EP2420427B1 - Procédé et dispositif de surveillance de l'état de fonctionnement d'un dispositif d'embrayage - Google Patents
Procédé et dispositif de surveillance de l'état de fonctionnement d'un dispositif d'embrayage Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2420427B1 EP2420427B1 EP11175827.2A EP11175827A EP2420427B1 EP 2420427 B1 EP2420427 B1 EP 2420427B1 EP 11175827 A EP11175827 A EP 11175827A EP 2420427 B1 EP2420427 B1 EP 2420427B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- train
- signal
- coupling
- vehicle
- uncoupling
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 title claims description 105
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 title claims description 105
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 title claims description 105
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims description 41
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 title claims description 15
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 claims description 20
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims description 20
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims description 12
- 230000001960 triggered effect Effects 0.000 claims description 7
- 230000009849 deactivation Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 10
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000001965 increasing effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000011664 signaling Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000000977 initiatory effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000004913 activation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000001976 improved effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003137 locomotive effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000007257 malfunction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004886 process control Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000004065 semiconductor Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000002123 temporal effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000007704 transition Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000000712 assembly Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000429 assembly Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000010267 cellular communication Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012790 confirmation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007796 conventional method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001939 inductive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000013011 mating Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007420 reactivation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001105 regulatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001502 supplementing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
- B61L15/00—Indicators provided on the vehicle or train for signalling purposes
- B61L15/0018—Communication with or on the vehicle or train
- B61L15/0036—Conductor-based, e.g. using CAN-Bus, train-line or optical fibres
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
- B61L15/00—Indicators provided on the vehicle or train for signalling purposes
- B61L15/0054—Train integrity supervision, e.g. end-of-train [EOT] devices
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
- B61L15/00—Indicators provided on the vehicle or train for signalling purposes
- B61L15/0081—On-board diagnosis or maintenance
Definitions
- the DE 10 2008 034 018B3 discloses a method for determining the coupled state of a UIC clutch, a UIC clutch, and a UIC clutch assembly.
- the invention relates to a method for monitoring an operating state of at least one coupling device and / or coupling point of a coupling device provided for the mechanical connection of two vehicles to a train.
- the invention further relates to an automatic coupling device having a control unit for monitoring an operating state of at least one coupling device and / or coupling point provided for the mechanical connection of two vehicles to a train.
- This object is achieved in the method of the type mentioned by the features of claim 1.
- the evaluation according to the invention which also takes into account the decoupling release signal in addition to the clutch state signal, advantageously makes it possible to carry out a universal monitoring of the clutch device by taking into account the clutch state signal, while at the same time giving the possibility of actually decoupling by the additional consideration of the decoupling enable signal signal, so that in the case of a desired uncoupling not triggered error reactions be as they may be intended to detect unwanted uncoupling.
- the principle of the invention is applicable to all vehicle assemblies or trains that can be formed by means of at least one coupling device of individual vehicles, in particular rail vehicles with automatic coupling devices. Particularly advantageous is the use of the invention in self-braking vehicles indirectly.
- the clutch state signal is formed by means of a corresponding sensor, which is mounted in the region of the coupling device.
- a limit switch is provided, which is attached to the coupling device so that it performs a switching state change when the coupling device is transferred from a coupled state to a decoupled state, or vice versa. This electrical switching state change can be evaluated according to the invention.
- sensor means such as capacitive or inductive or optically operating sensor means are alternatively or additionally also used to monitor a coupling state or a state transition.
- the decoupling release signal is advantageously defined in a preferred embodiment of the invention, in particular in rail vehicles, such that it can not or only with difficulty be influenced by unauthorized persons, whereby the sabotage safety of the monitoring method is significantly increased.
- it is advantageous to select as uncoupling enable signal such a signal which can be influenced only at considerable expense of an outdoor area of the train or even only using a driver's desk of the train or a power train of the train.
- a particular advantage of the invention is furthermore that the decoupling enable signal is formed from a combination of a plurality of signals or logic operations, which in turn are formed from further signals or operating variables, whereby an even more reliable operating arrangement is obtained.
- the decoupling enable signal is not formed solely as a function of a standstill signal characterizing a speed of the train and / or at least one of the vehicles. That is, in this case, the decoupling enable signal is formed using the standstill signal, but in addition becomes evaluated at least one other signal of the train or a vehicle to provide increased security, which, inter alia, stricter legal requirements or criteria catalogs of appropriate regulatory authorities sufficient.
- an increased evaluation precision compared to known systems is required, in which only the standstill signal is used to decide whether a possibly occurring uncoupling is to be considered permissible or inadmissible.
- the invention thus distinguishes itself from those known methods in which, on the sole basis of the presence of the standstill signal, it is already concluded that possibly occurring decoupling operations are permissible.
- These methods have, inter alia, the disadvantage that, for example, an unauthorized or unwanted uncoupling of vehicles from a train that is ready to leave the track, can not be detected, since the parent sole evaluation of the standstill signal causes, when the standstill signal any decoupling is considered admissible.
- the unauthorized operation of a clutch emergency release to prepared for departure vehicles can be detected by the method according to the invention, because an effective uncoupling release only indicated by the uncoupling enable signal according to the invention which is not formed solely as a function of the standstill signal but at least one other variable.
- the uncoupling release signal according to the invention is not present for the detected decoupling (clutch state signal)
- unwanted decoupling can advantageously always be inferred according to the invention, in particular even while the idle signal already has a value of logical one indicating a standstill condition.
- the decouple enable signal must be in immediate temporal relation to a state change indicative of decoupling the coupling state signal.
- the uncouple enable signal must be present first, ie, even before a state of the state clutch signal from "coupled” changes to "uncoupled” so as not to preclude a vehicle reaction due to unwanted uncoupling.
- the decoupling enable signal iw it is also conceivable for the decoupling enable signal iw to be present simultaneously with the state change of the clutch state signal (possibly with a predefinable tolerance time, which depends on the design of a control unit carrying out the method), or that the decoupling enable signal also decouples shortly after one Condition indicating clutch state signal may be activated to signal the release, with in a desired decoupling.
- these signals are in a manner known per se by logic circuits, e.g. discrete logic circuits of semiconductor devices or relay circuits, processable or producible.
- the uncoupling enable signal in Dependence of the standstill signal and a pressure in a main air line of the train is formed.
- the uncoupling enable signal in this embodiment depends inter alia on the standstill signal, it is ensured that a desired coupling is always signaled or detected only when the standstill signal is present, thus the train has a very low speed or is at a standstill .
- the additional criterion of the pressure of the main air line to form the decoupling enable signal is advantageously a particularly safe criterion against manipulation because unauthorized persons generally do not have the opportunity to regulate the pressure in the main air line to a specific value. This can usually be done only from the driver's desk of a vehicle.
- the pressure of the main air line descriptive criterion may be designed so that the pressure of the main air line from a control pressure (for example, 5 bar) to a defined, lower value (for example, below 3 bar, for example between 2.5 bar and 2.8 bar) must be lowered so that - while the presence of the standstill signal - the invention
- Decouple enable signal assumes a state of logic 1 (true), thus indicating that an optional uncoupling operation is a desired uncoupling operation.
- the decoupling enable signal is formed as a function of the standstill signal and at least one further signal, which characterizes an operating variable of the train and / or at least one vehicle.
- a low-voltage line which is also present in the entire train, analogous to the main air line, is supplied to supply electrical consumers of the individual vehicles in a defined manner, for example by modulation with a high-frequency signal , which propagates on the entire electrical supply line and thus in each vehicle of the train is detectable by a simple detector circuit.
- the criterion according to the invention of the decoupling enable signal can also comprise further signals, which can also be realized, for example, by means of RFID identification transmitters and corresponding receivers in the region of the train.
- the control device can check, for example, whether the standstill signal is present and whether at the same time a certain, authorized RFID identification transmitter has been connected to the reading electronics of the train in order to indicate authorized uncoupling. In all other cases, a vehicle reaction can again be triggered because an unwanted disconnection has been concluded.
- the decoupling enable signal may be formed as a function of at least two operating variables of the train and / or at least one vehicle, in particular as a function of a) a signal of an operator-actuated input device and b) a pressure in a main air line of the train.
- the standstill signal is not used to the To form the invention uncouple release signal.
- the signal of an input device that can be actuated by an operator can be, for example, an output signal of a key switch, which can also be integrated, for example, into an existing system of the vehicle, such as a driver's desk or a control cabinet.
- the input device can also be designed as a conventional switch (without a key) or as an other input system, for example as an RFID input system or the like.
- the air pressure in a main air line of the train or vehicle is used, which can be evaluated, for example, by means of a pressure switch in a manner known to those skilled in the art and can be linked to the signal of the switch to form the uncoupling enable signal according to the invention.
- the coupling state signals of a plurality of coupling devices are evaluated by the control device.
- all three coupling devices of the corresponding vehicles become particularly advantageous According to the invention monitors, but at least the two coupling devices that connect the first and the second vehicle and the second and the third vehicle with each other.
- a coupling state signal of a single coupling point of a coupling device is evaluated by the control device.
- an automatic coupling device is provided with a control device according to claim 8.
- FIG. 1 shows a train 200, which is composed of a total of three rail vehicles 210, 220, 230.
- the first vehicle 210 is a traction vehicle, eg a locomotive.
- two coupling devices 247, 242 are provided, which connect the vehicles 210, 220, 230 with each other in a manner known per se.
- the coupling device 243 on the in FIG. 1 at the right end of the vehicle 230 is not coupled to another counterpart of another vehicle because the vehicle 230 is the last car (end car) of the train 200 according to FIG. 1 forms.
- the coupling devices 241, 242, 243 3 can be automatic couplings, which, in a manner known per se, also realize, in addition to a purely mechanical connection, an electrical and / or pneumatic connection of the individual pulling parts 210, 220, 230 with each other ,
- sensor means 121, 122, 123 are provided, which detect a coupling state of the respective coupling device 241, 242, 243.
- the sensor means 121, 122, 123 as limit switches, so as electromechanical sensor means formed, which undergo an electrical state change when the operating state of the respective coupling device 241, 242, 243 from “uncoupled” to “engaged” or vice versa.
- the limit switches 121, 122, 123 may be e.g. also be integrated directly into the coupling devices 241, 242, 243.
- a control device 100 which has an input interface 110 for receiving the coupling state signals S1, S2, S3, as supplied by the limit switches 121, 122, 123. According to the invention, when the clutch state signals S1, S2, S3 are evaluated by the control device 100 in order to conclude a desired uncoupling or unwanted uncoupling.
- control device 100 has a control unit 130 which is at least partially embodied in one of the following technologies: discrete logic circuitry using semiconductor devices (e.g., CMOS circuitry), relay circuitry, microcontroller, digital signal processor, programmable logic device, application specific integrated circuit.
- semiconductor devices e.g., CMOS circuitry
- relay circuitry e.g., relay circuitry
- microcontroller e.g., digital signal processor
- programmable logic device e.g., programmable logic device
- application specific integrated circuit e.g., CMOS circuitry
- the control device 100 then closes on an undesired decoupling of a vehicle 220 when the clutch state signal S2 of the relevant clutch device 242 indicates a decoupled state or a transition to this state and not simultaneously a decoupling enable signal EF the presence of a actually desired Disconnection process displays. That is, in order not to infer undesirable decoupling, e.g. may occur due to manipulation by unauthorized third parties or malfunctions, the decoupling enable signal EF provided according to the invention must indicate the presence of an actually desired decoupling process.
- a desired uncoupling to be able to perform without causing error reactions is advantageously provided according to the invention that a desired uncoupling must be signaled by means of a separate decoupling enable signal EF.
- the decoupling enable signal EF is preferably also supplied to the control device 100 and also evaluated by this or its control unit 130.
- the decoupling release signal EF is formed as a function of at least two different sizes, in particular of different operating variables of the train 200 or individual vehicles 210, 220, 230.
- the decoupling device is particularly advantageous. Release signal EF not alone for example, as a function of a standstill signal STS characterizing a speed of the train 200 and / or at least one of the vehicles 210, 220, 230 FIG. 2a ) educated.
- the decoupling enable signal EF in dependence of the standstill signal STS ( FIG. 2a ) and the pressure PHLL in the main air line (not shown) of train 200 (FIG. FIG. 1 ) is formed.
- the main air line is a pneumatic system that passes through the entire train 200.
- a control operating pressure for the main air line is usually 5 bar.
- the main air line is commonly used to operate a safety brake system of the train 200.
- the brakes of the train 200 are released.
- the pressure PHLL is reduced - starting from the control operating pressure - until the each desired braking effect is achieved.
- a renewed release of the brakes is again by increasing the pressure PHLL in the main air line up to the control operating pressure.
- the decoupling enable signal EF as a function of the standstill signal STS and of the pressure PHLL in the main air line of the train 200 advantageously makes it possible to provide a particularly reliable criterion for indicating an actually desired decoupling process.
- the decoupling enable signal EF according to the above definition is present only or has a value of "logical one" (true) only if, firstly, the standstill signal STS is also "logical one", ie the train 200 either only runs very slowly or is stationary, and secondly, if the defined pressure PHLL in the main air line of the train 200 is present.
- this pressure is a specifically specifiable pressure or pressure range of, for example, 2.8 bar, which thus also means, as it were, an encoding for displaying the information that a desired uncoupling process is to take place.
- the targeted setting of this particular pressure value or pressure range in the main air line is usually impossible for unauthorized persons and usually veranbeschbar only from a driver's desk of train 200 out. This is ensures that no unwanted manipulations by unauthorized persons or malfunctions lead to the erroneous signaling of a decoupling enable signal EF with the value logical one ".
- a valid disconnect enable signal EF may be generated only when the standstill signal STS is actually present and has a value of logic one, and when the predetermined pressure PHLL of the main air line has been initiated by deliberate action of the driver or other authorized person. That is, to indicate an actually desired clutch operation, the train 200 must first be transitioned to an operating state in which the standstill signal STS has a value of logic 1, and further the pressure PHLL in the main air line must be lowered to the predefined value become. Then, there is also a corresponding value logical one of the decoupling enable signal EF, and a decoupling operation may be initiated on one of the clutch devices 241, 242 without the controller 100 simultaneously closing on an undesired decoupling operation.
- the initiation of the vehicle reaction by the control unit 100 can take place, for example, via an interface 140 to a driver's desk and / or a vehicle bus and / or a control center.
- FIG. 1b shows a traction unit 210a according to a further, particularly preferred, embodiment of the invention.
- the locomotive 210a has at its in FIG. 1b left end face a first coupling point 240a, which is not currently connected to a suitable coupling point of another vehicle (not shown).
- the traction vehicle 210a has its in FIG. 1b right front side, a second coupling point 241a, which is connected to the mating coupling point 241b of another vehicle 220a.
- the second coupling point 241a forms with the coupling point 241b of the further vehicle 220a a coupling device 241 comparable to the system FIG. 1a ,
- the traction vehicle 210a has a total of two control units 100a, 100b, whose functionality and structure essentially correspond to those of the control unit 100 FIG. 1a equivalent.
- the first control unit 100a is associated with the first coupling point 240a
- the second control unit 100b is associated with the second coupling point 241a.
- the first coupling point 240a are further the sensor means 120a (again eg limit switch) which generate a clutch state signal characterizing the operating state of the clutch point 240a and supply it to the control unit 100a.
- the control unit 100b receives a comparable clutch state signal or clutch position status signal characterizing the operating state of the clutch point 241a from the sensor means 121a, which are likewise arranged or integrated in the region of their associated clutch point 241a.
- Each control unit 100a, 100b operates autonomously, ie independently of other similar control units 100b, 100a of the traction vehicle and is designed to carry out the method according to the invention.
- the control unit 100a, 100b according to FIG. 1b each a "single-channel" system compared to the variant FIG. 1a because the control unit 100a, 100b monitors only one coupling point 240a, 241a assigned to it.
- This "single-channel" variant is particularly preferred since it does not require any vehicle-overlapping signal connections, as may be the case in the system FIG. 1a the case is.
- FIG. 1b Rather, it shows a traction vehicle 210a having two mutually independent clutch state monitoring systems according to the invention, with the components 100a, 120a forming the first system and the components 100b, 121a forming the second system.
- the coupling device 241 comprising both co-operating coupling points 241a, 241b would advantageously be provided simultaneously by two systems according to the invention, namely for each Clutch point 241a, 241b one monitors.
- the train would move 200 according to FIG. 1a - instead of the pictured "three-channel" system - have a maximum of six monitoring systems, namely five pieces for in FIG. 1a illustrated coupling points of the coupling devices 241, 242, 243 and a sixth system for in FIG. 1a not shown second coupling point of the traction unit 210th
- FIG. 2a shows a first logic diagram for forming the decoupling enable signal EF according to the invention according to a first embodiment.
- a first input variable is formed by the standstill signal STS, which is present in the train 200 in a manner known per se only if the train 200 has a speed that is less than or equal to a predefinable threshold of, for example, about 1 or 2 km / h.
- the second input signal represents a pressure PHLL in FIG a main air line of the train 200.
- the evaluation block 180 it is checked whether the standstill signal STS has a value of logic one, and whether at the same time the pressure PHLL in the main air line in a predetermined pressure range (for example, between about 2.5 bar and about 2.8 bar) or pressure value.
- the evaluation block 180 outputs at its output 181 the uncoupling enable signal EF according to the invention with a value of logic one in order to enable the control device 100 (FIG. FIG. 1 ) indicating that a desired uncoupling process is imminent. If one of the two criteria for the input variables STS, PHLL is not fulfilled, the output variable EF has a value of logic zero, so that the control device 100 detects a decoupling in the region of the coupling devices 241, 242 by the signals S1, S2 corresponding vehicle reaction triggers.
- the functionality of the evaluation block 180 is preferably implemented in the control unit 130 of the control device 100. The same applies to the evaluation block 182 described below.
- FIG. 2b shows a further embodiment for determining the decoupling enable signal EF according to the invention.
- the evaluation device 182 is the input side again supplied to the standstill signal STS. Instead of the pressure signal PHLL ( FIG. 2a ) according to the embodiment according to FIG. 2b however, a modulation signal Mod is provided as a second input to the evaluation block 182.
- the modulation signal Mod is a signal that can be triggered, for example, by an authorized person in the area of one of the vehicles 210, 220, 230 and / or the corresponding coupling device 241, 242, 243, for example by modulating a corresponding supply voltage the entire train 200 extending electrical supply line (not shown).
- a similar signaling can also take place by means of a per se known RFID transponder system or the like.
- a wireless signaling of the modulation signal Mod directly to the control device 100 is conceivable, for example by means of a short-distance radio link (WLAN, Bluetooth, ZigBee) or the like.
- WLAN wireless local area network
- Bluetooth ZigBee
- cellular communication networks GSM, UMTS, LTE
- a de-assert enable signal EF having a logic one truth value is output to an output 183 of the evaluation block 182 only if the standstill signal STS has a logic one value and the stall condition is met, and if the modulation signal Mod indicates a legitimate one person signaled a desired imminent uncoupling process.
- This can be done for example by a predetermined modulation scheme.
- the control device 100 evaluating the signal EF of the evaluation unit 182, concludes that a desired decoupling process is present and does not initiate any vehicle reactions, as are provided in the event of an undesired decoupling operation.
- the decoupling enable signal EF is dependent on at least two operating variables of the train 200 (FIG. FIG. 1a ) and / or at least one vehicle 210 is formed, in particular as a function of a) a signal of an operator-actuatable input device and b) a pressure PHLL in a main air line of the train 200.
- the standstill signal STS is therefore not necessarily used, to form the decoupling enable signal EF according to the invention.
- the signal of an operator-actuatable input device may be, for example, an output signal of a key switch 502a (FIG. FIG.
- the input device can be designed as a conventional switch (without a key) or as other input system 502a, eg as an RFID input system or the like.
- the air pressure PHLL is used in a main air line of the train 200 or vehicle 210, which in the flowchart according to FIG.
- the pressure switch 502b in a manner known to those skilled in the art and can be linked to the signal of the switch 502a to form the uncoupling enable signal EF according to the invention, which is applied to the output of the evaluation block 502 for forwarding to the evaluation block 504, in turn
- the control device 100 for example as a logic circuit in the control unit 130, is realized.
- the functional block 506 arranged downstream of the evaluation block 504 serves to activate uncoupling valves 506b, for example, in those operating cases in which the preceding evaluation of the respective clutch state signal s1 and the decoupling enable signal EF has revealed that a desired decoupling is to be performed. Then according to FIG. 5 by block 506a checks whether the standstill signal STS is present, and if so, two control branches 506b for redundant uncoupling valves 1, 2 are activated to perform the uncoupling.
- the standstill signal STS is not used to form the uncoupling enable signal EF, but the standstill condition is only checked by block 506a when the uncoupling is to take place.
- the standstill condition STS could also be checked directly in the evaluation block 502, ie in addition to the two other criteria 502a, 502b.
- FIG. 3 shows a flowchart of an embodiment of a method according to the invention.
- a first step 300 the clutch state signals S1, S2, S3 ( FIG. 1 ) evaluated.
- the second step 310 the presence of the decoupling enable signal EF according to the invention is checked, for example by means of the method described above with reference to FIGS FIGS. 2a, 2b described logic circuits.
- step 320 an evaluation is made as to whether at a detected clutch state change at least one of the clutch state signals S1, S2, S3 is present at the same time the decoupling enable signal EF, and if appropriate, a corresponding vehicle reaction is initiated.
- the method according to FIG. 3 can preferably run permanently during the operation of the train 200 or even in predeterminable operating situations or times.
- a corresponding supply of the control device 100 with electrical energy as well as the supply of the signals S1, S2, S3, STS, PHLL, Mod must be ensured for the desired operating cases.
- the supply of the signals S1, S2, S3, STS, PHLL, Mod can be done either via separate channels or lines, or at least partially via the interface 140 to other on-board systems of the train 200th
- the control device 100a In the "single-channel" design of the control device 100a (FIG. FIG. 1b ) is to supply the control device 100a accordingly with the one clutch position state indicating sensor signal, for example, from the sensor 120a and the signal EF, which is formed for example by an external, integrated in an existing cabinet of the vehicle 210 logic. Such a logic, as well as the controller 100a, may also be integrated directly into a driver's desk or a control panel supplementing the driver's desk.
- the signal EF forming logic 502 FIG. 5
- the signal EF forming logic 502 must with the required input signals 502a, 502b and possibly 506a or STS ( FIG. 2a ) are supplied.
- FIG. 4a shows a logic diagram of another embodiment of the invention, which illustrates the monitoring of a coupling device 241 according to the invention.
- the connection 401 corresponds to a vehicle voltage connection of the train 200.
- the downstream function block 408 it is checked whether the standstill signal STS (FIG. Figure 2a, 2b ) is active, therefore the stoppage of the train 200 is displayed. If this is the case, the system branches to the subsequent block 410, in which it is checked whether a driver's console of the train 200 or of the railcar 210 (FIG. FIG. 1 ) has been activated for a defined time interval. If so, the system branches to function block 404, which checks to see if the coupling device 241 is mechanically coupled.
- the function block 404 corresponds to a check or evaluation of the clutch state signal S1 by the control unit 100. If the criterion of the function block 404 is met, the function block 406 is branched, in which a flag "no pull-break" for the coupling device 241 is signaled or is set.
- the function blocks 408, 410, 404 explained above correspond to an initialization path, as it is traversed during an initialization after switching on the control device 100 according to the invention.
- the flag "no pull-break" indicates that in the context of the monitoring of the invention Operating state of the coupling device 241 since no unwanted decoupling has been detected.
- the other functional blocks 412, 414 check whether the standstill signal is active, and then whether there is a defined main line pressure for uncoupling (block 414).
- the function blocks 412, 414 correspond to a functional branch, which is then run through when all actions are taken by an authorized person to prepare a desired uncoupling, namely to signal the uncoupling enable signal EF. That is, the function blocks 412, 414 check the criteria (STS, PHLL) necessary for the output of the decouple enable signal EF having a value of logic one, and in turn branch to the function block 406 which has the "no stall" state flag of the coupling device 241 puts.
- a comparable logic structure may be provided for the further coupling devices 242, 243 of the train 200 and the control device 100.
- FIG. 4b gives a block diagram describing recognition of the endcar 230.
- An initialization branch is given by the functional blocks 422, 424, wherein the functional block 422, which checks whether the carriage 230 is not coupled, is in turn connected to a vehicle voltage or a vehicle voltage terminal 421. If the carriage 230 is not coupled, ie its coupling device 243 is not connected to a corresponding coupling device of another following carriage (not shown), it is checked in the function block 424 whether the driver's console has been activated for a defined time interval. If this is not the case, then a branch is made into block 426, in which it is concluded that the carriage 230 is not coupled, and thus represents a terminal carriage 230.
- the branch formed by the function blocks 428, 430, 432 successively checks whether the standstill signal STS (FIG. Figure 2a, 2b ) is active (block 428), whether the driver's console is activated for a defined time interval (block 430), and whether the carriage 230 is mechanically coupled (block 432). Only when these criteria are met is it also branched to block 426.
- Figure 4c shows a logic diagram illustrating the signal flow, as it is used in another embodiment to set the flag "no pull-break".
- this flag is preferably always set after an initialization of the control device 100 when all limit switches of the sensor means 121, 122, 123 have been checked and no decoupled state has been detected.
- the flag is preferably stored over the entire operating period of the controller 100.
- the terminal 441 is in turn connected to a vehicle voltage terminal of the train 200.
- the flag "no pull-off" is set.
- a safety loop is closed in blocks 448 or no quick brake is set, so that no safety braking is triggered.
- the traction signals are driven in a predefined manner.
- the block 450 is in turn with a Vehicle voltage terminal 441 'connected.
- the function block 442 it is also possible to branch to the block 444 via the function block 446, with which it is checked whether there is no thread break at a coupling point, in which the flag "no thread break" is set.
- the function block 442 is then passed through successfully if the logic block according to FIG Figure 4c checked carriage is about a Endwagen 230, while the function block 446 according to Figure 4c is then passed through successfully when the checked car is not the end car 230 and at the same time there is no draft break on the coupling device 241.
- Illustrated diagrams are advantageously also implemented in the control device 100, in particular in the control unit 130. They can preferably be implemented as relay circuits or else in the form of a program for a microcontroller and / or a digital signal processor (DSP).
- DSP digital signal processor
- EPGA programmable logic device
- CPLD programmable logic device
- ASIC application specific integrated circuits
- the clutch states "mechanically coupled” or “mechanically uncoupled” are automatically detected by means of the clutch state signals S1, S2, S3 and the sensor means 121, 122, 123 (for Example limit switch), and a flag "no pull-break" is set or initialized.
- the flag can be realized, for example, in a hard-wired circuit by a relay. If a coupling state changes at the uncoupled coupling point 243 of the endcarriage 230, then, according to a preferred embodiment, this has no influence on the overtravel detection according to the invention.
- the signaling of a wanted train separation is advantageously carried out as already described above using the dedicated decoupling enable signal EF, which in turn can depend on various criteria (STS, PHLL, MOD).
- the following technical implementation results in detail: is a driver's seat in the train 200 / train activated, for example, in a power car 210, then over a short time interval, the state of each coupling device 241, 242, 243 in the train 200 queried and stored in the controller 100, for example, using the flag "no pull-break". Until a renewed activation of a driver's desk, the monitoring according to the invention remains active.
- the state of a coupling device 241, 242 changes from “coupled” to "not coupled", irrespective of the cause of the release (for example activation of uncoupling valve / emergency lug etc.), the state of a coupling device 241, 242 changes as a result of an unintentional train separation / unintentional uncoupling Flag "no pull-off""cleared and triggered one or more of the vehicle reactions described several times above For example, the interruption of a safety / rapid braking loop in the still leading tensile part 210 and the severed tensile part 220, 230 act. The other vehicle reactions, which are preferably also carried out, are described above.
- the current requirements for the vehicle reaction of the train 200 can be met, in particular in the case of an unwanted train separation, as described in the Supplementary Regulations No. B015 "from ⁇ 4 AEG and EBO derived protection goals for the coupling of vehicles with automatic Clutch in Stand "(Internet: WWW.EBA.BUND.DE home page> Infotheque> Vehicles> Brakes).
- the procedure for generating the decoupling enable signal EF is as follows: in order to signal a regular decoupling by means of the decoupling enable signal EF according to the invention, the main air line is lowered from a control pressure to a defined value of, for example, 2.8 bar , And with an additional presence of the standstill signal STS a decoupling operation (for example, with key switch or Entkupplungsseil) are performed without this is detected as a pull-off, because the controller 100 has been successfully informed about the disengagement release signal EF according to the invention that desired decoupling process will be performed.
- a decoupling operation for example, with key switch or Entkupplungsseil
- a further particularly preferred variant according to the triggering of a pull-break, that is, after the detection of an unwanted uncoupling, only by a deactivation and re-activation of a driver's desk (If necessary, connected with a renewed confirmation of the now changed train configuration) in the train 200 / train part, the circuit or controller 100 are reset.
- the control device 100 is preferably equipped with the communication interface 140 for communication with the driver's desk of the railcar 210 or another vehicle, but may also have further or more interfaces to other systems.
- the dark switching of the train closing signals can only be canceled by operating a special operating element by the driver / driver, but first the event "pull-off" must be acknowledged by the driver, for example by a corresponding driver Input at a man-machine interface of the control device 100 provided for this purpose, such as a key switch or a graphical user interface.
- a man-machine interface of the control device 100 provided for this purpose, such as a key switch or a graphical user interface.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Electric Propulsion And Braking For Vehicles (AREA)
- Train Traffic Observation, Control, And Security (AREA)
- Arrangement And Mounting Of Devices That Control Transmission Of Motive Force (AREA)
Claims (13)
- Procédé de surveillance de l'état de fonctionnement d'au moins un dispositif de couplage automatique (241, 242, 243) conçu pour la liaison mécanique de deux véhicules (210, 220) pour former un train (200), un interrupteur de fin de course étant monté sur le dispositif de couplage automatique (241, 242, 243), dans lequel un signal d'état de couplage (s1, s2, s3), caractérisant un état de fonctionnement du dispositif de couplage (241, 242, 243), est généré au moyen de l'interrupteur de fin de course et analysé par un dispositif de commande (100), un découplage indésirable d'un véhicule (220) étant déterminé lorsque le signal d'état de couplage (s1, s2, s3) affiche un état désaccouplé et si un signal d'autorisation de découplage (EF) n'affiche pas en même temps l'existence d'un processus de découplage souhaité, le signal d'autorisation de découplage (EF) étant généré non pas uniquement en fonction d'un signal d'immobilisation (STS) caractérisant une vitesse du train (200) et/ou d'au moins un des véhicules (210, 220), mais également en fonction d'au moins un autre signal, qui caractérise une grandeur de fonctionnement du train (200) et/ou d'au moins un véhicule (210, 220, 230).
- Procédé selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que le signal d'autorisation de découplage (EF) est généré en fonction du signal d'immobilisation (STS) et d'une pression (PHLL) dans une conduite d'air principale du train (200).
- Procédé selon l'une des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce que le signal d'autorisation de découplage (EF) est généré en fonction d'au moins deux grandeurs de fonctionnement du train (200) et/ou d'au moins un véhicule (210, 220, 230), plus particulièrement en fonction a) d'un signal d'un dispositif d'entrée pouvant être actionné par un opérateur et b) d'une pression (PHLL) dans une conduite d'air principale du train (200).
- Procédé selon l'une des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce qu'une réaction de véhicule est déclenchée lorsqu'un découplage indésirable a été détecté.
- Procédé selon la revendication 4, caractérisé en ce que la réaction du véhicule comprend au moins une des étapes suivantes :- interruption d'une boucle de freinage de sécurité / rapide dans une partie du train encore entraînante et/ou dans la partie du train séparée,- désactivation d'un signal lumineux de fin de train au niveau de l'ancien point de couplage, plus particulièrement selon Ril 408 DB Netz AG,- déclenchement de messages de systèmes de contrôle correspondants, plus particulièrement dans un mode de fonctionnement normal,- suppression de la configuration confirmée du train, plus particulièrement dans tous les modes de fonctionnement,- mise en place d'un verrouillage de traction matériel sur la base de l'état de couplage désormais différent dans chaque partie du train.
- Procédé selon l'une des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce que les signaux d'état de couplage (s1, s2, s3) de plusieurs dispositifs de couplage (241, 242, 243) sont analysés par le dispositif de commande (100).
- Procédé selon l'une des revendications 1 à 5, caractérisé en ce qu'un signal d'état de couplage d'un seul point de couplage (241a) d'un dispositif de couplage (241) est analysé par le dispositif de couplage (100b).
- Dispositif de couplage automatique (241) pour un véhicule (210, 220, 230 ; 210a, 220a), plus particulièrement un véhicule ferroviaire, un interrupteur de fin de course étant monté sur le dispositif de couplage automatique (241), avec un dispositif de commande (100a, 100b, 100) pour la surveillance d'un état de fonctionnement du dispositif de couplage (241, 242, 243) conçu pour la liaison mécanique de deux véhicules (210, 220) en un train (200), dans lequel un signal d'état de couplage (s1, s2, s3) caractérisant un état de fonctionnement du dispositif de couplage (241, 242, 243) peut être généré au moyen de l'interrupteur de fin de course et analysé par le dispositif de commande (100), le dispositif de commande (100) étant conçu de façon à déterminer un découplage indésirable d'un véhicule (220) lorsque le signal d'état de couplage (s1, s2, s3) affiche un état découplé et si un signal d'autorisation de découplage (EF) n'affiche pas en même temps l'existence d'un processus de découplage souhaité, et le dispositif de commande (100a, 100b, 100) comprenant un bloc d'analyse (180, 182) qui est conçu de façon à ce que le signal d'autorisation de découplage (EF) soit généré non pas uniquement en fonction d'un signal d'immobilisation (STS) caractérisant une vitesse du train (200) et/ou d'au moins un des véhicules (210, 220), mais également en fonction d'au moins autre signal, qui caractérise une grandeur de fonctionnement du train (200) et/ou d'au moins un véhicule (210, 220, 230).
- Dispositif de couplage selon la revendication 8, le dispositif de commande étant caractérisé par une unité de commande (130) qui est réalisée au moins partiellement à l'aide d'une des technologies suivantes : circuit à relais, micro-contrôleur, processeur numérique de signaux, composant à logique programmable, circuit intégré spécifique à l'application.
- Dispositif de couplage selon l'une des revendications 8 à 9, le dispositif de commande étant caractérisé par au moins une interface (140) pour la communication avec un autre système du train (200) et/ou d'au moins un véhicule (210, 220, 230).
- Dispositif de couplage selon l'une des revendications 8 à 10, le dispositif de commande (100) étant conçu pour l'exécution du procédé selon l'une des revendications 1 à 7.
- Dispositif de couplage selon l'une des revendications 8 à 11, le dispositif de commande (100) étant conçu pour exécuter et/ou déclencher une réaction du véhicule avec au moins une des étapes suivantes :- interruption d'une boucle de freinage de sécurité / rapide dans une partie du train encore entraînante et/ou dans la partie du train séparée,- désactivation d'un signal lumineux de fin de train au niveau de l'ancien point de couplage, plus particulièrement selon Ril 408 DB Netz AG,- déclenchement de messages lumineux correspondants, plus particulièrement dans un mode de fonctionnement normal,- suppression de la configuration confirmée du train, plus particulièrement dans tous les modes de fonctionnement,- mise en place d'un verrouillage de traction matériel sur la base de l'état de couplage désormais différent dans chaque partie du train.
- Véhicule (210, 210a), plus particulièrement véhicule ferroviaire, avec au moins un dispositif de couplage (241) selon l'une des revendications 8 à 12.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
PL11175827T PL2420427T3 (pl) | 2010-08-16 | 2011-07-28 | Sposób i urządzenie do kontroli stanu roboczego urządzenia sprzęgowego |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE201010035302 DE102010035302C5 (de) | 2010-08-16 | 2010-08-16 | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Überwachung eines Betriebszustands einer Kupplungsvorrichtung |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2420427A2 EP2420427A2 (fr) | 2012-02-22 |
EP2420427A3 EP2420427A3 (fr) | 2015-04-15 |
EP2420427B1 true EP2420427B1 (fr) | 2017-08-30 |
Family
ID=44543068
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP11175827.2A Active EP2420427B1 (fr) | 2010-08-16 | 2011-07-28 | Procédé et dispositif de surveillance de l'état de fonctionnement d'un dispositif d'embrayage |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP2420427B1 (fr) |
DE (1) | DE102010035302C5 (fr) |
PL (1) | PL2420427T3 (fr) |
RU (1) | RU2563095C2 (fr) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2023222358A1 (fr) * | 2022-05-16 | 2023-11-23 | Siemens Mobility GmbH | Procédé et système pour la détermination automatisée de l'intégrité de train d'un train |
EP4368473A1 (fr) * | 2022-11-14 | 2024-05-15 | KNORR-BREMSE Systeme für Schienenfahrzeuge GmbH | Découplage sécurisé de véhicules ferroviaires |
Families Citing this family (14)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE102012009114B4 (de) * | 2012-05-09 | 2014-03-13 | Db Fernverkehr Ag | Verfahren zum Kuppeln von Schienenfahrzeugen |
FR2996705B1 (fr) * | 2012-10-10 | 2014-12-12 | Ms Relais | Panneau a relais configurable |
US8942868B2 (en) * | 2012-12-31 | 2015-01-27 | Thales Canada Inc | Train end and train integrity circuit for train control system |
EP3000688A1 (fr) * | 2014-09-26 | 2016-03-30 | Siemens Rail Automation S.A.U. | Système et procédé pour vérifier l'intégrité d'un véhicule à unités multiples |
CN105059310B (zh) * | 2015-08-10 | 2017-10-03 | 中车青岛四方机车车辆股份有限公司 | 一种实现头尾车任意重联的控制系统及控制方法 |
NL2018143B1 (en) * | 2017-01-09 | 2018-07-25 | Jtag Tech B V | A system and method of testing correct mechanical coupling of vehicles forming a train. |
RU2679850C2 (ru) * | 2017-01-30 | 2019-02-13 | Общество с ограниченной ответственностью (ООО) "ПРЕМИКС" | Способ обучения эвакуации машин |
CN107097809B (zh) * | 2017-03-31 | 2019-02-01 | 中车青岛四方机车车辆股份有限公司 | 司机室监控的控制方法以及司机室监控的控制装置 |
CN109808617B (zh) * | 2017-11-21 | 2022-03-18 | 中车唐山机车车辆有限公司 | 一种列车和列车供电控制方法 |
CN108163012B (zh) * | 2017-12-27 | 2019-12-03 | 卡斯柯信号有限公司 | 一种支持列车动态连挂和解编的控制方法 |
RU2689089C1 (ru) * | 2018-07-09 | 2019-05-23 | Федеральное государственное бюджетное образовательное учреждение высшего образования Иркутский государственный университет путей сообщения (ФГБОУ ВО ИрГУПС) | Способ контроля технического состояния автосцепки вагона при текущем осмотре |
CN111824184B (zh) * | 2020-06-30 | 2021-12-17 | 通号城市轨道交通技术有限公司 | 连挂列车的解编方法及系统 |
CN111994097B (zh) * | 2020-08-19 | 2021-11-12 | 交控科技股份有限公司 | 一种基于协同编队的y字型线路动态解编方法及系统 |
WO2023194349A1 (fr) * | 2022-04-06 | 2023-10-12 | Voith Patent Gmbh | Système de dételage, attelage automatique simple traction, véhicule ferroviaire doté d'un attelage automatique simple traction pourvu d'un système de dételage de ce type, et procédé de dételage d'un attelage automatique qui est attelé mécaniquement à un attelage simple traction homologue |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE202006015627U1 (de) | 2006-10-10 | 2007-02-01 | Aait Anlagen- Und Industrietechnik Gmbh | Drucküberwachungseinrichtung (PMU) für eine Hauptluftleitung eines Zuges |
DE102008034018B3 (de) | 2008-07-16 | 2009-07-30 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Verfahren zum Ermitteln des Kupplungszustands einer Eisenbahnkupplung, Eisenbahnkupplung sowie Anordnung mit einer Eisenbahnkupplung |
US20100148013A1 (en) | 2005-12-23 | 2010-06-17 | General Electric Company | System and method for optical locomotive decoupling detection |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
RU2272249C2 (ru) * | 2004-02-24 | 2006-03-20 | Общество с ограниченной ответственностью "Научно-производственное предприятие "СПЕКТР" | Устройство автоматического контроля механизма автосцепных устройств грузовых вагонов от саморасцепа на ходу поезда |
US7845504B2 (en) * | 2005-12-23 | 2010-12-07 | General Electric Company | System and method for determining whether a locomotive or rail engine is coupled to a rail car or other engine |
DE102006005207B4 (de) * | 2006-02-02 | 2007-10-18 | Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. | Vorrichtung zur fahrzeugseitigen Überwachung der Zugvollständigkeit |
DE102008061411A1 (de) * | 2008-01-08 | 2010-07-01 | Krittian, Franz, Dr.-Ing. | Verfahren zur Vermeidung von Zugtrennungen durch fahrzeuginterne Überwachung der Hauptluftleitung und der Achsenzahl |
-
2010
- 2010-08-16 DE DE201010035302 patent/DE102010035302C5/de active Active
-
2011
- 2011-07-28 PL PL11175827T patent/PL2420427T3/pl unknown
- 2011-07-28 EP EP11175827.2A patent/EP2420427B1/fr active Active
- 2011-08-15 RU RU2011133928/11A patent/RU2563095C2/ru active
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20100148013A1 (en) | 2005-12-23 | 2010-06-17 | General Electric Company | System and method for optical locomotive decoupling detection |
DE202006015627U1 (de) | 2006-10-10 | 2007-02-01 | Aait Anlagen- Und Industrietechnik Gmbh | Drucküberwachungseinrichtung (PMU) für eine Hauptluftleitung eines Zuges |
DE102008034018B3 (de) | 2008-07-16 | 2009-07-30 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Verfahren zum Ermitteln des Kupplungszustands einer Eisenbahnkupplung, Eisenbahnkupplung sowie Anordnung mit einer Eisenbahnkupplung |
Non-Patent Citations (14)
Title |
---|
ANONYMOUS: "ICE-T, Wikipedia", 28 April 2018 (2018-04-28), pages 26pp, XP055498496, Retrieved from the Internet <URL:https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ICE_T&oldid=176951462> |
ANONYMOUS: "Kupplungssteuerung P222", ZEICHNUNG, 6 May 2003 (2003-05-06), pages 1pp |
ANONYMOUS: "Positionsschalter, Wikipedia", 15 February 2018 (2018-02-15), pages 1pp, XP055498487, Retrieved from the Internet <URL:https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Positionsschalter&oldid=174031571> |
DEUTSCHE BAHN AG: "ICE T (7-tlg.) BR 411, 1. Serie", DATEN UND FAKTEN, September 2017 (2017-09-01), pages 1 - 2, XP055498507 |
DEUTSCHE BAHN AG: "ICE T (7-tlg.) BR 411, 2. Serie", DATEN UND FAKTEN, September 2017 (2017-09-01), pages 1 - 2, XP055498511 |
DEUTSCHE BAHN AG: "ICE T (85-tlg.) BR 415", DATEN UND FAKTEN, September 2017 (2017-09-01), pages 1 - 2, XP055498503 |
RUBIN: "Abnahmeprotokoll Fahrzeug und magnetische Fahrsperre", PROTOKOLL FÜR ABNAHMEN SOWIE FÜR ERSTMUSTER-, TYP-, STÜCK-UND FREIGABEPRÜFUNGEN, 21 May 2008 (2008-05-21), pages 1 - 9 |
SIEMENS AG: "Fahrzeugbeschreibung Bedienungsanleitung", SIEMENS BEDIENUNGSANLEITUNG DT3, VERSION DRAFT 0.5, 30 June 2005 (2005-06-30), pages 1-13, 38, 79 - 82, XP055499052 |
SIEMENS AG: "Sicherheitsbewertung zum Nachweis der Ubereinstimmung von Systemanforderungen und ihrer Umsetzung Los 2 (Sichertheitsbericht Los 2)", SICHERHEITSNACHWEISKONZEPT RUBIN NÜRNBERG LOS 2, DOK. NR. A52838-E0555-U110-C-00, 27 September 2007 (2007-09-27), pages 1-21, 51-57, 197 - 314, XP055499034 |
SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT: "Stromlaufplan", U-BAHN NUERNBERG DT3, DOK. NR: (3)A52835-E0555-S201-H, 31 January 2007 (2007-01-31), pages 74pp, XP055499104 |
SIEMENS: "ICT Pflichtenheft Funktionsbeschreibung Nebenbetriebe, version 1.40", 24 September 2002 (2002-09-24), pages 1 - 30, XP055498490 |
VAG VERKEHRS-AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT NURNBERG: "Rubin: Die automatiscge U-Bahn-Linie U3 im Erprobungsbetrieb - Bisher insgesamt gut gelaufen", VAG PRESSEINFORMATION, 1 February 2008 (2008-02-01), pages 1 - 4, XP055499109 |
VAG VERKEHRS-AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT NURNBERG: "U3-Erprobungsbetrieb ist beendet- Warten auf die Freigabe für den Fahrgastbetrieb", VAG PRESSEINFORMATION, 22 April 2008 (2008-04-22), pages 1 - 3, XP055499112 |
VOITH TURBO SCHARFENBERG GMBH & CO. KG: "Schaku Automatische Scharfenberg® Kupplung 1.035.155", BETRIEBSANLEITUNG, VERSION: 2B/11.05, November 2005 (2005-11-01), pages 0-2-0-10, 1-1-1-6, 1-25 - 1-29, XP055499043 |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2023222358A1 (fr) * | 2022-05-16 | 2023-11-23 | Siemens Mobility GmbH | Procédé et système pour la détermination automatisée de l'intégrité de train d'un train |
EP4368473A1 (fr) * | 2022-11-14 | 2024-05-15 | KNORR-BREMSE Systeme für Schienenfahrzeuge GmbH | Découplage sécurisé de véhicules ferroviaires |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
RU2011133928A (ru) | 2013-02-20 |
EP2420427A3 (fr) | 2015-04-15 |
DE102010035302C5 (de) | 2015-04-23 |
RU2563095C2 (ru) | 2015-09-20 |
EP2420427A2 (fr) | 2012-02-22 |
PL2420427T3 (pl) | 2018-02-28 |
DE102010035302A1 (de) | 2012-02-16 |
DE102010035302B4 (de) | 2012-05-10 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP2420427B1 (fr) | Procédé et dispositif de surveillance de l'état de fonctionnement d'un dispositif d'embrayage | |
EP2176106B1 (fr) | Système de freinage pour véhicule et procédé d'exploitation d'un système de freinage pour véhicule | |
EP2750930B1 (fr) | Procédé destiné à signaler un processus de freinage chez une remorque, système de commande et remorque | |
EP1848619B1 (fr) | Dispositif de freinage destine a un vehicule sur rails | |
DE102013020177A1 (de) | Kraftfahrzeug | |
EP3871933B1 (fr) | Dispositif d'essai et procédé d'essai d'un système de freinage électro-pneumatique des trains | |
DE102008027731B4 (de) | Elektrische Feststellbremse mit Einfallsperre und Verfahren zum Betreiben einer elektrischen Feststellbremse mit Einfallsperre | |
EP2628147B1 (fr) | Dispositif et procédé de signalisation de dysfonctionnements dans un véhicule | |
EP3956190B1 (fr) | Dispositif de blocage de frein et procédé de fonctionnement d'un dispositif de blocage de frein | |
DE102012003328A1 (de) | Verfahren und Steuergerät für eine Antriebsstrang-Komponente | |
DE102004041672B4 (de) | Notbremseinrichtung und Bremssystem für ein Schienenfahrzeug sowie Verfahren zum Sicherstellen einer Notbremsfunktion bei Schienenfahrzeugen | |
WO2011100949A1 (fr) | Circuit de sécurité passif | |
EP2617615B1 (fr) | Installation de freinage pneumatique d'une remorque | |
EP2559602B1 (fr) | Procédé et dispositif destiné à bloquer la traction d'un véhicule ferroviaire arrêté | |
DE102017208888A1 (de) | Verfahren zur sicheren Durchführung einer Zugtaufe | |
EP0829406B1 (fr) | Installation de frein à deux conduites pour remorque | |
EP1679729B1 (fr) | Dispositif destiné à une émission de signal sûre | |
DE102005034522A1 (de) | Kraftfahrzeug mit einer Bremseinrichtung und Verfahren zum Steuern einer Bremseinrichtung | |
EP3038868B2 (fr) | Procédé pour freiner une véhicule de chémin de fer et système de commande et/ou réglage pour un système de freinage | |
WO2002099547A1 (fr) | Dispositif de production securisee de signal | |
EP3230135B1 (fr) | Système d'aide au démarrage en côte et véhicule automobile muni dudit système | |
EP3091156B1 (fr) | Procédé de détection d'un actionnement | |
EP2423060A1 (fr) | Procédé de commande d'un système d'assistance au freinage et système d'assistance au freinage pour un véhicule | |
EP1630055A1 (fr) | Véhicule automobile avec un système de freinage et procédé d'actionnement d'un système de freinage | |
EP4368473A1 (fr) | Découplage sécurisé de véhicules ferroviaires |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
TPAC | Observations filed by third parties |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNTIPA |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: ALSTOM TRANSPORT TECHNOLOGIES |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: ALSTOM TRANSPORT TECHNOLOGIES SAS |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: ALSTOM TRANSPORT TECHNOLOGIES |
|
PUAL | Search report despatched |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A3 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: B61L 15/00 20060101AFI20150310BHEP |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20151015 |
|
RBV | Designated contracting states (corrected) |
Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: ALSTOM TRANSPORT TECHNOLOGIES |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20170228 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 923220 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20170915 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: FP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 502011012891 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170830 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170830 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171130 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170830 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170830 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171230 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170830 Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170830 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171201 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170830 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171130 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170830 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170830 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R026 Ref document number: 502011012891 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170830 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170830 Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170830 |
|
PLBI | Opposition filed |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260 |
|
PLAX | Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2 |
|
26 | Opposition filed |
Opponent name: SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT Effective date: 20180528 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170830 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170830 |
|
PLBB | Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180728 Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170830 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20180731 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180731 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180731 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180731 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180728 |
|
PLAB | Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO |
|
R26 | Opposition filed (corrected) |
Opponent name: SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT Effective date: 20180528 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170830 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170830 Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20110728 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170830 Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170830 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170830 |
|
APBM | Appeal reference recorded |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREFNO |
|
APBP | Date of receipt of notice of appeal recorded |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA2O |
|
APAH | Appeal reference modified |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCREFNO |
|
APBQ | Date of receipt of statement of grounds of appeal recorded |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA3O |
|
PLAB | Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO |
|
R26 | Opposition filed (corrected) |
Opponent name: SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT Effective date: 20180528 |
|
APBU | Appeal procedure closed |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA9O |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20230719 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
P01 | Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered |
Effective date: 20230823 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20230724 Year of fee payment: 13 Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20230720 Year of fee payment: 13 Ref country code: CZ Payment date: 20230721 Year of fee payment: 13 Ref country code: AT Payment date: 20230720 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Payment date: 20230724 Year of fee payment: 13 Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20230725 Year of fee payment: 13 Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20230719 Year of fee payment: 13 |