EP1614602B1 - Device for measuring of condition data of a rolling wheelset of a railbound vehicle - Google Patents
Device for measuring of condition data of a rolling wheelset of a railbound vehicle Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP1614602B1 EP1614602B1 EP05014004A EP05014004A EP1614602B1 EP 1614602 B1 EP1614602 B1 EP 1614602B1 EP 05014004 A EP05014004 A EP 05014004A EP 05014004 A EP05014004 A EP 05014004A EP 1614602 B1 EP1614602 B1 EP 1614602B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- rail
- distance
- wheel
- measuring
- status data
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Not-in-force
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61K—AUXILIARY EQUIPMENT SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR RAILWAYS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B61K9/00—Railway vehicle profile gauges; Detecting or indicating overheating of components; Apparatus on locomotives or cars to indicate bad track sections; General design of track recording vehicles
- B61K9/08—Measuring installations for surveying permanent way
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61K—AUXILIARY EQUIPMENT SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR RAILWAYS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B61K9/00—Railway vehicle profile gauges; Detecting or indicating overheating of components; Apparatus on locomotives or cars to indicate bad track sections; General design of track recording vehicles
- B61K9/12—Measuring or surveying wheel-rims
Definitions
- the invention relates to a device for measuring state data on a rolling wheel of a scooter-bound vehicle according to the preamble of patent claim 1.
- the geometry of the wheel-rail contact significantly determines the driving behavior of rail vehicles and at the same time significantly influences the wear on the wheelsets and the rails.
- the track position, curves and, of course, the running behavior in the transverse direction (sinusoidal run) can lead to greatly differing wear. If it comes to the flange start-up (in curves or at high speeds), forces must be transmitted safely between wheel flange and rail. A "climbing" of the wheel flange is undesirable. Vehicle and track operators are therefore always interested in knowing the status data of rolling wheelsets in order to prevent damage to the track and the vehicle, to increase safety on the rail networks, to control maintenance intervals or to give the vehicle operators damaging, defective wheelsets with higher overriding charges strain.
- the status data for wheel sets or wheels could previously only be determined quasi-statically in repair shops.
- the wheel profile was scanned manually with gauges and characterized the wear on the treads and flange margins determined.
- the rail vehicle had to be transported to a special repair shop and made accessible so that the wheel profile could be scanned manually.
- Such a measuring method is very complicated and in particular for the comprehensive control of overrunning rail vehicles with some different vehicle operators hardly feasible.
- a dynamic monitoring device of railway wheels which measures the out-of-roundness of all rolling over a track track wheelsets.
- a monitoring device is clamped on both rails of the track section, which consists essentially of a strip which is arranged along the rail, that a mecanicrollendes vehicle this moves with the flange vertically downwards.
- the strip is supported by several inclined leaf springs, which hold the strip at rest in a certain starting position parallel to the running surface of the rail.
- a displacement transducer is mounted, which measures the distance of the depressed by the wheel flange strip and an electronic evaluation device supplies.
- At least one full Rohmmusicung is detected by the bar or more such strips behind each other as a measuring section and determined by the electronic evaluation device, if a wheel is out of round.
- a monitoring device should be able to determine a runout of 0.1 mm, but should only be suitable for slow crossing speeds of specified 8 km / h. Even if this monitoring device can not only be used for measuring out-of-roundness, but can also detect any difference in diameter, it is obviously unsuitable for nationwide monitoring of the wheelsets of fast-moving train connections.
- a measuring device for rail vehicle wheels which detects the depth of flats regardless of the driving speed.
- a so-called auxiliary rail is mounted in parallel to the rail at this isolated, which is an electrical capacitor forms whose capacity assumes a certain value when rolling over a wheel. In this case, the capacity changes abruptly when rolling past a flat, from which then the flat is derivable.
- Such a monitoring device is due to the necessary pulse-like capacitance change suitable only for a flat spot detection, so that other changes to the vehicle wheels are not measurable. So it is particularly often necessary to determine the wear-related abrasion on the entire tread of the rail vehicle, because this damage to the track or security hazards should be prevented.
- a device for measuring state data on a rolling wheelset of a rail-bound vehicle For example, a device for measuring state data on a rolling wheelset of a rail-bound vehicle is known. For detecting the flange height vertically below the passing wheel flange of the rail vehicle at least one non-contact measuring distance sensor is provided. This distance sensor is connected to an evaluation device which determines at least the wear of the horizontal rail wheel running surface from a distance value. The device further comprises at least one incorporated in the rail head non-contact distance sensor, which detects the distance to the horizontal Schienenradlauf configuration. However, this device is exclusively designed to determine state data of individual wheels.
- a device for measuring state data on a rolling wheel of a rail vehicle in which at least one non-contact distance sensor is provided for detecting the flange height vertically below the passing wheel flange of the rail vehicle wheel.
- This distance sensor is connected to an evaluation device, which consists of a distance value at least the wear of the horizontal Rail wheel running surface determined.
- this measuring device is only used to determine the flange height, so that no conclusion on the wear on the rails is possible.
- a device for determining the transverse dimension of two wheels of a rail vehicle is known.
- a device for determining the axial distance of two wheels mounted on an axle of a rail vehicle is disclosed.
- the measuring device has two non-contact measuring horizontally arranged distance sensors at the level of the passing vehicle wheels between the rails, which detect the horizontal distances to the vertical vehicle wheel end faces.
- the axial distance between the vehicle wheels is determined by an evaluation device from the detected distances. This device is used for tracking inspection, with no status data of the wheels can be determined therefrom.
- a device for measuring state data on a rolling wheelset of a rail-bound vehicle is known.
- at least one non-contact distance sensor is provided for detecting the flange height vertically below the passing wheel flange of the rail vehicle wheel.
- the distance sensor is connected to an evaluation device, which determines at least the wear of the horizontal Schienenradlauf construction from a distance value.
- the device further comprises at least one further non-contact distance sensor, which detects the distance to the horizontal Schienenradlauf construction.
- the horizontal distance to the vertical Radstirn preparation is also detected by non-contact measuring horizontally arranged distance sensors along at least one track between the rails the horizontal distance and the track between two opposite determined on an axle arranged wheels using the evaluation device. Since this device mainly serves to determine the condition data of wheels, it is not suitable for obtaining conclusions about the condition of the rail running surface.
- the invention is therefore based on the object to improve a device for state data acquisition on a rolling wheelset of a rail vehicle so that can be detected reliably and with the simplest means in addition to the wear on the wheels wear and tear on the rails.
- the invention has the advantage that can be measured by the non-contact distance sensors on the inner Radstirn vom the transverse or axial displacement of the continuous wheelset.
- a permissible shaft run (sinusoidal run) or a damage-dependent reciprocal flange start-up can be determined as a so-called zig-7ack run at a fast driving speed of a train.
- This can be detected in particular with high precision if the axially and horizontally arranged distance sensors are provided on a measuring path of the length of at least one wheel revolution.
- distance sensors on a measuring path of the length of at least one wheel circumference can also be calculated at the same time the transit speed and is advantageously monitoring a predetermined speed limit monitored.
- the invention additionally has the advantage that when a so-called zigzag run is detected, the speed is less subject to damage can be specified, through which the safety of rail traffic is increased and at the same time the wear on the rail network can be reduced.
- the invention also has the advantage that even with only one distance sensor below the passing vehicle wheel per rail, the individual wheelsets can be monitored even at fast crossing on wear-prone excessive wear. This is basically possible in the entire track network, so that the track network can be protected nationwide against such harmful rail vehicles. It has been found to be advantageous that the individual wheels are worn evenly in their tread most evenly, so that even from a single distance measurement of the wheel flange on the tread wear of the respective rail vehicle wheel can be closed and at default of a limit the defective wheelsets are immediately detectable. As a result, not only the safety on the rail network can be improved, but at the same time the wear on the rail running surfaces is significantly herabsetzbar. Since the invention proceeds from a contactless measuring system, it is largely maintenance-free, has little interference and can be reliably operated for a long time.
- the measuring device Due to the arrangement of the distance sensors below the flange directly adjacent to the rails, the measuring device is advantageously very space-saving to install and can be provided practically at any point in the track network.
- sensors can be used by the non-contact displacement measurement, which make the measuring device largely insensitive to contamination, dust, temperature fluctuations and mechanical damage.
- Due to the reference size of the wheel flange height a very high accuracy in the measurement of the tread wear is achieved by a simple displacement measurement with distance sensors, since the flange diameter the rail vehicle wheels is not subject to wear and is usually produced with a manufacturing accuracy of +/- 0.3 mm.
- the measuring accuracy is also increased, since a measuring distance of approximately 4 m results, which is preferably equipped with at least four distance sensors, from which an average tread wear can be calculated with the aid of an electronic evaluation device.
- non-contact distance sensors are additionally provided on the inner Radstirn vom provided by the advantageously still the transverse or axial displacement of the continuous wheelset can be measured.
- a permissible shaft run sinusoidal run
- a damage-dependent alternating flange start-up can be determined as a so-called zig-zag run when the speed of a train is fast. This can be detected in particular with high precision if the axially and horizontally arranged distance sensors are provided on a measuring path of the length of at least one wheel revolution.
- the invention also has the advantage that, when a so-called zigzag run is detected, a less damage-prone speed can be predetermined by which the safety of the rail traffic is increased and, at the same time, the wear on the rail network can be reduced.
- a plurality of distance sensors are arranged radially offset in the rail profile, whereby the wheel profile is scanned at least on the running surfaces.
- these distance sensors are provided for profile measurement in bores or transverse crevices of the rail head and sealed sealed, so that the distance sensors protected and the rail recesses do not interfere with the fürfahrvorgang.
- an override shoe is additionally provided laterally on the rail, which bridges over a partial interruption of the rail, so that even with fast crossings no so-called joints occur.
- FIG. 1 The drawing shows a section of a rail area is shown, in which next to a rail 1 below a participationrollenden rail vehicle 2, a contactless distance sensor 3 is arranged, which forms an electronic evaluation device 4, a measuring device for measuring the wear on the horizontal Radlauf vom as state data of a rail vehicle wheel 2 ,
- Rail vehicle wheels 2 that have been newly manufactured or newly repaired have very accurate manufacturing dimensions that are suitable as reference dimensions.
- commonly used rail vehicle wheels 2 of locomotives of the German Federal Railways AG usually have a tread diameter D L of 1250 mm, which are manufactured with a tolerance of +/- 0.3 mm.
- Such rail vehicle wheels 2 have on a tread face for guiding on the rail 1 a flange 6 in the amount of 28 mm, so that therefrom results in a flange diameter D s of 1.306 mm.
- Such a flange 6 is subject to its flange 7 no wear and thus is suitable for an accuracy of +/- 0.3 mm as a reference.
- the rail height Sy is known, from the distance of the flange 6 and a reference point to the rail height Sy the wear or the wear on the horizontal wheel tread 5 can be determined.
- the invention therefore proposes to measure when crossing a rail vehicle respectively the distance of the flange 6 from a reference to rail height Sy contactless and from the Laufzanabrieb or wear Sa or the average tread diameter D L by means of an electronic Evaluation device 4 to calculate. Therefore, at least one distance sensor 3 is preferably arranged in the inner region between the two rails 1 below the vorbcirollenden wheel flanges 6 next to each rail 1. These are non-contact measuring transducers which preferably operate on the inductive measuring principle or represent microwave or ultrasonic transducers. In a specific embodiment, such a distance sensor 3 could also be embedded in the rail head or be provided horizontally next to the rail 1 and from there scan the flange height Sn.
- Such contactless displacement transducers are widely used in industrial Messtcchnik and have in particular at small distances up to 50 mm high accuracies of +/- 0.1 mm.
- Such an inductive displacement sensor is used as a distance sensor 3 on at least one of the sleepers 10, preferably adjacent to each of the two rails 1 arranged, wherein the measuring head 8 must have at least a distance of the maximum allowable wear or, for example, of 10 mm from the rolling flange collar 7 of a novel set of wheels 14 and rail vehicle wheel 2.
- Such an inductive distance sensor 3 measures by the inductive influence of the ferromagnetic flange 6 the distance Sx between its measuring head 8 as a measuring surface and the wheel flange 7.
- a threshold 10 connected to an electrical evaluation device 4, which detects the roll over a wheelset 14, the distance values Sx and caches.
- the tread wear Sa of each rail vehicle wheel 2 can be measured directly when rolling over the train and displayed in a connected display device 11.
- a known target value of the tread diameter D L of z. B. 1,250 mm but also the actual tread diameter D L is calculated.
- the two tread diameters D L and Lauffestverschl respectively satisfy Sa of a wheelset 14 to detect deviations within the wheelset 14, which indicates a non-uniform wear, flat or ovality, which is particularly risky and damaging to the Glcissystem and should be detected in any case early.
- a limit value for the maximum allowable abrasion value Sa of, for example, 8 mm can be entered into the evaluation device 4, bci a rail vehicle is basically no longer roadworthy and also provides for a special wear on the track system. Such exceeding of this limit value can also be signaled immediately and when achcr number of axles the damaged wheelset in the train is also immediately identifiable. For a registered train but can also be determined wear classes are determined to specify the train a certain maximum speed or to calculate from a wear-dependent override fee.
- the angle of the Achswolf can be determined transversely to the direction of travel, which must not exceed a certain angle value in a straight-ahead or in the so-called wave ,
- a measuring section of the length Su of at least one wheel circumference provided, which preferably contains four non-contact distance sensors (A1, A2, A3, A4).
- the rail vehicle wheel 2 or its wheel flange 6 is scanned radially on its entire circumference, wherein the distance sensor A1 and A4 would basically have to measure the same flange center distance Sx.
- the measurement accuracy can be increased considerably.
- the drawing is provided that in addition to the radially sensing distance sensors 3 are still preferably two axially or horizontally detecting distance sensors A5, A9 are mounted in the inner region between the rails 1. These two non-contact distance sensors A5, A9 are arranged symmetrically to a rail center plane 12 and directed to the vertical end faces 13 of the flange 6. Preferably, it is the same inductively measuring distance sensors 3 as after Fig. 1 the drawing, which are used for radial distance measurement Sx. With these two axially or horizontally measuring distance sensors A5, A9, both the distance S1 to the left rail vehicle wheel 2 and the distance S2 to the right rail vehicle wheel 2 are detected in a wheel set 14 and also fed to the evaluation device 4.
- the measuring device can also use the not permitted stops of the rail flange 6 are detected and signaled on the rail 1 with +/- 5.5 mm axial misalignment.
- a particularly accurate monitoring of the permissible axial misalignment during straight travel and normal sinusoidal operation is in Fig. 5
- the drawing shows where a measuring section with at least four axially or horizontally measuring distance sensors A5, A6, A7, A8 is provided. Through this measuring section of the continuous axial displacement of a wheelset 14 is measured and can be compared with predetermined limits or used for more accurate AR measurement.
- FIG. 6 The drawing shows an embodiment is shown, in which additionally distance sensors A10, A11, A12 are provided in Schichncnkopf 9, with which the profile of the horizontal tread 5 and the vertical tread 18 of the rail vehicle 2 are scanned as additional state data.
- distance sensors A10, A11, A12 are provided in Schichncnkopf 9, with which the profile of the horizontal tread 5 and the vertical tread 18 of the rail vehicle 2 are scanned as additional state data.
- the radial distance sensor 3 and the axial distance sensor A5 three more distance sensors A10, A11, A12 are inserted in the rail head 9.
- the radial distance sensor 3 could be embedded in the rail head 9 below the distance sensor A12 and scan the wheel flange height Sn.
- the mounting position in detail is in the cut-out in Fig. 7 the drawing shown.
- two inductive scanning sensors A10, A11 are preferably inserted into two holes 15 in the horizontal running surface 20 of the rail 1 so far that their measuring head 19 is so far from the rail running surface 20 of preferably 10 mm spaced that a very accurate measuring range results and damage is avoided.
- These distance sensors A10, A11 measure when rolling over a rail vehicle wheel 2 the distance between the recessed sensor heads 19 and the rolling horizontal tread parts 5 of the rail vehicle wheel second
- the evaluation device 4 determines the flange thickness and compares this with a predetermined known setpoint value. As a result, both the flange thickness, an impermissible flange thickness S3, or the damage of the flange cores 18 may be displayed in a display device 11 or signaled by other devices.
- a measuring section of length Su at least one wheel circumference so that the entire profile of a rolling rail vehicle wheel 2 crmittclbar and evaluated for deviations from a predetermined target profile geometry in the electronic evaluation device 4.
- the wear on the rail running surfaces 20 can be determined.
- only one set of wheels 14 with a desired profile geometry is to be moved symmetrically over the measuring section and the tread spacing of the rail vehicle wheels 2 and the flange thickness S3 are to be measured. If a measured value falls below z.
- the Einlassticfc the distance sensors A10 and A11 of 10 mm, this represents a wear of the horizontal rail running surface 20 is.
- the evaluation device 4 determines a wear on the vertical rail side surface 18 when the distance values of the distance sensors A5 and A12 fall below a predetermined desired value, which results from a predetermined target flange thickness S3 plus the known distance between the two sensors A5 and A12. Due to the resulting track wear values on the associated track section, its condition values can be displayed at regular intervals and then required repair work can be initiated.
- a preferred embodiment for determining the state data of the rail vehicle wheels 2 and the rail wear as shown 6 and 7 the drawing is in 8 and 9 the drawing shown.
- the distance sensors A10, A11 and A12 are not in the holes, but advantageously arranged in a transverse gap 16 of the rail head 9, which is also retrofitted in a simple manner by means of a cutting device in an existing rail section 1.
- the transverse gap width corresponds at least to the diameter of Three distance sensors A10, A11 and A12, which scan the wheel geometry similar to the sensors A10 to A12 in Fig. 6 the drawing.
- a drive-over shoe 17 is additionally attached laterally in a rail head recess, which allows uninterrupted passage of the rail vehicle wheels 2.
- the Abstandssensorcn A10 to A12 are preferably fixed with an elastic potting compound in the rail head 9 and are thereby also additionally protected against damaging external influences.
- the measuring device according to the invention can also be mounted on the measuring section of a rail vehicle scale or another rail force measuring device, in which case existing power supply devices and / or a program-controlled computing device 4 can be used.
- these status data can be linked to the detected wheel geometry values in order to increase the accuracy of these measurements.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Length Measuring Devices With Unspecified Measuring Means (AREA)
- Arrangements For Transmission Of Measured Signals (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Die Erfindung betrifft eine Vorrichtung zur Messung von Zustandsdaten an einem rollenden Radsatz eines schicncngcbundenen Fahrzeugs gemäß dem Oberbegriff des Patentanspruchs 1.The invention relates to a device for measuring state data on a rolling wheel of a scooter-bound vehicle according to the preamble of
Die Geometrie des Rad-Schiene-Kontaktes bestimmt wesentlich das Fahrverhalten von Schienenfahrzeugen und beeinflusst gleichzeitig den Verschleiß an den Radsätzen und den Schienen entscheidend. Dabei können insbesondere die Gleislage, Kurven und natürlich das Laufverhalten in Querrichtung (Sinuslauf) zu stark unterschiedlichem Verschleiß führen. Kommt es zum Spurkranzanlauf (in Kurven bzw. bei hohen Geschwindigkeiten), müssen zwischen Spurkranz und Schiene erheblich Kräfte sicher übertragen werden können. Ein "Aufklettern" des Spurkranzes ist unerwünscht. Fahrzeug- wie auch Gleisstreckenbetreiber sind daher stets interessiert, die Zustandsdaten von rollenden Radsätzen zu kennen, um Schäden am Gleis und am Fahrzeug zu verhindern, die Sicherheit auf den Gleisnetzen zu erhöhen, Wartungsintervalle zu steuern oder die Fahrzeugbetreiber schädigender, mangelhafter Radsätze mit höheren Überfahrgebühren zu belasten.The geometry of the wheel-rail contact significantly determines the driving behavior of rail vehicles and at the same time significantly influences the wear on the wheelsets and the rails. In particular, the track position, curves and, of course, the running behavior in the transverse direction (sinusoidal run) can lead to greatly differing wear. If it comes to the flange start-up (in curves or at high speeds), forces must be transmitted safely between wheel flange and rail. A "climbing" of the wheel flange is undesirable. Vehicle and track operators are therefore always interested in knowing the status data of rolling wheelsets in order to prevent damage to the track and the vehicle, to increase safety on the rail networks, to control maintenance intervals or to give the vehicle operators damaging, defective wheelsets with higher overriding charges strain.
Die Zustandsdaten für Radsätze bzw. Räder konnten bisher nur quasi statisch in Instandsetzungswerken ermittelt werden. Dabei wurde das Radprofil manuell mit Messlehren abgetastet und dadurch der Verschleiß an den Laufflächen und Spurkranzrändern festgestellt. Dazu musste das Schienenfahrzeug aber jeweils in ein spezielles Instandsetzungswerk verbracht und so zugänglich gemacht werden, dass das Radprofil manuell abtastbar war. Ein derartiges Messverfahren ist sehr aufwändig und insbesondere zur flächendeckenden Kontrolle von überfahrenden Schienenfahrzeugen mit teilweise unterschiedlichsten Fahrzeugbetreibern kaum durchführbar.The status data for wheel sets or wheels could previously only be determined quasi-statically in repair shops. Here, the wheel profile was scanned manually with gauges and characterized the wear on the treads and flange margins determined. For this, however, the rail vehicle had to be transported to a special repair shop and made accessible so that the wheel profile could be scanned manually. Such a measuring method is very complicated and in particular for the comprehensive control of overrunning rail vehicles with some different vehicle operators hardly feasible.
Allerdings ist aus der
Aus der
Aus der
In der
Aus der
Aus der
Der Erfindung liegt deshalb die Aufgabe zugrunde, eine Vorrichtung zur Zustandsdatenerfassung an einem rollenden Radsatz eines schienengebundenen Fahrzeugs so zu verbessern, dass sich neben den Verschleißerscheinungen an den Laufrädern auch Verschleißerscheinungen an den Laufschienen zuverlässig und mit einfachsten Mitteln erfassen lassen.The invention is therefore based on the object to improve a device for state data acquisition on a rolling wheelset of a rail vehicle so that can be detected reliably and with the simplest means in addition to the wear on the wheels wear and tear on the rails.
Diese Aufgabe wird durch die im Patentanspruch 1 angegebene Erfindung gelöst. Weiterbildungen und vorteilhafte Ausführungsbeispiele der Erfindung sind in den Unteransprüchen angegeben.This object is achieved by the invention defined in
Die Erfindung hat den Vorteil, dass durch die berührungslos messenden Abstandssensoren an den inneren Radstirnflächen der Quer- bzw. Axialversatz des durchlaufenden Radsatzes gemessen werden kann. Dadurch ist bei schneller Fahrgeschwindigkeit eines Zugverbandes gleichzeitig ein symmetrischer Geradeauslauf, ein zulässiger Wellenlauf (Sinuslauf) oder ein schadensbedingter wechselseitiger Spurkranzanlauf als sogenannter Zick-7ack-Lauf ermittelbar. Dies ist insbesondere hochgenau feststellbar, wenn die axial und horizontal angeordneten Abstandssensoren auf einer Messstrecke von der Länge mindestens einer Radumdrehung vorgesehen sind. Mit Abstandssensoren auf einer Messstrecke von der Länge mindestens eines Radumfangs kann gleichzeitig auch die Durchfahrtgeschwindigkeit errechnet werden und ist vorteilhafterweise auch die Einhaltung einer vorgegebenen Geschwindigkeitsbeschränkung überwachbar. Die Erfindung hat zusätzlich den Vorteil, dass bei Feststellung eines sogenannten Zick-Zack-Laufs eine weniger schadensgeneigte Geschwindigkeit vorgebbar ist, durch die die Sicherheit des Bahnverkehrs erhöht wird und gleichzeitig auch der Verschleiß am Schienennetz verringerbar ist.The invention has the advantage that can be measured by the non-contact distance sensors on the inner Radstirnflächen the transverse or axial displacement of the continuous wheelset. As a result, at the same time a symmetrical straight-line run, a permissible shaft run (sinusoidal run) or a damage-dependent reciprocal flange start-up can be determined as a so-called zig-7ack run at a fast driving speed of a train. This can be detected in particular with high precision if the axially and horizontally arranged distance sensors are provided on a measuring path of the length of at least one wheel revolution. With distance sensors on a measuring path of the length of at least one wheel circumference can also be calculated at the same time the transit speed and is advantageously monitoring a predetermined speed limit monitored. The invention additionally has the advantage that when a so-called zigzag run is detected, the speed is less subject to damage can be specified, through which the safety of rail traffic is increased and at the same time the wear on the rail network can be reduced.
Die Erfindung hat weiterhin den Vorteil, dass bereits mit nur einem Abstandssensor unterhalb des vorbeilaufenden Fahrzeugrades je Schiene die einzelnen Radsätze auch bei schneller Überfahrt auf verschleißbehaftete übermäßige Abnutzungen überwacht werden können. Dies ist im Grunde im gesamten Gleisnetz möglich, so dass das Gleisnetz flächendeckend gegen derartige schädigende Schienenfahrzeuge geschützt werden kann. Dabei hat sich vorteilhafterweise herausgestellt, dass die einzelnen Räder in ihrer Lauffläche meist gleichmäßig abgenutzt sind, so dass bereits aus einer einzigen Abstandsmessung der Spurkranzkuppe auf den Laufflächenverschleiß des jeweiligen Schienenfahrzeugrades geschlossen werden kann und bei Vorgabe eines Grenzwertes die schadhaften Radsätze sofort feststellbar sind. Dadurch kann nicht nur die Sicherheit auf dem Gleisnetz verbessert werden, sondern ist auch gleichzeitig der Verschleiß an den Schienenlaufflächen erheblicher herabsetzbar. Da die Erfindung von einem berührungslosen Meßsystem ausgeht, ist dieses weitgehend wartungsfrei, wenig störbehaftet und über längere Zeit zuverlässig betreibbar.The invention also has the advantage that even with only one distance sensor below the passing vehicle wheel per rail, the individual wheelsets can be monitored even at fast crossing on wear-prone excessive wear. This is basically possible in the entire track network, so that the track network can be protected nationwide against such harmful rail vehicles. It has been found to be advantageous that the individual wheels are worn evenly in their tread most evenly, so that even from a single distance measurement of the wheel flange on the tread wear of the respective rail vehicle wheel can be closed and at default of a limit the defective wheelsets are immediately detectable. As a result, not only the safety on the rail network can be improved, but at the same time the wear on the rail running surfaces is significantly herabsetzbar. Since the invention proceeds from a contactless measuring system, it is largely maintenance-free, has little interference and can be reliably operated for a long time.
Durch die Anordnung der Abstandssensoren unterhalb des Spurkranzes unmittelbar neben den Fahrschienen, ist die Messvorrichtung vorteilhafterweise sehr platzsparend anzubringen und kann praktisch an jeder Stelle im Gleisnetz vorgesehen werden. Dabei können durch die berührungslose Wegmessung Sensoren eingesetzt werden, die die Messvorrichtung weitgehend unempfindlich gegen Verschmutzung, Staubeinwirkung, Temperaturschwankungen und mechanische Beschädigungen machen. Durch die Bezugsgröße der Spurkranzhöhe wird dabei durch eine einfache Wegmessung mit Abstandssensoren eine sehr hohe Genauigkeit in der Messung der Laufflächenabnutzung erreicht, da der Spurkranzdurchmesser der Schienenfahrzeugräder keinem Verschleiß unterliegt und in der Regel mit einer Fertigungsgenauigkeit von +/- 0,3 mm hergestellt wird.Due to the arrangement of the distance sensors below the flange directly adjacent to the rails, the measuring device is advantageously very space-saving to install and can be provided practically at any point in the track network. In this case, sensors can be used by the non-contact displacement measurement, which make the measuring device largely insensitive to contamination, dust, temperature fluctuations and mechanical damage. Due to the reference size of the wheel flange height a very high accuracy in the measurement of the tread wear is achieved by a simple displacement measurement with distance sensors, since the flange diameter the rail vehicle wheels is not subject to wear and is usually produced with a manufacturing accuracy of +/- 0.3 mm.
Bei einer besonderen Ausführung der Erfindung ist vorgesehen, entlang der Schiene mehrere Abstandssensoren vorzusehen, so dass bei Abtastung eines gesamten Radumfangs vorteilhafterweise zusätzlich auch Flachztellen und Unrundheiten ermittelbar sind. Dabei wird gleichzeitig auch die Messgenauigkeit erhöht, da sich eine Messstrecke von ca. 4 m ergibt, die vorzugsweise mit mindestens vier Abstandssensoren bestückt ist, aus der mit Hilfe einer elektronischen Auswertevorrichtung ein gemittelter Laufflächenverschleiß errechenbar ist.In a particular embodiment of the invention, it is provided to provide a plurality of distance sensors along the rail, so that when sampling an entire wheel circumference advantageously also flat tines and out-of-roundnesses can be determined. At the same time, the measuring accuracy is also increased, since a measuring distance of approximately 4 m results, which is preferably equipped with at least four distance sensors, from which an average tread wear can be calculated with the aid of an electronic evaluation device.
Bei einer weiteren besonderen Ausführung der Erfindung sind zusätzlich noch berührungslos messende Abstandssensoren an den inneren Radstirnflächen vorgesehen, durch die vorteilhafterweise noch der Quer- bzw. Axialversatz des durchlaufenden Radsatzes gemessen werden kann. Dadurch ist bei schneller Fahrgeschwindigkeit eines Zugverbandes gleichzeitig ein symmetrischer Geradeauslauf, ein zulässiger Wellenlauf (Sinuslauf) oder ein schadensbedingter wechselseitiger Spurkranzanlauf als sogenannter Zick-Zack-Lauf ermittelbar. Dies ist insbesondere hochgenau feststellbar, wenn die axial und horizontal angeordneten Abstandssensoren auf einer Messstrecke von der Länge mindestens einer Radumdrehung vorgesehen sind. Mit Abstandssensoren auf einer Messstrecke von der Länge mindestens eines Radumfangs kann gleichzeitig auch die Durchfahrtgeschwindigkeit errechnet werden und ist vorteilhafterweise auch die Einhaltung einer vorgegebenen Geschwindigkeitsbeschränkung überwachbar. Die Erfindung hat weiterhin den Vorteil, dass bei Feststellung eines sogenannten Zick-Zack-Laufs eine weniger schadensgeneigte Geschwindigkeit vorgebbar ist, durch die die Sicherheit des Bahnverkehrs erhöht wird und gleichzeitig auch der Verschleiß am Schienennetz verringerbar ist.In a further particular embodiment of the invention, non-contact distance sensors are additionally provided on the inner Radstirnflächen provided by the advantageously still the transverse or axial displacement of the continuous wheelset can be measured. As a result, at the same time a symmetrical straight-line run, a permissible shaft run (sinusoidal run) or a damage-dependent alternating flange start-up can be determined as a so-called zig-zag run when the speed of a train is fast. This can be detected in particular with high precision if the axially and horizontally arranged distance sensors are provided on a measuring path of the length of at least one wheel revolution. With distance sensors on a measuring section of the length of at least one wheel circumference can also be calculated at the same time the transit speed and is advantageously monitoring a predetermined speed limit monitored. The invention also has the advantage that, when a so-called zigzag run is detected, a less damage-prone speed can be predetermined by which the safety of the rail traffic is increased and, at the same time, the wear on the rail network can be reduced.
Bei einer zusätzlichen Ausführungsart der Erfindung ist vorgesehen, dass mehrere Abstandssensoren radial versetzt im Schienenprofil angeordnet sind, wodurch das Radprofil mindestens an den Laufflächen abtastbar ist. Dadurch sind vorteilhafterweise unterschiedliche radiale Laufflächendurchmesser oder ein Spurkranzverschleiß und damit eine Abweichung vom Sollprofil des Fahrzeugrades feststellbar, die mindestens bei hoher Geschwindigkeit zu einem unruhigen und unsicheren Fahrverhalten führen. Vorteilhafterweise sind diese Abstandssensoren zur Profilmessung in Bohrungen oder Querspalten des Schienenkopfes vorgesehen und abgedichtet verschlossen, so dass die Abstandssensoren geschützt und die Schienenaussparungen den Überfahrvorgang nicht stören. Bei einer querspaltweisen Aussparung ist zusätzlich noch ein Überfahrschuh seitlich an der Schiene vorgesehen, der eine teilweise Unterbrechung der Schiene übcrbrückt, so dass auch bei schnellen Überfahrten keine sogenannten Stoßstellen auftreten. Durch derartig eingelassene Abstandssensoren in der Schiene ist gleichzeitig auch ein Schienenverschleiß an der Mcssstcllc crmittclbar, wenn sich der Abstand zu Schienenfahrzeugrädern mit einem Sollprofil verringert. Dadurch kann vorteilhafterweise auch der Gleiszustand auf vorgegebenen Strecken überwacht und damit verschleißabhängige Instandsetzungsmaßnahmen rechtzeitig veranlasst oder unnötige zyklische Instandsetzungsarbeiten vermieden werden.In an additional embodiment of the invention it is provided that a plurality of distance sensors are arranged radially offset in the rail profile, whereby the wheel profile is scanned at least on the running surfaces. As a result, advantageously different radial tread diameter or flange wear and thus a deviation from the nominal profile of the vehicle wheel can be determined, which lead to a restless and unsafe driving behavior at least at high speed. Advantageously, these distance sensors are provided for profile measurement in bores or transverse crevices of the rail head and sealed sealed, so that the distance sensors protected and the rail recesses do not interfere with the Überfahrvorgang. In the case of a cross-gap recess, an override shoe is additionally provided laterally on the rail, which bridges over a partial interruption of the rail, so that even with fast crossings no so-called joints occur. Through such distance sensors inserted in the rail at the same time a rail wear on the Mcssstcllc crmittclbar when the distance to rail vehicle wheels reduced with a nominal profile. As a result, it is also advantageously possible to monitor the track condition on predetermined routes, thus prompting wear-dependent repair measures in good time or avoiding unnecessary cyclical repair work.
Die Erfindung wird anhand eines Ausführungsbeispiels, das in der Zeichnung dargestellt ist, näher erläutert. Es zeigen:
- Fig. 1:
- einen schematisch dargestellten Ausschnitt eines Schienenbereichs mit einem Abstandssensor vertikal neben einer Schiene;
- Fig. 2:
- einen schematisch dargestellten Ausschnitt aus einem Radprofil eines Schienenfahrzeuges;
- Fig. 3:
- eine schematische Darstellung einer Messstreeke mit vier Abstandssensoren unterhalb eines vorbeirollenden Spurkranzes;
- Fig. 4:
- eine schematische Darstellung eines Gleisabschnitts mit zwei horizontal angeordneten Abstandssensoren im Innenbereich neben den Laufflächen der Schienen;
- Fig. 5:
- eine schematische Darstellung einer Messstrecke mit vier horizontal angeordneten Abstandssensoren entlang eines Schienenabschnittes;
- Fig. 6:
- eine schematische Darstellung eines Schienenkopfes mit drei in Bohrungen angeordneter Abstandssensoren;
- Fig. 7:
- einen Ausschnitt eines in einer Bohrung eingesetzten Abstandssensors;
- Fig. 8:
- eine schematische Darstellung eines Schienenkopfes mit drei innerhalb eines Querspaltes angeordneter Abstandssensoren, und
- Fig. 9:
- eine Draufsicht auf den Ausschnitt eines schematisch dargestellten Schienenabschnittes mit im Querspalt angeordneter Abstandssensoren.
- Fig. 1:
- a schematically illustrated section of a rail area with a distance sensor vertically next to a rail;
- Fig. 2:
- a schematically illustrated section of a wheel profile of a rail vehicle;
- 3:
- a schematic representation of a measuring tower with four distance sensors below a vorbeirollenden wheel flange;
- 4:
- a schematic representation of a track section with two horizontally arranged distance sensors in the inner area next to the running surfaces of the rails;
- Fig. 5:
- a schematic representation of a measuring section with four horizontally arranged distance sensors along a rail section;
- Fig. 6:
- a schematic representation of a rail head with three arranged in holes distance sensors;
- Fig. 7:
- a section of a distance sensor used in a bore;
- Fig. 8:
- a schematic representation of a rail head with three spaced within a transverse gap distance sensors, and
- Fig. 9:
- a plan view of the section of a schematically illustrated rail section with arranged in the transverse gap distance sensors.
In
Schienenfahrzeugräder 2, die neu hergestellt oder neu instandgesetzt wurden, besitzen sehr genaue Fertigungsmaße, die sich als Referenzmaße eignen. Dabei besitzen heute gebräuchliche Schienenfahrzeugräder 2 von Loks der Deutschen Bundesbahn AG meist einen Laufflächendurchmesser DL von 1.250 mm, die mit einem Toleranzmaß von +/- 0,3 mm gefertigt sind. Derartige Schienenfahrzeugräder 2 besitzen an einer Laufflächenseite zur Führung auf der Schiene 1 einen Spurkranz 6 in Höhe von 28 mm, so dass sich daraus ein Spurkranzdurchmesser Ds von 1.306 mm ergibt. Ein derartiger Spurkranz 6 unterliegt an seinen Spurkranzkuppen 7 keinerlei Abnutzung und ist damit bei einer Genauigkeit von +/- 0,3 mm als Bezugsgröße geeignet. Da darüber hinaus die Schienenhöhe Sy bekannt ist, kann aus dem Abstand des Spurkranzes 6 und einem Referenzpunkt zur Schienenhöhe Sy der Verschleiß bzw. die Abnutzung an der horizontalen Radlauffläche 5 bestimmt werden.
Diese Radlaufflächen 5 sind bei heutigen schnellen Zuggeschwindigkeiten (> 160 km/h) einem starken Abrieb an den Kontaktflächen zur Schiene 1 ausgesetzt, so dass derartige Schienenfahrzeugräder 2 mindestens nach bestimmten Laufleistungen ausgetauscht oder aufwändig instandgesetzt werden müssen. Da ein derartiger Verschleiß aber nicht nur von der Laufleistung, sondern auch material- und geschwindigkeitsabhängig ist sowie vom Zustand der Gleisstrecke abhängt, kann dieser im Grunde nur durch eine direkte Messung ermittelt werden. Aus Sicherheitsgründen ist dabei höchstens ein Abrieb der Lauffläche 5 von 8 mm zulässig, bei dem spätestens die Schienenfahrzeugräder 2 mit neuen Laufreifen bestückt oder ausgetauscht werden müssen.These wheel treads 5 are exposed to a strong abrasion at the contact surfaces to the
Zur Überwachung derartig verschleißbehafteter Schienenfahrzeugräder 2 schlägt die Erfindung deshalb vor, bei der Überfahrt eines Schienenfahrzeugs jeweils den Abstand des Spurkranzes 6 von einem Bezugspunkt zur Schienenhöhe Sy berührungslos zu messen und daraus den Laufflächenabrieb bzw. die Abnutzung Sa oder den mittleren Laufflächendurchmesser DL mittels einer elektronischen Auswertevorrichtung 4 zu berechnen. Deshalb ist im Innenbereich zwischen den beiden Schienen 1 unterhalb der vorbcirollenden Spurkränze 6 neben jeder Schiene 1 vorzugsweise mindestens ein Abstandssensor 3 angeordnet. Dabei handelt es sich um berührungslos messende Wegaufnehmer, die vorzugsweise nach dem induktivcn Messprinzip arbeiten oder Mikrowellen- oder Ultraschallwegaufnehmer darstellen. Bei einer speziellen Ausführung könnte ein derartiger Abstandssensor 3 auch im Schienenkopf eingelassen sein oder horizontal neben der Schiene 1 vorgesehen werden und von dort die Spurkranzhöhe Sn abtasten.For monitoring such wear-prone
Derartige berührungslos arbeitenden Wegaufnehmer werden in der industriellen Messtcchnik vielfältig eingesetzt und weisen insbesondere bei geringen Abständen bis zu 50 mm hohe Genauigkeiten von +/- 0,1 mm auf. Ein derartiger induktiver Wegaufnehmer wird als Abstandssensor 3 auf mindestens einer der Schwellen 10 vorzugsweise neben jeder der beiden Schienen 1 angeordnet, wobei dessen Messkopf 8 mindestens einen Abstand des maximal zulässigen Verschleißes oder beispielsweise von 10 mm von den überrollenden Spurkränzenkuppen 7 eines neuartigen Radsatzes 14 bzw. Schienenfahrzeugrades 2 aufweisen muss.Such contactless displacement transducers are widely used in industrial Messtcchnik and have in particular at small distances up to 50 mm high accuracies of +/- 0.1 mm. Such an inductive displacement sensor is used as a
Ein derartiger induktiver Abstandssensor 3 misst durch die induktive Beeinflussung des ferromagnetischen Spurkranzes 6 den Abstand Sx zwischen seinem Messkopf 8 als Messfläche und der Spurkranzkuppe 7. Zur Ermittlung des Abriebs bzw. der Abnutzung Sa der Laufflächen 5 oder des Laufflächendurchmessers DL sind mindestens die beiden gegenüberliegenden Abstandssensoren 3 einer Schwelle 10 mit einer elektrischen Auswertevorrichtung 4 verbunden, die beim Überrollen eines Radsatzes 14 die Abstandswerte Sx erfasst und zwischenspeichert. Aus dem niedrigsten erfassten Abstandswert Sx der überrollen Spurkranzkuppe 7 errechnet die Auswertevorrichtung 4 mit Hilfe der vorgegebenen bekannten Sensorhöhe Ss und Schienenhöhe Sy auf der gemeinsamen Schwelle 10 sowie der vorgegebenen bekannten Soll-Spurkranzhöhe Sn nach der Gleichung Sa=Sy-Sx-Sn-Ss den zu ermittelnden Abrieb Sa, der sich durch eine Erhöhung des Spurkranzes 6 bei einer Abnutzung ergibt. Denn wie in
Mit einer derartigen Messvorrichtung kann die Laufflächenabnutzung Sa jedes Schienenfahrzeugrades 2 direkt beim Überrollen des Zugverbandes gemessen und in einer angeschlossenen Anzeigevorrichtung 11 angezeigt werden. Über den Abstand Sx und der Eingabe eines bekannten Sollwertes des Laufflächendurchmessers DL von z. B. 1.250 mm ist aber auch der tatsächliche Laufflächendurchmesser DL errechenbar. Vorteilhafterweise sind die beiden Laufflächendurchmesser DL bzw. Laufflächenverschleißwerte Sa eines Radsatzes 14 gegenüberzustellen, um Abweichungen innerhalb des Radsatzes 14 feststellen zu können, der auf eine ungleichförmige Abnutzung, Flachstellen oder Unrundheiten hinweist, was besonders gefahrenträchtig und schädigend für das Glcissystem ist und in jedem Fall frühzeitig festgestellt werden sollte. Bei einer bevorzugten Ausbildung kann in die Auswertevorrichtung 4 auch ein Grenzwert für den maximal zulässigen Abriebswert Sa von beispielsweise 8 mm eingegeben werden, bci dem ein Schienenfahrzeug in Grunde nicht mehr fahrtüchtig ist und auch für einen besonderen Verschleiß am Gleissystem sorgt. Eine derartige Überschreitung dieses Grenzwertes kann auch sogleich signalisiert werden und bei erfasstcr Achsenzahl ist der beschädigte Radsatz im Zugverband auch sofort identifizierbar. Für einen erfassten Zugverband können aber auch festlegbare Verschleißklassen ermittelt werden, um dem Zug eine bestimmte Höchstgeschwindigkeit vorzugeben oder daraus eine verschleißabhängige Überfahrgebühr zu errechnen.With such a measuring device, the tread wear Sa of each
Bei einer Ausführungsform der Erfindung mit zwei gegenüberliegenden Abstandssensoren 3 auf einer Schwelle 10 zur Messung der zwei Schienenfahrzeugräder 2 eines Radsatzes 14, kann auch der Winkel der Achsstellung quer zur Fahrtrichtung ermittelt werden, der bei einer Geradeausfahrt oder beim sogenannten Wellenlauf einen bestimmten Winkelwert nicht überschreiten darf.In one embodiment of the invention with two opposing
Bei einer weiteren Ausführung der Erfindung ist wie in
Bei einer zusätzlichen Ausführung der Erfindung nach
Da bei Hochgeschwindigkeitsstrecken nur ein Quer- oder Axialversatz bei einer Geradeausfahrt und normalem Sinusverlauf von +/- 3 mm zulässig ist, kann mit der Messvorrichtung auch das nicht zulässige Anschlagen des Schienenkranzes 6 an der Schiene 1 bei +/- 5,5 mm Axialversatz erfasst und signalisiert werden. Eine besonders genaue Überwachung des zulässigen Axialversatzes bei einer Geradeausfahrt und normalem Sinuslauf ist in
In
Bei dem bei der Deutschen Bundesbahn AG verwendetcn Standardschienenprofil UIC 60 und dem bekannten Schienenradprofil DIN 5573-E1425 müssten im Neuzustand der Schienenfahrzeugräder 2 und bei symmetrischem Radsatzlauf beide Flächenteile direkt auf der Schienenlauffläche 20 aufliegen, so dass der erfasste Abstand gleich dem Abstand zwischen Sensorkopf 19 und der Schienenlauffläche 20 von vorzugsweise 10 mm entsprechen muss und gleichzeitig als Referenzwert in der Auswerteeinrichtung 4 eingespeichert wird. Weicht hingegen ein danach gemessener Abstandswert von diesen positiv ab, so kann daraus auf einen Verschleiß des Schicnenfahrzeugradprofils geschlossen werden. Da eine nennenswerte Abweichung von der Soll-Radprofilgeometrie das Fahrverhalten insbesondere in Gleisbögen negativ beeinflusst und zu einer Erhöhung der Amplituden des sogenannten Sinuslaufs führt, ist nur eine bestimmte Abweichung zulässig, die in der Auswertevorrichtung 4 als Grenzwert vorgegeben ist und bei einer Überschreitung angezeigt oder signalisiert wird.When used in the Deutsche Bundesbahn AG standard rail profile UIC 60 and the well-known rail profile DIN 5573-E1425 would have in the new state of the
Ein zu starker Sinuslauf führt zusätzlich zu einem starken Verschleiß der Spurkranzschulter als vertikale Lauffläche 18, so dass in der gegenüberliegenden Vertikalfläche des Schienenkopfes 9 ein weiterer induktiver Abstandssensor A12 vorgeschen ist. Dieser misst den Abstand zwischen dcr Spurkranzschulter und der ihr gegenüberliegenden vertikalen Schienenkopffläche. Durch die gleichzeitige Messung der Axialverschiebung des Schienenfahrzeugrades 2 durch den Abstandssensor A5 und den bekannten Abstand zwischen den beiden Abstandssensoren A5 und A12 ermittelt daraus die Auswertevorrichtung 4 die Spurkranzdicke und vergleicht diese mit einem vorgegebenen bekannten Sollwert. Als Ergebnis kann sowohl die Spurkranzdicke, eine unzulässige Spurkranzdicke S3 oder die Beschädigung der Spurkranzschultcr 18 in einer Anzeigevorrichtung 11 angezeigt oder durch andere Vorrichtungen signalisiert werden. Bei einer derartigen Messung mehrerer Radflächenabstände als Zustandsdaten auf einer Messstrecke von der Länge Su mindestens eines Radumfangs ist damit das gesamte Profil eines überrollenden Schienenfahrzeugrades 2 crmittclbar und auf Abweichungen gegenüber einer vorgegebenen Soll-Profilgeometrie in der elektronischen Auswertevorrichtung 4 auswertbar.Too much sinusoidal run leads in addition to a strong wear of the wheel flange shoulder as a
Mit einer derartigen Abstandsmessung ist auch die Abnutzung auf den Schienenlaufflächen 20 ermittelbar. Dazu ist lediglich ein Radsatz 14 mit einer Soll-Profilgeometrie symmetrisch über die Messstrecke zu bewegen und dabei die Laufflächenabstände der Schienenfahrzeugräder 2 und die Spurkranzdicke S3 zu messen. Unterschreitet dabei ein Messwert z. B. die Einlassticfc der Abstandssensoren A10 und A11 von 10 mm, so stellt dies eine Abnutzung der horizontalen Schienenlauffläche 20 dar.With such a distance measurement, the wear on the rail running surfaces 20 can be determined. For this purpose, only one set of wheels 14 with a desired profile geometry is to be moved symmetrically over the measuring section and the tread spacing of the
Hingegen ermittelt die Auswerteeinrichtung 4 eine Abnutzung an der vertikalen Schienenseitenfläche 18, wenn die Abstandwerte der Abstandssensoren A5 und A12 einen vorgegebenen Sollwert unterschreiten, der sich aus einer vorgegebenen Soll-Spurkranzdicke S3 plus dem bekannten Abstand zwischen den beiden Sensoren A5 und A12 ergibt. Aufgrund der daraus festgestellten Schienenabnutzungswerte auf der zugehörigen Gleisstrecke können dessen Zustandswerte in regelmäßigen Abständen angezeigt und daraufhin notwendige Instandsetzungsarbeiten veranlasst werden.On the other hand, the evaluation device 4 determines a wear on the vertical
Eine bevorzugte Ausführungsform zur Ermittlung der Zustandsdaten der Schienenfahrzeugräder 2 und der Schienenabnutzung wie nach
Vorzugsweise kann die erfindungsgemäße Messvorrichtung auch mit auf der Messstrecke einer Schienenfahrzeugwaage oder einer anderen Schienenkraftmessvorrichtung angebracht werden, wobei dann vorhandene Stromversorgungseinrichtungen und/oder eine programmgesteuerte Recheneinrichtung 4 mit nutzbar sind. Dabei kann insbesondere unter Berücksichtigung unterschiedlicher Krafteinwirkungen beim Überrollen von Schienenfahrzeugrädern 2 mit Flachstellen oder Unrundheiten diese Zustandsdaten mit den erfassten Radgeometriewerten verknüpft werden, um die Genauigkeit dieser Messungcn zu erhöhen.Preferably, the measuring device according to the invention can also be mounted on the measuring section of a rail vehicle scale or another rail force measuring device, in which case existing power supply devices and / or a program-controlled computing device 4 can be used. In particular, taking into account different forces acting on the rolling over of
Claims (11)
- Device for measuring status data on a rolling wheel set (14) of a rail-mounted vehicle, in which at least one non-contact measuring distance sensor (3) is provided to detect the wheel flange height Sn vertically below the passing wheel flange (6) of the rail vehicle wheel (2), said distance sensor being connected to an evaluation device (4), which determines at least the wear Sa of the horizontal rail wheel running surface (5) from a distance value Sx, and in which at least one non-contact measuring distance sensor (A10, A11) is recessed in the rail head (9) of a rail (1), which sensor detects the distance from the horizontal rail wheel running surface (5), characterised in that on a measuring path of at least a wheel circumference length Su multiple non-contact measuring horizontally arranged distance sensors (A5 to A8) are provided at the level of the passing wheel flange (6) and along at least one rail (1) between the rails (1) symmetrically to a rail centre plane (12), which sensors detect the horizontal distance S1 from the vertical wheel flange face (13), that the evaluation device (4) determines axial displacement values of a passing rail vehicle wheel (2) or wheel set (14) from the detected distances S1 and the known centre distance So from the rail centre plane (12) and the wheel face distance Ar, and that the evaluation device (4) compares the respective axial displacement values with predetermined permissible limit values and indicates or displays when such a limit value is exceeded.
- Device for measuring status data according to claim 1, characterised in that at least one second non-contact measuring horizontally arranged distance sensor (A9) located opposite is provided at the level of the passing wheel flange (6) and along the second rail (1) between the rails (1) symmetrically to the rail centre plane (12), which sensor detects the horizontal distance S2 from the vertical wheel flange face (13), and that the evaluation device (4) determines the wheel face distance Ar of the passing wheel set (14) from the detected distance values S1 and S2 from at least two distance sensors (A5 - A8, A9) located opposite one another by means of the two known distances So from the rail centre plane (12).
- Device for measuring status data according to claim 1 or 2, characterised in that to determine the wheel flange height Sn of rail vehicle wheels (2) arranged on an axle at least two non-contact measuring distance sensors (3) are arranged between the two rails (1) to lie opposite one another on a sleeper (10) or other support surfaces, the measuring heads (8) of which are at a distance Sx of at least 10 mm from the wheel flange tips (7) of new value rail vehicle wheels (2) moving over these.
- Device for measuring status data according to one of claims 1 to 3, characterised in that the evaluation device (4) calculates the wear Sa on the horizontal wheel running surface (5) or the average running surface diameter DL of the rail vehicle wheels (2) of a wheel set (14) from the detected distance values Sx from the wheel flange tip (7), the sensor height Ss on the common sleeper (10) or support surface thereof, the rail height Sy on the common sleeper (10) or support surface and a desired wheel flange height Sn or the wheel flange diameter Ds.
- Device for measuring status data according to claim 4, characterised in that the evaluation device (4) compares the calculated wear value Sa or the average running surface diameter DL with one or more predetermined limit values and indicates or displays in a display device (11) when these are exceeded.
- Device for measuring status data according to claim 4 or 5, characterised in that to determine the wear value Sa or the average running surface diameter DL on a measuring path of at least one wheel circumference length Su multiple spaced non-contact measuring distance sensors (A1 to A4) are arranged along at least one rail (1).
- Device for measuring status data according to one of the preceding claims, characterised in that further non-contact measuring distance sensors (A10, A12) are recessed in the rail head (9), which sensors detect the distance from the wheel flange inside surface (18) of a passing rail vehicle wheel (2) and/or the distance of the transition of the horizontal running surface (5) to the wheel flange inside surface (18) of a passing rail vehicle wheel (2).
- Device for measuring status data according to one of the preceding claims, characterised in that the distance sensors (A10, A11, A12) recessed in the rail head (9) are recessed in bores (15) or in at least one transverse gap (16).
- Device for measuring status data according to one of claims 8 or 9, characterised in that for interruption-free overtravel the transverse gap (16) is respectively bridged with an overtravel saddle (17) on the longitudinal side of the rail.
- Device for measuring status data according to one of the preceding claims, characterised in that the evaluation device (4) determines at least the profile of a running surface (5, 18) of the rail vehicle wheel (2) and/or additionally also status data of the wheel flange (6) from the distance values of the distance sensors (A10, A11, A12) recessed into the rail head (9) and the radial and/or axial distance values Sx, S1, S2 of at least one of the distance sensors (A1 to A9).
- Device for measuring status data according to claim 10, characterised in that the evaluation device (4) determines the wear of at least one of the rail running surfaces (20) from the determined distance values when a new value wheel set (14) passes over and displays a wear value for this or when limit values are predetermined indicates when they are exceeded.
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE102004033432A DE102004033432B4 (en) | 2004-07-10 | 2004-07-10 | Device for measuring status data on a rolling wheelset of a rail-bound vehicle |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1614602A1 EP1614602A1 (en) | 2006-01-11 |
EP1614602B1 true EP1614602B1 (en) | 2011-05-04 |
Family
ID=35063012
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP05014004A Not-in-force EP1614602B1 (en) | 2004-07-10 | 2005-06-29 | Device for measuring of condition data of a rolling wheelset of a railbound vehicle |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP1614602B1 (en) |
AT (1) | ATE508029T1 (en) |
DE (2) | DE102004033432B4 (en) |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN107076645A (en) * | 2014-11-11 | 2017-08-18 | 新日铁住金株式会社 | The wheel wear assay method of rail truck wheel |
RU2696412C2 (en) * | 2014-10-16 | 2019-08-01 | Сименс Аг Эстеррайх | Railway vehicle wheels condition diagnostics |
EP4293317A1 (en) * | 2023-02-21 | 2023-12-20 | NSH-CTI Machine Tool (Jiangxi) Co., Ltd. | Online high-precision measuring device and method for full-size parameters of wheel set of rail transit vehicle |
Families Citing this family (18)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
ATE491614T1 (en) | 2004-07-16 | 2011-01-15 | Lynxrail Corp | DEVICE FOR DETERMINING THE SWING MOTION AND ANGLE OF A RAIL VEHICLE WHEEL SET |
DE102008034571A1 (en) * | 2008-07-24 | 2010-02-04 | Wash Tec Holding Gmbh | Wheel Guiding Rail, Vehicle Wash and Method for Centering a Vehicle |
IT1401612B1 (en) * | 2010-08-04 | 2013-07-26 | Dma S R L | APPARATUS OF VERIFICATION FOR RAILWAY SALTS AND GEOMETRY OF RAILWAY TROLLEYS AND ITS VERIFICATION PROCEDURE. |
CN102941862A (en) * | 2012-11-21 | 2013-02-27 | 成都主导科技有限责任公司 | Detection device for measuring wheel pair scratches based on vibration acceleration |
CO7060224A1 (en) | 2013-03-18 | 2014-09-19 | Univ Eafit | Inspection system and method for the inspection of the geometric parameters of railway vehicle wheels |
EP2832622B1 (en) * | 2013-07-29 | 2016-05-25 | Siemens S.A.S. | Method and devices for monitoring the correct rerailing of a guided vehicle |
DE102014000641A1 (en) | 2014-01-16 | 2015-07-16 | Innotec Lightweight Engineering & Polymer Technology Gmbh | Wheelset and wheelset and method of making them |
WO2016030009A1 (en) | 2014-08-29 | 2016-03-03 | Schenck Process Gmbh | Device and method for determining geometry characteristic values of a wheel profile on a rolling wheel of a rail vehicle |
DE202015005230U1 (en) | 2015-07-22 | 2015-08-24 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | track vehicle |
CN105066834A (en) * | 2015-09-23 | 2015-11-18 | 潘景轩 | Long distance measurement mechanical vehicle |
CN105865352B (en) * | 2016-05-17 | 2018-09-18 | 中国矿业大学 | A kind of Chain Wheel of Flight Bar Conveyor gear teeth tool-wear monitoring device and method |
CN106767415A (en) * | 2017-01-03 | 2017-05-31 | 北京铁道工程机电技术研究所有限公司 | Wheel profile physical dimension detection platform |
CN108819980B (en) * | 2018-06-27 | 2020-12-25 | 马鞍山市雷狮轨道交通装备有限公司 | Device and method for online dynamic measurement of geometric parameters of train wheels |
EP3637085B1 (en) * | 2018-10-12 | 2020-12-09 | HEGENSCHEIDT-MFD GmbH | Method for radial alignment of wheel sets of railway vehicles |
DE102019114288A1 (en) * | 2019-05-28 | 2020-12-03 | Lausitz Energie Bergbau Ag | Method and device for localizing a singular flaw on the running surface of a wheel of a rail-bound vehicle |
CN110239588B (en) * | 2019-06-12 | 2020-08-18 | 中国神华能源股份有限公司 | Wheel set tread wear determination method and device |
CN112429033B (en) * | 2019-08-25 | 2023-09-29 | 北京镭格之光测量技术有限公司 | Online measuring device and method for wheel cake parameters of railway vehicle |
CN116495026B (en) * | 2023-06-19 | 2023-08-29 | 成都铁安科技有限责任公司 | Method and system for adjusting wheel set damage detection rod |
Family Cites Families (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE1194892B (en) | 1962-04-11 | 1965-06-16 | Siemens Ag | Method and device for determining and measuring the depth of flat spots on rolling railway wheels |
US5577690A (en) * | 1994-09-15 | 1996-11-26 | Jodon Engineering Associates, Inc. | Microwave measurement of train wheel wear |
US5636026A (en) * | 1995-03-16 | 1997-06-03 | International Electronic Machines Corporation | Method and system for contactless measurement of railroad wheel characteristics |
GB9917203D0 (en) | 1999-07-23 | 1999-09-22 | Aea Technology Plc | Railway wheel monitoring |
DE10052045C2 (en) * | 2000-06-20 | 2002-06-27 | Fraunhofer Ges Forschung | Device and method for testing a railway wheel |
DE10101601A1 (en) * | 2001-01-16 | 2002-08-01 | Knorr Bremse Systeme | Flange detector |
DE10225071B4 (en) * | 2002-06-05 | 2004-05-27 | Schreck-Mieves Gmbh | Measuring method and device for determining a transverse dimension of two wheels of a rail vehicle |
-
2004
- 2004-07-10 DE DE102004033432A patent/DE102004033432B4/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2005
- 2005-06-29 DE DE502005011320T patent/DE502005011320D1/en active Active
- 2005-06-29 AT AT05014004T patent/ATE508029T1/en active
- 2005-06-29 EP EP05014004A patent/EP1614602B1/en not_active Not-in-force
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
RU2696412C2 (en) * | 2014-10-16 | 2019-08-01 | Сименс Аг Эстеррайх | Railway vehicle wheels condition diagnostics |
CN107076645A (en) * | 2014-11-11 | 2017-08-18 | 新日铁住金株式会社 | The wheel wear assay method of rail truck wheel |
CN107076645B (en) * | 2014-11-11 | 2019-11-12 | 日本制铁株式会社 | The wheel wear measuring method of rail truck wheel |
EP4293317A1 (en) * | 2023-02-21 | 2023-12-20 | NSH-CTI Machine Tool (Jiangxi) Co., Ltd. | Online high-precision measuring device and method for full-size parameters of wheel set of rail transit vehicle |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP1614602A1 (en) | 2006-01-11 |
DE502005011320D1 (en) | 2011-06-16 |
DE102004033432B4 (en) | 2012-07-12 |
DE102004033432A1 (en) | 2006-02-02 |
ATE508029T1 (en) | 2011-05-15 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP1614602B1 (en) | Device for measuring of condition data of a rolling wheelset of a railbound vehicle | |
EP1283301B1 (en) | Machine and method for recognizing the sleeper positions in a track | |
DE10260816A1 (en) | Measuring device for measuring the roundness of a railway wheel | |
EP3580393B1 (en) | Method and railway vehicle for contactlessly capturing a track geometry | |
DE4439342C2 (en) | Arrangement for determining out-of-round wheels of railway vehicles | |
EP3265774B1 (en) | Diagnostic device for determining an out-of-roundness on rail vehicle wheels in accordance with an impulse evaluation method | |
AT500769B1 (en) | METHOD FOR DETECTING STRENGTHS OF ELASTIC DEFORMATION IN AT LEAST ONE RAIL AND ONE SURFACE | |
EP2895655B1 (en) | Method and device for lateral copying at a rail | |
EP1839990B1 (en) | Assembly for checking the wheels of rail vehicles | |
EP1212228B1 (en) | Device for detecting eccentricities or wheel flats of rail vehicle wheels | |
EP1592595B1 (en) | Measurement path for determining various physical parameters of railed vehicles | |
DE4312876B4 (en) | Device for measuring and determining the change on the tread of a wheel of rail vehicles | |
DE10304008B4 (en) | Device for measuring the rail load | |
EP3458331A1 (en) | Method and device for monitoring at least one travel path component laid in rail construction | |
EP0728091B1 (en) | Method of monitoring railway traffic and railway tracks | |
DE10347812B4 (en) | Force measuring device for detecting the rail load | |
WO2017013025A1 (en) | Rail vehicle | |
EP2038160A1 (en) | System and method for determining the current local position of vehicles, especially of trains | |
DE10031092A1 (en) | Weighing device for rail vehicles | |
DE102008008578B3 (en) | Method for determining dynamic wheel strength during passage of railway vehicle on core of guide, crossing or crossing guide of rail traffic way, involves measuring concentrated loads on all strength-deriving places with passage of train | |
DE102019114288A1 (en) | Method and device for localizing a singular flaw on the running surface of a wheel of a rail-bound vehicle | |
DE102011086759B4 (en) | Method and device for determining wheel loads of rail vehicles | |
DE10225071A1 (en) | Rail vehicle wheel ridge clearance detection method for detecting transverse dimension detects a wheel ridge clearance on a rail vehicle's two opposing wheels with flexible bearings on a wheel axle | |
WO2011072762A1 (en) | Method and device for profiling a running surface geometry of track components | |
EP4334529A1 (en) | Method and device for ascertaining the surface quality of at least one rail head |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL BA HR LV MK YU |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20060701 |
|
AKX | Designation fees paid |
Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20080228 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: TRGR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 502005011320 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20110616 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 502005011320 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20110616 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: VDEP Effective date: 20110504 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110504 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110905 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110504 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110815 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110805 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110904 Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110504 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FD4D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110504 |
|
BERE | Be: lapsed |
Owner name: SCHENCK PROCESS G.M.B.H. Effective date: 20110630 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110504 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110504 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110504 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110504 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110504 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110504 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110504 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20110630 |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20120207 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20110630 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20110630 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 502005011320 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20120207 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20110630 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20110629 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110804 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110504 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110504 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R082 Ref document number: 502005011320 Country of ref document: DE Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R081 Ref document number: 502005011320 Country of ref document: DE Owner name: SCHENCK PROCESS EUROPE GMBH, DE Free format text: FORMER OWNER: SCHENCK PROCESS GMBH, 64293 DARMSTADT, DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20170620 Year of fee payment: 13 Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20170621 Year of fee payment: 13 Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20170621 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FI Payment date: 20170621 Year of fee payment: 13 Ref country code: AT Payment date: 20170622 Year of fee payment: 13 Ref country code: SE Payment date: 20170620 Year of fee payment: 13 Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20170626 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 502005011320 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: EUG |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180629 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180630 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MM01 Ref document number: 508029 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20180629 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20180629 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180629 Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190101 Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180629 Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180630 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180629 |