EP2082184B1 - Système et procédé d'explosion - Google Patents

Système et procédé d'explosion Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2082184B1
EP2082184B1 EP06846887A EP06846887A EP2082184B1 EP 2082184 B1 EP2082184 B1 EP 2082184B1 EP 06846887 A EP06846887 A EP 06846887A EP 06846887 A EP06846887 A EP 06846887A EP 2082184 B1 EP2082184 B1 EP 2082184B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
detonator
detonators
identity code
row
array
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP06846887A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP2082184A1 (fr
Inventor
Albertus A. LABUSCHAGNE
Andre Koekemoer
Craig Charles Schlenter
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Detnet South Africa Pty Ltd
Original Assignee
Detnet South Africa Pty Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Detnet South Africa Pty Ltd filed Critical Detnet South Africa Pty Ltd
Publication of EP2082184A1 publication Critical patent/EP2082184A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2082184B1 publication Critical patent/EP2082184B1/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F42—AMMUNITION; BLASTING
    • F42D—BLASTING
    • F42D1/00—Blasting methods or apparatus, e.g. loading or tamping
    • F42D1/04—Arrangements for ignition
    • F42D1/045—Arrangements for electric ignition
    • F42D1/05—Electric circuits for blasting
    • F42D1/055—Electric circuits for blasting specially adapted for firing multiple charges with a time delay

Definitions

  • This invention relates to a blasting method which makes use of electronic detonators.
  • electronic blasting systems can be divided into systems which are implemented using two wires which interconnect the detonators, and systems which make use of more than two wires.
  • blast times for the various detonators are usually assigned while a blaster is working at a blasting bench.
  • the additional wires allow the connection order of the detonators to be established and the wiring order can be used to determine blast timing factors.
  • This type of system can be easier to use as the blaster can readily configure the blast pattern in terms of inter-detonator and inter-row timing increments.
  • Some blasting systems make use of a location system such as a global positioning system (GPS) to collate the identity of a particular detonator with a geographical location in the blasting system. A blast time is then assigned to the detonator using the geographical coordinates of the detonator in the blast system.
  • GPS global positioning system
  • a GPS based system in order to be sufficiently accurate, does however require the use of a GPS reference station.
  • GPS location data may not be sufficiently accurate or readily available, due for example to a rock wall or rock body which blocks reception of a GPS signal.
  • a multi-wire blast system is generally easy to use a two-wire blast system has an economic benefit in that the cost of the wire and of the components used to make connections within the system is lower than the cost of a multi-wire system.
  • WO 00/09967 describes a blasting system which includes an array of electronic detonators, wherein each detonator has an identity code which is associated with the detonator's location in the array.
  • the invention is concerned with a blasting system which is readily implemented in a two-wire mode and which, if required, allows the visualisation of a blast pattern.
  • the invention provides a method of operating a blasting system which includes an array of electronic detonators, the method including the steps of assigning an identity code to each detonator which is determined at least partly by the detonator's location in the array, and storing the identity code of a detonator in a memory in the detonator.
  • the array may be formed by a plurality of boreholes arranged in at least one row. Each row is assigned a respective row identifier and each borehole in each row is assigned a respective borehole identifier. Each borehole may contain at least one detonator and the identity code for the detonator is dependent at least on the respective row identifier and on the respective borehole identifier.
  • the meaning of the term "row” in one respect may be notional.
  • the term is intended to include at least a succession of boreholes which may be positioned along a straight, curved or irregular path.
  • the boreholes may be grouped in circular or other arrays.
  • a row identifier, or a borehole identifier may then be determined by an actual row or borehole count, or by means of a sequential notation system e.g. an ordering arrangement based on a sequence in which the detonators, individually or in groups (rows), are to be fired.
  • a borehole contains at least first and second detonators either at the same position or at different positions in the hole, i.e. if use is made of multiprime or decking techniques, then the identity code for the first detonator may be distinguishable from the identity code for the second detonator.
  • the identity code for a detonator may be dependent on the position of the detonator, for example on the length of wire which extends from a mouth or collar of the borehole to the detonator.
  • the identity code may additionally depend on the position of the borehole, in a first direction or in a second direction, from a reference point, in the respective row.
  • the choice of the reference point may vary but, conveniently, a detonator in the row which fires first i.e. has the shortest time delay period, is used to fix the reference point.
  • the identity code of a detonator may be stored in a memory in the detonator and in the memory of a portable device.
  • the portable device may be used for generating the identity code.
  • the portable device may be used for transferring the identity codes of the detonators to a suitable destination e.g. a control unit, a storage device, a memory stick, a computer, etc. This transfer may be done using a physical connection e.g. wire or fibre optic, or wirelessly e.g. by using a radio frequency, infrared or other technique.
  • the control unit may be used for associating respective firing time information with each identity code.
  • the firing time information for a detonator may be dependent on the detonator's location in the array e.g. on the detonator's identity code.
  • the control unit may transfer the firing time information to each respective detonator and may be used for firing the detonators.
  • One or more intermediate control units slave units can be used between the control unit and the detonators to achieve a larger blast pattern than what is possible using the control unit alone, or to exercise localised or specific control techniques over some of the detonators in the array.
  • the method may be implemented in conjunction with safety and security protocols of any appropriate kind to ensure that adequate safeguards are in place to control the authorisation of the blast.
  • the identity code of each detonator may be used to generate a visual or textual representation of the detonator array.
  • the method includes the steps of arranging a plurality of electronic detonators which are spatially distributed from one another in an array, storing in each detonator a respective identity code which is dependent on the detonator's location in the array, transferring the identity codes for the detonators to a control location, storing in each detonator respective firing time information which is transferred from the control location, and transmitting a firing signal to the detonators.
  • the firing time information may be generated or allocated using any suitable technique or algorithm based for example on a regular inter-row and inter-hole time difference. Irregular holes or unusual situations can be accommodated by allowing an operator to allocate specfically determined firing time information to the corresponding detonators.
  • a blasting system which includes a plurality of electronic detonators which are positioned in a plurality of boreholes with at least one detonator in each borehole, and which are configured in a blast array which has at least one row and a plurality of detonators in the row, each detonator including a memory in which is stored at least respective firing time information and a respective identity code which is dependent, at least, on the row in which the detonator is, and on the detonator's position in the row, a harness which interconnects the detonators, a control unit, connected to the harness, which generates a signal to fire the detonators and which includes a control memory, and a portable device with a mechanism for generating the respective identity code for each detonator, means for transferring the identity code to the respective detonator, a first memory in which the identity code is stored and an interface for transferring the identity codes from the first memory to the control memory.
  • Firing time information may be stored in the memory. This may be in addition to the identity code, or the firing time information may, at the appropriate time, overwrite at least part of the identity code.
  • the detonators may be positioned in a plurality of boreholes with at least one detonator in each borehole.
  • control units can be configured in a master-slave relationship with each slave firing a respective group of detonators.
  • the blasting system includes a plurality of electronic detonators which are spatially distributed from one another in an array, each detonator including a memory in which is stored, at least, a respective identity code which is dependent, at least, on the detonator's location in the array, a harness which interconnects the detonators in parallel to one another, a portable device in which are stored the identity codes for the detonators, and a control apparatus in which are stored the identity codes and firing time information for each detonator and which transmits a firing signal on the harness to the detonators.
  • the control apparatus may comprise a single control unit or a number of control units configured to act in parallel in a synchronised way, or in a master-slave relationship.
  • the harness may comprise two elongate conductors and a plurality of connectors, at least one connector for each detonator, connected at intervals to the conductors.
  • the portable device may include a housing, a data input mechanism for inputting data relating to a detonator's location in the detonator array, a processor which, in response to the input data, is operable under the control of an algorithm to generate an identity code for the detonator which is dependent at least on the detonator's location in the array, a first memory in which the identity code is stored, and a two-connection interface for transferring the identity code to the respective detonator.
  • the portable device may include communication means for receiving data or signals from, or transferring data or signals to, an external device such as control apparatus or a control unit of the kind referred to, a computer, a storage device or the like.
  • an external device such as control apparatus or a control unit of the kind referred to, a computer, a storage device or the like.
  • the data and signal transfer may be done via physical links (wire or cable) or wirelessly (at infrared or radio frequencies).
  • the control unit may include communication means for receiving data or signals from, and for transferring data or signals to, by wireless links (radio frequencies, infrared etc.) or via physical links (wire, fibre optic cable etc.), the portable device referred to or one or more of the detonators.
  • wireless links radio frequencies, infrared etc.
  • physical links wire, fibre optic cable etc.
  • the control unit may include a housing, a control memory in which are stored firing time information for each of a plurality of detonators in the array and a respective identity code for each of the detonators, each identity code being dependent at least on the location of the respective detonator in the array, and a two-connection interface for transferring the firing time information to the respective detonators.
  • Figure 1 of the accompanying drawings illustrates a number of boreholes 10A, 10B .... 10N respectively formed at predetermined positions in the ground using conventional techniques.
  • the depth of a borehole and its size may vary according to requirements known in the art.
  • Each borehole contains explosive material 12 and at least one respective detonator 14A, 14B ... 14N.
  • a two-wire harness 16 is used to connect the detonators to one another in an array 18 which is defined by rows of detonators 20A, 20B, ... 20N and, within each row 20, the boreholes 10 which are in the row.
  • the array can be further particularised by the number of detonators in a borehole. As is shown in Figure 1 most of the boreholes contain one detonator but a limited number contain two detonators and one borehole contains three detonators. A number can be assigned to each detonator when they are decked or stacked in this way and this feature also characterises the blast array. Apart from the deck number the depth of a detonator inside a borehole can be used to characterise the blast array yet further. This can be assessed in any appropriate way, for example by the length 22 of a portion of the wire or harness which extends from the mouth or collar of the borehole in question to the detonator.
  • Another factor which can characterise the blast array is an indication of whether a particular detonator is to the left or the right of a chosen point in a row of detonators. This point can be chosen according to various criteria but conveniently can be determined by the position of a detonator in the row which will be fired first i.e. has the shortest time delay period.
  • the aforegoing parameters together with other information such as the spacing between rows of detonators and the spacing between adjacent detonators in a row, can be used, preferably with a suitable computer program, to generate a textual or graphical representation of a blast pattern.
  • row could be physical e.g. a group of boreholes could be configured or associated with each other in a definite pattern (such as a straight or curved line, a circle or the like) which is discernable as a "row”, or notional in the sense that a sequence or string of detonators at chosen yet irregularly situated positions, are referred to as a "row”.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates in block diagram form a portable device 24 connected to a detonator 14.
  • he detonator is generally of conventional construction and includes a tube 26 which contains primary explosive 28.
  • a bridge 30 is exposed to the primary explosive.
  • the bridge is connected to a processor 32 or a dedicated or custom-designed device (ASIC), which has resident memory 34.
  • Power for the operation of the circuit inside the detonator is provided from a capacitor 36.
  • Two leads 38 and 40 extend from the detonator and terminate in a connector block 42.
  • the portable device 24 includes a housing 44 and, within the housing, a battery 46, a processor 48, a memory 50 and software 52 resident in further memory.
  • a display 54 and a keypad 56 are mounted externally to the housing.
  • An output interface module 58 is connected to two leads 60 and 62 which terminate in a connector block 64.
  • the connector block is releasably engageable with the block 42, as required.
  • the device 24 includes another communication interface 66 which enables communication to take place with an external apparatus such as a control unit (see Figure 3 ), a computer, a memory stick or the like via wires or wirelessly as required.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates in block diagram form a control unit 70 which is used in the blasting system of the invention.
  • the control unit can be configured as an integrally constructed item or from a number of discrete modules.
  • the control unit includes a housing 72 and, inside the housing, a power supply 74, a processor 76, a memory 78, a data interface 80 and a software algorithm 82 stored in additional memory.
  • a display 84 and a keypad 86 are external fixed to the housing.
  • the control unit can have another communication interface 88 to allow communication with an external device such as the portable device 24, a computer, a memory stick or the like, by wires or wireless, as required.
  • the control unit can be a single device or it can be one of a plurality of similar devices which make up apparatus which controls the blast. In the latter case the control units can be configured in a master-slave relationship, with the slave control units reacting to a single master control unit, or in parallel, with suitable synchronising controls to ensure that the control units, each of which can be used to fire a distinct respective group of detonators, are operated in step with one another.
  • the method of the invention is based on the principle of identifying a detonator by means of identifiers or data associated with the location in which the detonator is installed in the array 18. Under factory conditions each detonator 14 is manufactured according to known criteria.
  • the memory 44 is not necessarily preprogrammed, as is often the case, with a unique identifier.
  • the detonator includes a single capacitor 36 which is used for powering the detonator when required as is explained hereinafter.
  • the battery 46 in the portable device 24 has a voltage which is inadequate to charge the capacitor 36 to a voltage which is sufficiently high to fire the bridge 30. Also, the voltage from the battery is not able, in any other way, to fire the bridge due to the presence of safety protocols and components which protect the bridge using techniques known in the art.
  • the explosive material 12 and the detonators 14 are placed in the boreholes according to requirement.
  • An operator also referred to as a blaster, makes use of the portable device 24 and goes from borehole to borehole.
  • the connector 64 is connected to the connector 42 of the relevant detonator.
  • the keypad 56 is manipulated by the blaster to input data pertaining to the position of the detonator in the blast array e.g. row one left, hole 3, deck 1, depth (22) x meters.
  • These identifiers are processed by the processor 48, using an algorithm in the software 52 to generate a unique code which is used to distinguish the detonator in question.
  • the identifiers may for example be used in the generation of a word (the identity code) as follows: the first byte of the word may represent the row number, the following byte may represent the hole number and a subsequent byte may represent the deck number.
  • the "modified" identity code is, as before stored in the portable device and in the memory of the detonator.
  • one of the identifiers can automatically increment as the blaster moves to a following hole.
  • the hole number may increment automatically thus allowing the blaster to move to the next hole and detonator, and generate the identity code.
  • the keyboard 56 can be used as required to change the direction of the parameter the blaster is entering e.g. next row, next deck, etc.
  • Visual and audible confirmation can provide feedback to the blaster if desired or even announce the current detonator number, hole number and so on.
  • Each of the detonators in the blast array is thus assigned a unique identity code which is stored in the memory 34 of the detonator. Also, during this process the identity codes for the detonators are accumulated in the memory 50 of the portable device. The codes can automatically be accumulated, or accumulation can take place only when the respective code has been loaded into a respective detonator which then transmits the code to the portable device, for storage in the portable device.
  • the blaster connects the harness 16 to the detonators.
  • the harness is a two-wire device and the detonators are thus linked to one another in parallel.
  • the portable device 24 is then placed in communication with the control unit 70. This can be done by directly coupling the device to the unit via the interfaces 58 and 80 or use can be made of another technique such as a short range radio frequency or infrared link.
  • the control unit 70 then reads the identity codes from the memory 50.
  • the connections of the harness to the detonators can be validated.
  • the connected detonators can be counted to ensure that all detonators in the system are connected to the harness. Also, at an appropriate time each detonator can be calibrated, particularly to take account of thermal or other factors which can affect the accuracy of operation of timer circuits in the detonator.
  • the control unit 70 can also engage in an auto-search routine by issuing queries on the harness, possibly via a slave unit, to search for detonators.
  • the control unit can interact with the portable device to identify which detonators are present in the installation.
  • Appropriate heuristics can for example be applied to ensure that if a hole exists, a preceeding hole must logically exist, or for example to ensure that the last detonator in each row is identified appropriately, as the last detonator, so that useful messages can be presented to a blaster if there are errors.
  • the blaster may choose to use the portable device or the control unit to search for faults.
  • One possible problem that may occur for example is if a blaster incorrectly assigns the same identity code to each of two detonators.
  • One way of addressing this is for the portable device to warn if the blaster attempts to assign an identity code that has already been used.
  • Another technique when testing the harness installation is to send an interrogating signal to the detonators and to examine the amplitude of a current modulated reply from the detonators. If a given detonator reply amplitude is larger than expected it could imply that two or more distinct detonators have the same identity code and are replying at the same time to a request from the portable device or control unit. The blaster is thereby alerted to this problem and can use techniques known in the art, such as a binary search, to find the detonators with the duplicate identity.
  • the blaster is presented with a representation of the number of detonators, holes, rows and the location of each detonator. This information is used to provide a textual or graphical depiction of the blast system for, if required, the information presents an image which can easily be inspected or assessed by a blaster to establish the correctness of the blast system. This, in turn, helps to identify an incorrect connection sequence, a "missing" detonator, or a similar fault.
  • the detonators have not been programmed with firing time information. This can be done in a number of ways. In one approach an algorithm in the software 82 is used to generate firing times for the respective detonators using fixed inter-row, inter-detonator (for deck blasts) and inter-hole timings as is known in the art. Alternatively the detonators are programmed by the blaster using other criteria. In another approach the timing information is externally generated, for example in a separate computer which is coupled to the control unit and, thereafter, the timing information is loaded into the memory 78. If desired a subset of the detonators or, in extreme cases all the detonators, can be assigned firing times individually.
  • This feature allows detonators which are not part of a regular blasting pattern to be easily accommodated.
  • the use of auto-search and auto-programming features simplifies the task of assigning firing times to the detonators, compared to the use of a technique in which the times are manually assigned to the detonators.
  • a table is thus established in which the various detonators, which are designated by their respective identity codes, have respective firing times uniquely associated with the detonators. These firing times may vary from one another or, depending on the blasting requirements, the firing times for certain detonators may be the same.
  • the control unit 70 is then connected to the harness 16 and is used to transfer the timing information to the respective detonators.
  • This connection can be physical, via two wires, fibre optic cables etc, or can be done wirelessly by means of a radio frequency or infra red link.
  • the control unit may form part of control apparatus which embodies a number of control units connected and regulated to act in parallel and in synchronisation, or connected in a master-slave configuration wherein a master control unit regulates the operation of a number of slave control units, with each slave control unit controlling the initiation of a separate group of detonators.
  • the timing information is correctly targeted to each detonator through the use of the corresponding identity code which allows the processor 32 to recognise the identity code and then to accept the timing information which is stored in the memory 34 in addition to the identity code or, alternatively, by overwriting the identity code in the respective detonator.
  • the detonators can be configured to respond, universally, to a broadcast address or signal. Thus with a single detonator connected to the harness communication can be established with the detonator irrespective of its identity code.
  • FIG. 4 is a flow chart summary of the preceding description.
  • Each detonator 14 is placed (80) in a respective borehole and positional information (82), dependent on the location of the detonator in the blast array, is input (84) into the portable device.
  • This device generates the identity code (86) which is stored in the device (88) and transferred to the detonator (90). This process is repeated until all the detonators have been identified in this way.
  • the identity codes are transferred to the control unit (92). Either the portable device is transported to the control unit and data transfer then takes place directly by direct or wireless links, or the codes are transferred by an intermediate medium.
  • the control apparatus, or a control unit therein once connected to the harness, searches for particular identity codes to establish which detonators are connected to the harness, and where the detonators are.
  • the timing information is then generated (94) or acquired from any external source.
  • the control unit is thereafter connected to the harness (96) and the timing information is transferred to the detonators (98).
  • a blast pattern can be generated and displayed at the control unit (100).
  • individual detonators are calibrated, at any appropriate time, using any suitable technique to ensure that the timing information is accurately employed at each respective detonator.
  • a validation procedure can be effected (102) and thereafter a firing sequence is initiated (104).
  • the power supply 74 When blasting is to occur the power supply 74 is used, under the control of protocols which are known in the art, to charge the various capacitors 36 in the detonators. Each capacitor then acts an energy source to power the further operation of the detonator.
  • a firing signal which is generated by the software 82 is then broadcast on the harness 16 and triggers the start of the programmed time interval at each respective detonator. At the end of the respective time interval the corresponding bridge 30 is fired.
  • the portable device 24 is incapable of firing any detonator and is used merely to assign identity codes to the detonators and to collect this information for transfer to the control unit.
  • the control unit directs firing time information to the various detonators in a unique manner, charges the capacitors and generates the blast signal.
  • the portable device and control unit are represented as being physical separate. This is not necessarily the case for the distinction could be notional, or functional, only, and the portable device could be integrally constructed in a physical sense with the control unit.
  • the invention is based on the allocation of unique identity codes to the detonators using the criteria referred to. However, due to human error or other factors, a detonator in the array may not be assigned an identity code. This type of oversight can be detected in different ways.
  • each detonator under factory conditions, can be assigned the same identity code (e.g. all zero) and, when the detonator is installed, the location - dependent identity code is then used to overwrite the factory code.
  • the blaster when testing an installation, can use the portable device or control unit to search for detonators which still carry the factory assigned code i.e. these detonators which have not been given location - dependent codes.
  • the processor 32 in each detonator can be programmed to indicate, in response to a suitable interrogating signal, whether or not a location - dependent identity code has been assigned to the detonator. This is easily done for example by setting a check bit in a memory of a detonator once an identity code has been allocated to the detonator.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)
  • Arrangements For Transmission Of Measured Signals (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne un système d'explosion qui comprend une pluralité de détonateurs électroniques (14) qui sont configurés en un réseau d'explosion (18) qui présente au moins une rangée (20) et une pluralité de détonateurs (14) dans la rangée (20), chaque détonateur (14) comprenant une mémoire (34) dans laquelle sont stockées au moins les informations respectives des temps d'allumage et un code respectif d'identité (86) qui dépend au moins de la rangée (20) dans laquelle se trouve le détonateur (14), et de la position du détonateur (14) dans la rangée (20), un faisceau de câbles (16) qui interconnecte les détonateurs (14), et au moins une unité de commande (70), connectée au faisceau de câbles (16), qui génère un signal pour allumer les détonateurs (14).

Claims (15)

  1. Procédé de fonctionnement d'un système d'abattage à l'explosif incluant un réseau (18) de détonateurs électroniques (14), lequel procédé comprend les étapes d'assignation à chaque détonateur (14) d'un code d'identification déterminé au moins en partie par la position du détonateur dans le réseau (18), et d'enregistrement du code d'identification du détonateur (14) dans une mémoire (34) dans le détonateur (14).
  2. Procédé selon la revendication 1 dans lequel le réseau (18) est formé de plusieurs orifices (10) disposés en au moins une rangée (20), un identifiant de rangée correspondant est attribué à chaque rangée, un identifiant d'orifice correspondant est attribué à chaque orifice (10) dans chaque rangée (20), et chaque orifice (10) contient au moins un détonateur (14) ; sachant que le code d'identification pour un détonateur (14) dépend de l'identifiant de rangée correspondant et de l'identifiant d'orifice correspondant et, facultativement, d'au moins un des critères suivants : la position du détonateur (14) dans l'orifice correspondant (10), la longueur d'un faisceau de câblage qui s'étend d'un col de l'orifice (10) contenant le détonateur (14) jusqu'au détonateur (14), ou la position du détonateur (14) dans l'orifice respectif (10), dans une première ou une seconde direction, à partir d'un point de référence, dans la rangée correspondante (20).
  3. Procédé selon la revendication 1 qui comprend une étape d'enregistrement du code d'identification de chaque détonateur (14) dans un dispositif portable (24), une étape de transfert des codes d'identification des détonateurs (14), enregistrés dans le dispositif portable (24), vers une unité de commande (70), dans l'unité de commande (70), une étape d'association d'informations concernant le moment d'allumage correspondante à chaque code d'identification, sachant que les informations concernant le moment d'allumage pour un détonateur (14) dépendent de la position du détonateur dans le réseau (18) ou du code d'identification du détonateur, une étape d'utilisation de l'unité de commande (70) pour transférer les informations respectives concernant le moment d'allumage à chaque détonateur (14), et une étape d'utilisation de l'unité de commande (70) pour mettre à feu les détonateurs (14).
  4. Procédé selon la revendication 3 qui comprend une étape d'utilisation de l'unité de commande (70) pour générer une représentation du réseau (18) de détonateurs (14) qui est basée sur les codes d'identification des détonateurs (14), et une étape d'affichage de la représentation sous forme textuelle ou graphique.
  5. Procédé selon la revendication 1 qui comprend une étape d'interrogation des détonateurs (14) et une étape de comparaison de l'amplitude d'une réponse émanant des détonateurs (14) par rapport à une amplitude de réponse attendue de manière à détecter si au moins deux détonateurs (14) ont le même code identification.
  6. Procédé de fonctionnement d'un système d'abattage à l'explosif qui comprend une étape d'installation de plusieurs détonateurs électroniques (14) qui sont répartis spatialement les uns par rapport aux autres dans un réseau (18), une étape d'enregistrement dans chaque détonateur (14) d'un code d'identification respectif qui dépend de la position du détonateur dans le réseau (18), sachant que le réseau (18) est configuré en au moins une rangée (20) avec plusieurs détonateurs (14) à des positions espacées dans la rangée (20), et que le code identification pour chaque détonateur (14) dépend de la rangée (20) dans laquelle se trouve le détonateur et de la position du détonateur dans la rangée, une étape de transfert des codes d'identification pour les détonateurs (14) vers un poste de commande, une étape d'enregistrement dans chaque détonateur (14) d'informations respectives concernant le moment d'allumage en écrasant au moins en partie le code d'identification, lesdites informations concernant le moment d'allumage étant transférées depuis le poste de commande, et une étape de transmission d'un signal d'allumage aux détonateurs (14).
  7. Procédé selon la revendication 6, sachant qu'un dispositif portable (24), dans lequel sont enregistrés les codes d'identification, est utilisé pour transférer les codes d'identification vers le poste de commande où les informations concernant le moment d'allumage sont générées et à partir duquel le signal d'allumage est transmis simultanément à tous les détonateurs (14).
  8. Procédé selon la revendication 6, sachant que les informations concernant le moment d'allumage pour chaque détonateur (14) dépendent du code d'identification du détonateur (14).
  9. Système d'abattage à l'explosif qui comprend plusieurs détonateurs électroniques (14) positionnés dans plusieurs orifices (10) avec au moins un détonateur (14) dans chaque orifice (10) et qui sont configurés dans un réseau d'explosion (18) qui présente au moins une rangée (20) et plusieurs détonateurs (14) dans une rangée (20), chaque détonateur (14) incluant une mémoire (34) dans laquelle sont enregistrées au moins les informations respectives concernant le moment d'allumage et un code d'identification correspondant qui dépend au moins de la rangée (20) dans laquelle le détonateur (14) se trouve et de la position du détonateur dans la rangée (20), un faisceau de câblage qui relie les détonateurs (14) entre eux, une unité de commande (70) connectée au faisceau qui génère un signal pour allumer les détonateurs (14) et qui comprend une mémoire de commande, et un dispositif portable (24) avec un mécanisme pour générer le code d'identification respectif pour chaque détonateur (14), des moyens pour transférer le code d'identification vers le détonateur (14) correspondant, une première mémoire dans laquelle est enregistré le code d'identification, et une interface pour transférer les codes d'identification de la première mémoire vers la mémoire de commande.
  10. Système d'abattage à l'explosif selon la revendication 9, sachant que les informations concernant le moment d'allumage pour chaque détonateur (14) sont enregistrées dans la mémoire de commande, et que les informations concernant le moment d'allumage sont transmises via le faisceau de câblage aux détonateurs (14) ou via une liaison sans fil à tous les détonateurs (14).
  11. Système d'abattage à l'explosif selon la revendication 9, sachant que le faisceau de câblage comprend deux conducteurs allongés qui connectent les détonateurs (14) en parallèle les uns aux autres.
  12. Système d'abattage à l'explosif comprenant plusieurs détonateurs électroniques (14) qui sont répartis spatialement les uns par rapport aux autres dans un réseau (18), chaque détonateur (14) incluant une mémoire (34) dans laquelle sont enregistrées au moins les informations respectives concernant le moment d'allumage et un code d'identification pour le détonateur (14) qui dépend au moins de la position du détonateur dans le réseau (18), un faisceau de câblage (16) qui relie les détonateurs (14) en parallèle entre eux, un dispositif portable (24) dans lequel sont enregistrés les codes d'identification respectifs pour les détonateurs (14), et une unité de commande (70) dans laquelle sont enregistrés le code d'identification et les informations concernant le moment d'allumage pour chaque détonateur (14), et qui transmet un signal d'allumage aux détonateurs (14).
  13. Système d'abattage à l'explosif selon la revendication 12, sachant que le signal d'allumage est transmis via le faisceau de câblage (16) aux détonateurs (14).
  14. Système d'abattage à l'explosif selon la revendication 12 ou 13, sachant que le système d'attache (16) comprend deux conducteurs allongés et plusieurs connecteurs, au moins un connecteur pour chaque détonateur (14), connectés aux conducteurs selon des intervalles.
  15. Dispositif portable (24) destiné à être utilisé dans un système d'abattage à l'explosif qui comprend un boîtier (44), un mécanisme de saisie des données permettant d'entrer les données concernant la position d'un détonateur dans un réseau (18) de détonateurs (14), un processeur (48) qui, en réponse aux données entrées, peut être utilisé sous le contrôle d'un algorithme pour générer un code d'identification pour le détonateur (14) qui dépend au moins de la position du détonateur dans le réseau (18), une première mémoire dans laquelle est enregistré le code identification, et une interface à deux connexions pour transférer le code d'identification vers le détonateur correspondant (14).
EP06846887A 2006-10-30 2006-10-30 Système et procédé d'explosion Active EP2082184B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/ZA2006/000123 WO2008055274A1 (fr) 2006-10-30 2006-10-30 Système et procédé d'explosion

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2082184A1 EP2082184A1 (fr) 2009-07-29
EP2082184B1 true EP2082184B1 (fr) 2012-06-27

Family

ID=38222040

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP06846887A Active EP2082184B1 (fr) 2006-10-30 2006-10-30 Système et procédé d'explosion

Country Status (4)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2082184B1 (fr)
AU (1) AU2006350184B2 (fr)
CA (1) CA2668327C (fr)
WO (1) WO2008055274A1 (fr)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10837749B2 (en) 2016-08-02 2020-11-17 Detnet South Africa (Pty) Ltd Detonator identifier assignment
US11009331B2 (en) 2013-12-02 2021-05-18 Austin Star Detonator Company Method and apparatus for wireless blasting

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7870825B2 (en) * 2003-07-15 2011-01-18 Special Devices, Incorporated Enhanced method, device, and system for identifying an unknown or unmarked slave device such as in an electronic blasting system
MX2012004277A (es) * 2009-10-13 2012-06-08 Dyno Nobel Inc Dispositivo registrado para operaciones de voladura y procedimiento de uso.

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2000009967A1 (fr) * 1998-08-13 2000-02-24 Expert Explosives (Proprietary) Limited Dispositif de tir
SE515809C2 (sv) * 2000-03-10 2001-10-15 Dyno Nobel Sweden Ab Förfarande vid avfyring av elektroniksprängkapslar i ett detonatorsystem samt ett detonatorsystem innefattande elektroniksprängkapslarna
DE10032139B4 (de) * 2000-05-05 2014-01-16 Orica Explosives Technology Pty. Ltd. Verfahren zur Installation eines Zündsystems und Zündsystem
US6941870B2 (en) * 2003-11-04 2005-09-13 Advanced Initiation Systems, Inc. Positional blasting system

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11009331B2 (en) 2013-12-02 2021-05-18 Austin Star Detonator Company Method and apparatus for wireless blasting
US10837749B2 (en) 2016-08-02 2020-11-17 Detnet South Africa (Pty) Ltd Detonator identifier assignment

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP2082184A1 (fr) 2009-07-29
WO2008055274A1 (fr) 2008-05-08
CA2668327C (fr) 2012-09-25
CA2668327A1 (fr) 2008-05-08
AU2006350184A1 (en) 2008-05-08
AU2006350184B2 (en) 2011-10-06

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7975613B2 (en) Blasting system and method
AU762142B2 (en) Blasting arrangement
US10047592B2 (en) System and method for performing a perforation operation
CA2589978C (fr) Ensembles detonateur sans fil et reseaux correspondants
EP1644692B1 (fr) Procede pour identifier un dispositif esclave inconnu ou non marque, par exemple dans un systeme de sautage electronique
US7848078B2 (en) Method of communication at a blast site, and corresponding blasting apparatus
EP2384412B1 (fr) Procedes et systemes permettant la definition d'adresses pour des dispositifs pyrotechniques dans un systeme de materiel militaire electronique
EP0897098A2 (fr) Système de mise à feu avec un contrÔleur connectable par moyen de câbles électriques
US20230296364A1 (en) Improved communications in electronic detonators
EP2082184B1 (fr) Système et procédé d'explosion
CN105283731B (zh) 一种电子雷管爆破管理系统及爆破施工方法
US11333476B2 (en) Blasting system and operating method for same
WO2008078288A1 (fr) Positionnement local dans un système de tir d'explosif
US12117281B2 (en) Blasting device for simultaneously registering multiple detonators based on blasting pattern information and method of using the same
EA045288B1 (ru) Способ установки набора электронных детонаторов и связанный с ним способ инициирования
CN113544461A (zh) 无线引爆系统
CN116547492A (zh) 用于安装一组电子雷管的方法和相关联的点火方法
NZ525983A (en) Programmable pyrotechnical firing installation having each detonator capable of responding to the central programming and firing control unit

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20090526

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20091208

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 564463

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20120715

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602006030489

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20120830

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120627

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120627

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: VDEP

Effective date: 20120627

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 564463

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20120627

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

Effective date: 20120627

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120627

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120928

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120627

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120627

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121027

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120627

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120627

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120627

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120627

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120627

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120627

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121029

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120627

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120627

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120627

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121008

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120627

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20121031

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20130328

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602006030489

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20130328

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20130628

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20121031

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130501

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20121031

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120927

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602006030489

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20130501

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20121031

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120627

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20121030

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20061030

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Payment date: 20190910

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20190925

Year of fee payment: 14

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20201030

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20201030

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20201030

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20231025

Year of fee payment: 18