EP1529251B1 - Determination de masse pour commandes automatiques de porte coulissante et d'ascenseur - Google Patents
Determination de masse pour commandes automatiques de porte coulissante et d'ascenseur Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP1529251B1 EP1529251B1 EP03790660A EP03790660A EP1529251B1 EP 1529251 B1 EP1529251 B1 EP 1529251B1 EP 03790660 A EP03790660 A EP 03790660A EP 03790660 A EP03790660 A EP 03790660A EP 1529251 B1 EP1529251 B1 EP 1529251B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- door
- door system
- mass
- drive device
- determined
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
- B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
- B66B13/00—Doors, gates, or other apparatus controlling access to, or exit from, cages or lift well landings
- B66B13/02—Door or gate operation
- B66B13/14—Control systems or devices
- B66B13/143—Control systems or devices electrical
- B66B13/146—Control systems or devices electrical method or algorithm for controlling doors
Definitions
- the invention relates to a method and a device for controlling an electrically operated door system by means of a control unit which configures itself, wherein the door system is moved by means of an electric drive device.
- Door systems that are moved by means of electric drive devices and in particular automatically, for example, automatic sliding doors or elevator doors, are subject to international standards such as e.g. CSA B44-M94, CEN EN81: 1: 1985, ASME A17.1-1996 and ASME A17.1-2000, respectively, which specify, among other things, the maximum permissible kinetic energy for such door systems.
- EP 0 848 309 A1 describes a device for monitoring and limiting the static closing force of a door, which is moved by means of a drive motor.
- a control device as described in EP 0 848 309 A1 not only causes high maintenance and associated costs, but also the installation and adaptation of the control device to a door system, e.g. to an elevator system, has proven to be extremely time consuming and costly.
- the invention is therefore based on the object to provide a method and an apparatus of the aforementioned type such that the disadvantages described above are avoided and current devices or methods, in particular with regard to the time required for installation or maintenance of the door system and the associated time Costs are optimized.
- the motor voltage of the drive device is predetermined by means of pulse-width modulation.
- the system acceleration can be determined very precisely.
- the friction in the system, one or more counterweights and the electrical voltage of the drive device are used as input parameters for the automatic mass determination.
- the friction should be as negligible as possible.
- the time, instantaneous speed and starting speed of an acceleration ramp predetermined with advantage by the pulse-width modulation are used as further input variables. In this way it is possible to be effective, lethargic Mass of the system at each instant of the acceleration ramp.
- a closing and opening travel is performed for mass determination.
- two mass determinations counterweights can be compensated in the calculation.
- a stationary position is not only the (almost) completely open or the (almost) completely closed door position of the elevator system. Any other positions of the elevator system are also to be regarded as a stationary position, provided that the door system is largely not moved in the appropriate position.
- the controlled travel of the door system has at least two phases, wherein during a first phase at constant speed, the friction of the system is determined and then the system mass is determined during a second phase at constant acceleration by means of an instantaneous speed of the system.
- a target tolerance of 20% or less can be maintained.
- the use of a device according to the invention is especially advantageous if the door system to be controlled has at least two door components which are connected to the drive device by means of a mechanical device for transmitting power, for example a toothed belt.
- Figure 1 shows an elevator control according to the invention, wherein the door control unit 1 is connected to the drive device 2.
- the drive device 2 preferably an electric motor, is connected to the door system 3.
- This connection is for example designed such that two, as shown in Figure 2 door components 5, the components of the door system 3, are connected by means of a toothed belt with the motor pinion of the drive device 2.
- a handheld terminal 4 is connected to the door control unit 1.
- the components 1, 2 and 4 can send measurement or control signals to one another.
- presettings can be made, for example by entering parameters, or values can be read out of the door control unit 1.
- Possible motor data of the drive device 2 are advantageously stored in a memory unit of the door control unit 1.
- FIG. 2 shows an elevator device in which a door control according to the invention is used.
- the door control unit 1 shown only schematically is in turn connected to the drive device 2 and the handheld terminal 4.
- Both the drive device and the door control unit 1 is connected to the door system 3, that here is composed of a two-part cabin door 5 and the counterweights 7.
- the drive device 2 is also firmly connected to the elevator car 8 with advantage.
- the door control unit 1 is also advantageously connected to the elevator car 8.
- detectors or photocells for opening the doors are provided.
- the maximum allowable kinetic energy of the door system should preferably be between 9.49 joules and 10 joules when the door contains a detector or photocell to open the door. If no opening devices are active, the maximum permissible kinetic energy should be between 3.39 joules and 4 joules.
- the maximum permissible speed of the door system depends on the system mass and the kinetic energy.
- the mass determination is influenced by the friction in the system 3, the counterweights 7, which are used, for example, to close the elevator door 5, and the motor voltage on the drive device 2.
- the drive device 2 is given a voltage ramp by the door control unit 1.
- U M : U EMK + i M ⁇ R M
- K 1 is a conversion factor
- v 0 corresponds to the starting speed of the door system 3
- v PWM corresponds to the speed component due to the pulse width modulation.
- F R corresponds to the frictional force of the system and F T of the inertial force for an accelerated mass, in this case the mass of the door system 1.
- the effective inertial mass of the system is determined during the acceleration ramp.
- the input times are the time t, the instantaneous velocity v and the starting velocity v 0 of the acceleration ramp.
- the door control unit 1 in a preferred embodiment of the invention has a time-critical operating system, e.g. an 8-bit microcontroller, a virtually friction-free door system 1 with the lowest possible door mass is initially selected to determine calibration values of the speed.
- a time-critical operating system e.g. an 8-bit microcontroller
- calibration values can first be determined independently of the system friction and the counterweight 7 as a function of the pulse-width modulation. For example, it is possible to store determined speed values for different masses in a table in order not to unnecessarily increase the processor utilization of the door control unit 1. Such a table contains values for the pulse-width modulation at the start of the mass determination and for the door speed at the end of the measurement runs of the door system 3.
- the door system 3 is preferably accelerated from the closed rest position and via a short distance, for example, 10 cm driven regulated in the opening direction. This is preferably done at a speed of 9 cm / sec to avoid overshoot and the occurrence of static friction components as much as possible.
- the pulse-width modulation value is increased at a distance of in each case 10 msec by preferably 3 increments in each case until the final value is reached. This achieves a nearly constant acceleration.
- a four-quadrant controller is used here and up to a total of 128 increments are passed through.
- the pulse-width modulation value is reduced again to a constant speed, for example 9 cm / sec, and the door is finally moved to an open rest position.
- the process can then be repeated analogously in the closing direction.
- the system mass can be determined with the aid of the relationship (9), in particular at this point in time.
- the friction is preferably calculated in a first movement section, that is, for example, during the first 10 cm door movement at 9 cm / sec on the basis of the current pulse width modulation value.
- the pulse-width modulation value increases with increasing friction.
- the counterweights 7 are compensated by two mass determinations, that is to say by successive opening or closing movements.
- the inventive method the mass can be determined with sufficient tolerance and norm facultye limits for the operation of the door system 3 are reliably maintained.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
- Elevator Door Apparatuses (AREA)
- Power-Operated Mechanisms For Wings (AREA)
- Walking Sticks, Umbrellas, And Fans (AREA)
Claims (8)
- Procédé pour configurer une unité de commande de porte (1) d'un système de porte (3), dans lequel
le système de porte (3) se déplace au moyen d'un dispositif d'entraînement (2) électrique,
la masse (mges) du système de porte (3) est déterminée automatiquement afin de configurer l'unité de commande de porte (1),
le système de porte (3)est, pour déterminer la masse (mges) du système de porte (3), accéléré de manière réglée pendant au moins un trajet contrôlé, puis est de nouveau arrêté,
caractérisé en ce que l'on prescrit la tension de moteur (UM) au dispositif d'entraînement (2), la tension de moteur (UM) augmentant ou diminuant linéairement pour accélérer ou arrêter de manière réglée le système de porte (3) et on détermine la masse à partir des données ainsi établies. - Procédé selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que l'on prescrit la tension de moteur ou le dispositif d'entraînement (2) par modulation d'impulsions en largeur.
- Procédé selon l'une des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce que le frottement dans le système (3), un ou plusieurs contrepoids (7) et la tension électrique du dispositif d'entraînement (2) sont utilisés comme paramètres d'entrée pour déterminer automatiquement la masse.
- Procédé selon l'une des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce qu'on effectue un trajet d'ouverture et un trajet de fermeture pour déterminer la masse.
- Procédé selon l'une des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce que le trajet contrôlé du système de porte (3) comprend au moins deux phases,- pendant une première phase, on détermine le frottement du système (2) à vitesse constante et- ensuite pendant une deuxième phase on détermine la masse du système à accélération constante à l'aide d'une vitesse instantanée du système (3).
- Procédé selon l'une des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce que les trajets pour déterminer la masse commencent ou se terminent dans une position de repos.
- Procédé selon l'une des revendications 1 à 5, caractérisé en ce que les trajets pour déterminer la masse commencent ou se terminent à une vitesse lente.
- Dispositif (1) pour commander un système de porte (3) à fonctionnement électrique, dans lequel le dispositif (1) est relié à un dispositif d'entraînement (2) du système de porte, comporte une unité de mémorisation pour enregistrer des valeurs d'étalonnage du système de porte (3) ainsi qu'un modulateur d'impulsions en largeur pour augmenter ou diminuer linéairement une tension de moteur et des moyens pour régler le dispositif d'entraînement (2) et comporte une unité de commande et de calcul pour exécuter un procédé selon l'une des revendications précédentes de telle manière qu'il soit possible de déterminer une masse du système de porte à partir des données déterminées pendant la modification linéaire de la tension de moteur.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE10236938A DE10236938A1 (de) | 2002-08-12 | 2002-08-12 | Masseermittlung bei automatischen Schiebe- und Aufzugtürsteuerungen |
DE10236938 | 2002-08-12 | ||
PCT/DE2003/002563 WO2004021094A1 (fr) | 2002-08-12 | 2003-07-30 | Determination de masse pour commandes automatiques de porte coulissante et d'ascenseur |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1529251A1 EP1529251A1 (fr) | 2005-05-11 |
EP1529251B1 true EP1529251B1 (fr) | 2006-09-06 |
Family
ID=31501739
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP03790660A Expired - Lifetime EP1529251B1 (fr) | 2002-08-12 | 2003-07-30 | Determination de masse pour commandes automatiques de porte coulissante et d'ascenseur |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP1529251B1 (fr) |
AT (1) | ATE338970T1 (fr) |
DE (2) | DE10236938A1 (fr) |
ES (1) | ES2271686T3 (fr) |
PT (1) | PT1529251E (fr) |
WO (1) | WO2004021094A1 (fr) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE102014201399A1 (de) | 2014-01-27 | 2015-07-30 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Ermittlung der bewegten Masse eines Türsystems |
Families Citing this family (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP4488210B2 (ja) * | 2002-09-27 | 2010-06-23 | 三菱電機株式会社 | エレベータドアの制御装置 |
DE102006043896A1 (de) | 2005-10-18 | 2007-04-19 | Siemens Ag | Verfahren und Steuereinrichtung zur automatischen Bestimmung einer Masse eines Türsystems |
DE102009021249B3 (de) * | 2009-05-14 | 2010-11-11 | Aufzugswerke M. Schmitt & Sohn Gmbh & Co. | Aufzugsanlage |
EP2565142A4 (fr) * | 2010-04-30 | 2017-12-27 | Mitsubishi Electric Corporation | Dispositif de commande de porte pour ascenseur |
DE102010064217B3 (de) * | 2010-12-27 | 2012-04-26 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Ermittlung einer Kraft |
DE102015200609B4 (de) * | 2015-01-16 | 2017-03-16 | Geze Gmbh | Verfahren zur automatischen Bestimmung der Reibung und der Masse eines Türsystems |
US9834414B2 (en) * | 2015-06-17 | 2017-12-05 | Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc. | System and method for controlling elevator door systems |
CN105347130B (zh) * | 2015-12-04 | 2017-08-25 | 安徽省特种设备检测院 | 一种电梯自动门平均关门速度下关门动能检测方法及装置 |
CN115123901A (zh) * | 2022-07-15 | 2022-09-30 | 菱王电梯有限公司 | 关门控制方法及装置、存储介质、电梯门系统 |
Family Cites Families (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
ES2086615T3 (es) * | 1991-12-24 | 1996-07-01 | Inventio Ag | Procedimiento y dispositivo para determinar la masa dinamica y la fuerza media de rozamiento de una puerta de ascensor. |
DE19526559A1 (de) * | 1995-07-20 | 1997-01-23 | Tornado Antriebstech Gmbh | Steuersystem für motorische Antriebe |
DE29621617U1 (de) * | 1996-12-12 | 1997-03-13 | Siemens AG, 80333 München | Vorrichtung zur Überwachung und Begrenzung der statischen Schließkraft einer längsgeführt hin und her bewegbaren Masse |
SE9700767D0 (sv) * | 1997-03-04 | 1997-03-04 | Asea Brown Boveri | Förfarande för bestämning av lastparametrar hos en industrirobot |
DE19944125C2 (de) * | 1999-09-15 | 2003-02-13 | Schmitt & Sohn Aufzugwerke | Verfahren zur automatischen Bestimmung der Auftreffgeschwindigkeit einer Aufzugtür auf einem Hindernis |
DE19956076A1 (de) * | 1999-11-22 | 2001-05-31 | Siemens Ag | Antriebseinrichtung für Aufzugtüren |
-
2002
- 2002-08-12 DE DE10236938A patent/DE10236938A1/de not_active Withdrawn
-
2003
- 2003-07-30 DE DE50304972T patent/DE50304972D1/de not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2003-07-30 WO PCT/DE2003/002563 patent/WO2004021094A1/fr active IP Right Grant
- 2003-07-30 AT AT03790660T patent/ATE338970T1/de active
- 2003-07-30 EP EP03790660A patent/EP1529251B1/fr not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2003-07-30 ES ES03790660T patent/ES2271686T3/es not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2003-07-30 PT PT03790660T patent/PT1529251E/pt unknown
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE102014201399A1 (de) | 2014-01-27 | 2015-07-30 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Ermittlung der bewegten Masse eines Türsystems |
WO2015110341A1 (fr) | 2014-01-27 | 2015-07-30 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Détermination de la masse en mouvement d'un système de porte |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
PT1529251E (pt) | 2007-01-31 |
DE50304972D1 (de) | 2006-10-19 |
DE10236938A1 (de) | 2004-03-11 |
ES2271686T3 (es) | 2007-04-16 |
ATE338970T1 (de) | 2006-09-15 |
EP1529251A1 (fr) | 2005-05-11 |
WO2004021094A1 (fr) | 2004-03-11 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
DE3823487C2 (de) | Anordnung und Verfahren zum steuerbaren Öffnen und Schließen einer Tür | |
DE69517546T2 (de) | Einrichtung und Verfahren zum Aufzugstürensteuerung | |
DE69128330T2 (de) | Einstellverfahren für das Digitalantriebssystem eines Aufzugs | |
EP1529251B1 (fr) | Determination de masse pour commandes automatiques de porte coulissante et d'ascenseur | |
DE4440420C2 (de) | Verfahren und Einrichtung zum Überwachen und/oder Steuern der Drehzahl eines Elektroantriebs mit Frequenzumrichter für Hubwerke | |
DE102011111450A1 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Überwachung eines einen rotierenden Antriebsmotor aufweisenden Antriebsaggregats, insbesondere eines Fensterhebers | |
EP0628015B1 (fr) | Procede de mise en mouvement et dispositif de commande d'une porte coulissante a fonctionnement commande et/ou asservi | |
DE102010044644A1 (de) | Verfahren zur Kollisionserkennung für eine Antriebseinheit | |
DE4138194C2 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Erfassung der Position und Bewegungsrichtung translatorisch und/oder rotatorisch bewegter Aggregate | |
EP2457860A2 (fr) | Dispositif de sécurité pour ascenseur | |
EP3238336A1 (fr) | Procédé de détermination d'un vecteur de courant statorique pour démarrer une machine synchrone d'un entraînement d'un dispositif de transport de personnes | |
EP3068722A1 (fr) | Détermination de la masse en mouvement d'un système de porte | |
DE102016213761A1 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Erkennung einer Einklemmung und/oder Schließkraftbegrenzung eines durch einen elektrischen Motor bewegbaren Teils | |
EP0561361B1 (fr) | Procédé et dispositif pour commander des actionneurs de porte | |
DE102011111439B3 (de) | Verfahren und Einrichtung zur Steuerung wenigstens eines Fensterheberantriebs eines Kraftfahrzeugs | |
WO2011012376A1 (fr) | Procédé et dispositif de détection de pincement à commande temporelle | |
DE102013224148A1 (de) | Verfahren zur Steuerung eines elektrischen Antriebs einer Tür oder eines Türflügels sowie Türsteuereinrichtung | |
DE102007005827B4 (de) | Vorrichtung und Verfahren für einen Funktionstest einer Bremse | |
EP1087279B1 (fr) | Procédé pour la détermination automatique de la vitesse de collision d'une porte d'ascenseur contre un obstacle | |
DE102018205342A1 (de) | Verfahren zum Betrieb eines Einklemmschutzes | |
DE102015200609B4 (de) | Verfahren zur automatischen Bestimmung der Reibung und der Masse eines Türsystems | |
DE102020207837A1 (de) | Schiebetürhalter für Kraftfahrzeug | |
DE112010002617T5 (de) | rsteuervorrichtung für Aufzüge | |
EP3353612B1 (fr) | Procédé de commande d'un entraînement électrique ainsi qu'entraînement électrique | |
DE10125748B4 (de) | Fensterheberelektronik |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20050111 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED. Effective date: 20060906 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20060906 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20060906 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20060906 Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20060906 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20060906 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: NV Representative=s name: SIEMENS SCHWEIZ AG Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 50304972 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20061019 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
GBT | Gb: translation of ep patent filed (gb section 77(6)(a)/1977) |
Effective date: 20061026 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20061206 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20061206 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20061206 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: PT Ref legal event code: SC4A Free format text: AVAILABILITY OF NATIONAL TRANSLATION Effective date: 20061121 |
|
NLV1 | Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act | ||
ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2271686 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FD4D |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FI Payment date: 20070607 Year of fee payment: 5 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Payment date: 20070619 Year of fee payment: 5 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20070607 |
|
BERE | Be: lapsed |
Owner name: SIEMENS A.G. Effective date: 20070731 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20070731 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20061207 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20070731 Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20070731 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20060906 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20070731 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: PT Ref legal event code: MM4A Free format text: LAPSE DUE TO NON-PAYMENT OF FEES Effective date: 20090130 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20090130 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20080730 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20060906 Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20070730 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20070307 Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20060906 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CZ Payment date: 20140723 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20140709 Year of fee payment: 12 Ref country code: AT Payment date: 20140605 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MM01 Ref document number: 338970 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20150730 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20150730 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20150730 Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20150730 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20150730 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 14 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 15 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20220720 Year of fee payment: 20 Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20220919 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20220721 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20221019 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R071 Ref document number: 50304972 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FD2A Effective date: 20230804 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION Effective date: 20230731 |