EP1576506A2 - Logiciel de modelisation d'emboutissage - Google Patents

Logiciel de modelisation d'emboutissage

Info

Publication number
EP1576506A2
EP1576506A2 EP03796141A EP03796141A EP1576506A2 EP 1576506 A2 EP1576506 A2 EP 1576506A2 EP 03796141 A EP03796141 A EP 03796141A EP 03796141 A EP03796141 A EP 03796141A EP 1576506 A2 EP1576506 A2 EP 1576506A2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
digital
collection
stamping
blank
specific
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP03796141A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
French (fr)
Inventor
Fayçal MEHREZ
Fouad El Khaldi
Christian Ahouangonou
Pierre Viossat
Caroline Borot
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
ESI Group SA
Original Assignee
ESI Group SA
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by ESI Group SA filed Critical ESI Group SA
Publication of EP1576506A2 publication Critical patent/EP1576506A2/fr
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F30/00Computer-aided design [CAD]
    • G06F30/20Design optimisation, verification or simulation
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F2111/00Details relating to CAD techniques
    • G06F2111/10Numerical modelling

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to the field of software for simulating physical phenomena.
  • the present invention relates more particularly to software for simulating stamping.
  • a first embodiment includes minimizing the discontinuities generated by the discharge by determining a voltage increment of a sample point in the mesh of the metal sheet in accordance with an incremental theory of plasticity about deformation.
  • a second embodiment includes modeling a pull rod as a plurality of non-linear elastic sources to minimize discontinuities in the elasticity force during discharge.
  • a third embodiment includes the filtering of a relative velocity vector of at least one contact node with respect to the useful surface of the punch, so as to avoid oscillations of friction forces due to the change of direction of the relative velocity vector during stamping of the part.
  • the prior art also knows, from American patent application US 5552995 (The Trustées of the Stevens Institute of Technology), a computer-based design system for designing a part, a tool for manufacturing the part and a process for manufacturing the room.
  • the design system has a processor and memory.
  • the memory stores patterns of functions, each pattern of function being a representation of a primitive object having a form and a function.
  • Each function pattern is indexed by the function of the primitive object and includes a representation of the primitive geometric entity having the form of the primitive object.
  • Each function pattern can include information relating to a tool for manufacturing the primitive object or to a process for manufacturing the primitive object.
  • the design system also includes an input device for receiving a request to design the part. This request includes one or more predetermined function (s) that the part performs.
  • a design core module executable by the processor, designs the part, the tool for manufacturing the part and the process for manufacturing the part by accessing the plurality of function patterns in the memory for locating one or more object (s) ) primitive (s) to perform the predetermined function (s).
  • a stamping tool is provided for manipulating a model on a computer, including mechanisms to allow a user to define a stamping tool to create a stamping function of the model. Characteristics of the stamping tool can be defined in such a way so that the stamping tool can be reused without having to redefine its characteristics.
  • the prior art also knows a solution for the design of a manufacturing process comprising stages of representation of a work piece as a plurality of triangular finite elements, of representation of stamping tools with mathematical equations which typically include cubic polynomials, simulating deformation of the workpiece by stamping tools with a finite element model, the finite element model being explicitly integrated.
  • the method can be implemented by an apparatus which includes a memory device which stores a program comprising instructions readable by a computer, and a processor which executes the instructions.
  • stamping simulation software of the prior art has the disadvantage of being limited for some as to the possibility of defining in a fine way the type of stamping process, and for others , more configurable, the disadvantage seen from the point of view of the end user, of being long and complex to implement taking into account the importance of the configuration.
  • the present invention intends to remedy the drawbacks of the prior art by proposing a system which allows the user to define his own models. of a stamping process and which allows this same user or another, once a stamping process model defined, to no longer have to make only a limited number of settings for the process model stamping considered.
  • Meta-models are defined to generate dialogs dedicated to the specific press of a given user.
  • the invention relates in its most general sense to a method of numerically simulating a stamping process comprising the steps consisting in:
  • the selection step modifies the state of the elementary constituents which are not relevant with regard to the constituents selected.
  • the method comprises a step of loading from an external information medium at least part of the configuration information from the collection.
  • the method comprises a step of loading from an external information medium of the blank model.
  • the method includes a step of loading from an external information medium the digital representation of said subset.
  • the step of constituting the specific collection is carried out via the display of a graphical interface and the recording of the information entered from said graphical interface.
  • the step of displaying a graphical interface comprises an operation for personalizing a pre-recorded interface, this personalization taking into account at least in part the information coming from the previous stages of the process.
  • several levels of use are defined, one of the levels of use, of supervision, requiring a common generic configuration defining in large part the stamping process concerned and the other levels of use, basic, not requiring more than a partial, complementary and specific configuration benefiting from the configuration previously carried out of the supervision level.
  • FIG. 1 represents the progress of the process in accordance with the invention
  • FIG. 2 represents the constitution and the processing of the meta-model in the form of a computer file
  • Figure 3 shows the application as seen by the supervisor
  • FIG. 4 shows the application as seen by the end user.
  • stamping process includes tools and features.
  • attribute means a physical and numerical characteristic. The deformation is often called “shaping” by one skilled in the art.
  • the meta-model has the structure of a computer file, which constitutes a major part of the project. As described in Figure 2, this meta-model is constituted by the supervisor. The latter therefore partially completes the project, and leaves fields that the end user will fill in by means of a graphical interface. The set consisting of the meta-model and the data provided by the end user, thus constituting a complete project, is thus created and will be processed by the "solver".
  • the supervisor chooses whether or not to let the end user fill in a given parameter. When a parameter is requested from the end user, a default value for this parameter is often provided by the supervisor.
  • the object of the invention is to allow users to define most of the stamping modeling process themselves.
  • the concept of macro-commands is divided into two distinct stages:
  • the “supervisor” is the person who creates the graphical interface representing the macro-command, the steps, the process diagram, the tool groups, the attributes of the default process and the attributes that will be requested from the user. final (as shown in Figure 3).
  • the “end user” is the person who uses the macro-command defined by the supervisor, by entering the following parameters (as shown in Figure 4): link between the groups and the mesh objects, parameters which can be modified for each drawing project (clamping force, drawing speed, friction ).
  • the "group” is a specific type of object: blank, greenhouse blank, matrix, punch ...
  • a group is defined by its representation in the diagram and by kinds of specific attributes directly accessible in the context of groups.
  • a group corresponds to an object (a component of the press) seen by the end user.
  • the attribute is the value corresponding to a property of a group (and therefore to objects) This can be a friction, a direction, a 2D curve ...
  • a step is a period of time during which each object has a single kind of kinematics: movement, force.
  • the entire simulation process should be divided into different stages, in accordance with the behavior of each group.
  • Each group is active, or non-active, during each stage. If a group is not active during a step, its entities (nodes, elements, 3D curves) will not be taken into account by the solver during the processing of this step.
  • a “parameter” is a value which is common to different groups and / or which can be requested from the user when he wishes to apply the macro-command. This can be a floating value (friction, thickness), a direction, a material property, an integer value (level of fineness, number of points), a 2D curve.
  • a macro command must be created by a user called supervisor within the application.
  • the supervisor does not need to load the project.
  • a user loads a pre-process module of a project, he needs to prepare the objects and the meshes necessary for the process. He then accesses a button on the macro command toolbar, chooses the macro command he wishes to execute, sets the “end user parameters” proposed by the corresponding dialog box and clicks on the “ Apply »
  • a graphic window is used to manage the creation, copying and deletion functions relating to macro-commands.
  • First three frames (“blank”, “tools” and “parameters”) contain data that will be active during the entire processing: the material attributes of the blank, the list of groups corresponding to the tools (with group name, color , material and thickness) and the list of end user parameters.
  • the list of parameters contains parameters which have two objectives: the first is, for the supervisor, to locate in a remote place a value which will be used by one or more attribute (s) of groups (for example tool / blank friction , common to all main tools). This simplifies changing this value.
  • the second objective is to determine which parameters will be requested from the end user. These parameters can be: material properties, friction, thickness, drawing direction, speed curve ...
  • stages The main frame (called "stages") allows attributes to be assigned to each group for each stage.
  • buttons for managing the stages a button per stage updates the diagram, the active groups and the attributes.
  • the supervisor can add, duplicate or remove steps.
  • the diagram represents the relative positions of each group in function of each step. Its use makes it possible to show diagrams of the stages of the process, by representing the various tools, their kinematics and their state (active or not during the stage).
  • a toolbox appears each time the macro command window is called up in supervisor mode. This toolbox includes four pages of the pattern for the stamping process: the “tools” page, the “blanks” page, the “behavior” page and the “post-process” page.
  • the "blanks” and “tools” sections contain attributes that are common for all stages (group names and colors, material attributes).
  • the stamping groups represent the content of the steps. Blank groups must have a real material attribute.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Geometry (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
  • Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
  • Mounting, Exchange, And Manufacturing Of Dies (AREA)
  • Shaping Metal By Deep-Drawing, Or The Like (AREA)
  • Control Of Presses (AREA)
  • Numerical Control (AREA)
  • Processing Or Creating Images (AREA)
EP03796141A 2002-12-02 2003-12-02 Logiciel de modelisation d'emboutissage Withdrawn EP1576506A2 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
FR0215157 2002-12-02
FR0215157A FR2847999B1 (fr) 2002-12-02 2002-12-02 Logiciel de modelisation d'emboutissage
PCT/FR2003/003564 WO2004053740A2 (fr) 2002-12-02 2003-12-02 Procede de simulation d'un processus d'emboutissage

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1576506A2 true EP1576506A2 (fr) 2005-09-21

Family

ID=32309919

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP03796141A Withdrawn EP1576506A2 (fr) 2002-12-02 2003-12-02 Logiciel de modelisation d'emboutissage

Country Status (9)

Country Link
US (1) US20060149523A1 (ko)
EP (1) EP1576506A2 (ko)
JP (1) JP2006516932A (ko)
KR (1) KR20050084119A (ko)
CN (1) CN101076804A (ko)
AU (1) AU2003298395A1 (ko)
CA (1) CA2508462A1 (ko)
FR (1) FR2847999B1 (ko)
WO (1) WO2004053740A2 (ko)

Families Citing this family (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2857889B1 (fr) * 2003-07-23 2005-09-23 Snecma Moteurs Procede de fabrication de pieces par forgeage de precision
CN101419638B (zh) * 2007-10-22 2012-05-16 鸿富锦精密工业(深圳)有限公司 冲头零件与其在冲压模板上对应孔的生成系统及方法
CN101645098B (zh) * 2008-08-04 2012-06-20 鸿富锦精密工业(深圳)有限公司 冲头与其在冲压模板上对应孔的生成系统及方法
CN102380521A (zh) * 2010-08-30 2012-03-21 上海世科嘉车辆技术研发有限公司 一种基于尺寸偏差大的平台车型的改款车的尺寸验证方法
DE102010035982B4 (de) * 2010-09-01 2013-10-31 Audi Ag Verfahren zur Pressensteuerung bei einem Tiefziehprozess zur Herstellung von Blechbauteilen, insbesondere von Karosseriebauteilen
CN117900364B (zh) * 2024-03-20 2024-05-10 星泓智造装备有限公司 一种海上风电塔筒法兰的近净成形锻造方法

Family Cites Families (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4953094A (en) * 1988-07-01 1990-08-28 Aerohydro, Inc. Method for lofting blanks and compounding plates for shell structures
US5377116A (en) * 1991-07-01 1994-12-27 Valenite Inc. Method and system for designing a cutting tool
JPH0519838A (ja) * 1991-07-15 1993-01-29 Fanuc Ltd 順送金型用cadシステムにおける製品作成シユミレーシヨン方式
JP2775538B2 (ja) * 1991-11-14 1998-07-16 住友重機械工業株式会社 成形シミュレーション方法及び装置
JP3218569B2 (ja) * 1992-04-13 2001-10-15 エフ・ディ−・ケイ株式会社 メッシュ生成装置
US5379227A (en) * 1992-12-21 1995-01-03 Ford Motor Company Method for aiding sheet metal forming tooling design
US5659493A (en) * 1995-03-03 1997-08-19 Ford Motor Company Virtual machining techniques for modifying computer models of parts
US5691909A (en) * 1995-12-29 1997-11-25 Western Atlas Method of virtual machining to predict the accuracy of part to be made with machine tools
JPH10166070A (ja) * 1996-12-06 1998-06-23 Mitsubishi Electric Corp プレス加工シミュレーション方法
US6353768B1 (en) * 1998-02-02 2002-03-05 General Electric Company Method and apparatus for designing a manufacturing process for sheet metal parts
US6295513B1 (en) * 1999-03-16 2001-09-25 Eagle Engineering Of America, Inc. Network-based system for the manufacture of parts with a virtual collaborative environment for design, developement, and fabricator selection
JP2001076022A (ja) * 1999-09-03 2001-03-23 Kobe Steel Ltd アルミニウム合金板からなる成形品の設計方法
US6975971B2 (en) * 2001-03-13 2005-12-13 Ford Global Technologies Llc System and method of section cutting and analysis of a computer model
US20020133266A1 (en) * 2001-03-14 2002-09-19 Landers Diane M. Horizontally structured manufacturing process modeling for alternate operations, large parts and charted parts
US6985793B2 (en) * 2003-01-31 2006-01-10 Delphi Technologies, Inc. Horizontally structured CAD/CAM coordinate system for manufacturing design
US7079908B2 (en) * 2003-01-31 2006-07-18 Delphi Technologies,Inc. Horizontally-structured modeling for analysis

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO2004053740A2 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU2003298395A1 (en) 2004-06-30
JP2006516932A (ja) 2006-07-13
CN101076804A (zh) 2007-11-21
FR2847999A1 (fr) 2004-06-04
CA2508462A1 (fr) 2004-06-24
FR2847999B1 (fr) 2005-02-11
WO2004053740A2 (fr) 2004-06-24
WO2004053740A3 (fr) 2006-09-28
US20060149523A1 (en) 2006-07-06
KR20050084119A (ko) 2005-08-26
AU2003298395A8 (en) 2004-06-30

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US10592065B2 (en) Navigation through the hierarchical structure of a three-dimensional modeled assembly of parts
RU2308763C2 (ru) Способ автоматического построения трехмерной геометрической модели изделия в системе геометрического моделирования
FR2821193A1 (fr) Dispositif de conception d'interface d'utilisateur
EP0610594B1 (fr) Système de conception et de fabrication assistée par ordinateur
TWI840403B (zh) 學習裝置、推論裝置、學習模型的生成方法及推論方法
WO2006123040A2 (fr) Procede et dispositif de generation d’un modele parametrique lie a une geometrie 3 d
EP3273905B1 (fr) Procede de determination d'une cartographie des contacts et/ou des distances entre les arcades maxillaire et mandibulaire d'un individu
FR3005368A1 (fr) Deplacement de visualisations entre affichages et contextes
EP1576506A2 (fr) Logiciel de modelisation d'emboutissage
Broek et al. Using physical models in design
CN105212452A (zh) 一种雕刻有个性化人像浮雕的吊坠体的制造方法
WO2009007550A2 (fr) Dispositif informatique pour la simulation d'un ensemble d'objets en interaction et procédé correspondant
EP2350890A1 (fr) Procede et dispositif de realisation d'un modele par elements finis
FR2868180A1 (fr) Procede et dispositif de simulation interactive du contact entre objets
FR2574009A1 (fr) Systeme pour l'aide a la creation et a l'industrialisation d'objets obtenus par decoupe et deformation a partir de metaux en feuille
FR3066959A1 (fr) Procede de generation d'un retour sensitif pour une interface et interface associee
EP1584071A1 (fr) Procede de conception d'une forme assistee par ordinateur.
EP3648065A1 (en) A system for determining visually relevant design differences between 3d models
Yamada et al. A method of kansei acquisition to 3D shape design and its application
EP2795490B1 (fr) Machine et procede d'evaluation de comportement de configurations d'un composant
EP1475726B1 (fr) Système d'interface graphique
JP6231713B1 (ja) プログラム、記録媒体、及び描画方法
FR2985055A1 (fr) Procede d'evaluation de comportement de configurations d'un composant
FR3090943A1 (fr) Procédé de modification de la forme d’un objet virtuel tridimensionnel représenté dans un espace immersif et système immersif mettant en œuvre ledit procédé
Molina et al. The use of GERAM to support SMEs development in Mexico

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20050615

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL LT LV MK

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
PUAK Availability of information related to the publication of the international search report

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009015

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20110701