EP2186546B1 - Inert gas fire extinguisher for reducing the risk of and extinguishing fires in a protected area - Google Patents
Inert gas fire extinguisher for reducing the risk of and extinguishing fires in a protected area Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2186546B1 EP2186546B1 EP08166037A EP08166037A EP2186546B1 EP 2186546 B1 EP2186546 B1 EP 2186546B1 EP 08166037 A EP08166037 A EP 08166037A EP 08166037 A EP08166037 A EP 08166037A EP 2186546 B1 EP2186546 B1 EP 2186546B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- pressure
- reducing
- oxygen content
- oxygen
- inert gas
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 239000011261 inert gas Substances 0.000 title claims description 92
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 35
- QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N atomic oxygen Chemical compound [O] QVGXLLKOCUKJST-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 123
- 229910052760 oxygen Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 123
- 239000001301 oxygen Substances 0.000 claims description 123
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 claims description 107
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims description 16
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000001747 exhibiting effect Effects 0.000 claims 2
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 113
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 description 26
- 230000001681 protective effect Effects 0.000 description 25
- IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Atomic nitrogen Chemical compound N#N IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 12
- 239000003638 chemical reducing agent Substances 0.000 description 11
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 9
- 239000003570 air Substances 0.000 description 8
- 239000012080 ambient air Substances 0.000 description 6
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 6
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 6
- 229910052757 nitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 6
- 239000000779 smoke Substances 0.000 description 6
- CURLTUGMZLYLDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon dioxide Chemical compound O=C=O CURLTUGMZLYLDI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000003449 preventive effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000002123 temporal effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 241001465754 Metazoa Species 0.000 description 2
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229910002092 carbon dioxide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000001569 carbon dioxide Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000006073 displacement reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000012528 membrane Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910052756 noble gas Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 241001494479 Pecora Species 0.000 description 1
- 229910000831 Steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000006978 adaptation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000443 aerosol Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000008033 biological extinction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012790 confirmation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012217 deletion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000037430 deletion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002706 hydrostatic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000014759 maintenance of location Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 150000002835 noble gases Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010926 purge Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010791 quenching Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000005855 radiation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000010959 steel Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000725 suspension Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001960 triggered effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A62—LIFE-SAVING; FIRE-FIGHTING
- A62C—FIRE-FIGHTING
- A62C99/00—Subject matter not provided for in other groups of this subclass
- A62C99/0009—Methods of extinguishing or preventing the spread of fire by cooling down or suffocating the flames
- A62C99/0018—Methods of extinguishing or preventing the spread of fire by cooling down or suffocating the flames using gases or vapours that do not support combustion, e.g. steam, carbon dioxide
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A62—LIFE-SAVING; FIRE-FIGHTING
- A62C—FIRE-FIGHTING
- A62C35/00—Permanently-installed equipment
- A62C35/02—Permanently-installed equipment with containers for delivering the extinguishing substance
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A62—LIFE-SAVING; FIRE-FIGHTING
- A62C—FIRE-FIGHTING
- A62C35/00—Permanently-installed equipment
- A62C35/02—Permanently-installed equipment with containers for delivering the extinguishing substance
- A62C35/11—Permanently-installed equipment with containers for delivering the extinguishing substance controlled by a signal from the danger zone
- A62C35/15—Permanently-installed equipment with containers for delivering the extinguishing substance controlled by a signal from the danger zone with a system for topping-up the supply of extinguishing material automatically
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A62—LIFE-SAVING; FIRE-FIGHTING
- A62C—FIRE-FIGHTING
- A62C35/00—Permanently-installed equipment
- A62C35/58—Pipe-line systems
- A62C35/68—Details, e.g. of pipes or valve systems
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A62—LIFE-SAVING; FIRE-FIGHTING
- A62C—FIRE-FIGHTING
- A62C99/00—Subject matter not provided for in other groups of this subclass
- A62C99/0009—Methods of extinguishing or preventing the spread of fire by cooling down or suffocating the flames
- A62C99/0018—Methods of extinguishing or preventing the spread of fire by cooling down or suffocating the flames using gases or vapours that do not support combustion, e.g. steam, carbon dioxide
- A62C99/0027—Carbon dioxide extinguishers
Definitions
- the invention relates to an inert gas fire extinguishing system for reducing the risk and extinguishing fires in a shelter, wherein the Inertgasfashionlöschstrom has at least one high-pressure gas storage, in which an oxygen-displacing gas is stored under high pressure, the high-pressure gas storage is connected via a quick opening valve with a manifold, and wherein an extinguishing line is further provided, which is connected on the one hand via a pressure reducing device to the manifold and on the other hand with extinguishing nozzles.
- the basic principle of the inert gas fire extinguishing technology is based on the recognition that in closed rooms, which are only occasionally entered by humans or animals and whose facilities react sensitively to the influence of water, the risk of fire thereby it can be counteracted that the oxygen concentration in the affected area is lowered to a value of, for example, about 12% by volume on average. With such a (reduced) oxygen concentration, most flammable materials can no longer ignite. Accordingly, the main area of application of inert gas extinguishing technology is also computerized areas, electrical sheep and distribution rooms, enclosed facilities as well as storage areas with high-quality assets. The extinguishing effect resulting from this process is based on the principle of oxygen displacement.
- Normal ambient air is known to be 21% by volume of oxygen, 78% by volume of nitrogen and 1% by volume of other gases.
- an oxygen displacing gas such as nitrogen
- the oxygen content in the room atmosphere of the enclosed space is reduced. It is known that an extinguishing effect already starts when the oxygen content drops below about 15% by volume.
- further lowering of the oxygen content may be required to the 12 vol% already mentioned as an example.
- base inertization level a reduced oxygen level compared to the oxygen level of normal ambient air, however, this reduced level of oxygen does not present any hazard to persons or animals, thus still providing the shelter with ease (ie, without special protective measures such as oxygen masks ).
- the basic inerting level corresponds, for example, to an oxygen content in the protected space of 15% by volume, 16% by volume or 17% by volume.
- full inertization level is to be understood as meaning a further reduced oxygen content in comparison to the oxygen content of the basic inertization level, in which the flammability of most materials has already been reduced to such an extent that they can no longer be ignited.
- the full inertization level is typically about 11% to 12% oxygen concentration by volume.
- an "inert gas extinguishing technology” in which by flooding a fire-prone or in fire room by oxygen-displacing gases such as carbon dioxide, nitrogen, noble gases or mixtures From this, the oxygen content in the shelter is first lowered to a certain lowering level (basic inerting level) of, for example, 16% by volume, in the event of a fire or if necessary a further lowering of the oxygen content to a certain full inerting level of, for example, 12% by volume or under it is made.
- a certain lowering level basic inerting level
- an inert gas generator such as a nitrogen generator is used as the inert gas source
- the number of high-pressure gas storage tanks required for full inertization in which the oxygen displacing gas or gas can be achieved Gas mixture (hereinafter also simply called “inert gas”) is stored in compressed form, can be kept as small as possible.
- inting curve means the time course of the oxygen content during the introduction of oxygen-displacing gas (inert gas) into the room atmosphere of the protective space.
- Multi-range fire extinguishing system suitable because the inerting is not adaptable to the individual shelters.
- an inert gas quantity introduced at maximum per unit of time for inerting should be adapted to the corresponding shelter.
- the available pressure relief and the compressive strength of the space envelope determine the maximum permissible amount of inert gas introduced into the protected area per unit of time. This maximum allowable amount of inert gas introduced into the shelter per unit of time ultimately sets the event sequence in the inertization of the shelter, i. the inertisation curve to be used for the room.
- the invention has for its object, an inert gas fire extinguishing system, as for example, from the publication.
- DE 198 11 851 A1 It is known to further develop to the effect that the inerting of a shelter, ie the setting of a lowering level in the room atmosphere of the shelter, according to different event sequences can be done.
- an inert gas fire extinguishing system of the aforementioned type is proposed according to the invention, in which the pressure reducing device has at least two parallel branches, each with a pressure reducing device, each parallel branch is connectable via a controllable valve to the manifold and the extinguishing line, and wherein each pressure reducing device is designed, to reduce a high input pressure to a low output pressure according to a known pressure reduction characteristic.
- the terms "inlet pressure” and “outlet pressure” respectively mean the hydrostatic pressure of the medium (the oxygen displacing gas) applied to the inlet side and outlet side of the corresponding pressure reducing device.
- the pressure reduction device via which the extinguisher with extinguishing nozzles connected to the high-pressure manifold (manifold) is connected, several if necessary via the control of appropriate valves switchable parallel branches, in each of which a pressure reduction device is arranged with known pressure reduction characteristic can be on simple Way to be adapted by the appropriate control of the parallel branches associated valves with the pressure reduction device to be made pressure reduction to the respective application.
- a pressure reduction device to be provided in a first of the at least two parallel branches, the pressure reduction characteristic of which has a significantly higher gradient than the pressure reduction characteristic of a pressure reduction device provided in a second parallel branch.
- the pressure reducing device of the first of the at least two parallel branches in this pressure reducing example, it is possible to increase the amount of oxygen displacing gas supplied from the inert gas fire extinguishing system per unit time compared to a case where the pressure reducing device of the second parallel branch is used to reduce the pressure becomes.
- the event sequence can be varied as needed and, for example, adapted to the pressure relief provided for the protected area to be flooded.
- pressure reduction characteristic means the dependence of the output pressure of a pressure reducing device on the input pressure. It is therefore an input pressure-output pressure characteristic.
- the pressure reduction characteristic of a pressure reduction device is particularly important with regard to the temporal evolution of the oxygen content in the shelter during the inertization, wherein this temporal evolution of the oxygen content is also referred to herein as "inerting".
- a Mehrbreichs inert gas fire extinguishing system can be provided with the solution according to the invention, wherein the amount of oxygen-displacing gas supplied by the inert gas fire extinguishing system to a protective space per unit time is adaptable to, for example, the pressure relief available for the corresponding space.
- the solution according to the invention also makes it possible that, in the case of a multistage inerting method, the respective subsidence levels, such as, for example, the basic or the full inertization level, are respectively set correspondingly to different inertization curves.
- the inert-gas fire-extinguishing system accordingly also has a control device for automatically carrying out a multi-stage inerting process, in which the oxygen content in the protective space is first lowered to a first lowering level (such as a basic inerting level) and if required, for example in case of fire, is then further lowered to one or step by step to a plurality of predetermined lowering levels.
- a first lowering level such as a basic inerting level
- the control device is designed to control the valves of the pressure reduction device such that - to set the corresponding Absenkungshiels - the oxygen content in the shelter is reduced in accordance with a predetermined inerting.
- control device is designed, on the one hand, to actuate the valves of the pressure reduction device in such a way that only one first parallel branch of the at least two parallel branches is connected to the high-pressure manifold (collecting manifold) for reducing the oxygen content to a first lowering level.
- control device is, on the other hand, designed to control the valves of the pressure reduction device such that only a second parallel branch of the at least two parallel branches is connected to the high-pressure manifold and the extinguishing line, in order to lower the oxygen content further to a second setback level, wherein the pressure reduction characteristic the pressure reducing means arranged in the first parallel branch is different from the pressure reducing characteristic of the pressure reducing means arranged in the second parallel branch.
- inert gas fire extinguishing system in which the first reduction level, for example, the Grundinertmaschinesclude and the second reduction level, for example, the Vollinertmaschinesclude, in this preferred implementation of inert gas fire extinguishing system according to the invention can ensure that, for example, in case of fire, the reduction of the oxygen content of the Grundinertmaschinesforementioned to the Vollinertmaschinesclude possible done quickly.
- the pressure reduction devices used for the inertization should be designed with regard to their pressure reduction characteristics such that the maximum permissible amount of oxygen-displacing gas supplied per unit time is not exceeded in order to meet in particular the requirements of effective pressure relief during flooding Protective space care and counteract possible damage to the space envelope.
- control region is designed to control the valves of the pressure reduction device in such a way that only a first parallel branch of the at least two parallel branches of the pressure reduction device is provided for lowering the oxygen content to the first lowering level is connected to the high pressure manifold and the low pressure extinguishing line, wherein the Control device is further configured, for further lowering the oxygen content to a second lowering level, such as the Vollinertmaschinescited to control the valves of the pressure reducing device such that the first parallel branch and a second parallel branch of the at least two parallel branches are connected to the manifold and the extinguishing line.
- a second lowering level such as the Vollinertmaschines designed to control the valves of the pressure reducing device such that the first parallel branch and a second parallel branch of the at least two parallel branches are connected to the manifold and the extinguishing line.
- the solution according to the invention is not limited to a pressure reducing device which has only two parallel branches.
- the pressure reduction device should have a correspondingly higher number of parallel branches.
- the inert gas fire extinguishing system initially lowers the oxygen content in the shelter to a base inerting level, and in the event of a fire (or at bedtime) in the shelter, the oxygen content is further lowered from the base inerting level to a lower level of subsidence and for a predetermined level Time is kept continuously at this subsidence level, wherein the oxygen content is then lowered from this subsidence level further to a Vollinertmaschinespar if a fire after a predetermined time has not extinguished.
- the pressure reduction device of Inertgas fire extinguishing system comprises at least three parallel branches, each with a pressure reducing device, each parallel branch via a controllable valve to the manifold and the extinguishing line is connected, and wherein each pressure reducing device is designed according to a known pressure reduction characteristic to reduce a high inlet pressure to a low outlet pressure.
- control device is designed to control the valves of the pressure reduction device such that only a third parallel branch of the at least three is to lower the oxygen content from the second lowering level to a third lowering level (such as the Vollinertmaschinesus) Parallel branches is connected to the manifold and the extinguishing line.
- pressure reducing devices are usually used to lower a relatively high inlet pressure (for example, 300 bar) to an outlet pressure of, for example, 60 bar on average.
- a pressure reducing device which is designed in the form of a pressure diaphragm, has a pressure reduction characteristic, in which the output pressure is proportional to the input pressure.
- the quick-opening valves are opened in the inert gas fire extinguishing system, this flows under high pressure in the at least one high-pressure gas storage stored oxygen-displacing gas in the high-pressure manifold (manifold), wherein subsequently adjusting itself in the manifold high gas pressure using the pressure reduction device is reduced to an operating pressure of, for example, 60 bar.
- the extinguishing pipe can be designed as a low-pressure line, while a high-pressure manifold is to be selected for the manifold.
- At least a part of the pressure reduction devices has a pressure reduction characteristic in which the output pressure does not exceed a predetermined pressure value independently of the applied input pressure over a predetermined pressure range (working range).
- a pressure reducing device which has a linear pressure reduction characteristic, for example, a pressure reducer, which ensures despite different pressures on the input side (input pressure) that on the output side, a certain output pressure is not exceeded.
- a pressure reduction device designed as a pressure reducer has an example spring-loaded membrane, the pressure acting on the output side of this membrane.
- the diaphragm should also be mechanically coupled to a valve to make the valve the more closed the higher the pressure on the output side increases. When reaching a (adjustable) maximum output pressure, the valve should completely shut off the gas flow.
- the solution according to the invention is not limited to an inert gas fire extinguishing system which has only one high-pressure gas storage.
- the inert gas fire extinguishing system comprises at least two high-pressure gas reservoirs which can be connected to the collecting line via a quick-opening valve, with each high-pressure gas accumulator being assigned a parallel branch with a pressure reducing device. This assignment is made such that when opening the quick opening valve of a high-pressure gas storage of at least two high-pressure gas automatically the valves of the pressure reducing device are controlled such that only the one high-pressure gas accumulator associated parallel branch is connected to the extinguishing line and the manifold.
- the inert gas fire extinguishing system is designed to carry out an inerting process, in which the oxygen content in the shelter is first lowered to a certain, first lowering level and maintained at this first lowering level, and in the event of a fire in the shelter (or at Demand), the oxygen content in the shelter is further lowered from the first descent level to a particular second descent level.
- the inerting system it can be achieved that the lowering of the oxygen content in the protection space to the first lowering level corresponding to a first inertization curve, which is predetermined by a pressure reduction characteristic of a first pressure reduction device, and that the further lowering of the oxygen content in the shelter to the second lowering level in accordance with a second inerting curve, which is predetermined by a pressure reduction characteristic of a second pressure reducing device.
- the shelter preferably continuously, with the aid of a detector at least one fire characteristic is measured to determine whether there is a fire in the shelter or if a fire already broken out in the shelter due to a carried out inerting already extinguished again.
- the measurement of the fire parameter does not have to be continuous, but it is also conceivable that at predetermined times or depending on certain predetermined events, such a measurement takes place.
- the measurement of the fire parameter is preferably carried out by means of a detector for detecting a fire characteristic, which emits a corresponding signal to the control device in the event of fire, in which preferably automatically an inerting of the protective space by controlling the corresponding Quick opening valves and valves of the pressure reducing device is made.
- the detection of a fire parameter takes place with the aid of an aspiratively operating system in which the room air of the protective room is taken from representative air samples and supplied to the detector for fire characteristics.
- fire characteristic is understood to mean physical quantities which are subject to measurable changes in the ambient air of an incipient fire, for example the ambient temperature, the proportion of solid or liquid or gas in the ambient air (formation of smoke in the form of particles or aerosols or steam) or the ambient radiation.
- representative air samples to be taken by means of an aspiratively operating fire detection system of the room air to be monitored and fed to a fire characteristic detector which emits a corresponding signal to the control device in the event of fire.
- An aspirative fire detection device is to be understood as a fire detection device which sucks, for example via a pipeline or duct system at a multiplicity of locations within the protection space, a representative subset of the room air of the protected space to be monitored and then feeds this subset to a measuring chamber with the detector for detecting a fire parameter ,
- this detector for detecting a fire parameter is designed in such a way to output a signal which also makes possible a quantitative statement with regard to the fire parameters present in the sucked subset of the ambient air.
- the invention is not limited only to the previously described inert gas fire extinguishing systems; Rather, it also relates to an inertization process preferably carried out with the inert gas fire extinguishing system according to the invention for reducing the risk and for extinguishing fires in a shelter.
- this inertization method in a first method step, the oxygen content in the protective space is lowered to a specific first lowering level. This is done by preferably controlled introduction of an oxygen-displacing gas (inert gas), which is stored in at least one high-pressure gas storage under high pressure or is provided by a nitrogen generator.
- the oxygen content in the shelter possibly by controlled tracking of inert gas or by continuous introduction of further inert gas - held at or below the first lowering level.
- the oxygen content in the shelter is then further lowered from the first descent level to a particular second descent level.
- the inertization method it is provided that the lowering of the oxygen content in the protective space to the first lowering level corresponding to a first inertization curve, which is predetermined by a pressure reduction characteristic of a first pressure reducing device, which is arranged in a first parallel branch, and that the further lowering of the oxygen content in Protection space to the second lowering level is carried out according to a second inertization curve, which is predetermined by a pressure reduction characteristic of a second pressure reducing device, which is arranged in a second parallel branch.
- the inertization process according to the invention can be carried out in particular by an inert gas fire extinguishing system which, as described above, has a pressure reduction device with at least two parallel branches, and in which the oxygen-displacing gas is stored under high pressure up to, for example, 300 bar in high pressure gas reservoirs (such as steel tanks).
- this initially high accumulator pressure is reduced to a working pressure of preferably a maximum of 60 bar by a pressure-reducing device arranged in a first parallel branch of the pressure-reducing device.
- the pressure reduction device arranged in the first parallel branch comprises a diaphragm with a pre-defined diaphragm opening, which is calculated for example by means of suitable software, in order to reduce the pressure.
- the mass / volume flow introduced into the protected area also reduces in the case of oxygen-displacing gas.
- the mass / volume flow introduced into the protected area also reduces in the case of oxygen-displacing gas.
- the mass / volume flow over the available time can be evened out to prevent pressure and flow peaks at the beginning of the flooding and thus the necessary protective measures in the protected area (eg pressure relief opening area) to a minimum.
- the supply of oxygen-displacing gas is activated in one step, this supply is combined with a gradual switching behind the extinguishant supply arranged parallel branches of the pressure reducing device - and thus of pressure reducing devices, for example in the form of orifices.
- the oxygen-displacing gas flows at the beginning of the flooding at high supply pressure through a small diaphragm cross-section and with decreasing supply pressure through a stepwise enlarged diaphragm cross-section.
- the volume flow peak occurring in conventional extinguishing systems is capped at the beginning of the flooding, whereby the resulting safety measures can be reduced.
- connection of the individual parallel branches of the pressure reducing device and thus the connection of the individual pressure reducing devices, for example in the form of orifices can be done in addition, wherein at certain (predetermined) times another parallel branch is added in the extinguishing agent flow and the aperture cross sections of coming to reduce the pressure used Add pressure reduction devices.
- parallel branches of the pressure reducing device in which pressure reducing devices with different sized aperture (or more generally expressed with different pressure reduction characteristics) for the different times and switched off again.
- the invention also relates to an inerting method for reducing the risk and extinguishing fires in a shelter in which a high pressure oxygen displacing gas is first reduced to a working pressure and then introduced into the shelter to reduce the oxygen content in the shelter to lower to a certain lowering level, wherein for reducing the pressure of the oxygen-displacing gas stored under high pressure, a first pressure reducing device is used, through which already at the beginning of lowering the oxygen content, the oxygen displacing gas flows, and wherein at least to further reduce the pressure of the stored under high pressure oxygen-displacing gas a second pressure reducing device is used, through which the oxygen-displacing gas flows only after a predetermined time after the beginning of the lowering.
- Fig. 1 1 shows a schematic view of a first preferred embodiment of the inert gas fire extinguishing system 100 according to the invention.
- the inert gas fire extinguishing system 100 has a total of 5 high-pressure gas storages 1a, 1b, 1c, 2a, 2b which are each designed, for example, as commercially available 200 bar or 300 bar high-pressure gas cylinders. It would also be conceivable to use one or more high-pressure gas storage containers, for example in the form of high-pressure gas storage tubes, instead of high-pressure gas cylinders.
- an oxygen-displacing gas or gas mixture consisting for example of nitrogen, carbon dioxide and / or noble gas, is stored under high pressure.
- the inert gas fire extinguishing system 100 the high-pressure gas storage 1a, 1b, 1c, 2a, 2b in two groups consisting of the high-pressure gas storage 1a, 1b, 1c and the high-pressure gas storage 2a, 2b divided.
- the division of the high-pressure gas storage 1a, 1b, 1c and 2a, 2b in high-pressure gas storage batteries has the advantage that not all high-pressure gas storage 1a, 1b, 1c, 2a, 2b at the same time, but in a multi-stage inert gas fire extinguishing system for setting a certain Absenkungsgovernings in the room atmosphere of a shelter only the high-pressure gas storage 1a, 1b, 1c and 2a, 2b can be used.
- Each high-pressure gas storage 1a, 1b, 1c, 2a, 2b is connected to a high-pressure manifold 3 via a quick opening valve 11a, 11b, 11c, 12a, 12b. If necessary, the respective quick-opening valves 11a, 11b, 11c, 12a, 12b can be controlled by a control device 7 via corresponding control lines 13a, 13b in order to connect the associated high-pressure gas reservoir 1a, 1b, 1c, 2a, 2b to the high-pressure manifold 3.
- the high-pressure manifold 3 is connected to a pressure reducing device 6.
- the object of the pressure reducing device 6 is to reduce the oxygen displacing gas flowing into the high pressure manifold 3 under high pressure after opening at least one quick opening valve 11a, 11b, 11c, 12a, 12b to a predetermined operating pressure of, for example, 60 bar. Accordingly, there is at the input side of the pressure reducing device 6, a relatively high gas pressure, which is reduced by means of pressure reducing means 22, 32 to the low operating pressure.
- the output side of the pressure reduction device 6 is connected to a low-pressure extinguishing line 4, via which the oxygen-displacing gas throttled down in the pressure reduction device 6 to an operating pressure determined by the pressure reduction devices 22, 32 is supplied to the protective space 10.
- the low-pressure extinguishing line 4 opens in the shelter 10 via a plurality of extinguishing nozzles. 5
- the pressure reducing device 6 at least two, in the embodiment according to Fig. 1 exactly two parallel branches 21, 31.
- each parallel branch 21, 31, one of the already mentioned pressure reducing devices 22, 32 is arranged.
- the individual pressure reducing means 22, 32 of the respective parallel branches 21, 31 on the one hand to the high-pressure manifold 3 and on the other hand with the Low pressure extinguishing line 4 connectable.
- valves 23, 33 are arranged between the high-pressure manifold 3 and the corresponding pressure-reducing device 22, 32, it is of course also conceivable that the valves 23, 33 are present between the corresponding pressure-reducing devices 22, 32 and the low-pressure extinguishing line 4.
- control lines 24, 34 are provided, via which control commands from the control device 7 to the valves 23, 33 can be transmitted. Furthermore, the control device 7 is connected via control lines 13a and 13b to the already mentioned quick-opening valves 11a, 11b, 11c, 12a, 12b of the high-pressure gas reservoirs 1a, 1b, 1c, 2a, 2b in order to supply, if necessary, the quick-opening valves 11a, 11b, 11c, 12a, 12b associated high-pressure gas storage 1a, 2b, 1c, 2a, 2b to connect with either the high-pressure manifold 3 can.
- the pressure reduction devices 22, 32 provided in the two parallel branches 21, 31 can each have, for example, different pressure reduction characteristics.
- the pressure reduction device 22 arranged in the first parallel branch 21 is designed as a pressure reducer with a pressure reduction characteristic constant over a defined pressure range.
- valve 23 is opened to flood the protective space 10 with the aid of the control device 7 and the valve 33 arranged in the second parallel branch 31 flows, if at least one quick-opening valve 11a, 11b, 11c, 12a, 12b has been opened with the aid of the control device 7 -
- the inertization curve runs in a straight line.
- the steepness of the (rectilinear) Inerthneskurve is on the one hand by the volume of space of the enclosed shelter 10 and on the other hand by the reduced by means of the pressure reducing device 22 (constant) operating pressure at the output of the pressure reducing device 6 dependent.
- the pressure reduction device 22 designed as a pressure reducer reduces the high pressure present in the high-pressure manifold 3, the straight-line inerting curve runs more or less steeply.
- the pressure reduction device 32 arranged in the second parallel branch 31 can, for example, likewise be designed as a pressure reducer, which therefore supplies a constant outlet pressure over a certain working range independently of the inlet pressure. It is preferably provided that the pressure reduction characteristic curve of the pressure reduction device 32 arranged in the second parallel branch 31 is designed differently from the pressure reduction characteristic line of the pressure reduction device 22 arranged in the first parallel branch 21. Thus, it is conceivable, for example, that the pressure reduction device 32 arranged in the second parallel branch is designed to provide a constant outlet pressure that is greater in comparison with the reduced pressure present at the outlet of the pressure reduction device 22 arranged in the first parallel branch 21.
- the oxygen-displacing gas is supplied with different volume flows to the shelter 10 by a suitable control of the valves 23, 33.
- the maximum volume flow supplied to the protection space 10 should be matched to the maximum permissible amount of inert gas that can be supplied to the protection space 10 per unit time.
- the inert gas fire extinguishing system 100 is further equipped with a fire detection system, which has at least one fire characteristic quantity sensor 9.
- This fire characteristic quantity sensor 9 is connected in the illustrated embodiment via a control line to the control device 7. With the help of the fire detection system is checked continuously or at predetermined times or events, whether in the room air of the enclosed space 10 a fire has broken out. When a fire parameter is detected, the fire characteristic variable sensor 9 sends a corresponding signal to the control device 7. The control device 7 then preferably automatically initiates the inerting of the enclosed space 10.
- the inert gas fire extinguishing system 100 is also equipped with a sensor 8 for detecting the oxygen concentration in the room atmosphere of the protective space 10.
- the measured values taken by the sensor 8 continuously or at predetermined times or events are fed to the control device 7 via a corresponding data line.
- the oxygen concentration in the shelter 10 at a predetermined lowering level can be maintained by possibly required tracking of oxygen-displacing gas within a certain control range.
- Fig. 2 a further embodiment of the inert gas fire extinguishing system 100 according to the invention is shown.
- the structure corresponds to the in Fig. 2 shown inert gas fire extinguishing system 100 substantially the previously with reference to Fig. 1 described plant; with the exception that in Fig. 2
- the pressure reduction device 6 has a total of three parallel branches 21, 31 and 41, each having a pressure reduction device 22, 32, 42.
- Each parallel branch 21, 31, 41 of the pressure reducing device 6 is connected via a corresponding controllable by the control device 7 valve 23, 33, 43 with the high-pressure manifold 3 and the low-pressure extinguishing line 4 connectable.
- the individual pressure reducing means 22, 32, 42 different pressure reduction characteristics.
- the valves 23, 33, 43 selectively either one of the three parallel branches 21, 31, 41, or two of the three parallel branches 21, 31, 41, or all three parallel branches 21, 31, 41 simultaneously with the high pressure
- the inerting of the shelter 10 can be carried out according to a total of six different inerting curves.
- the in the FIGS. 1 and 2 illustrated pressure reducing means 21, 31, 41 may be formed as a pressure reducer having a constant, straight-line pressure reduction characteristic at least over a certain input pressure range, so that - regardless of the input pressure (pressure in the high-pressure manifold 3) - a constant output pressure unit is provided. If the pressure reduction takes place only with a pressure reducer, then the inertization curve assumes a straight course with a certain slope, the slope of the inertization curve can be influenced by varying the amount of oxygen displacing gas flowing through the pressure reducing device 6 per unit time.
- the pressure reduction devices 22, 32, 42 used in the pressure reduction device 6 are designed as pressure diaphragms, wherein a pressure reduction takes place by a change in cross section by means of a throttle plate with a bore of a specific diameter.
- the size of the bore is adapted to the inert gas fire extinguishing system according to the intended use.
- a pressure reduction device in which the pressure reduction takes place with the aid of a pressure diaphragm, has a curved pressure reduction characteristic, which is dependent on the course of the inlet pressure (pressure in the high-pressure manifold 3) and thus pressure peaks, in particular immediately after opening one of the quick-opening valves 11a, 11b , 11c, 12a, 12b.
- the inerting curve assumes an arcuate development.
- FIGS. 1 and 2 schematically shown embodiments of the inert gas fire extinguishing system 100 according to the invention are shown as a single-area extinguishing systems, of course, the use as a multi-range fire extinguishing system is conceivable.
- the controller 7 controls the multi-range valves accordingly to connect certain low pressure purge lines to the output of the pressure reducing device 6.
- FIGS. 3a and 3b show in each case the oxygen concentration and the quantitative measured value of a detected with the help of the fire characteristics sensor 9 fire characteristic or the smoke level in the shelter 10, wherein with the aid of an inert gas fire extinguishing system 100 according to the present invention, a multi-stage inerting process is performed.
- the representations in the FIGS. 3a and 3b It can be seen that until the time t 0 in the shelter 10, an oxygen concentration of about 21 vol .-% is present and thus corresponds to the oxygen concentration of the normal ambient air.
- the inerting of the protective space 10 begins by continuously supplying an oxygen-displacing gas until the time t 1 of the room atmosphere of the enclosed space 10.
- the representation in Fig. 3a It can be seen that in the time interval t 0 - t 1, the inerting curve is rectilinear and relatively flat. This curve shape of the inertization curve is possible, for example, by connecting a first of the at least two parallel branches 21, 31, 41 of the pressure reduction device 6 to the high-pressure manifold 3 and the low-pressure extinguishing line 4, in which first parallel branch 21 a pressure reduction device 22 designed as a pressure reducer is provided.
- the oxygen content in the enclosed space 10 is reduced to a first subsidence level of, for example, 15.9 vol%.
- a first subsidence level of, for example, 15.9 vol%.
- the oxygen content is maintained until time t 2 .
- This is preferably done by continuously measuring the oxygen concentration in the shelter 10 with the help of the oxygen sensor 8, and by introducing oxygen displacing gas or fresh air into the shelter in a controlled manner.
- the term "maintaining the oxygen concentration at your particular subsidence level” is understood to mean maintaining the oxygen concentration within a certain control range, ie, within a range defined by upper and lower thresholds.
- the maximum amplitude of the oxygen concentration in this control range is adjustable in advance and is for example 0.1 to 0.4 vol .-%.
- the smoke level or the quantitative measured value of the fire parameter which is detected continuously or at predefined times by the fire characteristic detector 9, has exceeded a first threshold value (alarm threshold 1) Fig. 3b can be seen.
- the oxygen content in the shelter is reduced from the original 21 vol% to the first descent level.
- the first subsidence level corresponds to the one in Fig.
- FIG. 3a illustrated curve of an oxygen concentration of about 15.9 vol .-%.
- the timing of the Fig. 3a can be seen, the lowering of the oxygen content to the first lowering level within a relatively long period of time (t 1 - t 0 ), since during the inerting, ie during the lowering of the oxygen content to the first lowering level, already an active fire fighting takes place.
- the slope of the inerting curve is increased in the illustrated embodiment, for example, by a second parallel branch 31 is switched on in the pressure reduction device 6 in addition to the first parallel branch 21, in which a pressure reduction device 32 is arranged in the form of a pressure reducer.
- the pressure reducing device 32 of the second parallel branch 31 is preferably designed to deliver a higher outlet pressure, so that the inerting curve is steeper in the lowering to the second lowering level ,
- Reconfirming the fire alarm at time t 4 causes the oxygen content in the shelter to be lowered further from the second descent level to the full inertization level, this time by introducing as fast as possible a corresponding amount of oxygen displacing gas into the space atmosphere of the shelter.
- at least two parallel branches 21, 31 are simultaneously opened in the pressure reduction device 6, in order to thus enable the largest possible inert gas throughput through the pressure reduction device 6. Since the pressure reducing devices 22, 32 used for pressure reduction are each designed as pressure reducers, the inerting curve again assumes a rectilinear course when lowering the oxygen content from the second lowering level to the third lowering level (full inerting level), although the gradient of the inerting curve is again is increased.
- the Vollinertmaschinesmat is preferably set such that it corresponds to an oxygen concentration, which is below the ignition limit of existing materials in the shelter (fire load).
- the Vollinertmaschinesmat is thus set via two intermediate stages, namely the first and the second lowering level.
- a different pressure reduction measure is used for each intermediate stage, which is ultimately reflected in the curve of the inerting curve.
- FIGS. 4a and 4b another scenario is presented in which the reduction of the oxygen content from originally 21% by volume to the first subsidence level (for example 15.9% by volume) is carried out according to a rectilinear inertization curve which deliberately has such a low slope that only after a relatively long time, the oxygen content in the shelter is lowered to the first lowering level. Due to the slow introduction of the oxygen-displacing gas into the shelter no special pressure relief measures must be provided. Furthermore, during the lowering of the oxygen content, the fire development or fire extinguishment can be observed very accurately.
- FIG. 5 is a schematic view of another exemplary embodiment of the inert gas fire extinguishing system 100 according to the invention, this time the inert gas fire extinguishing system 100 is designed in the form of a multi-range system, with which a preventive fire protection or fire extinguishing for a total of two shelters 10-1 and 10-2 of one and the same Inertgas mecaniclöschstrom 100 is provided.
- the available pressure relief and the compressive strength of the space envelope determined the maximum permissible amount of inert gas introduced per unit of time into the protected space. This maximum allowed, per unit of time in the Protected space introduced inert gas ultimately sets the event sequence in the inerting of the shelter, ie the applicable for the room inerting curve.
- the multi-range fire extinguishing system 100 substantially corresponds to the single-range fire extinguishing system, which previously with reference to the representation in Fig. 1 has been described.
- the multi-range fire extinguishing system 100 according to Fig. 5 a plurality of high-pressure gas storage 1a, 1b, 1c, 2a, 2b, which in turn may each be designed, for example, as commercially available 200-bar or 300-bar high-pressure gas cylinders, and in which an oxygen-displacing gas or gas mixture is stored under high pressure.
- Each high-pressure gas storage 1a, 1b, 1c, 2a, 2b can be connected to a high-pressure collecting pipe 3 via a quick-opening valve 11a, 11b, 11c, 12a, 12b which can be activated by a control device 7.
- the high-pressure manifold 3 is connected to a pressure reducing device 6, which at least two, in the embodiment according to Fig. 5 exactly two parallel branches 21, 31 has. In each parallel branch 21, 31, one of the already mentioned pressure reducing devices 22, 32 is arranged.
- the individual pressure reducing devices 22, 32 of the respective parallel branches 21, 31 can be connected to the high-pressure manifold 3 on the one hand and to a low-pressure extinguishing line 4 connected to the output side of the pressure reduction device 6 via corresponding valves 23, 33 that can be controlled by the control device 7.
- each parallel branch 4-1, 4-2 in one of the two shelters 10-1, 10- 2 in each case via a plurality of extinguishing nozzles 5 opens.
- Each parallel branch 4-1, 4-2 of the low-pressure extinguishing line 4 can be connected to the low-pressure extinguishing line 4 and thus to the outlet side of the pressure-reducing device 6 via a range valve 41, 42 that can be activated by the control device 7.
- the provided in the two parallel branches 21, 31 of the pressure reduction device 6 pressure reduction devices 22, 32 each have a adapted to one of the two shelters 10-1, 10-2 pressure reduction characteristic.
- the pressure reduction device arranged in the first parallel branch 21 22 has adapted to the maximum allowable load of the first shelter 10-1 pressure reduction characteristic.
- the valve 23 is opened and the valve 33 arranged in the second parallel branch 31 closes, if at least one quick-opening valve 11a, 11b, 11c, 12a flows with the aid of the control device 7 12b, the oxygen-displacing gas present in the high-pressure manifold 3 is passed through the first parallel branch 21 of the pressure-reducing device 6 to the low-pressure extinguishing line 4.
- the pressure reduction device 22 arranged in the first parallel branch 21 has a pressure reduction characteristic adapted to the maximum permissible load of the first protection space 10-1, the inerting of the first protection space 10-1 takes place in accordance with an event sequence which can be specifically adapted to the first protection space 10-1.
- the pressure reduction device 32 arranged in the second parallel branch 31 of the pressure reduction device 6 can correspondingly have a pressure reduction characteristic adapted to the maximum permissible load of the second protection space 10-2 so that, if required, the inerting of the second protection space 10-2 according to one to the second protection space 10-2 customizable event sequence can be done.
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Emergency Management (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Fire-Extinguishing By Fire Departments, And Fire-Extinguishing Equipment And Control Thereof (AREA)
- Fire-Extinguishing Compositions (AREA)
- Buildings Adapted To Withstand Abnormal External Influences (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Die Erfindung betrifft eine Inertgasfeuerlöschanlage zur Minderung des Risikos und zum Löschen von Bränden in einem Schutzraum, wobei die Inertgasfeuerlöschanlage mindestens einen Hochdruckgasspeicher aufweist, in welchem ein sauerstoffverdrängendes Gas unter hohem Druck gespeichert ist, wobei der Hochdruckgasspeicher über ein Schnellöffnungsventil mit einer Sammelleitung verbindbar ist, und wobei ferner eine Löschleitung vorgesehen ist, welche einerseits über eine Druckreduzierungsvorrichtung mit der Sammelleitung und andererseits mit Löschdüsen verbunden ist.The invention relates to an inert gas fire extinguishing system for reducing the risk and extinguishing fires in a shelter, wherein the Inertgasfeuerlöschanlage has at least one high-pressure gas storage, in which an oxygen-displacing gas is stored under high pressure, the high-pressure gas storage is connected via a quick opening valve with a manifold, and wherein an extinguishing line is further provided, which is connected on the one hand via a pressure reducing device to the manifold and on the other hand with extinguishing nozzles.
Eine derartige Inertgasfeuerlöschanlage ist dem Prinzip nach aus dem Stand der Technik bekannt. Beispielsweise wird in der deutschen Patentanmeldung
Dem Grundprinzip der Inertgasfeuerlöschtechnik liegt die Erkenntnis zu Grunde, dass in geschlossenen Räumen, die nur gelegentlich von Mensch oder Tier betreten werden und deren Einrichtungen sensibel auf Wassereinvirkung reagieren, der Brandgefahr dadurch begegnet werden kann, dass die Sauerstoffkonzentration in dem betroffenen Bereich auf einen Wert von im Mittel beispielsweise etwa 12 Vol.-% abgesenkt wird. Bei einer solchen (reduzierten) Sauerstoffkonzentration können sich die meisten brennbaren Materialien nicht mehr entzünden. Haupteinsatzgebiet der Inertgaslöschtechnik sind dementsprechend auch EDV-Bereiche, elektrische Schaf- und Verteilerräume, umschlossene Einrichtungen sowie Lagerbereiche mit hochwertigen Wirtschaftsgütern. Die bei diesem Verfahren resultierende Löschwirkung beruht auf dem Prinzip der Sauerstoffverdrängung. Normale Umgebungsluft besteht bekanntlich zu 21 Vol.-% aus Sauerstoff, zu 78 Vol.-% aus Stickstoff und zu 1 Vol.-% aus sonstigen Gasen. Zum Löschen wird durch Einleiten eines sauerstoffverdrängenden Gases, wie beispielsweise Stickstoff, der Sauerstoffanteil in der Raumatmosphäre des umschlossenen Raumes verringert. Es ist bekannt, dass eine Löschwirkung bereits dann einsetzt, wenn der Sauerstoffanteil unter etwa 15 Vol.-% absinkt. Abhängig von den in dem Schutzraum vorhandenen brennbaren Materielien kann ein weiteres Absenken des Sauerstoffanteils auf die als Beispiel bereits genannten 12 Vol.-% erforderlich sein.The basic principle of the inert gas fire extinguishing technology is based on the recognition that in closed rooms, which are only occasionally entered by humans or animals and whose facilities react sensitively to the influence of water, the risk of fire thereby it can be counteracted that the oxygen concentration in the affected area is lowered to a value of, for example, about 12% by volume on average. With such a (reduced) oxygen concentration, most flammable materials can no longer ignite. Accordingly, the main area of application of inert gas extinguishing technology is also computerized areas, electrical sheep and distribution rooms, enclosed facilities as well as storage areas with high-quality assets. The extinguishing effect resulting from this process is based on the principle of oxygen displacement. Normal ambient air is known to be 21% by volume of oxygen, 78% by volume of nitrogen and 1% by volume of other gases. To extinguish, by introducing an oxygen displacing gas, such as nitrogen, the oxygen content in the room atmosphere of the enclosed space is reduced. It is known that an extinguishing effect already starts when the oxygen content drops below about 15% by volume. Depending on the combustible materials present in the shelter, further lowering of the oxygen content may be required to the 12 vol% already mentioned as an example.
Unter dem hierin verwendeten Begriff "Grundinertisierungsniveau" ist ein im Vergleich zum Sauerstoffgehalt der normalen Umgebungsluft reduzierter Sauerstoffgehalt zu verstehen, wobei allerdings dieser reduzierte Sauerstoffgehalt noch keinerlei Gefährdung von Personen oder Tieren bedeutet, sodass diese den Schutzraum noch problemlos (d. h. ohne besondere Schutzmaßnahmen wie beispielsweise Sauerstoffmasken) betreten können. Das Grundinertisierungsniveau entspricht beispielsweise einem Sauerstoffgehalt in dem Schutzraum von 15 Vol.-%, 16 Vol.-% oder 17 Vol.-%.By the term "base inertization level" as used herein is meant a reduced oxygen level compared to the oxygen level of normal ambient air, however, this reduced level of oxygen does not present any hazard to persons or animals, thus still providing the shelter with ease (ie, without special protective measures such as oxygen masks ). The basic inerting level corresponds, for example, to an oxygen content in the protected space of 15% by volume, 16% by volume or 17% by volume.
Hingegen ist unter dem Begriff "Vollinertisierungsniveau" ein im Vergleich zum Sauerstoffgehalt des Grundinertisierungsniveaus weiter reduzierter Sauerstoffgehalt zu verstehen, bei welchem die Entflammbarkeit der meisten Materialien bereits soweit herabgesetzt ist, dass sich diese nicht mehr entzünden können. Abhängig von der in dem betroffenen Schutzraum vorhandenen Brandlast liegt das Vollinertisierungsniveau in der Regel bei etwa 11 Vol.-% bis 12 Vol.-% Sauerstoffkonzentration.On the other hand, the term "full inertization level" is to be understood as meaning a further reduced oxygen content in comparison to the oxygen content of the basic inertization level, in which the flammability of most materials has already been reduced to such an extent that they can no longer be ignited. Depending on the fire load present in the affected shelter, the full inertization level is typically about 11% to 12% oxygen concentration by volume.
Bei einem beispielsweise aus der Druckschrift
Bei der praktischen Anwendung des vorstehend beschriebenen und an sich bekannten zweistufigen Inertisierungsverfahrens hat es sich bei bestimmten Fällen allerdings als problematisch erwiesen, dass die Inertisierung des Schutzraumes zum Einstellen eines vorgegebenen Absenkungsniveaus, wie beispielsweise des Grund- oder Vollinertisierungsniveaus, nicht entsprechend einem vorab festlegbaren Ereignisablauf erfolgen kann. Insbesondere wird bei derzeit bekannten mehrstufigen Inertgasfeuerlöschanlagen nicht berücksichtigt, dass es ggf. wünschenswert ist, eine stufenweise Inertisierung eines Schutzraumes, d.h. ein schrittweises Einstellen vorgegebener Absenkungsniveaus, entsprechend unterschiedlicher Ereignisabläufe vorzunehmen, wobei diese Ereignisabläufe an besondere Bedingungen anpassbar sind. Bei einem mehrstufigen Inertisierungsverfahren, wie es beispielsweise aus der Druckschrift
Unter dem hierin verwendeten Begriff "Inertisierungskurve" ist der zeitliche Verlauf des Sauerstoffgehalts bei der Einleitung von sauerstoffverdrängendem Gas (Inertgas) in die Raumatmosphäre des Schutzraumes zu verstehen.The term "inerting curve" as used herein means the time course of the oxygen content during the introduction of oxygen-displacing gas (inert gas) into the room atmosphere of the protective space.
Aufgrund dieser Einschränkung ist eine Inertgasfeuerlöschanlage, wie sie beispielsweise in der Druckschrift
Mehrbereichsfeuerlöschanlage geeignet, da die Inertisierung nicht an die einzelnen Schutzräume anpassbar ist. Insbesondere wird nicht berücksichtigt, dass beispielsweise bei unterschiedlich dimensionierten Schutzräumen eine zur Inertisierung maximal pro Zeiteinheit eingeleitete Inertgasmenge an den entsprechenden Schutzraum angepasst sein sollte. Hierbei bestimmen insbesondere die zur Verfügung stehende Druckentlastung sowie die Druckfestigkeit der Raumhülle die maximal zulässige, pro Zeiteinheit in den Schutzraum eingeleitete Inertgasmenge. Diese maximal zulässige, pro Zeiteinheit in den Schutzraum eingeleitete Inertgasmenge legt letztendlich den Ereignisablauf bei der Inertisierung des Schutzraumes, d.h. die für den Raum anzuwendende Inertisierungskurve fest.Multi-range fire extinguishing system suitable because the inerting is not adaptable to the individual shelters. In particular, it is not considered that, for example, in the case of differently dimensioned shelters, an inert gas quantity introduced at maximum per unit of time for inerting should be adapted to the corresponding shelter. In particular, the available pressure relief and the compressive strength of the space envelope determine the maximum permissible amount of inert gas introduced into the protected area per unit of time. This maximum allowable amount of inert gas introduced into the shelter per unit of time ultimately sets the event sequence in the inertization of the shelter, i. the inertisation curve to be used for the room.
Bei der Verwendung einer Inertgasfeuerlöschanlage als Mehrbereichsanlage, bei welcher also ein präventiver Brandschutz oder eine Brandlöschung für mehrere Schutzräume von ein und derselben Inertgasfeuerlöschanlage bereitgestellt wird, tritt somit das Problem auf, dass unabhängig davon, welcher der mehreren Schutzräume mit einem sauerstoffverdrängenden Gas zu fluten ist, die Inertisierung des Schutzraumes entsprechend ein und demselben Ereignisablauf vorgenommen wird. Demnach wird bei herkömmlichen Mehrbereichs-Feuerlöschanlagen einem Schutzraum, der ein relativ kleines Raumvolumen aufweist, pro Zeiteinheit dieselbe Menge an sauerstoffverdrängendem Gas zugeführt, wie einem Schutzraum mit einem verhältnismäßig großen Raumvolumen. Da die von der Inertgasfeuerlöschanlage pro Zeiteinheit bereitstellbare Inertgasmenge insbesondere von den existierenden Druckentlastungsmaßnahmen der jeweiligen Schutzräume abhängig ist, bedeutet dies, dass unter Umständen die Inertisierung eines Schutzraumes wesentlich langsamer erfolgt, als dies tatsächlich möglich wäre.When using an inert gas fire extinguishing system as a multi-zone system, in which therefore a preventive fire protection or fire extinguishing for several shelters provided by one and the same inert gas fire extinguishing system, thus the problem arises that regardless of which of the multiple shelters is to flood with an oxygen-displacing gas, the inerting of the shelter is carried out according to one and the same event sequence. Thus, in conventional multi-range fire extinguishing systems, a shelter having a relatively small volume of space is supplied with the same amount of oxygen displacing gas per unit time as a shelter having a relatively large volume of space. Since the amount of inert gas which can be supplied by the inert-gas fire extinguishing system per unit of time depends, in particular, on the existing pressure relief measures of the respective protective rooms, this means that under certain circumstances the inerting of a protected area may be much slower than would actually be possible.
Auf Grundlage dieser Problemstellung liegt der Erfindung die Aufgabe zugrunde, eine Inertgasfeuerlöschanlage, wie sie beispielsweise aus der Druckschrift.
Zur Lösung dieser Aufgabe wird erfindungsgemäß eine Inertgasfeuerlöschanlage der eingangs genannten Art vorgeschlagen, bei welcher die Druckreduzierungsvorrichtung mindestens zwei Parallelzweige mit jeweils einer Druckreduzierungseinrichtung aufweist, wobei jeder Parallelzweig über ein ansteuerbares Ventil mit der Sammelleitung und der Löschleitung verbindbar ist, und wobei jede Druckreduzierungseinrichtung ausgelegt ist, gemäß einer bekannten Druckreduzierungskennlinie einen hohen Eingangsdruck auf einen niedrigen Ausgangsdruck zu reduzieren. Unter den hierin verwendeten Begriffen "Eingangsdruck" bzw. "Ausgangsdruck" ist jeweils der an der Eingangsseite bzw. Ausgangsseite der entsprechenden Druckreduzierungseinrichtung anliegender hydrostatische Druck des Mediums (des sauerstoffverdrängenden Gases) zu verstehen.To achieve this object, an inert gas fire extinguishing system of the aforementioned type is proposed according to the invention, in which the pressure reducing device has at least two parallel branches, each with a pressure reducing device, each parallel branch is connectable via a controllable valve to the manifold and the extinguishing line, and wherein each pressure reducing device is designed, to reduce a high input pressure to a low output pressure according to a known pressure reduction characteristic. As used herein, the terms "inlet pressure" and "outlet pressure" respectively mean the hydrostatic pressure of the medium (the oxygen displacing gas) applied to the inlet side and outlet side of the corresponding pressure reducing device.
Die mit der erfindungsgemäßen Lösungen erzielbaren Vorteile liegen auf der Hand. Dadurch, dass die Druckreduzierungsvorrichtung, über welche die mit Löschdüsen verbundene Löschleitung mit der Hochdruck-Sammelleitung (Sammelrohr) verbunden ist, mehrere bei Bedarf über die Ansteuerung entsprechender Ventile zuschaltbare Parallelzweige verfügt, in denen jeweils eine Druckreduzierungseinrichtung mit bekannter Druckreduzierungskennlinie angeordnet ist, kann auf einfache Weise durch geeignetes Ansteuern der den Parallelzweigen zugeordneten Ventilen die mit der Druckreduzierungsvorrichtung vorzunehmende Druckreduzierung an die jeweilige Anwendung angepasst werden. So ist es beispielsweise denkbar, dass in einem ersten der mindestens zwei Parallelzweige eine Druckreduzierungseinrichtung vorgesehen ist, deren Druckreduzierungskennlinie im Vergleich zu der Druckreduzierungskennlinie einer in einem zweiten Parallelzweig vorgesehenen Druckreduzierungseinrichtung eine deutlich höhere Steigung aufweist. Indem bei diesem Bespiel zur Druckreduzierung die Druchreduzierungseinrichtung des ersten der mindestens zwei Parallelzweige eingesetzt wird, ist es möglich, die von der Inertgasfeuerlöschanlage pro Zeiteinheit der Löschleitung zugeführten Menge an sauerstoffverdrängendem Gas zu erhöhen verglichen mit einem Fall, wenn zur Druckreduzierung die Druckreduzierungseinrichtung des zweiten Parallelzweiges verwendet wird. Auf diese Weise kann mit ein und derselben Inertgasfeuerlöschanlage beim Fluten eines Schutzbereiches der Ereignisablauf je nach Bedarf variiert und beispielsweise an die für den zu flutenden Schutzbereich vorgesehene Druckentlastung angepasst werden.The advantages that can be achieved with the solutions according to the invention are obvious. The fact that the pressure reduction device, via which the extinguisher with extinguishing nozzles connected to the high-pressure manifold (manifold) is connected, several if necessary via the control of appropriate valves switchable parallel branches, in each of which a pressure reduction device is arranged with known pressure reduction characteristic can be on simple Way to be adapted by the appropriate control of the parallel branches associated valves with the pressure reduction device to be made pressure reduction to the respective application. Thus, it is conceivable, for example, for a pressure reduction device to be provided in a first of the at least two parallel branches, the pressure reduction characteristic of which has a significantly higher gradient than the pressure reduction characteristic of a pressure reduction device provided in a second parallel branch. By using the pressure reducing device of the first of the at least two parallel branches in this pressure reducing example, it is possible to increase the amount of oxygen displacing gas supplied from the inert gas fire extinguishing system per unit time compared to a case where the pressure reducing device of the second parallel branch is used to reduce the pressure becomes. In this way, with one and the same inert gas fire extinguishing system during flooding of a protected area, the event sequence can be varied as needed and, for example, adapted to the pressure relief provided for the protected area to be flooded.
Unter dem hierin verwendeten Begriff "Druckreduzierungskennlinie" ist die Abhängigkeit des Ausgangsdruckes einer Druckreduzierungseinrichtung von dem Eingangsdruck zu verstehen. Es handelt sich demnach um eine Eingangsdruck-Ausgangsdruck-Kennlinie. Die Druckreduzierungskennlinie einer Druckreduzierungseinrichtung ist insbesondere wichtig im Hinblick auf die zeitliche Entwicklung des Sauerstoffgehaltes im Schutzraum während der Inertisierung, wobei diese zeitliche Entwicklung des Sauerstoffgehaltes hierin auch als "Inertisierungskurve" bezeichnet wird.The term "pressure reduction characteristic" as used herein means the dependence of the output pressure of a pressure reducing device on the input pressure. It is therefore an input pressure-output pressure characteristic. The pressure reduction characteristic of a pressure reduction device is particularly important with regard to the temporal evolution of the oxygen content in the shelter during the inertization, wherein this temporal evolution of the oxygen content is also referred to herein as "inerting".
Demnach ist es ersichtlich, dass mit der erfindungsgemäßen Lösung eine Mehrbreichs-Inertgasfeuerlöschanlage bereitstellbar ist, wobei die von der Inertgasfeuerlöschanlage einem Schutzraum pro Zeiteinheit zugeführte Menge an sauerstoffverdrängendem Gas anpassbar an beispielsweise die für den entsprechenden Raum zur Verfügung stehende Druckentlastung ist.Accordingly, it can be seen that a Mehrbreichs inert gas fire extinguishing system can be provided with the solution according to the invention, wherein the amount of oxygen-displacing gas supplied by the inert gas fire extinguishing system to a protective space per unit time is adaptable to, for example, the pressure relief available for the corresponding space.
Darüber hinaus ermöglicht es die erfindungsgemäße Lösung auch, dass bei einem mehrstufigen Inertisierungsverfahren die jeweiligen Absenkungsniveaus, wie beispielsweise das Grund- oder das Vollinertisierungsniveau, jeweils entsprechend unterschiedlicher Inertisierungskurven eingestellt werden.In addition, the solution according to the invention also makes it possible that, in the case of a multistage inerting method, the respective subsidence levels, such as, for example, the basic or the full inertization level, are respectively set correspondingly to different inertization curves.
In einer bevorzugten Weiterentwicklung der erfindungsgemäßen Lösung weist die Inertgasfeuerlöschanlage demnach ferner eine Steuereinrichtung zum automatischen Durchführen eines mehrstufigen Inertisierungsverfahrens auf, bei welchem der Sauerstoffgehalt in dem Schutzraum zunächst auf ein erstes Absenkungsniveau (wie beispielsweise ein Grundinertisierungsniveau) abgesenkt und bei Bedarf, zum Beispiel im Brandfall, anschließend auf ein oder schrittweise auf mehrere vorgegebene Absenkungsniveaus weiter abgesenkt wird. Vorzugsweise ist bei dieser Weiterbildung die Steuereinrichtung ausgebildet, die Ventile der Druckreduzierungsvorrichtung derart anzusteuern, dass - zum Einstellen der entsprechenden Absenkungsniveaus - der Sauerstoffgehalt im Schutzraum entsprechend einer vorab festgelegten Inertisierungskurve reduziert wird.In a preferred further development of the solution according to the invention, the inert-gas fire-extinguishing system accordingly also has a control device for automatically carrying out a multi-stage inerting process, in which the oxygen content in the protective space is first lowered to a first lowering level (such as a basic inerting level) and if required, for example in case of fire, is then further lowered to one or step by step to a plurality of predetermined lowering levels. Preferably, in this development, the control device is designed to control the valves of the pressure reduction device such that - to set the corresponding Absenkungsniveaus - the oxygen content in the shelter is reduced in accordance with a predetermined inerting.
Diese Weiterbildung gestattet es somit, dass bei einem mehrstufigen Inertisierungsverfahren automatisch die zum Einstellen der jeweiligen Absenkungsniveaus vorzunehmende Inertisierung gemäß unterschiedlichen, an die Absenkungsniveaus angepassten Ereignisabläufen stattfindet.This development thus makes it possible that, in the case of a multi-stage inerting method, the inerting to be made for setting the respective lowering levels takes place automatically in accordance with different event sequences adapted to the lowering levels.
In einer Realisierung der zuletzt genannten Weiterbildung ist es bevorzugt, wenn die Steuereinrichtung einerseits ausgebildet ist, zum Absenken des Sauerstoffgehaltes auf ein erstes Absenkungsniveau die Ventile der Druckreduzierungsvorrichtung derart anzusteuern, dass nur ein erster Parallelzweig der mindestens zwei Parallelzweige mit der Hochdruck-Sammelleitung (Sammelrohr) und der Löschleitung verbunden ist, und dass die Steuereinrichtung andererseits ausgebildet ist, zum weiteren Absenken des Sauerstoffgehaltes auf ein zweites Absenkdungsniveau die Ventile der Druckreduzierungsvorrichtung derart anzusteuern, dass nur ein zweiter Parallelzweig der mindestens zwei Parallelzweige mit der Hochdruck-Sammelleitung und der Löschleitung verbunden ist, wobei die Druckreduzierungskennlinie der in dem ersten Parallelzweig angeordneten Druckreduzierungseinrichtung verschieden von der Druckreduzierungskennlinie der in dem zweiten Parallelzweig angeordneten Druckreduzierungseinrichtung ist. Bei dieser Realisierung der erfindungsgemäßen Lösung ist es somit denkbar, dass für den zweiten Parallelzweig, über welchen die Hochdruck-Sammelleitung und die Niederdruck-Löschleitung dann miteinander verbunden werden, wenn der Sauerstoffgehalt in dem Schutzraum von einem bereits eingestellten ersten Absenkdungsniveau auf ein vorgegebenes zweites Absenkungsniveau weiter reduziert wird, eine Druckreduzierungskennlinie gewählt wird, die - im Vergleich zu der Steilheit der Druckreduzierungskennlinie der in dem ersten Parallelzweig zum Einsatz kommenden Druckreduzierungseinrichtung - eine relativ großen Steilheit aufweist. Indem die Druckreduzierungskennlinien der mindestens zwei Druckreduzierungseinrichtungen derart gewählt werden, erfolgt das Absenken des Sauerstoffgehaltes in dem Schutzraum von dem ersten Absenkdungsniveau auf das zweite Absenkungsniveau im Verhältnis schneller als die Absenkung des Sauerstoffgehaltes von beispielsweise dem Normalniveau auf das erste Absenkungsniveau.In an implementation of the last-mentioned further development, it is preferred if the control device is designed, on the one hand, to actuate the valves of the pressure reduction device in such a way that only one first parallel branch of the at least two parallel branches is connected to the high-pressure manifold (collecting manifold) for reducing the oxygen content to a first lowering level. and the extinguishing line is connected, and in that the control device is, on the other hand, designed to control the valves of the pressure reduction device such that only a second parallel branch of the at least two parallel branches is connected to the high-pressure manifold and the extinguishing line, in order to lower the oxygen content further to a second setback level, wherein the pressure reduction characteristic the pressure reducing means arranged in the first parallel branch is different from the pressure reducing characteristic of the pressure reducing means arranged in the second parallel branch. In this realization of the solution according to the invention, it is thus conceivable that for the second parallel branch, via which the high-pressure manifold and the low-pressure extinguishing line are then connected to each other, if the oxygen content in the shelter from an already set first Absenkdungsniveau to a predetermined second lowering level is further reduced, a pressure reduction characteristic is selected, which - compared to the steepness of the pressure reduction characteristic of the pressure reducer used in the first parallel branch - has a relatively large slope. By so selecting the pressure reduction characteristics of the at least two pressure reducing means, the lowering of the oxygen content in the shelter from the first lowering level to the second lowering level is faster than lowering the oxygen content from, for example, the normal level to the first lowering level.
Bei einem zweistufigen Inertisierungsverfahren, bei welchem das erste Absenkungsniveau beispielsweise dem Grundinertisierungsniveau und das zweite Absenkungsniveau beispielsweise dem Vollinertisierungsniveau entspricht, kann bei dieser bevorzugten Realisierung der erfindungsgemäßen Inertgasfeuerlöschanlage sichergestellt werden, dass beispielsweise im Falle eines Brandes die Absenkung des Sauerstoffgehaltes von dem Grundinertisierungsniveau auf das Vollinertisierungsniveau möglichst rasch erfolgt. Vorzugsweise sollten dabei allerdings die für die Inertisierung zum Einsatz kommenden Druckreduzierungseinrichtungen im Hinblick auf deren Druckreduzierungskennlinien derart ausgeführt sein, dass für einen bestimmten Schutzraum die maximal zulässige pro Zeiteinheit zugeführte Menge an sauerstoffverdrängendem Gas nicht überschritten wird, um insbesondere den Anforderungen einer wirksamen Druckentlastung beim Fluten des Schutzraumes Sorge zu tragen und einer möglichen Beschädigung der Raumhülle entgegenzuwirken.In a two-stage inerting process, in which the first reduction level, for example, the Grundinertisierungsniveau and the second reduction level, for example, the Vollinertisierungsniveau, in this preferred implementation of inert gas fire extinguishing system according to the invention can ensure that, for example, in case of fire, the reduction of the oxygen content of the Grundinertisierungsniveau to the Vollinertisierungsniveau possible done quickly. Preferably, however, the pressure reduction devices used for the inertization should be designed with regard to their pressure reduction characteristics such that the maximum permissible amount of oxygen-displacing gas supplied per unit time is not exceeded in order to meet in particular the requirements of effective pressure relief during flooding Protective space care and counteract possible damage to the space envelope.
Alternativ zu der zuletzt genannten Ausführungsform ist es selbstverständlich auch denkbar, dass die Steuereichrichtung ausgebildet ist, zum Absenken des Sauerstoffgehaltes auf das erste Absenkungsniveau, wie beispielsweise das Grundinertisierungsniveau, die Ventile der Druckreduzierungsvorrichtung derart anzusteuern, dass nur ein erster Parallelzweig der mindestens zwei Parallelzweige der Druckreduzierungsvorrichtung mit der Hochdruck-Sammelleitung und der Niederdruck-Löschleitung verbunden ist, wobei die Steuereinrichtung ferner ausgebildet ist, zum weiteren Absenken des Sauerstoffgehaltes auf ein zweites Absenkungsniveau, wie beispielsweise das Vollinertisierungsniveau, die Ventile der Druckreduzierungsvorrichtung derart anzusteuern, dass der erste Parallelzweig und ein zweiter Parallelzweig der mindestens zwei Parallelzweige mit der Sammelleitung und der Löschleitung verbunden sind. Bei dieser Ausführungsform ist es - im Gegensatz zu der zuvor beschriebenen Ausführungsform - durchaus denkbar, dass die Druckreduzierungskennlinien der in dem ersten und dem zweiten Parallelzweig angeordneten Druckreduzierungseinrichtungen identisch sind.As an alternative to the last-mentioned embodiment, it is naturally also conceivable for the control region to be designed to control the valves of the pressure reduction device in such a way that only a first parallel branch of the at least two parallel branches of the pressure reduction device is provided for lowering the oxygen content to the first lowering level is connected to the high pressure manifold and the low pressure extinguishing line, wherein the Control device is further configured, for further lowering the oxygen content to a second lowering level, such as the Vollinertisierungsniveau to control the valves of the pressure reducing device such that the first parallel branch and a second parallel branch of the at least two parallel branches are connected to the manifold and the extinguishing line. In this embodiment, it is entirely conceivable, in contrast to the previously described embodiment, that the pressure reduction characteristics of the pressure reduction devices arranged in the first and the second parallel branches are identical.
Indem zum weiteren Absenken des Sauerstoffgehaltes auf das zweite Absenkungsniveau sowohl der erste als auch der zweite Parallelzweig der Druckreduzierungsvorrichtung die Verbindung der Sammelleitung mit der Löschleitung herstellen, wird erreicht, dass die Absenkung des Sauerstoffgehaltes auf das zweite Absenkungsniveau im Vergleich zur Absenkung des Sauerstoffgehalts auf das erste Absenkungsniveau deutlich schneller durchgeführt werden kann. Demnach erfolgt die weitere Absenkung auf das zweite Absenkungsniveau gemäß einer Inertisierungskurve, die steiler verläuft im Vergleich zu der Inertisierungskurve, die bei der Absenkung des Sauerstoffgehaltes auf das erste Absenkungsniveau maßgeblich ist. Wie auch bei der zuvor beschriebenen Ausführungsform ist es dabei bevorzugt, dass auch bei der Absenkung des Sauerstoffgehaltes auf das zweite Absenkungsniveau die pro Zeiteinheit den Schutzraum zugeführte Menge an sauerstoffverdrängendem Gas nicht den maximal zulässigen Volumenstrom überschreitet, der für den Schutz raum insbesondere im Hinblick auf die gegebene Druckentlastung vorgegeben ist.By further reducing both the first and the second parallel branches of the pressure reduction device to connect the manifold to the quench line for further decreasing the oxygen content to the second recession level, it is achieved that lowering the oxygen content to the second descent level compared to lowering the oxygen content to the first Lowering level can be performed much faster. Accordingly, the further reduction to the second subsidence level occurs according to an inertization curve, which is steeper compared to the inertization curve, which is decisive in lowering the oxygen content to the first subsidence level. As with the embodiment described above, it is preferred that even with the reduction of the oxygen content to the second lowering level per unit time the shelter supplied amount of oxygen-displacing gas does not exceed the maximum allowable flow, the space for the protection in particular with regard to given pressure relief is given.
Die erfindungsgemäße Lösung ist nicht auf eine Druckreduzierungsvorrichtung beschränkt, welche lediglich zwei Parallelzweige aufweist. Insbesondere für Anwendungen, bei welchen eine Inertisierung des Schutzraumes in mehr als zwei Schritten (Absenkungsniveaus) durchzuführen ist, sollte die Druckreduzierungsvorrichtung eine entsprechend höhere Anzahl an Parallelzweigen aufweisen. So ist es beispielsweise denkbar, dass mit der Inertgasfeuerlöschanlage der Sauerstoffgehalt in dem Schutzraum zunächst auf ein Grundinertisierungsniveau abgesenkt wird, wobei im Falle eines Brandes (oder bei Bedart) in dem Schutzraum der Sauerstoffgehalt von dem Grundinertisierungsniveau weiter auf ein tieferliegendes Absenkungsniveau abgesenkt und für eine vorgegebene Zeit auf diesem Absenkungsniveau kontinuierlich gehalten wird, wobei der Sauerstoffgehalt von diesem Absenkungsniveau anschließend weiter auf ein Vollinertisierungsniveau abgesenkt wird, wenn ein Brand nach Ablauf einer vorgegebenen Zeit noch nicht erloschen ist. Um zu erreichen, dass bei einer derartigen (dreistufigen) Inertisierung des Schutzraumes bei dem Einstellen der jeweiligen Absenkungsniveaus (Grundinertisierungsniveau, Absenkungsniveau, Vollinertisierungsniveau) für jede durchzuführende Absenkung der Ereignisablauf und insbesondere die Inertisierungskurve individuell angepasst werden kann, ist es bevorzugt, wenn die Druckreduzierungsvorrichtung der erfindungsgemäßen Inertgasfeuerlöschanlage mindestens drei Parallelzweige mit jeweils einer Druckreduzierungseinrichtung aufweist, wobei jeder Parallelzweig über ein ansteuerbares Ventil mit der Sammelleitung und der Löschleitung verbindbar ist, und wobei jede Druckreduzierungseinrichtung ausgelegt ist, gemäß einer bekannten Druckreduzierungskennlinie einen hohen Eingangsdruck auf einen niedrigen Ausgangsdruck zu reduzieren. Bei dieser bevorzugten Ausführungsform der Inertgasfeuerlöschanlage ist es ferner bevorzugt, wenn die Steuereinrichtung ausgebildet ist, zum Absenken des Sauerstoffgehaltes von dem zweiten Absenkungsniveau auf ein drittes Absenkungsniveau (wie beispielsweise das Vollinertisierungsniveau) die Ventile der Druckreduzierungsvorrichtung derart anzusteuern, dass nur ein dritter Parallelzweig der mindestens drei Parallelzweige mit der Sammelleitung und der Löschleitung verbunden ist.The solution according to the invention is not limited to a pressure reducing device which has only two parallel branches. In particular, for applications in which an inerting of the shelter in more than two steps (lowering levels) is performed, the pressure reduction device should have a correspondingly higher number of parallel branches. Thus, for example, it is conceivable that the inert gas fire extinguishing system initially lowers the oxygen content in the shelter to a base inerting level, and in the event of a fire (or at bedtime) in the shelter, the oxygen content is further lowered from the base inerting level to a lower level of subsidence and for a predetermined level Time is kept continuously at this subsidence level, wherein the oxygen content is then lowered from this subsidence level further to a Vollinertisierungsniveau if a fire after a predetermined time has not extinguished. In order to achieve that, in such a (three-stage) inerting of the shelter in setting the respective lowering levels (Grundinertisierungsniveau, Abenkungsniveau, Vollinertisierungsniveau) for each reduction to be performed, the event flow and in particular the inerting curve can be customized, it is preferred if the pressure reduction device of Inertgas fire extinguishing system according to the invention comprises at least three parallel branches, each with a pressure reducing device, each parallel branch via a controllable valve to the manifold and the extinguishing line is connected, and wherein each pressure reducing device is designed according to a known pressure reduction characteristic to reduce a high inlet pressure to a low outlet pressure. In this preferred embodiment of the inert gas fire extinguishing system it is further preferred, if the control device is designed to control the valves of the pressure reduction device such that only a third parallel branch of the at least three is to lower the oxygen content from the second lowering level to a third lowering level (such as the Vollinertisierungsniveau) Parallel branches is connected to the manifold and the extinguishing line.
Demnach ist es mit der erfindungsgemäßen Lösung möglich, bei einem mehrstufigen Inertisierungsverfahren für jede Inertisierungsstufe (für jedes Absenkungsniveau) unterschiedliche Druckreduzierungsmaßnahmen einzusetzen, um die pro Zeiteinheit während des Einstellens des jeweiligen Absenhungsniveaus dem Schutzraum zugeführte Menge an sauerstoffverdrängendem Gas individuell einstellen zu können, so dass die Absenkung des Sauerstoffgehaltes auf die einzelnen Absenkungsniveaus entsprechend unterschiedlicher Inertisierungskurven erfolgen kann. Dies ist insbesondere dann von Vorteil, wenn zum Einstellen der einzelnen Absenkungsniveaus unterschiedliche Mengen an sauerstoffverdrängendem Gases notwendig sind, d.h. wenn der Abstand zwischen den entsprechenden Absenkungsniveaus verschieden ist.Accordingly, with the solution according to the invention, it is possible to use different pressure reduction measures for each inertization stage (for each reduction level) in order to be able to individually adjust the amount of oxygen-displacing gas supplied to the protection space per unit time during the setting of the respective suspension level, so that the Lowering of the oxygen content to the individual lowering levels can be carried out according to different inerting curves. This is particularly advantageous when different amounts of oxygen displacing gas are necessary to set the individual subsidence levels, i. when the distance between the corresponding lowering levels is different.
Derzeit werden in der Inertgasfeuerlöschtechnik als Druckreduzierungseinrichtung üblicherweise Druckblenden verwendet, um einen relativ hohen Eingangsdruck (von beispielsweise 300 bar) auf einen Ausgangsdruck von im Mittel beispielsweise 60 bar abzusenken. Eine Druckreduzierungseinrichtung, welche in Gestalt einer Druckblende ausgeführt ist, weist eine Druckreduzierungskennlinie auf, bei welcher der Ausgangsdruck proportional abhängig von dem Eingangsdruck ist. Wenn bei der Inertgasfeuerlöschanlage die Schnellöffnungsventile geöffnet werden, strömt das unter hohem Druck in dem mindestens einen Hochdruckgasspeicher gelagerte sauerstoffverdrängende Gas in die Hochdruck-Sammelleitung (Sammelrohr), wobei anschließend der sich in der Sammelleitung einstellende hohe Gasdruck mit Hilfe der Druckreduzierungseinrichtung auf einen Betriebsdruck von beispielsweise 60 bar reduziert wird. Demnach kann die Löschleitung als Niederdruck-Leitung ausgeführt sein, während für die Sammelleitung ein Hochdruck-Sammelrohr zu wählen ist.At present, in the inert gas fire extinguishing technique pressure reducing devices are usually used to lower a relatively high inlet pressure (for example, 300 bar) to an outlet pressure of, for example, 60 bar on average. A pressure reducing device, which is designed in the form of a pressure diaphragm, has a pressure reduction characteristic, in which the output pressure is proportional to the input pressure. When the quick-opening valves are opened in the inert gas fire extinguishing system, this flows under high pressure in the at least one high-pressure gas storage stored oxygen-displacing gas in the high-pressure manifold (manifold), wherein subsequently adjusting itself in the manifold high gas pressure using the pressure reduction device is reduced to an operating pressure of, for example, 60 bar. Accordingly, the extinguishing pipe can be designed as a low-pressure line, while a high-pressure manifold is to be selected for the manifold.
Zu berücksichtigen ist, dass während der Inertisierung des Schutzraumes der anfänglich hohe Druck in der Hochdruck-Sammelleitung relativ schnell absinkt, wenn sich mindestens ein über ein geöffnetes Schnellöffnungsventil mit der Sammelleitung verbundener Hochdruckgasspeicher entleert. Kommt als Druckreduzierungseinrichtung eine Druckblende, d.h. eine Drosselscheibe mit einer Bohrung zum Einsatz, weist die Inertisierungskurve am Anfang des Inertisierungsvorganges eine hohe Druckspitze auf, die proportional zu dem Druck in der Sammelleitung relativ rasch abfällt. Eine derartige Druckspitze am Anfang des Inertisierungsvorganges ist jedoch im Hinblick auf eine vorzusehende Druckentlastung im Schutzraum problematisch, da die Druckentlastung an der maximal auftretenden, pro Zeiteinheit der Raumatmosphäre des Schutzraumes zugeführten Menge an sauerstoffverdrängendem Gas angepasst ist.It should be noted that during the inerting of the protective space, the initially high pressure in the high-pressure manifold drops relatively quickly when at least one high-pressure gas reservoir connected to the collecting line via an opened quick-opening valve is emptied. Comes as Druckreduzierungseinrichtung a pressure diaphragm, i. a throttle disk with a bore for use, the inerting curve at the beginning of the inerting process, a high pressure peak, which decreases in proportion to the pressure in the manifold relatively quickly. Such a pressure peak at the beginning of the inerting process, however, is problematic in view of a pressure relief to be provided in the shelter because the pressure relief at the maximum occurring, per unit time of the room atmosphere of the shelter supplied amount of oxygen displacing gas is adjusted.
Demnach ist es bevorzugt, wenn bei der erfindungsgemäßen Inertgasfeuerlöschanlage zumindest ein Teil der Druckreduzierungseinrichtungen eine Druckreduzierungskennlinie aufweist, bei welcher der Ausgangsdruck unabhängig von dem angelegten Eingangsdruck über einen vorgegebenen Druckbereich (Arbeitsbereich) einen vorgegebenen Druckwert nicht überschreitet. Als Druckreduzierungseinrichtung, welche eine lineare Druckreduzierungskennlinie aufweist, ist beispielsweise ein Druckminderer, der trotz unterschiedlicher Drücke auf der Eingangsseite (Eingangsdruck) dafür sorgt, dass auf der Ausgangsseite ein bestimmter Ausgangsdruck nicht überschritten wird. Denkbar dabei ist es, dass eine als Druckminderer ausgeführte Druckreduzierungseinrichtung eine beispielsweise federbelastete Membran aufweist, wobei der Druck auf der Ausgangsseite auf diese Membran einwirkt. Die Membran sollte ferner mechanisch mit einem Ventil gekoppelt sein, um zu erreichen, dass das Ventil desto weiter geschlossen, je höher der Druck auf der Ausgangsseite ansteigt. Bei Erreichen eines (einstellbaren) höchstzulässigen Ausgangsdrucks sollte das Ventil den Gasdurchfluss vollständig absperrt.Accordingly, it is preferred if in the inert gas fire extinguishing system according to the invention at least a part of the pressure reduction devices has a pressure reduction characteristic in which the output pressure does not exceed a predetermined pressure value independently of the applied input pressure over a predetermined pressure range (working range). As a pressure reducing device, which has a linear pressure reduction characteristic, for example, a pressure reducer, which ensures despite different pressures on the input side (input pressure) that on the output side, a certain output pressure is not exceeded. It is conceivable that a pressure reduction device designed as a pressure reducer has an example spring-loaded membrane, the pressure acting on the output side of this membrane. The diaphragm should also be mechanically coupled to a valve to make the valve the more closed the higher the pressure on the output side increases. When reaching a (adjustable) maximum output pressure, the valve should completely shut off the gas flow.
Die erfindungsgemäße Lösung ist nicht auf eine Inertgasfeuerlöschanlage beschränkt, die lediglich einen Hochdruckgasspeicher aufweist. In einer bevorzugten Ausführungsform umfasst die Inertgasfeuerlöschanlage mindestens zwei über ein Schnellöffnungsventil mit der Sammelleitung verbindbare Hochdruckgasspeicher, wobei jedem Hochdruckgasspeicher ein Parallelzweig mit einer Druckreduzierungseinrichtung zugeordnet ist. Diese Zuordnung erfolgt derart, dass beim Öffnen des Schnellöffnungsventils von einem Hochdruckgasspeicher der mindestens zwei Hochdruckgasspeicher automatisch die Ventile der Druckreduzierungsvorrichtung derart angesteuert werden, dass nur der dem einen Hochdruckgasspeicher zugeordnete Parallelzweig mit der Löschleitung und der Sammelleitung verbunden ist.The solution according to the invention is not limited to an inert gas fire extinguishing system which has only one high-pressure gas storage. In a preferred embodiment The inert gas fire extinguishing system comprises at least two high-pressure gas reservoirs which can be connected to the collecting line via a quick-opening valve, with each high-pressure gas accumulator being assigned a parallel branch with a pressure reducing device. This assignment is made such that when opening the quick opening valve of a high-pressure gas storage of at least two high-pressure gas automatically the valves of the pressure reducing device are controlled such that only the one high-pressure gas accumulator associated parallel branch is connected to the extinguishing line and the manifold.
Demnach bleibt festzuhalten, dass die erfindungsgemäße Inertgasfeuerlöschanlage zur Ausführung eines Inertisierungsverfahrens ausgelegt ist, bei welchem der Sauerstoffgehalt in dem Schutzraum zunächst auf einen bestimmtes, erstes Absenkungsniveau abgesenkt und auf diesem ersten Absenkungsniveau gehalten wird, und wobei im Falle eines Brandes in dem Schutzraum (oder bei Bedarf) der Sauerstoffgehalt in dem Schutzraum von dem ersten Absenkungsniveau auf ein bestimmtes, zweites Absenkungsniveau weiter abgesenkt wird. Mit der erfindungsgemäßen Inertisierungsanlage kann dabei erreicht werden, dass das Absenken des Sauerstoffgehaltes in dem Schutzraum auf das erste Absenkungsniveau entsprechend einer ersten Inertisierungskurve erfolgt, die vorgegeben ist durch eine Druckreduzierungskennlinie einer ersten Druckreduzierungseinrichtung, und dass das weitere Absenken des Sauerstoffgehalts im Schutzraum auf das zweite Absenkungsniveau entsprechend einer zweiten Inertisierungskurve erfolgt, die vorgegeben ist durch eine Druckreduzierungskennlinie einer zweiten Druckreduzierungseinrichtung.Accordingly, it should be noted that the inert gas fire extinguishing system according to the invention is designed to carry out an inerting process, in which the oxygen content in the shelter is first lowered to a certain, first lowering level and maintained at this first lowering level, and in the event of a fire in the shelter (or at Demand), the oxygen content in the shelter is further lowered from the first descent level to a particular second descent level. With the inerting system according to the invention, it can be achieved that the lowering of the oxygen content in the protection space to the first lowering level corresponding to a first inertization curve, which is predetermined by a pressure reduction characteristic of a first pressure reduction device, and that the further lowering of the oxygen content in the shelter to the second lowering level in accordance with a second inerting curve, which is predetermined by a pressure reduction characteristic of a second pressure reducing device.
Zur Realisierung dieses zuvor angesprochenen Inertisierungsverfahrens ist es bevorzugt, wenn im Schutzraum, vorzugsweise kontinuierlich, mit Hilfe eines Detektors zumindest eine Brandkenngröße gemessen wird, um zu ermitteln, ob in dem Schutzraum ein Brand vorliegt bzw. ob ein in dem Schutzraum bereits ausgebrochener Brand aufgrund einer durchgeführten Inertisierung schon wieder erloschen ist. Die Messung der Brandkenngröße muss allerdings nicht kontinuierlich erfolgen, vielmehr ist auch denkbar, dass zu vorgegebenen Zeiten bzw. abhängig von bestimmten vorgegebenen Ereignissen eine derartige Messung erfolgt. Die Messung der Brandkenngröße wird vorzugsweise mittels eines Detektors zur Erfassung einer Brandkenngröße durchgeführt, der im Brandfall ein entsprechendes Signal an die Steuereinrichtung abgibt, in welcher vorzugsweise automatisch eine Inertisierung des Schutzraumes durch Ansteuerung der entsprechenden Schnellöffnungsventile und Ventile der Druckreduzierungsvorrichtung vorgenommen wird.To realize this previously mentioned inerting method, it is preferred if in the shelter, preferably continuously, with the aid of a detector at least one fire characteristic is measured to determine whether there is a fire in the shelter or if a fire already broken out in the shelter due to a carried out inerting already extinguished again. However, the measurement of the fire parameter does not have to be continuous, but it is also conceivable that at predetermined times or depending on certain predetermined events, such a measurement takes place. The measurement of the fire parameter is preferably carried out by means of a detector for detecting a fire characteristic, which emits a corresponding signal to the control device in the event of fire, in which preferably automatically an inerting of the protective space by controlling the corresponding Quick opening valves and valves of the pressure reducing device is made.
In einer bevorzugten Realisierung der erfindungsgemäßen Lösung ist vorgesehen, dass die Erfassung einer Brandkenngröße mit Hilfe eines aspirativ arbeitenden System erfolgt, bei welchem die Raumluft des Schutzraumes repräsentative Luftproben entnommen und dem Detektor für Brandkenngrößen zugeführt werden.In a preferred realization of the solution according to the invention, it is provided that the detection of a fire parameter takes place with the aid of an aspiratively operating system in which the room air of the protective room is taken from representative air samples and supplied to the detector for fire characteristics.
Unter dem Begriff "Brandkenngröße" werden physikalische Größen verstanden, die in der Umgebungsluft eines Entstehungsbrandes messbaren Veränderungen unterliegen, zum Beispiel die Umgebungstemperatur, der Feststoff- oder Flüssigkeits- oder Gasanteil in der Umgebungsluft (Bildung von Rauch in Form von Partikeln oder Aerosolen oder Dampf) oder die Umgebungsstrahlung. Beispielsweise ist es denkbar, dass mittels eines aspirativ arbeitenden Branderkennungssystems der Raumluft des zu überwachenden Schutzraumes repräsentative Luftproben entnommen und einem Detektor für Brandkenngrößen zugeführt werden, der im Brandfall ein entsprechendes Signal an die Steuereinrichtung abgibt.The term "fire characteristic" is understood to mean physical quantities which are subject to measurable changes in the ambient air of an incipient fire, for example the ambient temperature, the proportion of solid or liquid or gas in the ambient air (formation of smoke in the form of particles or aerosols or steam) or the ambient radiation. For example, it is conceivable for representative air samples to be taken by means of an aspiratively operating fire detection system of the room air to be monitored and fed to a fire characteristic detector which emits a corresponding signal to the control device in the event of fire.
Unter einer aspirativen Branderkennungsvorrichtung ist eine Branderkennungsvorrichtung zu verstehen, die beispielsweise über ein Rohrleitungs- oder Kanalsystem an einer Vielzahl von Stellen innerhalb des Schutzraumes eine repräsentative Teilmenge der Raumluft des zu überwachenden Schutzraumes ansaugt und diese Teilmenge dann einer Messkammer mit dem Detektor zum Erfassen einer Brandkenngröße zuleitet. Insbesondere wäre es denkbar, dass dieser Detektor zum Erfassen einer Brandkenngröße derart ausgelegt ist, ein Signal auszugeben, welches auch eine quantitative Aussage hinsichtlich der in der angesaugten Teilmenge der Raumluft vorhandenen Brandkenngrößen ermöglicht. Damit wäre es möglich, den zeitlichen Verlauf des Brandes bzw. den zeitlichen Verlauf der Entwicklung des Brandes zu erfassen, um somit die Wirksamkeit des Einstellens und des Haltens der unterschiedlichen Absenkungsniveaus im Schutzraum zu bestimmen. Insbesondere wäre es möglich, somit eine Aussage darüber zu erhalten, welche erforderliche Menge an Inertgas noch dem Schutzraum zur Brandlöschung zugeführt werden muss.An aspirative fire detection device is to be understood as a fire detection device which sucks, for example via a pipeline or duct system at a multiplicity of locations within the protection space, a representative subset of the room air of the protected space to be monitored and then feeds this subset to a measuring chamber with the detector for detecting a fire parameter , In particular, it would be conceivable that this detector for detecting a fire parameter is designed in such a way to output a signal which also makes possible a quantitative statement with regard to the fire parameters present in the sucked subset of the ambient air. Thus, it would be possible to record the time course of the fire or the time course of the development of the fire, so as to determine the effectiveness of setting and holding the different levels of reduction in the shelter. In particular, it would be possible to obtain a statement as to which required amount of inert gas still has to be supplied to the protective space for extinguishing the fire.
Die Erfindung ist nicht nur auf die zuvor beschriebene Inertgasfeuerlöschanlagen beschränkt; vielmehr betrifft sie auch ein vorzugsweise mit der erfindungsgemäßen Inertgasfeuerlöschanlage ausführbares Inertisierungsverfahren zur Minderung des Risikos und zum Löschen von Bränden in einem Schutzraum. Bei diesem Inertisierungsverfahren wird in einem ersten Verfahrensschritt der Sauerstoffgehalt in dem Schutzraum auf ein bestimmtes erstes Absenkungsniveau abgesenkt. Dies erfolgt durch vorzugsweise geregeltes Einleiten eines sauerstoffverdrängenden Gases (Inertgas), welches in mindestens einem Hochdruckgasspeicher unter hohem Druck gelagert ist oder von einem Stickstoffgenerator bereitgestellt wird. Anschließend wird der Sauerstoffgehalt in dem Schutzraum - ggf. durch geregeltes Nachführen von Inertgas oder durch kontinuierliches Einleiten von weiterem Inertgas - auf bzw. unter dem ersten Absenkungsniveau gehalten. Im Falle eines Brandes in dem Schutzraum oder bei Bedarf wird anschließend der Sauerstoffgehalt in dem Schutzraum von dem ersten Absenkungsniveau auf ein bestimmtes zweites Absenkungsniveau weiter abgesenkt. Bei dem Inertisierungsverfahren ist erfindungsgemäß vorgesehen, dass das Absenken des Sauerstoffgehaltes im Schutzraum auf das erste Absenkungsniveau entsprechend einer ersten Inertisierungskurve erfolgt, die vorgegeben ist durch eine Druckreduzierungskennlinie einer ersten Druckreduzierungseinrichtung, welche in einem ersten Parallelzweig angeordnet ist, und dass das weitere Absenken des Sauerstoffgehaltes im Schutzraum auf das zweite Absenkungsniveau entsprechend einer zweiten Inertisierungskurve erfolgt, die vorgegeben ist durch eine Druckreduzierungskennlinie einer zweiten Druckreduzierungseinrichtung, welche in einem zweiten Parallelzweig angeordnet ist.The invention is not limited only to the previously described inert gas fire extinguishing systems; Rather, it also relates to an inertization process preferably carried out with the inert gas fire extinguishing system according to the invention for reducing the risk and for extinguishing fires in a shelter. In this inertization method, in a first method step, the oxygen content in the protective space is lowered to a specific first lowering level. This is done by preferably controlled introduction of an oxygen-displacing gas (inert gas), which is stored in at least one high-pressure gas storage under high pressure or is provided by a nitrogen generator. Subsequently, the oxygen content in the shelter - possibly by controlled tracking of inert gas or by continuous introduction of further inert gas - held at or below the first lowering level. In the event of a fire in the shelter or as needed, the oxygen content in the shelter is then further lowered from the first descent level to a particular second descent level. According to the invention, in the inertization method it is provided that the lowering of the oxygen content in the protective space to the first lowering level corresponding to a first inertization curve, which is predetermined by a pressure reduction characteristic of a first pressure reducing device, which is arranged in a first parallel branch, and that the further lowering of the oxygen content in Protection space to the second lowering level is carried out according to a second inertization curve, which is predetermined by a pressure reduction characteristic of a second pressure reducing device, which is arranged in a second parallel branch.
Selbstverständlich ist es aber auch denkbar, dass bei Bedarf eine weitere Absenkung des Sauerstoffgehalts in dem Schutzraum von dem zweiten Absenkungsniveau auf ein bestimmtes drittes Absenkungsniveau erfolgt.Of course, it is also conceivable that, if necessary, a further reduction of the oxygen content in the shelter from the second subsidence level to a certain third subsidence level.
Das erfindungsgemäße Inertisierungsverfahren kann insbesondere von einer Inertgasfeuerlöschanlage ausgeführt werden, welche - wie vorstehend beschrieben - eine Druckreduzierungsvorrichtung mit mindestens zwei Parallelzweigen aufweist, und bei welcher das sauerstoffverdrängende Gas unter hohem Druck bis beispielsweise 300 bar in Hochdruckgasspeichern (wie etwa Stahlbehältern) bevorratet wird. Vor Einleitung des sauerstoffverdrängenden Gases in den Schutzraum wird dieser anfänglich hohe Speicherdruck durch eine in einem ersten Parallelzweig der Druckreduzierungsvorrichtung angeordnete Druckreduzierungseinrichtung auf einen Arbeitsdruck von vorzugsweise maximal 60 bar reduziert. Die in dem ersten Parallelzweig angeordnete Druckreduzierungseinrichtung umfasst zur Druckreduzierung eine Blende mit einer vorab festgelegten, beispielsweise mittels geeigneter Software berechneten Blendenöffnung.The inertization process according to the invention can be carried out in particular by an inert gas fire extinguishing system which, as described above, has a pressure reduction device with at least two parallel branches, and in which the oxygen-displacing gas is stored under high pressure up to, for example, 300 bar in high pressure gas reservoirs (such as steel tanks). Before the oxygen-displacing gas is introduced into the protective space, this initially high accumulator pressure is reduced to a working pressure of preferably a maximum of 60 bar by a pressure-reducing device arranged in a first parallel branch of the pressure-reducing device. The pressure reduction device arranged in the first parallel branch comprises a diaphragm with a pre-defined diaphragm opening, which is calculated for example by means of suitable software, in order to reduce the pressure.
Es ist bekannt, dass mit der Entleerung der Hochdruckgasspeicher der Bevorratungsdruck in den Löschmittelbehältern und somit auch der an der in dem ersten Parallelzweig angeordneten Druckreduzierungseinrichtung anliegende Eingangsdruck sinkt. Ebenso sinkt auch der Arbeitsdruck hinter der Blende der Druckreduzierungseinrichtung, d.h. der Ausgangsdruck der in dem ersten Parallelzweig angeordneten Druckreduzierungseinrichtun.It is known that with the emptying of the high-pressure gas storage, the storage pressure in the extinguishing agent containers and thus also the inlet pressure applied to the pressure-reducing device arranged in the first parallel branch sinks. Also, the working pressure behind the orifice of the pressure reducing device, i.e., the pressure decreases. the outlet pressure of the arranged in the first parallel branch Druckreduzierungseinrichtun.
Mit den sinkenden Drücken in dem Hochdruckgasspeicher bzw. hinter der Blende der in dem ersten Parallelzweig angeordneten Druckreduzierungseinrichtung reduziert sich auch der in den Schutzbereich eingeführte Massen-/Volumenstrom an sauerstoftverdrängendem Gas. Um eine definierte Menge an sauerstoffverdrängendem Gas in einer vorbestimmten Zeit in den Schutzbereich einzubringen, muss demnach Sorge getragen werden, dass zu Beginn der Flutung ein entsprechend hoher Massen-/Volumenstrom vorliegt, wobei dieser zu Beginn der Flutung vorliegende hohe Massen-/Volumenstrom von dem mit der Entleerung der Hochdruckgasspeicher sinkenden Be\Torratungsdruck ablängt. Problematisch allerdings ist, dass der zu Beginn der Flutung vorliegende hohe Massen-/Volumenstrom den Schutzbereich entsprechenden Belastungen durch Überdruck, Turbulenzen etc. aussetzt.With the sinking pressures in the high-pressure gas storage or behind the orifice of the pressure-reducing device arranged in the first parallel branch, the mass / volume flow introduced into the protected area also reduces in the case of oxygen-displacing gas. In order to introduce a defined amount of oxygen-displacing gas in a predetermined time in the protection area, so care must be taken that at the beginning of the flooding a correspondingly high mass / volume flow is present, this present at the beginning of flooding high mass / volume flow of the with the emptying of the high-pressure gas storage decreasing Be \ Torratungsdruck ablängt. The problem, however, is that the high mass / volume flow present at the beginning of the flooding exposes the protected area to corresponding loads due to overpressure, turbulence, etc.
Mit der erfindungsgemäßen Lösung ist es möglich, dass in einer besonders einfach zu realisierenden aber dennoch effektiven Weise der Massen-/Volumenstrom über die zur Verfügung stehende Zeit vergleichmäßigt werden kann, um Druck und Volumenstromspitzen zu Beginn der Flutung zu verhindern und somit die erforderlichen Schutzmaßnahmen im geschützten Bereich (z.B. Druckentlastungs-Öffnungsfläche) auf ein Minimum reduzieren zu können.With the solution according to the invention, it is possible that in a particularly easy to implement yet effective manner, the mass / volume flow over the available time can be evened out to prevent pressure and flow peaks at the beginning of the flooding and thus the necessary protective measures in the protected area (eg pressure relief opening area) to a minimum.
Beispielsweise ist es mit der erfindungsgemäßen Lösung möglich, dass die Zufuhr von sauerstoffverdrängendem Gas in einem Schritt aktiviert wird, wobei diese Zufuhr kombiniert ist mit einem stufenweisen Zuschalten von hinter dem Löschmittelvorrat angeordneten Parallelzweigen der Druckreduzierungsvorrichtung - und somit von Druckreduzierungseinrichtungen beispielsweise in Gestalt von Blenden. Auf diese Weise wird erreicht, dass das sauerstoffverdrängende Gas zu Beginn der Flutung bei hohem Vorratsdruck durch einen kleinen Blendenquerschnitt und mit fallendem Vorratsdruck durch einen stufenweise vergrößerten Blendenquerschnitt strömt. Es wird somit die bei konventionellen Löschanlagen auftretende Volumenstromspitze zu Beginn der Flutung gekappt, wodurch auch die resultierenden Sicherheitsmaßnahmen reduziert werden können.For example, it is possible with the inventive solution that the supply of oxygen-displacing gas is activated in one step, this supply is combined with a gradual switching behind the extinguishant supply arranged parallel branches of the pressure reducing device - and thus of pressure reducing devices, for example in the form of orifices. In this way it is achieved that the oxygen-displacing gas flows at the beginning of the flooding at high supply pressure through a small diaphragm cross-section and with decreasing supply pressure through a stepwise enlarged diaphragm cross-section. Thus, the volume flow peak occurring in conventional extinguishing systems is capped at the beginning of the flooding, whereby the resulting safety measures can be reduced.
Das Zuschalten der einzelnen Parallelzweige der Druckreduzierungsvorrichtung, und somit das Zuschalten der einzelnen Druckreduzierungseinrichtungen beispielsweise in Gestalt von Blenden kann addierend erfolgen, wobei zu bestimmten (vorab festgelegten) Zeitpunkten ein weiterer Parallelzweig in den Löschmittelstrom hinzugeschaltet wird und sich die Blendenquerschnitte der zur Druckreduzierung zum Einsatz kommenden Druckreduzierungseinrichtungen addieren. Alternativ hierzu ist es selbstverständlich auch denkbar, dass Parallelzweige der Druckreduzierungsvorrichtung, in denen Druckreduzierungseinrichtungen mit unterschiedlich großen Blenden (bzw. allgemeiner ausgedrückt mit unterschiedlichen Druckreduzierungskennlinien) für die verschiedenen Zeitpunkte zu- und wieder abgeschaltet werden.The connection of the individual parallel branches of the pressure reducing device, and thus the connection of the individual pressure reducing devices, for example in the form of orifices can be done in addition, wherein at certain (predetermined) times another parallel branch is added in the extinguishing agent flow and the aperture cross sections of coming to reduce the pressure used Add pressure reduction devices. Alternatively, it is of course also conceivable that parallel branches of the pressure reducing device, in which pressure reducing devices with different sized aperture (or more generally expressed with different pressure reduction characteristics) for the different times and switched off again.
Allgemeiner ausgedrückt betrifft demnach die Erfindung auch ein Inertisierungsverfahren zur Minderung des Risikos und zum Löschen von Bränden in einem Schutzraum, bei welchem ein unter hohem Druck gelagertes sauerstoffverdrängendes Gas zunächst auf einen Arbeitsdruck reduziert und anschließend in den Schutzraum eingeleitet wird, um den Sauerstoffgehalt in dem Schutzraum auf ein bestimmtes Absenkungsniveau abzusenken, wobei zur Druckreduzierung des unter hohem Druck gelagerten sauerstoffverdrängenden Gases eine erste Druckreduzierungseinrichtung zum Einsatz kommt, durch welche bereits zu Beginn der Absenkung des Sauerstoffgehaltes das sauerstoffverdrängende Gas strömt, und wobei zur Druckreduzierung des unter hohem Druck gelagerten sauerstoffverdrängenden Gases ferner mindestens eine zweite Druckreduzierungseinrichtung zum Einsatz kommt, durch welche erst nach Ablauf einer vorgegebenen Zeit nach Beginn der Absenkung das sauerstoffverdrängende Gas strömt.More generally, therefore, the invention also relates to an inerting method for reducing the risk and extinguishing fires in a shelter in which a high pressure oxygen displacing gas is first reduced to a working pressure and then introduced into the shelter to reduce the oxygen content in the shelter to lower to a certain lowering level, wherein for reducing the pressure of the oxygen-displacing gas stored under high pressure, a first pressure reducing device is used, through which already at the beginning of lowering the oxygen content, the oxygen displacing gas flows, and wherein at least to further reduce the pressure of the stored under high pressure oxygen-displacing gas a second pressure reducing device is used, through which the oxygen-displacing gas flows only after a predetermined time after the beginning of the lowering.
Im Folgenden werden beispielhafte Ausführungsformen der erfindungsgemäßen Inertgasfeuerlöschanlage anhand der beiliegenden Zeichnungen näher beschrieben.In the following, exemplary embodiments of the inert gas fire extinguishing system according to the invention will be described in more detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.
Es zeigt:
- Fig. 1
- eine schematische Ansicht einer ersten beispielhaften Ausführungsform der erfindungsgemäßen Inertgasfeuerlöschanlage;
- Fig. 2
- eine schematische Ansicht einer weiteren beispielhaften Ausführungsform der erfindungsgemäßen Inertgasfeuerlöschanlage;
- Fig. 3a
- den zeitlichen Verlauf der Sauerstoffkonzentration in einem Schutzraum bei Anwendung eines mit Hilfe einer Ausführungsform der erfindungsge- mäßen Inertgasfeuerlöschanlage durchgeführten Inertisierungsverfahrens;
- Fig. 3b
- den zeitlichen Verlauf eines quantitativen Messwertes einer Brandkenngrö- ße bzw. des Rauchpegels in einem Schutzraum, in welchem die Sauerstoff- konzentration gemäß dem in
Fig. 3a gezeigten Kurvenverlauf mit Hilfe ei- ner bevorzugten Ausführungsform der erfindungsgemäßen Inertgasfeuerlö- schanlage abgesenkt wird; - Fig. 4a
- den zeitlichen Verlauf der Sauerstoffkonzentration in einem Schutzraum bei der Anwendung einer Ausführungsform der erfindungsgemäßen Inert- gasfeuerlöschanlage zur Durchführung eines mehrstufigen Inertisierungs- verfahrens, wobei bereits während der Reduzierung des Sauerstoffgehaltes auf ein erstes Absenkungsniveau der Brand erloschen ist;
- Fig. 4b
- den zeitliche Verlauf des quantitativen Messwertes einer Brandkenngröße bzw. des Rauchpegels in einem Schutzraum, in welchem die Sauerstoffkon- zentration gemäß dem in
Fig. 4a gezeigten Kurvenverlauf mit Hilfe einer bevorzugten Ausführungsform der erfindungsgemäßen Inertgasfeuerlö- schanlage abgesenkt wird; und - Fig. 5
- eine schematische Ansicht einer weiteren beispielhaften Ausführungsform der erfindungsgemäßen Inertgasfeuerlöschanlage, die in Gestalt einer Mehrbereichsanlage ausgeführt ist.
- Fig. 1
- a schematic view of a first exemplary embodiment of the inert gas fire extinguishing system according to the invention;
- Fig. 2
- a schematic view of another exemplary embodiment of the inert gas fire extinguishing system according to the invention;
- Fig. 3a
- the time course of the oxygen concentration in a protective space when using an inertization process carried out with the aid of an embodiment of the inert gas fire extinguishing system according to the invention;
- Fig. 3b
- the time course of a quantitative measured value of a fire parameter or the smoke level in a shelter in which the oxygen concentration according to the in
Fig. 3a shown curve curve is lowered by means of a preferred embodiment of the inert gas fire extinguishing system according to the invention; - Fig. 4a
- the time course of the oxygen concentration in a shelter in the application of an embodiment of the inert gas fire extinguishing system according to the invention for carrying out a multi-stage inerting process, already during the reduction of the oxygen content to a first lowering level of the fire is extinguished;
- Fig. 4b
- the temporal course of the quantitative measured value of a fire parameter or the smoke level in a shelter, in which the oxygen concentration in accordance with the in
Fig. 4a shown curve profile is lowered by means of a preferred embodiment of the inert gas fire extinguishing system according to the invention; and - Fig. 5
- a schematic view of another exemplary embodiment of the inert gas fire extinguishing system according to the invention, which is designed in the form of a multi-range system.
Bei der dargestellten Ausführungsform der Inertgasfeuerlöschanlage 100 sind die Hochdruckgasspeicher 1a, 1b, 1c, 2a, 2b in zwei Gruppen bestehend aus den Hochdruckgasspeichern 1a, 1b, 1c und den Hochdruckgasspeichern 2a, 2b eingeteilt. Die Einteilung der Hochdruckgasspeicher 1a, 1b, 1c und 2a, 2b in Hochdruckgasspeicherbatterien hat den Vorteil, dass bei einer mehrstufigen Inertgasfeuerlöschanlage zum Einstellen eines bestimmten Absenkungsniveaus in der Raumatmosphäre eines Schutzraumes 10 nicht alle Hochdruckgasspeicher 1a, 1b, 1c, 2a, 2b gleichzeitig, sondern nur die Hochdruckgasspeicher 1a, 1b, 1c bzw. 2a, 2b verwendet werden können.In the illustrated embodiment, the inert gas
Jeder Hochdruckgasspeicher 1a, 1b, 1c, 2a, 2b ist mit einem Hochdruck-Sammelrohr 3 über ein Schnellöffnungsventil 11a, 11b, 11c, 12a, 12b verbindbar. Die jeweiligen Schnellöffnungsventile 11a, 11b, 11c, 12a, 12b können bei Bedarf über entsprechende Steuerleitungen 13a, 13b von einer Steuereinrichtung 7 angesteuert werden, um den zugehörigen Hochdruckgasspeicher 1a, 1b, 1c, 2a, 2b mit der Hochdruck-Sammelleitung 3 zu verbinden.Each high-
Die Hochdruck-Sammelleitung 3 ist mit einer Druckreduzierungsvorrichtung 6 verbunden. Die Aufgabe der Druckreduzierungsvorrichtung 6 besteht darin, das nach dem Öffnen von mindestens einem Schnellöffnungsventil 11a, 11b, 11c, 12a, 12b in die Hochdruck-Sammelleitung 3 unter hohem Druck einströmende sauerstoffverdrängende Gas auf einen vorab festgelegten Betriebsdruck von beispielsweise 60 bar zu reduzieren. Demnach liegt an der Eingangsseite der Druckreduzierungsvorrichtung 6 ein relativ hoher Gasdruck vor, der mit Hilfe von Druckreduzierungseinrichtungen 22, 32 auf den niedrigen Betriebsdruck reduziert wird. Die Ausgangsseite der Druckreduzierungsvorrichtung 6 ist mit einer Niederdruck-Löschleitung 4 verbunden, über welche das in der Druckreduzierungsvorrichtung 6 auf einen von den Druckreduzierungseinrichtungen 22, 32 bestimmten Betriebsdruck heruntergedrosselte sauerstoffverdrängende Gas dem Schutzraum 10 zugeführt wird. Wie schematisch in
Erfindungsgemäß weist die Druckreduzierungsvorrichtung 6 mindestens zwei, in der Ausführungsform gemäß
Zur Ansteuerung der jeweiligen Ventile 23, 33 der Druckreduzierungsvorrichtung 6 sind entsprechende Steuerleitungen 24, 34 vorgesehen, über welche Ansteuerbefehle von der Steuereinrichtung 7 zu den Ventilen 23, 33 übertragen werden können. Des Weiteren ist die Steuereinrichtung 7 über Steuerleitungen 13a und 13b mit den bereits erwähnten Schnellöftnungsventilen 11a, 11b, 11c, 12a, 12b der Hochdruckgasspeicher 1a, 1b, 1c, 2a, 2b verbunden, um bei Bedarf die den Schnellöftnungsventilen 11a, 11b, 11c, 12a, 12b zugeordneten Hochdruckgasspeicher 1a, 2b, 1c, 2a, 2b wahlweise mit der Hochdruck-Sammelleitung 3 verbinden zu können.For controlling the
Bei der in
Die in dem zweiten Parallelzweig 31 angeordnete Druckreduzierungseinrichtung 32 kann beispielsweise ebenfalls als Druckminderer ausgeführt sein, welcher also über einen bestimmten Arbeitsbereich unabhängig von dem Eingangsdruck einen konstanten Ausgangsdruck liefert. Bevorzugt ist dabei vorgesehen, dass die Druckreduzierungskennlinie der in dem zweiten Parallelzweig 31 angeordneten Druckreduzierungseinrichtung 32 verschieden von der Druckreduzierungskennlinie der in dem ersten Parallelzweig 21 angeordneten Druckreduzierungseinrichtung 22 ausgeführt ist. So ist es beispielsweise denkbar, dass die in dem zweiten Parallelzweig angeordnete Druckreduzierungseinrichtung 32 ausgelegt ist, einen konstanten Ausgangsdruck bereitzustellen, der größer ist im Vergleich zu dem am Ausgang der im ersten Parallelzweig 21 angeordneten Druckreduzierungseinrichtung 22 vorliegenden reduzierten Druck. Auf diese Weise ist es möglich, dass durch eine geeignete Ansteuerung der Ventile 23, 33 dem Schutzraum 10 das sauerstoffverdrängende Gas mit unterschiedlichen Volumenströmen zugeführt wird. Im Hinblick auf eine notwendige Druckentlastung sollte dabei der dem Schutzraum 10 maximal zugeführte Volumenstrom an die maximal zulässige, pro Zeiteinheit dem Schutzraum 10 zuführbare Inertgasmenge angepasst sein.The
Wie in
Das mit Hilfe der Steuereinrichtung 7 realisierbare Inertisierungsverfahren wird anschließend im Zusammenhang mit den
Der
In
Vorzugsweise weisen bei der in
Die in den
Andererseits ist es selbstverständlich aber auch denkbar, dass zumindest ein Teil der in der Druckreduzierungsvorrichtung 6 zum Einsatz kommenden Druckreduzierungseinrichtungen 22, 32, 42 als Druckblende ausgeführt sind, wobei eine Druckreduzierung durch eine Querschnittsveränderung mittels einer Drosselscheibe mit einer Bohrung von einem bestimmten Durchmesser erfolgt. Die Größe der Bohrung ist der Inertgasfeuerlöschanlage nach Einsatzzweck angepasst ausgelegt. Eine Druckreduzierungseinrichtung, bei welcher die Druckreduzierung mit Hilfe einer Druckblende erfolgt, weist eine gekrümmte Druckreduzierungskennlinie auf, die abhängig ist von dem Verlauf des Eingangsdruckes (Druck in der Hochdruck-Sammelleitung 3) und somit Druckspitzen, insbesondere unmittelbar nach Öffnung eines der Schnellöffnungsventile 11a, 11b, 11c, 12a, 12b durchlässt.On the other hand, it is of course also conceivable, however, that at least some of the
Erfolgt die Inertisierung des Schutzraumes 10 über eine Druckreduzierungseinrichtung, welche zur Druckreduzierung einer Druckblende aufweist, nimmt die Inertisierungskurve einen bogenförmigen Verauf an.If the inerting of the
Obwohl die in den
Nachfolgend wird unter Bezugnahme auf die
Zum Zeitpunkt t0 beginnt die Inertisierung des Schutzraumes 10, indem bis zum Zeitpunkt t1 der Raumatmosphäre des umschlossenen Raumes 10 kontinuierlich ein sauerstoffverdrängendes Gas zugeführt wird. Der Darstellung in
Zum Zeitpunkt t1 ist der Sauerstoffgehalt in dem umschlossenen Raum 10 auf ein erstes Absenkungsniveau von beispielsweise 15,9 Vol.-% reduziert. Auf diesem ersten Absenkungsniveau wird der Sauerstoffgehalt bis zum Zeitpunkt t2 gehalten. Dies erfolgt vorzugsweise, indem mit Hilfe des Sauerstoffsensors 8 kontinuierlich die Sauerstoffkonzentration in dem Schutzraum 10 gemessen wird, und indem in den Schutzraum in geregelter Weise sauerstoffverdrängendes Gas bzw. Frischluft eingeleitet wird. Unter dem Begriff "Halten der Sauerstoffkonzentration auf deinem bestimmten Absenkungsniveau" ist hierin das Halten der Sauerstoffkonzentration innerhalb eines gewissen Regelbereiches zu verstehen, d.h. innerhalb eines Bereiches, der durch einen oberen und einen unteren Schwellenwert definiert wird. Die maximale Amplitude der Sauerstoffkonzentration in diesem Regelbereich ist vorab einstellbar und beträgt beispielsweise 0,1 bis 0,4 Vol.-%.At time t 1 , the oxygen content in the enclosed
In dem in
Indem kontinuierlich die Brandentwicktung in dem Schutzraum 10 während der Absenkung des Sauerstoffgehaltes auf das erste Absenkungsniveau überwacht wird, kann festgestellt werden, ob bereits während der Absenkung das Feuer vollständig erloschen ist.By continuously monitoring the fire development in the
Bei dem in den
Wenn, was bei den in den
Die Steigung der Inertisierungskurve wird bei der dargestellten Ausführungsform beispielsweise dadurch erhöht, indem in der Druckreduzierungsvorrichtung 6 zusätzlich zu dem ersten Parallelzweig 21 ein zweiter Parallelzweig 31 zugeschaltet wird, in dem eine Druckreduzierungseinrichtung 32 in Gestalt eines Druckminderers angeordnet ist. Im Unterschied zu der Druckreduzierungseinrichtung 22, welche in dem ersten Parallelzweig 21 der Druckreduzierungsvorrichtung 6 angeordnet ist, ist die Druckreduzierungsvorrichtung 32 des zweiten Parallelzweiges 31 vorzugsweise allerdings ausgelegt, einen höheren Ausgangsdruck zu liefern, so dass die Inertisierungskurve bei der Absenkung auf das zweite Absenkungsniveau steiler verläuft.The slope of the inerting curve is increased in the illustrated embodiment, for example, by a second
Dem zugehörigen Kurvenverlauf der
Das erneute Bestätigen des Feueralarms zum Zeitpunkt t4 bewirkt, dass in dem Schutzraum nun der Sauerstoffgehalt von dem zweiten Absenkungsniveau weiter auf das Vollinertisierungsniveau abgesenkt wird, was diesmal durch möglichst rasches Einleiten einer entsprechenden Menge an sauerstoffverdrängendem Gas in die Raumatmosphäre des Schutzraumes erfolgt. Im Einzelnen werden zu diesem Zweck in der Druckreduzierungsvorrichtung 6 zumindest zwei Parallelzweige 21, 31 gleichzeitig geöffnet, um somit einen möglichst großen Inertgasdurchsatz durch die Druckreduzierungsvorrichtung 6 zu ermöglichen. Da die zur Druckreduzierung zum Einsatz kommenden Druckreduzierungseinrichtungen 22, 32 jeweils als Druckminderer ausgeführt sind, nimmt die Inertisierungskurve bei der Absenkung des Sauerstoffgehaltes von dem zweiten Absenkungsniveau auf das dritte Absenkungsniveau (Vollinertisierungsniveau) wieder einen geradlinigen Verlauf an, wobei allerdings die Steigung der Inertisierungskurve noch einmal erhöht wird.Reconfirming the fire alarm at time t 4 causes the oxygen content in the shelter to be lowered further from the second descent level to the full inertization level, this time by introducing as fast as possible a corresponding amount of oxygen displacing gas into the space atmosphere of the shelter. Specifically, for this purpose, at least two
Das Vollinertisierungsniveau ist vorzugsweise derart festgelegt, dass es einer Sauerstoffkonzentration entspricht, die unterhalb der Entzündungsgrenze der im Schutzraum vorhandenen Materialien (Brandlast) liegt. Mit dem Einstellen des Vollinertisierungsniveaus im Schutzraum wird somit der Brand durch Sauerstoffentzug Vollständig gelöscht, wobei gleichzeitig ein Wiederentzünden der Materialen im Schutzraum wirksam verhindert wird.The Vollinertisierungsniveau is preferably set such that it corresponds to an oxygen concentration, which is below the ignition limit of existing materials in the shelter (fire load). By setting the Vollinertisierungsniveaus in the shelter so the fire is completely extinguished by oxygen deprivation, at the same time a re-ignition of the materials in the shelter is effectively prevented.
Dem Kurvenverlauf der
Bei der Durchführung des Inertisierungsverfahrens, wie es beispielhaft anhand der
In den
Bei dem in
In
Wie bereits eingangs ausgeführt, ist es bei herkömmlichen Mehrbereichs-Feuerlöschanlagen problematisch, dass unabhängig davon, welcher der Schutzräume mit einem sauerstoffverdrängenden Gas zu fluten ist, die Inertisierung des Schutzraumes entsprechend ein und demselben Ereignisablauf vorgenommen wird. Demnach wird bei herkömmlichen Mehrbereichs-Feuerlöschanlagen einem Schutzraum, der ein relativ kleines Raumvolumen aufweist, pro Zeiteinheit dieselbe Menge an sauerstoffverdrängendem Gas zugeführt, wie einem Schutzraum mit einem verhältnismäßig großen Raumvolumen. Da die von der Inertgasfeuerlöschanlage pro Zeiteinheit bereitstellbare Inertgasmenge insbesondere von den existierenden Druckentlastungsmaßnahmen der jeweiligen Schutzräume abhängig ist, bedeutet dies, dass unter Umständen die Inertisierung eines Schutzraumes wesentlich langsamer erfolgt, als dies tatsächlich möglich wäre.As already mentioned, it is problematic in conventional multi-range fire extinguishing systems that regardless of which of the shelters is to flood with an oxygen-displacing gas, the inerting of the shelter is carried out according to one and the same event sequence. Thus, in conventional multi-range fire extinguishing systems, a shelter having a relatively small volume of space is supplied with the same amount of oxygen displacing gas per unit time as a shelter having a relatively large volume of space. Since the amount of inert gas which can be supplied by the inert-gas fire extinguishing system per unit of time depends, in particular, on the existing pressure relief measures of the respective protective rooms, this means that under certain circumstances the inerting of a protected area may be much slower than would actually be possible.
Mit der erfindungsgemäßen Lösung, die in einer beispielhaften Ausführungsform in
Die in
Im Unterschied zu der in
Bei der in
Da die in dem ersten Parallelzweig 21 angeordnete Druckreduzierungseinrichtung 22 eine an die maximal zulässige Belastung des ersten Schutzraumes 10-1 angepasste Druckreduzierungskennlinie aufweist, erfolgt die Inertisierung des ersten Schutzraumes 10-1 gemäß einem an den ersten Schutzraum 10-1 speziell anpassbaren Ereignisablauf.Since the
Da die in dem zweiten Parallelzweig 31 der Druckreduzierungsvorrichtung 6 angeordnete Druckreduzierungseinrichtung 32 kann entsprechend eine an die maximal zulässige Belastung des zweiten Schutzraumes 10-2 angepasste Druckreduzierungskennlinie aufweisen, so dass bei Bedarf auch die Inertisierung des zweiten Schutzraumes 10-2 gemäß einem an den zweiten Schutzraum 10-2 speziell anpassbaren Ereignisablauf erfolgen kann.Since the
Claims (14)
- An inert gas fire extinguisher (100) for reducing the risk of and extinguishing fires in a protected room (10, 10-1, 10-2), wherein the inert gas fire extinguisher (100) comprises at least one high-pressure gas tank (1a, 1b, 1c; 2a, 2b) in which an oxygen-displacing gas is stored under high pressure, wherein the high-pressure gas tank (1a, 1b, 1c; 2a, 2b) is connectable to a collecting line (3) via a quick-release valve (11a, 11b, 11c; 12a, 12b), and wherein an extin-guishing line (4, 4-1, 4-2) is further provided which is connected on one side to the collecting line (3) via a pressure-reducing device (6) and on the other side to extinguishing nozzles (5),
characterized in that
the pressure-reducing device (6) comprises at least two parallel branches (21, 31, 41), each having a pressure-reducing unit (22, 32, 42), wherein each parallel branch (21, 31, 41) is connectable to the collecting line (3) and the extinguishing line (4, 4-1, 4-2) via a controllable valve (23, 33, 43), and wherein each pressure-reducing unit (22, 32, 42) is designed to reduce a high input pressure to a low output pressure according to a preset pressure-reducing characteristic. - The inert gas fire extinguisher (100) according to claim 1,
wherein a control device (7) is further provided to automatically effect a multistage inerting process in which the oxygen content in the protected room (10, 10-1, 10-2) is first lowered to a first reduced level and then further lowered as needed to another preset reduced level or successively to multiple preset reduced levels, wherein the control device (7) is designed to control the valves (23, 33, 43) of the pressure-reducing device (6) to set the reduced level such that the oxygen content in the protected room (10, 10-1, 10-2) reduces in accordance with a preset inerting curve. - The inert gas fire extinguisher (100) according to claim 2,
wherein the control device (7) is designed to control the valves (23, 33, 43) of the pressure-reducing device (6) to lower the oxygen content to the first reduced level such that only one first parallel branch (21; 31) of the at least two parallel branches (21, 31, 41) is connected to the collecting line (3) and the extinguishing line (4, 4-1, 4-2), and
wherein the control device (7) is further designed to control the valves (23, 33, 43) of the pressure-reducing device (6) to further lower the oxygen content to a second reduced level such that only one second parallel branch (31; 21) of the at least two parallel branches (21, 31, 41) is connected to the collecting line (3) and the extinguishing line (4, 4-1, 4-2),
wherein the pressure-reducing characteristic of the pressure-reducing unit (22) arranged in the first parallel branch (21) differs from the pressure-reducing characteristic of the pressure-reducing unit (32) arranged in the second parallel branch (31). - The inert gas fire extinguisher (100) according to claim 2,
wherein the control device (7) is designed to control the valves (23, 33, 43) of the pressure-reducing device (6) to lower the oxygen content to the first reduced level such that only one first parallel branch (21) of the at least two parallel branches (21, 31, 41) is connected to the collecting line (3) and the extinguishing line (4, 4-1, 4-2), and
wherein the control device (7) is further designed to control the valves (23, 33, 43) of the pressure-reducing device (6) to further lower the oxygen content to a second reduced level such that the first parallel branch (21) and a second parallel branch (31) of the at least two parallel branches (21, 31, 41) are connected to the collecting line (3) and the extinguishing line (4, 4-1, 4-2). - The inert gas fire extinguisher (100) according to any one of claims 2 to 4,
wherein the pressure-reducing device (6) comprises at least three parallel branches (21, 31, 41) each having a pressure-reducing unit (22, 32, 42), wherein each parallel branch (21, 31, 41) is connectable to the collecting line (3) and the extinguishing line (4, 4-1, 4-2) via a controllable valve (23, 33, 43), and wherein each pressure-reducing unit (22, 32, 42) is designed to reduce a high input pressure to a low output pressure according to a preset pressure-reducing characteristic, and
wherein the control device (7) is designed to control the valves (23, 33, 43) of the pressure-reducing device (6) to lower the oxygen content from the second reduced level to a third reduced level such that only one third parallel branch (41) of the at least three parallel branches (21, 31, 41) is connected to the collecting line (3) and the extinguishing line (4, 4-1, 4-2). - The inert gas fire extinguisher (100) according to any one of the preceding claims,
wherein at least some of the pressure-reducing units (22, 32, 42) exhibit a pressure-reducing characteristic with which, irrespective of a set input pressure, the output pressure does not exceed a predefined pressure value. - The inert gas fire extinguisher (100) according to any one of the preceding claims,
wherein at least some of the pressure-reducing units (22, 32, 42) exhibit a pressure-reducing characteristic with which the output pressure is proportionally dependent on the input pressure. - The inert gas fire extinguisher (100) according to any one of the preceding claims,
wherein at least some of the pressure-reducing units (22, 32, 42) exhibit a pressure-reducing characteristic with which, irrespective of a set input pressure, the output pressure assumes a predefinable constant pressure value over at least a specific range of pressure. - The inert gas fire extinguisher (100) according to any one of the preceding claims which comprises at least two high-pressure gas tanks (1a, 1b, 1c; 2a, 2b) which are connectable to a collecting line (3) via a quick-release valve (11a, 11b, 11c; 12a, 12b), wherein a parallel branch having a pressure-reducing unit (22, 32, 42) is allocated to each high-pressure gas tank (1a, 1b, 1c; 2a, 2b) such that when the quick-release valve (11a, 11b, 11c; 12a, 12b) of one high-pressure gas tank (1a, 1b, 1c; 2a, 2b) of the at least two high-pressure gas tanks (1a, 1b, 1c; 2a, 2b) opens, the valves (23, 33, 43) automatically control the pressure-reducing device (6) such that only the parallel branch (21, 31, 41) allocated to the one high-pressure gas tank (1a, 1b, 1c; 2a, 2b) is connected to the extinguishing line (4, 4-1, 4-2) and the collecting line (3).
- An inerting method for reducing the risk of and extinguishing fires in a protected room (10, 10-1, 10-2) in which an oxygen-displacing gas stored under high pressure is first reduced to a working pressure and subsequently introduced into the protected room (10, 10-1, 10-2) so as to lower the oxygen content in the protected room (10, 10-1, 10-2) to a specific reduced level,
characterized in that
a first pressure-reducing unit (22; 32) arranged in a first parallel branch (21; 31) is used to reduce the pressure of the oxygen-displacing gas stored under high pressure, and through which the oxygen-displacing gas flows as soon as the oxygen content begins to be lowered; and that
at least one second pressure-reducing unit (32; 22) arranged in a second parallel branch (31; 21) is further used to reduce the pressure of the oxygen-displacing gas stored under high pressure, and through which the oxygen-displacing gas only flows after a predefined period of time has passed since the oxygen content began to be lowered. - The inerting method according to claim 10,
wherein the first pressure-reducing unit (22; 32) is a pressure aperture exhibiting a first aperture cross-section, and wherein the second pressure-reducing unit (22; 32) is a pressure aperture exhibiting a larger aperture cross-section than the first aperture cross-section. - The inerting method according to claim 10 or 11,
wherein after the predefined time set for reducing the pressure has passed, the oxygen-displacing gas flows through both the first pressure-reducing unit (22; 32) as well as through the at least one second pressure-reducing unit (32; 22). - The inerting method according to any one of claims 10 to 12, wherein the inerting method comprises the following steps:a) lowering the oxygen content in the protected room (10) to a specific first reduced level;b) maintaining the oxygen content in the protected room (10) at or below the first reduced level; andc) in the event of a fire in the protected room (10) or if otherwise needed, the oxygen content in the protected room (10) is further lowered from the first reduced level to a specific second reduced level,wherein the lowering of the oxygen content in the protected room (10) to the first reduced level ensues in accordance with a first inerting curve which is predetermined by a pressure-reducing characteristic of the first pressure-reducing unit (22; 32), and wherein the further lowering of the oxygen content in the protected room (10) to the second reduced level ensues in accordance with a second inerting curve which is predetermined by a pressure-reducing characteristic of the second pressure-reducing unit (32; 22).
- The inerting method according to claim 13,
wherein at least one fire parameter is measured in the protected room (10, 10-1, 10-2), preferably continuously, in order to determine the presence of fire in said protected room (10, 10-1, 10-2).
Priority Applications (14)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AT08166037T ATE479476T1 (en) | 2008-10-07 | 2008-10-07 | INERT GAS FIRE EXTINGUISHING SYSTEM FOR REDUCING THE RISK AND EXTINGUISHING FIRE IN A PROTECTED ROOM |
ES08166037T ES2351888T3 (en) | 2008-10-07 | 2008-10-07 | INSTALLATION OF FIRE EXTINGUISHING BY GAS INERTE TO REDUCE THE RISK AND EXTINGUISH FIRE IN A PROTECTED PREMISES. |
EP08166037A EP2186546B1 (en) | 2008-10-07 | 2008-10-07 | Inert gas fire extinguisher for reducing the risk of and extinguishing fires in a protected area |
PL08166037T PL2186546T3 (en) | 2008-10-07 | 2008-10-07 | Inert gas fire extinguisher for reducing the risk of and extinguishing fires in a protected area |
DK08166037.5T DK2186546T3 (en) | 2008-10-07 | 2008-10-07 | Inert gas fire extinguishers to reduce risk and extinguish fires in a shelter |
DE502008001275T DE502008001275D1 (en) | 2008-10-07 | 2008-10-07 | Inert gas fire extinguishing system for reducing the risk and extinguishing fires in a shelter |
CA2737679A CA2737679C (en) | 2008-10-07 | 2009-10-07 | Inert gas fire extinguisher for reducing the risk and for extinguishing fires in a protected space |
RU2011113003/12A RU2506105C2 (en) | 2008-10-07 | 2009-10-07 | System of fire extinguishing with inert gas to reduce risk of fire and fire extinguishing in protected room |
US12/998,300 US9079054B2 (en) | 2008-10-07 | 2009-10-07 | Inert gas fire extinguisher for reducing the risk and for extinguishing fires in a protected space |
AU2009301140A AU2009301140B2 (en) | 2008-10-07 | 2009-10-07 | Inert gas fire extinguisher for reducing the risk and for extinguishing fires in a protected space |
CN2009801396111A CN102170942A (en) | 2008-10-07 | 2009-10-07 | Inert gas fire extinguisher for reducing the risk and for extinguishing fires in a protected space |
BRPI0920437A BRPI0920437A2 (en) | 2008-10-07 | 2009-10-07 | inert gas fire extinguishing system and inertization method to reduce the risk of, and extinguish, fire in a protected environment. |
PCT/EP2009/063019 WO2010040771A1 (en) | 2008-10-07 | 2009-10-07 | Inert gas fire extinguisher for reducing the risk and for extinguishing fires in a protected space |
HK10106852.2A HK1140443A1 (en) | 2008-10-07 | 2010-07-14 | Inert gas fire extinguisher for reducing the risk of and extinguishing fires in a protected area |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP08166037A EP2186546B1 (en) | 2008-10-07 | 2008-10-07 | Inert gas fire extinguisher for reducing the risk of and extinguishing fires in a protected area |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2186546A1 EP2186546A1 (en) | 2010-05-19 |
EP2186546B1 true EP2186546B1 (en) | 2010-09-01 |
Family
ID=40377398
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP08166037A Active EP2186546B1 (en) | 2008-10-07 | 2008-10-07 | Inert gas fire extinguisher for reducing the risk of and extinguishing fires in a protected area |
Country Status (14)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US9079054B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP2186546B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN102170942A (en) |
AT (1) | ATE479476T1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU2009301140B2 (en) |
BR (1) | BRPI0920437A2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2737679C (en) |
DE (1) | DE502008001275D1 (en) |
DK (1) | DK2186546T3 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2351888T3 (en) |
HK (1) | HK1140443A1 (en) |
PL (1) | PL2186546T3 (en) |
RU (1) | RU2506105C2 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2010040771A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (22)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20120217028A1 (en) * | 2011-02-24 | 2012-08-30 | Kidde Technologies, Inc. | Active odorant warning |
EP2594319B1 (en) * | 2011-11-18 | 2018-05-30 | Minimax GmbH & Co KG | Assembly for extinguishing or making inert with a synthetic liquid extinguishing agent |
PT2602006T (en) | 2011-12-05 | 2017-03-08 | Amrona Ag | Method for extinguishing a fire in a closed space and fire extinguishing assembly |
CN103100173A (en) * | 2013-02-26 | 2013-05-15 | 王靖 | Fixed pipe network extinguishing system |
EP2896432B1 (en) * | 2014-01-17 | 2016-05-25 | Minimax GmbH & Co KG | Method and assembly for extinguishing with a liquid synthetic fire extinguishing agent |
EP2937116B1 (en) * | 2014-04-25 | 2023-10-18 | Siemens Schweiz AG | Reduction of noise and positive air pressure when discharging a gas extinguisher system |
DE102014210032B4 (en) * | 2014-05-26 | 2018-05-03 | Minimax Gmbh & Co. Kg | Fire protection device for lowering an atmospheric oxygen concentration in a protected area of a building |
JP6400365B2 (en) * | 2014-07-22 | 2018-10-03 | エア・ウォーター防災株式会社 | Gas fire extinguishing equipment |
EP2998002B1 (en) | 2014-09-22 | 2016-12-21 | Amrona AG | Inert gas extinguishing system |
GB2543357A (en) * | 2015-10-16 | 2017-04-19 | Graviner Ltd Kidde | Fire supression systems |
US10933262B2 (en) | 2015-12-22 | 2021-03-02 | WAGNER Fire Safety, Inc. | Oxygen-reducing installation and method for operating an oxygen-reducing installation |
CN108430592A (en) * | 2015-12-22 | 2018-08-21 | 艾摩罗那股份公司 | The method that oxygen reduces system and reduces system for operating oxygen |
JP6594769B2 (en) * | 2015-12-25 | 2019-10-23 | 能美防災株式会社 | Packaged automatic fire extinguishing equipment |
US11376458B2 (en) | 2016-12-20 | 2022-07-05 | Carrier Corporation | Fire protection system for an enclosure and method of fire protection for an enclosure |
EP3568215B1 (en) * | 2017-01-12 | 2021-09-01 | Fire Eater A/S | A method for inerting a fire |
DK3568214T3 (en) * | 2017-01-12 | 2021-07-05 | Fire Eater As | Sensor-based fire inerting gas system |
CN118477268A (en) * | 2017-10-31 | 2024-08-13 | 天津森罗科技股份有限公司 | Low-oxygen fireproof system and method thereof |
DE102017130587A1 (en) * | 2017-12-19 | 2019-06-19 | Minimax Gmbh & Co. Kg | Pneumatic control unit for multi-range fire extinguishing systems, as well as multi-range fire extinguishing system with selbigem |
CN110211475A (en) * | 2019-06-28 | 2019-09-06 | 上海海事大学 | One kind being based on a variety of inert gas mixing extinguishing test devices |
WO2021165972A1 (en) * | 2020-02-22 | 2021-08-26 | David Shavit | Community outdoor fire defense |
WO2024075021A1 (en) * | 2022-10-04 | 2024-04-11 | Tyco Fire Products Lp | Fire suppression system with regulator |
CN115591155A (en) * | 2022-11-03 | 2023-01-13 | 上海穗杉实业股份有限公司(Cn) | Nitrogen injection and oxygen control environment-controlled fire protection system and method for reducing nitrogen injection time |
Family Cites Families (13)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5287702A (en) * | 1992-05-15 | 1994-02-22 | Preferred Co2 Systems, Inc. | Carbon dioxide storage with thermoelectric cooling for fire suppression systems |
DE19811851C2 (en) | 1998-03-18 | 2001-01-04 | Wagner Alarm Sicherung | Inerting procedure for fire prevention and extinguishing in closed rooms |
US20020040940A1 (en) * | 1998-03-18 | 2002-04-11 | Wagner Ernst Werner | Inerting method and apparatus for preventing and extinguishing fires in enclosed spaces |
US6390203B1 (en) * | 1999-01-11 | 2002-05-21 | Yulian Y. Borisov | Fire suppression apparatus and method |
AU3727900A (en) * | 1999-03-03 | 2000-09-21 | Fmc Corporation | Explosion prevention system for internal turret mooring system |
DE10051662B4 (en) | 2000-10-18 | 2004-04-01 | Airbus Deutschland Gmbh | Procedure for extinguishing a fire that has broken out inside a closed room |
DE50111557D1 (en) * | 2001-09-15 | 2007-01-11 | Siemens Schweiz Ag | Process for fire extinguishing and extinguishing system |
EP1454658B1 (en) * | 2003-03-04 | 2008-03-19 | Linde Aktiengesellschaft | Method and system for fire suppressing |
EP1454685B1 (en) * | 2003-03-04 | 2014-08-13 | Langenstein & Schemann Gmbh | Method for forming a workpiece |
DE10310439B3 (en) * | 2003-03-11 | 2004-12-09 | Basf Coatings Ag | Process for fire and explosion protection in a high-bay warehouse for chemical hazardous substances and fire and explosion-protected high-bay warehouse |
GB2424184A (en) * | 2005-03-14 | 2006-09-20 | Kidde Ip Holdings Ltd | Inert gas fire suppression system |
RU2286190C1 (en) * | 2005-03-24 | 2006-10-27 | Федеральное Государственное унитарное предприятие "Особое конструкторское бюро высокоэнергетических лазеров "Гранат" им. В.К. Орлова" (ФГУП "ОКБ "Гранат" им. В.К. Орлова") | Extinguishing system for multistory building or building structure |
SI1911498T1 (en) * | 2006-10-11 | 2009-04-30 | Amrona Ag | Multi-stage inerting method for preventing and extinguishing fires is enclosed spaces |
-
2008
- 2008-10-07 ES ES08166037T patent/ES2351888T3/en active Active
- 2008-10-07 DE DE502008001275T patent/DE502008001275D1/en active Active
- 2008-10-07 DK DK08166037.5T patent/DK2186546T3/en active
- 2008-10-07 EP EP08166037A patent/EP2186546B1/en active Active
- 2008-10-07 AT AT08166037T patent/ATE479476T1/en active
- 2008-10-07 PL PL08166037T patent/PL2186546T3/en unknown
-
2009
- 2009-10-07 CA CA2737679A patent/CA2737679C/en active Active
- 2009-10-07 BR BRPI0920437A patent/BRPI0920437A2/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2009-10-07 US US12/998,300 patent/US9079054B2/en active Active
- 2009-10-07 CN CN2009801396111A patent/CN102170942A/en active Pending
- 2009-10-07 WO PCT/EP2009/063019 patent/WO2010040771A1/en active Application Filing
- 2009-10-07 RU RU2011113003/12A patent/RU2506105C2/en active
- 2009-10-07 AU AU2009301140A patent/AU2009301140B2/en active Active
-
2010
- 2010-07-14 HK HK10106852.2A patent/HK1140443A1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
BRPI0920437A2 (en) | 2015-12-22 |
CN102170942A (en) | 2011-08-31 |
US20110253396A1 (en) | 2011-10-20 |
RU2011113003A (en) | 2012-11-20 |
PL2186546T3 (en) | 2011-02-28 |
WO2010040771A1 (en) | 2010-04-15 |
DE502008001275D1 (en) | 2010-10-14 |
US9079054B2 (en) | 2015-07-14 |
CA2737679C (en) | 2015-06-30 |
RU2506105C2 (en) | 2014-02-10 |
HK1140443A1 (en) | 2010-10-15 |
AU2009301140B2 (en) | 2013-03-28 |
CA2737679A1 (en) | 2010-04-15 |
AU2009301140A1 (en) | 2010-04-15 |
ES2351888T3 (en) | 2011-02-11 |
EP2186546A1 (en) | 2010-05-19 |
ATE479476T1 (en) | 2010-09-15 |
DK2186546T3 (en) | 2011-01-03 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP2186546B1 (en) | Inert gas fire extinguisher for reducing the risk of and extinguishing fires in a protected area | |
EP1911498B1 (en) | Multi-stage inerting method for preventing and extinguishing fires is enclosed spaces | |
EP1062005B1 (en) | Inerting method for preventing and extinguishing fires in enclosed spaces | |
EP1683548B1 (en) | Inerting method for avoiding fire | |
EP2724754B1 (en) | Method and device for determining and/or monitoring the air permeability of an enclosed space | |
EP3094385B1 (en) | Control station and method for actuating two extinguishing agent supply devices | |
EP1913980B1 (en) | Inerting device with safety device | |
EP2462994B1 (en) | Inertisation method to prevent and/or extinguish fires and inertisation system to implement the method | |
EP1682232B1 (en) | Device for preventing and extinguishing fires | |
EP2204219A1 (en) | Inertisation method to prevent and/or extinguish fires and inertisation system to implement the method | |
EP2881149A1 (en) | Oxygen reduction system and method for operating an oxygen reduction system | |
EP1550482A1 (en) | Inerting method for extinguishing fires | |
EP2602006B1 (en) | Method for extinguishing a fire in a closed space and fire extinguishing assembly | |
EP1913979B1 (en) | Inerting device with nitrogen generator | |
EP1220705B1 (en) | Fire-extinguishing device | |
EP2998002B1 (en) | Inert gas extinguishing system | |
EP1550481B1 (en) | Inerting method for decreasing the risk of a fire | |
DE102005023101A1 (en) | Inert gas e.g. nitrogen, introducing method for fire-extinguishing system, involves conducting compressed inert gas with defined flow-rate into fire-extinguishing or protection area to maintain intended room pressure | |
EP3687636B1 (en) | Dry alarm valve station and fire-extinguishing facility comprising same | |
WO2016062690A1 (en) | System and method for oxygen reduction in a target space | |
Klaffenböck et al. | Automatic fire‐fighting systems in tunnels | |
DE102016104843A1 (en) | Modernization of sprinkler systems | |
DE202011101038U1 (en) | Fire extinguishing system and triggering unit for a fire extinguishing system |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20081017 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL BA MK RS |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 502008001275 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20101014 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: HK Ref legal event code: DE Ref document number: 1140443 Country of ref document: HK |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: NV Representative=s name: CAVID GMBH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: T3 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: T3 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: HK Ref legal event code: GR Ref document number: 1140443 Country of ref document: HK |
|
AKX | Designation fees paid |
Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20101201 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100901 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100901 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Effective date: 20110201 |
|
LTIE | Lt: invalidation of european patent or patent extension |
Effective date: 20100901 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100901 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100901 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100901 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: PL Ref legal event code: T3 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FD4D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100901 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20101202 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100901 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: NV Representative=s name: REUTELER & CIE SA |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100901 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110101 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100901 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100901 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110103 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100901 Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20101031 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20110606 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 502008001275 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20110606 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100901 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110302 Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20101007 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100901 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100901 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20101201 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20100901 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Payment date: 20161019 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: EBP Effective date: 20171031 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20171031 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20211223 Year of fee payment: 14 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20211028 Year of fee payment: 14 Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20211022 Year of fee payment: 14 Ref country code: BE Payment date: 20211020 Year of fee payment: 14 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20221031 |
|
P01 | Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered |
Effective date: 20230526 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20221031 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20221031 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20221007 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FD2A Effective date: 20231127 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Payment date: 20230928 Year of fee payment: 16 Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20231019 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20231020 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20221008 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20221008 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20231020 Year of fee payment: 16 Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20231102 Year of fee payment: 16 Ref country code: AT Payment date: 20231020 Year of fee payment: 16 |