EP1577210B1 - Active roll stabilisation system for ships - Google Patents
Active roll stabilisation system for ships Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP1577210B1 EP1577210B1 EP05075559A EP05075559A EP1577210B1 EP 1577210 B1 EP1577210 B1 EP 1577210B1 EP 05075559 A EP05075559 A EP 05075559A EP 05075559 A EP05075559 A EP 05075559A EP 1577210 B1 EP1577210 B1 EP 1577210B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- stabilisation
- ship
- sub
- active
- stabilisation system
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 230000006641 stabilisation Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 181
- 230000033001 locomotion Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 53
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 28
- 238000013016 damping Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 24
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000005096 rolling process Methods 0.000 description 14
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 7
- 230000003019 stabilising effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000001133 acceleration Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 102220047090 rs6152 Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B63—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
- B63B—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; EQUIPMENT FOR SHIPPING
- B63B39/00—Equipment to decrease pitch, roll, or like unwanted vessel movements; Apparatus for indicating vessel attitude
- B63B39/06—Equipment to decrease pitch, roll, or like unwanted vessel movements; Apparatus for indicating vessel attitude to decrease vessel movements by using foils acting on ambient water
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B63—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
- B63B—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; EQUIPMENT FOR SHIPPING
- B63B39/00—Equipment to decrease pitch, roll, or like unwanted vessel movements; Apparatus for indicating vessel attitude
- B63B39/06—Equipment to decrease pitch, roll, or like unwanted vessel movements; Apparatus for indicating vessel attitude to decrease vessel movements by using foils acting on ambient water
- B63B2039/068—Equipment to decrease pitch, roll, or like unwanted vessel movements; Apparatus for indicating vessel attitude to decrease vessel movements by using foils acting on ambient water the foils having a variable cross section, e.g. a variable camber
Definitions
- the invention relates to an active roll stabilisation system for ships, comprising at least one stabilisation element extending below the water line, which is mounted on a rotary shaft that extends through the ship's hull, sensor means for sensing the ship's movements and delivering control signals on the basis thereof to rotation means for rotating the rotary shaft for the purpose of damping the ship's movements that are being sensed by means of the stabilisation element.
- Such an active roll stabilisation system for ships is known, for example from US patent No. 3,818,959 .
- it is proposed to impart a reciprocating rotary motion to a fin-like stabilisation element that projects into the water from the ship's hull below the waterline so as to compensate for the rolling motions that the ship undergoes while sailing.
- the ship is fitted with sensor means, for example angle sensors, speed sensors and acceleration sensors, by means of which the angle, the rate of roll or the roll acceleration are sensed.
- Control signals are generated on the basis of the data being obtained, which signals control the direction of rotation and the speed of rotation of the stabilisation element via the rotation means.
- a reaction force acting on the water can be generated by means of said fin-like stabilisation element while sailing, which reaction force imparts a counteracting lifting or torsional moment to the ship, which is to counter the ship's roll, if the stabilisation element is correctly controlled.
- a drawback of the stabilisation system according to said US patent is the fact that it is fairly static as regards the control thereof and that it can only be used while the ship is sailing.
- the above-described lifting effect does not occur, or not to a sufficient extent, while the ship is stationary, because there is no functional water movement past the stabilisation elements, and consequently there can be no effective roll stabilisation.
- the object of the invention is therefore to provide an active roll stabilisation system for ships that can be used both with sailing ships and with ship that are at anchor.
- the active roll stabilisation system is to that end characterized in that the stabilisation element is provided with a sub-element that is movable with respect to the stabilisation element. This makes it possible to impart an additional lifting moment to the ship via the stabilisation element, both while the ship is sailing and while the ship is at anchor, for the purpose of effectively damping or countering the ship's movements that are being sensed.
- the sub-element is pivotable about a sub-pivot, whilst the sub-pivot may extend parallel to the rotary shaft.
- the sub-element may be slidably accommodated in a space formed in the stabilisation element.
- the sub-element is capable of movement independently of the rotary motion of the stabilisation element.
- the sub-element may have a curved shape or a wing shape, in a specific embodiment it is made of a flexible material.
- one embodiment of the active stabilisation system is characterized in that the rotation means comprise at least one piston-cylinder combination, said piston being connected to the rotary shaft. Also other rotation means, such as rotation actuators or an electrical driving mechanism may be used, however.
- the rotation means comprise two piston-cylinder combinations, each piston being connected on either side of the longitudinal direction of the rotary shaft to a yoke mounted to the shaft end that extends into the ship's hull, Said latter construction provides a more reliable control of the stabilisation element and thus a more functional damping of the ship's movements that are being sensed.
- drive means are present for driving the sub-element, which drive means are at least partially accommodated in the stabilisation element.
- the rotary shaft may be of hollow construction, and the drive means may also comprise a hinging drive shaft, that is carried through said hollow, rotary shaft.
- the drive means comprise a linkage accommodated in the stabilisation element, which linkage is connected to the sub-element on the one hand and to the hinging drive shaft on the other hand.
- the drive means comprise at least one extension element accommodated in the stabilisation element, which is connected to the sub-element, for extending and retracting the sub-element.
- the extension element may form part of a spindle driving mechanism of a piston-cylinder combination.
- the position of the sub-element with respect to the stabilisation element is adjustable in dependence on the speed of movement of the ship.
- the invention also relates to a method for active roll stabilisation of ship through the use of an active stabilisation system according to the invention, which method comprises the steps of:
- Fig. 1 shows an active stabilisation device according to the prior art.
- a ship 1 having a stem 1a and a stern 1b is fitted with an active stabilisation device indicated at 2.
- This known active stabilisation device 2 for ship's movements as described in US patent No. 3,818,959 is built up of two stabilisation elements 3, which project from the ship 1 on the port side 1' and on the starboard side 1'', respectively, below the water line 5.
- each stabilisation element 3 is mounted, whether or not by means of a flange 8 (see the partial view of the stabilisation element in Fig. 1 ), to the shaft end 4a of a shaft 4 extending from the ship's hull 1c, which can be rotated by rotation means (not shown).
- the active stabilisation system 2 is also provided with a sensor means, which sense the ship's movements and more in particular the ship's roll as indicated at 6. On the basis thereof, control signals are delivered to the rotation means (not shown), which rotate the stabilisation elements 3 via the rotary shafts 4 (depending on the stabilisation correction that is to be carried out).
- the sensor means may consist of angle sensors, roll speed sensors and acceleration sensors, which continuously sense the angle of the ship 1 with respect to the horizontal water surface 5, the speed or the acceleration effected by the rolling motions 6.
- the active stabilisation system as shown in Fig. 1 is intended for damping ship's movements while the ship is sailing (indicated at 7 in Fig. 1 ).
- the interaction between the rotating stabilisation element 3 and the water flowing past results in a reaction force or lifting moment opposed to the rolling movement 6 of the ship 1.
- the rolling movement 6 of the ship 1 can be corrected by means of said lifting moment and the resulting reaction forces.
- One drawback of the known active stabilisation device 2 is the fact that it can only be used with ships while sailing and to a limited, not very effective degree with ships that are substantially stationary ("at anchor"). It is in particular with the latter group of ships (for example chartered ships that lie at anchor in a bay for prolonged periods of time) that the present invention can be suitably used.
- Figs. 2A and 2B show two embodiments of stabilisation elements 3 according to the prior art.
- a fin or stabilisation element 3 projecting under the ship, being rotatable about a shaft 4 is used for effectively damping the ship's roll imparted to the ship 1 by the waves while the ship is sailing.
- the stabilisation element 3 reciprocates about its axis of rotation 4, a reaction force is generated by the water flowing past while the ship is sailing, which reaction force, provided the movement of the stabilisation element is properly controlled, generates a counteracting moment to counter the ship's roll.
- the constructional dimensions of the stabilisation element 3 determine the effectiveness of the stabilisation element, i.e. the effect of the stabilisation element moving through the water. More in particular, to obtain a maximum effective stabilisation effect while is sailing, it is desirable to select a maximum ratio between the width and the length of the stabilisation element, the so-called Aspect Ratio (AR). This implies that the width of the stabilisation element must be much greater than the length thereof, as is shown in Fig. 2A , so that the turning moment of the stabilisation element 3 will be small while sailing and the stabilisation element can be quickly reciprocated through the water, using little energy/power.
- AR Aspect Ratio
- Fig. 1 As for the time being the stabilisation elements shown in Fig. 1 will be used for stabilising the ship's roll while sailing, considering the current state of the art, it must be attempted to find an optimum Aspect Ratio between the two stabilisation situations (the ship sailing and the ship being stationary).
- the turning moment of the stabilisation element is determined in part by the distance A (the moment arm) of the centre of pressure C p of the forces that act on the stabilisation element.
- the distance or arm A between the axis 4 and the centre of pressure C p of a stabilisation element having a high AR is smaller than that of a stabilisation element having a low AR (see Fig. 2B ).
- the stabilisation element 10 that is shown therein is composed of a main element 11 of elongated shape, which is movable about an axis of rotation 4 with respect to the ship 1 with a first end 11a, similar to the situation that is shown in Fig. 1 .
- the main axis of rotation 4 and the sub-axis of rotation 13 are spaced some distance apart.
- the sub-axis of rotation may extend parallel to the main axis of rotation, although this is not necessary.
- the sub-element 12 can be actively rotated with respect to the main element 11 in one embodiment.
- the shaft 4 on which the main element 11 is mounted is of hollow construction, and a drive shaft 14 extends through the hollow shaft 4.
- the rotary shaft 4 and the drive shaft 14 both extend through the ship's hull, being connected in the interior of the ship with, respectively, rotation means (not shown) for rotating the rotary shaft 4 (and the main element 11 and the sub-element 12) and drive means (not shown) for driving the drive shaft 14 that extends through the hollow rotary shaft.
- the drive shaft 14 is connected with its free end 14' to a transmission 15, which transmits the rotation that is imparted to the drive shaft 14 by the drive means to the free end 13' of the sub-shaft 13.
- the transmission 15 may consist of a linkage, which transmits the rotation of the drive shaft 14 to the sub-shaft 13 by making use of a lever principle, thus effecting a rotation of the sub-element 12 with respect to the main element 11, independently of the rotation imparted to the main element 11 by the rotary shaft 4.
- the sub-element 12 is driven independently of the rotary main element 11, it is possible to change the Aspect Ratio (AR) of the stabilisation element 10 in an effective manner in dependence on the desired stabilisation action that the stabilisation element 10 is to carry out in order to oppose or damp the ship's roll while the ship is stationary or while the ship is sailing.
- AR Aspect Ratio
- Fig. 6 shows the stabilisation principle of the active stabilisation system according to the invention with a stationary ship 1.
- a ship 1 undergoes a reciprocating (harmonic) rolling motion about its longitudinal axis 1d with a maximum heel toward port (indicated at 16) and toward starboard (indicated at 18).
- the heel or inclination of the ship is minimal in the positions indicated at 19 and 17.
- the ship At the points of maximum heel 16 and 18 (port side 1' and starboard side 1'', respectively), the ship has a rate of roll that equals zero (phase I), whilst the maximum rate of roll during the rolling movement from port 1' to starboard 1'' (from position 16 to position 17 and onwards to position 18) is reached at the point of equilibrium 17 (phase II).
- the rate of roll of the ship will decrease during the movement of the ship from the point of a equilibrium 17 to the starboard side, until the rate of roll of the ship equals zero again (phase III) at the point of maximum heel of the ship to starboard 1'' (position 18). From said position 18. the ship 1 will roll back to port 1', reaching its maximum rate of roll again at the point of equilibrium 19 (phase IV). This rate of roll will decrease as the ship further heels over to port 1', reaching a value that equals zero (phase I) again at the point of maximum heel 16 to port.
- the ship 1 is provided with at least one stabilisation device according to the invention both on the port side 1' and on the starboard side 1''.
- the ship 1 may be provided with more than one stabilisation device on either side thereof.
- Each stabilisation device comprises a stabilisation element 10' (10'') consisting of a main element 11' (11'') and a sub-element 12' (12'').
- Fig. 6 shows a stabilisation element 10' (10'') as shown in Figs. 3-5 .
- One stabilisation device according to the invention can be controlled and activated during the phases I-II-III-IV for damping the ship's roll 6.
- phase I of the rolling movement 6 of the ship the ship 1 heels over to port 1', which downward movement is offset by an counter moment in upward direction on the port side 1' and by a counter moment in downward direction on the starboard side 1''.
- a downward rotary motion about axis of rotation 4' in the direction of the bottom of the sea is imparted to the stabilisation element 10 on the port side 1'.
- the stabilisation element 10 is rotated in upward direction toward the water surface 5 about the axis of rotation 4''.
- the sub-element 12' (12") is held in line with the main element 11' (11'') during the larger part of the rotary motion during phase I.
- the stabilisation element 10' (10'') obtains a low AR, which, as already explained before, is the most effective ratio for damping the roll of a stationary ship.
- the downwardly rotating main element 11' on the port side 1' and the upwardly rotating main element 11'' on the starboard side 1'' displace water in downward (and upward, respectively) direction, resulting in an upward (and downward, respectively) reaction force and counter moment on the ship, as a result of which the downward roll to port is damped.
- the rotary motion of the main element 11' (11'') is no longer directed downwards (upwards), so that the element no longer displaces water downwards (upwards) in an effective manner.
- the damping of the ship's roll through rotation of the main element 11' (11'') has "worn off".
- the sub-element 12' (12'') is rotated further downwards (upwards) via the drive means (not shown), the drive shaft 14 and the transmission 15, so that the sub-element 12' (12'') is no longer in line with the main element 11' (11'') at the end of phase I, but extends at an angle thereto.
- phase II of the ship's roll 6 the ship 1 rolls about its longitudinal axis 1d towards starboard 1'', with the rate of roll of the ship gradually increasing in the direction of position 17.
- the weight of the ship generates a turning moment about the longitudinal axis 1d, which moment is so large that a lifting moment generated by the stabilisation elements 10' (10'') will by no means suffice to counter this moment.
- the sub-element 12' (12'') is returned to an advantageous starting position with respect to the main element 11' (11''), as shown in Fig. 6 , for damping the ship's rolling motion during phase III.
- phase III The ship's roll toward starboard 1'' (phase III) must be compensated by a downward (upward) movement of the stabilisation element 10' (10'') on the port side 1' and the starboard side 1'', respectively.
- the sub-element 12' (12'') is held in line with the main element 11' (11'') as much as possible so as to obtain a stabilisation element 10' (10'') having a minimum AR.
- the stabilisation elements 10' (10'') are capable of "scooping" a maximum amount of water in this position and moving it upwards (downwards), making it possible to generate the most effective reaction force and the resulting lifting moment for opposing the ship's rolling movement toward starboard.
- phase III the rotary motion of the main element 11' (11'') is no longer directed upwards (downwards), so that water is no longer effectively displaced in upward (downward) direction.
- the damping of the ship's roll through rotation of the main element 11' (11'') has "worn off".
- an additional stabilising action can be obtained by imparting an upward (downward) movement to the sub-element 12' (12"), so that the sub-element 12' (12") will take up an angle with respect to the main element 11' (11"), as is shown in Fig. 6 .
- the ship 1 At the end of phase III, the ship 1 heels over maximally toward starboard 1'' (indicated at 18), after which the ship 1 will roll back toward port 1' during phase IV.
- the rate of roll of the ship gradually increases while the ship rolls towards position 19, so that the stabilisation elements 10' (10'') will have little effect.
- the weight of the ship generates a turning moment about the longitudinal axis 1d, which moment is so large that a lifting moment generated by the stabilisation elements 10' (10'') will by no means suffice to counter this moment.
- phase IV the sub-element 12' (12'') is merely returned to an advantageous starting position with respect to the main element 11' (11''), as shown in Fig 6 , for damping the ship's rolling motion during phase I.
- the ship's roll is damped or opposed in the manner described above.
- Figs. 7A and 7B show two other stabilisation principles of the active stabilisation system according to the invention. While Fig. 6 shows the stabilisation principle of the active stabilisation system according to the invention with a stationary ship, Figs, 7A and 7B show the stabilisation principle of the active stabilisation system according to the invention with a sailing ship, with Fig. 7A relating in particular to a ship sailing at low speeds and Fig. 7 relating to the stabilisation principle with the ship sailing at high speed (for example cruising speed).
- the stabilisation element 10 in the stabilisation principle as shown in Fig. 7A the sub-element 12 is so controlled with respect to the main element 11 that, in particular at low speeds, the stabilisation element 10 (composed of the main element 11 and the sub-element 12) has a maximum damping effect on the roll that the ship undergoes at low speeds as well.
- the water flowing past is additionally deflected by the adjusted sub-elements 12, as a result of which the so-called lifting action of the water flowing past is enhanced and consequently the reaction force exerted on the water by the stabilisation element 10 for correcting the ship's roll is most effective.
- a stabilisation element 10 having a low AR value is created.
- Fig. 7B shows the stabilisation principle of the active stabilisation system according to the invention with a ship sailing at a high speed or cruising speed.
- the sub-element 12 is to that end controlled in such a manner during operation that it will extend or be oriented more or less parallel to the direction of flow at all times, and consequently does not contribute to the stabilising effect that the stabilisation element 10 can have on the ship's roll.
- the flow under the ship is oriented altogether different from the direction of travel of the ship.
- the stabilisation principle or the stabilisation method according to the invention utilizes the speed of the ship 1. Measuring the speed enables the control electronics to determine whether the sub-element 12 must actively contribute towards the damping of the ship's roll ( Fig. 7A ) or whether a position parallel to the water flowing past must be imparted to said sub-element at all times, as in Fig. 7B .
- Fig. 8 shows another embodiment of a stabilisation element 10 according to the invention.
- the stabilisation element 10 is built up of a main element 110, which is capable of reciprocating rotating movement about an axis of rotation 40 in dependence on the ship's rolling movements as sensed.
- the sub-element according to the invention is indicated at 120 in this figure, it can be slidably accommodated in a recess 50 formed in the main element 110 (see partial view (c)).
- the sub-element 120 is accommodated in fully telescoped position in the space of 50 in the main element 110, so that the stabilisation element 10 thus obtained has a high Aspect Ratio (AR).
- AR Aspect Ratio
- Such a stabilisation element has a low turning moment, therefore, which makes it very suitable for use while the ship is sailing.
- View (b) shows the sub-element 120 in the extended position, as a result of which the stabilisation element of 10 has a low Aspect Ratio (AR). This enables the stabilisation element 10 to "scoop" a large amount of water, which makes it very suitable for damping the roll of a stationary ship.
- AR Aspect Ratio
- the sub-element 120 is accommodated in guides (not shown) in the space 50 in order to enable the sub-element 120 to telescope in and out as shown in views (a) and (b).
- the sub-element 120 can be moved in and out along said guides by suitable drive means 60, for example in the form of piston-cylinder combinations 60a and 60 b, respectively, mounted on either side of the sub-element 120, near each guide.
- Each piston-cylinder combination 60a-60b comprises a cylinder 62a-62b and a piston 61a-61b connected to the sub-element 120.
- the piston 61a-61b can be made to carry out a stroke by adding a suitable pressurised medium (air, water or, for example, oil), causing the sub-element 120 to move out of the space 50 along the guides and thus effect a random extension of the main element 110 in dependence on the desired reaction force or lifting moment that the stabilisation element 10 is to generate for damping the ship's roll.
- a suitable pressurised medium air, water or, for example, oil
- the drive means may be configured as a (screwed) spindle driving mechanism.
- the Aspect Ratio of the stabilisation element 10, and consequently also the stabilising counter action of the stabilisation element 10 on the ship's roll, can be adapted in a simple manner by moving the sub-element 120 in and out in a variable manner during the rotary motion of the sub-element 110 about the axis of rotation 4.
- the active stabilisation system according to the invention provides a more effective stabilisation technique for opposing a ship's rolling movements both while the ship is stationary and while the ship is sailing (at low speed and at high speed).
- the simple yet robust construction and driving arrangement of the sub-element with respect to the main element enable the active stabilisation system according to the invention to realise a stabilisation effect on the rolling movements being sensed in a quick and simple manner, but above all the system can be adjusted very quickly for stabilising the ship's roll while the ship is sailing at low speed or at high speed or while the ship is stationary.
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Ocean & Marine Engineering (AREA)
- Vibration Prevention Devices (AREA)
- Control Of Position, Course, Altitude, Or Attitude Of Moving Bodies (AREA)
- Earth Drilling (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The invention relates to an active roll stabilisation system for ships, comprising at least one stabilisation element extending below the water line, which is mounted on a rotary shaft that extends through the ship's hull, sensor means for sensing the ship's movements and delivering control signals on the basis thereof to rotation means for rotating the rotary shaft for the purpose of damping the ship's movements that are being sensed by means of the stabilisation element.
- Such an active roll stabilisation system for ships is known, for example from
US patent No. 3,818,959 . In said US patent it is proposed to impart a reciprocating rotary motion to a fin-like stabilisation element that projects into the water from the ship's hull below the waterline so as to compensate for the rolling motions that the ship undergoes while sailing. To that end, the ship is fitted with sensor means, for example angle sensors, speed sensors and acceleration sensors, by means of which the angle, the rate of roll or the roll acceleration are sensed. Control signals are generated on the basis of the data being obtained, which signals control the direction of rotation and the speed of rotation of the stabilisation element via the rotation means. - A reaction force acting on the water can be generated by means of said fin-like stabilisation element while sailing, which reaction force imparts a counteracting lifting or torsional moment to the ship, which is to counter the ship's roll, if the stabilisation element is correctly controlled.
- A drawback of the stabilisation system according to said US patent is the fact that it is fairly static as regards the control thereof and that it can only be used while the ship is sailing. The above-described lifting effect does not occur, or not to a sufficient extent, while the ship is stationary, because there is no functional water movement past the stabilisation elements, and consequently there can be no effective roll stabilisation.
- The object of the invention is therefore to provide an active roll stabilisation system for ships that can be used both with sailing ships and with ship that are at anchor. According to the invention, the active roll stabilisation system is to that end characterized in that the stabilisation element is provided with a sub-element that is movable with respect to the stabilisation element. This makes it possible to impart an additional lifting moment to the ship via the stabilisation element, both while the ship is sailing and while the ship is at anchor, for the purpose of effectively damping or countering the ship's movements that are being sensed.
- In a functional embodiment, the sub-element is pivotable about a sub-pivot, whilst the sub-pivot may extend parallel to the rotary shaft. In another effective embodiment, the sub-element may be slidably accommodated in a space formed in the stabilisation element.
- To achieve a more effective damping of the ship's movements being sensed, the sub-element is capable of movement independently of the rotary motion of the stabilisation element.
- The sub-element may have a curved shape or a wing shape, in a specific embodiment it is made of a flexible material.
- According to the invention, one embodiment of the active stabilisation system is characterized in that the rotation means comprise at least one piston-cylinder combination, said piston being connected to the rotary shaft. Also other rotation means, such as rotation actuators or an electrical driving mechanism may be used, however.
- More specifically, the rotation means comprise two piston-cylinder combinations, each piston being connected on either side of the longitudinal direction of the rotary shaft to a yoke mounted to the shaft end that extends into the ship's hull, Said latter construction provides a more reliable control of the stabilisation element and thus a more functional damping of the ship's movements that are being sensed.
- In another functional embodiment, drive means are present for driving the sub-element, which drive means are at least partially accommodated in the stabilisation element. The rotary shaft may be of hollow construction, and the drive means may also comprise a hinging drive shaft, that is carried through said hollow, rotary shaft.
- In another embodiment, on the other hand, the drive means comprise a linkage accommodated in the stabilisation element, which linkage is connected to the sub-element on the one hand and to the hinging drive shaft on the other hand.
- The above aspects provide a simple, robust yet reliable driving mechanism for the sub-element.
- In another embodiment, the drive means comprise at least one extension element accommodated in the stabilisation element, which is connected to the sub-element, for extending and retracting the sub-element.
- The extension element may form part of a spindle driving mechanism of a piston-cylinder combination.
- More specifically, according to the invention the position of the sub-element with respect to the stabilisation element is adjustable in dependence on the speed of movement of the ship.
- The invention also relates to a method for active roll stabilisation of ship through the use of an active stabilisation system according to the invention, which method comprises the steps of:
- A) sensing the ship's movements
- B) delivering control signals on the basis thereof for rotating the rotary shaft for the purpose of
- C) damping the ship's movements that are being sensed by means of the stabilisation element. According to the invention, the method is further characterized by the steps of:
- D) measuring the speed of the ship in the direction of travel; and
- E) adjusting the position of the sub-element with respect to the stabilisation element on the basis of the speed measured in step D).
- The invention will now be explained in more detail with reference to a drawing, in which:
-
Fig. 1 shows a ship fitted with an active stabilisation system according to the prior art; -
Figs. 2A and 2B show two embodiments of stabilisation elements according to the prior art; -
Fig. 3 shows a first embodiment of a stabilisation element according to the invention; -
Figs. 4 and 5 are detail views of the embodiment that is shown inFig. 3 ; -
Fig. 6 shows the stabilisation principle of the active stabilisation system according to the invention; -
Figs. 7A and 7B show other possible stabilisation principles of the active stabilisation system according to the invention; -
Fig. 8 shows a second embodiment of a stabilisation element according to the invention. - For easy reference, like parts will be indicated by the same numerals in the description of the figures below.
-
Fig. 1 shows an active stabilisation device according to the prior art. Aship 1 having a stem 1a and astern 1b is fitted with an active stabilisation device indicated at 2. This known active stabilisation device 2 for ship's movements as described inUS patent No. 3,818,959 is built up of twostabilisation elements 3, which project from theship 1 on the port side 1' and on the starboard side 1'', respectively, below thewater line 5. - To that end, each
stabilisation element 3 is mounted, whether or not by means of a flange 8 (see the partial view of the stabilisation element inFig. 1 ), to theshaft end 4a of ashaft 4 extending from the ship's hull 1c, which can be rotated by rotation means (not shown). - Although this is not shown in the drawing, the active stabilisation system 2 according to the prior art is also provided with a sensor means, which sense the ship's movements and more in particular the ship's roll as indicated at 6. On the basis thereof, control signals are delivered to the rotation means (not shown), which rotate the
stabilisation elements 3 via the rotary shafts 4 (depending on the stabilisation correction that is to be carried out). The sensor means may consist of angle sensors, roll speed sensors and acceleration sensors, which continuously sense the angle of theship 1 with respect to thehorizontal water surface 5, the speed or the acceleration effected by therolling motions 6. - The active stabilisation system as shown in
Fig. 1 is intended for damping ship's movements while the ship is sailing (indicated at 7 inFig. 1 ). The interaction between the rotatingstabilisation element 3 and the water flowing past results in a reaction force or lifting moment opposed to therolling movement 6 of theship 1. Therolling movement 6 of theship 1 can be corrected by means of said lifting moment and the resulting reaction forces. - One drawback of the known active stabilisation device 2 is the fact that it can only be used with ships while sailing and to a limited, not very effective degree with ships that are substantially stationary ("at anchor"). It is in particular with the latter group of ships (for example chartered ships that lie at anchor in a bay for prolonged periods of time) that the present invention can be suitably used.
-
Figs. 2A and 2B show two embodiments ofstabilisation elements 3 according to the prior art. As already explained with reference toFig. 1 , a fin orstabilisation element 3 projecting under the ship, being rotatable about ashaft 4, is used for effectively damping the ship's roll imparted to theship 1 by the waves while the ship is sailing. As thestabilisation element 3 reciprocates about its axis ofrotation 4, a reaction force is generated by the water flowing past while the ship is sailing, which reaction force, provided the movement of the stabilisation element is properly controlled, generates a counteracting moment to counter the ship's roll. - The constructional dimensions of the
stabilisation element 3 determine the effectiveness of the stabilisation element, i.e. the effect of the stabilisation element moving through the water. More in particular, to obtain a maximum effective stabilisation effect while is sailing, it is desirable to select a maximum ratio between the width and the length of the stabilisation element, the so-called Aspect Ratio (AR). This implies that the width of the stabilisation element must be much greater than the length thereof, as is shown inFig. 2A , so that the turning moment of thestabilisation element 3 will be small while sailing and the stabilisation element can be quickly reciprocated through the water, using little energy/power. - While the ship is stationary, the interaction between the stabilisation element and the water flowing past (while sailing) is absent, so that the counteracting lifting moment does not occur. It is desirable, therefore, to select a minimum value for the Aspect Ratio between the width and the length of the stabilisation element while the ship is stationary. This means that the length of the stabilisation element must be much greater than the width thereof, as is shown in
Fig. 2B . During stabilisation, as much water as possible is "scooped" or moved during the movement of thestabilisation element 3 through the water, thus generating a counteracting lifting moment. -
- AR = the Aspect Ratio
- S = the width of the stabilisation element
- Ct = the smallest length of the stabilisation element
- Cr = the greatest length of the stabilisation element
- As for the time being the stabilisation elements shown in
Fig. 1 will be used for stabilising the ship's roll while sailing, considering the current state of the art, it must be attempted to find an optimum Aspect Ratio between the two stabilisation situations (the ship sailing and the ship being stationary). - From a viewpoint of effectiveness it is desirable to use a
stabilisation element 3 having a high AR ratio while sailing, whereas astabilisation element 3 having a low AR is preferred while the ship is stationary. This can be explained by the fact that the moment required for turning or rotating the stabilisation element about theshaft 4 is higher in the case of a stabilisation element having a high AR than in the case of astabilisation element 3 having a low AR. - The turning moment of the stabilisation element is determined in part by the distance A (the moment arm) of the centre of pressure Cp of the forces that act on the stabilisation element. The distance or arm A between the
axis 4 and the centre of pressure Cp of a stabilisation element having a high AR (seeFig. 2A ) is smaller than that of a stabilisation element having a low AR (seeFig. 2B ). - From a viewpoint of functionality it is desirable, therefore, to design a stabilisation element that can be used both while the ship is sailing and while the ship is stationary.
- One embodiment of such a stabilisation element is shown in
Fig. 3 . Thestabilisation element 10 that is shown therein is composed of amain element 11 of elongated shape, which is movable about an axis ofrotation 4 with respect to theship 1 with afirst end 11a, similar to the situation that is shown inFig. 1 . - As is clearly shown in
Fig. 3 , the main axis ofrotation 4 and the sub-axis ofrotation 13 are spaced some distance apart. The sub-axis of rotation may extend parallel to the main axis of rotation, although this is not necessary. Using the sub-element 12, it is possible to effectively adapt the constructional dimensions of thestabilisation element 10 to the stabilisation situation in which thestabilisation element 10 is to be used. - As is shown in
Figs. 4 and 5 , the sub-element 12 can be actively rotated with respect to themain element 11 in one embodiment. To that end, theshaft 4 on which themain element 11 is mounted is of hollow construction, and adrive shaft 14 extends through thehollow shaft 4. Therotary shaft 4 and thedrive shaft 14 both extend through the ship's hull, being connected in the interior of the ship with, respectively, rotation means (not shown) for rotating the rotary shaft 4 (and themain element 11 and the sub-element 12) and drive means (not shown) for driving thedrive shaft 14 that extends through the hollow rotary shaft. - The
drive shaft 14 is connected with its free end 14' to atransmission 15, which transmits the rotation that is imparted to thedrive shaft 14 by the drive means to the free end 13' of the sub-shaft 13. As is shown in the partial views (a)-(d) ofFig. 4 , thetransmission 15 may consist of a linkage, which transmits the rotation of thedrive shaft 14 to the sub-shaft 13 by making use of a lever principle, thus effecting a rotation of the sub-element 12 with respect to themain element 11, independently of the rotation imparted to themain element 11 by therotary shaft 4. - Since the sub-element 12 is driven independently of the rotary
main element 11, it is possible to change the Aspect Ratio (AR) of thestabilisation element 10 in an effective manner in dependence on the desired stabilisation action that thestabilisation element 10 is to carry out in order to oppose or damp the ship's roll while the ship is stationary or while the ship is sailing. -
Fig. 6 shows the stabilisation principle of the active stabilisation system according to the invention with astationary ship 1. - As a result of the wave motion, a
ship 1 undergoes a reciprocating (harmonic) rolling motion about itslongitudinal axis 1d with a maximum heel toward port (indicated at 16) and toward starboard (indicated at 18). The heel or inclination of the ship is minimal in the positions indicated at 19 and 17. At the points ofmaximum heel 16 and 18 (port side 1' and starboard side 1'', respectively), the ship has a rate of roll that equals zero (phase I), whilst the maximum rate of roll during the rolling movement from port 1' to starboard 1'' (fromposition 16 to position 17 and onwards to position 18) is reached at the point of equilibrium 17 (phase II). - The rate of roll of the ship will decrease during the movement of the ship from the point of a
equilibrium 17 to the starboard side, until the rate of roll of the ship equals zero again (phase III) at the point of maximum heel of the ship to starboard 1'' (position 18). From saidposition 18. theship 1 will roll back to port 1', reaching its maximum rate of roll again at the point of equilibrium 19 (phase IV). This rate of roll will decrease as the ship further heels over to port 1', reaching a value that equals zero (phase I) again at the point ofmaximum heel 16 to port. - The
ship 1 is provided with at least one stabilisation device according to the invention both on the port side 1' and on the starboard side 1''. Alternatively, theship 1 may be provided with more than one stabilisation device on either side thereof. Each stabilisation device comprises a stabilisation element 10' (10'') consisting of a main element 11' (11'') and a sub-element 12' (12'').Fig. 6 shows a stabilisation element 10' (10'') as shown inFigs. 3-5 . - One stabilisation device according to the invention, or both, can be controlled and activated during the phases I-II-III-IV for damping the ship's
roll 6. - During phase I of the rolling
movement 6 of the ship, theship 1 heels over to port 1', which downward movement is offset by an counter moment in upward direction on the port side 1' and by a counter moment in downward direction on the starboard side 1''. To that end, a downward rotary motion about axis of rotation 4' in the direction of the bottom of the sea is imparted to thestabilisation element 10 on the port side 1'. On the starboard side 1'', thestabilisation element 10 is rotated in upward direction toward thewater surface 5 about the axis of rotation 4''. - The sub-element 12' (12") is held in line with the main element 11' (11'') during the larger part of the rotary motion during phase I. The stabilisation element 10' (10'') obtains a low AR, which, as already explained before, is the most effective ratio for damping the roll of a stationary ship. The downwardly rotating main element 11' on the port side 1' and the upwardly rotating main element 11'' on the starboard side 1'' displace water in downward (and upward, respectively) direction, resulting in an upward (and downward, respectively) reaction force and counter moment on the ship, as a result of which the downward roll to port is damped.
- At the end of phase I, the rotary motion of the main element 11' (11'') is no longer directed downwards (upwards), so that the element no longer displaces water downwards (upwards) in an effective manner. The damping of the ship's roll through rotation of the main element 11' (11'') has "worn off". To be able to damp the ship's rolling movement at the end of phase I yet, the sub-element 12' (12'') is rotated further downwards (upwards) via the drive means (not shown), the
drive shaft 14 and thetransmission 15, so that the sub-element 12' (12'') is no longer in line with the main element 11' (11'') at the end of phase I, but extends at an angle thereto. - An additional downward (upward) counterforce is exerted on the water by the moving sub-element 12' (12''), which makes it possible to additionally damp the downward roll of the ship to port.
- While the main element 11' (11'') is at the end of its downward (upward) stroke at the end of phase I, and consequently is no longer able to generate an effective counter moment for damping the ship's roll. such an effective counter moment can on the other hand be generated by means of the sub-element 12' (12'').
- During phase II of the ship's
roll 6, theship 1 rolls about itslongitudinal axis 1d towards starboard 1'', with the rate of roll of the ship gradually increasing in the direction ofposition 17. During phase II, the weight of the ship generates a turning moment about thelongitudinal axis 1d, which moment is so large that a lifting moment generated by the stabilisation elements 10' (10'') will by no means suffice to counter this moment. During phase II, the sub-element 12' (12'') is returned to an advantageous starting position with respect to the main element 11' (11''), as shown inFig. 6 , for damping the ship's rolling motion during phase III. - The ship's roll toward starboard 1'' (phase III) must be compensated by a downward (upward) movement of the stabilisation element 10' (10'') on the port side 1' and the starboard side 1'', respectively. To achieve the most effective stabilisation, the sub-element 12' (12'') is held in line with the main element 11' (11'') as much as possible so as to obtain a stabilisation element 10' (10'') having a minimum AR. During phase III, the stabilisation elements 10' (10'') are capable of "scooping" a maximum amount of water in this position and moving it upwards (downwards), making it possible to generate the most effective reaction force and the resulting lifting moment for opposing the ship's rolling movement toward starboard.
- At the end of phase III, the rotary motion of the main element 11' (11'') is no longer directed upwards (downwards), so that water is no longer effectively displaced in upward (downward) direction. The damping of the ship's roll through rotation of the main element 11' (11'') has "worn off". Analogously to the description of phase I, an additional stabilising action can be obtained by imparting an upward (downward) movement to the sub-element 12' (12"), so that the sub-element 12' (12") will take up an angle with respect to the main element 11' (11"), as is shown in
Fig. 6 . - At the end of phase III, the
ship 1 heels over maximally toward starboard 1'' (indicated at 18), after which theship 1 will roll back toward port 1' during phase IV. The rate of roll of the ship gradually increases while the ship rolls towardsposition 19, so that the stabilisation elements 10' (10'') will have little effect. The weight of the ship generates a turning moment about thelongitudinal axis 1d, which moment is so large that a lifting moment generated by the stabilisation elements 10' (10'') will by no means suffice to counter this moment. - During phase IV, the sub-element 12' (12'') is merely returned to an advantageous starting position with respect to the main element 11' (11''), as shown in
Fig 6 , for damping the ship's rolling motion during phase I. During phase I, the ship's roll is damped or opposed in the manner described above. -
Figs. 7A and 7B show two other stabilisation principles of the active stabilisation system according to the invention. WhileFig. 6 shows the stabilisation principle of the active stabilisation system according to the invention with a stationary ship,Figs, 7A and 7B show the stabilisation principle of the active stabilisation system according to the invention with a sailing ship, withFig. 7A relating in particular to a ship sailing at low speeds andFig. 7 relating to the stabilisation principle with the ship sailing at high speed (for example cruising speed). - Referring to that which is shown in
Figs. 2A and 2B , in the stabilisation principle as shown inFig. 7A the sub-element 12 is so controlled with respect to themain element 11 that, in particular at low speeds, the stabilisation element 10 (composed of themain element 11 and the sub-element 12) has a maximum damping effect on the roll that the ship undergoes at low speeds as well. The water flowing past is additionally deflected by the adjustedsub-elements 12, as a result of which the so-called lifting action of the water flowing past is enhanced and consequently the reaction force exerted on the water by thestabilisation element 10 for correcting the ship's roll is most effective. Especially at low speeds, astabilisation element 10 having a low AR value is created. -
Fig. 7B , on the other hand, shows the stabilisation principle of the active stabilisation system according to the invention with a ship sailing at a high speed or cruising speed. To generate a minimum moment in order to enable quick rotation of thestabilisation element 10 about the axis ofrotation 4, using little energy/power, it is desirable to realise astabilisation element 10 having a high AR value at high speeds. The sub-element 12 is to that end controlled in such a manner during operation that it will extend or be oriented more or less parallel to the direction of flow at all times, and consequently does not contribute to the stabilising effect that thestabilisation element 10 can have on the ship's roll. In some cases, the flow under the ship is oriented altogether different from the direction of travel of the ship. - In this operating condition (
Fig. 7B ), only themain element 11 contributes towards the creation of a reaction force on the water for the purpose of opposing or damping the ship's roll. - The stabilisation principle or the stabilisation method according to the invention utilizes the speed of the
ship 1. Measuring the speed enables the control electronics to determine whether the sub-element 12 must actively contribute towards the damping of the ship's roll (Fig. 7A ) or whether a position parallel to the water flowing past must be imparted to said sub-element at all times, as inFig. 7B . -
Fig. 8 shows another embodiment of astabilisation element 10 according to the invention. Also in this case, thestabilisation element 10 is built up of amain element 110, which is capable of reciprocating rotating movement about an axis ofrotation 40 in dependence on the ship's rolling movements as sensed. The sub-element according to the invention is indicated at 120 in this figure, it can be slidably accommodated in arecess 50 formed in the main element 110 (see partial view (c)). - In view (a) of
Fig. 8 , the sub-element 120 is accommodated in fully telescoped position in the space of 50 in themain element 110, so that thestabilisation element 10 thus obtained has a high Aspect Ratio (AR). Such a stabilisation element has a low turning moment, therefore, which makes it very suitable for use while the ship is sailing. - View (b) shows the sub-element 120 in the extended position, as a result of which the stabilisation element of 10 has a low Aspect Ratio (AR). This enables the
stabilisation element 10 to "scoop" a large amount of water, which makes it very suitable for damping the roll of a stationary ship. - The sub-element 120 is accommodated in guides (not shown) in the
space 50 in order to enable the sub-element 120 to telescope in and out as shown in views (a) and (b). The sub-element 120 can be moved in and out along said guides by suitable drive means 60, for example in the form of piston-cylinder combinations 60a and 60 b, respectively, mounted on either side of the sub-element 120, near each guide. - Each piston-
cylinder combination 60a-60b comprises acylinder 62a-62b and apiston 61a-61b connected to the sub-element 120. Thepiston 61a-61b can be made to carry out a stroke by adding a suitable pressurised medium (air, water or, for example, oil), causing the sub-element 120 to move out of thespace 50 along the guides and thus effect a random extension of themain element 110 in dependence on the desired reaction force or lifting moment that thestabilisation element 10 is to generate for damping the ship's roll. - In another embodiment, the drive means may be configured as a (screwed) spindle driving mechanism.
- Thus the Aspect Ratio of the
stabilisation element 10, and consequently also the stabilising counter action of thestabilisation element 10 on the ship's roll, can be adapted in a simple manner by moving the sub-element 120 in and out in a variable manner during the rotary motion of the sub-element 110 about the axis ofrotation 4. - It will be apparent that the active stabilisation system according to the invention provides a more effective stabilisation technique for opposing a ship's rolling movements both while the ship is stationary and while the ship is sailing (at low speed and at high speed). The simple yet robust construction and driving arrangement of the sub-element with respect to the main element enable the active stabilisation system according to the invention to realise a stabilisation effect on the rolling movements being sensed in a quick and simple manner, but above all the system can be adjusted very quickly for stabilising the ship's roll while the ship is sailing at low speed or at high speed or while the ship is stationary.
Claims (19)
- An active roll stabilisation system (2) for ships (1), comprising at least- one stabilisation element (3; 11; 110) extending below the water line (5), which is mounted on a rotary shaft (4; 40) that extends through the ship's hull (1c),- sensor means for sensing the ship's movements and delivering control signals on the basis thereof to- rotation means for rotating the rotary shaft for the purpose of damping the ship's movements that are being sensed by means of the stabilisation element, characterized in that the stabilisation element is provided with a sub-element (12; 120) that is movable with respect to the rotating stabilisation element thereby imparting an additional lifting moment to the ship via the stabilisation element for the purpose of damping the ship's movements that are being sensed.
- An active stabilisation system according to claim 1, characterized in that said sub-element (12) is pivotable about a sub-shaft (13).
- An active stabilisation system according to claim 2, characterized in that the sub-pivot (13) extends parallel to the rotary shaft (4).
- An active stabilisation system according to claim 1, characterized in that the sub-element (120) is slidably accommodated in a space (50) formed in the stabilisation element (110).
- An active stabilisation system according to any one or more of the preceding claims, characterized in that the sub-element (12; 120) is capable of movement independently of the rotary movement of the stabilisation element (11; 110).
- An active stabilisation system according to any one or more of the preceding claims, characterized in that the sub-element has a curved shape.
- An active stabilisation system according to any one or more of the preceding claims, characterized in that the sub-element has a wing shape.
- An active stabilisation system according to any one or more of the preceding claims, characterized in that the sub-element is made of a flexible material.
- An active stabilisation system according to any one or more of the preceding claims, characterized in that the rotation means comprise at least one piston-cylinder combination, said piston being connected to the rotary shaft.
- An active stabilisation system according to claim 9, characterized in that the rotation means comprise two piston-cylinder combinations, each piston being connected on either side of the longitudinal direction of the rotary shaft to a yoke mounted to the shaft end that extends into the ship's hull.
- An active stabilisation system according to any one or more of the preceding claims, characterized in that drive means are present for driving the sub-element, which drive means are at least partially accommodated in the stabilisation element.
- An active stabilisation system according to claim 11, characterized in that the rotary shaft is of hollow construction, and the drive means also comprise a drive shaft that is carried through said hollow, rotary shaft.
- An active stabilisation system according to claim 12, characterized in that the drive means comprise a linkage accommodated in the stabilisation element, which linkage is connected to the sub-element on the one hand and to the drive shaft on the other hand.
- An active stabilisation system according to claim 11, characterized in that the drive means comprise at least one extension element accommodated in the stabilisation element, which is connected to the sub-element, for extending and retracting the sub-element.
- An active stabilisation system according to claim 14, characterized in that said extension element forms part of a spindle driving mechanism.
- An active stabilisation system according to claim 14, characterized in that said extension element forms part of a piston-cylinder combination.
- An active stabilisation system according to any one or more of the preceding claims, characterized in that the position of the sub-element with respect to the stabilisation element is adjustable in dependence on the speed of movement of the ship.
- A ship provided with an active stabilisation system according to any one or more of the preceding claims.
- A method for active roll stabilisation of ship through the use of an active stabilisation system according to one of the claims 1 to 17, which method comprises the steps of:A) sensing the ship's movementsB) delivering control signals on the basis thereof for rotating the rotary shaft for the purpose ofC) damping the ship's movements that are being sensed by means of the stabilisation element, the method being further characterized by the steps of:D) measuring the speed of the ship in the direction of travel; andE) adjusting the position of the sub-element with respect to the stabilisation element on the basis of the speed measured in step D) as part of the stabilisation action.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
NL1025733A NL1025733C1 (en) | 2004-03-16 | 2004-03-16 | Active pendulum damping system for ship movements. |
NL1025733 | 2004-03-16 |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1577210A1 EP1577210A1 (en) | 2005-09-21 |
EP1577210B1 true EP1577210B1 (en) | 2008-02-27 |
Family
ID=34836859
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP05075559A Active EP1577210B1 (en) | 2004-03-16 | 2005-03-08 | Active roll stabilisation system for ships |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP1577210B1 (en) |
AT (1) | ATE387376T1 (en) |
DE (1) | DE602005004944T2 (en) |
DK (1) | DK1577210T3 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2299947T3 (en) |
NL (1) | NL1025733C1 (en) |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN101879935A (en) * | 2010-06-25 | 2010-11-10 | 哈尔滨工程大学 | Drag-reducing device of anti-rolling fin of ship wing flap |
DE102011005313B3 (en) * | 2011-03-09 | 2012-05-31 | Blohm + Voss Industries Gmbh | Fin device for stabilizing water vehicle, particularly ship, has main fin element drivable by drive device and tail fin element movably placed at main fin element |
US10077098B2 (en) | 2012-05-31 | 2018-09-18 | Cmc Marine S.R.L. | Control method for anti-roll stabilization of watercraft, and corresponding stabilization system and computer program product |
Families Citing this family (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
ITTO20080725A1 (en) | 2008-10-02 | 2010-04-03 | Cmc S R L | ANTI-ROLLIO AUTOMATIC STABILIZATION SYSTEM FOR BOATS |
US8534211B2 (en) | 2009-09-18 | 2013-09-17 | Naiad Maritime Group, Inc. | Variable geometry fin |
CN105121272B (en) | 2013-04-18 | 2017-06-23 | 罗尼·斯考恩 | Stabilizer and active systems stabilisation for ship |
DE102014217227A1 (en) | 2014-08-28 | 2016-03-03 | Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. (DLR) | Fin stabilizer and watercraft |
EP3507189B1 (en) | 2016-09-02 | 2023-12-13 | Sleipner Motor AS | Stabilizer fin for a watercraft |
IT201600094283A1 (en) | 2016-09-20 | 2016-12-20 | Psc Eng S R L | Procedure for controlling the rolling and / or pitching motion of a boat at no or low vessel speed |
Family Cites Families (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB893054A (en) * | 1960-02-11 | 1962-04-04 | Doak Aircraft Company Inc | A controllably articulatable vane |
GB922977A (en) * | 1961-06-28 | 1963-04-03 | Arthur Paul Pedrick | Anti-roll ship stabiliser |
US3818959A (en) * | 1973-02-09 | 1974-06-25 | E Larsh | Ship stabilizer fin |
WO1987002641A1 (en) * | 1985-11-01 | 1987-05-07 | Lockheed Missiles & Space Company, Inc. | High-speed semisubmerged ship maneuvering system |
US4777899A (en) * | 1987-03-20 | 1988-10-18 | Van Dusen & Meyer | Hydraulically actuated fin stabilizer system |
FR2736888B1 (en) * | 1995-07-21 | 1997-09-26 | Havre Chantiers | ANTI-TANGAGE STABILIZATION DEVICE FOR VESSELS |
-
2004
- 2004-03-16 NL NL1025733A patent/NL1025733C1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
-
2005
- 2005-03-08 DE DE602005004944T patent/DE602005004944T2/en active Active
- 2005-03-08 AT AT05075559T patent/ATE387376T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2005-03-08 ES ES05075559T patent/ES2299947T3/en active Active
- 2005-03-08 EP EP05075559A patent/EP1577210B1/en active Active
- 2005-03-08 DK DK05075559T patent/DK1577210T3/en active
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN101879935A (en) * | 2010-06-25 | 2010-11-10 | 哈尔滨工程大学 | Drag-reducing device of anti-rolling fin of ship wing flap |
DE102011005313B3 (en) * | 2011-03-09 | 2012-05-31 | Blohm + Voss Industries Gmbh | Fin device for stabilizing water vehicle, particularly ship, has main fin element drivable by drive device and tail fin element movably placed at main fin element |
US10077098B2 (en) | 2012-05-31 | 2018-09-18 | Cmc Marine S.R.L. | Control method for anti-roll stabilization of watercraft, and corresponding stabilization system and computer program product |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
ES2299947T3 (en) | 2008-06-01 |
EP1577210A1 (en) | 2005-09-21 |
DK1577210T3 (en) | 2008-06-16 |
ATE387376T1 (en) | 2008-03-15 |
DE602005004944T2 (en) | 2009-03-19 |
DE602005004944D1 (en) | 2008-04-10 |
NL1025733C1 (en) | 2005-09-19 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7451715B2 (en) | Active roll stabilisation system for ships | |
EP1577210B1 (en) | Active roll stabilisation system for ships | |
US8468964B2 (en) | Methods and arrangements for redirecting thrust from a propeller | |
US4261278A (en) | Gyro-controlled pitch stabilizing system | |
JP6820274B2 (en) | Boat with adjustable and stabilizing devices | |
CN108313232B (en) | Combined ship stabilizing device based on two-dimensional vector propeller and moving weight | |
US10370069B2 (en) | Multifunctional system for damping a ship's motion | |
EP2910463A1 (en) | Method for actively damping a ship's motion as well as such an active roll stabilisation system | |
EP2277771A1 (en) | Active roll stabilisation system for ships | |
WO1996020105A1 (en) | Means and method for dynamic trim of a fast, planing or semi-planing boathull | |
NO338013B1 (en) | Dynamic stabilizer for an underwater vessel | |
DK201470079A1 (en) | A method of operating a boat | |
JP2023548724A (en) | System and method for controlling motion compensated pile guides for floating ships and ships | |
US5988097A (en) | Watercraft stabilized by controlled hydrofoil elevation | |
AU2021100933A4 (en) | Marine vessel fender and control system | |
KR101225115B1 (en) | Fin stabilizer of ship with thruster | |
KR20240032439A (en) | Shaft generatior system of ship | |
KR20230156309A (en) | Ship vibration damper system | |
US10363999B2 (en) | Active roll stabilisation system for damping a ship's motion | |
CN113039121B (en) | Method and system for tail fin driving | |
WO2009083892A2 (en) | Device for stabilising the rolling motion of boats. | |
JP2004009949A (en) | Blade angle detecting device in marine propulsion apparatus | |
JP2012096774A (en) | Trimaran ship with roll-reducing function | |
RU72456U1 (en) | WALKING SHIP | |
KR100292094B1 (en) | An anti capsizing device for fishing boat |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL BA HR LV MK YU |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20060321 |
|
AKX | Designation fees paid |
Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
RIN1 | Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected) |
Inventor name: DINNISSEN, LAMBERTUS J. M. Inventor name: OOMS, JOHANNES Inventor name: KOOP, MATTHEUS T. |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 602005004944 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20080410 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2299947 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: T3 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080627 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080227 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080227 |
|
ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080227 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080227 Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080227 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080227 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080527 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080227 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080721 Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20080331 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080227 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080227 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20080310 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080227 |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20081128 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080527 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080227 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20090331 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20090331 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080828 Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20080308 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080528 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 14 |
|
P01 | Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered |
Effective date: 20230527 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20240320 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20240320 Year of fee payment: 20 Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20240320 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Payment date: 20240301 Year of fee payment: 20 Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20240329 Year of fee payment: 20 Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20240321 Year of fee payment: 20 Ref country code: DK Payment date: 20240326 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20240426 Year of fee payment: 20 |