EP1641411A1 - Integriertes mikrofluid- gerät zur spermaisolation und insemination - Google Patents

Integriertes mikrofluid- gerät zur spermaisolation und insemination

Info

Publication number
EP1641411A1
EP1641411A1 EP04754440A EP04754440A EP1641411A1 EP 1641411 A1 EP1641411 A1 EP 1641411A1 EP 04754440 A EP04754440 A EP 04754440A EP 04754440 A EP04754440 A EP 04754440A EP 1641411 A1 EP1641411 A1 EP 1641411A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
sperm
oocyte
sort
channel
reservoir
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP04754440A
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Inventor
Shuichi Takayama
Gary D. Smith
Ronald Suh
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
University of Michigan
Original Assignee
University of Michigan
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by University of Michigan filed Critical University of Michigan
Publication of EP1641411A1 publication Critical patent/EP1641411A1/de
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N5/00Undifferentiated human, animal or plant cells, e.g. cell lines; Tissues; Cultivation or maintenance thereof; Culture media therefor
    • C12N5/06Animal cells or tissues; Human cells or tissues
    • C12N5/0602Vertebrate cells
    • C12N5/0608Germ cells
    • C12N5/0612Germ cells sorting of gametes, e.g. according to sex or motility
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B17/00Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
    • A61B17/42Gynaecological or obstetrical instruments or methods
    • A61B17/425Gynaecological or obstetrical instruments or methods for reproduction or fertilisation
    • A61B17/43Gynaecological or obstetrical instruments or methods for reproduction or fertilisation for artificial insemination
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B17/00Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
    • A61B17/42Gynaecological or obstetrical instruments or methods
    • A61B17/425Gynaecological or obstetrical instruments or methods for reproduction or fertilisation
    • A61B17/435Gynaecological or obstetrical instruments or methods for reproduction or fertilisation for embryo or ova transplantation
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61DVETERINARY INSTRUMENTS, IMPLEMENTS, TOOLS, OR METHODS
    • A61D19/00Instruments or methods for reproduction or fertilisation
    • A61D19/02Instruments or methods for reproduction or fertilisation for artificial insemination
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12MAPPARATUS FOR ENZYMOLOGY OR MICROBIOLOGY; APPARATUS FOR CULTURING MICROORGANISMS FOR PRODUCING BIOMASS, FOR GROWING CELLS OR FOR OBTAINING FERMENTATION OR METABOLIC PRODUCTS, i.e. BIOREACTORS OR FERMENTERS
    • C12M21/00Bioreactors or fermenters specially adapted for specific uses
    • C12M21/06Bioreactors or fermenters specially adapted for specific uses for in vitro fertilization
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12MAPPARATUS FOR ENZYMOLOGY OR MICROBIOLOGY; APPARATUS FOR CULTURING MICROORGANISMS FOR PRODUCING BIOMASS, FOR GROWING CELLS OR FOR OBTAINING FERMENTATION OR METABOLIC PRODUCTS, i.e. BIOREACTORS OR FERMENTERS
    • C12M23/00Constructional details, e.g. recesses, hinges
    • C12M23/02Form or structure of the vessel
    • C12M23/16Microfluidic devices; Capillary tubes
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01LCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL LABORATORY APPARATUS FOR GENERAL USE
    • B01L3/00Containers or dishes for laboratory use, e.g. laboratory glassware; Droppers
    • B01L3/50Containers for the purpose of retaining a material to be analysed, e.g. test tubes
    • B01L3/502Containers for the purpose of retaining a material to be analysed, e.g. test tubes with fluid transport, e.g. in multi-compartment structures
    • B01L3/5027Containers for the purpose of retaining a material to be analysed, e.g. test tubes with fluid transport, e.g. in multi-compartment structures by integrated microfluidic structures, i.e. dimensions of channels and chambers are such that surface tension forces are important, e.g. lab-on-a-chip

Definitions

  • the present invention is directed to an integral microfluidics device which sorts sperm based on sperm motility and utilizes sorted sperm for oocyte insemination, to a method for its use, and to a further method for microfluidic insemination of oocytes.
  • An integral device which both sorts sperm based on motility and then uses the sorted sperm to inseminate an oocyte consists of minimally two gravity driven pumps, one for semen and one for a media fluid, and a common sort channel wherein more motile sperm swim across the interface between co-laminar flows of semen and media fluid.
  • the media fluid, now enriched with more motile sperm, is used "on chip" to fertilize trapped oocytes, or may be used with a simple and separate microfiuidic device to fertilize trapped oocytes.
  • FIGURE 1 illustrates schematically the sperm sorting portion of one aspect of the invention.
  • FIGURES 2a, 2b, and 2c illustrate the principle of sperm sorting relied upon in one aspect of the present invention.
  • FIGURE 3 illustrates one embodiment of a device of one aspect of the subject invention.
  • FIGURE 4 illustrates one embodiment of a barrier utilized to trap oocytes in an insemination chamber.
  • FIGURE 5 illustrates a simple Gravity Driven Horizontal Pump.
  • FIGURE 6 illustrates the surprisingly increased efficiency of microfiuidic insemination at low sperm levels.
  • FIGURE 7 illustrates a further embodiment of the invention.
  • the integral devices of the subject invention sorts sperm "on chip" , and rely on the ability of motile sperm to cross the interface between co-laminar flow of a sperm-containing liquid such as semen, and a media fluid in which the sperm remains viable.
  • the principles involved are illustrated in Figure 2, in which streams of media fluid and semen converge in a common sort channel, and sperm of higher motility cross the interface between the co-flowing streams. The streams are then separated. The result is a media fluid enriched with sperm of higher motility.
  • the process may be repeated in parallel or in series, or both, to create highly efficient sperm sorting.
  • Such sorting is described in Schuster, et al., "Isolation of Motile Sperm From Semen Samples Using Microfluidics", REPROD. BIOMED. ONLINE 7, 75 - 81.
  • the subject invention devices incorporate a gravity driven horizontal pump with a constant head.
  • the constant head facilitates an exceptionally uniform flow rate.
  • the gravity driven pump like the sperm sorting portion of the inventive device will be described later in greater detail.
  • the final component of the subject invention integral device is an insemination chamber.
  • Sorted sperm enter the msemination chamber either directly from the sort channel, or following initial accumulation in a sorted sperm reservoir.
  • One or more oocytes are first deposited in the chamber, and are prevented from exiting the chamber by a suitable barrier which allows fluid and sperm to flow, but prevents the oocyte from doing so.
  • the insemination chamber may also be used in and of itself, with sperm which has been isolated by laminar flow spe ⁇ n sorting or conventional sperm sorting. It has been surprisingly discovered that at low sperm concentrations, microfiuidic insemination is more efficient than conventional culture techniques such as center- well, culture tubes, or microdrops under oil.
  • the devices may be prepared from numerous materials. However, due to its substantially biologically inert character and the ease of its use, castable silicones are preferably employed. The device will now be described in greater detail, in terms of its components.
  • the gravity driven microfiuidic pump system comprises horizontally- oriented fluid supply reservoir(s) and a horizontally oriented outlet reservoir(s) connected via microchannel(s) in which the pump fluid flows.
  • the fluid supply reservoirs are substantially horizontal, and are of sufficient size to carry the desired amount of fluid for sustained operation.
  • substantially horizontal is meant a horizontal or nearly horizontal position such that the hydrostatic pressure asserted by the liquid in the supply reservoir is relatively constant.
  • a horizontal reservoir may deviate from the absolute horizontal orientation to generate a pumping system where the hydrostatic pressure is intentionally caused to vary over time.
  • an orientation which deviates from horizontal by about 10° or less, preferably 5° or less is suitable.
  • a very slight incline toward the outlet of the supply i.e.
  • the volume of the supply reservoir is normally considerably greater than the volume of the microchannel(s) through which fluid flow is desired.
  • the reservoir may be several mL in volume.
  • Gravity driven pumps deliver liquid at an essentially constant "head. "
  • the reservoir may constitute a straight run of hollow section and may also be bent in a U-configuration or in a horizontal spiral to conserve space.
  • a suitable configuration is shown in Figure 5, which will later be described in greater detail.
  • the internal cross-section of the hollow section may be of any desired shape.
  • the internal cross-section is half-round, but elliptical, square, rectangular, octagonal, ("polyhedral") or other cross-sections may be used as well, as long as the shape is such that it maintains enough surface tension to keep the fluid inside from spilling out.
  • the liquid spans the entire height of the reservoir, even when nearly empty, due to surface tension.
  • the cross-sectional shape may vary along the length of the reservoir to program different hydrostatic pressures at different points in time determined by the amount of fluid volumes present in the reservoirs.
  • a separate supply reservoir may be connected to the microfluidic device to supply fluid for more extended periods.
  • a glass tubing reservoir may have standard microfluidics connectors which enable connection to a microfluidic device channel through suitable tubing, for example hollow tubing of polydimethylsiloxane elastomer ("PDMS”), polysulfone, etc.
  • PDMS polydimethylsiloxane elastomer
  • at least a portion of the supply reservoir and the microchannel(s) are at different heights, so that when positioned such that the supply reservoir is horizontal, a gravity-created hydrostatic pressure condition exists between the reservoir and the microchannel outlet.
  • the microchannel may be horizontal, inclined or vertical, preferably horizontal.
  • the "diameter" or cross-sectional dimensions of the fluid supply reservoir are only critical to the extent that the surface tension between the fluid and the walls of the reservoir is sufficient to maintain the liquid within the reservoir at a given reservoir internal diameter, and the internal diameter is not so small as to prevent fluid flow due to the surface tension.
  • This relationship between surface tension and internal diameter will vary depending upon several factors, including the geometry of the internal cross-section of the reservoir, the nature of the inner walls of the reservoir, and the nature of the fluid.
  • the suitability of any particular reservoir may be assessed easily by filling the reservoir with liquid and observing whether the reservoir will hold the liquid stably while pumping liquid through the microchannel when connected thereto.
  • reservoirs of square or rectangular cross-section will be expected to allow for larger "diameters" than those of circular cross-section due to increased interaction between the fluid and the walls at the corners of the internal cross-section and the higher surface to volume ratio of non-circular cross-sections.
  • internal walls which are hydrophilic will exhibit lesser fluid/wall interactions than surfaces which are less hydrophilic (or more hydrophobic).
  • the nature of the fluid itself is important. The presence of surface tension- lowering compounds in the fluid will alter the maximum "diameter" accordingly.
  • the suitability for any given internal "diameter”/configuration can be simply assessed” by ascertaining, first, whether fluid can be held within the reservoir by orienting the reservoir horizontally and determining that the fluid will not flow out of its own accord; and second, by ascertaining that the interaction between the wall of the reservoir and the fluid is not so high that the desired flow rate between the reservoir and a given microchannel cannot be obtained.
  • Channels in the microfluidic device exhibit fluid flow due to hydrostatic pressure created by a difference in height (relative to gravitational field) between the supply reservoir and the microchannel.
  • the sort channel of the device is terminated in an outlet.
  • the outlet is preferably in fluid communication with an outlet fluid reservoir, in order to prevent fluctuations in pressure associated with formation of "drops" from the outlet.
  • the outlet reservoir may be a simple container with which the microchannel communicates, or preferably is an outlet reservoir of the same size, material, and geometry as the supply reservoir, but with a lower height and/or vertical position. In such a situation, capillary forces substantially cancel out and hydrostatic pressure due to gravity is the only driving force for the liquid.
  • the integral devices of the subject invention contain minimally two fluid supply reservoirs, one for the sperm to be sorted, and one for the fluid media which will receive higher motility sperm.
  • the integral devices may contain further reservoir(s) for supplying fluid streams of different composition, e.g. different nutrients, growth factors, etc. , or to present a larger supply of liquid than is possible in a single reservoir alone. It should be remembered that although the length of fluid supply reservoirs can be increased easily, their cross-section cannot, since too large a cross-section will prevent the fluid from occupying the entire height of the reservoir. These considerations do not necessarily apply to the outlet reservoirs, although these also preferably are constructed with regard to the same criteria.
  • valved The passageways of the subject devices, for example those from or to the various fluid reservoirs, may be valved. Valving is particularly important when multiple media reservoirs are employed. Valving may be by active microvalves embedded within the chip and actuated by conventional means, or may be external to the chip, "squeezing" the respective passage closed by relying on the elastomeric nature of the device. Devices of rigid construction must rely on internal valving, whether internally actuated or externally actuated, for example by electromagnetic fields. Suitable valves are known to those skilled in the art. Toggling of valves from one reservoir to the next following fertilization can be used to simulate fluctuating nutrient content in in vitro systems.
  • the reservoirs and microchannels of a gravity pump device is shown in Figure 5.
  • the supply reservoir is considerably greater in volume than the microchannel volume so that flow may occur for some length of time.
  • the supply reservoir 68 is somewhat larger in area and taller than the outlet reservoir 69. When filled with fluid, the height difference of the two reservoirs allows fluid flow through microchannel 70 until the heights of fluid in the two reservoirs is equal.
  • the entire device may be micromachined from glass, metal, or other substrates, e.g. silica, but is preferably cast from thermoplastic or thermoset polymer using a "master. " Cast polydimethylsilicone elastomer is preferably used.
  • the sperm receiving reservoir and media reservoirs may be constructed with microtubing protruding into the respective reservoirs to supply fluid, or may communicate with a simple supply passage which exits the surface of the device and is suitably configured to receive the tip of a pipet, a syringe needle, etc. , to supply fluid to the device.
  • the motile-sperm depleted fluid reservoir and sorted, sperm reservoir while not requiring a fluid supply, must ordinarily be at least vented in order that an airlock preventing fluid flow cannot be formed.
  • the devices are preferably supplied fluid full, only requiring insertion of oocyte(s) and sperm sample into their respective locations, and initiation of pumping action to begin fluid flow.
  • the device of Figure 1 is shown in schematic form in plan, i.e. as viewed from above.
  • the device 1 embodiment consists of a motile particle sort stream inlet 2 (or motile particle supply reservoir serving as an inlet), a media stream inlet 3 (or media reservoir), a motile particle-depleted sort stream outlet (or reservoir) 4, and a motile particle-enriched stream outlet (or reservoir) 5.
  • a sort channel 6 Connecting the sort channel 6 to the respective inlets and outlets are sort stream inlet channel 7, media stream inlet channel 8, motile particle-depleted sort stream outlet channel 9, and motile particle-enriched media stream outlet channel 10.
  • the width of the sort stream channel must be large enough to allow the particles of interest to pass through effectively without blockage, as is also true of both outlet streams.
  • the inlet streams and outlet streams will have a cross-sectional area less than the sort channel.
  • the relative cross-sections will be dependent on the flow volume and flow rates of the various streams.
  • the linear flow rates are preferably similar, although the relative flow rates are only limited by the occurrence of mixing between the sort stream and the media stream.
  • the volume of the media stream may be less than, substantially the same as, or greater than the volume of the sort stream over any section of the sort channel.
  • a supply of sperm is introduced into sort stream inlet 2 and caused to flow toward motile particle-depleted sort stream outlet 9, initially through channel 7, then through sort channel 6, and next to outlet channel 9.
  • a media supply stream compatible (i.e. not destructive) of the sperm to be sorted is introduced into media stream inlet 3 and caused to flow through channel 8 into sort channel 6, through channel 10, and into motile particle-enriched media outlet 5.
  • a non-mixing, and preferably laminar flow is created, such that the sort stream and media stream flow in parallel through the sort channel.
  • Non-motile (or lesser-motile) particles tend to remain in the sort stream, while motile particles move about randomly and enter the media stream. As a result of this random movement, the sort stream becomes depleted of motile sperm, while the media stream becomes increasingly enriched.
  • FIG. 2a illustrate pictorially the separation of motile from non-motile sperm and other non-motile particles in the sort channel of the device of Figure 1.
  • the sort channel 6 is shown, beginning at the point of confluence of the sort stream 11 and the media stream 12.
  • the sort stream 11 contains motile 13 and non-motile sperm 14 as well as other non-motile particles, here designated as "round cells" 15.
  • round cells the size of the media stream in plan, and hence its volume, is considerably greater than the sort stream. Since sperm (and similarly, other motile particles) assume an essentially random distribution in the total liquid within a short period, a larger media stream volume will necessarily contain a larger fraction of total motile sperm 13.
  • the randomization of motile sperm between the two streams has begun, and continues until the desired degree of randomization has been achieved.
  • This degree of randomization is preferably such that the concentration of motile sperm in the media phase per unit of volume is the same or greater than the concentration per unit volume in the sort stream.
  • the sort stream and media stream are maintained as separate streams, each exhibiting laminar flow, and having a common boundary, or interface, 16. Greater concentration of motile particles in the media stream over the amount dictated by pure randomization may be achievable by employing a media stream in which the motile particles have increased mobility, i.e. by selecting a media stream less viscous than the sort stream, or by including additives which increase mobility of motile sperm relative to non-motile or poorly motile sperm.
  • the motile sperm-enriched media stream is harvested by diverting it to flow into the motile particle-enriched channel 10, while the now motile particle-depleted sort stream continues through channel 9 into outlet 4.
  • the diverting juncture 17 which separates the motile particle-depleted sort stream from the motile particle-enriched stream may be of any geometry which avoids substantial mixing of the streams at this point.
  • the juncture 17 may be positioned, for example, to provide for substantially the same outlet channel configuration (i.e. height, width) of the sort stream inlet, at this point.
  • the juncture 17 may also be configured such that a small portion of the media stream is also directed to the motile particle-depleted sort stream outlet 9. In this case, a modest loss of motile sperm will occur, however, the probability that non-motile sperm may enter the motile sperm-enriched media stream will be lessened as a result.
  • the nature of the sort stream is not critical.
  • the sort stream may be a biologically derived stream such as semen, or may be washed, diluted, may be treated with additives, stains or fluorescing dyes, viscosity modifiers, may be buffered, etc., so long as the treatment does not impair the viability of the desired exit stream (motile particle-depleted or motile particle-enriched).
  • the media stream may be selected with the same considerations in mind which are applied to selection or modification of the sort stream.
  • the media stream may be water, but for biological systems, it is typical to employ fluids which maintain or enhance biological activity, such as physiological saline, buffered saline, nutrient broths, and the like.
  • the preferred media is HEPES buffered human tubal fluid.
  • the nature of the media fluid and the sort fluid may be selected, if possible, to avoid interfacial mixing due to osmotic effects. This is the case, for example, when the base fluid (e.g. water) of both the sort and media streams have substantially the same amounts of soluble ingredients such as salts, acids, bases, buffers, dissolved organic material, and the like.
  • the fluids may also be selected, when possible, to avoid interfacial mixing by diffusion. However, complete absence of any diffusion is an unlikely goal in this respect.
  • the relative fluid volumes may be selected with respect to the desired degree of incorporation of the motile particles within the media phase. For the highest degree of incorporation, the media volume should be large with respect to the sort fluid volume.
  • Ratios of media fluid to sort fluid of from 1:100 to 100:1, preferably within the range of 1: 10 to 10: 1 may be used.
  • the ratio of media volume to sort fluid volume is within the range of 1 : 1 to 3:1.
  • the media fluid volume is most preferably higher than the sort fluid volume.
  • the linear flow rates of the sort fluid and media fluid are preferably substantially the same, i.e. within a range of flow rates of 1.5: 1 to 1:1.5. If the linear flow rate of the media fluid is greater than that of the sort fluid, correspondingly less transverse volume of media fluid can be used for the same degree of motile particle incorporation.
  • Flow is preferably concurrent, although counterconcurrent flow is also possible provided that interfacial mixing is not exacerbated beyond that which facilitates the desired degree of depletion/enrichment of the sort and media fluids.
  • the interface between the sort and media fluids is preferably a substantially non-mixing interface.
  • non-mixing is meant an absence of mixing which occurs due to excessive turbulence between the two fluids.
  • Turbulent flow generally results in partial to full mixing of the streams, rendering depletion/enrichment of motile particles less efficient or even completely impossible.
  • the theoretically best resolution of motile particles occurs when a static-appearing interface or "streamline" is created where interfacial mixing occurs only due to diffusional and osmotic effects.
  • the turbulence is excessive when the desired degree of resolution cannot be obtained, even with multiple stages of devices.
  • the turbulence expressed as a Reynolds number, should in any case be less than 2000, more preferably less than 100, yet more preferably less than 10, and most preferably 1 or less.
  • High performance devices such as those illustrated by example herein, exhibit a Reynolds number of approximately 0.1.
  • the nature of the interface i.e. its degree of turbulence, may be assessed by the degree of resolution.
  • the turbulence may also be assessed in numerous additional ways.
  • the optically transparent nature of the device allows the interface itself to be observed microscopically, for example by coloring one or both of the fluids and observing the interface by the change of color at the interface.
  • the interface between media of differing refractive index are also easily observed.
  • the degree of mixing of the sort and media streams may also be monitored by introducing a taggant, i.e. a radioactive soluble compound or non- motile particle, a visual or fluorescent dye, etc. , into one stream but not the other.
  • Appearance of the taggant in the outlet stream of the stream initially containing no taggant provides evidence of interfacial mixing, either of a turbulent kind, or by diffusion or osmosis. Some incorporation due to the latter two effects is expected, but is also expected to be quite minimal.
  • An incorporation of 50% of the taggant into the non-tagged stream essentially constitutes complete mixing. Mixing of less than 20% of the taggant into the non-tagged stream, preferably less than 10%, more preferably less than 5 % , and most preferably less than 1 % is desired. So long as the Reynolds number is kept reasonably low, the degree of turbulence will be satisfactory.
  • a flow which satisfies the above criteria is termed a "substantially non-turbulent flow" herein. It should be noted that concurrent flow streams exhibit much less turbulence, and hence interfacial mixing, than countercurrent flow streams.
  • the rate itself may vary widely.
  • the walls of the sorting device also create the possibility for turbulence, since they are static with respect to the fluid flow. The effect of the walls will be most important when narrow channels are employed, and particularly at the walls which abut the narrower of the sort or media streams. Since the devices of interest are rather small and have rather small channels, linear flow rates of less than 10 cm/s, preferably less than 10 mm/s are preferred. Flow rates of between 0.1 mm/s to 10 mm/s are particularly preferred. The low end of linear flow rate is determined by the mixing of non-motile particles from the sort stream into the media stream by Brownian motion.
  • Determining the relative flow volumes, relative flow rates, and absolute flow rates of any given stream can be routinely accomplished by one skilled in the art by simple calculations and/or measurements of resolution, for example by varying the respective rates and volumes and determining the relative enrichment and depletion of particles between the sort and media streams.
  • Sort channel length is generally a function of the rapidity at which motile particles randomize themselves between the two phases, and the flow rates. For example, at a given flow rate, motile particles which have limited motility will require a longer sort channel, while at a given sort channel length, less motile particles will require a slower rate of flow. Interfacial surface area also effects the geometry of the device. For example, flat rectangular sort channels with one fluid located parallel to and abutting a channel face of greater dimension, and with the other fluid adjacent, will exhibit faster randomization and thus require less sort channel length than the same channel when the first fluid is located parallel to and abutting a channel face of lesser dimension.
  • the sort channel will be quite short, in almost all cases less than 2-5 cm, and for most devices, in the range of 100 ⁇ m to 1 cm.
  • a sort channel length of 5000 ⁇ m (5 mm) has proven quite satisfactory. In staged devices, shorter sort channel lengths may be desirable.
  • the cross-sectional geometry of the sort channel is not critical. Square, rectangular, ellipsoidal, circular, trapezoidal, triangular or other cross- sections may be used. For ease of manufacturing, non-undercut channels such as square, rectangular, triangular, trapezoidal, and half-round or half-elliptical sections are preferred.
  • the cross-sectional areas and hence size of the supply channels and outlet channels are generally smaller than those of the sort channel.
  • the minimum size of the sort stream inlet channel is dictated by the size of the particles which are present in the sort stream.
  • the sort stream channel provides a free channel from 3 to 10 times the size of the particles expected to be contained therein.
  • the size of the media stream outlet channel but not necessarily to the media stream inlet channel.
  • the sort stream inlet and outlet channels will have comparable sizes, although in some instances, as described earlier, it may be desirable that the outlet channel is larger than the inlet, thus incorporating a portion of the media stream into the sort stream.
  • a rectangular sort stream inlet channel of 50 ⁇ m height, 100 ⁇ m width, and 5000 ⁇ m length has proven satisfactory.
  • the length of the various inlet and outlet channels is not critical. It is preferred that at least the inlet channels have some substantial length, to encourage formation of a laminar flow stream prior to the confluence of the sort and media stream channels. In general, more viscous fluids will not require as long a channel length as less viscous fluids.
  • the inlet channels may be completely dispensed with, i.e. the sort stream inlet (or reservoir) and/or media stream inlet (or reservoir) may feed directly into the sort channel. For most purposes, however, and to facilitate construction of sorting devices, it is preferable that inlet channels be employed. For the sperm sorting device described later, for example, inlet channel lengths of about 3 mm have proven satisfactory.
  • the junction 18 ( Figure 1) of confluence of the sort and media streams is preferably configured to encourage a smooth joining of the fluid streams without excessive mixing. In general, therefore, the junction will be a relatively acute angle.
  • the included angles between the sort stream inlet channel and the sort channel and between the media stream inlet channel and sort channel may be the same or different, i.e. the devices are not necessarily symmetrical.
  • the same considerations apply to the junction 17 where the sort stream and media stream are separated, or "diverted" from each other.
  • the sort stream inlet channel, sort channel, and sort stream outlet channel be substantially linear to provide as little disturbance of the non-motile particles in the sort stream as possible.
  • the material of construction of the devices may be any suitable material, and the fabrication of the device may involve any fabrication process.
  • devices may be micromachined chemically by etching of glass, silica, silicon, metals, or by solution etching of polymers, etc.
  • the devices may also be individually fabricated by known stereolithography techniques.
  • the devices may be injection molded of moldable polymers, for example silicone rubber, thermoplastic polyurethane, polyethylene , polypropylene, polytetrafluoroethylene, polyvinyl chloride, polyvinylidene chloride, polyamide, polyester, and the like.
  • castable materials are polymers, including epoxy resins, curable polyurethane elastomers, polymer solutions, i.e. solutions of acrylate polymers in methylene chloride or other solvents, and preferably, curable polyorganosiloxanes, most preferably for cost reasons, polyorganosiloxanes which predominately bear methyl groups, such as polydimethylsiloxanes (“PDMS").
  • PDMS polydimethylsiloxanes
  • Curable PDMS polymers are well known and available from many sources. Both addition curable and condensation-curable systems are available, as also are peroxide-cured systems.
  • All these PDMS polymers have a small proportion of reactive groups which react to form crosslinks and/or cause chain extension during cure. Both one part (RTV-1) and two part (RTV-2) systems are available. Addition curable systems are preferred when biological particle viability is essential.
  • transparent devices are desirable. Such devices may be made of glass or transparent polymers. PDMS polymers are well suited for transparent devices. A benefit of employing a polymer which is slightly elastomeric is the case of removal from the mold and the potential for providing undercut channels, which is generally not possible with hard, rigid materials. Methods of fabrication of microfluidic devices by casting of silicone polymers is well known. See, e.g. D.C. Duffy et al., "Rapid Prototyping of Microfluidic Systems in
  • channel and reservoir walls of the devices may be selected in view of the application of the device and the fluids contemplated for use therein.
  • the walls may be treated or derivitized to modify their surfaces with biologically compatible or bioactive coatings, or to provide chemical functionality.
  • BSA bovine serum albumin
  • the oocyte insemination chamber and the sorted sperm receiving reservoir may be a single reservoir performing both functions. Alternatively, a separate insemination chamber may be provided.
  • the insemination chamber and sorted sperm reservoir are preferably connected by a flow channel which will allow sperm-containing liquid to flow into the insemination chamber.
  • This flow may be valved, and initiated by gravity pumping, as with the media reservoir and sperm reservoir, or may require assist in the nature of pressure or by vacuum, i.e. aspiration, to initiate or cause (maintain) flow.
  • the insemination chamber may be sized in accordance to the number of oocytes desired to be introduced, and their species-dependent size.
  • the chamber must have a means for introducing one or more oocytes into the chamber.
  • the chamber may be configured with narrowings to condition the oocytes, when desired, i.e. to remove cumulus cells or to force them to the poles of the oocyte.
  • Techniques for micromanipulation of oocytes are known. See, e.g. Beebe et al., "Microfluidic Technology for Assisted Reproduction," THERIOGENOLOGY, 57 125-135 (2002).
  • the chamber may communicate with the outside of the device with a funnel shaped opening configured to receive a pipet tip, and having an "oocyte duct" which communicates with the insemination chamber and which is of sufficient diameter so as to allow oocytes to pass.
  • the insemination chamber may be a static volume, it is much preferred to establish fluid flow through the chamber in order to continue to supply new sperm sources, nutrient media, and the like, and to remove products of cellular metabolism.
  • the oocyte chamber must, in general, contain a barrier which contains holes or passages which permit the flow of fluids and sperm, but which are sized so as not to allow the oocytes to travel through the barrier.
  • the barrier may in principle be a wall of the insemination chamber having a small exit hole or channel for fluid and sperm to pass. However, it is preferably to provide for further holes or channels which will serve to appreciably prevent stagnant volumes where metabolic byproducts and/or cellular toxins may accumulate. It must be kept in mind that microfluidics devices are quite small, and thus barrier structures which may be contemplated for macroscopic devices may be incapable of fabrication in microdevices.
  • FIG 4 One barrier structure 46 which has been found to work well is illustrated in Figure 4. Like many microfluidics devices, this barrier design is advantageously created from multiple layers of cast polymer, which are then assembled into the finished device.
  • a lower layer 60 is configured to contain a blocking wall 61 of a height typical of an oocyte 62 to be deposited in the chamber, preferably somewhat taller, and of a thickness 63.
  • An upper layer 64 is configured to contain multiple parallel grooves or channels 65 which are longer than the thickness 63, such that when the second layer is affixed to the first layer with the channels directly over the blocking wall, a multiplicity of passages over the blocking wall are created. These channels may extend transversely over the entire width of the insemination chamber. Such a device permits virtually unimpeded flow while still serving as a barrier to the oocyte.
  • a simple device for microfluidic insemination consists of a microchannel sized to receive one or more oocytes, and containing a barrier as described with the channel.
  • a funnel-shaped or other shaped opening allows injection or pipetting of oocytes into the channel, and continued liquid flow causes the oocytes to travel down the channel to the barrier.
  • the barrier and microchannel thus together comprise an insemination chamber.
  • Sperm containing liquid may then be allowed to flow into and preferably through the chamber. Following fertilization, the liquid flow may be replaced by nutrient-containing liquid.
  • Various liquids may be alternated to simulate in vivo systems.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates one embodiment of an integral sperm sorting and insemination device 30.
  • the drawing depicts the passages in the device, which is preferably constructed by assembling multiple layers of cast silicone elastomer.
  • the sort channel 31 is supplied with sperm from sperm receiving reservoir 32, which has a passage 33 leading to the exterior of the PDMS device, and configured with a funnel like opening 34 so as to more readily receive a pipet tip or other delivery device.
  • the reservoir 32 has a height and width such that as fluid flows outwards into channel 31, the fluid level will not drop, but instead, a "plug" of fluid will move horizontally.
  • Sperm-containing liquid e.g. semen, is introduced into the reservoir through passage 33.
  • Sort media fluid is introduced into sort media reservoir 35 through passage 36, terminated by a funnel shaped opening 37. From the sort media reservoir, fluid flows through media channel 38 to sort channel 31. At the confluence of the sperm liquid stream and the sort media stream, sort channel 31 widens to accommodate the co-laminar streams, and this widened portion 39 continues up to the point of separation 40 of the streams into a continuing stream 41 which flows into a depleted sperm reservoir 42, preferably having an outlet or vent 43 to the outside.
  • the sort media now enriched with more motile sperm, flows through sorted sperm channel 44 to oocyte chamber 45.
  • the oocyte chamber 45 may be of the same dimensions as channel 44, or may, as shown here, be larger.
  • barriers 46 Prior to and following the oocyte insemination chamber 45 are located barriers 46 which allow media fluid and sperm to pass, but which do not allow an oocyte to pass.
  • the barrier may be similar to that of Figure 4, for example. From the chamber 45, the fluid flow continues to the sorted sperm reservoir 48, which may also have an outlet or vent 49.
  • oocyte duct 50 Delivery of one or more oocytes into chamber 45 may be accomplished via oocyte duct 50, which is terminated by a funnel shaped opening 51.
  • the interior dimensions of duct 50 are such that oocytes may pass through the duct into chamber 45.
  • a portion 52 of duct 50 is horizontal prior to entry into the chamber 45, to allow for valving by valve 53.
  • Valve 53 may be an internal, actively initiated valve, or may be an external valve, for example a electromagnetically or piezoelectrically actuated tactile sensor as might be found on a programmable braile display.
  • the oocyte may be removed by disassembling the device, or by opening valve 53 and withdrawing the oocyte by suction back through oocyte duct 50.
  • the device of Figure 3 is a "pass through" inseminator, since the sorted sperm flow by the oocyte on their way to the sorted sperm reservoir.
  • the valved oocyte duct may be connected directly to sorted sperm reservoir 48 to provide an insemination chamber or well rather than a channel. Note the outlet has been provided with a simple "pin" barrier 47 to prevent egress of the egg from the chamber.
  • Another device is shown in Figure 7, wherein greater flexibility in oocyte/sperm contact is possible. Equivalent portions of Figure 7 are labeled similarly to Figure 3. However, in Figure 7, sorted sperm flow directly to sorted sperm reservoir 48. From reservoir 48, a sperm channel 55 directs sperm to oocyte chamber 45, from which oocytes are prevented from leaving by barrier grates 46. Oocyte(s) are delivered into chamber 45 by oocyte duct 50.
  • the sperm channel 55 is configured so as to be valved between the sorted sperm reservoir 48 and oocyte chamber 45, e.g. by a "braille" actuator valve 56.
  • an active or passive pump may be positioned, in this case, a series of three or more braile actuators 56 which press on the channel from outside in a sequential rhythmic pattern, which causes a peristaltic-like pumping action.
  • a dynamic culture system holds numerous advantages in comparison to current static culture systems.
  • gradual movement of media over embryos would have the ability to remove metabolic by-products such as ammonia and oxygen free radicals which are detrimental to embryo development.
  • individual blastomeres (cells) that comprise the embryo can undergo apoptotic death, fragmentation and release of apoptotic cell death agents that may be detrimental to survival of remaining blastomeres.
  • a dynamic culture system would remove such agents.
  • current human embryo culture strategies use 2-3 sequential media for 3-6 day culture with abrupt media changes, which can inflict osmotic stress upon embryos.
  • a dynamic culture system would allow gradual media changes that may be beneficial.
  • the microfluidics device described above is more efficient than conventional methods of fertilization when sperm concentration is low.
  • the recommended sperm concentration is 1 x 10 6 sperm/mL.
  • the fertilization efficience is considerably lower, about 12% (% of oocytes fertilized) as opposed to about 37% in standard center- well equipment.
  • the fertilization rate at a lower concentration of 0.5 x 10 6 sperm/mL fared even worse in the microfluidics device, at about 8% versus about 36% for the center- well IVF.
  • the subject invention also pertains to a method of increasing fertilization rate at low sperm concentrations, by employing a device of the subject invention.
  • the improvement is assessed by comparing the average rate of fertilization in the microfluidics device to the rate of fertilization in a center-well technique, using the same sperm concentration, same media, and same temperature.
  • the improvement may be assessed employing sperm and oocytes from a single species, or the results obtained from different species may be averaged. If statistical data for a given species, i.e. human, bovine, cannot be obtained due to difficulties in collecting suitable data or to expense, it may be assumed, for the purpose of assessing the scope of the claims, that the mouse species, in particular the B6C3F1 variant, will determine the improvement.
  • a microfluidic sperm sorting device is prepared from Dow Corning
  • the curable PDMS is cast onto a master having the desired reservoir and channel features as protuberances.
  • the cast PDMS sorting devices are plasma oxidized to seal the open channel side of the casting to a glass cover slide. Channels and reservoirs are coated with 1 % bovine serum albumin fraction V from Sigma, dissolved in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) from Invitrogen Corporation. The entire device is approximately 6 mm thick, exclusive of the cover slide, and somewhat larger than a U.S. penny coin. A perspective view of the device is shown in Figure 1.
  • the PDMS casting is transparent, and only the reservoirs and channels are depicted.
  • a glass cover slide or other substrate would be bonded to the bottom plane of the device.
  • the channels are rectangular in cross-section, with a channel height of 50 ⁇ m, while the reservoirs are roughly semi-circular.
  • Both inlet reservoirs 2 and 3 are approximately 3 mm in height, while the outlet reservoirs are approximately 2 mm in height.
  • the inlet and outlet channels 7, 8, 9, 10 are about 5000 ⁇ m long.
  • the sperm inlet channel 7 and the motile depleted sperm outlet channel 9 have a width of 100 ⁇ m, while the media inlet channel 8 and outlet channel 10 have a width of about 300 ⁇ m.
  • the sort channel 6 has a width of 500 ⁇ m and a length of 5000 ⁇ m.
  • Semen samples were obtained with institution Review Board approval from men undergoing infertility evaluation. Sorting tests were performed using washed semen samples. In the order listed, 60 ⁇ L of processing media was added to the media inlet reservoir, 50 ⁇ L of a washed semen sample to the sample inlet reservoir, and 2 ⁇ L of media to each of the outlet reservoirs. Sperm sorting yields were calculated taking these dilution factors into account. The numbers of motile sperm were determined by a Makler Counting Chamber (Sefi-Medical Instruments, Haifi, Israel).
  • sperm samples For visualization of membrane-compromised sperm, which generally corresponds to non-motile sperm, 3 ⁇ L of propidium iodide (Molecular Probes, www.probes.com, 60 mM dissolved in processing media) was added to sperm samples prior to sorting. A Texas Red filter set (577 nm excitation, 620 nm emission) was used to view red fluorescence from stained cells. An inverted microscope (NIKON TE 300, www.nikon-usa.com) with a CCD camera (Hamamatsu ORCA-100, www.hamamatsu.com) was used to capture images and record movies.
  • NIKON TE 300 www.nikon-usa.com
  • CCD camera Hamamatsu ORCA-100, www.hamamatsu.com
  • the sorting device uses a sorting system where non-motile sperm flow along their initial streamlines and exit one outlet whereas motile sperm can deviate from their initial streamlines and exit through a different outlet.
  • This sorting mechanism is related to the "filtering" mechanism used in an "H-filter” where rapidly diffusing small molecules exit through a different outlet from larger molecules and particles that diffuse more slowly.
  • the difference between the two devices is that the sorting device of the present invention takes advantage of active movement of cells whereas an H-filter takes advantage of passive diffusion of particles.
  • This type of sorting is possible because in small channels, multiple laminar streams can flow parallel to each other with no turbulent mixing at the interface between the streams.
  • Typical Reynolds Numbers for the flow of sperm sample and media inside the sorting device were on the order of 0.1.
  • motile human sperm swim at velocities greater than 20 ⁇ m/sec at 20 °C. This rapid mobility allows motile sperm, but not the non-motile sperm, to distribute themselves randomly within the width of a 500 ⁇ m channel within seconds.
  • the sorting device was designed specifically to give sperm a residence time of 20 seconds in the main separation channel. A bifurcation placed at the end of this separation channel allows efficient collection of only the motile sperm that deviated from its initial inlet stream.
  • the sorting device described integrates all functions necessary for sperm sorting, for example, inlet/outlet ports, fluid reservoirs, pumps, power source, sort channel, etc., onto a simple chip design that is practical to manufacture and use.
  • a key design feature of this embodiment is the set of four horizontally- oriented fluid reservoirs that also function as sample inlet/outlet ports and a fluid pumping system.
  • the orientation, geometry, and size of these reservoirs are designed to balance gravitational forces and surface tension forces, and provide a pumping system that generates a steady flow rate over extended periods of time regardless of the volume of fluid in the reservoirs. This contrasts with conventional gravity-driven pumping systems whose flow rates decrease over time as the volume of fluid in the inlet reservoir decreases.
  • the diameters of the reservoirs were selected to be small enough that surface tension prevents liquid from spilling out of the horizontally-oriented reservoirs, but large enough to hold sufficient amounts of sample (tens to hundreds of microliters) and allow convenient sample introduction and recovery.
  • This balance of forces allows the reservoirs to be arranged horizontally without the liquid inside spilling out.
  • the horizontal reservoir arrangement holds the height difference between the fluid in the inlet and outlet reservoirs the same (1.0 mm height difference hetween inlet and outlet reservoir ceilings) regardless of the volume of fluid present in the reservoirs and maintains a constant hydraulic pressure even as the amount of fluid in the reservoirs changes.
  • the passively-driven pumping system described here is unique in that it uses horizontally-oriented reservoirs to overcome the problem of traditional gravity-driven pumping, where the pressure decreases as the amount of liquid in the reservoir decreases. Furthermore, the structure of the pump is greatly simplified compared to other mechanical or non-mechanical pumping systems allowing easy manufacture and integration of the pump into a small, integrated device. Finally, the use of gravity and surface tension as the driving-force contributes to the overall small size of the sorting device by eliminating the need for power supplies such as batteries. Taking gravity, surface tension, and channel resistance into consideration, the sorting device was designed to give a steady flow rate of sperm with a residence time of approximately 20 seconds inside the main sort channel.
  • the device is designed so that the flow resistance of the fluid reservoirs is more than 10 times less than that of the microfluidic channels, and therefore negligible.
  • the resistance of the channels calculated to be 2.8xl0 12 kg/(sec/m 4 ) approximates the total resistance of the system. Since a bulk flow rate of 0.008 ⁇ L/sec is required to achieve the desired residence time of 20 seconds and the total resistance is 2.8xl0 12 kg/(sec/m 4 ), the net pressure drop required to drive the fluid is 23 N/m 2 .
  • we designed the dimensions of the reservoirs such that capillary forces (3.0 mm diameter inlet reservoir vs.
  • the sperm tracking experiments shows the process of how motile sperm can swim out of its initial streamline.
  • PI stains membrane compromised cells such as dead cells, and thus allows the non-motile sperm to be highlighted and visualized with red fluorescence while the motile sperm remain unstained.
  • the bar graphs in Figure 8 compare percentage of sperm that are motile before and after sorting. The unshaded bars represent the initial sperm sample, while the solid bars represent the motile particle- enriched media stream. The purity of motile sperm after sorting was nearly 100% regardless of motile sperm purity before sorting.
  • the yields (39%, 42%, 43%), defined as the ratio of the number of motile sperm in the motile sperm outlet reservoir to the total number of motile sperm in the sperm sample inlet reservoir, were comparable to or greater than the recovery rates (0.8% to 50%) of sperm processed using conventional sorting methods such as direct swim-up, swim-up from a pellet of centrifuged sperm, or density gradient separation. It was also observed that sperm morphology, another important trait that correlates with successful pregnancies, also improved after sorting with the device (Strict Sperm Morphology: 9.5 + 1.1 % normal before sorting to 22.4 + 3.3 % normal after sorting).
  • Kruger Strict sperm morphology is a set of criteria or standards whereby sperm must fit within specific measurements (head width and length, tail length, acrosome making up a certain percentage of the sperm head) and lack abnormalities (e.g. pin head, round head, crimped tail).
  • a device similar to that of Example 1 is configured with a funnel shaped oocyte duct communicating with the channel leading to the sorted sperm reservoir, as shown in Figure 3.
  • a mouse cumulus mass (20 - 30 oocytes) is introduced by means of a pipet.
  • Mouse sperm is introduced into the sperm reservoir and media fluid into the media fluid (sort fluid) reservoir.
  • sort fluid media fluid
  • One co-laminar flow begins, more motile sperm cross over the interface between the co-flowing streams, and the sperm-enriched media fluid flows into the sorted sperm reservoir collection well (volume: ca. 30 - 40 ⁇ L), which also serves as the insemination chamber.
  • Successful fertilization is noted following 24 hours of co-incubation within the collection well (insemination chamber).
  • a microfluidic channel/insemination device is fabricated from PDMS by the layering technique.
  • a single microchannel connects two larger reservoirs, one having a funnel shaped oocyte duct attached thereto, which also serves as a fluid inlet.
  • the microchannel is 500 ⁇ m wide by 180 ⁇ m deep, and is about 2 cm long. After about 80% of its length, the channel contains a barrier grate as depicted by Figure 4.
  • the parallel channels of the barrier grate are prepared as a separate PDMS layer and subsequently bonded to the layer containing the channel.
  • Oocytes from B6C3F1 mice are introduced into the device of Example 3 by pipet, and buffered media is added to cause the oocytes to travel to the barrier grate where their further progress is blocked. Fertilization is achieved by adding sperm-containing media into the microchannel. Various concentrations of sperm are employed, and the fertilization rate compared to fertilization employing the same types of oocytes, media, and sperm, but by a center- well method. The results are given in Figure 6.

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
  • Surgery (AREA)
  • Reproductive Health (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • Heart & Thoracic Surgery (AREA)
  • Gynecology & Obstetrics (AREA)
  • Pregnancy & Childbirth (AREA)
  • Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
  • Sustainable Development (AREA)
  • Medical Informatics (AREA)
  • Transplantation (AREA)
  • Cell Biology (AREA)
  • Developmental Biology & Embryology (AREA)
  • Dispersion Chemistry (AREA)
  • Clinical Laboratory Science (AREA)
  • Apparatus Associated With Microorganisms And Enzymes (AREA)
  • Micro-Organisms Or Cultivation Processes Thereof (AREA)
EP04754440A 2003-06-06 2004-06-07 Integriertes mikrofluid- gerät zur spermaisolation und insemination Withdrawn EP1641411A1 (de)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US47666403P 2003-06-06 2003-06-06
PCT/US2004/017829 WO2004108011A1 (en) 2003-06-06 2004-06-07 Integrated microfluidic sperm isolation and insemination device

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1641411A1 true EP1641411A1 (de) 2006-04-05

Family

ID=33511806

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP04754440A Withdrawn EP1641411A1 (de) 2003-06-06 2004-06-07 Integriertes mikrofluid- gerät zur spermaisolation und insemination

Country Status (4)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1641411A1 (de)
JP (1) JP2006527028A (de)
CA (1) CA2527733A1 (de)
WO (1) WO2004108011A1 (de)

Families Citing this family (20)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9157550B2 (en) 2009-01-05 2015-10-13 The Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Illinois Microfluidic systems and methods
CN101914435B (zh) * 2010-05-24 2013-08-21 博奥生物有限公司 一种微管道装置及其使用方法
CN101947124B (zh) 2010-06-25 2012-07-04 博奥生物有限公司 一种集成式微流控芯片装置及其使用方法
CN102580794B (zh) 2011-01-13 2014-03-19 博奥生物有限公司 可定位细胞及生物体的微流控芯片及其应用
WO2012126478A1 (en) 2011-03-21 2012-09-27 Motilitycount Aps Device for analysis of cellular motility
CN108889345B (zh) * 2011-05-20 2020-10-09 布里格姆及妇女医院股份有限公司 游动细胞的分析和分选
CN102242055B (zh) 2011-06-03 2013-08-14 博奥生物有限公司 一种精子活力评价及筛选的方法及其专用微流控芯片装置
US20150079676A1 (en) 2012-02-29 2015-03-19 Auckland Uniservices Limited Method and apparatus for the isolation of motile sperm
WO2013132897A1 (ja) * 2012-03-09 2013-09-12 株式会社メニコン 精子取扱用具
CN104254596B (zh) * 2012-04-16 2016-09-07 康奈尔大学 自动化胞浆内精子注射辅助授精系统
GB201309766D0 (en) * 2013-05-31 2013-07-17 Labman Automation Ltd IVF egg collection chamber and system
US9663755B2 (en) 2013-11-19 2017-05-30 The Governing Council Of The University Of Toronto Apparatus and methods for sperm separation
WO2016064896A1 (en) 2014-10-20 2016-04-28 University Of Utah Research Foundation Tissue sample processing system and associated methods
DE102015116391B4 (de) 2015-09-28 2017-04-27 Marion Vollmer Medizinische Vorrichtung für die selektive Separierung einer biologischen Probe
AR107746A1 (es) * 2017-02-24 2018-05-30 Herberto Ernesto Hector Repetto Dispositivo y método de separación de células móviles
ES1229586Y (es) * 2019-01-16 2019-08-09 Instituto Nac De Investigacion Y Tecnologia Agraria Y Alimentaria Inia Dispositivo para la seleccion de espermatozoides
TWI672136B (zh) * 2019-02-01 2019-09-21 國立清華大學 精子分選器與精子分選方法
EP4005672A1 (de) * 2020-11-25 2022-06-01 Pera Labs Medikal Arastirma ve Gelistirme Limited Sirketi Vorrichtung zur trennung und analyse von samenproben, system und verfahren
AR125716A1 (es) * 2021-04-21 2023-08-09 Selectivity S A S Un dispositivo de inseminación y un proceso que lo utiliza
KR102646806B1 (ko) * 2021-09-08 2024-03-13 단국대학교 산학협력단 정자의 성별 분류장치

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5296375A (en) * 1992-05-01 1994-03-22 Trustees Of The University Of Pennsylvania Mesoscale sperm handling devices
CA2408616C (en) * 2000-05-12 2007-10-02 The Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Illinois Microfluidic channel embryo and/or oocyte handling, analysis and biological evaluation
WO2003072765A1 (en) * 2002-02-27 2003-09-04 The Regents Of The University Of Michigan Process for sorting motile particles from lesser-motile particles and apparatus suitable therefor

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO2004108011A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA2527733A1 (en) 2004-12-16
JP2006527028A (ja) 2006-11-30
WO2004108011A1 (en) 2004-12-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US10227562B2 (en) Process for sorting motile particles from lesser-motile particles and apparatus suitable therefor
US20060270021A1 (en) Integrated microfluidic sperm isolation and insemination device
EP1641411A1 (de) Integriertes mikrofluid- gerät zur spermaisolation und insemination
US20230234061A1 (en) Manipulation of fluids, fluid components and reactions in microfluidic systems
US10675626B2 (en) Manipulation of fluids, fluid components and reactions in microfluidic systems
US10174305B2 (en) Microfluidic droplet encapsulation
US10274479B2 (en) Method for sperm motility evaluation and screening and its microfluidic device
US7704728B2 (en) Microfluidic gravity pump with constant flow rate
JP2017158491A (ja) 検体処理方法、検体処理チップおよび検体処理装置
JP4982768B2 (ja) 粒子処理用マイクロ流路システムおよび粒子処理方法
JP6839173B2 (ja) 流体力学シャトリングチップ機器、及び、分離した単一細胞を捕捉する方法
US20230053160A1 (en) Selective and High-Resolution Printing of Single Cells
WO2022227853A1 (zh) 微流控芯片、盒体装置、微流控装置

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20051214

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20090226

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20110104