EP2446985B1 - Iron-based mixed powder for powder metallurgy - Google Patents

Iron-based mixed powder for powder metallurgy Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2446985B1
EP2446985B1 EP10792237.9A EP10792237A EP2446985B1 EP 2446985 B1 EP2446985 B1 EP 2446985B1 EP 10792237 A EP10792237 A EP 10792237A EP 2446985 B1 EP2446985 B1 EP 2446985B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
iron
powder
oxide
based mixed
mass
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP10792237.9A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2446985A1 (en
EP2446985A4 (en
Inventor
Takashi Kawano
Tomoshige Ono
Yukiko Ozaki
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
JFE Steel Corp
Original Assignee
JFE Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by JFE Steel Corp filed Critical JFE Steel Corp
Publication of EP2446985A1 publication Critical patent/EP2446985A1/en
Publication of EP2446985A4 publication Critical patent/EP2446985A4/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2446985B1 publication Critical patent/EP2446985B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B22CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
    • B22FWORKING METALLIC POWDER; MANUFACTURE OF ARTICLES FROM METALLIC POWDER; MAKING METALLIC POWDER; APPARATUS OR DEVICES SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR METALLIC POWDER
    • B22F1/00Metallic powder; Treatment of metallic powder, e.g. to facilitate working or to improve properties
    • B22F1/10Metallic powder containing lubricating or binding agents; Metallic powder containing organic material
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B22CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
    • B22FWORKING METALLIC POWDER; MANUFACTURE OF ARTICLES FROM METALLIC POWDER; MAKING METALLIC POWDER; APPARATUS OR DEVICES SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR METALLIC POWDER
    • B22F1/00Metallic powder; Treatment of metallic powder, e.g. to facilitate working or to improve properties
    • B22F1/10Metallic powder containing lubricating or binding agents; Metallic powder containing organic material
    • B22F1/103Metallic powder containing lubricating or binding agents; Metallic powder containing organic material containing an organic binding agent comprising a mixture of, or obtained by reaction of, two or more components other than a solvent or a lubricating agent
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C1/00Making non-ferrous alloys
    • C22C1/10Alloys containing non-metals
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C33/00Making ferrous alloys
    • C22C33/02Making ferrous alloys by powder metallurgy
    • C22C33/0207Using a mixture of prealloyed powders or a master alloy
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C33/00Making ferrous alloys
    • C22C33/02Making ferrous alloys by powder metallurgy
    • C22C33/0207Using a mixture of prealloyed powders or a master alloy
    • C22C33/0228Using a mixture of prealloyed powders or a master alloy comprising other non-metallic compounds or more than 5% of graphite

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to an iron-based mixed powder suitable for use in powder metallurgy.
  • the present invention is intended to increase green density and is also intended to advantageously reduce the ejection force necessary to withdraw a green compact from a die after compaction.
  • source powders are mixed together; the mixture is transferred, is filled into a die, and is then pressed into a formed body (hereinafter referred to as a green compact); and the green compact is withdrawn from the die and is then subjected to a posttreatment such as sintering as required.
  • a posttreatment such as sintering
  • Patent Literature 1 discloses that the flowability of an iron-based mixed powder can be improved by adding a fullerene, which serves as a carbon supply component, thereto.
  • Patent Literature 2 discloses a technique for improving the flowability of a powder composition for metallurgy by adding a particulate inorganic oxide with an average particle size of less than 500 nm thereto.
  • a lubricant that has ductility and that is soft at a temperature at which an iron-based mixed powder is pressed. This is because the lubricant seeps out of the iron-based mixed powder during pressing to adhere to a surface of a die and therefore reduces the friction between the die and the green compact.
  • the lubricant has ductility and therefore is likely to adhere to particles of an iron powder and powder for an alloy. Hence, there is a problem in that the flowability and filling ability of an iron-based mixed powder are impaired.
  • the blending of the above carbon material, fine particles, and lubricant reduces the theoretical density (the density determined assuming that the voidage is zero) of the iron-based mixed powder to cause a reduction in green density; hence, it is not preferable to blend large amounts of these materials.
  • Patent Literature 3 discloses a technique in which a powder of iron oxide (such as mill scale) is added to a powder of finish-reduced iron to control a dimensional change of a sintered body.
  • a powder of iron oxide such as mill scale
  • Patent Literature 4 discloses a method for synthesizing micaceous iron oxide (MIO) known as a pigment for rust-proof paints for steel materials. According to the method disclosed in Patent Literature 4, primary particles of ⁇ - iron oxide that have a size of 1 ⁇ m to 100 ⁇ m and an aspect ratio of 5 to 30 are obtained.
  • MIO micaceous iron oxide
  • An iron powder used for generating a green compact is for instance known from JP 03064402 .
  • Said mixed powder consists of 45% to 65% of a metallic powder for sintering, and 35% to 55% of an organic binder. Furthermore, there may be added one of the several oxides.
  • the iron-based powder has a particle size below 10 ⁇ m.
  • An iron-based mixed powder having iron-based powder and oxide particles is likewise known from US 4 255 193 A .
  • the iron-based powder has an average particle size between 10 and 315 ⁇ m and the oxide particles having a size between 2 and 10 ⁇ m.
  • the average particle size in said document is the cumulative of one of 50% of the fraction volume.
  • US 5 507 853 A discloses an iron-based mixed powder with an iron-based powder, an oxide powder and a comparatively low amount of lubricant.
  • An powder containing iron-based powder and an oxide are also disclosed by US 5 766 304 .
  • JP 806256801 A discloses an iron steel powder, which may be fixed with an oxide particle.
  • the present invention has been developed in view of the aforementioned circumstances and has an object to suggest an iron-based mixed powder for powder metallurgy.
  • the iron-based mixed powder can accomplish both an increase in product quality and a reduction in production cost in such a way that the density of a green compact is increased by increasing the flowability of the iron-based mixed powder and ejection force is greatly reduced after compaction.
  • the inventors have investigated various additives for use in iron-based powders for the purpose of achieving the above object.
  • the inventors have found that the addition of an appropriate amount of oxide particles with an average size of 0.5 ⁇ m or more to an iron-based powder provides significantly improved flowability and also provides improved green density and ejection force.
  • the present invention is based on the above finding.
  • the present invention provides an iron-based mixed powder having the features defined in claim 1. Further preferred embodiments are defined in the dependent claims.
  • Oxide refers to an oxide forming the oxide particles.
  • Fig. 1 is a schematic view illustrating the aspect ratio of powder.
  • oxide particles are used as a component for improving the flowability of an iron-based powder. The reason is as described below.
  • Common iron-based mixed powders contain about 1% by mass of organic lubricants for the purpose of increasing the flowability of powder or decreasing the ejection force of green compacts.
  • the organic lubricants have a specific gravity of about 1.0 and are significantly lower in specific gravity than iron powders, which have a specific gravity of 7.8.
  • segregation occurs during mixing to cause a reduction in flowability or differences in properties between lots.
  • the oxide particles used herein are made of, for example, iron oxide (hematite)
  • the oxide particles have a specific gravity of 5.3 and are higher in specific gravity than the organic lubricants. Therefore, the oxide particles are less affected by the flow of air in a powder bed during fluidization as compared to the organic lubricants.
  • an organic lubricant is entirely or partially replaced with the oxide particles and therefore the segregation of various additives is prevented. This probably results in the improvement of the flowability of the iron-based mixed powder.
  • the oxide particles when the oxide particles have a large size, the oxide particles do not cover the surface of the iron-based powder unlike a flowability-improving powder, disclosed in Patent Literature 2, containing primary particles with a size on the order of nanometers but are probably filled in voids in the iron-based powder in a preferred manner.
  • a flowability-improving powder disclosed in Patent Literature 2
  • the effective contact area between a green compact and a die is increased and therefore the springback stress is distributed. This probably results in a reduction in ejection force.
  • the oxide particles need to have an average size of 0.5 ⁇ m or more.
  • the average size of the oxide particles is less than 0.5 ⁇ m, the effect of reducing ejection force cannot be sufficiently obtained.
  • the average size of the oxide particles is more than 100 ⁇ m, the oxide particles cannot be uniformly mixed with iron-based mixed powders (an average size of about 100 ⁇ m) usually used in powder metallurgy and therefore cannot exhibit the above effect.
  • the average size of the oxide particles is preferably 100 ⁇ m or less.
  • the average size of the oxide particles is more preferably 40 ⁇ m or less and further more preferably 20 ⁇ m or less.
  • the average size of the oxide particles is preferably determined by a method described in Example 1.
  • the oxide particles may contain about 20% by mass or less (the percentage with respect to the oxide particles) of an impurity other than the oxide. Those having lower impurity content (for example, 10% by mass or less or 2% by mass or less) are preferably used if the commercial availability thereof is not difficult.
  • the impurity is not particularly limited and any impurity (for example, a metal or another inorganic compound) contained in oxide particles produced by a known commercial process is not particularly problematic.
  • particles containing an oxide containing Fe 2 O 3 , Al 2 O 3 , and SiO 2 are not particularly limited in component or crystal structure.
  • the content of an oxide of at least one selected from the group consisting of iron, aluminum, and silicon in the oxide particles is preferably about 80% by mass or more (the percentage with respect to the oxide) and more preferably 98% or more in total.
  • a particulate oxide satisfying the above is preferably readily available at low cost.
  • an oxide of iron or an iron-based oxide containing an oxide of iron as a major component is particularly preferred.
  • commercially available examples of the iron-based oxide include those containing about 70% to 95% by mass (the percentage with respect to the oxide) of an oxide of iron and about 5% to 30% by mass of an oxide of Al and/or an oxide of Si in total.
  • Patent Literature 4 discloses a method for synthesizing ⁇ -iron oxide with an aspect ratio of 5 to 30.
  • this method requires heating and pressurizing for a long time in the course of synthesis, is irreversibly high in production cost, and also is not readily available.
  • the aspect ratio is preferably less than 5.
  • the aspect ratio refers to the ratio of the longitudinal to the thickness size of powder as shown in Fig. 1 .
  • the aspect ratio of the oxide particles is preferably determined by a method described in Example 1.
  • the content of the oxide particles in the iron-based mixed powder when the content of the oxide particles in the iron-based mixed powder is less than 0.01% by mass, the effect of adding the oxide particles is not obtained. However, when the content thereof is more than 5.0% by mass, an extreme increase in ejection force is caused, which is not preferred. Thus, the content of the oxide particles is 0.01% to 5.0% by mass.
  • the lower limit is preferably 0.05% by mass.
  • the upper limit is preferably 1.0% by mass.
  • the following powders are examples of the iron-based powder, which is a major component of the iron-based mixed powder: pure iron powders such as atomized iron powders and reduced iron powders, diffusion alloyed steel powders, prealloyed steel powders, and hybrid steel powders produced by diffusion alloy components in prealloyed steel powders.
  • the iron-based powder preferably has an average particle size of 1 ⁇ m or more and more preferably about 10 ⁇ m to 200 ⁇ m.
  • major component as used herein means that the content of the iron-based powder in the iron-based mixed powder is 50% by mass or more.
  • powder for an alloy examples include graphite powders; powders of metals such as Cu, Mo, and Ni; and metal compound powders. Other known powders for alloys also can be used.
  • the strength of a sintered body can be increased by mixing the iron-based powder with at least one of these powders for alloys.
  • the sum of the contents of these powders for alloys in the iron-based mixed powder is preferably about 0.1% to 10% by mass. This is because when the content of these powders for alloys is 0.1% by mass or more or more than 10% by mass, the strength of an obtained sintered body is advantageously increased or the dimensional accuracy of the sintered body is reduced, respectively.
  • the powder for an alloy is preferably in such a state (hereinafter referred to as an iron powder with alloy component adhered thereon) that the powder for an alloy is attached to the iron-based powder with an organic binder therebetween. This prevents the segregation of the powder for an alloy and allows components in powder to be uniformly distributed therein.
  • an aliphatic amide, a metallic soap, or the like is particularly advantageous and appropriate to the organic binder.
  • organic binders such as polyolefins, polyesters, (meth)acrylic polymers, and vinyl acetate polymers can be used. These organic binders may be used alone or in combination. In the case of using two or more the organic binders, at least a part of the organic binders may be used in the form of a composite melt.
  • the content of the organic binder is less than 0.01% by mass, the powder for an alloy cannot be uniformly or sufficiently attached to iron powders. However, when the content thereof is more than 1.0% by mass, the iron powders adhere to each other to aggregate and therefore flowability may possibly be reduced.
  • the content of the organic binder preferably ranges from 0.01% to 1.0% by mass.
  • the content (mass percent) of the organic binder refers to the percentage of the organic binder in the iron-based mixed powder for powder metallurgy.
  • a free lubricant may be added thereto.
  • the content of the free lubricant in the iron-based mixed powder for powder metallurgy is preferably 1.0% by mass or less.
  • the content of the free lubricant is preferably 0.01% by mass or more (the percentage with respect to the iron-based mixed powder).
  • the free lubricant is preferably a metallic soap (for example, zinc stearate, manganese stearate, lithium stearate, or the like), a bis amide (for example, ethylene bis-stearamide or the like), an aliphatic amide (for example, monostearamide, erucamide, or the like) including an monoamide, an aliphatic acid (for example, oleic acid, stearic acid, or the like), a thermoplastic resin (for example, an polyamide, polyethylene, polyacetal, or the like), which has the effect of reducing the ejection force of a green compact.
  • a known free lubricant other than the above free lubricant can be used.
  • the content of the organic lubricant is less than ever and the organic lubricant is replaced with the oxide particles, whereby flowability and green density can be improved while excellent ejection force is maintained. That is, the reduction in content of the organic lubricant usually degrades ejection force; however, in the present invention, this adverse effect can be avoided by the addition of the oxide.
  • the use of the oxide instead of the organic lubricant improves green density. Furthermore, the presence of the oxide particles improves fluidity.
  • the content of the organic lubricant in the iron-based mixed powder is preferably 0.8% by mass or less, more preferably 0.7% by mass or less, and further more preferably 0.6% by mass or less.
  • the lower limit of the content of the organic lubricant is preferably 0.02% by mass, which is the sum of the lower limit of the content of the organic binder and that of the free lubricant.
  • the organic lubricant contains at least one of the organic binder, an organic free lubricant, and an organic non-free lubricant (an organic lubricant attached to an iron powder with a binder therebetween).
  • the organic non-free lubricant is frequently substituted by that of the organic binder in view or the function thereof. Therefore, the sum of the content of the organic binder and that of the organic free lubricant corresponds to the content of the organic lubricant.
  • the content of iron in the iron-based mixed powder is preferably 50% by mass or more.
  • the iron-based powder is mixed with the oxide particles according to the present invention and additives such as a binder and a lubricant and is further mixed with powder for an alloy as required.
  • the additives, such as the binder and the lubricant need not be necessarily added to the iron-based powder at once. After primary mixing is performed using a portion of additives, secondary mixing may be performed using the rest thereof.
  • a mixing method is not particularly limited. Any conventionally known mixer can be used.
  • the following mixer can be used: for example, an impeller-type mixer (for example, a Henschel mixer or the like) or a rotary mixer (for example, a V-type mixer, a double-cone mixer, or the like), which is conventional known.
  • the following mixer is particularly advantageous and appropriate: a high-speed mixer, a disk pelletizer, a plough share mixer, a conical mixer, or the like, which is suitable for heating.
  • an additive for property improvement may be used in addition to the above additives according to purpose.
  • the addition of a powder of MnS or the like for machinability improvement is exemplified for the purpose of improving the machinability of a sintered body.
  • Prepared iron-based powders were two types: Pure Iron Powder A (an atomized iron powder with an average particle size of 80 ⁇ m) and iron powder with alloy component adhered thereon B prepared by attaching powders for alloys to this pure iron powder with organic binders therebetween.
  • the powders, for alloys, used for B were 2.0% by mass of a Cu powder (an average particle size of 25 ⁇ m) and 0.8% by mass of a graphite powder (an average particle size of 5.0 ⁇ m).
  • the organic binders used were 0.05% by mass of monostearamide and 0.05% by mass of ethylene bis-stearamide. The percentage of each of these additives is a proportion to iron-based mixed powder.
  • Pure Iron Powder A and iron powder with alloy component adhered thereon B were mixed with oxide particles with an aspect ratio of less than 5 and free lubricants at various ratios, whereby iron-based mixed powders for powder metallurgy were obtained.
  • the oxide particles used were JC (TM) (Fe 2 O 3 produced by JFE Chemical Corporation), MIOX (TM) (an Fe 2 O 3 -SiO 2 -Al 2 O 3 mixture, containing 90% by mass of Fe 2 O 3 , 5% by mass of SiO 2 , and 3% by mass of Al 2 O 3 , the remainder being impurities (each is an approximate value), produced by Karntner Montanindustrie Deutschen mbH), and A31 (TM) (Al 2 O 3 produced by Nippon Light Metal Company, Ltd.).
  • the free lubricants used were zinc stearate, ethylene bis-stearamide, and erucamide in addition to 0.1% by mass of lithium stearate.
  • the iron powders and the oxide particles were measured for average particle size by a laser diffraction/scattering method (according to JIS R 1629) and the particle size at 50% in the particle size distribution (the cumulative volume fraction) was used. The oxide particles were observed with a scanning electron microscope. The average of the aspect ratios of randomly selected 50 particles was used as the aspect ratio.
  • the blending ratio of these mixed powders is shown in Table 1.
  • the blending ratio is a proportion to each iron-based mixed powder for powder metallurgy.
  • the content (mass percent) of an organic lubricant is equal to the content of a free lubricant shown in Table 2.
  • the content thereof is equal to the sum of the content (0.1% by mass) of an organic binder and the content of a free lubricant shown in Table 2.
  • Each obtained iron-based mixed powder was filled into a die and was then pressed at room temperature with a pressure of 980 MPa, whereby a cylindrical green compact with a diameter of 11 mm and a height of 11 mm was obtained.
  • the flowability of the iron-based mixed powder, the ejection force needed to withdraw the green compact from the die, and the density of the green compact were measured.
  • the measurement results are shown in Table 1.
  • the flowability of the iron-based mixed powder was evaluated in accordance with JIS Z 2502.
  • the flowability is good when the fluidity is not more than 30 seconds per 50 grams
  • the compressibility is good when the green density is 7.35 Mg/m 3 or more
  • the drawability is good when the ejection force is 25 MPa or less.
  • Type of iron-based powder Oxide particles Free lubricant Properties Remarks Type Average particle size ( ⁇ m) Aspect ratio Content (mass percent) Type Content (mass percent) Fluidity (sec/50 g) Green density (Mg/m 3 ) Ejection force (MPa) 1 B Iron oxide 1.0 1 0.05 Zinc stearate 0.4 23.9 7.38 17 Comparative Example 6 2 A iron oxide 1.0 1 1.0 Zinc stearate 0.4 23.9 7.36 17 Comparative Example 7 3 B Fe 2 O 3 ⁇ SiO 2 ⁇ Al 2 O 3 mixture 0.8 2 0.2 Ethylene bis-stearamide 0.1 21.0 7.42 18 Example 3 4 B Fe 2 O 3 ⁇ SiO 2 ⁇ Al 2 O 3 mixture 4.0 2 0.2 Ethylene bis-stearamide 0..1 21.1 7.42 18 Example 4 5 B Fe 2 O 3 ⁇ SiO 2 ⁇ Al 2 O 3 mixture 18 3 0.2 Erucamide 0,1 21.8 7.43 21 Example 5 6 B Fe 2 O 3 ⁇ SiO
  • comparative examples are poor in at least one of flowability, green density, and ejection force.
  • a prepared iron-based powder was the same as iron powder with alloy component adhered thereon B described in Example 1.
  • the iron-based powder was mixed with oxide particles (an aspect ratio of less than 5) and free lubricants as shown in Table 2, whereby iron-based mixed powders for powder metallurgy were obtained.
  • the oxide particles used were similar to the commercial products described in Example 1.
  • the percentage of each additive shown in Table 2 is a proportion to corresponding iron-based mixed powder.
  • the flowability of each iron-based mixed powder, the ejection force needed to withdraw a green compact (obtained from the iron-based mixed powder) from the die, and the density of the green compact were measured in the same manner as that described in Example 1. The measurement results are summarized in Table 2. [Table 2] Table 2 No.
  • Table 2 shows that iron-based mixed powders (Nos. 14 and 15) which contain iron oxide particles (particles of an Fe 2 O 3 -SiO 2 -Al 2 O 3 mixture) and which have a reduced organic lubricant content of 0.4% to 0.5% by mass have substantially equal ejection force and also have significantly improved green density and flowability as compared to, for example, an iron-based mixed powder (No. 20) containing 0.8% by mass of an organic lubricant. As is clear from No. 13, good flowability, green density, and ejection force can be obtained even though an organic lubricant is further reduced.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Powder Metallurgy (AREA)

Description

    Technical Field
  • The present invention relates to an iron-based mixed powder suitable for use in powder metallurgy. In particular, the present invention is intended to increase green density and is also intended to advantageously reduce the ejection force necessary to withdraw a green compact from a die after compaction.
  • Background Art
  • In a powder metallurgy process, source powders are mixed together; the mixture is transferred, is filled into a die, and is then pressed into a formed body (hereinafter referred to as a green compact); and the green compact is withdrawn from the die and is then subjected to a posttreatment such as sintering as required.
  • In the powder metallurgy process, in order to achieve an increase in product quality and a reduction in production cost, it is necessary to ensure all of high powder flowability in a transferring step, high compressibility in a pressing step, and low ejection force in a step of withdrawing the green compact from the die.
  • As for techniques for improving the flowability of iron-based mixed powders, Patent Literature 1 discloses that the flowability of an iron-based mixed powder can be improved by adding a fullerene, which serves as a carbon supply component, thereto.
  • Furthermore, Patent Literature 2 discloses a technique for improving the flowability of a powder composition for metallurgy by adding a particulate inorganic oxide with an average particle size of less than 500 nm thereto.
  • However, the use of these techniques is insufficient to achieve high compressibility and low ejection force while flowability is maintained.
  • In order to increase the density of a green compact or in order to reduce the ejection force thereof, it is effective to use a lubricant that has ductility and that is soft at a temperature at which an iron-based mixed powder is pressed. This is because the lubricant seeps out of the iron-based mixed powder during pressing to adhere to a surface of a die and therefore reduces the friction between the die and the green compact.
  • However, the lubricant has ductility and therefore is likely to adhere to particles of an iron powder and powder for an alloy. Hence, there is a problem in that the flowability and filling ability of an iron-based mixed powder are impaired.
  • The blending of the above carbon material, fine particles, and lubricant reduces the theoretical density (the density determined assuming that the voidage is zero) of the iron-based mixed powder to cause a reduction in green density; hence, it is not preferable to blend large amounts of these materials.
  • It has been extremely difficult to balance the flowability of a conventional iron-based mixed powder, high green density, and low ejection force.
  • As for techniques relating to additives for iron-based mixed powders, Patent Literature 3 discloses a technique in which a powder of iron oxide (such as mill scale) is added to a powder of finish-reduced iron to control a dimensional change of a sintered body.
  • As for techniques relating to iron oxide powders, Patent Literature 4 discloses a method for synthesizing micaceous iron oxide (MIO) known as a pigment for rust-proof paints for steel materials. According to the method disclosed in Patent Literature 4, primary particles of α- iron oxide that have a size of 1 µm to 100 µm and an aspect ratio of 5 to 30 are obtained.
  • An iron powder used for generating a green compact is for instance known from JP 03064402 . Said mixed powder consists of 45% to 65% of a metallic powder for sintering, and 35% to 55% of an organic binder. Furthermore, there may be added one of the several oxides. The iron-based powder has a particle size below 10 µm.
  • An iron-based mixed powder having iron-based powder and oxide particles is likewise known from US 4 255 193 A . The iron-based powder has an average particle size between 10 and 315 µm and the oxide particles having a size between 2 and 10 µm. The average particle size in said document is the cumulative of one of 50% of the fraction volume.
  • US 5 507 853 A discloses an iron-based mixed powder with an iron-based powder, an oxide powder and a comparatively low amount of lubricant. An powder containing iron-based powder and an oxide are also disclosed by US 5 766 304 . JP 806256801 A discloses an iron steel powder, which may be fixed with an oxide particle.
  • Related Art Document Patent Literature
    • PTL I: Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 2007-31744
    • PTL 2: PCT Japanese Translation Patent Publication No. 2002-515542
    • PTL 3: Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 8-325667
    • PTL 4: Japanese Unexamined Patent Application
    Summary of Invention Problems to be Solved by the Invention
  • The present invention has been developed in view of the aforementioned circumstances and has an object to suggest an iron-based mixed powder for powder metallurgy. The iron-based mixed powder can accomplish both an increase in product quality and a reduction in production cost in such a way that the density of a green compact is increased by increasing the flowability of the iron-based mixed powder and ejection force is greatly reduced after compaction.
  • In view of the powder disclosed in US 5 507 853 A , it is an object of the present invention to provide a mixture having a higher fluidity and a higher green density.
  • Solution to Problem
  • The inventors have investigated various additives for use in iron-based powders for the purpose of achieving the above object.
  • As a result, the inventors have found that the addition of an appropriate amount of oxide particles with an average size of 0.5 µm or more to an iron-based powder provides significantly improved flowability and also provides improved green density and ejection force. The present invention is based on the above finding.
  • In order to solve the aforementioned problem, the present invention provides an iron-based mixed powder having the features defined in claim 1. Further preferred embodiments are defined in the dependent claims.
  • Oxide refers to an oxide forming the oxide particles.
  • Advantageous Effects of Invention
  • According to the present invention, not only increased flowability but also high green density and low ejection force can be achieved by adding an appropriate amount of oxide particles having an average size of 0.5 µm or more to an iron-based powder. This results in an increase in production efficiency and a reduction in production cost.
  • Brief Description of Drawing
  • [Fig. 1] Fig. 1 is a schematic view illustrating the aspect ratio of powder.
  • Description of Embodiments
  • The present invention will now be described in detail.
  • In the present invention, oxide particles are used as a component for improving the flowability of an iron-based powder. The reason is as described below.
  • Common iron-based mixed powders contain about 1% by mass of organic lubricants for the purpose of increasing the flowability of powder or decreasing the ejection force of green compacts. The organic lubricants have a specific gravity of about 1.0 and are significantly lower in specific gravity than iron powders, which have a specific gravity of 7.8. In general, in the case of mixing powders that are significantly different in specific gravity from each other, segregation occurs during mixing to cause a reduction in flowability or differences in properties between lots.
  • Thus, in the case of mixing different types of powders, it is important that the difference in specific gravity therebetween is as small as possible.
  • When the oxide particles used herein are made of, for example, iron oxide (hematite), the oxide particles have a specific gravity of 5.3 and are higher in specific gravity than the organic lubricants. Therefore, the oxide particles are less affected by the flow of air in a powder bed during fluidization as compared to the organic lubricants. In an iron-based mixed powder according to the present invention, presumably, an organic lubricant is entirely or partially replaced with the oxide particles and therefore the segregation of various additives is prevented. This probably results in the improvement of the flowability of the iron-based mixed powder.
  • In the present invention, when the oxide particles have a large size, the oxide particles do not cover the surface of the iron-based powder unlike a flowability-improving powder, disclosed in Patent Literature 2, containing primary particles with a size on the order of nanometers but are probably filled in voids in the iron-based powder in a preferred manner. Thus, in a forming step presumably, the effective contact area between a green compact and a die is increased and therefore the springback stress is distributed. This probably results in a reduction in ejection force.
  • In order to exhibit the above effect, the oxide particles need to have an average size of 0.5 µm or more. When the average size of the oxide particles is less than 0.5 µm, the effect of reducing ejection force cannot be sufficiently obtained. However, when the average size of the oxide particles is more than 100 µm, the oxide particles cannot be uniformly mixed with iron-based mixed powders (an average size of about 100 µm) usually used in powder metallurgy and therefore cannot exhibit the above effect. Thus, the average size of the oxide particles is preferably 100 µm or less. The average size of the oxide particles is more preferably 40 µm or less and further more preferably 20 µm or less. The average size of the oxide particles is preferably determined by a method described in Example 1.
  • The oxide particles may contain about 20% by mass or less (the percentage with respect to the oxide particles) of an impurity other than the oxide. Those having lower impurity content (for example, 10% by mass or less or 2% by mass or less) are preferably used if the commercial availability thereof is not difficult. The impurity is not particularly limited and any impurity (for example, a metal or another inorganic compound) contained in oxide particles produced by a known commercial process is not particularly problematic.
  • In the present invention, particles containing an oxide containing Fe2O3, Al2O3, and SiO2 and are not particularly limited in component or crystal structure. The content of an oxide of at least one selected from the group consisting of iron, aluminum, and silicon in the oxide particles is preferably about 80% by mass or more (the percentage with respect to the oxide) and more preferably 98% or more in total.
  • In order to carry out the present invention at low cost, a particulate oxide satisfying the above is preferably readily available at low cost. In view of availability, an oxide of iron or an iron-based oxide containing an oxide of iron as a major component is particularly preferred. Commercially available examples of the iron-based oxide include those containing about 70% to 95% by mass (the percentage with respect to the oxide) of an oxide of iron and about 5% to 30% by mass of an oxide of Al and/or an oxide of Si in total.
  • When the form of powder is viewed from the viewpoint of aspect ratio, particles with high aspect ratio can be artificially synthesized. For example, Patent Literature 4 discloses a method for synthesizing α-iron oxide with an aspect ratio of 5 to 30. However, this method requires heating and pressurizing for a long time in the course of synthesis, is irreversibly high in production cost, and also is not readily available. Thus, the aspect ratio is preferably less than 5.
  • In the present invention, the aspect ratio refers to the ratio of the longitudinal to the thickness size of powder as shown in Fig. 1. The aspect ratio of the oxide particles is preferably determined by a method described in Example 1.
  • In the present invention, when the content of the oxide particles in the iron-based mixed powder is less than 0.01% by mass, the effect of adding the oxide particles is not obtained. However, when the content thereof is more than 5.0% by mass, an extreme increase in ejection force is caused, which is not preferred. Thus, the content of the oxide particles is 0.01% to 5.0% by mass.
  • The lower limit is preferably 0.05% by mass. The upper limit is preferably 1.0% by mass.
  • In the present invention, the following powders are examples of the iron-based powder, which is a major component of the iron-based mixed powder: pure iron powders such as atomized iron powders and reduced iron powders, diffusion alloyed steel powders, prealloyed steel powders, and hybrid steel powders produced by diffusion alloy components in prealloyed steel powders. The iron-based powder preferably has an average particle size of 1 µm or more and more preferably about 10 µm to 200 µm. The term "major component" as used herein means that the content of the iron-based powder in the iron-based mixed powder is 50% by mass or more.
  • Examples of powder for an alloy include graphite powders; powders of metals such as Cu, Mo, and Ni; and metal compound powders. Other known powders for alloys also can be used. The strength of a sintered body can be increased by mixing the iron-based powder with at least one of these powders for alloys.
  • The sum of the contents of these powders for alloys in the iron-based mixed powder is preferably about 0.1% to 10% by mass. This is because when the content of these powders for alloys is 0.1% by mass or more or more than 10% by mass, the strength of an obtained sintered body is advantageously increased or the dimensional accuracy of the sintered body is reduced, respectively.
  • The powder for an alloy is preferably in such a state (hereinafter referred to as an iron powder with alloy component adhered thereon) that the powder for an alloy is attached to the iron-based powder with an organic binder therebetween. This prevents the segregation of the powder for an alloy and allows components in powder to be uniformly distributed therein.
  • Herein, an aliphatic amide, a metallic soap, or the like is particularly advantageous and appropriate to the organic binder. Other known organic binders such as polyolefins, polyesters, (meth)acrylic polymers, and vinyl acetate polymers can be used. These organic binders may be used alone or in combination. In the case of using two or more the organic binders, at least a part of the organic binders may be used in the form of a composite melt. When the content of the organic binder is less than 0.01% by mass, the powder for an alloy cannot be uniformly or sufficiently attached to iron powders. However, when the content thereof is more than 1.0% by mass, the iron powders adhere to each other to aggregate and therefore flowability may possibly be reduced. Thus, the content of the organic binder preferably ranges from 0.01% to 1.0% by mass. The content (mass percent) of the organic binder refers to the percentage of the organic binder in the iron-based mixed powder for powder metallurgy.
  • In order to improve the flowability and formability of the iron-based mixed powder for powder metallurgy, a free lubricant (powder) may be added thereto. The content of the free lubricant in the iron-based mixed powder for powder metallurgy is preferably 1.0% by mass or less. On the other hand, the content of the free lubricant is preferably 0.01% by mass or more (the percentage with respect to the iron-based mixed powder). The free lubricant is preferably a metallic soap (for example, zinc stearate, manganese stearate, lithium stearate, or the like), a bis amide (for example, ethylene bis-stearamide or the like), an aliphatic amide (for example, monostearamide, erucamide, or the like) including an monoamide, an aliphatic acid (for example, oleic acid, stearic acid, or the like), a thermoplastic resin (for example, an polyamide, polyethylene, polyacetal, or the like), which has the effect of reducing the ejection force of a green compact. A known free lubricant other than the above free lubricant can be used.
  • In the present invention, the content of the organic lubricant is less than ever and the organic lubricant is replaced with the oxide particles, whereby flowability and green density can be improved while excellent ejection force is maintained. That is, the reduction in content of the organic lubricant usually degrades ejection force; however, in the present invention, this adverse effect can be avoided by the addition of the oxide. The use of the oxide instead of the organic lubricant improves green density. Furthermore, the presence of the oxide particles improves fluidity. In order to obtain the above advantages, the content of the organic lubricant in the iron-based mixed powder is preferably 0.8% by mass or less, more preferably 0.7% by mass or less, and further more preferably 0.6% by mass or less. The lower limit of the content of the organic lubricant is preferably 0.02% by mass, which is the sum of the lower limit of the content of the organic binder and that of the free lubricant.
  • The organic lubricant contains at least one of the organic binder, an organic free lubricant, and an organic non-free lubricant (an organic lubricant attached to an iron powder with a binder therebetween). The organic non-free lubricant is frequently substituted by that of the organic binder in view or the function thereof. Therefore, the sum of the content of the organic binder and that of the organic free lubricant corresponds to the content of the organic lubricant.
  • The content of iron in the iron-based mixed powder is preferably 50% by mass or more.
  • A method for producing the iron-based mixed powder according to the present invention is described below.
  • The iron-based powder is mixed with the oxide particles according to the present invention and additives such as a binder and a lubricant and is further mixed with powder for an alloy as required. The additives, such as the binder and the lubricant, need not be necessarily added to the iron-based powder at once. After primary mixing is performed using a portion of additives, secondary mixing may be performed using the rest thereof.
  • A mixing method is not particularly limited. Any conventionally known mixer can be used. The following mixer can be used: for example, an impeller-type mixer (for example, a Henschel mixer or the like) or a rotary mixer (for example, a V-type mixer, a double-cone mixer, or the like), which is conventional known. When heating is necessary, the following mixer is particularly advantageous and appropriate: a high-speed mixer, a disk pelletizer, a plough share mixer, a conical mixer, or the like, which is suitable for heating.
  • In the present invention, an additive for property improvement may be used in addition to the above additives according to purpose. For example, the addition of a powder of MnS or the like for machinability improvement is exemplified for the purpose of improving the machinability of a sintered body.
  • [EXAMPLES] [EXAMPLE 1]
  • Prepared iron-based powders were two types: Pure Iron Powder A (an atomized iron powder with an average particle size of 80 µm) and iron powder with alloy component adhered thereon B prepared by attaching powders for alloys to this pure iron powder with organic binders therebetween. The powders, for alloys, used for B were 2.0% by mass of a Cu powder (an average particle size of 25 µm) and 0.8% by mass of a graphite powder (an average particle size of 5.0 µm). The organic binders used were 0.05% by mass of monostearamide and 0.05% by mass of ethylene bis-stearamide. The percentage of each of these additives is a proportion to iron-based mixed powder.
  • Pure Iron Powder A and iron powder with alloy component adhered thereon B were mixed with oxide particles with an aspect ratio of less than 5 and free lubricants at various ratios, whereby iron-based mixed powders for powder metallurgy were obtained. The oxide particles used were JC (TM) (Fe2O3 produced by JFE Chemical Corporation), MIOX (TM) (an Fe2O3-SiO2-Al2O3 mixture, containing 90% by mass of Fe2O3, 5% by mass of SiO2, and 3% by mass of Al2O3, the remainder being impurities (each is an approximate value), produced by Karntner Montanindustrie Gesellschaft mbH), and A31 (TM) (Al2O3 produced by Nippon Light Metal Company, Ltd.). The free lubricants used were zinc stearate, ethylene bis-stearamide, and erucamide in addition to 0.1% by mass of lithium stearate. The iron powders and the oxide particles were measured for average particle size by a laser diffraction/scattering method (according to JIS R 1629) and the particle size at 50% in the particle size distribution (the cumulative volume fraction) was used. The oxide particles were observed with a scanning electron microscope. The average of the aspect ratios of randomly selected 50 particles was used as the aspect ratio.
  • The blending ratio of these mixed powders is shown in Table 1. The blending ratio is a proportion to each iron-based mixed powder for powder metallurgy. For Pure Iron Powder A, the content (mass percent) of an organic lubricant is equal to the content of a free lubricant shown in Table 2. For iron powder with alloy component adhered thereon B, the content thereof is equal to the sum of the content (0.1% by mass) of an organic binder and the content of a free lubricant shown in Table 2.
  • Each obtained iron-based mixed powder was filled into a die and was then pressed at room temperature with a pressure of 980 MPa, whereby a cylindrical green compact with a diameter of 11 mm and a height of 11 mm was obtained. In this operation, the flowability of the iron-based mixed powder, the ejection force needed to withdraw the green compact from the die, and the density of the green compact were measured. The measurement results are shown in Table 1. The flowability of the iron-based mixed powder was evaluated in accordance with JIS Z 2502.
  • Herein, the flowability is good when the fluidity is not more than 30 seconds per 50 grams, the compressibility is good when the green density is 7.35 Mg/m3 or more, and the drawability is good when the ejection force is 25 MPa or less.
    [Table 1] Table 1
    No. Type of iron-based powder Oxide particles Free lubricant Properties Remarks
    Type Average particle size (µm) Aspect ratio Content (mass percent) Type Content (mass percent) Fluidity (sec/50 g) Green density (Mg/m3) Ejection force (MPa)
    1 B Iron oxide 1.0 1 0.05 Zinc stearate 0.4 23.9 7.38 17 Comparative Example 6
    2 A iron oxide 1.0 1 1.0 Zinc stearate 0.4 23.9 7.36 17 Comparative Example 7
    3 B Fe2O3·SiO2·Al2O3 mixture 0.8 2 0.2 Ethylene bis-stearamide 0.1 21.0 7.42 18 Example 3
    4 B Fe2O3·SiO2·Al2O3 mixture 4.0 2 0.2 Ethylene bis-stearamide 0..1 21.1 7.42 18 Example 4
    5 B Fe2O3·SiO2·Al2O3 mixture 18 3 0.2 Erucamide 0,1 21.8 7.43 21 Example 5
    6 B Fe2O3·SiO2·Al2O3 mixture 38 4 0.2 Ethylene bis-stearamide 0.1 21.3 7.42 22 Example 6 Comparative
    7 A Aluminum oxide 5.0 1 0.1 Erucamide 0.4 23.1 7.38 19 Example 8
    8 B Aluminum oxide 0.2 1 0.2 Erucamide 0.4 Not flow 7.33 16 Comparative Example 1
    9 A Iron oxide 0.08 1 0.2 Erucamide 0.8 Not flow 7.29 45 Comparative Example 2
    10 B Iron oxide 180 2 0.2 Erucamide 0.8 Not flow 7.29 45 Comparative Example 3
    11 B Fe2O3·SiO2·Al2O3 mixture 38 4 0.005 Erucamide 0.3 Not flow 7.31 25 Comparative Example 4
    12 B Iron oxide 20 1 6.0 Zinc stearate 0.2 30.7 7.31 35 Comparative Example 5
    * A: Pure iron powder, B: iron powder with alloy component adhered thereon
  • As is clear from Table 1, an iron-based mixed powder excellent in flowability, compressibility, and ejection force can be obtained by the addition of an appropriate amount of oxide particles according to the present invention.
  • In contrast, comparative examples are poor in at least one of flowability, green density, and ejection force.
  • [EXAMPLE 2]
  • A prepared iron-based powder was the same as iron powder with alloy component adhered thereon B described in Example 1. The iron-based powder was mixed with oxide particles (an aspect ratio of less than 5) and free lubricants as shown in Table 2, whereby iron-based mixed powders for powder metallurgy were obtained. The oxide particles used were similar to the commercial products described in Example 1. The percentage of each additive shown in Table 2 is a proportion to corresponding iron-based mixed powder. The flowability of each iron-based mixed powder, the ejection force needed to withdraw a green compact (obtained from the iron-based mixed powder) from the die, and the density of the green compact were measured in the same manner as that described in Example 1. The measurement results are summarized in Table 2.
    [Table 2] Table 2
    No. Content of binder mass percent Free lubricant Content of organic lubricant mass percent Oxide powder Properties Remarks
    Type Content mass percent Type Average particle size (µm) Aspect ratio Content mass percent Fluidity sec/50 g Green density Mg/m3 Ejection force MPa
    13 0.1 Ethylene bis-stearamide 0.1 0.20 Fe2O3·SiO2·Al2O3 mixture 4 2 0.05 24.6 7.41 20 Example
    14 0.1 Ethylene bis-stearamide 0.3 0.40 Fe2O3·SiO2·Al2O3 mixture 4 2 0.2 23.8 7.43 19 Example
    15 0.1 Ethylene bis-stearamide 0.4 0.50 Fe2OSiOAl2O3 mixture 4 2 0.2 24.2 7.42 19 Example
    16 0.1 Ethylene bis-stearamide 0.7 0.80 Fe2O3·SiO2·AbO3 mixture 4 2 0.2 29.0 7.35 15 Example
    17 0.1 Ethylene bis-stearamide 0.1 0.20 Not used - - - 28.2 7.34 35 Comparative Example
    18 0.1 Ethylene bis-stearamide 0.4 0.50 Not used - - - Not flow 7.33 22 Comparative Example
    19 0.1 Ethylene bis-stearamide 0.5 0.60 Not used - - - Not flow 7.30 20 Comparative Example
    20 0.1 Ethylene bis-stearamide 0.7 0.80 Not used - - - Not flow 7.27 18 Comparative Example
    21 0.1 Ethylene bis-stearamide 0.2 0.30 Iron oxide 1 1 0.2 24.2 7.41 16 Example
    22 0.1 Ethylene bis-stearamide 0.4 0.50 Aluminum oxide 5 1 0.2 24.6 7.42 15 Example
  • Table 2 shows that iron-based mixed powders (Nos. 14 and 15) which contain iron oxide particles (particles of an Fe2O3-SiO2-Al2O3 mixture) and which have a reduced organic lubricant content of 0.4% to 0.5% by mass have substantially equal ejection force and also have significantly improved green density and flowability as compared to, for example, an iron-based mixed powder (No. 20) containing 0.8% by mass of an organic lubricant. As is clear from No. 13, good flowability, green density, and ejection force can be obtained even though an organic lubricant is further reduced.
  • In the case of changing an organic binder, a free lubricant, powder for an alloy, and/or oxide particles (in particular, oxide particles containing iron, aluminum, and/or silicon) or in the case of adding powder for machinability improvement, substantially the same results as those described in Example 1 or 2 were obtained.
  • Industrial Applicability
  • Not only flowability but also green density and ejection force can be improved by adding an appropriate amount of oxide particles according to the present invention to an iron-based powder. Therefore, production efficiency can be increased and production costs can be reduced.
  • Reference Signs List
  • 1
    longitudinal size
    2
    thickness

Claims (4)

  1. An iron-based mixed powder for powder metallurgy, containing an iron-based powder with an average particle size between 10 µm to 200 µm; and 0.01% to 5.0% by mass of particles of an oxide, wherein the oxide particles have an average particle size between 0.5 µm and 100 µm,
    wherein the average particle size is measured with a laser diffraction and scattering method according to JIS R 1629, and wherein the average particle size is the cumulative fraction volume to 50% of the particle sizes in the particle size distribution,
    wherein the oxide particles are a mixture of Fe2O3, SiO2, and Al2O3.
  2. The iron-based mixed powder for powder metallurgy according to Claim 1, further containing powder for an alloy, which powder is selected from the group consisting of graphite, Cu, Mo, Ni.
  3. The iron-based mixed powder for powder metallurgy according to any one of Claims 1 and 2, further containing an organic binder.
  4. The iron-based mixed powder for powder metallurgy according to any one of Claims 1 to 3, further containing a lubricant, which is not attached to the iron powder with a binder there between.
EP10792237.9A 2009-06-26 2010-06-25 Iron-based mixed powder for powder metallurgy Active EP2446985B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2009152593 2009-06-26
JP2010142355A JP5663974B2 (en) 2009-06-26 2010-06-23 Iron-based mixed powder for powder metallurgy
PCT/JP2010/061297 WO2010150920A1 (en) 2009-06-26 2010-06-25 Iron-based mixed powder for powder metallurgy

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2446985A1 EP2446985A1 (en) 2012-05-02
EP2446985A4 EP2446985A4 (en) 2015-06-17
EP2446985B1 true EP2446985B1 (en) 2017-12-27

Family

ID=43386686

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP10792237.9A Active EP2446985B1 (en) 2009-06-26 2010-06-25 Iron-based mixed powder for powder metallurgy

Country Status (7)

Country Link
US (1) US20120085201A1 (en)
EP (1) EP2446985B1 (en)
JP (1) JP5663974B2 (en)
KR (1) KR101355040B1 (en)
CN (1) CN102802843B (en)
CA (1) CA2766042C (en)
WO (1) WO2010150920A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN102129908A (en) * 2011-04-01 2011-07-20 钢铁研究总院 Novel composite soft magnetic material and preparation method thereof
JP5945915B2 (en) * 2012-03-02 2016-07-05 日立化成株式会社 Powder mixture and method for producing sintered member
JP2016056445A (en) * 2014-09-04 2016-04-21 Ntn株式会社 Mixed powder for powder metallurgy, sintered metal component using the same, and method for producing the mixed powder for powder metallurgy
KR101664603B1 (en) * 2014-11-27 2016-10-11 현대자동차주식회사 Powder metallurgical method
JP6766399B2 (en) * 2016-03-28 2020-10-14 大同特殊鋼株式会社 Sintering powder and sintered body
CN112584948B (en) * 2018-09-26 2022-10-25 杰富意钢铁株式会社 Mixed powder for powder metallurgy and lubricant for powder metallurgy
CN112276073B (en) * 2020-09-23 2022-12-30 山东鲁银新材料科技有限公司 Powder metallurgy composition comprising silicon dioxide as a leavening agent and a flow rate enhancer

Family Cites Families (19)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CS204329B1 (en) * 1978-09-22 1981-04-30 Milan Slesar Method of making the sintered iron pressings of the hardened iron oxides
JP2743090B2 (en) * 1989-07-31 1998-04-22 株式会社 小松製作所 How to control the carbon content of metal injection products
JP2829644B2 (en) 1989-10-13 1998-11-25 日本化学工業株式会社 Production method of α-iron oxide
EP0618027B1 (en) * 1992-09-18 1999-03-10 Kawasaki Steel Corporation Iron powder and mixed powder for powder metallurgy and production of iron powder
JPH06136404A (en) * 1992-10-28 1994-05-17 Kawasaki Steel Corp Production of iron-base soft magnetic material sintered compact
JP3351844B2 (en) * 1993-03-01 2002-12-03 川崎製鉄株式会社 Alloy steel powder for iron-based sintered material and method for producing the same
EP0739991B1 (en) * 1995-04-25 2000-11-29 Kawasaki Steel Corporation Iron-base powder mixture for powder metallurgy and manufacturing method therefor
JPH08325667A (en) 1995-05-26 1996-12-10 Kobe Steel Ltd Method for controlling dimensional change of powder metallurgical iron sintered compact
US6280683B1 (en) * 1997-10-21 2001-08-28 Hoeganaes Corporation Metallurgical compositions containing binding agent/lubricant and process for preparing same
SE9704494D0 (en) * 1997-12-02 1997-12-02 Hoeganaes Ab Lubricant for metallurgical powder compositions
ES2230700T3 (en) * 1998-05-15 2005-05-01 Hoganas Ab IRON BASED METALURGICAL COMPOSITIONS CONTAINING FLOW AGENTS AND METHODS TO USE THEM.
JP2002008913A (en) * 2000-06-19 2002-01-11 Daido Electronics Co Ltd Rare earth magnet and its molding material
JP4208689B2 (en) * 2003-09-30 2009-01-14 日立粉末冶金株式会社 Method for producing high corrosion resistance stainless sintered material
JP4412133B2 (en) * 2004-09-27 2010-02-10 Jfeスチール株式会社 Iron-based mixed powder for powder metallurgy
JP2006124777A (en) * 2004-10-28 2006-05-18 Kobe Steel Ltd Powder mixture for powder metallurgy and green compact molding
JP2006213984A (en) * 2005-02-07 2006-08-17 Tdk Corp Super-magnetostrictive material and manufacturing method therefor
JP2007031744A (en) 2005-07-22 2007-02-08 Kobe Steel Ltd Powdery mixture for powder metallurgy
US20070186722A1 (en) * 2006-01-12 2007-08-16 Hoeganaes Corporation Methods for preparing metallurgical powder compositions and compacted articles made from the same
EP2221130B1 (en) * 2007-12-13 2019-04-24 JFE Steel Corporation Iron based powder for powder metallurgy and manufacture thereof

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
None *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
KR101355040B1 (en) 2014-01-22
JP2011026700A (en) 2011-02-10
JP5663974B2 (en) 2015-02-04
CN102802843A (en) 2012-11-28
CA2766042C (en) 2014-03-25
KR20120026086A (en) 2012-03-16
CA2766042A1 (en) 2010-12-29
US20120085201A1 (en) 2012-04-12
EP2446985A1 (en) 2012-05-02
WO2010150920A1 (en) 2010-12-29
EP2446985A4 (en) 2015-06-17
CN102802843B (en) 2015-06-17

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2446985B1 (en) Iron-based mixed powder for powder metallurgy
EP2379764B1 (en) A method of producing a diffusion alloyed iron or iron-based powder, a diffusion alloyed powder and a composition including this powder
EP2436462B1 (en) A powder metallurgy method using iron-based mixed powder
EP1995004B1 (en) Mixed powder for powder metallurgy, green compact thereof and sintered compact
CN1950161A (en) Powder metallurgical compositions and methods for making the same
JP5617529B2 (en) Iron-based mixed powder for powder metallurgy
JP5504963B2 (en) Mixed powder for powder metallurgy and sintered metal powder with excellent machinability
EP3722021B1 (en) Partially diffusion-alloyed steel powder
CN111432957B (en) Alloy steel powder
US11643710B2 (en) Mixed powder for powder metallurgy
JP5439926B2 (en) Iron-based mixed powder for powder metallurgy
EP3858514A1 (en) Mixed powder for powder metallurgy and lubricant for powder metallurgy
JP2024017984A (en) Iron-based powder mix for powder metallurgy, iron-based sintered body, and sintered mechanical component

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20120126

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: B22F 1/02 20060101ALI20150507BHEP

Ipc: B22F 1/00 20060101AFI20150507BHEP

Ipc: C22C 33/02 20060101ALI20150507BHEP

RA4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched (corrected)

Effective date: 20150518

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20160127

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: C22C 33/02 20060101ALI20170403BHEP

Ipc: C22C 1/10 20060101ALI20170403BHEP

Ipc: B22F 1/00 20060101AFI20170403BHEP

Ipc: B22F 1/02 20060101ALI20170403BHEP

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20170504

GRAJ Information related to disapproval of communication of intention to grant by the applicant or resumption of examination proceedings by the epo deleted

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDIGR1

INTC Intention to grant announced (deleted)
GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20170901

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 957875

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20180115

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602010047679

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180327

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171227

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171227

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20171227

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 957875

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20171227

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171227

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180328

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180327

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171227

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171227

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171227

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171227

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171227

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171227

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171227

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171227

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171227

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171227

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171227

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171227

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20180427

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602010047679

Country of ref document: DE

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171227

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20180928

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602010047679

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20180625

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171227

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20180630

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180625

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171227

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180630

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190101

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180625

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180630

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180630

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180625

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180630

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180625

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171227

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171227

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20100625

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171227

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171227

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20230510

Year of fee payment: 14