EP1646945A2 - Überwachungs- und koordinierungseinrichtung in einem computernetzwerk - Google Patents
Überwachungs- und koordinierungseinrichtung in einem computernetzwerkInfo
- Publication number
- EP1646945A2 EP1646945A2 EP04732610A EP04732610A EP1646945A2 EP 1646945 A2 EP1646945 A2 EP 1646945A2 EP 04732610 A EP04732610 A EP 04732610A EP 04732610 A EP04732610 A EP 04732610A EP 1646945 A2 EP1646945 A2 EP 1646945A2
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- computers
- monitoring
- computer
- computer network
- coordinating
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Ceased
Links
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L43/00—Arrangements for monitoring or testing data switching networks
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/07—Responding to the occurrence of a fault, e.g. fault tolerance
- G06F11/16—Error detection or correction of the data by redundancy in hardware
- G06F11/20—Error detection or correction of the data by redundancy in hardware using active fault-masking, e.g. by switching out faulty elements or by switching in spare elements
- G06F11/202—Error detection or correction of the data by redundancy in hardware using active fault-masking, e.g. by switching out faulty elements or by switching in spare elements where processing functionality is redundant
- G06F11/2023—Failover techniques
- G06F11/2025—Failover techniques using centralised failover control functionality
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/07—Responding to the occurrence of a fault, e.g. fault tolerance
- G06F11/16—Error detection or correction of the data by redundancy in hardware
- G06F11/20—Error detection or correction of the data by redundancy in hardware using active fault-masking, e.g. by switching out faulty elements or by switching in spare elements
- G06F11/202—Error detection or correction of the data by redundancy in hardware using active fault-masking, e.g. by switching out faulty elements or by switching in spare elements where processing functionality is redundant
- G06F11/2035—Error detection or correction of the data by redundancy in hardware using active fault-masking, e.g. by switching out faulty elements or by switching in spare elements where processing functionality is redundant without idle spare hardware
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L41/00—Arrangements for maintenance, administration or management of data switching networks, e.g. of packet switching networks
- H04L41/04—Network management architectures or arrangements
- H04L41/044—Network management architectures or arrangements comprising hierarchical management structures
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L43/00—Arrangements for monitoring or testing data switching networks
- H04L43/08—Monitoring or testing based on specific metrics, e.g. QoS, energy consumption or environmental parameters
- H04L43/0805—Monitoring or testing based on specific metrics, e.g. QoS, energy consumption or environmental parameters by checking availability
- H04L43/0817—Monitoring or testing based on specific metrics, e.g. QoS, energy consumption or environmental parameters by checking availability by checking functioning
Definitions
- the invention relates to a device for monitoring and coordinating
- computers are connected to one another, for example via cable or radio, in such a way that they can exchange data with one another. They have the advantage that different people can edit or process data in different places.
- Two computers that are connected to each other for data exchange form a small network.
- the data exchange takes place via suitable protocols for the data exchange.
- security aspects often have to be considered during the transmission, for example to prevent unauthorized persons from accessing data in the network.
- Computer networks based on the “client-server system” are known, each of which has a central computer (server) to which various workstations (clients), ie computers dependent on the central computer, can access.
- the data is stored centrally on the central computer.
- the central computer manages the data stored there and, if necessary, the corresponding access rights to this data.
- Client-server system has the advantage that in principle all network participants can access the same database.
- a second computer with a parallel database is often set up so that if one computer fails, the other is still available.
- security measures are particularly important when the data is particularly sensitive, such as for billing, personal data and the like.
- Database can take on different tasks. In such devices, only the other computer is used as data backup.
- the computers connected in this way are often technically extremely strictly connected to each other (via heartbeat line) and monitor each other.
- the individual computers are often physically housed in different buildings or rooms.
- the central computers are also monitored by system controllers.
- the individual computers normally work with less power (for example 70%) in order to take over the work of the neighboring computer if necessary. This happens, for example, when one
- the status of the individual computers is currently monitored using scripts. These are sequences of instructions or commands that are executed by the computer. These scripts can monitor other software. If the computer reports a computer as defective, a so-called failover is triggered. Unfortunately, this often leads to misinterpretations. It can happen that one computer signals avoidable malfunctions to the other, although it is full is functional. The other computer then takes over the functions and tasks of the other computer. It happens that the same database is processed by two different computers. Organizationally, this leads to great chaos.
- the object of the invention is to eliminate the disadvantages of the prior art and to provide increased reliability, it does not lead to misinterpretations
- the object is achieved in that in a device for monitoring and coordinating computers in a computer network of the type mentioned at the outset, in which
- Computers are provided to the central computer unit.
- the object is achieved by a method for such a device for monitoring and coordinating computers in a computer network according to the type mentioned at the outset, in which a central computer unit as
- Monitoring and coordination system is integrated in the computer network, status changes of the individual computers being transmitted to the central computer unit.
- the invention is based on the principle of designing the computer network in such a way that a central computer unit initially monitors individual computers in the network. For this purpose, the status of the computer is constantly transmitted to the central computer unit. This then decides whether a computer in the network has failed or not. If the If the central computer unit detects a failure or a malfunction, it is only authorized to coordinate the individual computers with regard to the further procedure. With this facility for monitoring and coordinating computers in a computer network, one is no longer dependent on the unsafe scripts, in particular for coordinating the computers.
- An advantageous embodiment of the invention results from the fact that the means for detecting and transmitting status changes are designed as a program module on the individual computers. It is often sufficient to run a program module on the individual computers, which first records the status and then transmits it to the central computer unit.
- an advantageous alternative to the software solution results from the fact that the means for detecting and transmitting status changes are designed as hardware components in the individual computers. In principle, software and hardware solutions can also be present in parallel in the computers.
- the central computer unit advantageously has means for assigning functions and / or tasks.
- the tasks and / or functions of one computer e.g. in the event of a signaled malfunction, all or part of it can be assigned to another computer, which then takes over these tasks and / or functions accordingly.
- the central computer unit has means for transferring functions and / or tasks of one computer to at least one other computer.
- failure protection is provided in the individual computers of the computer network and transmits information about malfunctions to the central computer unit. If failures or even total failures occur in a computer, this measure is suitable for transmitting information regarding the malfunctions of the central computer unit.
- the central computer unit has means which actively query the status of the individual computers. This allows the central computer unit to determine, for example, at what point in time it would like to process the status of an individual computer or which computer should be queried. It can also be easily prevented that all status messages arrive at the same time.
- the central computer unit has a graphic operator unit. This makes it easier to operate such a unit.
- the graphic operator unit is then preferably virtual, in particular as a web
- An advantageous embodiment of the method according to the invention for a device for monitoring and coordinating computers in a computer network results accordingly in that the transmission and detection of the changes in status of the individual computers take place via a program module. The status is first recorded and then transmitted to the central computer unit.
- An advantageous alternative to the software solution arises when the method according to the invention is designed if the detection and transmission of changes in status takes place via a hardware component in the individual computers.
- a further preferred embodiment of the method according to the invention is that the central computer unit transfers the function and tasks of one computer, in particular in the event of malfunctions, to another computer.
- the status changes are preferably transmitted in encrypted form or via secure channels. This prevents access to the status data and, for example, manipulation by unauthorized persons.
- the status changes are transmitted via the intranet.
- the method according to the invention can be easily implemented using existing network devices without any great additional technical outlay.
- Computers of the computer network are queried.
- the central computer unit itself can e.g. at what point in time they process the status of an individual computer or which computer is to be queried.
- Fig. 1 shows an inventive device for monitoring
- Computer network 24 is to be understood to mean computers which are connected to one another directly or indirectly, ie via one or more computers, for data exchange.
- the computer network 24 is shown as dashed lines which connect the computers 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22 to one another.
- the data exchange between the computers 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22 takes place, for example, via cables, in particular fixed telephone lines, and / or via radio.
- Other modes of transmission, such as light guides or infrared transmissions, are of course also conceivable individually or in combination.
- a central computer unit 26 is located in the computer network 24.
- the central computer unit 26 is connected to each computer 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22 that is to be monitored. This is symbolized by arrows 32 and 34.
- the central computer unit 26 can be operated via a graphical operator unit, not shown in the present exemplary embodiment.
- the computers 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22 in the computer network 24 each contain one
- Hardware component 28 which detects the respective status of the computers 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22 and transmits them to the central computer unit 26.
- the computers 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22 each also have a fail-safe 30 which informs the central computer unit 26 of any malfunctions in their computers.
- the 'hardware component 28 continuously provides the status of each computer 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22 26, to the central computer unit in this way always knows the central computer unit 26 virtually the status of each computer 12, 14, 16 , 18, 20, 22.
- the central computer unit 26 can itself query the status of a computer 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22.
- Functions of another computer can be displayed or partially taken over.
- the computer 16 has malfunctions in the present exemplary embodiment.
- the takeover of the tasks or functions of the computer 16 is indicated by arrow 36.
- the functions and / or tasks are likewise assigned to the computer 12 by the central computer unit 26, which is indicated by arrow 38.
- the failure is reported by the failover 30 to the central computer unit 26, which can then react accordingly and carry out the coordination. Through these measures, an increased level of security can be achieved overall in a computer network. Misinterpretations can be avoided by the central computer unit 26.
- Computer unit 26 however, the actual status. The tasks do not have to be transferred to another working computer. The reports of the avoidable malfunctions of the computer are clarified and then, if necessary, declared by the central computer unit 26 as non-existent. The defective computer 14, 16 can continue to work in the computer network 24 without any problems.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Debugging And Monitoring (AREA)
- Computer And Data Communications (AREA)
- Data Exchanges In Wide-Area Networks (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE10323369A DE10323369A1 (de) | 2003-05-21 | 2003-05-21 | Überwachungs- und Koordinierungseinrichtung in einem Computernetzwerk |
PCT/EP2004/005145 WO2004104832A2 (de) | 2003-05-21 | 2004-05-13 | Überwachungs- und koordinierungseinrichtung in einem computernetzwerk |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1646945A2 true EP1646945A2 (de) | 2006-04-19 |
Family
ID=33441214
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP04732610A Ceased EP1646945A2 (de) | 2003-05-21 | 2004-05-13 | Überwachungs- und koordinierungseinrichtung in einem computernetzwerk |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP1646945A2 (de) |
DE (1) | DE10323369A1 (de) |
WO (1) | WO2004104832A2 (de) |
Family Cites Families (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4412281A (en) * | 1980-07-11 | 1983-10-25 | Raytheon Company | Distributed signal processing system |
US5819028A (en) * | 1992-06-10 | 1998-10-06 | Bay Networks, Inc. | Method and apparatus for determining the health of a network |
JP3535267B2 (ja) * | 1995-07-03 | 2004-06-07 | 富士通株式会社 | 監視システムの監視状態表示装置 |
US5764913A (en) * | 1996-04-05 | 1998-06-09 | Microsoft Corporation | Computer network status monitoring system |
JP3614625B2 (ja) * | 1997-10-27 | 2005-01-26 | 株式会社日立製作所 | 管理マネージャ計算機、記録媒体、および、計算機運用管理方法 |
US6401119B1 (en) * | 1998-09-18 | 2002-06-04 | Ics Intellegent Communication Software Gmbh | Method and system for monitoring and managing network condition |
US6115743A (en) * | 1998-09-22 | 2000-09-05 | Mci Worldcom, Inc. | Interface system for integrated monitoring and management of network devices in a telecommunication network |
US6678729B1 (en) * | 2000-02-29 | 2004-01-13 | Worldcom, Inc. | Method of monitoring the availability of a messaging and VOIP networking |
-
2003
- 2003-05-21 DE DE10323369A patent/DE10323369A1/de not_active Withdrawn
-
2004
- 2004-05-13 WO PCT/EP2004/005145 patent/WO2004104832A2/de active Application Filing
- 2004-05-13 EP EP04732610A patent/EP1646945A2/de not_active Ceased
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See references of WO2004104832A2 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2004104832A3 (de) | 2006-07-20 |
WO2004104832A2 (de) | 2004-12-02 |
DE10323369A1 (de) | 2004-12-16 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
DE19651270C2 (de) | Vorrichtung und Verfahren zum Bedienen eines Gerätes | |
DE69505218T2 (de) | Verfahren zur Fehleridentifizierung in einem komplexen System | |
DE10321454B4 (de) | System und Verfahren zur Leistungsverwaltung in einem Computersystem mit mehreren Stromversorgungsnetzen | |
DE102011014142A1 (de) | Fahrzeugsteuervorrichtung für eine CAN-Kommunikation und Diagnoseverfahren hierfür | |
EP1699203B1 (de) | Modulares numerisches steuergerät | |
DE10312699B4 (de) | Nichtinvasives Testen von Netzwerkschnittstellen-Fehlercodes für ein Sicherheitsnetzwerk | |
DE4113959A1 (de) | Ueberwachungseinrichtung | |
DE112005002111T5 (de) | Vereinigungssystem, Systemvereinigungsverfahren und Systemvereinigungsprogramm | |
DE112012005740T5 (de) | Duplexsteuerungssystem und dessen Steuerungsverfahren | |
DE102016215243A1 (de) | Anordnung mit einer technischen Anlage sowie Verfahren zu deren Betrieb | |
EP1646945A2 (de) | Überwachungs- und koordinierungseinrichtung in einem computernetzwerk | |
DE102004048394B4 (de) | Fernsteuerungssystem | |
DE102004039810A1 (de) | Vorrichtung zum Steuern der Energieversorgung mindestens einer datentechnischen Einrichtung | |
DE102016108997A1 (de) | Vorrichtung zum Auslesen von Daten aus einem sicherheitskritischen Steuergerät | |
DE202018000385U1 (de) | Vorrichtung zur Bereitstellung von Maschinendaten | |
DE102018000361A1 (de) | Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Bereitstellung von Maschinendaten | |
EP3514640B1 (de) | Vorrichtung und verfahren zur bereitstellung von maschinendaten | |
WO2014111257A1 (de) | Vorrichtung, system und verfahren zur maschinenwartung | |
DE102007007537A1 (de) | Leitsystem einer technischen Anlage | |
AT507204B1 (de) | Verfahren sowie anlage zur verteilung von einlangenden daten | |
DE102004057800B4 (de) | Computerverbundsystem und Verfahren zur Überwachung des Betriebszustands einer Computereinheit innerhalb eines Computerverbundsystems durch einen Überwachungsmonitor | |
LU501035B1 (de) | Verfahren und System zum Absichern des Austausches von Daten in einem Netzwerksystem für industrielle Steuerungen | |
EP3800517A1 (de) | Redundantes automatisierungssystem, verfahren zur erstellung eines solchen automatisierungssystems, computerprogramm und computerlesbares medium | |
DE102023100444A1 (de) | Verfahren und System zum Betreiben einer Internet der Dinge (IoT) -Vorrichtung | |
EP4246326A1 (de) | Verfahren, vorrichtung und systemanordnung zur prozessüberwachung in echtzeit |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20060209 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL HR LT LV MK |
|
PUAK | Availability of information related to the publication of the international search report |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009015 |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20061204 |
|
APBK | Appeal reference recorded |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREFNE |
|
APBN | Date of receipt of notice of appeal recorded |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA2E |
|
APBR | Date of receipt of statement of grounds of appeal recorded |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA3E |
|
APAF | Appeal reference modified |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCREFNE |
|
APAF | Appeal reference modified |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCREFNE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R003 |
|
APBT | Appeal procedure closed |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNNOA9E |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN REFUSED |
|
18R | Application refused |
Effective date: 20170621 |