EP2458563B1 - Ferndiagnose von Fahrzeugen - Google Patents

Ferndiagnose von Fahrzeugen Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2458563B1
EP2458563B1 EP11188159.5A EP11188159A EP2458563B1 EP 2458563 B1 EP2458563 B1 EP 2458563B1 EP 11188159 A EP11188159 A EP 11188159A EP 2458563 B1 EP2458563 B1 EP 2458563B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
diagnosis
vehicle
command
central processor
processor resource
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP11188159.5A
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2458563A3 (de
EP2458563A2 (de
Inventor
Joakim Drott
Ulla Salonen
Erik BRÅKENHIELM
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Scania CV AB
Original Assignee
Scania CV AB
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Scania CV AB filed Critical Scania CV AB
Publication of EP2458563A2 publication Critical patent/EP2458563A2/de
Publication of EP2458563A3 publication Critical patent/EP2458563A3/de
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2458563B1 publication Critical patent/EP2458563B1/de
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07C—TIME OR ATTENDANCE REGISTERS; REGISTERING OR INDICATING THE WORKING OF MACHINES; GENERATING RANDOM NUMBERS; VOTING OR LOTTERY APPARATUS; ARRANGEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS FOR CHECKING NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
    • G07C5/00—Registering or indicating the working of vehicles
    • G07C5/08—Registering or indicating performance data other than driving, working, idle, or waiting time, with or without registering driving, working, idle or waiting time
    • G07C5/0808—Diagnosing performance data
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07C—TIME OR ATTENDANCE REGISTERS; REGISTERING OR INDICATING THE WORKING OF MACHINES; GENERATING RANDOM NUMBERS; VOTING OR LOTTERY APPARATUS; ARRANGEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS FOR CHECKING NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
    • G07C5/00—Registering or indicating the working of vehicles
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07C—TIME OR ATTENDANCE REGISTERS; REGISTERING OR INDICATING THE WORKING OF MACHINES; GENERATING RANDOM NUMBERS; VOTING OR LOTTERY APPARATUS; ARRANGEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS FOR CHECKING NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
    • G07C5/00—Registering or indicating the working of vehicles
    • G07C5/008—Registering or indicating the working of vehicles communicating information to a remotely located station

Definitions

  • the present invention relates generally to solutions for fault diagnosis of vehicles.
  • the invention relates to a system for diagnosis of vehicle, comprising a central processor resource configured to communicate wirelessly with at least one vehicle, and a local module located in the respective vehicle and configured to receive diagnosis commands from the central processor resource, to cause execution of said diagnosis commands concerning at least one unit connected to a network in the vehicle, leading to at least one command response, and to return said at least one command response to the central processor resource.
  • the invention also relates to a method, a computer programme and a computer-readable medium corresponding to this system.
  • the object of the present invention is therefore to propose a solution which solves the above problems and therefore makes safe remote diagnosis of motor vehicles possible both as regards control of their programmable units and as regards the data integrity of those units.
  • the object is achieved by the system described in the introduction whereby the central processor resource includes a superordinate diagnosis unit adapted to generating diagnosis commands in the form of control instructions.
  • the local module is itself adapted to exclusively executing diagnosis commands in response to said control instructions from the central processor resource.
  • This system is advantageous in that the vehicle can thus only be remote-diagnosed from an authorised central processor resource. At the same time, it is of course also possible at a workshop to connect diagnosis equipment directly to the vehicle's internal network in order to conduct a conventional diagnosis.
  • the local module is adapted, before executing a diagnosis command, to checking whether it is associated with one or more conditions relating to operating the vehicle, e.g. the brakes not being activated.
  • the local module is adapted to only executing diagnosis commands if all of the associated operation-related conditions are fulfilled. This reduces the risk that the proposed remote diagnosis might put at risk, or interfere with, important vehicle functions during operation of the vehicle.
  • the local module is also configured to monitor, while executing a diagnosis command, any conditions associated with it. If at least one of said associated conditions is found not to be fulfilled while it is executing the diagnosis command, the local module is configured to cease executing it. The risk of interference with important vehicle functions can thus be further reduced.
  • the local module is configured to resume execution of the diagnosis command if, after a cessation, all of the conditions associated with it are again found to be fulfilled.
  • the risk of potential interference with important vehicle functions can thus be minimised while at the same time making a remote diagnosis take relatively little time.
  • a set of parameters for the conditions relating to operation of the vehicle is supposed to be defined by the superordinate diagnosis unit. This means that the complexity of the local module can be kept low and the superordinate diagnosis unit can dynamically indicate which magnitudes have to be tested for a certain condition and within what limit values the respective condition is regarded as fulfilled.
  • the superordinate diagnosis unit is configured to issue diagnosis commands iteratively by generating a first diagnosis command, receiving at least one command response thereto and generating on the basis thereof at least a second diagnosis command, and so on.
  • a typical diagnosis situation does in fact entail repeated questions before a proper diagnosis can be arrived at. To this end, it is normal to determine a suitable follow-up question to at least one previous diagnosis command.
  • the local module comprises local software adapted to controlling the local module's interaction with the vehicle's internal network and with the superordinate diagnosis unit.
  • the local software is also configured to be updatable from the central processor resource. This means that the whole diagnosis process can be adjusted and controlled very effectively from the central processor resource.
  • the object is achieved by the method described in the introduction whereby the central processor resource is supposed to include a superordinate diagnosis unit adapted to generating diagnosis commands in the form of control instructions.
  • the method comprises execution of diagnosis commands in the vehicle exclusively in response to control instructions from the central processor resource.
  • the object is achieved by a computer programme which can be directly downloaded to the internal memory of a computer and comprises software for controlling the steps according to the method proposed above when said programme is run on a computer.
  • the object is achieved by a computer-readable medium which has stored on it a programme adapted to enabling a computer to control the steps according to the method proposed above.
  • the system comprises a central processor resource 100 and at least one vehicle 180.
  • the central processor resource 100 is configured to communicate wirelessly with a designated vehicle 180 via at least one network, such as Internet and a mobile communication network 160 (e.g. represented by a WLAN, GSM network or 3G network).
  • the central processor resource 100 includes a superordinate diagnosis unit 110 adapted to generating diagnosis commands DC in the form of control instructions CI.
  • diagnostic information may for example comprise information about fault codes from control units (e.g. ECUs) of the vehicle 180, statistics about how the vehicle 180 has been used during a historical period, and current and historical values for sensors and actuators in the vehicle's electrical system.
  • control units e.g. ECUs
  • control units in the vehicle 180 contain many different types of information (in varying formats), the commands needed for controlling different control units (and versions of them) generally differ considerably from one another.
  • a relatively advanced logic and knowledge database is therefore required to be able to decide on the basis of the configuration of a given vehicle 180 what are appropriate diagnosis commands DC/control instructions CI for it.
  • this functionality is located in the central processor resource 100.
  • each vehicle 180 is equipped with a local module 182.
  • the local module 182 is adapted to exclusively executing diagnosis commands DC in the form of control instructions CI from the central processor resource 100. Assurance is thus provided that only authorised control means have access to a network 184 in the vehicle 180 and to the units connected thereto, here exemplified by the unit marked 186.
  • the local module 182 causes execution of at least one diagnosis command DC concerning at least one unit 186 which is connected to the internal network 184 of the vehicle 180. Said at least one diagnosis command DC itself results in at least one command response R which is returned to the central processor resource 100 via the local module 182 and the network/networks 150, 160.
  • the superordinate diagnosis unit 110 is with advantage configured to issue diagnosis commands DC iteratively depending on the results arising from the questions posed/diagnosis commands DC issued. This means that a first diagnosis command DC is produced and at least one first command response R is received. On the basis of said at least one first command response R, the superordinate diagnosis unit 110 then issues at least a second diagnosis command DC which results in at least one second command response R, and so on.
  • Producing a diagnosis command DC may involve substantial parts of the resources of a control unit. If a diagnosis procedure is conducted during operation of the vehicle 180, there is therefore risk that the procedure might put at risk, or at least interfere with, important vehicle functions. According to an embodiment of the invention, a given diagnosis command DC may therefore be associated with one or more conditions relating to operation of the vehicle 180. Examples of such conditions are the brakes not being activated, the vehicle's speed being below a certain value and a power take-off not being activated. In this case the local module 182 only executes a diagnosis command DC if all of the operation-related conditions associated with it are fulfilled.
  • the local module 182 is adapted, before executing a diagnosis command DC, to checking whether it is associated with one or more conditions relating to operation of the vehicle 180, and to only executing it if all of the operation-related conditions associated with it are fulfilled.
  • the local module 182 is further configured to apply the procedure of monitoring, during execution of a diagnosis command DC, any conditions associated with it, and of ceasing to execute it if one or more of said associated conditions is found not to be fulfilled.
  • the local module 182 is with advantage configured to resume executing a diagnosis command DC as soon as all of the conditions associated with it are again found to be fulfilled. Depending on the amount of time its completion takes and whether said conditions are fulfilled and not fulfilled, the execution of a given diagnosis command may of course be halted and resumed more than once.
  • each condition relating to operation of the vehicle 180 for deciding whether execution of a diagnosis command DC is allowed is defined by one or more parameters, e.g. an indicated speed range, no activation of manually initiated braking, no activation of the power take-off of the vehicle 180 or a requirement for the steering wheel angle deflection to be within an indicated range.
  • the set of parameters which indicate respective conditions relating to operation of the vehicle 180 be defined by the superordinate diagnosis unit 110.
  • the local module 182 contains local software adapted to controlling its interaction with the network 184 in the vehicle 180 and with the superordinate diagnosis unit 110.
  • the local software is also configured to be updatable from the central processor resource 100 so that the diagnostic process can be controlled and adjusted effectively from the central processor resource.
  • the central processor resource 100 be configured to function in accordance with the instructions in central software which is executed in the processor resource 100. It is therefore advantageous if the central processor resource 100 includes, or is in some other way linked to, a memory module M containing software which, when executed in the central processor resource 100, causes the procedure described above to be applied.
  • a first step 210 checks whether a diagnosis command has been received in the local module of a vehicle. If such is the case, a step 220 follows, otherwise the procedure loops back and comes to a halt at step 210. Step 220 checks whether a diagnosis command received consists exclusively of control instructions from the central processor resource. If such is the case, a step 230 follows, otherwise the procedure loops back to step 210. Step 230 executes the diagnosis command defined by the control instructions, whereupon a corresponding command response is generated. A step 240 then returns the command response to the central processor resource, followed by the procedure looping back to step 210.
  • Figure 3 is a flowchart illustrating a preferred embodiment of the proposed method.
  • two initial steps 210 and 220 check whether a diagnosis command has been received and whether it is based solely on control instructions from the central processor resource. If such is the case, the next step 310 checks whether the diagnosis command received is associated with one or more conditions relating to operation of the vehicle. If it is found that the command is not associated with any such conditions, this finding is followed by the executing step and reporting step 230 and 240 respectively as above, after which the procedure loops back to step 210.
  • step 310 is followed by a step 320 which checks whether said condition/s is/are fulfilled. If one or more conditions are not fulfilled, the procedure loops back and comes to a halt at 320. Otherwise step 230 follows.
  • the method steps described with reference to Figures 2 and 3 may be controlled by means of programmed computer apparatus.
  • the invention extends to computer programmes, especially computer programmes on or in a carrier, suited to practically implementing the invention.
  • the programme may be in the form of source code, object code, a code intermediate between source and object code, e.g. in partly compiled form, or in any other form suitable for use in implementing the process according to the invention.
  • the carrier may be any entity or device capable of carrying the programme.
  • the carrier may comprise a storage medium such as a flash memory, an ROM (read only memory), e.g.
  • the carrier may also be a transmitting carrier such as an electrical or optical signal which can be conveyed by an electrical or optical cable or via radio or in some other way.
  • the carrier may take the form of such a cable, device or means.
  • the carrier may be an integrated circuit in which the programme is embedded and which is adapted to conducting, or to being used in conducting, the relevant processes.

Claims (9)

  1. System zur Diagnose von Fahrzeugen, umfassend
    eine Zentralprozessoreinrichtung (100), die zum drahtlosen Kommunizieren mit wenigstens einem Fahrzeug (180) eingerichtet ist, und
    ein lokales Modul (182), das in dem entsprechenden Fahrzeug (180) angeordnet und dazu eingerichtet ist
    Diagnosebefehle (DC) von der Zentralprozessoreinrichtung (100) zu empfangen,
    eine Ausführung der zumindest eine Einheit (186), die mit einem Netzwerk (184) in dem Fahrzeug (180) verbunden ist, betreffenden Diagnosebefehle (DC) zu veranlassen, was zu mindestens einer Befehlsantwort (R) führt, und
    die mindestens eine Befehlsantwort (R) an die Zentralprozessoreinrichtung (100) zurückzuliefern,
    wobei die Zentralprozessoreinrichtung (100) eine übergeordnete Diagnoseeinheit (110) enthält, welche Diagnosebefehle (DC) in Gestalt von Steueranweisungen (CI) zu erzeugen vermag, und das lokale Modul (182) dazu eingerichtet ist, Diagnosebefehle (DC) ausschließlich in Antwort auf die Steueranweisungen (CI) von der Zentralprozessoreinrichtung (100) auszuführen,
    wobei das lokale Modul (182) vor einem Ausführen eines Diagnosebefehls (DC) dazu eingerichtet ist zu überprüfen, ob er einer oder mehreren einen Betrieb des Fahrzeugs (180) betreffenden Bedingungen zugehörig ist, und ihn nur auszuführen, falls alle der ihm zugehörigen, einen Betrieb betreffenden Bedingungen erfüllt sind, wobei diese Bedingungen einen angegebenen Fahrzeuggeschwindigkeitsbereich und/oder keine Aktivierung eines manuell initiierten Bremsvorgangs und/oder keine Aktivierung des Nebenabtriebs des Fahrzeugs (180) und/oder eine Anforderung, dass der Lenkradeinschlag sich innerhalb eines angegebenen Bereichs befindet, umfassen,
    wobei das lokale Modul (182) ferner dazu eingerichtet ist
    beim Ausführen eines Diagnosebefehls (DC) jegliche ihm zugehörige Bedingungen zu überwachen, und
    ein Ausführen des Diagnosebefehls (DC) zu beenden, falls eine oder mehrere dieser zugehörigen Bedingungen als nicht erfüllt erkannt werden, und wobei das lokale Modul (182) ferner dazu eingerichtet ist,
    ein Ausführen des Diagnosebefehls wieder aufzunehmen, falls alle der ihm zugehörigen Bedingungen als wieder erfüllt erkannt werden.
  2. System nach Anspruch 1, wobei ein Parametersatz für die eine oder die mehreren einen Betrieb des Fahrzeugs (180) betreffenden Bedingungen durch die übergeordnete Diagnoseeinheit (110) festgelegt ist.
  3. System nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, wobei die übergeordnete Diagnoseeinheit (110) dazu eingerichtet ist, Diagnosebefehle (DC) iterativ auszugeben durch
    Empfangen mindestens einer Befehlsantwort (R) in Reaktion auf einen ersten Diagnosebefehl (DC), und basierend darauf
    Erzeugen wenigstens eines zweiten Diagnosebefehls (DC).
  4. System nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, wobei das lokale Modul (182) lokale Software enthält, die dazu eingerichtet ist, seine Interaktion mit dem Netzwerk (184) in dem Fahrzeug (180) und der übergeordneten Diagnoseeinheit (110) zu steuern, wobei die lokale Software dazu konfiguriert ist, von der Zentralprozessoreinrichtung (100) aktualisierbar zu sein.
  5. Verfahren zur Diagnose von Fahrzeugen (180), umfassend
    eine Drahtloskommunikation zwischen einer Zentralprozessoreinrichtung (100) und einem lokalen Modul (182) in dem Fahrzeug (180), wobei die Kommunikation sorgt für
    ein Empfangen zumindest eines Diagnosebefehls (DC) von der Zentralprozessoreinrichtung (100) in dem lokalen Modul (182) und ein Antworten darauf durch
    Ausführen des zumindest einen, wenigstens eine Einheit (186), die mit einem Netzwerk (184) in dem Fahrzeug (180) verbunden ist, betreffenden Diagnosebefehls (DC), was zu mindestens einer Befehlsantwort (R) führt, und
    Zurückliefern der mindestens einen Befehlsantwort (R) an die Zentralprozessoreinrichtung (100),
    wobei die Zentralprozessoreinrichtung (100) eine übergeordnete Diagnoseeinheit (110) enthält, die Diagnosebefehle (DC) in Gestalt von Steueranweisungen (CI) zu erzeugen vermag, und wobei das Verfahren umfasst
    Ausführen von Diagnosebefehlen (DC) in dem Fahrzeug (180) ausschließlich in Antwort auf die Steueranweisungen (CI) von der Zentralprozessoreinrichtung (100),
    Überprüfen, bevor ein Diagnosebefehl (DC) ausgeführt wird, ob er einer oder mehreren einen Betrieb des Fahrzeugs (180) betreffenden Bedingungen zugehörig ist, und
    Ausführen des Diagnosebefehls (DC) nur dann, falls alle der ihm zugehörigen, einen Betrieb betreffenden Bedingungen erfüllt sind, wobei die Bedingungen einen angegebenen Fahrzeuggeschwindigkeitsbereich und/oder keine Aktivierung eines manuell initiierten Bremsvorgangs und/oder keine Aktivierung des Nebenabtriebs des Fahrzeugs (180) und/oder eine Anforderung, dass der Lenkradeinschlag sich innerhalb eines angegebenen Bereichs befindet, umfassen,
    Überwachen, während einer Ausführung des Diagnosebefehls (DC), jeglicher ihm zugehöriger Bedingungen, Beenden des Ausführens des Diagnosebefehls (DC), falls eine oder mehrere dieser zugehörigen Bedingungen als nicht erfüllt erkannt werden, und
    Fortsetzen einer Ausführung des Diagnosebefehls (DC), falls alle der ihm zugehörigen Bedingungen als wieder erfüllt erkannt werden.
  6. Verfahren nach Anspruch 5, wobei ein Parametersatz für die eine oder die mehreren einen Betrieb des Fahrzeugs (180) betreffenden Bedingungen durch die übergeordnete Diagnoseeinheit (110) festgelegt wird.
  7. Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 5 bis 6, umfassend eine iterative Ausgabe von Diagnosebefehlen (DC) durch
    Empfangen mindestens einer Befehlsantwort (R) in der übergeordneten Diagnoseeinheit (110), und basierend darauf
    Erzeugen wenigstens eines weiteren Diagnosebefehls (DC).
  8. Computerprogramm, welches unmittelbar in dem internen Speicher (M) eines Computers heruntergeladen werden kann und Software enthält zum Steuern der Schritte nach einem der Ansprüche 5 bis 7, wenn das Programm auf dem Computer abläuft.
  9. Computerlesbares Medium (M), welches auf sich ein Programm gespeichert hat, das dazu eingerichtet ist, einen Computer dazu zu befähigen, die Schritte nach einem der Ansprüche 5 bis 7 zu steuern.
EP11188159.5A 2010-11-29 2011-11-08 Ferndiagnose von Fahrzeugen Active EP2458563B1 (de)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
SE1051247A SE535369C2 (sv) 2010-11-29 2010-11-29 Fjärrdiagnostisering av fordon

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2458563A2 EP2458563A2 (de) 2012-05-30
EP2458563A3 EP2458563A3 (de) 2014-09-17
EP2458563B1 true EP2458563B1 (de) 2020-02-12

Family

ID=45218229

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP11188159.5A Active EP2458563B1 (de) 2010-11-29 2011-11-08 Ferndiagnose von Fahrzeugen

Country Status (2)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2458563B1 (de)
SE (1) SE535369C2 (de)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11449327B2 (en) 2018-11-30 2022-09-20 Paccar Inc Error-resilient over-the-air software updates for vehicles
US11356425B2 (en) 2018-11-30 2022-06-07 Paccar Inc Techniques for improving security of encrypted vehicle software updates

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050154500A1 (en) * 2002-06-10 2005-07-14 Thomas Sonnenrein Method and device for emitting and/or receiving information relating to a vehicle
DE102004056434A1 (de) * 2004-11-23 2006-05-24 Daimlerchrysler Ag Diagnose- und Serviecesystem für ein Kraftfahrzeug
WO2006075533A1 (en) * 2005-01-11 2006-07-20 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Remote control method and system, vehicle with remote controllable function, and control server

Family Cites Families (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6429773B1 (en) * 2000-10-31 2002-08-06 Hewlett-Packard Company System for remotely communicating with a vehicle
US6701232B2 (en) * 2001-04-25 2004-03-02 Fuji Jukogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Vehicle management system
US6594579B1 (en) * 2001-08-06 2003-07-15 Networkcar Internet-based method for determining a vehicle's fuel efficiency
DE10145906A1 (de) * 2001-09-18 2003-04-10 Bosch Gmbh Robert Verfahren zur Durchfühung einer Ferndiagnose bei einem Kraftfahrzeug, Fahrzeugdiagnosemodul und Servicecenter
ITMI20040880A1 (it) 2004-05-03 2004-08-03 Iveco Spa Apparato e metodo di diagnostica veicolare a distanza
KR100801397B1 (ko) 2004-12-04 2008-02-05 주식회사 현대오토넷 텔레매틱스 시스템을 이용한 원격지 차량 진단 시스템 및그 제어방법
US9117319B2 (en) * 2005-06-30 2015-08-25 Innova Electronics, Inc. Handheld automotive diagnostic tool with VIN decoder and communication system
DE102006044896B3 (de) 2006-09-22 2008-04-10 GM Global Technology Operations, Inc., Detroit Manipulationsferndiagnosesystem für ein Fahrzeug
JP2008179314A (ja) 2007-01-26 2008-08-07 Denso Corp 車両診断システム
US7668643B2 (en) 2007-03-30 2010-02-23 O2Micro International Ltd. Method and system for automatically inspecting and registering automotive exhaust emission data
JP4451905B2 (ja) 2007-12-21 2010-04-14 本田技研工業株式会社 車両の遠隔診断システム
US20090177336A1 (en) * 2008-01-07 2009-07-09 Mcclellan Scott System and Method for Triggering Vehicle Functions
US8285439B2 (en) * 2009-04-07 2012-10-09 Ford Global Technologies, Llc System and method for performing vehicle diagnostics

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050154500A1 (en) * 2002-06-10 2005-07-14 Thomas Sonnenrein Method and device for emitting and/or receiving information relating to a vehicle
DE102004056434A1 (de) * 2004-11-23 2006-05-24 Daimlerchrysler Ag Diagnose- und Serviecesystem für ein Kraftfahrzeug
WO2006075533A1 (en) * 2005-01-11 2006-07-20 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Remote control method and system, vehicle with remote controllable function, and control server

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
SE1051247A1 (sv) 2012-05-30
SE535369C2 (sv) 2012-07-10
EP2458563A3 (de) 2014-09-17
EP2458563A2 (de) 2012-05-30

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8315760B2 (en) Method and system for retrieving diagnostic information
EP4049910A1 (de) Automatisches steuerungssystem, steuerverfahren und vorrichtung
CN105278994A (zh) 车载ecu软件的更新方法及更新系统
WO2007123602A1 (en) Configurable method and system for vehicle fault alert
KR102442296B1 (ko) IoT 기반 가변 재구성 유연 조립 시스템 및 생산 라인 재구성 방법
CN105703991B (zh) 局部互联网络系统和方法
CN103124938A (zh) 对可编程逻辑控制器的执行环境进行升级的方法、系统及程序
EP2764343B1 (de) Verfahren und vorrichtung zur problembehebung bei einer karosseriefunktion von fahrzeugen
US20150277891A1 (en) Electronic controller software coding system and method for vehicle control
EP2458563B1 (de) Ferndiagnose von Fahrzeugen
US20080307406A1 (en) Device and method for checking the current software installation in field devices in a distributed system, in particular an automation system
CN111723646A (zh) 一种远程辅助维护设备的方法和装置
CN115016428A (zh) 一种应用于特种车辆的立体化多级诊断系统及方法
JP2007248070A (ja) 車両走行試験装置
EP2458564B1 (de) Ferndiagnose von Fahrzeugen
CN106882162B (zh) 车辆维护装置及系统
CN115993811A (zh) 一种基于l4级智能驾驶算法的故障降级仿真测试方法
US20220207927A1 (en) Method and system for managing a maintenance task of a motor vehicle
CN114924750A (zh) 一种车载应用软件生成方法、装置、设备及存储介质
CN114237205A (zh) 车辆的故障诊断方法、装置、车辆及存储介质
CN113126589A (zh) 车载自诊断方法、车载智能系统及自诊断系统
Börger et al. SOTIF-a new challenge for functional testing
US20160011932A1 (en) Method for Monitoring Software in a Road Vehicle
US10809687B2 (en) Field device with self-recovery
KR102623351B1 (ko) 스마트 팩토리 시스템

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: G07C 5/00 20060101AFI20140812BHEP

Ipc: G07C 5/08 20060101ALI20140812BHEP

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20150317

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20151223

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20190911

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1233136

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20200215

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602011064903

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200512

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20200212

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200512

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200513

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200612

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200705

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602011064903

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 1233136

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20200212

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20201113

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20201108

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20201108

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20201130

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20201130

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20201130

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20201108

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20201130

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20201108

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200212

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20201130

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230518

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20230929

Year of fee payment: 13