EP1828065B1 - vERFAHREN ZUR ERHÖHTEN PRODUKTION VON BIOGAS IN THERMOPHILEN, ANAEROBEN FERMENTERN - Google Patents

vERFAHREN ZUR ERHÖHTEN PRODUKTION VON BIOGAS IN THERMOPHILEN, ANAEROBEN FERMENTERN Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1828065B1
EP1828065B1 EP20050812051 EP05812051A EP1828065B1 EP 1828065 B1 EP1828065 B1 EP 1828065B1 EP 20050812051 EP20050812051 EP 20050812051 EP 05812051 A EP05812051 A EP 05812051A EP 1828065 B1 EP1828065 B1 EP 1828065B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
thermophilic
biogas
anaerobic
acetogenic
hydrogen
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP20050812051
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1828065A1 (de
Inventor
Kornel Kovacs
Zoltan Bagi
Katalin Rakhelyne Perei
Gabor Rakhely
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Schmack Biogas GmbH
Original Assignee
Schmack Biogas GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Schmack Biogas GmbH filed Critical Schmack Biogas GmbH
Priority to SI200531596T priority Critical patent/SI1828065T1/sl
Priority to PL05812051T priority patent/PL1828065T3/pl
Publication of EP1828065A1 publication Critical patent/EP1828065A1/de
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1828065B1 publication Critical patent/EP1828065B1/de
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F3/00—Biological treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
    • C02F3/34—Biological treatment of water, waste water, or sewage characterised by the microorganisms used
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F3/00—Biological treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
    • C02F2003/001—Biological treatment of water, waste water, or sewage using granular carriers or supports for the microorganisms
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F2103/00—Nature of the water, waste water, sewage or sludge to be treated
    • C02F2103/20—Nature of the water, waste water, sewage or sludge to be treated from animal husbandry
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F2301/00—General aspects of water treatment
    • C02F2301/10—Temperature conditions for biological treatment
    • C02F2301/106—Thermophilic treatment
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F3/00—Biological treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
    • C02F3/28—Anaerobic digestion processes
    • C02F3/286—Anaerobic digestion processes including two or more steps
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E50/00—Technologies for the production of fuel of non-fossil origin
    • Y02E50/30—Fuel from waste, e.g. synthetic alcohol or diesel

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a use of a thermophilic, anaerobic, acetogenic, hydrogen-producing bacterium for increasing biogas production of thermophilic anaerobe systems wherein the biogas fermentation system is inoculated with a microorganism culture.
  • the microorganism is selected to increase the production of an intermedier facilitating the process and/or expedite decomposition of the substrate, thereby promote microbial events resulting in biogas production.
  • methane-rich biogas is formed when organic material from various sources is decomposed under anaerobic conditions.
  • Numerous microbial strains participate in the process, these strains can be divided into three major groups.
  • the first group include polymer-degrading bacteria; they hydrolyze large biomolecules and convert them into smaller molecules. These intermediates constitute the foodstuff for the acetogens, which produce organic acids, for example acetate, propionate, and butyrate. In certain cases the acetogens also produce hydrogen as a byproduct of their metabolism.
  • the third group of microbes participating in biogas formation is called the group of methanogens.
  • biogas i.e., methane and carbon dioxide.
  • the microbes taking part in the degradation of organic material and in the generation of biogas depend on each others' metabolic activity: they form a consortium when functioning properly.
  • Patent EP 0 263 796 A specific difficulty identified in Patent EP 0 263 796 is the different optimal temperature requirement for the hydrolytic and acetogenic steps (above 37°C) and for methanogenesis (below 37°C).
  • thermophilic systems may be increased by the supply of in situ produced hydrogen using a hydrogen producer bacterium.
  • thermophilic biogas production consortia As the microbiological composition of the thermophilic biogas production consortia is completely different from the mesophilic counterpart, due to the huge difference in the operational temperature, conclusions based on findings for mesophilic systems can not extended to thermophilic biogas production. Therefore, our understanding of the mesophilic process cannot be extrapolated to the thermophilic technology.
  • thermophilic and mesophilic anaerobic digestion carried out a comparative study of thermophilic and mesophilic anaerobic digestion in order to evaluate various reactor configurations.
  • the authors used a thermophilic anaerobic sludge culture obtained from an anaerobic sludge digester to start fermentation. This is a well established method used by the present inventors as well as many others to shorten the start-up period of reactors. Such an inoculating culture is spontaneously formed and its composition is undefined.
  • Kim et al concluded that "Two phase digestion at both temperatures did not show any significant benefit".
  • Kim et al. described their results with a model in which the microorganisms in a consortium are in a close proximity to each other.
  • Kim et al. also mentioned, as a hypothesis, that H2 concentration should be in a very narrow range, i.e. between 10 -4 to 10 -6 at to achieve sufficient conversion of propionate to acetate/H2 and in turn H2 conversion to methane and mention that "this is a severe limitation" (page 4370, paragraph bridging col 1 and col 2).
  • Kim et al. do not suggest any simple and effective tool to improve biogas production of these fermentors.
  • thermophilic anaerobic systems are particularly vulnerable and are usually less stable from a microbiological point of view.
  • the metabolic equilibrium may shift significantly due to the accumulation of organic acids, and biogas production may stop. If this operational disaster takes place the fermenter has to be emptied and restarted using fresh organic substrate and the development of the proper microbial consortium usually takes a significant amount of time, sometimes even months.
  • thermophilic biogas production systems that may use various organic materials and wastes as substrate. It is of particular importance to have efficient, one-reactor systems in the thermophilic temperature range for the economically feasible biogas production.
  • the new process to be proposed is aimed to serve this goal by advising an environmentally friendly, efficient technology that allows large scale implementation.
  • thermophilic biogas production technologies can be increased by adding a suitable hydrogen producing thermophilic microbial culture to the already existing natural biogas production consortium.
  • the microbial activity of methane producers can be augmented this way in the thermophilic consortium, by supplying sufficient reducing power and substrate for biological methane production.
  • An additional advantage can be employed if we use a hydrogen producer strain that contributes to the better utilization of the organic substrate, e.g., by its capability to hydrolyze biopolymers.
  • the anaerobic biogas production can be intensified via a relatively simple biotechnological method. This improves the economical feasibility of the overall system when wastes and side products generated in food processing and agricultural activities are converted to biogas in an anaerobic treatment technology.
  • thermophilic system proved to be useful in a wide variety of applications using biomass from many sources. This indicates that the various thermophilic microbial consortia are similar in at least one aspect, i.e., in situ hydrogen production is a crucially important beneficial step in all thermophilic systems investigated so far.
  • Caldicellulosiruptor saccharolyticus is a particularly suitable microorganism to bring about the desired advantageous effect.
  • the invention relates to a use of a thermophilic, anaerobic, acetogenic, hydrogen-producing bacterium for increasing methane production in a biomass fermenting system, wherein biomass is fermented under anaerobic and thermophilic conditions by a consortium comprising polymer degrading microorganisms, acetogenic microorganisms and methanogenic microorganisms.
  • the invention relates to a use for increasing biogas production by fermenting biomass under anaerobic and thermophilic conditions, by using a consortium comprising polymer degrading microorganisms, acetogenic microorganisms and methanogenic microorganisms, wherein before starting biogas production or during biogas production a culture of the thermophilic, hydrogen producing microorganism is added, at least once, to the biogas producing consortium.
  • the consortium further comprises a polymer degrading microorganism and/or before the start of biogas production or during biogas production a polymer degrading microorganism is added, at least once, to the consortium.
  • thermophilic conditions Upon fermentation thermophilic conditions are provided, preferably the temperature is set to 45-70°C, more preferably to 50-60°C.
  • the pH is set.
  • the pH is between pH 6 and pH 8 more preferably between pH 6,5 and pH 7,5 , highly preferably between pH 6,5 and pH 7, between pH 6,8 and pH 7,2, e.g. about pH 7, or between pH 7 and pH 7,5.
  • the microorganisms of the invention are bacteria.
  • the microorganisms are thermophiles, i.e. are capable of exerting their desired effect under thermophilic conditions, i.e. temperature range.
  • the temperature under the thermophilic conditions used in the invention is preferably 40-90°C, more preferably 45-70°C, highly preferably 50-60°C.
  • the hydrogen producing bacterium used according to the invention is an acetogenic bacterium.
  • an acetogenic bacterium which is capable of working under thermophilic and anaerobic condition, and which is a hydrogen producer.
  • the bacterium used in the invention has a polymer degrading, preferably a carbohydrate (polysaccharide) degrading activity.
  • additives can be used.
  • the additives may be e.g. nutrients or foodstuffs for the microorganisms or bacteria, e.g. various organic compounds or mixture thereof. Certain compounds, e.g. sugar may result in a substrate inhibition; therefore, experiments should be carried out to determine the useful quantity.
  • Materials of large surface area e.g. wood chips, can be applied as well, and in preferred embodiments the cells can be bound to carriers (immobilized to), e.g. rhyolitic tuff.
  • the biomass can be any material.
  • the biomass can be any material.
  • the biomass can be any material.
  • sedimented or pelleted e.g. by centrifuge
  • immobilized cells e.g. cells immobilized to e.g. rhyolitic tuff or perlite
  • Biomass means the organic material of living or non-living organisms (i.e., of microbial, plant or animal origin) and the byproducts of any industrial processing that use these materials as well as the organic fraction of biological origin produced in agricultural activities and human sess.
  • the biomass or its fraction can be converted using fermentation.
  • a "microbial consortium” means a population of several microbial species, involving at least two independent strains or species, where at least one metabolic product of one species is utilized by an other one, i.e. the microorganisms cooperate or act together.
  • Thermophilic conditions mean an environment that is suitable for microbial growth and has a minimum temperature of 40°C, preferably of 45°C, and more preferably of 45-75°C or at least 50°C, highly preferably or 50-60°C.
  • acetogenic bacterium is a microbe that produces small organic acids as one of the end products of its fermentation, e.g., acetate, propionate, or butyrate, from the degradation products of biopolymers such as polysaccharides or proteins.
  • a "hydrogen producing" acetogenic bacterium is capable of converting substrate molecules of biopolymer origin (e.g. polysaccharides, proteins) to hydrogen gas.
  • the acetogenic and hydrogen producing acetogenic bacteria to be used in the patented process act preferably but not exclusively as part of a microbial consortium.
  • the invention relates to a use of a thermophilic, anaerobic, acetogenic, hydrogen-producing bacterium for increasing methane production in a biomass fermenting system.
  • An essential element of the use of the invention is the inoculation of the biogas producing system by an appropriate microorganism culture, wherein said biogas producing system operates at thermophilic temperatures by anaerobe fermentation.
  • the inoculation can be used both during the start-up period of a biogas fermenter and during the operational period of an already established biogas fermenting system.
  • the microbe should be a hydrogen producing, thermophilic (growing at 45-70°C preferentially between 50-60°C), anaerobic microorganism. Preferably, it should be an acetogenic bacterium.
  • the biological activity of the selected microorganism should facilitate the microbiological events leading to biogas production, e.g., through the generation of intermediers suitable for increased biogas yield or through a more thorough fermentation of the original organic substrate.
  • the microorganism fulfils both of these requirements.
  • the appropriate bacterium may be selected by e.g. the following approach:
  • any newly isolated thermophilic, polymer degrading strain can be tested.
  • the polymer degrading capability is demonstrated by growing the bacteria on the particular polymer (oligo or polysaccharides) as a sole carbon source. Those that can grow on the particular carbon source will be capable of its metabolism. Tests should be carried out under anaerobic (anoxic), thermophilic conditions, at nearly neutral pH. If the selected microbe can grow in a biogas forming consortium, it may contribute to the intensification of biogas production.
  • the hydrogen evolving activity of the isolated strain should be checked.
  • the selected or isolated strain is tested for its polymer degrading activity. This can be e.g. the degradation of proteins and/or polysaccharides.
  • thermophilic, polymer degrading, protein degrading or carbohydrate degrading microorganisms for an acetogenic bacterium strain of increased hydrogen producing activity.
  • strain(s) selected according the above-mentioned procedures will most likely be suitable to be used in the invention, model experiments are advisably needed before large scale application to see if the selected strain can indeed fit into the thermophilic biogas producing consortium.
  • thermophilic consortium In these laboratory scale experiments the selected strain(s) are tested for their ability to adapt to the thermophilic consortium. Biogas production is modeled such a way that before the start of the fermentation or during the developed process the separately cultivated bacteria are added and biogas production is monitored together. The control experiment is identical in every aspect except that the intensifying bacterium is not added to the system.
  • composition is determined.
  • inoculum is Caldicellulosiruptor saccharolyticus and preferably the strain DSM 8903. This strain and other strains possessing similar properties can be used for the intensification of biogas production.
  • the size of the inoculum is usually 5-10% of the total fermenter volume if a growing culture is used.
  • the biomass substrate is filled into the fermenter and biogas production is started using any of the known procedures and a biogas production system using natural consortia of microorganisms is developed.
  • the biogas producing fermenter is inoculated with the cultivated monoculture of the selected bacterium, e.g., Caldicellulosiruptor saccharolyticus. If necessary the inoculation is repeated as the fermentation progresses.
  • a minimum requirement is to maintain the system at the appropriate temperature and under anaerobic conditions.
  • the anaerobic degradation of most biomass sources develops spontaneously although the start-up phase may need considerable time in certain cases.
  • the appropriate pH which is usually near neutral, should be maintained when some biomass sources are fermented, e.g., biomass of plant origin; in other cases (e.g., waste water sludge, animal manure) the pH becomes stable without adding any buffering substance.
  • the start-up phase can be shortened by using inocula for example from an anaerobic waste water sludge treatment facility.
  • Inocula can be obtained from any thermophilic anaerobic digester or can be prepared separately by using animal manure or waste water sludge and incubating it under anaerobic conditions at thermophilic temperature and incubating it until fermentation starts.
  • thermophilic temperature by slowly elevating the temperature.
  • the preferred experimental vessel is a single space anaerobic fermenter capable of continuous or semi-continuous operational modes.
  • the biogas produced is transferred from time to time or, preferably, continuously and used for energy production. Biogas can be utilized near the site of its production.
  • the hydrogen evolving activity of the selected strain(s) can be tested using the following method:
  • strains degrading polysaccharides are screened.
  • An example of how this can be tested is the following:
  • Protein degradation activity is also determined by using a spectrophotometer.
  • the supernatant of the precultivated bacterium strain is added to the protein sample and the pH is adjusted to 7.0 with phosphate buffer. Absorbance of the sample is measured at 280 nm. A decrease in absorbance indicates protein degradation activity.
  • Both strains were stored in a frozen state at -70°C, they were cultivated in the specified respective DSM media, i.e., DSM-1 for Enterobacter and DSM 640 for Caldicellulosiruptor. Inocula were routinely cultivated in 150 ml sterile glass vessels under oxygen free nitrogen gas to ensure the anaerobic environment.
  • Pig slurry was used in this preliminary experiment.
  • the slurry substrate was dispensed in 50 ml aliquots into glass vessels of 100 ml volume and sealed air tight. Some of the vessels were inoculated with 5ml of pure culture of Caldicellulosiruptor saccharolyticus.
  • the headspace was replaced with nitrogen gas. Incubation was carried out at 55°C. A gas sample was removed anaerobically from the head space every day and the gas was subjected to qualitative and quantitative analysis. The results are presented in Fig. 1 .
  • the x axis of the graph indicates days after the start of the experiment, the y axis shows the amount of the biogas in GC units.
  • the inoculated ones clearly display that methane production starts faster and the overall biogas generation produces more gas than in the controls.
  • the basic substrate for biogas production was pig slurry again, but it is treated in 50 liter fermenters and additives were tested for their ability to augment biogas production.
  • the additives examined were waste water sludge, sugar (saccharose) and wood chips.
  • Waste water activated sludge contains mostly microorganisms and some undigested organic material, sugar is a preferred carbon source for most microbes and wood chip increased the surface available for the microbes.
  • Figure 2 demonstrates that in the presence of Caldicellulosiruptor saccharolyticus biogas production started very quickly and the overall gas production volume clearly exceeds that of the control. When sugar was added to the system, substrate inhibition was observed.
  • the dried biomass was used at various concentrations, in 1-10VN% range.
  • the tests were carried out in sealed glass vessels of 100 ml volume.
  • the experiments aimed to determine the intensification conditions using centrifuged bacteria ( Fig. 3 ) and the same bacteria immobilized on rhyolitic tuff (perlite) ( Fig. 4 ).
  • biogas production can be intensified even when the substrate is predominantly a low biogas yield, cellulose rich material, i.e. an energy grass. It has also been concluded that concentration of the bacteria by centrifugation and even more advantageously through immobilization on a cheap mineral carrier material may further improve biogas production.
  • concentration of the bacteria by centrifugation and even more advantageously through immobilization on a cheap mineral carrier material may further improve biogas production.
  • Several high specific surface carrier material can be used for immobilization of the hydrogen producing bacteria; perlite, a low cost and abundant material, is just one of them.
  • Fig. 5 shows the daily methane production, measured at taking aliquot samples.
  • the numbers indicate the cumulative biogas production measured in the head space of the glass vessels. The value obtained on the 14 th day was considered 100% for comparisons.
  • methane production starts on the 7 th or 8 th day.
  • the vessels were incubated at 55°C, which was significantly higher than the initial temperature of the biomass. It is conceivable that the microbes present in the slurry had to adopt themselves to the thermophilic conditions and it took time to develop a stable thermophilic consortium. This explains why biogas production started only after an extended period of time (day 7 or 8); actually by this time methanogens, initiating an intensive methane production, were grown up.
  • Fig. 6 shows the volume of accumulated biogas in the vessels, day by day. The experiment was terminated on day 14 and the total amount generated by this time was considered as 100%. Intensive methane formation was observed from day 5 or 6 and biogas production decreased after day 12. The experiment demonstrated that waste water sludge is a suitable substrate for biogas production.
  • Fig. 8 shows the comparison of the cumulative biogas productions using these various substrates.
  • Jerusalem artichoke is a particularly suitable source of biomass for biogas production. This plant can be cultivated using cheap technology and produces high concentration of biomass. It is also concluded that the process described here can be useful with other energy plants as well.
  • Examples 3-5 we have demonstrated that biogas production can be intensified as a result of the addition of a suitably selected bacterium (which was C. saccharolyticus in these examples but it could be an other strain as well), and there is a direct cause-effect relationship accompanying the addition of the bacteria in various forms.
  • a suitably selected bacterium which was C. saccharolyticus in these examples but it could be an other strain as well
  • the substrates were used in 10-15 g quantity and the dry matter content was precisely determined. Then a suspension was prepared by the addition of water or buffer solution. The reaction volume was standardized so that each gram of dry matter was dispersed in 40 ml of water or aqueous solution, and the volume of the substrate was augmented accordingly. The final volume was thus around 400 ml in each experiment. When substrates of plant origin were studied, it was suspended routinely in phosphate buffer (pH7).
  • Sealable glass vessels of 500 ml volume were used, immediately after filling in the substrate the vessels were sealed air-tight and the headspace was made anaerobic by flushing it with high purity nitrogen gas.
  • the reaction vessels were connected to containers filled with saturated salt solution and the volume of the produced biogas was determined by measuring the amount of salt solution displaced by the biogas.
  • the measured values were normalized to the gas volume at 30°C in order to make sure that the data do not contain systematic error due to the temperature dependence of gas expansion.
  • the productivity values are expressed as biogas ml per 1 g of organic solid for direct comparison.
  • the gas composition of biogas (e.g. methane and carbon-dioxide) was followed using a gas chromatograph (SRI 8610C) fitted with a PorapackQ column and thermal conductivity detector.
  • the gas chromatograph was calibrated using standard methods and gas mixtures.
  • the methane content of the biogas ranged between 50-60% in the experiments.
  • Figures show the total biogas production.
  • the hydrogen producing bacteria were separately cultivated as described in Example 1 and the fresh cultures were added to the vessels in 5-20v/v% (preferably in 10v/v%) concentration.
  • Enterobacter cloacae DSM 3264 was used as mesophilic hydrogen producer at 30°C and Caldicellulosiruptor saccharolyticus DSM 8903 was employed as thermophilic hydrogen producer at 55°C.
  • Controls were supplemented with equal volume of fresh media, without bacteria.
  • Biogas formation was measured daily and plotted as seen in the figures. The cumulative biogas production was estimated after normalizing the gas volumes and adding up the partial values. The total generated biogas (normalized for 1 g organic solid and for 30°C temperature) was compared with the same numbers obtained with the controls and their ratio was defined as the degree of intensification.
  • saccharolyticus Total gas volume at 30° per 1 g dry matter (ml): 84,8 119,5 Degree of intensification (%): 100% 140,9 Jerusalem artichoke, tuber Mesophilic (30°C): mass of treated biomass (g): 28 dry material content (%) 36,8 dry material/experiment (g): 10,3 Results control 74,0 E. cloacae 109,0 Total gas volume at 30° per 1 g dry matter (ml): Degree of intensification (%): 100 147,2 Thermophilic (55°C): mass of treated biomass (g): 28 dry material content (%) 21,14 dry material/experiment (g): 5,9192 Results control C.
  • saccharolyticus mass of treated biomass (g): 400 400 dry material content (%) 4,1 4,1 dry material/experiment (g): 16,4 16,4 Results control
  • thermophilic anaerobic, hydrogen producer The beneficial effect of the addition of a thermophilic anaerobic, hydrogen producer has been demonstrated in a filed experiment.
  • the fermenter was erected on a pig farm that has approximately 12000 pigs.
  • the main unit of the set-up is the fermenter, which is a single reactor space, anaerobic fermenter having a total volume of 15 m 3 .
  • the operational temperature was 55°C, this was maintained with the help of a built in heating coil in which hot water was circulated.
  • the completely stirred fermenter was filled up with 6 m 3 of pig slurry.
  • the fermenter works in a semi-continuous mode of operation, every day 10% of the fermenter volume is replaced with fresh substrate.
  • a gas storage container hold the biogas and prevents potentially dangerous backflow of the gas and/or substrate.
  • the biogas then passes through a water vapor removing device (cold finger) before it passes through a gas volume metering device that records the biogas production in a continuous manner. Gas samples are collected at this point in order to follow the changes in gas composition.
  • a gas torch then bums the biogas for safety reasons, in order to avoid risk of explosion.
  • the fermenter is air tight and thus establishes and maintains anaerobic conditions.
  • the biogas generated at the beginning of the process replaces air above the liquid phase in the fermenter.
  • anaerobicity can be established by purging the fermenter with nitrogen or carbon dioxide gases.
  • the fermenter was almost completely filled with pig slurry, the volume of which was continuously lowered to a level of 6 m 3 .
  • the invention brings about modifications in the anaerobic biomass treatment technologies, which increases the efficacy of already existing biogas plants and shortens the pay-out period of newly established ones by implementing a relatively simple process.
  • the newly recognized advantageous properties of the participating microorganisms are exploited.
  • the technology converts organic waste and byproducts of agriculture and the food production industry and communal organic waste in a closed process into biogas and biofertilizer. Az a result, the environmentally dangerous organic biomass, which is frequently considered as "waste" is recycled without the production of other pollutants.
  • the products of the improved anaerobic treatment technology are useful for renewable energy carrier and as a fertilizer.
  • the technology can be adopted to every known and currently used anaerobic biological treatment processes. It is particularly beneficial in animal farms dealing with at least 200 animals having a unit size of 500 kg each or equivalent smaller livestock.
  • the technology gives excellent results with animal manure or sludge, solid, mixed or liquid other organic wastes, communal solid wastes, waste water sludge, and various agricultural and food industrial wastes.

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Biodiversity & Conservation Biology (AREA)
  • Hydrology & Water Resources (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Water Supply & Treatment (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Processing Of Solid Wastes (AREA)
  • Treatment Of Sludge (AREA)
  • Preparation Of Compounds By Using Micro-Organisms (AREA)

Claims (10)

  1. Verwendung eines thermophilen, anaeroben, acetogenen, Wasserstoff produzierenden Bakteriums zur Erhöhung der Methanproduktion in einem Biogas produzierenden System, wobei Biomasse unter anaeroben und thermophilen Bedingungen durch eine Polymer abbauende Mikroorganismen, acetogene Mikroorganismen und methanogene Mikroorganismen umfassende Mikroorganismengemeinschaft fermentiert wird.
  2. Verwendung nach Anspruch 1, wobei das Biogas produzierende System mit einer Kultur des thermophilen, anaeroben, acetogenen, Wasserstoff produzierenden Bakteriums während der Startphase oder während der Betriebsphase des Biogas fermentierenden Systems inokuliert wird.
  3. Verwendung nach einem der Ansprüche 1 oder 2, wobei das thermophile, anaerobe, acetogene, Wasserstoff produzierende Bakterium zur Gattung Thermotoga, Thermococcus, Pyrococcus, Clostridium, Ruminococcus oder zur Gattung Caldicellulosiruptor gehört, wobei das thermophile, anaerobe, acetogene, Wasserstoff produzierende Bacterium bevorzugt Caldicellulosiruptor saccharolyticus ist.
  4. Verwendung nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 3, wobei die Biomasse:
    - Flüssigmist,
    - Klärschlamm oder
    - Pflanzenabfall, bevorzugt Pflanzenabfall von energiereichen Pflanzen,
    oder jedes Gemisch davon ist.
  5. Verwendung nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 4, wobei das thermophile, anaerobe, acetogene, Wasserstoff produzierende Bakterium zusammen mit einem Additiv verwendet wird, wobei das Additiv bevorzugt ein Material ist, das von einem der Mikroorganismen als Nährstoff nutzbar ist und/oder ein Material mit vergrößerter Oberfläche ist.
  6. Verwendung nach Anspruch 5, wobei die Zellen des thermophilen, anaeroben, acetogenen, Wasserstoff produzierendem Bakteriums sedimentiert oder an einen Träger, bevorzugt einen inerten Träger mit hoch spezifischer Oberfläche, z. B. Perlit, gebunden sind.
  7. Verwendung nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 6, wobei die Biomasse in einem Fermenter mit einem einzigen Reaktorbehälter oder einem einzigen Reaktorraum fermentiert wird.
  8. Verwendung nach Anspruch 7, wobei das thermophile, anaerobe, acetogene, Wasserstoff produzierende Bakterium in einem Verfahren verwendet wird, bei dem die Biomasse in einem kontinuierlichen Betriebssystem fermentiert wird, wobei
    das produzierte Biogas und/oder die produzierte fermentierte Biomasse kontinuierlich oder mehrmals, bevorzugt in gegebenen Zeiträumen, entfernt wird, und
    das thermophile, anaerobe, acetogene, Wasserstoff produzierende Bakterium kontinuierlich oder mehrmals, bevorzugt in gegebenen Zeiträumen, in den Fermenter eingespeist wird.
  9. Verwendung nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 8, wobei das Bakterium eine Polymer abbauende, bevorzugt eine Kohlenhydrat abbauende Aktivität aufweist.
  10. Verwendung nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, wobei das thermophile, anaerobe, acetogene, Wasserstoff produzierende Bakterium in einem Verfahren verwendet wird, das die folgenden Schritte umfasst:
    - Starten der Fermentation der Biomasse durch Einstellen ihrer Temperatur auf 45 bis 70 C, bevorzugt auf 50 bis 60 °C, und optional Inokulieren der Biomasse mit einem Inokulum, das Polymer abbauende Mikroorganismen, acetogene Mikroorganismen und/oder methanogene Mikroorganismen umfasst,
    - Bereitstellen von anaeroben Bedingungen für die Fermentation,
    - Inokulieren des Biogas produzierenden Systems mit einer Kultur aus einem thermophilen, anaeroben, acetogenen, Wasserstoff produzierenden Bakterium vor dem Beginn der Fermentation oder während der Fermentation,
    - Fortsetzen der Fermentation bei 45 bis 70 °C, bevorzugt bei 50 bis 60 °C, unter anaeroben Bedingungen,
    - Gewinnen oder Verwenden des produzierten, Methan enthaltenden Biogases.
EP20050812051 2004-11-26 2005-11-28 vERFAHREN ZUR ERHÖHTEN PRODUKTION VON BIOGAS IN THERMOPHILEN, ANAEROBEN FERMENTERN Active EP1828065B1 (de)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
SI200531596T SI1828065T1 (sl) 2004-11-26 2005-11-28 Postopek za povečano produkcijo bioplina v termofilnih, anaerobnih fermentorjih
PL05812051T PL1828065T3 (pl) 2004-11-26 2005-11-28 Sposób zwiększonej produkcji biogazu w termofilowych, beztlenowych fermentatorach

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
HU0402444A HUP0402444A2 (en) 2004-11-26 2004-11-26 Process for enhancing the biogas production of thermophyl anaerobic fermenter
PCT/HU2005/000125 WO2006056819A1 (en) 2004-11-26 2005-11-28 Method for increased production of biogas

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1828065A1 EP1828065A1 (de) 2007-09-05
EP1828065B1 true EP1828065B1 (de) 2012-07-04

Family

ID=89985637

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP20050812051 Active EP1828065B1 (de) 2004-11-26 2005-11-28 vERFAHREN ZUR ERHÖHTEN PRODUKTION VON BIOGAS IN THERMOPHILEN, ANAEROBEN FERMENTERN

Country Status (11)

Country Link
US (1) US7888085B2 (de)
EP (1) EP1828065B1 (de)
DK (1) DK1828065T3 (de)
ES (1) ES2390347T3 (de)
HR (1) HRP20120704T1 (de)
HU (1) HUP0402444A2 (de)
NO (1) NO20073270L (de)
PL (1) PL1828065T3 (de)
RS (1) RS52462B (de)
SI (1) SI1828065T1 (de)
WO (1) WO2006056819A1 (de)

Families Citing this family (27)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103626300A (zh) * 2006-07-18 2014-03-12 极高热学控股公司 使用超嗜热生物体产能
US8278087B2 (en) 2006-07-18 2012-10-02 The University of Regensburg Energy production with hyperthermophilic organisms
AU2012201169B2 (en) * 2006-07-18 2014-07-03 Hyperthermics As Energy production with hyperthermophilic organisms
EP2097499A4 (de) * 2006-12-18 2012-05-02 Univ Maryland Verfahren für rasche anaerobe faulung von biomasse mittels mikroben und herstellung von biokraftstoffen daraus
JP5111936B2 (ja) * 2007-05-23 2013-01-09 大成建設株式会社 有機性廃棄物の処理方法
WO2009076948A2 (de) * 2007-12-19 2009-06-25 Schmack Biogas Ag Reduktone zur erzeugung von biogas
CN101918568B (zh) * 2008-01-10 2013-06-05 史马克沼气股份有限公司 用于制备沼气的煎盘梭菌
WO2009086812A2 (de) * 2008-01-10 2009-07-16 Schmack Biogas Ag Clostridium sporosphaeroides zur erzeugung von biogas
DE102009003587A1 (de) * 2009-03-07 2010-09-09 Schmack Biogas Gmbh Mikroorganismen zur Verflüssigung von Biomasse
EP2352835B1 (de) * 2008-12-23 2012-09-05 Schmack Biogas GmbH Clostridium sporosphaeroides zur Erzeugung von Biogas aus Biomasse
SG175011A1 (en) * 2009-04-02 2011-11-28 Agency Science Tech & Res Methods for improving biogas production in the presence of hard substrates
US20120064506A1 (en) * 2010-03-09 2012-03-15 Enos Loy Stover Optimized biogas (biomethane) production from anaerobic reactors
CA2819377A1 (en) * 2010-12-21 2012-06-28 Yejun Han Thermostable c. bescii enzymes
US10619173B2 (en) 2014-07-22 2020-04-14 Iogen Corporation Process for using biogenic carbon dioxide derived from non-fossil organic material
US9108894B1 (en) 2014-07-22 2015-08-18 Iogen Corporation Process for using biogenic carbon dioxide derived from non-fossil organic material
WO2016011555A1 (en) 2014-07-22 2016-01-28 Iogen Corporation Process for producing fuel using two fermentations
US11434509B2 (en) 2014-12-08 2022-09-06 Iogen Corporation Process for using biogenic carbon dioxide derived from non-fossil organic material
US11168339B1 (en) * 2017-12-14 2021-11-09 CBG Partners, LLC Processes and systems for anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass and organic wastes
CN108676790A (zh) * 2018-07-25 2018-10-19 佛山腾鲤新能源科技有限公司 一种沼气发酵用复合微生物菌剂的制备方法
US20210079340A1 (en) * 2019-09-17 2021-03-18 Indian Oil Corporation Limited Microbial consortium for enhancing the methane production from feedstock
CN111560415A (zh) * 2020-05-20 2020-08-21 华北电力大学 一种用于生物质发电的细菌实时调节的方法
CN111733190B (zh) * 2020-07-03 2022-02-25 中国科学院广州能源研究所 一种自给自足的沼气发酵性能生物强化方法
CN112063661B (zh) * 2020-11-13 2021-02-09 中国农业科学院农业环境与可持续发展研究所 一种农业废弃物通过发酵方式生产中链羧酸的方法与应用
CN113564209B (zh) * 2021-06-30 2024-06-14 南京工业大学 利用电信号与化学信号耦合提高混菌体系甲烷产量的方法
CN114736932A (zh) * 2022-04-11 2022-07-12 同济大学 一种基于群体感应的强化有机固废厌氧消化产沼性能的方法
CN114934077A (zh) * 2022-06-20 2022-08-23 香港浸会大学深圳研究院 一种强化乳酸定向转化的两相厌氧消化产甲烷的方法
CN115433742B (zh) * 2022-08-12 2024-03-19 中国林业科学研究院林产化学工业研究所 一种固态厌氧发酵农林剩余物联产沼气和有机肥的方法

Family Cites Families (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3383309A (en) 1965-10-13 1968-05-14 Fmc Corp Anaerobic sludge digestion
HU195978B (en) 1985-11-19 1988-08-29 Mta Szegedi Biolog Koezponti Process for increacing the biogas producing capacity of fermentation system applying mixed bacterial pupulation
IT1198448B (it) 1986-10-08 1988-12-21 Enea Procedimento per la produzione di biogas mediante processo a doppio stadio in un unico reattore,ed impianto utilizzante il detto procedimento
DE4226087A1 (de) 1992-04-16 1993-10-21 Recycling Energie Abfall Verfahren zur biologischen Aufbereitung organischer Substanzen, insbesondere zur anaeroben biologischen Hydrolyse zur anschließenden Biomethanisierung und Vorrichtung zur Durchführung des Verfahrens
US5651890A (en) 1995-04-04 1997-07-29 Trost; Paul B. Use of propane as stripper gas in anaerobic digestion of wastewaters
US6342378B1 (en) 1998-08-07 2002-01-29 The Regents Of The University Of California Biogasification of solid waste with an anaerobic-phased solids-digester system
AU1560800A (en) 1999-11-12 2001-05-30 Insertam S.L. Biological purification plant for residual waters equipped with anaerobic digestors and purification process
US6569332B2 (en) 2000-06-26 2003-05-27 Jack L. Ainsworth Integrated anaerobic digester system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
ES2390347T3 (es) 2012-11-12
HRP20120704T1 (hr) 2012-09-30
RS52462B (en) 2013-02-28
SI1828065T1 (sl) 2012-12-31
HU0402444D0 (en) 2005-01-28
NO20073270L (no) 2007-08-27
US20080124775A1 (en) 2008-05-29
EP1828065A1 (de) 2007-09-05
PL1828065T3 (pl) 2012-12-31
HUP0402444A2 (en) 2006-11-28
WO2006056819A1 (en) 2006-06-01
DK1828065T3 (da) 2012-10-01
US7888085B2 (en) 2011-02-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1828065B1 (de) vERFAHREN ZUR ERHÖHTEN PRODUKTION VON BIOGAS IN THERMOPHILEN, ANAEROBEN FERMENTERN
Nkemka et al. Bioaugmentation with an anaerobic fungus in a two-stage process for biohydrogen and biogas production using corn silage and cattail
Zhang et al. Bioaugmentation with an acetate-type fermentation bacterium Acetobacteroides hydrogenigenes improves methane production from corn straw
Krishnan et al. Process enhancement of hydrogen and methane production from palm oil mill effluent using two-stage thermophilic and mesophilic fermentation
Ventorino et al. Pre-treatment and inoculum affect the microbial community structure and enhance the biogas reactor performance in a pilot-scale biodigestion of municipal solid waste
Zhao et al. Material and microbial changes during corn stalk silage and their effects on methane fermentation
Ivanova et al. Thermophilic biohydrogen production from energy plants by Caldicellulosiruptor saccharolyticus and comparison with related studies
Guo et al. Hydrogen production from agricultural waste by dark fermentation: a review
Insam et al. Microbes in aerobic and anaerobic waste treatment
CN101506107B (zh) 使用超嗜热生物体产能
Suksong et al. Thermophilic solid-state anaerobic digestion of solid waste residues from palm oil mill industry for biogas production
Dollhofer et al. Accelerated biogas production from lignocellulosic biomass after pre-treatment with Neocallimastix frontalis
US20140134697A1 (en) Process for the digestion of organic material
Borth et al. Pilot-scale anaerobic co-digestion of food and garden waste: Methane potential, performance and microbial analysis
Li et al. Strategy of controlling the volumetric loading rate to promote hydrogen-production performance in a mesophilic-kitchen-waste fermentor and the microbial ecology analyses
Xia et al. Recent studies on thermophilic anaerobic bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass
Xu et al. Hydrogen generation performance from Taihu algae and food waste by anaerobic codigestion
Bernat et al. Valorisation of the selectively collected organic fractions of municipal solid waste in anaerobic digestion
Solli et al. Process performance and population dynamics of ammonium tolerant microorganisms during co-digestion of fish waste and manure
Saritpongteeraka et al. Co-fermentation of oil palm lignocellulosic residue with pig manure in anaerobic leach bed reactor for fatty acid production
Liu et al. Biohydrogen production from household solid waste (HSW) at extreme-thermophilic temperature (70° C)–influence of pH and acetate concentration
EP3131856B1 (de) Herstellung von wasserstoff und anderen gasförmigen oder flüssigen produkten in einem beschleunigten biologischen verfahren
EP3162898B1 (de) Verfahren zur herstellung von biogas aus einem festen gärrest
WO2013000927A1 (en) Process for the treatment of sludge or other organic material
Sinbuathong et al. Preparation of active hydrogen-producing cultures from palm oil mill sludge for biohydrogen production system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20070625

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA HR MK YU

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20100825

RTI1 Title (correction)

Free format text: METHOD FOR INCREASED PRODUCTION OF BIOGAS IN THERMOPHILIC, ANAEROBIC FERMENTERS

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: SCHMACK BIOGAS GMBH

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA HR MK YU

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 565097

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20120715

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602005035037

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20120830

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: HR

Ref legal event code: TUEP

Ref document number: P20120704

Country of ref document: HR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: RO

Ref legal event code: EPE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: T3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: MEYER & KOLLEGEN

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: HR

Ref legal event code: T1PR

Ref document number: P20120704

Country of ref document: HR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: T3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2390347

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

Effective date: 20121112

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SK

Ref legal event code: T3

Ref document number: E 12571

Country of ref document: SK

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: PL

Ref legal event code: T3

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120704

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120704

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121104

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120704

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121005

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121105

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120704

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20130405

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20121004

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602005035037

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20130405

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: HU

Ref legal event code: AG4A

Ref document number: E016295

Country of ref document: HU

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: HR

Ref legal event code: ODRP

Ref document number: P20120704

Country of ref document: HR

Payment date: 20131028

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Payment date: 20131120

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20131121

Year of fee payment: 9

Ref country code: LT

Payment date: 20131025

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LV

Payment date: 20131113

Year of fee payment: 9

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20131128

Year of fee payment: 9

Ref country code: SI

Payment date: 20131030

Year of fee payment: 9

Ref country code: HU

Payment date: 20131120

Year of fee payment: 9

Ref country code: RO

Payment date: 20131029

Year of fee payment: 9

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20121130

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20121128

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: HR

Ref legal event code: PBON

Ref document number: P20120704

Country of ref document: HR

Effective date: 20141128

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: EBP

Effective date: 20141130

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MM4D

Effective date: 20141128

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20141129

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20141128

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20141128

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20141130

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20141130

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20141129

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20141128

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SI

Ref legal event code: KO00

Effective date: 20150720

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20141130

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 11

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20151230

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Payment date: 20151119

Year of fee payment: 11

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20141129

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Payment date: 20151130

Year of fee payment: 11

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20151119

Year of fee payment: 11

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Payment date: 20161112

Year of fee payment: 12

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 565097

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20161128

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20161128

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SK

Ref legal event code: MM4A

Ref document number: E 12571

Country of ref document: SK

Effective date: 20161128

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20161128

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 13

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20161128

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20181120

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20181129

Year of fee payment: 14

Ref country code: PL

Payment date: 20181106

Year of fee payment: 14

Ref country code: CZ

Payment date: 20181127

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20181126

Year of fee payment: 14

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20181123

Year of fee payment: 14

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20181120

Year of fee payment: 14

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20181120

Year of fee payment: 14

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602005035037

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20191201

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20191128

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20191130

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20191128

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20191201

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20191128

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20191130

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200603

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20191128

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20191130

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20191128

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20171128