EP2089456A1

EP2089456A1 - Method for the production of flameproofed fiber composite materials or prepregs

Info

Publication number: EP2089456A1
Application number: EP07822488A
Authority: EP
Inventors: Herbert Costard
Original assignee: Individual
Current assignee: Flasin GmbH
Priority date: 2006-11-15
Filing date: 2007-11-12
Publication date: 2009-08-19
Also published as: WO2008058924A1; BRPI0717377A2; DE102007016698A1; CA2667407A1; US20100324192A1

Abstract

The invention relates to an optimized method for improving the flameproofing of fiber composite materials or prepregs, particularly for the production of thermosets. An upper limit already exists on the percentage increase in flameproofing agent for glass fiber composites. However, the application of natural fibers in the composite increases the demands placed on the flameproofing. Thus the problem addressed by this invention is to offer a new method for the flameproofing of natural fiber composites and composites with increased flameproofing, and for the flameproofing of conventional fiber composites, which avoids the disadvantages of known methods which are created by increasing the viscosity of the polymer with flameproofing agent. Furthermore, a flameproofed composite should be offered, which avoids the disadvantages of known fiber composites which are created by increasing the viscosity of the polymer with flameproofing agent. The problem is solved, in addition to a device according to the invention, in that during the production of flameproofed fiber composite materials containing fiber material embedded in polymer, a cover layer is constructed containing flameproofing agent in the area of at least one surface area of the fiber composite materials.

Description

Process for the production of flame-retardant fiber composites or prepregs

Technical area

The invention relates to an optimized process for improving the flame retardancy of fiber composites or prepregs, especially for the production of thermosets. But it is also applicable to the production of flame-retardant thermoplastics or mixtures of thermoplastics and thermosets.

State of the art

These fiber composites are formed from semifinished fiber products such as nonwovens, fabrics, loops or rovings including glass fibers, carbon fibers, synthetic fibers or natural fibers, such as cotton, flax or hemp. (Ut .: Flemming, Ziegmann, Roth, Faserverbundbauweisen, Berlin 1995) embedded in a polymeric matrix system.

Prepregs are formed from monomers intended for polymerization and fiber semi-finished products embedded therein, as well as other additives. They are semi-finished products that can be processed by machine. By using prepregs it is possible to achieve a consistent and high quality. By curing under high temperatures, short cycle times are possible.

As polymeric matrix systems are mainly unsaturated polyester resins, epoxy resins and phenolic resins used, more recently, resin systems based on natural oil. Furthermore, multi-component materials (polymer blends) are used to adapt the technical and chemical properties of the corresponding application. All these materials are summarized below under the term polymer.

As processing aids and for the change in properties additives can be mixed in the plastics, such as emulsifiers and catalysts.

In thermosets, but also in thermoplastics, other additives are often used. They serve as extenders for resin reduction, to improve the surface quality, to reduce the brittleness and to increase the rigidity and optionally to increase the flame resistance (Ref: Hellerich, Harsche, Haenle, Material Guide plastics, Munich 2001). The quantitative use of these additives is limited because in the entry of the polymer in the semifinished fiber product, a certain viscosity can not be exceeded, otherwise a uniform penetration of the fiber composite is not possible and thus the strength of the fiber composite would fall sharply. The addition of such substances also limits the percentage of the polymer, whereby a decrease in the strength of the fiber composite occurs.

Flame retardants added as the polymer matrix or the monomer or molten thermoplastic intended for the polymerization and to increase the rigidity and, if appropriate, to increase the flame resistance (LJt: Hellerich, Harsche, Haenle, Material Guide Plastics, Munich 2001). The quantitative use of these additives is limited because in the entry of the polymer in the semifinished fiber product, a certain viscosity can not be exceeded, otherwise a uniform penetration of the fiber composite is not possible and thus the strength of the fiber composite would fall sharply. The addition of such substances also limits the percentage of the polymer, whereby a decrease in the strength of the fiber composite occurs.

Flame retardants added to the polymer matrix or to the monomer or molten thermoplastic used for the polymerization are, for example, aluminum hydroxide Al (OH) ₃ , halogen-splitting or phosphorus-containing products. For environmental reasons, the halogen-containing products have been replaced by newer, more expensive, but less effective products. Aluminum hydroxide releases water or steam when reacted by the action of heat; the phosphorus-containing products enter into nonflammable gases with the combustible substances. In the polymers registered flame retardants often adversely affect the physical properties of the plastics and often have a negative impact on the processing.

When using natural fibers in the composite material, additional requirements are imposed on flame retardancy, because the natural fibers are combustible substances, essentially cellulose. Thus, the flame retardant must be further designed, in particular to be extended to an appropriate treatment of the fibers. In contrast, the flame retardant in glass fiber composites only has the task to control or restrict the burning behavior of the plastic.

A percentage increase in the flame retardant in the polymer matrix is, as stated above, already in glass fiber composites one Limit set.

In terms of weight equal mass natural fibers have due to their lower specific weight, with a similar volume, a higher fiber density in the semifinished fiber product. The penetration of the liquid polymer therefore requires a lower viscosity of the polymer in natural fiber applications compared to glass fiber semifinished products. The glass fiber semi-finished products are smooth-drawn filaments which result in an open semi-finished fiber product. The semi-finished natural fiber products are plant cells and bundles of plant cells, some of which are connected to each other at the middle lamellae and by OH groups. In this structure, the polymer must be able to penetrate, in order to achieve good fiber-matrix adhesion. The entry of additives and thus also of flame retardants in the polymer are so narrow limits especially in natural fibers with the conventional method of entry of flame retardants in the polymer because of the viscosity increase. Therefore, this procedure is not suitable for flame retardancy measures with an increased need for flame retardance, as for example with natural fiber prepregs or flame-sensitive polymers.

Presentation of the invention

Thus, it is an object of this invention, a new method for the

Flame protection of natural fiber composites and composite materials with increased flame retardant requirements, as well as for the flame retardancy of conventional Faserverbundwerksoffen specify, which avoids the disadvantages of the known methods, which result from the increase in viscosity of the polymer by flame retardants. In addition, a flame-retardant composite material is to be specified, which avoids the disadvantages of the known fiber composites, which result from the increase in viscosity of the polymer by the flame retardant.

The object is achieved by a method according to

Claim 1 or a composite material according to claim 10. The dependent claims 2-9 and 11 and 12 give advantageous Further education.

With regard to the method, the object is achieved according to the invention by forming a flameproofing agent-containing cover layer in the region of at least one surface of the fiber composite material in the production of flame-retardant fiber composites containing polymer material embedded in the polymer.

Surprisingly and contrary to the prevailing view in professional circles, sufficient flame retardancy can be achieved only with largely complete enforcement of the fiber composite material with flame retardants, it is possible by the inventive method, a flame retardant requirements also appropriate flame protection by applying a significant flame retardant To achieve cover layer. Such a cover can also be applied later.

In this case, the polymer used for embedding the fiber material or provided for the polymerization of monomer and / or the molten thermoplastic may also contain property-modifying additives. Such additives can also develop a flame retardant effect. However, it should be noted that the essential concentration of the flame retardant is in the topcoat.

The difference between natural fiber composite materials (NFK) and, for example, glass fiber composite materials (GRP) consists in the fundamentally different adhesion conditions of the polymer to the fibers. In the case of GRP, surface adhesion, which is achieved, for example, by the use of PVA as a polymer, takes place, whereas in NFK, adhesion by free OH groups to and in the cell structure makes it possible to attach to the polymer. Therefore, a "soaking" of the fiber material with the polymer used for embedding is necessary.

Therefore, especially in NFK advantageously polymer without or with only a smaller proportion of the total required flame retardants and other additives used to adjust the viscosity so that the "impregnation" of the fibers is guaranteed, that is one uniform wetting of the fibers can be done with the polymer.

The inventive method is thus particularly advantageous in the application to natural fiber composites, but can also be applied to all other fiber composites, such as glass fiber composites. In this way, conventional fiber composites can also be equipped so that they correspond to increased flame protection conditions without a loss of strength of the fiber composite material is expected. That is, fiber composites, which currently can only meet the cost of their stability or not increased flame retardance requirements, can now be equipped with an additional, superficial flame retardant and thus be used even with increased flame retardance requirements.

By using a method according to the invention, depending on the operating conditions, the flame retardant concentration to be provided in the polymer used for embedding can be significantly reduced or a use of flame retardant material in the polymer used for embedding can be completely dispensed with (compare claim 5). As a result, a lower viscosity of the polymer can be achieved than is possible with conventional methods with equally strong flameproofing equipment. Thus, in particular with natural fibers, a better impregnation of the fibers and / or a better connection between polymer and fiber can be achieved. This makes it possible to produce fiber composite material with stronger flame retardant for the same stability or higher stability with the same fire protection equipment.

According to the invention, the flame retardant is largely on the surface of the fiber composite material and thus has a much more active in case of fire, in contrast to the method of complete entry of the flame retardant in the polymer, in which only a selective release of the flame retardant, for example Water or water vapor when using aluminum hydroxide, takes place, depending on the mass fraction of the flame retardant on the polymer.

It is also possible according to the invention on the covering layer forming a fire protection layer, for example of aluminum hydroxide enclosed in polymer (compare claim 4), to apply further layers, such as, for example, coatings and / or foliations. Cover layer is to be understood here as an underlying fiber composite material against fire protective layer, so a covering this layer.

It is particularly advantageous that the covering layer forming

Flame retardant according to claim 2 applied to the fiber composite material before the polymer used for embedding or the molten thermoplastic is completely cured. As a result, the flame retardant can be bound to or in a region near the surface of the fiber composite material. It is particularly advantageous to roll in the flame retardant after application even before complete curing of the polymer used for embedding or of the molten thermoplastic or in prepregs in the pressing and polymerization in the tool in the composite and encase with the polymer.

The technical preparation of the prepregs is preferably carried out on the known prepreg or SMC systems with the addition of a spreading or coating device for aluminum hydroxide, for a

Aluminum hydroxide dispersion or for a polymer which is highly concentrated with aluminum hydroxide. When nonwovens are used, especially in the case of thin nonwovens, a prior hydroentanglement of the nonwovens should be carried out in order to increase the breaking length and to improve the drapability of the nonwovens and thus of the prepregs.

Advantageously, the flame retardant according to claim 3 act as a curing agent.

According to dependent claim 6, the fiber material prior to embedding in polymer or molten thermoplastic or intended for polymerization monomer by soaking, spraying, Coating or other methods with flame retardant material. This procedure can be combined with a flameproofing device according to claim 1, as intended in the context of this invention, but is not reliant on flame retardancy according to claim 1 and, taken in isolation, can constitute an independent (separate) invention. Accordingly, the flame retardant can also be obtained alone or at least for the most part by equipping the fiber material with flame retardant material, for example, by impregnating, spraying, coating or the like of the fiber material. Thus, a flame retardant fiber composite according to this separate invention may consist of flame retardant fiber material embedded in polymer, monomer intended for polymerization, and / or molten thermoplastic. In this case, the polymer, the monomer intended for the polymerization and / or the molten thermoplastic can be equipped with additional flame retardant or be free from such. The fiber composite material may further be provided with a flame retardant layer on its surface, but is not necessarily dependent on such depending on Flammschutzanforderung.

The amount of applied to the fibers or registered in this flame retardant can be varied so that depending on the type of polymer and application, only a small amount or no flame retardant must be mixed into the polymer used for embedding.

The applied to the fiber (especially natural fiber)

Flame retardant material according to the invention is particularly chosen so that it allows the subsequently registered polymer to penetrate through the flame retardant material up to or into the fiber to allow good fiber / matrix adhesion or by the applied to the fiber flame retardant no or no essential To cause waste of the total strength in the composite.

When soaking the fibers are applied with a liquid Flame retardant, for example, with an aqueous phosphorus dispersion according to dependent claim 8, equipped and dried before the entry of the polymer.

In multilayer, for example, 10-layer fiber composites, according to the invention, the outer layers with a high proportion of flame retardants, such as Al (OH) ₃ , provided to achieve the desired flame retardancy, without affecting the overall strength significantly negative. These outer layers can then be made both with or without fibers.

The object is also achieved according to claim 10 by a flame-retardant fiber composite material or prepreg, including embedded in polymer fiber material wherein the concentration of at least one flame retardant at least in the region of at least one surface is higher than average in the rest of the composite material or at least one surface increases. In particular, in the region of a surface, that is to say on the surface and / or superficially incorporated into the fiber composite material, a layer is arranged with an increased flame retardant concentration, which is higher than the rest of the fiber composite. The increase in the flame retardant concentration can be designed to be fluid or sudden.

Way (s) for carrying out the invention

Further advantages and features of the invention will become apparent from the following description of non-limiting embodiments.

As a comparative basis was present in aqueous solution

Flame retardant (Flacavon GP with an active ingredient concentration of 15%, Schill + Seilacher AG) impregnated and then dried paper fleece 100% cotton linters with a basis weight of 180 g / m ² and a thickness of 0.5 mm in phenolic resin (Bakelite PHL 2485, Hexion Specialty Chemicals GmbH). The fiber mass fraction in the produced prepreg (honeycomb sandwich 3.7 mm with Nomex honeycomb 3.00 mm, EURO Composites) amounted to about 50 percent by weight. The fire test gave the following values: Fire length 60 s vertical 120 mm

Brand length 12 s vertical 22 mm

Heat release peak 5 min 78 kW / m ²

Heat release 2 min 77 kW min / m ²

In an otherwise identical prepreg preparation was applied to the surface of the polymer-impregnated paper web by scattering aluminum hydroxide. It loosely adhered to the surface of the uncured polymer. By subsequently rolling the aluminum hydroxide into the surface, the flame retardant was coated with the polymer and solidified in the surface of the prepreg. This procedure did not result in a loss of strength. Depending on the amount applied, 10 to 80% of aluminum hydroxide was incorporated into the polymer on the surface of the composite. Based on the total mass that corresponds to a proportion of aluminum hydroxide of about 1 to 20 weight percent. The fire test gave the following values:

Fire length 60 s vertically 110 mm

Fire length 12 s vertical 13 mm

Heat release peak 5 min 46 kW / m ²

Heat release 2 min 61 kW min / m ²

Alternatively, for example, with flame retardant (Flacavon GP with an active ingredient concentration of 15%, Schill + Seilacher AG) provided wet fleece made of 100% bleached flax with 15 mm fiber length and a basis weight of 180 g / m ² and a thickness of 0.5mm embedded in phenolic resin (Bakelite PHL 2485, Hexion Specialty Chemicals GmbH). Aluminum hydroxide was embedded in the polymer on the surfaces. The fiber mass fraction in the produced prepreg (honeycomb sandwich 3.7 mm with Nomex honeycomb 3.00 mm, EURO Composites) amounted to about 50 percent by weight. The fire test gave the following values:

Fire length 60 s vertical 112 mm

Fire length 12 s vertical 14 mm

Heat release peak 5 min 47 kW / m ² Heat release 2 min 60 kW min / m ²

Further tests were modified as follows

Fiber composites were performed: glass fabric 7781, basis weight 296 g / m ² , thickness 0.4 mm;

Fiber mass fraction in prepreg about 65% by weight; no

Aluminum hydroxide on prepreg surface: Fire length 60 s vertical 101 mm Fire length 12 s vertical 15 mm Heat release peak 5 min 19 kW / m ² Heat release 2 min 15 kW min / m ² [0052 ] Glass fabric 7781, basis weight 296 g / m ² , thickness 0.4 mm;

Fiber mass fraction in prepreg about 65% by weight; With

Aluminum hydroxide on prepreg surface (see above): Fire length 60 s vertical 90 mm Fire length 12 s vertical 11 mm heat release peak 5 min 16 kW / m ² heat release 2 min 12 kW min / m ²

Claims

claims

1. A process for the preparation of flame-retardant fiber composites or prepregs, comprising in polymer or in unpolymerized monomer embedded fiber material, characterized in that in the region of at least one surface of the fiber composite material at least one flame retardant-containing top layer is formed.

2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that the applied in the region of the at least one surface flame retardant is applied before the at least one polymer is completely cured or before the monomer is polymerized.

3. The method according to any one of the above claims, characterized in that the applied in the region of at least one surface flame retardant acts simultaneously as a curing agent.

4. The method according to any one of the above claims, characterized in that is used as the flame retardant aluminum hydroxide.

5. The method according to any one of the above claims, characterized in that the monomer used for the polymerization or the at least one polymer before being brought into contact with the fibers, no flame retardants are added.

6. The method according to any one of the above claims, characterized in that the fiber material is provided prior to introduction into the monomer used for the polymerization or in the at least one polymer by soaking, spraying, coating or other methods with flame retardant.

7. The method according to claim 6, characterized in that an aqueous or alcoholic solution or an organic solvent solution or dispersion of a flame retardant material is used.

8. The method according to any one of claims 6 or 7, characterized in that a flame retardant material based on phosphorus is used.

9. The method according to claim 6, characterized in that a suitable for textiles flame retardant material is used.

10. Flame-retardant fiber composite material or prepreg, embedded in polymer or embedded in unpolymerized monomer Fiber material, characterized in that the concentration of at least one flame retardant at least in the region of at least one surface is higher than average increases in the rest of the composite material or to at least one surface.

11. flame-retardant fiber composite material or prepreg, according to claim 10, characterized in that the fiber composite material on at least one surface having a cover layer with a significantly higher flame retardant than the average flame retardant concentration of the rest of the composite material.

12. Flame-retardant fiber composite material or prepreg, according to claim 11, characterized in that the at least one cover layer includes embedded in polymer aluminum hydroxide.