EP1577210B1 - Active roll stabilisation system for ships - Google Patents

Active roll stabilisation system for ships Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1577210B1
EP1577210B1 EP05075559A EP05075559A EP1577210B1 EP 1577210 B1 EP1577210 B1 EP 1577210B1 EP 05075559 A EP05075559 A EP 05075559A EP 05075559 A EP05075559 A EP 05075559A EP 1577210 B1 EP1577210 B1 EP 1577210B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
stabilisation
ship
sub
active
stabilisation system
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP05075559A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1577210A1 (en
Inventor
Lambertus J. M. Dinnissen
Mattheus T. Koop
Johannes Ooms
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Quantum Controls BV
Original Assignee
Quantum Controls BV
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Quantum Controls BV filed Critical Quantum Controls BV
Publication of EP1577210A1 publication Critical patent/EP1577210A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1577210B1 publication Critical patent/EP1577210B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B63SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
    • B63BSHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; EQUIPMENT FOR SHIPPING 
    • B63B39/00Equipment to decrease pitch, roll, or like unwanted vessel movements; Apparatus for indicating vessel attitude
    • B63B39/06Equipment to decrease pitch, roll, or like unwanted vessel movements; Apparatus for indicating vessel attitude to decrease vessel movements by using foils acting on ambient water
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B63SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
    • B63BSHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; EQUIPMENT FOR SHIPPING 
    • B63B39/00Equipment to decrease pitch, roll, or like unwanted vessel movements; Apparatus for indicating vessel attitude
    • B63B39/06Equipment to decrease pitch, roll, or like unwanted vessel movements; Apparatus for indicating vessel attitude to decrease vessel movements by using foils acting on ambient water
    • B63B2039/068Equipment to decrease pitch, roll, or like unwanted vessel movements; Apparatus for indicating vessel attitude to decrease vessel movements by using foils acting on ambient water the foils having a variable cross section, e.g. a variable camber

Definitions

  • the invention relates to an active roll stabilisation system for ships, comprising at least one stabilisation element extending below the water line, which is mounted on a rotary shaft that extends through the ship's hull, sensor means for sensing the ship's movements and delivering control signals on the basis thereof to rotation means for rotating the rotary shaft for the purpose of damping the ship's movements that are being sensed by means of the stabilisation element.
  • Such an active roll stabilisation system for ships is known, for example from US patent No. 3,818,959 .
  • it is proposed to impart a reciprocating rotary motion to a fin-like stabilisation element that projects into the water from the ship's hull below the waterline so as to compensate for the rolling motions that the ship undergoes while sailing.
  • the ship is fitted with sensor means, for example angle sensors, speed sensors and acceleration sensors, by means of which the angle, the rate of roll or the roll acceleration are sensed.
  • Control signals are generated on the basis of the data being obtained, which signals control the direction of rotation and the speed of rotation of the stabilisation element via the rotation means.
  • a reaction force acting on the water can be generated by means of said fin-like stabilisation element while sailing, which reaction force imparts a counteracting lifting or torsional moment to the ship, which is to counter the ship's roll, if the stabilisation element is correctly controlled.
  • a drawback of the stabilisation system according to said US patent is the fact that it is fairly static as regards the control thereof and that it can only be used while the ship is sailing.
  • the above-described lifting effect does not occur, or not to a sufficient extent, while the ship is stationary, because there is no functional water movement past the stabilisation elements, and consequently there can be no effective roll stabilisation.
  • the object of the invention is therefore to provide an active roll stabilisation system for ships that can be used both with sailing ships and with ship that are at anchor.
  • the active roll stabilisation system is to that end characterized in that the stabilisation element is provided with a sub-element that is movable with respect to the stabilisation element. This makes it possible to impart an additional lifting moment to the ship via the stabilisation element, both while the ship is sailing and while the ship is at anchor, for the purpose of effectively damping or countering the ship's movements that are being sensed.
  • the sub-element is pivotable about a sub-pivot, whilst the sub-pivot may extend parallel to the rotary shaft.
  • the sub-element may be slidably accommodated in a space formed in the stabilisation element.
  • the sub-element is capable of movement independently of the rotary motion of the stabilisation element.
  • the sub-element may have a curved shape or a wing shape, in a specific embodiment it is made of a flexible material.
  • one embodiment of the active stabilisation system is characterized in that the rotation means comprise at least one piston-cylinder combination, said piston being connected to the rotary shaft. Also other rotation means, such as rotation actuators or an electrical driving mechanism may be used, however.
  • the rotation means comprise two piston-cylinder combinations, each piston being connected on either side of the longitudinal direction of the rotary shaft to a yoke mounted to the shaft end that extends into the ship's hull, Said latter construction provides a more reliable control of the stabilisation element and thus a more functional damping of the ship's movements that are being sensed.
  • drive means are present for driving the sub-element, which drive means are at least partially accommodated in the stabilisation element.
  • the rotary shaft may be of hollow construction, and the drive means may also comprise a hinging drive shaft, that is carried through said hollow, rotary shaft.
  • the drive means comprise a linkage accommodated in the stabilisation element, which linkage is connected to the sub-element on the one hand and to the hinging drive shaft on the other hand.
  • the drive means comprise at least one extension element accommodated in the stabilisation element, which is connected to the sub-element, for extending and retracting the sub-element.
  • the extension element may form part of a spindle driving mechanism of a piston-cylinder combination.
  • the position of the sub-element with respect to the stabilisation element is adjustable in dependence on the speed of movement of the ship.
  • the invention also relates to a method for active roll stabilisation of ship through the use of an active stabilisation system according to the invention, which method comprises the steps of:
  • Fig. 1 shows an active stabilisation device according to the prior art.
  • a ship 1 having a stem 1a and a stern 1b is fitted with an active stabilisation device indicated at 2.
  • This known active stabilisation device 2 for ship's movements as described in US patent No. 3,818,959 is built up of two stabilisation elements 3, which project from the ship 1 on the port side 1' and on the starboard side 1'', respectively, below the water line 5.
  • each stabilisation element 3 is mounted, whether or not by means of a flange 8 (see the partial view of the stabilisation element in Fig. 1 ), to the shaft end 4a of a shaft 4 extending from the ship's hull 1c, which can be rotated by rotation means (not shown).
  • the active stabilisation system 2 is also provided with a sensor means, which sense the ship's movements and more in particular the ship's roll as indicated at 6. On the basis thereof, control signals are delivered to the rotation means (not shown), which rotate the stabilisation elements 3 via the rotary shafts 4 (depending on the stabilisation correction that is to be carried out).
  • the sensor means may consist of angle sensors, roll speed sensors and acceleration sensors, which continuously sense the angle of the ship 1 with respect to the horizontal water surface 5, the speed or the acceleration effected by the rolling motions 6.
  • the active stabilisation system as shown in Fig. 1 is intended for damping ship's movements while the ship is sailing (indicated at 7 in Fig. 1 ).
  • the interaction between the rotating stabilisation element 3 and the water flowing past results in a reaction force or lifting moment opposed to the rolling movement 6 of the ship 1.
  • the rolling movement 6 of the ship 1 can be corrected by means of said lifting moment and the resulting reaction forces.
  • One drawback of the known active stabilisation device 2 is the fact that it can only be used with ships while sailing and to a limited, not very effective degree with ships that are substantially stationary ("at anchor"). It is in particular with the latter group of ships (for example chartered ships that lie at anchor in a bay for prolonged periods of time) that the present invention can be suitably used.
  • Figs. 2A and 2B show two embodiments of stabilisation elements 3 according to the prior art.
  • a fin or stabilisation element 3 projecting under the ship, being rotatable about a shaft 4 is used for effectively damping the ship's roll imparted to the ship 1 by the waves while the ship is sailing.
  • the stabilisation element 3 reciprocates about its axis of rotation 4, a reaction force is generated by the water flowing past while the ship is sailing, which reaction force, provided the movement of the stabilisation element is properly controlled, generates a counteracting moment to counter the ship's roll.
  • the constructional dimensions of the stabilisation element 3 determine the effectiveness of the stabilisation element, i.e. the effect of the stabilisation element moving through the water. More in particular, to obtain a maximum effective stabilisation effect while is sailing, it is desirable to select a maximum ratio between the width and the length of the stabilisation element, the so-called Aspect Ratio (AR). This implies that the width of the stabilisation element must be much greater than the length thereof, as is shown in Fig. 2A , so that the turning moment of the stabilisation element 3 will be small while sailing and the stabilisation element can be quickly reciprocated through the water, using little energy/power.
  • AR Aspect Ratio
  • Fig. 1 As for the time being the stabilisation elements shown in Fig. 1 will be used for stabilising the ship's roll while sailing, considering the current state of the art, it must be attempted to find an optimum Aspect Ratio between the two stabilisation situations (the ship sailing and the ship being stationary).
  • the turning moment of the stabilisation element is determined in part by the distance A (the moment arm) of the centre of pressure C p of the forces that act on the stabilisation element.
  • the distance or arm A between the axis 4 and the centre of pressure C p of a stabilisation element having a high AR is smaller than that of a stabilisation element having a low AR (see Fig. 2B ).
  • the stabilisation element 10 that is shown therein is composed of a main element 11 of elongated shape, which is movable about an axis of rotation 4 with respect to the ship 1 with a first end 11a, similar to the situation that is shown in Fig. 1 .
  • the main axis of rotation 4 and the sub-axis of rotation 13 are spaced some distance apart.
  • the sub-axis of rotation may extend parallel to the main axis of rotation, although this is not necessary.
  • the sub-element 12 can be actively rotated with respect to the main element 11 in one embodiment.
  • the shaft 4 on which the main element 11 is mounted is of hollow construction, and a drive shaft 14 extends through the hollow shaft 4.
  • the rotary shaft 4 and the drive shaft 14 both extend through the ship's hull, being connected in the interior of the ship with, respectively, rotation means (not shown) for rotating the rotary shaft 4 (and the main element 11 and the sub-element 12) and drive means (not shown) for driving the drive shaft 14 that extends through the hollow rotary shaft.
  • the drive shaft 14 is connected with its free end 14' to a transmission 15, which transmits the rotation that is imparted to the drive shaft 14 by the drive means to the free end 13' of the sub-shaft 13.
  • the transmission 15 may consist of a linkage, which transmits the rotation of the drive shaft 14 to the sub-shaft 13 by making use of a lever principle, thus effecting a rotation of the sub-element 12 with respect to the main element 11, independently of the rotation imparted to the main element 11 by the rotary shaft 4.
  • the sub-element 12 is driven independently of the rotary main element 11, it is possible to change the Aspect Ratio (AR) of the stabilisation element 10 in an effective manner in dependence on the desired stabilisation action that the stabilisation element 10 is to carry out in order to oppose or damp the ship's roll while the ship is stationary or while the ship is sailing.
  • AR Aspect Ratio
  • Fig. 6 shows the stabilisation principle of the active stabilisation system according to the invention with a stationary ship 1.
  • a ship 1 undergoes a reciprocating (harmonic) rolling motion about its longitudinal axis 1d with a maximum heel toward port (indicated at 16) and toward starboard (indicated at 18).
  • the heel or inclination of the ship is minimal in the positions indicated at 19 and 17.
  • the ship At the points of maximum heel 16 and 18 (port side 1' and starboard side 1'', respectively), the ship has a rate of roll that equals zero (phase I), whilst the maximum rate of roll during the rolling movement from port 1' to starboard 1'' (from position 16 to position 17 and onwards to position 18) is reached at the point of equilibrium 17 (phase II).
  • the rate of roll of the ship will decrease during the movement of the ship from the point of a equilibrium 17 to the starboard side, until the rate of roll of the ship equals zero again (phase III) at the point of maximum heel of the ship to starboard 1'' (position 18). From said position 18. the ship 1 will roll back to port 1', reaching its maximum rate of roll again at the point of equilibrium 19 (phase IV). This rate of roll will decrease as the ship further heels over to port 1', reaching a value that equals zero (phase I) again at the point of maximum heel 16 to port.
  • the ship 1 is provided with at least one stabilisation device according to the invention both on the port side 1' and on the starboard side 1''.
  • the ship 1 may be provided with more than one stabilisation device on either side thereof.
  • Each stabilisation device comprises a stabilisation element 10' (10'') consisting of a main element 11' (11'') and a sub-element 12' (12'').
  • Fig. 6 shows a stabilisation element 10' (10'') as shown in Figs. 3-5 .
  • One stabilisation device according to the invention can be controlled and activated during the phases I-II-III-IV for damping the ship's roll 6.
  • phase I of the rolling movement 6 of the ship the ship 1 heels over to port 1', which downward movement is offset by an counter moment in upward direction on the port side 1' and by a counter moment in downward direction on the starboard side 1''.
  • a downward rotary motion about axis of rotation 4' in the direction of the bottom of the sea is imparted to the stabilisation element 10 on the port side 1'.
  • the stabilisation element 10 is rotated in upward direction toward the water surface 5 about the axis of rotation 4''.
  • the sub-element 12' (12") is held in line with the main element 11' (11'') during the larger part of the rotary motion during phase I.
  • the stabilisation element 10' (10'') obtains a low AR, which, as already explained before, is the most effective ratio for damping the roll of a stationary ship.
  • the downwardly rotating main element 11' on the port side 1' and the upwardly rotating main element 11'' on the starboard side 1'' displace water in downward (and upward, respectively) direction, resulting in an upward (and downward, respectively) reaction force and counter moment on the ship, as a result of which the downward roll to port is damped.
  • the rotary motion of the main element 11' (11'') is no longer directed downwards (upwards), so that the element no longer displaces water downwards (upwards) in an effective manner.
  • the damping of the ship's roll through rotation of the main element 11' (11'') has "worn off".
  • the sub-element 12' (12'') is rotated further downwards (upwards) via the drive means (not shown), the drive shaft 14 and the transmission 15, so that the sub-element 12' (12'') is no longer in line with the main element 11' (11'') at the end of phase I, but extends at an angle thereto.
  • phase II of the ship's roll 6 the ship 1 rolls about its longitudinal axis 1d towards starboard 1'', with the rate of roll of the ship gradually increasing in the direction of position 17.
  • the weight of the ship generates a turning moment about the longitudinal axis 1d, which moment is so large that a lifting moment generated by the stabilisation elements 10' (10'') will by no means suffice to counter this moment.
  • the sub-element 12' (12'') is returned to an advantageous starting position with respect to the main element 11' (11''), as shown in Fig. 6 , for damping the ship's rolling motion during phase III.
  • phase III The ship's roll toward starboard 1'' (phase III) must be compensated by a downward (upward) movement of the stabilisation element 10' (10'') on the port side 1' and the starboard side 1'', respectively.
  • the sub-element 12' (12'') is held in line with the main element 11' (11'') as much as possible so as to obtain a stabilisation element 10' (10'') having a minimum AR.
  • the stabilisation elements 10' (10'') are capable of "scooping" a maximum amount of water in this position and moving it upwards (downwards), making it possible to generate the most effective reaction force and the resulting lifting moment for opposing the ship's rolling movement toward starboard.
  • phase III the rotary motion of the main element 11' (11'') is no longer directed upwards (downwards), so that water is no longer effectively displaced in upward (downward) direction.
  • the damping of the ship's roll through rotation of the main element 11' (11'') has "worn off".
  • an additional stabilising action can be obtained by imparting an upward (downward) movement to the sub-element 12' (12"), so that the sub-element 12' (12") will take up an angle with respect to the main element 11' (11"), as is shown in Fig. 6 .
  • the ship 1 At the end of phase III, the ship 1 heels over maximally toward starboard 1'' (indicated at 18), after which the ship 1 will roll back toward port 1' during phase IV.
  • the rate of roll of the ship gradually increases while the ship rolls towards position 19, so that the stabilisation elements 10' (10'') will have little effect.
  • the weight of the ship generates a turning moment about the longitudinal axis 1d, which moment is so large that a lifting moment generated by the stabilisation elements 10' (10'') will by no means suffice to counter this moment.
  • phase IV the sub-element 12' (12'') is merely returned to an advantageous starting position with respect to the main element 11' (11''), as shown in Fig 6 , for damping the ship's rolling motion during phase I.
  • the ship's roll is damped or opposed in the manner described above.
  • Figs. 7A and 7B show two other stabilisation principles of the active stabilisation system according to the invention. While Fig. 6 shows the stabilisation principle of the active stabilisation system according to the invention with a stationary ship, Figs, 7A and 7B show the stabilisation principle of the active stabilisation system according to the invention with a sailing ship, with Fig. 7A relating in particular to a ship sailing at low speeds and Fig. 7 relating to the stabilisation principle with the ship sailing at high speed (for example cruising speed).
  • the stabilisation element 10 in the stabilisation principle as shown in Fig. 7A the sub-element 12 is so controlled with respect to the main element 11 that, in particular at low speeds, the stabilisation element 10 (composed of the main element 11 and the sub-element 12) has a maximum damping effect on the roll that the ship undergoes at low speeds as well.
  • the water flowing past is additionally deflected by the adjusted sub-elements 12, as a result of which the so-called lifting action of the water flowing past is enhanced and consequently the reaction force exerted on the water by the stabilisation element 10 for correcting the ship's roll is most effective.
  • a stabilisation element 10 having a low AR value is created.
  • Fig. 7B shows the stabilisation principle of the active stabilisation system according to the invention with a ship sailing at a high speed or cruising speed.
  • the sub-element 12 is to that end controlled in such a manner during operation that it will extend or be oriented more or less parallel to the direction of flow at all times, and consequently does not contribute to the stabilising effect that the stabilisation element 10 can have on the ship's roll.
  • the flow under the ship is oriented altogether different from the direction of travel of the ship.
  • the stabilisation principle or the stabilisation method according to the invention utilizes the speed of the ship 1. Measuring the speed enables the control electronics to determine whether the sub-element 12 must actively contribute towards the damping of the ship's roll ( Fig. 7A ) or whether a position parallel to the water flowing past must be imparted to said sub-element at all times, as in Fig. 7B .
  • Fig. 8 shows another embodiment of a stabilisation element 10 according to the invention.
  • the stabilisation element 10 is built up of a main element 110, which is capable of reciprocating rotating movement about an axis of rotation 40 in dependence on the ship's rolling movements as sensed.
  • the sub-element according to the invention is indicated at 120 in this figure, it can be slidably accommodated in a recess 50 formed in the main element 110 (see partial view (c)).
  • the sub-element 120 is accommodated in fully telescoped position in the space of 50 in the main element 110, so that the stabilisation element 10 thus obtained has a high Aspect Ratio (AR).
  • AR Aspect Ratio
  • Such a stabilisation element has a low turning moment, therefore, which makes it very suitable for use while the ship is sailing.
  • View (b) shows the sub-element 120 in the extended position, as a result of which the stabilisation element of 10 has a low Aspect Ratio (AR). This enables the stabilisation element 10 to "scoop" a large amount of water, which makes it very suitable for damping the roll of a stationary ship.
  • AR Aspect Ratio
  • the sub-element 120 is accommodated in guides (not shown) in the space 50 in order to enable the sub-element 120 to telescope in and out as shown in views (a) and (b).
  • the sub-element 120 can be moved in and out along said guides by suitable drive means 60, for example in the form of piston-cylinder combinations 60a and 60 b, respectively, mounted on either side of the sub-element 120, near each guide.
  • Each piston-cylinder combination 60a-60b comprises a cylinder 62a-62b and a piston 61a-61b connected to the sub-element 120.
  • the piston 61a-61b can be made to carry out a stroke by adding a suitable pressurised medium (air, water or, for example, oil), causing the sub-element 120 to move out of the space 50 along the guides and thus effect a random extension of the main element 110 in dependence on the desired reaction force or lifting moment that the stabilisation element 10 is to generate for damping the ship's roll.
  • a suitable pressurised medium air, water or, for example, oil
  • the drive means may be configured as a (screwed) spindle driving mechanism.
  • the Aspect Ratio of the stabilisation element 10, and consequently also the stabilising counter action of the stabilisation element 10 on the ship's roll, can be adapted in a simple manner by moving the sub-element 120 in and out in a variable manner during the rotary motion of the sub-element 110 about the axis of rotation 4.
  • the active stabilisation system according to the invention provides a more effective stabilisation technique for opposing a ship's rolling movements both while the ship is stationary and while the ship is sailing (at low speed and at high speed).
  • the simple yet robust construction and driving arrangement of the sub-element with respect to the main element enable the active stabilisation system according to the invention to realise a stabilisation effect on the rolling movements being sensed in a quick and simple manner, but above all the system can be adjusted very quickly for stabilising the ship's roll while the ship is sailing at low speed or at high speed or while the ship is stationary.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Ocean & Marine Engineering (AREA)
  • Vibration Prevention Devices (AREA)
  • Control Of Position, Course, Altitude, Or Attitude Of Moving Bodies (AREA)
  • Earth Drilling (AREA)

Abstract

The invention relates to an active roll stabilisation system for ships, comprising at least one stabilisation element (10) extending below the water line, which is mounted on a rotary shaft (4,40) that extends through the ship's hull, sensor means for sensing the ship's movements and delivering control signals on the basis thereof to rotation means for rotating the rotary shaft (4,40) for the purpose of damping the ship's movements that are being sensed by means of the stabilisation element.The object of the invention is to provide an active roll stabilisation system for ships that can be used both with sailing ships and with ship that are at anchor. According to the invention, the active roll stabilisation system is to that end characterized in that the stabilisation element (10) is provided with a sub-element (12,120) that is movable with respect to the stabilisation element. This makes it possible to impart an additional lifting moment to the ship via the stabilisation element (10), both while the ship is sailing and while the ship is at anchor, for the purpose of effectively damping or countering the ship's movements that are being sensed.

Description

  • The invention relates to an active roll stabilisation system for ships, comprising at least one stabilisation element extending below the water line, which is mounted on a rotary shaft that extends through the ship's hull, sensor means for sensing the ship's movements and delivering control signals on the basis thereof to rotation means for rotating the rotary shaft for the purpose of damping the ship's movements that are being sensed by means of the stabilisation element.
  • Such an active roll stabilisation system for ships is known, for example from US patent No. 3,818,959 . In said US patent it is proposed to impart a reciprocating rotary motion to a fin-like stabilisation element that projects into the water from the ship's hull below the waterline so as to compensate for the rolling motions that the ship undergoes while sailing. To that end, the ship is fitted with sensor means, for example angle sensors, speed sensors and acceleration sensors, by means of which the angle, the rate of roll or the roll acceleration are sensed. Control signals are generated on the basis of the data being obtained, which signals control the direction of rotation and the speed of rotation of the stabilisation element via the rotation means.
  • A reaction force acting on the water can be generated by means of said fin-like stabilisation element while sailing, which reaction force imparts a counteracting lifting or torsional moment to the ship, which is to counter the ship's roll, if the stabilisation element is correctly controlled.
  • A drawback of the stabilisation system according to said US patent is the fact that it is fairly static as regards the control thereof and that it can only be used while the ship is sailing. The above-described lifting effect does not occur, or not to a sufficient extent, while the ship is stationary, because there is no functional water movement past the stabilisation elements, and consequently there can be no effective roll stabilisation.
  • The object of the invention is therefore to provide an active roll stabilisation system for ships that can be used both with sailing ships and with ship that are at anchor. According to the invention, the active roll stabilisation system is to that end characterized in that the stabilisation element is provided with a sub-element that is movable with respect to the stabilisation element. This makes it possible to impart an additional lifting moment to the ship via the stabilisation element, both while the ship is sailing and while the ship is at anchor, for the purpose of effectively damping or countering the ship's movements that are being sensed.
  • In a functional embodiment, the sub-element is pivotable about a sub-pivot, whilst the sub-pivot may extend parallel to the rotary shaft. In another effective embodiment, the sub-element may be slidably accommodated in a space formed in the stabilisation element.
  • To achieve a more effective damping of the ship's movements being sensed, the sub-element is capable of movement independently of the rotary motion of the stabilisation element.
  • The sub-element may have a curved shape or a wing shape, in a specific embodiment it is made of a flexible material.
  • According to the invention, one embodiment of the active stabilisation system is characterized in that the rotation means comprise at least one piston-cylinder combination, said piston being connected to the rotary shaft. Also other rotation means, such as rotation actuators or an electrical driving mechanism may be used, however.
  • More specifically, the rotation means comprise two piston-cylinder combinations, each piston being connected on either side of the longitudinal direction of the rotary shaft to a yoke mounted to the shaft end that extends into the ship's hull, Said latter construction provides a more reliable control of the stabilisation element and thus a more functional damping of the ship's movements that are being sensed.
  • In another functional embodiment, drive means are present for driving the sub-element, which drive means are at least partially accommodated in the stabilisation element. The rotary shaft may be of hollow construction, and the drive means may also comprise a hinging drive shaft, that is carried through said hollow, rotary shaft.
  • In another embodiment, on the other hand, the drive means comprise a linkage accommodated in the stabilisation element, which linkage is connected to the sub-element on the one hand and to the hinging drive shaft on the other hand.
  • The above aspects provide a simple, robust yet reliable driving mechanism for the sub-element.
  • In another embodiment, the drive means comprise at least one extension element accommodated in the stabilisation element, which is connected to the sub-element, for extending and retracting the sub-element.
  • The extension element may form part of a spindle driving mechanism of a piston-cylinder combination.
  • More specifically, according to the invention the position of the sub-element with respect to the stabilisation element is adjustable in dependence on the speed of movement of the ship.
  • The invention also relates to a method for active roll stabilisation of ship through the use of an active stabilisation system according to the invention, which method comprises the steps of:
    1. A) sensing the ship's movements
    2. B) delivering control signals on the basis thereof for rotating the rotary shaft for the purpose of
    3. C) damping the ship's movements that are being sensed by means of the stabilisation element. According to the invention, the method is further characterized by the steps of:
    4. D) measuring the speed of the ship in the direction of travel; and
    5. E) adjusting the position of the sub-element with respect to the stabilisation element on the basis of the speed measured in step D).
  • The invention will now be explained in more detail with reference to a drawing, in which:
    • Fig. 1 shows a ship fitted with an active stabilisation system according to the prior art;
    • Figs. 2A and 2B show two embodiments of stabilisation elements according to the prior art;
    • Fig. 3 shows a first embodiment of a stabilisation element according to the invention;
    • Figs. 4 and 5 are detail views of the embodiment that is shown in Fig. 3;
    • Fig. 6 shows the stabilisation principle of the active stabilisation system according to the invention;
    • Figs. 7A and 7B show other possible stabilisation principles of the active stabilisation system according to the invention;
    • Fig. 8 shows a second embodiment of a stabilisation element according to the invention.
  • For easy reference, like parts will be indicated by the same numerals in the description of the figures below.
  • Fig. 1 shows an active stabilisation device according to the prior art. A ship 1 having a stem 1a and a stern 1b is fitted with an active stabilisation device indicated at 2. This known active stabilisation device 2 for ship's movements as described in US patent No. 3,818,959 is built up of two stabilisation elements 3, which project from the ship 1 on the port side 1' and on the starboard side 1'', respectively, below the water line 5.
  • To that end, each stabilisation element 3 is mounted, whether or not by means of a flange 8 (see the partial view of the stabilisation element in Fig. 1), to the shaft end 4a of a shaft 4 extending from the ship's hull 1c, which can be rotated by rotation means (not shown).
  • Although this is not shown in the drawing, the active stabilisation system 2 according to the prior art is also provided with a sensor means, which sense the ship's movements and more in particular the ship's roll as indicated at 6. On the basis thereof, control signals are delivered to the rotation means (not shown), which rotate the stabilisation elements 3 via the rotary shafts 4 (depending on the stabilisation correction that is to be carried out). The sensor means may consist of angle sensors, roll speed sensors and acceleration sensors, which continuously sense the angle of the ship 1 with respect to the horizontal water surface 5, the speed or the acceleration effected by the rolling motions 6.
  • The active stabilisation system as shown in Fig. 1 is intended for damping ship's movements while the ship is sailing (indicated at 7 in Fig. 1). The interaction between the rotating stabilisation element 3 and the water flowing past results in a reaction force or lifting moment opposed to the rolling movement 6 of the ship 1. The rolling movement 6 of the ship 1 can be corrected by means of said lifting moment and the resulting reaction forces.
  • One drawback of the known active stabilisation device 2 is the fact that it can only be used with ships while sailing and to a limited, not very effective degree with ships that are substantially stationary ("at anchor"). It is in particular with the latter group of ships (for example chartered ships that lie at anchor in a bay for prolonged periods of time) that the present invention can be suitably used.
  • Figs. 2A and 2B show two embodiments of stabilisation elements 3 according to the prior art. As already explained with reference to Fig. 1, a fin or stabilisation element 3 projecting under the ship, being rotatable about a shaft 4, is used for effectively damping the ship's roll imparted to the ship 1 by the waves while the ship is sailing. As the stabilisation element 3 reciprocates about its axis of rotation 4, a reaction force is generated by the water flowing past while the ship is sailing, which reaction force, provided the movement of the stabilisation element is properly controlled, generates a counteracting moment to counter the ship's roll.
  • The constructional dimensions of the stabilisation element 3 determine the effectiveness of the stabilisation element, i.e. the effect of the stabilisation element moving through the water. More in particular, to obtain a maximum effective stabilisation effect while is sailing, it is desirable to select a maximum ratio between the width and the length of the stabilisation element, the so-called Aspect Ratio (AR). This implies that the width of the stabilisation element must be much greater than the length thereof, as is shown in Fig. 2A, so that the turning moment of the stabilisation element 3 will be small while sailing and the stabilisation element can be quickly reciprocated through the water, using little energy/power.
  • While the ship is stationary, the interaction between the stabilisation element and the water flowing past (while sailing) is absent, so that the counteracting lifting moment does not occur. It is desirable, therefore, to select a minimum value for the Aspect Ratio between the width and the length of the stabilisation element while the ship is stationary. This means that the length of the stabilisation element must be much greater than the width thereof, as is shown in Fig. 2B. During stabilisation, as much water as possible is "scooped" or moved during the movement of the stabilisation element 3 through the water, thus generating a counteracting lifting moment.
  • The Aspect Ratio (AR) of a stabilisation element according to the prior art is defined by: AR = S C r + C t 2
    Figure imgb0001
    wherein;
    • AR = the Aspect Ratio
    • S = the width of the stabilisation element
    • Ct = the smallest length of the stabilisation element
    • Cr = the greatest length of the stabilisation element
  • As for the time being the stabilisation elements shown in Fig. 1 will be used for stabilising the ship's roll while sailing, considering the current state of the art, it must be attempted to find an optimum Aspect Ratio between the two stabilisation situations (the ship sailing and the ship being stationary).
  • From a viewpoint of effectiveness it is desirable to use a stabilisation element 3 having a high AR ratio while sailing, whereas a stabilisation element 3 having a low AR is preferred while the ship is stationary. This can be explained by the fact that the moment required for turning or rotating the stabilisation element about the shaft 4 is higher in the case of a stabilisation element having a high AR than in the case of a stabilisation element 3 having a low AR.
  • The turning moment of the stabilisation element is determined in part by the distance A (the moment arm) of the centre of pressure Cp of the forces that act on the stabilisation element. The distance or arm A between the axis 4 and the centre of pressure Cp of a stabilisation element having a high AR (see Fig. 2A) is smaller than that of a stabilisation element having a low AR (see Fig. 2B).
  • From a viewpoint of functionality it is desirable, therefore, to design a stabilisation element that can be used both while the ship is sailing and while the ship is stationary.
  • One embodiment of such a stabilisation element is shown in Fig. 3. The stabilisation element 10 that is shown therein is composed of a main element 11 of elongated shape, which is movable about an axis of rotation 4 with respect to the ship 1 with a first end 11a, similar to the situation that is shown in Fig. 1.
  • As is clearly shown in Fig. 3, the main axis of rotation 4 and the sub-axis of rotation 13 are spaced some distance apart. The sub-axis of rotation may extend parallel to the main axis of rotation, although this is not necessary. Using the sub-element 12, it is possible to effectively adapt the constructional dimensions of the stabilisation element 10 to the stabilisation situation in which the stabilisation element 10 is to be used.
  • As is shown in Figs. 4 and 5, the sub-element 12 can be actively rotated with respect to the main element 11 in one embodiment. To that end, the shaft 4 on which the main element 11 is mounted is of hollow construction, and a drive shaft 14 extends through the hollow shaft 4. The rotary shaft 4 and the drive shaft 14 both extend through the ship's hull, being connected in the interior of the ship with, respectively, rotation means (not shown) for rotating the rotary shaft 4 (and the main element 11 and the sub-element 12) and drive means (not shown) for driving the drive shaft 14 that extends through the hollow rotary shaft.
  • The drive shaft 14 is connected with its free end 14' to a transmission 15, which transmits the rotation that is imparted to the drive shaft 14 by the drive means to the free end 13' of the sub-shaft 13. As is shown in the partial views (a)-(d) of Fig. 4, the transmission 15 may consist of a linkage, which transmits the rotation of the drive shaft 14 to the sub-shaft 13 by making use of a lever principle, thus effecting a rotation of the sub-element 12 with respect to the main element 11, independently of the rotation imparted to the main element 11 by the rotary shaft 4.
  • Since the sub-element 12 is driven independently of the rotary main element 11, it is possible to change the Aspect Ratio (AR) of the stabilisation element 10 in an effective manner in dependence on the desired stabilisation action that the stabilisation element 10 is to carry out in order to oppose or damp the ship's roll while the ship is stationary or while the ship is sailing.
  • Fig. 6 shows the stabilisation principle of the active stabilisation system according to the invention with a stationary ship 1.
  • As a result of the wave motion, a ship 1 undergoes a reciprocating (harmonic) rolling motion about its longitudinal axis 1d with a maximum heel toward port (indicated at 16) and toward starboard (indicated at 18). The heel or inclination of the ship is minimal in the positions indicated at 19 and 17. At the points of maximum heel 16 and 18 (port side 1' and starboard side 1'', respectively), the ship has a rate of roll that equals zero (phase I), whilst the maximum rate of roll during the rolling movement from port 1' to starboard 1'' (from position 16 to position 17 and onwards to position 18) is reached at the point of equilibrium 17 (phase II).
  • The rate of roll of the ship will decrease during the movement of the ship from the point of a equilibrium 17 to the starboard side, until the rate of roll of the ship equals zero again (phase III) at the point of maximum heel of the ship to starboard 1'' (position 18). From said position 18. the ship 1 will roll back to port 1', reaching its maximum rate of roll again at the point of equilibrium 19 (phase IV). This rate of roll will decrease as the ship further heels over to port 1', reaching a value that equals zero (phase I) again at the point of maximum heel 16 to port.
  • The ship 1 is provided with at least one stabilisation device according to the invention both on the port side 1' and on the starboard side 1''. Alternatively, the ship 1 may be provided with more than one stabilisation device on either side thereof. Each stabilisation device comprises a stabilisation element 10' (10'') consisting of a main element 11' (11'') and a sub-element 12' (12''). Fig. 6 shows a stabilisation element 10' (10'') as shown in Figs. 3-5.
  • One stabilisation device according to the invention, or both, can be controlled and activated during the phases I-II-III-IV for damping the ship's roll 6.
  • During phase I of the rolling movement 6 of the ship, the ship 1 heels over to port 1', which downward movement is offset by an counter moment in upward direction on the port side 1' and by a counter moment in downward direction on the starboard side 1''. To that end, a downward rotary motion about axis of rotation 4' in the direction of the bottom of the sea is imparted to the stabilisation element 10 on the port side 1'. On the starboard side 1'', the stabilisation element 10 is rotated in upward direction toward the water surface 5 about the axis of rotation 4''.
  • The sub-element 12' (12") is held in line with the main element 11' (11'') during the larger part of the rotary motion during phase I. The stabilisation element 10' (10'') obtains a low AR, which, as already explained before, is the most effective ratio for damping the roll of a stationary ship. The downwardly rotating main element 11' on the port side 1' and the upwardly rotating main element 11'' on the starboard side 1'' displace water in downward (and upward, respectively) direction, resulting in an upward (and downward, respectively) reaction force and counter moment on the ship, as a result of which the downward roll to port is damped.
  • At the end of phase I, the rotary motion of the main element 11' (11'') is no longer directed downwards (upwards), so that the element no longer displaces water downwards (upwards) in an effective manner. The damping of the ship's roll through rotation of the main element 11' (11'') has "worn off". To be able to damp the ship's rolling movement at the end of phase I yet, the sub-element 12' (12'') is rotated further downwards (upwards) via the drive means (not shown), the drive shaft 14 and the transmission 15, so that the sub-element 12' (12'') is no longer in line with the main element 11' (11'') at the end of phase I, but extends at an angle thereto.
  • An additional downward (upward) counterforce is exerted on the water by the moving sub-element 12' (12''), which makes it possible to additionally damp the downward roll of the ship to port.
  • While the main element 11' (11'') is at the end of its downward (upward) stroke at the end of phase I, and consequently is no longer able to generate an effective counter moment for damping the ship's roll. such an effective counter moment can on the other hand be generated by means of the sub-element 12' (12'').
  • During phase II of the ship's roll 6, the ship 1 rolls about its longitudinal axis 1d towards starboard 1'', with the rate of roll of the ship gradually increasing in the direction of position 17. During phase II, the weight of the ship generates a turning moment about the longitudinal axis 1d, which moment is so large that a lifting moment generated by the stabilisation elements 10' (10'') will by no means suffice to counter this moment. During phase II, the sub-element 12' (12'') is returned to an advantageous starting position with respect to the main element 11' (11''), as shown in Fig. 6, for damping the ship's rolling motion during phase III.
  • The ship's roll toward starboard 1'' (phase III) must be compensated by a downward (upward) movement of the stabilisation element 10' (10'') on the port side 1' and the starboard side 1'', respectively. To achieve the most effective stabilisation, the sub-element 12' (12'') is held in line with the main element 11' (11'') as much as possible so as to obtain a stabilisation element 10' (10'') having a minimum AR. During phase III, the stabilisation elements 10' (10'') are capable of "scooping" a maximum amount of water in this position and moving it upwards (downwards), making it possible to generate the most effective reaction force and the resulting lifting moment for opposing the ship's rolling movement toward starboard.
  • At the end of phase III, the rotary motion of the main element 11' (11'') is no longer directed upwards (downwards), so that water is no longer effectively displaced in upward (downward) direction. The damping of the ship's roll through rotation of the main element 11' (11'') has "worn off". Analogously to the description of phase I, an additional stabilising action can be obtained by imparting an upward (downward) movement to the sub-element 12' (12"), so that the sub-element 12' (12") will take up an angle with respect to the main element 11' (11"), as is shown in Fig. 6.
  • At the end of phase III, the ship 1 heels over maximally toward starboard 1'' (indicated at 18), after which the ship 1 will roll back toward port 1' during phase IV. The rate of roll of the ship gradually increases while the ship rolls towards position 19, so that the stabilisation elements 10' (10'') will have little effect. The weight of the ship generates a turning moment about the longitudinal axis 1d, which moment is so large that a lifting moment generated by the stabilisation elements 10' (10'') will by no means suffice to counter this moment.
  • During phase IV, the sub-element 12' (12'') is merely returned to an advantageous starting position with respect to the main element 11' (11''), as shown in Fig 6, for damping the ship's rolling motion during phase I. During phase I, the ship's roll is damped or opposed in the manner described above.
  • Figs. 7A and 7B show two other stabilisation principles of the active stabilisation system according to the invention. While Fig. 6 shows the stabilisation principle of the active stabilisation system according to the invention with a stationary ship, Figs, 7A and 7B show the stabilisation principle of the active stabilisation system according to the invention with a sailing ship, with Fig. 7A relating in particular to a ship sailing at low speeds and Fig. 7 relating to the stabilisation principle with the ship sailing at high speed (for example cruising speed).
  • Referring to that which is shown in Figs. 2A and 2B, in the stabilisation principle as shown in Fig. 7A the sub-element 12 is so controlled with respect to the main element 11 that, in particular at low speeds, the stabilisation element 10 (composed of the main element 11 and the sub-element 12) has a maximum damping effect on the roll that the ship undergoes at low speeds as well. The water flowing past is additionally deflected by the adjusted sub-elements 12, as a result of which the so-called lifting action of the water flowing past is enhanced and consequently the reaction force exerted on the water by the stabilisation element 10 for correcting the ship's roll is most effective. Especially at low speeds, a stabilisation element 10 having a low AR value is created.
  • Fig. 7B, on the other hand, shows the stabilisation principle of the active stabilisation system according to the invention with a ship sailing at a high speed or cruising speed. To generate a minimum moment in order to enable quick rotation of the stabilisation element 10 about the axis of rotation 4, using little energy/power, it is desirable to realise a stabilisation element 10 having a high AR value at high speeds. The sub-element 12 is to that end controlled in such a manner during operation that it will extend or be oriented more or less parallel to the direction of flow at all times, and consequently does not contribute to the stabilising effect that the stabilisation element 10 can have on the ship's roll. In some cases, the flow under the ship is oriented altogether different from the direction of travel of the ship.
  • In this operating condition (Fig. 7B), only the main element 11 contributes towards the creation of a reaction force on the water for the purpose of opposing or damping the ship's roll.
  • The stabilisation principle or the stabilisation method according to the invention utilizes the speed of the ship 1. Measuring the speed enables the control electronics to determine whether the sub-element 12 must actively contribute towards the damping of the ship's roll (Fig. 7A) or whether a position parallel to the water flowing past must be imparted to said sub-element at all times, as in Fig. 7B.
  • Fig. 8 shows another embodiment of a stabilisation element 10 according to the invention. Also in this case, the stabilisation element 10 is built up of a main element 110, which is capable of reciprocating rotating movement about an axis of rotation 40 in dependence on the ship's rolling movements as sensed. The sub-element according to the invention is indicated at 120 in this figure, it can be slidably accommodated in a recess 50 formed in the main element 110 (see partial view (c)).
  • In view (a) of Fig. 8, the sub-element 120 is accommodated in fully telescoped position in the space of 50 in the main element 110, so that the stabilisation element 10 thus obtained has a high Aspect Ratio (AR). Such a stabilisation element has a low turning moment, therefore, which makes it very suitable for use while the ship is sailing.
  • View (b) shows the sub-element 120 in the extended position, as a result of which the stabilisation element of 10 has a low Aspect Ratio (AR). This enables the stabilisation element 10 to "scoop" a large amount of water, which makes it very suitable for damping the roll of a stationary ship.
  • The sub-element 120 is accommodated in guides (not shown) in the space 50 in order to enable the sub-element 120 to telescope in and out as shown in views (a) and (b). The sub-element 120 can be moved in and out along said guides by suitable drive means 60, for example in the form of piston-cylinder combinations 60a and 60 b, respectively, mounted on either side of the sub-element 120, near each guide.
  • Each piston-cylinder combination 60a-60b comprises a cylinder 62a-62b and a piston 61a-61b connected to the sub-element 120. The piston 61a-61b can be made to carry out a stroke by adding a suitable pressurised medium (air, water or, for example, oil), causing the sub-element 120 to move out of the space 50 along the guides and thus effect a random extension of the main element 110 in dependence on the desired reaction force or lifting moment that the stabilisation element 10 is to generate for damping the ship's roll.
  • In another embodiment, the drive means may be configured as a (screwed) spindle driving mechanism.
  • Thus the Aspect Ratio of the stabilisation element 10, and consequently also the stabilising counter action of the stabilisation element 10 on the ship's roll, can be adapted in a simple manner by moving the sub-element 120 in and out in a variable manner during the rotary motion of the sub-element 110 about the axis of rotation 4.
  • It will be apparent that the active stabilisation system according to the invention provides a more effective stabilisation technique for opposing a ship's rolling movements both while the ship is stationary and while the ship is sailing (at low speed and at high speed). The simple yet robust construction and driving arrangement of the sub-element with respect to the main element enable the active stabilisation system according to the invention to realise a stabilisation effect on the rolling movements being sensed in a quick and simple manner, but above all the system can be adjusted very quickly for stabilising the ship's roll while the ship is sailing at low speed or at high speed or while the ship is stationary.

Claims (19)

  1. An active roll stabilisation system (2) for ships (1), comprising at least
    - one stabilisation element (3; 11; 110) extending below the water line (5), which is mounted on a rotary shaft (4; 40) that extends through the ship's hull (1c),
    - sensor means for sensing the ship's movements and delivering control signals on the basis thereof to
    - rotation means for rotating the rotary shaft for the purpose of damping the ship's movements that are being sensed by means of the stabilisation element, characterized in that the stabilisation element is provided with a sub-element (12; 120) that is movable with respect to the rotating stabilisation element thereby imparting an additional lifting moment to the ship via the stabilisation element for the purpose of damping the ship's movements that are being sensed.
  2. An active stabilisation system according to claim 1, characterized in that said sub-element (12) is pivotable about a sub-shaft (13).
  3. An active stabilisation system according to claim 2, characterized in that the sub-pivot (13) extends parallel to the rotary shaft (4).
  4. An active stabilisation system according to claim 1, characterized in that the sub-element (120) is slidably accommodated in a space (50) formed in the stabilisation element (110).
  5. An active stabilisation system according to any one or more of the preceding claims, characterized in that the sub-element (12; 120) is capable of movement independently of the rotary movement of the stabilisation element (11; 110).
  6. An active stabilisation system according to any one or more of the preceding claims, characterized in that the sub-element has a curved shape.
  7. An active stabilisation system according to any one or more of the preceding claims, characterized in that the sub-element has a wing shape.
  8. An active stabilisation system according to any one or more of the preceding claims, characterized in that the sub-element is made of a flexible material.
  9. An active stabilisation system according to any one or more of the preceding claims, characterized in that the rotation means comprise at least one piston-cylinder combination, said piston being connected to the rotary shaft.
  10. An active stabilisation system according to claim 9, characterized in that the rotation means comprise two piston-cylinder combinations, each piston being connected on either side of the longitudinal direction of the rotary shaft to a yoke mounted to the shaft end that extends into the ship's hull.
  11. An active stabilisation system according to any one or more of the preceding claims, characterized in that drive means are present for driving the sub-element, which drive means are at least partially accommodated in the stabilisation element.
  12. An active stabilisation system according to claim 11, characterized in that the rotary shaft is of hollow construction, and the drive means also comprise a drive shaft that is carried through said hollow, rotary shaft.
  13. An active stabilisation system according to claim 12, characterized in that the drive means comprise a linkage accommodated in the stabilisation element, which linkage is connected to the sub-element on the one hand and to the drive shaft on the other hand.
  14. An active stabilisation system according to claim 11, characterized in that the drive means comprise at least one extension element accommodated in the stabilisation element, which is connected to the sub-element, for extending and retracting the sub-element.
  15. An active stabilisation system according to claim 14, characterized in that said extension element forms part of a spindle driving mechanism.
  16. An active stabilisation system according to claim 14, characterized in that said extension element forms part of a piston-cylinder combination.
  17. An active stabilisation system according to any one or more of the preceding claims, characterized in that the position of the sub-element with respect to the stabilisation element is adjustable in dependence on the speed of movement of the ship.
  18. A ship provided with an active stabilisation system according to any one or more of the preceding claims.
  19. A method for active roll stabilisation of ship through the use of an active stabilisation system according to one of the claims 1 to 17, which method comprises the steps of:
    A) sensing the ship's movements
    B) delivering control signals on the basis thereof for rotating the rotary shaft for the purpose of
    C) damping the ship's movements that are being sensed by means of the stabilisation element, the method being further characterized by the steps of:
    D) measuring the speed of the ship in the direction of travel; and
    E) adjusting the position of the sub-element with respect to the stabilisation element on the basis of the speed measured in step D) as part of the stabilisation action.
EP05075559A 2004-03-16 2005-03-08 Active roll stabilisation system for ships Active EP1577210B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
NL1025733A NL1025733C1 (en) 2004-03-16 2004-03-16 Active pendulum damping system for ship movements.
NL1025733 2004-03-16

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1577210A1 EP1577210A1 (en) 2005-09-21
EP1577210B1 true EP1577210B1 (en) 2008-02-27

Family

ID=34836859

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP05075559A Active EP1577210B1 (en) 2004-03-16 2005-03-08 Active roll stabilisation system for ships

Country Status (6)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1577210B1 (en)
AT (1) ATE387376T1 (en)
DE (1) DE602005004944T2 (en)
DK (1) DK1577210T3 (en)
ES (1) ES2299947T3 (en)
NL (1) NL1025733C1 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101879935A (en) * 2010-06-25 2010-11-10 哈尔滨工程大学 Drag-reducing device of anti-rolling fin of ship wing flap
DE102011005313B3 (en) * 2011-03-09 2012-05-31 Blohm + Voss Industries Gmbh Fin device for stabilizing water vehicle, particularly ship, has main fin element drivable by drive device and tail fin element movably placed at main fin element
US10077098B2 (en) 2012-05-31 2018-09-18 Cmc Marine S.R.L. Control method for anti-roll stabilization of watercraft, and corresponding stabilization system and computer program product

Families Citing this family (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
ITTO20080725A1 (en) 2008-10-02 2010-04-03 Cmc S R L ANTI-ROLLIO AUTOMATIC STABILIZATION SYSTEM FOR BOATS
US8534211B2 (en) 2009-09-18 2013-09-17 Naiad Maritime Group, Inc. Variable geometry fin
CN105121272B (en) 2013-04-18 2017-06-23 罗尼·斯考恩 Stabilizer and active systems stabilisation for ship
DE102014217227A1 (en) 2014-08-28 2016-03-03 Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. (DLR) Fin stabilizer and watercraft
EP3507189B1 (en) 2016-09-02 2023-12-13 Sleipner Motor AS Stabilizer fin for a watercraft
IT201600094283A1 (en) 2016-09-20 2016-12-20 Psc Eng S R L Procedure for controlling the rolling and / or pitching motion of a boat at no or low vessel speed

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB893054A (en) * 1960-02-11 1962-04-04 Doak Aircraft Company Inc A controllably articulatable vane
GB922977A (en) * 1961-06-28 1963-04-03 Arthur Paul Pedrick Anti-roll ship stabiliser
US3818959A (en) * 1973-02-09 1974-06-25 E Larsh Ship stabilizer fin
WO1987002641A1 (en) * 1985-11-01 1987-05-07 Lockheed Missiles & Space Company, Inc. High-speed semisubmerged ship maneuvering system
US4777899A (en) * 1987-03-20 1988-10-18 Van Dusen & Meyer Hydraulically actuated fin stabilizer system
FR2736888B1 (en) * 1995-07-21 1997-09-26 Havre Chantiers ANTI-TANGAGE STABILIZATION DEVICE FOR VESSELS

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101879935A (en) * 2010-06-25 2010-11-10 哈尔滨工程大学 Drag-reducing device of anti-rolling fin of ship wing flap
DE102011005313B3 (en) * 2011-03-09 2012-05-31 Blohm + Voss Industries Gmbh Fin device for stabilizing water vehicle, particularly ship, has main fin element drivable by drive device and tail fin element movably placed at main fin element
US10077098B2 (en) 2012-05-31 2018-09-18 Cmc Marine S.R.L. Control method for anti-roll stabilization of watercraft, and corresponding stabilization system and computer program product

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
ES2299947T3 (en) 2008-06-01
EP1577210A1 (en) 2005-09-21
DK1577210T3 (en) 2008-06-16
ATE387376T1 (en) 2008-03-15
DE602005004944T2 (en) 2009-03-19
DE602005004944D1 (en) 2008-04-10
NL1025733C1 (en) 2005-09-19

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7451715B2 (en) Active roll stabilisation system for ships
EP1577210B1 (en) Active roll stabilisation system for ships
US8468964B2 (en) Methods and arrangements for redirecting thrust from a propeller
US4261278A (en) Gyro-controlled pitch stabilizing system
JP6820274B2 (en) Boat with adjustable and stabilizing devices
CN108313232B (en) Combined ship stabilizing device based on two-dimensional vector propeller and moving weight
US10370069B2 (en) Multifunctional system for damping a ship's motion
EP2910463A1 (en) Method for actively damping a ship's motion as well as such an active roll stabilisation system
EP2277771A1 (en) Active roll stabilisation system for ships
WO1996020105A1 (en) Means and method for dynamic trim of a fast, planing or semi-planing boathull
NO338013B1 (en) Dynamic stabilizer for an underwater vessel
DK201470079A1 (en) A method of operating a boat
JP2023548724A (en) System and method for controlling motion compensated pile guides for floating ships and ships
US5988097A (en) Watercraft stabilized by controlled hydrofoil elevation
AU2021100933A4 (en) Marine vessel fender and control system
KR101225115B1 (en) Fin stabilizer of ship with thruster
KR20240032439A (en) Shaft generatior system of ship
KR20230156309A (en) Ship vibration damper system
US10363999B2 (en) Active roll stabilisation system for damping a ship's motion
CN113039121B (en) Method and system for tail fin driving
WO2009083892A2 (en) Device for stabilising the rolling motion of boats.
JP2004009949A (en) Blade angle detecting device in marine propulsion apparatus
JP2012096774A (en) Trimaran ship with roll-reducing function
RU72456U1 (en) WALKING SHIP
KR100292094B1 (en) An anti capsizing device for fishing boat

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA HR LV MK YU

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20060321

AKX Designation fees paid

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: DINNISSEN, LAMBERTUS J. M.

Inventor name: OOMS, JOHANNES

Inventor name: KOOP, MATTHEUS T.

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 602005004944

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20080410

Kind code of ref document: P

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2299947

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DK

Ref legal event code: T3

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080627

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080227

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080227

ET Fr: translation filed
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080227

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080227

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080227

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080227

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080527

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080227

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080721

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20080331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080227

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080227

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20080310

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080227

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20081128

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080527

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080227

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090331

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080828

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20080308

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080528

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 12

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 13

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 14

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230527

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20240320

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20240320

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20240320

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Payment date: 20240301

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20240329

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20240321

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: DK

Payment date: 20240326

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20240426

Year of fee payment: 20