EP1831670A2 - Dispositifs nanoelectroniques pour la detection d'adn et la reconnaissance de sequences polynucleotidiques - Google Patents

Dispositifs nanoelectroniques pour la detection d'adn et la reconnaissance de sequences polynucleotidiques

Info

Publication number
EP1831670A2
EP1831670A2 EP05855662A EP05855662A EP1831670A2 EP 1831670 A2 EP1831670 A2 EP 1831670A2 EP 05855662 A EP05855662 A EP 05855662A EP 05855662 A EP05855662 A EP 05855662A EP 1831670 A2 EP1831670 A2 EP 1831670A2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
nanotube
sensor
dna
substrate
nanotubes
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP05855662A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP1831670A4 (fr
Inventor
Jean-Christophe P. Gabriel
Shripal Gandhi
George Gruner
Charles Steven Joiner, Jr.
Ron Sosnowski
Alexander Star
Eugene Tu
Christian Valcke
Joseph Niemann
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nanomix Inc
Original Assignee
Niemann Joseph
Nanomix Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US11/212,026 external-priority patent/US20070178477A1/en
Priority claimed from US11/274,747 external-priority patent/US20070208243A1/en
Application filed by Niemann Joseph, Nanomix Inc filed Critical Niemann Joseph
Publication of EP1831670A2 publication Critical patent/EP1831670A2/fr
Publication of EP1831670A4 publication Critical patent/EP1831670A4/fr
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
    • G01N33/48—Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
    • G01N33/50—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
    • G01N33/53—Immunoassay; Biospecific binding assay; Materials therefor
    • G01N33/543—Immunoassay; Biospecific binding assay; Materials therefor with an insoluble carrier for immobilising immunochemicals
    • G01N33/54366—Apparatus specially adapted for solid-phase testing
    • G01N33/54373—Apparatus specially adapted for solid-phase testing involving physiochemical end-point determination, e.g. wave-guides, FETS, gratings
    • G01N33/5438—Electrodes
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B82—NANOTECHNOLOGY
    • B82Y—SPECIFIC USES OR APPLICATIONS OF NANOSTRUCTURES; MEASUREMENT OR ANALYSIS OF NANOSTRUCTURES; MANUFACTURE OR TREATMENT OF NANOSTRUCTURES
    • B82Y10/00—Nanotechnology for information processing, storage or transmission, e.g. quantum computing or single electron logic
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q1/00—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
    • C12Q1/68—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving nucleic acids
    • C12Q1/6813—Hybridisation assays
    • C12Q1/6816—Hybridisation assays characterised by the detection means
    • C12Q1/6825—Nucleic acid detection involving sensors
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N27/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of electric, electrochemical, or magnetic means
    • G01N27/26—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of electric, electrochemical, or magnetic means by investigating electrochemical variables; by using electrolysis or electrophoresis
    • G01N27/403—Cells and electrode assemblies
    • G01N27/414—Ion-sensitive or chemical field-effect transistors, i.e. ISFETS or CHEMFETS
    • G01N27/4145—Ion-sensitive or chemical field-effect transistors, i.e. ISFETS or CHEMFETS specially adapted for biomolecules, e.g. gate electrode with immobilised receptors
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N27/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of electric, electrochemical, or magnetic means
    • G01N27/26—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of electric, electrochemical, or magnetic means by investigating electrochemical variables; by using electrolysis or electrophoresis
    • G01N27/403—Cells and electrode assemblies
    • G01N27/414—Ion-sensitive or chemical field-effect transistors, i.e. ISFETS or CHEMFETS
    • G01N27/4146—Ion-sensitive or chemical field-effect transistors, i.e. ISFETS or CHEMFETS involving nanosized elements, e.g. nanotubes, nanowires
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01L—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL LABORATORY APPARATUS FOR GENERAL USE
    • B01L3/00—Containers or dishes for laboratory use, e.g. laboratory glassware; Droppers
    • B01L3/50—Containers for the purpose of retaining a material to be analysed, e.g. test tubes
    • B01L3/502—Containers for the purpose of retaining a material to be analysed, e.g. test tubes with fluid transport, e.g. in multi-compartment structures
    • B01L3/5027—Containers for the purpose of retaining a material to be analysed, e.g. test tubes with fluid transport, e.g. in multi-compartment structures by integrated microfluidic structures, i.e. dimensions of channels and chambers are such that surface tension forces are important, e.g. lab-on-a-chip
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B82—NANOTECHNOLOGY
    • B82Y—SPECIFIC USES OR APPLICATIONS OF NANOSTRUCTURES; MEASUREMENT OR ANALYSIS OF NANOSTRUCTURES; MANUFACTURE OR TREATMENT OF NANOSTRUCTURES
    • B82Y15/00—Nanotechnology for interacting, sensing or actuating, e.g. quantum dots as markers in protein assays or molecular motors
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01L—SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
    • H01L2924/00—Indexing scheme for arrangements or methods for connecting or disconnecting semiconductor or solid-state bodies as covered by H01L24/00
    • H01L2924/0001—Technical content checked by a classifier
    • H01L2924/0002—Not covered by any one of groups H01L24/00, H01L24/00 and H01L2224/00

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to sensors for detecting polynucleotide sequences, and more particularly to sensors using nanotubes as electronic transducers of DNA hybridization.
  • ssDNA single-strand DNA
  • cDNA complementary strand
  • dsDNA double-stranded DNA
  • the labeled ssDNA will be incorporated in labeled dsDNA, and the dsDNA will thus be detectable with optical instruments.
  • optical detection makes this approach convenient, the chemical reaction by which the DNA is labeled is expensive and time-consuming. A detection method which did not require labeling would significantly increase the usefulness of DNA scanning for routine medical tests.
  • a second problem results from the low sensitivity of traditional detection methods. Although some of these methods are sensitive to low concentrations of DNA, they require large absolute numbers of DNA molecules. In a medical application, only a few cells are usually available, and consequently only a few DNA molecules of the target sequence will be present in a sample. This problem has been ameliorated by the use of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), which can amplify the quantity of target DNA a million-fold. Like labeling, PCR is a complex chemical reaction, which makes tests expensive and slow. [0023] Thus, there is a clear need for a sensitive, fast, technique for detecting specific target DNA sequences. Such a technique should operate without the use of PCR or labeling. What is needed are devices and methods for label-free DNA detection, such as label-free electronic methods offering sensitivity, selectivity and low cost for the detection of DNA hybridization.
  • Nanostructures possess unique properties for sensor applications; in that they may be essentially one- dimensional so as to be extremely sensitive to electronic perturbations, are readily functionalized, and are compatible with many semiconducting manufacturing processes. Embodiments having aspects of the invention employ nanostructures which have properties heavily influence by the atoms are on the surface, thus providing a basis for sensitive electronic detection.
  • a " nanostructure" is any object which has at least one dimension smaller than 100 nm and comprises at least one sheet or other shape of crystalline material.
  • a nanostructure may comprise an elongate tube-like configuration including one or more rolled lattice sheets of atoms connected with graphite-like chemical bonds.
  • Examples include, but are not limited to, nanowires, nanospheres, single-walled nanotubes, double-walled nanotubes, multi-walled nanotubes, fullerenes and fullerene-like "onions”.
  • Chemical constituents of the crystalline material include, but are not limited to, carbon, boron, nitrogen, oxygen, boron nitride, molybdenum disulfide, and tungsten disulfide.
  • Exemplary embodiments preferably include one or more carbon nanotubes, and more preferably one or more single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs).
  • the devices include SWNTs which have a size and form in which virtually all the atoms on their surface.
  • Nanoelectronic Detector Devices A number of alternative embodiments of nanosensor detector or sensor devices having aspects of the invention may be employed for the electronic detection and/or identification of chemical and/or biomolecular analytes, such as polynucleotide species.
  • the alternative device embodiments generally include an element including at least one nanostructure ("nanostructure element”) whose electronic properties are highly sensitive to interaction with a target analyte.
  • One or more conducting elements may communicate with the nanostructure element to provide signal(s) for measurement of one or more device electronic properties which are influenced by the response of the nanostructure element to exposure to an analyte medium.
  • the nanostructure element and conductors are disposed adjacent to a supporting substrate, which typically includes at least a dielectric surface (or surface coating) to provide electrical isolation of device elements.
  • Substrates may be rigid or flexible, and may be generally planar or flat, or alternatively may have functional shapes, such as a tubular configuration.
  • Substrates have a chemical composition, of which examples include, but are not limited to, silicon oxide, silicon nitride, aluminum oxide, polyimide, and polycarbonate.
  • the substrate includes one or more layers, films or coatings comprising such materials as silicon oxide, SIO2, Si3N4, and the like, upon the surface of a silicon wafer or chip.
  • substrates include flexible and/or porous materials. Additional alternative substrates having aspects of the invention are described in the Examples included herein.
  • Nanotube network devices may comprise a collective structure which includes a plurality of nanostructures, such as SWNTs or other nanotubes arranged to form a collective structure.
  • a plurality nanotubes may be arranged generally parallel to one another.
  • Such nanostructure elements may be disposed generally parallel to a substrate or alternatively may be disposed generally perpendicularly to a substrate.
  • the nanostructured element may advantageously comprise a random interconnected network of nanotubes ("nanotube network”) disposed on or adjacent a substrate, and communicating with at least one electrical lead.
  • a "nanotube network”, as used herein, is a film of nanotubes disposed on a substrate in a defined area.
  • a film of nanotubes comprises at least one nanotube disposed on a substrate in such a way that the nanotube is substantially parallel to the substrate.
  • the film may comprise many nanotubes oriented parallel to each other. Alternatively, the film may comprise many nanotubes oriented randomly.
  • the film may comprise few nanotubes in a selected area of substrate, or the film may comprise many nanotubes in a selected area of substrate.
  • the number of nanotubes in an area of substrate is referred to as the density of a network.
  • the film comprises many nanotubes oriented randomly, with the density high enough that electric current may pass through the network from one side of the defined area to the other side, such as via nanotube-to-nanotube contact points.
  • Nanotube networks may be made by such methods as chemical vapor deposition (CVD) with traditional lithography, by solvent suspension deposition, vacuum deposition, and the like. See for example, US Patent Application No. 10/177,929 (corresponding to WO2004-040.671); US Patent Application No.
  • nanostructure elements may by measured using one or more contacts.
  • a contact includes a conducting element disposed such that the conducting element is in electrical communication with the nanostructure element, such as a nanotube network.
  • contacts may be disposed directly on a substrate surface, or alternatively may by disposed over a nanotube network.
  • Electric current flowing in the nanotube network may be measured by employing at least two contacts that are placed within the defined area of the nanotube network, such that each contact is in electrical communication with the network.
  • a source and a drain electrode may be spaced apart in communication with the nanotube network where the interconnections between nanotubes provides a conduction path between source and drain.
  • the source and drain may be configured as a pattern of interdigitated electrodes electrically communicating with the nanotube network, and arranged upon a substrate to be approximately coextensive with the nanotube network.
  • the electrodes may be deposited over the network, for example by employing photolithographic masking and metal vapor deposition, although alternative arrangements are possible, such as disposing the electrodes between the network and the substrate.
  • an additional conducting element referred to as a gate or counter electrode
  • a gate or counter electrode is provided such that it is not in electrical communication with the nanostructured element (such as at least one nanotube), but such that there is an electrical capacitance between the gate electrode and the nanostructured element .
  • Exemplary devices comprise field-effect transistors where the channel of the transistor comprises the nanotube(s), and the device may be referred to as a nanotube field effect transistors or NTFET.
  • the gate electrode is a conducting plane within the substrate beneath the silicon oxide. Examples of such nanotube electronic devices are provided, among other places, in patent application Serial Nos.
  • a gate or counter electrode may comprise a conductive layer disposed adjacent (e.g., under, above, beside), but electrically isolated from, the nanostructure element, such as a conductive polymeric material deposited on a flexible substrate. Resistance, impedance, transconductance or other properties of the nanotubes may be measured under the influence of a selected or variable gate voltage.
  • a transistor device arrangement lends itself to measurement of the channel transconductance as a function of gate voltage (e.g., G/Vg signal).
  • a transistor has a maximum conductance, which is the greatest conductance measured with the gate voltage in a range, and a minimum conductance, which is the least conductance measured with the gate voltage in a range.
  • a transistor has an on-off ratio, which is the ratio between the maximum conductance and the minimum conductance.
  • a nanotube transistor has an on-off ratio preferably greater than 1.2, more preferably greater than 2, and most preferably greater than 10.
  • FIG. 1 shows an exemplary conductance curve as a function of gate voltage between +10 V and -10 V for a nanotube electronic device.
  • Relatively high conductance in the "on" curve portion 101 occurs at gate voltages less than about -5 V; relatively low conductance in the "off' curve portion 102 occurs at gate voltages greater than about 0 V.
  • the on/off ratio is about 100.
  • the gate electrode is a conducting element in contact with a conducting liquid, said liquid being in contact with the nanotube network. Examples of this embodiment are provided, among other places, in Bradley et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 , 218301 (2003), which is incorporated herein, in its entirety, by reference.
  • the conducting elements provide for connecting to an electrical circuit for observing an electrical property of the nanotube sensor.
  • Any suitable electrical property may provide the basis for sensor sensitivity, for example, electrical resistance, electrical conductance, current, voltage, capacitance, transistor on current, transistor off current, or transistor threshold voltage.
  • sensitivity may be based on measurements including a combination, relationship, pattern and/or ratios of properties and/or the variation of one or more properties over time.
  • a transistor sensor may be controllably scanned through a selected range of gate voltages, the voltages compared to corresponding measured sensor current flow (generally referred to herein as an I- Vg curve or scan).
  • I-Vg scan may be through any selected gate voltage range and at one or more selected source-drain potentials.
  • the Vg range is typically selected from at least device "on” voltage through at least the device “off' voltage.
  • the scan can be either with increasing Vg, decreasing Vg, or both, and may be cycled +- at any selected frequency.
  • the electronic sensor device may include and/or be coupled with a suitable microprocessor or other computer device of known design, which may be suitably programmed to carry out the measurement methods and analyze the resultant signals.
  • a suitable microprocessor or other computer device of known design which may be suitably programmed to carry out the measurement methods and analyze the resultant signals.
  • Those skilled in the art will appreciate that other electrical and/or magnetic properties, and the like may also be measured as a basis for sensitivity. Accordingly, this list is not meant to be restrictive of the types of device properties that can be measured.
  • nanostructure element e.g., species or layers attached or absorbed upon one or more of the nanostructure element, the substrate, the conductor, and the like
  • Additional materials may be included in association with the nanostructure element (e.g., species or layers attached or absorbed upon one or more of the nanostructure element, the substrate, the conductor, and the like) to mediate the interaction of the device elements with the analyte medium, including target species, cross contaminants and the like.
  • Such materials may include one or more of recognition layers or molecular transducers (such as the ssDNA oligomer probes in the following examples), catalyst materials, passivation materials, inhibition materials, protective materials, filters, analyte attractors, concentrators, binding species, and the like. Such materials and elements can function to improve selectivity, specificity and/or device service characteristics.
  • the invention provides an electronic sensor device with which to detect specific target sequences of polynucleotides.
  • the sensor comprises nanostructured elements, (for example single and/or multiwalled carbon nanotubes and/or interconnecting networks comprising such nanotubes) which interact with polynucleotides so as to act as sensing elements.
  • the nanostructured elements comprise carbon nanotubes, and more particularly, randomly oriented networks of carbon nanotubes.
  • the nanotubes are modified before sensing by the adsorption of ssDNA probe sequences. No labeling of the DNA is required.
  • the invention provides a method for using the sensor device.
  • DNA means polynucleotides.
  • polynucleotides include, but are not limited to, deoxyribonucleic acid, ribonucleic acid, messenger ribonucleic acid, transfer ribonucleic acid, and peptide nucleic acid.
  • the defining characteristics of polynucleotides are a chain of nucleic acids and a sequence of bases, each base chemically bonded to a nucleic acid and each base capable of pairing with an appropriate base on a matching sequence. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that other variations of polynucleotides may be produced which share these defining characteristics.
  • a “single- strand DNA”, referred to hereafter as “ssDNA”, may be a single strand of deoxyribonucleic acid, ribonucleic acid, or any other polynucleotide as described above.
  • a “double-strand DNA”, referred to hereafter as “dsDNA”, may be a double strand of any polynucleotide described above.
  • “Complimentary DNA”, referred to hereafter as “cDNA” may be any strand of a polynucleotide described above which is a single-strand sequence complimentary to an already referenced single-strand sequence.
  • the invention provides a nanotube sensor device comprising a nanotube network, one or more contacts, and ssDNA contacting the nanotubes.
  • Multiple methods are available for preparing the ssDNA contacting the nanotubes.
  • ssDNA in solution is mixed with nanotubes in suspension, as described in by Zheng, M. et al. in Nature Materials 2003, 2, 338-342.
  • the resulting solution contains nanotubes around which are wrapped ssDNA strands.
  • the solution is cast onto a substrate, so that ssDNA-wrapped nanotubes are disposed on the substrate. After the disposal of the nanotubes, contacts are made using standard techniques of lithography and metal deposition.
  • a nanotube network is disposed on a substrate and contacts are made.
  • the resulting electronic device is exposed to a solution containing ssDNA.
  • the invention provides devices in which ssDNA contacts the nanotubes directly, without the use of an intervening linker molecule. Further, the ssDNA contacts the nanotubes but does not contact the substrate in areas which are not contacted by nanotubes.
  • the ssDNA in a particular sensor device may be selected to be cDNA for a particular target sequence.
  • the target sequence is the sequence of bases that the sensor device is intended to detect.
  • the cDNA for the target sequence is known as the probe sequence. Once a target sequence is specified, a quantity of DNA with the probe sequence must be obtained. A variety of techniques are known for synthesizing DNA with specified sequences and for synthesizing DNA complementary to a given sequence. Those skilled in the art will have knowledge of these techniques. Further, appropriate cDNA or other polynucleotide to make a probe specific to a desired target sequence can generally be obtained from known commercial suppliers serving the biotechnology industry. [0053] A sensor device may be used by exposing the nanotube network to a solution containing sample ssDNA. The network should be exposed to the solution for a period of time long enough for hybridization to occur.
  • This period of time depends on the concentration of the sample DNA, the quantity of the solution, the temperature of the room, the pH of the solution, and other variables. Those skilled in the art are familiar with the effect of these variables on DNA hybridization and are capable of choosing an appropriate period of time, solution composition, temperature and other conditions of hybridization without undue experimentation. [0054] Multiple methods of using the sensor devices are disclosed.
  • the sensor device is first measured by varying a gate voltage applied by a conducting plane beneath the insulator of the substrate. Then the network is exposed to a solution containing sample ssDNA for the period of time disclosed above. Next, the solution is removed, and a period of time is allowed to lapse sufficient for the substrate to become substantially dry. This period of time may be made briefer by taking actions which speed the drying process. For example, dry air may be blown over the substrate. After the substrate is dry, the sensor device is measured again by varying the gate voltage. The resulting measurement is compared to the first measurement to see if dsDNA is present.
  • the network is exposed to pure water to obtain a baseline.
  • the sensor device is first measured by varying a gate voltage applied by a conducting plane beneath the insulator of the substrate. Then the network is exposed to a solution of sample DNA in pure water. If the sample DNA contains target DNA, hybridization may occur over time, and the resulting measurement of the sensor device changes in comparison to the first measurement.
  • the network is exposed to pure water to obtain a baseline.
  • the sensor device is first measured by varying a gate voltage applied by a conducting plane beneath the insulator of the substrate. Then the network is exposed to a solution of sample DNA in a buffer compounded (in terms of temperature, pH, dissolved species, and the like) to promote hybridization.
  • the network may be washed to remove unhybridized DNA and other material. Following washing, the network is again exposed to pure water, and the measurement is repeated. If the sample DNA contains target DNA, hybridization of this DNA will result measurable changes in sensor device characteristics in comparison to the first measurement.
  • the baseline measurement is performed in the same buffer as is used for hybridization. Then the network is exposed to a solution of sample DNA in the hybridization buffer. Following a period of time for hybridization, the measurement is repeated. If the sample DNA contains target DNA, hybridization of this DNA will result measurable changes in sensor device characteristics in comparison to the first measurement.
  • the network is exposed to a conducting liquid.
  • the conducting liquid is a buffer appropriate for physiological fluids; most preferably, the conducting liquid is phosphate buffer solution (PBS).
  • PBS phosphate buffer solution
  • the sensor device is first measured by varying a gate voltage applied by a conducting element in contact with the conducting liquid. Then the network is exposed to a solution of sample DNA in a similar conducting liquid. While the network is exposed, the sensor device is measured by varying the gate voltage. If the sample DNA contains target DNA, hybridization occurs over time, and the resulting measurement of the sensor device changes in comparison to the first measurement.
  • the binding energy of the dsDNA can be challenged through stringency techniques. This can be done through temperature increases or buffer changes, for example sodium hydroxide.
  • Additional stringency controls may include various ionic constituents of the hybridization medium, such as sodium or magnesium ions.
  • a voltage may be applied to elements of the sensor (e.g, a nanotube network) before, during and/or after hybridization to influence polynucleotide behavior.
  • a polynucleotide such as cDNA has a phosphate-based backbone which typically is ionized in the hybridization medium so as to carry a localized negative charge.
  • Selectively charged sensor elements may be used to provide an attractive or repulsive stringency factor, for example, to destabilize a SNP-mismatched probe hybrid relative to a corresponding fully-matched probe hybrid (e.g., during incubation or during a rinse process).
  • stringency Through variations in stringency, it is possible to differentiate binding of strands with complete or incomplete complementary base pairs. Changes in electrical properties of the nanotubes in response to the stringency process allow discrimination of single base mismatches (SNP), among other things.
  • the hybridization conditions may be adjusted (e.g. by variation in temperature) so as to produce a distinctly different device measurement response between the homozygous and heterozygous samples.
  • these sensors may be constructed in arrays, e.g., arrays of transistor sensors functionalized for a plurality of different target DNA fragments. See Application No. 10/388,701 entitled “Modification Of Selectivity For Sensing For Nanostructure Device Arrays” (published as US 2003-0175,161), incorporated by reference above.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram showing an exemplary conductance curve for a nanotube transistor device.
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram showing an exemplary design for a nanotube sensor using a random network of nanotubes.
  • FIG. 3 is a schematic cross-sectional diagram showing the exemplary nanotube sensor of FIG. 2.
  • FIG. 4 is a flow chart showing exemplary steps of a method for making a nanoelectronic sensor according to the invention, and as described in Example A.
  • FIG. 5 is a flow chart showing exemplary steps of a method for sensing an polynucleotide according to the invention.
  • FIG. 6 is a chart showing conductance as a function of gate voltage for a nanotube electronic device in three circumstances, as described further in the detailed description of the preferred embodiment.
  • FIG. 7A shows the device characteristics of the sensor of Example B after functionalization with the pyrene-DNA conjugate and treatment with cDNA.
  • FIG. 7B shows the device characteristics of the sensor of Example B after functionalization with the pyrene-DNA conjugate, treatment with SNP-DNA, and subsequent treatment with cDNA.
  • FIG. 8A shows an exemplary DNA assay embodiment according to certain aspects of the invention, employing a detector probe linked to the sensor.
  • FIGS. 8B-F shows an alternative DNA assay embodiment according to certain aspects of the invention, employing electroactive incalators.
  • FIGS. 8A-D shows an alternative DNA assay embodiment according to certain aspects of the invention, employing amplifier groups.
  • FIGS. 9A-B shows an alternative DNA assay embodiment according to certain aspects of the invention, employing antibody-antigen binding to link the detector probe to the sensor.
  • FIGS. 10A-D shows two alternative sensor architectures according to certain aspects of the invention, in which the detector probe is linked to nanostructures such as nanotubes.
  • FIGS. 11A-C shows two alternative sensor architectures according to certain aspects, of the invention, in which the detector probe is linked to the sensor substrate.
  • FIGS. 12A-B shows two alternative sensor architectures according to certain aspects of the invention, in which the detector probe is linked to the sensor electrodes.
  • FIGS. 13-14 illustrates schematically an exemplary nanotube and detection portion of an electroanalytical device having aspects of the invention, where in a target is measured by direct electrical interaction.
  • FIGS. 15A-B illustrates schematically an exemplary nanotube and detection portion of an electroanalytical device having aspects of the invention, where in a target is measured by differential blocking of the nanotube with respect to strong effector molecules.
  • FIGS. 16A-B illustrates schematically an exemplary nanotube and detection portion of an electroanalytical device having aspects of the invention, where in a target is measured by characteristic dissociation point with respect to a stringency parameter.
  • TABLE 2 describes the two capture probes and the target DNA that are employed in Example E.
  • FIGS. 17A-D illustrates a DNA assay device, wherein
  • FIG. 17A is a cross-sectional diagram which illustrates an exemplary electronic sensing device for detecting an analyte, conFIG.d in this example as a
  • FIG. 17B are three views of a photomicrograph (SEM) of a sensor generally similar to that of FIG. 1A: View (a) showing the layout of interdigitated source and drain contacts; View (b) showing an enlarged detail of a nanotube network N and the contacts; and View (c) showing an enlarged detail of the margin of a nanotube network; [0095] FIG. 17C is a photograph of a sensor generally similar to that of
  • FIGS. 1A, 1 B fabricated on a die, and mounted as a chip in a conventional
  • FIG. 17D is a photograph of a sensor generally similar to that of
  • FIGS. 1A and 1 B packaged in the manner shown in FIG. 1C, and installed on an exemplary circuit board of an electronic sensor system.
  • FIGS. 18A-D illustrate the process of Autoprobe testing of wafers, wherein:
  • FIGS. 18A and 18B are examples of wafer maps of device maximum conductance and of device modulation respectively for an exemplary NTFET wafer.
  • FIGS. 18C and 18D are examples device population plots of the conductance and of the modulation data shown in FIGS. 18A and 18B respectively.
  • FIGS. 19A-D illustrate fluorescent confirmation of probe attachment, wherein:
  • FIG. 19A shows the device after incubation with the unlabeled ssDNA capture probe, but before treatment with target DNA
  • FIG. 19B shows the fluorescent image of a NTNFET device following incubation with Cy5-labeled target DNA
  • FIG. 19C shows a comparable fluorescent image of a NTNFET device following incubation with Cy5-labeled target DNA; and [00104]
  • FIG. 19D is a bar graph showing a quantitative comparison of target
  • FIGS. 20A-20B illustrate NTNFET device electronic responses to
  • FIG. 2OA illustrates the effect of the complementary probe hybridization
  • FIG. 2OA illustrates the effect of the non-complementary probe hybridization.
  • FIGS. 21 A though 21 E illustrate an allele-specific assay to detect single-nucleotide polymorphisms, wherein: [00109] FIG. 21A is a plot which shows the allele specific wild-type capture probe hybridized with wild-type synthetic HFE target; [00110] FIG. 21 B is a plot which shows the mutant capture probe exposed the same hybridization conditions with wild-type synthetic HFE target; [00111] FIG. 21 C is a plot which summarizes both electronic (1-G/G0) and fluorescent optical responses from the fluorescent target labels for hemochromatosis detection;
  • Example F is a graph of electronic response in NTNFET devices to HFE single-nucleotide polymorphisms, as a function of electrode pitch; and [00113]
  • FIG. 21 E is a graph illustrating the enhancement detection of single- nucleotide polymorphisms in the presence of obscuring nonhomologous DNA by means of "blocking" with triton X-100.
  • FIGS. 22A-22D illustrate NTNFET response to hybridization of unlabeled oligonucleotides at different concentrations of ionic species and target DNA, wherein: [00116] FIG. 22A is a plot of modulated conductance response for the exemplary NTNFET device in a sodium phosphate buffer for nM target DNA concentrations;
  • FIG. 22B is a plot of modulated conductance response for the exemplary NTNFET device under the influence of Mg+2 ions nanoM target DNA concentrations;
  • FIG. 22C is a plot of modulated conductance response for the exemplary NTNFET device with Mg+2 ions at picoMolar ranges of the DNA target species; and [00119]
  • FIG. 22D is a plot of the data of FIGS. 22A-22C showing of the normalized conductance (G/G0) of the three NTNFET devices as function of target DNA concentrations.
  • Example G is a plot of modulated conductance response for the exemplary NTNFET device with Mg+2 ions at picoMolar ranges of the DNA target species.
  • FIG. 22D is a plot of the data of FIGS. 22A-22C showing of the normalized conductance (G/G0) of the three NTNFET devices as function of target DNA concentrations.
  • FIGS. 23A through 23H illustrate the operation of a multiplex assay panel embodiment having aspects of the invention, wherein: [00122] FIG. 23A is a diagram showing the array as incubated with a mixture of different probes kinds which bind to the sensors of the array; [00123] FIG. 23B shows the array with excess and non-binding probes rinsed away;
  • FIG. 23C is a diagram showing the sensors as interrogated by measurement circuitry; [00125] FIG. 23D shows sensor signals correlated with probe binding configuration.;
  • FIG. 23E is a diagram showing the array incubated with sample target species
  • FIG. 23F shows the array with excess sample rinsed away; [00128] FIG. 23G shows the sensors interrogated following sample exposure; and
  • FIG. 23H shows sensor signals correlated with probe-target binding status.
  • FIGS. 24A through 24D illustrate an example of employing multiple signals from a single sensor to characterized the probe-sensor configuration, wherein:
  • FIGS. 24A-B show the array embodiment exposed to incubation procedures generally as described above with respect to FIGS. 23A-B ;
  • FIGS. 24C-D show measurements of both source-drain conductance (left hand axis of each sub-plot) and channel-gate capacitance (right hand axis of each sub-plot).
  • FIGS. 25A through 25E illustrate the use on enhancement groups to facilitate probe characterization.
  • FIG. 26 shows an exemplary field effect transistor sensor in which a biofunctional layer is deposited above a nanotube network.
  • FIG. 27 shows an exemplary "network-on-top" field effect transistor sensor having aspects of the invention in which a nanotube network is disposed above a biofunctional layer.
  • FIG. 28 shows an alternative exemplary field effect transistor sensor having aspects of the invention having a subsequently deposited pattern of source and drain conductors.
  • FIG. 29 shows an addition alternative exemplary sensor having aspects of the invention.
  • FIGS. 3OA and 3OB are top and side views of exemplary sensor having aspects of the invention, showing a plurality of recognition molecules.
  • FIG. 31 is an alternative embodiment having aspects of the invention, generally similar to that of FIG. 8A in which the probe group is attached to a biofunctional layer.
  • FIG. 32A is a diagram contrasting alternative configurations of a nanosensors having aspects of the invention, one providing for a transport-limited parallel or tangential flow of analyte medium with a sensor having a porous substrate and providing for a reaction-limited perpendicular or through-flow of analyte medium.
  • FIGS. 32B-32C are photomicrographs of two alternative micro- porous alumina membranes, such as may be employed in through-flow sensor embodiments having aspects of the invention.
  • FIGS. 33A-33D illustrate alternative exemplary embodiments of nanosensors having aspects of the invention and providing for flow of analyte medium through a porous substrate, and show an exemplary module for fluidic sample analysis.
  • FIGS. 34A-34B illustrate alternative exemplary embodiments of nanosensors having aspects of the invention and providing for electric field stringency to control binding of non-specific polynucleotides.
  • FIG. 35 illustrates alternative exemplary embodiments of nanosensors having aspects of the invention having capillary delivery of samples.
  • FIGS. 36A-36C illustrate alternative exemplary embodiments of nanosensors having aspects of the invention a having a network of nanotubes superficially applied to a porous membrane.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT [00148]
  • the present invention provides a nanotube sensor device that detects a target DNA sequence. The device requires no labeling of the target DNA and responds electronically to the presence of the target DNA.
  • like element numerals are used to indicate like elements appearing in one or more of the figures.
  • a nanotube DNA sensor 100 may comprise a suitable substrate 140, for example, a degenerately doped silicon wafer.
  • Other substrates may include, for example, other semiconductors, or insulating substrates such as ceramics or polymers.
  • Substrate 140 may be passivated with a silicon oxide film 180, as known in the art.
  • a gate electrode 170 may be formed in a lower layer of the substrate, and connected to a contact 176 via any suitable conductor 175.
  • the substrate may comprise a conducting base material, such as doped silicon, covered by an insulating layer, such as SiO2, in which the conducting base material is connected to circuitry to serve as a gate or counter electrode.
  • a network of randomly oriented nanotubes 120 is disposed over a silicon substrate 140, and the device includes a pair of contacts 101 , 110 having interdigitated portions disposed over network 120, the network providing a conducting channel between the contact pair.
  • the substrate 140 outside of the generally rectangular area 130 should be substantially free of the nanotube network 120.
  • Alternative embodiments may comprise a single or a plurality of nanotubes disposed adjacent a substrate, in which the nanotubes are in electrical contact with one or more contacts. In some embodiments, most or all of the nanotubes may span to electrically conduct between a pair of adjacent contacts.
  • Inter-nanotube contacts may serve to provide a conductive path, permitting current or charge transmission through the network.
  • the contacts 101 , 110 are deposited over network 120.
  • contacts may be deposited upon substrate 140, and network 120 formed upon the contacts.
  • contacts 101 , 110 may be provided, and may optionally have a covering passivation layer 180, as known in the art.
  • contacts 101 , 110 may comprise one or more metal layers, such as titanium and gold.
  • Contacts 101 , 1 10 may comprise a plurality of interdigitated portions disposed over a generally rectangular region 130.
  • the interdigitated configuration advantageously increases the surface area of the contacts that can be exposed to a nanotube film between the contacts.
  • Other configurations of contacts may also be suitable, for example, parallel labyrinths of any desired shape, or any other configuration providing a sensor region between opposing contacts.
  • the rectangular shape of region 130 is merely exemplary, and this region may comprise any desired shape.
  • Contacts 101 , 110 may be configured as source and drain electrodes for a field-effect transistor device, or merely serve as connections to a resistive or capacitive sensor.
  • a single contact (e.g., 101) may be employed to induce an electrical field or capacitance of the network 120 relative to gate electrode 170 or other counter electrode, so as to provide a sensor signal.
  • a barrier material 160 For example, an epoxy resin, or any other suitable polymer or resin material, may be deposited to form a barrier 160, and removed, such as by etching, from a region between the opposing contacts 101 , 110.
  • a plurality of single-strand DNA molecules 150 may be disposed over the nanotube film using any suitable method, for example as described herein below.
  • the DNA molecules may be attached directly to nanotubes in the nanotube film 120, or may rest on the substrate 140 near nanotubes in the film.
  • DNA molecules may be disposed over a material interposed between the nanotube film and the DNA.
  • the DNA should, however, be disposed sufficiently close to the nanotube film so that a reaction between the ssDNA and complementary ssDNA strands influences a measured electrical property of sensor 100.
  • the ssDNA contacts the nanotubes directly, without the use of an intervening linker molecule . Further, the ssDNA contacts the nanotubes but does not contact the substrate in areas which are not contacted by nanotubes.
  • the ssDNA molecule 150 may be removed from substrate 140 except from over the nanotube film 120.
  • the ssDNA in a particular sensor device is selected to be cDNA for a particular target sequence.
  • the target sequence is the sequence of bases that the sensor device is intended to detect.
  • the cDNA for the target sequence is known as the probe sequence. Once a target sequence is specified, a quantity of DNA with the probe sequence must be obtained.
  • a variety of techniques are known for synthesizing DNA with specified sequences and for synthesizing DNA complementary to a given sequence. Those skilled in the art will have knowledge of these techniques. Further, cDNA may often be obtained from commercial sources.
  • a plurality of nanotube sensors like sensor 100 may be formed in parallel on a single substrate, and later separated. Separated devices may be mounted in chip carriers as known in the art, and integrated with conventional electronics to provide useful sensing instrumentation that should be capable of sensing a targeted polynucleotide. Multiple sensors sensitive to different sequences may be combined in an electronic device to detect a variety of different polynucleotide sequences at once.
  • One of ordinary skill may construct suitable electronics for a sensing instrument, using the disclosure herein.
  • FIG. 4 shows exemplary steps in a method 400 for making a nanoelectronic sensor for particular DNA sequences. Steps 410 through 490 may be performed in any operative order.
  • a gate electrode may be formed on a substrate, for example a passivated silicon or other semiconducting substrate, or on a semiconducting substrate such as a ceramic or polymer material.
  • the electrode may comprise a metal or other conducting material, and may be formed using photolithography and lift-off as known in the art, or any other suitable method.
  • the gate electrode comprises bulk silicon substrate wafer material, connected to suitable circuitry.
  • the substrate (and embedded gate electrode, if included) may be coated with a passivation or insulating layer, such as a silicon oxide layer, as known in the art.
  • a passivation or insulating layer such as a silicon oxide layer
  • one or more nanotubes is placed in the substrate in electrical communication with each of the opposing contacts.
  • the substrate 140 may be coated with carbon nanotubes in a random network, as described in the earlier-referenced United States patent application Serial No. 10/177,929.
  • other methods as known in the art for forming nanotubes between contacts may be used.
  • the resulting nanotubes may be oriented in a specified fashion, or randomly oriented. If randomly oriented, the nanotubes should provide a network of connected nanotubes that connects the opposing contacts via at least one pathway. Nanotubes should be removed from the substrate in areas other than between the opposing documents, using any suitable method, such as plasma etching.
  • a pair of opposing contacts such as source and drain electrodes, may be formed on the substrate.
  • the contacts may be above the nanotubes, or may be between the nanotubes and the substrate.
  • titanium contacts may be formed and covered with a gold layer using photolithography and lift-off to form opposing contacts.
  • the contacts may comprise a plurality of interdigitated portions disposed over an intermediate region of any desired shape.
  • an optional layer of barrier material may be deposited over the contacts.
  • Various polymers and resins are known in the art, and may comprise a suitable barrier.
  • an epoxy coating may be used.
  • the barrier may be applied only in certain areas of the substrate, or applied over the entire substrate and removed from operative areas of the sensor such as between the contacts.
  • the barrier may provide for electrical insulation, preventing short-circuiting of the sensor when in contact with an conductive fluid, or otherwise protecting the sensor from exposure to the environment.
  • the barrier may also be helpful in controlling the deposition of other materials, including but not limited to nanotubes and DNA molecules. Any number of barrier layers may be used.
  • a solution of oligonucleotide may be prepared.
  • the desired ssDNA (“probe sequence") may be obtained from a commercial source or synthesized as known in the art.
  • a water or organic solution of the probe sequence may be prepared at a suitable concentration.
  • a solution of 10 "4 M concentration may be prepared by dissolving 100,000 p mole of the oligonucleotide in 1000 ⁇ l_ of pure (18 M ⁇ ).
  • Other solvents compatible with ssDNA may be used.
  • the electrical properties of the sensor device Prior to depositing the ssDNA, the electrical properties of the sensor device may optionally be noted as a baseline.
  • the oligonucleotide solution may be applied over the active region 130 of the sensor device.
  • a drop of DNA solution may be placed on the chip over region 130.
  • the solution may be dried to evaporate the carrier and leave the ssDNA behind intact.
  • the chip may be removed from the chamber, rinsed with 18 M ⁇ water and blown dry with dry nitrogen.
  • excess ssDNA may be removed. This may occur by rinsing and blowing, as just described. More aggressive methods, e.g., etching, may be used if excess DNA is bonded to other areas of the substrate.
  • FIG. 5 shows exemplary steps of a method 500 for using a sensor device according to the invention.
  • a sensor is used by exposing the nanotube network to a solution containing sample ssDNA, and observing changes in the electrical properties of the sensor.
  • the sample is prepared as known in the art.
  • DNA may be extracted from a patient's cells by dissolution. Double-stranded DNA should be reduced to ssDNA using a method as known in the art. If a sufficiently large sample of DNA is available, if may be possible to avoid use of a PCR method to increase DNA concentration.
  • the sensor of the present invention may operate using an extremely small sample volume (e.g., less than 100 ⁇ l_), use of PCR may in some instances be avoided.
  • the sensor is exposed to the sample solution.
  • the sensor should be left in the solution for a period of time long enough for hybridization to occur between at least one ssDNA molecule on the nanotube network and a complementary ssDNA molecule in solution. This period of time depends on the concentration of the sample DNA, the quantity of the solution, the temperature of the room, the pH of the solution, and other variables. Those skilled in the art are familiar with the effect of these variables on DNA hybridization and are capable of choosing an appropriate period of time.
  • an electrical response of the sensor is observed.
  • the sensor device is first measured by varying a gate voltage applied by a conducting plane beneath the insulator of the substrate. Then the network is exposed to a solution containing sample ssDNA for the period of time disclosed above. Next, the solution is removed, and a period of time is allowed to lapse sufficient for the substrate to become substantially dry. This period of time may be made briefer by taking actions which speed the drying process. For example, dry air may be blown over the substrate. After the substrate is dry, the sensor device is measured again by varying the gate voltage. The resulting measurement is compared to the first measurement to see if dsDNA is present. [00177] In another embodiment, the network is exposed to pure water.
  • the sensor device is first measured by varying a gate voltage applied by a conducting plane beneath the insulator of the substrate. Then the network is exposed to a solution of sample DNA in pure water. While the network is exposed, the sensor device is measured by varying the gate voltage. If the sample DNA contains target DNA, hybridization occurs over time, and the resulting measurement of the sensor device changes in comparison to the first measurement.
  • the network is exposed to a conducting liquid.
  • the conducting liquid is a buffer appropriate for physiological fluids; most preferably, the conducting liquid is phosphate buffer solution (PBS).
  • PBS phosphate buffer solution
  • the sensor device is first measured by varying a gate voltage applied by a conducting element in contact with the conducting liquid. Then the network is exposed to a solution of sample DNA in a similar conducting liquid. While the network is exposed, the sensor device is measured by varying the gate voltage. If the sample DNA contains target DNA, hybridization occurs over time, and the resulting measurement of the sensor device changes in comparison to the first measurement.
  • the observed electrical response should be correlated to the target species to determine a positive or negative result.
  • the target sequence is ether present, or it is not.
  • Reaction between the sensor and the targeted gene sequence should produce results that are consistent and repeatable for sensors of a given type.
  • a positive or negative result, and a confidence level may be based on a comparison between a particular sensor response and statistical control data for sensors of the same type. Confidence in a result may be increased by performing multiple measurements using multiple sensors in parallel.
  • a degenerately doped silicon wafer with a silicon oxide film was coated with carbon nanotubes in a random network, as described in the earlier- referenced United States patent application Serial No. 10/177,929 and generally in accordance with the description hereinabove.
  • Titanium contacts 30 nm thick covered with gold contacts 120 nm thick were deposited and patterned by photolithography and lift-off to form opposing contacts.
  • the contacts each comprised a plurality of interdigitated portions disposed over a generally rectangular region.
  • a network of randomly oriented nanotubes was disposed over the silicon substrate. Nanotubes in the network were in electrical contact with interdigitated portions of the contacts.
  • nanotubes outside of the generally rectangular area were removed by oxygen plasma etching, leaving nanotube network remaining.
  • the use of interdigitated sets of metal electrodes with nanotube network interposed generally between the interdigitated contacts results in many nanotubes connected in parallel across the electrodes.
  • a die was separated from the wafer and mounted in a standard 40- pin chip carrier, with wires connecting the interdigitated wires on the chip to the contacts on the chip carrier.
  • the contact pads and wires on the packages were coated with epoxy resin, which was allowed to cure. Chips in packages thus prepared were rinsed with acetone, isopropanol, deionized water, and then 18 M ⁇ water.
  • a solution of oligonucleotide 5'-CCT AAT AAC AAT-3' at concentration 10-4 M was prepared by dissolving 84500 pmole of the oligonucleotide in 845 ⁇ l_ of pure water (18 M ⁇ water from a NANOpure Infinity UV water system).
  • a chip prepared as described above was measured by varying a gate voltage applied by a conducting plane underneath the insulator. The resulting curve is shown in FIG. 6 as item 600. Then a drop containing 20 ⁇ l_ of DNA solution was placed on the chip. The chip and solution were placed in a humidified chamber at room temperature for 12 hours. Then the chip was removed from the chamber and rinsed with 18 M ⁇ water and blown dry with dry nitrogen.
  • the chip was measured by varying the gate voltage.
  • the resulting curve is shown in FIG. 6 as item 610.
  • This curve represents a sensor device prepared for use as a sensor.
  • the nanotube network is contacted by ssDNA with a probe sequence.
  • the effect of the ssDNA coating on the electronic measurement is that the curve 610 is shifted to the left of curve 600.
  • one chip was prepared with a labeled ssDNA. Labeled ssDNA is not necessary for the preferred embodiment and is only described here for illustrative purposes.
  • a solution of oligonucleotide 5'-HS-(CH2)6-CCT AAT AAC AAT- fluorescein -3' at concentration 10-5 M in 18 M ⁇ water was prepared as a receptor DNA sequence.
  • a chip was exposed to this solution overnight, rinsed, and dried with nitrogen gas. An optical fluorescence micrograph of this chip was observed, and a green fluorescein label appeared as a bright area only in a defined area where the nanotube network was present, and not in other areas of the substrate. This demonstrated that the receptor DNA strand was attached to the nanotubes of the sensor.
  • FIG. 6 shows the resulting curve FIG. as item 620.
  • This curve represents the result of hybridization of the probe DNA with the target DNA.
  • the effect of the target DNA hybridization on the electronic measurement is that the curve 620 is shifted to the right of curve 600.
  • a nanotube sensor device comprises a carbon nanotube network field effect transistor ("NTFET” or “NTNFET”) device functionalized with single- stranded DNA (ssDNA).
  • NTFET carbon nanotube network field effect transistor
  • ssDNA single-stranded DNA
  • cDNA complementary single-stranded DNA
  • sbmDNA single base mismatch single-stranded DNA
  • One or more carbon nanotube FET device comprising a single nanotube and/or a networks of nanotubes disposed to form a conducting channel between at least a source and a drain electrode.
  • the FET geometry may include a bottom gate electrode and/or a liquid gate electrode.
  • NTNFET devices were prepared according to procedures further described, among other places, in US patent application Nos. 10/177,929, 10/656,898, and 10/704,066, each incorporated by reference above.
  • Electric current is an electrical property that may be measured using contacts.
  • a contact comprises a conducting element that may be disposed on the substrate, such that the conducting element is in electrical communication with the nanotube network. At least two contacts may be placed within the defined area of the nanotube network, such that each contact is in electrical communication with the network.
  • an additional conducting element referred to as a gate electrode
  • a gate electrode is provided such that it is not in electrical communication with the at least one nanotube, but such that there is an electrical capacitance between the gate electrode and the at least one nanotube.
  • the gate electrode is a conducting plane within the substrate beneath the silicon oxide. Examples of such nanotube electronic devices are provided, among other places, in the above incorporated patent applications Nos. 10/656,898 and 10/704,066.
  • the sensor NT devices may be made using standard photolithography techniques on, for example, 100 mm wafers.
  • NTFET devices were fabricated using SWNTs grown by chemical vapor deposition (CVD) at 900 0 C using dispersed iron nanoparticles as growth promoter and a methane/hydrogen gas mixture. Electrical leads were patterned on top of the nanotubes from titanium films 30 nm thick capped with a gold layer 120 nm thick. After conducting initial electrical measurements to establish the device characteristic, the substrates were wire bonded and packaged in a 40-pin CERDIP package before conducting the DNA experiments. The contact pads and wires on the packages were coated with epoxy resin, which was allowed to cure.
  • the DNA experiments were performed by putting a single drop of the DNA solution on the package, which is located in a sealed jar, containing a beaker with ⁇ 100 ml. of water to prevent the evaporation of the drop.
  • PMS Parallel Measurement System
  • This system is capable of measuring device characteristics of up to 12 nanotube-based sensors simultaneously.
  • a set of 32 independent analog switches are digitally controlled via PC and allow the user to select the junctions to be measured.
  • Applied source-drain bias and gate voltage are both user defined (amplitude, frequency, function). The system can measure device conductance as both a function of time and gate-voltage.
  • B-2.1 Preparation of Chips. Before each chip was used, it was packaged and the wires and contacts were coated with epoxy, which was allowed to cure. The chip was rinsed from a squirt bottle with acetone, isopropanol, deionized water, and finally was washed using the formalized washing procedure (Section B-2.2), after which initial I-Vg curves were taken. [00202] B-2.2 Washing Procedure. A packaged chip was briefly rinsed with a squirt of 18 MW water to remove any analyte on the surface.
  • B-3.1. Formation of Pyrene Monolayer A packaged chip (in this case, W517 26:21) was cleaned and initial I-Vg measurements were taken. A 2.5 mg/mL solution of pyrene butanoic acid succinimidyl ester in N 1 N- dimethylformamide (DMF) was prepared by dissolving 3.08 mg of the pyrene substance in 1.232 ml_ of DMF. 50 mL of this solution was placed on the surface of the chip, which was then sealed inside of a chamber for 2 hours at room temperature with an open container of DMF to prevent the drop from evaporating. The chip was then removed, was rinsed with DMF, acetone, and isopropanol, and was then cleaned (Section 2.2), and I-Vg curves were taken.
  • DMF N 1 N- dimethylformamide
  • a 10-6 M solution of the DNA oligonucleotide was prepared by diluting 10 mL of a 10-4 solution of the oligonucleotide with 990 mL of a 0.01 M Phosphate buffered saline solution (pH 7.4 @25°C). 20 mL of this DNA solution was placed on the surface of a chip, which had been functionalized with a DNA-pyrene layer according to Section B-3. The chip was then sealed inside of a chamber overnight at room temperature with an open container of water to provide humidity and prevent the drop from evaporating. The chip was then removed, was washed, and I-Vg curves were taken.
  • B-4.2 cDNA A chip (W517 26:21 ) was functionalized according to Section B-3, and was then treated with cDNA according to Section B-4.1.
  • FIG. 7A shows the I-Vg curve, which reveals that the curve is shifted to the right, suggesting that the device can detect the hybridization of the covalently bound DNA with the cDNA. A shift to the right is consistent with shifts seen in previous experiments when double stranded DNA is present.
  • B-4.3. SNP-DNA A chip (W517 26:24) was functionalized according to Section B-3, and was then treated with SNP-DNA according to Section B-4.1.
  • FIG. 7B shows the I-Vg curve and reveals a shift to the right, which is similar to the shift seen with cDNA in Section B-4.2. This indicates that the device can detect the cDNA after being exposed to the SNP-DNA. If the SNP-DNA was not washed away in Section B-4.3, then the cDNA can displace the SNP-DNA, producing a result that is consistent with the data seen for hybridization in Section B-4.2 and elsewhere.
  • the nanoscale electronic devices may be used for real time monitoring and detection of nucleic acids (RNA and DNA) in small quantities.
  • RNA and DNA nucleic acids
  • the NTNFET devices can detect a small amount of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA).
  • ssDNA single-stranded DNA
  • SNP single nucleotide polymorphism
  • SNPs are the key target for commercial genetic tests and can be potentially identified by NTNFET devices.
  • EXAMPLE C [00217] DNA assays using nanoelectronic devices.
  • FIGS. 8-12 A number of different exemplary DNA (or other polynucleotide) assay embodiments having aspects of the invention are shown in FIGS. 8-12.
  • the senor 10 comprises a platform having at least one nanostructure, such as nanotube 12 disposed adjacent substrate 14 and in electrical communication between at least a source electrode 16 and a drain electrode 18.
  • the device may include at least one additional electrode, such as gate electrode 20 disposed adjacent nanotube 12.
  • the gate electrode 20 is shown embedded in substrate 14, but alternative electrodes types and locations may be included (e.g., a bottom gate electrode , top gate and/or liquid gate electrode), as described above with respect to other NTFET sensor embodiments.
  • FIGS. 10A and B show schematically two alternative configurations.
  • FIG. 10A shows a plurality of conductor "islands" interconnected by nanotubes
  • FIG. 10 B shows a nanotube network embodiment, in which plurality of nanotubes form an interconnecting network or film of nanotubes providing a conducting channel between source and drain electrodes.
  • the conducting channel may comprise one or more channels or paths via a plurality of nanotubes connected to one another in series.
  • the density and/or composition of such a network of nanotubes is selected (by controlled formation and/or by post-formation modification) to provide a desired degree of conductivity and sensor sensitivity.
  • a plurality of source and/or a plurality of drain electrodes may be included, for example an interdigitating series of such electrodes.
  • the nanotube 12 may be disposed to lie under, beside or above the electodes, or combinations thereof.
  • Nanotube films may be made directly on the substrate, e.g. by nanodispersed-catalyst-mediated CVD, solution deposition and the like. Alternatively, a nanotube film may be made separately and deposited upon the substrate 14 as a separate step, either directly or including a film carrier layer. See Patent Application Nos.
  • substrate 14 may be a rigid structure, e.g. a semiconductor wafer, monocrystalline silicon, polycrystalline silicon, or the like, or alternatively may be flexible, e.g. a polymer sheet, web, or the like. Portions of the nanotube film may be selectively removed from portions of the substrate so as to tailor the nanotube film in relation to the electrodes 16 and 18. Likewise, the contacts or electrodes 16 and 18 (and/or gate or additional electrodes) may be deposited or formed prior to the nanotubes 12 or afterwards. Optionally, additional electronic circuitry may be formed integrally with sensor 10 on substrate 14, e.g. for signal processing and the like.
  • the senor includes a detecting probe, such as probe 22, the probe includes a linker group, such as linker 26 which is associated (preferably non-covalently) with the nanotube 12, so as to bind the probe to the sensor 10.
  • a cDNA 24 is bound to linker 26 (preferably covalently) at one portion of the cDNA, the cDNA also having an exposed complement base sequence extending outward from linker 26.
  • the linker may be a molecule or group configured to non-covalently bind to nanotube 12 and to covalently bond to cDNA 24, e.g., an aromatic molecule such as pyrene and/or a polymer.
  • a linker group may connect to more than one cDNA, and conversely a cDNA may connect to more than one linker group, depending on the nature and conformation of the linker.
  • a liner group comprising a distributed polymer layer may have a plurality of cDNA molecules bonded at different points on the polymer layer.
  • the "cDNA” is not necessarily a deoxyribose polynucleotide, but may include other target-specific polynucleotide species, such as RNA, a modified or substituted DNA, and the like, having a detector nucleotide sequence which provides for at least partial hybridization with a selected target sequence.
  • the target "ssDNA” molecule is not necessarily a discrete fully-denatured deoxyribose polynucliotide strand, but may include RNA, dsDNA, partially-denatured dsDNA, species with "sticky ends", and the like, wherein the target molecule includes a target nucleotide sequence which provides for at least a partial hybridization with the "cDNA" of the probe.
  • the probe 22 is shown detecting a single-stranded fragment of DNA 30 by hybridizing with target base sequence 32. Suitable sensor circuitry (not shown in FIGS.
  • sensor 10 is connected to sensor 10 so as to detect and/or quantify an electrical response of sensor 10 to the hybridization of DNA 30, in a manner described above with respect to other sensor embodiments.
  • the conductance between source 16 and drain 18 may change upon hybridization, the change being measured.
  • the hybridization of DNA 30 may cause a phase shift in the device characteristics of sensor 10 produced as the voltage of gate electrode 20 is varied through a selected voltage range. Additional or alternative properties of sensor 10 may be measured to detect hybridization.
  • the senor 10 may be used to discriminate between a relatively complete hybrid match between cDNA 24 and selected target sequence 32 on the one hand, and a contrasting partial, discontinuous, and/or or looped hybridization of the target sequence on the other hand.
  • the sensor 10 produces an electrical response to the hybridization event with signal characteristics reflecting the degree and/or character of hybridization of probe cDNA 24 to a target sequence 32.
  • the signal produced upon partial hybridization of a sequence which has a single base mismatch (sbmDNA) relative to the corresponding probe sequence can be distinguished from the hybridization of a completely matched sequence.
  • This capability of sensor 10 provides for the characterization of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), among other things.
  • the ssDNA 30 may alternatively be a RNA polynucleotide, a hetero or modified polynucleotide, a plasmid, a viral fragment, a double stranded DNA fragment (e.g. having a "sticky end" or other exposed strand target portion available for hybridization with probe 22), a partially-annealed dsDNA fragment, an oligonucleotide, or the like.
  • the probe 24 may be prepared to suit a selected target sequence 32, the cDNA being obtained by known methods.
  • cDNA may contain nucleotides and/or hetero-groups in addition to a nucleotide sequence complementary to target sequence 32, for example, tail or head portions selected for binding to linker 26, selected for purification, amplification and/or other processing steps, optional labeling groups, and the like.
  • the cDNA 24 may then be bonded to linker group 26 (e.g.
  • Prefabricated sensor platforms 10 may then be functionalized, for example by treatment with a solution or suspension of probe 22 so as to bind linker 26 to nanotube 12 (e.g., by pi-pi stacking of pyrene molecules associated with the graphitic lattice of nanotube 12), followed by washing and drying.
  • the functionalized sensor 10 may then be used for detection of an analyte ssDNA having target sequence 32, suspended in a sample medium. Suitable calibration procedures may be carried out, e.g. by exposing sensor 10 to an equivalent sample medium having ssDNA known to lack target sequence 32.
  • the prefabricated sensor platforms 10 may be pre-treated with a linker group material 26 (e.g., a polymer selected to react with or bind to a portion of cDNA 24).
  • a linker group material 26 e.g., a polymer selected to react with or bind to a portion of cDNA 24.
  • a target-specific cDNA 24 may be prepared, and the sensor 10 functionalized by binding with the cDNA 24 to create probe 22 in situ.
  • an array sensor system comprises a space-apart plurality of individual sensors 10.
  • the array may be prefabricated as described above, and the sensors 10 may be individually functionalized with one of a plurality of different probes, each having cDNA specific to a particular selected target sequence.
  • ink-jet type application methods may be used to treat the array in a predetermined pattern of functionality.
  • Such a multi-functionality array may be employed so that a single analyte sample medium may be tested for a plurality of different target DNA sequences substantially simultaneously.
  • Signal processing circuitry of known design may be used to process signals from the plurality of sensors 10 of the array serially, in parallel, or according to any selected pattern.
  • Accessory elements such as microfluidic reservoirs, channels, needle, valves, pumps, and/or injectors, and the like, may be included in the array embodiment, configured to provide controlled functionalization of the sensors, controlled sample delivery to the sensors, sample purging from the sensors, washing/reconditioning of the sensors, and/or controlled calibration of the sensors, and the like.
  • FIGS. 8B and 9 illustrate a number of alternative assay embodiments according to the invention, one or more of which may be employed instead of or in combination with the embodiments described above.
  • FIG. 8B and 9 illustrate a number of alternative assay embodiments according to the invention, one or more of which may be employed instead of or in combination with the embodiments described above.
  • FIG. 8B shows schematically an alternative exemplary embodiment according to aspects of the invention, employing an electroactive intercalator 34, either in the sample medium and/separately introduced following hybridization.
  • the intercalator 34 associates with the hybridized portion (double stranded region) of the probe 22-target sequence 32 complex, so as to amplify and/or modify the measured response of sensor 10, so as to facilitate measurement and/or detection of hybridization.
  • examples include the use of electroactive intercalators such as daunomycin, methylene blue, lr(bpy)(phen)(phi)3+, and the like; groove binders, such as Ru(NH3)5CI2+, and the like; or combinations thereof.
  • electroactive intercalators such as daunomycin, methylene blue, lr(bpy)(phen)(phi)3+, and the like
  • groove binders such as Ru(NH3)5CI2+, and the like; or combinations thereof.
  • FIG. 9A shows schematically an alternative exemplary assay embodiment according to aspects of the invention, employing an secondary or sandwich probe 40, configured to hybridize with a second portion of ssDNA 30, referred to as "sandwich sequence" 44.
  • the sandwich probe 40 includes a second cDNA 42 having a portion including a sequence of bases complementary to sandwich sequence 44.
  • the cDNA 42 includes a portion which is in turn bound to an amplifier group 46, preferably covalently.
  • the amplifier group 46 serves to increase or modify the signal response of sensor 10 upon hybridization of target sequence 32 to detector probe 22.
  • the amplifier group 46 may be a group or label which causes a detectable and/or a quantifiable signal of sensor 10 without further reactivity.
  • amplifier group 46 may be a group which causes a detectable and/or a quantifiable signal of sensor 10 upon further reaction with another promoter material, such as a chemical or biochemical substrate. Examples of amplifier groups are shown in FIGS. 9A-C. [00243] There are a number of alternative methods of use embodiments according to aspects of the invention for the assay shown in FIG. 9A. For example, comprising:
  • step (c) may be a pretreatment of treatment of the analyte sample, carried out prior to step (b).
  • additional calibration steps may be optionally included at various times.
  • the washing steps are exemplary, as one of ordinary skill in the art will readily be able to tune or optimize the methods embodiments for particular applications to avoid cross contamination and other sources of error, without undue experimentation and without departing from the spirit of the invention.
  • the sandwich sequence 44 may be a common sequence expected to be present in the sample DNA fragments, and target sequence 32 may be an analyte-specific sequence of unknown presence in the sample.
  • probe 46 may be configured to undergo relatively non-specific binding to sample DNA in comparison to more highly target- specific binding of probe 22.
  • probe 46 optionally may include additional groups to promote binding to sample DNA and/or to prevent undesired blocking of probe 22.
  • amplifier group 46 may be comprise a promoter or catalyst, such as an enzyme, causing an oxidation/reduction or other reaction with a chemical or biochemical substrate thereby influencing sensor 10 to provide a detectable response.
  • amplifier group 46 may comprise urease.
  • Step (d) above may comprise treating with a urea solution, to produce ammonia and carbon dioxide if bound probe 46 is present, so as to modify the pH of the solution and thereby detectably change the signal of sensor 10.
  • enzyme systems which may be employed are cholinesterase; peroxidase (e.g. HRP); glucose oxidase, and the like.
  • Other examples of amplifier group 46 are ferrocene, metal nanoparticles, labels (nanoparticles, proteins, etc.), and the like.
  • FIG. 9E shows schematically an alternative exemplary assay embodiment according to aspects of the invention.
  • the sandwich probe 40 and ssDNA 30 are generally similar to that shown and described with respect to FIG. 9A.
  • the detector probe 50 comprises a tether group 57 and a corresponding detector group 53, joined or mated to one another.
  • Tether group 57 includes linker 58 connected to a tether species (in this case antibody 56).
  • Detector group 53 includes cDNA 52 connected to a tether-mating species (in this case antigen 54 where the antigen is selected to have epitopes configured to bind to the receptors or binding sites of antibody 56).
  • the antigen 54 may comprise biotin and the antibody 56 may comprise streptavidin. In other alternative embodiments (not shown) the arrangement may be the reverse of that shown in FIG.
  • an antigen may be connected to the linker, and the antibody connected to the cDNA.
  • Other alternative combinations of tether and tether- mating species may be employed, where the tether and tether-mating species are selected to be readily joinable or mate-able to one another to form the self- assembled detector probe 50.
  • the tether group 57 and the detector group 53 may generally be prepared separately.
  • a partially-functionalized sensor platform including the tether group 57 may be prepared, and provided and stored without the detector group 53.
  • Such a sub-assembly does not have vulnerability to substances or conditions that may specifically degrade polynucleotides (for example endonucleases, exonucleases and the like).
  • this embodiment is especially suitable for applications in which it is desired to prefabricate a sensor assembly without a target-specific cDNA (i.e., a relatively generic sensor), and then introduce any one of a number of different target-specific detector groups which are conveniently joinable or mate-able to the tether group (self-assembly or simple reaction) at the time of, or shortly before, sample measurement.
  • the rapid, robust, and selective antigen-antibody binding reaction is a preferred embodiment of the tether/tether-matching system.
  • the tether/tether-matching system illustrated in FIG. 9E may also be employed in conjunction with other embodiments having aspects of the invention, such as the exemplary embodiments shown in FIGS. 8-9D, providing similar advantages.
  • a particular sensor 10 may be functionalized employing more than one combination of tether/tether-matching system, wherein the detector groups each have the same selected cDNA type (in certain applications where a particular cross-reactivity is desired, more than one kind of cDNA may be employed in a particular sensor. However, more typically, the sensor will be configured to maximize target selectivity)
  • the self assembling tether/tether-mating system is particularly useful in sensor array embodiments having aspects of the invention, in that a relatively generic sensor array can be pre-fabricated with tether groups bonded to the plurality of sensors. A selected pattern of different target-specific detector groups may then be applied by known methods to complete the patterned target-specific functionalization of the sensor array, e.g. by multiple or automated pipette systems or by "ink jet” methodology.
  • FIGS. 10A and 10B shows an "island” sensor embodiment 70 and a “nanotube network” sensor embodiment 72, respectively, each according to certain aspects of the invention. These embodiments are generally applicable to the assay embodiments shown in FIGS. 8-9.
  • Nanostructures 12 (in this case, single wall carbon nanotubes, "SWCNT” or abbreviated “NT") communicate electrically with source electrode 16 and drain electrode 18.
  • SWCNT single wall carbon nanotubes
  • NT a plurality of nanotubes 12 form an interconnecting network between source 16 and drain 18.
  • Linker groups 76 may be seen to connect the cDNA strands 74 to nanotubes 12.
  • the ssDNA strands 78 may be seen to be diffusing in the vicinity of cDNA strands 74.
  • FIGS. 10C and 10D schematically show the connection of cDNA strands 74 with nanotubes 12 be action of linker groups 76, as exemplified by (FIG. 10C) an organic group 76 (e.g., pyrene) covalently bonded to the cDNA 74 or (FIG. 10D) a reactive polymer group 76' covalently bonded to cDNA 74, or the like or combinations thereof.
  • FIGS. 11 A and 11 B show alternative sensor architectures 80 and 82 in which the cDNA 84 is attached to the surface of substrate 14' (e.g., a silicon dioxide layer covering a silicon wafer) by means of a chemical connection, such as a covalent bond.
  • substrate 14' e.g., a silicon dioxide layer covering a silicon wafer
  • FIG. 11C shows the sequence of steps of an alternative linker method to bind the cDNA 84 to the substrate 14, employing known reactants and methods, as shown in the sequence of steps (steps 1-3).
  • Hybridization of ssDNA 88 to cDMA 84 influences the electrical properties of sensor 80 or 82 respectively so as to produce a detection signal generally similar to that described above for the various assay embodiments.
  • FIGS. 12A and 12B show alternative sensor architectures 90 and 92 in which the cDNA 94 is attached to the surface of electrodes or contacts 16' and 18' (electrodes may be bare, oxidized surface, or a coated surface) by means of a chemical connection, such as a covalent bond, e.g., by formation of DNA-5'-thiol at the cDNA 5' end, employing known reactants and methods.
  • the cDNA 94 may be attached to contacts 16' or 18' by polymer linker groups, and the like. Hybridization of ssDNA 98 to cDMA 94 influences the electrical properties of sensor 90 or 92 respectively so as to produce a detection signal generally similar to that described above for the various assay embodiments.
  • label groups known in the art may be employed for separation of the target DNA from genomic DNA in the vicinity of the nanotube device 10.
  • labels nanoparticles, proteins, etc.
  • magnetic beads and antibodies may be employed for such separation.
  • pre-measurement sample DNA purification and/or segregation, and the like are carried out adjacent the sensor (or adjacent the sensor array in array embodiments) as part of an integrated sample processing and measurement system, and may include magnetic controls, electrostatic controls, combinations of these, and the like.
  • a microprocessor or computer element is included to control and coordinate both sample DNA purification and/or segregation and sample detection and measurement.
  • EXAMPLE D [00267] DNA Analytical Nanostructured Devices For Human Identification.
  • Several publications have described the use of silicon nanowire FETs for detecting DNA hybrids (see, for example, Nano Lett. 2004, 4, 245 and Nano Lett. 2004, 4, 51 , both of which references are incorporated by reference). Nanowires, however have diameters greater than nanotubes by orders of magnitude and are therefore much less sensitive to surface-generated perturbations in conductivity.
  • carbon nanotubes display unique structural and electrical properties.
  • the electrical features of nanotubes as they relate to the interaction with DNA may be employed for human identification.
  • the inventors herein have published results detecting streptavidin attachment to biotinylated nanotubes, demonstrating a ten-fold increase in sensitivity over similar studies with nanowire FETs. See, for example Nano Lett. 2003, 3, 459, and also US Patent Application No.
  • nanotube-Based Electronic Detection Of Biomolecules 10/704,066 filed November 7, 2003 entitled “Nanotube-Based Electronic Detection Of Biomolecules” (published as US 2004-0132070 on July 8, 2004), both of which publications are incorporated by reference.
  • the use of nanotubes facilitates the biological functionalization through covalent and non-covalent attachment chemistry.
  • Exemplary embodiments of electroanalytical nanotube devices having aspects of the invention are modified by biological molecules which enhance biosensing performance. These devices, which may be configured as ordered arrays of single-nanotube transistors, show efficient electrical communications and sensitivities required for applications in DNA hybridizations.
  • NTFET electroanalytical devices Compared to conventional bio-detection methods such as fluorescence and luminescence, these devices offer homogeneous detection, no requirement for an assay 'label', small size, multiplexed detection, high sensitivity, low manufacturing cost and minimal drive electronics. Such NTFET devices also have characteristics that may be optimized for high-throughput applications. [00272] Embodiments of NTFET electroanalytical devices having aspects of the invention accomplish these advantages because DNA attaches to the single- atom thick wall of the nanotube to affect the flow of the electrons through the nanotube. By including the nanotube as the conductor of the transistor, very slight changes in the nature of the molecules attached to the nanotube may be distinguished.
  • Embodiments of NTFET electroanalytical devices having aspects of the invention can detect the difference between ssDNA capture molecules and the duplex molecule formed by hybridization of the complement without the need for a non-DNA label. All of these features enhance the performance of instruments for point-of-use applications for DNA identification.
  • Autosomal SNPs may be used to attain the same probabilistic resolution for human identification as STRs. In one example, this includes a panel of from about 35 to about 150 loci, depending on the particular human identification application.
  • a SNP panel product is currently being offered by Orchid for paternity testing, an application which does not require access to databases. SNPs are also being investigated for their ability to predict physical characteristics of the individual presenting the sample. The physical traits being examined include: skin, hair and eye color.
  • NTFET devices having aspects of the invention provide a tremendous opportunity in the forensics arena.
  • the ability to detect DNA without labels, the small size, low energy requirements and the integration of work flow steps permit NTFETs to be the enabling technology of portable and easy to use DNA identification instruments.
  • Certain embodiments having aspects of the inventions differentiate DNA fragments by size, and include a nanotube-based device having the capability of providing signals descriptive of the DNA attached to them.
  • Alternative embodiments are configured and optimized for determination of STR loci and the identification of SNPs.
  • the DNA length may be determined at a resolution of four bases, and/or to differentiate among possible homozygote and heterozygote alleles of an STR locus.
  • a single-nanotube field effect transistor having aspects of the invention is employed to make this determination.
  • DNA fragment indentification Nucleic acids, such as single- stranded DNAs, short double-stranded DNAs, and some total RNAs can attach directly to single-wall nanotubes (SWNT) in water-based media. As shown in FIG. 13, the DNA typically binds to the SWNT so that the hydrophilic sugar-phosphate backbone of the DNA is pointing to the exterior to achieve solubility in water.
  • SWNT single-wall nanotubes
  • Exemplary embodiments of electroanalytical devices having aspects of the invention include a platform comprising a photo-lithographically fabricated silicon chip, with locations for the addition of nanotubes to form FETs.
  • capture oligonucleotides are designed so that overhanging ssDNA from the target is juxtaposed with the nanotube.
  • the capture oligonucleotide is disposed on or adjacent a nanotube by suitable attachment chemistry, and contains a sequence complementary to a portion of the target oligonucleotide (e.g., a STR). Following capture of a target STR fragment, the fragment may interact and becomes associated with the nanotube.
  • Targets of differing lengths have measurably distinct effects on the nanotube electrical properties.
  • FIGS. 13 and 14 illustrate a relatively long STR and a relatively short STR respectively. The characteristics of the detected FET signal are correlated with DNA targets of different lengths. Differences in measured signals may subsequently be used to discriminate DNA samples of different lengths.
  • FIGS. 15A and 15B after DNA target binding, molecules that have a strong effect on NTFET conductance (strong effector moleculses or s.e.m.) can be reacted with the nanotube.
  • the arrangement of this example is generally similar to that of FIGS. 14 A, B. Since NTFETs can be made with CNTs as short as 100nm, it is possible to measure the unprotected portion of the NT by counting the strong effector molecules that bind outside the DNA protected region. The length of the target DNA might then be calculated by the relative level of electrical deflection caused by the strong effector molecules.
  • NTNFETs are selectively functionalized with DNA oligonucleotides probes, which retain hybridization specificity.
  • NTNFETs with immobilized synthetic oligonucleotides selectively recognize target DNA sequences with single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP).
  • SNP single-nucleotide polymorphism
  • Nanosensor Devices include NTNFETs including a nanostructure element comprising a random interconnected network of carbon nanotubes, the network electrically communicating between interdigitated patterns of source and drain electrodes, and may be influenced by the bias field of a gate electrode comprising a dielectric- covered, doped silicon substrate.
  • FIG. 17A shows an exemplary electronic sensing device 100 having aspects of the invention, for detecting an analyte 101 , comprising a nanostructure sensor 102.
  • Sensor 102 comprises a substrate 104, and a conducting channel or layer 106 comprising a nanostructure material, such as a nanotube or network of nanotubes, disposed on the substrate.
  • the nanostructure material 106 may contact the substrate as shown, or in the alternative, may be spaced a distance away from the substrate, with or without a layer of intervening material.
  • conducting channel 106 may comprise one or more carbon nanotubes.
  • conducting channel 106 may comprise a plurality of nanotubes forming a mesh, film or network.
  • Certain exemplary embodiments having aspects of the invention include nanostructure elements which may be made using chemical vapor deposition (CVD) and traditional lithography, or may be deposited by other methods, such as solvent suspension deposition, AFM manipulation, and the like. Certain embodiments include one or more discrete nanotubes in electrical contact with one or more metal electrodes. A number of different arrangements of active nanostructures may be included without departing from the spirit of the invention.
  • CVD chemical vapor deposition
  • AFM manipulation atomic layer deposition
  • Certain embodiments include one or more discrete nanotubes in electrical contact with one or more metal electrodes. A number of different arrangements of active nanostructures may be included without departing from the spirit of the invention.
  • One or more conductive elements or contacts may be disposed over the substrate and electrically connected to conducting channel 106 comprising a nanostructure material.
  • the conductive elements permit electrical charge and/or current to be applied to the nanostructured material of channel 106, and may be used in the measurement of an electrical property of the channel 106.
  • contacts 110, 112 may comprise source and drain electrodes, respectively, permitting application of a source-drain voltage Vsd, and inducing a current in channel 106.
  • Elements 110, 112 may comprise metal electrodes in contact with conducting channel 106.
  • a conductive or semi-conducting material (not shown) may be interposed between contacts 110, 112 and conducting channel 106.
  • the device 100 may be operated as a gate-controlled field effect transistor, with sensor 102 further comprising a gate electrode 114.
  • a gate-controlled field effect transistor Such a device is referred to herein as a nanotube field effect transistor or NTFET.
  • Gate 114 may comprise a base portion of substrate 104, such as a doped-silicon wafer material isolated from contacts 110, 112 and channel 106 by a dielectric layer 116, so as to permit a capacitance to be created by an applied gate voltage Vg.
  • the substrate 104 may comprise a silicon back gate 114, isolated by a dielectric layer 116 comprising SiO2.
  • the device 100 may be employed in other measurement modes.
  • device 100 may be employed as a capacitive or impedance sensor using known circuitry to create an electric field gradient between conducting channel 106 (e.g., via either of contacts 110, 112) and gate 114 and to measure the capacitance and/or impedance of this structure in relation to the influence of an analyte.
  • Sensor 102 may further comprise a layer of inhibiting or passivation material 118 covering regions adjacent to the connections between the conductive elements 110, 112 and conducting channel 106.
  • the inhibiting material may be impermeable to at least one chemical species, such as to the analyte 101 or to environmental materials such as water or other solvents, oxygen, nitrogen, and the like.
  • the inhibiting material 118 may comprise a passivation material as known in the art, such as silicon dioxide, aluminum oxide, silicon nitride, or other suitable material. Further details concerning the use of inhibiting materials in a NTFET are described in prior application Serial No.
  • the conducting channel 106 may be functionalized to produce a sensitivity to one or more target analytes 101.
  • nanostructures such as carbon nanotubes may respond to a target analyte through charge transfer or other interaction between the device and the analyte, more generally a specific sensitivity can be achieved by employing a recognition material 120, also called a functionalization material, that induces a measurable change in the device characteristics upon interaction with a target analyte.
  • the functionalization or a recognition material 120 shown in FIG. 17A is a generic representation. Further description in the Example F details the functionalization for DNA detection, and in particular, the discrimination of human hereditary polymorphisms.
  • FIG. 17B shows a scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of the a single random network NTNFET device 10.
  • View (a) of FIG. 17B shows a complete device with interdigitated source S and drain D electrodes with contact leads extending to pads at the substrate edge.
  • Enlarged view (b) shows a portion of the device 10 including a portion of nanotube network N disposed adjacent the electrodes, the network margin being trimmed to limit it to the interdigitated electrode region.
  • An additional enlarged view (c) shows the details of the lead/network pattern of a small portion of the device, showing a single digit of source S separated by spacing L from adjacent digit of drain D. In this example L is approximately 10 ⁇ m.
  • the interconnected random carbon nanotube network N can be seen to collectively communicate between S and D, although it may be seen that, in general, the individual nanotubes do not lead across space L.
  • the electrodes are deposited on top of the network N, although alternative configurations may be employed. Lying beneath the network N is the substrate, which in this example is a doped silicon wafer protected by a surface dielectric layer, and in which optionally the silicon base serves as a gate electrode.
  • device 100 may be packaged in a conventional manner to conveniently permit connection to operating circuitry.
  • FIG. 17C is a photograph of a sensor generally similar to that of FIGS.
  • Device 100 may further comprise suitable circuitry in communication with sensor elements to perform electrical measurements.
  • FIG. 17D is a photograph of a sensor generally similar to that of FIGS. 17A and 17B, packaged in the manner shown in FIG. 17C, and installed on an exemplary circuit board of an electronic sensor system.
  • a conventional power source may supply a source-drain voltage (Vsd) between contacts 110, 112.
  • Vsd source-drain voltage
  • Measurements via the sensor device 100 may be carried out by circuitry represented schematically by meter 122 connected between contacts 110, 112.
  • a conventional power source 124 may be connected to provide a selected or controllable gate voltage (Vg).
  • Device 100 may include one or more electrical supplies and/or a signal control and processing unit (not shown) as known in the art, in communication with the sensor 102.
  • Suitable elements may be included in the sensor system architecture to facilitate application of liquid phase biological analyte media, and the system may be readily adapted to make the NTNFET biochip detection platform suitable for whole blood samples.
  • NTFET devices for DNA detection A large plurality of such devices may be fabricated simultaneously at a wafer-level scale. In this example, each wafer consists of about one thousand dies with 2.54 x 2.54 mm2 dimensions, with several devices patterned onto each die, the devices having a size of about 210 ⁇ m by 270 ⁇ m.
  • the devices were fabricated using SWNTs grown via chemical vapor deposition (CVD) at 900°C using dispersed iron nanoparticles as growth promoter and a methane/hydrogen gas mixture on doped Si 100 mm wafers with SiO2 at its surface. Nanotubes outside the intended network area N were removed using oxygen plasma to electrically isolate each device.
  • Electrical leads or electrodes were patterned on top of the nanotubes from evaporated Ti-Au films (30 nm and 120 nm thick, respectively) using standard photolithography techniques. The electrode pattern comprises source S and drain D electrodes in an interdigitated with a separation L of about 10 ⁇ m.
  • the electrode separation L may be selected to optimized device performance, and in this example devices with other dimensions (pitches ranging from 5 to 100 ⁇ m) were also present on the die. As seen in the enlarged image, the nanotubes are disposed in a random interconnecting arrangement, so as to provide an communication path between source S and drain D. [00307] Devices with other dimensions (e.g., pitches ranging from 5 to 100 ⁇ m) may be fabricated on the die, permitting adjacent devices to be optimized with differing functional geometry. Electronic characterization of NTNFET devices, such as current flow between source and drain electrodes as a function of applied gate voltage and bias voltage, were conducted using an autoprobe tester.
  • FIGS. 18A-D illustrate the process of testing of I-Vg data of NTFET wafers as measured by a conventional autoprobe instrument, for example the 100 mm wafer as described above with NTNFET devices having 10 ⁇ m pitch structure.
  • FIGS. 18C and 18D are examples device population plots of the conductance and of the modulation data shown in FIGS. 18A and 18B respectively. Note that for device maximum channel conductance (18C), the population behavior is very narrowly defined, with on a small percentage of devices falling short of the plateau of maximum conductance.
  • An analog output voltage was used to sweep the gate of the NTNFETs.
  • Device characteristics such as source-drain voltage and current were calculated in LabVIEW from voltage measurements across sense resistors. Continuous I-VG measurements were taken with a gate voltage triangle wave sweep at frequency of 3 Hz from -10V to +10V.
  • DNA Immobilization In this example, chemicals were purchased from Aldrich and used as received. Oligonucleotides unmodified and modified with Cy5 or FITC fluorescent labels at the 5'-end were synthesized by Alpha DNA. Allele-specific oligonucleotides for H63D polymorphism were synthesized by IDT. The oligonucleotide structures for both capture probes and targets are identified in TABLE !
  • All DNA solutions were prepared using 18MW water (NANOpure Infinity UV water system).
  • packaged chips with NTNFET devices were cleaned in acid baths containing HNO3 (0.1M), HCI (0.1M), and 18MW water on the orbital shaker for 15 minutes in each bath.
  • the packages were rinsed by hand with 40OmM phosphate (PB) buffer (pH 7.2) and then washed two times in 40OmM PB on the orbital shaker for 5 minutes.
  • the packages are then rinsed with 5OmM PB and blown dry with nitrogen prior to electronic testing.
  • PB 40OmM phosphate
  • the chips were incubated in 5mM solutions of oligonucleotides in 20OmM PB buffer for one hour in a humid chamber. The standard washing procedure was then applied to remove excess and weakly bound DNA molecules prior to hybridization experiments. The hybridization experiments were performed by incubating the chips in 20OmM PB buffer solutions with complementary DNA (10 ⁇ l_ at 5OnM, unless otherwise noted) for one hour in a humid chamber, followed by a standard washing procedure. All incubations were performed at room temperature (-22 0 C). [00313] Optical Imaging.
  • Optical data were acquired by a Zeiss Axioskop 40 microscope, equipped with a TE cooled monochromatic CCD camera (DVC). Cy5 and FITC specific filter sets were obtained from Chroma. Images were captured using a Meteor ll/digital frame grabber board and lntellicam software (Matrox). ImageJ was used for image processing and quantitation. The chips were imaged in 0.1 M sodium bicarbonate buffer (pH 8.3) to maximize FITC fluorescence emission.
  • ssDNA 5 -CCT AAT AAC AAT-3' (Alpha DNA) was selected.
  • 50 nM of target DNA was used to allow integration of the fluorescence signal in 10-20 seconds to minimize photobleaching.
  • a plurality of substantially identical interdigitated NTNFET devices were prepared with a distance between electrodes of 10 ⁇ m.
  • Probe Attachment First, attachment of ssDNA capture probes to the devices were confirmed using Cy5-labeled ssDNA oligonucleotides, to demonstrate the functionalization of the device with a ssDNA capture probe. A bare NTNFET device without capture probe way photomicrographed, and should no measurable fluorescence signal. Next, an NTNFET device was treated with a target-matched probe comprising Cy5-labeled ssDNA: 5'-CCT AAT AAC AAT-3' (Alpha DNA), followed by thorough washings to remove excess and weakly bound DNA molecules. The device after incubation shows clear fluorescence, confirming attachment of the capture probe.
  • NTNFET devices were treated as described below to demonstrate the hybridization of the capture probe with a target ssDNA.
  • the respective probe comprised an unlabeled ssDNA oligonucleotide of the same kind as used in the attachment examples, i.e., the target-matched probe comprising unlabeled 5'-CCT AAT AAC AAT-3' (Alpha DNA), and the non-target-matched probe comprising un-labeled dA12 oligonucleotide.
  • the device were treated with the respective probe and washed thoroughly to remove excess and weakly bound probe molecules. Fluorescence microscopy images of the NTNFET devices were made after DNA incubations for 1 hour followed by removing unbound DNA oligomers. The fluorescent signals were measured as a difference between carbon nanotube device area and bare silicon wafer after 20 s integration.
  • FIGS. 19A, B and C show a series of fluorescent images of exemplary demonstration embodiments, the image covering a portion of the interdigitated electrode and network region of device 10 corresponding to approximately the left-hand portion of FIG. 17B, View (b). Note that although the original images were produced and analyzed as true color photomicrograph images, in this patent application the images are presented as processed negative images which are consistent with the originals for demonstration purposes, while allowing clear monochrome printing for patent publication purposes. [00320] FIG. 19A shows the device after incubation with the unlabeled ssDNA capture probe, but before treatment with target DNA, the device showing no significant fluorescence (the matched and un-matched probes showed essentially the same signal).
  • FIG. 19B shows the fluorescent image of a NTNFET device (pre- treated with target-matched probe 5'-CCT AAT AAC AAT-3' DNA as described above) following incubation with Cy5-labeled target DNA, and subsequent washing. Note that the changes in fluorescence between FIGS. 2A and 2B confirm that DNA hybridization takes place under these conditions.
  • FIG. 19C shows a comparable fluorescent image of a NTNFET device (pre-treated with non-target-matched probe dA12 oligonucleotide as described above, see TABLE 1) following incubation with Cy5-labeled target DNA, and subsequent washing.
  • the dA12 oligonucleotide control probe lacks a complementary sequence to the target probe, as there is only six base homology between dA12 and the target DNA sequence.
  • FIG. 19D is a bar graph showing a quantitative comparison of target DNA hybridization, calculated as a difference between fluorescence signal from carbon nanotube area versus bare Si surface after 20 sec. integration, have shown two orders of magnitude stronger signal for DNA hybridization system containing fully matched DNA (FIG. 2B) as opposed to system containing mismatched DNA oligonucleotides (FIG. 2C).
  • FIGS. 20A-20B illustrate NTNFET device electronic responses for DNA immobilization and hybridization.
  • G-Vg transfer curves i.e., source-drain conductance (G) as a function of applied gate voltage (Vg)
  • G-Vg transfer curves i.e., source-drain conductance (G) as a function of applied gate voltage (Vg)
  • G-Vg transfer curves i.e., source-drain conductance (G) as a function of applied gate voltage (Vg)
  • G-Vg transfer curves i.e., source-drain conductance (G) as a function of applied gate voltage (Vg)
  • G-Vg transfer curves i.e., source-drain conductance (G) as a function of applied gate voltage (Vg)
  • FIGS. 2OA and 2OB illustrate the transfer characteristics of the bare NT network devices are consistent with p-type with positive threshold voltages (continuous line in each figure). Note that there is significant hysteresis with respect to increasing versus decreasing gate voltage Vg.
  • FIGS. 2OA and 2OB illustrates the effect of incubation of the device with ssDNA capture probe, which is immobilized on the device and results in a shift of G-Vg curve towards more negative gate voltage values (dashed line in each figure), showing a similar effect of shift of threshold voltage for the 5'-CCT AAT AAC AAT-3' DNA probe (FIG. 3A) and the dA12 oligonucleotide probe (FIG. 3B).
  • FIGS. 2OA and 2OB illustrates the effect of hybridization with target DNA on NTNFET electronic properties in each example (alternate dash-dot line in each figure), were investigated by measurements.
  • FIG. 2OA and 2OB illustrates the effect of hybridization with target DNA on NTNFET electronic properties in each example (alternate dash-dot line in each figure), were investigated by measurements.
  • FIGS. 21 A though 21 C illustrate an allele-specific assay to detect the presence of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) using nanoelectronic detectors, such as NTNFETs.
  • SNPs are the most abundant and highly conserved variations in the human genome and have been associated with a wide variety of diseases. The screening of large populations necessitates cost- effective and efficient high-throughput scanning, which will be facilitated by electronic and label-free techniques.
  • HHC hereditary hemochromatosis
  • HFE hereditary hemochromatosis
  • HLA-H The hereditary hemochromatosis gene
  • the HFE protein is a transmembrane protein expressed in intestinal and liver cells; it works in conjunction with another small protein called beta-2-microglobulin to regulate iron uptake.
  • Several mutations have been identified in the HFE gene which can result in disease.
  • One of these is the H63D mutation, a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) 1 and is related to clinical iron overload.
  • SNP single nucleotide polymorphism
  • a G replaces C at nucleotide 187 of the gene (187CaG), causing aspartate to substitute for histidine at amino acid position 63 in the HFE protein.
  • TABLE 2 describes the two capture probes and the target DNA used in this example.
  • FIGS. 21 A and 21 B depicts (the solid line) the transfer characteristic (G-Vg curve) of the device showing the effect of incubation of the device with the ssDNA capture probe, wild-type probe (FIG. 21A) and mutant probe (FIG. 21 B) respectively. Also FIGS.
  • FIG. 21 A and 21 B depicts the G-Vg curve following hybridization with the HFE target probe (the dashed line in each figure).
  • the allele specific wild-type capture probe is hybridized with wild-type synthetic HFE target (50 nM).
  • the w-t/w-t hybrid matching combination was stable to the post-hybridization washing procedure, and resulted in significant decrease of the device conductance and a significant shift of G-Vg curve towards more negative gate voltage values.
  • FIG. 21 B shows the mutant capture probe when exposed the same hybridization conditions with wild-type synthetic HFE target (50 nM).
  • FIG. 21 C summarizes both electronic (1-G/G0) and fluorescent optical responses from the fluorescent target labels for hemochromatosis detection. In the plot in FIG. 21 C, data from three devices with similar geometry and 10 urn S/D pitch ware used, and mean normalized response values are shown.
  • NTNFET response due to hybridization was obscured by the nonhomologous DNA suggesting nonspecific adsorption to the nanotubes or competitive displacement of the capture probes.
  • the former mechanism is shown by blocking nonspecific binding sites (NSB) with 0.01% Triton X-100 in PB.
  • NNB nonspecific binding sites
  • the chips were incubated with the triton solution for 15' at room temperature, and washed as previously described.
  • the triton blocking step enabled SNP discrimination at 100 pM target in the presence of 104 fold molar excess of nonhomologous DNA.
  • FIGS. 22A-22D demonstrate the electronic response of the exemplary NTNFET device embodiment to hybridization of unlabeled oligonucleotides at different concentrations of ionic species and target DNA.
  • the devices used are generally similar to those employed in Example E above.
  • the oligonucleotides in this example are the unlabeled complementary 12-mer capture and target oligonucleotides describe in the forgoing examples and listed in TABLE 1.
  • FIG. 22A is a plot of source-drain conductance (G) as function of gate voltage (Vg) for the exemplary NTNFET device. The demonstration was carried out in 200 mM phosphate buffer at a pH or 7.2. The upper-most curve shows the response of the bare device (both rising and falling Vg as described in FIG. 3A).
  • FIGS. 22B and 22C are plots generally comparable to that of FIG. 22A, but with the demonstration carried out in buffer comprising 10 mM phosphate buffer with a magnesium ion source added, 20 mM MgCI2. Similarly, the uppermost curve shows the response of the bare device. The second curve shows the effect of the unlabeled ssDNA probe attachment without hybridization. [00351] In FIG. 22A, but with the demonstration carried out in buffer comprising 10 mM phosphate buffer with a magnesium ion source added, 20 mM MgCI2. Similarly, the uppermost curve shows the response of the bare device. The second curve shows the effect of the unlabeled ssDNA probe attachment without hybridization. [00351] In FIG.
  • the lower four curves show the effect of increasing target DNA concentration on hybridization under the influence of the additional Mg+2 ions for the same nanoMolar range as in FIG. 5A, representing target DNA concentrations of 1 , 10, 50, 100, and 200 nM in descending order (the curves for 50 nM and 100 nM are superimposed and thus not distinct at the scale of plot). Note the dramatically increased effect of hybridization on device conductance under the influence to magnesium ions.
  • FIG. 22C demonstrates the sensitivity of the device and assay for hybridization at picoMolar ranges of the DNA target species, under the same hybridization conditions as FIG. 22B (Mg+2 ions).
  • the lower four curves show the effect of increasing target DNA concentration in descending order, but in this figure, the curves represent target DNA concentrations of 1 , 10, and 50 pM and 1 nM respectively.
  • FIG. 22D is a plot of the data of FIGS. 22A-22C showing of the normalized conductance (G/G0) of the three NTNFET devices as function of target DNA concentrations.
  • the data show that the addition of Mg2+ during hybridization increased the sensitivity of DNA detection by 1000 fold, from 1 nM to 1 pM, or from 5x109 to 5x106 molecules, compared to Na+ alone. Furthermore, the dynamic range was increased from roughly 2.5 to 5 logs. Note also that the slope of the linear trend lines the Na+ hybridization data and the Mg2+ hybridization data differ by almost factor of two, i.e., -0.11 for Na+ data versus - 0.06 for the Mg2+ data.
  • NTNFET response to residual buffer or cation effects is negated.
  • the NTNFET devices were washed with the same salt concentrations (standard washing procedure). This ensures that the observed changes in NTNFET device characteristics are not related to random changes in mobile charge concentrations on the device surface.
  • control procedures were carried out where the devices were hybridized by incubation in the Na+ containing medium, the unbound target DNA was washed away, and then the device was exposed to Mg2+ solution.
  • NTNFET electronic characteristics can be correlated with DNA detection.
  • the results were confirmed by using fluorescently labeled DNA compounds which verified DNA adsorption and hybridization were selective for nanotubes.
  • sensors with only a few or a single carbon nanotube sensing elements can be fabricated, sensors used in this study contain a random network of nanotubes, covering a relatively large surface area between two metal electrodes (FIG. 17B).
  • the random network geometry has several advantages: it eliminates the problems of nanotube alignment and assembly, conductivity variations due to chirality and geometry, and is tolerant to individual SWNT channel failure since the device characteristics are averaged over a large number of nanotubes.
  • such devices can be developed on low-cost flexible and/or transparent polymer substrates by spray deposition or casting nanotubes from solution.
  • SWNTs may be superior if one considers it to be a true nanoscale sensor.
  • nanotubes exhibit surprisingly large electrical or 1/f noise.
  • the magnitude of the 1/f noise is inversely proportional to the number of charge carriers in the device so a network with a large number of SWNTs reduces the 1/f noise by approximately (n)-1.3 , where (n) is the number of SWNTs in the channel of the device.
  • 1/f noise is a significant factor then large nanotube networks will have a distinct advantage over single nanotube channel devices.
  • NTNFET biochips clearly differentiated between mutant and wild-type alleles of the HFE gene, responsible for hereditary hemochromatosis.
  • the sensor architecture may be readily adapted to make the NTNFET biochip detection platform suitable for whole blood samples.
  • Alternative embodiments such as longer capture probes or the addition of a high affinity linker sequence (such as the (GT)20 oligonucleotide), can make the attachment more robust for more complex samples.
  • Covalent attachment of DNA capture probes may also improve signal to noise ratio because then surfactants can be used to lower background.
  • microfluidics may be employed in order to facilitate the sample delivery and the manipulation of small volumes of DNA samples.
  • Example G as set forth in the present application includes the subject matter of the corresponding "Example C" described in US Provisional Application No. 60/629,604, filed November 19, 2004, together with further illustration of the inventive concepts.
  • US Provisional Application No. 60/629,604 is incorporated by reference in and claimed as priority by US Patent Application No. 11/212,026 filed August 24, 2005 entitled “Nanotube Sensor Devices For DNA Detection”. Each of these applications is incorporated by reference herein.
  • a tether-probe combination may comprise a pair of species with a highly specific mutual binding affinity, such as an antibody-antigen pair, an cell-surface receptor and a mating ligand, or any one of a broad class of biological species providing ligand pairs with specific mutual affinity.
  • the self assembly property of such probe-tether pairs permits a sensor array having aspects of the invention to be pre-patterned with a plurality of different tether groups, and conveniently self assembled with corresponding specific probe groups at a convenient time, shortly before carrying out a DNA assay where probe groups are either perishable, or not previously determined.
  • assay targets are time variable, such as the constantly changing strains of influenza, HIV and the like.
  • inventive architecture described permits a pre-pattemed "generic" array device may be self- assembled as a completed target-specific assay array at or close to the time of use.
  • EXAMPLE G provides an important alternative approach to an self assembling array of target-specific detectors having aspects of the invention.
  • Nanoelectronic devices having aspects of the invention provide the capability of molecular scale detection. Small devices with sensitivity levels that allow detection of a single target biomolecule enable novel array architectures providing embodiments with unique utility..
  • Molecular diagnostic tests generally consist of a panel of analytes to provide a health care provider with sufficient information to determine susceptibility to a disease state.
  • One example of this is a test for mutations in the gene coding for the Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane conductance Regulator protein that are associated with the Cystic Fibriosis disease. Over 900 mutations have been identified in that gene and 25 of them have been designated by the College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists as being associated with the disease at a high enough frequency to warrant testing. Therefore the CF panel consists of 25 tests for genetic variants. Many technologies have emerged to accommodate the need of analyzing several variables simultaneously (multiplexing).
  • a plurality of different probe groups may be distinguished by the signals that may be acquired by the various alternative embodiments on nanostructured sensor described herein.
  • different DNA probes each with a distinct hybridization sequence, may be configured to have different overall sequence lengths.
  • Different polynucleotide lengths with differing molecular masses can be distinguished by the difference in there electrical influence on a nanostructure such as a SWNT, for example producing a distinct signature (e.g., in nanotube conductance, capacitance or the like) with may be measured.
  • FIGURES 23A through 23H illustrate the operation of a multiplex assay panel embodiment having aspects of the invention.
  • the multiplex assay panel comprises an array nanosensors (5 are shown).
  • the sensors may be substantially the same in configuration and properties.
  • the array may conveniently comprise a large number of sensors, e.g., arranged in a two dimensional pattern on a chip, and packaged to permit individual sensors to be selectively interrogated by measurement circuitry.
  • the array sensors comprise NTFETs as described elsewhere in this application, permitting convenient measurement of transconductance properties (source/drain), modulation characteristics (variable gate bias), and/or capacitance properties (capacitance or impedance of channel relative to gate electrode) through patterned source-drain-gate contacts of the transistor array.
  • NTFETs as described elsewhere in this application, permitting convenient measurement of transconductance properties (source/drain), modulation characteristics (variable gate bias), and/or capacitance properties (capacitance or impedance of channel relative to gate electrode) through patterned source-drain-gate contacts of the transistor array.
  • capacitive sensors including capacitive sensors, breakdown voltage sensors, magnetic sensors and the like.
  • Alternative embodiments may have more than one type or class of sensor, each class of sensor being represented by a plurality of same type. Such a multi-class array may permit measurements under differing conditions or dynamic ranges.
  • alternative embodiments may employ probes exploiting and detection schemes other than polynucleotide hybridization affinity, such as antigen-antibody affinity, receptor-ligand affinity, and the like. Multiplex array panels may thus be adapted to a wide range of applications, including molecular diagnostics (DNA, RNA, proteins); Organism detection (viral, bacterial); Chemical analysis (combinations of gases, water contaminants); pharmaceutical production and the like.
  • the array is incubated with a mixture of different probes kinds (represented by shapes A, B and C) which bind to the sensors of the array in a random fashion (or quasi-random or irregular fashion), so that a desired mixture of sensor functionalization is obtained.
  • the dilution and/or stringency conditions may be adjusted to favor a single probe attachment per sensor.
  • excess and non-binding probes may be rinse away, as shown in FIGURE 23B.
  • the sensors of the array may be individually interrogated by measurement circuitry, and the signals may be conveniently stored in a processor for further operations.
  • the array may be maintained during measurement under conditions which are optimized for probe characterization measurement, and may be substantially different than those prevailing during probe incubation. For example, measurements may be made wet or dry, under a particular buffer composition, particular temperature, and the like.
  • the signal or signals from each sensor may be correlated with a specific probe binding configuration. In the example shown, particular signal magnitudes are correlated with the single binding of each of the three probe varieties "A", "B", and “C", and also with the configuration of no binding (empty) and multiple binding.
  • a map of the inferred probe configuration of each sensor may be stored in processor memory. This provides a map of multiplex detectors that may not have a predictable spatial order, but whose detection potential is known. [00378] It should be understood that while the schematic example of FIGURE 23C indicates measurement of a single quantity, multiple or complex properties may be measured and employed in probe-sensor characterization. For example NTFET devices characteristics, hysteresis, on-off ratio, trigger threshold, and the like or combinations of these may be employed in this determination (see discussion re FIGURE 24).
  • the assay panel array is incubated with a sample medium putatively containing target species.
  • the corresponding targets "b” and “c” corresponding to probes "B” and “C are present in the sample, non-target species “d” is also present, but target species "a” corresponding to probe "A” is absent.
  • the buffer or media composition and stringency conditions for sample incubation may be adjusted to optimize specific binding while preserving probe-sensor attachment.
  • excess sample may be rinse away, as shown in FIGURE 23F , leaving targets "b” and "c” bound to the corresponding probes.
  • the sensors of the array may be individually interrogated by measurement circuitry, and the signals may be conveniently stored in a processor for further operations.
  • the array may be maintained during measurement under conditions which are optimized for the sample measurement, and may be substantially different than those prevailing during sample incubation.
  • the signal or signals from each sensor may be correlated with probe-target binding status. In certain embodiments, particular probe-target combinations may be distinguished from the measured signals, but this is not a necessary criteria. In the example shown, the process need only correlate a signal as "positive” or "negative” for any given sensor.
  • FIGURE 24A to 24D illustrate an example of employing multiple signals from a single sensor to characterized the probe-sensor configuration.
  • the incubation procedures of FIGURES 24A-B may be generally as described above with respect to FIGURES 23A-B.
  • this example includes obtaining measurements of both source-drain conductance (left hand axis of each sub-plot) and channel-gate capacitance (right hand axis of each sub-plot).
  • One or more of the particular values of these properties, their ratios, or their sums or differences may be employed to characterize the probe status of the respective sensor (e.g., "A", "B", "C multiple or empty). Note that similar measurement strategies may be employed in target species determination (not shown).
  • FIGURE 25A to 25E illustrate the use on enhancement groups to facilitate probe characterization.
  • Example C herein (see FIGURES 8 and 9), and in particular the use of enhancement groups such as electroactive incalators, amplifier groups, and the like to increase and modify the sensor signal in response to a species interaction event.
  • enhancement groups such as electroactive incalators, amplifier groups, and the like to increase and modify the sensor signal in response to a species interaction event.
  • enhancement groups as magnetic microbeads, nanodots and the like may be employed to increase probe characterization signal strength and distinction.
  • a range of alternative enhancement groups may be employed to permit "single-molecule" probe characterization and mapping.
  • FIGURES 25A-B The incubation procedures of FIGURES 25A-B may be generally as described above with respect to FIGURES 23A-B, with the exception that in the example shown, enhancement groups E1 , E2, and E3 are attached to probes "C", "A” and “B” respectively, with the probe attachment thus binding a combination of both probe and enhancement group to each sensor.
  • the enhancement group may be added and bound to the probe after attachment of the probe to the particular sensor. This may be either by a specific affinity between probe and enhancement group (e.g., antibody-antigen affinity).
  • the enhancement group may be the same for each kind of probe, the same enhancement group, the influence of the enhancement group be sufficient to produce a distinct measurement when attached to the different kinds of probes.
  • the sensors of the array may be individually interrogated by measurement circuitry, for example as in the manner shown in FIGURES 23C and 24C.
  • the probe status for each sensor is characterized by the signal or signals generated by the sensor in response to the combination of probe and enhancement group.
  • the enhancement group may be removed prior to assay panel use for sample target determinations, for example by particular reagents or buffers, variation in stringency conditions and the like. In alternative assay embodiments, the Alternatively, the enhancement group may remain attached during assay panel use for sample target determinations. [00389] It should be noted that the multiplex assay array embodiments described in EXAMPLE C and in EXAMPLE G may be used in combination without departing from the spirit of the invention.
  • Nanosensors With Overlaying Nanotube Network employ an architecture in which a network of nanostructured elements (such as single-walled carbon nanotubes or SWCNT) are formed or deposited directly on a substrate material, for example a silicon wafer coated with a dielectric layer.
  • a network of nanostructured elements such as single-walled carbon nanotubes or SWCNT
  • Various functionalization materials may then be deposited above the nanotube network, for example a polymer recognition layer sensitive to a selected analyte, or a coating of molecular transducers including probe molecules with an affinity for a selected target biomolecule, and the like.
  • the above described sensor architecture may be described as being reversed, i.e.
  • NT network-on-top a functionalization layer may be deposited upon the substrate prior to formation of the nanotube network, and the NT network subsequently deposited or formed above the functionalization layer.
  • This architecture permits a greater exposure of the nanotube network to the analyte medium, and also permits the substrate to be conveniently coated or isolated from the analyte medium without impairing the exposure of the nanotube network.
  • the functionalization layer may comprise a composite structure, for example including a substrate passivation layer, a ligand layer, a bio-probe layer, a selectively permeable layer, and the like.
  • the addition of a "NT network-on-top architecture increased the range of operational arrangements available to provide maximum flexibility in sensor functionalization strategies.
  • nanostructured conductive and semiconductor element precursors e.g., carbon nanotubes in carrier fluid dispersion
  • substrates other than monocrystaline silicon e.g., polycrystalline semiconductors, polymer substrates, flexible substrates, polyimide, polycarbonate, PET and the like
  • nanostructured sensor platform FIG. 1
  • an exemplary field NT network effect transistor sensor having aspects of the invention, including a interconnected nanotube network 11 deposited or formed upon a substrate 12.
  • the network 11 spans and electrically communicates between a spaced-apart contact pair comprising source electrode 13 and drain electrode 14.
  • An optional contact passivation material 16 coats the electrodes 13 and 14 without interfering with electrical communication of electrodes 13 and 14 with network 11.
  • At least one recognition or functionalization material shown as a biofunctional layer 17, is disposed in contact with network 1 1 and arranged generally upon and/or diffused into the upper surface of network 11.
  • NT network-on-bottom the biofunctional layer 17 or other recognition material may optionally be disposed to penetrate downward to the substrate 12.
  • the contacts 13, 14 may be formed first, then network 11 formed or deposited, and subsequently the biofunctional layer 17 or other recognition material deposited.
  • One or more optional operative coatings may be deposited either under, within, and/or over the biofunctional layer, such as a semi-permeable layer configured and composed to restrict exposure of network 11 and/or substrate 12 to particular species within an analyte medium.
  • a semi-permeable layer configured and composed to restrict exposure of network 11 and/or substrate 12 to particular species within an analyte medium.
  • FIG. 27 illustrates an exemplary "network-on-top" field effect transistor sensor 20 having aspects of the invention, in which a nanotube network 21 is disposed above a biofunctional layer 27 (and showing optional contact passivation coatings 26).
  • At least one recognition or functionalization material shown as a biofunctional layer 27, is disposed in contact with substrate 22.
  • Nanotube network 21 is formed or deposited upon functionalization layer 27 and in electrical communication between spaced-apart source electrode 23 and drain electrode 24.
  • Optional contact passivation material 26 coats the electrodes 23 and 24 without interfering with electrical communication of electrodes 23 and 24 with network 21.
  • the substrate 22 can comprise a dielectric material, an insulating polymer, a flexible substrate or a combination of these.
  • the substrate may include an insulating layer (not shown) covering the gate electrode 25, while other components of the substrate may comprise a flexible polymer and the like.
  • the network may comprise other nano-structural elements in addition to or instead of SWCNTs, such as multiwall nanotubes, nanowires, and the like.
  • the making of NTFET sensors such as shown in the examples herein may employ conventional methods to form the described elements, such as methods used silicon wafer processing in the electronic industry. Alternatively or additionally, the described elements may be formed employing printing and deposition methods of the type generally known as "ink jet" methods. This is particularly useful in the making of compact arrays having a plurality of sensors in a single package, or where for purposes of mass production of sensors it is desired to make a plurality of sensors "at the wafer level" for subsequent division and packaging.
  • single wall nanotube networks may be formed by a number of methods. Among these are in-situ growth of nanotubes from dispersed nanoparticles of catalysts, as described, among other places in US Patent Application No. 10/177,929 filed June 21 , 2002 entitled “Dispersed Growth Of Nanotubes On A Substrate", incorporated above.
  • nanotube networks may be made using deposition methods such as described in US Patent Application No. 10/846,072 filed May 14, 2004 entitled “Flexible nanotube transistors", incorporated above.
  • a useful method of making nanotube networks is described in L. Hu, D. S.
  • the functionalization layer 27 may comprise a composite structure (not shown), for example including a substrate passivation layer, a ligand layer, a bio-probe layer, a selectively permeable layer, and the like.
  • Alternative "Nanotube Network-On -Top" arrangements may be employed.
  • FIG. 28 shows an alternative structural arrangement of a field effect transistor sensor 30 having aspects of the invention generally similar to the embodiment of FIG. 27, and in which a nanotube network 31 is disposed above a biofunctionalization layer 37, but below a subsequently deposited pattern of source and drain conductors 33 and 34.
  • FIG. 28 shows an alternative structural arrangement of a field effect transistor sensor 30 having aspects of the invention generally similar to the embodiment of FIG. 27, and in which a nanotube network 31 is disposed above a biofunctionalization layer 37, but below a subsequently deposited pattern of source and drain conductors 33 and 34.
  • 29 shows an addition alternative exemplary field effect transistor sensor 40 having aspects of the invention, having a nanotube network 41 disposed above both a biofunctionalization layer 47 and source and drain conductors 43 and 44, with the nanotube network 41 covering at least portions of one or both of the electrode elements.
  • Nanostructured Sensor Functionalization may be treated or engaged with many alternative functionalization materials, probes, molecular transducers, coatings and the like.
  • functionalization with respect to a nanostructured sensor device includes generally alternation or additions to the basic electronic device platform to produce or increase sensitivity to one or more target or analyte species, such that the sensitivity induces a measurable effect.
  • fuctionalization may include such things as altering or creating defects in the lattice structure of nanotubes, changing the overall composition of a nanotube network, covalently attaching groups to nanotubes, non-covalently attaching groups or materials to nanotubes, attaching groups to substrates or electrodes adjacent to nanotubes, or combinations of theses.
  • functionalization alterations or additions may be performed either before, during or after the formation of the NT network.
  • a functionalization group may induce a measurable effect upon recognition of a target or analyte by measurable electron transfer effects or by alternations of the microenvironment adjacent the nanotube device so as to induce measurable electronic effects, or combinations of these.
  • Functionalization may include more than one layer, coating or deposited material, e.g., an NTFET may include a recognition material which interacts with a target analyte combined with a protective material which restricts exposure or response to one or more non-target species, such as a selectively permeable layer.
  • functionalization may include the interaction of more than one group or species in addition to the nanotubes of the NTFET or similar device, such as both a fixed recognition material (e.g., a probe biomolecule noncovalently bonded to the nanotubes) and a selected cofactor or substrate species introduced into an analyte medium prior to or coincident with measurement.
  • a fixed recognition material e.g., a probe biomolecule noncovalently bonded to the nanotubes
  • a selected cofactor or substrate species introduced into an analyte medium prior to or coincident with measurement.
  • a biofunctional layer e.g., 27 in FIG.
  • biomolecule 27 may be configured and composed to do one or more operational tasks, for example it may preventing nonspecific binding on non-target species, it may facilitating attachment of biomolecules and/or probe species, it may react to alter the electrical state or electro-chemical environment of the nanotubes when the sensor is exposed to a target species, or combinations of the above.
  • biofunctional compositions or sublayers include those which avoid nonspecific binding of biomolecules, such as a polyethilene glycol (PEG); those that avoid nonspecific binding and to which a biomolecule can be attached, such as a PEG-polyethilene imine (PEI) blend; and/or those that include surfaces or biomolecules that lead to specific binding, such as polymer, and biomolecule coatings. See A.
  • FIGs. 30A-30B shows an exemplary field effect transistor sensor 40 having an additional recognition species such as recognition molecule 58 deposited or ligated to biofunctional layer 57, which in turn is disposed in contact with substrate 52.
  • Nanotube network 51 is formed or deposited upon functionalization layer 57 and in electrical communication between spaced-apart source electrode 53 and drain electrode 54.
  • Recognition molecules may include, for example, DNA probes, enzymes, antibodies and the like, configured and selected to bind, react with and/or hybridize with a target species.
  • FIGS. 8A, 10C and 10D illustrate particular examples of biofunctionalization having aspects of the invention.
  • the probe 70 is shown detecting a single-stranded fragment of DNA 84 by hybridizing with target base sequence 72.
  • linker molecule 67 such as pyrene
  • Suitable sensor circuitry is connected to sensor 60 so as to detect and/or quantify an electrical response of sensor 60 to the hybridization of DNA 74, in a manner described above with respect to other sensor embodiments. See FIGS. 10C and 10D.
  • the conductance between source 63 and drain 64 may change upon hybridization, the change being measured.
  • the hybridization of DNA 74 may cause a phase shift in the device characteristics of sensor 60 produced as the voltage of gate electrode 65 is varied through a selected voltage range. Additional or alternative properties of sensor 60 may be measured to detect hybridization.
  • FIG. 31 is an alternative embodiment having aspects of the invention, generally similar to that of FIG. 8A, in which the probe group is attached to a biofunctional layer adjacent the substrate.
  • the probe 90 is shown detecting a single-stranded fragment of DNA 94 by hybridizing with target base sequence 92.
  • biofunctional layer 95 may be covalently bound to cDNA 88 to form probe 90 via bond 96 (e.g. layer 95 may contain groups configured to bond to the cDNA, such as the polymer shown in FIG. 10C).
  • Suitable sensor circuitry (not shown) is connected to sensor 80 so as to detect and/or quantify an electrical response of sensor 80 to the hybridization of DNA 94, in a manner generally similar to the example of FIG.
  • the conductance between source 83 and drain 84 may change upon hybridization, the change being measured.
  • the hybridization of DNA 94 may cause a phase shift in the device characteristics of sensor 80 produced as the voltage of gate electrode 85 is varied through a selected voltage range. Additional or alternative properties of sensor 80 may be measured to detect hybridization.
  • carbon nanotubes have properties which allow them to be bound or tethered to various biomolecules or chemical species, so that the properties of the biomolecule or chemical species modifies the properties of the nanotube so as to provide useful functionalization capability for NTFETs and like sensors.
  • Exemplary method embodiment for making NTFETS [00417] 1. prepare substrate, array layout, etc.. [00418] 2. deposit contacts
  • biofunctional layer e.g., recognition material, ligand material, protective coating (PEG, etc.), or combinations of these
  • biofunctional layer e.g., recognition material, ligand material, protective coating (PEG, etc.), or combinations of these
  • PEG protective coating
  • a nanosensor device upon a micro- porous membrane or substrate, is that detection chemistry may be accelerated, analyte molecules concentrated, and sensitivity improved. Reaction kinetics in conventional microfluidics, were a liquid sample media flows parallel to a sensor surface, are determined by Nernst diffusion layer ( ⁇ 5 ⁇ m thick).
  • a sensor comprises a porous substrate, and a fluid (liquid or gas) sample may be controlled microfluidically to flow through the substrate. This arrangement makes binding reactions rate-limiting and may decrease assay time by 100 to 1000 fold.
  • exemplary embodiments having aspects of the invention employ the fluid flow of a sample medium to concentrate a dilute target in proximity to the active sensor surface. Likewise, a greater sensitivity may be achieved by cumulative reaction with target species with the sensor as the sample media moves through the substrate.
  • the detection chemistry tends to be transport limited, depending on the diffusion of target molecules across a surface boundary layer to interact with sensitive elements, e.g., a CNT film and/or associated functionalization material.
  • sensitive elements e.g., a CNT film and/or associated functionalization material.
  • the detection chemistry tends to be reaction limited, i.e., the rate at which the target molecules bind or otherwise interact with the sensitive elements. This effect can permit the porous substrate to respond more quickly.
  • the micro-porous membrane can act as a filter, to concentrate or detain target molecules adjacent the sensitive elements, as solvent or suspension phase fluid (e.g., gas or liquid solvent) pass through the membrane relatively unimpeded.
  • solvent or suspension phase fluid e.g., gas or liquid solvent
  • FIG. 32B shows a SEM micrograph of a commercially available microporous anodic alumina membrane with a regular pore diameter of about 20 nm (Anopore® membrane, by Whatman pic), and FIG. 32C shows a SEM micrograph of an experimental anodic alumina membrane with a hexagonal pore arrangement of about 5 nm diameter (University of Twente, Nederlands).
  • FIGS. 33A-33D illustrate alternative exemplary embodiments of nanosensors having aspects of the invention and providing for flow of analyte medium through a porous substrate, and show an exemplary module for fluidic sample analysis.
  • FIG. 33A is a is a cross-sectional diagram of a nanosensor embodiment 4Op similar in a number of respects to the capacitive sensor shown in FIG. 16.
  • the reference numerals refer generally to comparable elements as in FIG. 16.
  • a nanotube network 41 (and optionally any selected functionalization material) is deposited on a microporous membrane 41a, and is shown overlain by an interdigitated pair of contacts d and c2 (44a, 44b).
  • the network is restricted in coverage, so as to leave a nonconducting gap "g" between the network portion "d" and the contact 44a.
  • FIG. 33B is a is a cross-sectional diagram of a nanosensor embodiment 100p similar in a number of respects to the NTFET sensor shown in FIG. 1A.
  • one or more optional gate electrodes 114' are embedded within microporous membrane 41 a (or alternatively, the gate '114 is disposed above the membrane 41a and covered by a thin porous insulator 46).
  • Nanotube network 106 (and optionally any selected functionalization material) is deposited upon membrane 41a, and is contacted by a pair of contacts 110, 112.
  • the microporous membrane 41 a is optionally supported by a porous support 41 b, the porous substrate thus comprising 41a and 41b.
  • 33C and 33D are two orthogonal cross-sectional diagrams of an exemplary flow-though micro-fluidic sensor module 190 providing for the conduct of a gaseous or liquid analyte medium, and including one or more sensor devices disposed on porous substrates, such as the sensors 4Op and 10Op depicted in FIGS. 33A-33B.
  • FIG. 194 there are four such sensors, arranged to share a common porous substrate 41 comprising a microporous membrane 41a and a porous support 41 b, so that the combined devices 4Op, 10Op and substrate 41 form a "porous chip" 194.
  • the chip 194 is mounted within a module housing comprising an upper portion 191a defining an analyte media inlet 192, and a lower portion 191 b defining an analyte media outlet 193.
  • Circuit leads 195 connect the devices 4Op and 10Op of chip 194 through a via in body 191 to an external signal connector 196.
  • body 191 may comprise an assemblage of planar portions such as glass slides, separated by spacers, shaped and formed to provide mountings and conduits (e.g., etched polymer or glass, bonded to planar portions, such as by adhesives, US welding, and the like).
  • Sensor module 190 is preferably integrated in a detector system (not shown) providing for controlled sampling and flow of gaseous or liquid analyte media, and for the analysis and output of measurement date.
  • a detector system not shown
  • sensor embodiments having aspects of the invention to employ electrical modulation of binding interactions, so as to provide increased specificity and increased reaction rates, and to avoid mismatched hybridization and nonspecific binding.
  • adjustable operating modes to favor selected priorities, e.g, higher sensitivity/higher false positives vs lower sensitivity/lower false positives.
  • FIGS. 34A-34b illustrate alternative exemplary embodiments of nanosensors having aspects of the invention and providing for electric field stringency to control binding of non-specific polynucleotides.
  • device 10 comprises a nanotube 2 is in contact with at least one contact 3 (substrate not shown) and has attached one or more polynucleotide probes 5.
  • FIG. 34A shows device 10 with the nanotube 2 in an uncharged state. A highly complementary target 5 is hybridized to probe 4 and a less complementary target 6 is partially hybridized to probe 4'. An excess or non- complementary target 7 is bound to the nanotube 2 but not to a probe.
  • FIG. 34B shows device 10 with the nanotube 2 in an uncharged state.
  • FIG. 35 illustrates alternative exemplary embodiments of nanosensors having aspects of the invention having capillary delivery of samples.
  • the assay device 20 may be configured as a disposable or partially disposable test strip.
  • Device 20 has a detector 10 which is preferably a flow-through sensor as described herein. Sample 1 is applied to a porous intake portion 2 which wicks the sample to contact sensor 10.
  • reagents 3 or bioactive species 4 may be dissolved in sample 1 as it flows towwards sensor 10.
  • Circuitry 8 receives a signal from sensor 10 by connector 7, so as to output a measurement to a user.
  • FIGS. 36A-36C illustrate alternative exemplary embodiment 30 of a nanosensor having aspects of the invention, and having a network of nanotubes 2 superficially applied from solution to a porous membrane 3 (such as that shown in Fig. 32B).
  • the nanotube net work may be prepared and deposited generally in the manner described in US Patent Applications No. 60/748,834, filed December 9, 2005, entitled “Nanoelectronic Sensors Having Substrates With Pre-Patterned Electrodes, And Environmental Ammonia Control System", and No. 11/274,747, filed November 14, 2005, entitled “Carbon Nanotube based Glucose sensing", each of which is incorporated by this reference.
  • a suitable aqueous deposition solution may be made by suspending SWNT-PABS powder in water (preferably at a concentration of about 1 mg/mL), and ultrasonication may be employed to assist in making a homogeneous dispersion.
  • the carbon nanotube dispersion may be sprayed with an air brush to coat the substrate.
  • SWNT-PABS powder poly (m-aminobenzene sulfonic acid or PABS covalently attached to SWNTs) is commercially available from Carbon Solutions, Inc. of Riverside CA, and may be made as described in B Zhao et al, "Synthesis and Properties of a Water-Soluble Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube-Poly(m-aminobenzene sulfonic acid) Graft Copolymer", Adv Funct Mater (2004) VoI 14, No 1 pp 71-76, which article is incorporated by reference.
  • An aqueous solution of SWNT-PABS may be prepared by ultrasonication (e.g., 1 mg/mL).
  • the deposition is done in several light coating steps with intermediate drying (for example on a hotplate with the temperature of about 55 to 75 degree C).
  • the film resistance may be measured between steps until the selected resistance is obtained (the measurement may be between printed traces, or may be by pin probes on the network coating.
  • the deposition may be continued until resistance with a half-inch pin probe spacing is about 15 K Ohm.
  • the PABS assists in creating the aqueous dispersion.
  • alternative solvent methods may be employed, such as are described in US Application No. 10/846,072 filed May 14, 2004, entitled “Flexible nanotube transistors", which is incorporated by reference.
  • nanosensor devices having aspects of the invention exploit one or more of a number of device properties, such as capacitance, transconductance, resistance, impedance, inductance, magnetic or electromechanical properties, piezoelectric effects, electro-optical effects, and the like.
  • Additional conducting elements may be include to permit desired properties to be measured electronically and provide the detector signal or signals, such as source and drain electrodes, counter electrodes, gate electrodes, reference electrodes, pseudo-reference electrodes and the like.
  • the device embodiments may include other elements which enhance nanosensor performance.
  • a micro-hotplate may be include a sensor chip to permit thermal control to enhance sensor speed and/or sensitivity, and to facilitate device recovery or cycling.
  • the device embodiments may be integrated with other components which extend nanosensor system operation, such as a microfluidic sampling device, purification device, PCR or other amplification device, power sources, remote or wireless communication devices, and the like.
  • the devices may be made by known processes used in the semiconductor industry, preferably as a plurality of devices arranged on a wafer. Typically one or a plurality of devices are disposed on each distinct die of the wafer, the die being separated following fabrication and packaged by conventional methods to facilitate integration into an electronic measurement system.
  • Known microprocessors, output devices, displays and/or power sources and the like may be included in the sensor system.
  • Alternative sensor devices having aspects of the invention may be configured for systems including wireless sensor and base receiver/transceiver units to permit dispersed placement of sensor units, allowing convenient integration into existing and/or conventional monitoring and alarm systems (e.g., industrial/environmental monitoring systems, wearable patient monitoring units, and the like).
  • Additional exemplary embodiments having aspects of the invention comprise an electronic sensor device which is biocompatible and configured to be operated with all or a portion of the device emplaced or inserted within a patient's body. Known biocompatible materials may be readily used to construct the sensor device.
  • one or more sensor devices are integrated into or coupled to a drug delivery system.
  • the electronic sensor device is configured so as to control the release of one or more drugs in relation to the measured blood concentration of one or more target species.
  • Sensor devices made according to aspects of the invention may take a number of alternative forms.
  • a disposable sensor unit may be configured to mate to a reusable electronic measurement system, or the measurement system itself may be economically produced so as to be disposable as well.
  • Alternative embodiments may include an array with multiple sensor elements on a chip, wherein the multiple sensors are functionalized for a plurality of different species, so that the device can provide a plurality of distinct measurements.

Abstract

L'invention concerne un dispositif à nanotubes conçu comme un détecteur électronique de séquence d'ADN cible. Un film de nanotubes est déposé sur les électrodes d'un substrat. Une solution d'ADN monocaténaire est préparée de façon à être complémentaire à une séquence d'ADN cible. La solution d'ADN est déposée sur les électrodes, séchée et éliminée du substrat, à l'exception d'une région se situant entre les électrodes. La structure résultante, qui comprend des brins de la séquence d'ADN voulue en contact direct avec les nanotubes, entre des électrodes opposées, forme un détecteur qui est sensible électriquement à la présence de brins d'ADN cible. D'autres formes de réalisation décrites utilisent des groupes lieurs qui fixent des sondes d'ADN simple brin au dispositif de détection à nanotubes.
EP05855662A 2004-12-28 2005-12-23 Dispositifs nanoelectroniques pour la detection d'adn et la reconnaissance de sequences polynucleotidiques Withdrawn EP1831670A4 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (9)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US63995404P 2004-12-28 2004-12-28
US65727505P 2005-02-28 2005-02-28
US66887905P 2005-04-05 2005-04-05
US11/212,026 US20070178477A1 (en) 2002-01-16 2005-08-24 Nanotube sensor devices for DNA detection
US73090505P 2005-10-27 2005-10-27
US11/274,747 US20070208243A1 (en) 2002-01-16 2005-11-15 Nanoelectronic glucose sensors
US73869405P 2005-11-21 2005-11-21
US74883405P 2005-12-09 2005-12-09
PCT/US2005/047143 WO2006071895A2 (fr) 2004-12-28 2005-12-23 Dispositifs nanoelectroniques pour la detection d'adn et la reconnaissance de sequences polynucleotidiques

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1831670A2 true EP1831670A2 (fr) 2007-09-12
EP1831670A4 EP1831670A4 (fr) 2010-09-15

Family

ID=36615493

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP05855662A Withdrawn EP1831670A4 (fr) 2004-12-28 2005-12-23 Dispositifs nanoelectroniques pour la detection d'adn et la reconnaissance de sequences polynucleotidiques

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1831670A4 (fr)
JP (1) JP2008525822A (fr)
WO (1) WO2006071895A2 (fr)

Families Citing this family (34)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8154093B2 (en) 2002-01-16 2012-04-10 Nanomix, Inc. Nano-electronic sensors for chemical and biological analytes, including capacitance and bio-membrane devices
US7948041B2 (en) 2005-05-19 2011-05-24 Nanomix, Inc. Sensor having a thin-film inhibition layer
JP2008511008A (ja) * 2004-08-24 2008-04-10 ナノミックス・インコーポレーテッド Ｄｎａ検出用ナノチューブセンサー装置
JP2009532064A (ja) * 2006-04-04 2009-09-10 ナノミックス・インコーポレーテッド 被検体増幅とレポーターを用いる生体分子のナノ電子的検出
ES2289948B1 (es) * 2006-07-19 2008-09-16 Starlab Barcelona, S.L. Sensor electrofisiologico.
JP5061342B2 (ja) * 2006-09-11 2012-10-31 国立大学法人大阪大学 カーボンナノチューブ電極及び当該電極を用いたセンサー
US8465634B2 (en) * 2007-05-23 2013-06-18 Arizona Board Of Regents Systems and methods for integrated electrochemical and electrical detection
WO2009026729A1 (fr) * 2007-08-30 2009-03-05 University Of Waterloo Peptides à auto-assemblage à base d'appariement d'acides aminés et procédés
JP5235215B2 (ja) * 2008-07-10 2013-07-10 株式会社イデアルスター ガスセンサー
WO2010039941A2 (fr) * 2008-10-02 2010-04-08 University Of New Haven Dispositif de détection par nanocapteur biologique
GB0822733D0 (en) * 2008-12-12 2009-01-21 Univ Warwick Nanotube electrochemistry
EP2462051A4 (fr) 2009-08-07 2013-06-26 Nanomix Inc Biodétection à base d'un nanotube de carbone magnétique
JP2011220803A (ja) * 2010-04-08 2011-11-04 Mitsumi Electric Co Ltd 電界効果トランジスタ素子を具備するバイオセンサ
US9184099B2 (en) 2010-10-04 2015-11-10 The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University Biosensor devices, systems and methods therefor
KR101963462B1 (ko) 2010-10-04 2019-03-28 제납시스 인크. 재사용 가능한 자동화 평행 생물 반응 시스템 및 방법
US9399217B2 (en) 2010-10-04 2016-07-26 Genapsys, Inc. Chamber free nanoreactor system
US9926596B2 (en) 2011-05-27 2018-03-27 Genapsys, Inc. Systems and methods for genetic and biological analysis
KR101940833B1 (ko) * 2011-05-27 2019-01-21 제납시스 인크. 유전자 및 생물학적 분석을 위한 시스템 및 방법
US8585973B2 (en) 2011-05-27 2013-11-19 The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University Nano-sensor array
CN106591103B (zh) 2011-12-01 2021-06-04 吉纳普赛斯股份有限公司 用于高效电子测序与检测的系统和方法
CN104781658B (zh) 2012-10-16 2017-11-21 皇家飞利浦有限公司 具有纳米线chemfet传感器的集成电路、感测设备、测量方法及制造方法
CN102938397B (zh) * 2012-12-05 2015-09-09 苏州纳格光电科技有限公司 电子器件及其制备方法
WO2014152625A1 (fr) 2013-03-15 2014-09-25 Genapsys, Inc. Systèmes et procédés pour l'analyse biologique
JP6473444B2 (ja) * 2013-05-29 2019-02-20 シーエスアイアールＣｓｉｒ 電界効果トランジスタ及び複数の電界効果トランジスタを含む気体検出器
US10125393B2 (en) 2013-12-11 2018-11-13 Genapsys, Inc. Systems and methods for biological analysis and computation
WO2015086654A1 (fr) * 2013-12-12 2015-06-18 Altra Tech Limited Capteur capacitif et procédé d'utilisation
US9822401B2 (en) 2014-04-18 2017-11-21 Genapsys, Inc. Methods and systems for nucleic acid amplification
WO2016168734A1 (fr) * 2015-04-15 2016-10-20 Malcolm Alastair J Procédés de fabrication de réseaux de semi-conducteurs
WO2017033922A1 (fr) * 2015-08-24 2017-03-02 国立大学法人 東京大学 Procédé permettant de détecter une substance cible à l'aide d'un transistor à effet de champ
CN116397014A (zh) 2016-07-20 2023-07-07 测序健康公司 用于核酸测序的系统和方法
EP3684951A4 (fr) 2017-09-21 2021-06-16 Genapsys, Inc. Systèmes et procédés de séquençage d'acides nucléiques
US20190219512A1 (en) * 2018-01-12 2019-07-18 Clifford H. Kern, III Device, procedure and system for detecting bacterial pathogens including methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus or clostridium difficile
CN113588605A (zh) * 2021-06-18 2021-11-02 山东师范大学 一种检测多种环境雌激素的方法及其应用
US11845079B2 (en) * 2021-12-08 2023-12-19 International Business Machines Corporation Integrated silicon platform for electronic biosensors

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20040202603A1 (en) * 1994-12-08 2004-10-14 Hyperion Catalysis International, Inc. Functionalized nanotubes
US7416699B2 (en) * 1998-08-14 2008-08-26 The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University Carbon nanotube devices
EP1247089B1 (fr) * 1999-12-15 2008-07-23 Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University Dispositifs de nanotubes de carbone
KR20030055346A (ko) * 2000-12-11 2003-07-02 프레지던트 앤드 펠로우즈 오브 하버드 칼리지 나노센서
JP2003322653A (ja) * 2002-05-07 2003-11-14 Toshiba Corp プローブ固定支持体及びプローブ固定担体
AU2003291385A1 (en) * 2002-11-08 2004-06-03 Nanomix, Inc. Nanotube-based electronic detection of biological molecules
JP2004347532A (ja) * 2003-05-23 2004-12-09 Japan Science & Technology Agency バイオセンサー

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
No further relevant documents disclosed *
See also references of WO2006071895A2 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2006071895A2 (fr) 2006-07-06
WO2006071895A3 (fr) 2007-02-08
EP1831670A4 (fr) 2010-09-15
JP2008525822A (ja) 2008-07-17

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1831670A2 (fr) Dispositifs nanoelectroniques pour la detection d'adn et la reconnaissance de sequences polynucleotidiques
US20070178477A1 (en) Nanotube sensor devices for DNA detection
JP5743974B2 (ja) Ｄｎａ検出用ナノチューブセンサー装置
US9880126B2 (en) Biosensor based on carbon nanotube-electric field effect transistor and method for producing the same
Feigel et al. Biosensors based on one-dimensional nanostructures
US9103775B2 (en) Nano-electronic sensors for chemical and biological analytes, including capacitance and bio-membrane devices
US8232584B2 (en) Nanoscale sensors
Liu et al. Carbon nanomaterials field-effect-transistor-based biosensors
Patolsky et al. Nanowire sensors for medicine and the life sciences
Stern et al. Semiconducting nanowire field-effect transistor biomolecular sensors
Berdat et al. Label-free detection of DNA with interdigitated micro-electrodes in a fluidic cell
US20060269927A1 (en) Nanoscale sensors
US20070259359A1 (en) Nanoelectronic Detection of Biomolecules Employing Analyte Amplification and Reporters
CN102016570A (zh) 使用和构建纳米传感器平台的方法
CA2646465A1 (fr) Appareil de capteurs lies en microreseau incluant des materiaux pour une sonde biologique et utilisant des transistors en nanotubes de carbone
CA2484948A1 (fr) Detection electrique d'hybridation d'adn et d'autres evenements specifiques de liaison
KR101130947B1 (ko) 탄소나노튜브-전계효과 트랜지스터 기반의 바이오센서 및 그 제조방법
Bronder et al. Detection of PCR-amplified tuberculosis DNA fragments with polyelectrolyte-modified field-effect sensors
JP2004132954A (ja) 一個または複数個の分析物を検出するための方法および装置、ならびに装置の使用
WO2007114931A2 (fr) Detection nanoelectronique de biomolecules en employant l'amplification des analytes et des rapporteurs
JP4482856B2 (ja) 試料中の標的物質の検出方法、センサ基体、及び検出キット
US20090258438A1 (en) Method for universal biodetection of antigens and biomolecules
JP5069343B2 (ja) 炭素ナノチューブ−電界効果トランジスタベースのバイオセンサー及びその製造方法
US20210140917A1 (en) Devices and methods for detecting/discriminating complementary and mismatched nucleic acids using ultrathin film field-effect transistors
Liu et al. Label-free protein detection by ZnO nanowire based bio-sensors

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20070619

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: NANOMIX, INC.

A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 20100818

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: C12M 3/00 20060101ALI20100812BHEP

Ipc: G01N 27/00 20060101ALI20100812BHEP

Ipc: G01N 27/12 20060101ALI20100812BHEP

Ipc: G01N 21/00 20060101AFI20070709BHEP

Ipc: G01N 33/543 20060101ALI20100812BHEP

Ipc: C12Q 1/68 20060101ALI20100812BHEP

Ipc: G01N 33/00 20060101ALI20100812BHEP

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20110317