EP1423545A1 - Iron ore briquetting - Google Patents

Iron ore briquetting

Info

Publication number
EP1423545A1
EP1423545A1 EP02764361A EP02764361A EP1423545A1 EP 1423545 A1 EP1423545 A1 EP 1423545A1 EP 02764361 A EP02764361 A EP 02764361A EP 02764361 A EP02764361 A EP 02764361A EP 1423545 A1 EP1423545 A1 EP 1423545A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
ore
method defined
briquette
flux
briquettes
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP02764361A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1423545A4 (en
EP1423545B1 (en
Inventor
Geoffrey Stuart Beros
John Francis Gannon
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization CSIRO
Robe River Mining Co Pty Ltd
Original Assignee
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization CSIRO
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization CSIRO filed Critical Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization CSIRO
Publication of EP1423545A1 publication Critical patent/EP1423545A1/en
Publication of EP1423545A4 publication Critical patent/EP1423545A4/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1423545B1 publication Critical patent/EP1423545B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22B—PRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
    • C22B1/00—Preliminary treatment of ores or scrap
    • C22B1/14—Agglomerating; Briquetting; Binding; Granulating
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B30—PRESSES
    • B30B—PRESSES IN GENERAL
    • B30B11/00—Presses specially adapted for forming shaped articles from material in particulate or plastic state, e.g. briquetting presses, tabletting presses
    • B30B11/16—Presses specially adapted for forming shaped articles from material in particulate or plastic state, e.g. briquetting presses, tabletting presses using pocketed rollers, e.g. two co-operating pocketed rollers
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22B—PRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
    • C22B1/00—Preliminary treatment of ores or scrap
    • C22B1/14—Agglomerating; Briquetting; Binding; Granulating
    • C22B1/24—Binding; Briquetting ; Granulating
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22B—PRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
    • C22B1/00—Preliminary treatment of ores or scrap
    • C22B1/14—Agglomerating; Briquetting; Binding; Granulating
    • C22B1/24—Binding; Briquetting ; Granulating
    • C22B1/2413—Binding; Briquetting ; Granulating enduration of pellets
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22B—PRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
    • C22B1/00—Preliminary treatment of ores or scrap
    • C22B1/14—Agglomerating; Briquetting; Binding; Granulating
    • C22B1/24—Binding; Briquetting ; Granulating
    • C22B1/242—Binding; Briquetting ; Granulating with binders
    • C22B1/243—Binding; Briquetting ; Granulating with binders inorganic
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22B—PRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
    • C22B1/00—Preliminary treatment of ores or scrap
    • C22B1/14—Agglomerating; Briquetting; Binding; Granulating
    • C22B1/24—Binding; Briquetting ; Granulating
    • C22B1/248—Binding; Briquetting ; Granulating of metal scrap or alloys

Definitions

  • the present invention is concerned with the production of iron ore briquettes suitable for transport and use in iron making processes.
  • Pelletising consists of two distinct operations; forming pellets from moist ore fines and then firing them at a temperature in the region of 1300°C. It is critical in order to prepare suitable pellets that the ore be ground very fine, generally to a size where in the order of 60% of the ore passes 45 ⁇ m. It is then formed into pellets in either a horizontal drum or an inclined disc, generally with the addition of a suitable binder. The formed pellets are then fired in a process sometimes referred to as induration in shaft kilns, horizontal travelling grates, or a combination of travelling grates and rotary kilns.
  • Pelletising is a practicable and commercially attractive method of agglomerating fine concentrates, but requires substantial grinding in order to achieve the required particle sizing which is an energy intensive process.
  • Pellets made from goethite-hematite ores require extended induration times, affecting process economics.
  • Solid fuel, in the form of coke, is often added to reduce induration time which results in the production of noxious emissions (including dioxins, NO x and SO x ) .
  • Sintering consists of granulating moist iron ore fines and other fine materials with solid fuel, normally coke breeze, and loading the granulated mixture onto a permeable travelling grate. Air is drawn downwards through the grate as the temperature is raised. After a short ignition period, external heating of the bed is discontinued and as the solid fuel in the bed burns a narrow combustion zone moves downwards through the bed, each layer in turn being heated to approximately 1300°C. Bonding takes place between the grains during combustion, and a strong agglomerate is formed.
  • traditional sintering processes result in high levels of noxious emissions, particularly sulfur oxides and dioxins, and therefore the process is undesirable and unsustainable on environmental grounds .
  • Briquetting is a process in which there was commercial interest in the late 1800' s and early 1900' s, but production of iron ore briquettes for use as a blast furnace feed material never reached any significant levels, decreased after 1950, and had ceased by about 1960.
  • the process as practised involved the pressing of ore fines into a block of some suitable size and shape, and then indurating the block.
  • binders such as tar and pitch and/or other additives such as organic products, sodium silicate, ferrous sulfate, magnesium chloride, limestone and cement were tested.
  • the Grondal process simply involved mixing iron ore with water and pressing into oblong blocks the size of building bricks. These were then hardened by passing them through a tunnel kiln heated to 1350°C.
  • JP 60-243232 describes briquettes that have a flat shape in order to provide for stable distribution in a blast furnace. Specifically, the
  • Japanese specification discloses that the flat-shaped briquettes are much more easily reduced at higher temperatures than conventional spherical pellets.
  • the briquettes are made with a volume between 2 and 30cc in order to balance a relatively high compression strength against an inferior rotary or tumble strength and impact resistance with increasing size.
  • the Japanese specification discloses that larger briquettes are less easily reduced in a blast furnace.
  • the applicant has carried out extensive research work into the production of briquettes from iron ore and has invented a method that can produce briquettes that have suitable properties for use in blast furnaces and other direct reduction vessels.
  • a method of producing an iron ore briquette that is suitable for use as a blast furnace or other direct reduction furnace feedstock which includes the steps of:
  • predetermined particle size distribution of ore particles that is mixed with flux in step (a) can be produced without grinding ore.
  • the method includes crushing and screening ore to form the predetermined particle size distribution that is mixed with flux in step (a) .
  • the top size of the predetermined particle size distribution that is mixed with flux in step (a) is 3.5 mm.
  • the top size is 3.0 mm.
  • the top size is 2.5 mm.
  • the top size is 1.5 mm.
  • the top size is 1.0 mm.
  • the predetermined particle size distribution that is mixed with flux in step (a) includes less than 50% passing a 45 ⁇ screen.
  • the particle size distribution includes less than 30% passing the 45 ⁇ m screen.
  • the particle size distribution includes less than 10% passing the 45 ⁇ m screen.
  • the ore is a hydrated iron ore.
  • the hydrated ore is a goethite- containing ore.
  • the flux has a particle size distribution that is predominantly less than 100 ⁇ m.
  • the particle size distribution of the flux includes more than 95% passing a 250 ⁇ m screen.
  • the flux is limestone.
  • the ore/flux mixture produced in step (a) is selected so that the basicity of the fired briquette is greater than 0.2.
  • the basicity is greater than 0.6.
  • step (b) includes adjusting the water content of the ore so that the moisture content of the ore/flux mixture is 2-12% by weight of the total weight of the ore/flux mixture.
  • total weight of the ore/flux mixture means the total of the (a) dry weight of the ore/flux mix, (b) the weight of the inherent moisture of the mixture, and (c) the weight of the moisture (if any) added to the mixture in the method.
  • moisture content is the total of (b) and (c) above.
  • step (b) includes adjusting the water content of the ore so that the moisture content of the ore/flux mixture is 2-5% by weight of the total weight of the ore/flux mixture for ores that are dense hematite ores.
  • step (b) includes adjusting the water content of the ore so that the moisture content of the ore/flux mixture is 4-8% by weight of the total weight of the ore/flux mixture for ores containing up to 50% geothite.
  • step (b) includes adjusting the water content of the ore so that the moisture content of the ore/flux mixture is 6-12%by weight of the total weight of the ore/flux mixture for ores that are predominantly, ie contain more than 50%, goethite ores.
  • pressing step (c) produces briquettes that are 10 cc or less in volume.
  • More preferably pressing step (c) produces briquettes that are 8.5cc or less in volume.
  • More preferably pressing step (c) produces briquettes that are 6.5 cc or less in volume.
  • pressing step (c) includes pressing the ore/flux mixture using a low roll pressure.
  • the low roll pressure is sufficient to produce briquettes having a green compressive strength of at least 2kgf.
  • the green compressive strength is at least 4kgf.
  • the green compressive strength is at least 5kgf.
  • the low roll pressure is generated by a roll pressing force of 10-140 kN/cm on the mixture of ore/flux.
  • the roll pressing force is 10-60 kN/cm.
  • the roll pressing force is 10-40 kN/cm.
  • Preferably indurating step (d) includes heating the briquette to a firing temperature with 40 minutes.
  • Preferably indurating step (d) includes heating the briquette to a firing temperature within 35 minutes.
  • More preferably indurating step (d) includes heating the briquette to the firing temperature within 30 minutes .
  • step (d) includes heating the briquette to the firing temperature within 20 minutes.
  • step (b) includes heating the briquette to the firing temperature within 15 minutes.
  • the firing temperature is at least 1200°C .
  • the firing temperature is at least 1260°C.
  • the firing temperature is at least 1320°C.
  • the firing temperature is at least 1350°C.
  • the firing temperature is at least 1380°C.
  • the fired briquette has a crush strength of at least 200kgf .
  • the fired briquette has a crush strength of at least 200kgf .
  • Iron ore fines are broadly characterised into four groups on the basis of petrological characteristics, such as mineralogy, mineral association and particle texture, porosity, size distribution and chemistry.
  • the groups are:
  • the bonding mechanism in green briquettes involves a combination of bonds including the mechanical interlocking of particles, van der Waal's forces, and in the case of raw material types GC and G, hydrogen bonding to varying degrees is dependent on the percentage of hydrated iron species present, eg goethite.
  • characteristics of the feed material have been identified as having a significant influence on the formation of such bonds that affect the quality and processing performance of the green and fired briquettes. These characteristics are the moisture level of the feed material and its flow characteristics, the chemical composition of the ore, its size distribution and petrological characteristics and porosity.
  • the feed materials are of the widest size distribution possible in order to achieve a high packing density and increased bonding of the ore particles.
  • the bonding mechanism of green briquettes is believed to be through a combination of bonds arising from the mechanical interlocking of particles, van der Waal's forces, and hydrogen bonding in the cases of raw material types GC and G.
  • a broad size distribution increases the packing density and improves the strength of the green briquette, it is possible to briquette closely sized iron ores.
  • the top size of the particles is determined by the crushing process but is preferably less than 2.5 mm in order to produce briquettes of acceptable fired properties following the induration process. Generally, ore types HC and HG can be briquetted with coarser top sizes due to the lower heat requirements of these raw materials to attain acceptable fired strength.
  • the top size of the raw material can be reduced through either crushing or screening processes.
  • the bottom size of the particles has no absolute limit, but it is not necessary or desirable, to grind the ore into very fine particles (as required for pelletising) as this is an additional economic burden rendered unnecessary by the present invention. Preferably less than 10% of the particles pass a 45 ⁇ sieve.
  • the pocket dimensions of the briquetting apparatus should be selected on the basis of the maximum particle size to be briquetted, as well as for adequate induration performance, to ensure that satisfactory briquetting can be achieved.
  • the maximum particle size to achieve satisfactory briquetting is 25-30% of the minimum pocket dimension. If the maximum particle size exceeds this specification it may be necessary to select a larger pocket size.
  • a moisture content of between 2 and 12 wt % for the feed material is used to optimise green briquette quality and product yield.
  • Dense hematite concentrates have low optimum briquetting moistures, generally in the range of 2-5 wt %. These concentrates are often made up of closely sized particles with a smooth surface texture that generates low strength briquettes because of decreased interlocking of particles. More porous goethite-containing ores with up to 50% goethite (GC) briquette well in the range of 4-8 wt % moisture and more porous predominantly goethite ores (G) briquette well in the range of 6-12 wt% moisture. Such ores have a rough surface texture and shape enhancing their briquetting characteristics.
  • Conventional briquetting apparatus may be used in the method of the invention.
  • such apparatus includes two adjacent rolls with pockets which come together at a nip zone in order to compress the feed material into adjacent, aligned pockets to produce briquettes.
  • the rolls are preferably horizontally aligned to achieve the required throughput for economic feasibility.
  • briquetting of iron ores is preferably conducted at roll pressing forces of 10-140 kN/cm and more preferably at the low end of this range, typically from 10-60 kN/cm.
  • Such low pressure operation for iron ore briquetting is ( significant and makes it possible to achieve high production rates by the use of wide rolls on the briquetting machine up to 1.6m in length.
  • the roll pressure is carefully controlled within the low pressure range in order to optimise the briquetting operation. If the roll pressure is too low, the rolls are forced apart producing a thick web and distorted briquettes impairing the product yield and the quality of the briquette, particularly after induration. If the roll pressure exceeds the optimum, poor closure of the briquettes occurs because of the "clamshell" effect on release of the briquettes from the pocket. The clamshell effect is more pronounced for small roll diameters and excess roll pressures, which also cause pocket binding/jamming. Although the density and crush strength of the green briquettes will be increased, the impact resistance of the fired briquettes will be severely impaired.
  • the moisture level is selected to influence the flow characteristics of the material through the feed system, and moisture levels of 2-12 wt % for the feed material are generally suitable. If the moisture level is too high for the feed system, the feed pressure is adversely affected resulting in a decreased yield and some impairment of briquette quality, characterised by a lower green strength. It the feed material is too low in moisture for the feed system the resultant feed pressure will cause clamshelling which may result in decreased yields, increased wear rates of the roll pockets, and inferior fired properties.
  • the briquetting apparatus may be operated with a pre-compactor feed system or with a gravity feed system.
  • the latter system is advantageous where high tonnages are to be briquetted, as in the iron ore industry.
  • a roll diameter is selected in order to ensure that briquette quality is obtained at an economic production rate.
  • Large diameter rolls increase production rates, however they also increase the area of the nip zone. Careful control of the nip zone facilitates formation of quality green briquettes and avoids formation of briquettes with an excessively thick web.
  • Alterations in roll diameter may also alter the optimum moisture level for feed material where increased roll diameters represent increases in feed moisture.
  • Roll diameters typically vary from 250 mm - 1200 mm. In order to maximise production, preferably the rolls are operated at the fastest speed possible whilst maintaining briquette quality. However, a very low roll speed may be used if productivity is of a secondary concern.
  • roll speeds in the range of 1 rpm to 20 rpm are employed. It is desirable in order to maintain quality, particularly at high roll speeds, that the feed material be presented to the rolls at a rate that matches the briquette production rate and with a nip zone area that produces the forces required to form quality briquettes.
  • Any suitable roll width may be selected provided that it is within the pressure capabilities of the briquetting machine. As briquetting of iron ores is a low pressure operation, wide rolls are preferred, increasing the capacity of the machine. The rolls are preferably horizontally aligned to allow for use with a gravity feed system.
  • the flow characteristics of iron ores, whether HC, GC (including HG and GH) , or G, are suitable for gravity feeding at the moisture ranges specified above for each classification.
  • the pocket shape should not generally be of a sharp angular nature, but be more smooth and rounded to improve handling characteristics. By way of example, a length/width and width/depth ratio of approximately 0.65 is suitable. Pocket shapes also have specific release angles, 110-120° that combat the tendency for sticking in the pockets.
  • the pocket size can be optimised according to the requirements for the induration process and the raw material top size and the iron making blast furnace.
  • the briquettes have a volume of between 2 and 30 cc.
  • the volume is 10 cc or less. More preferably the volume is 8.5 cc or less. More preferably the volume is less than 6.5 cc.
  • a staggered pocket con iguration is preferred as this makes the optimum use of the available space on the face of the rolls, and hence maximises throughput.
  • the induration method and conditions are selected having regard to the complex relationship between raw material characteristics and the influence of the briquette dimensions.
  • the feed material includes the iron ore made up of iron oxide and gangue minerals, with the required flux added to give the required basicity level in the fired briquette.
  • Test results have shown that the flux should preferably be finely sized, typically >95% passing 250 um, in order to achieve the required properties in the fired briquette.
  • Induration may be carried out using a straight grate, grate-kiln or a continuous kiln type process.
  • An important characteristic of the briquette of the present invention is the ability to withstand high temperatures on heating at fast rates, such as heating to a firing temperature within 30 minutes, more preferably within 20 minutes. This is in direct contrast with conventional understanding of how goethitic ores respond in induration situations, where is has been shown that they spall when heated too fast through the dehydroxylation and free water removal zones .
  • the thermal stability of the briquettes of the present invention has been found to be much greater than pellets and they may be heated at much faster rates than pellets without spalling. This allows a much shorter heating cycle. Consequently, briquette productivity can be significantly higher than for pellets using the same material. For instance, briquette productivities potentially in the order of 30t/m .day in a straight grate kiln can be achieved, compared to pellet productivities of 16t/m 2 .day for HG ores in the same kiln.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of suitable apparatus with 250 mm diameter rolls and a precompacted feed system for conducting the process of the present invention
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic illustration of suitable apparatus with 450 mm diameter rolls and a gravity feed system for conducting the process of the present invention
  • FIG. 3 is a schematic illustration of suitable apparatus with 650 mm diameter rolls and a gravity feed system for conducting the process of the present invention
  • FIG. 4 is a plot of yield of whole briquettes versus feed moisture for HG material on 450 mm rolls with 6 cc almond forms and 4 cc elongate almond pockets;
  • FIG. 5 is a plot showing the effect of feed moisture on green briquette strength for HG material on 450 mm rolls with varying pocket dimensions
  • FIG. 6 is a plot showing the effect of feed moisture on green briquette strength for HG material using 650 mm rolls and 7.5 cc ⁇ pillows';
  • FIG. 7 shows the effect of roll pressing force on briquette properties; thickness, green strength and green density on 450 mm rolls and 9 cc almond forms;
  • FIG. 8 is a plot showing the effects of roll pressing on green strength for HG material using 650 mm rolls and 7.5 cc ⁇ pillows' ;
  • FIG. 9 is a plot showing the effect of roll pressing force on green strength for GH material using 650 mm rolls and 7.5 cc ⁇ pillows' ;
  • FIG. 10 shows the effect of roll speed on briquette properties; thickness, green strength and green density for a rolls pressure of 90kg/cm 2 and a feed moisture of 6 wt % using 450 mm rolls and 9 cc almond forms;
  • FIG. 11 is the operating window for a briquetting machine with a pre-compactor, 250 mm rolls, 4 cc almond forms and HG material;
  • FIG. 12 shows temperature profiles for briquette induration in a 500 mm deep bed
  • FIG. 13 shows temperature profiles for briquette induration that produced briquettes at high productivities and a typical temperature profile for pellet induration that produced pellets at a lower productivity
  • FIG. 14 is a plot showing the effect of average bed temperature on briquettes made with GH material using 650 mm rolls and 7.5 cc ⁇ pillows' at the end of a grate cycle in a batch grate kiln;
  • FIG. 15 is a plot showing the effect of average bed temperature on briquettes made with GH material using 650 mm rolls and 7.5 cc ⁇ pillows' at the end of a grate- kiln firing cycle in a batch grate kiln;
  • FIG. 16 is a plot showing the effect of time at firing temperature (1380°C) on briquettes made with GH material using 650 mm rolls and 7.5 cc ⁇ pillows' during a test cycle in the batch grate kiln;
  • FIG. 17 is a plot showing the effect of time at firing temperature (1380 °C) on briquettes made with GH material using 650 mm rolls and 7.5 cc ⁇ pillows' during a test cycle in the batch grate kiln;
  • FIG. 18 is a plot showing the effects of residence time on 7.5 cc GH briquettes in the kiln during a test cycle in the kiln only.
  • FIG. 19 is a plot showing the effect of bed height and grate firing profile on briquettes made with GH material using 650 mm rolls and 7.5 cc ⁇ pillows' during a test cycle in the batch grate kiln;
  • FIG. 20 is a plot showing the effect of bed height and grate firing profile on briquettes made with GH material using 650 mm rolls and 7.5 cc ⁇ pillows' during a test cycle in the batch grate kiln;
  • FIG. 21 shows the effect of basicity and firing temperature on the fired crush strength of briquettes made with HG material, 250 mm rolls and 4 cc almond forms;
  • FIG. 22 shows the effect of basicity on the briquette reduced properties; swell, crush strength after reduction (CSAR) and reducibility index of briquettes made with HG material, 250 mm rolls and 4 cc almond form;
  • Briquetting was performed using three different roll presses with varying roll diameter, width and feed systems.
  • the briquettes produced were pillow-shaped with nominal dimensions of 13x19x28 mm and a volume of 4 cc. There was a single row of 30 pockets around the circumference of each roll.
  • Briquetting was also performed using a Komarek BH400 double roll press, with a roll diameter of 450 mm and a roll width of 75 mm. Feed material was gravity fed into the nip zone from a feed hopper located above the rolls.
  • a schematic of its main components can be seen in Figure 2.
  • Briquettes of varying dimensions were produced with the following details: (1) Nominally 17.5x28x34.3 mm with a volume of 8.9 cc. There was a double row of 48 pockets arranged in staggered alignment around the circumference of each row (9 cc Almond forms) .
  • Briquetting was also conducted using a K ⁇ ppern 52/6.5 double roll press with a diameter of 650 mm and a roll width of 130 mm. Feed material was gravity fed into a nip zone from a hopper located above. Nip zone area was controlled through use of a *nip zone adjuster' .
  • a schematic of its main components can be seen in Figure 3.
  • the briquettes produced were ⁇ pillow' shaped with nominal dimensions of 30x24x16 mm and forms a volume of 7.5 cc. There were four rows of 77 pockets arranged symmetrically across the face of the roll. Of the two rolls, one was fixed whilst the other "floating roll” was held against the fixed roll by an oil and gas filled ram. The oil in the ram was pressurised to provide the desired specific pressing force between the rolls.
  • Figure 4 illustrates that feed moisture had a significant effect on the yield of 6 cc and 4cc briquettes produced by the briquetting press with 450 mm rolls as described in Example 1.
  • the feed material was gravity fed to the rolls while the rolls operated at a fixed roll speed of 20 rpm and a roll pressure of 90kg/cm 2 .
  • Feed moisture control is also important as variation in moisture content affects green properties such as green strength, abrasion resistance and shatter strengths. This is illustrated in Figures 5 and 6.
  • Figure 5 shows the relationship between feed moisture level and strength for briquettes made with HG using the 450 mm rolls, a gravity feed system, and a variety of pocket sizes.
  • Figure 6 shows the same relationship for briquettes made with the 650 mm rolls and 7.5 cc pockets for HG material.
  • Green strength tended to increase to a maximum for the optimum moisture content of approximately 6%. At moisture levels exceeding 7.5% the green strength was unacceptably low. Feed moisture had less of an influence on shatter strength and the green abrasion resistance of the briquettes.
  • briquetting operations can be carried out over a wide range of rolls pressures, it is preferred that briquetting be carried out at low pressures .
  • Such low pressure operation for iron ore briquetting is significant and opens up the possibility of achieving high production rates with wide rolls on a briquetting machines.
  • roll pressure should be carefully controlled within this low pressure range if the briquetting operation is to be optimised. If roll pressure is too low and nip zone area is not carefully controlled, the rolls are forced apart producing a thick web and distorted briquettes impairing the product yield and the quality of the briquette, particularly after induration. If roll pressure exceeds the optimum, poor closure of the briquettes occurs because of the "clamshell" effect on release of the briquette from the pocket. Although the density and crush strength of the green briquette will be increased, the impact resistance of the fired briquette will be severely impaired.
  • Figure 7 shows the effect of roll pressure on briquette thickness and quality (measured in terms of crush strength) for raw material HG produced in a gravity fed machine with 450mm diameter rolls with nominal 9 cc pockets. The figure shows that acceptable green strength was obtained at roll pressures as low as 60 kg/cm 2 .
  • Figures 8 and 9 show the effect of pressing force and resultant green strength that was obtained using the 650 mm diameter rolls.
  • the work was carried out on HG and GH raw material types and illustrates a similar relationship between roll pressure and green strength as with the 450 mm work. Specifically, the figures show that acceptable green strengths were obtained at pressing forces of 20 kN/cm.
  • Pressing force was also found to exert a significant influence on the shatter strength and the green abrasion resistance of the briquettes, with both variables increasing in response to increased roll pressure.
  • Roll pressure can be used primarily to control the amount of pressure exerted on feed material and roll speed can be altered to maximise the production rate. However, it is important to consider the effects of roll speed on briquette thickness and green strength when optimising the green briquetting operation.
  • the diagram shown in Figure 11 is an example of an operating window for briquetting with 250 mm rolls to form nominally 4 cc briquettes out of HG material on the Taiyo press.
  • roll pressure was fixed at 150 kg/cm 2 and precompactor speed was fixed at 20 rpm.
  • a series of curves are shown for feed moisture from 4 wt % to 12 wt %. Each represents conditions that resulted in the formation of whole briquettes.
  • Green briquettes produced under optimised conditions were found to be thermally very stable compared to pellets formed from the same material. This is shown in Figures 12 and 13.
  • Figure 12 shows the temperature profiles for the inlet and outlet gas and three positions within the bed of briquettes during laboratory-scale induration trials simulating a straight grate process.
  • the bed temperatures were measured by thermocouples placed at 100, 250 and 500 mm from the top of the bed.
  • the briquettes were found to be be thermally stable when heated at fast rates shown in the figures.
  • the excellent drying performance allowed the inlet gas temperature to be raised from ambient to 1340°C in ten minutes without spalling the briquettes.
  • Figure 13 shows the temperature profiles for briquette induration that produced nominal 4 cc briquettes of HG ore at productives of 32 t/m 2 . d and 25 t/m 2 .d.
  • the figure also shows, by way of comparison, a typical induration temperature profile for pellets.
  • the pellet profile was an optimised profile so that pellet spalling was minimised and fired properties were maximised.
  • the pellet profile produced pellets with a productivity of 16t/m 2 .d, which is considerably lower than the productivities of the briquettes.
  • the briquettes and the pellets were made from the same ore type.
  • the high productivities for the briquettes was due to the thermal stability of the green briquettes which enabled the briquettes to be heated at fast rates.
  • the thermal stability of the briquettes was found to be not exclusive to one induration method and to one ore type .
  • a pilot scale grate-kiln system was used to determine the properties of briquettes as they exited a grate prior to entry to a kiln.
  • the equipment consisted of a pot grate and a batch kiln. To simulate the travelling grate a LGP gas burner was used to generate the flame temperature. The pot grate was capable of up and down draught gas flow. The temperature of the material was measured throughout the bed using thermocouples set into and through the wall of the pot. These measurements were assumed to be the briquette temperature during the firing cycle. Due to the size of the briquettes tested, it may be that the temperature measurement shows the external briquette temperatures and not the internal temperatures. The temperature measured is most likely a mixture of briquette outside temperature and gas temperature at that location in the bed.
  • the bed height selected for the induration process was found to be not critical and not inhibited by gas permeability generally selected to avoid deformation of the briquettes at the lower parts of the bed while achieving a reasonable productivity.
  • gas permeability generally selected to avoid deformation of the briquettes at the lower parts of the bed while achieving a reasonable productivity.
  • permeability of the bed was not greatly compromised by bed height. Consequently, the induration process is not restricted by this variable as is the case with pelletising operations.
  • Green briquette bed depth can be selected to optimise productivity without compromising quality.
  • a grate-kiln process may offer certain advantages in terms of producing a better fired product compared to products obtained from other induration processes. It also heats the briquettes more uniformly through high temperature ranges in a way that reduces temperature gradients within the briquette and avoids differential shrinkage of the briquette that may lead to cracking. Also, as all the briquettes are subject to similar firing temperatures and time in the rotating kiln, briquette quality is more uniform compared to the straight grate process. Possibilities also exist for the production of briquettes suitable for direct reduction processes, providing a raw material of a suitable grade is used.
  • Figure 15 also shows that tumble strength (Tumble Index - Tl) and abrasion resistance (Abrasion Index - Al) , improved with firing temperature.
  • the grate firing profile was the same, with only the firing time in the kiln at the firing temperature being changed from 6 to 9 minutes.
  • the total firing time in the kiln remained the same, the extra time for the firing was taken from the rate of heating in the kiln, so that the 9 minutes firing time had a quicker heating rate to 1380° compared to the 6 minutes firing time.
  • Tests were also conducted with 6.3cc GH briquettes using the same firing profile as that used for the 7.5cc case.
  • the fired strength increased significantly from the longer firing time in the kiln. This was due to greater heat penetration of the briquettes during the firing cycle.
  • Figure 18 shows that the fired properties improved with increasing residence time, suggesting the importance of heating the product thoroughly to achieve the final properties required.
  • the reducibility index (RI) remained relatively stable across the range of basicity levels.
  • the RI varied from 53.8% at a basicity of 0.20 to just over 62.2% at a basicity of 1.00.
  • the swell index showed some response and varied from 11% at the lowest basicity to 14.8% in the mid- ranges, decreasing to zero at a basicity of 1.20.
  • the crush strength after reduction (CSAR) showed a large response to changes in the basicity level, ranging from 22 kgf at 0.20 basicity to 121 kgf at 1.20 basicity. This change in reduced strength reflects the fired crush strength results and is again related to variation in the bonding phases of the fired briquettes.
  • the low basicity briquettes were predominantly bonded by iron oxide-iron oxide bonds, which degrade during reduction. At increased basicity levels, slag bonding becomes more significant. These bonds are more stable during reduction, accounting for the higher reduced strengths and little or no swell at a basicity of 1.20.
  • Slag bonding also becomes a more important form of bonding in briquettes made from GH and G where higher Si0 2 and A1 2 0 3 levels result in increased flux additions .
  • Such briquettes generally prove stronger after reduction as the reduction process does not result in the breakdown of non-ferrous bonding phases.
  • High grade ores, such as HC, which require low flux addition rely almost solely on oxide-oxide bonding and hence have lower strength after reduction values.

Abstract

A method of producing an iron one briquette that is suitable for use as a blast furnace or other direct reduction furnace feedstock which includes the steps of: (1) mixing: (i) ore having a predetermined particle size distribution with a top size of 4.0 mm or less; and (ii) a flux; to form an ore/flux; (2) adjusting the water content of the ore prior to or during mixing step (1) to optimise briquette quality and product yield; (3) pressing the ore/flux mixture into a green briquette; and (4) indurating the green briquette to from a fured briquette.

Description

IRON ORE BRIQUETTING
The present invention is concerned with the production of iron ore briquettes suitable for transport and use in iron making processes.
Methods of agglomerating iron ores have been in development since the late 1800' s. However, of all the available processes only the pelletising and sintering processes are now of significance, but these suffer from certain disadvantages .
Pelletising consists of two distinct operations; forming pellets from moist ore fines and then firing them at a temperature in the region of 1300°C. It is critical in order to prepare suitable pellets that the ore be ground very fine, generally to a size where in the order of 60% of the ore passes 45 μm. It is then formed into pellets in either a horizontal drum or an inclined disc, generally with the addition of a suitable binder. The formed pellets are then fired in a process sometimes referred to as induration in shaft kilns, horizontal travelling grates, or a combination of travelling grates and rotary kilns. Pelletising is a practicable and commercially attractive method of agglomerating fine concentrates, but requires substantial grinding in order to achieve the required particle sizing which is an energy intensive process. Pellets made from goethite-hematite ores require extended induration times, affecting process economics. Solid fuel, in the form of coke, is often added to reduce induration time which results in the production of noxious emissions (including dioxins, NOx and SOx) .
Sintering consists of granulating moist iron ore fines and other fine materials with solid fuel, normally coke breeze, and loading the granulated mixture onto a permeable travelling grate. Air is drawn downwards through the grate as the temperature is raised. After a short ignition period, external heating of the bed is discontinued and as the solid fuel in the bed burns a narrow combustion zone moves downwards through the bed, each layer in turn being heated to approximately 1300°C. Bonding takes place between the grains during combustion, and a strong agglomerate is formed. However, traditional sintering processes result in high levels of noxious emissions, particularly sulfur oxides and dioxins, and therefore the process is undesirable and unsustainable on environmental grounds .
Briquetting is a process in which there was commercial interest in the late 1800' s and early 1900' s, but production of iron ore briquettes for use as a blast furnace feed material never reached any significant levels, decreased after 1950, and had ceased by about 1960. The process as practised involved the pressing of ore fines into a block of some suitable size and shape, and then indurating the block. A wide range of binders such as tar and pitch and/or other additives such as organic products, sodium silicate, ferrous sulfate, magnesium chloride, limestone and cement were tested. However, the earliest briquetting process, the Grondal process, simply involved mixing iron ore with water and pressing into oblong blocks the size of building bricks. These were then hardened by passing them through a tunnel kiln heated to 1350°C.
While developments in briquetting processes have been generally directed towards the development of suitable binders, JP 60-243232 describes briquettes that have a flat shape in order to provide for stable distribution in a blast furnace. Specifically, the
Japanese specification discloses that the flat-shaped briquettes are much more easily reduced at higher temperatures than conventional spherical pellets. The briquettes are made with a volume between 2 and 30cc in order to balance a relatively high compression strength against an inferior rotary or tumble strength and impact resistance with increasing size. The Japanese specification discloses that larger briquettes are less easily reduced in a blast furnace. However, aside from the size and shape of the briquettes there is no other factor described as critical, and, indeed, there is no detailed description of any other aspect of the production of the briquettes.
The applicant has carried out extensive research work into the production of briquettes from iron ore and has invented a method that can produce briquettes that have suitable properties for use in blast furnaces and other direct reduction vessels.
The applicant has found that there are a number of crucial factors in the success of this production method. These factors include characterising the raw material on the basis of mineralogy, porosity, size distribution and chemical composition, and then using this information to determine the required parameters, including the most suitable briquette forming parameters and induration parameters, to manufacture a suitable final product.
According to the present invention there is provided a method of producing an iron ore briquette that is suitable for use as a blast furnace or other direct reduction furnace feedstock which includes the steps of:
(a) mixing: (i) ore having a predetermined particle size distribution with a top size of 4.0 mm or less; and (ii) a flux; to form an ore/flux mixture; (b) adjusting the water content of the ore prior to or during mixing step (a) to optimise briquette quality and product yield;
(c) pressing the ore/flux mixture into a green briquette; and
(d) indurating the green briquette to form a fired briquette.
One feature of the above-described method is that the predetermined particle size distribution of ore particles that is mixed with flux in step (a) can be produced without grinding ore.
Preferably the method includes crushing and screening ore to form the predetermined particle size distribution that is mixed with flux in step (a) .
Preferably the top size of the predetermined particle size distribution that is mixed with flux in step (a) is 3.5 mm.
Preferably the top size is 3.0 mm.
More preferably the top size is 2.5 mm.
More preferably the top size is 1.5 mm.
More preferably the top size is 1.0 mm.
Preferably the predetermined particle size distribution that is mixed with flux in step (a) includes less than 50% passing a 45 μ screen.
More preferably the particle size distribution includes less than 30% passing the 45μm screen.
More preferably the particle size distribution includes less than 10% passing the 45μm screen.
Preferably the ore is a hydrated iron ore.
Preferably the hydrated ore is a goethite- containing ore.
Preferably the flux has a particle size distribution that is predominantly less than 100 μm.
Preferably the particle size distribution of the flux includes more than 95% passing a 250 μm screen.
Preferably the flux is limestone.
Preferably the ore/flux mixture produced in step (a) is selected so that the basicity of the fired briquette is greater than 0.2.
More preferably the basicity is greater than 0.6.
The term "basicity" is understood herein to mean
(%CaO + %MgO)/(%Si02 + %A1203) of the fired briquette.
Preferably there is no binder in the ore/flux mixture .
Preferably step (b) includes adjusting the water content of the ore so that the moisture content of the ore/flux mixture is 2-12% by weight of the total weight of the ore/flux mixture.
The term "total weight of the ore/flux mixture" means the total of the (a) dry weight of the ore/flux mix, (b) the weight of the inherent moisture of the mixture, and (c) the weight of the moisture (if any) added to the mixture in the method.
The term "moisture content" is the total of (b) and (c) above.
Preferably step (b) includes adjusting the water content of the ore so that the moisture content of the ore/flux mixture is 2-5% by weight of the total weight of the ore/flux mixture for ores that are dense hematite ores.
Preferably step (b) includes adjusting the water content of the ore so that the moisture content of the ore/flux mixture is 4-8% by weight of the total weight of the ore/flux mixture for ores containing up to 50% geothite.
Preferably step (b) includes adjusting the water content of the ore so that the moisture content of the ore/flux mixture is 6-12%by weight of the total weight of the ore/flux mixture for ores that are predominantly, ie contain more than 50%, goethite ores.
Preferably pressing step (c) produces briquettes that are 10 cc or less in volume.
More preferably pressing step (c) produces briquettes that are 8.5cc or less in volume.
More preferably pressing step (c) produces briquettes that are 6.5 cc or less in volume.
Preferably pressing step (c) includes pressing the ore/flux mixture using a low roll pressure. Preferably the low roll pressure is sufficient to produce briquettes having a green compressive strength of at least 2kgf.
More preferably the green compressive strength is at least 4kgf.
More preferably the green compressive strength is at least 5kgf.
Preferably the low roll pressure is generated by a roll pressing force of 10-140 kN/cm on the mixture of ore/flux.
More preferably the roll pressing force is 10-60 kN/cm.
More preferably the roll pressing force is 10-40 kN/cm.
Preferably indurating step (d) includes heating the briquette to a firing temperature with 40 minutes.
Preferably indurating step (d) includes heating the briquette to a firing temperature within 35 minutes.
More preferably indurating step (d) includes heating the briquette to the firing temperature within 30 minutes .
More preferably step (d) includes heating the briquette to the firing temperature within 20 minutes.
More preferably step (b) includes heating the briquette to the firing temperature within 15 minutes.
Preferably the firing temperature is at least 1200°C .
More preferably the firing temperature is at least 1260°C.
More preferably the firing temperature is at least 1320°C.
More preferably the firing temperature is at least 1350°C.
More preferably the firing temperature is at least 1380°C.
Preferably the fired briquette has a crush strength of at least 200kgf .
More preferably the fired briquette has a crush strength of at least 200kgf .
Iron ore fines are broadly characterised into four groups on the basis of petrological characteristics, such as mineralogy, mineral association and particle texture, porosity, size distribution and chemistry. The groups are:
(a) HC - Dense hematite/magnetite ores;
(b) GC - Ores containing up to 50% goethite; and;
(c) G - Ores containing predominantly goethite, ie greater than 50% goethite, such as pisolites, detritals, and channel iron deposits.
The following pages of the specification refer to two particular sub-groups of GC ores, namely: (i) HG - goethite-containing ores that are dominated by hematite; and
(ii) GH - ores with approximately equal amounts of hematite and goethite.
While not wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that the bonding mechanism in green briquettes involves a combination of bonds including the mechanical interlocking of particles, van der Waal's forces, and in the case of raw material types GC and G, hydrogen bonding to varying degrees is dependent on the percentage of hydrated iron species present, eg goethite. Several characteristics of the feed material have been identified as having a significant influence on the formation of such bonds that affect the quality and processing performance of the green and fired briquettes. These characteristics are the moisture level of the feed material and its flow characteristics, the chemical composition of the ore, its size distribution and petrological characteristics and porosity.
Preferably the feed materials are of the widest size distribution possible in order to achieve a high packing density and increased bonding of the ore particles. As noted above, the bonding mechanism of green briquettes is believed to be through a combination of bonds arising from the mechanical interlocking of particles, van der Waal's forces, and hydrogen bonding in the cases of raw material types GC and G. Although a broad size distribution increases the packing density and improves the strength of the green briquette, it is possible to briquette closely sized iron ores.
The top size of the particles is determined by the crushing process but is preferably less than 2.5 mm in order to produce briquettes of acceptable fired properties following the induration process. Generally, ore types HC and HG can be briquetted with coarser top sizes due to the lower heat requirements of these raw materials to attain acceptable fired strength. The top size of the raw material can be reduced through either crushing or screening processes. The bottom size of the particles has no absolute limit, but it is not necessary or desirable, to grind the ore into very fine particles (as required for pelletising) as this is an additional economic burden rendered unnecessary by the present invention. Preferably less than 10% of the particles pass a 45 μ sieve.
Advantageously the pocket dimensions of the briquetting apparatus should be selected on the basis of the maximum particle size to be briquetted, as well as for adequate induration performance, to ensure that satisfactory briquetting can be achieved. Typically the maximum particle size to achieve satisfactory briquetting is 25-30% of the minimum pocket dimension. If the maximum particle size exceeds this specification it may be necessary to select a larger pocket size.
It is desirable to control feed moisture in order to optimise green briquette quality and product yield. Moisture addition should not exceed the level at which liquid bridging becomes a significant form of inter- particle bonding. This results in both decreased green strength and adversely affects thermal stability. Insufficient moisture can lead to overpressurisation in the briquette pressing step and adversely affect green briquette quality and yield.
Depending on the feed characteristics of the ore to be processed, a moisture content of between 2 and 12 wt % for the feed material is used to optimise green briquette quality and product yield. Dense hematite concentrates (HC) have low optimum briquetting moistures, generally in the range of 2-5 wt %. These concentrates are often made up of closely sized particles with a smooth surface texture that generates low strength briquettes because of decreased interlocking of particles. More porous goethite-containing ores with up to 50% goethite (GC) briquette well in the range of 4-8 wt % moisture and more porous predominantly goethite ores (G) briquette well in the range of 6-12 wt% moisture. Such ores have a rough surface texture and shape enhancing their briquetting characteristics.
Conventional briquetting apparatus may be used in the method of the invention. In essence, such apparatus includes two adjacent rolls with pockets which come together at a nip zone in order to compress the feed material into adjacent, aligned pockets to produce briquettes. In the case of the present invention, the rolls are preferably horizontally aligned to achieve the required throughput for economic feasibility.
Although briquetting can be carried out over a wide range of roll pressures depending on the application, briquetting of iron ores is preferably conducted at roll pressing forces of 10-140 kN/cm and more preferably at the low end of this range, typically from 10-60 kN/cm. Such low pressure operation for iron ore briquetting is ( significant and makes it possible to achieve high production rates by the use of wide rolls on the briquetting machine up to 1.6m in length.
Preferably the roll pressure is carefully controlled within the low pressure range in order to optimise the briquetting operation. If the roll pressure is too low, the rolls are forced apart producing a thick web and distorted briquettes impairing the product yield and the quality of the briquette, particularly after induration. If the roll pressure exceeds the optimum, poor closure of the briquettes occurs because of the "clamshell" effect on release of the briquettes from the pocket. The clamshell effect is more pronounced for small roll diameters and excess roll pressures, which also cause pocket binding/jamming. Although the density and crush strength of the green briquettes will be increased, the impact resistance of the fired briquettes will be severely impaired.
Preferably the moisture level is selected to influence the flow characteristics of the material through the feed system, and moisture levels of 2-12 wt % for the feed material are generally suitable. If the moisture level is too high for the feed system, the feed pressure is adversely affected resulting in a decreased yield and some impairment of briquette quality, characterised by a lower green strength. It the feed material is too low in moisture for the feed system the resultant feed pressure will cause clamshelling which may result in decreased yields, increased wear rates of the roll pockets, and inferior fired properties.
The briquetting apparatus may be operated with a pre-compactor feed system or with a gravity feed system. The latter system is advantageous where high tonnages are to be briquetted, as in the iron ore industry.
With regard to briquetting presses, a roll diameter is selected in order to ensure that briquette quality is obtained at an economic production rate. Large diameter rolls increase production rates, however they also increase the area of the nip zone. Careful control of the nip zone facilitates formation of quality green briquettes and avoids formation of briquettes with an excessively thick web. Alterations in roll diameter may also alter the optimum moisture level for feed material where increased roll diameters represent increases in feed moisture. Roll diameters typically vary from 250 mm - 1200 mm. In order to maximise production, preferably the rolls are operated at the fastest speed possible whilst maintaining briquette quality. However, a very low roll speed may be used if productivity is of a secondary concern.
Typically, roll speeds in the range of 1 rpm to 20 rpm are employed. It is desirable in order to maintain quality, particularly at high roll speeds, that the feed material be presented to the rolls at a rate that matches the briquette production rate and with a nip zone area that produces the forces required to form quality briquettes.
Any suitable roll width may be selected provided that it is within the pressure capabilities of the briquetting machine. As briquetting of iron ores is a low pressure operation, wide rolls are preferred, increasing the capacity of the machine. The rolls are preferably horizontally aligned to allow for use with a gravity feed system. The flow characteristics of iron ores, whether HC, GC (including HG and GH) , or G, are suitable for gravity feeding at the moisture ranges specified above for each classification.
The pocket shape should not generally be of a sharp angular nature, but be more smooth and rounded to improve handling characteristics. By way of example, a length/width and width/depth ratio of approximately 0.65 is suitable. Pocket shapes also have specific release angles, 110-120° that combat the tendency for sticking in the pockets.
The pocket size can be optimised according to the requirements for the induration process and the raw material top size and the iron making blast furnace. Typically the briquettes have a volume of between 2 and 30 cc. Preferably the volume is 10 cc or less. More preferably the volume is 8.5 cc or less. More preferably the volume is less than 6.5 cc.
A staggered pocket con iguration is preferred as this makes the optimum use of the available space on the face of the rolls, and hence maximises throughput.
Preferably the induration method and conditions are selected having regard to the complex relationship between raw material characteristics and the influence of the briquette dimensions.
Consideration of the relationship between briquette volume, shape and the petrological characteristics of the raw material is required. The chemical composition of the feed material will have a significant influence on the properties of the fired briquette. Apart from moisture, the feed material includes the iron ore made up of iron oxide and gangue minerals, with the required flux added to give the required basicity level in the fired briquette. Test results have shown that the flux should preferably be finely sized, typically >95% passing 250 um, in order to achieve the required properties in the fired briquette.
While not wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that the bonding mechanism for fired briquettes involves diffusion bonding and re-crystallisation of the iron oxide particles as well as slag bonding at higher flux levels. Therefore, flux level and firing temperature and, to a certain extent, firing time have a strong influence on briquette properties. Elevated basicity levels may improve reduced strengths as well as indurated strengths as higher flux levels encourage the formation of bonding phases which resist demormation under reducing conditions.
Induration may be carried out using a straight grate, grate-kiln or a continuous kiln type process.
It has been found that green briquettes produced under an optimised firing profile are thermally very stable compared to pellets prepared from the same material. The feed ore for pelletising must be ground to a fine size, typically up to 60% passing 45 μm, and the pellets dried slowly at low temperatures, typically <200°C to avoid spalling. In contrast, as indicated above, the feed ore for the present invention that can be indurated successfully can be much coarser, with top sizes preferably up to 2.5 mm, and hence does not need grinding to the same extent as is required to produce pellets. This characteristic represents major capital cost reductions for briquetting operations over traditional pellet production plants.
An important characteristic of the briquette of the present invention is the ability to withstand high temperatures on heating at fast rates, such as heating to a firing temperature within 30 minutes, more preferably within 20 minutes. This is in direct contrast with conventional understanding of how goethitic ores respond in induration situations, where is has been shown that they spall when heated too fast through the dehydroxylation and free water removal zones .
As is indicated above, the thermal stability of the briquettes of the present invention has been found to be much greater than pellets and they may be heated at much faster rates than pellets without spalling. This allows a much shorter heating cycle. Consequently, briquette productivity can be significantly higher than for pellets using the same material. For instance, briquette productivities potentially in the order of 30t/m .day in a straight grate kiln can be achieved, compared to pellet productivities of 16t/m2.day for HG ores in the same kiln.
It will be clearly understood that, although prior art publications are referred to herein, this reference does not constitute an admission that any of these documents form part of the common general knowledge in the art, in Australia or in any other country.
Preferred embodiments of the present invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of suitable apparatus with 250 mm diameter rolls and a precompacted feed system for conducting the process of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic illustration of suitable apparatus with 450 mm diameter rolls and a gravity feed system for conducting the process of the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a schematic illustration of suitable apparatus with 650 mm diameter rolls and a gravity feed system for conducting the process of the present invention;
FIG. 4 is a plot of yield of whole briquettes versus feed moisture for HG material on 450 mm rolls with 6 cc almond forms and 4 cc elongate almond pockets;
FIG. 5 is a plot showing the effect of feed moisture on green briquette strength for HG material on 450 mm rolls with varying pocket dimensions; FIG. 6 is a plot showing the effect of feed moisture on green briquette strength for HG material using 650 mm rolls and 7.5 cc ^pillows';
FIG. 7 shows the effect of roll pressing force on briquette properties; thickness, green strength and green density on 450 mm rolls and 9 cc almond forms;
FIG. 8 is a plot showing the effects of roll pressing on green strength for HG material using 650 mm rolls and 7.5 cc ^pillows' ;
FIG. 9 is a plot showing the effect of roll pressing force on green strength for GH material using 650 mm rolls and 7.5 cc ^pillows' ;
FIG. 10 shows the effect of roll speed on briquette properties; thickness, green strength and green density for a rolls pressure of 90kg/cm2 and a feed moisture of 6 wt % using 450 mm rolls and 9 cc almond forms;
FIG. 11 is the operating window for a briquetting machine with a pre-compactor, 250 mm rolls, 4 cc almond forms and HG material;
FIG. 12 shows temperature profiles for briquette induration in a 500 mm deep bed;
FIG. 13 shows temperature profiles for briquette induration that produced briquettes at high productivities and a typical temperature profile for pellet induration that produced pellets at a lower productivity;
FIG. 14 is a plot showing the effect of average bed temperature on briquettes made with GH material using 650 mm rolls and 7.5 cc ^pillows' at the end of a grate cycle in a batch grate kiln;
FIG. 15 is a plot showing the effect of average bed temperature on briquettes made with GH material using 650 mm rolls and 7.5 cc ^pillows' at the end of a grate- kiln firing cycle in a batch grate kiln;
FIG. 16 is a plot showing the effect of time at firing temperature (1380°C) on briquettes made with GH material using 650 mm rolls and 7.5 cc ^pillows' during a test cycle in the batch grate kiln;
FIG. 17 is a plot showing the effect of time at firing temperature (1380 °C) on briquettes made with GH material using 650 mm rolls and 7.5 cc ^pillows' during a test cycle in the batch grate kiln;
FIG. 18 is a plot showing the effects of residence time on 7.5 cc GH briquettes in the kiln during a test cycle in the kiln only.
FIG. 19 is a plot showing the effect of bed height and grate firing profile on briquettes made with GH material using 650 mm rolls and 7.5 cc ^pillows' during a test cycle in the batch grate kiln;
FIG. 20 is a plot showing the effect of bed height and grate firing profile on briquettes made with GH material using 650 mm rolls and 7.5 cc ^pillows' during a test cycle in the batch grate kiln;
FIG. 21 shows the effect of basicity and firing temperature on the fired crush strength of briquettes made with HG material, 250 mm rolls and 4 cc almond forms;
FIG. 22 shows the effect of basicity on the briquette reduced properties; swell, crush strength after reduction (CSAR) and reducibility index of briquettes made with HG material, 250 mm rolls and 4 cc almond form;
EXAMPLE 1
Briquetting was performed using three different roll presses with varying roll diameter, width and feed systems.
Initial testing was conducted using a Taiyo K- 102A double roll press, which has a nominal capacity of 300 kg/hr. This machine has 250 mm diameter rolls of 36 mm width and features a screw-type precompactor. A schematic showing its main components can be seen in Figure 1.
The briquettes produced were pillow-shaped with nominal dimensions of 13x19x28 mm and a volume of 4 cc. There was a single row of 30 pockets around the circumference of each roll.
Of the two rolls, one was fixed whilst the other "floating roll" was held against the fixed roll by an oil and gas filled ram. The oil in the ram was pressurised to provide the desired load force between the rolls.
Briquetting was also performed using a Komarek BH400 double roll press, with a roll diameter of 450 mm and a roll width of 75 mm. Feed material was gravity fed into the nip zone from a feed hopper located above the rolls. A schematic of its main components can be seen in Figure 2.
Briquettes of varying dimensions were produced with the following details: (1) Nominally 17.5x28x34.3 mm with a volume of 8.9 cc. There was a double row of 48 pockets arranged in staggered alignment around the circumference of each row (9 cc Almond forms) .
(2) Nominally 14.5x22.1x33.9 mm with a volume of 6.3 cc. There was a double row of 60 pockets arranged in a staggered alignment around the circumference of each roll (6 cc Almond forms).
(3) Nominally 15.2x21.7x22.9 mm with a volume of 3.9 cc. There was a triple row of 58 pockets arranged in a staggered alignment around the circumference of each row (4 cc spherical) .
(4) Nominally 11.2x17.3x32.1 mm with a volume of 3.9 cc. There was a double row of 72 pockets arranged in a symmetrical alignment around the circumference of each roll (4 cc elongate) .
Of the two rolls, one was fixed whilst the other "floating roll" was held against the fixed roll by an oil and gas filled ram. The oil in the ram was pressurised to provide the desired specific pressing force between the rolls.
Briquetting was also conducted using a Kδppern 52/6.5 double roll press with a diameter of 650 mm and a roll width of 130 mm. Feed material was gravity fed into a nip zone from a hopper located above. Nip zone area was controlled through use of a *nip zone adjuster' . A schematic of its main components can be seen in Figure 3.
The briquettes produced were Λpillow' shaped with nominal dimensions of 30x24x16 mm and forms a volume of 7.5 cc. There were four rows of 77 pockets arranged symmetrically across the face of the roll. Of the two rolls, one was fixed whilst the other "floating roll" was held against the fixed roll by an oil and gas filled ram. The oil in the ram was pressurised to provide the desired specific pressing force between the rolls.
EXAMPLE 2
The effect of feed moisture content was investigated.
Figure 4 illustrates that feed moisture had a significant effect on the yield of 6 cc and 4cc briquettes produced by the briquetting press with 450 mm rolls as described in Example 1. The feed material was gravity fed to the rolls while the rolls operated at a fixed roll speed of 20 rpm and a roll pressure of 90kg/cm2.
Feed moisture control is also important as variation in moisture content affects green properties such as green strength, abrasion resistance and shatter strengths. This is illustrated in Figures 5 and 6.
Figure 5 shows the relationship between feed moisture level and strength for briquettes made with HG using the 450 mm rolls, a gravity feed system, and a variety of pocket sizes.
Figure 6 shows the same relationship for briquettes made with the 650 mm rolls and 7.5 cc pockets for HG material.
Green strength tended to increase to a maximum for the optimum moisture content of approximately 6%. At moisture levels exceeding 7.5% the green strength was unacceptably low. Feed moisture had less of an influence on shatter strength and the green abrasion resistance of the briquettes.
EXAMPLE 3
As is indicated above, although briquetting operations can be carried out over a wide range of rolls pressures, it is preferred that briquetting be carried out at low pressures . Such low pressure operation for iron ore briquetting is significant and opens up the possibility of achieving high production rates with wide rolls on a briquetting machines.
However, as is indicated above, roll pressure should be carefully controlled within this low pressure range if the briquetting operation is to be optimised. If roll pressure is too low and nip zone area is not carefully controlled, the rolls are forced apart producing a thick web and distorted briquettes impairing the product yield and the quality of the briquette, particularly after induration. If roll pressure exceeds the optimum, poor closure of the briquettes occurs because of the "clamshell" effect on release of the briquette from the pocket. Although the density and crush strength of the green briquette will be increased, the impact resistance of the fired briquette will be severely impaired.
Figure 7 shows the effect of roll pressure on briquette thickness and quality (measured in terms of crush strength) for raw material HG produced in a gravity fed machine with 450mm diameter rolls with nominal 9 cc pockets. The figure shows that acceptable green strength was obtained at roll pressures as low as 60 kg/cm2.
Figures 8 and 9 show the effect of pressing force and resultant green strength that was obtained using the 650 mm diameter rolls. The work was carried out on HG and GH raw material types and illustrates a similar relationship between roll pressure and green strength as with the 450 mm work. Specifically, the figures show that acceptable green strengths were obtained at pressing forces of 20 kN/cm.
Pressing force was also found to exert a significant influence on the shatter strength and the green abrasion resistance of the briquettes, with both variables increasing in response to increased roll pressure.
EXAMPLE 4
Roll speed was also investigated.
Roll speed, measured in rpm, was found to exert an influence on the amount of pressure applied to feed materials.
Increased roll speeds result in shorter residence time in the nip zone of the rolls and hence lower pressure is exerted for a longer period of time. Roll pressure can be used primarily to control the amount of pressure exerted on feed material and roll speed can be altered to maximise the production rate. However, it is important to consider the effects of roll speed on briquette thickness and green strength when optimising the green briquetting operation.
The effect of roll speed on briquette thickness and quality (measured in terms of crush strength) for raw material HG is shown in Figure 10 for a gravity fed machine with 450 mm diameter rolls. The Figure shows that thickness and green strength decreased as roll speed increased.
EXAMPLE 5
The process variables of the briquetting machine as described in Example 1, ie, roll speed, precompactor speed and roll pressure, and the briquette density were used to determine an operating window for this particular system of briquetting.
The diagram shown in Figure 11 is an example of an operating window for briquetting with 250 mm rolls to form nominally 4 cc briquettes out of HG material on the Taiyo press.
To simplify the curves, roll pressure was fixed at 150 kg/cm2 and precompactor speed was fixed at 20 rpm. A series of curves are shown for feed moisture from 4 wt % to 12 wt %. Each represents conditions that resulted in the formation of whole briquettes.
To the right of the curves there is a region of low feed pressure where pockets are not filled or the briquettes are weak and split readily. To the left of the curves there is a region where the pressure on the feed is too high. Briquettes shear and pocket blockage occurred. Across the strength range, below 6 kgf, the briquettes were too weak to withstand pocket release and either remain in the pockets or split on release. Above 30 kgf, further compaction could not be achieved. The briquettes were thick and began to *clam shell' . The strength range of 6 to 30 kgf defined the outer limits within which whole briquettes could be formed with the sample material and the Taiyo briquetting machine.
To determine the operating window certain product and quality parameters including yield, density, crush strength and drop/shatter strength need to be considered. Once these properties are taken into consideration, a smaller region can be defined which is the operating region of the briquetting process.
In Figure 11, this region occurs at rolls speeds between 5 and 9 rpm and green strengths between 6 kgf and 18 kgf.
EXAMPLE 6
Green briquettes produced under optimised conditions were found to be thermally very stable compared to pellets formed from the same material. This is shown in Figures 12 and 13.
Figure 12 shows the temperature profiles for the inlet and outlet gas and three positions within the bed of briquettes during laboratory-scale induration trials simulating a straight grate process.
The bed temperatures were measured by thermocouples placed at 100, 250 and 500 mm from the top of the bed.
The briquettes were found to be be thermally stable when heated at fast rates shown in the figures. The excellent drying performance allowed the inlet gas temperature to be raised from ambient to 1340°C in ten minutes without spalling the briquettes.
Figure 13 shows the temperature profiles for briquette induration that produced nominal 4 cc briquettes of HG ore at productives of 32 t/m2. d and 25 t/m2 .d. The figure also shows, by way of comparison, a typical induration temperature profile for pellets. The pellet profile was an optimised profile so that pellet spalling was minimised and fired properties were maximised. The pellet profile produced pellets with a productivity of 16t/m2.d, which is considerably lower than the productivities of the briquettes. The briquettes and the pellets were made from the same ore type.
The high productivities for the briquettes was due to the thermal stability of the green briquettes which enabled the briquettes to be heated at fast rates.
The thermal stability of the briquettes was found to be not exclusive to one induration method and to one ore type .
EXAMPLE 7
A pilot scale grate-kiln system was used to determine the properties of briquettes as they exited a grate prior to entry to a kiln.
The equipment consisted of a pot grate and a batch kiln. To simulate the travelling grate a LGP gas burner was used to generate the flame temperature. The pot grate was capable of up and down draught gas flow. The temperature of the material was measured throughout the bed using thermocouples set into and through the wall of the pot. These measurements were assumed to be the briquette temperature during the firing cycle. Due to the size of the briquettes tested, it may be that the temperature measurement shows the external briquette temperatures and not the internal temperatures. The temperature measured is most likely a mixture of briquette outside temperature and gas temperature at that location in the bed.
Figure 14 shows how the temperature of the briquettes made from GH material (d95 = 1mm) with a green nominal size of 7.5cc initially increased to a maximum at approximately 300-400°C average bed temperature, and then fell to a minimum temperature at ~700°C. At higher temperatures the strength then increased again. The strength fell to a minimum value at ~700°C, which is lower than the green strength. This is a critical factor for transport of the material from the grate-to the kiln. As the strength was lowest at this temperature range, the maximum amount of degradation could be expected if the firing profile included transfer from the grate to the kiln at this temperature.
For a straight grate process, the bed height selected for the induration process was found to be not critical and not inhibited by gas permeability generally selected to avoid deformation of the briquettes at the lower parts of the bed while achieving a reasonable productivity. In addition, at briquette volumes exceeding 6 cc, permeability of the bed was not greatly compromised by bed height. Consequently, the induration process is not restricted by this variable as is the case with pelletising operations. Green briquette bed depth can be selected to optimise productivity without compromising quality.
A grate-kiln process may offer certain advantages in terms of producing a better fired product compared to products obtained from other induration processes. It also heats the briquettes more uniformly through high temperature ranges in a way that reduces temperature gradients within the briquette and avoids differential shrinkage of the briquette that may lead to cracking. Also, as all the briquettes are subject to similar firing temperatures and time in the rotating kiln, briquette quality is more uniform compared to the straight grate process. Possibilities also exist for the production of briquettes suitable for direct reduction processes, providing a raw material of a suitable grade is used.
EXAMPLE 8
Firing temperature was investigated.
Briquettes of GH material (d95 = 1mm) 7.5cc were fired in the grate-kiln pilot rig, all using the same firing profiles for the grate section. After transfer to the kiln, the same profile was applied for firing, except that the firing temperature reached was altered as shown. The results are shown in Figure 15.
There is a clear indication in Figure 15 that to achieve suitable fired strength in briquettes of this size the firing temperature in the kiln should be at least 1380°C.
Figure 15 also shows that tumble strength (Tumble Index - Tl) and abrasion resistance (Abrasion Index - Al) , improved with firing temperature.
EXAMPLE 9
Firing temperature and time at temperature were investigated.
Briquettes made from GH material (d95 = 1mm) with a nominal size of 7.5cc were fired in a series of grate- kiln tests. The grate firing profile was the same, with only the firing time in the kiln at the firing temperature being changed from 6 to 9 minutes. The total firing time in the kiln remained the same, the extra time for the firing was taken from the rate of heating in the kiln, so that the 9 minutes firing time had a quicker heating rate to 1380° compared to the 6 minutes firing time.
Tests were also conducted with 6.3cc GH briquettes using the same firing profile as that used for the 7.5cc case.
Results are illustrated in Figures 16 and 17.
For the nominally 7.5cc size GH briquettes, the fired strength increased significantly from the longer firing time in the kiln. This was due to greater heat penetration of the briquettes during the firing cycle.
The fired properties for the 6.3 cc GH briquettes were superior to those produced for the 7.5cc case, inferring that the issue of heat penetration is a significant issue for fired property generation of the briquettes. This result also suggests that when heat penetration in the briquettes is insufficient adequate strength will not be generated in the fired product.
EXAMPLE 10
The effect of residence time in a grate kiln was investigated.
Briquettes made from GH material (d95 = 1mm) and nominally 7.5cc were fired in a pilot scale batch grate kiln. They were charged green into a kiln that had been preheated to either 500 or 1000°C. Firing profiles were imposed on the briquettes and the total residence time reported. The results are shown in Figure 18.
Figure 18 shows that the fired properties improved with increasing residence time, suggesting the importance of heating the product thoroughly to achieve the final properties required.
The effect of rapid heating was not reduced by a larger bed depth of the grate. This is shown in Figures 19 and 20. The green briquette bed was highly permeable and did not restrict airflow, as often occurs with pellets . The maximum bed depth useable has not been defined, but is likely to be greater than 300mm. This far exceeded that possible for even the best pellet beds in a grate-kiln system.
EXAMPLE 11
The effect of the chemistry of briquettes was investigated.
The effect of basicity and temperature on the fired briquette properties made from HG material was determined by firing the briquettes in the muffle furnace at specific temperatures and times. The results are shown in Figure 21.
Results for the chemical analyses of the fired briquettes made at varying basicities produced fired briquettes which varied in grade from 63.81% Fe at a basicity of 1.2 up to 65.93% Fe for a basicity of 0.2, reflecting the level of flux addition.
As can be seen in Figure 21, crush strength increased with both temperature and as basicity increased from 0.2 to 0.8. This effect becomes more significant as the temperature increased across the range studied and it was possible to achieve 300 kgf at 1295°C for 0.6 basicity and at 1280°C for 0.8 basicity.
The explanation for increased basicity levels resulting in increased strengths is related to changes in the bonding mechanism. At low basicity levels, bonding of the particles occurs as a result of recrystallisation of iron oxide and the formation of iron oxide-iron oxide bonds. At increased basicity levels, melt formation occurs at lower temperatures enhancing melting of iron oxide crystals, and slag bonding becomes more significant giving higher strengths for the same temperature.
EXAMPLE 12
Reduction testing, using whole briquettes and standard reduction test methods JIS 8713/IS07215 was carried out on HG briquettes that were fired at 1300°C for 10 min. The results of reducibility, swell and crush strength after reduction (CSAR) are shown in Figure 22.
The reducibility index (RI) remained relatively stable across the range of basicity levels. The RI varied from 53.8% at a basicity of 0.20 to just over 62.2% at a basicity of 1.00.
The swell index showed some response and varied from 11% at the lowest basicity to 14.8% in the mid- ranges, decreasing to zero at a basicity of 1.20. The crush strength after reduction (CSAR) showed a large response to changes in the basicity level, ranging from 22 kgf at 0.20 basicity to 121 kgf at 1.20 basicity. This change in reduced strength reflects the fired crush strength results and is again related to variation in the bonding phases of the fired briquettes. The low basicity briquettes were predominantly bonded by iron oxide-iron oxide bonds, which degrade during reduction. At increased basicity levels, slag bonding becomes more significant. These bonds are more stable during reduction, accounting for the higher reduced strengths and little or no swell at a basicity of 1.20. Slag bonding also becomes a more important form of bonding in briquettes made from GH and G where higher Si02 and A1203 levels result in increased flux additions . Such briquettes generally prove stronger after reduction as the reduction process does not result in the breakdown of non-ferrous bonding phases. High grade ores, such as HC, which require low flux addition rely almost solely on oxide-oxide bonding and hence have lower strength after reduction values.
Many modifications may be made to the embodiments of the present invention described above without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.

Claims

CLAIMS :
1. A method of producing an iron ore briquette that is suitable for use as a blast furnace or other direct reduction furnace feedstock which includes the steps of:
(a) mixing: (i) ore having a predetermined particle size distribution with a top size of 4.0 mm or less; and (ii) a flux; to form an ore/flux mixture;
(b) adjusting the water content of the ore prior to or during mixing step (a) to optimise briquette quality and product yield;
(c) pressing the ore/flux mixture into a green briquette; and
(d) indurating the green briquette to form a fired briquette.
2. The method defined in claim 1 further includes crushing and screening ore to form the predetermined particle size distribution that is mixed with flux in step (a) .
3. The method defined in claim 1 or claim 2 wherein the top size of the predetermined particle size distribution of ore that is mixed with flux in step (a) is 3.5 mm.
4. The method defined in claim 3 wherein the top size is 3.0 mm.
5. The method defined in claim 3 wherein the top size is 2.5 mm.
6. The method defined in claim 3 wherein the top size is 1.5 mm.
7. The method defined in claim 3 wherein the top size is 1.0 mm.
8. The method defined in any one of the preceding claims wherein the predetermined particle size distribution of ore that is mixed with flux in step (a) includes less than 50% passing a 45 μm screen.
9. The method defined in claim 8 wherein the predetermined ore particle size includes less than 30% passing the 45μm screen.
10. The method defined in claim 8 wherein the predetermined ore particle size includes less than 10% passing the 45μm screen.
11. The method defined in any one of the preceding claims wherein the ore is a hydrated iron ore.
12. The method defined in claim 11 wherein the hydrated ore is a goethite-containing ore.
13. The method defined in any one of the preceding claims wherein the flux has a particle size distribution that is predominantly less than 100 μm.
14. The method defined in any one of the preceding claims wherein the particle size distribution of the flux includes more than 95% passing a 250 um screen.
15. The method defined in any one of the preceding claims wherein the ore/flux mixture produced in step (a) is selected so that the basicity of the fired briquette produced in step (d) is greater than 0.2..
16. The method defined in claim 15 wherein the basicity is greater than 0.6.
17. The method defined in any one of the preceding claims wherein there is no binder in the ore/flux mixture.
18. The method defined in any one of the preceding claims wherein step (b) includes adjusting the water content of the ore so that the moisture content of the ore/flux mixture is 2-12% by weight of the total weight of the ore/flux mixture.
19. The method defined in claim 18 wherein step (b) includes adjusting the water content of the ore so that the moisture content of the ore/flux mixture is 2-5% by weight of the total weight of the ore/flux mixture for ores that are dense hematite ores.
20. The method defined in claim 18 wherein step (b) includes adjusting the water content of the ore so that the moisture content of the ore/flux mixture is 4-8% by weight of the total weight of the ore/flux mixture for ores containing up to 50% goethite.
21. The method defined in claim 18 wherein step (b) includes adjusting the water content of the ore so that the moisture content of the ore/flux mixture is 6-10% by weight of the total weight of the ore/flux mixture for ores that are predominantly, ie contains more than 50%, goethite.
22. The method defined in any one of the preceding claims wherein pressing step (c) produces briquettes that are 6 cc or less in volume.
23. The method defined in claim 22 wherein the briquettes are 8.5 cc or les in volume.
24. The method defined in claim 22 wherein the briquettes are 6.5 cc or less in volume.
25. The method defined in any one of the preceding claims wherein pressing step (c) includes pressing the ore/flux mixture using a low roll pressure.
26. The method defined in claim 25 wherein the low roll pressure is sufficient to produce briquettes having a green compressive strength of at least 2kgf .
27. The method defined in claim 25 wherein the low roll pressure is generated by a roll pressing force of 10-
140 kN/cm on the mixture of ore/flux.
28. The method defined in claim 25 wherein the roll pressing force is 10-40kN/cm.
29. The method defined in any one of the preceding claims wherein indurating step (d) includes heating the briquette to a firing temperature within 40 minutes.
30. The method defined in claim 29 wherein step (d) includes heating the briquette to the firing temperature within 35 minutes.
31. The method defined in claim 29 wherein step (b) includes heating the briquette to the firing temperature within 30 minutes.
32. The method defined in claim 29 wherein step (d) includes heating the briquette to the firing temperature within 20 minutes.
33. The method defined in claim 29 wherein step (d) including heating the briquette to the firing temperature within 15 minutes.
34. The method defined in any one of claims 29 to 33 wherein the firing temperature is at least 1200°C.
35. The method defined in claim 34 wherein the firing temperature is at least 1260°C.
36. The method defined in claim 34 wherein the firing temperature is at least 1320°C.
37. The method defined in claim 34 wherein the firing temperature is at least 1350°C.
38. The method defined in claim 34 wherein the firing temperature is at least 1380°C.
39. The method defined in any one of the preceding claims wherein the fired briquette has a crush strength of at least 200kgf.
40. A fired briquette produced by the method according to any one of the preceding claims which has a crush strength of at least 200 kgf.
EP02764361A 2001-08-02 2002-08-02 Iron ore briquetting Expired - Lifetime EP1423545B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AUPR678301 2001-08-02
AUPR6783A AUPR678301A0 (en) 2001-08-02 2001-08-02 Iron ore briquetting
PCT/AU2002/001033 WO2003012153A1 (en) 2001-08-02 2002-08-02 Iron ore briquetting

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1423545A1 true EP1423545A1 (en) 2004-06-02
EP1423545A4 EP1423545A4 (en) 2004-08-18
EP1423545B1 EP1423545B1 (en) 2010-04-28

Family

ID=3830739

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP02764361A Expired - Lifetime EP1423545B1 (en) 2001-08-02 2002-08-02 Iron ore briquetting
EP02753907A Expired - Lifetime EP1425427B1 (en) 2001-08-02 2002-08-02 Iron ore briquetting

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP02753907A Expired - Lifetime EP1425427B1 (en) 2001-08-02 2002-08-02 Iron ore briquetting

Country Status (12)

Country Link
US (2) US20050050996A1 (en)
EP (2) EP1423545B1 (en)
JP (3) JP5389308B2 (en)
KR (4) KR20040053106A (en)
CN (2) CN100430496C (en)
AT (2) ATE466112T1 (en)
AU (4) AUPR678301A0 (en)
BR (2) BR0211877B1 (en)
CA (2) CA2456191C (en)
DE (2) DE60236172D1 (en)
WO (3) WO2003012154A1 (en)
ZA (2) ZA200400957B (en)

Families Citing this family (25)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
AUPR678301A0 (en) * 2001-08-02 2001-08-23 Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation Iron ore briquetting
BRPI0506136B8 (en) * 2004-10-19 2018-10-23 Posco compacted iron manufacturing equipment
KR100726208B1 (en) * 2005-11-11 2007-06-11 조영기 The steel ingot or carbon steel ingot manufacturing method and manufacturing devices which uses the steel by product
EP2172571B1 (en) * 2007-05-28 2016-09-28 Kabushiki Kaisha Kobe Seiko Sho Method for production of carbon composite metal oxide briquette
JP5160848B2 (en) * 2007-09-18 2013-03-13 株式会社神戸製鋼所 Manufacturing method of briquette with carbonaceous materials using oil-containing steelworks dust
CN102388153B (en) * 2009-05-15 2013-09-18 株式会社神户制钢所 Method for manufacturing high-density reduced iron and device for manufacturing high-density reduced iron
CN102181630B (en) * 2011-04-12 2012-08-01 首钢总公司 Method for using paigeite powder in sintering
KR101405485B1 (en) * 2012-07-02 2014-06-11 주식회사 포스코 Compacting machine
KR101424608B1 (en) * 2012-07-30 2014-07-31 주식회사 포스코 Device for manufacturing briquette
CN103846051A (en) * 2014-03-05 2014-06-11 天津特斯达生物质能源机械有限公司 Rotary plunger type straw granulator
MX2014014746A (en) 2014-12-03 2015-10-02 D R &D Labs And Engineering S De R L De C V Process for obtaining briquettes from pelelt fines, dri sludge, dri fines and dust from dri dusting for being industrially used in procceses for producing direct reduction iron.
CN104561532A (en) * 2014-12-17 2015-04-29 山东钢铁集团淄博张钢有限公司 Mechanical ball pressing preparation technology of carbon-containing iron material for converter direct steelmaking
CN107429310B (en) * 2015-03-17 2019-12-20 高丽大学校产学协力团 Magnetite-based sintered ore and its production process
BE1023884B1 (en) * 2016-07-08 2017-09-04 Lhoist Rech Et Developpement Sa PROCESS FOR PRODUCING BRIQUETTES CONTAINING ACTIVE IRON OXIDE AND BRIQUETTES THUS OBTAINED
KR101908483B1 (en) * 2016-11-28 2018-12-19 주식회사 포스코 Manufacturing apparatus for lump, manufacturing apparatus for sintered ore using the same and method thereof
GB201706116D0 (en) 2017-04-18 2017-05-31 Legacy Hill Resources Ltd Iron ore pellets
CN107020768B (en) * 2017-05-05 2019-08-16 张建龙 Dry roller pressing type prilling machine
CN108893599A (en) * 2018-08-27 2018-11-27 锡矿山闪星锑业有限责任公司 A kind of briquetting device and method of low-grade fritter diameter antimony oxide ore
US11787737B2 (en) * 2018-09-14 2023-10-17 Laticrete International, Inc. Process for composite block thinset, grout, and self-leveling underlayment material
WO2020122701A1 (en) 2018-12-12 2020-06-18 Jesus R Cuauro Pulgar Method for producing briquettes from pellet fines, dri sludge, dri fines and dust from dri dedusting systems, for industrial use in direct-reduced iron production processes
KR102216012B1 (en) * 2018-12-18 2021-02-15 주식회사 포스코 Manufacturing apparatus of briquette, manufacturing method of briquette, manufacturing apparatus of molten iron and briquette
LU101759B1 (en) * 2020-04-24 2021-10-25 Wurth Paul Sa Method for supplying raw material to a sinter plant
CN113155389B (en) * 2021-04-30 2023-06-30 吉林省安全科学技术研究院 Device and method for measuring and evaluating vibration transmissivity of glove palm
CN113405872B (en) * 2021-06-17 2022-11-15 北京科技大学 Evaluation and measurement method for continuous crystallization performance of iron ore powder
KR102581287B1 (en) 2021-09-14 2023-09-20 오화석 Briquette Continuous molding Machine

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS62174334A (en) * 1986-01-27 1987-07-31 Kobe Steel Ltd Production of iron ore briquette
JPS62290833A (en) * 1986-06-07 1987-12-17 Kobe Steel Ltd Carbonaceous material-containing non-calcined briquette
JPH01156430A (en) * 1987-12-11 1989-06-20 Nkk Corp Manufacture of briquetted ore

Family Cites Families (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS5926651B2 (en) * 1977-03-07 1984-06-29 新日本製鐵株式会社 Method for manufacturing non-calcined agglomerate ore
US4225457A (en) * 1979-02-26 1980-09-30 Dynecology Incorporated Briquette comprising caking coal and municipal solid waste
JPS60243232A (en) * 1984-05-14 1985-12-03 Kobe Steel Ltd Iron ore briquette
JPS60255935A (en) * 1984-06-01 1985-12-17 Nippon Steel Corp Manufacture of briquette for iron manufacture
JPS6237325A (en) * 1985-06-27 1987-02-18 Nippon Kokan Kk <Nkk> Calcined lump ore and its production
US4701214A (en) * 1986-04-30 1987-10-20 Midrex International B.V. Rotterdam Method of producing iron using rotary hearth and apparatus
JPS62278233A (en) * 1986-05-26 1987-12-03 Kobe Steel Ltd Iron-ore briquette
IN167132B (en) * 1986-12-15 1990-09-01 Nippon Kokan Kk
US4919711A (en) * 1987-06-29 1990-04-24 Aqualon Company Binder for metal-containing ores
JPH01240626A (en) * 1988-03-22 1989-09-26 Nkk Corp Manufacture of ingot-forming ore for shaft furnace
JPH0310024A (en) * 1989-06-07 1991-01-17 Nippon Yakin Kogyo Co Ltd Method for molding ore briquette
WO1994014987A1 (en) * 1992-12-24 1994-07-07 Bhp Iron Ore Pty. Ltd. Mineral processing
EP0670772A1 (en) * 1993-09-30 1995-09-13 Maschinenfabrik Köppern GmbH &amp; Co. KG Process for producing sponge iron briquettes from fine ore
AUPM665494A0 (en) * 1994-07-06 1994-07-28 Bhp Iron Ore Pty Ltd Mineral processing
JP3114016B2 (en) * 1998-05-15 2000-12-04 株式会社ホギメディカル Wound hemostatic material having cell adhesion promoting effect
JP3476371B2 (en) * 1998-09-08 2003-12-10 株式会社神戸製鋼所 Iron ore pellet manufacturing method
US6802886B2 (en) * 2000-06-05 2004-10-12 Midrex Technologies, Inc. Method of producing a metallized briquette
AUPR678301A0 (en) * 2001-08-02 2001-08-23 Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation Iron ore briquetting

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS62174334A (en) * 1986-01-27 1987-07-31 Kobe Steel Ltd Production of iron ore briquette
JPS62290833A (en) * 1986-06-07 1987-12-17 Kobe Steel Ltd Carbonaceous material-containing non-calcined briquette
JPH01156430A (en) * 1987-12-11 1989-06-20 Nkk Corp Manufacture of briquetted ore

Non-Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
DATABASE WPI Section Ch, Week 197843 Derwent Publications Ltd., London, GB; Class M24, AN 1978-77489A XP002285674 & JP 53 108813 A (NIPPON STEEL CORP) 22 September 1978 (1978-09-22) *
PATENT ABSTRACTS OF JAPAN vol. 0120, no. 22 (C-470), 22 January 1988 (1988-01-22) & JP 62 174334 A (KOBE STEEL LTD), 31 July 1987 (1987-07-31) *
PATENT ABSTRACTS OF JAPAN vol. 0121, no. 86 (C-500), 31 May 1988 (1988-05-31) & JP 62 290833 A (KOBE STEEL LTD), 17 December 1987 (1987-12-17) *
PATENT ABSTRACTS OF JAPAN vol. 0134, no. 17 (C-636), 14 September 1989 (1989-09-14) & JP 1 156430 A (NKK CORP), 20 June 1989 (1989-06-20) *
See also references of WO03012153A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA2456188C (en) 2010-10-26
BR0211944B1 (en) 2012-09-04
JP5389308B2 (en) 2014-01-15
ZA200400957B (en) 2005-04-26
US20050050996A1 (en) 2005-03-10
BR0211877B1 (en) 2011-07-26
ZA200400955B (en) 2005-04-26
EP1425427A1 (en) 2004-06-09
KR20100122961A (en) 2010-11-23
KR101068600B1 (en) 2011-09-30
JP2011017083A (en) 2011-01-27
JP5253701B2 (en) 2013-07-31
KR20040044189A (en) 2004-05-27
CA2456191A1 (en) 2003-02-13
CN1561400A (en) 2005-01-05
AU2002322154B2 (en) 2008-01-31
CN100430496C (en) 2008-11-05
US20050126343A1 (en) 2005-06-16
JP2004536968A (en) 2004-12-09
WO2003012152A1 (en) 2003-02-13
AU2002325621B2 (en) 2008-10-23
DE60236945D1 (en) 2010-08-19
BR0211944B8 (en) 2013-04-16
WO2003012153A1 (en) 2003-02-13
CN1307317C (en) 2007-03-28
EP1425427B1 (en) 2010-07-07
ATE473303T1 (en) 2010-07-15
BR0211877A (en) 2004-09-21
EP1423545A4 (en) 2004-08-18
WO2003012154A1 (en) 2003-02-13
CA2456191C (en) 2010-10-26
AUPR678301A0 (en) 2001-08-23
EP1423545B1 (en) 2010-04-28
KR20100113177A (en) 2010-10-20
KR20040053106A (en) 2004-06-23
EP1425427A4 (en) 2004-08-18
KR101067460B1 (en) 2011-09-27
JP2004536969A (en) 2004-12-09
ATE466112T1 (en) 2010-05-15
CN1564874A (en) 2005-01-12
DE60236172D1 (en) 2010-06-10
BR0211944A (en) 2004-09-28
CA2456188A1 (en) 2003-02-13
AU2002328650B2 (en) 2008-01-17

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1423545B1 (en) Iron ore briquetting
AU2002328650A1 (en) Iron ore briquetting
AU2002322154A1 (en) Iron ore briquetting
AU2002325621A1 (en) Iron ore briquetting
US20120180599A1 (en) Method for producing an agglomerate made of fine material containing metal oxide for use as a blast furnace feed material
US3759693A (en) Method of producing reduced iron ore pellets
JP5498919B2 (en) Method for producing reduced iron
TW200307756A (en) Method for making reduced iron
CA1099518A (en) Fired iron-ore pellets having macro pores and process for producing the same
JP6988778B2 (en) Manufacturing method of charcoal interior sinter and equipment for manufacturing charcoal interior sinter
RU2781327C1 (en) Method for creating iron ore fines agglomerate and agglomerated product
JP5835144B2 (en) Method for producing unfired carbon-containing agglomerated blast furnace
RU2774518C1 (en) Method for obtaining sintered ore
JP7227053B2 (en) Method for producing sintered ore
JPS60248831A (en) Manufacture of uncalcined lump ore
JPS60184642A (en) Manufacture of unfired lump ore
TW202113090A (en) Carbon-containing ore and manufacturing method thereof with the carbon-containing ore containing iron-containing raw materials, carbon materials and a binder
Das et al. Agglomeration
JPH05287391A (en) Treatment of pellet for charging into blast furnace

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20040301

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL LT LV MK RO SI

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: 7C 22B 1/243 B

Ipc: 7C 22B 1/14 A

Ipc: 7C 22B 1/24 B

A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 20040705

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20050302

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20050302

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: COMMONWEALTH SCIENTIFIC AND INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH OR

Owner name: ROBE RIVER MINING COMPANY PTY LTD

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 60236172

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20100610

Kind code of ref document: P

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: T3

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100808

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100428

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100428

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100428

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100729

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100830

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100428

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100428

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100428

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100428

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100831

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20110131

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20100802

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100831

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100831

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100802

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100802

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100802

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100428

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100728

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 15

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 16

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 17

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20210728

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20210831

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20210818

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20210823

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Payment date: 20210728

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20210728

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20210819

Year of fee payment: 20

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R071

Ref document number: 60236172

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MK

Effective date: 20220801

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK07

Ref document number: 466112

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20220802

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MK

Effective date: 20220802