EP2607542A2 - Procédé permettant de maximiser la vitesse de rotation de tambour par la surveillance continue d'inertie lors de l'extraction - Google Patents

Procédé permettant de maximiser la vitesse de rotation de tambour par la surveillance continue d'inertie lors de l'extraction Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2607542A2
EP2607542A2 EP20120197541 EP12197541A EP2607542A2 EP 2607542 A2 EP2607542 A2 EP 2607542A2 EP 20120197541 EP20120197541 EP 20120197541 EP 12197541 A EP12197541 A EP 12197541A EP 2607542 A2 EP2607542 A2 EP 2607542A2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
drum
speed
rotational speed
mass
force value
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP20120197541
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP2607542A3 (fr
EP2607542B1 (fr
Inventor
Farhad Ashrafzadeh
Donald E. Erickson
Brian P. Janke
Peter E. Zasowski
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Whirlpool Corp
Original Assignee
Whirlpool Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Whirlpool Corp filed Critical Whirlpool Corp
Publication of EP2607542A2 publication Critical patent/EP2607542A2/fr
Publication of EP2607542A3 publication Critical patent/EP2607542A3/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2607542B1 publication Critical patent/EP2607542B1/fr
Not-in-force legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
    • D06—TREATMENT OF TEXTILES OR THE LIKE; LAUNDERING; FLEXIBLE MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • D06F—LAUNDERING, DRYING, IRONING, PRESSING OR FOLDING TEXTILE ARTICLES
    • D06F33/00—Control of operations performed in washing machines or washer-dryers 
    • D06F33/30—Control of washing machines characterised by the purpose or target of the control 
    • D06F33/48—Preventing or reducing imbalance or noise
    • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
    • D06—TREATMENT OF TEXTILES OR THE LIKE; LAUNDERING; FLEXIBLE MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • D06F—LAUNDERING, DRYING, IRONING, PRESSING OR FOLDING TEXTILE ARTICLES
    • D06F2103/00—Parameters monitored or detected for the control of domestic laundry washing machines, washer-dryers or laundry dryers
    • D06F2103/02—Characteristics of laundry or load
    • D06F2103/04—Quantity, e.g. weight or variation of weight
    • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
    • D06—TREATMENT OF TEXTILES OR THE LIKE; LAUNDERING; FLEXIBLE MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • D06F—LAUNDERING, DRYING, IRONING, PRESSING OR FOLDING TEXTILE ARTICLES
    • D06F2103/00—Parameters monitored or detected for the control of domestic laundry washing machines, washer-dryers or laundry dryers
    • D06F2103/24—Spin speed; Drum movements
    • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
    • D06—TREATMENT OF TEXTILES OR THE LIKE; LAUNDERING; FLEXIBLE MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • D06F—LAUNDERING, DRYING, IRONING, PRESSING OR FOLDING TEXTILE ARTICLES
    • D06F2105/00—Systems or parameters controlled or affected by the control systems of washing machines, washer-dryers or laundry dryers
    • D06F2105/46—Drum speed; Actuation of motors, e.g. starting or interrupting

Definitions

  • Laundry treating appliances such as clothes washers, may include a perforate rotatable drum or basket positioned within an imperforate tub.
  • the drum may at least partially define a treating chamber in which a laundry load may be received for treatment according to a selected cycle of operation.
  • a motor may rotate the drum and laundry load about a rotational axis at a preselected sufficiently high speed to centrifugally extract liquid from the laundry load.
  • extraction may be optimized by maximizing the rotational speed of the drum, i.e. the maximum obtainable rotational speed as limited by the motor's capabilities, which may minimize the cycle time.
  • the motor may limit the maximum rotational speed of the drum
  • physical limitations of the system may prevent the maximum rotational speed from being safely obtained.
  • One example of such a limitation may be a large inertia associated with the drum, such as from an unbalanced laundry load. If an inertia is too large, it may create a bending stress on the motor shaft or a hoop stress in the drum that would exceed the corresponding design limits.
  • the drum speed may be limited if the inertia is too large, i.e. the rotational speed may be reduced below the maximum rotational speed to prevent motor shaft and hoop stresses from becoming too great. However, extraction at a lower speed may lengthen the cycle time.
  • a laundry treating appliance may have a rotatable drum defining a treating chamber for receiving a laundry load, a motor rotatably driving the drum, and a controller controlling the operation of the motor.
  • the laundry treating appliance may be operated by accelerating the drum with the motor toward a final speed greater than a satellizing speed, determining a mass value indicative of the mass of the rotating drum and contents within the treating chamber during the accelerating, determining a current rotational speed during the acceleration, calculating a force value indicative of a force acting on the drum based on the determined mass value and the current rotational speed, comparing the force value to a reference force value, and repeating the determining, calculating, and comparing during the acceleration, and ceasing the accelerating when the force value obtains a predetermined relationship with the reference force value.
  • Figure 1 is an exemplary schematic view of a laundry treating appliance in the form of a washing machine according to an embodiment of an environment of the invention.
  • FIG 2 is an exemplary schematic view of a control system of the laundry treating appliance of Figure 1 according to an embodiment of the invention.
  • Figure 3 is an exemplary graphical representation of rotational speed or torque vs. time for the washing machine of Figure 1 comprising a sinusoidal signal superimposed on a constant acceleration signal.
  • Figure 4 is an exemplary graphical representation of generally increasing rotational speed and generally decreasing torque for an extraction phase of a laundry cycle.
  • Figure 5 is an exemplary graphical representation of a decrease in inertia with time for an extraction phase of a laundry treatment cycle.
  • Figure 6 is an exemplary method flow chart for maximizing drum rotational speed by continuously monitoring inertia during an extraction phase of a laundry treatment cycle.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic view of a laundry treating appliance showing one embodiment of an environment in which the invention operates.
  • the laundry treating appliance may be any appliance which performs a cycle of operation to clean or otherwise treat items placed therein, non-limiting examples of which include a horizontal or vertical axis clothes washer; a combination washing machine and dryer; a tumbling or stationary refreshing/revitalizing machine; an extractor; a non-aqueous washing apparatus; and a revitalizing machine.
  • the laundry treating appliance of Figure 1 is illustrated as a washing machine 10, which may include a structural support system comprising a cabinet 12 which defines a housing within which a laundry holding system resides.
  • the housing may have a chassis and/or a frame, defining an interior that encloses components typically found in a conventional washing machine, such as motors, pumps, fluid lines, controls, sensors, transducers, and the like. Such components will not be described further herein except as necessary for a complete understanding of the invention.
  • the laundry holding system comprises a tub 14 supported within the cabinet 12 by a suitable suspension system 28, and a drum 16 provided within the tub 14, the drum 16 defining at least a portion of a laundry treating chamber 18.
  • the laundry holding system may further include a door 24 which may be movably mounted to the cabinet 12 to selectively close both the tub 14 and the drum 16.
  • a bellows 26 may couple an open face of the tub 14 with the cabinet 12, with the door 24 sealing against the bellows 26 when the door 24 closes the tub 14.
  • the suspension system 28 may dynamically suspend the laundry holding system within the structural support system.
  • the washing machine 10 may include a drive system 80 for rotating the drum 16 within the tub 14.
  • the drive system 80 may include a motor 88, which may be directly coupled with the drum 16 through a motor drive shaft 90, to rotate the drum 16 about a rotational axis during a cycle of operation.
  • the motor 88 may be a direct-drive, brushless permanent magnet (BPM) motor having a stator 92 and a rotor 94. Alternately, the motor 88 may be coupled to the drum 16 through a belt coupled with a drum drive shaft (not shown) to rotate the drum 16, as is known in the art.
  • Other motors such as an induction motor or a permanent split capacitor (PSC) motor, may also be used.
  • the motor 88 may rotate the drum 16 at various speeds in either rotational direction.
  • the washing machine 10 may also include a control system for controlling the operation of the washing machine 10 to implement one or more cycles of operation.
  • the control system may include a controller 96 located within the cabinet 12 and a user interface 98 that is operably coupled with the controller 96.
  • the user interface 98 may include one or more knobs, dials, switches, displays, touch screens and the like for communicating with the user, such as to receive input and provide output.
  • the user may enter different types of information including, without limitation, cycle selection and cycle parameters, such as cycle options.
  • the controller 96 may include a machine controller and any additional controller provided for controlling any of the components of the washing machine 10.
  • the controller 96 may include the machine controller and a motor controller.
  • Many known types of controllers may be used for the controller 96, and the specific type of controller is not germane to the invention.
  • the controller may be a microprocessor-based controller that implements control software and sends/receives one or more electrical signals to/from each of the various working components to effect the control software.
  • proportional control (P), proportional integral control (PI), and proportional derivative control (PD), or a combination thereof, i.e. a proportional integral derivative control (PID) may be used to control the various components.
  • the controller 96 may be provided with a controller memory 100 and a central processing unit (CPU) 102.
  • the memory 100 may store control software that is executed by the CPU 102 in completing a cycle of operation using the washing machine 10, and any additional software. Examples, without limitation, of cycles of operation include: wash, heavy duty wash, delicate wash, quick wash, pre-wash, refresh, rinse only, and timed wash.
  • the memory 100 may store information in a suitable format, such as a database or tabular form, and may store data received from one or more components of the washing machine 10 that may be communicably coupled with the controller 96.
  • the database or tabular form may be used to store the various operating parameters for the one or more cycles of operation, including factory default values for the operating parameters and any adjustments to them by the control system or by user input.
  • the controller 96 may be operably coupled with one or more components of the washing machine 10 for communicating with and controlling the operation of the component to complete a cycle of operation.
  • the controller 96 may be operably coupled with the motor 88.
  • the controller 96 may also be operably coupled with a sump heater to heat wash liquid as required by the controller, one or more pumps, one or more valves for controlling the flow of liquid during a cycle of operation, a steam generator, and the like.
  • the controller 96 may also be coupled with one or more sensors associated with one or more systems of the washing machine 10 for processing and storing information from the sensors. Such sensors are known in the art and are not shown for simplicity.
  • sensors that may be communicably coupled with the controller 96 include a motor torque sensor 104, which may be used to determine a variety of system and laundry characteristics, such as laundry load inertia or mass, and a motor speed sensor 108 for determining a speed output indicative of the rotational speed of the motor 88.
  • the motor speed sensor 108 may be a separate component, or may be integrated directly into the motor 88. Regardless of the type of speed sensor employed, or the coupling of the drum 16 with the motor 88, the speed sensor 108 may be adapted to enable the controller 96 to determine the rotational speed of the drum 16 from the rotational speed of the motor 88.
  • the motor torque sensor 104 may include a motor controller or similar data output transducer (not shown) on the motor 88 that may provide data communication with the motor 88 and provide analog or digital motor characteristic signals, such as oscillations, to the controller 96 that may be indicative of an applied torque.
  • the controller 96 may use the motor characteristics data to determine the torque developed by the motor 88 using an algorithm that may be stored in the controller memory 100.
  • the motor torque sensor 104 may be any suitable sensor, such as a voltage or current sensor, for outputting a current or voltage signal indicative of the current or voltage supplied to the motor 88 and enabling a determination of the torque applied by the motor 88. Additionally, the motor torque sensor 104 may be a separate sensor or may be integrated with the motor 88. For example, motor characteristics, such as speed, current, voltage, rotation direction, torque etc., may be processed such that the data may provide information in the same manner as a separate torque sensor. Contemporary motors often have a dedicated controller that outputs data for such information.
  • One or more load amount, or mass, sensors 106 may be included in the washing machine 10 and may be positioned in any suitable location for providing a mass output indicative of the mass of the rotating drum and laundry within the treating chamber 18.
  • the amount of laundry in the treating chamber may be determined based on the weight of the laundry and/or the volume of laundry in the treating chamber 18.
  • the load amount sensors 106 may output a signal indicative of either the weight of the laundry load in the treating chamber 18 or the volume of the laundry load in the treating chamber 18.
  • the load amount sensors 106 may be any suitable type of sensor capable of measuring the weight or volume of laundry in the treating chamber 18. Non-limiting examples may include load volume, pressure, or force transducers, which may include, for example, load cells and strain gauges.
  • the load amount sensors 106 may be operably coupled with the suspension system 28 to sense the weight borne by the suspension system 28. The weight borne by the suspension system 28 may correlate to the weight of the laundry loaded into the treating chamber 18 such that the load amount sensor 106 may indicate the weight of the laundry loaded in the treating chamber 18.
  • an IR or optical based sensor may be employed to determine the volume of laundry in the treating chamber 18.
  • the washing machine 10 may have one or more pairs of feet extending from the cabinet 12 and supporting the cabinet 12 on the floor, and a weight sensor (not shown) may be operably coupled to at least one of the feet to sense the weight borne by the at least one foot, which may correlate to the weight of the laundry loaded into the treating chamber 18.
  • a weight sensor (not shown) may be operably coupled to at least one of the feet to sense the weight borne by the at least one foot, which may correlate to the weight of the laundry loaded into the treating chamber 18.
  • the amount of laundry within the treating chamber 18 may be determined based on a motor sensor output, such as output from a motor torque sensor 104.
  • the motor torque may be a function of the inertia of the rotating drum and laundry load. Generally, the greater the inertia of the rotating drum and laundry, the greater the motor torque.
  • the described embodiment may, during an operational cycle of the washing machine 10, control the acceleration and/or rotational speed of the motor 88, determine a mass value for the rotating drum and laundry, calculate a force value indicative of a force acting on the drum 16 based on the determined mass value and the rotational speed, compare the calculated force value with a reference force value, and control and ultimately terminate acceleration when the determined force value satisfies a predetermined relationship with the reference force value.
  • Extraction may begin by accelerating the drum and laundry items toward a satellizing speed.
  • a reference force value that is indicative of a not-to-exceed force acting on the drum may be previously determined and stored in the memory 100.
  • a mass value indicative of the mass of the drum and laundry items may be determined.
  • the mass value may be determined from an inertia value for the rotating drum and laundry load, or from other known methods.
  • the inertia value may be determined during acceleration from changes in motor torque or motor power.
  • the rotational speed may be determined.
  • a force value indicative of a force acting on the drum may be calculated based on the determined mass value and the rotational speed.
  • the rotational speed may be determined by utilizing a known speed transducer or by other known methods. Thus, at preselected time intervals, a mass value, an inertia value, and a rotational speed may be determined.
  • the calculated force value may be compared to the reference force value. If the calculated force value is less than the reference force value, acceleration of the drum and laundry items may continue. At a preselected time interval, a mass value and an inertia value may again be determined, along with the rotational speed. Another force value may be calculated and compared to the reference force value. If the calculated force value is less than the reference force value, acceleration may continue. Thus, as long as the reference force value is not reached, the rotational speed of the drum and the laundry items may be steadily increased, thereby steadily increasing the rate of extraction of the liquid from the laundry items.
  • the rotational speed may either be maintained at a constant value, or reduced until the calculated force value is less than or equal to the reference force value and the rotational speed may then be maintained at the constant value, i.e. the optimal extraction speed.
  • Extraction may continue at the optimal extraction speed, the mass value, inertia value, and rotational speed may be determined, and force values may be calculated and compared to the reference force value.
  • the mass value and inertia value may decrease, which may be reflected in a decrease in the calculated force value below the reference force value.
  • the decrease in the calculated force value may enable an increase in the extraction speed, thereby increasing the rate of extraction.
  • This continued increase in speed, determination of decreased mass value and inertia value, calculation of the decreased force value and comparison with the reference force value, and speed adjustment may optimize the rate of extraction and enable a shorter extraction period.
  • the exemplary embodiment of the invention may enable the inertia of the laundry load to be determined during an acceleration phase that proceeds without the interposition of a constant speed phase. This may be accomplished by applying a periodic signal to an otherwise linear speed profile. It has been observed that the inertia of the laundry load may be determined by applying a periodic torque signal to the speed profile in such a manner as to split the periodic signal into two 1 ⁇ 2-period portions to enable the inertia of the laundry load to be solved by cancelling out damping and friction forces.
  • the values for parameters used herein need not be a direct determination or calculation of the corresponding value. While it may be possible to actually calculate the values, in most cases it may not be necessary to do so.
  • an output, such as a voltage signal or the like, of a suitable sensor for a system parameter, such as inertia, torque, etc. can be used and compared to a reference value for the output for the parameter, which negates the need to go to the trouble to make a final determination.
  • the values used in here include both absolute values or a referential value, which may serve to indicate a value without providing an absolute determination or calculation of the value, and the values may be a direct or indirect indicator of the parameter, such as torque under certain circumstances is an indicator of the inertia.
  • FIG 3 illustrates a periodic torque profile/signal 70 superimposed over a constant acceleration phase 72 of a speed profile 68.
  • the periodic torque profile 70 may enable the inertia of the drum 16 and laundry load to be determined for each individual torque signal period 78 during the acceleration phase 72.
  • the periodic torque profile 70 may have a constant period 132, and may comprise a plurality of periods.
  • the torque from the motor 88 may be configured to periodically increase and decrease by communicating with the motor torque sensor 104 and/or the controller 96.
  • the resulting torque profile 70 may be in the form of a periodic trace, such as saw-toothed as illustrated, sinusoidal, or otherwise configured to enable the data analysis described hereinafter.
  • the periodic torque profile 70 may be applied to the acceleration phase 72 by reference to a function or lookup table stored in the memory 100 in the controller 96.
  • the speed profile 68 may include the acceleration phase 72 and an extraction phase 84.
  • the acceleration phase 72 may be linear, i.e. the rotational speed of the drum 16 and laundry load may increase linearly, thus the acceleration may be constant and continuous, although as discussed above it may also periodically vary somewhat.
  • the acceleration phase 72 may be adapted to increase the rotational speed from zero up to an extraction speed, ES, 84 somewhat greater than a satellizing speed, SS, 82.
  • the term "satellizing speed” refers to a drum rotational speed at which the laundry load satellizes, which may be higher than the speed at which satellizing first occurs.
  • the periodic torque signal 70 may be generated in different ways.
  • a laundry load imbalance in the treating chamber 18 may induce a periodic torque or speed signal during the rotation of the drum 16.
  • the torque or speed signal may be conditioned to have a periodic component. Since power is proportional to torque and may be determined based on torque, torque may conversely be determined based on power consumed by the motor 88.
  • the motor torque sensor 104 outputting a signal indicative of the torque of the motor 88 may effectively operate as a power sensor for generating a power signal indicative of the power provided to the motor 88.
  • This may be accomplished by the motor controller generating a periodic waveform as the basis for the acceleration phase 72.
  • the periodic waveform having a selected frequency, e.g. less than 2 Hz, may be superimposed on the acceleration phase 72 of the speed profile 68.
  • the waveform may include a plurality of equal periods 78.
  • Each period 78 may be bisected into a first half period 74 corresponding to an increasing trace of the periodic waveform, representing a positive torque, and a second half period 76 corresponding to a decreasing trace of the periodic waveform, representing a negative torque.
  • the first half period 74 and the second half period 76 may be alternately symmetrical with respect to the acceleration phase 72.
  • the amplitude of the periodic torque signal 70 in Figure 3 is exaggerated for clarification.
  • the amplitude of each half period 74, 76 may be limited to a small value to minimize the duration of any speed plateaus and optimize the time to reach the extraction speed 84.
  • the torque associated with the first half period 74 may be greater than the torque associated with the second half period 76 due to the alternating nature of the torque profile 70. As illustrated in Figure 3 , torque may increase during the first half period 74 and decrease or remain constant during the second half period 76. From this, the inertia may be determined.
  • Both ⁇ 74 and ⁇ 76 may be determined by output from the motor torque sensor 104 and/or the controller 96.
  • Acceleration, ⁇ may be a known value, such as a preselected constant acceleration controlled by the controller 96, or may be determined by a suitable sensor. Therefore, an inertia value may be determined for each single period 78 of the torque profile 70 as the acceleration phase 72 continues. A sequence of inertia values may be readily developed and stored in the memory 100 while acceleration progresses uninterrupted.
  • a mass value indicative of the mass of the rotating drum 16 and laundry load may be determined.
  • the mass value may be determined as an equivalent of an inertia value, which as described above may be determined from a change in torque.
  • Rotation of the drum 16 and a laundry load contained therein may create a force on the motor drive shaft 90, and/or a hoop force on the drum 16, that exceeds a maximum design force value.
  • the motor drive shaft force and the hoop force may be determined as a combined value, or individually.
  • the design limits for the drive shaft force and the hoop force may be established for a selected washer.
  • the determined drive shaft and hoop forces may be compared to the design limits for the drive shaft and hoop forces, respectively.
  • the determined value for the combined motor drive shaft force and hoop force may be compared to a design limit for the combined drive shaft force and hoop force.
  • at least one of inertia and rotational speed may be controlled to maintain the drive shaft force and hoop force below a predetermined value corresponding to the maximum design force for the drum 16. Rotational speed may be more readily controlled than inertia.
  • Figure 4 is a graphical representation of a speed profile 124 illustrating an interrelationship between speed and torque over time.
  • Speed may be increased linearly during a first acceleration phase 126 and a second acceleration phase 130, as described previously herein.
  • the torque may decrease as moisture is extracted. If the acceleration phases 126, 130 are interrupted by a constant speed plateau 128, it may be noted that torque will continue to decrease during the speed plateau, although at a reduced rate.
  • Inertia values may be determined, i.e. updated, for selected speed or time intervals pursuant to equation (4); for example, time intervals 140-142, 142-144, 144-146, 152-154, 154-156A, and so on. Inertia values may also be determined for a time interval 148-150, if a speed plateau is included.
  • speed plateaus may be omitted so that the acceleration may be constant up to a selected extraction speed, which for this description may be a function of the design limits of the drum.
  • Figure 4 illustrates such a condition, in which the first acceleration phase 126 may continue unchanged beyond the time interval point 148 to the selected extraction speed 134 corresponding with a time interval point 156B.
  • the constant acceleration to the selected extraction speed 134 may include small-amplitude oscillations superimposed on the constant acceleration.
  • Figure 4 illustrates that maintaining a linear speed profile may shorten the drying time by a time differential 138 as compared with the profile including the speed plateau 128.
  • the drum 16 may be controlled to rotate at or below a design maximum speed 136 corresponding to design limits for the drive shaft force and hoop force.
  • the selected extraction speed 134 may be set at a value somewhat less than the design maximum speed 136.
  • the design maximum speed 136 may include a buffer, to which the drum may be accelerated. In those cases in which a buffer is not included, a buffer may be selected, which is represented by the extraction speed 134. Additionally, the speed 134 may be selected based on the type of laundry. For example, certain fabrics may wrinkle more readily than others when subjected to high centrifugal forces. Thus, it may be desirable to set the speed 134 to avoid such wrinkling and the like.
  • acceleration may be discontinued so that extraction may continue at the selected extraction speed 134.
  • the torque may continue to decrease in an asymptotic manner, as illustrated in Figure 4 .
  • the inertia may similarly decrease and approach an asymptote 169.
  • FIG. 5 illustrates an idealized asymptotic inertia decay curve 110.
  • this exemplary asymptotic decay in inertia may be continuously monitored as the decay curve 110 approaches the asymptote 169, until the inertia reaches an asymptotic reference value 164 representing an optimal extraction time 166 and residual moisture content (RMC).
  • RMC residual moisture content
  • the load spins at a high speed, liquid may be extracted from the laundry load. Initially, when the moisture content is high, the rate of liquid extraction may be large. As a result of this large liquid extraction, the inertia may drop substantially. However, as time passes at a high spin speed, less liquid may be extracted over a given period of time. As a result, the change in inertia may tend toward the reference value. Therefore, by monitoring the change in calculated inertia, the optimal time to stop spinning may be identified.
  • the high-speed portion of the spin cycle illustrated in Figure 4 i.e. the selected extraction speed plateau 134, may be reflected in the continuing decrease in torque and inertia.
  • the rotational speed of the drum 16 and laundry load may also tend to decrease, dropping further below the design maximum speed 136. Consequently, the drum 16 and laundry load may be accelerated to a first increased speed 158 greater than the selected extraction speed 134.
  • torque and inertia may again tend to decrease, in response to which the speed may be accelerated to a second increased speed 160.
  • This increase in speed following a decrease in torque and inertia may continue until a final increased speed 162 may be reached.
  • the asymptotic torque reference value 164 may be reached, corresponding to an optimal extraction time 168, at which point 166, the extraction may be terminated.
  • While the increase in speed from the time interval point 156A to the time interval point 168 is illustrated as preselected sequential steps, it need not be. It is just as likely that the increase in speed may be continuous, as exemplified by profile portion 126A. The speed may also asymptotically increase in response to the asymptotic decrease of the inertia, i.e. inertia decreases and speed consequently increases, as exemplified by profile portion 126B. Regardless of the manner in which the speed continues, both profile portions 126A, 126B may reach the design maximum speed 136. In such a case, the controller 96 may be programmed to immediately terminate the operation cycle, reduce the speed to a value less than the design maximum speed 136, reduce the speed to the selected extraction speed 134, transmit an error or warning signal, and the like.
  • FIG. 6 a flow chart of a method for maximizing the rotational speed of the drum 16 in the washing machine 10 during extraction by continuously monitoring the inertia is illustrated.
  • the sequence of steps depicted for this method is for illustrative purposes only, and is not meant to limit the method in any way as it may be understood that the steps may proceed in a different order, or additional or intervening steps may be included, without detracting from the invention.
  • the method of Figure 6 begins with the step 36 of determining a maximum force condition of the drum 16 as a function of 1) the mass of the drum and laundry load, and 2) a drum rotational speed.
  • the maximum force condition may be determined for both the motor drive shaft 90 and hoop stress individually, or in combination.
  • a maximum drum rotational speed that is greater than a satellizing speed may be set in step 38.
  • the drum 16 and laundry load may be accelerated in step 40 toward a final speed greater than a satellizing speed for the washer 10.
  • a preselected interval which may be an interval of time, speed, or the like, the rotational speed of the drum 16 may be determined in step 42.
  • the torque may be determined at the preselected interval in step 44.
  • the difference in value of the torque at the immediately previous interval and at the preselected interval may be determined in step 46, and utilized to determine an inertia value at step 48.
  • a mass value indicative of the mass of the rotating drum 16 and laundry load at the preselected interval may be determined at step 50.
  • a force value indicative of a force acting on the drum 16 may be calculated based on the determined mass value and the current rotational speed at the preselected interval at step 52.
  • the force value may be a calculated force, or may be represented by an inertia value, a change in torque, or the value directly correlated with a force acting on the drum at the preselected interval.
  • the force value may be compared with a reference force value at step 54.
  • the reference force value may be indicative of the maximum force condition, or a threshold force value less than the maximum force condition. If the force value exceeds the reference force value, the cycle may be terminated in step 58. If the force value does not exceed the reference force value, the maximum rotational speed may be reset based upon the mass value and the determined rotational speed in step 56, and the method may be repeated beginning with step 40.
  • the washer 10 may identify whether the inertia has decreased to a level that may enable the drum speed to be safely increased.
  • the drum 16 and laundry load may always be spinning at a maximum safe spin speed, thereby extracting liquid from a laundry load in a minimum time.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Textile Engineering (AREA)
  • Control Of Washing Machine And Dryer (AREA)
EP12197541.1A 2011-12-22 2012-12-17 Procédé permettant de maximiser la vitesse de rotation de tambour par la surveillance continue d'inertie lors de l'extraction Not-in-force EP2607542B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201161578925P 2011-12-22 2011-12-22
US13/633,200 US20130160221A1 (en) 2011-12-22 2012-10-02 Method for maximizing drum rotational speed by continuously monitoring inertia during extraction

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2607542A2 true EP2607542A2 (fr) 2013-06-26
EP2607542A3 EP2607542A3 (fr) 2015-06-10
EP2607542B1 EP2607542B1 (fr) 2016-05-18

Family

ID=47678491

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP12197541.1A Not-in-force EP2607542B1 (fr) 2011-12-22 2012-12-17 Procédé permettant de maximiser la vitesse de rotation de tambour par la surveillance continue d'inertie lors de l'extraction

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US20130160221A1 (fr)
EP (1) EP2607542B1 (fr)
PL (1) PL2607542T3 (fr)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20140082959A1 (en) * 2012-09-24 2014-03-27 Lg Electronics Inc. Method for controlling laundry treating appratus
EP2952620A1 (fr) * 2014-06-02 2015-12-09 Miele & Cie. KG Procédé de fonctionnement d'une centrifugeuse et centrifugeuse

Families Citing this family (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9518351B2 (en) 2013-11-13 2016-12-13 Haier Us Appliance Solutions, Inc. Washing machine appliance
US9890492B2 (en) * 2015-03-24 2018-02-13 Whirlpool Corporation Method of determining inertia in a laundry treating appliance
US9988751B2 (en) 2015-07-29 2018-06-05 Whirlpool Corporation Laundry treating appliance and methods of reducing tub contact therein
CN104963164B (zh) * 2015-07-31 2017-05-10 广东威灵电机制造有限公司 滚筒洗衣机及其控制方法和装置
US10273621B2 (en) 2015-10-01 2019-04-30 Whirlpool Corporation Laundry treating appliance and methods of operation
US9885135B2 (en) 2015-11-19 2018-02-06 Whirlpool Corporation Laundry treating appliance and methods of operation
US9863080B2 (en) 2015-11-19 2018-01-09 Whirlpool Corporation Laundry treating appliance and methods of operation
US9890490B2 (en) * 2015-11-19 2018-02-13 Whirlpool Corporation Laundry treating appliance and methods of operation
US9873968B2 (en) 2015-11-19 2018-01-23 Whirlpool Corporation Laundry treating appliance and methods of operation
US9988753B2 (en) 2015-11-19 2018-06-05 Whirlpool Corporation Laundry treating appliance and methods of operation
US10041202B2 (en) 2015-11-19 2018-08-07 Whirlpool Corporation Laundry treating appliance and methods of operation
CN108755009B (zh) * 2018-06-14 2021-02-23 广东威灵电机制造有限公司 衣物处理装置的运行控制方法、系统、装置及存储介质
WO2020071739A1 (fr) * 2018-10-02 2020-04-09 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Lave-linge

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE4038178C2 (de) * 1990-11-30 1994-07-28 Telefunken Microelectron Verfahren zur Unwuchtmessung einer beladenen Wäschetrommel beim Schleudervorgang einer Waschmaschine
DE4431846C2 (de) * 1994-09-07 2001-02-15 Diehl Ako Stiftung Gmbh & Co Verfahren zum beladungsabhängigen Steuern und/oder Regeln einer Waschmaschine oder eines Wäschetrockners
EP1342826A1 (fr) * 2002-03-04 2003-09-10 Primus N.V. Système pour le contrôle du balourd dans des machines à linge
DE10305675B3 (de) * 2003-02-12 2004-05-27 Diehl Ako Stiftung & Co. Kg Verfahren zum Bestimmen der Trommel einer Wäschebehandlungsmaschine
US7591038B2 (en) * 2003-04-28 2009-09-22 Emerson Electric Co., Method and system for operating a clothes washing machine
EP1738013B1 (fr) * 2004-03-01 2012-01-11 Arçelik Anonim Sirketi Procede de detection de charge

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
None

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20140082959A1 (en) * 2012-09-24 2014-03-27 Lg Electronics Inc. Method for controlling laundry treating appratus
US9127388B2 (en) * 2012-09-24 2015-09-08 Lg Electronics Inc. Method for controlling laundry treating apparatus
EP2952620A1 (fr) * 2014-06-02 2015-12-09 Miele & Cie. KG Procédé de fonctionnement d'une centrifugeuse et centrifugeuse

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP2607542A3 (fr) 2015-06-10
US20130160221A1 (en) 2013-06-27
EP2607542B1 (fr) 2016-05-18
PL2607542T3 (pl) 2016-09-30

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2607542B1 (fr) Procédé permettant de maximiser la vitesse de rotation de tambour par la surveillance continue d'inertie lors de l'extraction
US9890489B2 (en) Laundry treating appliance and method using inertia detection to control liquid extraction
EP2607543B1 (fr) Procédé permettant de déterminer une force d'inertie d'un chargement de linge dans un appareil de traitement de linge
US8186227B2 (en) Method and apparatus for determining load amount in a laundry treating appliance
KR100663144B1 (ko) 세탁기의 세탁조 불균형을 검출하기 위한 방법 및 장치
US9080277B2 (en) Apparatus and method for determining inertia of a laundry load
US9587342B2 (en) Method for detecting satellization speed of clothes load in a horizontal axis laundry treating appliance
EP2684990B1 (fr) Appareil de traitement de linge et procédé de fonctionnement
US11739466B2 (en) Laundry treating appliance and methods of operation
US8819880B2 (en) Efficient energy usage for a laundry appliance
EP2463433A2 (fr) Procédé et appareil de redistribution d'un déséquilibre dans un appareil de traitement du linge
EP2377982B1 (fr) Procédé pour déterminer une condition déséquilibrée dans un appareil de traitement du linge et appareil de traitement du linge
US9890492B2 (en) Method of determining inertia in a laundry treating appliance
US10501880B2 (en) Laundry treating appliance and method of operation
EP2684991B1 (fr) Procédé de fonctionnement d'un appareil de traitement de linge

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: D06F 33/02 20060101ALI20150505BHEP

Ipc: D06F 37/20 20060101ALI20150505BHEP

Ipc: D06F 39/00 20060101AFI20150505BHEP

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20151210

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20160224

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 800573

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20160615

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602012018480

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20160518

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160518

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160518

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160518

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160818

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 5

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 800573

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20160518

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160518

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160518

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160518

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160919

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160518

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160518

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160819

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Payment date: 20160929

Year of fee payment: 5

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160518

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160518

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160518

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160518

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160518

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20161111

Year of fee payment: 5

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20161213

Year of fee payment: 5

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20161214

Year of fee payment: 5

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602012018480

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160518

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160518

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160518

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20161221

Year of fee payment: 5

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20170221

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160518

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160518

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20161217

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20161231

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20161231

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20161217

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160518

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20121217

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160518

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160518

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160518

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602012018480

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160518

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20171217

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20161217

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20180831

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171217

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20160518

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180703

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180102

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171217

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171217