en) Gearless in-line torque-limited device
KR20090035757A (en) Bit for removing damaged screws
EP3677800A1 (en) Wood screw
CN211923564U (en) Precession device
WO2014126525A1 (en) A tool holder arrangement
JP3036344B2 (en) Coupling device
US20180147703A1 (en) Screwdriver with rotating lever
CN220378662U (en) High-strength hexagon head bolt
CN219152718U (en) Impact tool

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20150209

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20160415

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 808408

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20160715

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602013008994

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 4

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160629

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160929

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160629

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20160629

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160629

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160629

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160629

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160930

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160629

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160629

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 808408

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20160629

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160831

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160629

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160629

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160629

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160629

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160629

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161029

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160629

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160629

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160629

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160629

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160629

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20161031

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602013008994

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160629

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160831

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160831

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160629

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20170330

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160809

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 5

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160929

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160629

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160809

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20130809

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160629

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160629

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160831

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 6

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160629

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160629

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20190722

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20190723

Year of fee payment: 7

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602013008994

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210302

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200831