EP2649462B1 - Method and apparatus for sensing ground leakage and automated self testing thereof - Google Patents
Method and apparatus for sensing ground leakage and automated self testing thereof Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2649462B1 EP2649462B1 EP11847380.0A EP11847380A EP2649462B1 EP 2649462 B1 EP2649462 B1 EP 2649462B1 EP 11847380 A EP11847380 A EP 11847380A EP 2649462 B1 EP2649462 B1 EP 2649462B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- leakage current
- circuit
- current values
- threshold level
- self
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 title claims description 87
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims description 36
- 238000004804 winding Methods 0.000 claims description 50
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 claims description 20
- 238000002955 isolation Methods 0.000 claims description 18
- 230000004907 flux Effects 0.000 claims description 13
- 230000000737 periodic effect Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000001939 inductive effect Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000010200 validation analysis Methods 0.000 claims 1
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 48
- 230000007935 neutral effect Effects 0.000 description 26
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 26
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 14
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 8
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 7
- 230000003750 conditioning effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 3
- 208000027418 Wounds and injury Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000009977 dual effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000007726 management method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 206010014405 Electrocution Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 241001481828 Glyptocephalus cynoglossus Species 0.000 description 1
- 230000002457 bidirectional effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003990 capacitor Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007257 malfunction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012806 monitoring device Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000035939 shock Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012358 sourcing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010998 test method Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01R—MEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
- G01R31/00—Arrangements for testing electric properties; Arrangements for locating electric faults; Arrangements for electrical testing characterised by what is being tested not provided for elsewhere
- G01R31/50—Testing of electric apparatus, lines, cables or components for short-circuits, continuity, leakage current or incorrect line connections
- G01R31/52—Testing for short-circuits, leakage current or ground faults
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01R—MEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
- G01R19/00—Arrangements for measuring currents or voltages or for indicating presence or sign thereof
- G01R19/165—Indicating that current or voltage is either above or below a predetermined value or within or outside a predetermined range of values
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01R—MEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
- G01R31/00—Arrangements for testing electric properties; Arrangements for locating electric faults; Arrangements for electrical testing characterised by what is being tested not provided for elsewhere
- G01R31/40—Testing power supplies
- G01R31/42—AC power supplies
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
- H02H—EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS
- H02H3/00—Emergency protective circuit arrangements for automatic disconnection directly responsive to an undesired change from normal electric working condition with or without subsequent reconnection ; integrated protection
- H02H3/26—Emergency protective circuit arrangements for automatic disconnection directly responsive to an undesired change from normal electric working condition with or without subsequent reconnection ; integrated protection responsive to difference between voltages or between currents; responsive to phase angle between voltages or between currents
- H02H3/28—Emergency protective circuit arrangements for automatic disconnection directly responsive to an undesired change from normal electric working condition with or without subsequent reconnection ; integrated protection responsive to difference between voltages or between currents; responsive to phase angle between voltages or between currents involving comparison of the voltage or current values at two spaced portions of a single system, e.g. at opposite ends of one line, at input and output of apparatus
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
- H02H—EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS
- H02H3/00—Emergency protective circuit arrangements for automatic disconnection directly responsive to an undesired change from normal electric working condition with or without subsequent reconnection ; integrated protection
- H02H3/26—Emergency protective circuit arrangements for automatic disconnection directly responsive to an undesired change from normal electric working condition with or without subsequent reconnection ; integrated protection responsive to difference between voltages or between currents; responsive to phase angle between voltages or between currents
- H02H3/32—Emergency protective circuit arrangements for automatic disconnection directly responsive to an undesired change from normal electric working condition with or without subsequent reconnection ; integrated protection responsive to difference between voltages or between currents; responsive to phase angle between voltages or between currents involving comparison of the voltage or current values at corresponding points in different conductors of a single system, e.g. of currents in go and return conductors
- H02H3/33—Emergency protective circuit arrangements for automatic disconnection directly responsive to an undesired change from normal electric working condition with or without subsequent reconnection ; integrated protection responsive to difference between voltages or between currents; responsive to phase angle between voltages or between currents involving comparison of the voltage or current values at corresponding points in different conductors of a single system, e.g. of currents in go and return conductors using summation current transformers
- H02H3/334—Emergency protective circuit arrangements for automatic disconnection directly responsive to an undesired change from normal electric working condition with or without subsequent reconnection ; integrated protection responsive to difference between voltages or between currents; responsive to phase angle between voltages or between currents involving comparison of the voltage or current values at corresponding points in different conductors of a single system, e.g. of currents in go and return conductors using summation current transformers with means to produce an artificial unbalance for other protection or monitoring reasons or remote control
- H02H3/335—Emergency protective circuit arrangements for automatic disconnection directly responsive to an undesired change from normal electric working condition with or without subsequent reconnection ; integrated protection responsive to difference between voltages or between currents; responsive to phase angle between voltages or between currents involving comparison of the voltage or current values at corresponding points in different conductors of a single system, e.g. of currents in go and return conductors using summation current transformers with means to produce an artificial unbalance for other protection or monitoring reasons or remote control the main function being self testing of the device
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01R—MEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
- G01R35/00—Testing or calibrating of apparatus covered by the other groups of this subclass
Definitions
- the present invention relates to methods and apparatus for sensing leakage current in a system, and more particularly, to a circuit that is capable of sensing such leakage and also operates to perform self-testing to ensure proper sensing capability.
- alternating current (AC) power circuits current from a single phase AC source normally flows from an AC source via a phase wire, through a load that is fed by the AC power, back through a neutral wire to the AC source, and vice versa. Any component of current that does not flow to the load via the phase wire and from the load via the neutral wire will flow via one or more leakage paths to earth ground. Such current is known as leakage or residual current. Leakage current is dangerous because it can lead to electrocution and/or fires if not properly controlled.
- GFIs Ground Fault Interrupters
- RCDs Residual Current Detectors
- FIG. 1 A diagram of a typical GFI circuit 10 is shown in FIG. 1 .
- a single phase AC source of power is provided by way of a phase wire L and a neutral wire N.
- the phase and neutral wires L, N are coupled to the load 14 (which in a residence may be an appliance of some kind), and AC current cycles from the source over the phase wire L, through the load 14, and back to the source via the neutral wire N, and vice versa.
- the GFI circuit 10 includes a differential current transformer (T1), including a toroidal core through which the phase and neutral wires L, N pass. By passing through the current transformer, T1, the phase and neutral wires L, N function as the primary winding of T1.
- the secondary winding 12 includes a number of turns of wire wound around the core of the transformer T1.
- the secondary winding 12 is coupled to a circuit interrupter 16.
- the circuit interrupter 16 includes a control function 16A and a switch 16B, which is illustrated as a double pole, single throw (DPST) switch.
- the control function 16A operates to actuate (open) the DPST switch 16B when there is voltage present across, and/or current through, the secondary winding 12.
- the induced current in the secondary winding 12 is sensed by the control function 16A and opens the DPST switch 16B, thereby interrupting the leakage current as well as the power to the load 14.
- the control function 16A opens the DPST switch 16B, thereby interrupting the leakage current as well as the power to the load 14.
- the leakage path must be cleared, and a user must manually reset the switch 16B to the closed state.
- the GFI circuit 10 includes a test feature.
- the test feature is implemented via a test button or witch S1, which may be manually pressed by the user. Pressing the test switch S1 is intended to cause the circuit interrupter 16 to trip and open the DPST switch 16B, thereby indicating that the GFI circuit 10 operates properly. Pressing the test switch S1 causes a small resistive load R1 to draw a current that bypasses the primary winding of the transformer T1.
- the bypass current has the same effect as leakage current in that the sum of the respective AC currents through the phase and neutral wires L, N, passing through the primary winding of the transformer T1 is non-zero.
- the non-zero current through the primary winding induces a current in the secondary winding 12 of the transformer T1, which is sensed by the control function 16A and opens the DPST switch 16B, thereby interrupting current paths over the phase and neutral wires L, N.
- IT equipment rooms also known as data centers
- a PDU is also a piece of IT equipment and typically includes: (a) a high power inlet from which power is received (typically from a panel board); (b) multiple lower power outlets; and (c) (optional) circuit breakers or fuses to protect the outlets from over current conditions (short circuits, etc.).
- PDUs are often designed to report certain status information over a communication and/or input/output interface, including: (a) the voltage being supplied to a given PDU's inlet, (b) how much power is flowing in the inlet and each outlet, and (c) the trip state (whether voltage is present) of each circuit breaker.
- Standard GFI circuits may employ a fixed trip threshold for leakage current that is not appropriate for a data center. Still further, since data centers include thousands of units of IT equipment, it would be far too time-consuming, and susceptible to error, to manually test each GFI circuit 10.
- Document US 2008/0007879 A1 relates to methods and techniques for an intelligent GFCI device (IGFCI) having a microcontroller programmed to perform self-testing on a periodic basis and communicate the results of this testing to a remote monitoring device such as a remote central logging computer.
- IGFCI intelligent GFCI device
- a remote monitoring device such as a remote central logging computer.
- a plurality of self-testing IGFCI devices can be tested and reset systematically from a remotely located device to reduce disruption to users.
- the IGFCI device can be configured to be automatically reset or manually reset upon the application of AC power to the device.
- the electric leak breaker for self-test comprises power supply lines for connecting a power source supply with a load; a zero-phase current transformer installed on the power supply lines and for sensing a current difference between the power supply lines; a leakage current detecting unit connected to the zero-phase current transformer for detecting whether a leakage current occurs to generate a detection signal; a driving unit for making the power supply lines broken when a critical voltage or a voltage higher than the critical voltage is provided; and a self-test unit for periodically inducing the leakage current at the power supply lines to test whether the leakage detecting unit is normally operating, and for providing a lower voltage than the critical voltage to the driving unit to test whether the driving unit is normally operating in a self-test operation.
- Document US 6 262 871 B1 relates to an electronic test circuit for the self-testing of fault detection devices such as GFCI's, AFCI's and RCD's which enhances the safety of such devices by automatically testing the function of all components of these detection components without the need for manual intervention.
- This self-test device tests the functioning of the primary circuit breaker and detects failure modes such as welded contacts in the circuit breaker.
- a secondary, "one-shot" circuit breaker power may be safely and automatically removed from a malfunctioning fault detection device.
- Document US 6 807 035 B1 relates to a fault interrupter having a microcontroller to detect actual faults.
- the fault interrupter initiates a periodic self-test and provides external notification to the user upon successful or unsuccessful completion of the test.
- the fault interrupter generates the test signal at a selected time to substantially coincide with the zero-crossing of the AC power source.
- a manual test can also be performed using a manual test switch provided as a direct input to the microcontroller.
- Document US 7 468 871 provides a residual current device (RCD) for protecting a circuit by tripping in response to an imbalance signal representative of residual current imbalance in the circuit.
- the RCD trips the circuit when the imbalance signal exceeds a predetermined threshold rating.
- the RCD comprises test means for increasing the imbalance signal so as to test operation of the RCD against the rating.
- the RCD comprises: a current transformer for generating an imbalance sense current in a sense coil in response to a current imbalance in an electrical supply; and a degaussing coil for substantially removing remanence in the current transformer by application of a degaussing signal to the degaussing coil.
- Document US 5 872 926 provides a system and method for transmitting a message generated by a message source to diverse communication devices.
- the types of communication devices to receive the message and their respective sites are selected in response to message parameters contained in the message file.
- the message is converted to a format appropriate for communicating with selected communication devices and then automatically transmitted to the selected sites.
- Document US 2006/0146456 A1 discloses a circuit for disconnecting a power source upon the detection of a leakage.
- the circuit comprises a disconnect switch for disconnecting the power source.
- a primary circuit controls the disconnect switch.
- a secondary circuit senses a leakage current.
- An optical switch interconnects the primary circuit and the secondary circuit for opening the disconnect switch upon the secondary circuit sensing a leakage current.
- the circuit is suitable for use as a leakage current detection and interruption circuit for completely electrically disconnecting and isolating the power source and the primary circuit from the secondary circuit.
- a system for sensing leakage current includes one or more of the following features: (i) the ability to automatically, and preferably on a programmable, periodic basis, perform a self-test of the critical system hardware and/or software used to measure and monitor leakage current; (ii) the ability to permit an operator to set one or more leakage current levels, such as a warning level and/or a critical level; (iii) the ability to visually display a status indication of one or more leakage current conditions, such as an actual RMS leakage current measurement, an indication of a normal (or acceptable) leakage current level, an indication of a warning (e.g., elevated but not critical) leakage current level, an indication of a critical (e.g., an unacceptably, or near unacceptably, elevated) leakage current level, an indication that a self-test has uncovered faulty hardware and/or software; and (iv) the ability to dispatch notifications reporting the presence of one or more of the aforementioned
- FIG. 2 a block diagram of a system 100 in accordance with one or more aspects of the present invention.
- the system 100 includes a leakage current sensor 102, and a control circuit 104.
- the leakage current sensor 102 operates to measure leakage current from a source of AC power, which provides power to at least one load circuit 140.
- the load circuit 140 includes one or more pieces of IT equipment in a data center.
- the control circuit 104 operates to take certain action in response to received measured leakage current values from the leakage current sensor 102.
- the primary actions that the control circuit 104 circuit takes with respect to the received measured leakage current values are: (i) to compare the measured leakage current values against one or more predetermined thresholds to establish status therefor; and (ii) to perform one or more self tests to determine whether the leakage current sensor 102 is operative.
- the leakage current sensor 102 includes a differential current transformer (T100), which includes a core, e.g., a toroidal core, through which the phase and neutral wires L, N pass.
- T100 differential current transformer
- the secondary winding 120 includes a number of turns of wire wound around the core of the transformer T100.
- the secondary winding 120 is input into a signal conditioning circuit 106, such as current-to-voltage converter circuit, which produces a voltage indicative of the current induced into the secondary winding 120 of the transformer T100.
- the AC source of power is assumed to be a single phase source, where the legs of the AC source are the phase and neutral wires. It is understood, however, that the embodiments of the invention disclosed and described herein may be readily extended to other types of AC sources, including a split phase configuration, and/or a three phase source.
- the legs are respective phase wires of a multi-phase AC source, such as line-1 and line-2; line-1 and neutral; or line-2 and neutral.
- the legs may be line-1, line-2, and line-3; or line-1, line-2, line-3, and neutral.
- the legs simply pass through the center of the toroidal core of the transformer T100, such that the legs form a multifilar, single turn coil, which acts as the primary winding of T100.
- the embodiments illustrated in the figures and discussed herein are in the context of a single phase AC source, it is understood that any of such embodiments may readily be extended to operate with other types of AC sources.
- the voltage induced into the secondary winding 120 of the transformer T100 is an indicator of the leakage current in the system 100.
- there is no leakage current there is no net current flow in the primary winding of the transformer T100, which in turn results in no induced current in the secondary winding 120.
- the voltage produced by the signal conditioning circuit 106 is therefore substantially zero (although there may be some noise component in a practical circuit).
- the sum of the respective AC currents in the phase and neutral wires L, N through the core is not zero.
- the imbalance in current through the primary winding of the transformer T100 caused by the leakage current flow induces a current in the secondary winding 120 of the transformer T1.
- the voltage produced by the signal conditioning circuit 106 is therefore some analog value indicative of the current in the secondary winding 120.
- the control circuit 104 is preferably implemented by way of a suitable microcontroller, which operates to execute software/firmware instructions in order to achieve desirable operation of the system 100.
- a microcontroller 104 may include one or more high impedance input pins (labeled INPUT in FIG. 2 ) for receiving analog voltage signals, such as the voltage from the signal conditioning circuit 106.
- the microcontroller 104 preferably includes at least one input pin that is set up to receive an analog voltage signal, and convert same to a digital signal for manipulation.
- an external analog-to-digital (A/D) converter (not shown) may be employed between the signal conditioning circuit 106 and a digital input pin of the microcontroller 104.
- the microcontroller 104 may be implemented utilizing any of the known technologies, such as commercially-available microprocessors, digital signal processors, any of the known processors that are operable to execute software and/or firmware programs, programmable digital devices or systems, programmable array logic devices, or any combination of the above, including devices now available and/or devices which are hereinafter developed.
- the microcontroller 104 may be implemented using the STM32 ARM MCU, which is available from a company called STMicroelectronics.
- Software/firmware being executed by the microcontroller 104 is operable to mathematically manipulate the data presented at the INPUT terminal, which is a digitized version of the measured current induced into the secondary winding 120 of the transformer T100. Among such mathematical manipulations is preferably the aforementioned comparison of the measured leakage current values against one or more predetermined thresholds.
- the microcontroller 104 operates to convert the digital values representing the current in the secondary winding 120 of the transformer T100 into an actual RMS value of the leakage current. This conversion formula will be well understood to a skilled artisan from the description herein. The conversion will be a function of the number of turns of the primary winding of the transformer T100, the number of turns of the secondary winding 120 of the transformer T100, and the transform characteristics of the signal conditioning circuit 106.
- the system 100 may include a display 108 operatively coupled to the microcontroller 104, wherein the display 108 includes some type of screen 300 providing a visual indication of the measured leakage current values 302.
- the display 108 includes some type of screen 300 providing a visual indication of the measured leakage current values 302.
- an operator within the data center may easily obtain an indication as to the leakage current in the one or more pieces of IT equipment.
- a plurality of separate leakage current sensors 102 and/or microcontrollers 104 may be employed to separately measure leakage current in (and/or other functions discussed later herein) individual pieces of IT equipment or respective groups of such equipment.
- the microcontroller 104 operates to execute such function by way of the software/firmware running thereon.
- the system 100 may come pre-programmed with the one or more predetermined threshold levels.
- the microcontroller 104 is programmable by the operator in order to set at least one of the one or more predetermined thresholds.
- FIGS. 3 and 4 being a flow chart illustrating certain process steps and/or functions 400 of the system 100.
- the process 400 is indicative of at least certain portions of the software/firmware running on the microcontroller 104 to achieve desirable operation of the system 100.
- the operator may be prompted to enter, or may proactively induce the microcontroller 104 to receive, certain settings, such as one or more predetermined thresholds.
- certain settings such as one or more predetermined thresholds.
- the process flow branches in the negative to action 406.
- the operator may set a first threshold level indicating a leakage current, which if present would be higher than desired and/or otherwise excessive when considering the specifications of the particular application.
- the first threshold level may be considered a warning level because, even though the level is elevated, the system may continue to operate, the threat posed by the level may not be extreme, etc.
- the operator may set a second threshold level indicating a leakage current, which if present would be higher than the first threshold level, substantially higher than desired, and excessive when considering the normal operation of the particular system under measurement.
- the second threshold level may be considered a critical level because the system may not operate properly, the threat posed by the level may be unacceptable, etc.
- the settings for the first and second threshold levels are stored in memory (not shown) and used during the comparison process (as will be discussed below).
- the first and second threshold levels may be displayed at location 304 of the display 108 as a warning level and a critical level, respectively.
- the levels listed at location 304 of the display 108 may indicate a dual function, both displaying the selected levels and operating as inputs of the operator's selection to the microcontroller 104, in which case the display 108 operates as an input/output device.
- the microcontroller 104 reads the leakage current value (e.g., obtains a digital representation of the current in the secondary winding 120 of the transformer T100 and converts same into a value of measured leakage current, preferably an RMS value).
- the microcontroller 104 determines whether the measured value of leakage current is above the critical value. If negative, the process flow branches to action 412, where the microcontroller 104 determines whether the measured value of leakage current is above the warning level. An affirmative determination at action 408, or an affirmative or negative determination at action 412 will result in some conclusive status condition.
- An affirmative determination at action 408 causes the process flow to branch to action 410 and indicates that the measured leakage current in the system is above the second threshold level, the critical level, which in this example is above 10 mA.
- the microcontroller 104 sets the status level to critical and potentially takes further action. For example, upon a status of critical (and/or upon a change in status from something else to critical), the microcontroller 104 may operate to display the status on the display 108, such as at location 306, where the leakage status level, labeled "Critical", is highlighted. Alternatively or additionally, the microcontroller 104 may operate to store such status in an event log.
- the status may include the level (critical), the specific current magnitude, the threshold setting, the time, the date, the duration of the condition, etc. Thereafter, an operator and/or another program may access the event log via the microcontroller 104 in order to obtain the status data, consider same, and validate the ability of the system 100 to monitor the leakage current.
- the microcontroller 104 may operate to send a notification of the status (or change in status) to one or more destinations.
- the system 100 may include a message transmission system 110 coupled to the microcontroller 104 (and/or integral thereto), which operates to transmit one or more messages indicating the aforementioned status.
- the one or more messages may be of any number of specific protocol (s), such as: (i) a simple network management protocol, (ii) a packet switched network protocol, (iii) an electronic mail protocol, (iv) an instant messaging protocol, (v) a telephone protocol, and/or any other suitable protocol.
- the message transmission system 110 is programmable by the operator to select the messaging protocol, and the display 108 shows a visual indication of the selected messaging protocol at location 308.
- the protocols listed at location 308 of the display 108 may provide a dual function, both displaying the selected protocol(s) and operating as inputs of the operator's selection to the microcontroller 104, in which case the display 108 operates as an input/output device.
- An affirmative determination at action 412 causes the process flow to branch to action 414 and indicates that the measured leakage current in the system is above the first threshold level (but not the second threshold level), i.e., the warning level, which in this example is above 4 mA but less than 10 mA.
- the microcontroller 104 sets the status level to warning and potentially takes further action. For example, upon a status of warning (and/or upon a change in status from something else to warning), the microcontroller 104 may operate to display the status at location 306, by highlighting the level labeled "Warning".
- the microcontroller 104 may operate to store such status in an event log, which may include one or more of the level (warning), the specific current magnitude as measured, the threshold setting, the time, the date, the duration of the condition, etc. Additionally or alternatively, the microcontroller 104 may operate to send a notification of the status (or change in status) to one or more destinations in a manner similar to that discussed above with respect to the status of critical.
- a negative determination at action 412 causes the process flow to branch to action 416 and indicates that the measured leakage current in the system is not above the first or second threshold levels, i.e., the normal level, which in this example is below 4 mA.
- the microcontroller 104 sets the status level to normal. Possible further action includes one or more of: (i) displaying the status at location 306, by highlighting the level labeled "Normal”, (ii) storing such status in an event log, and (iii) sending a notification of the status (or change in status) to one or more destinations.
- the process flow advances to action 418.
- the second general action is preferably performing (preferably automatically) one or more self tests to determine whether the leakage current sensor 102 is operative.
- the system 100 includes a means for self testing the leakage current sensing capabilities of the system 100.
- the leakage current sensor 102 includes a switch circuit S100 that turns on and off in response to a control signal, GPIO, output from the microcontroller 104, and a resistance R100.
- the switch circuit S100 and the resistance R100 are coupled in series between the phase wire L and the neutral wire N, such that an unbalanced flux is produced within the core of the transformer T100 when the switch S100 turns on.
- the series switch S100 and resistance R100 are configured such that current flowing therethrough bypasses the core of the transformer T100.
- the current flowing in the phase wire L and the neutral wire N will not be equal but opposite through the core, thereby creating an additional component of flux in the core that induces a current in the secondary winding 120 of the transformer T100.
- the value of the resistance R100 is chosen such that the induced current in the secondary winding 120 is sufficient to test the leakage current sensing capabilities of the system 100.
- the software/firmware of the microcontroller is preferably operable to establish the proper potential on the switch circuit S100 (which may be implemented using one or more transistors, such as a MOSFET, etc.) in order to turn same on an off.
- the GPIO pin may be capable of operating as an output, where the state of the GPIO pin may be OFF or ON, depending on the commands established by software/firmware being executed on the microcontroller 104.
- the OFF state is defined as a logic "low” level, which may be any suitable voltage potential (often about 0 volts, or ground), and in such state the GPIO pin is capable of sinking current (into a relatively low impedance).
- the ON state is defined as a logic "high” level, which again may be any suitable voltage potential.
- the actual voltage of the GPIO pin in the ON state is often dictated by the operating DC supply voltage to the microcontroller 104.
- such logic high voltage level may be anywhere between about 0.333 to about 5 VDC (with reference to ground), although lower and higher voltage levels are also possible.
- the GPIO pin In the ON state, the GPIO pin is capable of sourcing current at the logic high voltage level (from a relatively low source impedance).
- the implementation of the switch circuit S100 will establish that the switch turns on upon an ON state of the GPIO pin and that the switch turns off upon an OFF state of the GPIO pin. It is noted that the specific implementation of the switch circuit S100 will dictate whether the switch turns on in response to the GPIO in the ON state or the OFF state, either relationship will suffice.
- the microcontroller 104 measures the faux leakage current and compares same to a threshold level, which may be one of the aforementioned warning and/or critical levels, and/or may be another level specific to a self test.
- the conditions may include a time, date, interval, and/or other metric.
- the operator may set the conditions for self test at action 402 (discussed above with respect to settings), and such setting(s) may be displayed at location 304.
- the display 108 operates as an input/output device, the operator may set the self test conditions (in this example an interval of 24 hours) through manipulation of the screen 300 or other input element of the display 108.
- An affirmative determination at action 418 causes the process flow to branch to action 420 and indicates that the status of the system 100 is in self test mode.
- the display 108 may indicate the self test mode at location 306 ( FIG. 3 ) by highlighting the label "Testing".
- the software/firmware may produce a control signal on the GPIO pin of the microcontroller 104, which turns on the switch circuit S100.
- the microcontroller 104 compares the measured leakage current to one or more thresholds, such as 4 mA, 10 mA, and/or other thresholds.
- the process then advances to action 422, where a determination is made as to whether the result of the comparison at action 420 indicates that the leakage current sensing circuitry failed the self test.
- the microcontroller 104 sets the status to hardware failure and potentially takes further action. For example, upon a status of hardware failure (and/or upon a change in status from something else to such), the microcontroller 104 may operate to display the status at location 306, by highlighting the label "HW Failure". Alternatively or additionally, the microcontroller 104 may operate to store such status into an event log, which may include one or more of the test current measurement, the threshold(s), the time, the date, the duration of the condition, etc. Additionally or alternatively, the microcontroller 104 may operate to send a notification of the status (or change in status) to one or more destinations in a manner similar to that discussed above. After completing the processes of action 424, the process flow loops back to action 402, where the process flow repeats.
- FIG. 5 illustrates a more detailed schematic diagram of a circuit suitable for implementing the systems discussed above, and/or other embodiments disclosed or described herein.
- the system 100A is similar to the system 100 discussed above.
- a more specific (and/or alternative) example for implementing the leakage current sensor is illustrated in FIG. 5 .
- the source of AC power and the load circuit 140 are on a primary side of an electrical isolation boundary, and the microcontroller 104 is on a secondary side of the electrical isolation boundary. Maintaining the isolation boundary is desirable, and often required by law or specification, to protect operators using/maintaining the load 140 and/or the microcontroller 104 from shock or other hazards associated with the AC source.
- the leakage current sensor 202 includes a first circuit 202A on the primary side of the electrical isolation boundary, and a second circuit 202B on the secondary side of the electrical isolation boundary. Additionally, the leakage current sensor 202 includes one or more third circuits that inter-couple the first and second circuits 202A, 202B of the leakage current sensor 202, yet maintain the electrical isolation boundary therebetween.
- the one or more third circuits include the differential current transformer T100 and an isolator circuit 204.
- the differential current transformer T100 maintains isolation because there is no direct connection from the secondary winding 120 to the primary winding (the phase and neutral wires L, N).
- the transformer includes one or more turns of the phase and neutral wires L, N in a bifilar configuration, and a plurality of turns on secondary winding 120 to establish a 1000:1 turns ratio.
- the isolator circuit 204 maintains isolation because there is no direct connection from the primary side to the secondary side.
- the isolator circuit 204 includes a primary side circuit 208, and a secondary side circuit 206.
- the primary side circuit 208 operates to induce an unbalanced flux in the transformer core that produces a current in the secondary winding 120 of the differential current transformer T100.
- the unbalanced flux is in response to an intermediate control signal (within the isolator circuit 204) crossing the electrical isolation boundary from the secondary side thereof.
- the isolator circuit 204 includes a light emitting device in the secondary side circuit 206, which produces light when activated by the microcontroller 104 (not shown).
- the intermediate control signal crosses the electrical isolation boundary from the secondary side to the primary side thereof.
- the isolator circuit 204 also includes a light sensitive switch circuit (in this example a TRIAC) in the primary side circuit 208 that turns on and off in response to the light of the intermediate control signal.
- the light emitting device 206 is the LED cathode of the TRIAC, and is connected to the GPIO pin of the microcontroller 104. When the microcontroller 104 sets the GPIO pin to the OFF state, a current flows through R201 and the LED 206 of the TRIAC, which causes the light sensitive switch 208 of the TRIAC to turn on.
- the leakage current sensor 202 includes an additional test winding on the transformer T100 that produces the unbalanced flux in the transformer core in response to the light sensitive switch circuit 208 turning on.
- the light sensitive switch circuit 208, the test winding and a resistance R210 are coupled in series between the phase wire L and the neutral wire N, such that the unbalanced flux is produced in response to the intermediate control signal (the light) turning on the switch circuit 208.
- the current flowing through the test winding induces the unbalanced flux, thereby generating the induced current in the secondary winding 120 of the transformer T100.
- V the primary AC voltage
- T the number of turns (e.g., about one or two) of the test winding about the core
- the secondary side circuit 206 includes a burden resistor R205, which may be about 100 ohms.
- the differential voltage, V, across R205 is converted to a single-ended voltage output by operational amplifier U200.
- capacitors C201 and C202 e.g., about 1.5 nF
- capacitors C201 and C202 are included to form a first order low pass filter with a cut-off frequency of about 1000 Hz.
- the operational amplifier U202 is configured as a buffer and provides a bias point for U200.
- the components of the operational amplifier U202 may be established to produce a bias point of about 1.65 volts. Assuming the example of a test leakage current of 5.76 mA, a 57.6 mV signal will be produced at the output of U200.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Power Engineering (AREA)
- Testing Of Short-Circuits, Discontinuities, Leakage, Or Incorrect Line Connections (AREA)
- Emergency Protection Circuit Devices (AREA)
Description
- The present invention relates to methods and apparatus for sensing leakage current in a system, and more particularly, to a circuit that is capable of sensing such leakage and also operates to perform self-testing to ensure proper sensing capability.
- In alternating current (AC) power circuits, current from a single phase AC source normally flows from an AC source via a phase wire, through a load that is fed by the AC power, back through a neutral wire to the AC source, and vice versa. Any component of current that does not flow to the load via the phase wire and from the load via the neutral wire will flow via one or more leakage paths to earth ground. Such current is known as leakage or residual current. Leakage current is dangerous because it can lead to electrocution and/or fires if not properly controlled.
- Ground Fault Interrupters (GFIs), which are also known as Residual Current Detectors (RCDs), are commonly available devices for detecting and interrupting leakage current flow. A diagram of a
typical GFI circuit 10 is shown inFIG. 1 . By way of example, a single phase AC source of power is provided by way of a phase wire L and a neutral wire N. The phase and neutral wires L, N are coupled to the load 14 (which in a residence may be an appliance of some kind), and AC current cycles from the source over the phase wire L, through theload 14, and back to the source via the neutral wire N, and vice versa. - The
GFI circuit 10 includes a differential current transformer (T1), including a toroidal core through which the phase and neutral wires L, N pass. By passing through the current transformer, T1, the phase and neutral wires L, N function as the primary winding of T1. Thesecondary winding 12 includes a number of turns of wire wound around the core of the transformer T1. Thesecondary winding 12 is coupled to acircuit interrupter 16. Thecircuit interrupter 16 includes acontrol function 16A and aswitch 16B, which is illustrated as a double pole, single throw (DPST) switch. Thecontrol function 16A operates to actuate (open) theDPST switch 16B when there is voltage present across, and/or current through, thesecondary winding 12. - When there is no leakage current to earth ground, the sum of the respective AC currents in the phase and neutral wires L, N (through the primary winding) of the transformer T1 is zero. This results a net zero current flow in the primary of the transformer T1, which in turn results in no induced current in the
secondary winding 12. Thus, thecontrol function 16A does not open theDPST switch 16B and the AC current continues to flow through theload 14 from the AC source. - When there is leakage current to ground, however, the sum of the respective AC currents in the phase and neutral wires L, N (through the primary winding) of the transformer T1 is not zero. Indeed, for example, if some current were to flow from the AC source over the phase wire L, through earth ground, and back to the AC source, effectively bypassing the transformer T1, then there would be a greater magnitude AC current flowing over the phase wire L, through the primary of the transformer T1, than would return over the neutral wire N, through the primary of the transformer T1. The imbalance in current through the primary winding of the transformer T1 caused by the leakage current flow induces a current in the
secondary winding 12 of the transformer T1. The induced current in thesecondary winding 12 is sensed by thecontrol function 16A and opens theDPST switch 16B, thereby interrupting the leakage current as well as the power to theload 14. In atypical GFI circuit 10, once thecircuit interrupter 16 trips (theDPST switch 16B opens), the leakage path must be cleared, and a user must manually reset theswitch 16B to the closed state. - In order to permit a user to verify that the
GFI circuit 10 is operational, i.e., that an apparent zero primary winding current and/or zero secondary winding current is not due to a malfunction, theGFI circuit 10 includes a test feature. The test feature is implemented via a test button or witch S1, which may be manually pressed by the user. Pressing the test switch S1 is intended to cause thecircuit interrupter 16 to trip and open theDPST switch 16B, thereby indicating that theGFI circuit 10 operates properly. Pressing the test switch S1 causes a small resistive load R1 to draw a current that bypasses the primary winding of the transformer T1. The bypass current has the same effect as leakage current in that the sum of the respective AC currents through the phase and neutral wires L, N, passing through the primary winding of the transformer T1 is non-zero. The non-zero current through the primary winding induces a current in thesecondary winding 12 of the transformer T1, which is sensed by thecontrol function 16A and opens theDPST switch 16B, thereby interrupting current paths over the phase and neutral wires L, N. - While leakage current is of concern in Information Technology (IT) equipment rooms, the
conventional GFI circuit 10 is not a suitable solution to leakage current problems. IT equipment rooms (also known as data centers) utilize hundreds or even thousands of units of IT equipment. Each piece of IT equipment receives primary AC power by plugging into an outlet of a power distribution unit (PDU). A PDU is also a piece of IT equipment and typically includes: (a) a high power inlet from which power is received (typically from a panel board); (b) multiple lower power outlets; and (c) (optional) circuit breakers or fuses to protect the outlets from over current conditions (short circuits, etc.). PDUs are often designed to report certain status information over a communication and/or input/output interface, including: (a) the voltage being supplied to a given PDU's inlet, (b) how much power is flowing in the inlet and each outlet, and (c) the trip state (whether voltage is present) of each circuit breaker. - In a data center, it is not practical to use a
standard GFI circuit 10 for a number of reasons. For example, it would be far too disruptive to unconditionally interrupt AC power to an IT device due to leakage current. Indeed, sensitive data may be corrupted and/or irrevocably lost if AC power were interrupted without notice. Additionally, industrial equipment (such as in data centers) may not be permitted to exhibit the same level of leakage current as those established in conventionalresidential GFI circuits 10. Indeed, the permissible level of leakage current in a data center (and/or other industrial environment) may be up to about 3.5 mA of current. Standard GFI circuits, however, may employ a fixed trip threshold for leakage current that is not appropriate for a data center. Still further, since data centers include thousands of units of IT equipment, it would be far too time-consuming, and susceptible to error, to manually test eachGFI circuit 10. - Although the prior art systems address some issues associated with leakage current, the known solutions are unsatisfactory in the context of a data center (or other industrial environment). There are, therefore, needs in the art for new methods and apparatus for sensing ground leakage current in a system, and more particularly, for sensing such ground leakage and also operating to perform self-testing to ensure proper sensing capability.
- Document
US 2008/0007879 A1 relates to methods and techniques for an intelligent GFCI device (IGFCI) having a microcontroller programmed to perform self-testing on a periodic basis and communicate the results of this testing to a remote monitoring device such as a remote central logging computer. In some implementations, with two-way (bidirectional) communication, a plurality of self-testing IGFCI devices can be tested and reset systematically from a remotely located device to reduce disruption to users. The IGFCI device can be configured to be automatically reset or manually reset upon the application of AC power to the device. - Document
US 2005/0243484 A1 relates to an electric leak breaker for self-test. The electric leak breaker for self-test comprises power supply lines for connecting a power source supply with a load; a zero-phase current transformer installed on the power supply lines and for sensing a current difference between the power supply lines; a leakage current detecting unit connected to the zero-phase current transformer for detecting whether a leakage current occurs to generate a detection signal; a driving unit for making the power supply lines broken when a critical voltage or a voltage higher than the critical voltage is provided; and a self-test unit for periodically inducing the leakage current at the power supply lines to test whether the leakage detecting unit is normally operating, and for providing a lower voltage than the critical voltage to the driving unit to test whether the driving unit is normally operating in a self-test operation. According to the present invention, it is possible to periodically test the electric leak breaker as well as to overcome an inconvenience to push a reset button. - Document
US 6 262 871 B1 relates to an electronic test circuit for the self-testing of fault detection devices such as GFCI's, AFCI's and RCD's which enhances the safety of such devices by automatically testing the function of all components of these detection components without the need for manual intervention. This self-test device tests the functioning of the primary circuit breaker and detects failure modes such as welded contacts in the circuit breaker. By using a secondary, "one-shot" circuit breaker, power may be safely and automatically removed from a malfunctioning fault detection device. - Document
US 6 807 035 B1 relates to a fault interrupter having a microcontroller to detect actual faults. The fault interrupter initiates a periodic self-test and provides external notification to the user upon successful or unsuccessful completion of the test. The fault interrupter generates the test signal at a selected time to substantially coincide with the zero-crossing of the AC power source. A manual test can also be performed using a manual test switch provided as a direct input to the microcontroller. - Document
US 7 468 871 provides a residual current device (RCD) for protecting a circuit by tripping in response to an imbalance signal representative of residual current imbalance in the circuit. The RCD trips the circuit when the imbalance signal exceeds a predetermined threshold rating. The RCD comprises test means for increasing the imbalance signal so as to test operation of the RCD against the rating. In another aspect the RCD comprises: a current transformer for generating an imbalance sense current in a sense coil in response to a current imbalance in an electrical supply; and a degaussing coil for substantially removing remanence in the current transformer by application of a degaussing signal to the degaussing coil. - Document
US 5 872 926 provides a system and method for transmitting a message generated by a message source to diverse communication devices. The types of communication devices to receive the message and their respective sites are selected in response to message parameters contained in the message file. The message is converted to a format appropriate for communicating with selected communication devices and then automatically transmitted to the selected sites. - Document
US 2006/0146456 A1 discloses a circuit for disconnecting a power source upon the detection of a leakage. The circuit comprises a disconnect switch for disconnecting the power source. A primary circuit controls the disconnect switch. A secondary circuit senses a leakage current. An optical switch interconnects the primary circuit and the secondary circuit for opening the disconnect switch upon the secondary circuit sensing a leakage current. The circuit is suitable for use as a leakage current detection and interruption circuit for completely electrically disconnecting and isolating the power source and the primary circuit from the secondary circuit. - The invention is defined by the appended claims. Aspects not covered by the invention are provided for a better understanding of the invention.
- In accordance with one or more aspects of the present invention described herein, a system for sensing leakage current includes one or more of the following features: (i) the ability to automatically, and preferably on a programmable, periodic basis, perform a self-test of the critical system hardware and/or software used to measure and monitor leakage current; (ii) the ability to permit an operator to set one or more leakage current levels, such as a warning level and/or a critical level; (iii) the ability to visually display a status indication of one or more leakage current conditions, such as an actual RMS leakage current measurement, an indication of a normal (or acceptable) leakage current level, an indication of a warning (e.g., elevated but not critical) leakage current level, an indication of a critical (e.g., an unacceptably, or near unacceptably, elevated) leakage current level, an indication that a self-test has uncovered faulty hardware and/or software; and (iv) the ability to dispatch notifications reporting the presence of one or more of the aforementioned status indications (and/or a change in such status), such as by way of the simple network management protocol (SNMP), e-mail, and/or other electronic means.
- Other aspects, features, and advantages of the present invention will be apparent to one skilled in the art from the description herein taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
- For the purposes of illustration, there are forms shown in the drawings that are presently preferred, it being understood, however, that the invention is not limited to the precise arrangements and instrumentalities shown.
-
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a conventional GFI circuit for sensing and interrupting AC power to a load when leakage current is present in accordance with the prior art; -
FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a leakage current sensing system in accordance with one or more aspects of the present invention; -
FIG. 3 is a generalized representation of a visual user-interface suitable for use in the leakage current sensing system ofFIG. 2 and/or other embodiments disclosed and/or described herein; -
FIG. 4 is a diagram of a process flow that may be employed in the leakage current sensing system ofFIG. 2 and/or other embodiments disclosed and/or described herein; and -
FIG. 5 is a more detailed schematic diagram of a circuit that is suitable for implementing the leakage current sensing system ofFIG. 2 and/or other embodiments disclosed and/or described herein. - With reference to the drawings wherein like numerals indicate like elements there is shown in
FIG. 2 a block diagram of asystem 100 in accordance with one or more aspects of the present invention. Thesystem 100 includes a leakagecurrent sensor 102, and acontrol circuit 104. The leakagecurrent sensor 102 operates to measure leakage current from a source of AC power, which provides power to at least oneload circuit 140. In accordance with one or more aspects of the present invention, it is specifically contemplated that theload circuit 140 includes one or more pieces of IT equipment in a data center. - The
control circuit 104 operates to take certain action in response to received measured leakage current values from the leakagecurrent sensor 102. The primary actions that thecontrol circuit 104 circuit takes with respect to the received measured leakage current values are: (i) to compare the measured leakage current values against one or more predetermined thresholds to establish status therefor; and (ii) to perform one or more self tests to determine whether the leakagecurrent sensor 102 is operative. - With regard to the former action, comparing the measured leakage current values against one or more predetermined thresholds, the operation of the
system 100 is as follows. The AC source of power is coupled to theload 140 by way of a phase wire L and a neutral wire N. The leakagecurrent sensor 102 includes a differential current transformer (T100), which includes a core, e.g., a toroidal core, through which the phase and neutral wires L, N pass. By passing through the center of the toroidal core of the transformer T100, the phase and neutral wires L, N establish a bifilar, single turn coil, which acts as a primary winding of T100. The secondary winding 120 includes a number of turns of wire wound around the core of the transformer T100. The secondary winding 120 is input into asignal conditioning circuit 106, such as current-to-voltage converter circuit, which produces a voltage indicative of the current induced into the secondary winding 120 of the transformer T100. - It is noted that, for purposes of discussion, the AC source of power is assumed to be a single phase source, where the legs of the AC source are the phase and neutral wires. It is understood, however, that the embodiments of the invention disclosed and described herein may be readily extended to other types of AC sources, including a split phase configuration, and/or a three phase source. In a split phase configuration, the legs are respective phase wires of a multi-phase AC source, such as line-1 and line-2; line-1 and neutral; or line-2 and neutral. In a three phase AC source, the legs may be line-1, line-2, and line-3; or line-1, line-2, line-3, and neutral. Indeed, for any of the other type of AC sources, the legs simply pass through the center of the toroidal core of the transformer T100, such that the legs form a multifilar, single turn coil, which acts as the primary winding of T100. Thus, while the embodiments illustrated in the figures and discussed herein are in the context of a single phase AC source, it is understood that any of such embodiments may readily be extended to operate with other types of AC sources.
- The voltage induced into the secondary winding 120 of the transformer T100 is an indicator of the leakage current in the
system 100. As discussed earlier in this description, without any leakage current, precisely the same magnitude of current flows in each of the phase and neutral wires L, N; however, each such magnitude of current is of opposite polarity flowing through the core. If leakage current is present, then such equal but opposite current flow does not exist with respect to the core, and some amount of current finds its way back to the AC source through another path, e.g., through earth ground, EG. When there is no leakage current, there is no net current flow in the primary winding of the transformer T100, which in turn results in no induced current in the secondary winding 120. The voltage produced by thesignal conditioning circuit 106 is therefore substantially zero (although there may be some noise component in a practical circuit). When there is leakage current, however, the sum of the respective AC currents in the phase and neutral wires L, N through the core is not zero. The imbalance in current through the primary winding of the transformer T100 caused by the leakage current flow induces a current in the secondary winding 120 of the transformer T1. The voltage produced by thesignal conditioning circuit 106 is therefore some analog value indicative of the current in the secondary winding 120. - The
control circuit 104 is preferably implemented by way of a suitable microcontroller, which operates to execute software/firmware instructions in order to achieve desirable operation of thesystem 100. Such amicrocontroller 104 may include one or more high impedance input pins (labeled INPUT inFIG. 2 ) for receiving analog voltage signals, such as the voltage from thesignal conditioning circuit 106. More particularly, themicrocontroller 104 preferably includes at least one input pin that is set up to receive an analog voltage signal, and convert same to a digital signal for manipulation. In an alternative implementation, if themicrocontroller 104 does not include suitable internal circuitry, an external analog-to-digital (A/D) converter (not shown) may be employed between thesignal conditioning circuit 106 and a digital input pin of themicrocontroller 104. - The
microcontroller 104 may be implemented utilizing any of the known technologies, such as commercially-available microprocessors, digital signal processors, any of the known processors that are operable to execute software and/or firmware programs, programmable digital devices or systems, programmable array logic devices, or any combination of the above, including devices now available and/or devices which are hereinafter developed. By way of example, themicrocontroller 104 may be implemented using the STM32 ARM MCU, which is available from a company called STMicroelectronics. - Software/firmware being executed by the
microcontroller 104 is operable to mathematically manipulate the data presented at the INPUT terminal, which is a digitized version of the measured current induced into the secondary winding 120 of the transformer T100. Among such mathematical manipulations is preferably the aforementioned comparison of the measured leakage current values against one or more predetermined thresholds. In this regard, themicrocontroller 104 operates to convert the digital values representing the current in the secondary winding 120 of the transformer T100 into an actual RMS value of the leakage current. This conversion formula will be well understood to a skilled artisan from the description herein. The conversion will be a function of the number of turns of the primary winding of the transformer T100, the number of turns of the secondary winding 120 of the transformer T100, and the transform characteristics of thesignal conditioning circuit 106. - In accordance with one or more aspects of the invention, and as illustrated in
FIGS. 2 and3 , thesystem 100 may include adisplay 108 operatively coupled to themicrocontroller 104, wherein thedisplay 108 includes some type ofscreen 300 providing a visual indication of the measured leakagecurrent values 302. Advantageously, an operator within the data center may easily obtain an indication as to the leakage current in the one or more pieces of IT equipment. It is further contemplated that a plurality of separate leakagecurrent sensors 102 and/ormicrocontrollers 104 may be employed to separately measure leakage current in (and/or other functions discussed later herein) individual pieces of IT equipment or respective groups of such equipment. - Returning to the specific action of comparing the measured leakage current values against one or more predetermined thresholds, the
microcontroller 104 operates to execute such function by way of the software/firmware running thereon. Thesystem 100 may come pre-programmed with the one or more predetermined threshold levels. Preferably, however, themicrocontroller 104 is programmable by the operator in order to set at least one of the one or more predetermined thresholds. In this regard, reference is made toFIGS. 3 and4 , the latter being a flow chart illustrating certain process steps and/orfunctions 400 of thesystem 100. In general, theprocess 400 is indicative of at least certain portions of the software/firmware running on themicrocontroller 104 to achieve desirable operation of thesystem 100. - At
action 402 ofFIG. 4 , the operator may be prompted to enter, or may proactively induce themicrocontroller 104 to receive, certain settings, such as one or more predetermined thresholds. In this regard, if the operator is not permitted to set the one or more thresholds, the process flow branches in the negative toaction 406. If, however, the operator is permitted to set the one or more thresholds, the process flow branches in the affirmative toaction 404. By way of example, the operator may set a first threshold level indicating a leakage current, which if present would be higher than desired and/or otherwise excessive when considering the specifications of the particular application. The first threshold level may be considered a warning level because, even though the level is elevated, the system may continue to operate, the threat posed by the level may not be extreme, etc. By way of further example, the operator may set a second threshold level indicating a leakage current, which if present would be higher than the first threshold level, substantially higher than desired, and excessive when considering the normal operation of the particular system under measurement. The second threshold level may be considered a critical level because the system may not operate properly, the threat posed by the level may be unacceptable, etc. - At
action 404, the settings for the first and second threshold levels are stored in memory (not shown) and used during the comparison process (as will be discussed below). In addition, as shown inFIG. 3 , the first and second threshold levels may be displayed atlocation 304 of thedisplay 108 as a warning level and a critical level, respectively. Notably, the levels listed atlocation 304 of thedisplay 108 may indicate a dual function, both displaying the selected levels and operating as inputs of the operator's selection to themicrocontroller 104, in which case thedisplay 108 operates as an input/output device. Onceaction 404 is complete, the process flow continues toaction 406. - At
action 406, themicrocontroller 104 reads the leakage current value (e.g., obtains a digital representation of the current in the secondary winding 120 of the transformer T100 and converts same into a value of measured leakage current, preferably an RMS value). Next, ataction 408, themicrocontroller 104 determines whether the measured value of leakage current is above the critical value. If negative, the process flow branches toaction 412, where themicrocontroller 104 determines whether the measured value of leakage current is above the warning level. An affirmative determination ataction 408, or an affirmative or negative determination ataction 412 will result in some conclusive status condition. - An affirmative determination at
action 408 causes the process flow to branch toaction 410 and indicates that the measured leakage current in the system is above the second threshold level, the critical level, which in this example is above 10 mA. Ataction 410 themicrocontroller 104 sets the status level to critical and potentially takes further action. For example, upon a status of critical (and/or upon a change in status from something else to critical), themicrocontroller 104 may operate to display the status on thedisplay 108, such as atlocation 306, where the leakage status level, labeled "Critical", is highlighted. Alternatively or additionally, themicrocontroller 104 may operate to store such status in an event log. The status may include the level (critical), the specific current magnitude, the threshold setting, the time, the date, the duration of the condition, etc. Thereafter, an operator and/or another program may access the event log via themicrocontroller 104 in order to obtain the status data, consider same, and validate the ability of thesystem 100 to monitor the leakage current. - Additionally or alternatively, the
microcontroller 104 may operate to send a notification of the status (or change in status) to one or more destinations. In this regard, thesystem 100 may include amessage transmission system 110 coupled to the microcontroller 104 (and/or integral thereto), which operates to transmit one or more messages indicating the aforementioned status. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the one or more messages may be of any number of specific protocol (s), such as: (i) a simple network management protocol, (ii) a packet switched network protocol, (iii) an electronic mail protocol, (iv) an instant messaging protocol, (v) a telephone protocol, and/or any other suitable protocol. Preferably, themessage transmission system 110 is programmable by the operator to select the messaging protocol, and thedisplay 108 shows a visual indication of the selected messaging protocol atlocation 308. Notably, the protocols listed atlocation 308 of thedisplay 108 may provide a dual function, both displaying the selected protocol(s) and operating as inputs of the operator's selection to themicrocontroller 104, in which case thedisplay 108 operates as an input/output device. - Once the processes associated with
action 410 are complete, the process flow loops back toaction 406, where the process there is repeated so long as the critical status exists. - An affirmative determination at
action 412 causes the process flow to branch toaction 414 and indicates that the measured leakage current in the system is above the first threshold level (but not the second threshold level), i.e., the warning level, which in this example is above 4 mA but less than 10 mA. Ataction 414 themicrocontroller 104 sets the status level to warning and potentially takes further action. For example, upon a status of warning (and/or upon a change in status from something else to warning), themicrocontroller 104 may operate to display the status atlocation 306, by highlighting the level labeled "Warning". Alternatively or additionally, themicrocontroller 104 may operate to store such status in an event log, which may include one or more of the level (warning), the specific current magnitude as measured, the threshold setting, the time, the date, the duration of the condition, etc. Additionally or alternatively, themicrocontroller 104 may operate to send a notification of the status (or change in status) to one or more destinations in a manner similar to that discussed above with respect to the status of critical. - Once the processes associated with
action 414 are complete, the process flow loops back toaction 406, where the process there is repeated so long as the warning status exists. - Further, a negative determination at
action 412 causes the process flow to branch toaction 416 and indicates that the measured leakage current in the system is not above the first or second threshold levels, i.e., the normal level, which in this example is below 4 mA. Ataction 416 themicrocontroller 104 sets the status level to normal. Possible further action includes one or more of: (i) displaying the status atlocation 306, by highlighting the level labeled "Normal", (ii) storing such status in an event log, and (iii) sending a notification of the status (or change in status) to one or more destinations. - Once the processes associated with
action 416 are complete, the process flow advances toaction 418. Returning to an earlier discussion of the primary actions that themicrocontroller 104 takes with respect to the received measured leakage current values, the second general action is preferably performing (preferably automatically) one or more self tests to determine whether the leakagecurrent sensor 102 is operative. Before discussing the specific functions and aspects associated withaction 418 et seq., a discussion of the structure and operation of thesystem 100 as concerns self testing capabilities will be presented. - Turning to
FIG. 2 , thesystem 100 includes a means for self testing the leakage current sensing capabilities of thesystem 100. In particular, the leakagecurrent sensor 102 includes a switch circuit S100 that turns on and off in response to a control signal, GPIO, output from themicrocontroller 104, and a resistance R100. The switch circuit S100 and the resistance R100 are coupled in series between the phase wire L and the neutral wire N, such that an unbalanced flux is produced within the core of the transformer T100 when the switch S100 turns on. In the example shown, the series switch S100 and resistance R100 are configured such that current flowing therethrough bypasses the core of the transformer T100. Thus, the current flowing in the phase wire L and the neutral wire N will not be equal but opposite through the core, thereby creating an additional component of flux in the core that induces a current in the secondary winding 120 of the transformer T100. The value of the resistance R100 is chosen such that the induced current in the secondary winding 120 is sufficient to test the leakage current sensing capabilities of thesystem 100. - The software/firmware of the microcontroller is preferably operable to establish the proper potential on the switch circuit S100 (which may be implemented using one or more transistors, such as a MOSFET, etc.) in order to turn same on an off. The GPIO pin may be capable of operating as an output, where the state of the GPIO pin may be OFF or ON, depending on the commands established by software/firmware being executed on the
microcontroller 104. The OFF state is defined as a logic "low" level, which may be any suitable voltage potential (often about 0 volts, or ground), and in such state the GPIO pin is capable of sinking current (into a relatively low impedance). The ON state is defined as a logic "high" level, which again may be any suitable voltage potential. The actual voltage of the GPIO pin in the ON state is often dictated by the operating DC supply voltage to themicrocontroller 104. By way of example, such logic high voltage level may be anywhere between about 0.333 to about 5 VDC (with reference to ground), although lower and higher voltage levels are also possible. In the ON state, the GPIO pin is capable of sourcing current at the logic high voltage level (from a relatively low source impedance). - The implementation of the switch circuit S100 will establish that the switch turns on upon an ON state of the GPIO pin and that the switch turns off upon an OFF state of the GPIO pin. It is noted that the specific implementation of the switch circuit S100 will dictate whether the switch turns on in response to the GPIO in the ON state or the OFF state, either relationship will suffice. When the switch circuit S100 turns on and current is induced into the secondary winding 120, the
microcontroller 104 measures the faux leakage current and compares same to a threshold level, which may be one of the aforementioned warning and/or critical levels, and/or may be another level specific to a self test. - Turning again to
FIGS. 3 and4 , ataction 418, a determination is made as to whether the conditions are ripe for a self test procedure. By way of example, the conditions may include a time, date, interval, and/or other metric. In some embodiments, it is desirable to conduct the self test periodically, such as every 24 hours. In this regard, the operator may set the conditions for self test at action 402 (discussed above with respect to settings), and such setting(s) may be displayed atlocation 304. Again, if thedisplay 108 operates as an input/output device, the operator may set the self test conditions (in this example an interval of 24 hours) through manipulation of thescreen 300 or other input element of thedisplay 108. - An affirmative determination at
action 418 causes the process flow to branch toaction 420 and indicates that the status of thesystem 100 is in self test mode. Thedisplay 108 may indicate the self test mode at location 306 (FIG. 3 ) by highlighting the label "Testing". As discussed above, the software/firmware may produce a control signal on the GPIO pin of themicrocontroller 104, which turns on the switch circuit S100. Themicrocontroller 104 then compares the measured leakage current to one or more thresholds, such as 4 mA, 10 mA, and/or other thresholds. The process then advances toaction 422, where a determination is made as to whether the result of the comparison ataction 420 indicates that the leakage current sensing circuitry failed the self test. If the result of the determination is negative (i.e., that the test passed), then the process flow loops back toaction 402, where the process flow repeats. If, however, the result of the determination is positive (i.e., that the test failed), then the process flow advances toaction 424. - At
action 424 themicrocontroller 104 sets the status to hardware failure and potentially takes further action. For example, upon a status of hardware failure (and/or upon a change in status from something else to such), themicrocontroller 104 may operate to display the status atlocation 306, by highlighting the label "HW Failure". Alternatively or additionally, themicrocontroller 104 may operate to store such status into an event log, which may include one or more of the test current measurement, the threshold(s), the time, the date, the duration of the condition, etc. Additionally or alternatively, themicrocontroller 104 may operate to send a notification of the status (or change in status) to one or more destinations in a manner similar to that discussed above. After completing the processes ofaction 424, the process flow loops back toaction 402, where the process flow repeats. - Reference is now made to
FIG. 5 , which illustrates a more detailed schematic diagram of a circuit suitable for implementing the systems discussed above, and/or other embodiments disclosed or described herein. In many ways the system 100A is similar to thesystem 100 discussed above. A more specific (and/or alternative) example for implementing the leakage current sensor is illustrated inFIG. 5 . - In the system 100A, the source of AC power and the
load circuit 140 are on a primary side of an electrical isolation boundary, and themicrocontroller 104 is on a secondary side of the electrical isolation boundary. Maintaining the isolation boundary is desirable, and often required by law or specification, to protect operators using/maintaining theload 140 and/or themicrocontroller 104 from shock or other hazards associated with the AC source. - The leakage current sensor 202 includes a
first circuit 202A on the primary side of the electrical isolation boundary, and asecond circuit 202B on the secondary side of the electrical isolation boundary. Additionally, the leakage current sensor 202 includes one or more third circuits that inter-couple the first andsecond circuits isolator circuit 204. The differential current transformer T100 maintains isolation because there is no direct connection from the secondary winding 120 to the primary winding (the phase and neutral wires L, N). The transformer includes one or more turns of the phase and neutral wires L, N in a bifilar configuration, and a plurality of turns on secondary winding 120 to establish a 1000:1 turns ratio. - Similarly, the
isolator circuit 204 maintains isolation because there is no direct connection from the primary side to the secondary side. In particular, theisolator circuit 204 includes aprimary side circuit 208, and asecondary side circuit 206. Theprimary side circuit 208 operates to induce an unbalanced flux in the transformer core that produces a current in the secondary winding 120 of the differential current transformer T100. The unbalanced flux is in response to an intermediate control signal (within the isolator circuit 204) crossing the electrical isolation boundary from the secondary side thereof. In this example, theisolator circuit 204 includes a light emitting device in thesecondary side circuit 206, which produces light when activated by the microcontroller 104 (not shown). The intermediate control signal (the light) crosses the electrical isolation boundary from the secondary side to the primary side thereof. Theisolator circuit 204 also includes a light sensitive switch circuit (in this example a TRIAC) in theprimary side circuit 208 that turns on and off in response to the light of the intermediate control signal. Thelight emitting device 206 is the LED cathode of the TRIAC, and is connected to the GPIO pin of themicrocontroller 104. When themicrocontroller 104 sets the GPIO pin to the OFF state, a current flows through R201 and theLED 206 of the TRIAC, which causes the lightsensitive switch 208 of the TRIAC to turn on. - The leakage current sensor 202 includes an additional test winding on the transformer T100 that produces the unbalanced flux in the transformer core in response to the light
sensitive switch circuit 208 turning on. In particular, the lightsensitive switch circuit 208, the test winding and a resistance R210 (in this example implemented using a plurality of resistors) are coupled in series between the phase wire L and the neutral wire N, such that the unbalanced flux is produced in response to the intermediate control signal (the light) turning on theswitch circuit 208. The current flowing through the test winding induces the unbalanced flux, thereby generating the induced current in the secondary winding 120 of the transformer T100. The net result of turning on theswitch 208 of the TRIAC is to cause a self-test (faux) leakage current equal to V x T / R, where V is the primary AC voltage, T is the number of turns (e.g., about one or two) of the test winding about the core, and R is the resistance. For example, if V = 230, T = 1, and R = 3990, a leakage current of 5.76 mA will be generated. - The
secondary side circuit 206 includes a burden resistor R205, which may be about 100 ohms. The voltage produced across the burden resistor R205 is equal to 0.1 x the actual leakage current, which adheres to the following equation: - The differential voltage, V, across R205 is converted to a single-ended voltage output by operational amplifier U200. The operational amplifier U200 is configured as a differential amplifier with a gain of 100 (as set by the ratios R208/R206 and R209/R207). Assuming that resistors R208 = R209 = 100K, and R206 = R207 = 1K, this results in an output voltage, VOUT = 10 x ILEAK, which is input into the
microcontroller 104, preferably the ADC input thereof. To eliminate or reduce high frequency noise pickup, capacitors C201 and C202 (e.g., about 1.5 nF) are included to form a first order low pass filter with a cut-off frequency of about 1000 Hz. The operational amplifier U202 is configured as a buffer and provides a bias point for U200. By way of example, the components of the operational amplifier U202 may be established to produce a bias point of about 1.65 volts. Assuming the example of a test leakage current of 5.76 mA, a 57.6 mV signal will be produced at the output of U200. - Although the invention herein has been described with reference to particular embodiments, it is to be understood that these embodiments are merely illustrative of the principles and applications of the present invention.
Claims (18)
- An apparatus (100), comprising:a leakage current sensor (102) configured to measure leakage current from a source of AC power, which provides power to at least one load circuit (140); anda control circuit (104) configured to: (i) receive measured leakage current values from the leakage current sensor (102), (ii) compare the measured leakage current values against one or more predetermined thresholds to establish status therefor; and (iii) perform a self test to determine whether the leakage current sensor (102) is operative;characterized in thatthe source of AC power and the at least one load (140) are on a primary side of an electrical isolation boundary;the control circuit (204) is on a secondary side of the electrical isolation boundary; andthe leakage current sensor (202) includes: (i) a first circuit (202A) on the primary side of the electrical isolation boundary; (ii) a second circuit (202B) on the secondary side of the electrical isolation boundary; and (iii) one or more third circuits (T100, 204) that inter-couple the first and second circuits (202A, 202B) of the leakage current sensor (102) yet maintain the electrical isolation boundary therebetween,wherein the one or more third circuits of the leakage current sensor (102) include:a differential current transformer (T100) having: (i) a primary winding formed by one or more equal numbers of turns of respective legs about a transformer core as such legs pass from the source of AC power to the at least one load (140), and (ii) a secondary winding (120) formed by a plurality of turns of wire about the transformer core; andan isolator circuit (204) having: (i) a primary side circuit (208) configured to induce an unbalanced flux in the transformer core that produces a current in the secondary winding (120) of the differential current transformer (T100), the unbalanced flux being in response to an intermediate control signal crossing the electrical isolation boundary from the secondary side thereof; and (ii) a secondary side circuit (206) configured to produce the intermediate control signal in response to a test control signal produced by the control circuit (104).
- The apparatus (100) of claim 1, wherein:the control circuit (104) is configured to be programmable by an operator in order to set at least one of the one or more predetermined thresholds;the predetermined thresholds include at least one of: (i) a first threshold level indicating a measure leakage current that is excessive; and (ii) a second threshold level, higher than the first threshold level; andthe control circuit (104) is configured to store and retrieve results of the comparisons of the measured leakage current values against the one or more predetermined thresholds.
- The apparatus (100) of claim 2, wherein at least one of:the control circuit (104) is configured to be programmable by an operator in order to set at least one of: (i) periodic self test time intervals; (ii) one or more dates of the self tests, and (iii) one or more times for the self tests; andthe control circuit (104) is configured to store and retrieve results of one or more of the self tests for validation of the leakage current sensor (102).
- The apparatus (100) of claim 3, wherein the control circuit (104) is configured to store into an event log at least one of:
the results of one or more of the self tests; and the comparisons of the measured leakage current values against the one or more predetermined thresholds. - The apparatus (100) of claim 3,
further comprising a display (108) operatively coupled to the control circuit (104), wherein the display (108) is configured to show a visual indication of at least one of:the measured leakage current values;the first threshold level;the second threshold level;the periodic self test time intervals;the one or more dates of the self tests; andthe one or more times for the self tests. - The apparatus (100) of claim 3,
further comprising a display (108) operatively coupled to the control circuit (104), wherein the display (108) is configured to show a visual indication of the status, the status including at least one of:
whether the measured leakage current values are at normal levels, because the comparison indicates that the measured leakage current values are below the first threshold level;
whether the measured leakage current values are at warning levels, because the comparison indicates that the measured leakage current values are above the first threshold level but below the second threshold level;
whether the measured leakage current values are at critical levels, because the comparison indicates that the measured leakage current values are above the second threshold level;
whether a self test is in progress;
whether results of one or more self tests indicate that the leakage current sensor (102) is non-operative; and
whether results of one or more self tests indicate that the leakage current sensor (102) is operative. - The apparatus (100) of claim 3, further comprising a message transmission system (110) coupled to the control circuit (104) and configured to transmit one or more messages indicating at least one of: the results of one or more of the self tests; and the comparisons of the measured leakage current values against the one or more predetermined thresholds.
- The apparatus (100) of claim 4, wherein the control circuit (104) is configured to store the status indicators into the event log, including at least one of:whether the measured leakage current values are at normal levels, because the comparison indicates that the measured leakage current values are below the first threshold level;whether the measured leakage current values are at warning levels, because the comparison indicates that the measured leakage current values are above the first threshold level but below the second threshold level;whether the measured leakage current values are at critical levels, because the comparison indicates that the measured leakage current values are above the second threshold level;whether a self test is in progress;whether results of one or more self tests indicate that the leakage current sensor (102) is non-operative; andwhether results of one or more self tests indicate that the leakage current sensor (102) is operative.
- The apparatus (100) of claim 7, wherein the message transmission system (110) is configured to send the one or more messages in at least one of: (i) a simple network management protocol, (ii) a packet switched network protocol, (iii) an electronic mail protocol, (iv) an instant messaging protocol, and (v) a telephone protocol.
- The apparatus (100) of claim 9, wherein the message transmission system (110) is configured to be programmable by an operator to select the messaging protocol.
- The apparatus (100) of claim 10, further comprising a display (108) operatively coupled to the control circuit (104), wherein the display (108) is configured to show a visual indication of the selected messaging protocol.
- The apparatus (100) of claim 9, wherein the status indicators include at least one of:whether the measured leakage current values are at normal levels, because the comparison indicates that the measured leakage current values are below the first threshold level;whether the measured leakage current values are at warning levels, because the comparison indicates that the measured leakage current values are above the first threshold level but below the second threshold level;whether the measured leakage current values are at critical levels, because the comparison indicates that the measured leakage current values are above the second threshold level;whether a self test is in progress;whether results of one or more self tests indicate that the leakage current sensor (102) is non-operative; andwhether results of one or more self tests indicate that the leakage current sensor (102) is operative.
- The apparatus (100) of claim 1, wherein the secondary side circuit (206) of the isolator circuit (204) includes:a switch circuit configured to turn on and off in response to the intermediate control signal;a test winding of one or more turns on the differential current transformer (T100); anda resistance;wherein the switch circuit, test winding, and resistance are coupled in series between the legs such that the unbalanced flux is produced in response to the intermediate control signal turning the switch circuit on
- The apparatus (100) of claim 1, wherein the secondary side circuit (206) of the isolator circuit (204) includes:a switch circuit configured to turn on and off in response to the intermediate control signal; anda resistance, wherein:the switch circuit and the resistance are coupled in series between the legs such that the unbalanced flux is produced in response to the intermediate control signal turning the switch circuit on, andthe connection of the secondary side circuit (206) of the isolator circuit (204) to the legs is such that current flowing through the switch circuit and the resistance bypasses the transformer core
- The apparatus (100) of claim 1, wherein the isolator circuit (204) includes:a light emitting device within the secondary side circuit (206) configured to produce light as the intermediate control signal in response to the test control signal produced by the control circuit (104), wherein the light crosses the electrical isolation boundary from the secondary side to the primary side thereof; anda light sensitive switch circuit configured to turn on and off in response to the light of the intermediate control signal.
- A method performed by the apparatus (100) according to any of the preceding claims, comprising:measuring, by the leakage current sensor (202), leakage current from a source of AC power, which provides power to at least one load circuit (140); andcomparing, by the control circuit (104), the measured leakage current values against one or more predetermined thresholds to establish status therefor; andautomatically performing self tests to determine whether the leakage current sensing and comparing operations are operative,wherein the performing self tests includes:producing a test control signal by the control circuit (104),producing an intermediate control signal in response to the test control signal produced by the control circuit (104), andinducing an unbalanced flux in the transformer core that produces a current in the secondary winding (120) of the differential current transformer (T100), the unbalanced flux being in response to the intermediate control signal crossing the electrical isolation boundary from the secondary side thereof.
- The method of claim 16, further comprising permitting an operator set at least one of:the one or more predetermined thresholds; andtiming at which the self tests are performed.
- The method of claim 17, wherein
the predetermined thresholds include at least one of: (i) a first threshold level indicating a measure leakage current that is higher than desired; and (ii) a second threshold level, higher than the first threshold level; and
the timing at which the self tests are performed include at least one of: (i) periodic self test time intervals; (ii) one or more dates of the self tests, and (iii) one or more times for the self tests.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US12/965,190 US8907678B2 (en) | 2010-12-10 | 2010-12-10 | Methods and apparatus for sensing ground leakage and automated self testing thereof |
PCT/US2011/064106 WO2012078958A2 (en) | 2010-12-10 | 2011-12-09 | Methods and apparatus for sensing ground leakage and automated self testing thereof |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2649462A2 EP2649462A2 (en) | 2013-10-16 |
EP2649462A4 EP2649462A4 (en) | 2017-12-27 |
EP2649462B1 true EP2649462B1 (en) | 2021-03-31 |
Family
ID=46198715
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP11847380.0A Active EP2649462B1 (en) | 2010-12-10 | 2011-12-09 | Method and apparatus for sensing ground leakage and automated self testing thereof |
Country Status (7)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US8907678B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP2649462B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP5707508B2 (en) |
KR (1) | KR101650615B1 (en) |
AU (2) | AU2011338224A1 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2819134C (en) |
WO (1) | WO2012078958A2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (35)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US9547026B1 (en) * | 2012-12-28 | 2017-01-17 | Fabien Chraim | Plug-through energy monitor |
US10132856B2 (en) * | 2013-03-15 | 2018-11-20 | Hubbell Incorporated | GFCI self test software functional program for autonomous monitoring and fail safe power denial operations |
GB2521188A (en) | 2013-12-12 | 2015-06-17 | Eaton Ind Netherlands Bv | Alternating current circuit breaker with self-test capability |
JP6403433B2 (en) * | 2014-05-28 | 2018-10-10 | スリーエム イノベイティブ プロパティズ カンパニー | Leak detector |
DE102014219869A1 (en) * | 2014-09-30 | 2016-03-31 | Phoenix Contact Gmbh & Co. Kg | Residual current monitoring device |
JP6520423B2 (en) * | 2014-11-14 | 2019-05-29 | 株式会社村田製作所 | Electric leakage detection circuit |
CN106300250B (en) * | 2015-05-21 | 2019-04-16 | 台达电子工业股份有限公司 | Charging circuit interruption means and charging circuit self-detection method |
TWI554002B (en) * | 2015-05-21 | 2016-10-11 | 台達電子工業股份有限公司 | Charging circuit interrupting devices and methods for self-testing charging circuit interrupting devices |
US9319029B1 (en) * | 2015-06-19 | 2016-04-19 | Clover Network, Inc. | System and method for automatic filter tuning |
RU2642127C2 (en) * | 2016-02-04 | 2018-01-24 | Государственное казённое образовательное учреждение высшего образования "Российская таможенная академия" | Measuring device of leakage current in load of single-phase rectifier |
CN106019194A (en) * | 2016-06-29 | 2016-10-12 | 张家港友诚科技机电有限公司 | Test method for electric leakage detection circuit |
KR101719677B1 (en) * | 2016-10-27 | 2017-03-24 | (주)케이엔 | Power distributor, control board and distribution board having function of cut-off and recovery by stages against earthquake and optimal operation |
RU2645434C1 (en) * | 2016-11-22 | 2018-02-21 | Федеральное государственное бюджетное учреждение науки Институт проблем управления им. В.А. Трапезникова Российской академии наук | Device for measuring differential current |
CN108110999B (en) * | 2016-11-23 | 2020-10-16 | 台达电子工业股份有限公司 | Power distribution device and operation method thereof |
KR20180075242A (en) * | 2016-12-26 | 2018-07-04 | 엘에스산전 주식회사 | Leakage current braking apparatus for electric vehicle charger |
US11163016B2 (en) * | 2017-03-17 | 2021-11-02 | Zhejiang Magtron Intelligent Technology Limited Cooperation | Leakage current sensor and leakage current monitoring device |
KR101886250B1 (en) * | 2017-03-23 | 2018-08-07 | 한밭대학교 산학협력단 | Energy metering apparatus and method using the same |
US10951018B2 (en) | 2017-11-15 | 2021-03-16 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Ground fault current interrupter circuit |
KR102404816B1 (en) * | 2018-02-23 | 2022-05-31 | 주식회사 엘지에너지솔루션 | Apparatus and method for diagnosing currentsensor |
EP3546957A1 (en) * | 2018-03-28 | 2019-10-02 | Siemens Healthcare GmbH | Isolated grounding effectiveness monitor |
DE102018128627A1 (en) * | 2018-11-15 | 2020-05-20 | Eaton Intelligent Power Limited | Residual current circuit breaker |
KR102281269B1 (en) * | 2019-04-30 | 2021-07-29 | 심유진 | Electric Vehicle Charging Module Device |
US11391805B2 (en) | 2019-05-10 | 2022-07-19 | Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation | Systems and methods for current sense resistor built-in-test |
US11742651B2 (en) | 2019-05-10 | 2023-08-29 | Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation | Systems and methods for arc fault detection built-in-test |
JP2020197396A (en) * | 2019-05-31 | 2020-12-10 | アイシン精機株式会社 | Current detection device |
KR20210016234A (en) | 2019-08-02 | 2021-02-15 | 현대자동차주식회사 | Device for detecting current leakage and current leakage detection system including the same |
JP7308705B2 (en) * | 2019-09-13 | 2023-07-14 | 大阪瓦斯株式会社 | Power measuring device |
JP7370004B2 (en) * | 2019-12-23 | 2023-10-27 | パナソニックIpマネジメント株式会社 | Electrical leakage detection system, automatic maintenance inspection system, and electric leakage detection method |
EP4233084A1 (en) * | 2020-12-21 | 2023-08-30 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Protective switching device and method |
US11982721B2 (en) * | 2021-01-08 | 2024-05-14 | Rosemount Aerospace Inc. | Detecting leakage currents in a powered electrical system |
CN112952746A (en) * | 2021-01-27 | 2021-06-11 | 广东电网有限责任公司 | Electric shock protection device |
KR102328806B1 (en) * | 2021-09-07 | 2021-11-22 | 주식회사 현대콘트롤전기 | A Leakage voltage monitoring system |
WO2023091848A1 (en) * | 2021-11-22 | 2023-05-25 | Nxstage Medical, Inc. | Grounding assurance and voltage-to-patient detection for patient safety |
US20240077547A1 (en) * | 2022-09-01 | 2024-03-07 | Webasto Charging Systems, Inc. | Digital residual current detecting system |
CN115932385B (en) * | 2022-12-12 | 2023-11-17 | 怀化建南机器厂有限公司 | Residual current monitoring method and system and single-phase intelligent electric energy meter |
Family Cites Families (28)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3671809A (en) * | 1971-11-01 | 1972-06-20 | Gte Sylvania Inc | Ground fault detector including magnetic amplifier bridge means |
US3947759A (en) * | 1974-09-16 | 1976-03-30 | Continental Engineering, Inc. | Leakage current monitoring system and method |
JPS52138266U (en) * | 1976-04-14 | 1977-10-20 | ||
US4532568A (en) | 1983-01-28 | 1985-07-30 | Kraus Sr Arthur A | Three-phase leakage protection by electronic control |
US4809123A (en) * | 1986-04-14 | 1989-02-28 | Isco, Inc. | Ground fault detector for high-voltage DC power supplies |
US5600524A (en) * | 1995-05-04 | 1997-02-04 | Leviton Manufacturing Co., Inc. | Intelligent ground fault circuit interrupter |
US5872926A (en) | 1996-05-31 | 1999-02-16 | Adaptive Micro Systems, Inc. | Integrated message system |
JP3388482B2 (en) * | 1996-05-31 | 2003-03-24 | 三菱電機株式会社 | Earth leakage detection device |
TW403838B (en) * | 1997-10-30 | 2000-09-01 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Electric leak detecting method and apparatus for electric motorcars |
US6262871B1 (en) * | 1998-05-28 | 2001-07-17 | X-L Synergy, Llc | Fail safe fault interrupter |
JP2000019211A (en) * | 1998-07-01 | 2000-01-21 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Leak detector |
US6191589B1 (en) | 1999-03-29 | 2001-02-20 | George A. Spencer | Test circuit for an AFCI/GFCI circuit breaker |
JP3517617B2 (en) * | 1999-09-17 | 2004-04-12 | 株式会社東芝 | Electric leakage detection method for electrical equipment |
WO2001077769A1 (en) * | 2000-04-06 | 2001-10-18 | Jang Hon Lee | Power control apparatus and the method |
DE10125910B4 (en) * | 2000-05-30 | 2007-02-01 | International Rectifier Corp., El Segundo | Method and circuit for detecting motor insulation faults |
US6807035B1 (en) | 2000-11-28 | 2004-10-19 | Hubbell Incorporated | Fault interrupter using microcontroller for fault sensing and automatic self-testing |
GB0226111D0 (en) | 2002-11-08 | 2002-12-18 | Delta Electrical Ltd | Residual current devices |
KR100564944B1 (en) * | 2004-04-30 | 2006-03-30 | 제일전기공업 주식회사 | Electric leak breaker for self-testing |
US7129745B2 (en) * | 2004-05-19 | 2006-10-31 | Altera Corporation | Apparatus and methods for adjusting performance of integrated circuits |
CN101138139A (en) | 2005-01-04 | 2008-03-05 | 科技研究公司 | Leakage current detection and interruption circuit |
CN1328587C (en) * | 2005-12-27 | 2007-07-25 | 通领科技集团有限公司 | Life-stopping intelligent inspection and inspector for leakage protector |
JP2007312445A (en) * | 2006-05-15 | 2007-11-29 | Gs Yuasa Corporation:Kk | Management system for insulation monitoring device |
US7911746B2 (en) * | 2006-06-01 | 2011-03-22 | Leviton Manufacturing Co., Inc. | GFCI with self-test and remote annunciation capabilities |
US20080180866A1 (en) * | 2007-01-29 | 2008-07-31 | Honor Tone, Ltd. | Combined arc fault circuit interrupter and leakage current detector interrupter |
JP4306781B2 (en) * | 2007-10-30 | 2009-08-05 | ダイキン工業株式会社 | Earth leakage detection circuit |
JP2010151488A (en) * | 2008-12-24 | 2010-07-08 | Ntt Facilities Inc | Device and system for detecting ground fault |
US8320089B1 (en) * | 2009-04-16 | 2012-11-27 | Musco Corporation | Apparatus, method, and system for integrating ground fault circuit interrupters in equipment-grounded high voltage systems |
US8605394B2 (en) * | 2009-07-09 | 2013-12-10 | Musco Corporation | Apparatus, method, and system for monitoring leakage current and detecting fault conditions in electrical systems |
-
2010
- 2010-12-10 US US12/965,190 patent/US8907678B2/en active Active
-
2011
- 2011-12-09 KR KR1020137014904A patent/KR101650615B1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2011-12-09 EP EP11847380.0A patent/EP2649462B1/en active Active
- 2011-12-09 WO PCT/US2011/064106 patent/WO2012078958A2/en unknown
- 2011-12-09 JP JP2013543369A patent/JP5707508B2/en active Active
- 2011-12-09 AU AU2011338224A patent/AU2011338224A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2011-12-09 CA CA2819134A patent/CA2819134C/en active Active
-
2014
- 2014-12-09 US US14/564,564 patent/US9411021B2/en active Active - Reinstated
-
2016
- 2016-01-18 AU AU2016200263A patent/AU2016200263B2/en active Active
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
None * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20150301127A1 (en) | 2015-10-22 |
EP2649462A2 (en) | 2013-10-16 |
WO2012078958A3 (en) | 2014-03-13 |
CA2819134C (en) | 2017-04-11 |
JP5707508B2 (en) | 2015-04-30 |
US8907678B2 (en) | 2014-12-09 |
KR101650615B1 (en) | 2016-08-23 |
KR20130087557A (en) | 2013-08-06 |
AU2011338224A1 (en) | 2013-07-04 |
AU2016200263A1 (en) | 2016-02-11 |
EP2649462A4 (en) | 2017-12-27 |
US20120146655A1 (en) | 2012-06-14 |
AU2016200263B2 (en) | 2017-12-21 |
US9411021B2 (en) | 2016-08-09 |
WO2012078958A2 (en) | 2012-06-14 |
JP2014511474A (en) | 2014-05-15 |
CA2819134A1 (en) | 2012-06-14 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP2649462B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for sensing ground leakage and automated self testing thereof | |
US8654487B2 (en) | Methods, systems, and apparatus and for detecting parallel electrical arc faults | |
CA2236283C (en) | Ground fault circuit interrupter system with uncommitted contacts | |
US7911746B2 (en) | GFCI with self-test and remote annunciation capabilities | |
EP0762591A2 (en) | Electrical system with arc protection | |
RU2488131C2 (en) | Method and device for detection of failures in neutral return path of electric mains | |
CN103792459A (en) | Methods and apparatus for testing an electronic trip device | |
WO2008061321A1 (en) | Power supply monitoring system | |
CN101366161A (en) | Receptacle providing sustained excessive voltage protection | |
AU2006243066B2 (en) | Circuit protection device and test facility to simulate a fault condition | |
US20060187594A1 (en) | DC ground fault circuit interrupter | |
JP2009142021A (en) | Leakage relay | |
US8427794B2 (en) | Multi-pole arc-fault circuit interrupter | |
KR101930804B1 (en) | Earth leakage breaker with automatic checking method using double electric-shock prevention function, and automatic checking pcb circuit function method using the same | |
US6765390B2 (en) | Diagnostic wiring verification tester | |
KR20230158346A (en) | Bidirectional multi-function electronic earth leakage circuit breaker | |
Orue et al. | Making faults to protect power networks | |
Idris | AN AUTOMATED ELECTRICAL PROTECTION SYSTEMFOR THREE PHASE SYSTEM | |
MXPA98003528A (en) | Ground fault circuit switch system with no compromise contacts | |
JPH0982209A (en) | Plug type ground leakage circuit breaker |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20130604 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
R17D | Deferred search report published (corrected) |
Effective date: 20140313 |
|
A4 | Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched |
Effective date: 20171128 |
|
RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: G01R 19/165 20060101ALI20171122BHEP Ipc: H02H 3/33 20060101ALI20171122BHEP Ipc: G01R 31/14 20060101AFI20171122BHEP Ipc: G01R 35/00 20060101ALI20171122BHEP Ipc: G01R 31/02 20060101ALI20171122BHEP Ipc: G01R 31/42 20060101ALI20171122BHEP Ipc: H02H 3/28 20060101ALI20171122BHEP |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20200213 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: H02H 3/33 20060101ALI20200922BHEP Ipc: G01R 35/00 20060101ALI20200922BHEP Ipc: G01R 31/14 20060101AFI20200922BHEP Ipc: H02H 3/28 20060101ALI20200922BHEP Ipc: G01R 31/52 20200101ALI20200922BHEP Ipc: G01R 31/42 20060101ALI20200922BHEP Ipc: G01R 19/165 20060101ALI20200922BHEP |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20201021 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602011070578 Country of ref document: DE Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 1377543 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20210415 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG9D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210630 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210630 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210331 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210331 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210331 Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210331 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210331 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20210331 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK05 Ref document number: 1377543 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20210331 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210331 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210331 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210331 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210331 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210331 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210331 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210731 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210331 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210331 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210802 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210331 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210331 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602011070578 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210331 Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210331 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20220104 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210731 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210331 Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210331 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20211231 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20211209 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20211209 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20211231 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20211231 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20211231 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20111209 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210331 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210331 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20231002 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20231015 Year of fee payment: 13 Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20230719 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20210331 |