EP1291600A1 - Procédé de guidage d'un engin, notamment d'une munition - Google Patents
Procédé de guidage d'un engin, notamment d'une munition Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP1291600A1 EP1291600A1 EP02292199A EP02292199A EP1291600A1 EP 1291600 A1 EP1291600 A1 EP 1291600A1 EP 02292199 A EP02292199 A EP 02292199A EP 02292199 A EP02292199 A EP 02292199A EP 1291600 A1 EP1291600 A1 EP 1291600A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- machine
- vector
- ammunition
- target
- munition
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F41—WEAPONS
- F41G—WEAPON SIGHTS; AIMING
- F41G7/00—Direction control systems for self-propelled missiles
- F41G7/20—Direction control systems for self-propelled missiles based on continuous observation of target position
- F41G7/22—Homing guidance systems
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F41—WEAPONS
- F41G—WEAPON SIGHTS; AIMING
- F41G7/00—Direction control systems for self-propelled missiles
- F41G7/34—Direction control systems for self-propelled missiles based on predetermined target position data
- F41G7/346—Direction control systems for self-propelled missiles based on predetermined target position data using global navigation satellite systems, e.g. GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS
Definitions
- the subject of the present invention is a method of guiding a gear towards a target, in particular to improve the accuracy of the shooting of a Ammunition previously calculated to reach the target.
- the position of the target target is provided before firing to a fire calculator determining values of fire parameters like the angles of the shot and the initial speed to be transmitted to the ammunition when firing. After the shot and in the absence of guidance, the ammunition follows a trajectory ballistic.
- the impact accuracy of the ammunition is better when the gap between the actual point of impact and the planned point of impact is reduced and the guns or current mortars equipped with their fire calculator ensure accuracy relatively good impact.
- a mortar with a shell and draws from the front presents a curved shot with a range of less than 15 kilometers and a precision of a hundred meters.
- a gun is loaded to the back and makes a more horizontal shot with a range of up to 40 kilometers.
- the more important and frequent imbrication of the forces adversaries and the presence of civilian populations impose the need for the artillery to be able to operate further destruction and neutralization more precise by firing a munition and guiding it on its flight to a well defined target.
- the guiding of a munition is carried out in a known manner by placing implementation of a guide law on all or part of the flight of the ammunition.
- the law The guide system determines instructions to be applied to an actuator of the munition, for example an impeller or a group of control surfaces, for modify the trajectory of the ammunition during its flight in order to bring it closer of the target.
- Proportional navigation is a known guide law of a ammunition which consists in controlling a proportional charge factor to the rotation speed of the line connecting the ammunition to the target. This speed being for example measured using homing devices carried by the ammunition or calculated from parameters provided for example by a central inertial embedded in the ammunition. Load factor control peculiar to proportional navigation leads to a rotational speed from the line connecting the ammunition to the target tending toward zero. Navigation Proportional tends to collide the guided munition with the target. This guidance makes it possible to null the distance of passage which is the distance between the point of real impact and the target.
- Proportional navigation guidance is easy to implement it has the disadvantage of imposing a rectilinear trajectory on the ammunition that is not optimal with respect to the curved ballistic trajectory that follows a munition without guidance.
- the problem is to develop a guidance of the ammunition ensuring like proportional navigation a passing distance theoretically zero but with a lower load factor. It's about to find guidance with impact accuracy as good as the one obtained with proportional navigation guidance while presenting a lower energy cost.
- the invention responds to this problem by a guiding method of a machine, in particular a munition, towards a target, the method applying to the machine a proportional acceleration proportional to the vector product of the speed of the machine by the difference of the vectors rotation of the connecting line the craft and the target and the right connecting the craft to the point of ballistic impact predicts said craft.
- the guidance according to the process starts for example after the climax the trajectory of the ammunition fired.
- the process is iterative in closed loop for example until the impact of the ammunition, or to a position of the ammunition providing significantly better impact accuracy than obtained with unguided ballistic fire.
- the method generates guiding orders carrying out a navigation proportional change around the ballistic trajectory of the munition.
- the guide law of the method according to the invention allows the munition thus guided to move towards the target by deviating slightly from its ballistic trajectory.
- the implementation of the method according to the invention has the advantage of requiring a low load factor.
- FIG. 1 schematically illustrates a conventional servocontrol of an acceleration instruction applied to a munition.
- a guidance calculator 1 generates from the information represented by the inputs X1 to Xn a guiding order for controlling the transverse acceleration vector of the munition 8 in the form of a vector value.
- ⁇ c acceleration setpoint This instruction ⁇ it is compared in a comparator 2 to vector transverse acceleration ⁇ measured m of the ammunition 8 using an instrument case 3 comprising gyrometers and accelerometers.
- the gap 4 between the commanded acceleration ⁇ c and measured acceleration ⁇ m is introduced into a compensating calculator 5, which generates, starting from particular current rotation angles of the ammunition and the gap 4, a position command ⁇ of a rudder of the munition whose purpose is to reduce the gap between the measurement and the instruction.
- the position command ⁇ is executed for example by means of a signal amplifier 6 followed by a steering motor 7.
- the reactions of the ammunition 8 to the position command ⁇ are measured using the instrument box 3 and again compared to the setpoint ⁇ c acceleration so as to achieve a closed loop servo to the set value provided by the guidance computer.
- FIG. 2 schematically shows a servo a position instruction applied to a munition containing a embedded inertial unit.
- a position command 30 to be reached by a munition 23 is supplied as input to a guidance calculator 21 which also receives as input measures 25 from an inertial unit 22 on the munition 23.
- the guidance computer 21 implement a guiding algorithm elaborating from the inputs of the calculator a load factor value 24 to be applied to the cell aerodynamic represented by the ammunition 23 to change the trajectory so that it satisfies said position instruction provided at the input of the guidance computer 21.
- the load factor is a acceleration developed laterally to change the ammunition of path.
- the guidance algorithm makes it possible to control an acceleration respecting a guide law.
- the onboard inertial unit 22 is example, a hybridized GPS inertial unit, whose abbreviation stands for Global Positionning System in English, with accelerometers and gyrometers, and to calculate the coordinates of the position, the components of the speed and attitudes of the ammunition.
- the power plant embedded inertial 22 makes 25 measurements of the flight situation of the munition which feed the guidance computer 21 into a loop of guidance which is a closed loop servo.
- the load factor value 24 is applied to the ammunition 23 by means of a control computer 26 receiving as input the value of load factor 24 on the one hand and measures 27 on the actual movement of the ammunition subjected to the load factor 24 that come from the central inertial 22 boarded on the other hand.
- the piloting computer 26 elaborates a steering value 28 which is applied to the actuators 29 which influence on the flight path and orientation of the ammunition.
- a control loop is closed between the control computer 26 and the ammunition 23 by the introduction in the control computer 26 of new measures 27 of the flight situation of the ammunition, for example acceleration variations and rotation captured by the accelerometers and gyrometers of the plant inertial 22 boarded. The control loop ensures the enslavement of the ammunition 23 at the load factor value 24 recorded.
- the activation of the guidance and steering loops assures the guiding the ammunition. Guiding can be carried out on all or part of the ammunition race.
- Figure 3 shows two trajectories of a munition.
- a munition M is drawn for example from a point O with a conventional preliminary fire calculation determining the firing angles and the initial speed to apply to the munition based assumptions about values such as the mass of the munition, aerodynamic characteristics of the munition and a known wind condition or predicts.
- the ammunition After firing, the ammunition describes a real trajectory 31 and reaches at a certain date t a point M, for example located after the apogee 32 of the path.
- Various deviations from the assumptions taken into account during of the shot lead the ammunition to travel a real trajectory 31 different from the ballistic trajectory 30 provided during the firing.
- the ammunition is not guided, it is subjected to a ballistic acceleration ⁇ TP due mainly to the forces of gravity and drag corresponding to the aerodynamic slowdown, and from the point M it follows a ballistic trajectory whose estimate at time t is a first ballistic trajectory that does not reach the target B but presents a ballistic impact point 1 whose position in space is distinct from that of the target.
- the implementation of the guiding method according to the invention leads to the ammunition to perform a second trajectory 34 which reaches the target.
- the ammunition is controlled by a position command whose value is that of the position of the target B.
- the enslavement is for example the one described with reference to FIG. 2 and implements a guiding law according to the invention.
- the munition is for example equipped with an inertial unit hybridized GPS that calculates the coordinates of position M and the components of ammunition velocity as well as the attitudes of the ammunition.
- the ammunition trajectory is ballistic and has an impact point l with the ground.
- the ammunition animated by the speed V M , is located at the position M.
- the inertial hybridised GPS onboard unit calculates the speed V M and the position M for example by the calculation of the vector OM between the point O of origin of the shot and the position M.
- the coordinates of the point of ballistic impact I are for example evaluated by prediction in a landmark by simplified simulation of the ballistic trajectory ⁇ from the point M of the munition at time t in integrating the state vector until the impact l.
- the ballistic trajectory variable ⁇ In a temporal landmark of variable ⁇ , the ballistic trajectory variable ⁇ has a current point P (t, ⁇ ) depending on the time t during which the munition is at position M.
- the current point P (t , ⁇ ) is animated by a speed V P (t, ⁇ ) also dependent on t and the variable ⁇ to describe the predicted ballistic trajectory ⁇ .
- g the acceleration of gravity
- V the speed module
- V P (t, ⁇ ) equal to the square root of the sum of the squares of the components V x , V y and V z of said velocity vector V P (t, ⁇ )
- q is equal to 1/2 ⁇ V 2
- ⁇ is the density of the air
- S is the surface of the master torque of the ammunition
- Cx is the drag coefficient of the ammunition
- m the mass of the ammunition.
- ⁇ MB - MB ⁇ V M r 2 ⁇ in which the data of the onboard GPS hybridised inertial unit allow the calculation of the three terms MB , V M and r.
- the guiding method according to the invention controls a setpoint acceleration ⁇ c on ammunition at point M whose value is proportional to the vector product of the ammunition velocity V M by the difference of the rotation vector ⁇ MB of the line connecting the ammunition and the target and the rotation vector ⁇ MI of the straight line connecting the ammunition to the point of ballistic impact I predicted for said munition from its known position in point M.
- ⁇ vs - K V M ⁇ ( ⁇ MB - ⁇ MID )
- K is a coefficient of proportionality.
- K is strictly greater than 2.
- a value of K strictly greater than two ensures a stability of the guide servo.
- the value of the coefficient of proportionality K is preferably limited to a value between three and four.
- the munition is equipped with a GPS hybridized inertial unit, which comprises three accelerometers and three gyrometers, and the setpoint acceleration vector.
- ⁇ c is calculated in terrestrial axes for example in said reference (O, x, y, z).
- the vector ⁇ it is projected on the axes of the munition, in which the actuators of the munition operate, by the rotations ⁇ , ⁇ and ⁇ measured by the inertial unit.
- the rotations ⁇ , ⁇ and ⁇ correspond to the passage of the terrestrial trihedron (x, y, z) to the trihedron of the axes of pitch, yaw and roll of the munition.
- the method of the invention controls an acceleration perpendicular to the speed of the ammunition.
- the setpoint acceleration according to the invention advantageously has a substantially zero projection on the roll axis of the ammunition.
- the munition is not equipped with a GPS hybridized inertial unit, but it is equipped with a GPS receiver, two accelerometers for generating control commands for the actuators, and a gyrometer.
- the GPS receiver provides measurements in a reference pseudo-aerodynamic trihedron.
- the target acceleration vector ⁇ c according to the invention is projected on said pseudo-aerodynamic trihedron by the rotations of aerodynamic azimuth ⁇ and aerodynamic slope ⁇ , which are calculated using the components of the speed of the ammunition V M expressed in terrestrial axes, and by the rolling rotation of the munition ⁇ measured by said gyrometer.
- the yaw and pitch angles of the munition are respectively assimilated to, or modeled by, the azimuth and slope angles of the velocity vector provided by the GPS receiver.
- This variant has the advantage of leading to a lighter ammunition than in the example of FIG.
- rotation ⁇ MB to which the vector is subject MB is measured by means of a homing device equipping the munition.
- the on-board autodirector comprises a target detection system B and calculation means or mechanical means for estimating the rotational speed ⁇ MB of the right ammunition-target.
- the ammunition includes an onertial unit and an onboard self-steering. This variant has the advantage of being free of knowledge of the speed of the target.
- the calculation of the setpoint acceleration ⁇ c according to the guide law of the invention is iterated by the method according to a temporal sampling which depends on the dynamic response of said munition to a load factor.
- the method is for example implemented with a sampling of 20 Hertz for a 120 millimeter mortar ammunition.
- the second trajectory 34 of FIG. 3 has the advantage of being curve. It is at every moment close to the ballistic trajectory instant ammunition.
- the guide path according to the method of the invention differs from the guidance according to the proportional navigation classic that imposes a rectilinear trajectory to the ammunition.
- the proportional method tends to make the guidance trajectory lower than that of the natural ballistics of the ammunition, this lower trajectory to be compensated at the end of the guidance by a trajectory higher than the ballistic trajectory.
- Navigation proportional leads over time to commands from an actuator ammunition that are a bit contradictory and are not optimal.
- the guidance according to the invention has the particular advantage of controlling a setpoint acceleration ⁇ c zero, it does not perform trajectory error correction when the ballistic trajectory reaches the target. Proportional navigation in such a case a course correction which corresponds to a degradation compared to natural ballistics.
- the guidance according to the invention allows a cost in energy, a size and a reduced mass of ammunition.
- the method according to the invention provides the control of a factor of zero final charge.
- the speed of the ammunition has the advantage of being aligned with its longitudinal axis during the impact.
- the invention makes it possible to optimize the terminal efficiency of the load of the ammunition.
- the method according to the invention has been described for an application to guiding a munition. It applies of course also to other types gear to guide to a target.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
- Remote Sensing (AREA)
- Aiming, Guidance, Guns With A Light Source, Armor, Camouflage, And Targets (AREA)
- Control Of Position, Course, Altitude, Or Attitude Of Moving Bodies (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- la figure 1, un exemple d'asservissement classique d'une consigne d'accélération appliquée à une munition ;
- la figure 2, un exemple d'asservissement d'une consigne de position appliquée à une munition ;
- la figure 3, un exemple de trajectoire avec et sans l'invention.
V est le module de la vitesse
q est égal à 1 / 2 ρ V2 où ρ est la masse volumique de l'air,
S est la surface du maítre couple de la munition,
Cx est le coefficient de traínée de la munition et
m est la masse de la munition.
Lesdites composantes Vx, Vy et Vz sont les dérivées par rapport au temps τ des composantes dans ledit repère terrestre (O, x, y, z) du point courant P(t, τ).
dans laquelle les données de la centrale inertielle hybridée GPS embarquée permettent le calcul des trois termes
K est strictement supérieur à 2.
Claims (12)
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
FR0111621 | 2001-09-07 | ||
FR0111621A FR2829593B1 (fr) | 2001-09-07 | 2001-09-07 | Procede de guidage d'un engin, notamment d'une munition |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1291600A1 true EP1291600A1 (fr) | 2003-03-12 |
EP1291600B1 EP1291600B1 (fr) | 2005-12-14 |
Family
ID=8867083
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP02292199A Expired - Lifetime EP1291600B1 (fr) | 2001-09-07 | 2002-09-06 | Procédé de guidage d'un engin, notamment d'une munition |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP1291600B1 (fr) |
DE (1) | DE60207952T2 (fr) |
FR (1) | FR2829593B1 (fr) |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
FR2893154A1 (fr) * | 2005-11-10 | 2007-05-11 | Tda Armements Sas Soc Par Acti | Procede et dispositif de determination de la vitesse de rotation d'une droite projectile-cible et dispositif de guidage d'un projectile, notamment d'une munition |
CN104197954A (zh) * | 2014-08-13 | 2014-12-10 | 北京航天控制仪器研究所 | 一种惯性导航系统三维空间落点精度估计方法 |
CN108519104A (zh) * | 2018-02-11 | 2018-09-11 | 北京航天控制仪器研究所 | 三参数椭圆概率误差描述导航落点精度的估计方法及系统 |
Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4512537A (en) * | 1973-08-10 | 1985-04-23 | Sanders Associates, Inc. | Canard control assembly for a projectile |
DE3522154A1 (de) * | 1985-06-21 | 1987-01-02 | Diehl Gmbh & Co | Suchzuender-submunition |
EP0809084A1 (fr) * | 1996-05-14 | 1997-11-26 | Tda Armements S.A.S. | Dispositif de détermination de l'orientation en roulis d'un engin volant, notamment d'une munition |
EP1092941A1 (fr) * | 1999-10-15 | 2001-04-18 | Tda Armements S.A.S. | Dispositif de correction de trajectoire pour projectiles guides gyroscopes |
-
2001
- 2001-09-07 FR FR0111621A patent/FR2829593B1/fr not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2002
- 2002-09-06 EP EP02292199A patent/EP1291600B1/fr not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-09-06 DE DE60207952T patent/DE60207952T2/de not_active Expired - Lifetime
Patent Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4512537A (en) * | 1973-08-10 | 1985-04-23 | Sanders Associates, Inc. | Canard control assembly for a projectile |
DE3522154A1 (de) * | 1985-06-21 | 1987-01-02 | Diehl Gmbh & Co | Suchzuender-submunition |
EP0809084A1 (fr) * | 1996-05-14 | 1997-11-26 | Tda Armements S.A.S. | Dispositif de détermination de l'orientation en roulis d'un engin volant, notamment d'une munition |
EP1092941A1 (fr) * | 1999-10-15 | 2001-04-18 | Tda Armements S.A.S. | Dispositif de correction de trajectoire pour projectiles guides gyroscopes |
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
FR2893154A1 (fr) * | 2005-11-10 | 2007-05-11 | Tda Armements Sas Soc Par Acti | Procede et dispositif de determination de la vitesse de rotation d'une droite projectile-cible et dispositif de guidage d'un projectile, notamment d'une munition |
EP1785688A1 (fr) * | 2005-11-10 | 2007-05-16 | Tda Armements S.A.S. | Procédé et dispositif de détermination de la vitesse de rotation d'une droite projectile-cible et dispositif de guidage d'un projectile, notamment d'une munition |
CN104197954A (zh) * | 2014-08-13 | 2014-12-10 | 北京航天控制仪器研究所 | 一种惯性导航系统三维空间落点精度估计方法 |
CN104197954B (zh) * | 2014-08-13 | 2017-01-18 | 北京航天控制仪器研究所 | 一种惯性导航系统三维空间落点精度估计方法 |
CN108519104A (zh) * | 2018-02-11 | 2018-09-11 | 北京航天控制仪器研究所 | 三参数椭圆概率误差描述导航落点精度的估计方法及系统 |
CN108519104B (zh) * | 2018-02-11 | 2020-12-18 | 北京航天控制仪器研究所 | 三参数椭圆概率误差描述导航落点精度的估计方法及系统 |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP1291600B1 (fr) | 2005-12-14 |
DE60207952D1 (de) | 2006-01-19 |
FR2829593A1 (fr) | 2003-03-14 |
DE60207952T2 (de) | 2006-08-03 |
FR2829593B1 (fr) | 2003-11-21 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US8489258B2 (en) | Propulsive guidance for atmospheric skip entry trajectories | |
US7500636B2 (en) | Processes and devices to guide and/or steer a projectile | |
EP3111166B1 (fr) | Système de navigation inertielle | |
US9211947B2 (en) | Unmanned aerial vehicle angular reorientation | |
EP2169508B1 (fr) | Système de guidage d'un projectile | |
KR20170142903A (ko) | 관성 내비게이션 시스템 | |
US8047070B2 (en) | Fast response projectile roll estimator | |
EP1480000B1 (fr) | Procédé de controle de la trajectoire d'un projectile girant | |
EP1291600B1 (fr) | Procédé de guidage d'un engin, notamment d'une munition | |
EP1798622B1 (fr) | Procédé permettant d'assurer la navigation et/ou le guidage et/ou le pilotage d'un projectile vers un objectif et dispositif mettant en oeuvre un tel procédé | |
EP2758744B1 (fr) | Détermination d'angle d'incidence | |
Solano-López et al. | Strategies for high performance GNSS/IMU Guidance, Navigation and Control of Rocketry | |
EP1422587B1 (fr) | Procédé d'élaboration d'un ordre de commande pour un organe permettant le pilotage d'un projectile girant | |
WO2004074760A1 (fr) | Procede et dispositif de guidage d'un engin volant, notamment un missile, sur une cible | |
EP1311428A1 (fr) | Utilisation de la trajectoire de la fusee de lancement dans le mesureur inertiel d'une charge utile | |
EP0420760B1 (fr) | Procédé et système de guidage autonome vers une cible d'un projectile balistique aéroporté propulsé | |
FR2463909A1 (fr) | Procede de pilotage et de guidage d'un missile, et missile equipe de moyens de mise en oeuvre de ce procede | |
WO2011002343A1 (fr) | Procédé étendu pour guidage terminal | |
EP1785688B1 (fr) | Procédé et dispositif de détermination de la vitesse de rotation d'une droite projectile-cible et dispositif de guidage d'un projectile, notamment d'une munition | |
Josey et al. | Spinning Projectile Navigation and Guidance Using Strapdown Seeker | |
FR2657690A1 (fr) | Dispositif de mesure d'attitude en roulis et/ou en tangage d'un projectile. |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE SK TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL LT LV MK RO SI |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20030901 |
|
AKX | Designation fees paid |
Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT SE |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT SE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 60207952 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20060119 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
GBT | Gb: translation of ep patent filed (gb section 77(6)(a)/1977) |
Effective date: 20060227 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: TRGR |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20060915 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 15 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20170830 Year of fee payment: 16 Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20170831 Year of fee payment: 16 Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20170925 Year of fee payment: 16 Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20170829 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Payment date: 20170912 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 60207952 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: EUG |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20180906 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180907 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190402 Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180906 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180930 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180906 |