EP2084675A1 - Darstellung des ergebnisses eines prüfungsschritts in einem intelligenten dokument - Google Patents
Darstellung des ergebnisses eines prüfungsschritts in einem intelligenten dokumentInfo
- Publication number
- EP2084675A1 EP2084675A1 EP07819276A EP07819276A EP2084675A1 EP 2084675 A1 EP2084675 A1 EP 2084675A1 EP 07819276 A EP07819276 A EP 07819276A EP 07819276 A EP07819276 A EP 07819276A EP 2084675 A1 EP2084675 A1 EP 2084675A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- program
- indication
- result
- intelligent document
- document
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
- G07B—TICKET-ISSUING APPARATUS; FARE-REGISTERING APPARATUS; FRANKING APPARATUS
- G07B17/00—Franking apparatus
- G07B17/00185—Details internally of apparatus in a franking system, e.g. franking machine at customer or apparatus at post office
- G07B17/00314—Communication within apparatus, personal computer [PC] system, or server, e.g. between printhead and central unit in a franking machine
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
- G07B—TICKET-ISSUING APPARATUS; FARE-REGISTERING APPARATUS; FRANKING APPARATUS
- G07B17/00—Franking apparatus
- G07B17/00016—Relations between apparatus, e.g. franking machine at customer or apparatus at post office, in a franking system
- G07B17/00024—Physical or organizational aspects of franking systems
- G07B2017/00048—Software architecture
- G07B2017/00056—Client-server
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
- G07B—TICKET-ISSUING APPARATUS; FARE-REGISTERING APPARATUS; FRANKING APPARATUS
- G07B17/00—Franking apparatus
- G07B17/00016—Relations between apparatus, e.g. franking machine at customer or apparatus at post office, in a franking system
- G07B17/0008—Communication details outside or between apparatus
- G07B2017/00145—Communication details outside or between apparatus via the Internet
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
- G07B—TICKET-ISSUING APPARATUS; FARE-REGISTERING APPARATUS; FRANKING APPARATUS
- G07B17/00—Franking apparatus
- G07B17/00185—Details internally of apparatus in a franking system, e.g. franking machine at customer or apparatus at post office
- G07B17/00193—Constructional details of apparatus in a franking system
- G07B2017/00201—Open franking system, i.e. the printer is not dedicated to franking only, e.g. PC (Personal Computer)
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
- G07B—TICKET-ISSUING APPARATUS; FARE-REGISTERING APPARATUS; FRANKING APPARATUS
- G07B17/00—Franking apparatus
- G07B17/00185—Details internally of apparatus in a franking system, e.g. franking machine at customer or apparatus at post office
- G07B17/00314—Communication within apparatus, personal computer [PC] system, or server, e.g. between printhead and central unit in a franking machine
- G07B2017/0033—Communication with software component, e.g. dll or object
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
- G07B—TICKET-ISSUING APPARATUS; FARE-REGISTERING APPARATUS; FRANKING APPARATUS
- G07B17/00—Franking apparatus
- G07B17/00185—Details internally of apparatus in a franking system, e.g. franking machine at customer or apparatus at post office
- G07B17/00314—Communication within apparatus, personal computer [PC] system, or server, e.g. between printhead and central unit in a franking machine
- G07B2017/00338—Error detection or handling
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
- G07B—TICKET-ISSUING APPARATUS; FARE-REGISTERING APPARATUS; FRANKING APPARATUS
- G07B17/00—Franking apparatus
- G07B17/00185—Details internally of apparatus in a franking system, e.g. franking machine at customer or apparatus at post office
- G07B17/00435—Details specific to central, non-customer apparatus, e.g. servers at post office or vendor
- G07B2017/00443—Verification of mailpieces, e.g. by checking databases
Definitions
- the invention relates to a method for generating a smart document.
- the invention further relates to an intelligent document and an apparatus for generating an intelligent document which is suitable for carrying out the method.
- German Patent Application DE 10 2004 046 051 A1 to provide postage indicia, which are generated in a central franking server, to an operating unit via a network using an intelligent document.
- intelligent documents contain process logic that allows the content of the document to be changed and given processes to be executed.
- the known method provides to record the printing of a postage indicium contained in such an intelligent document in a central database and to determine before printing whether the postage indicium has already been printed out once. If this is the case, the pressure is not enabled, so that a misrepresentation of multiple franking the franking mark is prevented.
- the logging of the printing and the checking steps are carried out by means of the process logic of the intelligent document, in particular the communication between the operating unit and the central database controls.
- a program execution environment is required that is included in a presentation program that is executed in the customer's control panel and is designed to represent and interpret ordinary and intelligent documents.
- An example of such a presentation program is the "Adobe Reader” from the company Adobe, which can process even more modern PDF documents in addition to conventional PDF documents (PDF: Portable Document Format).
- a postage indicium can not be printed if certain conditions for printing are not met. For example, printing may not be carried out if the operating unit has a version of the presentation program that is incapable of interpreting intelligent documents or if a corresponding functionality of the presentation program is not activated. In these cases, although static contents of the intelligent document can normally be displayed on the operating unit, the functionality of the document for carrying out the necessary database query and for controlling the pressure is not available. Furthermore, the network connection between the operating unit and the network can be deactivated, so that it can not be determined whether the postage indicium has not already been printed. In this case, printing the franking mark is also not possible.
- this object is achieved by a method having the features of patent claim 1, by an intelligent document having the features of claim 14, and by a device having the features of claim 16.
- the intelligent document comprises a program which, if a prerequisite is present, can be executed by means of a program execution environment and contains contents which can be displayed by means of a presentation program.
- a program module is implemented in the intelligent document and is designed to generate a displayable indication of a result of the checking step for checking the existence of the prerequisite within the intelligent document. It will also create an intelligent document that will
- Program which is executable by means of a program execution environment if a prerequisite exists, and the displayable by means of a presentation program
- the intelligent document is characterized in that it contains a program module which is designed to generate a displayable indication of a result of the checking step for checking the existence of the prerequisite within the intelligent document.
- an apparatus for generating an intelligent document which comprises a program which, if a prerequisite is available, can be executed by means of a program execution environment and which contains contents that can be displayed by means of a presentation program.
- the apparatus is adapted to introduce a program module into the intelligent document which is designed to generate a displayable indication of a result of the checking step for checking the existence of the prerequisite within the intelligent document.
- an advantage of the invention is that the intelligent document itself contains a program module with which an indication of the result of a checking step can be generated. This enables the intelligent document itself to indicate the result of a checking step, so that the result of the checking step is displayed independently of the configuration of the presentation program.
- an indication that can be displayed within an intelligent document is an indication that can be displayed by means of the presentation program, for example, on a screen.
- Intelligent documents can, in addition to the content that can be displayed, contain other contents, such as program code, which are not displayed by means of a presentation program, at least in a normal presentation mode.
- test steps it is advantageously checked whether certain conditions exist for the use of the functionality of the intelligent document. If these requirements are fulfilled, a positive result of the check step is displayed. If the prerequisites are not fulfilled, a negative result will be displayed, so that the user will know which condition is not met. He can use this knowledge to create the corresponding prerequisite.
- the intelligent document and the device it is provided that the checking step is carried out by means of the program module.
- the functionality for carrying out the checking step is also advantageously present in the intelligent document itself, so that the intelligent document can check itself independently of the specific configuration of the presentation program.
- a development of the method, the intelligent document and the device is characterized in that in the checking step, it is checked if the program execution environment is available.
- This development has the advantage that it is checked whether the program execution environment is available, so that the user can be informed if necessary that the program execution environment is not present and therefore certain functions of the intelligent document are not available.
- the verification step can not be performed directly by executing a program.
- the specification of a negative result of the examination step can not be introduced into the intelligent document by means of the program module.
- An embodiment of the method therefore comprises inserting into the intelligent document a displayable indication of a negative result of the checking step, and in that the program module is adapted to convert the indication of the negative result of the checking step into a representable indication of a positive result of the checking step.
- an embodiment of the intelligent document provides that the intelligent document contains a displayable indication of a negative result of the checking step, which can be converted by means of the program module into an illustrative indication of a positive result of the checking step.
- an embodiment of the device is characterized in that the device is designed to introduce a displayable indication of a negative result of the checking step in the intelligent document, and that the program module is adapted to the representable indication of the negative result of the checking step in an indication of a positive result of the test step.
- the test of whether the program execution environment is present can advantageously be made implicitly by means of the program module generating the indication of the result of the verification step within the intelligent document. This is achieved because, due to the execution of the program module, which can only take place when the program execution environment is available, an indication of a positive result of the test step is produced by a conversion of an indication of a negative result of the test step already present in the intelligent document. If the program execution environment is not available, the program module can not be executed and the indication of the negative result of the verification step is retained.
- An embodiment of the method, the intelligent document and the device is further characterized in that the program module is adapted to block the presentation of the representable indication of the negative result of the checking step after the opening of the intelligent document. If the program execution environment is present, the representation of the negative result of the verification step after the opening of the intelligent document is first suppressed. This has the advantage that the user is not already displayed a negative statement of a test step before the result of the test step is present.
- the intelligent document and the device is characterized in that the program module is designed to enable the presentation of the representable indication of a result of the checking step after the checking step has been carried out.
- the result of the checking step in this embodiment is displayed only after the execution of the checking step, i. then when the exam result is available.
- the program controls the one-time printing of a postage indicium and that the intelligent document is transmitted from a franking server via a network to a franking client.
- An embodiment of the method, of the intelligent document and of the device is furthermore distinguished by the fact that, at a first printing of the postage indicium, a message is transmitted from the user client to the franking server. is averaged and that the pressure due to the message is logged in the mailing server.
- the program for controlling the printing of the postage indicium can only be executed if there is a network connection between the franking client and the postage server and if, on the basis of a query by the postage server, is made that the franking mark has not yet been printed.
- An embodiment of the method, the intelligent document and the device is characterized in that it is checked in the checking step, whether an access to the network exists.
- the intelligent document and of the apparatus includes that in the checking step a query of the franking server is made, in which it is checked whether contents of the intelligent document have already been printed once.
- the intelligent document and the device includes that the program execution environment is part of the presentation program.
- a computer program product is provided which includes a computer program for carrying out a method of the kind described above.
- FIG. 1 shows a schematic representation of a user client connected to a server from which intelligent documents can be transmitted to the user client
- FIG. 2 a shows an exemplary illustration of representable contents of an intelligent document
- FIG. 2b shows an exemplary illustration of representable contents of an intelligent document
- FIG. 1 schematically shows a user client 101 which is connected via a network 102 to a server 103.
- the network 102 is, for example, the Internet or an intranet.
- the user client 101 is a PC (personal computer) which has a display device 104 and at least one input device 109 as well as a memory 105 and a processor 106.
- the memory 105 stores, in particular, a presentation program that is stored in the user client 101 and is capable of opening conventional documents of a particular format, such as PDF documents, and displaying their contents on the display 104.
- the presentation program allows the processing of intelligent documents, that is, it is designed to display displayable contents of intelligent documents on the display device 104 and to execute programs contained in the intelligent document. To do this, the presentation program provides a program execution environment that can be used to interpret and execute program instructions contained in programs.
- the user client 101 is connected via an interface to a printing device 107 and has a network interface for connection to the network 102.
- Intelligent documents are transmitted from the server 103 to the user client 101 via the network 102.
- the server 103 has a device designed for example as a software program for generating intelligent documents.
- the server 103 is designed as a franking server, which provides intelligent documents for the printing of postage indicia.
- the server 103 also includes a database 108 with one entry for each generated and to a user client 101 transmitted franking mark.
- the intelligent documents include content that can be displayed on the display 104 by means of the presentation program and consist of text and / or graphic elements. Furthermore, the intelligent documents embed programs executable by the program execution environment of the presentation program.
- the programs are scripts that contain program code that can be interpreted by the program execution environment. On the basis of the programs, displayable contents of the intelligent documents can be changed. Further, the programs allow the execution of other processes, such as the control of the printing device 107 for the printing of contents of the intelligent document or accesses to the network interface.
- the program code is not displayed on the display device 104 in a normal presentation mode of the presentation program. In principle, however, the presentation program can insert via a special presentation mode in which the program code can also be displayed.
- an intelligent document provided by the server 103 also contains status information for indicating the result of one or more checking steps.
- Representable information of the test results are generated by means of one or more program modules, which are also included in the intelligent document.
- the program modules can be developed as independent programs or as part of a program which is intended to carry out the main functionality of the intelligent document.
- Within the verification steps it is determined whether certain conditions exist for the use of the main functionalities of the intelligent document. In this way, in the case of unusable functionality, the user acquires, in particular, knowledge of a possibly unfulfilled condition. He can use this knowledge to create the prerequisite and then to use the functionalities of the intelligent document.
- a prerequisite for the use of the functionality of an intelligent document is basically the availability of the program execution environment.
- not all presentation programs for presenting documents in the smart document format contain an appropriate program execution environment.
- the program execution environment may not be present in older versions of the presentation program. In these versions, only the displayable contents present in the intelligent document can be displayed and / or printed.
- a checking step particularly checks whether the presentation program of the user client 101 has a program execution environment suitable for executing the program contained in the intelligent document. In order to be able to correctly display the result of this checking step even if the program execution environment does not exist, a displayable indication of a negative is already present when the intelligent document is created
- the intelligent document will grammatical module that converts the indication of the negative result of the test step into the statement of successful completion of the test step, when it is executed.
- the intelligent document is preferably configured in such a way that the program module is automatically started when the intelligent document is opened in the presentation program while the program execution environment is present.
- the indication of the negative examination result is displayed first, regardless of whether the program execution environment is available or not.
- the presentation of the negative examination results is blocked after opening by means of the program module, if this can be carried out. If this is not the case because of the lack of the program execution environment, the negative check result is also displayed in this embodiment after opening.
- the program module is started after the intelligent document is opened. Due to the execution of the program, the indication of the negative result of the checking step, that is, the indication that the required program execution environment is not available, is then converted into an indication of a positive result of the checking step. If the program execution environment is not available, the program module can not be executed and the indication of the negative result of the verification step remains unchanged. The test of whether the program execution environment is available is thus implicitly performed and provides a positive or negative tive result, depending on whether the program module can be executed or not. After the conversion of the indication of the negative examination result into the indication of a positive examination result, this is displayed on the display device 104. If the representation of the indication of the negative result of the checking step has been blocked after the opening of the intelligent document, the representation of the indication of the (positive) checking result for it is enabled by means of the program module.
- the conversion of the indication of the negative result of the checking step into the presentation of a positive result of the checking step can be done by changing the indication. For example, one or more characters may be added to the negative indication to produce an indication of a positive result of the verification step. Furthermore, the status indication may be colored, for example.
- the conversion of the indication of the negative result of the checking step into an indication of a positive result can be effected here by a color change which is carried out by means of the program.
- characters or symbols indicating the negative result of the test result are at least partially replaced by characters or symbols by means of which a positive result of the test step is displayed.
- further check steps may be executed by means of a program included in the smart document when the program execution environment for Available .
- the results of these test steps can then be presented in the same way, by means of a program module converting the indication of a negative result into the statement of a positive result.
- the presentation of the indication of the negative result of the test step can also be blocked until the execution of these test steps. Since these examination steps can only be carried out if the program execution environment is present, it can also be dispensed with for these examination steps to first introduce a negative statement of the examination result in the document.
- the representable indication of the result of the test steps can be generated by means of the corresponding program modules after carrying out the test steps.
- the intelligent document may initially contain a neutral indication of the examination result, which is then converted into the indication of a positive or negative examination result in accordance with the result of the examination step.
- FIG. 2 a shows by way of example a representation of contents of an intelligent document on the display device 104 of a user client 101.
- the intelligent document allows one-time printing of a postage indicium, which may contain cryptographically secured data, which allow the verification of its authenticity.
- the intelligent document comprises a main area 201 around which, for example, a pattern of the postage indicium or of a franking label containing the postage indicium is displayed can. The pattern can be printed out as often as you like.
- the intelligent document provides a button 202 which is connected to a program for controlling the pattern printing contained in the intelligent document.
- the intelligent document contains another button 203, the actuation of which triggers the printing of the valid postage indicium.
- a program is linked to the button 203, which controls the printing of the valid postage indicium and is executed when the button is pressed.
- the buttons 202, 203 can be actuated by the user of the user client 101 by means of the input device 109.
- the print of the valid postage indicium is logged, the logging being controlled by a program of the intelligent document.
- the program Upon actuation of the button 203, the program initiates the transmission of a message about the pressure to the server 103, in the database 108 of which, after receiving the message, a corresponding note about the pressure in the data record is added, which is assigned to the postage indicium.
- the postage indicium is assigned a unique identification code, which is used in particular for identifying the database entry and is also contained in the message.
- the postage indicium on the display device 104 can not be displayed in order to prevent copies of the representation from being generated and used for franking mailpieces. This is achieved in one embodiment in that the postage indicium is located in a hidden area of the intelligent contained in the ligature document, which is not represented by the presentation program.
- the valid postage indicium is only retrieved from the server 103 upon actuation of the button 203 for the print.
- the presentation program has a program execution environment for executing programs embedded in the intelligent document
- the database does not contain a note about the printing of the postage indicium.
- the results of these test steps are displayed in the intelligent document in a status display 205.
- the illustrated status display includes a status field 206 for indicating the result of the check as to whether the program execution environment is available, a status field 207 for indicating the result of the check as to whether there is a network connection, and a status field 208 for indicating the result of the check whether the franking mark has already been printed once.
- the intelligent document provided by the server 103 contains in this case Next, the status display shown schematically in Figure 2a, which includes at least the indication of a negative result of the first test step, in which the presence of the program execution environment is checked.
- results of the other checking steps in which the connection of the user client 101 to the network 102 and the presence of the note via the print in the database of the server 103 are checked, are preferably also shown in a negative way.
- these details it is also possible with these details to introduce them into the document in a neutral form and to convert them into statements of a positive or negative test result, depending on the success, after the examination steps have been carried out.
- the fact that there is initially an indication of negative test results in the document has the particular advantage that the status information for these test steps behave in the same way as the indication of the result of the test as to whether the program execution environment is present. This test result can not be introduced into the document in neutral form and be converted after successful examination, since the missing
- the negative result of a check step is represented by a cross within the status fields 206, 207, 208 in the embodiment of the status display shown in FIG. 2a.
- the checking steps are carried out successively.
- the corresponding details of the negative test result in the status display 205 are converted into an indication of positive test results.
- the following test step is started.
- the intelligent document contains a program module which converts the indication of the negative result contained in the status field 206 of the check whether the program execution environment is present, as described above, into a positive check result.
- the network connection and the corresponding information in the status field 207 are converted into the specification of a positive result of the checking step or the indication of the positive result of the checking step is generated.
- the database 108 of the server 103 is queried via the network 102 by means of a program module present in the intelligent document in order to determine whether the postage indicium has already been printed out once. If this is not the case, the corresponding information in the status field 208 is converted into the indication of a positive result of the checking step or the indication of the positive result of the checking step is generated.
- the button 203 for initiating printing of the valid postage indicium is displayed or activated in such a way that it can be actuated by the user.
- FIG. 2b shows, by way of example, the details of the positive results of the test steps within the status display 205 of the intelligent document already shown in FIG. 2a.
- the crosses illustrated in FIG. 2a in the status fields 206, 207, 208 are replaced by hooks in order to indicate the positive test results.
- the successful execution of all the checking steps is indicated by the letters "OK", which are likewise introduced into the intelligent document by means of a program as displayable content, if the last checking step has been carried out successfully has been.
- test step was unsuccessful, an indication of the negative result of the corresponding test step is displayed. If this information has already been included in the intelligent generation and its representation has been suppressed until the corresponding test step has been carried out, the presentation of the indication of the negative test result will be released, if available.
- the following test steps are preferably no longer performed.
- the user On the basis of an illustrated negative result of a particular checking step, the user is informed about a missing requirement for the franking of a mailpiece by means of the intelligent document. It gives him the opportunity to take measures to create the appropriate conditions. For example, specifying a negative result of the test as to whether the program execution environment is available may install a version of the presentation program on user client 101 having the program execution environment.
- the user can, for example, activate the network connection. If a negative result of the check as to whether the postage indicium has not already been printed out is displayed, the user knows that he can not print the postage indicium again and can request a new postage indicium from server 103 for franking the mailpiece ,
- the invention is not limited in particular to the test steps shown. Rather, the skilled artisan recognizes that within the scope of the invention, other test steps can be performed, the results of which are presented in the document. Furthermore, the invention is by no means limited to the presentation of results of test steps performed when printing postage indicia. On the contrary, the person skilled in the art recognizes that the invention can also be used in fields other than the franking of mailpieces. In particular, the existence of the program execution environment for each smart document can be checked and the result of the review presented.
- the intelligent documents can be, for example, intelligent documents with animated graphics or forms. In particular, the invention can be used with forms that are used in communication with authorities and that are executed as intelligent documents. On the basis of the test steps, the results of which are presented in the invention, it is also possible in particular to check whether certain mandatory fields of a form have been filled out.
- the invention can also be used in intelligent documents that are protected by the "intelligence" from unauthorized access.
- texts should be mentioned which can only be displayed and / or printed if the user is authorized to do so, whereby the authorization of the user is checked by the intelligent document, for example by a server query taking place via the network 102.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Document Processing Apparatus (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE102006051418A DE102006051418A1 (de) | 2006-10-27 | 2006-10-27 | Darstellung des Ergebnisses eines Prüfungsschritts in einem intelligenten Dokument |
PCT/EP2007/009223 WO2008049597A1 (de) | 2006-10-27 | 2007-10-24 | Darstellung des ergebnisses eines prüfungsschritts in einem intelligenten dokument |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2084675A1 true EP2084675A1 (de) | 2009-08-05 |
EP2084675B1 EP2084675B1 (de) | 2012-12-12 |
Family
ID=38895618
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP07819276A Not-in-force EP2084675B1 (de) | 2006-10-27 | 2007-10-24 | Darstellung des ergebnisses eines prüfungsschritts in einem intelligenten dokument |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20100063943A1 (de) |
EP (1) | EP2084675B1 (de) |
DE (1) | DE102006051418A1 (de) |
WO (1) | WO2008049597A1 (de) |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US9177281B2 (en) | 2010-03-18 | 2015-11-03 | United Parcel Service Of America, Inc. | Systems and methods for a secure shipping label |
Family Cites Families (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6671813B2 (en) * | 1995-06-07 | 2003-12-30 | Stamps.Com, Inc. | Secure on-line PC postage metering system |
US20020023057A1 (en) * | 1999-06-01 | 2002-02-21 | Goodwin Johnathan David | Web-enabled value bearing item printing |
US20030074324A1 (en) * | 2000-02-11 | 2003-04-17 | Kresina Roman P. | Apparatus and method for providing postal services |
US20020182578A1 (en) * | 2001-06-01 | 2002-12-05 | Rachman Bruce A. | Online course support method and system |
US7319989B2 (en) * | 2003-03-04 | 2008-01-15 | Pitney Bowes Inc. | Method and system for protection against replay of an indicium message in a closed system meter |
US20050138469A1 (en) * | 2003-09-19 | 2005-06-23 | Pitney Bowes Inc. | Fraud detection in a postage system |
US7353213B2 (en) * | 2003-09-19 | 2008-04-01 | Pitney Bowes Inc. | System and method for preventing duplicate printing in a web browser |
DE102004046051A1 (de) * | 2004-09-21 | 2006-03-30 | Deutsche Post Ag | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Frankieren von Postsendungen |
-
2006
- 2006-10-27 DE DE102006051418A patent/DE102006051418A1/de not_active Ceased
-
2007
- 2007-10-24 WO PCT/EP2007/009223 patent/WO2008049597A1/de active Application Filing
- 2007-10-24 EP EP07819276A patent/EP2084675B1/de not_active Not-in-force
- 2007-10-24 US US12/447,273 patent/US20100063943A1/en not_active Abandoned
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See references of WO2008049597A1 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP2084675B1 (de) | 2012-12-12 |
WO2008049597A1 (de) | 2008-05-02 |
DE102006051418A1 (de) | 2008-04-30 |
US20100063943A1 (en) | 2010-03-11 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
DE10250187B4 (de) | Bedieneinheit mit Benutzerkonten für ein elektrofotografisches Druck- oder Kopiersystem | |
EP1902407B1 (de) | System zum übertragen von daten aus einer dokumentenanwendung in eine datenanwendung | |
EP1916628B1 (de) | Verfahren zum Erzeugen eines intelligenten Dokuments und Vorrichtung zur Durchführung des Verfahrens | |
DE60219706T2 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Anfügen einer elektronischen Unterschrift an ein strukturiertes Dokument | |
DE10123411A1 (de) | Verfahren, Gerätesystem und Computerprogrammsystem zum visuellen Überprüfen eines Druckdatenstroms | |
WO2011120624A1 (de) | Mobile wartungseinheit | |
WO2006032331A2 (de) | Verfahren und vorrichtung zum frankieren von postsendungen | |
EP2084675B1 (de) | Darstellung des ergebnisses eines prüfungsschritts in einem intelligenten dokument | |
EP2199908A1 (de) | Zugriffsverfahren auf ein Übertragungsmedium | |
EP1916629B1 (de) | Verfahren zur Verhinderung von einem Mehrfachdruck eines Frankiervermerks | |
EP2774125B1 (de) | Dokumentenprüfung | |
DE60004788T2 (de) | Verfahren zum aufspüren von verstecktem text und dessen verwendung bei genehmigung von elektronischen dokumenten | |
DE10055145B4 (de) | Verfahren zum Versehen von Postsendungen mit Frankierungsvermerken | |
DE102004056001A1 (de) | Vorrichtung zum Handling von Montage- und Prüfanweisungen | |
DE10250181A1 (de) | Bedienfeld für ein elektrofotografisches Druck -oder Kopiersystem mit Vor- und/oder Nachverarbeitungseinheit sowie Integration des Bedienfeldes in einen Druckerserver | |
Ignizio | Validating claims for algorithms proposed for publication | |
DE102008036263A1 (de) | Dauerhafte Anzeige und Authentifizierung von Statusinformationen eines technischen Geräts | |
DE102004046018A1 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Frankieren von Postsendungen | |
WO2010091674A2 (de) | Verfahren und ein system zum übersetzen eines textes aus einer ersten sprache in zumindest eine weitere sprache sowie ein computer-programm-produkt | |
EP2455867A1 (de) | Verfahren zur digitalen Signatur und zum Hoch- und Herunterladen von Schriften | |
WO2022161683A1 (de) | Fehleranfälligkeit einer build-pipeline | |
DE102019120301A1 (de) | System und Verfahren zur Überprüfung der Zusammengehörigkeit eines Fahrzeugs und dieses identifizierende Identifizierungskennzeichen | |
DE19922768A1 (de) | Verfahren zum Installieren von Software und/oder zum Testen eines Computersystems | |
DE102009044394A1 (de) | Verfahren zur Konfiguration eines Peripheriegerätes einer Datenverarbeitungsanlage, System und Computerprogrammprodukt | |
EP1926035A1 (de) | Verfahren zum Erstellen eines menschenlesbaren Dokumentes sowie maschinenlesbares Dokument |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20090527 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20100308 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 588642 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20121215 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 502007011039 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20130131 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121212 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121212 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130323 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121212 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: VDEP Effective date: 20121212 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130313 Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121212 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121212 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121212 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130312 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121212 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130412 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121212 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121212 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121212 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121212 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130412 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121212 |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20130913 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121212 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121212 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 502007011039 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20130913 |
|
BERE | Be: lapsed |
Owner name: DEUTSCHE POST A.G. Effective date: 20131031 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121212 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20131024 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20131031 Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20131024 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20131031 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20140630 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 502007011039 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20140501 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20140501 Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20131031 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20131031 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20131024 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MM01 Ref document number: 588642 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20131024 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20131024 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121212 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20071024 Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20131024 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121212 |