EP3458331A1 - Method and device for monitoring at least one travel path component laid in rail construction - Google Patents
Method and device for monitoring at least one travel path component laid in rail constructionInfo
- Publication number
- EP3458331A1 EP3458331A1 EP17724725.1A EP17724725A EP3458331A1 EP 3458331 A1 EP3458331 A1 EP 3458331A1 EP 17724725 A EP17724725 A EP 17724725A EP 3458331 A1 EP3458331 A1 EP 3458331A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- data
- sensor
- rail
- component
- signal processing
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 22
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 21
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 11
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 23
- 238000005096 rolling process Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 10
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000007619 statistical method Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 9
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 8
- 230000011218 segmentation Effects 0.000 description 7
- 238000005094 computer simulation Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000002349 favourable effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000002123 temporal effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000001133 acceleration Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000007704 transition Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000001960 triggered effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000001186 cumulative effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000011065 in-situ storage Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000003137 locomotive effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000007774 longterm Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000003908 quality control method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000008439 repair process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000001276 Kolmogorov–Smirnov test Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004888 barrier function Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012512 characterization method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007405 data analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011157 data evaluation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002950 deficient Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000035939 shock Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009897 systematic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011179 visual inspection Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
- B61L23/00—Control, warning or like safety means along the route or between vehicles or trains
- B61L23/04—Control, warning or like safety means along the route or between vehicles or trains for monitoring the mechanical state of the route
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
- B61L1/00—Devices along the route controlled by interaction with the vehicle or train
- B61L1/02—Electric devices associated with track, e.g. rail contacts
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
- B61L1/00—Devices along the route controlled by interaction with the vehicle or train
- B61L1/20—Safety arrangements for preventing or indicating malfunction of the device, e.g. by leakage current, by lightning
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
- B61L23/00—Control, warning or like safety means along the route or between vehicles or trains
- B61L23/04—Control, warning or like safety means along the route or between vehicles or trains for monitoring the mechanical state of the route
- B61L23/042—Track changes detection
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
- B61L23/00—Control, warning or like safety means along the route or between vehicles or trains
- B61L23/04—Control, warning or like safety means along the route or between vehicles or trains for monitoring the mechanical state of the route
- B61L23/042—Track changes detection
- B61L23/045—Rail wear
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E01—CONSTRUCTION OF ROADS, RAILWAYS, OR BRIDGES
- E01B—PERMANENT WAY; PERMANENT-WAY TOOLS; MACHINES FOR MAKING RAILWAYS OF ALL KINDS
- E01B35/00—Applications of measuring apparatus or devices for track-building purposes
- E01B35/12—Applications of measuring apparatus or devices for track-building purposes for measuring movement of the track or of the components thereof under rolling loads, e.g. depression of sleepers, increase of gauge
Definitions
- the invention relates to a method for continuous particular
- Condition monitoring of at least one laid in railway construction infrastructure component in particular a rail switch, with at least one arranged on the infrastructure component sensor.
- the invention relates to a device for continuous particular
- Condition monitoring of at least one infrastructure component laid in railway construction comprising at least one sensor arranged on the infrastructure component.
- the invention relates to a use of such a device.
- sensors are arranged, for example, on a specially used rail vehicle, which measure forces acting on rails on the rails.
- a method of diagnosing a rail switch with a rail vehicle Sensor is disclosed, for example, in WO 2006/032307 A1. With such a method, it is possible to detect acting forces or their change, but there is always only a punctual monitoring instead. In addition, it is also necessary during a journey of such a rail vehicle, a
- Rail line at least partially blocked for scheduled traffic.
- WO 02/090166 A1 discloses a device for
- Condition monitoring of tracks with multiple sensors comparing measured values with reference values.
- a condition of any infrastructure component, in particular a rail switch can not be monitored effectively enough, since a considerable part of defects is not recognized.
- EP 0 344 145 A1 discloses a device for detecting a state of
- the object of the invention is to provide a method of the type mentioned, with which a state of a track component, in particular a rail switch, can be reliably and effectively detected and automated.
- Another object is to provide a device of the aforementioned type, with which a state of a track component, in particular a rail switch, reliably and effectively and automatically recognizable.
- the procedural object is achieved in that in a method of the type mentioned by the sensor at and additionally before and / or after a rollover of the infrastructure component by a rail vehicle data is collected and segmented, wherein from the detected and segmented data, a state of the infrastructure component is determined.
- An advantage achieved with the invention is to be seen in particular in that, by segmenting the data, a state of a route component can be continuously, automatically and in-situ monitored or determined. It can be monitored, for example, moving points, rigid Weichenherzen, rails and / or sleepers of a railway line. Data is preferred in each case
- a response of the infrastructure component to a current operation is used to make statements about a state of the same, for example, a time-resolved development of an elongation at a certain position.
- a load of the corresponding infrastructure component before, during and / or after a rolling over or crossing of a rail vehicle is measured or recorded at a measuring point for all rail vehicles.
- the recorded or recorded data are segmented or evaluated a load of the infrastructure component as a function of time.
- the data is divided into three parts: a load on the infrastructure component before a crossing, during a crossing and after crossing the rail vehicle via the infrastructure component.
- the values of the first part and the third part are optionally compared with one another, that is, a load on the
- a type of load on the infrastructure component can be characterized.
- a state of a track component is monitored by a single sensor, in particular by a strain sensor, which z. B. may be formed as strain gauges or optical strain gauge.
- a state of a infrastructure component such as a railroad switch is determined by a method according to the invention, but optionally also a state of a wheel of a rail vehicle. For example, hollow or out-of-round wheels are detected. This is especially true for one
- Movement component shifted This can be detected by appropriate comparison algorithms. Further, a transition between a rail and a
- Track switch formed discontinuous, so that in a roll over the same both the rail switches and wheels of the rail vehicle are loaded.
- the states of the rail switch and the wheels influence each other or there is a cumulative effect.
- the individual effects can also be analyzed separately from each other by the segmentation of the recorded data.
- captured data may be interpreted using computer models, where the computer models describe a response of the travel component to these rolling wheels. This allows different influencing factors to be separated. It can be distinguished, for example, whether a strong shock during a
- Track component are used by the segmentation characteristic patterns in the same for the identification of a rail vehicle.
- rail vehicles with a cargo that changes with each journey such as freight trains and rail vehicles, with essentially the same load as passenger trains on each journey.
- Rail vehicles of the former type the load or a weight thereof is determined for each axle and calculated from a total weight of the rail vehicle. It is thus also possible to have a weight of a wagon of a freight train and thus to detect a state of charge of the same or with a theoretical
- Rail vehicle determined from the measured signals. This is done in particular without additional speed sensors, acceleration sensors and / or train information. Furthermore, for example, a state of a switch heart of a rail switch is predicted with predetermined algorithms. In addition, envelopes are used to isolate individual measurements for further analysis. It will also be detected by the envelope long-term deviations of the same, which indicate continuing changes. A prerequisite for the evaluation of the data with envelopes is the segmentation of the same as well as the automated determination of a train speed from sensor data.
- Rail vehicle influences of a track to decouple. This is preferably done automatically.
- Signal analysis is particularly preferably carried out in situ so that necessary maintenance work on the instrument can be obtained via meaningful evaluation results
- Track component can be predicted. It can be provided that the data detected and / or evaluated by the sensor are compared with known data. As a result, for example, setpoint data is matched with measured data, whereby a deviation from a desired state of a travel path component is detected. It is thus possible to perform a quality control of a infrastructure component. For example, from the measured and processed data by comparison with a setpoint geometry of a switch rated a quality of Radlauflaufes directly after installation, which allows quality control of a switch geometry and local installation. In addition, it distinguishes in particular random noise or disturbances caused by natural sources from an approaching rail vehicle. Noise caused by conventional sources usually has a Gaussian distribution. Another statistical distribution of data suggests other causes, such as a defective rail vehicle itself, a misshaped wheel, a lowered rail switch or other deviations. In a first step, therefore, a statistical distribution of data is determined and checked whether the data is a
- Gaussian distribution or statistically distributed differently.
- a cause of the noise is determined from this. If there is no Gaussian distribution, the noise is caused by an irregularity. It has proved to be favorable to automatically check those data which are obtained from a load of the infrastructure component immediately before rolling over the same by a rail vehicle by a so-called Kolmogorov-Smirnov test.
- the acquired data are processed in a signal processing system connected to the sensor and arranged directly on the track component for information about a condition of the track component.
- the data processed in this way are used to evaluate influences from a rolling over vehicle such as a railroad car and a track or a track component, for example a railroad track switch.
- a rolling over vehicle such as a railroad car and a track or a track component, for example a railroad track switch.
- a large number of data is recorded and evaluated on the spot. For example, an elongation at at least one point of the infrastructure component is detected, in particular by means of a measuring strip or optical method, such that sensor signals triggered in particular by train crossings are resolved temporally into individual axes and a signal level is determined by individual axle loads.
- Track component of the at least one sensor data are detected.
- a track component such as a rail switch
- a sensor signal is triggered.
- punctual monitoring it is thus possible to have more precise or temporally resolved ones
- the evaluation results are automatically and continuously transmitted to central points, such as a local traffic service or a headquarters of the infrastructure company.
- analyzed and reduced data are transmitted to the central computer via, for example, radio networks.
- data from different measuring points are transmitted and combined.
- Intelligent data analysis which is made possible by computer models of the infrastructure component, allows changes to be recorded and analyzed over a longer period of time. From this further action requirements can be derived, such as a prediction of a next inspection or an exchange plan
- Track component is measured. This is especially of a
- Detected strain gauge which is placed directly on the track component.
- the elongation per unit of time can also by an optical Dehnmess vide be determined.
- a speed and / or an acceleration of a rail vehicle rolling over the travel component is subsequently determined.
- the further goal is achieved if a signal processing system is provided in a device of the type mentioned in order to evaluate data detected by the sensor directly to the infrastructure component.
- Arrangement of the signal processing system on the infrastructure component detected by the sensor data can be evaluated in place.
- acquired data in the signal processing system can be processed directly on site for meaningful information about a state of a infrastructure component such as a railroad switch.
- a point in time for a repair or an exchange of the monitored infrastructure component can be predicted.
- a sensor for measuring or detecting an elongation per unit time may be provided, for. B. a strain sensor, which is arranged directly on the track component.
- the strain sensor can, for example, as strain gauges or optical
- the signal processing system determines from the data detected by the sensor, for example, a speed and / or
- Acceleration of a rail vehicle which travels over the infrastructure component with the sensor.
- the sensor is connected to the signal processing system.
- a distance of the axes of the rail vehicle is generally known, since this is usually standardized. It may further be provided that the
- Signal processing system from the processed data without additional sensors a rail vehicle type as well as a weight and a speed of
- a single sensor is provided, preferably a strain sensor. It is favorable, however, if a plurality of sensors are arranged on a track component, wherein preferably the sensors are designed to measure different data and connected to the signal processing system.
- Signal processing system then evaluates the data transmitted to each of these sensors.
- sensors in addition to a strain gauge, a temperature sensor, a sound sensor, an optical strain gauge and / or the like may be provided. It is useful if the sensors are of different types, but it may also be beneficial if two or more similar sensors on a
- Track component are arranged.
- one or more sensors and in each case a signal processing system are arranged on a plurality of track components.
- one or more sensors are each arranged on rails, rail switches or the like, which receive different data. It is thus provided a so-called sensor swarm, wherein the sensors at a distance of 100 m to 1000 m, preferably from 250 m to 750 m, in particular of about 500 m, are arranged from each other.
- a distance between individual sensors depends on a routing.
- sensors which are arranged at a distance of 1000 m or more from each other may be sufficient.
- Rail network are always the same number and type of sensors are arranged so that the respective collected data with each other and / or optionally with
- Standard data are comparable. It is particularly useful if only one sensor is arranged per measuring point, which is designed in particular as a strain sensor.
- Track components possible.
- the data acquired by the sensor or the sensors on a track component is preferably evaluated first by each signal processing system, and the evaluated data is subsequently exchanged with the other signal processing systems in order to minimize the amount of data to be transmitted. Subsequently, the exchanged data
- the signal processing system comprises a device for self-sufficient energy supply. This submission is designed for example as a photovoltaic system. Furthermore, it is favorable if the or each signal processing system is designed with local energy stores and a device for wireless data transmission.
- Fig. 1 recorded data from different rail vehicles when driving over a rail switch
- FIG. 2 shows a temporal segmentation of acquired data
- Fig. 3 detected and evaluated data of a rail vehicle when driving over a rail switch
- Fig. 5 shows collected data for six rail vehicles when driving over a
- FIG. 6 shows data in accordance with FIG. 5;
- Fig. 7 envelopes and deviations.
- Fig. 1 shows recorded data from different rail vehicles when driving over a rail switch. It is a strain or stretching of a rigid
- Rail vehicles are shown among themselves, these are different types of passenger trains and freight trains and a maintenance train.
- At least one sensor is arranged on the track component.
- a strain gauge is on a switch heart arranged to measure an elongation per unit time of the infrastructure component.
- the acquired data is then evaluated directly on the infrastructure component, for which purpose a signal processing system is arranged directly on it.
- characteristic patterns are used in the same for the identification of a rail vehicle.
- a load of the corresponding infrastructure component before, during and after a crossing of a rail vehicle is measured at a measuring point, the data being segmented. This can be seen in Fig. 1, wherein maximum deflections of the strain measurements of individual axes rolling over railroad tracks
- the temporally first strong deflections thus correspond to the axes of a traction vehicle and the temporal subsequent deflections the axes of the following cars.
- the data recorded before or afterwards correspond to a signal from the sensor before or after the passage of the sensor
- Fig. 2 wherein three areas A, B, C are visible. The segmentation is done to a
- Rail switch arranged sensor to separate.
- the temporal segmentation may be used additionally or alternatively to separate overflow signals of a locomotive and wagons as well as for the separate analysis of individual axes.
- a monitoring of the statistics of the strain signals before and / or after an actual railroad overflow makes it possible to distinguish between rail vehicles without faulty running behavior without restrictions. Consequently, such information can be provided to a railway operator.
- running rail vehicles can be used for condition monitoring of the guideway.
- FIGS. 3 and 4 respectively show recorded and evaluated data of a
- the uppermost part shows the data collected by the sensor before a sensor overflow, whereby an elongation per unit of time is recorded.
- the middle part shows a histogram of the acquired signal as a strain-dependent frequency.
- an evaluation of the signal by the Kolmogorow-Smirnow test By such an evaluation, random noise caused by conventional sources of noise caused by an approaching rail vehicle is generated.
- Fig. 3 shows a Gaussian distribution
- Fig. 4 shows a different distribution and the data have oscillating components. This allows the conclusion that the data recorded and evaluated in FIG. 4 represents a deviation from a standard state. In this case, individual flats in wheels, which are caused for example by non-standard braking and lead to a non-round running behavior can be identified.
- FIG. 5 shows recorded data for six rail vehicles running without restrictions when traveling over a rail switch. Data from such rail vehicles have in the run on a Gaussian distribution. In this example, it is a passenger train traveling at regular intervals via a railroad track instrumented with a sensor. In the same way, locomotives of freight trains can be compared, as doing likewise at regular intervals similar
- Raw data of a time-strain signal measurement shown in FIG. 5 can be corrected via a generally standardized axial distance with respect to an actual speed of the rail vehicle and then brought to coincidence. This is shown in FIG. As a result, a direct comparison of time-expansion curves of the rail vehicles traveling at different times over the railroad track is possible. Irrespective of a railway network (heavy-load network, passenger train network or mixed transport network), it can be assumed that during the service life of a infrastructure component it will be of similar kind at regular intervals
- Rail vehicles is run over. It is therefore appropriate to further evaluate the typical curves obtained in this way for individual types of rail vehicles using statistical methods, and to evaluate the signals of one or more typical types
- FIG. 7 shows an envelope determined from the overflows of the same rail vehicle shown on FIGS. 5 and 6 on different days of a week and a deviation from individual measurements of the same. In this way, each new crossing of the same type of rail vehicle can be compared with the previous ones.
- a long-term monitoring of a shape of the envelope thus allows direct conclusions about a state of an envelope Guideway component. Furthermore, continuous changes are detected via the envelope.
- a continuous change in the envelope of a specific rail switch indicates normal wear, while a sudden change in the envelope indicates breakouts in the area of a wheel transition. It is useful to consider the different variations of envelopes with computer simulations of a wheel overflow for a specific switch type and a selected one
- Rail vehicle type to combine a correlation between a measured change in the envelopes and a physical change in the
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Architecture (AREA)
- Civil Engineering (AREA)
- Structural Engineering (AREA)
- Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
- Train Traffic Observation, Control, And Security (AREA)
- Machines For Laying And Maintaining Railways (AREA)
- Length Measuring Devices With Unspecified Measuring Means (AREA)
- Electric Propulsion And Braking For Vehicles (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
ATA50458/2016A AT518759A1 (en) | 2016-05-17 | 2016-05-17 | Method and device for monitoring at least one infrastructure component laid in railway construction |
PCT/AT2017/060129 WO2017197423A1 (en) | 2016-05-17 | 2017-05-16 | Method and device for monitoring at least one travel path component laid in rail construction |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP3458331A1 true EP3458331A1 (en) | 2019-03-27 |
EP3458331B1 EP3458331B1 (en) | 2020-07-15 |
Family
ID=58744918
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP17724725.1A Active EP3458331B1 (en) | 2016-05-17 | 2017-05-16 | Method and device for monitoring at least one travel path component laid in rail construction |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP3458331B1 (en) |
AT (1) | AT518759A1 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2823163T3 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2017197423A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US11260888B2 (en) * | 2018-11-16 | 2022-03-01 | Alstom Transport Technologies | Method and system for health assessment of a track circuit and/or of a track section |
DE102019211406A1 (en) * | 2019-07-31 | 2021-02-04 | Siemens Mobility GmbH | Method for recognizing faulty measurement events and computer program product |
EP4342764A1 (en) * | 2022-09-20 | 2024-03-27 | voestalpine Signaling Austria GmbH | Method for monitoring a rail switch and switch drive |
Family Cites Families (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE4207516A1 (en) * | 1992-03-10 | 1993-09-16 | Gerd R Dipl Ing Wetzler | METHOD FOR GENERATING LOAD-RELATED SWITCHING SIGNALS ON RAILWAY RAILWAYS |
DE102007034504A1 (en) * | 2007-07-24 | 2009-02-05 | Rögener, Baldur | Method and monitoring system for monitoring rail tracks |
DE202010009904U1 (en) * | 2010-06-24 | 2011-10-25 | Baldur Rögener | Metrological arrangement for determining the track position and / or changing the track geometry (deformation) |
DE102011084160A1 (en) * | 2011-10-07 | 2013-04-11 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method and device for rail break detection |
DE102014216726A1 (en) * | 2014-08-22 | 2016-02-25 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method for increasing the availability of a wheel recognition device and wheel recognition device |
-
2016
- 2016-05-17 AT ATA50458/2016A patent/AT518759A1/en unknown
-
2017
- 2017-05-16 WO PCT/AT2017/060129 patent/WO2017197423A1/en unknown
- 2017-05-16 EP EP17724725.1A patent/EP3458331B1/en active Active
- 2017-05-16 ES ES17724725T patent/ES2823163T3/en active Active
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
AT518759A1 (en) | 2017-12-15 |
WO2017197423A1 (en) | 2017-11-23 |
ES2823163T3 (en) | 2021-05-06 |
EP3458331B1 (en) | 2020-07-15 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
DE102004045457B4 (en) | Method for diagnosis and condition monitoring of switches, crossings or intersection points and rail joints by a rail vehicle | |
EP2359104B1 (en) | System for analysis of vehicle condition in rail vehicles | |
WO2018041569A1 (en) | Device and method for determining the state of railways | |
EP1977950B1 (en) | Method for effect-related assessment of the placing of a track | |
EP3206933B1 (en) | State diagnosis of rail vehicle wheels | |
DE19837476A1 (en) | Preventive surveillance and monitoring procedure for railway rolling stock driving characteristics | |
DE19836081A1 (en) | Failure detection method for rail vehicle component | |
EP3458331B1 (en) | Method and device for monitoring at least one travel path component laid in rail construction | |
EP3374246B1 (en) | Method and device for comparison-controlled detection of derailing | |
EP2464556B1 (en) | Method and electronic device to monitor the status of components of railway vehicles | |
WO2018104040A1 (en) | Method and device for diagnosing railway switches under load | |
EP1592595B1 (en) | Measurement path for determining various physical parameters of railed vehicles | |
DE102019210884B4 (en) | Measuring arrangement and method for determining a distance between a distance sensor arranged on an axle-mounted gearbox of a rail-bound vehicle and a measuring zero surface outside the gearbox during operation | |
EP1278673B1 (en) | Method for monitoring driving characteristics of a rail vehicle | |
DE10062602B4 (en) | Method and device for monitoring the behavior of rail vehicles and for diagnosing components of rail vehicles | |
EP1165355B1 (en) | Method and device for monitoring a vehicle | |
DE10020520B4 (en) | Method and device for monitoring the driving properties of a rail vehicle | |
DE102014108685A1 (en) | Method and device for derailment detection | |
DE102009015011A1 (en) | Method for monitoring the running stability of rail vehicles | |
DE19825594C2 (en) | Method and device for checking wheel tires of rail vehicles | |
EP3823876B1 (en) | Method and arrangement for identifying a rail vehicle wheel | |
DE102008008578B3 (en) | Method for determining dynamic wheel strength during passage of railway vehicle on core of guide, crossing or crossing guide of rail traffic way, involves measuring concentrated loads on all strength-deriving places with passage of train | |
EP3214423B1 (en) | Early detection of bearing wear | |
DE10022684A1 (en) | Safety system for railway vehicles and tracks compares acquired acoustic spectrum with normal operating spectrum, detects deviations as defect information, compares with defect spectra | |
DE102022100785A1 (en) | Method and device for determining the length L of a flat spot on the running surface of a wheel of a rail vehicle |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: UNKNOWN |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE |
|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20181214 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
DAV | Request for validation of the european patent (deleted) | ||
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20191209 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20200506 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 502017006220 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 1290720 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20200815 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: NV Representative=s name: INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY SERVICES GMBH, CH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: FP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: TRGR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200715 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200715 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201116 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201015 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201015 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201016 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200715 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200715 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200715 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200715 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20201115 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 502017006220 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200715 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200715 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200715 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200715 Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200715 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2823163 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 Effective date: 20210506 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200715 |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20210416 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200715 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200715 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210516 Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200715 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210516 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200715 |
|
P01 | Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered |
Effective date: 20230527 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20170516 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200715 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20240521 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20240521 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20240521 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20240602 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20240627 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Payment date: 20240522 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: PD Owner name: VOESTALPINE SIGNALING AUSTRIA GMBH; AT Free format text: DETAILS ASSIGNMENT: CHANGE OF OWNER(S), ASSIGNMENT; FORMER OWNER NAME: MATERIALS CENTER LEOBEN FORSCHUNG GMBH Effective date: 20240712 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20240528 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R081 Ref document number: 502017006220 Country of ref document: DE Owner name: VOESTALPINE SIGNALING AUSTRIA GMBH, AT Free format text: FORMER OWNER: MATERIALS CENTER LEOBEN FORSCHUNG GMBH, LEOBEN, AT |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: 732E Free format text: REGISTERED BETWEEN 20240711 AND 20240717 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: PD Owner name: VOESTALPINE SIGNALING AUSTRIA; AT Free format text: DETAILS ASSIGNMENT: CHANGE OF OWNER(S), ASSIGNMENT; FORMER OWNER NAME: MATERIALS CENTER LEOBEN FORSCHUNG GMBH Effective date: 20240705 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Payment date: 20240521 Year of fee payment: 8 Ref country code: BE Payment date: 20240521 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: PC Ref document number: 1290720 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Owner name: VOESTALPINE SIGNALING AUSTRIA GMBH, AT Effective date: 20240809 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20200715 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20240524 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: PC2A Owner name: VOESTALPINE SIGNALING AUSTRIA GMBH Effective date: 20241104 |