EP1730990A2 - Removal tool and method for extended wear canal devices - Google Patents

Removal tool and method for extended wear canal devices

Info

Publication number
EP1730990A2
EP1730990A2 EP05713071A EP05713071A EP1730990A2 EP 1730990 A2 EP1730990 A2 EP 1730990A2 EP 05713071 A EP05713071 A EP 05713071A EP 05713071 A EP05713071 A EP 05713071A EP 1730990 A2 EP1730990 A2 EP 1730990A2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
removal tool
ear canal
hearing device
hooks
removal
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP05713071A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
French (fr)
Inventor
Adnan Shennib
Gregory Kushner
Richard Carl Urso
Ralph Patrick Contioso
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Insound Medical Inc
Original Assignee
Insound Medical Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Insound Medical Inc filed Critical Insound Medical Inc
Publication of EP1730990A2 publication Critical patent/EP1730990A2/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B17/00Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
    • A61B17/50Instruments, other than pincettes or toothpicks, for removing foreign bodies from the human body
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04RLOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R25/00Deaf-aid sets, i.e. electro-acoustic or electro-mechanical hearing aids; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
    • H04R25/65Housing parts, e.g. shells, tips or moulds, or their manufacture
    • H04R25/652Ear tips; Ear moulds
    • H04R25/654Ear wax retarders
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04RLOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R2460/00Details of hearing devices, i.e. of ear- or headphones covered by H04R1/10 or H04R5/033 but not provided for in any of their subgroups, or of hearing aids covered by H04R25/00 but not provided for in any of its subgroups
    • H04R2460/17Hearing device specific tools used for storing or handling hearing devices or parts thereof, e.g. placement in the ear, replacement of cerumen barriers, repair, cleaning hearing devices

Definitions

  • Embodiments of the present invention relate to a tool and method for the removal of hearing devices that are worn at least partially in the ear canal. More specifically, embodiments of the invention relate to a tool and a method for removal of a completely in the canal hearing device including devices positioned deep in the canal.
  • ear canal the external acoustic meatus
  • ear canal is generally narrow and contoured as shown in the coronal view in Fig. 1.
  • the ear canal 10 is approximately 25 mm in length from the canal aperture 17 to the center of the tympanic membrane 18 (eardrum).
  • the cartilaginous region 11 of the ear canal 10 deforms and moves in response to the mandibular (jaw) motions, which occur during talking, yawning, chewing, etc.
  • the medial (towards the tympanic membrane) part, a bony region 13 proximal to the tympanic membrane, is rigid due to the underlying bony tissue.
  • the skin 14 in the bony region 13 is thin (relative to the skin 16 in the cartilaginous region) and is more sensitive to touch or pressure.
  • the ear canal 10 terminates medially with the tympanic membrane 18. Laterally and external to the ear canal is the concha cavity 2 and the auricle 3, both also cartilaginous.
  • the junction between the concha cavity 2 and the cartilaginous part 11 of the ear canal at the aperture 17 is also defined by a characteristic bend 12 known as the first bend of the ear canal.
  • Hair 5 and debris 4 in the ear canal are primarily present in the cartilaginous region 11.
  • Physiologic debris includes cerumen (earwax), sweat, decayed hair, and oils produced by the various glands underneath the skin in the cartilaginous region.
  • Non-physiologic debris consists primarily of environmental particles that enter the ear canal.
  • Canal debris is naturally extruded to the outside of the ear by the process of lateral epithelial cell migration (see e.g., Ballachanda, The Human ear Canal, Singular Publishing, 1995, pp. 195). There is no cerumen production or hair in the bony part of the ear canal.
  • a cross-sectional view of the typical ear canal 10 (Fig. 2) reveals generally an oval shape and pointed inferiorly (lower side).
  • the long diameter (D L ) is along the vertical axis and the short diameter (D s) is along the horizontal axis.
  • First generation hearing devices were primarily of the Behind-The-Ear (BTE) type. However they have been largely replaced by In-The-Canal (ITC) hearing devices are of which there are three types. In-The-Ear (ITE) devices rest primarily in the concha of the ear and have the disadvantages of being fairly conspicuous to a bystander and relatively bulky to wear. Smaller ITC devices fit partially in the concha and partially in the ear canal and are less visible but still leave a substantial portion of the hearing device exposed.
  • BTE Behind-The-Ear
  • ITC In-The-Canal
  • CIC hearing devices have come into greater use. These devices fit deep within the ear canal and can be essentially hidden from view from the outside. In addition to the obvious cosmetic advantages, CIC hearing devices provide, they also have several performance advantages that larger, externally mounted devices do not offer. Placing the hearing device deep within the ear canal and proximate to the tympanic membrane (ear drum) improves the frequency response of the device, reduces distortion due to jaw extrusion, reduces the occurrence of the occlusion effect and improves overall sound fidelity.
  • CIC hearing devices particularly those positioned deep in the ear, are not as readily accessible by the user as are conventional ICT devices.
  • a simple and effective method is therefore desirable for the removal of these devices, particularly when professional help—such as an ear, nose and throat specialist (ENT) or an audiologist— and/or specialized equipment— such as a scope microscope— are not readily available.
  • professional help such as an ear, nose and throat specialist (ENT) or an audiologist— and/or specialized equipment— such as a scope microscope— are not readily available.
  • Various embodiments of the invention provide systems, tools and methods for removing a hearing aid or other hearing device from the ear of user including CIC hearing aids inserted deeply in the ear canal. Also, embodiments allow the hearing device to be removed by the user or by another person (e.g. a doctor or audiologist). Further, embodiments allow the hearing device to be removed with minimal dexterity by the user and without visualization of either the ear or the tool by the user and. '
  • One embodiment provides a removal tool for atraumatically removing a hearing device inserted deeply in the ear canal of a user.
  • the removal tool comprises a shaft adapted to be grasp in the hand and a plurality of hooks or other attachment elements coupled to a first end of the shaft.
  • the hooks have a shape and orientation configured to minimize injurious contact with the walls of the ear canal when the removal tool is inserted into the ear canal.
  • the hooks are also configured to detachably engage a loop structure or other attachment system of the hearing device for removal of the device independent of a radial orientation of the shaft with respect to the hearing device.
  • the hooks can also be configured to engage the loop structure in two or more planes for removal of the hearing device.
  • the hooks can be configured to engage the loop structure so as to exert minimal axial force on the hearing device in a medial direction. Desirably, this force causes no or only minimal displacement of the hearing device in the medial direction. This is desirable to prevent the hearing device from inadvertently being pushed against the tympanic membrane.
  • the hooks can have a variety of configurations and orientations to minimize injury or irritation to the ear canal as well as to facilitate removal of the hearing aid.
  • the hooks are configured to point inwardly and away from walls of the ear canal when the removal tool is inserted into the ear canal of the user this minimizes contact with canal walls.
  • the hooks can include an atraumtic coating, such as TEFLON or KAPTON.
  • the hooks can also be configured to engage the loop structure without precise positioning of a particular hook with respect to the hearing device or the ear canal. This can be accomplished by configuring the hooks to be able to grab an attachment loop of the loop structure at multiple locations on the loop. The use of multiple hooks that engage the loops in multiple places also allows the user to engage the loop structure without direct visualization of the removal tool. Further, the hooks can be distributed or otherwise positioned to center the removal tool in the ear canal, hi one embodiment, this can be accomplished by radially distributing at least three hooks equidistantly around the perimeter of an end portion of the shaft.
  • the hooks are desirably configured to define a gap between the hook and the shaft where the gap has a dimension configured to allow the hook to detachably engage a loop of the loop structure.
  • the hooks will have first and second portions where the second portion is shorter and coupled to the first at a retrograde angle, which can be in the range from 20 to 40 degrees and more preferably in the range of 26 to 30 degrees.
  • an atraumatic coating will be applied to longer first portion but can applied to the second portion.
  • the hooks are configured to allow the loops to slide over the hooks including the shorter portion during insertion and removal of the removal tool. This facilitates sliding of the loop into the hook gap and to become engaged as well as sliding out to become disengaged. Slidability can be accomplished by the use of a lubricous coating, such as a flouro-polymer, over all or a portion of the hook. In an embodiment this coating can be the same as the atraumatic coating.
  • the loop structure can comprise a single loop or multiple loops which can lie in multiple planes, which allows the hooks or other attachment means to engage the loops in multiple planes.
  • the loop structure comprises a resilient polymer or metal and has sufficient flexibility and resilience to both deform and return to an original shape during the tool insertion process.
  • the loop structure has sufficient pull strength to allow removal of the hearing aid by the removal tool, including embodiments where the loop structure has only a single loop.
  • the removal tool can also include a magnet for wireless communication with a magnetically controllable switching means of the hearing aid such as reed switch used to control volume or put the hearing device into a sleep mode.
  • the magnet can be embedded or otherwise coupled to an end portion of the removal tool.
  • the engagement elements themselves can actually comprise magnets and the attachment system a series of ferrous elements wherein the magnets have sufficient magnetic force to engage the ferrous attachment elements and pull the hearing device from the ear.
  • the hearing device user or another person inserts the removal tool into the user's ear canal until the hooks make contact with the loop structure and detachably engage the with the loop structure (or attachment system). This can be facilitated by withdrawing the tool slightly to set the hook in the loop and vica versa. Engagement can be accomplished independent of the radial orientation of the removal tool with respect to the hearing device since the hooks can engage the loops at multiple locations on the loop.
  • the hooks can engage a single loop or multiple loops in multiple planes so as to have multi-planer engagement and can engage the loops with no or only minimal application of axial force on the hearing device such that the device is not appreciably pushed back into the canal.
  • the tool is then withdrawn out of the ear removing the engaged hearing device.
  • the hearing device is then detached from the tool.
  • the tool can be disengaged from the hearing device by slightly advancing the tool back into the ear canal to disengage the hooks. Insertion and removal are accomplished with minimal or no irritation or injury to the wall of the canal and can be done without visualization of the removal tool and minimal dexterity on the part of the user.
  • Fig. 1 is a side coronal view of the external ear canal.
  • Fig. 2 is a cross-sectional view of the ear canal in the cartilaginous region.
  • FIG. 3 is a perspective view illustrating an embodiment of a hearing aid device.
  • FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view illustrating an embodiment of a hearing aid device positioned in the bony portion of the ear canal.
  • Fig. 5 is a lateral view illustrating an embodiment of a removal tool for removing a hearing device positioned deeply in the ear canal.
  • Fig.6 is a cross-sectional view illustrating use of an embodiment of the removal tool for removing a hearing device positioned deeply in the ear canal.
  • FIG. 7 is a perspective view illustrating an embodiment of a multi-plane loop system for use with an embodiment of a removal tool for removing a hearing device positioned deeply in the ear canal.
  • Fig. 8 is an exploded view illustrating an embodiment of a protective cap and housing for use with an embodiment of a removal tool for removing a hearing device positioned deeply in the ear canal.
  • a removal tool 120 can include extended wear, completely in the canal (CIC) hearing aids including those adapted to be positioned deep-in-the-canal (which are sometimes described as DITC devices).
  • CIC hearing aid 20 An embodiment of an extended wear CIC hearing aid 20 that can be positioned deep in the ear canal is shown Figs. 3-4.
  • CIC hearing aid 20 can include a microphone assembly 30, a receiver or speaker assembly 35 and a battery assembly 40 including a battery 50 contained in battery cavity 60 by an enclosure 70.
  • Embodiments of hearing device 20 are described further in co-pending and commonly assigned U.S. Patent Application Serial No.
  • hearing device 20 (Attorney Docket No. 022176-001810US).
  • removal tool 120 can be adapted for removal of a variety of INT and CIC hearing aids including deep-in- the-canal hearing devices.
  • Removal tool 120 includes a shaft portion 137 configured to be grasp in the hand and one or more engagement elements 121 distributed around an end portion 137e of the shaft.
  • Engagement elements 121 are configured to engage and attach to hearing aid 20 via an attachment system 111 that is coupled to hearing aid 20. More specifically, elements 121 can be configured to engage or mate with attachment system 111, though alternatively they can also be configured to attach to the hearing device directly. Desirably elements 121 are configured to detachably engage system 111, that is they can attach and then detach with system 111 through one or more mechanical motions.
  • Elements can 121 can comprise pins, clamps, magnets or other mechanical or magnetic engagement means known in the art.
  • elements 121 comprise a plurality of thin hooks 122 positioned at a first end of a shaft 137 of removal tool 120.
  • the hooks are desirably configured to detachably engage one or more loops of a loop structure which comprise an embodiment of attachment system 111 described below.
  • the hooks can also be adapted to attach to an attachment system adapted for removable (e.g. pealable) cleaning layers adhered to the hearing device.
  • the attachment system can comprise a loop structure similar to embodiments described herein.
  • the configuration, shape, orientation and other properties of the hooks can be configured to eliminate or other wise reduce injury or irritation to ear canal 10 and other part of the ear as well as facilitate removal of hearing device.
  • the hooks 22 can be bent inwardly towards axis 135 of shaft 137 to minimize injury and/or irritation to the ear canal when the tool is inserted.
  • all or a portion of the hooks can have an atraumatic coating 125, such as TEFLON that is configured to minimize injury and irritation to the ear canals, in another words to make the hooks atraumatic.
  • the hooks can be sufficiently flexible (e.g.
  • embodiments of the removal tool having multiple inwardly bent atraumatic hooks provide a tool and method for a user to atraumatically remove their hearing aid.
  • the hooks are desirably be configured to allow the user to remove the hearing aid with minimal dexterity and without direct or minimal visualization of the removal tool or the ear. This can be accomplished through the use of a multi-planer loop system described herein and by configuring the hook to be able to grab an attachment loop structure at multiple locations on the loop. Such a configuration allows the hooks to engage the loop structure without precise positioning of a particular hook with respect to the hearing device or the ear canal. Further, by radialy distributing the loops around the perimeter 137p of an end portion of the shaft, the hooks can engage the loops structure independent of the radial orientation of the shaft with respect to the ear canal or the hearing device.
  • the radial distribution of the hooks around the tool can also be configured to center the tool in the ear canal. In this way, the user, without any direct visual observation of the tool, or their own ear can insert the removal tool into the ear canal in any radial orientation and still engage and remove their hearing aid.
  • the tool includes three or more hooks 122 that are equidistantly distributed around the perimeter 137 ⁇ of an end portion 137e of shaft 137.
  • the hooks 122 are bent at selectable angle 126 with respect to a longitudinal axis 135 of removal tool 120
  • angle 126 is retrograde angel with respect to hook 122 and can be about 20 to 40 degrees, more preferably about 25 to 35 degree, most preferably about 26 is 30 degrees.
  • hooks 122 include a shorter leg 128 which is coupled to a tip portion 127t of longer leg 127 of the hook at a retrograde angle 126 to form a gap or space 124.
  • Leg 128 can be formed by bending hook 122 using a fixture or other metal working tool or method known in the art.
  • Gap 124 is configured to allow the passage of one or more loops 112L of a loop system 112 to allow the hook to engage and grab the loop.
  • leg 128 is configured to allow loops 112L to slide over leg and into gap 124.
  • the removal hook is desirably sufficiently lubricous such that the removal tool does not engage and grab at the removal loops and remain fixed in an initial position at which it encounters the removal loops. This can be accomplished by the use of low friction and/or lubricous materials for construction of hooks 122 including leg 128 and/or the use of lubricous surface layers, or coating for hooks 122.
  • leg 128 can be fabricated from a steel alloy that is polished (e.g., by electro-polishing, electroplating, etc.) to have a low friction surface.
  • hooks 122 and loop system 112 are configured such that removal tool 120 can disengage from hearing device 20 after engagement, if so desired. If a subject that is wearing device 20 wishes to remove the device, but experiences pain or discomfort while doing so, removal tool 120 can be disengaged from hearing device 20 to halt the extraction process. This can be accomplished by slightly pushing the tool in the medial direction such that loops slide out from the hook. The subject can then seek assistance for subsequent removal of the hearing device by a second individual or a hearing care professional. Disengagement of removal tool 120 can be by the facilitated through configuration of hook gaps 124 and bend angle 126 to allow the loops to readily slide in an out of the hook to engage and disengage from the hook.
  • hooks have selectable material and dimensional properties to facilitate canal insertion and engagement with the loop structure (or other attachment system) and subsequent removal of the hearing device for the ear canal.
  • the material used to fabricate hooks 122 can have sufficient flexibility and resilience for the hooks to both bend and substantially return to their original shape during the insertion process. More specifically, hooks 122 can have sufficient spring memory that they will substantially return to their original shape upon bending or other deformation.
  • the hook have sufficient flexibility to bend somewhat if they make contact with the ear canal wall during insertion, but with sufficient stiffness such that once they engage loops 112 they retain their shape to pull hearing device 20 out of the ear canal.
  • the desirably material is relatively biocompatible and corrosion resistant.
  • Suitable materials for hook 122 can include resilient plastics such as polycarbonates, polyethylenes or polyimides and non-corrosive resilient metals such as stainless steel, spring steel and shape memory alloys known in the art such as NITINOL.
  • shape memory materials the hooks can be imparted with desired shape, using metallurgical methods known in the art.
  • the hooks are fabricated from 302 stainless steel available from Fort Wayne Metals in Michigan.
  • the hooks can have an outer diameter ranging from about 0.2 mm (0.010 in.) to about 0.75 mm (0.030 in.), preferably from about 0.3 mm (0.012 in.) to about 0.5 mm (0.020 in.), and most preferably from about 0.35 mm (0.014 in.) to about 0.45 mm (0.18 in.).
  • all or a portion of hooks 122 may include a coating 125 configured to provide protection to the ear canal from injury or irritation by the removal tool, as well as comfort to the person in whose ear the removal tool is being used.
  • coating 125 is fabricated from a soft tissue atraumatic material known in the biomaterial arts. In specific embodiments the softness or durometer of the material is less than that of the epithelial tissue on the ear canals.
  • coating 125 is sufficiently lubricous to allow hooks 122 to slide over tissue in the ear and ear canal al well as allow loops 112L of removal system 112 to slide over the hooks including shorter leg 128. Coating 125 can cover all or a portion of leg 122.
  • leg 128 can be given low frictional properties for the slidable engagement of loops 121 through the use of surface treatments such as polishing, or through the use of a thin liquid coating such as silicone oil
  • coating 125 can be selected from silicones, polyimides and fluoro-polymers.
  • Suitable fluoro-polymers include Teflon®, available from the DuPont® Corporation.
  • Suitable polyimides include Kapton® also available from the DuPont® Corporation.
  • the coating comprises Kapton® a coating which is preferably applied to hooks before they are bent, and the stripped away after bending to expose all or a portion of leg portion 128.
  • the coating can be applied using dip coating or spray coating methods known in the art or can also be applied as an adhesive tape coating.
  • attachment system 111 can comprise any number of attachment means known in the art, e.g. clamps, catches, sockets, etc.
  • attachments system 111 is a loop system 112 (also called loop structure 112) comprised of one or more loops 112L that are configured to be engaged by hooks 122 (or other attachment elements 121) for removal of hearing aid 120 from the ear canal.
  • Loop structure 112 has sufficient pull strength to allow removal of the hearing aid by the removal tool, this can include embodiments where the loop structure has only a single loop.
  • a single loop 112L has sufficient tensile strength (i.e. pull strength) to pull the hearing device out of ear canal 10.
  • the tensile strength of loops 112L can be selected through selection of the materials and diameter of loop 112L. In various embodiments, the tensile strength of loop 112L can be in the range of about 0.1 lbs to 2 lbs of force, with specific embodiments of 0.25, 0.5 and 1 lbs of force.
  • the removal loops 1211 are adapted to be able to slide freely along shorter legs 128 of removal hooks 122 into gap or space 124 between the hooks such that hooks 122 can properly engage the removal loop.
  • the loops are configured to have a combination of flexibility, resilience and/or spring memory such that the loop will bend as its passes through gap 124 and then spring back against the leg portion 128 or other portion of hook 122 to be caught by the hook. In this way, the loop structure becomes mechanically engaged by the hooks.
  • loop system 112 can comprise a lateral, multi-plane loop system 112m.
  • Multi-plane system 112p is configured to allow hooks 122 to engage multiple loops 112L in multiple planes 112p.
  • the multi-plane system also allows a given hook 122 to engage or grab any number of loops in multiple locations on the loop.
  • These and related embodiments of a multi-plane loop system 112p allow hooks 122 to attach to the loop system and hearing device 20 without precise positioning of a given hook 122 with respect to the hearing aid 20 or ear canal 10. This in turn, allows a user to use the tool to remove a hearing device without visualization of the tool or ear and/or to do so with a minimal amount of dexterity.
  • loops 1211 can lie in substantially orthogonal planes with respect to each other or other selectable angles.
  • loop structure 112 and hooks 122 are configured such the hooks engage the loops (i.e. the loops are caught by the hooks) with no or only minimal application of axial force on the hearing device such that the hearing device is not appreciably pushed back into the canal.
  • The can be accomplished by one or more of the following configurations: i) configuring the hooks and/or the loops with low fiction lubricous surfaces such that the hooks easily slide over hooks including leg portion 128 as is described herein; ii) selecting the loop material such that it bends under compression (i.e. it has a low compression modulus); and iii) configuring the size of gap 124 relative to the diameter of the loops such that loop readily fit through the gap.
  • loop system 112 comprises individual strands or legs 140 and 142 that join at knot 146 to form shorter leg or third strand 144.
  • Leg 140 can lie in a first plane 112pl and leg 142 can lie in second plane 112p2.which can be orthogonal to each other.
  • knot 146 is disposed on the loops at an offset position from the apexes 140a and 142a of legs 140 and 142 in to order eliminate the presence of a cumbersome ball or similar bulk at the end of the removal loop system 112 which might otherwise cause irritation to the ear canal of the wearer of the hearing device.
  • knot 146 can be moved closer or farther from the base 142b or 144b of strands 142 or 144.
  • FIG. 7 it will be understood by those knowledgeable in the relative field that other numbers and combinations of removal loops 112L can also be contemplated.
  • system 112, 112p could include 4, 5, 6 or even more loops.
  • removal loop system 112 comprises a flexible resilient material, yet one that is sufficiently rigid to withstand significant displacement from its original shape.
  • Suitable materials include resilient metals and polymers known in the arts including various suture materials known in the arts.
  • Other desirable material properties for the loops 112L of loop system 112 include sufficient lubricity and/or softness (e.g., durometer) to be non irritating and/or atraumatic to the ear canals; sufficient lubricity to allow slidable movement of the hooks over the loops and sufficient strength (e.g. tensile strength) to facilitate removal of a deeply worn hearing device without breakage of the removal loops.
  • Polyproplyene was found to meet these criteria and therefore in a preferred material removal, all or a portion of loops 121 are fabricated from polypropylene.
  • removal tool 120 may be provided with an optional cap or cover 132 in order to protect hooks 122 from being damaged during transportation or when the tool is not in use.
  • An example of one such cap according to an embodiment of the present invention is shown in FIG. 8.
  • Removal tool 120 is inserted into optional cap 132 until tab 134 engages partially hidden slot 136. With the proper twist lock configuration, tab 134 matingly engages slot 136 in order to lock removal tool 120 into cap 132.
  • Either a soft click sound and/or the manual sensation that a gentle resistance has been overcome can signify to the user of the removal tool that the tool has mated with cap 132.
  • Optional geographic features 134 of cap 132 include knurls— or, as depicted in FIG. 3, raised tabs— to provide greater handling convenience for the cap. This feature is especially beneficial for those who may be manually compromised or experience dexterity problems.
  • removal tool 120 includes a shaft 137 for convenience in using and grasping tool 120. All or portion of shaft 137 can include a graspable portion 137g. Graspable portion 137g can include textured surface 137t or shaped grip to facilitate holding of the removal tool. Shaft 137 may also comprise an optional magnet 139 which can be housed in the shaft or housed within optional magnet cover 138 as is shown in Fig 8. Magnet 139 can be used, for example, for the remote or wireless configuration of a hearing device that incorporates control means capable of communication with a magnet. One such magnetically controllable device is the extended wear hearing device illustrated at 20. According to a preferred embodiment, removal tool 120 also comprises magnet 139 in order that the magnet is available in case it becomes necessary or desirable to controllably communicate with hearing device 20 without removal of the device from the ear canal of an individual wearing the device.
  • removal tool 120 may also comprise an optional housing or shield 150 for ease and convenience in transporting or carrying removal tool 120.
  • housing or shield 150 is comprised of a non-magnetizable metal it is further useful in preventing inadvertent demagnetization of devices or objects- such as credit cards—that one might carry on one's person in close proximity to the removal tool if optional magnet 139 is included in shaft 137.
  • removal tool 120 With removal tool 120 inserted into cap 132 and locked into position such that tab 134 engages slot 136, housing 150 can be positioned about the removal tool until partially hidden slot 152 matingly engages tab 154 on cap 132.
  • housing 150 becomes connected to cap 132 to provide a convenient holder or container for transporting removal tool 120 and magnet 139, while providing both components in easy access to a wearer or user of a hearing device.
  • Optional hole 156 with optional key ring 158 positioned therethrough in housing 150 are included in Fig. 8 to illustrate one technique for carrying and keeping removal tool 120 readily at hand according to one embodiment of the present invention.
  • the tool can also be adapted to remove other devices or objects in the ear such as ear plugs, hearing device cleaning layers and systems, etc.

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Surgery (AREA)
  • Otolaryngology (AREA)
  • Medical Informatics (AREA)
  • Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
  • Neurosurgery (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Heart & Thoracic Surgery (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
  • Body Washing Hand Wipes And Brushes (AREA)
  • Dental Tools And Instruments Or Auxiliary Dental Instruments (AREA)
  • Headphones And Earphones (AREA)
EP05713071A 2004-02-06 2005-02-07 Removal tool and method for extended wear canal devices Withdrawn EP1730990A2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US54277304P 2004-02-06 2004-02-06
PCT/US2005/003897 WO2005077011A2 (en) 2004-02-06 2005-02-07 Removal tool and method for extended wear canal devices

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1730990A2 true EP1730990A2 (en) 2006-12-13

Family

ID=34860337

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP05713071A Withdrawn EP1730990A2 (en) 2004-02-06 2005-02-07 Removal tool and method for extended wear canal devices

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1730990A2 (ja)
JP (1) JP2007522737A (ja)
WO (1) WO2005077011A2 (ja)

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8184842B2 (en) * 2009-03-20 2012-05-22 Insound Medical, Inc. Tool for insertion and removal of in-canal hearing devices
EP2355552B1 (en) 2010-01-29 2012-11-21 Oticon A/S Hearing aid and handling tool
DE102010006359A1 (de) * 2010-02-01 2011-08-04 Siemens Medical Instruments Pte. Ltd. Hörsystem mit Positioniervorrichtung und entsprechendes Positionierverfahren
EP3086574A3 (en) * 2015-04-20 2017-03-15 Oticon A/s Hearing aid device and hearing aid device system
DE102018207918A1 (de) * 2018-05-18 2019-11-21 Vibrosonic Gmbh Verfahren zum Laden eines im Gehörgang getragenen elektrischen Geräts, elektrisches Gerät, Lademodul und Hörsystem

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4817609A (en) * 1987-09-11 1989-04-04 Resound Corporation Method for treating hearing deficiencies

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO2005077011A3 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2005077011A2 (en) 2005-08-25
WO2005077011A3 (en) 2006-10-05
JP2007522737A (ja) 2007-08-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7388961B2 (en) Removal tool and method for extended wear canal devices
US8023675B2 (en) Systems and methods for in situ cerumen removal from hearing devices
US7466836B2 (en) Removal tool for in situ cerumen removal from hearing devices
EP1216603B1 (en) Retention and extraction device for a hearing aid
AU773468B2 (en) Semi-permanent canal hearing device
US5003608A (en) Apparatus and method for manipulating devices in orifices
US6359993B2 (en) Conformal tip for a hearing aid with integrated vent and retrieval cord
US6473513B1 (en) Extended wear canal hearing device
US8798301B2 (en) Tool for removal of canal hearing device from ear canal
CA2297659A1 (en) Acoustic coupler
WO2005077011A2 (en) Removal tool and method for extended wear canal devices
US9961458B1 (en) Hearing aid sleeve
JP2007184722A (ja) 骨導補聴器及び骨導スピーカ
US6516074B1 (en) Hearing device with integrated battery compartment and switch
WO2014146702A1 (en) Behind the ear hearing aid
WO2001043499A1 (en) Conformal tip for a hearing device with integrated vent and retrieval cord
WO2000042815A1 (en) Conformal tip for a hearing aid
WO2001043500A1 (en) Conformal tip for a hearing aid
EP3573351B1 (en) Hearing aid with hinge less battery drawer
JP2024076509A (ja) 補聴器、補聴器本体及び保持部材
JP2022077994A (ja) 聴覚装置のイヤピースための保持部材

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20060822

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA HR LV MK YU

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20090829