Classifications

• • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
  • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
  • B01L—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL LABORATORY APPARATUS FOR GENERAL USE
  • B01L3/00—Containers or dishes for laboratory use, e.g. laboratory glassware; Droppers
  • B01L3/50—Containers for the purpose of retaining a material to be analysed, e.g. test tubes
  • B01L3/502—Containers for the purpose of retaining a material to be analysed, e.g. test tubes with fluid transport, e.g. in multi-compartment structures
  • B01L3/5025—Containers for the purpose of retaining a material to be analysed, e.g. test tubes with fluid transport, e.g. in multi-compartment structures for parallel transport of multiple samples
  • B01L3/50255—Multi-well filtration
• • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
  • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
  • B01D—SEPARATION
  • B01D61/00—Processes of separation using semi-permeable membranes, e.g. dialysis, osmosis or ultrafiltration; Apparatus, accessories or auxiliary operations specially adapted therefor
  • B01D61/14—Ultrafiltration; Microfiltration
  • B01D61/18—Apparatus therefor
• • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
  • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
  • B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
  • B01J2219/00—Chemical, physical or physico-chemical processes in general; Their relevant apparatus
  • B01J2219/00274—Sequential or parallel reactions; Apparatus and devices for combinatorial chemistry or for making arrays; Chemical library technology
  • B01J2219/00277—Apparatus
  • B01J2219/00279—Features relating to reactor vessels
  • B01J2219/00306—Reactor vessels in a multiple arrangement
  • B01J2219/00313—Reactor vessels in a multiple arrangement the reactor vessels being formed by arrays of wells in blocks
  • B01J2219/00315—Microtiter plates
  • B01J2219/00317—Microwell devices, i.e. having large numbers of wells
• • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
  • C40—COMBINATORIAL TECHNOLOGY
  • C40B—COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY; LIBRARIES, e.g. CHEMICAL LIBRARIES
  • C40B60/00—Apparatus specially adapted for use in combinatorial chemistry or with libraries
  • C40B60/14—Apparatus specially adapted for use in combinatorial chemistry or with libraries for creating libraries

Definitions

• the Multiscreen® multiple well membrane filter for laboratory and research use is used for laboratory assays.
• These filters and its competitive products are made by first creating a support plate by injection molding a resin.
• a resin typically, polyethylene, BarexTM polymer, acrylic or styrene is used as the resin.
• the support plate would have a number of through holes, with the wall of such holes serving as the side wall (circular well) or walls (multi-hedral well) of the wells.
• the resin in its injection-molded form must not interfere with the laboratory assay it is used for.
• the multi-well device is then created by cutting filter membrane into discs and attaching the discs to one side of each through hole, thereby creating the wells.
• Such filter membrane is typically attached to the support by bonding, either thermal or ultrasonic. This is a labor-intensive operation, adding substantially to the cost of manufacturing.
• a mold has to be produced for each device.
• the process of producing a mold for use in production first requires the production of a prototype mold. Such molds cost around $50,000. Once the final design of the product is agreed upon, a production mold is made.
• the cost of a production mold varies with the number of cavities intended for the injection-molding tool. For example, a one-cavity tool for 96 well plate production requires a mold that typically costs $90,000. A two-cavity tool for 96 well plate production requires a mold that typically costs $160,000.
• a limitation of the molds is that they are suitable only for similar materials. One could not use the polyethylene mold to produce a styrene support. This limits the products that can be made available because it is not cost effective to produce the same plate design from two different materials due to the cost of capital and the time to recoup the investment.
• PTFE Teflon® polytetraflouroethylene
• a substantially inert material is not used to produce supports because it is not a cost effective alternative for injection molding low cost parts.
• a PTFE multi-well plate would be useful for assays that require no protein binding by the support.
• a PTFE plate in combination with a low protein binding membrane would have substantial utility. Until the present invention, such a device was not available due to its cost and the limitations of technology.
• the current format of choice for multi-well membrane filters is a 96 well plate with a support that is made from injection-molded resins such as polyethylene, styrene and acrylic. 12 and 24 well formats preceded the 96 well plate, but as robotics improved and sample volumes have mushroomed, the need for more assays per plate (higher well density) has increased. Moreover, the volume of the typical assay is shrinking dramatically because of the costs of the material being assayed, proteins, nucleic acids and the like, the costs of the solvents, buffers, enzymes and the like, and improvements in detection technology. As such, that market requires multiple well membrane filters that have more wells in same area with the wells having smaller volumes. Indeed, formats of 384, 1536, 9600 wells are envisioned.
• the present invention solves the prior art problems by providing a platform suitable for affixing a membrane that results in a multi-well membrane filter suitable for high throughput screening assays in high density, low volume formats.
• the current invention allows for quick, inexpensive change over in the manufacturing process without the expensive tooling costs required by the injection molding process.
• the present invention can provide a multi-well membrane filter that is much cheaper on a per well basis than prior art multi-well membrane filters.
• the present invention provides a means for using PTFE supports in multi-well membrane filters that are competitive on a per well basis with the current injection molded polyethylene support in the 96 well format.
• the present invention provides a multi-well membrane filter comprising a support characterized by through holes not having been molded therein; and a membrane filter fixed to said support so at least one side of at least two such through holes are covered such that the device has at least two wells suitable for receiving material to be assayed.
• the present invention provides a method of producing a multi-well membrane filter device, the method comprising 1) selecting a pre-formed support suitable for affixing a membrane thereto; 2) removing material from such pre-formed support so as to form substantially aligned through holes therein; 3) selecting a membrane suitable for filtering solutions in a laboratory setting; and 4) forming wells by laminating the membrane to the support.
• Figure 1 provides top and sectional views of a multi-well filter device with different well shapes and an underdrain laminated thereto
• the present invention provides a multi-well membrane filter, the filter comprising a support characterized by through holes not having been molded therein; and a membrane filter fixed to said support so at least one side of at least two such through holes are covered such that the device has at least two wells suitable for receiving material to be assayed.
• the support may be made of glass, metallic materials, ceramic materials, elastomeric materials and coated cellulosic materials.
• the support includes polymeric material.
• Polymeric materials suitable for the present invention include polyethylene, acrylic, PTFE, polycarbonate and styrene.
• the plate height is less than one quarter inch thick.
• the multi-well membrane filter of the present invention is configured to have at least 96 wells.
• wells in a specific device may have different volumes.
• individual wells have a volume in the range of 50 to 150 microliters. More preferably, the individual wells have a volume in the range of 70 to 130 microliters.
• a volume of about 100 to 120 microliters is preferred. It is envisioned that for formats greater than the 384-well format, the volume requirements will diminish.
• the wells may also have different shapes.
• the multi-well membrane filter of the present invention will have an underdrain laminated to the opposite side of the membrane to facilitate collection of filtrate.
• the membrane contains patterned porous structures.
• the present invention provides a method of producing a multi-well membrane filter device, the method comprising selecting a pre-formed support suitable for affixing a membrane thereto; removing material from such pre-formed support so as to form substantially aligned through holes therein; selecting a membrane suitable for filtering solutions in a laboratory setting; and forming wells by laminating the membrane to the support.
• the method of the present invention includes extruding a material of
• the through holes in the pre-formed support are made by selectively drilling, punching, burning or dissolving material to be removed.
• the preferred method of laminating the membrane to the support is in a web converting process.
• Preferred methods of laminating include diffusion bonding, adhesive bonding, welding and thermal bonding.
• Figure 1 provides an example of the present invention.
• a rigid sheet 10 is infused with a matrix of wells.
• the wells could be pre-punched or they could be produced online within an assembly process, such as a web converting process.
• the perforated sheet could be presented to the assembly machine precut and stacked or on a continuous web and cut to size online.
• the well matrix will be determined by the end users needs, but it could have numerous configurations and the wells do not necessarily need to be all of the same shape or size.
• Figure 1, Top View provides the wells of the present invention having round, square, and other shapes. Virtually any shape that is required for the product may be provided.
• the rigid sheet 10 allows for easy handling during manufacturing and easy handling during use by the end user (a human or a robot).
• the web process uses sheet stock
• using sheet/roll stock as the starting material allows for a variety of resins and support thicknesses because most vendors of sheet stock supply a wide range of resins and thicknesses to be used with this type of assembly process.
• By varying the thickness of the sheet various products could be developed with different starting well volumes. One could also use the same sheet thickness and vary the volume by removing more material when the through holes are created.
• a membrane 14 is attached to the perforated sheet.
• the membrane could be completely hydrophobic or hydrophilic or it could be hydrophilic with hydrophobic regions 18.
• the present invention may also be used in connection with related case no. MCA-474 filed concurrently herewith that is related to porous structures having selected functional patterns upon and/or in them. That invention is particularly related to porous structures such as membranes that have a series of one or more patterns of porous and non-porous areas. Such patterned porous structures may be laminated on the support structure of the present invention. It is envisioned that non-porous regions of the membrane will situated where the hydrophobic region 18 is in Figure 1.
• the means of laminating; that is, attachment could be any of the following: 1. Heat (thermal, ultrasonic, vibration)- The membrane and perforated sheet are held together under pressure. Then ultrasonic energy, vibration energy, or thermal energy applies heat. The melted resin will be pushed into the pores of the membrane. 2. Epoxy- A very thin film of epoxy (air cured, heat cured, UV cured) is applied to 1 side of the perforated sheet. Then the membrane is applied and held in place at specific pressure and cured. If UN is used for curing, then the sheet and or the membrane must be transparent to the UN light. Although epoxy is discussed in this disclosure, most adhesives (silicone based, acrylic based, etc.) will work as described above as long as they are compatible with the rigid sheet, membrane and assay.
• Solvent- A solvent that dissolves the perforated sheets only is applied to 1 surface of the perforated sheet or to the membrane. The membrane is pressed onto the perforated sheet and held until the excess solvent has been dispersed. The dissolved resin will be pushed into the pores of the membrane.
• a solvent that can dissolve both the perforated sheet and the membrane is applied only to the perforated sheet. The membrane is pressed onto the perforated sheet and held until the excess solvent has been dispersed.
• the dissolved resin from the membrane and the dissolved resin from the perforated sheet mix and solidify.
• Durapore® membrane produced by Millipore Corporation would be solvent bonded to a polycarbonate sheet with methylene chloride. It is critical that the solvent be compatible with the materials used to produce the support and the membrane.
• the present invention also provides a process of making a multi well membrane with limited cross talk. Specifically the process further comprises the step of making the seal formed around the individual wells after the lamination step impervious to the filtrate.
• the seal between the support and the membrane needs only to be secure enough to prevent the membrane from releasing from the sheet and prevent the fluid from crossing from well to well between the sheet and the surface of the membrane.
• it is imperative that the seal formed around the individual wells is impervious to the filtrate so that cross talk between the wells is avoided.
• the present invention provides a variety of different means of making the seal formed around the individual wells after the lamination step impervious to the filtrate.
• FIG. 1 presents the use of an underdrain 20 with present invention.
• Underdrains are typically vacuum formed or molded and may be added after the membrane has been laminated it may added at same time as the membrane. The same bonding technologies described above would be used during lamination of the underdrain 20.
• the present invention results in a superior multi-well membrane device process because the manufacturing cost thereof on a well-to-well basis will be much less expensive than prior art because the support or rigid sheet will be less expensive than a molded part.
• the present invention results in a superior multi-well membrane device process because the assembly process could be a web converting process. Use of such process would further reduce assembly costs.
• the present invention results in a superior multi-well membrane device process because multiple resins and thickness are readily available for the rigid sheets. Moreover, product design variations (chemical compatabilities, geometries, thicknesses and the like) can be made with minor die punch changes (this cannot be done with injection molds) and minor adjustments to the assembly equipment.
• the present invention results in a superior multi-well membrane device process because the rigid sheet concept allows for multiple line extensions using the same assembly equipment.
• the present invention results in a superior multi-well membrane device because it provides substantially increased well density, lower volume, tailored volume in a single card and the ability to use PTFE on a cost effective basis.

Landscapes

• Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
• Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
• Water Supply & Treatment (AREA)
• Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
• Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
• Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
• General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
• Hematology (AREA)
• Clinical Laboratory Science (AREA)
• Separation Using Semi-Permeable Membranes (AREA)
• Laminated Bodies (AREA)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Publications (1)

Family

ID=22551833

Family Applications (1)

Country Status (2)

Families Citing this family (13)

Family Cites Families (8)

• 2000
  • 2000-09-18 EP EP00965123A patent/EP1214139A2/de not_active Ceased
  • 2000-09-18 WO PCT/US2000/025585 patent/WO2001019502A2/en not_active Application Discontinuation

Non-Patent Citations (1)

Also Published As

Similar Documents

Legal Events