EP1614449A1 - Blocking device - Google Patents

Blocking device Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1614449A1
EP1614449A1 EP05014584A EP05014584A EP1614449A1 EP 1614449 A1 EP1614449 A1 EP 1614449A1 EP 05014584 A EP05014584 A EP 05014584A EP 05014584 A EP05014584 A EP 05014584A EP 1614449 A1 EP1614449 A1 EP 1614449A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
blocking device
branches
handle
weights
hinge
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP05014584A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1614449B1 (en
Inventor
Christer Eriksson
Benny Eriksson
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Overseas Trade Ltd
Original Assignee
Overseas Trade Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Overseas Trade Ltd filed Critical Overseas Trade Ltd
Publication of EP1614449A1 publication Critical patent/EP1614449A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1614449B1 publication Critical patent/EP1614449B1/en
Not-in-force legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A63SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
    • A63BAPPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
    • A63B21/00Exercising apparatus for developing or strengthening the muscles or joints of the body by working against a counterforce, with or without measuring devices
    • A63B21/06User-manipulated weights
    • A63B21/062User-manipulated weights including guide for vertical or non-vertical weights or array of weights to move against gravity forces
    • A63B21/0626User-manipulated weights including guide for vertical or non-vertical weights or array of weights to move against gravity forces with substantially vertical guiding means
    • A63B21/0628User-manipulated weights including guide for vertical or non-vertical weights or array of weights to move against gravity forces with substantially vertical guiding means for vertical array of weights
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A63SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
    • A63BAPPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
    • A63B21/00Exercising apparatus for developing or strengthening the muscles or joints of the body by working against a counterforce, with or without measuring devices
    • A63B21/06User-manipulated weights
    • A63B21/062User-manipulated weights including guide for vertical or non-vertical weights or array of weights to move against gravity forces
    • A63B21/0626User-manipulated weights including guide for vertical or non-vertical weights or array of weights to move against gravity forces with substantially vertical guiding means
    • A63B21/0628User-manipulated weights including guide for vertical or non-vertical weights or array of weights to move against gravity forces with substantially vertical guiding means for vertical array of weights
    • A63B21/063Weight selecting means

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a blocking device for training machines of the type that includes a set of weights comprising a plurality of weights arranged on each other, the blocking device comprising two front branches, which are separable against the action of a spring force and which are arranged to co-operate with grips in a lever included in the set of weights.
  • Training machines of the above-mentioned type comprising sets/packages of weights having a plurality of loose weights piled on each other, have for a long time been and still are the most functional and most used machines for muscular training.
  • today there is also access to specially designed machines adapted for the training of individual muscles or muscle groups in the entire body.
  • Common to the training machines is, however, that a training person often desires to change the load resistance a great number of times in each machine in order to, during the entire training session, obtain a suitable load in each individual exercise, and that the training machines most often are used by a great number of training persons having different load wishes.
  • the blocking device should, however, safely be held in place on the location that is intended to prevent injuries on muscles and machines. Injuries that easily arises if the blocking device comes out of the engagement with the lever, which entails that the load on heavily strained muscles suddenly ceases and the weights fall down in the machine.
  • a blocking device of the type initially mentioned that solves this in a satisfactory way is shown in SE 459 156.
  • Said publication shows a blocking device having two branches, which are turnable around a common hinge in such a way that the parts of the branches located in front of the hinge are spaced apart when the parts of the branches located behind the hinge are pressed together.
  • a disadvantage is that the training person has to apply a transverse gripping force on the blocking device before the same can be inserted into or pulled out of the set of weights in order to thereby change the load.
  • a primary object of the invention is to provide a blocking device, which easily can be handled without great mobility in the fingers being required.
  • Another object of the invention is to provide a blocking device, which can be inserted into and pulled out of a set of weights solely by applying a pressure force and a tensile force, respectively, on the same.
  • An additional object of the invention is to provide a blocking device, which allows simple handling and reliable function at the same time as the risk of squeezing has been reduced considerable.
  • the blocking device defined by way of introduction, which is characterized in that the same comprises a handle connected to at least one branch and means arranged to, in co-operation with the lever, separate the branches upon axially imposed tensile and/or pressure forces.
  • Preferred embodiments of the blocking device according to the invention are further seen in the dependent claims 2-9, as well as in the following, detailed
  • a blocking device or a weight fork is shown, generally designated 1, which comprises two branches 2, 3, which are mutually turnably arranged around a hinge 4. Furthermore, the branches are separable against the action of a spring force, which in the example is provided by a spring element 5.
  • the blocking device 1 comprises a rear part, which comprises a handle 6.
  • the spring element 5 consists of a compression spring, which acts between the branches 2, 3 and which is situated between the hinge 4 and the handle 6, whereupon the front ends of the branches 2, 3, located in front of the hinge 4, are actuated to aim toward each other.
  • the spring element 5 may, for instance, instead consist of a tension spring situated in front of the hinge 4.
  • the hinge 4 consists of a pin, which is turnably arranged in hole-provided ears connected to the branches 2, 3.
  • the same In the area of the front ends of the branches 2, 3, the same have opposite recesses 7 in the branch edges facing each other. Jointly, the recesses 7 have the shape of a drip, i.e., an essentially circular shape that is drawn out in the forward direction in such a way that a sliding surface 8 is formed in each recess 7 in the front part of the recess 7. Furthermore, this first pair of sliding surfaces 8 run together in the forward direction at an angle to each other that should be less than 150°, preferably this angle should be acute.
  • the recesses 7 are intended to co-operate with a weight lever or weight collector 10 included in a set of weights 9, more precisely by coming into engagement with grooves or grips 11 arranged axially separated along the length extension of the lever 10.
  • a set of weights 9 consists of a plurality of loose weights 12 piled on each other, which are arranged to slide and be guided along guides or sliding bars 13.
  • the blocking device 1 is insertable between two adjacent weights in order to co-operate with the lever 10 with the purpose of, in a safe and reliable way, forcing all weights located above the blocking device 1 to collectively follow the lever 10 and run along the guides 13 when the lever 10 is lifted in any way as a consequence of a training repetition executed in the training machine.
  • the distance between the respective grip 11 may vary as long as the distances correspond to the thicknesses of the individual weights 12.
  • the guides 13 are comprised in a stand (not shown) that constitutes or forms part of a training machine, which may be wall mounted as well as freestanding.
  • the branches 2, 3 are also provided with a second pair of sliding surfaces or chamfered edges 14, arranged in front of the recess 7 of the respective branch 2, 3.
  • the second pair of sliding surfaces 14 converge in the backward direction at an angle to each other that should be less than 150°, preferably this angle should be acute.
  • each sliding surface in the second pair 14 should be longer than 15 mm in order to position the blocking device 1 in relation to the lever 10 upon insertion of the same in the set of weights 9 and cause the branches 2, 3 at abutment against the lever 10 to be spaced apart when an axial pressure force is applied to the handle 6.
  • the sliding surfaces 8 of the recesses 7 have the purpose of, at abutment against the lever 10, separating the branches 2, 3 when an axial tensile force is applied to the handle 6 in order to pull out the blocking device 1 from the set of weights 9. It should be pointed out that the sliding surfaces 8, 14 do not need to be completely straight, but may advantageously be somewhat curved in order to obtain smoother transitions between the same.
  • one of the branches 2 is longer than the other seen in the backward direction from the hinge 4.
  • the handle 6 is fixedly connected to the longer branch 2 only, the second, short branch 3 only being actuatable in the axial direction by means of the hinge 4.
  • the second pair of sliding surfaces 14 and the first pair of sliding surfaces 8 allow the lever 10 to force apart the front ends of the branches 2, 3, such as has been described above, i.e., get the second, short branch 3 to turn around the hinge 4, when pressure and tensile forces, respectively, are applied to the handle 6 (see figure 2).
  • the branches 2, 3 have to be capable of being separated so much that the grips 11 of lever 10 can be inserted into and brought out of the front ends or jaws of the blocking device 1.
  • FIG 3 in which a part of a training machine is shown.
  • the weight plates 12 are provided with slide bushes (not shown) in order to decrease the friction between the weights 12 and the guides 13.
  • the slide bushes are preferably manufactured from nylon and each one has a collar that abuts against the top side of the respective weight plate. The collar works as a distance sleeve between the individual weights 12 in order to enable introduction of the blocking device 1 into the gap that is formed between two adjacent weights 12.
  • the slide bushes also have an absorbing effect against noise and impacts, which protects the hearing of the training persons and the weights 12 from being impaired and damaged, respectively, when the same are dropped against each other.
  • the gap between two adjacent weights is desired to be as small as possible in order for the total height of the set of weights 9 to be as small as possible, and that is why the branches 2, 3 of the blocking device 1 have to be thin in order to be insertable into said gap, however the same must not be so thin that they are deformed by the load they are subjected to during training.
  • it is suitable to make the branches from metal, or some other material having similar, requisite properties.
  • the branches 2, 3 may have one or more wings or stop flanges 15, which project from the branches 2, 3 transverse to the extension plane thereof, with the purpose of providing the blocking device 1 a distinct maximum insertion depth, when the wings 15 are pressed against the front edges of the weights 12, wherein the recesses 7 are in engagement with the lever 10.
  • the distinct insertion depth counteracts that the blocking device 1 is pressed in too far, which reduces the risk of the branches 2, 3 or the hinge 4 being damaged at the same time as a space between the front edge of the weight plates 12 and the wings 15 gives an indication of the recesses 7 of the blocking device 1 not being in engagement with the lever 10 in a satisfying way.
  • the handle 6 consists of a cross piece 16 and two connecting pieces 17, 18 projecting forward from the cross piece, at least one of which is connected to at least one branch.
  • the connecting pieces 17, 18 run together while forming a closed, form-stiff ring that in turn is connected to at least one branch 2.
  • the ring surrounds an opening 19, which has a diameter transverse to the length extension of the blocking device and a diameter along the blocking device that is smaller than the transverse diameter, more precisely the opening has a substantially oval basic form.
  • the opening should be dimensioned in such a way that a number of normal-sized fingers, two, three or four, should be possible to be inserted, at which the handle should be wedged up somewhat around the same, i.e., that the blocking device should follow the hand without the fingers having to be closed around the cross piece 16.
  • the transverse diameter should be larger than 40 mm (two fingers). Simultaneously, said transverse diameter should be less than 80 mm (four fingers). In practice, the same may amount to about 60 mm (three fingers).
  • the longitudinal diameter may, in practice, amount to about 20 mm.
  • one of the connecting pieces 18 is longer than the other, whereupon they, together with the cross piece 16, form a handle 6 that is not closed, the longer connecting piece 18 being connected to at least one branch.
  • the distance transverse to the length extension of the blocking device 1 between the connecting pieces should be regarded as analogous to the size of the transverse diameter described above, in order to enable, in the similar way, a physical handicapped person to use the blocking device 1.
  • the handle 6 can be integrated with one of the branches 2 and then in a suitable way be supplied, for instance, a polyamide coating, preferably by immersing the same in a liquid polyamide mass, which is brought to solidify on the handle 6 after application.
  • the branches 2, 3 may be manufactured separately and a handle 6 separately, whereupon the handle in a suitable way is connected to at least one of the branches.
  • any other suitable material can be used that meets the object of making the handle more grip-friendly at the same time as the same should be wear-resistant.
  • the branches may essentially be equally long and fixedly connected to the handle.
  • such a construction lacks a hinge around which the branches can turn, and also a physical, individual spring element in order to urge the front ends of the branches together.
  • the branches instead the branches have waists near the handle, at which the branches can be deflected from each other against the inherent spring force or elasticity of the same.
  • the branches should enclose the lever but one branch may, for instance, be arranged to be stuck into the corresponding hole in the lever, the other branch coming into engagement with an external groove on the lever or that both branches come into engagement with holes in the lever.
  • the extension plane of the handle and the extension plane of the branches do not have to coincide, even if still preferred, but the handle may be arranged in a plane that is turned at an arbitrary angle in relation to the extension plane of the branches.
  • the hinge and the spring element may be realized in multiple ways, they may, for instance, be integrated in one unit.
  • the handle does not need to be in the shape of a closed ring in order to get a form-stiff property, from a manufacturing point of view it may even be preferred that the ring is not closed without because of this losing the stiffness thereof.
  • form-stiff it is meant herein a shape that is not changed much when forces are applied to the same, i.e., the shape is allowed to be somewhat elastic without the general idea according to the invention being deviated from.
  • the handle does not have to be fixedly connected to the branches but may be fixedly connected to or constitute a part of the hinge around which the branches are turnably arranged.

Abstract

The invention relates to a blocking device for training machines of the type that includes a set of weights comprising a plurality of weights arranged on each other, the blocking device (1) comprising two front branches (2, 3), which are separable against the action of a spring force and which are arranged to co-operate with grips in a lever included in the set of weights. According to the invention, the blocking device (1) comprises a handle (6) connected to at least one branch (2) and means (8, 14) arranged to, in co-operation with the lever, separate the branches (2, 3) upon axially applied tensile and/or pressure forces.

Description

    Technical Field of the Invention
  • The present invention relates to a blocking device for training machines of the type that includes a set of weights comprising a plurality of weights arranged on each other, the blocking device comprising two front branches, which are separable against the action of a spring force and which are arranged to co-operate with grips in a lever included in the set of weights.
  • Background of the Invention and Prior Art
  • Training machines of the above-mentioned type comprising sets/packages of weights having a plurality of loose weights piled on each other, have for a long time been and still are the most functional and most used machines for muscular training. Apart from a great selection of multifunction machines, today there is also access to specially designed machines adapted for the training of individual muscles or muscle groups in the entire body. Common to the training machines is, however, that a training person often desires to change the load resistance a great number of times in each machine in order to, during the entire training session, obtain a suitable load in each individual exercise, and that the training machines most often are used by a great number of training persons having different load wishes. This is realised by the use of a blocking device that in a simple way is insertable in several places in the set of weights with the purpose of all weights located above the blocking device collectively having to follow the lever when this is lifted as a consequence of a training repetition executed in the training machine.
  • At the same time as the load is desired to be simple to change, the blocking device should, however, safely be held in place on the location that is intended to prevent injuries on muscles and machines. Injuries that easily arises if the blocking device comes out of the engagement with the lever, which entails that the load on heavily strained muscles suddenly ceases and the weights fall down in the machine. A blocking device of the type initially mentioned that solves this in a satisfactory way is shown in SE 459 156. Said publication shows a blocking device having two branches, which are turnable around a common hinge in such a way that the parts of the branches located in front of the hinge are spaced apart when the parts of the branches located behind the hinge are pressed together. Thus, a disadvantage is that the training person has to apply a transverse gripping force on the blocking device before the same can be inserted into or pulled out of the set of weights in order to thereby change the load.
  • This seems to be entirely problem-free for a person having full moving ability, when pressing together of the fingers of the hand does not involve any problem. For persons having physical handicap in the hands, pressing together of the fingers only may, however, be extremely difficult, and therefore, for many persons, pressing together a spring-loaded blocking device becomes an impossible task to carry out.
  • Objects and Features of the Invention
  • The present invention aims at obviating the above-mentioned shortcomings of previously known blocking devices and at providing an improved blocking device, which is particularly suitable for persons having physical handicap. Thus, a primary object of the invention is to provide a blocking device, which easily can be handled without great mobility in the fingers being required. Another object of the invention is to provide a blocking device, which can be inserted into and pulled out of a set of weights solely by applying a pressure force and a tensile force, respectively, on the same. An additional object of the invention is to provide a blocking device, which allows simple handling and reliable function at the same time as the risk of squeezing has been reduced considerable.
  • According to the invention, at least the primary object is attained by means of the blocking device defined by way of introduction, which is characterized in that the same comprises a handle connected to at least one branch and means arranged to, in co-operation with the lever, separate the branches upon axially imposed tensile and/or pressure forces. Preferred embodiments of the blocking device according to the invention are further seen in the dependent claims 2-9, as well as in the following, detailed
  • description of preferred embodiments. Brief Description of the Drawings
  • In the drawings:
  • Fig. 1
    is a perspective view of a blocking device according to the invention with the branches in a collected position,
    Fig. 2
    is a view corresponding to figure 1 of a blocking device with the branches in a separated position, and
    Fig. 3
    is a perspective view of a part of a training machine with the blocking device in co-operation with a set of weights, in which a number of weights are removed.
    Detailed Description of Preferred Embodiments of the Invention
  • In figures 1 and 2, a blocking device or a weight fork is shown, generally designated 1, which comprises two branches 2, 3, which are mutually turnably arranged around a hinge 4. Furthermore, the branches are separable against the action of a spring force, which in the example is provided by a spring element 5. In addition, the blocking device 1 comprises a rear part, which comprises a handle 6. In the embodiment of the invention shown, the spring element 5 consists of a compression spring, which acts between the branches 2, 3 and which is situated between the hinge 4 and the handle 6, whereupon the front ends of the branches 2, 3, located in front of the hinge 4, are actuated to aim toward each other. The spring element 5 may, for instance, instead consist of a tension spring situated in front of the hinge 4. In the example shown, the hinge 4 consists of a pin, which is turnably arranged in hole-provided ears connected to the branches 2, 3.
  • In the area of the front ends of the branches 2, 3, the same have opposite recesses 7 in the branch edges facing each other. Jointly, the recesses 7 have the shape of a drip, i.e., an essentially circular shape that is drawn out in the forward direction in such a way that a sliding surface 8 is formed in each recess 7 in the front part of the recess 7. Furthermore, this first pair of sliding surfaces 8 run together in the forward direction at an angle to each other that should be less than 150°, preferably this angle should be acute.
  • Now reference is made also to figure 3. The recesses 7 are intended to co-operate with a weight lever or weight collector 10 included in a set of weights 9, more precisely by coming into engagement with grooves or grips 11 arranged axially separated along the length extension of the lever 10. Such a set of weights 9 consists of a plurality of loose weights 12 piled on each other, which are arranged to slide and be guided along guides or sliding bars 13. The blocking device 1 is insertable between two adjacent weights in order to co-operate with the lever 10 with the purpose of, in a safe and reliable way, forcing all weights located above the blocking device 1 to collectively follow the lever 10 and run along the guides 13 when the lever 10 is lifted in any way as a consequence of a training repetition executed in the training machine. The distance between the respective grip 11 may vary as long as the distances correspond to the thicknesses of the individual weights 12. The guides 13 are comprised in a stand (not shown) that constitutes or forms part of a training machine, which may be wall mounted as well as freestanding.
  • Furthermore, the branches 2, 3 are also provided with a second pair of sliding surfaces or chamfered edges 14, arranged in front of the recess 7 of the respective branch 2, 3. The second pair of sliding surfaces 14 converge in the backward direction at an angle to each other that should be less than 150°, preferably this angle should be acute. Furthermore, each sliding surface in the second pair 14 should be longer than 15 mm in order to position the blocking device 1 in relation to the lever 10 upon insertion of the same in the set of weights 9 and cause the branches 2, 3 at abutment against the lever 10 to be spaced apart when an axial pressure force is applied to the handle 6. In an analogous way, the sliding surfaces 8 of the recesses 7 have the purpose of, at abutment against the lever 10, separating the branches 2, 3 when an axial tensile force is applied to the handle 6 in order to pull out the blocking device 1 from the set of weights 9. It should be pointed out that the sliding surfaces 8, 14 do not need to be completely straight, but may advantageously be somewhat curved in order to obtain smoother transitions between the same.
  • In the preferred embodiment of the blocking device according to the invention shown in the figures, one of the branches 2 is longer than the other seen in the backward direction from the hinge 4. In the example shown in figure 1, the handle 6 is fixedly connected to the longer branch 2 only, the second, short branch 3 only being actuatable in the axial direction by means of the hinge 4. The second pair of sliding surfaces 14 and the first pair of sliding surfaces 8 allow the lever 10 to force apart the front ends of the branches 2, 3, such as has been described above, i.e., get the second, short branch 3 to turn around the hinge 4, when pressure and tensile forces, respectively, are applied to the handle 6 (see figure 2). It should be pointed out that the branches 2, 3 have to be capable of being separated so much that the grips 11 of lever 10 can be inserted into and brought out of the front ends or jaws of the blocking device 1.
  • Now reference is made once again to figure 3, in which a part of a training machine is shown. In the figure, a number of weights are removed in order to show how the blocking device 1 and the lever 10 co-operate. The weight plates 12 are provided with slide bushes (not shown) in order to decrease the friction between the weights 12 and the guides 13. The slide bushes are preferably manufactured from nylon and each one has a collar that abuts against the top side of the respective weight plate. The collar works as a distance sleeve between the individual weights 12 in order to enable introduction of the blocking device 1 into the gap that is formed between two adjacent weights 12. Furthermore, the slide bushes also have an absorbing effect against noise and impacts, which protects the hearing of the training persons and the weights 12 from being impaired and damaged, respectively, when the same are dropped against each other. The gap between two adjacent weights is desired to be as small as possible in order for the total height of the set of weights 9 to be as small as possible, and that is why the branches 2, 3 of the blocking device 1 have to be thin in order to be insertable into said gap, however the same must not be so thin that they are deformed by the load they are subjected to during training. In order for the blocking device 1 to have good strength and manage the space limitation, it is suitable to make the branches from metal, or some other material having similar, requisite properties.
  • In level with or immediately in front of the hinge 4, the branches 2, 3 may have one or more wings or stop flanges 15, which project from the branches 2, 3 transverse to the extension plane thereof, with the purpose of providing the blocking device 1 a distinct maximum insertion depth, when the wings 15 are pressed against the front edges of the weights 12, wherein the recesses 7 are in engagement with the lever 10. The distinct insertion depth counteracts that the blocking device 1 is pressed in too far, which reduces the risk of the branches 2, 3 or the hinge 4 being damaged at the same time as a space between the front edge of the weight plates 12 and the wings 15 gives an indication of the recesses 7 of the blocking device 1 not being in engagement with the lever 10 in a satisfying way.
  • Now reference is made once again to figure 1. The handle 6 consists of a cross piece 16 and two connecting pieces 17, 18 projecting forward from the cross piece, at least one of which is connected to at least one branch. In a preferred embodiment, the connecting pieces 17, 18 run together while forming a closed, form-stiff ring that in turn is connected to at least one branch 2. The ring surrounds an opening 19, which has a diameter transverse to the length extension of the blocking device and a diameter along the blocking device that is smaller than the transverse diameter, more precisely the opening has a substantially oval basic form. The opening should be dimensioned in such a way that a number of normal-sized fingers, two, three or four, should be possible to be inserted, at which the handle should be wedged up somewhat around the same, i.e., that the blocking device should follow the hand without the fingers having to be closed around the cross piece 16. This is in order to enable a physical handicapped person having limited mobility in the fingers of the hand to use the blocking device 1 and thereby the training machine. Thereby, the transverse diameter should be larger than 40 mm (two fingers). Simultaneously, said transverse diameter should be less than 80 mm (four fingers). In practice, the same may amount to about 60 mm (three fingers). The longitudinal diameter may, in practice, amount to about 20 mm.
  • In an alternative embodiment, not shown, one of the connecting pieces 18 is longer than the other, whereupon they, together with the cross piece 16, form a handle 6 that is not closed, the longer connecting piece 18 being connected to at least one branch. In this embodiment, the distance transverse to the length extension of the blocking device 1 between the connecting pieces should be regarded as analogous to the size of the transverse diameter described above, in order to enable, in the similar way, a physical handicapped person to use the blocking device 1.
  • The handle 6 can be integrated with one of the branches 2 and then in a suitable way be supplied, for instance, a polyamide coating, preferably by immersing the same in a liquid polyamide mass, which is brought to solidify on the handle 6 after application. Alternatively, the branches 2, 3 may be manufactured separately and a handle 6 separately, whereupon the handle in a suitable way is connected to at least one of the branches. Instead of polyamide, any other suitable material can be used that meets the object of making the handle more grip-friendly at the same time as the same should be wear-resistant.
  • In an alternative embodiment, not shown, of the blocking device according to the invention, the branches may essentially be equally long and fixedly connected to the handle. In other words, such a construction lacks a hinge around which the branches can turn, and also a physical, individual spring element in order to urge the front ends of the branches together. In this alternative embodiment of the blocking device according to the invention, instead the branches have waists near the handle, at which the branches can be deflected from each other against the inherent spring force or elasticity of the same.
  • Feasible Modifications of the Invention
  • The invention is not solely limited to the embodiments described above and illustrated in the drawings. Thus, it is not necessary that the branches should enclose the lever but one branch may, for instance, be arranged to be stuck into the corresponding hole in the lever, the other branch coming into engagement with an external groove on the lever or that both branches come into engagement with holes in the lever. The extension plane of the handle and the extension plane of the branches do not have to coincide, even if still preferred, but the handle may be arranged in a plane that is turned at an arbitrary angle in relation to the extension plane of the branches. Furthermore, the hinge and the spring element may be realized in multiple ways, they may, for instance, be integrated in one unit. It should also once again be pointed out that the handle does not need to be in the shape of a closed ring in order to get a form-stiff property, from a manufacturing point of view it may even be preferred that the ring is not closed without because of this losing the stiffness thereof. With form-stiff, it is meant herein a shape that is not changed much when forces are applied to the same, i.e., the shape is allowed to be somewhat elastic without the general idea according to the invention being deviated from. Furthermore, the handle does not have to be fixedly connected to the branches but may be fixedly connected to or constitute a part of the hinge around which the branches are turnably arranged.

Claims (9)

  1. Blocking device for training machines of the type that includes a set of weights (9) comprising a plurality of weights (12) arranged on each other, the blocking device (1) comprising two front branches (2, 3), which are separable against the action of a spring force and which are arranged to co-operate with grips (11) in a lever (10) included in the set of weights (9), characterized in that the blocking device (1) comprises a handle (6) connected to at least one branch (2) and means (8, 14) arranged to, in co-operation with the lever (10), separate the branches (2, 3) upon axially applied tensile and/or pressure forces.
  2. Blocking device according to claim 1, characterized in that said means (8) comprises a first pair of sliding surfaces included in opposite recesses (7) arranged in the area of the front ends of the branches (2, 3).
  3. Blocking device according to claim 2, characterized in that said means (14) comprises a second pair of sliding surfaces arranged in the front ends of the branches (2, 3) in front of the first pair of sliding surfaces (8).
  4. Blocking device according to any one of claims 1-3, characterized in that the handle (6) is form-stiff and fixedly connected to at least one branch (2).
  5. Blocking device according to any one of claims 1-4, characterized in that the handle (6) includes a rear cross piece (16), which extends transverse to the length extension of the branches (2, 3).
  6. Blocking device according to claim 5, characterized in that the handle (6) is in the shape of a closed, form-stiff ring comprising the rear cross piece (16), as well as two connecting pieces (17, 18), which converge in the forward direction from the cross piece (16).
  7. Blocking device according to any one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the handle (6) and the branches (2, 3) extend in a common plane.
  8. Blocking device according to any one of the preceding claims, the branches being inter-connected via a hinge (4) and loaded by a spring (5), which aims to bring together the portions of the branches (2, 3) that extend forward from the hinge, characterized in that, of the portions of the branches (2, 3) that extend rearward from the hinge (4), one is longer than the other and connected to the handle (6).
  9. Blocking device according to claim 8, characterized in that the spring (5) consists of a compression spring located between the hinge (4) and the handle (6).
EP05014584A 2004-07-07 2005-07-06 Blocking device Not-in-force EP1614449B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
SE0401784A SE527416C2 (en) 2004-07-07 2004-07-07 Blocking device

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1614449A1 true EP1614449A1 (en) 2006-01-11
EP1614449B1 EP1614449B1 (en) 2008-04-30

Family

ID=32768795

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP05014584A Not-in-force EP1614449B1 (en) 2004-07-07 2005-07-06 Blocking device

Country Status (4)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1614449B1 (en)
AT (1) ATE393653T1 (en)
DE (1) DE602005006349T2 (en)
SE (1) SE527416C2 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1878472A3 (en) * 2006-07-11 2008-12-17 TECHNOGYM S.p.A. Exercise machine
EP2069031A2 (en) * 2006-08-02 2009-06-17 Intellex Inc. Selectorized dumbbell having shock absorbing system
CN104888404A (en) * 2014-03-09 2015-09-09 上海体育学院 Handheld training device with ring internally provided with elastically-connected mass block

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
SE459156B (en) 1988-07-01 1989-06-12 Heavy Gym Production Ab Stop unit for wt. training appts.
US4953266A (en) * 1988-08-26 1990-09-04 Wella Aktiengesellschaft One-piece plastic clip
WO2001000919A1 (en) * 1999-06-28 2001-01-04 Brian Robert Alfred Wybrow Clamping system
WO2001031108A1 (en) * 1998-04-28 2001-05-03 Genprod Clothes peg

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
SE459156B (en) 1988-07-01 1989-06-12 Heavy Gym Production Ab Stop unit for wt. training appts.
US4953266A (en) * 1988-08-26 1990-09-04 Wella Aktiengesellschaft One-piece plastic clip
WO2001031108A1 (en) * 1998-04-28 2001-05-03 Genprod Clothes peg
WO2001000919A1 (en) * 1999-06-28 2001-01-04 Brian Robert Alfred Wybrow Clamping system

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP1878472A3 (en) * 2006-07-11 2008-12-17 TECHNOGYM S.p.A. Exercise machine
US7608023B2 (en) 2006-07-11 2009-10-27 Technogym S.P.A. Exercise machine
EP2069031A2 (en) * 2006-08-02 2009-06-17 Intellex Inc. Selectorized dumbbell having shock absorbing system
EP2319590A1 (en) * 2006-08-02 2011-05-11 PowerBlock Holdings, Inc. Selectorized dumbbell having shock absorbing system
EP2069031B1 (en) * 2006-08-02 2015-01-21 PowerBlock Holdings, Inc. Selectorized dumbbell having shock absorbing system
CN104888404A (en) * 2014-03-09 2015-09-09 上海体育学院 Handheld training device with ring internally provided with elastically-connected mass block

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE602005006349T2 (en) 2009-06-10
SE0401784D0 (en) 2004-07-07
ATE393653T1 (en) 2008-05-15
SE0401784L (en) 2006-01-08
EP1614449B1 (en) 2008-04-30
SE527416C2 (en) 2006-02-28
DE602005006349D1 (en) 2008-06-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1614450B1 (en) Set of weights and blocking device
EP0919147B1 (en) Glove with integrated Ski pole wrist strap
US20090275448A1 (en) Gripping apparatus for an exercise bar
EP1745815A1 (en) Side loading needle depth stop
US10004970B1 (en) Lift-assist device
EP1614449B1 (en) Blocking device
DE2707959A1 (en) SKI POLE AND SKI GLOVE HOLDING AND CATCHING DEVICE
DE60106392T2 (en) DISTRIBUTION DEVICE WITH GRIPPING DEVICE
WO2012001670A2 (en) Portable training device, in particular for arm exercises
AT507638B1 (en) HANDLE WITH RECORDING DEVICE
DE20201733U1 (en) Torque limiting device of a hammer hammer mechanism
EP3595483A1 (en) Pole handle
DE10151615C2 (en) Expander and method for attaching the pull cables in the expander handles
EP3162410B1 (en) Means for ascending a rope
EP3174608B1 (en) Sports dumbbell
EP1516539A1 (en) Ice cream scoop
DE8212845U1 (en) Sports equipment for strengthening the finger, arm and shoulder muscles
EP3595782B1 (en) Outdoor fitness equipment
DE3323705C2 (en) tweezers
EP4218958A1 (en) Training device
AT511121B1 (en) HANDLE ELEMENT FOR A SPORTSTOCK
DE2360067C3 (en) Walking stick unit
CH713570A1 (en) Stock control.
WO1994029078A1 (en) Pliers with two arms and one set of jaws
DE7206999U (en) Device for exercising the muscles of the human body

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA HR MK YU

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: ERIKSSON, CHRISTER

Inventor name: ERIKSSON, BENNY

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20060705

AKX Designation fees paid

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20060901

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20060901

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: FRENCH

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 602005006349

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20080612

Kind code of ref document: P

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080430

NLV1 Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080730

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080430

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080930

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080810

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080430

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080430

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080430

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080430

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080830

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080731

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080430

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080430

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080430

EN Fr: translation not filed
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080430

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080430

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080430

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20080731

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20090202

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080430

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20090227

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20080706

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080430

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090731

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090731

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080430

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081101

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20080706

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080430

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080731

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 602005006349

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: VOSSIUS & PARTNER, DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 602005006349

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: CARETAKER SALES MARKETING SWEDEN AB, SE

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: OVERSEAS TRADE LTD., LONDON, GB

Effective date: 20130819

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 602005006349

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: VOSSIUS & PARTNER, DE

Effective date: 20130819

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 602005006349

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: VOSSIUS & PARTNER PATENTANWAELTE RECHTSANWAELT, DE

Effective date: 20130819

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: 732E

Free format text: REGISTERED BETWEEN 20131003 AND 20131009

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20160719

Year of fee payment: 12

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20160722

Year of fee payment: 12

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602005006349

Country of ref document: DE

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20170706

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180201

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170706