EP1077271A1 - Revêtements en borure de chrome - Google Patents

Revêtements en borure de chrome Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1077271A1
EP1077271A1 EP99116057A EP99116057A EP1077271A1 EP 1077271 A1 EP1077271 A1 EP 1077271A1 EP 99116057 A EP99116057 A EP 99116057A EP 99116057 A EP99116057 A EP 99116057A EP 1077271 A1 EP1077271 A1 EP 1077271A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
chromium
coating
coatings
substrate
alloy
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP99116057A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Inventor
Albert Jiinjen Sue
Robert Clark Tucker, Jr.
Patrick Joseph Nemeth
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Praxair ST Technology Inc
Praxair Technology Inc
Original Assignee
Praxair ST Technology Inc
Praxair Technology Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Praxair ST Technology Inc, Praxair Technology Inc filed Critical Praxair ST Technology Inc
Priority to EP99116057A priority Critical patent/EP1077271A1/fr
Publication of EP1077271A1 publication Critical patent/EP1077271A1/fr
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23—COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23C—COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
    • C23C4/00—Coating by spraying the coating material in the molten state, e.g. by flame, plasma or electric discharge
    • C23C4/04—Coating by spraying the coating material in the molten state, e.g. by flame, plasma or electric discharge characterised by the coating material
    • C23C4/06—Metallic material
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23—COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23C—COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
    • C23C4/00—Coating by spraying the coating material in the molten state, e.g. by flame, plasma or electric discharge
    • C23C4/18—After-treatment

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to chromium boride coatings having excellent adhesive wear and corrosion resistance and to a process for preparing such coatings. More particularly, the invention relates to hard, dense, low-porosity, wear and corrosion resistant coatings containing ultrafine chromium boride particles dispersed in a metallic matrix. The invention also relates to a process for preparing such coatings in situ by thermal spray and diffusion reaction techniques.
  • Plasma arc spraying and detonation gun D-Gun
  • Typical detonation gun techniques are disclosed in U.S. Patent Nos. 2,714,563 and 2,950,867.
  • Plasma arc spraying techniques are disclosed in U.S. Patent Nos. 2,858,411 and 3,016,447.
  • Other thermal spray techniques are also known, for example, so called “high velocity" plasma and "hypersonic" combustion spray processes, as well as the various flame spray processes.
  • Heat treatment of the coatings is necessary and may be done after deposition in a vacuum or inert gas furnace or by electron beam, laser beam, induction heating, transferred plasma arc or other techniques.
  • Alternative deposition techniques such as slurries, filled fabrics or electrophoresis, followed by heat treatment, are also known.
  • Still other methods include simultaneous deposition and fusion utilizing plasma transferred arc, laser or electron beam surface fusion with or without post deposition heat treatment.
  • valve seat coating is not compatible with many heat treated and hardenable alloys which are useful as substrate materials.
  • a conventional Ni-Cr-B-Si-Fe coating alloy when applied as an overlay to a valve seat made of AISI 410 stainless steel or AISI 4130 steel usually fails by cracking or spalling after heat treatment. This is due to a mismatch in expansion rates between the substrate and coating. Accordingly, there is a present need to develop new coatings which can be employed with a greater variety of substrate materials.
  • chromium boride coatings having excellent adhesive wear and corrosion resistance and which are compatible with a number of alloy substrates.
  • These coatings comprise hard, ultrafine, chromium boride particles dispersed in a metallic matrix, the particles constituting less than about 30 volume percent of the coating, the balance being metal matrix.
  • the atomic ratio of chromium metal to boron in the coating is between about 0.8 and 1.5.
  • the metal matrix may be composed of nickel or a nickel base alloy containing a metal selected from the group consisting of chromium, silicon and iron.
  • the coatings of the present invention may be prepared by process which comprises depositing a mechanically blended powder mixture of chromium metal or a chromium alloy or mixture of both, and a boron-containing alloy onto a substrate and then heat treating the as-deposited coating.
  • the heat treatment effects a diffusion reaction between the deposited elements resulting in the formation of ultrafine particles of chromium boride dispersed in a metal matrix.
  • the coating can be deposited onto the substrate using any of the known deposition techniques mentioned earlier.
  • Figure 1 is a group of curves showing the relationship between hardness, abrasive and adhesive wear and the volume fraction of CrB particles in a coating according to the present invention.
  • Figure 2 is a bar graph showing the adhesive wear resistance of various coatings mated against a conventional detonation gun tungsten carbide based coating.
  • Figures 3(a) and (b) through Figures 7 (a) and (b), inclusive are photomicrographs taken at a magnification of 200X showing the microstructures of sections perpendicular and parallel, respectively, to the surface of typical CrB coatings of present invention prepared with different volume fractions of hard phase.
  • Figures 8(a), (b) and (c) are photomicrographs taken at a magnification of 200X showing the microstructure of a section perpendicular to the surface of conventional coatings of the prior art.
  • the coatings of the present invention are preferably applied to a substrate using thermal spray processes.
  • an electric arc is established between a non-consumable electrode and a second non-consumable electrode spaced therefrom.
  • a gas is passed in contact with the non-consumable electrode such that it contains the arc.
  • the arc-containing gas is constricted by a nozzle and results in a high thermal content effluent.
  • the powdered coating material is injected into the high thermal content effluent and is deposited onto the surface to be coated.
  • This process and plasma arc torch used therein are described in U.S. Patent No. 2,858,411.
  • the plasma spray process produces a deposited coating which is sound, dense, and adherent to the substrate.
  • the deposited coating consists of irregularly shaped microscopic splats or leaves which are interlocked and mechanically bonded to one another and also to the substrate.
  • D-Gun detonation gun
  • a typical D-Gun consists essentially of a water-cooled barrel which is several feet long with an inside diameter of about one inch.
  • a mixture of oxygen and a fuel gas eg. acetylene, in a specified ratio (usually about 1:1) is feed into the barrel along with a charge of powder to be coated.
  • the gas is then ignited and the detonation wave accelerates the powder to about 2400 ft./sec. (730 m/sec.) while heating the powder close to or above its melting point.
  • a pulse of nitrogen purges the barrel and readies the system for the next detonation. The cycle is then repeated many times a second.
  • the D-Gun deposits a circle of coating on the substrate with each detonation.
  • the circles of coating are typically about one inch (25 mm) in diameter and a few ten thousandths of an inch (i.e. several microns) thick.
  • Each of circle coating is composed of many overlapping microscopic splats corresponding to the individual powder particles. The overlapping splats are interlocked and bond to each other and to the substrate without substantially alloying at the interface thereof.
  • the placement of the circles in the coating deposition are closely controlled to build-up a smooth coating of uniform thickness and to minimize substrate heating and residual stresses in the applied coating.
  • the powdered coating material used in the thermal spray process will have essentially the same composition as the applied coating itself. With some thermal spray equipment, however, changes in composition may be expected. In such cases the powder composition will be adjusted accordingly to achieve the desired coating composition.
  • wear and corrosion resistant coatings are applied to a metallic substrate by plasma spraying a mechanically blended powder mixture containing particles of chromium metal or chromium alloy or mixture of both and a boron-containing alloy or mixture of alloys, followed by heat treatment at elevated temperatures, eg, from about 900 to about 1100°C. At these temperatures, diffusion and chemical reactions occur between the thin overlapping splats deposited by the thermal spray process, some of which contain the chromium metal component and others of which contain the boron-containing alloy or mixture of alloys. These diffusion and chemical reactions result in the formation of chromium boride (CrB) precipitates which are dispersed in a metal matrix.
  • CrB chromium boride
  • the precipitates are usually dispersed uniformly throughout the matrix, although in some cases they may be aggregated in small clusters which are evenly distributed in the matrix. Essentially no reaction takes place between the powder particles during deposition so that the splats, before heat treatment, retain their initial powder composition.
  • the coatings of the present invention may be prepared using a two component system, that is, a first chromium metal or chromium alloy component and a second boron-containing alloy component or alternatively, a multiple component system may be employed.
  • the multiple component system may include additional chromium metal or chromium alloy and may be used in those cases where it is desirable to incorporate chromium metal in the alloy matrix, for example, to increase corrosion resistance.
  • the formation of coatings containing chromium boride precipitates in a metal matrix may proceed according to one of the following equations: (1) Cr + (M 1 -B) ⁇ CrB + M 1 (2) (M 2 -Cr) + (M 1 -B) ⁇ CrB + (M 1 -M 2 ) (3) Cr + (M 1 -B) + (M 2 -Cr) ⁇ CrB + (M 1 -M 2 -Cr) wherein
  • the purpose of the metal M 2 is to modify the properties of the matrix, e.g., to include additional chromium in order to improve the corrosion resistance.
  • M 1 and M 2 may also contain small amounts of other elements such as carbon, oxygen and nitrogen.
  • the proportion of chromium metal and boron used in the powder mixture determines the volume fraction of the chromium borides that precipitates in the metal matrix. Generally, the ratio should be kept in a range from about 0.8 to about 1.5.
  • the volume fraction of chromium boride precipitates in the coating should be maintained in a range of from about 12 to about 30 volume percent, preferable from about 15 to 25 volume percent.
  • the coatings can be prepared with a volume fraction of chromium borides in the above ranges if the elements in the boron-containing alloy are kept within the following proportions: from about 2.5 to about 10 wt. % boron, 0 to about 25 wt. % chromium, 0 to about 2 wt. % manganese, 0 to about 2 wt. % aluminum, 0 to about 1 wt. % carbon, 0 to about 5 wt. % silicon, 0 to about 5 wt. % phosphorus, 0 to about 2 wt. % copper and 0 to about 5 wt. % iron, the balance being nickel.
  • any boron-containing alloy can be used to prepare coatings according to the present invention so long as the alloy satisfies the reaction requirements for one of the Equations (1) - (3) above as well as providing the desired elements in the metal matrix.
  • Alloys which are particularly suited for use in preparing coatings according to the present invention are given in Table I below. BORON-CONTAINING ALLOYS Composition (weight %) Alloy No. Ni B Cr Si Fe 1 Balance 3 7 4 4 2 Balance 7.3 3.2 2.6 3 Balance 8.9 3.0 2.2 2.7
  • the powder mixture used to prepare the coatings has a particle size of less than about 200 mesh.
  • the as-deposited coating It is important in the practice of the present invention to heat treat the as-deposited coating at a sufficiently elevated temperature for the boron-containing alloy to be fluid enough to promote the diffusion reaction, typically about 900°C.
  • the heat treatment temperature can be substantially higher than 900°C if desired, e.g. about 1100°C, but the temperature should not be so high as to detrimentally effect the substrate.
  • the as-deposited coating should be maintained at the heat treatment temperature for times sufficient to promote the reaction and/or diffusion between the components of the coating. A limited, but important, amount of diffusion reaction occurs also with the substrate.
  • the heat treatment of the coating is generally carried out in a vacuum or an inert gas furnace.
  • the heat treatment can be achieved by surface fusion processes such as electron beam, laser beam, transferred plasma arc, induction heating or other technique so long as the time at elevated temperature is sufficiently short or a protective atmosphere is provided such that no significant oxidation of the coating occurs.
  • Suitable substrate materials which can be coated according to the present invention include, for example, steel, stainless steel, iron base alloys, nickel, nickel base alloys, cobalt, cobalt base alloys, chromium, chromium base alloys, titanium, titanium base alloys, refractory metals and refractory-metal base alloys.
  • the volume fraction of the hard phase can be as high as 20 percent or more.
  • the volume fraction of hard phase should be kept below about 20 percent. It has been found that the coatings having a volume fraction of CrB above these levels are not ductile enough to withstand the high internal stresses imposed by expansion of the substrate. This is a particularly troublesome problem with some alloys such as AISI 410 which undergo thermal expansion through the martensite phase transformation.
  • the thickness of coatings prepared according to the present invention generally varies from about 0.005 to about 0.040 inch (0.1 to 1.0 mm).
  • the microstructures of the coatings of the present invention are somewhat complex and not fully understood. However, it is known from studies so far conducted that the coatings contain a hard phase comprising ultrafine particles of chromium boride in a metal matrix.
  • the metal matrix is essentially crystalline, relatively dense, softer than the hard phase and has a low permeability.
  • the chromium boride particles may be dispersed in a substantially uniform manner throughout the matrix or the particles may be aggregated in small clusters which are usually distributed evenly in the matrix.
  • clusters of CrB particles are formed in the coatings as the volume fraction approaches the upper limit of about 30 volume percent.
  • the size of the chromium boride particles will vary depending upon several factors including the heat treatment temperature and time. Generally, the average particle size will be sub-micron, typically from about 0.1 to about 1.0 micron.
  • the hardness of the coatings varies in proportion to the volume fraction of the hard phase. It is possible, therefore, to tailor the hardness to a particular range of values by varying the atomic ratio of chromium metal to boron within the powder mixture. Generally, the hardness of the coatings ranges from about 250 to about 700 DPH 300 (HV.3).
  • An important advantage of the present invention is that the diffusion reaction between chromium or chromium alloy and the boron-containing alloy takes place at relatively low heat treatment temperatures, eg about 1000°C. Although the exact reason for this phenomenon is not understood, it is believed to be due to the build-up of high internal stresses and dislocations inside the lamellar splats or leaves that are deposited onto the substrate by thermal spraying. In contrast, chromium borides have been formed by conventional casting or hot pressed methods at significantly higher temperatures greater than about 1150°C. These higher temperatures are usually detrimental to most steels. Due to the low heat treatment temperatures required in the present coating process, these substrates can now be coated without any harmful effects.
  • a number of CrB coatings were prepared by plasma spraying powder mixtures of an alloy of nickel-20 chromium and Alloy No. 2 onto low carbon AISI 1018 2 steel specimens measuring 1/2 x 3/4 x 2-3/4 inches (13 x 19 x 70 mm), AISI 410 stainless steel specimens measuring 5/8 x 1 x 2 (16 x 25 x 51 mm), Inconel 718 3 superalloy specimens measuring 1/2 x 1 x 2-3/4 (13 x 25 x 70 mm) and AISI 4140 and AISI 4130 alloy steel specimens measuring 1/2 x 1 x 2-3/4 inches to a thickness of about 0.020 inch (0.5 mm).
  • the Cr to B atomic ratio in the powder mixture was about 1.
  • the as-deposited coatings were heat treated for one hour at temperatures of from about 970 to 1020°C in vacuum or argon, followed by a sequence of heat treatments, depending upon the substrate material.
  • the as-coated and heat-treated coatings had an apparent porosity of less than about 0.5 percent.
  • the very fine CrB precipitates were uniformly dispersed throughout a Ni-Cr-Si-Fe matrix.
  • the interdiffusion zone of the coating/substrate had a thickness of about 30 to 40 micrometers.
  • Heat Treatment Schedules Coating/410 SS (1) Heat treated at 1000°C/l hr./Ar, furnace cool to 940°C, hold at 940°C/15 min./Ar, fan cool in Ar. (2) Temper at 700°C/45 min./Ar oil quench, and temper at 685°C/45 min./Ar, oil quench. Coating/Inco 718 (1) Heat treat at 1000°C/1 hr./Ar, fan cool in Ar.
  • the first heat treatment step (1) promotes the diffusion reaction in the coating, while the second heat treatment step (2) achieves the desired mechanical properties of the substrate.
  • a number of CrB coatings were prepared by plasma spraying powder mixtures of nickel-20 chromium and Alloy No. 1 onto AISI 410 stainless steel measuring 5/8 x 1 x 2 inches (16 x 25 x 51 mm) to a thickness of about .020 inch (0.5 mm).
  • the mixture formulation was as follows: Alloy No. 1 + 39.3 (Ni-20 Cr). All compositions will be expressed hereinafter in weight percent, eg. 60.7 wt.% Alloy No. 1 + 39.3 wt. % (Ni-20 Cr) equals Alloy No. 1 + 39.3 (Ni-20Cr).
  • the Cr to B atomic ratio was about 1.4.
  • the as-deposited coatings were heat treated for one hour at temperatures of about 970 to 1020°C in vacuum or argon.
  • the coatings consisted of CrB precipitates uniformly dispersed throughout a Ni-Cr-Si-Fe matrix.
  • the volume fraction of the CrB precipitates in these coatings was 15.5 volume percent. This was less than volume percent of precipitates in the coatings of Example I.
  • the coatings prepared in this example were subjected to the same heat treatment schedule for the AISI 410 stainless steel substrate as outlined in Table II. After the heat treatment, the coatings were examined and found to contain no cracks or defects, indicating that this particular coating was compatible with the 410 stainless steel substrate.
  • the hardness of these CrB coatings was about 340 DPH 300 (HV.3). This was less than the hardness of the coatings prepared in Example I; however, the instance coatings were more ductile and strain resistant.
  • a number of CrB coatings were prepared by plasma spraying powder mixtures of chromium metal or nickel-20 chromium and a boron-containing alloy onto AISI 1018 steel specimens measuring 3/4 x 1/2 x 2-1/2 inches to a thickness of about 0.020 inch (0.5 mm).
  • the powder mixtures were based on the formulation of stoichiometric CrB in the coating such that the calculated chromium boride volume fraction varied from about 13.4 to 42.6 percent.
  • the mix formulations were as follows:
  • the hardness of the CrB coatings varied from about 280 to 740 DPH 300 (HV.3).
  • a number of coatings were made from conventional alloy powders designated herein as Cl, a brazing alloy (Alloy No. 1) and C2 were prepared by plasma spraying the alloy powder onto the same AISI 1018 steel specimens, then heat treating the as deposited coating in the same manner as described above.
  • Coatings made from another conventional alloy powder (Ni-Cr-B-Si-Fe) designated herein as C3 were applied onto the steel specimens using standard weld deposition techniques.
  • composition of coatings prepared from mix formulations (2) and (3) correspond closely to the composition of the conventional coatings, particularly coating C3.
  • the composition of coatings prepared according to the present invention are similar to those of conventional coatings, microscopically the structures of these coatings are significantly different.
  • Abrasive wear properties of the coatings prepared above were determined using a standard dry sand/rubber wheel abrasion test described in ASTM Standard G65-80 Procedure A.
  • ASTM Standard G65-80 Procedure A the coated specimens were loaded by means of a lever arm against a rotating wheel with a chlorobutyl rubber rim around the wheel.
  • An abrasive i.e., 50-70 mesh Ottawa Silica Sand
  • the wheel was rotated in the direction of the abrasive flow.
  • the test specimens were weighted before and after the test and their weight loss was recorded. Because of the wide differences in the densities of different materials tested, the mass loss is normally converted to volume loss to evaluate the relative ranking of the materials.
  • the average volume loss for coatings of the present invention ranged from about 5 to 50 mm 3 /1000 revolutions. The volume loss was found to decrease with increasing volume fraction of the hard phase in the coatings.
  • the CrB coatings were also subjected to erosion tests. These tests were conducted according to standard procedures using alumina particles with a nominal size of 27 microns and a particle velocity of about 91 meters per sec at two impingement angles of 90° and 30°. The average erosion rate was found to be about 60 to 120 and about 30 to 37 micrometers per gram, respectively.
  • the dry adhesive wear resistance of both the chromium boride and the conventional coatings was evaluated using a block-on-ring (alpha) tester.
  • the test conditions were fixed at 80° oscillation, 1000 and 2000 cycles, 164 Kg (360 lbs.) normal load and 18m/min. (60 ft./min.) rotating speed in dry air at room temperature.
  • the adhesive wear resistance of the coating was determined by measuring the volume loss based on measurements of wear, scar length and width on the block and weight loss on the ring.
  • Table IV summarizes the metallographic evaluation, sand abrasion, erosion and adhesive wear resistance of all the coatings tested.
  • the group of curves in Figure 1 show the relationship between hardness, abrasive and adhesive wear and the chromium boride volume fraction in coatings prepared according to the present invention.
  • the curves are based on average values of test results obtained on various CrB coatings prepared in this example. It should be noted first that the hardness of the coatings is linearly proportional to the CrB volume fraction.
  • the sand abrasion wear rate of the coatings is represented by curve A. It will be seen that the sand abrasion wear rate is non-linear and varies inversely with the volume fraction of chromium boride.
  • the adhesive wear rate at 1000 cycles is represented by curve B and at 2000 cycles by curve C. The adhesive wear rate increases non-linearly with increasing boride content in the coating.
  • the coatings exhibit a higher adhesive wear rate when tested at 2000 cycles. It should also be noted that minimum volume loss occurs with coatings having a chromium boride volume fraction of between about 12 and 30 percent. Coatings having a volume fraction greater than about 30 percent show a significant increase in volume loss.
  • the bar graphs of Figure 2 show comparisons in the volume loss between chromium boride coatings and conventional alloy coatings against mating UCAR LW-15 coatings.
  • the CrB coatings M2, M3 and M4 representing those prepared from mix formulations (2), (3) and (4), respectively, are superior to the conventional alloy coatings C1 and C2 and comparable to or better than conventional coatings C3.
  • the volume loss of LW-15 coatings when mating against CrB coatings is 3 to 10 times less than those mated against the conventional alloy coatings.
  • microstructures of sections parallel and perpendicular to the surface of a series of chromium boride coatings made from mix formulations (1) to (5) are shown in Figures 3(a) and (b) through Figures 7(a) and (b), inclusive.
  • the volume fraction of chromium boride in the coatings prepared from these mix formulations (1) to (5) ranges from 13.4 to 42.6%.
  • C refers to the coating
  • S refers to the substrate
  • the dark areas are precipitates and the light areas are matrix.
  • microstructures of the sections perpendicular to the surface of the coatings reveal that the precipitates of chromium boride are dispersed substantially uniformly throughout the matrix in the case of the coatings made from mix formulations (1), (2) and (3) having a volume fraction of CrB of 13.4, 15.5 and 19.7% respectively, as shown in Figures 3(a), 4(a) and 5(a).
  • the microstructures of the coatings made from the remaining mix formulations (4) and (5) reveal that the precipitates of chromium boride aggregate as lamellar clusters distributed throughout the matrix as shown in Figures 6(a) and 7(a). These coatings had a CrB volume fraction of 32.5 and 42.6 percent, respectively.
  • FIGs 3(b) to 7(b), inclusive show the microstructure of the sections parallel to the surface of the coatings made from mix formulations (1) through (5), respectively, and reveal basically the same type of precipitation as occurs in the sections perpendicular to the surface of the coatings.
  • the coatings made from mix formulations (1), (2) and (3) having CrB volume fraction of 13.4, 15.5 and 19.7% exhibit a substantially uniform precipitation of the chromium boride throughout the matrix as shown in Figures 3(b), 4(b) and 5(b).
  • the precipitates aggregated in clusters which were distributed evenly throughout the matrix as shown in Figures 6(b) and 7(b). These coatings had a volume fraction greater than 30 percent.
  • microstructures of sections perpendicular to the surface of conventional plasma sprayed and heat treated C1 and C2 coatings and weld-deposited C3 coatings are shown in Figures 8(a), (b) and (c), respectively. Since these conventional alloy coatings were made by using a prealloyed powder, the microstructure of the section parallel to the surface of each coating is expected to be the same as that of the section perpendicular to the surface.
  • coatings C1 relatively high boron and low chromium content result in the formation of very fine Ni 3 B structure as the primary hard phase.
  • the chromium boride precipitates are in a needle shape as shown in Figure 8(b). In the weld deposited coatings C3, the CrB precipitates are blocky with a particle size of about 3 micrometers.
  • the morphology and particle size of the chromium boride precipitates were also examined in sections parallel to the surface of the CrB coatings by scanning electron microscope (SEM). It was found that both the morphology and particle size of the chromium boride precipitates depend upon the formation mechanism. Coatings made with two powder components, i.e., a low melting boron-containing nickel base alloy and nickel-20 chromium or chromium metal, had a more uniform distribution of the precipitates than those made with three components, i.e., boron-containing alloy, nickel-20 chromium and chromium metal.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Plasma & Fusion (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Coating By Spraying Or Casting (AREA)
EP99116057A 1999-08-16 1999-08-16 Revêtements en borure de chrome Withdrawn EP1077271A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP99116057A EP1077271A1 (fr) 1999-08-16 1999-08-16 Revêtements en borure de chrome

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP99116057A EP1077271A1 (fr) 1999-08-16 1999-08-16 Revêtements en borure de chrome

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1077271A1 true EP1077271A1 (fr) 2001-02-21

Family

ID=8238782

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP99116057A Withdrawn EP1077271A1 (fr) 1999-08-16 1999-08-16 Revêtements en borure de chrome

Country Status (1)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1077271A1 (fr)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2005056879A1 (fr) * 2003-09-29 2005-06-23 General Electric Company Systemes de revetement nanostructures
WO2006084925A1 (fr) * 2005-02-11 2006-08-17 Fundacion Inasmet Procede destine a la protection d'alliages de titane contre des temperatures elevees et materiau obtenu
EP1995344A1 (fr) * 2007-05-25 2008-11-26 InnCoa GmbH Revêtement doté d'une gestion ultérieure par diffusion

Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB826181A (en) * 1956-04-06 1959-12-31 Metallizing Engineering Co Inc Improvements in spraywelding materials
GB842280A (en) * 1957-03-05 1960-07-27 Kanthal Ab Improvements in or relating to the formation of corrosion-resistant metallic coatings by so-called flame-spraying techniques
GB842487A (en) * 1956-12-04 1960-07-27 Union Carbide Corp Improvements in and relating to admixtures of unalloyed powder
GB941089A (en) * 1962-03-06 1963-11-06 Coast Metals Inc Application of cobalt-base alloys to metal parts
GB1439947A (en) * 1972-05-30 1976-06-16 Union Carbide Corp Corrosion resistant coatings and process for making the same
GB2023175A (en) * 1978-04-17 1979-12-28 Bbc Brown Boveri & Cie High temperature protective layer
DE3703205A1 (de) * 1986-02-05 1988-10-13 Castolin Sa Verfahren zum herstellen einer erosionsbestaendigen oberflaechenschicht auf einem metallischen werkstueck
EP0320195A1 (fr) * 1987-12-10 1989-06-14 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Alliages à base de cuivre, résistant à l'usure
JPH04333575A (ja) * 1991-01-29 1992-11-20 Nippon Parkerizing Co Ltd チタン含有金属材料上に複合被覆膜層を形成する方法

Patent Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB826181A (en) * 1956-04-06 1959-12-31 Metallizing Engineering Co Inc Improvements in spraywelding materials
GB842487A (en) * 1956-12-04 1960-07-27 Union Carbide Corp Improvements in and relating to admixtures of unalloyed powder
GB842280A (en) * 1957-03-05 1960-07-27 Kanthal Ab Improvements in or relating to the formation of corrosion-resistant metallic coatings by so-called flame-spraying techniques
GB941089A (en) * 1962-03-06 1963-11-06 Coast Metals Inc Application of cobalt-base alloys to metal parts
GB1439947A (en) * 1972-05-30 1976-06-16 Union Carbide Corp Corrosion resistant coatings and process for making the same
GB2023175A (en) * 1978-04-17 1979-12-28 Bbc Brown Boveri & Cie High temperature protective layer
DE3703205A1 (de) * 1986-02-05 1988-10-13 Castolin Sa Verfahren zum herstellen einer erosionsbestaendigen oberflaechenschicht auf einem metallischen werkstueck
EP0320195A1 (fr) * 1987-12-10 1989-06-14 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Alliages à base de cuivre, résistant à l'usure
JPH04333575A (ja) * 1991-01-29 1992-11-20 Nippon Parkerizing Co Ltd チタン含有金属材料上に複合被覆膜層を形成する方法

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
PATENT ABSTRACTS OF JAPAN vol. 17, no. 176 (C - 1045) 6 April 1993 (1993-04-06) *

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2005056879A1 (fr) * 2003-09-29 2005-06-23 General Electric Company Systemes de revetement nanostructures
WO2006084925A1 (fr) * 2005-02-11 2006-08-17 Fundacion Inasmet Procede destine a la protection d'alliages de titane contre des temperatures elevees et materiau obtenu
EP1995344A1 (fr) * 2007-05-25 2008-11-26 InnCoa GmbH Revêtement doté d'une gestion ultérieure par diffusion

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5981081A (en) Transition metal boride coatings
US4626476A (en) Wear and corrosion resistant coatings applied at high deposition rates
US7141110B2 (en) Erosion resistant coatings and methods thereof
KR900002491B1 (ko) 내마모성 피복조성물 및 그 제조방법
US5966585A (en) Titanium carbide/tungsten boride coatings
EP0143342B1 (fr) Revêtements à résistance élevée, à l'usure et à la corrosion et procédé pour leur fabrication
MXPA04008463A (es) Revestimiento y polvo resistente a corrosion.
EP1077272A1 (fr) Revêtements en carbure de titane/borure de tungstène
US4626477A (en) Wear and corrosion resistant coatings and method for producing the same
US6007922A (en) Chromium boride coatings
US5312653A (en) Niobium carbide alloy coating process for improving the erosion resistance of a metal surface
US4588608A (en) High strength, wear and corrosion resistant coatings and method for producing the same
EP1077271A1 (fr) Revêtements en borure de chrome
EP0605175B1 (fr) Article revêtu et procédé de revêtement de cet article
CA1229204A (fr) Enduits resistant a l'usure et la corrosion, et leur fabrication
KR100447289B1 (ko) 탄화티탄/붕화텅스텐 코팅막
JP2001020056A (ja) 炭化チタン／硼化タングステンコーティング
KR20010017861A (ko) 붕화크롬 코팅
JP2001020055A (ja) 硼化クロムコーティング
US4588606A (en) Abrasion resistant coating and method for producing the same
EP0143344B1 (fr) Revêtements résistant à l'usure et à la corrosion appliqués à vitesse de dépôt élevée
Trpčevská et al. Investigation of Microstructures of Plasma and HVOF Sprayed Carbide Coatings
Moraes et al. Creep of High-Strength Steel Coated with Plasma Sprayed Self-Fluxing Alloy. Metals 2023, 13, 763
Nechiporenko et al. Plasma-arc spray-coating of powders of self-fluxing iron-base alloys. II. Structure and properties of the coatings
Kosikowski et al. Functionally Gradient Erosion/Oxidation Resistant Coatings

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20010228

AKX Designation fees paid

Free format text: AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20020911

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20050113