EP2660348A1 - Die steel having superior rusting resistance and thermal conductivity, and method for producing same - Google Patents
Die steel having superior rusting resistance and thermal conductivity, and method for producing same Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2660348A1 EP2660348A1 EP11854240.6A EP11854240A EP2660348A1 EP 2660348 A1 EP2660348 A1 EP 2660348A1 EP 11854240 A EP11854240 A EP 11854240A EP 2660348 A1 EP2660348 A1 EP 2660348A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- steel
- less
- thermal conductivity
- mold
- hardness
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 229910000831 Steel Inorganic materials 0.000 title claims abstract description 188
- 239000010959 steel Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 188
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 8
- JEIPFZHSYJVQDO-UHFFFAOYSA-N iron(III) oxide Inorganic materials O=[Fe]O[Fe]=O JEIPFZHSYJVQDO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 58
- 238000005496 tempering Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 30
- 229910052750 molybdenum Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 22
- 229910052721 tungsten Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 21
- 229910052804 chromium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 16
- 239000012535 impurity Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 16
- 229910052759 nickel Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 13
- 230000000171 quenching effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 13
- 229910052799 carbon Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 12
- 229910052748 manganese Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 10
- 238000010791 quenching Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 10
- 229910052710 silicon Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 10
- 229910052717 sulfur Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 10
- 229910052802 copper Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 9
- 229910052757 nitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 9
- 229910052760 oxygen Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 6
- 229910052698 phosphorus Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 6
- 229910052720 vanadium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 6
- 230000014509 gene expression Effects 0.000 claims description 16
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 12
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 abstract description 12
- 230000000052 comparative effect Effects 0.000 description 25
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 13
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 11
- 238000010137 moulding (plastic) Methods 0.000 description 6
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 5
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 description 5
- 150000001247 metal acetylides Chemical class 0.000 description 4
- 238000005260 corrosion Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000007797 corrosion Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 description 3
- 150000004767 nitrides Chemical class 0.000 description 3
- 239000002244 precipitate Substances 0.000 description 3
- IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Atomic nitrogen Chemical compound N#N IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- PNEYBMLMFCGWSK-UHFFFAOYSA-N aluminium oxide Inorganic materials [O-2].[O-2].[O-2].[Al+3].[Al+3] PNEYBMLMFCGWSK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000001816 cooling Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229910052593 corundum Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 238000005520 cutting process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010438 heat treatment Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000003754 machining Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000002844 melting Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000008018 melting Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229910052755 nonmetal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 238000005498 polishing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910001845 yogo sapphire Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 229910000859 α-Fe Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 229910000851 Alloy steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910002549 Fe–Cu Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N atomic oxygen Chemical compound [O] QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009833 condensation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000005494 condensation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004512 die casting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010309 melting process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000465 moulding Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010068 moulding (rubber) Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005121 nitriding Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000001301 oxygen Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001556 precipitation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011002 quantification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000611 regression analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009991 scouring Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005204 segregation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000006104 solid solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005728 strengthening Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C21—METALLURGY OF IRON
- C21D—MODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
- C21D1/00—General methods or devices for heat treatment, e.g. annealing, hardening, quenching or tempering
- C21D1/18—Hardening; Quenching with or without subsequent tempering
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C21—METALLURGY OF IRON
- C21D—MODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
- C21D1/00—General methods or devices for heat treatment, e.g. annealing, hardening, quenching or tempering
- C21D1/18—Hardening; Quenching with or without subsequent tempering
- C21D1/25—Hardening, combined with annealing between 300 degrees Celsius and 600 degrees Celsius, i.e. heat refining ("Vergüten")
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22C—ALLOYS
- C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
- C22C38/001—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing N
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22C—ALLOYS
- C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
- C22C38/002—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing In, Mg, or other elements not provided for in one single group C22C38/001 - C22C38/60
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22C—ALLOYS
- C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
- C22C38/02—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing silicon
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22C—ALLOYS
- C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
- C22C38/04—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing manganese
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22C—ALLOYS
- C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
- C22C38/06—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing aluminium
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22C—ALLOYS
- C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
- C22C38/18—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
- C22C38/40—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel
- C22C38/42—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel with copper
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22C—ALLOYS
- C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
- C22C38/18—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
- C22C38/40—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel
- C22C38/44—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel with molybdenum or tungsten
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22C—ALLOYS
- C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
- C22C38/18—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
- C22C38/40—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel
- C22C38/46—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel with vanadium
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22C—ALLOYS
- C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
- C22C38/60—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing lead, selenium, tellurium, or antimony, or more than 0.04% by weight of sulfur
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a mold steel having improved rusting resistance and thermal conductivity, and suitable mainly for the application of plastic molding.
- the invention also relates to a method for producing the steel.
- improvement of the rust resistance and thermal conductivity are particularly required for recent mold steel.
- a mold When a mold is not in use, e.g. between productions or during maintenance, dew condensation may occur and cause rust on a mold surface.
- the mold steel When the rust generates on the surface of the mold, removing of the rust, e.g. by scouring, is necessary for restarting the use, and thus productivity is reduced. Therefore, the mold steel is required to have a good rust resistance.
- an improvement of thermal conductivity of the mold steel is important since it reduces a thermal cycle and increases productivity in a plastic molding process where heating and cooling are repeated.
- an alloy steel comprising, by mass% (hereinafter expressed as "%"): 0.075 to 0.15% C; up to 1.0% Si; 1 to 3% Mn; 2 to 5% Cr; 1 to 4% Ni wherein Mn+Cr+Ni ⁇ 6, Mo and W either alone or in a complex such that (Mo+1/2W) is 0.1 to 1.0%; up to 0.015% P; up to 0.02% S; and the balance of Fe and impurities (Patent Literature 1).
- a mold steel comprising: 0.10 to 0.25% C; up to 1.00% Si; up to 2.00% Mn; 0.60 to 1.50% Ni; more than 1.00 to 2.50% Cr; Mo and W either alone or in a complex such that (Mo+1/2W) is 1.00% or less; 0.03 to 0.15% V; 0.50 to 2.00% Cu; up to 0.05% S, wherein Al is restricted to 0.10% or less, N is restricted to 0.06% or less, and O is restricted to 0.005% or less, and the balance being Fe and inevitable impurities (Patent Literature 2).
- the mold steel including 2 to 5% Cr of Patent Literature 1 has good rust resistance. However, since the steel has a low coefficient of thermal conductivity, a thermal cycle time may increase and productivity is reduced in some molding conditions. Meanwhile, the mold steel including 2.5% or less Cr of Patent Literature 2 has a high coefficient of thermal conductivity and can reduce the thermal cycle time. However, as compared to the steel of Patent Literature 1, it still leaves place for improving the rust resistance. Thus, the thermal conductivity and the rust resistance are conflicting properties, and a mold steel having both of the properties at high levels has been desired.
- An object of the present invention is to provide a mold steel having both improved thermal conductivity and rust resistance, and to provide a preferable method for producing the mold steel.
- the present inventors have studied compositions of mold steels, and thus found that many elements constituting conventional mold steels mutually act on the rust resistance and thermal conductivity in a complex manner. To achieve the both properties, the inventors have extracted factors having a particularly high influence among the elementals, and found an optimum relationship between the contents thereof. Thus, they reached the present invention.
- the present invention provides a mold steel having improved rust resistance and thermal conductivity.
- the steel comprises, by mass%:
- the invention also provides a method for producing a mold steel having improved rust resistance and thermal conductivity.
- the method comprises subjecting the steel to quenching and tempering at a temperature of not lower than 530°C so as to have a hardness of 30 to 42 HRC, wherein the steel comprising, by mass%:
- following values of Expressions 1 and 2 are not less than 100, 85 - 60.1 ⁇ C % - 115 ⁇ S % + 0.1 ⁇ Ni % + 7.17 ⁇ Cr % + 2.44 ⁇ Mo + 1 / 2 ⁇ W % , and 140 + 30.9 ⁇ C % - 17.8 ⁇ Si % - 10.5 ⁇ Mn % - 12.4 ⁇ Ni % - 3.68 ⁇ Cr % - 1.26 ⁇ Mo + 1 / 2 ⁇ W % - 3.68 Cu % , where the bracket [ ] indicates a mass percent of the element in the bracket.
- both improved rust resistance and thermal conductivity that have been conventionally achieved only individually, can be simultaneously achieved with high reproducibility.
- this is effective for improvement in the art of a mold.
- the invention specifies the elements having a significant influence on rust resistance or thermal conductivity as constituting elements of the mold steel.
- C, S, Ni, Cr, Mo and W have a significant influence on rust resistance
- C, Si, Mn, Ni, Cr, Mo, W, and Cu have a significant influence on thermal conductivity.
- the thermal conductivity can be increased by adjusting the contents of C, Si, Mn, Ni, Cr, Mo, W and Cu for a mold steel having a good rust resistance described in Patent Literature 1.
- the rusting resistance can be increased by adjusting the contents of C, S, Ni, Cr, Mo and W for a mold steel having superior thermal conductivity described in Patent Literature 2.
- the invention quantifies a degree of influence of the elements on each of rust resistance and thermal conductivity.
- the quantification clarifies the composition of the mold steel to be adjusted, thereby improving the rust resistance and thermal conductivity. Now, each element will be described.
- C is an element that increases a quenching property, and causes structural strengthening by precipitation of Cr, Mo(W), and V carbides by tempering. It is a basic element required for maintaining a hardness of 30 to 42 HRC described later by quenching and tempering. In order to suppress machining distortion that occurs during a cutting process or the like, it is desirable to reduce a residual stress in the steel, and this requires a high tempering temperature described above. Thus, for the steel of the invention, it is important to add an enough C amount to stably achieve a hardness of not lower than 30 HRC even through tempering at e.g. 530°C or higher is conducted.
- C is added not more than 0.15% according to the invention.
- the solid-solved Cr is a major factor for reducing a coefficient of thermal conductivity of the mold steel.
- C is set to be not less than 0.07%.
- the C content is not less than 0.08% and/or not more than 0.13%. More preferably, the C content is not less than 0.1% and/or not more than 0.12%. Further preferably, the C content is not more than 0.1%.
- Si more than 0% and less than 0.8%
- Si is an element that increases corrosion resistance against atmosphere when the mold is in use, such as a gas generated from a material to be molded in plastic molding. However, too much Si significantly reduces a coefficient of thermal conductivity of the steel, and reduces thermal conductivity. Low Si content reduces anisotropy of a mechanical property and also reduces banded segregation to provide a good mirror finishing property. Thus, the Si content is less than 0.8% according to the invention. Preferably, the Si content is not less than 0.1% and/or not more than 0.6%. More preferably, the Si content is not less than 0.15% and/or not more than 0.5%. Further preferably, the Si content is not less than 0.2%. Particularly preferably, Si is not less than 0.25%.
- Mn is an element that improves a quenching property, prevents generation of ferrite phase, and provides an appropriate hardness by quenching and tempering.
- too much Mn significantly reduces thermal conductivity, and is also combined with S described later to generate a non-metal inclusion MnS which causes rust or pin holes.
- too much Mn increases viscosity of the matrix and reduces machinability.
- the Mn content is less than 1.5%.
- the Mn content is not less than 0.1% and/or not more than 1.0%. More preferably, the Mn content is not less than 0.2% and/or not more than 0.8%. Further preferably, the Mn content is not less than 0.3%.
- the P content is less than 0.05% according to the invention.
- the P content is not more than 0.03%.
- MnS in a form of non-metal inclusion MnS significantly improves machinability.
- MnS promotes anisotropy of a mechanical property, particularly, toughness or the like, and reduces performance of the die itself.
- MnS becomes a starting point of rust or pin holes, which significantly reduce rust resistance and polish finish property that are important properties of the steel of the invention.
- S is limited to be less than 0.06%.
- the S content is not more than 0.035%.
- a preferable lower limit is 0.005% or more.
- Ni more than 0% and less than 0.9%
- Ni also improves a quenching property of the steel of the invention, and prevents generation of ferrite phase.
- Ni is an element that increases rust resistance of the steel of the invention. However, too much Ni reduces a coefficient of thermal conductivity, and also increases viscosity of the matrix to reduce machinability.
- the Ni content is less than 0.9%.
- the Ni content is not less than 0.1% and/or not more than 0.6%. More preferably, Ni is not less than 0.15%, and further preferably not less than 0.2%.
- Cr is an element that precipitates and coagulates as fine carbide by tempering to increase strength of the steel of the invention. Cr is also solid-solved in the matrix to increase the rust resistance of the steel of the invention. Furthermore, when the steel is subjected to nitriding treatment, Cr increases a hardness of the nitride layer. However, too much Cr increases an amount of the solid-solved Cr and significantly reduces a coefficient of thermal conductivity as well as reduces softening resistance. Thus, the Cr content according to the invention is 2.9 to 4.9%. Preferably, the Cr content is not less than 3.5% and/or not more than 4.8%. Further preferably, the Cr content is not less than 3.8%.
- Mo and W either alone or in a complex (Mo+1/2W): more than 0% and less than 0.8%.
- Mo and W precipitate and coagulate as fine carbides in the tempering process to increase strength of the steel of the invention.
- Mo and W also increase softening resistance in the tempering process.
- Mo and W are solid-solved, like Cr, in the matrix to increase rust resistance of the steel according to the invention. Thus, they are added either alone or in a complex.
- Mo and W are partially solid-solved in an oxide film on a mold surface, and thus have an effect of increasing corrosion resistance against a corrosive gas generated from e.g. plastic during the use of the mold.
- too much Mo and W reduce machinability.
- a coefficient of thermal conductivity is significantly reduced.
- Mo and W either alone or in a complex defined by a relational expression of (Mo+1/2W) are set to less than 0.8% according to the invention.
- V more than 0% and less than 0.15%
- V improves resistance to tempering softening, and prevents coarsening of grains and increases toughness. Also, V forms minute hard carbide to increase abrasive resistance. However, too much V reduces machinability, and thus the V content is less than 0.15%.
- the V content is not less than 0.03% and/or not more than 0.10%. More preferably, the V content is not less than 0.05%, and further preferably, not less than 0.07%.
- the Cu is an element that precipitates and coagulates a Fe-Cu solid solution in the tempering process to increase strength of the steel according to the invention.
- too much Cu significantly reduces hot workability, and also reduces a coefficient of thermal conductivity, thereby reducing thermal conductivity of the steel according to the invention.
- the Cu content is 0.25 to 1.8% according to the invention.
- the Cu content is not less than 0.4% and/or not more than 1.5%. More preferably, the Cu content is not less than 0.7%, and further preferably not less than 1.0%.
- Al is an inevitable impurity and is generally used as a deoxidizing element in a melting process. If much Al 2 O 3 presents in the steel after hardness is adjusted, a mirror finishing property is reduced.
- the Al content is preferably restricted to less than 0.1% according to the invention. More preferably, the Al content is less than 0.05%.
- the N content in the steel is preferably restricted to a low level.
- the N content is preferably restricted to less than 0.06% according to the invention. More preferably, the N content is less than 0.03%.
- an upper limit of the O content is preferably restricted to 0.005% according to the invention. More preferably, the O content is less than 0.003%.
- values of following Expressions 1 and 2 are not less than 100 (a value in the bracket indicates a content (mass%) of each element).
- the contents of elements constituting the steel need to be controlled within the above ranges to achieve improved rust resistance and thermal conductivity, on condition that basic properties such as strength, softening resistance and machinability are satisfied.
- basic properties such as strength, softening resistance and machinability are satisfied.
- the influence on the rust resistance and thermal conductivity differs depending on the individual elements.
- it is effective to mutually control the contents of the elements to achieve the rust resistance and thermal conductivity while maintaining the basic properties.
- the degree of influence on rust resistance and thermal conductivity was searched for individual elements constituting the steel of the invention.
- the rust resistance is increase by Cr, Mo, W and Ni in this order, while S and C reduce rust resistance in this order.
- C has a higher effect of increasing thermal conductivity, and Si, Ni, Mn, Cr, Cu, Mo and W, in this order, reduce thermal conductivity.
- a multiple regression analysis using the contents of the elements as variables was performed to represent the above degree of influence as an appropriate mutual coefficient.
- the degree of influence of the elements on the rust resistance of the steel of the present invention can be mutually expressed by following Expression 1.
- a coefficient of an element increasing the property is represented by plus, while a coefficient of an element reducing the property is represented by minus, and a larger absolute value shows a higher degree of influence.
- a value by Expression 1 is preferably not less than 100 to further improve the rust resistance. Further preferably, the value is not less than 105. 85 - 60.1 ⁇ C % - 115 ⁇ S % + 0.1 ⁇ Ni % + 7.17 ⁇ Cr % + 2.44 ⁇ Mo + 1 / 2 ⁇ W %
- the degree of influence of the elements on the thermal conductivity of the steel of the present invention can be mutually expressed by following Expression 2.
- a coefficient of an element increasing the property is represented by plus, while a coefficient of an element reducing the property is represented by minus, and a larger absolute value shows a higher degree of influence.
- a value by Expression 2 is preferably not less than 100 to further improve the thermal conductivity. Further preferably, the value is not less than 105. 140 + 30.9 ⁇ C % - 17.8 ⁇ Si % - 10.5 ⁇ Mn % - 12.4 ⁇ Ni % - 3.68 ⁇ Cr % - 1.26 ⁇ Mo + 1 / 2 ⁇ W % - 3.68 Cu %
- a hardness of the mold steel according to the invention is defined to be 30 to 42 HRC.
- the hardness is not less than 35 HRC and/or not more than 40 HRC.
- the mold steel of the invention can be used as a so-called preharden steel, which is adjusted to the hardness through quenching and tempering heat treatment and then machined into a mold shape.
- the steel of the invention can stably obtain the hardness of not lower than 30 HRC, further not lower than 35 HRC, even though it is subjected to hot tempering at not lower than 530°C, or even tempering at not lower than 540°C.
- the mold steel of the invention is adjusted to have an optimum composition having both improved rust resistance and thermal conductivity, as well as a tempering property as described above. Quenching temperature is not limited at this time. For example, quenching from a temperature of not lower than 900°C can be applied.
- a steel ingot of 10 kg adjusted to have a predetermined composition was melted in a vacuum melting furnace.
- the composition is shown in Table 1.
- Table 1 also shows values of Expressions 1 and 2 according to the invention.
- Conventional steels 1 and 2 correspond to those in Patent Literatures 1 and 2, respectively.
- the steel ingot was forged at 1150°C to obtain a steel material having a thickness of 30 mm and a width of 30 mm, and the steel material was annealed at 860°C. From each annealed material, three steel pieces having following different sizes and shapes were processed: a piece of 10 mm ⁇ 10 mm ⁇ 10 mm for measuring hardness, a piece of 5 mm ⁇ 8 mm ⁇ 15 mm for evaluating rust resistance, and a piece having a diameter of 10 mm and a thickness of 1 mm for evaluating thermal conductivity. The pieces were subjected to predetermined quenching and tempering and then following tests were conducted.
- the steel piece of 10 mm ⁇ 10 mm ⁇ 10 mm was quenched from 950°C by gas cooling. Tempering was performed at 550°C for two hours since the high temperature tempering is advantageous for reducing residual stress in the steel.
- the results of hardness are shown in Table 2.
- the steel of the invention achieved a hardness of not less than 30 HRC even tempered at 550°C, and achieved a hardness of not lower than 35 HRC in a preferable case. [Table 2] No.
- the steel piece of 5 mm ⁇ 8 mm ⁇ 15 mm was quenched as described above. Tempering was performed at an appropriate temperature of 540°C to 580°C for two hours so that the hardness was adjusted to 34 to 36 HRC (target hardness: 35 HRC). An exposure test of the tempered piece was performed at a temperature of 80°C and a humidity of 90% for 24 hours, and an area ratio of rust on a surface of 8 mm ⁇ 15 mm was calculated (100 ⁇ rust area (mm 2 )/surface area of the test piece (mm 2 )). The results are shown in Table 3.
- the steel piece having a diameter of 10 mm and a thickness of 1 mm was used and quenched as described above. Tempering was performed at an appropriate temperature of 540°C to 580°C for two hours so as to obtain a hardness of 34 to 36 HRC (target hardness: 35 HRC) as described above, together with a test piece for rust resistance evaluation. A coefficient of thermal conductivity of the tempered test piece was measured by a laser flash method. The results are shown in Table 3. [Table 3] No.
- steels 1 to 6 of the invention having adjusted compositions achieved both rust resistance and coefficient of thermal conductivity superior compared to the conventional steels 1 and 2.
- the steels 3 to 6 of the invention which have not less than 100 of the value of Expression 1 are not confirmed of generation of the rust.
- a coefficient of thermal conductivity was significantly reduced.
- the comparative steel 2 has a composition close to that of the steel of the invention, a coefficient of thermal conductivity is low since it has high Ni. Since the comparative steel 3 has a low Cr content, rust resistance is also reduced.
- Table 4 also shows values of Expressions 1 and 2 according to the invention as in Table 1.
- Example 2 the steel ingot was forged and annealed under the same conditions as those in Example 1 described above. From each annealed material, three steel pieces having following different sizes and shapes were machined: a piece of 10 mm ⁇ 10 mm ⁇ 10 mm for evaluating hardness, a piece of 5 mm ⁇ 8 mm ⁇ 15 mm for evaluating rust resistance, and a piece of a diameter of 10 mm and a thickness of 1 mm for evaluating thermal conductivity. Then, the following tests were conducted on the pieces having been subjected to predetermined quenching and tempering.
- the steel piece of 10 mm ⁇ 10 mm ⁇ 10 mm was quenched under the same conditions as Example 1. Tempering was conducted under two conditions at 550°C for two hours in Example 1, and at 580°C for two hours. The results of hardness are shown in Table 5. Table 5 also shows the results of the steels 2, 3, 5 and 6 of the invention, the comparative steels 1 to 3, and the conventional steels 1 and 2 in Example 1. The steel of the invention achieved a hardness of 30 HRC or more through tempering at 580°C as well as at 550°C. A hardness of 35 HRC or more was obtained in a preferable case. A steel 22 of the invention having a low V content had a hardness of less than 30 HRC through tempering at 580°C.
- a comparative steel 4 having a low C content did not achieve 30 HRC through tempering both at 550°C and 580°C.
- Table 5 No. HARDNESS (HRC) 550°C TEMPERING 580°C TEMPERING STEEL OF THE INVENTION 2 36.0 34.1 STEEL OF THE INVENTION 3 32.7 30.5 STEEL OF THE INVENTION 5 37.8 31.9 STEEL OF THE INVENTION 6 37.4 32.0 STEEL OF THE INVENTION 7 37.6 32.8 STEEL OF THE INVENTION 8 39.5 34.3 STEEL OF THE INVENTION 9 39.0 34.4 STEEL OF THE INVENTION 10 43.5 37.7 STEEL OF THE INVENTION 11 36.0 32.8 STEEL OF THE INVENTION 12 36.1 33.5 STEEL OF THE INVENTION 13 37.4 33.3 STEEL OF THE INVENTION 14 38.9 34.4 STEEL OF THE INVENTION 15 38.4 34.4 STEEL OF THE INVENTION 16 39.4 36.7
- Example 6 The steel piece of 5 mm ⁇ 8 mm ⁇ 15 mm was quenched and tempered, and it was subjected to an exposure test under the same condition as the rust resistance evaluation in Example 1. A mass of the test piece after the rust generated through the test was removed and compared with a mass of the piece before the test. Thus, a mass reduction rate (100 ⁇ reduction amount (g) of test piece/mass (g) of test piece before test) was calculated. The results are shown in Table 6. Table 6 also shows the results of the conventional steel 2 in Example 1.
- Example 6 The steel piece having a diameter of 10 mm and a thickness of 1 mm was quenched and tempered under the same conditions as the thermal conductivity evaluation in Example 1, and a coefficient of thermal conductivity was measured. The results are shown in Table 6. Table 6 also shows the results of the conventional steel 2 in Example 1. [Table 6] No.
- steels 7 to 22 of the invention have superior rust resistance and coefficient of thermal conductivity. Thus, both properties are achieved.
- the steel 10 of the invention has a high C content, it has a high value of Expression 1 and thus good rust resistance is obtained.
- Comparative steels 5 and 6 have a high Si content and a coefficient of thermal conductivity is low.
- Comparative steel 7 has a low Cr content and has a large mass reduction due to rust generation, and thus rust resistance is low.
- Table 7 shows values of Expressions 1 and 2 according to the invention.
- Table 7 No. COMPOSITON (mass%) C Si Mn P S Ni Cr Mo w STEEL OF THE INVENTION 23 0.110 0.32 0.30 0.021 0.0132 0.20 4.55 0.24 ⁇ 0.01 COMPOSITION (mass%) (ppm for [ ]) EXPRESSION (1) VALUE EXPRESSION (2) VALUE V Cu Al [N] [O] Fe *1 0.08 0.85 0.001 88 22 Bal. 110.1 111.9 * 1: impurities are included
- the steel of the invention satisfies the basic properties for a die.
- it can be applied to a die for rubber molding, for hot working used in a small lot production, for die-casting, or the like, besides a die for plastic molding.
Abstract
Description
- The present invention relates to a mold steel having improved rusting resistance and thermal conductivity, and suitable mainly for the application of plastic molding. The invention also relates to a method for producing the steel.
- Conventionally, a mold steel particularly used for plastic molding is mainly required to have
- (1) good mirror finishing properties, and low tendency of generation of pin holes or other micro pits,
- (2) good texturing process properties,
- (3) high strength, wear resistance and toughness,
- (4) good machinability,
- (5) high corrosion resistance and rust resistance,
- (6) high thermal conductivity, or the like.
- Among them, improvement of the rust resistance and thermal conductivity are particularly required for recent mold steel. When a mold is not in use, e.g. between productions or during maintenance, dew condensation may occur and cause rust on a mold surface. When the rust generates on the surface of the mold, removing of the rust, e.g. by scouring, is necessary for restarting the use, and thus productivity is reduced. Therefore, the mold steel is required to have a good rust resistance. Also, an improvement of thermal conductivity of the mold steel is important since it reduces a thermal cycle and increases productivity in a plastic molding process where heating and cooling are repeated.
- As a mold steel for plastic molding, proposed is an alloy steel comprising, by mass% (hereinafter expressed as "%"): 0.075 to 0.15% C; up to 1.0% Si; 1 to 3% Mn; 2 to 5% Cr; 1 to 4% Ni wherein Mn+Cr+Ni≥6, Mo and W either alone or in a complex such that (Mo+1/2W) is 0.1 to 1.0%; up to 0.015% P; up to 0.02% S; and the balance of Fe and impurities (Patent Literature 1).
- Also, a mold steel is proposed comprising: 0.10 to 0.25% C; up to 1.00% Si; up to 2.00% Mn; 0.60 to 1.50% Ni; more than 1.00 to 2.50% Cr; Mo and W either alone or in a complex such that (Mo+1/2W) is 1.00% or less; 0.03 to 0.15% V; 0.50 to 2.00% Cu; up to 0.05% S, wherein Al is restricted to 0.10% or less, N is restricted to 0.06% or less, and O is restricted to 0.005% or less, and the balance being Fe and inevitable impurities (Patent Literature 2).
-
- Patent Literature 1:
JP-A-2001-505617 - Patent Literature 2:
JP-A-2007-146278 - The mold steel including 2 to 5% Cr of Patent Literature 1 has good rust resistance. However, since the steel has a low coefficient of thermal conductivity, a thermal cycle time may increase and productivity is reduced in some molding conditions. Meanwhile, the mold steel including 2.5% or less Cr of Patent Literature 2 has a high coefficient of thermal conductivity and can reduce the thermal cycle time. However, as compared to the steel of Patent Literature 1, it still leaves place for improving the rust resistance. Thus, the thermal conductivity and the rust resistance are conflicting properties, and a mold steel having both of the properties at high levels has been desired.
- An object of the present invention is to provide a mold steel having both improved thermal conductivity and rust resistance, and to provide a preferable method for producing the mold steel.
- The present inventors have studied compositions of mold steels, and thus found that many elements constituting conventional mold steels mutually act on the rust resistance and thermal conductivity in a complex manner. To achieve the both properties, the inventors have extracted factors having a particularly high influence among the elementals, and found an optimum relationship between the contents thereof. Thus, they reached the present invention.
- Specifically, the present invention provides a mold steel having improved rust resistance and thermal conductivity. The steel comprises, by mass%:
- 0.07 to 0.15% C;
- more than 0% and less than 0.8% Si;
- more than 0% and less than 1.5% Mn;
- less than 0.05% P;
- less than 0.06% S;
- more than 0% and less than 0.9% Ni;
- 2.9 to 4.9% Cr;
- Mo and W either alone or in a complex such that (Mo+1/2W) is more than 0% and less than 0.8%;
- more than 0% and less than 0.15% V;
- 0.25 to 1.8% Cu, and
- The invention also provides a method for producing a mold steel having improved rust resistance and thermal conductivity. The method comprises subjecting the steel to quenching and tempering at a temperature of not lower than 530°C so as to have a hardness of 30 to 42 HRC, wherein the steel comprising, by mass%:
- 0.07 to 0.15% C;
- more than 0% and less than 0.8% Si;
- more than 0% and less than 1.5% Mn;
- less than 0.05% P;
- less than 0.06% S;
- more than 0% and less than 0.9% Ni;
- 2.9 to 4.9% Cr;
- Mo and W either alone or in a complex such that (Mo+1/2W) is more than 0% and less than 0.8%;
- more than 0% and less than 0.15% V;
- 0.25 to 1.8% Cu, and
-
- According to the present invention, both improved rust resistance and thermal conductivity, that have been conventionally achieved only individually, can be simultaneously achieved with high reproducibility. Thus, this is effective for improvement in the art of a mold.
- The invention specifies the elements having a significant influence on rust resistance or thermal conductivity as constituting elements of the mold steel. Specifically, C, S, Ni, Cr, Mo and W have a significant influence on rust resistance, and C, Si, Mn, Ni, Cr, Mo, W, and Cu have a significant influence on thermal conductivity. Accordingly, the thermal conductivity can be increased by adjusting the contents of C, Si, Mn, Ni, Cr, Mo, W and Cu for a mold steel having a good rust resistance described in Patent Literature 1. The rusting resistance can be increased by adjusting the contents of C, S, Ni, Cr, Mo and W for a mold steel having superior thermal conductivity described in Patent Literature 2.
- In another aspect, the invention quantifies a degree of influence of the elements on each of rust resistance and thermal conductivity. The quantification clarifies the composition of the mold steel to be adjusted, thereby improving the rust resistance and thermal conductivity. Now, each element will be described.
- C: 0.07 to 0.15%
- C is an element that increases a quenching property, and causes structural strengthening by precipitation of Cr, Mo(W), and V carbides by tempering. It is a basic element required for maintaining a hardness of 30 to 42 HRC described later by quenching and tempering. In order to suppress machining distortion that occurs during a cutting process or the like, it is desirable to reduce a residual stress in the steel, and this requires a high tempering temperature described above. Thus, for the steel of the invention, it is important to add an enough C amount to stably achieve a hardness of not lower than 30 HRC even through tempering at e.g. 530°C or higher is conducted.
- However, as the C amount increases, Cr carbides are formed and solid-solved Cr in a matrix decreases, and thus the rust resistance is lowered. Thus, C is added not more than 0.15% according to the invention. Meanwhile, the solid-solved Cr is a major factor for reducing a coefficient of thermal conductivity of the mold steel. Thus, too little C, which forms Cr carbides, reduces thermal conductivity of the mold steel and prevents a required hardness. Thus, C is set to be not less than 0.07%. Preferably, the C content is not less than 0.08% and/or not more than 0.13%. More preferably, the C content is not less than 0.1% and/or not more than 0.12%. Further preferably, the C content is not more than 0.1%.
- Si: more than 0% and less than 0.8%
- Si is an element that increases corrosion resistance against atmosphere when the mold is in use, such as a gas generated from a material to be molded in plastic molding. However, too much Si significantly reduces a coefficient of thermal conductivity of the steel, and reduces thermal conductivity. Low Si content reduces anisotropy of a mechanical property and also reduces banded segregation to provide a good mirror finishing property. Thus, the Si content is less than 0.8% according to the invention. Preferably, the Si content is not less than 0.1% and/or not more than 0.6%. More preferably, the Si content is not less than 0.15% and/or not more than 0.5%. Further preferably, the Si content is not less than 0.2%. Particularly preferably, Si is not less than 0.25%.
- Mn: more than 0% and less than 1.5%
- Mn is an element that improves a quenching property, prevents generation of ferrite phase, and provides an appropriate hardness by quenching and tempering. However, too much Mn significantly reduces thermal conductivity, and is also combined with S described later to generate a non-metal inclusion MnS which causes rust or pin holes. Also, too much Mn increases viscosity of the matrix and reduces machinability. Thus, the Mn content is less than 1.5%. Preferably, the Mn content is not less than 0.1% and/or not more than 1.0%. More preferably, the Mn content is not less than 0.2% and/or not more than 0.8%. Further preferably, the Mn content is not less than 0.3%.
- P: less than 0.05%
- Too much P reduces hot workability and toughness. Thus, the P content is less than 0.05% according to the invention. Preferably, the P content is not more than 0.03%.
- S: less than 0.06%
- S in a form of non-metal inclusion MnS significantly improves machinability. However, much MnS promotes anisotropy of a mechanical property, particularly, toughness or the like, and reduces performance of the die itself. MnS becomes a starting point of rust or pin holes, which significantly reduce rust resistance and polish finish property that are important properties of the steel of the invention. Thus, even when added, S is limited to be less than 0.06%. Preferably, the S content is not more than 0.035%. A preferable lower limit is 0.005% or more.
- Ni: more than 0% and less than 0.9%
- Ni also improves a quenching property of the steel of the invention, and prevents generation of ferrite phase. Ni is an element that increases rust resistance of the steel of the invention. However, too much Ni reduces a coefficient of thermal conductivity, and also increases viscosity of the matrix to reduce machinability. Thus, the Ni content is less than 0.9%. Preferably, the Ni content is not less than 0.1% and/or not more than 0.6%. More preferably, Ni is not less than 0.15%, and further preferably not less than 0.2%.
- Cr: 2.9 to 4.9%
- Cr is an element that precipitates and coagulates as fine carbide by tempering to increase strength of the steel of the invention. Cr is also solid-solved in the matrix to increase the rust resistance of the steel of the invention. Furthermore, when the steel is subjected to nitriding treatment, Cr increases a hardness of the nitride layer. However, too much Cr increases an amount of the solid-solved Cr and significantly reduces a coefficient of thermal conductivity as well as reduces softening resistance. Thus, the Cr content according to the invention is 2.9 to 4.9%. Preferably, the Cr content is not less than 3.5% and/or not more than 4.8%. Further preferably, the Cr content is not less than 3.8%.
- Mo and W either alone or in a complex (Mo+1/2W): more than 0% and less than 0.8%.
- Mo and W precipitate and coagulate as fine carbides in the tempering process to increase strength of the steel of the invention. Mo and W also increase softening resistance in the tempering process. Mo and W are solid-solved, like Cr, in the matrix to increase rust resistance of the steel according to the invention. Thus, they are added either alone or in a complex. Furthermore, Mo and W are partially solid-solved in an oxide film on a mold surface, and thus have an effect of increasing corrosion resistance against a corrosive gas generated from e.g. plastic during the use of the mold. However, too much Mo and W reduce machinability. When the above amount of solid-solved Mo and W increases, a coefficient of thermal conductivity is significantly reduced. Thus, Mo and W either alone or in a complex defined by a relational expression of (Mo+1/2W) are set to less than 0.8% according to the invention. Preferably not less than 0.1% and/or not more than 0.6%, further preferably not less than 0.3% and/or not more than 0.5%.
- V: more than 0% and less than 0.15%
- V improves resistance to tempering softening, and prevents coarsening of grains and increases toughness. Also, V forms minute hard carbide to increase abrasive resistance. However, too much V reduces machinability, and thus the V content is less than 0.15%. Preferably, the V content is not less than 0.03% and/or not more than 0.10%. More preferably, the V content is not less than 0.05%, and further preferably, not less than 0.07%.
- Cu: 0.25 to 1.8%
- Cu is an element that precipitates and coagulates a Fe-Cu solid solution in the tempering process to increase strength of the steel according to the invention. However, too much Cu significantly reduces hot workability, and also reduces a coefficient of thermal conductivity, thereby reducing thermal conductivity of the steel according to the invention. Thus, the Cu content is 0.25 to 1.8% according to the invention. Preferably, the Cu content is not less than 0.4% and/or not more than 1.5%. More preferably, the Cu content is not less than 0.7%, and further preferably not less than 1.0%.
- Al: less than 0.1%
- Al is an inevitable impurity and is generally used as a deoxidizing element in a melting process. If much Al2O3 presents in the steel after hardness is adjusted, a mirror finishing property is reduced. Thus, the Al content is preferably restricted to less than 0.1% according to the invention. More preferably, the Al content is less than 0.05%.
- N (nitrogen): less than 0.06%
- N is an inevitable impurity and forms a nitride in the steel. If too much nitride is formed, toughness, machinability and a polishing property of the die are significantly reduced. Thus, the N content in the steel is preferably restricted to a low level. Thus, the N content is preferably restricted to less than 0.06% according to the invention. More preferably, the N content is less than 0.03%.
- O (oxygen): less than 0.005%
- O is an inevitable impurity and forms an oxide in the steel. If too much oxide is formed, cold plastic workability and a polishing property are significantly reduced. It is particularly important to prevent the formation of Al2O3 as described above according to the invention. Thus, an upper limit of the O content is preferably restricted to 0.005% according to the invention. More preferably, the O content is less than 0.003%.
-
- The contents of elements constituting the steel need to be controlled within the above ranges to achieve improved rust resistance and thermal conductivity, on condition that basic properties such as strength, softening resistance and machinability are satisfied. However, the influence on the rust resistance and thermal conductivity differs depending on the individual elements. Thus, it is effective to mutually control the contents of the elements to achieve the rust resistance and thermal conductivity while maintaining the basic properties.
- Thus, the degree of influence on rust resistance and thermal conductivity was searched for individual elements constituting the steel of the invention. As the result, the rust resistance is increase by Cr, Mo, W and Ni in this order, while S and C reduce rust resistance in this order. The result also showed that C has a higher effect of increasing thermal conductivity, and Si, Ni, Mn, Cr, Cu, Mo and W, in this order, reduce thermal conductivity. A multiple regression analysis using the contents of the elements as variables was performed to represent the above degree of influence as an appropriate mutual coefficient.
- Specifically, the degree of influence of the elements on the rust resistance of the steel of the present invention can be mutually expressed by following Expression 1. At this time, a coefficient of an element increasing the property is represented by plus, while a coefficient of an element reducing the property is represented by minus, and a larger absolute value shows a higher degree of influence. For the steel of the present invention, a value by Expression 1 is preferably not less than 100 to further improve the rust resistance. Further preferably, the value is not less than 105.
- The degree of influence of the elements on the thermal conductivity of the steel of the present invention can be mutually expressed by following Expression 2. At this time, a coefficient of an element increasing the property is represented by plus, while a coefficient of an element reducing the property is represented by minus, and a larger absolute value shows a higher degree of influence. For the steel of the present invention, a value by Expression 2 is preferably not less than 100 to further improve the thermal conductivity. Further preferably, the value is not less than 105.
- Hardness of the die steel being 30 to 42 HRC
- Too low hardness reduces a mirror finishing property in producing a mold, and also reduces abrasive resistance as a mold product. On the other hand, too high hardness reduces machinability in producing the mold and also reduces toughness as the mold product. Thus, a hardness of the mold steel according to the invention is defined to be 30 to 42 HRC. Preferably, the hardness is not less than 35 HRC and/or not more than 40 HRC. The mold steel of the invention can be used as a so-called preharden steel, which is adjusted to the hardness through quenching and tempering heat treatment and then machined into a mold shape.
- The steel of the invention can stably obtain the hardness of not lower than 30 HRC, further not lower than 35 HRC, even though it is subjected to hot tempering at not lower than 530°C, or even tempering at not lower than 540°C. In order to prevent machining distortion that occurs in the cutting process or the like, it is advantageous to conduct the tempering process at a high temperature to reduce residual stress in the steel as described above. The mold steel of the invention is adjusted to have an optimum composition having both improved rust resistance and thermal conductivity, as well as a tempering property as described above. Quenching temperature is not limited at this time. For example, quenching from a temperature of not lower than 900°C can be applied.
- A steel ingot of 10 kg adjusted to have a predetermined composition was melted in a vacuum melting furnace. The composition is shown in Table 1. Table 1 also shows values of Expressions 1 and 2 according to the invention. Conventional steels 1 and 2 correspond to those in Patent Literatures 1 and 2, respectively.
- Next, the steel ingot was forged at 1150°C to obtain a steel material having a thickness of 30 mm and a width of 30 mm, and the steel material was annealed at 860°C. From each annealed material, three steel pieces having following different sizes and shapes were processed: a piece of 10 mm × 10 mm × 10 mm for measuring hardness, a piece of 5 mm × 8 mm × 15 mm for evaluating rust resistance, and a piece having a diameter of 10 mm and a thickness of 1 mm for evaluating thermal conductivity. The pieces were subjected to predetermined quenching and tempering and then following tests were conducted.
- The steel piece of 10 mm × 10 mm × 10 mm was quenched from 950°C by gas cooling. Tempering was performed at 550°C for two hours since the high temperature tempering is advantageous for reducing residual stress in the steel. The results of hardness are shown in Table 2. The steel of the invention achieved a hardness of not less than 30 HRC even tempered at 550°C, and achieved a hardness of not lower than 35 HRC in a preferable case.
[Table 2] No. HARDNESS (HRC) STEEL OF THE INVENTION 1 35.6 STEEL OF THE INVENTION 2 36.0 STEEL OF THE INVENTION 3 32.7 STEEL OF THE INVENTION 4 38.7 STEEL OF THE INVENTION 5 37.8 STEEL OF THE INVENTION 6 37.4 COMPARATIVE STEEL 1 38.8 COMPARATIVE STEEL 2 38.1 COMPARATIVE STEEL 3 36.9 CONVENTIONAL STEEL 1 38.7 CONVENTIONAL STEEL 2 34.5 - The steel piece of 5 mm × 8 mm × 15 mm was quenched as described above. Tempering was performed at an appropriate temperature of 540°C to 580°C for two hours so that the hardness was adjusted to 34 to 36 HRC (target hardness: 35 HRC). An exposure test of the tempered piece was performed at a temperature of 80°C and a humidity of 90% for 24 hours, and an area ratio of rust on a surface of 8 mm × 15 mm was calculated (100 × rust area (mm2)/surface area of the test piece (mm2)). The results are shown in Table 3.
- The steel piece having a diameter of 10 mm and a thickness of 1 mm was used and quenched as described above. Tempering was performed at an appropriate temperature of 540°C to 580°C for two hours so as to obtain a hardness of 34 to 36 HRC (target hardness: 35 HRC) as described above, together with a test piece for rust resistance evaluation. A coefficient of thermal conductivity of the tempered test piece was measured by a laser flash method. The results are shown in Table 3.
[Table 3] No. RUST AREA RATIO (%) COEFFICIENT OF THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY (W/mk) STEEL OF THE INVENTION 1 4 32.7 STEEL OF THE INVENTION 2 3 32.6 STEEL OF THE INVENTION 3 0 33.6 STEEL OF THE INVENTION 4 0 31.5 STEEL OF THE INVENTION 5 0 31.1 STEEL OF THE INVENTION 6 0 31.9 COMPARATIVE STEEL 1 0 21.1 COMPARATIVE STEEL 2 0 24.4 COMPARATIVE STEEL 3 17 22.5 CONVENTIONAL STEEL 1 22 29.1 CONVENTIONAL STEEL 2 4 27.0 - From the results in Table 3, steels 1 to 6 of the invention having adjusted compositions achieved both rust resistance and coefficient of thermal conductivity superior compared to the conventional steels 1 and 2. The steels 3 to 6 of the invention which have not less than 100 of the value of Expression 1 are not confirmed of generation of the rust. On the other hand, for the comparative steel 1 having high Si and the comparative steel 3 having high Ni, a coefficient of thermal conductivity was significantly reduced. Although the comparative steel 2 has a composition close to that of the steel of the invention, a coefficient of thermal conductivity is low since it has high Ni. Since the comparative steel 3 has a low Cr content, rust resistance is also reduced.
-
- Next, the steel ingot was forged and annealed under the same conditions as those in Example 1 described above. From each annealed material, three steel pieces having following different sizes and shapes were machined: a piece of 10 mm × 10 mm × 10 mm for evaluating hardness, a piece of 5 mm × 8 mm × 15 mm for evaluating rust resistance, and a piece of a diameter of 10 mm and a thickness of 1 mm for evaluating thermal conductivity. Then, the following tests were conducted on the pieces having been subjected to predetermined quenching and tempering.
- The steel piece of 10 mm × 10 mm × 10 mm was quenched under the same conditions as Example 1. Tempering was conducted under two conditions at 550°C for two hours in Example 1, and at 580°C for two hours. The results of hardness are shown in Table 5. Table 5 also shows the results of the steels 2, 3, 5 and 6 of the invention, the comparative steels 1 to 3, and the conventional steels 1 and 2 in Example 1. The steel of the invention achieved a hardness of 30 HRC or more through tempering at 580°C as well as at 550°C. A hardness of 35 HRC or more was obtained in a preferable case. A steel 22 of the invention having a low V content had a hardness of less than 30 HRC through tempering at 580°C. A comparative steel 4 having a low C content did not achieve 30 HRC through tempering both at 550°C and 580°C.
[Table 5] No. HARDNESS (HRC) 550°C TEMPERING 580°C TEMPERING STEEL OF THE INVENTION 2 36.0 34.1 STEEL OF THE INVENTION 3 32.7 30.5 STEEL OF THE INVENTION 5 37.8 31.9 STEEL OF THE INVENTION 6 37.4 32.0 STEEL OF THE INVENTION 7 37.6 32.8 STEEL OF THE INVENTION 8 39.5 34.3 STEEL OF THE INVENTION 9 39.0 34.4 STEEL OF THE INVENTION 10 43.5 37.7 STEEL OF THE INVENTION 11 36.0 32.8 STEEL OF THE INVENTION 12 36.1 33.5 STEEL OF THE INVENTION 13 37.4 33.3 STEEL OF THE INVENTION 14 38.9 34.4 STEEL OF THE INVENTION 15 38.4 34.4 STEEL OF THE INVENTION 16 39.4 36.7 STEEL OF THE INVENTION 17 38.3 32.7 STEEL OF THE INVENTION 18 37.1 33.0 STEEL OF THE INVENTION 19 38.6 35.0 STEEL OF THE INVENTION 20 38.0 32.2 STEEL OF THE INVENTION 21 37.4 33.1 STEEL OF THE INVENTION 22 36.0 26.2 COMPARATIVE STEEL 1 38.8 30.5 COMPARATIVE STEEL 2 38.1 32.5 COMPARATIVE STEEL 3 36.9 33.5 COMPARATIVE STEEL 4 27.8 27.8 COMPARATIVE STEEL 5 36.9 27.9 COMPARATIVE STEEL 6 36.5 34.8 COMPARATIVE STEEL 7 33.9 32.8 CONVENTIONAL STEEL 1 38.7 31.5 CONVENTIONAL STEEL 2 34.5 28.0 - The steel piece of 5 mm × 8 mm × 15 mm was quenched and tempered, and it was subjected to an exposure test under the same condition as the rust resistance evaluation in Example 1. A mass of the test piece after the rust generated through the test was removed and compared with a mass of the piece before the test. Thus, a mass reduction rate (100 × reduction amount (g) of test piece/mass (g) of test piece before test) was calculated. The results are shown in Table 6. Table 6 also shows the results of the conventional steel 2 in Example 1.
- The steel piece having a diameter of 10 mm and a thickness of 1 mm was quenched and tempered under the same conditions as the thermal conductivity evaluation in Example 1, and a coefficient of thermal conductivity was measured. The results are shown in Table 6. Table 6 also shows the results of the conventional steel 2 in Example 1.
[Table 6] No. MASS REDUCTION RATE (%) COEFFICIENT OF THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY (W/mk) STEEL OF THE INVENTION 7 0.055 33.1 STEEL OF THE INVENTION 8 0.049 32.8 STEEL OF THE INVENTION 9 0.044 29.9 STEEL OF THE INVENTION 10 0.060 30.8 STEEL OF THE INVENTION 11 0.053 31.4 STEEL OF THE INVENTION 12 0.057 31.9 STEEL OF THE INVENTION 13 0.054 32.2 STEEL OF THE INVENTION 14 0.055 30.8 STEEL OF THE INVENTION 15 0.050 32.6 STEEL OF THE INVENTION 16 0.057 32.0 STEEL OF THE INVENTION 17 0.050 31.5 STEEL OF THE INVENTION 18 0.054 31.4 STEEL OF THE INVENTION 19 0.057 31.1 STEEL OF THE INVENTION 20 0.056 31.6 STEEL OF THE INVENTION 21 0.048 32.3 STEEL OF THE INVENTION 22 0.052 31.3 COMPARATIVE STEEL 4 0.067 30.5 COMPARATIVE STEEL 5 0.055 20.8 COMPARATIVE STEEL 6 0.071 26.0 COMPARATIVE STEEL 7 0.092 35.0 CONVENTIONAL STEEL 2 0.060 27.0 - From the results in Table 6, steels 7 to 22 of the invention have superior rust resistance and coefficient of thermal conductivity. Thus, both properties are achieved. Although the steel 10 of the invention has a high C content, it has a high value of Expression 1 and thus good rust resistance is obtained. Comparative steels 5 and 6 have a high Si content and a coefficient of thermal conductivity is low. Comparative steel 7 has a low Cr content and has a large mass reduction due to rust generation, and thus rust resistance is low.
- A steel ingot of 10 tons adjusted to have a composition in Table 7 was melted in an arc melting furnace. Like Table 1, Table 7 also shows values of Expressions 1 and 2 according to the invention.
[Table 7] No. COMPOSITON (mass%) C Si Mn P S Ni Cr Mo w STEEL OF THE INVENTION 23 0.110 0.32 0.30 0.021 0.0132 0.20 4.55 0.24 <0.01 COMPOSITION (mass%) (ppm for [ ]) EXPRESSION (1) VALUE EXPRESSION (2) VALUE V Cu Al [N] [O] Fe*1 0.08 0.85 0.001 88 22 Bal. 110.1 111.9 * 1: impurities are included - Next, the steel ingots were forged and extended to obtain a square bar having a sectional area of 6500 cm2. From the bar, two pieces of following different sizes and shapes were taken: a piece of 5 mm × 8 mm × 15 mm for evaluating rust resistance, and a piece having a diameter of 10 mm and a thickness of 1 mm for evaluating thermal conductivity. The rust resistance evaluation and the thermal conductivity evaluation were conducted under the same conditions as those in Example 2. The results are shown in Table 8.
[Table 8] No. MASS REDUCTION RATE (%) COEFFICIENT OF THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY (W/mk) STEEL OF THE INVENTION 23 0.053 30.6 - The results in Table 8 show that steel 23 of the invention achieves both superior rust resistance and thermal conductivity.
- The steel of the invention satisfies the basic properties for a die. Thus, it can be applied to a die for rubber molding, for hot working used in a small lot production, for die-casting, or the like, besides a die for plastic molding.
Claims (6)
- A mold steel having improved rust resistance and thermal conductivity, the steel comprising, by mass%:0.07 to 0.15% C;more than 0% and less than 0.8% Si;more than 0% and less than 1.5% Mn;less than 0.05% P;less than 0.06% S;more than 0% and less than 0.9% Ni;2.9 to 4.9% Cr;Mo and W either alone or in a complex such that (Mo+1/2W) is more than 0% and less than 0.8%;more than 0% and less than 0.15% V;0.25 to 1.8% Cu, andthe balance being Fe and inevitable impurities,
wherein the mold steel has a hardness of 30 to 42 HRC. - The mold steel according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the impurities include less than 0.1% Al, less than 0.06% N, and less than 0.005% O.
- A method for producing a mold steel having improved rust resistance and thermal conductivity, the method comprising subjecting the steel to quenching and tempering at a temperature of not lower than 530°C so as to have a hardness of 30 to 42 HRC, wherein the steel comprises, by mass%:0.07 to 0.15% C;more than 0% and less than 0.8% Si;more than 0% and less than 1.5% Mn;less than 0.05% P;less than 0.06% S;more than 0% and less than 0.9% Ni;2.9 to 4.9% Cr;Mo and W either alone or in a complex such that (Mo+1/2W) is more than 0% and less than 0.8%;more than 0% and less than 0.15% V;0.25 to 1.8% Cu, andthe balance being Fe and inevitable impurities.
- The method according to claim 4 or 5 wherein the impurities include less than 0.1% Al, less than 0.06% N, and less than 0.005% O.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
JP2010289442 | 2010-12-27 | ||
PCT/JP2011/072317 WO2012090562A1 (en) | 2010-12-27 | 2011-09-29 | Die steel having superior rusting resistance and thermal conductivity, and method for producing same |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2660348A1 true EP2660348A1 (en) | 2013-11-06 |
EP2660348A4 EP2660348A4 (en) | 2014-09-03 |
EP2660348B1 EP2660348B1 (en) | 2017-11-15 |
Family
ID=46382687
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP11854240.6A Active EP2660348B1 (en) | 2010-12-27 | 2011-09-29 | Die steel having superior rusting resistance and thermal conductivity, and method for producing same |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP2660348B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP5534482B2 (en) |
KR (1) | KR101545417B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN103282530B (en) |
WO (1) | WO2012090562A1 (en) |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP3636791A1 (en) * | 2018-10-12 | 2020-04-15 | Daido Steel Co.,Ltd. | Steel for mold |
US10975460B2 (en) | 2015-01-28 | 2021-04-13 | Daido Steel Co., Ltd. | Steel powder and mold using the same |
US11141778B2 (en) | 2015-09-11 | 2021-10-12 | Daido Steel Co., Ltd. | Steel for molds and molding tool |
Families Citing this family (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2013177669A (en) * | 2012-01-31 | 2013-09-09 | Daido Steel Co Ltd | Steel for forming die having excellent thermal conductivity, mirror polishability, weatherability, toughness, and machinability |
CN103774047B (en) * | 2012-10-20 | 2017-03-01 | 大同特殊钢株式会社 | There is the mould steel of excellent thermal conductance, mirror polishability and toughness |
TWI500781B (en) | 2013-02-28 | 2015-09-21 | Hitachi Metals Ltd | Steel for mold and production method thereof |
JP6601051B2 (en) * | 2015-01-28 | 2019-11-06 | 大同特殊鋼株式会社 | Steel powder |
JP6520518B2 (en) * | 2015-07-24 | 2019-05-29 | 大同特殊鋼株式会社 | Mold repair welding material |
CN112708816A (en) * | 2021-01-28 | 2021-04-27 | 南通成科精密铸件有限公司 | Die casting and surface treatment method thereof |
CN114250422B (en) * | 2021-12-31 | 2022-09-30 | 安徽哈特三维科技有限公司 | Die steel with good toughness and high thermal conductivity and preparation method thereof |
Citations (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPS62230955A (en) * | 1986-03-31 | 1987-10-09 | Nippon Steel Corp | Steel for excavating drill pipe excellent in corrosion resistance |
JPH0250910A (en) * | 1988-08-15 | 1990-02-20 | Nippon Steel Corp | Production of steel plate for die having good heat fatigue characteristic |
EP0709481A1 (en) * | 1994-10-31 | 1996-05-01 | CREUSOT LOIRE INDUSTRIE (Société Anonyme) | Low alloy steel for the manufacture of moulds for plastic materials or for rubber articles |
US5639421A (en) * | 1994-04-11 | 1997-06-17 | Daido Tokushuko Kabushhiki Kaisha | High-hardness precipitation hardening steel for metallic mold |
JP2000054068A (en) * | 1998-08-03 | 2000-02-22 | Hitachi Metals Ltd | High strength prehardening steel material excellent in machinability |
JP2000169931A (en) * | 1998-09-29 | 2000-06-20 | Nippon Steel Corp | Steel for laser welding |
JP2000297351A (en) * | 1999-04-12 | 2000-10-24 | Hitachi Metals Ltd | Steel for diecasting die and diecasting die |
JP2009256797A (en) * | 2008-03-28 | 2009-11-05 | Hitachi Metals Ltd | Steel for die having excellent machinability |
JP2010065301A (en) * | 2008-09-12 | 2010-03-25 | Nippon Steel Corp | High-strength steel excellent in corrosion resistance at coating in seashore area, and method of producing the same |
Family Cites Families (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPH08164465A (en) * | 1994-12-12 | 1996-06-25 | Daido Steel Co Ltd | Steel for die of die casting in small quantity production |
SE506918C2 (en) | 1996-06-26 | 1998-03-02 | Uddeholm Tooling Ab | Steel alloy, steel product made from the alloy and use of the alloy / product |
JP3292122B2 (en) * | 1997-12-19 | 2002-06-17 | 日本鋼管株式会社 | Seamless steel pipe manufacturing tools |
JP2004002951A (en) * | 2002-04-12 | 2004-01-08 | Daido Steel Co Ltd | Free cutting tool steel |
JP4258371B2 (en) * | 2003-12-26 | 2009-04-30 | 大同特殊鋼株式会社 | Plastic mold steel with excellent workability |
KR100836699B1 (en) * | 2005-10-27 | 2008-06-10 | 히타치 긴조쿠 가부시키가이샤 | Die steel |
JP4269293B2 (en) | 2005-10-27 | 2009-05-27 | 日立金属株式会社 | Steel for mold |
-
2011
- 2011-09-29 KR KR1020137015973A patent/KR101545417B1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2011-09-29 EP EP11854240.6A patent/EP2660348B1/en active Active
- 2011-09-29 CN CN201180062842.4A patent/CN103282530B/en active Active
- 2011-09-29 WO PCT/JP2011/072317 patent/WO2012090562A1/en active Application Filing
- 2011-09-29 JP JP2012550755A patent/JP5534482B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPS62230955A (en) * | 1986-03-31 | 1987-10-09 | Nippon Steel Corp | Steel for excavating drill pipe excellent in corrosion resistance |
JPH0250910A (en) * | 1988-08-15 | 1990-02-20 | Nippon Steel Corp | Production of steel plate for die having good heat fatigue characteristic |
US5639421A (en) * | 1994-04-11 | 1997-06-17 | Daido Tokushuko Kabushhiki Kaisha | High-hardness precipitation hardening steel for metallic mold |
EP0709481A1 (en) * | 1994-10-31 | 1996-05-01 | CREUSOT LOIRE INDUSTRIE (Société Anonyme) | Low alloy steel for the manufacture of moulds for plastic materials or for rubber articles |
JP2000054068A (en) * | 1998-08-03 | 2000-02-22 | Hitachi Metals Ltd | High strength prehardening steel material excellent in machinability |
JP2000169931A (en) * | 1998-09-29 | 2000-06-20 | Nippon Steel Corp | Steel for laser welding |
JP2000297351A (en) * | 1999-04-12 | 2000-10-24 | Hitachi Metals Ltd | Steel for diecasting die and diecasting die |
JP2009256797A (en) * | 2008-03-28 | 2009-11-05 | Hitachi Metals Ltd | Steel for die having excellent machinability |
JP2010065301A (en) * | 2008-09-12 | 2010-03-25 | Nippon Steel Corp | High-strength steel excellent in corrosion resistance at coating in seashore area, and method of producing the same |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See also references of WO2012090562A1 * |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US10975460B2 (en) | 2015-01-28 | 2021-04-13 | Daido Steel Co., Ltd. | Steel powder and mold using the same |
US11141778B2 (en) | 2015-09-11 | 2021-10-12 | Daido Steel Co., Ltd. | Steel for molds and molding tool |
EP3636791A1 (en) * | 2018-10-12 | 2020-04-15 | Daido Steel Co.,Ltd. | Steel for mold |
US11377718B2 (en) | 2018-10-12 | 2022-07-05 | Daido Steel Co., Ltd. | Steel for mold |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JP5534482B2 (en) | 2014-07-02 |
CN103282530A (en) | 2013-09-04 |
EP2660348A4 (en) | 2014-09-03 |
CN103282530B (en) | 2015-05-13 |
KR20130091351A (en) | 2013-08-16 |
KR101545417B1 (en) | 2015-08-18 |
EP2660348B1 (en) | 2017-11-15 |
JPWO2012090562A1 (en) | 2014-06-05 |
WO2012090562A1 (en) | 2012-07-05 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP2660348B1 (en) | Die steel having superior rusting resistance and thermal conductivity, and method for producing same | |
EP3135777B1 (en) | Steel for mold and mold | |
JP6432070B2 (en) | Hot die steel for long-life die casting excellent in high-temperature thermal conductivity and method for producing the same | |
EP3631032B1 (en) | High-strength, hot rolled abrasive wear resistant steel strip and method of manufacturing thereof | |
KR101688759B1 (en) | Die steel and method for producing same | |
WO2016075951A1 (en) | Hot work tool steel | |
JP2012214833A (en) | Cold tool steel | |
EP3199656A1 (en) | Cold tool material and method for manufacturing cold tool | |
JP2014025103A (en) | Hot tool steel | |
JP2005336553A (en) | Hot tool steel | |
KR101711889B1 (en) | Alloy tool steels having excellent wear resistance in cold-working | |
JP5043529B2 (en) | Steel for plastic molding dies with excellent specularity | |
EP3862458B1 (en) | Hot work tool steel and hot work tool | |
JP2866113B2 (en) | Corrosion resistant mold steel | |
KR101602445B1 (en) | Steel for Hydraulic Breaker Chisel With High Hardenability and Method for Manufacturing the Same | |
JP2001220646A (en) | Prehardened steel for plastic molding die | |
KR101986187B1 (en) | Cast steel | |
CN115679194B (en) | Plastic mold steel plate and manufacturing method thereof | |
CN115478214B (en) | Mining chain steel and manufacturing method thereof | |
WO2022190441A1 (en) | Hot work tool steel | |
JP2009270160A (en) | Method for producing steel material for soft-nitriding | |
KR101605964B1 (en) | Die steel and manufacturing method thereof | |
JPH11181549A (en) | Cold tool made of casting excellent in weldability and its production | |
KR101909501B1 (en) | Cast steel with excellent flexural strength and tool and die using the same | |
KR20240056258A (en) | Martensitic stainless steel with excellent primary carbide quality and method of manufacturing the same |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20130729 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
A4 | Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched |
Effective date: 20140731 |
|
RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: C22C 38/60 20060101ALI20140725BHEP Ipc: C22C 38/00 20060101AFI20140725BHEP Ipc: C21D 6/00 20060101ALI20140725BHEP |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20160421 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20170328 |
|
GRAJ | Information related to disapproval of communication of intention to grant by the applicant or resumption of examination proceedings by the epo deleted |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDIGR1 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS |
|
INTC | Intention to grant announced (deleted) | ||
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: HITACHI METALS, LTD. |
|
GRAR | Information related to intention to grant a patent recorded |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR71 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20170919 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 946362 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20171115 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602011043474 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20171115 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK05 Ref document number: 946362 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20171115 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171115 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171115 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171115 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171115 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171115 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180215 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171115 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171115 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171115 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180215 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180216 Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171115 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171115 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171115 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171115 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171115 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602011043474 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171115 Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171115 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171115 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20180817 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171115 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171115 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20180930 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180929 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180929 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180930 Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180930 Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180930 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180930 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180929 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171115 Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20110929 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20171115 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171115 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180315 |
|
P01 | Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered |
Effective date: 20230525 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Payment date: 20230928 Year of fee payment: 13 Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20230810 Year of fee payment: 13 Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20230810 Year of fee payment: 13 Ref country code: CZ Payment date: 20230919 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20230802 Year of fee payment: 13 |