EP1724200B1 - Synthetic stopper with manual uncorking for bottle for sparkling wine or similar - Google Patents
Synthetic stopper with manual uncorking for bottle for sparkling wine or similar Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP1724200B1 EP1724200B1 EP05425341A EP05425341A EP1724200B1 EP 1724200 B1 EP1724200 B1 EP 1724200B1 EP 05425341 A EP05425341 A EP 05425341A EP 05425341 A EP05425341 A EP 05425341A EP 1724200 B1 EP1724200 B1 EP 1724200B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- stopper
- bottle
- upper portion
- longitudinal axis
- similar
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Not-in-force
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B65—CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
- B65D—CONTAINERS FOR STORAGE OR TRANSPORT OF ARTICLES OR MATERIALS, e.g. BAGS, BARRELS, BOTTLES, BOXES, CANS, CARTONS, CRATES, DRUMS, JARS, TANKS, HOPPERS, FORWARDING CONTAINERS; ACCESSORIES, CLOSURES, OR FITTINGS THEREFOR; PACKAGING ELEMENTS; PACKAGES
- B65D39/00—Closures arranged within necks or pouring openings or in discharge apertures, e.g. stoppers
- B65D39/0005—Closures arranged within necks or pouring openings or in discharge apertures, e.g. stoppers made in one piece
- B65D39/0017—Injection-molded plastic closures for "Champagne"- or "Sekt"-type bottles
Definitions
- the present invention concerns a synthetic stopper with manual uncorking for bottle for sparkling wine or similar, of the type specified in the preamble of the first claim.
- the stoppers designed for this use counter the outward thrust exerted by the high internal pressure that is created in the bottle due to the presence of carbon dioxide which develops during evolution of the above-mentioned drinks.
- stoppers for sparkling wines and similar are manually uncorked and have a part outside the bottle, further fastened by means of wire hoods and similar which cling to the outer part of the bottle.
- Uncorking can be obtained by manually removing the hood and then twisting and pulling out which can be performed manually by gripping the part of the stopper outside the bottle.
- This manual extraction process is particularly characteristic of sparkling wines and similar which are very frequently used for parties, opening ceremonies and various other events.
- corks are commonly used formed into a substantially cylindrical shape before corking.
- Said corks have a diameter of approximately 30 - 32 mm, a length of approximately 40 - 48 mm and are generally made of two parts: an upper part in agglomerated cork and a lower part consisting of two natural cork washers with total thickness of approximately 10 mm.
- the corking operation is performed by a strong radial compression of the cork in a clamp to a diameter of between 14 mm and 16 mm (approximately half the initial diameter) and introduction of the cork into the bottle at the required depth, so that the washers are inside the bottle and approximately half the height of the cork is outside the neck of the bottle.
- Adhesion between the cork and the inside of the neck of the bottle is guaranteed by the high elasticity of the washers which provide a good seal against gases and liquids and the necessary radial pressure which enables the cork to resist the outward thrust due to the high internal pressure.
- the agglomerated cork part inserted in the bottle does not have any specific seal function at the interface between cork and bottle as it is has a very low elasticity, but constitutes mainly a connection between the lower washers and the part that remains outside the bottle.
- the part made of agglomerated cork in fact, although more rigid, has a lower elasticity and a high viscosity. Consequently this upper part undergoes semi-permanent deformation which produces a moderate elastic thrust on the neck of the bottle.
- Said operation consists of several phases, such as positioning the cork by means of optical or mechanical positioners, placing the cork in a clamp for radial compression, insertion of the cork into the bottle and application of the hood.
- corks One of the main drawbacks deriving from use of these corks consists in a possible alteration of the taste of the drink due in particular to mould contained in the corks or to the material itself, of vegetable origin, of which said corks are made.
- the technical function of the present invention is to produce a synthetic stopper with manual uncorking for bottles for sparkling wine and similar able to overcome the above drawbacks.
- an important aim of the invention is to produce a synthetic stopper overall substantially similar to the traditional corks which can be used substantially in the same way.
- Another important aim of the invention is to provide a synthetic stopper able to guarantee a good seal for the gases and liquids contained in the bottle and withstand the pressures generated inside the bottle during evolution of the sparkling wine until said stopper is extracted.
- a further aim of the invention is to obtain a synthetic stopper able to ensure easy extraction by means of traditional manual uncorking and which at the same time has a high physical structural integrity during said extraction operation.
- a further aim of the invention is to produce an inexpensive synthetic stopper which is easy to produce and which can be easily used on traditional automatic bottling plants, without substantial modifications to the same.
- the synthetic bottle stopper according to the invention is indicated overall by number 1, and is shown in Fig. 2 and 3.
- the neck of the bottle 10 has a section, parallel to the axis 12, of circular shape.
- This circular section has a minimum diameter near the aperture 11, increasing as it moves away from the same.
- corks 1a After corking the traditional corks 1a have a lower part 1b embedded in the neck or inlet 12 and an upper part 1c outside the bottle 10 which can be grasped manually.
- the upper part 1 c has an average development of approximately 20-25 mm.
- stoppers 1 Since the traditional cork dimensions are substantially maintained in stoppers 1 according to the invention, it is possible to use automatic bottling plants of known type and also not to change the traditional known outer form of the corks for sparkling wines.
- Fig. 1a In particular the studies of the applicant are geared to corks of the most widespread type, illustrated in Fig. 1a. These traditional corks 1 a have an upper part 1 c in agglomerated cork and the lower part 1b provided with two washers 1d made of natural cork.
- the extraction force indicated was identified by means of traction and forced mechanical translation of the corks in the extraction direction, i.e. parallel to the development axis 13 of the inlet 12.
- the synthetic stopper 1 according to the invention is made of one single polymeric material, i.e. a synthetic elastomer.
- One single material is the preferable technical solution when replacing a traditional cork with a synthetic stopper which is cheaper and more widely available, while maintaining characteristics as similar as possible to those of a traditional cork.
- the elastic seal reaction is then exerted by all the lower portion embedded in the bottle and not only by end sections like the washers of the traditional corks.
- the polymeric material forming the synthetic stopper must, as its primary purpose, ensure an overall pressure inside the bottle similar to that of a traditional cork.
- a lower pressure would make the stability of the stopper uncertain and a higher pressure would make uncorking difficult and unpleasant as it would require greater manual extraction forces than usual.
- a similar soft material is not acceptable for the upper portion 3, as it is not easy to grip and above all because it deforms considerably and is easily damaged or splits even with normal uncorking forces, previously described.
- the whole synthetic stopper 1 a rigid material sufficient to withstand manual forces similar to those involved in uncorking of traditional corks without yielding or breaking and therefore satisfactory for the needs of the upper portion 3.
- This material partly reproduces the apparent characteristics of the traditional agglomerated material with low elasticity and high viscosity, which tends to deform only very gradually.
- the same lower portion has been appropriately modified in shape.
- the shape modifications are of the type designed to maintain continuity between the upper portion 3 and the lower portion 2, to permit automatic corking by means of traditional machinery.
- the polymeric materials preferred for production of the synthetic stopper 1 with a modulus of elasticity of the said type are the highly ramified polyolefins with very low density, if necessary with the addition of styrene-based thermoplastic elastomers such as SEBS, SEPS, SEEPS, in a percentage not exceeding 30%.
- Said materials have a density of between 0.75 and 0.92 kg/dm 3 , and furthermore are processed preferably by injection moulding using known expanding agents, of both chemical and physical type; the density of the fnished product therefore has values of between 0.25 and 0.7 kg/dm 3 .
- the synthetic stopper 1 according to the invention has a lower part 2 at least mainly with appropriately modified shape.
- the upper base 5 of the lower portion 2 is adjacent to the upper portion 3 and has no dimensional discontinuity, i.e. gaps, steps, notches and similar, with respect to the same upper portion 3.
- the choice between 7° and 19° depends on the maximum extraction force required, which can vary between 50 and 60 kgW, on the precise modulus of elasticity of the material, variable between 5 and 8 MPa, and also on the precise overall dimensions of the stopper, which can also vary slightly as required.
- the technical solution consisting in shaping of the lower portion 2 to give it a slightly tronco-conical shape, in addition to the advantage of continuity with the upper cylindrical portion 3, which considerably reduces the risks of local breakage, also has the advantage of making the extraction operation quick and easy.
- the above graph shows how the uncorking force evolves as the section of stopper extracted increases, in the case of a synthetic stopper made of material with a modulus of elasticity of approximately 5 MPa and an angle of incidence ⁇ of approximately 10°.
- the uncorking force is identified by means of the same procedures as those of the graphs of Fig. 1c and the curve of the forces 8 has an initial peak of maximum force, necessary to overcome the static friction, of between 50 and 60 kgW, followed by a much lower kinetic friction which from approximately 30 kgW gradually and rapidly decreases.
- the lower portion 2 can have a height of between approximately 20 mm and 25 mm and a minimum cross dimension, which coincides with the lower base 7, between 24 mm and 29 mm.
- the lower base 7 has a preferably concave surface.
- Said surface takes on a flat shape after the lower portion 2 has been deformed following insertion of the same in the cylindrical inlet 12. This prevents unattractive swelling of the lower base 7 towards the outside.
- the stopper 1 according to the invention is used on traditional bottling plants that compress the lower part 2 and insert it in the bottles 10 so that the longitudinal axis 4 coincides with the axis of development 13.
- the invention offers important advantages.
- the polymeric materials used eliminate the problems due to the use of traditional corks 1a, in particular wines bottled with said stoppers are not affected by modification of their organoleptic properties and bouquet due to the presence of mould or other.
- This characteristic also permits a precise evolution of the sparkling wine or similar in the bottle and therefore a precise determinable quality.
- a further advantage is provided by the fact that during manual uncorking the synthetic stopper 1 does not risk breakage or excessive deformation, since the same is made of a material with a modulus of elasticity between 5 and 20 MPa and there are no dimensional discontinuities that can trigger breakage.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Closures For Containers (AREA)
Description
- The present invention concerns a synthetic stopper with manual uncorking for bottle for sparkling wine or similar, of the type specified in the preamble of the first claim.
- As is known, currently sparkling wines, champagne and similar are distributed in glass bottles closed by means of corks.
- The stoppers designed for this use counter the outward thrust exerted by the high internal pressure that is created in the bottle due to the presence of carbon dioxide which develops during evolution of the above-mentioned drinks.
- Inside the bottles pressures of around 3 bars (300 kiloPascal [kPa]) develop, and can even reach 6 bars.
- According to the known technique the stopper is compressed and inserted inside the bottle so that the elastic return force which the stopper exerts prevents the cork itself from coming out.
- Again according to the known technique, stoppers for sparkling wines and similar are manually uncorked and have a part outside the bottle, further fastened by means of wire hoods and similar which cling to the outer part of the bottle.
- Uncorking can be obtained by manually removing the hood and then twisting and pulling out which can be performed manually by gripping the part of the stopper outside the bottle.
- This manual extraction process is particularly characteristic of sparkling wines and similar which are very frequently used for parties, opening ceremonies and various other events.
- In order to maintain traditional habits and also for practical reasons, quick easy manual extraction of the stoppers in question is expedient.
- Further characteristics are required of the stoppers in question, in particular: ease of insertion during the bottling phase, gas and liquid seal, low permeability to gases and liquids, no alteration of the organoleptic characteristics of the drink contained and no absorption of flavours.
- To meet said requirements corks are commonly used formed into a substantially cylindrical shape before corking.
- Said corks have a diameter of approximately 30 - 32 mm, a length of approximately 40 - 48 mm and are generally made of two parts: an upper part in agglomerated cork and a lower part consisting of two natural cork washers with total thickness of approximately 10 mm.
- The corking operation is performed by a strong radial compression of the cork in a clamp to a diameter of between 14 mm and 16 mm (approximately half the initial diameter) and introduction of the cork into the bottle at the required depth, so that the washers are inside the bottle and approximately half the height of the cork is outside the neck of the bottle.
- The classic mushroom shape of these corks is obtained by means of the radial compression referred to, which is performed only on the lower part of the cork.
- Adhesion between the cork and the inside of the neck of the bottle is guaranteed by the high elasticity of the washers which provide a good seal against gases and liquids and the necessary radial pressure which enables the cork to resist the outward thrust due to the high internal pressure.
- The agglomerated cork part inserted in the bottle does not have any specific seal function at the interface between cork and bottle as it is has a very low elasticity, but constitutes mainly a connection between the lower washers and the part that remains outside the bottle.
- The part made of agglomerated cork, in fact, although more rigid, has a lower elasticity and a high viscosity. Consequently this upper part undergoes semi-permanent deformation which produces a moderate elastic thrust on the neck of the bottle.
- As a result of these mechanical characteristics, said part made of agglomerated cork permits manual extraction of the cork, in fact if this part were too soft, it would lead to excessive deformation of the body of the cork when twisted with consequent danger of breakage of the same.
- It is also of fundamental importance, for rapid and economic bottling, that the corking operation can be performed in automatic plants at industrial level.
- Said operation consists of several phases, such as positioning the cork by means of optical or mechanical positioners, placing the cork in a clamp for radial compression, insertion of the cork into the bottle and application of the hood.
- The known technique referred to above has some important drawbacks.
- One of the main drawbacks deriving from use of these corks consists in a possible alteration of the taste of the drink due in particular to mould contained in the corks or to the material itself, of vegetable origin, of which said corks are made.
- Furthermore the traditional corks do not guarantee constant mechanical characteristics and can therefore have a different effect on evolution of the wines from bottle to bottle due to different radial seal.
- Said lack of uniformity of the physical-mechanical characteristics of the traditional corks can also result in occasional breakages of the corks during extraction or, on the contrary, difficulty in extraction.
- Last but not least, there is the disadvantage that said corks are costly to produce and the raw materials are expensive, due in particular to the increasing difficulty in locating supplies of cork.
- Attempts have already been made to solve the above problems by means of rigid synthetic mushroom-shaped stoppers made of thermoplastic material. Said stoppers have poor adhesion and seal, however, and considerable differences, also visual, with respect to natural corks. In fact, these stoppers are used only for sparkling wine or similar of low quality.
- Furthermore synthetic stoppers of shapes and dimensions different from the traditional ones do not permit use of the traditional automatic bottling plants at industrial level.
US 2634014 discloses a synthetic stopper according to the preamble of claim 1. - In this situation the technical function of the present invention is to produce a synthetic stopper with manual uncorking for bottles for sparkling wine and similar able to overcome the above drawbacks.
- In the context of said technical function, an important aim of the invention is to produce a synthetic stopper overall substantially similar to the traditional corks which can be used substantially in the same way.
- Another important aim of the invention is to provide a synthetic stopper able to guarantee a good seal for the gases and liquids contained in the bottle and withstand the pressures generated inside the bottle during evolution of the sparkling wine until said stopper is extracted.
- A further aim of the invention is to obtain a synthetic stopper able to ensure easy extraction by means of traditional manual uncorking and which at the same time has a high physical structural integrity during said extraction operation.
- Last but not least, a further aim of the invention is to produce an inexpensive synthetic stopper which is easy to produce and which can be easily used on traditional automatic bottling plants, without substantial modifications to the same.
- The technical function and the aims specified are achieved by a synthetic stopper with manual uncorking for bottle for sparkling wine and similar as claimed in the attached Claim 1.
- Preferred embodiments are highlighted in the dependent claims.
- Further characteristics and advantages of the invention are better clarified below by the detailed description of a synthetic stopper with manual uncorking, with reference to the attached drawings in which:
- Fig. 1a shows a traditional cork inserted in the neck of a bottle;
- Fig. 1b is a graph showing the radial force [σr] in MegaPascal [MPa] exerted by each individual cross section of the cork in Fig. 1a;
- Fig. 1c is a graph that shows on the Y axis the force necessary to move corks similar to the one in Fig. 1a in the direction of extraction and on the X axis the total length by which said corks are extracted;
- Fig. 2 is an axonometric illustration of a synthetic stopper according to the invention and a portion of a neck of a bottle;
- Fig. 3 highlights the median section of a bottle stopper according to the invention;
- Fig. 4 is a graph showing on the Y axis the force necessary to move the stopper according to the invention illustrated in Fig. 2 and 3 in the direction of extraction and on the X axis the total length by which said stopper is extracted.
- With reference to the Figures referred to, the synthetic bottle stopper according to the invention is indicated overall by number 1, and is shown in Fig. 2 and 3.
- It presents a
lower portion 2 designed to be inserted in abottle 10 for sparkling wine, champagne or similar. - In particular the
lower portion 2 obstructs, when in position, anaperture 11 of thebottle 10. From theaperture 11 aninlet 12 develops which constitutes the neck of thebottle 10 and defines an axis ofdevelopment 13. - As known, the neck of the
bottle 10 has a section, parallel to theaxis 12, of circular shape. This circular section has a minimum diameter near theaperture 11, increasing as it moves away from the same. - This increase in diameter is very slight in the part near the aperture consisting of the
inlet 12. In fact at 10 mm from the aperture the diameter of theinlet 12, initially approximately 18 mm, has on average increased by only approximately 0.3 mm, and at 20 mm from the aperture the diameter of the inlet has increased only by a further 0.6 mm approximately. - Consequently the
inlet 12 can be likened, for the sake of simplicity of calculation, to a cylindrical form. - Below, the inlet will be defined cylindrical.
- The
lower portion 2 is adjacent to anupper portion 3 which when in position remains outside thebottle 10 and can be grasped to manually remove the stopper 1. - Advantageously the synthetic stopper 1 has substantially the same overall dimensions as the
traditional corks 1a. - Before corking, the same are cylindrical and have an overall length of approximately 40-48 mm on average and an average diameter of approximately 30-32 mm.
- After corking the
traditional corks 1a have alower part 1b embedded in the neck orinlet 12 and anupper part 1c outside thebottle 10 which can be grasped manually. - The
upper part 1 c has an average development of approximately 20-25 mm. - Since the traditional cork dimensions are substantially maintained in stoppers 1 according to the invention, it is possible to use automatic bottling plants of known type and also not to change the traditional known outer form of the corks for sparkling wines.
- Studies carried out by the same applicant have further qualified important physical characteristics of the
traditional corks 1a, such as the radial pressure of the same and the extraction force required for uncorking. - In particular the studies of the applicant are geared to corks of the most widespread type, illustrated in Fig. 1a. These
traditional corks 1 a have anupper part 1 c in agglomerated cork and thelower part 1b provided with twowashers 1d made of natural cork. - As regards the radial pressure exerted on the neck or
inlet 12, the measurements were performed on a few dozen samples using appropriate loading cells in which the containment of thecork 1a inside theinlet 12 was simulated, and which permitted assessment of the radial pressure exerted by thecork 1 a calculated as mean value distributed over the entire length inserted. - Said tests provided a mean value of 3.8 MPa with a standard deviation of 1.2 MPa.
- Similar measurements performed on corks in which the
washers 1d were eliminated provided a mean radial pressure value of 1.5 MPa with a standard deviation of 0.6 MPa. - Suppose now that along the entire thickness of the
washers 1d the pressure exerted is constant, and that the same situation is present also on the part of agglomerated material inside the bottle, it can be assessed that the radial pressure near the area affected by the presence of thewashers 1d is equal to approximately 8.5 MPa, therefore considerably higher than the mean pressure exerted by the agglomerated part, equal to approximately 1.5 MPa. The situation is accurately illustrated in the graph in Fig. 1b, next to Fig. 1a, where atraditional cork 1a inserted in a bottle is schematised. - The graph of Fig. 1b shows a diagram indicating the trend of the radial force σr in MegaPascal [MPa] exerted by each individual cross section of the cork.
- As can be seen from the
pressure curve 1e, the radial pressure exerted by a cork is actually concentrated in the area in which the washers are present. - As regards the extraction force necessary for uncorking, the same is highlighted in Fig. 1c, which shows on the Y axis the force necessary to move
traditional corks 1a similar to that of Fig. 1a in the direction of extraction and on the X axis the total length by which said corks are extracted. - As said, the traditional corks do not guarantee constant characteristics and for this reason three curves of
force - In all cases an initial peak of maximum force is recorded, necessary to overcome the initial or static friction, between 50 and 60 kgW (kilogram weight, 1kgW = 9.81N), followed by a kinetic friction which remains below the static friction and which has a relatively, constant course and high force before decreasing very rapidly.
- The extraction force indicated was identified by means of traction and forced mechanical translation of the corks in the extraction direction, i.e. parallel to the
development axis 13 of theinlet 12. - Obviously the movements imposed manually during uncorking are more complex: manual uncorking involves not only axial cork movements but also rototranslatory or rotatory movements.
- Therefore not only axial traction forces but also torsion forces come into play.
- However, the extraction forces indicated in Fig. 1 c can be accepted as adequately indicative of the forces applied to the corks during extraction.
- Common experience shows that traditional corks withstand said forces well, due to the fact that their upper part 3a is made of an agglomerated material with low elasticity and high viscosity, which tends to deform only very gradually. The forces applied manually to the
upper part 1c of the corks are therefore transmitted without yielding to the lower part 2a embedded in theinlet 12 and in particular to thewashers 1d that exert the greatest seal pressure. - These forces, which provide for a maximum extraction force substantially between 50 and 60 kgW, are suited to the capacity of any user.
- It is also common experience that the seal of traditional corks, exerting a mean pressure of approximately 3.8 MPa on the
inlet 12, is normally sufficient to prevent leaks from the corks. - Contrary to said traditional corks, which combine a substantially rigid material with an elastic material, the synthetic stopper 1 according to the invention is made of one single polymeric material, i.e. a synthetic elastomer.
- The use of one single material provides important advantages such as reduced cost and relatively simple rapid production, for example via one single moulding phase.
- One single material is the preferable technical solution when replacing a traditional cork with a synthetic stopper which is cheaper and more widely available, while maintaining characteristics as similar as possible to those of a traditional cork.
- However, the use of one single material for the entire length of the stopper 1, also maintaining the dimensions of a
traditional cork 1a so that the usual corking machines can be used, involves some problems. - It must be possible to insert the stopper until it has a section diameter of almost half the initial diameter and in these conditions it must maintain an adequate elastic reaction inside the
inlet 12 of the bottle. - The elastic seal reaction is then exerted by all the lower portion embedded in the bottle and not only by end sections like the washers of the traditional corks.
- In this situation there may be incompatibility and conflicting needs between the
lower portion 2 and theupper portion 3 of the synthetic stopper 1. - In fact, the polymeric material forming the synthetic stopper must, as its primary purpose, ensure an overall pressure inside the bottle similar to that of a traditional cork. A lower pressure would make the stability of the stopper uncertain and a higher pressure would make uncorking difficult and unpleasant as it would require greater manual extraction forces than usual.
- The considerable deformability required and the fact that the entire
lower portion 2 of the synthetic stopper 1 exerts a pressure on theinlet 12 means that total pressures similar to those of traditional corks can be obtained only with materials that are substantially soft and easily deformable. This can be easily understood in the light of the fact that traditional corks exert their seal pressure mainly by means of the end washers made of highly deformable cork. - A similar soft material is not acceptable for the
upper portion 3, as it is not easy to grip and above all because it deforms considerably and is easily damaged or splits even with normal uncorking forces, previously described. - On the contrary, a sufficiently rigid material which is pleasant to touch on the
upper portion 3 determines a very strong elastic reaction in thelower portion 2 and therefore very high uncorking forces, substantially incompatible with traditional manual uncorking. - The applicant has solved these conflicting needs in an original manner.
- On the one hand it has identified as suitable for the whole
synthetic stopper 1 a rigid material sufficient to withstand manual forces similar to those involved in uncorking of traditional corks without yielding or breaking and therefore satisfactory for the needs of theupper portion 3. This material partly reproduces the apparent characteristics of the traditional agglomerated material with low elasticity and high viscosity, which tends to deform only very gradually. On the other hand, to bring the pressure exerted by thelower portion 2 on the neck orinlet 12 to the traditional levels, the same lower portion has been appropriately modified in shape. Advantageously, furthermore, the shape modifications are of the type designed to maintain continuity between theupper portion 3 and thelower portion 2, to permit automatic corking by means of traditional machinery. - More specifically, experiments were performed to determine the modulus of elasticity of the material forming the synthetic stopper 1.
- The
lower portion 2 designed to be inserted in theinlet 12 was permanently blocked and an axial traction force of between 50 and 60 kgW, i.e. substantially similar to the extraction force required for uncorking traditional corks, shown in Fig. 1c, was applied to theupper portion 3, which remains outside thebottle 10. As already said, the axial traction of the traditional corks in the direction of extraction does not correspond exactly to the movements performed manually during uncorking. The latter are more complex and also comprise rototranslatory or rotatory movements. Therefore not only axial traction forces but also torsion forces come into play. However, the axial traction forces can be accepted as adequately indicative of the forces that are applied on the stoppers during extraction. - These experiments highlighted that synthetic elastomers can have a modulus of elasticity between 5 and 20 MPa, preferably between 5 and 8 MPa.
- In fact, if the synthetic stopper 1 has said mechanical characteristics, when subjected to said axial traction force its
upper portion 3 presents sufficiently reduced deformations during uncorking. - Furthermore, no breaking or splitting of the material occurs.
- The polymeric materials preferred for production of the synthetic stopper 1 with a modulus of elasticity of the said type are the highly ramified polyolefins with very low density, if necessary with the addition of styrene-based thermoplastic elastomers such as SEBS, SEPS, SEEPS, in a percentage not exceeding 30%. Said materials have a density of between 0.75 and 0.92 kg/dm3, and furthermore are processed preferably by injection moulding using known expanding agents, of both chemical and physical type; the density of the fnished product therefore has values of between 0.25 and 0.7 kg/dm3.
- The production of a cylindrical synthetic stopper 1 with elastomers with a modulus of elasticity between 5 and 20 MPa nevertheless results in an excessive adhesion force of the stopper to the bottle, even if the modulus of elasticity has been chosen by identifying the minimum sufficient values.
- Said high adhesion force does not permit manual uncorking of the synthetic stopper. In fact, unlike the
traditional cork 1a which adheres to the bottle substantially by means of the washers 2a only, a synthetic stopper 1 made of one single material adheres via the whole of itslower part 2 to thebottle 10. - To remedy this serious drawback the synthetic stopper 1 according to the invention has a
lower part 2 at least mainly with appropriately modified shape. - Preferably the
lower part 2 has at least mainly a tronco-conical shape, the longitudinal axis of which is indicated bynumber 4 in Fig. 3. - Advantageously the
upper base 5 of thelower portion 2 is adjacent to theupper portion 3 and has no dimensional discontinuity, i.e. gaps, steps, notches and similar, with respect to the sameupper portion 3. - The
lateral surface 6 of the lower tronco-conical portion 2 has, with respect to thelongitudinal axis 4, an angle α of incidence, which determines the dimension of thelower base 7 of the lower tronco-conical portion 2. - In particular it was found that angles of incidence a between 7° and 19° are adequate because they determine an overall pressure on the neck or
inlet 12 similar to the overall pressure exerted by the traditional corks and consequently a maximum extraction force similar to the one required for traditional corks. - The choice between 7° and 19° depends on the maximum extraction force required, which can vary between 50 and 60 kgW, on the precise modulus of elasticity of the material, variable between 5 and 8 MPa, and also on the precise overall dimensions of the stopper, which can also vary slightly as required.
- The technical solution consisting in shaping of the
lower portion 2 to give it a slightly tronco-conical shape, in addition to the advantage of continuity with the uppercylindrical portion 3, which considerably reduces the risks of local breakage, also has the advantage of making the extraction operation quick and easy. - In fact, as the synthetic stopper 1 is extracted, the pressure on the
inlet 12 decreases rapidly as the diameter of thelower portion 2 still inserted decreases. - This fact is clearly confirmed by the graph shown in Fig. 4.
- The above graph shows how the uncorking force evolves as the section of stopper extracted increases, in the case of a synthetic stopper made of material with a modulus of elasticity of approximately 5 MPa and an angle of incidence α of approximately 10°.
- The uncorking force is identified by means of the same procedures as those of the graphs of Fig. 1c and the curve of the
forces 8 has an initial peak of maximum force, necessary to overcome the static friction, of between 50 and 60 kgW, followed by a much lower kinetic friction which from approximately 30 kgW gradually and rapidly decreases. - The above indications relating to the overall dimensions of the synthetic stopper 1 and the angle of incidence a can be translated into lower base dimensions.
- The
lower portion 2 can have a height of between approximately 20 mm and 25 mm and a minimum cross dimension, which coincides with thelower base 7, between 24 mm and 29 mm. - Furthermore the
lateral surface 6 is preferably provided with knurling, parallel to thelongitudinal axis 4, said knurling facilitating manual uncorking. - Lastly the
lower base 7 has a preferably concave surface. - Said surface takes on a flat shape after the
lower portion 2 has been deformed following insertion of the same in thecylindrical inlet 12. This prevents unattractive swelling of thelower base 7 towards the outside. - The stopper 1 according to the invention is used on traditional bottling plants that compress the
lower part 2 and insert it in thebottles 10 so that thelongitudinal axis 4 coincides with the axis ofdevelopment 13. - The invention offers important advantages.
- The polymeric materials used eliminate the problems due to the use of
traditional corks 1a, in particular wines bottled with said stoppers are not affected by modification of their organoleptic properties and bouquet due to the presence of mould or other. - A further advantage is the fact that the physical-chemical properties of the stoppers are constant and do not vary from stopper to stopper.
- This characteristic also permits a precise evolution of the sparkling wine or similar in the bottle and therefore a precise determinable quality.
- A further advantage of the present synthetic stopper 1 is that it guarantees good adhesion and therefore good seal along the entire profile of the lower tronco-
conical portion 2 and therefore better gas seal. - Furthermore the synthetic stopper 1 has an external appearance similar to the
traditional corks 1a and permits the same type of manual uncorking with the same intensity of initial force. - This permits traditional uncorking of bottles of sparkling wine, champagne and similar. In addition, as illustrated in Fig. 4, after an identical initial force, the force necessary to expel the synthetic stopper 1 is less than the force required to move the
traditional cork 1a. This guarantees quicker and more convenient manual uncorking. - The ease of manual uncorking is also further increased by the knurling, which ensures a firmer manual grip on the stopper 1.
- A further advantage is provided by the fact that during manual uncorking the synthetic stopper 1 does not risk breakage or excessive deformation, since the same is made of a material with a modulus of elasticity between 5 and 20 MPa and there are no dimensional discontinuities that can trigger breakage.
- Last but not least is the advantage that the synthetic stopper 1 has lower production costs and is made of cheaper raw materials.
- In addition the similarity of shape between the synthetic stoppers 1 and the traditional corks permits use of the same in automatic bottling plants.
Claims (11)
- Synthetic stopper with manual uncorking for bottle for sparkling wine or similar, said bottle (10) including a cylindrical inlet (12) and said synthetic stopper (1) comprising a lower portion (2) which can be inserted in said inlet (12) and an upper portion (3) designed to provide a support external to said bottle (10) and which can be gripped for the extraction of said lower portion (2) from said inlet (12), characterised in that it consists entirely of a polymeric material having a modulus of elasticity between 5 and 20 MPa, and in that said lower portion (2) has a longitudinal axis (4) and a lateral surface (6) at least mainly slanting by an angle (α) between 7° and 19° with respect to said longitudinal axis (4).
- Stopper as claimed in Claim 1, in which said polymeric material has a modulus of elasticity of 5 MPa and said lateral surface (6) is at least mainly slanting by an angle (α) of 10° with respect to said longitudinal axis (4).
- Stopper as claimed in Claim 1, in which said lower portion (2) has an upper base (5) adjacent to said upper portion (3) and without dimensional discontinuity with respect to said upper portion (3).
- Stopper as claimed in Claim 1, in which said polymeric material consists of highly ramified polyolefins with specific weight between 0.25 and 0.92 kg/dm3.
- Stopper as claimed in Claim 4, in which styrene-based thermoplastic elastomers in a percentage not exceeding 30% are added to said polymeric material.
- Stopper as claimed in Claim 4, in which said polymeric material is injection moulded with the aid of expanding agents.
- Stopper as claimed in Claim 1, in which said upper portion (3) is cylindrical with axis coinciding with said longitudinal axis (4) of said lower portion (2).
- Stopper as claimed in Claim 7, in which said upper portion (3) is provided with knurling parallel to said longitudinal axis (4).
- Stopper as claimed in Claim 1, in which said lower portion (2) has an upper base (5) adjacent to said upper portion (3) and having a dimension similar to said upper portion (3) in a crosswise direction to said longitudinal axis (4), a length between 20 mm and 25 mm, and a lower base (7) having a minimum dimension between 24 mm and 29 mm in a crosswise direction to said longitudinal axis (4).
- Stopper as claimed in Claim 9, in which said upper portion (3) is cylindrical and has a diameter between 30 mm and 32 mm and in which said lower portion (2) and said upper portion (3) define an overall length of said stopper between 40 mm and 45 mm, said stopper being dimensionally similar to traditional corks for sparkling wine.
- Stopper as claimed in Claim 9, in which said lower base (7) has a concave surface.
Priority Applications (7)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP05425341A EP1724200B1 (en) | 2005-05-18 | 2005-05-18 | Synthetic stopper with manual uncorking for bottle for sparkling wine or similar |
AT05425341T ATE371599T1 (en) | 2005-05-18 | 2005-05-18 | SYNTHETIC PLUG FOR CHAMPAGNE BOTTLES ETC. WITH MANUAL UNCORKING |
ES05425341T ES2293519T3 (en) | 2005-05-18 | 2005-05-18 | SYNTHETIC PLUG FOR WINE BOTTLES OR SIMILAR MANUAL OPENING. |
DE602005002248T DE602005002248T2 (en) | 2005-05-18 | 2005-05-18 | Synthetic stopper for champagne bottles u. Like. With manual uncorking |
US11/435,527 US20060261029A1 (en) | 2005-05-18 | 2006-05-17 | Synthetic stopper with manual uncorking for bottle for sparkling wine or similar |
AR20060102026A AR054273A1 (en) | 2005-05-18 | 2006-05-18 | SYNTHETIC PLUG WITH MANUAL EXTRACTION FOR FOAM OR SIMILAR EVINO BOTTLE |
CNA2006100928877A CN1872631A (en) | 2005-05-18 | 2006-05-18 | Synthetic stopper with manual uncorking for bottle for sparkling wine or similar |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP05425341A EP1724200B1 (en) | 2005-05-18 | 2005-05-18 | Synthetic stopper with manual uncorking for bottle for sparkling wine or similar |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1724200A1 EP1724200A1 (en) | 2006-11-22 |
EP1724200B1 true EP1724200B1 (en) | 2007-08-29 |
Family
ID=35094075
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP05425341A Not-in-force EP1724200B1 (en) | 2005-05-18 | 2005-05-18 | Synthetic stopper with manual uncorking for bottle for sparkling wine or similar |
Country Status (7)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20060261029A1 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1724200B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN1872631A (en) |
AR (1) | AR054273A1 (en) |
AT (1) | ATE371599T1 (en) |
DE (1) | DE602005002248T2 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2293519T3 (en) |
Families Citing this family (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
PT103591B (en) * | 2006-10-17 | 2010-03-23 | Inst Superior Tecnico | PROCESS OF PRODUCTION OF CYLINDRICAL BODIES OF CORK COMPOSITE MATERIAL, INTENDED FOR THE PRODUCTION OF ROLLS FOR PRESSURE WINES, AS WELL AS THE ROLLS PRODUCED BY THIS PROCESS |
PT104894A (en) * | 2009-12-17 | 2011-06-17 | Amorim & Irmaos S A | EASY INSERTION AND REMOVAL ROLL FOR QUIET WINES |
US20120255336A1 (en) * | 2011-04-06 | 2012-10-11 | Chauncey Edward W | Systems and methods for corrugating a metallic tape |
US8714383B2 (en) * | 2011-08-19 | 2014-05-06 | Corson Family Enterprises, Llc | Compound bung for wine and spirits barrels |
US9273781B2 (en) * | 2013-03-27 | 2016-03-01 | Continental Automotive Systems, Inc. | Overmolded ECU device |
US8807363B1 (en) * | 2013-05-19 | 2014-08-19 | James R. Gilliam | Wine cork having molded anti-taint barrier tip |
WO2015031640A2 (en) * | 2013-08-29 | 2015-03-05 | Bolger David V | Container closure device |
FR3037576B1 (en) * | 2015-06-19 | 2017-06-23 | Aymerick Sanchez | DEVICE FOR CLEARING A BOTTLE FROM A LIQUID UNDER PRESSURE SUCH AS A BOTTLE OF CHAMPAGNE |
Family Cites Families (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2192511A (en) * | 1936-07-27 | 1940-03-05 | Armstrong Cork Co | Bottle stopper |
DE819362C (en) * | 1948-10-16 | 1951-10-31 | Jens Toenningsen | Plugs made of wood or plastic |
US2634014A (en) * | 1949-12-22 | 1953-04-07 | George A Kimber | Bottle stopper |
GB689487A (en) * | 1950-10-25 | 1953-03-25 | Internat Bottle Company Ltd | Improvements in or relating to bottle or like stoppers |
FR1088929A (en) * | 1953-12-23 | 1955-03-11 | Stoppers and capping process | |
FR1285992A (en) * | 1961-01-17 | 1962-03-02 | Improvements to caps for bottles and similar containers | |
US4363416A (en) * | 1981-07-15 | 1982-12-14 | Apm, Inc. | Wine cork |
US4568723A (en) * | 1984-11-08 | 1986-02-04 | Mobil Oil Company | Blends of polypropylene, polycarbonate and a saturated styrene-ethylene-butylene-styrene rubber |
US20040232102A1 (en) * | 1996-11-18 | 2004-11-25 | Gardner William A. | Systems, devices and methods for opening a bottle sealed with a stopper and for sealing a bottle |
DE19848151C2 (en) * | 1998-10-20 | 2002-09-19 | Battenfeld Gmbh | Method and device for injection molding of plastic molded parts made of thermoplastic |
US20050055099A1 (en) * | 2003-09-09 | 2005-03-10 | Ku David N. | Flexible spinal disc |
-
2005
- 2005-05-18 AT AT05425341T patent/ATE371599T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2005-05-18 ES ES05425341T patent/ES2293519T3/en active Active
- 2005-05-18 EP EP05425341A patent/EP1724200B1/en not_active Not-in-force
- 2005-05-18 DE DE602005002248T patent/DE602005002248T2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2006
- 2006-05-17 US US11/435,527 patent/US20060261029A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2006-05-18 AR AR20060102026A patent/AR054273A1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2006-05-18 CN CNA2006100928877A patent/CN1872631A/en active Pending
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN1872631A (en) | 2006-12-06 |
DE602005002248T2 (en) | 2008-05-21 |
DE602005002248D1 (en) | 2007-10-11 |
AR054273A1 (en) | 2007-06-13 |
ATE371599T1 (en) | 2007-09-15 |
EP1724200A1 (en) | 2006-11-22 |
ES2293519T3 (en) | 2008-03-16 |
US20060261029A1 (en) | 2006-11-23 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP1724200B1 (en) | Synthetic stopper with manual uncorking for bottle for sparkling wine or similar | |
RU2261204C2 (en) | Closing device for vessels, particularly for bottles | |
US20080035599A1 (en) | Stopper for Closing a Bottle | |
CA2193075C (en) | Cork stopper for bottles of wine | |
US6478178B2 (en) | Fermentation lock for wine barrel | |
US4182458A (en) | Wine bottle stopper | |
US7832581B2 (en) | Closure and methods for placing and removing such a closure | |
RU164440U1 (en) | BOTTLE STOP | |
MX2011010587A (en) | Glued synthetic cork and method of manufacture. | |
RU2002121502A (en) | A method of manufacturing a cork for sparkling wine bottles | |
JP3723200B1 (en) | Cap and beverage closure device | |
US2576000A (en) | Fulcrum type crown cap remover | |
US20050247662A1 (en) | Closable containers | |
AU708355B2 (en) | Apparatus for removing cork and stoppering structure from pressurized bottle | |
WO2004024585A1 (en) | Closing stopper for containers | |
CN1068558C (en) | Cork stopper for bottles of wine | |
JP3786949B2 (en) | Cap and beverage closure device | |
EP1705127A2 (en) | Synthetic stopper for glass bottles | |
US251525A (en) | Instrument for opening internally stoppered bottles | |
EP1827999A1 (en) | Closure for liquid container, particularly, for sparkling wine and champagne bottles | |
CN111038837B (en) | High-sealing twist cover with strong adaptability | |
WO2007135560A2 (en) | Stopper for bottles or receptacles of various kind | |
GB1603452A (en) | Hollow stopper for vessels containing fermented beverages | |
EP0428428A2 (en) | Insert for second fermentation of champagne or wines produced by the traditional method | |
CN110902139A (en) | Safe and easily-opened twist cover |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20060320 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL BA HR LV MK YU |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
RIN1 | Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected) |
Inventor name: BIANCHI, SAURO Inventor name: CASINI, ROBERTO |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
AKX | Designation fees paid |
Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 602005002248 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20071011 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070829 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20071229 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070829 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070829 |
|
NLV1 | Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act | ||
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070829 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070829 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070829 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070829 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2293519 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070829 |
|
EN | Fr: translation not filed | ||
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070829 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20071130 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070829 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070829 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080129 |
|
ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: EERR Free format text: CORRECTION DE BOPI 08/17 - BREVETS EUROPEENS DONT LA TRADUCTION N A PAS ETE REMISE A L INPI. IL Y A LIEU DE SUPPRIMER : LA MENTION DE LA NON-REMISE. LA REMISE DE LA TRADUCTION EST PUBLIEE DANS LE PRESENT BOPI. |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070829 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20071129 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20080530 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20080531 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20080519 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070829 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070829 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070829 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20090601 Year of fee payment: 5 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20071129 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20090528 Year of fee payment: 5 Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20090506 Year of fee payment: 5 Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20090520 Year of fee payment: 5 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20090518 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20090518 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20080518 Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080301 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070829 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20110131 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100518 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20101201 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100531 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FD2A Effective date: 20110711 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20110629 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100519 |
|
P01 | Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered |
Effective date: 20230607 |