EP1314950B1 - Procédé et dispositif pour l'évaluation des erreurs de pointage d'un système d'arme et utilisation du procédé - Google Patents

Procédé et dispositif pour l'évaluation des erreurs de pointage d'un système d'arme et utilisation du procédé Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1314950B1
EP1314950B1 EP02022511A EP02022511A EP1314950B1 EP 1314950 B1 EP1314950 B1 EP 1314950B1 EP 02022511 A EP02022511 A EP 02022511A EP 02022511 A EP02022511 A EP 02022511A EP 1314950 B1 EP1314950 B1 EP 1314950B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
weapon
target
aiming
imaging device
time
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP02022511A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP1314950A1 (fr
Inventor
Nicolas Dr. Malakatas
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Rheinmetall Air Defence AG
Original Assignee
Oerlikon Contraves AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Oerlikon Contraves AG filed Critical Oerlikon Contraves AG
Publication of EP1314950A1 publication Critical patent/EP1314950A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1314950B1 publication Critical patent/EP1314950B1/fr
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41—WEAPONS
    • F41G—WEAPON SIGHTS; AIMING
    • F41G3/00—Aiming or laying means
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41—WEAPONS
    • F41G—WEAPON SIGHTS; AIMING
    • F41G3/00—Aiming or laying means
    • F41G3/32—Devices for testing or checking
    • F41G3/323—Devices for testing or checking for checking the angle between the muzzle axis of the gun and a reference axis, e.g. the axis of the associated sighting device

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method and to claim 1, a weapon system according to claim 7 and a use according to any one of claims 21 to 23.
  • Processes and devices of this type serve to improve the accuracy of To assess weapons systems used to combat fast-moving targets, in general, flight destinations.
  • Such weapons systems include a fire control and one or more of the Fire control unit associated guns.
  • the fire control unit is intended to Target to detect, acquire and track.
  • In pursuit of the goal, which is referred to as tracking, are practically running, that is in time very close to each other, measurements taken to to determine the location of the target for each measurement time.
  • a the weapon system assigned data processing system calculated retrospectively from the results of these measurements the state of motion of the target, among which at least an empirical path / time function, an empirical speed / time function and an acceleration / time function of the target. Due to the way / time function, the speed / time function and the Beschieun Trents / time function calculates the computer unit further the future Movement state of the target.
  • the actual future state of motion of the computer is not calculated Goal, but the state of motion that the target is likely to have and also referred to as the expected state of motion of the target.
  • a due date and an associated due date item are determined. at which the target is expected at maturity.
  • the due date position is determined in such a way that a bullet, which leads to a certain Launch time is fired by the weapon, at the due date arrives at the due date or, simply put, the target the due date position.
  • the maturity position determined in this way is therefore the expected one Meeting point.
  • the computing device computes also for the weapon or for the gun barrel a point of reference, on which the gun barrel must be aimed at the time of shooting, or a Azimuth and elevation, which have the gun barrel at the time of launch got to.
  • a point of reference on which the gun barrel must be aimed at the time of shooting, or a Azimuth and elevation, which have the gun barrel at the time of launch got to.
  • Vorhaltept the relative positions of fire control and weapon, both internal and external Ballistics and delays in the functioning of the system included.
  • the firing time to which the gun barrel lies must be directed to the point of reference, before the due date to which the target will be at the due date.
  • the directional accuracy of the weapon system which determines the hit, tested. This essentially examines whether the events are between tracking the target and launching a bullet as planned, namely, so that the target and bullet at the maturity date on the maturity position or at least in their immediate vicinity.
  • Various methods are known to detect straightening errors. A really true one Assessment of the hit performance of a weapons system is only possible when the fight against a goal is either actual or realistic is simulated.
  • a precise assessment of the directional accuracy or an accurate determination of Directional errors can be done, for example, by actually firing at a target and the angular and / or distanced placement of the projectiles from the target at their Flight is determined.
  • the goal is a manipulation goal or exercise target is used, which is should behave at least approximately like those real goals to whose combat the weapon system is provided.
  • Such manipulation targets are unmanned.
  • self-airborne manipulation targets are known which are remotely controlled are, on the other hand flightless manipulation targets, for example, of be towed a tow plane.
  • the filing can be done in two different ways be determined: either the way / time curves of both the Manipulierzieles as well as the projectiles determined and from it the filing of the projectiles determined by the manipulation target; For example, this can be the local area, in which manipulation target and projectiles meet, in the temporal area, to which this meeting takes place, illustrated, and from this the storage determined become. Or sensors are attached to the Manipulierziel, which on the passing bullets react. The big disadvantage of this method This is because it is very time-consuming and expensive.
  • Manipulation targets themselves as well as either additional facilities for investigation and measurement of trajectories and the evaluation of the determined Measurements or facilities for processing the from the sensors to Required signals required.
  • the use of unmanned, airworthy, remote-controlled manipulation targets also requires terrestrial facilities for remotely controlling these manipulation targets.
  • the totality of required Equipment is in any case, as stated above, expensive to purchase and laborious in operation; Usually these facilities can only be used by specialized staff are serviced and require an infrastructure that only on fixed shooting ranges, but not available in the field. There is also always the risk of damage or destruction of manipulation targets that are not can be avoided and should not be avoided, since the meeting of the Manipulierzieles the desired good leveling precisely just documented.
  • the tracking of the target that is the tracking, of the Fire control carried out in the usual way.
  • the gun barrel is constantly the Target tracked so that it is constantly focused on the target.
  • the goal is not shot, but a barrel mounted video camera take pictures of the target. These images are visualized immediately or later.
  • the straightening straight line ie a straight line in extension of the weapon barrel axis, becomes represented by a mark in the reproduced pictures.
  • the straightening error appears as a filing of the image of the target of this mark.
  • the goal at the Zero-Test can be a real target, so it is not shot at with projectiles but the bombardment is simulated to some extent by optical rays; however, in the simulation, a beam is recorded and visualized, the not from the weapon to the target but from the target to the weapon, but what for the procedure is irrelevant.
  • the weapon becomes the target immediately tracked, that is, azimuth and elevation are such that at perfect Directional accuracy the gun barrel is aimed exactly at the target; when visualizing the images of the video camera is then the target always on the mark. Because in Reality the directional accuracy is not perfect, because almost always certain Directional errors occur when viewing the images of the video camera the image of the target generally not on the mark.
  • the deviation of the picture the goal of the mark corresponds to the filing of the projectiles from the target.
  • Zero-Test is based on the fiction that bullets are used without mass, which traverse their trajectory at infinite projectile speed, so that the projectile flying time from the weapon barrel to the goal is zero, with which also the designation 'Zero-Test' is explained. Retention and inclusion of inside ballistic sizes the projectiles are from the data processing unit assigned to the weapon system not in the calculations of azimuth and elevation or the Control of the barrel considered; within the fiction of the infinite Bullet speed, they actually do not matter.
  • the advantage The zero test is that the additional facilities needed are not are expensive, and that the execution of the test is easy, so no specialized personnel must be employed; the execution of the test can not only take place on shooting ranges but also in the field.
  • the simplifications, which take place during the zero test, that means hiding all Facts related to the statement are simultaneous the disadvantages of the zero-test.
  • the new process is very cost effective and easy to carry out, though it is - just like the conventional zero test - only a test procedure, the digestion gives about the totality of straightening errors including the lead calculation. Therefore, the method does not allow diagnoses about the causes of Pointing error. Corrections of the straightening errors can therefore only by error compensation but not by eliminating the cause of the error. However, this does not diminish the value of the process, since ultimately only the effect of the weapon system is significant and it is meaningless, whether straightening causally or compensatorily switched off.
  • the steps described above are carried out continuously and preferably clocked, which means that the calculation steps for the value pairs due dates / due dates at calculation dates be carried out by very small and preferably the same Time intervals are separated.
  • the image display device thus shows continuously for a whole Zieltrajektorie the straightening errors of the weapon system.
  • Each due date is preferably based on a calculation time therefore, it does not generally coincide with any of the following Calculation times together.
  • a calculation date must generally have the appropriate due date determined by an interpolation between maturity positions whose due dates are close to the calculation date associated due date.
  • the calculations must be based on the deviation of the locations of the fire control and the weapon are taken into account.
  • the procedure can also be performed when the weapon relative to the fire control moved, that is, for example, mounted on a moving tank. In In this case, the changing weapon position must constantly be measured and be included in the calculations.
  • the hit of a weapon system tends to be better is assumed to be due to the images appearing on the image display device first, because the antiaircraft guns used as weapons usually have several weapons tubes, secondly, because in one Weapon system a fire control usually several weapons are assigned and third, because when shooting with real bullets always with scatters is to be expected.
  • the external ballistics which can affect the hit negative, not includes.
  • an image pickup device and one with the image pickup device via a connection device related image display device used.
  • a data processing unit with the required software and a storage unit are available.
  • the image display device is so connected to the image pickup device that the recorded Immediately play back images.
  • a video camera may be used as the image pickup device.
  • a first variant is the attachment of the image pickup device on or in the barrel, though, so that their optical axis with the weapon barrel axis coincidentally, that means directionally and in terms of location with her matches.
  • a second variant is the attachment of the image pickup device on the barrel, in such a way that its optical axis with the weapon barrel axis directionally but not in line.
  • a third variant is the attachment of the image pickup device to the gun barrel, and indeed so that their optical axis neither directionally nor positionally with the Weapon barrel axis coincides.
  • Attachment of the imaging device may be prior to beginning the actual procedure the difference between the optical axis of the image pickup device and weapon barrel axis, for example by means of adjusting tube mounted in the barrel, determined and in the subsequent process steps as compensatory Correction either purely optically or by consideration in the calculations be included.
  • Such a correction can be dispensed with, if at least the positional difference between the optical axis the image pickup device and weapon barrel axis compared to the distance between weapon and target is relatively low.
  • the image pickup device is mounted so that its optical axis with the Gun barrel axis coincides, so it can only temporarily attached to the weapon become.
  • the image pickup device is mounted so that its optical axis is in position not coincide with the weapon barrel axis, so it can definitely be attached to the weapon.
  • the advantage of this is that the method according to The invention then be carried out practically at any time and without preparation can; For example, it can be tested quickly, whether failures in combat of targets on missive of the weapon system or on unexpected ones Target movements are based.
  • the fixation must be relatively robust, especially when the image pickup device is attached directly to the gun barrel because it is subject to great shock during regular shooting.
  • Fixing agent used to mount the image pickup device to the weapon.
  • the weapons in the field may be exposed to large temperature differences
  • the image reproduction device is designed so that in the visualization of the Imaging device supplied images a mark, for example, a crosshair coordinate system or a corresponding field becomes visible; the Mark, that is, the origin of the crosshair or coordinate system or the corresponding field represents the straightening straight line, below which is the weapon barrel axis extending straight line is understood. If the goal coincides with the mark together, there is no shelf and the directional accuracy is perfect, which does not exclude that several errors in the timing chain between the tracking of the target and the aiming of the gun barrel occur, the but pick up. By additional markings or calibrations can at the Image reproduction device the extent of the tray are read.
  • the connecting device between the image pickup device and the image reproduction device may be a conventional cable connection, a fiber optic connection or a non-material connection to a transmitter on the image capture device and a receiver on the image display device.
  • Non-material connection devices have the advantage that no tangling arises when the gun barrel at a large angle, if necessary. To more as 360 °, is pivoted. But they are easily disturbed. Become material connection arrangements used, which are less susceptible to interference, so must Measures to be taken to prevent wide-angle pivoting of the Gun barrel to prevent tangling; this can rotate against each other Used contacts or cables, for example, led over a kind of gallows become.
  • Data processing unit can be used. This unit can only on the fire control unit or partly on the fire control unit and partly on the weapon be arranged by yourself. It can also be a separate and if necessary. Of weapon and Fire control unit separate computer and / or storage unit can be used, the if necessary, can be switched in a modular manner.
  • the relative position ie the distance and the Angular position, be known between weapon and fire control and in the calculations be taken into account.
  • the gun parallax must be started of the method.
  • a position measuring device This can be a complete one external device in the manner of a triangulation device or a internal device of the weapon system or one cooperating with a GPS Institution act.
  • the relative position between the weapon and the fire control device can also change, for example, if the weapon is moving on a moving vehicle, to Example on a tank, is mounted while the fire control is stationary. In this case, the ongoing change in relative position must be recorded and To be taken into account in the calculations that are being carried out of the procedure.
  • the position measuring device can therefore not be purely external Be institution.
  • the position measuring device is connected to the data processing system connected and the software must be trained to ongoing change of relative position in the calculations of the procedure.
  • Fig. 1 shows a weapon system to be checked for its directional accuracy or whose straightening errors are to be determined.
  • the weapon system has a Feuerleit réelle F and a weapon W with a gun barrel B and judging means for straightening the gun barrel on; for simplicity, it is assumed that the fire control device F and the weapon W are in the same position.
  • the barrel axis and its extension beyond the weapon barrel B are designated B.1 .
  • the weapon system is a data processing system EDV associated with the software required for the usual shooting operation S.
  • the weapon system W has an image recording device V, an image reproduction device M and a computer unit with a specific software S.1 .
  • the image pickup device V is, for example, a video camera.
  • the image pickup device V is designed to take pictures of the space that lies in front of the weapon barrel B.
  • the image pickup device V is arranged so that it executes the directional movements of the weapon barrel B in solidarity with the weapon barrel B.
  • the image pickup device V is arranged, preferably on the weapon W or on or in the weapon barrel B, so that its optical axis coincides exactly with the weapon barrel axis B.1 or differs so slightly from the weapon barrel axis B.1 that this deviation is responsible for the results of the method according to the invention is insignificant.
  • the image pickup device V can also be arranged so that its optical axis deviates in the direction and / or position of the weapon barrel axis B.1 in a non-negligible mass, but that this deviation is detected and compensated within the method according to the invention.
  • the image reproduction apparatus M is, for example, a monitor. It is connected to the image pickup device V and intended to make the images taken by the image pickup device V visible.
  • the computer unit can be integrated into the data processing system EDP ; this arrangement is common practice and also met in the example described; The function of the computer unit is thus perceived by the already existing data processing system EDP of the weapon system, so that only the specific software S.1 is additionally required.
  • Fig. 1 also shows a target Z which has taken position Pa at time Ta and position Pb at time Tb , and which occupies position Pc at time Tc .
  • the target Z moves on a target trajectory; in Fig. 1 , the portion z of the target trajectory which has flown through before time Tc is shown by a solid line, while that portion z + of the target trajectory which is presumed to be traversed after time Tc is shown by a dashed line; a dot-dash line represents that portion z + eff of the target trajectory, which is actually traversed after the time Tc , but which is not yet known at the time Tc .
  • the target Z is followed or tracked by the fire control device F , and the state of motion of the target Z is determined.
  • the target Z had the position Pa and the associated movement state at time Ta , and the position Pb and the associated movement state at time Tb .
  • the data processing system EDV which is assigned to the weapon system, calculates at the time Tc retrospectively the movement state of the target Z , which includes the section z - the target trajectory, until the time Tc .
  • a derivative calculation is performed in a manner known per se.
  • the data processing system EDV calculates by an extrapolation the expected future motion state of the target Z, which corresponds to the target trajectory z + .
  • a so-called maturity date T * and an associated maturity position P * are determined in such a way that a bullet G which would be launched at the time Tc by a weapon barrel B of a weapon W would arrive at the maturity position P * at the maturity date T * .
  • the projectile velocity and the internal ballistics of the projectile P are included.
  • the target Z is also expected in the vicinity of the corresponding due date position P * .
  • the target Z presumably does not reach the expected due date position P * precisely because its actual state of motion generally does not correspond to the calculated state of motion, so that the actual target trajectory z + eff does not coincide with the expected target trajectory z + or is traversed in time at the time calculated.
  • the derivative calculation is carried out continuously in successive calculation times.
  • the value pairs T *, P * determined for respectively associated due dates T * and due positions P * of the target Z are stored in a memory of the data processing system EDV in the manner of a table. This table is continuously updated on the basis of further determinations of movement states of the target Z continuing on the section z + eff of the target trajectory .
  • the due time T * has been reached, the weapon barrel B is directed to the due position P * .
  • the due date T * will not coincide exactly with one of the calculation times.
  • the calculation date used immediately after the due date T * which does not belong to one of the stored value pairs, is used as the due date.
  • the maturity position associated at this time which, of course, also does not belong to one of the stored value pairs, is then determined by interpolation between the value pair T * / P * and an adjacent value pair from the stored value pairs of maturity items and maturity dates. If a real projectile G were shot down to the maturity position P * at the time Tc , it would fly along a projectile trajectory g and would arrive at the maturity position P * in the due date T * . The target Z is in the due date T * in the environment A of this maturity position P *, so that almost certainly a hit would be made if the bullet G had actually been shot down. For these calculations a software S.1 is used.
  • the direction of the weapon barrel is only at the end of the projectile flight time and thus at the due date for the purpose of taking a picture.
  • the data processing unit EDV provides a signal on the basis of which the aiming means direct the weapon barrel B to the due position P * .
  • An image of this due date position P * and its environment A is taken by the image recording device V at the time of maturity T * . This image is visualized with the aid of the image reproduction device V.
  • the alignment of the gun barrel B and the shooting of the image are also continuous.
  • a mark X which represents the extension of the weapon barrel axis B1 . If the projectile G had been shot down at the time Tc , this mark X would correspond to the end of the projectile trajectory g .
  • the image of the target Z On the visualized image is also visible, with a certain shelf of the mark X , the image of the target Z , which is also denoted by Z.
  • the tray a of the image of the target Z of the mark X is a measure of the aiming error of the weapon system. Had the weapon system no straightening error, the image of the target Z and the mark X would coincide.
  • FIG. 3 which is not in the form of a scale, the processes described above are shown again, but it is assumed here that there is a distance d between the fire control device F and the weapon W.
  • the relative position of fire control device F and weapon W is measured by a position measuring device WF , which is shown in Figure 4 ; this may be an internal position-measuring device of the weapon system or a completely external position-measuring device.
  • the fire control device F or its search and track unit, is effective in a region C , the target Z is in the position Pc, and the weapon barrel B would be directed to the due position P * , if one missile were intended To shoot G ; this bullet G would still be in barrel B at the beginning of its projectile trajectory g, which it would fly through after the launch.
  • the target Z is near the maturity position P * and the weapon barrel B is directed to the maturity position P * .
  • the straightening error is shown in FIG. 3 as angle ⁇ .
  • the weapon system W has an internal position- measuring device W-F or a position- measuring device W-F cooperating with a GPS , which is connected to the data processing system EDV .
  • the software S.1 is also designed to include the ongoing change in the distance d and the angular position ⁇ between weapon W and fire control device F in the calculations.

Claims (23)

  1. Procédé permettant d'évaluer l'erreur de pointage d'un système d'arme, qui comprend :
    un appareil de conduite de tir (F) destiné à poursuivre une cible (Z),
    une arme (W) comportant un canon (B),
    des moyens de pointage destinés à orienter le canon (B), et
    une unité de traitement des données (EDV),
    dans laquelle
    l'appareil de conduite de tir (F) poursuit la cible (Z) et les moyens de pointage orientent le canon (B),
    un dispositif de prise de vues (V) déplacé solidairement avec le canon (B) capte de façon répétée des images de la cible (Z) et de son environnement, et
    un dispositif de reproduction d'images (M) rend visible les images captées par le dispositif de prise de vues (V) et une marque (X), ladite marque (X) représentant un point d'une droite de pointage de l'arme (W), une déviation (a) d'une image de la cible (Z) à la marque (X) représentant l'erreur de pointage du système d'arme,
    caractérisé en ce que
    le pointage du canon (B) est réalisé sur la base d'un calcul de dérivation tenant compte des déplacements de la cible (Z) et d'un projectile (G) qui peut être tiré par le canon (B), pour capter la totalité de l'erreur de pointage, y compris du calcul de dérivation.
  2. Procédé selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que
    l'appareil de conduite de tir (F) exécute de façon répétée, lors de la poursuite de la cible (Z), des mesures permettant de capter des positions de la cible (Z) et des moments auxquels la cible (Z) occupe ces positions,
    l'unité de traitement des données (EDV), de façon répétée, en un moment respectif (Tc) choisi respectivement en tant que moment de calcul,
    calcule, sur la base des mesures de l'appareil de conduite de tir (F), l'état de déplacement de la cible (Z) jusqu'alors occupé,
    calcule, sur la base de l'état de déplacement de la cible (Z) jusqu'alors occupé, l'état de déplacement futur attendu de la cible (Z),
    détermine des moments d'impact (T*) et des positions d'impact (P*) associées en tenant compte d'une déviation (d, δ) des positions de l'arme (W) à l'appareil de conduite de tir (F), de la vitesse et de la balistique intérieure des projectiles utilisables (G), de façon telle qu'au moment d'impact (T*), un projectile (G) qui serait tiré au moment de calcul (Tc) toucherait la position d'impact (P*), et que la cible (Z) se trouverait aux environs (A) de la position d'impact (P*),
    lors de l'atteinte d'un moment de référence (T°*), émet un signal qui est mis à disposition des moyens de pointage du canon (B), et en ce que
    le canon (B) est orienté au plus tard au moment d'impact (T*) sur la position d'impact (P*) associée, la déviation (a) correspondant à une erreur de pointage tenant compte du calcul de dérivation.
  3. Procédé selon la revendication 2,
    caractérisé en ce que le moment de référence (T°*) coïncide avec le moment d'impact (T*).
  4. Procédé selon l'une des revendications précédentes,
    caractérisé en ce que les retards conditionnés par le procédé, en particulier les retards lors de la transmission des signaux aux moyens de pointage du canon (B), sont pris en compte dans les calculs.
  5. Procédé selon l'une des revendications précédentes,
    caractérisé en ce que la déviation (d, δ) entre la position de l'arme (W) et la position de l'appareil de conduite de tir (F) est mesurée de façon répétée, et en ce que les modifications de cette déviation (d, δ) sont prises en compte en continu dans les calculs.
  6. Procédé selon l'une des revendications précédentes,
    caractérisé en ce qu'on détermine une déviation entre l'axe du canon (B.1) et un axe optique du dispositif de prise de vues (V) et que ces déviations sont prises en compte lors de la représentation des images prises par le dispositif de prise de vues (V) par le dispositif de reproduction d'images (M).
  7. Système d'arme comportant un dispositif (M, V, S.1) permettant d'évaluer les erreurs de pointage du système d'arme, lequel système d'arme comporte :
    un appareil de conduite de tir (F) destiné à poursuivre une cible (Z),
    une arme (W) comportant un canon (B),
    des moyens de pointage destinés à orienter le canon (B), et
    une unité de traitement des données (EDV) avec un logiciel (S), dans lequel
    l'appareil de conduite de tir (F) présente un dispositif à capteur pour mesurer les positions respectives de la cible (Z) et dans lequel
    le dispositif (M, V, S.1) présente
    un dispositif de prise de vues (V) déplacé solidairement avec le canon (B), pour capter des images de la cible (Z) et de son environnement, et
    un dispositif de reproduction d'images (M), pour visualiser les images captées et une marque (X), ladite marque (X) représentant un point d'une droite de pointage de l'arme (W), une déviation (a) d'une image de la cible (Z) à la marque (X) correspondant à l'erreur de pointage du système d'arme,
    caractérisé en ce que
    l'unité de traitement des données (EDV) est conçue
    pour calculer de façon répétée l'état de déplacement jusqu'alors occupé de la cible (Z),
    pour exécuter de façon répétée à un moment sélectionné respectivement en tant que moment de calcul (Tc) un calcul de dérivation pour, en tenant compte de l'état de déplacement précédent de la cible (Z) et en tenant compte de la vitesse et de la balistique intérieure des projectiles (G) pouvant être utilisés, déterminer un moment d'impact (T*) et une position d'impact (P*) de façon telle qu'au moment d'impact (T*), un projectile (G) qui aurait été tiré au moment de calcul (Tc) frapperait la position d'impact (P*) et que la cible (Z) serait attendue dans les environs de la position d'impact (P*), et en ce que
    un logiciel supplémentaire (S.1) existe pour l'unité de traitement des données (EDV) pour, sur la base du calcul de dérivation, mettre à disposition des moyens de pointage un signal pour que le canon (B) au moment d'impact (T*) soit orienté sur la position d'impact (P*), l'erreur de pointage, qui peut être visualisée à l'aide du dispositif de prise de vues (V) et du dispositif de reproduction d'images (M) représentant la totalité de l'erreur de pointage, y compris le calcul de dérivation.
  8. Système d'arme selon la revendication 7,
    caractérisé en ce que le canon est pointé au moment d'impact (T*) sur la position d'impact (P*).
  9. Système d'arme selon l'une des revendications 7 à 8,
    caractérisé en ce que le dispositif de reproduction d'images (M) est conçu et relié au dispositif de prise de vues (V) de façon telle que les images prises sont immédiatement reproduites.
  10. Système d'arme selon l'une des revendications 7 à 9,
    caractérisé en ce que le dispositif de prise de vues (V) est une caméra vidéo.
  11. Système d'arme selon l'une des revendications 7 à 10,
    caractérisé en ce que le dispositif de prise de vues (V) est disposé de façon telle qu'un axe optique du dispositif de prise de vues (V) coïncide avec un axe du canon (B.1).
  12. Système d'arme selon l'une des revendications 7 à 11,
    caractérisé en ce que le dispositif de prise de vues (V) est disposé de façon telle qu'un axe optique du dispositif de prise de vues (V) coïncide au moins dans sa direction et de préférence aussi dans sa position avec la position d'un axe du canon (B.1).
  13. Système d'arme selon l'une des revendications 7 à 12,
    caractérisé en ce que le dispositif de prise de vues (V) est fixé temporairement sur l'arme (W).
  14. Système d'arme selon l'une des revendications 7 à 12,
    caractérisé en ce que le dispositif de prise de vues (V) est fixé durablement sur l'arme (W).
  15. Système d'arme selon l'une des revendications 7 à 14,
    caractérisé en ce que le dispositif de reproduction d'images (M) est un moniteur.
  16. Système d'arme selon l'une des revendications 7 à 15,
    caractérisé en ce qu'il comprend un dispositif permettant de mesurer une déviation entre un axe optique du dispositif de prise de vue (V) et un axe du canon (B.1), pour compenser cette déviation lors de la visualisation des images mises à disposition par le dispositif de prise de vues (V).
  17. Système d'arme selon la revendication 16,
    caractérisé en ce que l'unité de traitement des données (EDV) est conçue pour réaliser des calculs pour déterminer la compensation nécessaire de l'écart de l'axe optique du dispositif de prise de vues (V) à l'axe du canon (B.1) lors de la visualisation des images mises à disposition par le dispositif de prise de vues (V).
  18. Système d'arme selon l'une des revendications 7 à 17,
    caractérisé en ce que
    il présente un dispositif de mesure de position (W-F) pour mesurer en continu, en cas d'avance de l'arme (W) par rapport à l'appareil de conduite de tir (F), la modification de la position relative de l'arme (W), et en ce que
    l'unité de traitement des données (EDV) est exécutée pour incorporer en continu dans les calculs la modification de la position de l'arme.
  19. Système d'arme selon la revendication 18,
    caractérisé en ce que le dispositif de mesure de position (W-F) est un dispositif interne du système d'arme.
  20. Système d'arme selon la revendication 18,
    caractérisé en ce que le dispositif de mesure de position (W-F) est un dispositif collaborant avec des moyens externes, par exemple avec un GPS.
  21. Utilisation d'un système d'arme selon l'une des revendications 7 à 20,
    caractérisé en ce que l'arme (W) est montée sur un véhicule (Q) et l'appareil de conduite du tir (F) est fixe.
  22. Utilisation d'un système d'arme selon l'une des revendications 7 à 20,
    caractérisé en ce que l'arme (W) et l'appareil de conduite de tir (F) sont montés sur un véhicule (Q).
  23. Utilisation d'un système d'arme selon l'une des revendications 7 à 20,
    caractérisé en ce que l'arme (W) est montée sur un véhicule (Q) qui exécute des déplacements de type oscillations et/ou vibrations, et est stabilisée par rapport à ce véhicule (Q) à l'aide d'un dispositif de stabilisation.
EP02022511A 2001-11-23 2002-10-07 Procédé et dispositif pour l'évaluation des erreurs de pointage d'un système d'arme et utilisation du procédé Expired - Lifetime EP1314950B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CH21672001 2001-11-23
CH21672001 2001-11-23

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1314950A1 EP1314950A1 (fr) 2003-05-28
EP1314950B1 true EP1314950B1 (fr) 2005-11-16

Family

ID=4567796

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP02022511A Expired - Lifetime EP1314950B1 (fr) 2001-11-23 2002-10-07 Procédé et dispositif pour l'évaluation des erreurs de pointage d'un système d'arme et utilisation du procédé

Country Status (11)

Country Link
US (1) US6805036B2 (fr)
EP (1) EP1314950B1 (fr)
KR (1) KR100917932B1 (fr)
AT (1) ATE310225T1 (fr)
AU (1) AU2002301626B2 (fr)
CA (1) CA2408778C (fr)
DE (1) DE50204935D1 (fr)
ES (1) ES2252373T3 (fr)
NO (1) NO325944B1 (fr)
SG (1) SG125076A1 (fr)
ZA (1) ZA200208629B (fr)

Families Citing this family (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20060005447A1 (en) * 2003-09-12 2006-01-12 Vitronics Inc. Processor aided firing of small arms
US7549367B2 (en) 2004-01-20 2009-06-23 Utah State University Research Foundation Control system for a weapon mount
US20110059421A1 (en) * 2008-06-25 2011-03-10 Honeywell International, Inc. Apparatus and method for automated feedback and dynamic correction of a weapon system
US8046203B2 (en) 2008-07-11 2011-10-25 Honeywell International Inc. Method and apparatus for analysis of errors, accuracy, and precision of guns and direct and indirect fire control mechanisms
US9151572B1 (en) * 2011-07-03 2015-10-06 Jeffrey M. Sieracki Aiming and alignment system for a shell firing weapon and method therefor
US10557686B2 (en) * 2016-04-25 2020-02-11 Bae Systems Plc System integration
JP7181997B2 (ja) * 2019-05-23 2022-12-01 日立Astemo株式会社 車両制御システム及び車両制御方法
CN112432557B (zh) * 2020-11-19 2022-10-28 中国北方车辆研究所 试验室条件下的坦克射击精度测试系统
CN112833704B (zh) * 2021-01-06 2022-11-15 中国人民解放军63856部队 一种新的弹道偏流测试方法
CN116882846B (zh) * 2023-09-07 2023-11-21 北京中科智易科技股份有限公司 操炮训练智能考核系统、方法及计算机存储介质

Family Cites Families (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3981010A (en) * 1972-07-03 1976-09-14 Rmc Research Corporation Object locating system
US4145952A (en) * 1977-02-03 1979-03-27 Gene Tye Aircraft gun sight system and method for high angle-off attacks
NL7905061A (nl) * 1979-06-29 1980-12-31 Hollandse Signaalapparaten Bv Werkwijze en inrichting voor het automatisch meten van richtfouten en het verbeteren van richtwaarden bij het schieten en richten van ballistische wapens tegen bewegende doelen.
FR2480424B1 (fr) * 1980-04-11 1987-07-10 Sfim Systeme de conduite automatique de tir air-air ou air-sol
GB2212291B (en) * 1980-08-14 1989-11-29 Marconi Co Ltd Sighting system
DE3044554A1 (de) * 1980-11-26 1982-06-24 Ernst Leitz Wetzlar Gmbh, 6330 Wetzlar Verfahren und anordnung zur pruefung der uebereinstimmung von visier- und ziellinien
US6491253B1 (en) * 1985-04-15 2002-12-10 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army Missile system and method for performing automatic fire control
TR27014A (tr) * 1987-05-15 1994-09-15 Contraves Ag Bir ates idare tertibati icin tevcih usulü ve bu usulü icra etmeye mahsus ates idare tertibati.
FR2712972B1 (fr) * 1993-11-25 1996-01-26 Aerospatiale Système de défense antiaérien et missile de défense pour un tel système.
CH694743A5 (de) * 2000-04-26 2005-06-30 Contraves Ag Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Korrektur von Ausrichtfehlern zwischen einer Sensoreinrichtung und einer Effektoreneinrichtung.
US6584879B2 (en) * 2001-11-14 2003-07-01 Northrop Grumman Corporation System and method for disabling time critical targets

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
NO20025618D0 (no) 2002-11-22
EP1314950A1 (fr) 2003-05-28
ATE310225T1 (de) 2005-12-15
CA2408778A1 (fr) 2003-05-23
KR100917932B1 (ko) 2009-09-21
DE50204935D1 (de) 2005-12-22
ES2252373T3 (es) 2006-05-16
NO20025618L (no) 2003-05-26
US20030140866A1 (en) 2003-07-31
NO325944B1 (no) 2008-08-25
CA2408778C (fr) 2009-09-15
ZA200208629B (en) 2003-05-19
AU2002301626B2 (en) 2008-06-26
KR20030043679A (ko) 2003-06-02
US6805036B2 (en) 2004-10-19
SG125076A1 (en) 2006-09-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1304539B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif pour pointer un tube de cannon et utilisation du dispositif
EP1314949B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif pour l'évaluation des erreurs de pointage d'un système d'arme et utilisation du procédé
DE3790614C2 (fr)
EP0018673B1 (fr) Procédé pour mesurer des erreurs de tir et dispositif de mesure de ces erreurs pour la mise en oeuvre de ce procédé
EP2634523B1 (fr) Dispositif de visée pour armes à feu, arme à feu et procédé d'alignement d'une arme à feu
DE2454453B2 (de) Vorrichtung zum Durchführen und Auswerten von Schießübungen mit Flugabwehrgeschützen mit simuliertem Feuer
DE2411790A1 (de) Verfahren und waffensystem zur gezielten bekaempfung von oberflaechenzielen
EP1314950B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif pour l'évaluation des erreurs de pointage d'un système d'arme et utilisation du procédé
CH661132A5 (de) Vorrichtung zur simulation des freien ausblicks mittels eines optischen geraetes.
DE3238848A1 (de) Verfahren und vorrichtung zum gesamten korrigieren des schiessvorganges von einem schuss auf den folgenden bei einer waffe mit gestreckter schussbahn
DE2936643A1 (de) Verfahren und anordnung fuer die abschaetzung der richtgenauigkeit einer waffe
DE1951622C3 (de) Anordnung zur simulierten Darstellung von Schußbahnen
DE19638968A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Bekämpfung anfliegender Flugkörper
WO1985003118A1 (fr) Installation de detection d'un but a installer sur des armes a feu
EP0090323A1 (fr) Dispositif d'entraînement pour l'instruction de tir de missiles guidés, en particulier de missiles sol-sol
EP0577017B1 (fr) Dispositif et méthode pour tester le comportement dynamique de canons
DE3002291A1 (de) Einrichtung zum unterweisen von schuetzen beim zielen und bei der zielverfolgung
WO2022083822A1 (fr) Détermination de solution de guidage de tir d'arme d'artillerie
DE4111935C2 (fr)
DE102012102235C5 (de) Militärisches Fahrzeug und Verfahren zur Ausrichtung eines Ausrüstungsgegenstands
EP3367045A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif permettant d'améliorer la précision de solutions de tir
DE19820528C2 (de) Verfahren zur Schußbeobachtung und Vorrichtung zur Durchführung des Verfahrens
DE19912093A1 (de) Verfahren zur Schußsimulation
EP1450125A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif pour combattre une cible
DE3545831A1 (de) Verfahren zum ueben des zielens unter verwendung eines laserschusssimulators und eines zielseitigen retroreflektors sowie schusssimulator zur durchfuehrung dieses verfahrens

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL LT LV MK RO SI

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20030625

AKX Designation fees paid

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE SK TR

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20040708

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE SK TR

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.

Effective date: 20051116

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20051116

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20051116

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20051116

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20051116

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 50204935

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20051222

Kind code of ref document: P

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: OK PAT AG PATENTE MARKEN LIZENZEN

GBT Gb: translation of ep patent filed (gb section 77(6)(a)/1977)

Effective date: 20060107

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060216

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060216

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060417

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GR

Ref legal event code: EP

Ref document number: 20060400503

Country of ref document: GR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2252373

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FD4D

ET Fr: translation filed
PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20060817

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20061031

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20051116

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20061007

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20051116

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20101014

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20101021

Year of fee payment: 9

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 50204935

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: THUL PATENTANWALTSGESELLSCHAFT MBH, DE

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20111013

Year of fee payment: 10

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 50204935

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: THUL PATENTANWALTSGESELLSCHAFT MBH, DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 50204935

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: RHEINMETALL AIR DEFENCE AG, CH

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: OERLIKON-CONTRAVES AG, ZUERICH, CH

Effective date: 20120523

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 50204935

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: THUL PATENTANWALTSGESELLSCHAFT MBH, DE

Effective date: 20120523

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 50204935

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: THUL PATENTANWALTSGESELLSCHAFT MBH, DE

Effective date: 20111130

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: *OERLIKON CONTRAVES A.G.

Effective date: 20121031

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 310225

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20121007

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20121007

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20121007

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20121007

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20121031

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20141022

Year of fee payment: 13

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20141028

Year of fee payment: 13

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20141021

Year of fee payment: 13

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20141021

Year of fee payment: 13

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20141022

Year of fee payment: 13

Ref country code: GR

Payment date: 20141014

Year of fee payment: 13

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20141021

Year of fee payment: 13

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20141024

Year of fee payment: 13

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Payment date: 20131007

Year of fee payment: 12

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 50204935

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: EUG

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20151101

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GR

Ref legal event code: ML

Ref document number: 20060400503

Country of ref document: GR

Effective date: 20160506

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160503

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20151031

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20151031

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160506

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20151007

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20160630

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20151008

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20151101

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20151102

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20170203

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20151008

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20151007