EP2216149A1 - Method for manufacturing chipboards - Google Patents
Method for manufacturing chipboards Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2216149A1 EP2216149A1 EP10152355A EP10152355A EP2216149A1 EP 2216149 A1 EP2216149 A1 EP 2216149A1 EP 10152355 A EP10152355 A EP 10152355A EP 10152355 A EP10152355 A EP 10152355A EP 2216149 A1 EP2216149 A1 EP 2216149A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- chips
- cover layers
- wood
- outer cover
- chipboard
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 30
- 239000011093 chipboard Substances 0.000 title claims description 46
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 title claims description 12
- 239000002023 wood Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 90
- 239000002699 waste material Substances 0.000 claims description 39
- 238000000227 grinding Methods 0.000 claims description 9
- 239000000428 dust Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000000717 retained effect Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000010410 layer Substances 0.000 description 115
- 239000011230 binding agent Substances 0.000 description 13
- 239000008186 active pharmaceutical agent Substances 0.000 description 12
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 5
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 5
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000001035 drying Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000012535 impurity Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000004026 adhesive bonding Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005452 bending Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000356 contaminant Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000010902 straw Substances 0.000 description 2
- 241000609240 Ambelania acida Species 0.000 description 1
- 244000025254 Cannabis sativa Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000012766 Cannabis sativa ssp. sativa var. sativa Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000012765 Cannabis sativa ssp. sativa var. spontanea Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 240000006240 Linum usitatissimum Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000004431 Linum usitatissimum Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 240000007594 Oryza sativa Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000007164 Oryza sativa Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229920003180 amino resin Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000010905 bagasse Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000009120 camo Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000005607 chanvre indien Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000002131 composite material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005520 cutting process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004090 dissolution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000945 filler Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011521 glass Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011487 hemp Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052500 inorganic mineral Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011707 mineral Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000004033 plastic Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920003023 plastic Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 230000008092 positive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002994 raw material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000009566 rice Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000004576 sand Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012216 screening Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007873 sieving Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002344 surface layer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002916 wood waste Substances 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B27—WORKING OR PRESERVING WOOD OR SIMILAR MATERIAL; NAILING OR STAPLING MACHINES IN GENERAL
- B27N—MANUFACTURE BY DRY PROCESSES OF ARTICLES, WITH OR WITHOUT ORGANIC BINDING AGENTS, MADE FROM PARTICLES OR FIBRES CONSISTING OF WOOD OR OTHER LIGNOCELLULOSIC OR LIKE ORGANIC MATERIAL
- B27N3/00—Manufacture of substantially flat articles, e.g. boards, from particles or fibres
- B27N3/007—Manufacture of substantially flat articles, e.g. boards, from particles or fibres and at least partly composed of recycled material
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B27—WORKING OR PRESERVING WOOD OR SIMILAR MATERIAL; NAILING OR STAPLING MACHINES IN GENERAL
- B27N—MANUFACTURE BY DRY PROCESSES OF ARTICLES, WITH OR WITHOUT ORGANIC BINDING AGENTS, MADE FROM PARTICLES OR FIBRES CONSISTING OF WOOD OR OTHER LIGNOCELLULOSIC OR LIKE ORGANIC MATERIAL
- B27N3/00—Manufacture of substantially flat articles, e.g. boards, from particles or fibres
- B27N3/08—Moulding or pressing
- B27N3/10—Moulding of mats
- B27N3/14—Distributing or orienting the particles or fibres
Definitions
- the invention relates to a method for the production of chipboard using waste wood and fresh wood with the features of the preamble of independent claim 1.
- the invention is concerned with the widest possible use of waste wood for the production of chipboard, without affecting their technological properties.
- chips from fresh wood usually cutting chips and / or Gatters Georgne, and chips from waste wood are dried in separate lines and then fractionated in separate screening devices.
- the chips are divided into four fractions in both lines: (1) oversized chips returned to comminution, (2) chips for the middle layer of chipboard, (3) chips for the chipboard cover layers and (4) dust, which can be added to the outer layers to a limited extent and otherwise burned.
- the yield of the individual fractions in addition to the type of Generation of chips can be influenced by the mesh size of Siebbeschreiben. In any case, coarse chips are created in both lines, which can be used in the middle layer of chipboard, and fine chips for the surface layers of chipboard.
- From the DE 29 34 212 A1 is a combination plate known in the cover layers of wood and a middle layer of other types of materials such.
- a middle layer of other types of materials such as hemp, flax, bagasse, rice straw, straw, etc., possibly with the addition of wood, are formed to use instead of scarce raw material wood waste in the middle class.
- the preparation of the wood chips for the outer layers and the materials for the middle layer is carried out in separate chip processing lines.
- the invention has for its object to provide a method having the features of the preamble of independent claim 1, with the best possible use of waste wood high quality chipboard with the best technological properties and high quality surface can be produced.
- the object is achieved by a method having the features of independent claim 1.
- the dependent claims 2 to 12 relate to preferred embodiments of the new method.
- the claim 13 is directed to a chipboard produced by the new method.
- the chips for the middle layer and the chips for each two outer layers are processed separately on each side of the chipboard. That is, on each side of the chipboard there is an outer cover layer, for which the chips are at least predominantly processed from fresh wood, and an inner cover layer, for which the chips are at least predominantly processed from waste wood.
- the chips for the outer and inner cover layers are kept separated from each other during production of the chipboard and glued and sprinkled separately.
- the chips of fresh wood are concentrated in the outer cover layers, while the chips of waste wood are concentrated in the inner cover layers and in the middle layer. In this way, the maximum possible benefit is drawn from the fresh wood used.
- the quality of the plate surface of a chipboard produced according to the invention corresponds to the quality of the surface of a chipboard, which is entirely made exclusively of fresh wood.
- Fresh wood chips can be made much longer and leaner than old wood shavings. As a result, less binder can be used in the outer cover layers to achieve the same strength values.
- the strength of a chipboard is essentially determined by its flexural strength. In turn, the bending strength is determined by the chip quality, ie the degree of slimming, and the degree of gluing, in particular of the outer cover layers.
- the shavings of waste wood in the inner cover layers which lie below the flexurally resistant outer cover layers in the case of a chipboard produced according to the invention, can be glued with less binder while achieving comparable strength properties.
- fine chips made of waste wood have an approximately cubic structure and therefore a much larger surface area in terms of weight than chips made of fresh wood and therefore normally require correspondingly more binder.
- a part of the cost advantage of waste wood over fresh wood which is more expensive as such and requires more energy to dry, is usually compensated.
- a maximum cost advantage can be achieved by the use of waste wood, since it is used with a relatively low binder content. For example, panels with a very high proportion of waste wood can be produced whose surfaces can be directly painted and printed.
- the outer cover layers are preferably composed only of fresh wood in order to maximize their surface quality.
- grinding dust can be recycled from the grinding of the chipboard produced according to the invention and added to the cover layers.
- this sanding dust is to be evaluated as fresh wood, since it is produced by sanding the cover layers consisting exclusively of fresh wood and accordingly contains no impurities.
- the inner cover layers as well as the middle layer of the chipboard can be composed exclusively of waste wood. Accordingly, in the new process, it is preferable to crush all the chips obtained from the fresh wood to a size that they are suitable for use in the outside Makes cover layers suitable.
- the middle layer can also be sprinkled from chips from waste wood and chips from fresh wood.
- the chips made of fresh wood according to the invention only or at least largely used for the outer layers, only a relatively small drying device is required for their drying.
- the completely separate preparation of the chips for the inner and outer cover layers also makes it possible to optimize the gluing of the various cover layers with regard to the chips contained and their function.
- different binder amounts or binder compositions may be used.
- the chips for the inner cover layers can be formed in principle coarser than the chips for the outer cover layers.
- the chips for the outer cover layers may pass through a sieve of mesh size in the range of 1.3 to 1.6 mm and be substantially retained by a sieve of 0.3 to 0.6 mm mesh while the chips for the inner cover layers, pass through a sieve with a mesh size in the range of 1.6 to 1.8 mm and can be substantially retained by a sieve with a mesh size of 0.5-0.75 mm.
- the chips for the outer cover layers have a relatively high degree of slimming of 1: 2.5 to 5.
- the thickness of the inner cover layers can be greater than that of the outer cover layers.
- the thickness of the inner cover layers can be set to 1 to 3 mm, while a thickness of the outer cover layers of only 0.5 to 1.5 mm is sufficient.
- this specification refers to the thickness of the outer cover layers after sanding.
- the at least five-layer structure of outer cover layers, inner cover layers and middle layer, wherein only the outer cover layers predominantly consist of fresh wood, is easily detectable.
- a chipboard 1 according to the invention produced according to Fig. 1 has two outer cover layers 2, two inner cover layers 3 and a middle layer 4.
- the middle layer 4 can additionally be subdivided into further partial layers.
- the outer cover layers 2 consist exclusively of chips of fresh wood and sanding dust from surface grinding of previously manufactured chipboard 1.
- fresh wood is treated separately to obtain chips of a single sieve fraction, typically through a sieve with a mesh size of 1.3 to 1.6 mm but is retained by a screen with a mesh size of 0.3 to 0.6 mm.
- Coarse chips are recalculated. Finer chips can be used to a limited extent as the previously mentioned fine grinding as a filler for the outer layers 2. Otherwise they will be burned.
- the chips of fresh wood of the sieve fraction described preferably have a high degree of slimming of about 1: 2.5 to 5, which allows to set a high bending strength of the particle board 1 on the outer cover layers 2 with a relatively low binder content.
- the outer cover layers 2, which are made exclusively of fresh wood, are free of contaminants. Your plan grinding is therefore easy, as well as a division of the chipboard 1 in desired formats. Outside the outer cover layers 2, the chipboard 1 can be completely formed on the basis of waste wood.
- wood chips from two sieve fractions for the inner cover layers 3 on the one hand and the middle layer 4 on the other hand are processed from comminuted waste wood.
- the chips made of waste wood of the inner cover layers 3 are typically somewhat coarser than those of the outer cover layers 2.
- the binder can basically be the same over all layers two to four of the chipboard 1. But it is also possible to use different binders and, for example, in the outer cover layers 2 and possibly also in the inner cover layers 3 in contrast to the middle layer 4 to use a formaldehyde-free binder.
- the person skilled in the art has optimization options in which he sensibly also takes into account the different compositions of the outer cover layers 2 on the one hand and the inner cover layers 3 and the middle layer 4 on the other hand from chips made of fresh wood or waste wood.
- Fig. 2 outlines a possible distribution of the mean chip size G over the thickness d of a chipboard 1 produced according to the invention Fig. 1 .
- the chips for the outer cover layers 2 are typically sprinkled with shavings becoming coarser towards the middle of the plate.
- the chips for the inner cover layers 3 and the middle layer 4 can, as indicated here, also be scattered with a homogeneous distribution over the thickness d.
- Fig. 3 indicated Spanschnverotti G over the thickness d, are selectively avoided in the jumps in the chip sizes between the individual layers 2 to 4. Smaller jumps in the chip size distribution are not critical. However, larger jumps may act as interfaces or interfaces at which there is an increased risk of dissolution of the composite of layers 2 to 4.
- the scattering units for the outer cover layers may be Windstreuschn or roller screens.
- roll gripper heads are preferably used with two superimposed roller beds. With appropriate adjustment, these devices can be used to produce homogeneous layers, layers with a "fine / coarse” selection and also combinations from "homogeneous to fine”.
- a homogeneous Spanuggnverogue in the middle layer can scattering heads with so-called fan-rollers (cage-former) or Roller screens are used with two superimposed roller beds.
- a Spanuggnverander which is a combination of in the FIGS. 2 and 3 shown Span supportivenveranderen is possible.
- the chip sizes of the middle layer 4 according to the symmetrical distribution Fig.
Landscapes
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
- Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
- Forests & Forestry (AREA)
- Dry Formation Of Fiberboard And The Like (AREA)
- Polysaccharides And Polysaccharide Derivatives (AREA)
- Heterocyclic Carbon Compounds Containing A Hetero Ring Having Oxygen Or Sulfur (AREA)
- Die Bonding (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Die Erfindung bezieht sich auf ein Verfahren zur Herstellung von Spanplatten unter Verwendung von Altholz und Frischholz mit den Merkmalen des Oberbegriffs des unabhängigen Patentanspruchs 1.The invention relates to a method for the production of chipboard using waste wood and fresh wood with the features of the preamble of
Die geeigneten Ressourcen fĂĽr Frischholz fĂĽr die Herstellung von Holzwerkstoffen sind begrenzt. Es wird daher notwendig, fĂĽr die Herstellung von Holzwerkstoffprodukten zunehmend auf Alt- oder Recyclingholz zurĂĽckzugreifen, dabei wird hier und im Folgenden der Begriff Altholz fĂĽr Holz verwendet, das bereits zuvor einmal zu einem Produkt verarbeitet wurde.The suitable resources for fresh wood for the production of wood-based materials are limited. It is therefore necessary to resort increasingly to the production of wood-based products on recycled or recycled wood, here and in the following the term waste wood for wood is used, which was previously processed once to a product.
Die Erfindung befasst sich mit einer möglichst weitgehenden Verwendung von Altholz für die Herstellung von Spanplatten, ohne deren technologischen Eigenschaften zu beeinträchtigen.The invention is concerned with the widest possible use of waste wood for the production of chipboard, without affecting their technological properties.
In der Spanplattenindustrie ist eine sogenannte zwei-strängige Spanaufbereitung bekannt. Hierbei werden Späne aus frischem Holz, in der Regel Schneidspäne und/oder Gatterspäne, und Späne aus Altholz in separaten Linien getrocknet und danach in separaten Siebeinrichtungen fraktioniert. Dabei werden die Späne in beiden Linien in vier Fraktionen aufgeteilt: (1) übergroße Späne, die zurück zur Zerkleinerung geführt werden, (2) Späne für die Mittelschicht der Spanplatten, (3) Späne für die Deckschichten der Spanplatten und (4) Staub, der in begrenztem Umfang den Deckschichten zugeschlagen werden kann und ansonsten verbrannt wird. Dabei kann die Ausbeute der einzelnen Fraktionen neben der Art der Generierung der Späne durch die Maschenweite der Siebbespannungen beeinflusst werden. In jedem Fall entstehen in beiden Linien grobe Späne, die in der Mittelschicht der Spanplatten eingesetzt werden können, und feine Späne für die Deckschichten der Spanplatten. Falls in den Sieben der Fraktion (3) nicht ausreichend Späne für die Deckschichten anfallen, werden Späne der Fraktion (2) der Mittelschicht zu Deckschichtspänen nachzerkleinert. Bei der bekannten zwei-strängigen Spanaufbereitung werden die Späne nach der individuellen Aufbereitung von Spänen aus Frischholz und Spänen aus Altholz fraktionsweise zusammengeführt, beleimt und danach mit je einem Streuaggregat für die untere Deckschicht, die Mittelschicht und die obere Deckschicht gestreut. Als Streuaggregate werden typischerweise entweder Windstreukammern (Absetzkammern) oder Rollensiebe eingesetzt. Windstreukammern fraktionieren nach der Flugeigenschaft der Späne, also nach Größe und Gewicht. Dabei fallen große, aber auch kleine schwere Teile vor den kleinen leichten Teilen aus dem Luftstrom aus. Rollensiebe mit einem Rollenbett fraktionieren nach der Größe der Späne. Dadurch entsteht ein Schichtaufbau von fein nach grob. Auch wenn die Fraktion (3) der Altholzlinie, d. h. die Deckschichtfraktion der Späne aus Altholz, nach dem Sieben beispielsweise in einem Steigsichter nachgereinigt wird, kann nicht verhindert werden, dass sich in den Deckschichten Störstoffe aus dem Altholz wiederfinden, zu denen beispielsweise Mineralien, feiner Sand, Glas und Kunststoffe zählen. Diese Störstoffe behindern das Schleifen der Oberflächen der Spanplatten. Sie erzeugen Ausbrüche an Schnittkanten beim Zerteilen der Spanplatten in kleinere Formate. Ferner erreicht die Plattenoberfläche aufgrund der Störstoffe nicht die Qualität einer Feinstschichtoberfläche einer ausschließlich aus Frischholz hergestellten Spanplatte. Erfahrungsgemäß sind auch die Standzeiten der Schleifbänder wesentlich kürzer, wenn in den Deckschichten viel Altholz enthalten. Die geschilderten Mängel treten besonders deutlich hervor, wenn die Deckschichten der Spanplatten mit Rollensieben hergestellt werden.In the chipboard industry, a so-called two-strand chip preparation is known. In this case, chips from fresh wood, usually cutting chips and / or Gatterspäne, and chips from waste wood are dried in separate lines and then fractionated in separate screening devices. The chips are divided into four fractions in both lines: (1) oversized chips returned to comminution, (2) chips for the middle layer of chipboard, (3) chips for the chipboard cover layers and (4) dust, which can be added to the outer layers to a limited extent and otherwise burned. The yield of the individual fractions in addition to the type of Generation of chips can be influenced by the mesh size of Siebbespannungen. In any case, coarse chips are created in both lines, which can be used in the middle layer of chipboard, and fine chips for the surface layers of chipboard. If there are insufficient chips for the cover layers in the sieves of fraction (3), shavings of fraction (2) of the middle layer are comminuted to cover shavings. In the known two-strand chip preparation the chips are fractionally joined after the individual preparation of chips from fresh wood and chips from waste wood, glued and then sprinkled with a scattering unit for the lower cover layer, the middle layer and the upper cover layer. As a scattering units typically either Windstreukammern (Absetzkammern) or roller screens are used. Windscrew chambers fractionate according to the flight characteristics of the chips, that is, their size and weight. Large, but also small heavy parts fall out of the air stream in front of the small, light parts. Roller screens with a roller bed fractionate according to the size of the chips. This creates a layered structure from fine to coarse. Even if the fraction (3) of the waste wood line, ie the top layer fraction of chips from waste wood, is cleaned after sieving, for example, in a climatic sifter, can not be prevented from finding in the top layers impurities from the waste wood to which, for example, minerals, finer Sand, glass and plastics count. These contaminants hinder the grinding of the surfaces of the chipboard. They produce cutouts at cut edges when dividing the chipboard into smaller formats. Furthermore, the plate surface does not reach the quality of a Feinstschichtoberfläche a chipboard made entirely of fresh wood due to the impurities. Experience has shown that the service lives of the sanding belts are also considerably shorter if there are a lot of waste wood in the cover layers. The described defects are particularly evident when the cover layers of the chipboard are manufactured with roller screens.
Aus der
Aus der
Aus der
Der Erfindung liegt die Aufgabe zugrunde, ein Verfahren mit den Merkmalen den Oberbegriffs des unabhängigen Patentanspruchs 1 aufzuzeigen, mit dem unter möglichst weitreichender Verwendung von Altholz hochwertige Spanplatten mit besten technologischen Eigenschaften und hochwertiger Oberfläche herstellbar sind.The invention has for its object to provide a method having the features of the preamble of
Erfindungsgemäß wird die Aufgabe durch ein Verfahren mit den Merkmalen des unabhängigen Patentanspruchs 1 gelöst. Die abhängigen Patentansprüche 2 bis 12 betreffen bevorzugte Ausführungsformen des neuen Verfahrens. Der Patentanspruch 13 ist auf eine nach dem neuen Verfahren hergestellte Spanplatte gerichtet.According to the invention the object is achieved by a method having the features of
Bei dem neuen Verfahren zur Herstellung von Spanplatten unter Verwendung von Altholz und Frischholz werden neben den Spänen für die Mittelschicht auch die Späne für jeweils zwei Deckschichten auf jeder Seite der Spanplatten getrennt aufbereitet. Das heißt, auf jeder Seite der Spanplatten gibt es eine äußere Deckschicht, für die die Späne zumindest überwiegend aus Frischholz aufbereitet werden, und eine innere Deckschicht, für die die Späne zumindest überwiegend aus Altholz aufbereitet werden. Die Späne für die äußeren und die inneren Deckschichten werden bei der Herstellung der Spanplatte durchgängig getrennt voneinander gehalten und auch separat beleimt und gestreut. So sind die Späne aus Frischholz in den äußeren Deckschichten konzentriert, während die Späne aus Altholz in den inneren Deckschichten und in der Mittelschicht konzentriert sind. Auf diese Weise wird der maximal mögliche Nutzen aus dem eingesetzten Frischholz gezogen. Sowohl die positiven Auswirkungen des Frischholzes auf die technologischen Eigenschaften der Spanplatten als auch auf deren Oberflächenqualität wirken sich in den äußeren Deckschichten maximal aus. So entspricht die Qualität der Plattenoberfläche einer erfindungsgemäß hergestellten Spanplatte der Qualität der Oberfläche einer Spanplatte, die insgesamt ausschließlich aus Frischholz hergestellt ist. Späne aus Frischholz können wesentlich länger und schlanker als Späne aus Altholz ausgebildet werden. Dadurch kann bei Erzielung gleicher Festigkeitswerte weniger Bindemittel in den äußeren Deckschichten eingesetzt werden. Die Festigkeit einer Spanplatte wird im Wesentlichen durch ihre Biegefestigkeit bestimmt. Die Biegefestigkeit wiederum wird durch die Spanqualität, d. h. den Schlankheitsgrad, und den Beleimungsgrad insbesondere der äußeren Deckschichten bestimmt. Aus diesen Gründen können bei Erzielung vergleichbarer Festigkeitseigenschaften auch die Späne aus Altholz in den inneren Deckschichten, die bei einer erfindungsgemäß hergestellten Spanplatte unter den biegefesten äußeren Deckschichten liegen, mit weniger Bindemittel beleimt werden. Bekanntlich haben feine Späne aus Altholz eine etwa kubische Struktur und damit eine wesentlich größere Oberfläche bezogen auf das Gewicht als Späne aus Frischholz und benötigen deshalb normalerweise entsprechend mehr Bindemittel. Hierdurch wird üblicherweise ein Teil des Kostenvorteils von Altholz gegenüber Frischholz, das als solches teurer ist und zum Trocknen mehr Energie erfordert, kompensiert. Bei dem erfindungsgemäßen Verfahren kann jedoch ein maximaler Kostenvorteil durch den Einsatz des Altholzes erzielt werden, da es mit einem relativ geringen Bindemittelanteil verwendet wird. So können u.a. Platten mit einem sehr hohen Altholzanteil hergestellt werden, deren Oberflächen direkt lackier- und bedruckbar sind.In the new process for producing chipboard using waste wood and fresh wood, in addition to the chips for the middle layer and the chips for each two outer layers are processed separately on each side of the chipboard. That is, on each side of the chipboard there is an outer cover layer, for which the chips are at least predominantly processed from fresh wood, and an inner cover layer, for which the chips are at least predominantly processed from waste wood. The chips for the outer and inner cover layers are kept separated from each other during production of the chipboard and glued and sprinkled separately. Thus, the chips of fresh wood are concentrated in the outer cover layers, while the chips of waste wood are concentrated in the inner cover layers and in the middle layer. In this way, the maximum possible benefit is drawn from the fresh wood used. Both the positive Effects of fresh wood on the technological properties of chipboard as well as on their surface quality have maximum effect in the outer cover layers. Thus, the quality of the plate surface of a chipboard produced according to the invention corresponds to the quality of the surface of a chipboard, which is entirely made exclusively of fresh wood. Fresh wood chips can be made much longer and leaner than old wood shavings. As a result, less binder can be used in the outer cover layers to achieve the same strength values. The strength of a chipboard is essentially determined by its flexural strength. In turn, the bending strength is determined by the chip quality, ie the degree of slimming, and the degree of gluing, in particular of the outer cover layers. For these reasons, the shavings of waste wood in the inner cover layers, which lie below the flexurally resistant outer cover layers in the case of a chipboard produced according to the invention, can be glued with less binder while achieving comparable strength properties. As is well known, fine chips made of waste wood have an approximately cubic structure and therefore a much larger surface area in terms of weight than chips made of fresh wood and therefore normally require correspondingly more binder. As a result, a part of the cost advantage of waste wood over fresh wood, which is more expensive as such and requires more energy to dry, is usually compensated. In the method according to the invention, however, a maximum cost advantage can be achieved by the use of waste wood, since it is used with a relatively low binder content. For example, panels with a very high proportion of waste wood can be produced whose surfaces can be directly painted and printed.
Wenn auch bei dem erfindungsgemäßen Verfahren nur wenig Frischholz zum Einsatz kommt, so werden doch die äußeren Deckschichten vorzugsweise nur aus Frischholz zusammengesetzt, um ihre Oberflächenqualität zu maximieren. Dabei kann Schleifstaub vom Schleifen der erfindungsgemäß hergestellten Spanplatten zurückgeführt und den Deckschichten zugesetzt werden. Dieser Schleifstaub ist im vorliegenden Fall wie Frischholz zu bewerten, da er durch Schleifen der ausschließlich aus Frischholz bestehenden Deckschichten entsteht und entsprechend keine Störstoffe enthält.Although only a small amount of fresh wood is used in the method according to the invention, the outer cover layers are preferably composed only of fresh wood in order to maximize their surface quality. In this case, grinding dust can be recycled from the grinding of the chipboard produced according to the invention and added to the cover layers. In the present case, this sanding dust is to be evaluated as fresh wood, since it is produced by sanding the cover layers consisting exclusively of fresh wood and accordingly contains no impurities.
Demgegenüber können bei dem neuen Verfahren die inneren Deckschichten ebenso wie die Mittelschicht der Spanplatten ausschließlich aus Altholz zusammengesetzt werden. Entsprechend ist es bei dem neuen Verfahren bevorzugt, alle aus dem Frischholz gewonnenen Späne auf eine Größe zu zerkleinern, die sie für die Verwendung in den äußeren Deckschichten geeignet macht. Grundsätzlich kann die Mittelschicht bei dem erfindungsgemäßen Verfahren auch aus Spänen aus Altholz und Spänen aus Frischholz gestreut werden.In contrast, in the new method, the inner cover layers as well as the middle layer of the chipboard can be composed exclusively of waste wood. Accordingly, in the new process, it is preferable to crush all the chips obtained from the fresh wood to a size that they are suitable for use in the outside Makes cover layers suitable. In principle, in the method according to the invention, the middle layer can also be sprinkled from chips from waste wood and chips from fresh wood.
Weil die Späne aus Frischholz erfindungsgemäß nur oder doch zumindest weit überwiegend für die Deckschichten eingesetzt werden, ist für deren Trocknung nur eine vergleichsweise kleine Trocknungseinrichtung erforderlich.Because the chips made of fresh wood according to the invention only or at least largely used for the outer layers, only a relatively small drying device is required for their drying.
Die vollständig getrennte Aufbereitung der Späne für die inneren und äußeren Deckschichten macht es auch möglich, die Beleimung der verschiedenen Deckschichten in Hinblick auf die enthaltenen Späne und ihre Funktion zu optimieren. Hierfür können unterschiedliche Bindemittelmengen oder auch Bindemittelzusammensetzungen zur Anwendung kommen.The completely separate preparation of the chips for the inner and outer cover layers also makes it possible to optimize the gluing of the various cover layers with regard to the chips contained and their function. For this purpose, different binder amounts or binder compositions may be used.
Um den Bindemittelbedarf bei dem neuen Verfahren ohne Nachteile für die hergestellten Spanplatten möglichst klein zu halten, können die Späne für die inneren Deckschichten grundsätzlich gröber als die Späne für die äußeren Deckschichten ausgebildet werden.In order to keep the binder requirement in the new method as small as possible without disadvantages for the chipboard produced, the chips for the inner cover layers can be formed in principle coarser than the chips for the outer cover layers.
Konkret können die Späne für die äußeren Deckschichten durch ein Sieb mit einer Maschenweite im Bereich von 1,3 bis 1,6 mm fallen und von einem Sieb mit einer Maschenweite von 0,3 bis 0,6 mm im Wesentlichen zurückgehalten werden, während die Späne für die inneren Deckschichten durch ein Sieb mit einer Maschenweite im Bereich von 1,6 bis 1,8 mm fallen und von einem Sieb mit einer Maschenweite von 0,5-0,75 mm im Wesentlichen zurückgehalten werden können.Concretely, the chips for the outer cover layers may pass through a sieve of mesh size in the range of 1.3 to 1.6 mm and be substantially retained by a sieve of 0.3 to 0.6 mm mesh while the chips for the inner cover layers, pass through a sieve with a mesh size in the range of 1.6 to 1.8 mm and can be substantially retained by a sieve with a mesh size of 0.5-0.75 mm.
Vorzugsweise weisen die Späne für die äußeren Deckschichten einen relativ hohen Schlankheitsgrad von 1 : 2,5 bis 5 auf.Preferably, the chips for the outer cover layers have a relatively high degree of slimming of 1: 2.5 to 5.
Weiter ist es bevorzugt, wenn zwischen den inneren und den äußeren Deckschichten und auch zu der Mittelschicht hin keine Trennschichten vorgesehen sind, wie sie sich durch große Sprünge bei den Spangrößen an den Rändern der Schichten ausbilden. Der Spangrößenverlauf innerhalb der einzelnen Schichten ist durch die Gestaltung und die Einstellung der Streueinrichtungen einstellbar.Furthermore, it is preferred if no separating layers are provided between the inner and outer cover layers and also towards the middle layer, as formed by large cracks in the chip sizes at the edges of the layers. The Spangrößenverlauf within the individual layers is adjustable by the design and the setting of the scatterers.
Wie wenig Frischholz für die erfindungsgemäße Herstellung von Spanplatten benötigt wird, wird daraus deutlich, dass die Dicke der inneren Deckschichten größer sein kann als diejenige der äußeren Deckschichten. So kann die Dicke der inneren Deckschichten auf 1 bis 3 mm eingestellt werden, während eine Dicke der äußeren Deckschichten von nur 0,5 bis 1,5 mm ausreichend ist. Diese Angabe bezieht sich jedoch auf die Dicke der äußeren Deckschichten nach dem Schleifen.How little fresh wood is required for the production of chipboard according to the invention, it is clear that the thickness of the inner cover layers can be greater than that of the outer cover layers. Thus, the thickness of the inner cover layers can be set to 1 to 3 mm, while a thickness of the outer cover layers of only 0.5 to 1.5 mm is sufficient. However, this specification refers to the thickness of the outer cover layers after sanding.
Bei einer erfindungsgemäß hergestellten Spanplatte ist der mindestens fünfschichtige Aufbau aus äußeren Deckschichten, inneren Deckschichten und Mittelschicht, wobei nur die äußeren Deckschichten überwiegend aus Frischholz bestehen, leicht nachweisbar.In a chipboard produced according to the invention, the at least five-layer structure of outer cover layers, inner cover layers and middle layer, wherein only the outer cover layers predominantly consist of fresh wood, is easily detectable.
Vorteilhafte Weiterbildungen der Erfindung ergeben sich aus den Patentansprüchen, der Beschreibung und den Zeichnungen. Die in der Beschreibungseinleitung genannten Vorteile von Merkmalen und von Kombinationen mehrerer Merkmale sind lediglich beispielhaft und können alternativ oder kumulativ zur Wirkung kommen, ohne dass die Vorteile zwingend von erfindungsgemäßen Ausführungsformen erzielt werden müssen. Weitere Merkmale sind den Zeichnungen - insbesondere den dargestellten Geometrien und den relativen Abmessungen mehrerer Bauteile zueinander sowie deren relativer Anordnung und Wirkverbindung - zu entnehmen. Die Kombination von Merkmalen unterschiedlicher Ausführungsformen der Erfindung oder von Merkmalen unterschiedlicher Patentansprüche ist ebenfalls abweichend von den gewählten Rückbeziehungen der Patentansprüche möglich und wird hiermit angeregt. Dies betrifft auch solche Merkmale, die in separaten Zeichnungen dargestellt sind oder bei deren Beschreibung genannt werden. Diese Merkmale können auch mit Merkmalen unterschiedlicher Patentansprüche kombiniert werden. Ebenso können in den Patentansprüchen aufgeführte Merkmale für weitere Ausführungsformen der Erfindung entfallen.Advantageous developments of the invention will become apparent from the claims, the description and the drawings. The advantages of features and of combinations of several features mentioned in the introduction to the description are merely exemplary and can come into effect alternatively or cumulatively, without the advantages having to be achieved by embodiments according to the invention. Further features are the drawings - in particular the illustrated geometries and the relative dimensions of several components to each other and their relative arrangement and operative connection - refer. The combination of features of different embodiments of the invention or of features of different claims is also possible deviating from the chosen relationships of the claims and is hereby stimulated. This also applies to those features which are shown in separate drawings or are mentioned in their description. These features can also be combined with features of different claims. Likewise, in the claims listed features for further embodiments of the invention can be omitted.
Die Erfindung wird im Folgenden anhand konkreter Ausführungsbeispiele unter Bezugnahme auf die beigefügten Zeichnungen näher erläutert und beschrieben.
- Fig. 1
- ist ein Querschnitt durch den Schichtaufbau einer erfindungsgemäß hergestellten Spanplatte.
- Fig. 2
- gibt den Verlauf der mittleren Spangröße über die Dicke einer ersten Ausführungsform der erfindungsgemäß hergestellten Spanplatte wieder, und
- Fig. 3
- gibt den Verlauf der mittleren Spangröße über die Dicke einer zweiten Ausführungsform einer erfindungsgemäß hergestellten Spanplatte wieder.
- Fig. 1
- is a cross section through the layer structure of a chipboard produced according to the invention.
- Fig. 2
- shows the course of the average chip size across the thickness of a first embodiment of the particle board according to the invention, and
- Fig. 3
- gives the course of the average chip size over the thickness of a second embodiment of a particle board according to the invention again.
Die Figuren sind dabei ausdrĂĽcklich als Prinzipdarstellungen zu verstehen und nicht unbedingt maĂźstabsgerecht.The figures are to be understood expressly as schematic representations and not necessarily to scale.
Eine erfindungsgemäß hergestellte Spanplatte 1 gemäß
Bevorzugt ist jedoch eine in
Die nachstehende Tabelle gibt mögliche Bemaßungen der verschiedenen Schichten 2 bis 4 einer Spanplatte 1 gemäß
Um das neue Verfahren zur Herstellung einer Spanplatte aus Frischholz und Altholz durchzuführen, werden neben mindestens drei Aufbereitungslinien für die Späne aus Frischholz für die äußeren Deckschichten 2, für die Späne aus Altholz für die inneren Deckschichten 3 und für die Späne aus Altholz für die Mittelschicht 4 insgesamt fünf Streueinheiten benötigt. Mit jeweils einer Streueinheit werden die Späne aus Frischholz für die äußeren Deckschichten 2 gestreut. Mit zwei weiteren Streueinheiten werden die Späne aus Altholz für die inneren Deckschichten 3 gestreut; und mit mindestens einer weiteren Streueinheit werden die Späne aus Altholz für die Mittelschicht 4 gestreut. Wenn dabei eine symmetrische Verteilung der Spangrößen auch über die Mittelschicht erreicht werden soll, wie dies in
Die Streueinheiten für die äußeren Deckschichten können Windstreukammern oder Rollensiebe sein. Für die Herstellung der inneren Deckschichten werden vorzugsweise Rollenstreuköpfe mit zwei übereinander angeordneten Rollenbetten eingesetzt. Bei entsprechender Einstellung können mit diesen Einrichtungen wahlweise homogene Schichten, Schichten mit einer "fein / grob" Selektierung und auch Kombinationen aus" von homogen nach fein" erzeugt werden. Für eine homogene Spangrößenverteilung in der Mittelschicht können Streuköpfe mit sogenannten Fächerwalzen (cage-former) oder Rollensiebe mit zwei übereinander angeordneten Rollenbetten eingesetzt werden. Auch eine Spangrößenverteilung, die eine Kombination der in den
Die für die Umsetzung der vorliegenden Erfindung erforderlichen Maschineninvestitionen werden dadurch schnell kompensiert, dass hochwertige Spanplatten, insbesondere mit hochwertiger Oberfläche unter Verwendung nur eines geringen Anteils an Frischholz und entsprechend relativ geringen Kosten für das Holz und dessen Trocknung hergestellt werden können.The machine investments required for the implementation of the present invention are quickly compensated by the fact that high-quality chipboard, especially with high-quality surface using only a small proportion of fresh wood and, accordingly, relatively low cost of the wood and its drying can be produced.
- 11
- Spanplattechipboard
- 22
- äußere Deckschichtouter cover layer
- 33
- innere Deckschichtinner cover layer
- 44
- Mittelschichtmiddle class
Claims (13)
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE102009000623A DE102009000623A1 (en) | 2009-02-04 | 2009-02-04 | Process for the production of chipboard |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2216149A1 true EP2216149A1 (en) | 2010-08-11 |
EP2216149B1 EP2216149B1 (en) | 2011-03-23 |
EP2216149B2 EP2216149B2 (en) | 2017-11-15 |
Family
ID=42105882
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP10152355.3A Active EP2216149B2 (en) | 2009-02-04 | 2010-02-02 | Method for manufacturing chipboards |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP2216149B2 (en) |
AT (1) | ATE502747T1 (en) |
DE (2) | DE102009000623A1 (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE202017103956U1 (en) | 2017-07-03 | 2017-09-13 | Kronospan Luxembourg S.A. | OSB board and device for producing an OSB board |
IT201900014682A1 (en) * | 2019-08-12 | 2021-02-12 | Fantoni Arredamenti Spa | WOOD FIBER PANEL AND RELATIVE PLANT AND METHOD OF CONSTRUCTION |
Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4035120A (en) * | 1970-04-24 | 1977-07-12 | Ab Karlstadplattan | Apparatus for making sawdust chipboard |
DE2934212A1 (en) | 1979-07-19 | 1981-02-05 | Hubertus Schmid | Combination boards utilising indigenous raw materials - veneered chipboard type constructions produced by hot pressing with min. binder |
DE19622421A1 (en) | 1996-06-04 | 1997-12-11 | Fraunhofer Ges Forschung | Process for processing waste wood |
DE19751326A1 (en) | 1997-11-19 | 1999-05-27 | Pfleiderer Unternehmensverwalt | Work material made from used and waste wood |
EP1033212A1 (en) * | 1999-03-03 | 2000-09-06 | The FORESTRY AND FOREST PRODUCTS RESEARCH INSTITUTE | Explosively - split fragments obtained by water-vapor explosion of wooden source materials, wooden material containing such fragments as its aggregate, their manufacturing methods and machines |
WO2003095167A1 (en) * | 2002-05-08 | 2003-11-20 | Inter Ikea Systems B.V. | A chip board and a process for the preparation thereof |
Family Cites Families (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CH438709A (en) †| 1965-08-12 | 1967-06-30 | Fischer Georg | Method and device for producing a hot-pressed wood-based panel |
DE3820376A1 (en) †| 1988-06-15 | 1989-12-21 | Novopan Gmbh | METHOD FOR PRODUCING MULTI-LAYERED CHIPBOARDS |
DE4434876B4 (en) †| 1994-09-29 | 2004-09-16 | Dieffenbacher Gmbh + Co. Kg | Process and plant for the continuous production of a multilayer board |
-
2009
- 2009-02-04 DE DE102009000623A patent/DE102009000623A1/en not_active Withdrawn
-
2010
- 2010-02-02 AT AT10152355T patent/ATE502747T1/en active
- 2010-02-02 DE DE502010000007T patent/DE502010000007D1/en active Active
- 2010-02-02 EP EP10152355.3A patent/EP2216149B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4035120A (en) * | 1970-04-24 | 1977-07-12 | Ab Karlstadplattan | Apparatus for making sawdust chipboard |
DE2934212A1 (en) | 1979-07-19 | 1981-02-05 | Hubertus Schmid | Combination boards utilising indigenous raw materials - veneered chipboard type constructions produced by hot pressing with min. binder |
DE19622421A1 (en) | 1996-06-04 | 1997-12-11 | Fraunhofer Ges Forschung | Process for processing waste wood |
DE19751326A1 (en) | 1997-11-19 | 1999-05-27 | Pfleiderer Unternehmensverwalt | Work material made from used and waste wood |
EP1033212A1 (en) * | 1999-03-03 | 2000-09-06 | The FORESTRY AND FOREST PRODUCTS RESEARCH INSTITUTE | Explosively - split fragments obtained by water-vapor explosion of wooden source materials, wooden material containing such fragments as its aggregate, their manufacturing methods and machines |
WO2003095167A1 (en) * | 2002-05-08 | 2003-11-20 | Inter Ikea Systems B.V. | A chip board and a process for the preparation thereof |
Cited By (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE202017103956U1 (en) | 2017-07-03 | 2017-09-13 | Kronospan Luxembourg S.A. | OSB board and device for producing an OSB board |
WO2019007538A1 (en) | 2017-07-03 | 2019-01-10 | Kronospan Luxembourg S.A. | Oriented strand board, process for production of an oriented strand board and apparatus for producing an oriented strand board |
EP3648937B1 (en) | 2017-07-03 | 2023-09-06 | Kronospan Luxembourg S.A. | Oriented strand board, process for production of an oriented strand board and apparatus for producing an oriented strand board |
US11969971B2 (en) | 2017-07-03 | 2024-04-30 | Kronospan Luxembourg S.A. | Oriented strand board, process for production of an oriented strand board and apparatus for producing an oriented strand board |
IT201900014682A1 (en) * | 2019-08-12 | 2021-02-12 | Fantoni Arredamenti Spa | WOOD FIBER PANEL AND RELATIVE PLANT AND METHOD OF CONSTRUCTION |
EP3778220A1 (en) | 2019-08-12 | 2021-02-17 | Fantoni S.p.A. | Plant and method to produce a wood fiber panel |
EP3778220B1 (en) | 2019-08-12 | 2023-05-10 | Fantoni S.p.A. | Plant and method to produce a wood fiber panel |
EP4223509A2 (en) | 2019-08-12 | 2023-08-09 | Fantoni S.p.A. | Plant and method to produce a wood fiber panel |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
DE102009000623A1 (en) | 2010-08-05 |
EP2216149B2 (en) | 2017-11-15 |
DE502010000007D1 (en) | 2011-05-05 |
EP2216149B1 (en) | 2011-03-23 |
ATE502747T1 (en) | 2011-04-15 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
DE3936312C2 (en) | ||
DE202017103956U1 (en) | OSB board and device for producing an OSB board | |
DE102016110070A1 (en) | Plant and method for producing a material plate | |
EP4010158B1 (en) | Material board and method for producing a material board | |
DE102017111134B4 (en) | Method and plant for producing a chipboard | |
EP2216149B1 (en) | Method for manufacturing chipboards | |
DE102015120653B4 (en) | Method and system for producing a multi-layer material panel and multi-layer material panel | |
EP2666604B1 (en) | Lightweight chipboard, and method of manufacture | |
DE2119397A1 (en) | Method and arrangement for the production of chipboard | |
CH672441A5 (en) | ||
DE202015106462U1 (en) | Plant for producing a multilayer material plate and a multilayer material plate | |
DE10049050A1 (en) | Oriented strand board with a shavings core and long chip outer layers, are obtained inexpensively with high bending modulus by using specified particle geometrical composition, core shavings content and pressure profile | |
DE102011118009A1 (en) | Method for manufacturing plates with three layers of lignocellulose or cellulose containing chips, involves procuring chips from palm fronds, particularly date-oil palm fronds, in which palm fronds of leaflets and of thorns are exempted | |
DE102020005511B4 (en) | Process for manufacturing a chipboard, plant for manufacturing chipboard and chipboard | |
DE102020005512B4 (en) | Process for the production of an OSB or wafer board, plant for the production of OSB or wafer boards and OSB or wafer boards | |
DE102017111098B4 (en) | Process for producing a particle board and a particle board | |
WO2023046989A2 (en) | Apparatus and method for processing waste wood, in particular for manufacturing material boards | |
DE202016102900U1 (en) | Plant for producing a material plate | |
WO2023046990A2 (en) | Plant and method for manufacturing material boards | |
WO2021023784A1 (en) | Method for producing a material board | |
DE102023000028A1 (en) | Spreading head, spreading system and method for producing a multi-layer spreading mat | |
EP2078599A1 (en) | Chipboard and method for producing same | |
AT306346B (en) | Chipboard with a top layer of wood fibers on one or both sides and a process for the production of these wood fibers | |
DE9116262U1 (en) | Multilayer chipboard | |
DE202017103072U1 (en) | chipboard |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20100604 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: B27N 3/14 20060101ALI20101021BHEP Ipc: B27N 3/00 20060101AFI20101021BHEP |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 502010000007 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20110505 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 502010000007 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20110505 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: VDEP Effective date: 20110323 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110624 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110323 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110323 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110323 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110323 |
|
LTIE | Lt: invalidation of european patent or patent extension |
Effective date: 20110323 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110323 Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110323 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110323 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110623 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110623 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FD4D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110323 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110725 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110323 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110323 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110704 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110723 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110323 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110323 |
|
PLBI | Opposition filed |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260 |
|
PLAX | Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110323 |
|
26 | Opposition filed |
Opponent name: FRITZ EGGER GMBH & CO. OG Effective date: 20111223 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110323 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R026 Ref document number: 502010000007 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20111223 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110323 |
|
BERE | Be: lapsed |
Owner name: GLUNZ A.G. Effective date: 20120228 |
|
PLBB | Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20120229 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20121031 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20120228 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20120229 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110323 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110323 |
|
PLCK | Communication despatched that opposition was rejected |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREJ1 |
|
APAH | Appeal reference modified |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCREFNO |
|
APBM | Appeal reference recorded |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREFNO |
|
APBP | Date of receipt of notice of appeal recorded |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA2O |
|
APBQ | Date of receipt of statement of grounds of appeal recorded |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA3O |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110323 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20120202 Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110323 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100202 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20140202 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20140228 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20140228 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20140202 |
|
PLAB | Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO |
|
R26 | Opposition filed (corrected) |
Opponent name: FRITZ EGGER GMBH & CO. OG Effective date: 20111223 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MM01 Ref document number: 502747 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20150202 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20150202 |
|
APBU | Appeal procedure closed |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA9O |
|
PUAH | Patent maintained in amended form |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009272 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: PATENT MAINTAINED AS AMENDED |
|
27A | Patent maintained in amended form |
Effective date: 20171115 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B2 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R102 Ref document number: 502010000007 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171115 |
|
P01 | Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered |
Effective date: 20230528 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20231213 Year of fee payment: 15 |