EP1957221B1 - A combination of casting process and alloy compositions resulting in cast parts with superior combination of elevated temperature creep properties, ductility and corrosion performance - Google Patents

A combination of casting process and alloy compositions resulting in cast parts with superior combination of elevated temperature creep properties, ductility and corrosion performance Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1957221B1
EP1957221B1 EP06805766A EP06805766A EP1957221B1 EP 1957221 B1 EP1957221 B1 EP 1957221B1 EP 06805766 A EP06805766 A EP 06805766A EP 06805766 A EP06805766 A EP 06805766A EP 1957221 B1 EP1957221 B1 EP 1957221B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
weight
metals
process according
anyone
amount
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP06805766A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1957221A1 (en
Inventor
Per Bakke
Westengen Haakon
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Magontec GmbH
Original Assignee
Magontec GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=37546955&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP1957221(B1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Magontec GmbH filed Critical Magontec GmbH
Priority to PL06805766T priority Critical patent/PL1957221T3/en
Priority to EP06805766A priority patent/EP1957221B1/en
Publication of EP1957221A1 publication Critical patent/EP1957221A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1957221B1 publication Critical patent/EP1957221B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B22CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
    • B22DCASTING OF METALS; CASTING OF OTHER SUBSTANCES BY THE SAME PROCESSES OR DEVICES
    • B22D17/00Pressure die casting or injection die casting, i.e. casting in which the metal is forced into a mould under high pressure
    • B22D17/08Cold chamber machines, i.e. with unheated press chamber into which molten metal is ladled
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B22CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
    • B22DCASTING OF METALS; CASTING OF OTHER SUBSTANCES BY THE SAME PROCESSES OR DEVICES
    • B22D21/00Casting non-ferrous metals or metallic compounds so far as their metallurgical properties are of importance for the casting procedure; Selection of compositions therefor
    • B22D21/002Castings of light metals
    • B22D21/007Castings of light metals with low melting point, e.g. Al 659 degrees C, Mg 650 degrees C
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B22CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
    • B22DCASTING OF METALS; CASTING OF OTHER SUBSTANCES BY THE SAME PROCESSES OR DEVICES
    • B22D17/00Pressure die casting or injection die casting, i.e. casting in which the metal is forced into a mould under high pressure
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B22CASTING; POWDER METALLURGY
    • B22DCASTING OF METALS; CASTING OF OTHER SUBSTANCES BY THE SAME PROCESSES OR DEVICES
    • B22D21/00Casting non-ferrous metals or metallic compounds so far as their metallurgical properties are of importance for the casting procedure; Selection of compositions therefor
    • B22D21/02Casting exceedingly oxidisable non-ferrous metals, e.g. in inert atmosphere
    • B22D21/04Casting aluminium or magnesium
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C23/00Alloys based on magnesium
    • C22C23/02Alloys based on magnesium with aluminium as the next major constituent
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C23/00Alloys based on magnesium
    • C22C23/06Alloys based on magnesium with a rare earth metal as the next major constituent

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a process for casting a magnesium alloy consisting of 2,0 - 6,00 % by weight of aluminium, 3,00 - 8,00 % by weight of rare earth metals (RE-metals), the ratio of the amount of RE-metals to the amount of aluminium expressed as % by weight being larger than 0,8, at least 40 % by weight of the RE-metals being cerium, less than 0,5 % by weight of manganese, less than 1,00 % by weight of zinc, less than 0,01% by weight of calcium less than 0,01% by weight of strontium and the balance being magnesium and unavoidable impurities, the total impurity level being below 0,1 % by weight.
  • RE-metals rare earth metals
  • Magnesium-based alloys are widely used as cast parts in the aerospace and automotive industries. Magnesium-based alloy cast parts can be produced by conventional casting methods, which include die-casting, sand casting, permanent and semi-permanent mold casting, plaster-mold casting and investment casting.
  • Mg-based alloys demonstrate a number of particularly advantageous properties that have prompted an increased demand for magnesium-based alloy cast parts in the automotive industry. These properties include low density, high strength-to-weight ratio, good castability, easy machinability and good damping characteristics.
  • Mg-Al-alloys or Mg-Al-Zn-alloys are known to lose their creep resistance at temperatures above 120° C.
  • Mg-At-Si alloys have been developed for higher temperature applications and offer only a limited improvement in creep resistance.
  • Alloys of the Mg-Al-Ca and Mg-Al-Sr system offer a further improvement in creep resistance, but a great disadvantage with these alloys is problems with castability. This is particularly a problem with high metal velocities impinging directly onto the die surface, the so-called water hammer effect.
  • alloy AE48 (4% AP, 2-3 % RE) offers a significant improvement in elevated temperatures properties and corrosion.
  • Mg-Al alloys containing elements like Sr and Ca offer a further improvement in creep properties, however at the cost of reduced castability.
  • Alloys of the Mg-Al-Ca and Mg-Al-Sr system offer a further improvement in creep resistance, but a great disadvantage with these alloys are problems with castability. This is particularly a problem with high metal velocities impinging directly onto the die surface, the so-called water hammer effect.
  • each machine has a die 10, 20 provided with a hydraulic damping system 11, 21 respectively.
  • Molten metal is introduced into the die by means of a shot cylinder 12, 22 provided with a piston 13, 23 respectively.
  • a shot cylinder 12, 22 provided with a piston 13, 23 respectively.
  • an auxiliary system for metering of the metal to the horizontal shot cylinder is required.
  • the hot chamber machine ( Fig. 1 B) uses a vertical piston system (12, 23) directly in the molten alloy.
  • the steel die 10, 20 is equipped with an oil (or water) cooling system controlling the die temperature in the range of 200-300°C.
  • a prerequisite for good quality is a short die filling time to avoid solidification of metal during filling.
  • a die filling time in the order of 10 -2 s x average part thickness (mm) is recommended. This is obtained by forcing the alloy through a gate with high speeds typically in the range 30-300 m/s. Plunger velocities up to 10 m/s with sufficiently large diameters are being used to obtain the desired volume flows in the shot cylinder for the short filling times needed.
  • Fig. 2 there is shown the relationship between the solidification range and the microstructure.
  • Line 30 indicates the grain size obtained, whereas line 31 is the obtained value for the secondary dendrite arm spacings.
  • cooling rate With die casting grain refining is obtained by the cooling rate. As mentioned above cooling rates in the range of 10-1000 °C/s is normally achieved. This typically results in grain sizes in the range of 5-100 ⁇ m.
  • the castability term describes the ability of an alloy to be cast into a final product with required functionalities and properties. It generally contains 3 categories; (1) the ability to form a part with all desired geometry features and dimensions, (2) the ability to produce a dense part with desired properties, and (3) the effects on die cast tooling, foundry equipment and die casting process efficiency.
  • the German Patent Application 2122148 describes alloys of the Mg-Al-RE type mainly Mg-Al-RE alloys with RE content ⁇ 3wt%, although alloys with higher RE content are discussed as well. It is known that the alloy AE42 (4% Al, 2-3% RE) offers a significant improvement in elevated temperature properties and corrosion properties. It is experienced that small RE additions to Mg-Al alloys lead to a significant improvement in corrosion properties, but a deterioration in the castability as problems with die sticking occur more frequently. In the annexed Fig. 5 there is shown the regions of excellent, poor and very poor castability in the Mg-Al-Re system.
  • the line 40 is the line indicating the solubility of RE at 680 °C, whereas the line 41 indicates the solubility of RE at 640 °C.
  • the region (dark) 42 represents the composition with very poor castability.
  • the region (intermediate) 43 represents the composition with poor castability and the region 44 (light) represents the compositions with excellent castability. As illustrated in Fig. 5 , the castability becomes worse as the RE content of the alloy increases. However, as Fig.
  • the compositions of the present invention minimise the volume fraction of the brittle Mg 17 Al 12 phase (The RE/Al ratio in the dispersoid phases increases with increasing %RE/%Al content in the alloy). Due to the fact that the eutectic Mg 17 Al 2 phase melts at around 420°C, the conventional Mg-Al alloys like AM50, AM60 and AZ91 will have a solidification range of nearly 200°C as shown in the annexed Fig. 6. Fig 6 shows the fraction solid (expressed in % by weight) on the horizontal axis versus the temperature (°C) on the vertical axis for a number of alloys. The Mg-Al-RE alloys with the %RE/%Al ratios as specified in the present invention will solidify completely at around 570°C, hence the solidification range is only approximately 50°C.
  • Mg-Al die casting alloys improves the die castability. This is due to the fact that Mg-Al alloys have a wide solidification range, which makes them inherently difficult to cast unless a sufficiently large amount of eutectic is present at the end of solidification. This can explain the good castability of AZ91 D consistent with the cooling curves shown in Fig. 6 . As the Al-content is reduced to 6, 5 and 2% in AM60, AM50 and AM20, respectively, the remaining eutectic is decreasing to a level where feeding becomes difficult during the final stages of solidification which means, for thick walled parts, microporosity and even larger voids can be present.
  • the ability to feed during the final stages is less important (while alloy fluidity becomes the significant factor) since the volume shrinkage is partly taken up by thickness reduction due to shrinkage from the die walls.
  • the AE44 and AE35 alloys show very different cooling characteristics from Mg-Al alloys. The solidification interval is significantly smaller, indicating concentrated shrinkage porosity can be decreased during solidification. These alloys have good fluidity during mold filling, and can thus easily be cast into final products with less casting defects.
  • the castability of AE44 and AE35 is relatively equal to that of AZ91D.
  • a further issue related to the narrow solidification interval is the fact that the commonly observed inverse segregation occurring in AZ91 D as well as AM alloys will not occur. This is illustrated by the fact that AE alloys with high RE contents have a shiny surface without segregations of Mg-Al eutectic phase. The surface layer solidifies during and immediately after die filling, and the temperature will rapidly decrease below the solidus temperature, thereby preventing molten metal to be forced towards the die surface when shrinkage starts. This will be beneficial to prevent reactions between the die wall and molten metal, which could lead to die sticking.
  • the surface layer having a thickness of approx. 50 ⁇ m, consists of equiaxed grains with size about 10 ⁇ m. This is a fairly small grain size, which can be explained by the rapid cooling conditions on the die wall.
  • the intermediate layer is about 100 ⁇ m thick and is extremely fine grained. The morphology is different from the former and DAS in the range of 2-4 ⁇ m is observed. The change in equilibrium melting point due to pressure may explain this observation. When the metal becomes pressurized the equilibrium melting point increases, i.e., the metal suddenly becomes undercooled.
  • the core consists of equiaxed grains of ⁇ 20 ⁇ m.
  • the solidification of the core is restricted by the heat flow out of the core to the die. Both the heat transport through the already solidified layer and the heat transfer over the casting/die interface will give a slower cooling rate than the skin and thus a coarser microstructure is formed.
  • Fig. 8 there is shown a box die (upper) part of the drawing. Micrographs of examples from node 3 (close to the gate) for alloys AM60, AM40, AE63, AE44 and AE35 as shown below. Hot cracks are observed in AM40 and AE63.
  • Fig. 8 have demonstrated that AE44 and AE35 are less susceptible to hot tearing than AM alloys. This is explained from the fairly rapid solidification of the surface layer resulting in the relatively fine grained structure as described above.
  • this layer becomes very ductile, and is therefore able to deform when thermal strains are developing during solidifaction.
  • a surface layer with coarser grains, as would typically appear in alloys with larger solidification interval, and/or a Mg 17 Al 12 rich layer, will have a much lower ductility and would tend to crack and form hot tears rather than deform.
  • Fig. 9 are SEM-BEC (Backscatter Electronic Composition) images showing the die cast microstructure of (from left to right) AE44, AE35 and AE63. While Al alone provides the solid solution strengthening, RE combines with AL forming dispersoid phases in the grain boundary regions.
  • FIG. 10 A further enlargement of the SEM-BEC-images for AE 44 is shown in Fig. 10 , which also shows the lamellar structure of Al x RE y phases in AE44.
  • the dispersoid AlxREy phases in the AE alloys consist of an extremely fine lamellar structure. This structure of submicron lamellas are stiffening the grain boundaries thereby preventing creep.
  • these lamellas are not brittle (or not as brittle as the eutectic Mg-Al) as the die cast AE44 alloy experience a ductility that is similar to AE42.
  • the network (mainly Al 11 RE 3 ) becomes fragmented and the grain boundary regions are probably influenced by a substantial amount of eutectic Mg-Al, reducing the ductility and the creep properties.
  • AE42 there is probably also a significant amount of eutectic Mg-Al that limits the creep properties.
  • the alloy AE35 has slightly lower ductility than AE44, but still higher than AE63.
  • Fig. 11 Numerous examples of mechanical properties including ductility, tensile strength, creep resistance and corrosion properties of the AE alloys are shown later.
  • the unique combination of creep resistance and ducility compared to existing alloys is illustrated in Fig. 11 .
  • the ducility horizontal axis
  • the zone 50 comprises AM-alloys, zones 51 AE-alloys, zone 52 AZ91 -alloy and zone 53 other high temperature alloys.
  • the AE alloys of the present invention are the only die casting alloys that combine ducility and elevated temperature properties in this way, and hence offer numerous new and unexplored opportunities for constructors and designers particulary in the automotive industry.
  • the present invention therefore provides:
  • RE-metais in general a number of RE-metais can be used as alloying element, such as e.g. Ce, La, Nd and or Pr and mixtures thereof. It is however preferred to use cerium in substantial amounts as this metal gives the best mechanical properties. Mn is added to improve the corrosion resistance but its addition is restricted due to limited solubility.
  • the aluminium content is between 2,0 and 6,00 % be weight, more preferably between 2,60 and 4,50 % by weight.
  • the RE-content is between 3,50 and 7,00 % by weight, the upper limit being restricted by the solubility of RE in the Mg-Al-RE system as indicated in Fig. 1 .
  • the RE/Al ratio is larger than 0.9.
  • composition of the alloy is selected in such a way that the aluminium content is between 3,6 and 4,5 % by weight and the RE-content is between 3,6 and 4,5 % be weight, with the additional constraint that the Re/Al ratio is larger than 0,9.
  • This type of alloys can be used for applications up to 175°C while still showing excellent creep properties and tensile strength. Moreover this alloy does not show any degradation of its properties due to ageing and has a good castability.
  • the composition of the alloy is such that the aluminium content is between 2,6 and 3,5 % by weight and the RE-content is greater than 4,6 % by weight.
  • this alloy does not show any degradation of properties due to ageing.
  • the RE-metals are selected from the group cerium, lanthanum, neodymium and praseodymium.
  • the RE-metals are contributing to the ease of alloying, but also increase the corrosion resistance, the creep resistance and improve the mechanical properties.
  • the amount of lanthanum is at least 15 % by weight and more preferably at least 20 % by weight of the total content of RE-metals, Preferably the amount of lanthanum is less than 35 % by weight of the total content of RE-metals.
  • the amount of neodymium is at least 7 % by weight and more preferably at least 10 % by weight of the total content of RE-metals. Preferably the amount of neodymium is less than 20 % by weight of the total content of RE-metals.
  • the amount of praseodymium is at least 2 % by weight and more preferably at least 4 % by weight of the total content of RE-metals. Preferably the amount of praseodymium is less than 10 % by weight. Of the total content of RE-metals.
  • the amount of cerium is greater than 50 % by weight of the total content of RE-metals, preferably between 50 and 55 % by weight.
  • test bars Of each alloy purposes a number of test bars has been made to do the testing described in the following examples. The performed tests are the following :
  • Test-bars of 6 mm in accordance to ASTM have been made, and the following
  • test material is used :
  • the testing is done in accordance with ASTM E 139
  • the corrosion is tested according to ASTM 117.
  • the Creep strain has been measured as a function of the time.
  • the y-axis is representing the creep strain expressed in percentage
  • the x-axis is representing the time expressed in hours.
  • the y-axis is representing the remaining load expressed in percentage of initial load, whereas the x-axis is representing the time expressed in hours.
  • the y-axis is representing the RE-content expressed in % by weight whereas the x-axis is representing the Al-content also expressed in % by weight.
  • the border lines between the zones with different shades are representing lines of equal corrosion resistances.

Abstract

A process for casting a magnesium alloy consisting of 2.0-6.00% by weight of aluminium, 3.00-8.00% by weight of rare earth metals (RE-metals), the ratio of the amount of RE-metals to the amount of aluminium expressed as % by weight being larger than 0.8, at least 40% by weight of the RE-metals being cerium, less than 0.5% by weight of manganese, less than 1.00% by weight of zinc, less than 0.01% by weight of calcium less than 0.01% by weight of strontium and the balance being magnesium and unavoidable impurities, the total impurity level being below 0.1% by weight, wherein the alloy is cast in a die the temperature of which is controlled in the range of 180-340° C., the die is filled in a time which expressed in milliseconds is equal to the product of a number between 5 and 500 multiplied by the average part thickness expressed in millimeter, the static metal pressures being maintained during casting between 20-70 MPa and is subsequently intensified up to 180 MPa.

Description

  • The invention relates to a process for casting a magnesium alloy consisting of
    2,0 - 6,00 % by weight of aluminium,
    3,00 - 8,00 % by weight of rare earth metals (RE-metals),
    the ratio of the amount of RE-metals to the amount of aluminium expressed as % by weight being larger than 0,8,
    at least 40 % by weight of the RE-metals being cerium,
    less than 0,5 % by weight of manganese,
    less than 1,00 % by weight of zinc,
    less than 0,01% by weight of calcium
    less than 0,01% by weight of strontium
    and the balance being magnesium and unavoidable impurities, the total impurity level being below 0,1 % by weight.
  • Magnesium-based alloys are widely used as cast parts in the aerospace and automotive industries. Magnesium-based alloy cast parts can be produced by conventional casting methods, which include die-casting, sand casting, permanent and semi-permanent mold casting, plaster-mold casting and investment casting.
  • Mg-based alloys demonstrate a number of particularly advantageous properties that have prompted an increased demand for magnesium-based alloy cast parts in the automotive industry. These properties include low density, high strength-to-weight ratio, good castability, easy machinability and good damping characteristics.
  • Most common magnesium die-casting alloys such as Mg-Al-alloys or Mg-Al-Zn-alloys are known to lose their creep resistance at temperatures above 120° C. Mg-At-Si alloys have been developed for higher temperature applications and offer only a limited improvement in creep resistance. Alloys of the Mg-Al-Ca and Mg-Al-Sr system offer a further improvement in creep resistance, but a great disadvantage with these alloys is problems with castability. This is particularly a problem with high metal velocities impinging directly onto the die surface, the so-called water hammer effect.
  • It is known that the alloy AE48 (4% AP, 2-3 % RE) offers a significant improvement in elevated temperatures properties and corrosion.
  • Mg-Al alloys containing elements like Sr and Ca offer a further improvement in creep properties, however at the cost of reduced castability. Alloys of the Mg-Al-Ca and Mg-Al-Sr system offer a further improvement in creep resistance, but a great disadvantage with these alloys are problems with castability. This is particularly a problem with high metal velocities impinging directly onto the die surface, the so-called water hammer effect.
  • In the annex Figures 1A and 1 B there are schematically shown cold chambers and hot chambers die castings machines respectively each machine has a die 10, 20 provided with a hydraulic damping system 11, 21 respectively.
  • Molten metal is introduced into the die by means of a shot cylinder 12, 22 provided with a piston 13, 23 respectively. In the cold chamber system an auxiliary system for metering of the metal to the horizontal shot cylinder is required. The hot chamber machine (Fig. 1 B) uses a vertical piston system (12, 23) directly in the molten alloy.
  • To obtain the excellent performance of the Mg-Al-Re alloys , it is mandatory that the alloys are cast under extremely rapid cooling conditions. This is the case for the high pressure die casting process. The steel die 10, 20 is equipped with an oil (or water) cooling system controlling the die temperature in the range of 200-300°C. A prerequisite for good quality is a short die filling time to avoid solidification of metal during filling. A die filling time in the order of 10-2 s x average part thickness (mm) is recommended. This is obtained by forcing the alloy through a gate with high speeds typically in the range 30-300 m/s. Plunger velocities up to 10 m/s with sufficiently large diameters are being used to obtain the desired volume flows in the shot cylinder for the short filling times needed. It is common to use static metal pressures 20-70 MPa and subsequent pressure intensification up to 150 MPa. With this casting method the resulting cooling rate of the component is typically in the range of 10-1000 °C/s depending on the thickness of the component being cast. For AE alloys this is a key factor in determining the properties, both because of general high cooling rate of the part, and in particular the extremely high cooling rate of the surface layer.
  • In the annexed Fig. 2 there is shown the relationship between the solidification range and the microstructure. On the horizontal axis there is shown the solidification rate expressed as ° C/S and on the left hand vertical scale the secondary dendrite arm spacings expressed in µm is shown, whereas the right hand vertical scale the grain diameter expressed in µm is shown. Line 30 indicates the grain size obtained, whereas line 31 is the obtained value for the secondary dendrite arm spacings.
  • With die casting grain refining is obtained by the cooling rate. As mentioned above cooling rates in the range of 10-1000 °C/s is normally achieved. This typically results in grain sizes in the range of 5-100 µm.
  • It is well known that fine grain size is beneficial for the ductility of an alloy. This relationship is illustrated in the annexed Fig. 3, in which the relationship between grain size and relative elongation has been shown. On the horizontal axis the arrange grain size has been represented expressed in µm, whereas the vertical axis gives the relative elongation expressed in %. In the graph there are shown two different composition, first pure Mg, line 35 and a Mg-alloy designated AZ91, line 36.
  • It is also well known that fine grain size is beneficial for the tensile yield strength of an alloy. This relationship (Hall-Petch) is shown in the annexed Fig. 4. In the horizontal axis there is represented the grain diameter, expressed as d (-0,5), in which has been expressed in µm , and in the vertical axis there is shown the tensile yield strength expressed in MPa.
  • It is therefore evident that the fine grain size provided by the very high cooling rates facilitated by the die casting process is a necessity for obtaining tensile strength and ductility.
  • The castability term describes the ability of an alloy to be cast into a final product with required functionalities and properties. It generally contains 3 categories; (1) the ability to form a part with all desired geometry features and dimensions, (2) the ability to produce a dense part with desired properties, and (3) the effects on die cast tooling, foundry equipment and die casting process efficiency.
  • The German Patent Application 2122148 describes alloys of the Mg-Al-RE type mainly Mg-Al-RE alloys with RE content < 3wt%, although alloys with higher RE content are discussed as well. It is known that the alloy AE42 (4% Al, 2-3% RE) offers a significant improvement in elevated temperature properties and corrosion properties. It is experienced that small RE additions to Mg-Al alloys lead to a significant improvement in corrosion properties, but a deterioration in the castability as problems with die sticking occur more frequently. In the annexed Fig. 5 there is shown the regions of excellent, poor and very poor castability in the Mg-Al-Re system. In the horizontal axis the amount of Al expressed as % by weight is shown, whereas in the vertical axis the amount of RE expressed in % by weight is shown. The line 40 is the line indicating the solubility of RE at 680 °C, whereas the line 41 indicates the solubility of RE at 640 °C. The region (dark) 42 represents the composition with very poor castability. The region (intermediate) 43 represents the composition with poor castability and the region 44 (light) represents the compositions with excellent castability. As illustrated in Fig. 5, the castability becomes worse as the RE content of the alloy increases. However, as Fig. 5 indicates, there is a region with RE >3.5 wt% (the upper limit restricted by the solubility of RE), Al in the range 2.5% to 5.0% and furthermore described with a %RE/%Al ratio greater than 0.8 where the high pressure die castability is excellent.
  • It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide relatively low cost magnesium-based alloys with improved elevated-temperature performance and improved castability.
  • Due to the formation of AlxREy dispersoid phases, the compositions of the present invention minimise the volume fraction of the brittle Mg17Al12 phase (The RE/Al ratio in the dispersoid phases increases with increasing %RE/%Al content in the alloy). Due to the fact that the eutectic Mg17Al2 phase melts at around 420°C, the conventional Mg-Al alloys like AM50, AM60 and AZ91 will have a solidification range of nearly 200°C as shown in the annexed Fig. 6. Fig 6 shows the fraction solid (expressed in % by weight) on the horizontal axis versus the temperature (°C) on the vertical axis for a number of alloys. The Mg-Al-RE alloys with the %RE/%Al ratios as specified in the present invention will solidify completely at around 570°C, hence the solidification range is only approximately 50°C.
  • In general, increasing aluminium content in Mg-Al die casting alloys improves the die castability. This is due to the fact that Mg-Al alloys have a wide solidification range, which makes them inherently difficult to cast unless a sufficiently large amount of eutectic is present at the end of solidification. This can explain the good castability of AZ91 D consistent with the cooling curves shown in Fig. 6. As the Al-content is reduced to 6, 5 and 2% in AM60, AM50 and AM20, respectively, the remaining eutectic is decreasing to a level where feeding becomes difficult during the final stages of solidification which means, for thick walled parts, microporosity and even larger voids can be present. For thin walled parts, the ability to feed during the final stages is less important (while alloy fluidity becomes the significant factor) since the volume shrinkage is partly taken up by thickness reduction due to shrinkage from the die walls. The AE44 and AE35 alloys show very different cooling characteristics from Mg-Al alloys. The solidification interval is significantly smaller, indicating concentrated shrinkage porosity can be decreased during solidification. These alloys have good fluidity during mold filling, and can thus easily be cast into final products with less casting defects. The castability of AE44 and AE35 is relatively equal to that of AZ91D.
  • A further issue related to the narrow solidification interval is the fact that the commonly observed inverse segregation occurring in AZ91 D as well as AM alloys will not occur. This is illustrated by the fact that AE alloys with high RE contents have a shiny surface without segregations of Mg-Al eutectic phase. The surface layer solidifies during and immediately after die filling, and the temperature will rapidly decrease below the solidus temperature, thereby preventing molten metal to be forced towards the die surface when shrinkage starts. This will be beneficial to prevent reactions between the die wall and molten metal, which could lead to die sticking.
  • An example with a wall thickness of about 3 mm showing three layers with different microstructure in AE44 is given in the annexed Fig. 7. The surface layer, having a thickness of approx. 50 µm, consists of equiaxed grains with size about 10 µm. This is a fairly small grain size, which can be explained by the rapid cooling conditions on the die wall. The intermediate layer is about 100 µm thick and is extremely fine grained. The morphology is different from the former and DAS in the range of 2-4 µm is observed. The change in equilibrium melting point due to pressure may explain this observation. When the metal becomes pressurized the equilibrium melting point increases, i.e., the metal suddenly becomes undercooled. In theory, this is the same for all Mg alloys, but there remains a significant difference in the solidification characteristics among the alloys. The core consists of equiaxed grains of ~20 µm. The solidification of the core is restricted by the heat flow out of the core to the die. Both the heat transport through the already solidified layer and the heat transfer over the casting/die interface will give a slower cooling rate than the skin and thus a coarser microstructure is formed.
  • When the RE content is low, or the %RE/%Al ratio is low like in AE42 or AE63, there will be a possibility that eutectic Mg-Al is present that could segregate to the surface, and lead to sticking. This may explain why AE42 shows up with a poorer castability.
  • In Fig. 8 there is shown a box die (upper) part of the drawing. Micrographs of examples from node 3 (close to the gate) for alloys AM60, AM40, AE63, AE44 and AE35 as shown below. Hot cracks are observed in AM40 and AE63.
  • Fig. 8, have demonstrated that AE44 and AE35 are less susceptible to hot tearing than AM alloys. This is explained from the fairly rapid solidification of the surface layer resulting in the relatively fine grained structure as described above.
  • Partly due to the fine grain structure and partly due to the absence of the brittle Mg17Al12 phase this layer becomes very ductile, and is therefore able to deform when thermal strains are developing during solidifaction. A surface layer with coarser grains, as would typically appear in alloys with larger solidification interval, and/or a Mg17Al12 rich layer, will have a much lower ductility and would tend to crack and form hot tears rather than deform.
  • Testing of large (~1.5m) thin walled parts (~3mm thick) has shown that the die filling characteristics of AE44 and AE35 are excellent, and since long range feeding is not necessary for thin walled parts as discussed above, this alloy is expected to be a viable alternative for these types of components, where die filling is of prime importance.
  • The properties of various AE alloys are explained from the observations that Al alone provides the solid solution strengthening while RE combines with Al forming dispersoid phases in the grain boundary regions. In the alloys AE44 and AE35, the dispersoid phase (mainly Al2RE) constitutes a continuous 3D network, effectively preventing creep arising from thermal activation and grain boundary sliding. This shown in Fig. 9 which are SEM-BEC (Backscatter Electronic Composition) images showing the die cast microstructure of (from left to right) AE44, AE35 and AE63. While Al alone provides the solid solution strengthening, RE combines with AL forming dispersoid phases in the grain boundary regions.
  • A further enlargement of the SEM-BEC-images for AE 44 is shown in Fig. 10, which also shows the lamellar structure of AlxREy phases in AE44. As seen from Fig. 10 the dispersoid AlxREy phases in the AE alloys consist of an extremely fine lamellar structure. This structure of submicron lamellas are stiffening the grain boundaries thereby preventing creep. On the other hand, these lamellas are not brittle (or not as brittle as the eutectic Mg-Al) as the die cast AE44 alloy experience a ductility that is similar to AE42. In AE63, the network (mainly Al11RE3) becomes fragmented and the grain boundary regions are probably influenced by a substantial amount of eutectic Mg-Al, reducing the ductility and the creep properties. In AE42 there is probably also a significant amount of eutectic Mg-Al that limits the creep properties. The alloy AE35 has slightly lower ductility than AE44, but still higher than AE63.
  • Numerous examples of mechanical properties including ductility, tensile strength, creep resistance and corrosion properties of the AE alloys are shown later. The unique combination of creep resistance and ducility compared to existing alloys is illustrated in Fig. 11. In fig. 11 the ducility (horizontal axis) is shown as versus the creep resistance for a number of known Mg-alloys. The zone 50 comprises AM-alloys, zones 51 AE-alloys, zone 52 AZ91 -alloy and zone 53 other high temperature alloys. The AE alloys of the present invention are the only die casting alloys that combine ducility and elevated temperature properties in this way, and hence offer numerous new and unexplored opportunities for constructors and designers particulary in the automotive industry.
  • An example for industry applicability of AE 44 is given in ..Magnesium makes its engine cradle mark" by N. Li, AEI Maerial Innovations. April 2005. pages 110-111. where the research and development of the engine cradle of the 2006 Chevrolet Corvette Z06 made of light weight magnesium is described.
  • Additional information about die casting of magnesium and magnesium alloys can be found in the ASM Specialty Handbook. "Magnesium and Magnesium Alloys" by Avedesian et al.. May 2000, pages 66-77. For example, in table 2 on page 67 typical mechanical properties of separately die-cast test bars for a range of magnesium alloys such as AE 42 and AZ91 are given.
  • It is a more particular object to provide relatively low cost die casting magnesium-aluminium-rare earth alloys with excellent castability, good creep resistance and tensile yield strength and bolt-load retention, particulary at elevated temperatures of at least 150° C.
  • SUMMARY OF INVENTION
  • The present invention therefore provides:
    • ■ the alloy is cast in a die the temperature of which is controlled in the range of 180-340° C,
    • ■ the die is filled in a time which expressed in milliseconds is equal to the product of a number between 5 and 500 multiplied by the average part thickness expressed in millimeter,
    • ■ the static metal pressures being maintained during casting between 20-70 MPa and is subsequently intensified up to 180 MPa.
  • By using the combination of a specified Mg-Al-RE alloy with a special casting process, products could be obtained having excellent creep resistance, at elevated temperature, high ductility and generally good mechanical properties as well as corrosion properties.
  • In general a number of RE-metais can be used as alloying element, such as e.g. Ce, La, Nd and or Pr and mixtures thereof. It is however preferred to use cerium in substantial amounts as this metal gives the best mechanical properties. Mn is added to improve the corrosion resistance but its addition is restricted due to limited solubility.
  • Preferably the aluminium content is between 2,0 and 6,00 % be weight, more preferably between 2,60 and 4,50 % by weight.
  • If higher amounts of aluminium are present, this can easily lead to the formation of a Mg17Al12-phases which is detrimental for the creep properties. Too low Al is negative for the castability.
  • With respect to the RE-metals it is preferred that the RE-content is between 3,50 and 7,00 % by weight, the upper limit being restricted by the solubility of RE in the Mg-Al-RE system as indicated in Fig. 1.
  • If more than 3.50 % RE by weight is present, this gives a significant improvement of the creep properties. More than 7.00 % be weight is not pratical because of the restricted solubility of RE-metals in liquid magnesium-aluminium alloys.
  • Furthermore, it is preferred that the RE/Al ratio is larger than 0.9.
  • For specific applications the composition of the alloy is selected in such a way that the aluminium content is between 3,6 and 4,5 % by weight and the RE-content is between 3,6 and 4,5 % be weight, with the additional constraint that the Re/Al ratio is larger than 0,9.
  • This type of alloys can be used for applications up to 175°C while still showing excellent creep properties and tensile strength. Moreover this alloy does not show any degradation of its properties due to ageing and has a good castability.
  • For applications above 175°C the composition of the alloy is such that the aluminium content is between 2,6 and 3,5 % by weight and the RE-content is greater than 4,6 % by weight.
  • Apart from the excellent creep properties and tensile strength this alloy does not show any degradation of properties due to ageing.
  • Preferably the RE-metals are selected from the group cerium, lanthanum, neodymium and praseodymium.
  • The RE-metals are contributing to the ease of alloying, but also increase the corrosion resistance, the creep resistance and improve the mechanical properties.
  • Preferably the amount of lanthanum is at least 15 % by weight and more preferably at least 20 % by weight of the total content of RE-metals, Preferably the amount of lanthanum is less than 35 % by weight of the total content of RE-metals.
  • Preferably the amount of neodymium is at least 7 % by weight and more preferably at least 10 % by weight of the total content of RE-metals. Preferably the amount of neodymium is less than 20 % by weight of the total content of RE-metals.
  • Preferably the amount of praseodymium is at least 2 % by weight and more preferably at least 4 % by weight of the total content of RE-metals. Preferably the amount of praseodymium is less than 10 % by weight. Of the total content of RE-metals.
  • Preferably the amount of cerium is greater than 50 % by weight of the total content of RE-metals, preferably between 50 and 55 % by weight.
  • It is known that calcium and strontium give an increase in creep resistance, and the addition of at least 0,5 % weight of calcium will improve the tensile strength. However, Ca and Sr should be avoided because even at very small concentrations these elements lead to considerable sticking problems thereby influencing the castability of the alloy.
  • The present invention is described in more detail with reference to the following example which are for purposes of illustration only and are not to be understood as indicating or implying any limitation on the brood invention described herein.
  • Example 1
  • In order to compose the influence of the alloying elements and a number of Mg-alloys have been prepared with the compositions as given in table 1.
  • Of each alloy purposes a number of test bars has been made to do the testing described in the following examples. The performed tests are the following :
  • Tensile strength and ductility
  • Test-bars of 6 mm in accordance to ASTM have been made, and the following
  • Test conditions has been used :
    • 10 kN Instron machine
    • Room temperature to 210 °C
    • At least 5 parallels at each temperature
    • Strain rate
      • 1.5 mm/min up to 0.5 % strain,
      • 10 mm/min above 0.5 % strain
    • Testing in accordance with ISO 6892
    Tensile creep testing
  • For this text the following test material is used :
    • Diameter: 6 mm
    • Gauge length : 32.8 mm
    • Radius of curvature : 9 mm
    • Grip head diameter: 12 mm
    • Total length : 125 mm
  • The testing is done in accordance with ASTM E 139
  • Stress relaxation testing
    • Test material
      • 12 mm diameter, 6 mm length
      • Cut from arbitrary end of creep bars
    • Testing in accordance with ASTM E328-86
    Corrosion properties
  • The corrosion is tested according to ASTM 117.
  • Example 2
  • For a number of compositions the strength has been measured as a function of the temperature.
  • The results are shown in Figures 12, 13 and 14. In these figures the y-axis is representing the tensile strength expressed in MPa, whereas the x-axis is representing the temperature expressed in degrees Celsius.
  • Example 3
  • For a number of compositions the Creep strain has been measured as a function of the time.
  • The results are shown in Figures 15 and 16. In fig. 15 the measurement is done at 175 °C whit a 40 MPa-force, and in fig. 16 the measurement is done at 150 °C with a 90 MPa-forces.
  • In these figures the y-axis is representing the creep strain expressed in percentage, whereas the x-axis is representing the time expressed in hours.
  • Example 4
  • For a number of compositions according to table 1 the stress relaxation has been defined, expressed as the remaining load versus the time. The results are shown in fig. 17, 18 and 19.
  • In these figures the y-axis is representing the remaining load expressed in percentage of initial load, whereas the x-axis is representing the time expressed in hours.
  • Example 5
  • For a number of compositions the corrosion properties have been defined in accordance to ASTM B117. In this test a great amount of data has been incorporated in order to define the influence of the RE-contest versus the Al-contest. The results are shown in Fig. 20.
  • In this figure the y-axis is representing the RE-content expressed in % by weight whereas the x-axis is representing the Al-content also expressed in % by weight.
  • The border lines between the zones with different shades are representing lines of equal corrosion resistances.
  • From these test results it is clear that a process for casting a magnesium alloy has been provided whereby products are obtained with a superior combination of elevated temperature creep properties, ductility and corrosion performance. Table 1
    Alloy Type Al wt% Mn wt% Zn wt% Si wt% Ce wt% La wt% Nd wt% Pr wt% RE wt% Ce/RE La/RE Nd/RE Pr/RE
    AZ91D 8,93 0,17 0,73
    AS21B 2,11 0,08 1,01 0,09
    AE35-24 3,23 0,29 2,49 1,73 0,94 0,28 5,44 45,77 31,80 17,28 5,15
    AE42-15 3,89 0,15 1,31 0,79 0,37 0,16 2,64 49,85 30,08 14,15 5,92
    AE44-24 4,12 0,29 2,11 1,53 0,75 0,23 4,62 45,67 33,12 16,23 4,98
    AE63-4 6,31 0,18 1,42 1,35 0,40 0,13 3,30 43,03 40,91 12,12 3,94
    ACe44 3,70 3,90 3,90 100,00
    ANd44 3,90 2,50 2,50 100,00
    ALa44 3,70 0,38 3,00 3,00 100,00
    ALaCe431 3,70 0,45 0,90 2,30 3,20 28,10 71,90
    ALaCe413 4,00 0,28 2,40 0,90 3,30 72,70 27,30
    ALaNd431 3,90 0,46 2,60 0,80 3,40 76,50 23,50
    ALaNd413 3,70 0,42 1,10 1,60 2,70 40,70 59,30
    ACeNd431 4,70 0,27 2,60 0,80 3,40 76,50 23,50
    ACeNd413 4,40 0,32 0,90 1,00 1,90 47,40 52,60
    ACeNd422 3,60 1,50 1,50 3,00 50,00 50,00

Claims (18)

  1. A process for casting a magnesium alloy consisting of
    2,0 - 6,00 % by weight of aluminium,
    3,00 - 8,00 % by weight of rare earth metals (RE-metals),
    the ratio of the amount of RE-metals to the amount of aluminium expressed as % by weight being larger than 0,8,
    at least 40 % by weight of the RE-metals being cerium,
    less than 0,5 % by weight of manganese,
    less than 1,00 % by weight of zinc,
    less than 0,01% by weight of calcium
    less than 0,01% by weight of strontium
    and the balance being magnesium and unavoidable impurities, the total impurity level being below 0,1 % by weight, wherein
    - the alloy is cast in a die the temperature of which is controlled in the range of 180-340°C,
    - the die is filled in a time which expressed in milliseconds is equal to the product of a number between 5 and 500 multiplied by the average part thickness expressed in millimeter,
    - the static metal pressures being maintained during casting between 20-70 MPa and is subsequently intensified up to 180 MPa.
  2. The process according to claim 1, wherein the die temperature is controlled to a temperature in the range between 200 and 270°C.
  3. The process according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the filling time of the die expressed in milliseconds is equal to product of the average part thickness expressed in millimetre multiplied by a number between 8 and 200, preferably between 5 and 50, most preferably between 5 and 20.
  4. The process according to anyone of the claims 1-3, wherein the static metal pressure during casting is maintained between 30-70 Mpa.
  5. The process according to anyone of the claims 1-4, wherein the cooling rate after casting is in the range of 10-1000 °C/s.
  6. The process according to anyone of the claims 1-5, wherein the aluminium content is between 2,50 and 5,50 % by weight, preferably between 2,60 and 4,50 % be weight.
  7. The process according to anyone of the claims 1-6, wherein the RE content is between 3,50 and 7,00 % by weight.
  8. The process according to anyone of the claims 1-7, wherein the aluminium content is between 3,6 and 4,5 % by weight and the RE-content is between 3,6 and 4,5 % by weight, and that RE-AI-ratio is larger than 0,9.
  9. The process according to anyone of the claims 1-8, wherein the aluminium content is between 2,6 and 3,5 % by weight and the RE-content is greater than 4,6 % by weight.
  10. The process according to anyone of the claims 1-9, wherein the RE-metals are selected from the group cerium, lanthanum, neodymium and praseodymium.
  11. The process according to the claim 10, wherein the amount of lanthanum is at least 15 % by weight of the total content of RE-metals, preferably at least 20 % by weight.
  12. The process according to claim 10 or 11, wherein the amount of lanthanum is at most 35 % by weight of the total content of RE-metals.
  13. The process according to anyone of the claims 10-12, wherein the amount of neodymium is at least 7 % by weight of the total content of RE-metals, preferably at least 10 % by weight.
  14. The process according to anyone of the claims 10-13, wherein the amount of neodymium is at most 20 % by weight of the total content ofRE-metals.
  15. The process according to anyone of the claims 10-14, wherein the amount of praseodymium is at least 2 % by weight of the total content of R-metals, preferably at least 4 % by weight.
  16. The process according to anyone of the claims 10-15, wherein the amount of praseodymium is at most 10 % by weight of the total content of RE-metals.
  17. The process according to anyone of the claims 10-16, wherein the amount of cerium is greater than 50 % by weight of the total content of RE-metals, preferably between 50 and 55 % by weight.
  18. The process according to anyone of the claims 10-17, wherein the amount of calcium and/or strontium is less than 0,01 % by weight.
EP06805766A 2005-11-10 2006-09-19 A combination of casting process and alloy compositions resulting in cast parts with superior combination of elevated temperature creep properties, ductility and corrosion performance Active EP1957221B1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PL06805766T PL1957221T3 (en) 2005-11-10 2006-09-19 A combination of casting process and alloy compositions resulting in cast parts with superior combination of elevated temperature creep properties, ductility and corrosion performance
EP06805766A EP1957221B1 (en) 2005-11-10 2006-09-19 A combination of casting process and alloy compositions resulting in cast parts with superior combination of elevated temperature creep properties, ductility and corrosion performance

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP05077583 2005-11-10
PCT/EP2006/009082 WO2007054152A1 (en) 2005-11-10 2006-09-19 A combination of casting process and alloy compositions resulting in cast parts with superior combination of elevated temperature creep properties, ductility and corrosion performance
EP06805766A EP1957221B1 (en) 2005-11-10 2006-09-19 A combination of casting process and alloy compositions resulting in cast parts with superior combination of elevated temperature creep properties, ductility and corrosion performance

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1957221A1 EP1957221A1 (en) 2008-08-20
EP1957221B1 true EP1957221B1 (en) 2011-12-28

Family

ID=37546955

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP06805766A Active EP1957221B1 (en) 2005-11-10 2006-09-19 A combination of casting process and alloy compositions resulting in cast parts with superior combination of elevated temperature creep properties, ductility and corrosion performance

Country Status (17)

Country Link
US (1) US20090133849A1 (en)
EP (1) EP1957221B1 (en)
JP (1) JP5290764B2 (en)
KR (1) KR101191105B1 (en)
CN (1) CN101528390B (en)
AT (1) ATE538887T1 (en)
AU (1) AU2006312743B2 (en)
BR (1) BRPI0618517B1 (en)
CA (1) CA2627491C (en)
EA (1) EA013656B1 (en)
ES (1) ES2379806T3 (en)
HR (1) HRP20120244T1 (en)
PL (1) PL1957221T3 (en)
PT (1) PT1957221E (en)
RS (1) RS52267B (en)
SI (1) SI1957221T1 (en)
WO (1) WO2007054152A1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE202016105961U1 (en) 2016-10-24 2016-12-20 Magontec Gmbh High strength and high ductile magnesium alloy

Families Citing this family (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
NO20063703L (en) * 2006-08-18 2008-02-19 Magontec Gmbh Magnesium stop process and alloy composition
CN101158002B (en) * 2007-11-06 2011-01-12 中国科学院长春应用化学研究所 AE series thermo-stable die-casting magnesium alloy containing cerium and lanthanide
CN102162053B (en) * 2011-03-11 2012-07-25 闻喜县瑞格镁业有限公司 Preparation method of high-strength high-temperature-creep-resistant magnesium-rare earth alloy
US9070304B2 (en) 2012-03-28 2015-06-30 Korea Institute Of Geoscience And Mineral Resources Debris-flow simulation apparatus having variable flume
KR101195409B1 (en) 2012-04-10 2012-11-05 한국지질자원연구원 debris flow flume to examine hydroplaning effect
US9669459B2 (en) * 2012-10-26 2017-06-06 Ford Motor Company System and method of making a cast part
CN103469124B (en) * 2013-09-12 2015-12-09 哈尔滨工程大学 A kind of in-situ authigenic Al 4la whisker reinforcement magnesium base composite material and preparation method
IL238698B (en) 2015-05-07 2018-04-30 Dead Sea Magnesium Ltd Creep resistant, ductile magnesium alloys for die casting
CN106862523A (en) * 2017-02-14 2017-06-20 山东银光钰源轻金属精密成型有限公司 A kind of C grades of Aluminum Alloy Used in Cars structural member die casting
CN107052298A (en) * 2017-02-14 2017-08-18 山东银光钰源轻金属精密成型有限公司 A kind of sedan door outside plate aluminum alloy die-casting die
CN109136699B (en) * 2017-06-15 2021-07-09 比亚迪股份有限公司 High-heat-conductivity magnesium alloy, inverter shell, inverter and automobile
CN107604228B (en) * 2017-08-30 2019-09-27 上海交通大学 Corrosion-resistant diecast magnesium alloy of high thermal conductivity and preparation method thereof
SE2150493A1 (en) * 2021-04-21 2022-05-24 Husqvarna Ab A Magnesium Alloy and a High Performance Magnesium Cylinder made from the Magnesium Alloy
WO2023159080A2 (en) * 2022-02-15 2023-08-24 Metali Llc Methods and systems for high pressure die casting
CN114921707B (en) * 2022-05-09 2023-04-14 苏州慧金新材料科技有限公司 Magnesium-based composite material cooperatively enhanced by rare earth and silicon carbide and preparation method thereof

Family Cites Families (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
NO132492C (en) 1973-10-01 1975-11-19 Nl Industries Inc
US5552110A (en) * 1991-07-26 1996-09-03 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Heat resistant magnesium alloy
US6264763B1 (en) * 1999-04-30 2001-07-24 General Motors Corporation Creep-resistant magnesium alloy die castings
EP1060817B1 (en) * 1999-06-04 2004-09-15 Mitsui Mining and Smelting Co., Ltd Pressure die-casting process of magnesium alloys
CN1225565C (en) * 2001-08-24 2005-11-02 三菱铝株式会社 Mould casting magnesium alloy
US6892790B2 (en) 2002-06-13 2005-05-17 Husky Injection Molding Systems Ltd. Process for injection molding semi-solid alloys
AUPS311202A0 (en) * 2002-06-21 2002-07-18 Cast Centre Pty Ltd Creep resistant magnesium alloy
WO2005108634A1 (en) * 2004-05-10 2005-11-17 Norsk Hydro Technology B.V. Magnesium alloy having improved elevated temperature performance
JP4926496B2 (en) * 2006-02-24 2012-05-09 株式会社豊田中央研究所 Magnesium alloy for die casting with excellent heat resistance, castability and corrosion resistance
NO20063703L (en) 2006-08-18 2008-02-19 Magontec Gmbh Magnesium stop process and alloy composition

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE202016105961U1 (en) 2016-10-24 2016-12-20 Magontec Gmbh High strength and high ductile magnesium alloy

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
ES2379806T3 (en) 2012-05-03
CN101528390B (en) 2011-06-22
PL1957221T3 (en) 2012-07-31
AU2006312743A1 (en) 2007-05-18
KR20080066805A (en) 2008-07-16
BRPI0618517B1 (en) 2018-01-09
CA2627491A1 (en) 2007-05-18
AU2006312743B2 (en) 2010-10-21
SI1957221T1 (en) 2012-03-30
JP2009527637A (en) 2009-07-30
US20090133849A1 (en) 2009-05-28
EA013656B1 (en) 2010-06-30
PT1957221E (en) 2012-04-03
RS52267B (en) 2012-10-31
EA200801268A1 (en) 2008-10-30
ATE538887T1 (en) 2012-01-15
JP5290764B2 (en) 2013-09-18
HRP20120244T1 (en) 2012-04-30
KR101191105B1 (en) 2012-10-16
BRPI0618517A2 (en) 2011-09-06
CA2627491C (en) 2011-11-22
CN101528390A (en) 2009-09-09
WO2007054152A1 (en) 2007-05-18
EP1957221A1 (en) 2008-08-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1957221B1 (en) A combination of casting process and alloy compositions resulting in cast parts with superior combination of elevated temperature creep properties, ductility and corrosion performance
EP0799901B1 (en) Heat-resistant magnesium alloy member
AU753538B2 (en) Die casting magnesium alloy
KR101082065B1 (en) Method for casting alloy composition
EP2369025B1 (en) Magnesium alloy and magnesium alloy casting
Li et al. Effect of specific pressure on microstructure and mechanical properties of squeeze casting ZA27 alloy
JPH0967635A (en) Aluminum alloy casting excellent in strength and toughness, by high pressure casting, and its production
JP4145242B2 (en) Aluminum alloy for casting, casting made of aluminum alloy and method for producing casting made of aluminum alloy
JP4285188B2 (en) Heat-resistant magnesium alloy for casting, casting made of magnesium alloy and method for producing the same
KR100916194B1 (en) Magnesium alloy having high strength and high toughness
EP3381586B1 (en) Method for low pressure permanent mold without a coating
MX2008006088A (en) A combination of casting process and alloy compositions resulting in cast parts with superior combination of elevated temperature creep properties, ductility and corrosion performance
Masoumi Effects of applied pressures and calcium contents on microstructure and tensile properties of squeeze cast magnesium-aluminum-calcium alloys.
Masoumi SQUEEZE CAST Mg-Al-Ca ALLOYS

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20080418

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA HR MK RS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20090316

TPAC Observations filed by third parties

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNTIPA

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

RAX Requested extension states of the european patent have changed

Extension state: MK

Payment date: 20080430

Extension state: BA

Payment date: 20080430

Extension state: HR

Payment date: 20080430

Extension state: RS

Payment date: 20080430

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA HR MK RS

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 538887

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20120115

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: T3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602006026749

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20120308

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: HR

Ref legal event code: TUEP

Ref document number: P20120244

Country of ref document: HR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: RO

Ref legal event code: EPE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: PT

Ref legal event code: SC4A

Free format text: AVAILABILITY OF NATIONAL TRANSLATION

Effective date: 20120321

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111228

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: HR

Ref legal event code: T1PR

Ref document number: P20120244

Country of ref document: HR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2379806

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

Effective date: 20120503

LTIE Lt: invalidation of european patent or patent extension

Effective date: 20111228

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111228

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120329

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111228

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111228

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111228

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120428

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: PL

Ref legal event code: T3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SK

Ref legal event code: T3

Ref document number: E 11798

Country of ref document: SK

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: HR

Ref legal event code: ODRP

Ref document number: P20120244

Country of ref document: HR

Payment date: 20120913

Year of fee payment: 7

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111228

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Payment date: 20120913

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20120919

Year of fee payment: 7

PLAX Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: NON FERRUM GMBH

Effective date: 20120928

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Payment date: 20120917

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: TR

Payment date: 20120917

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: BG

Payment date: 20120913

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: SI

Payment date: 20120912

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: SK

Payment date: 20120917

Year of fee payment: 7

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R026

Ref document number: 602006026749

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20120928

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20120926

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20120924

Year of fee payment: 7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20120920

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: PT

Payment date: 20120321

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20121010

Year of fee payment: 7

PLBB Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120930

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20111228

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120919

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: PT

Ref legal event code: MM4A

Free format text: LAPSE DUE TO NON-PAYMENT OF FEES

Effective date: 20140319

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: HR

Ref legal event code: PBON

Ref document number: P20120244

Country of ref document: HR

Effective date: 20130919

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: V1

Effective date: 20140401

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: EUG

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130919

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130920

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R100

Ref document number: 602006026749

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120919

PLCK Communication despatched that opposition was rejected

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREJ1

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SI

Ref legal event code: KO00

Effective date: 20140429

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SK

Ref legal event code: MM4A

Ref document number: E 11798

Country of ref document: SK

Effective date: 20130919

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20140530

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140319

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060919

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130919

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130920

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130930

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130919

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140401

PLBN Opposition rejected

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009273

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: OPPOSITION REJECTED

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20141007

27O Opposition rejected

Effective date: 20140513

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R100

Ref document number: 602006026749

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20140513

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130919

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: PL

Ref legal event code: LAPE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20141231

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130920

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130919

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140331

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20230920

Year of fee payment: 18

Ref country code: CZ

Payment date: 20230912

Year of fee payment: 18

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20230921

Year of fee payment: 18

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20230920

Year of fee payment: 18

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20231001

Year of fee payment: 18