EP0970277B1 - Procede et appareil de regulation de la caisse de tete d'une machine a papier - Google Patents

Procede et appareil de regulation de la caisse de tete d'une machine a papier Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0970277B1
EP0970277B1 EP98900864A EP98900864A EP0970277B1 EP 0970277 B1 EP0970277 B1 EP 0970277B1 EP 98900864 A EP98900864 A EP 98900864A EP 98900864 A EP98900864 A EP 98900864A EP 0970277 B1 EP0970277 B1 EP 0970277B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
feed
headbox
feed streams
streams
headboxes
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP98900864A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP0970277A1 (fr
Inventor
John Shakespeare
Juha Antero KNIIVILÄ
Petri Nyberg
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Valmet Technologies Oy
Original Assignee
Metso Paper Oy
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Metso Paper Oy filed Critical Metso Paper Oy
Publication of EP0970277A1 publication Critical patent/EP0970277A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0970277B1 publication Critical patent/EP0970277B1/fr
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21—PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21G—CALENDERS; ACCESSORIES FOR PAPER-MAKING MACHINES
    • D21G9/00—Other accessories for paper-making machines
    • D21G9/0009—Paper-making control systems
    • D21G9/0027—Paper-making control systems controlling the forming section
    • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21—PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21F—PAPER-MAKING MACHINES; METHODS OF PRODUCING PAPER THEREON
    • D21F1/00—Wet end of machines for making continuous webs of paper
    • D21F1/02—Head boxes of Fourdrinier machines
    • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21—PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21F—PAPER-MAKING MACHINES; METHODS OF PRODUCING PAPER THEREON
    • D21F1/00—Wet end of machines for making continuous webs of paper
    • D21F1/08—Regulating consistency
    • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21—PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21F—PAPER-MAKING MACHINES; METHODS OF PRODUCING PAPER THEREON
    • D21F7/00—Other details of machines for making continuous webs of paper
    • D21F7/06—Indicating or regulating the thickness of the layer; Signal devices

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method of controlling one or more cross-direction property profiles of a paper web manufactured by a paper machine, which method employs a control system for regulating a headbox or headboxes of a paper machine, and which headbox or headboxes is/are supplied with at least two feed streams which contain feedstuffs for the paper to be manufactured suspended in aqueous solution and which feed streams are divided into feed zones in cross-machine sections of the headbox or headboxes, which feed zones are each supplied with combinatory streams of said feed streams.
  • the invention relates to a paper machine comprising a control arrangement for controlling one or more cross-direction property profiles of a paper web manufactured by the paper machine, wherein the paper machine comprises means for supplying at least two feed streams to a headbox or headboxes of the paper machine, which feed streams contain, feedstuffs for the paper to be manufactured in aqueous solution, and means for dividing the feed streams into feed zones in cross-machine sections of the headbox or headboxes, which feed zones are each supplied with combinatory streams of said feed streams, and wherein the control arrangement comprises a control system for regulating a headbox or headboxes of the paper machine.
  • systems for controlling the cross-direction grammage of paper manufactured by paper machines operate in the following way.
  • The. flow of thickstock coming into a wire pit of a paper machine is regulated by a grammage valve based on grammage measurement at the dry end of the paper machine.
  • the grammage of the paper web is measured by means of measuring sensors traversing in a cross direction thereof, and the measurement result of the cross-direction grammage profile is averaged and passed as a feedback signal of a control system.
  • the flow of thickstock is passed from the grammage valve, as known in prior art, to the wire pit, into which white water from the wire section of the paper machine is also passed.
  • the thickstock flow and whitewater are mixed in the wire pit and the thus obtained diluted stock flow is passed, as known in itself, through pulp cleaning and deaeration devices to an inlet header of a headbox and therefrom further through a distribution tube bank of the headbox, possibly through an equalization chamber and a turbulence generator to a slice channel of the headbox.
  • a pulp suspension jet is discharged from the slice channel onto a forming wire or into a forming gap between forming wires.
  • the cross-direction grammage profile of paper manufactured by paper machines is regulated by profiling the height of a slice opening in a headbox based on the aforesaid grammage measurement at the dry end of the paper machine.
  • so-called dilution regulations have also become more common, comprising supplying dilution water, usually whitewater or a stock that is more dilute than the headbox stock, to individual feed points situated in the cross-direction in connection with a headbox.
  • This dilution water feed system serves to profile the cross-direction grammage profile of a slice jet together with the regulation of a profile bar or without it.
  • a special advantage of dilution regulation is that the headbox can be operated with a slice opening of a uniform height so that the cross-direction flows in the slice jet and after it, caused by the profiling of the height of the slice opening, as well as distortions of the fiber orientation profile of paper resulting from them may be avoided.
  • An object of the invention is to allow more accurate and faster control of properties of the paper web, by means of a novel method and arrangement of devices, and exploiting the benefits offered by them.
  • An object of this invention is to take advantage of several recent technologies in combination, including development of dilution headboxes, concentration measurement devices suited to the paper industry, and the potential for advanced control strategies in modem control systems.
  • Prior-art dilution headboxes are subdivided into several feed zones across the headbox. Additionally, there may be more than one layer of such feed zones. Two or more streams of feedstuff supply each layer of feed zones, and each stream of feedstuff may supply one or more layers of feed zones. Each feed zone in each layer is equipped with means of controlling the combinatory proportions of streams fed to that feed zone, normally using a suitable valve arrangement. Additionally, there may be one or more layers of feed zones which are supplied by only one feed stream, or are supplied by plural feed streams without means of controlling combinatory proportions of feed streams fed to each feed zone.
  • the dilute feedstuff is normally whitewater taken from the wire pit or short circulation, often with some processing, such as deaeration, cleaning, or filtration.
  • the main feedstuff also normally contains whitewater, to which a thickstock is added. In some cases, clarified water may be used instead of whitewater as the dilute feedstock.
  • each feed stream supplies feedstuffs of different material composition.
  • feedstuffs of different material composition.
  • whitewater and clear water streams may be supplied as well as the main feedstuff stream; alternatively, two main feed streams may carry different feedstuffs, with a third feed stream carrying a dilute feedstuff.
  • more than one stream contains the same feedstuff; in this case, all streams carrying an identical feedstuff are treated as a single consolidated stream for the purposes of this invention. Applicability of this invention requires that not all streams carry exactly the same feedstuff.
  • the streams fed to each feed zone are mixed together in any of several ways in the feed zone, producing an aggregate stream.
  • the aggregate streams from all feed zones are merged, forming a single jet discharged across the whole headbox. There may be some mixing between streams in adjacent feed zones in this merging.
  • An example of a dilution headbox is the Valmet Sym-Flo DTM.
  • multiple conventional (non-dilution) headboxes may be operated to form in combination a dilution headbox. This is possible if the headboxes do not all have the same feed streams, and there is a difference in composition between some of the feed streams to the individual headboxes. In this case, modulating the slice lip profiles has the effect of changing the combinatory proportions of the feed streams at each location across the web. However, the streams are not mixed, so the effect is similar to operation of a multilayer dilution headbox.
  • the feedstuffs used in the paper industry are of complex composition, containing many distinct material components suspended in an aqueous solution.
  • the principal material components are fibers of different kinds, with properties which depend on the fiber source (Norway spruce, silver birch, Eastern hemlock, bagasse, kenaf, etc.), and pulping process used. Resins and synthetic polymers, as well as various clays, minerals (ash), and other inorganic material may be added.
  • Substances such as dyes, brighteners, anti-brighteners, bleaches, and opacity agents may occur in quantities which have negligible effects on the weight, strength, or other material properties of the web, but which have major effects on color, brightness, opacity, and other optical properties of the web. There may also be solutes dissolved in the aqueous solution, affecting its pH and other chemical properties, thus modulating the effect of other feedstuff components on properties of the web.
  • the aqueous solution is drained through porous fabric (the "wire" of a forming section) into the wire pit, as whitewater, leaving much of the suspended material to substantially form the web.
  • the whitewater at each section of the wire contains substantially the same suspended components as the suspension layer above it, but in lesser concentrations. Normally, whitewater is combined from all sections of the wire into a single stream.
  • the whitewater streams from each forming unit may be kept separate in the process, or may be merged into a composite whitewater stream.
  • the fraction of each component suspended in the jet which remains in the web is referred to as the "retention" of that component.
  • Different components can have greatly differing retentions, and the retentions of some components is affected by chemical properties of the aqueous suspension (such as pH), and by concentrations of other components (such as polymers).
  • the whitewater varies in its component concentrations differently to the jet.
  • the retention of each component can vary differently with process conditions.
  • each component generally increases if the web is made heavier, but to different extents. Since a single property of the web such as weight may vary across the web, and since the composition of the jet can vary across the web, the retention of each component in the jet can also vary across the web. As the whitewater from the wire pit is a mixture of whitewater drained from all locations across the machine, the average retention can be inferred from concentration measurements in the feed streams to a headbox.
  • Some paper machines make only a few grades of paper, and employ substantially the same feedstuffs under substantially similar process conditions whenever a particular grade is being manufactured. Under these circumstances, each grade likely has a characteristic narrow range of retentions, and there is little variation in concentrations of the main feedstock or the whitewater.
  • Recycled fiber tends to be more variable in properties than new fiber, and its use is increasing in many paper machines.
  • Use of a paper machine's repulped off-specification production (broke) varies from time to time, even in single grade machines.
  • the plural feed streams to a dilution headbox normally contain different concentrations of each feedstuff component.
  • the ratio of concentrations of a component in the several feed streams is different for each component.
  • a whitewater feed stream will be relatively richer in solutes and fine suspended solids than in fibers, and relatively richer in short fibers than in long fibers, when compared to the main feed stream.
  • Newer, more sophisticated measurement devices are suitable for continuously and rapidly measuring concentrations of low consistency streams. These are capable of measuring distinct component concentrations, or distinct aggregate concentrations of groups of components (such as total ash concentration or total fiber concentration) as well as, or instead of measuring the total consistency.
  • concentration measurement device is the device marketed by the trademark Kajaani RM-200TM.
  • instruments are available for on-line measurement of other feed stream properties such as color and brightness of a sample, and for measuring the distribution of fiber lengths in a sample.
  • pH or temperature may determine the extent to which a feedstuff property affects web properties.
  • Devices for measuring pH, various solvated ionic species (as pNa, pK, etc.), or temperature are commonly available, including some suitable for use in headbox feed streams.
  • a paper machine is equipped with a number of measurement devices which traverse the moving web at one or more locations on the paper machine.
  • an array of sensors may be deployed across the web, or stationary sensors may remotely measure properties across the web.
  • Typical properties measured are basis weight, water weight, ash weight, caliper, gloss, brightness, opacity, fiber orientation, and strength. Some of these properties may be measured in greater detail, such as distinguishing between different species of ash (Al 2 O 3 , CaCO 3 , SiO 2 , TiO 2 , etc.) or different resins. Other properties, such as dry weight, fiber weight or percent moisture may be derived from these measurements.
  • properties of the suspension discharged from the headbox may be measured during formation of the web on the wire.
  • Such measurements should also be construed as web property measurements in the context of this invention, provided a property is measured at plural locations in the cross machine direction.
  • the ability to control the combinatory proportions of feed streams at each feed zone allows properties of the web to be controlled during manufacture.
  • a change in combinatory proportions at all feed zones across the headbox can affect one or more properties of the web at all locations across the web.
  • a change in combinatory proportions at a single feed zone can affect one or more of the web over a portion of the web.
  • the width of the affected portion of the web may not correspond to the width of the feed zone, and the effect may be unevenly distributed in magnitude or sign within the affected portion of the web. When more than one property is affected, the effect on each property may be differently distributed over portions of the web which may differ in width and location.
  • the effect on a material property of the web, such as ash weight, of changing the combinatory proportion of feed streams depends on the different concentrations within those streams of each component which influences that property.
  • the effect on other properties of the web depends both on material properties of the feed streams, and on non-material properties, such as brightness.
  • the retention of each feed stream component over the affected portion of the web may also affect the magnitude of the effect, and this retention may be influenced by several measurable properties of the feed streams, such as pH or temperature.
  • a control system can more effectively modulate the combinatory proportions of the feed streams if it can more accurately model the process effect of such modulation on each of the properties to be regulated.
  • Such modelling requires that the appropriate feed stream properties are measured, and that the dependencies between feed stream properties and web properties be substantially known. Many such dependencies are common knowledge.
  • a dilution headbox utilizes two feed streams, one carrying whitewater and the other carrying the main stock
  • the fiber in the web is supplied predominantly by the main stock stream, but the ash component may be supplied in similar degree by both streams.
  • changing the combinatory proportions of the feed streams at one or more feed zones will clearly affect the web fiber and ash profiles differently.
  • control systems which can effectively modulate one or more cross machine actuator systems to regulate one or more property profiles.
  • the regulation of web properties can be enhanced by providing suitable measurements of properties of the plural feedstreams to a control system, and utilizing a process model which relates changes in web properties to the combinatory proportions of feed streams and to the properties of the feed streams.
  • control system is the system marketed by the trademark Valmet Damatic XDTM.
  • the method of the invention is mainly characterized by the features defined in the characterizing part of claim 1.
  • the apparatus of the invention is mainly characterized by the features defined in the characterizing part of claim 7.
  • means are provided for sampling, continuously or at intervals, the material in each of two or more of the feed streams to a headbox which is equipped with means for controlling eombinatory proportions of those feed streams at each of plural feed zones across the headbox, and means are provided for measuring properties such as the concentrations of constituents in these samples, and means are provided for supplying those measurements or factors calculated therefrom to any regulatory means responsive to one or more measured properties of the web and modulating the aforesaid eombinatory proportions to regulate the aforesaid properties.
  • the novelty of this invention is in the use of means of sampling two or more feed streams to a headbox which is so equipped, together with means of measuring properties such as the concentrations of constituents of those samples, together with means of supplying those measurements or factors calculated therefrom to a means of regulating properties of the web during manufacture.
  • the benefits of this invention include more effective modulation of the combinatory proportions of the feed streams by any regulatory means responsive to one or more properties of the web, where such means includes means for modulation of the eombinatory proportions of the feed streams at each of several feed zones across a headbox.
  • the importance of this benefit is greatest in situations where one or more of the feed streams undergoes, or is likely to undergo a change in concentration of one or more of its constituents, or a change in brightness or color, or a change in another measured property, such changes occurring either continuously or intermittently, and in divers amounts.
  • the feed stream property measurements are used to calculate the effective proportionality factors between changes in the combinatory proportions of the feed streams and changes in properties of the web which are influenced by these feed stream properties and combinatory proportions.
  • Such effective proportionality factors may be for changes in the average combinatory proportions of the feed streams across the headbox, and may also or alternatively be for changes in the local combinatory proportions in each feed zone of the headbox.
  • Such effective proportionality factors may be for the change in the average of a property across the web, or for the local property at each of several subdivisions of the web across the machine, where such subdivisions normally correspond substantially to the feed zones, but may alternatively correspond to narrower or broader subdivisions of the sheet.
  • each feed stream to the headbox is sampled, or such streams are sampled as are combined to substantially form each feed stream.
  • it is not necessary to measure each property in all feed streams since it may be known that a particular property is negligibly present or invariant in some feed streams.
  • some feed streams may be unsampled, and have no property measurements. For example, if a feed stream supplies fresh clear water, it is unnecessary to measure the amount of fibre present in the stream, since the stream is a priori known to contain none.
  • a stream is formed by dosing a colorant of substantially known hue and intensity into a stream of substantially known color, and said dosing ratio is regulated and known, it is unnecessary to measure the color of the resulting stream, as its color can be calculated ab initio from known quantities.
  • Each means of sampling a stream may be situated at any convenient point in the stream.
  • a means of sampling the stream may be provided for each means of property measurement, or a means of sampling the stream may be shared among several means of property measurement.
  • the sampled streams are the main stock stream and the dilution stream, or such streams as are combined to substantially form the main stock stream and the dilution stream, and each means of sampling a stream may be situated at any convenient point in the stream in the case that more than one means of measuring a concentration or other property is supplied with a sample from a stream, a means of sampling the stream may be provided for each means of property measurement, or a means of sampling the stream may be shared among several means of property measurement.
  • Means for measuring concentration or other property may be one or more instruments attached permanently, periodically, or intermittently to a means for sampling a stream, or may be one or more instruments remote from the means for sampling the streams, and to which samples must be brought. Additionally or alternatively, means for sampling a stream may be integral to a means for measuring concentration or other property, including cases where the sampling of the stream takes place within the stream, by exposure within the stream of an element of the means for property measurement.
  • Means for sampling the streams may be autonomous or manually operated, and a means for measuring properties of a sample may be autonomous or manually operated. Means for measuring sample properties may be a laboratory procedure, carried out manually or mechanically.
  • Each means of measuring concentration may be responsive to the individual concentration of one or more constituents of the sample of the stream, or may be responsive to one or more aggregate concentrations of combined constituents of the sample of the stream, or may be responsive to both individual and aggregate concentrations.
  • the measured concentrations are commonly for constituents such as a particular fiber type or a particular chemical species, or aggregates of constituents such as total fiber or total ash content.
  • Each means of measuring other properties may be responsive to one or more optical properties, such as brightness or color, or may be responsive to one or more thermal or mechanical properties, such as viscosity, or may be responsive to chemical properties, such as pH, or to other properties, such as conductivity or magnetic reluctance.
  • a single instrument may provide measurements of several properties, which may include concentration, optical, electromagnetic, thermal, mechanical, and chemical properties.
  • FIG. 1 schematically depicts an embodiment of the invention where a dilution headbox 3 is provided with two feed streams 11 and 12.
  • One stream 11 supplies a stock suspension, while the other 12 supplies a dilution medium.
  • the two feed streams 11,12 feed each feed zone of the headbox 3 by means of a suitable valve arrangement 10.
  • the valve means 10 of the feed zones to the headbox feed zones are regulated by a computer or other instrument 110 which can communicate with other computers or instruments.
  • Each feed stream 11,12 is equipped with a stream sampling arrangement 21,22, and these stream sampling arrangements 21,22 are connected to concentration measurement devices 31,32 which measure one or more concentrations or other properties of the streams.
  • the feed stream property measurement devices 31,32 are connected to a computer or other instrument 130 which can communicate the measured properties or factors calculated therefrom to other computers or instruments.
  • the headbox discharge forms the paper web 5, which moves along the machine.
  • a measurement device 40 commonly a frame with a traversing sensor platform, situated on the machine measures one or more properties of each subdivision of the web 5 as it passes the device 40.
  • This device 40 is connected to a computer or other instrument 140 which can communicate with other computers or instruments.
  • a control system 150 communicates with the feed zone regulating computers or instruments, with the stream property measurement computers or instruments 130, and with the web 5 property measurement computers or instruments 140.
  • the control system 150 regulates one or more web 5 property profiles supplied by the web 5 measurement system 140 by modulating the combinatory proportions of the two feed streams 11,12 at each feed zone, by means of the actuation system 110, and employs in its control calculations the feed stream property measurements or factors calculated therefrom, supplied by the stream measurement system 130 for both of the streams 11,12.
  • Means 151 are normally provided to information from the control system to human operators, and for the operators to enter commands and setpoint values to the control system.
  • the number of feed zones may be greater than three, and the feed zones may be of equal or unequal capacity and characteristics. It is not necessary for all means of combining flows to be identical, and not all need be modulated by the web property profile regulator, provided at least three are so modulated.
  • the various measurement and control systems may be embodied in a greater or lesser number of elements than shown. There may be plural means 151 for interaction with human operators, or none, and when such plural means are employed, they may be similar or dissimilar.
  • the number of feed zones shown in Figure 1 is three, but the embodiment includes greater numbers of feed zones, of equal or unequal flow capacity and evenly or unevenly distributed across the headbox.
  • the salient functions of the various systems may in practice be combined in a lesser number of distinct units, or divided among a greater number of units.
  • concentrations or other properties of the feed streams are used in the control calculations for regulating web properties by modulating combinatory proportions of feed streams in each feed zone of the headbox 3.
  • FIG 2a schematically depicts a simple variation of the embodiment presented in Figure 1, and described above.
  • a feed stream has two sampling arrangements 21,26, each with a single device for measuring stream properties 31, 36.
  • These devices 31,36 are connected to a computer or other instrument 130 capable of communicating with other computers or instruments.
  • the control system 150 employs in its control calculations the feed stream property measurements or factors calculated therefrom, supplied by the stream measurement system 130 for all three of the stream measurement devices 31,32,36.
  • FIG 2b schematically depicts a simple variation of the embodiment presented in Figure 1, and described above.
  • both feed streams 11,12 have two sampling arrangements 21,22,26,27, each with a single device for measuring stream properties 31,32,36,37.
  • These devices are connected to a computer or other instrument 130 capable of communicating with other computers or instruments.
  • the control system 150 employs in its control calculations the feed stream property measurements or factors calculated therefrom, supplied by the stream measurement system 130 for all four of the stream measurement devices 31,32,36,37.
  • FIG. 2c schematically depicts a simple variation of the embodiment presented in Figure 1, and described above.
  • two property measurement devices 35, 36 are connected to one of the sampling arrangements 26. These devices are connected to a computer or other instrument 131 capable of communicating with other computers or instruments.
  • the control system 150 employs in its control calculations the feed stream property measurements or factors calculated therefrom, supplied by both stream measurement systems 130,131 or the four stream measurement devices 31,32,35,36.
  • FIG. 3 schematically depicts a variation of the embodiment presented in Figure 1, and described above.
  • three feed streams 11,12,13 are fed to each feed zone of the headbox, and each feed zone of the headbox 3 has means 10 suitable for modulating the flow proportions from the three feed streams 11,12,13.
  • a sampling arrangement 23 for the third stream 13 is connected to a feed stream property measurement device 33, which is connected to a computer or other instrument 130 capable of communicating the measurements to other computers or instruments.
  • the control system 150 regulates one or more profiles supplied by the web measurement system 140 by modulating the combinatory proportions of the three feed streams at each feed zone of the headbox 3, by means of the actuation system 110, and employs in its control calculations the feed stream property measurements or factors calculated therefrom, supplied by the stream measurement system 130 for each of the three streams 11,12,13.
  • the control system 150 regulates one or more profiles of the web 5 supplied by the web 5 measurement system 140 by modulating the combinatory proportions of the three feed streams (11,12,13) at each feed zone by means of the actuation system 110, by employing in control calculations the concentration measurements or factors calculated therefrom, supplied by the stream measurement system 130 for each of the three streams (11,12,13).
  • FIG 4 schematically depicts a variation of the embodiment presented in Figure 1, and described above.
  • three feed streams 11,12,13 are fed to a dilution headbox 3 equipped with two layers of independently modulated feed zones.
  • One feed stream 13 supplies the upper layer only
  • another 11 supplies both layers
  • the third 12 supplies the lower layer only.
  • the combinatory proportions in each feed zone in each of the two layers of feed zones of the headbox are modulated by means of suitable valve arrangements 10a,10b provided for each layer.
  • the valve arrangements 10a, 10b to the headbox feed zones in both layers are regulated by a computer or other instrument 110,111 capable of communicating with other computers or instruments.
  • the control system 150 regulates one or more profiles supplied by the measurement system 140 by modulating the combinatory proportions of the feed streams at each feed zone of each layer, by means of their actuation systems 110,111, and employs in its control calculations the feed stream property measurements or factors calculated therefrom, supplied by the stream measurement system 130 for the three stream measurement devices 31,32,33. Additionally, the control system 150 may similarly modulate the combinatory proportions of layers, either of entire layers or of subdivisions of layers.
  • the number of feed layers may be greater than two, and not all layers need have a means of combining flows to their feed zones. Also, not all layers which have means of combining flows to their feed zones need be modulated by the web property profile regulator.
  • the means of combining flows to feed zones in different layers may be of equal or unequal capacity and characteristics.
  • the number and character of feed zones and associated means may differ between layers, but at least one layer should have at least three means of combining flows, where such means are modulated by the profile regulator.
  • the embodiment of Figure 4 may be generalized to more than two layers, of equal or unequal characteristics.
  • the number of feed streams to feed zones may differ between layers.
  • Each feed stream may feed one layer or more than one layer.
  • More than one feed stream may convey the same feedstuff, provided at least one layer of feed zones is supplied with two or more different feed streams.
  • FIG. 5 schematically depicts a variation of the embodiment presented in Figure 1, and described above.
  • arrangements 15 are also provided for modulating the slice lip of the headbox 3 at plural locations across the web 5.
  • the arrangement 15 for modulating the slice lip of the headbox is regulated by a computer or other instrument 115 capable of communicating with other computers or instruments.
  • the control system 150 regulates one or more profiles supplied by the measurement system 140 by modulating the combinatory proportions of the feed streams at each feed zone of the headbox 3 by means of their actuation system 110, and by modulating the shape of the headbox slice lip by means of its actuation system 115, and employs in its control calculations the feed stream property measurements or factors calculated therefrom, supplied by the stream measurement system 130 for both of the streams 11,12.
  • one or more property profiles can be regulated by the combined modulation of feed stream combinatory proportions and slice lip shape.
  • two or more property profiles are of interest, such as fiber orientation and dry weight or caliper.
  • FIG. 6 schematically depicts a variation of the embodiment presented in Figure 1, and described above.
  • four feed streams 11,12,13,14 are fed to two dilution headboxes 3a,3b equipped with independently modulated feed zones, where the webs 5a,5b produced by the headboxes 3a,3b are spliced into a single web 5 before the measurement device 40.
  • Two feed streams 11,12 supply the lower headbox 3a only, and the other two feed streams 13,14 supply the upper headbox 3b only.
  • the combinatory proportions in each feed zone in each of the two headboxes 3a,3b are modulated by means of a suitable valve arrangement 10a,10b for each headbox 3a,3b.
  • the valve arrangements 10a,10b for the feed zones in each headbox 3a,3b are regulated by a computer or other instrument 110,111 capable of communicating with other computers or instruments.
  • the control system 150 regulates one or more profiles of the web 5 supplied by the measurement system 140 by modulating the combinatory proportions of the feed streams at each feed zone of each layer, by means of their actuation systems 110,111, and employs in its control calculations the feed stream property measurements or factors calculated therefrom, supplied by the stream measurement system 130 for the four stream measurement devices 31,32, 33,34. Additionally, the control system 150 may similarly modulate the combinatory proportions of layers of headboxes 3a,3b, either of entire headboxes or of subdivisions of headboxes.
  • the number of headboxes may be greater than two, and not all headboxes need have a means of combining flows to their feed zones. Also, not all headboxes which have means of combining flows to their feed zones need be modulated by the web property profile regulator.
  • the means of combining flows to feed zones in a headbox may be of equal or unequal capacity and characteristics.
  • the number and character of feed zones and associated means may differ between headboxes, but at least one headbox should have at least one layer which has at least three means of combining flows, where such means are modulated by the profile regulator.
  • This embodiment may be generalized to more than two headboxes, of equal or unequal characteristics, where their webs are spliced together during manufacture.
  • Each headbox may have its own forming section, or more than one headbox may be on the same forming section.
  • multiple headboxes are analogous to a single headbox with number and type of layers equal to the sum of the actual headbox layers.
  • FIG 7 schematically depicts a simple variation of the embodiment presented in Figure 1, and described above.
  • three web measurement devices 40, 41,42 are deployed at different locations on the paper machine, and each is connected to a computer or other instrument 140,141,142 which can communicate with other computers or instruments.
  • the control system 150 regulates one or more profiles supplied by one or more of the web measurement instruments 140,141,142 by modulating the combinatory proportions of the two feed streams at each feed zone, by means of the actuation system 110, and employs in its control calculations the feed stream property measurements or factors calculated therefrom, supplied by the stream measurement system 130 for both of the streams 11,12.
  • a web measurement device may be connected to more than one web measurement computer or instrument, and a web measurement computer or instrument may be connected to more than one web measurement device.
  • a web measurement computer or instrument may be incorporated within a web measurement device.
  • each means may measure single or plural or all measured property profiles.
  • Each measured property profile may be measured at single or plural or all means.
  • each of the plural means may measure the same or a different plurality of web property profiles.
  • FIG. 8 schematically depicts another embodiment of the invention, in which two conventional headboxes 3a,3b are supplied with different feed streams 11,12.
  • the arrangements for modulating the slice lip of each headbox are regulated by a computer or other instrument 115,116 capable of communicating with other computers or instruments.
  • the control system 150 regulates one or more profiles supplied by the web measurement system 140 by modulating the combinatory proportions of the feed streams at each feed zone of each layer of the headbox, by means of the slice lip actuation systems 15a,15b,115, and employs in its control calculations the feed stream property measurements or factors calculated therefrom, supplied by the feed stream measurement system 130 for the feed stream property measurement devices 31,32. Additionally, the control system 150 may similarly modulate the combinatory proportions of headboxes, either of entire headboxes or of subdivisions of headboxes.
  • the number of headboxes may be greater than two, and not all headboxes need have a means of modulating their slice lips. Also, not all headboxes which have means of modulating their slice lips need be modulated by the web property profile regulator.
  • the number of means of modulating the slice lip may be greater than three, and may be evenly or unevenly distributed across the slice lip, and may have equal or unequal capacity across the slice lip.
  • the number and character of means of modulating slice lips may differ between headboxes, but at least one headbox should have at least three means of modulating its slice lip, where such means are modulated by the profile regulator.
  • the two conventional headboxes are, within the context of this invention, operated as if they formed a single dilution headbox, where modulating the shape of the slice lip on each headbox alters the profile of combinatory proportions of the two jets.
  • This embodiment may be generalized to more than two headboxes, of equal or unequal characteristics, where their webs are spliced together during manufacture.
  • multiple conventional headboxes are analogous to a single dilution headbox with number and type of feed streams equal to the sum of the feed streams to the individual headboxes.
  • Figure 9 depicts another embodiment of the invention as a block diagram of a method for regulating a web property profile by modulating combinatory proportions of two streams to plural feed zones in a dilution headbox, which uses measurements of feed stream properties in its calculations.
  • a property measurement is provided for each of the two feed streams m31, m32. These measurements are used in a calculation unit 230, to produce the effective proportionality factor p41 between changes in combinatory proportions of the two feedstreams and changes in the regulated web property.
  • the web property measured profile m41 and its seipoint profile s41 are supplied to a calculation unit 241 which produces the web property error profile e41.
  • the proportionality factor p41 and the web property error profile e41 are used by the profile regulation means 210 to modulate its output s10, which is normally the combinatory proportion setpoint profile, or a profile of setpoints for such means as substantially determine the combinatory proportion profile.
  • the proportionality factor calculation unit 230 may employ other measurements and factors in addition to those shown, as may be required for the process relation between the regulated web property and the feed stream properties.
  • the proportionality factor p41 may be a single value effective across the whole headbox, or it may be a profile of values, each effective in one or more feed zones of the headbox, or it may be a matrix of values, each effective in one or more feed zones of the headbox and in some subdivisions of the web in the cross machine direction, where the number of rows in such matrix of values need not be the same as the number of columns.
  • the proportionality factor p41 may be supplied directly by the feed stream property measurement means.
  • the web property profile regulator 210 may employ other measurements and factors in addition to those shown.
  • the web property profile error e41 calculation unit 241 may be contained within the regulator 210, and may utilize weighting factors or nonlinear operations in addition to a simple error calculation.
  • the operations performed within the regulator 210 may be any commonly known algorithms for profile regulation, including, but not limited to
  • Such operations may additionally include any commonly known time domain compensation method for profiles, including but not limited to
  • Figure 10 depicts a variation of the embodiment presented in Figure 9, and described above.
  • a second web property profile measurement m42 and its setpoint profile s42 are supplied to a calculation unit 242 which produces a second web property error profile e42.
  • the proportionality factor calculation unit 230 produces a second effective proportionality factor p42, which relates changes in the combinatory proportions of the two feed streams to changes in the second profile.
  • Both proportionality factors p41, p42 and both web property error profiles e41, e42 are used by the profile regulation means 210 to modulate its output.
  • the calculation methods for the second web property error profile, and for the second effective proportionality factor may differ from those for the first.
  • the operation of the profile regulating means may be modulated by use of weight factors or similar techniques, such that the regulation of one profile takes precedence over the other, or such that the regulation effects a compromise between regulation of one or the other.
  • Figure 11 depicts a variation of the embodiment presented in Figure 9, and described above.
  • a property measurement is provided for a third feed stream m33, and supplied to a calculation unit 230 which produces effective proportionality factors p41a, p41b, which relate changes in the combinatory proportions of the three feed streams to changes in the regulated profile.
  • Both proportionality factors p41a, p41b and the web property error profile e41 are used by the web property profile regulation means 210 to modulate its outputs s10a, s10b, which are normally the combinatory proportion setpoint profiles, or profiles of setpoints for such means as substantially determine the combinatory proportion profiles.
  • Figure 12 depicts a variation of the embodiment presented in Figure 9, and described above.
  • a second property measurement is provided for each of the two feed streams m36, m37, and supplied to a calculation unit 230, which produces the effective proportionality factor p41, which relates changes in the combinatory proportions of the two feed streams to changes in the regulated profile.
  • the calculation unit 230 uses the measurements of both properties in both feed streams to produce the effective proportionality factor p41.
  • Figure 13a schematically depicts a simple variation of the embodiment presented in Figure 9, and described above.
  • a means 215 is provided for converting a combinatory proportion setpoint profile s10 into setpoint profiles s15a, s15b for slice lips of two headboxes such that said combinatory proportion profile is achieved between two headboxes.
  • a means 225 may also be provided for calculating the prevailing combinatory proportion profile m10 from the measured slice lip profiles m15a, m15b.
  • the means 215 and 225 may optionally employ additional measurements and factors in their calculations.
  • Figure 13b schematically depicts a simple variation of the embodiment presented in Figure 9, and described above.
  • the prevailing combinatory proportion profile m10 is also supplied to the web property profile regulation means 210, for use therein.
  • Figure 13c schematically depicts a simple variation of the embodiment presented in Figure 9, and described above.
  • the web property profile regulation means 210 modulates both the profile of combinatory proportions of the two feed streams s10, and the slice lip profile of the headbox s15.
  • the prevailing slice lip profile m15 can be supplied to the web property profile regulation means 210, for use therein.
  • Figure 13d schematically depicts a simple variation of the embodiment presented in Figure 9, and described above.
  • the prevailing combinatory proportion profile m10 and the measured web property profile m41 are also supplied to the calculation unit 230 which may use them in calculating a profile or matrix of effective proportionality factors p41.
  • the measurement of concentrations or other properties of the feed streams allows calculation of effective proportionality factors between changes to combinatory proportions of feed streams and changes to property profiles at each subdivision of the web in the cross machine direction.
  • the controller can adjust combinatory proportions of feed streams to the headbox feed zones to compensate for those changes before any adverse effects occur in the regulated properties of the web.
  • the effective proportionality factor between a web 5 property W (such as dry weight or ash weight), whose value is W i at a subdivision i of the web in the cross machine direction, and the combinatory proportion K j of two feedstreams to feed zone j of the headbox, where the constituent (such as total consistency or ash consistency) influencing the property has measured concentration C D in the stream whose proportion is K j , and measured concentration C S in the stream whose proportion is 1-K j
  • ⁇ W i ⁇ K j R ji (C D -C S ) W i C D K j + C S (1-K j )
  • R ji is a coefficient indicating the degree of influence of feed zone j of the headbox over a property in subdivision i of the web.
  • the formulation expressed above defines a matrix of proportionality values, each effective for a single headbox feed zone and a single subdivision of the web.
  • Other formulations may be used to relate properties such as opacity, brightness, or color of the web to TiO 2 concentration in or brightness or color of the feed streams.
  • other formulations may be used to relate other properties of the web to pertinent properties of the feed streams.
  • the invention extends to multiple headbox arrangements, one or more of which is a dilution headbox with means of modulating combinatory proportions of two or more feed streams at each of plural feed zones, with concentration measurements of samples in plural feed streams to one or more such dilution headboxes.
  • the invention extends to control of multiple dilution headboxes in concert, and to combinations of dilution headboxes and conventional headboxes.
  • the essence of this invention is not in the use of any particular formula in calculating effective proportionality factors for a means of regulating one or more properties of the web, nor is it in the use of any particular means of regulating one or more properties of the web used in controlling the operation of the headbox.
  • the essence of this invention is in the use of means of sampling two or more feed streams to a headbox as described above, with means of measuring properties of constituents of said samples, and in the use of the measured properties or factors calculated therefrom in any formulation used in any means of regulating properties of the web during manufacture, where such regulatory means modulate the combinatory proportions of the feed streams at several feed zones across the headbox.

Landscapes

  • Paper (AREA)
  • Medicines Containing Material From Animals Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)
  • Amplifiers (AREA)

Claims (16)

  1. Procédé de contrôle d'un ou plusieurs profils de propriété de sens travers d'une feuille de papier continue (5) fabriquée par une machine à papier, lequel procédé emploie un système de contrôle (150) pour réguler une caisse de tête (3) ou des caisses de tête (3a, 3b) de la machine à papier, et laquelle caisse de tête (3) ou lesquelles caisses de tête (3a, 3b) est/sont fournie (s) avec au moins deux circuits d'alimentation (11, 12) qui contiennent des pâtes d'alimentation pour le papier à fabriquer suspendues dans une solution aqueuse et lesquels circuits d'alimentation sont divisés en zones d'alimentation dans les sections de la machine croisée de la caisse de tête (3) ou des caisses de tête (3a, 3b), lesquelles zones d'alimentation sont chacune munies de circuits combinatoires desdits circuits d'alimentation (11, 12; 11, 12, 13; 11, 12, 13, 14), caractérisé en ce que ledit profil de propriété ou lesdits profils de propriété est/sont mesurés par un système de mesure (40, 140), le signal de mesure obtenu à partir dudit système de mesure étant fourni au dit système de contrôle (150), et en ce qu'une propriété, telle que la concentration et/ou la consistance et/ou la blancheur et/ou la couleur d'un ou de plusieurs pâtes d'alimentation desdits circuits d'alimentation (11, 12 ; 11, 12, 13; 11, 12, 13, 14) est mesurée et le signal de mesure ainsi obtenu est alimenté vers ledit système de contrôle (150), et en ce que, en se basant sur ladite mesure du profil ou des profils de propriété et en se basant sur lesdites mesures de ladite propriété, telles que la concentration et/ou la consistance et/ou la blancheur et/ou la couleur, et en se basant sur les valeurs de consigne, les signaux de contrôle sont formés pour réguler un actionneur (10) ou une combinaison d'actionneur (10a, 10b) situé à chacune desdites zones d'alimentation de la caisse de tête (3) ou des caisses de tête (3a, 3b), par lequel actionneur ou laquelle combinaison d'actionneur, les proportions combinatoires des différents circuits d'alimentation (11, 12) fournis à la zone d'alimentation en question sont affectées pour réaliser un profil ou des profils de propriété souhaité (s) de la feuille (5).
  2. Procédé selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que le/les profil/profils de propriété souhaité (s) de sens travers et/ou mesuré (s) de la feuille de papier continue (5) à fabriquer est/sont choisi (s) dans le groupe suivant: grammage, poids des cendres, épaisseur du papier, brillance, lustre, blancheur, couleur, opacité, orientation de la fibre, résistance, matières sèches, pourcentage d'humidité et/ou différentes composants de poids des cendres, et/ou différentes représentations paramétriques de couleur, telles que : i) le spectre de reflet ; ii) le spectre de transmission ; iii) la nuance, la chromie, la valeur ; iv) Hunter L, a, b ; v) CIE L*, a*, b*; vi)CIE trichromatique, et/ou les différents attributs de couleur, tels que : i) la blancheur; ii) la clarté ; iii) la teinte ; iv) la pureté ; v) la longueur d'onde dominante ; vi) l'indice de fluorescence ; vii) l'indice de métamérisme.
  3. Procédé selon la revendication 1 ou 2, caractérisé en ce que dans le procédé un circuit d'alimentation (11) est un circuit principal de papier régulé en consistance et l'autre circuit d'alimentation (12) est un circuit d'eau de dilution, de préférence un circuit d'eau collée, la concentration et/ou la consistance d'un ou plusieurs constituant (s) dans lesdits circuits étant mesurés.
  4. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1, 2 ou 3, caractérisé en ce que le procédé emploie trois circuits d'alimentation différents (11, 12, 13) qui fournissent chacun chaque zone d'alimentation de la caisse de tête (3) ou des caisses de tête (3a, 3b).
  5. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1, 2 ou 3, caractérisé en ce que la caisse de tête (3) est fournie par trois circuits d'alimentation différents (11, 12, 13), deux (12, 13) des circuits d'alimentation fournissent différentes couches de la caisse de tête (3) et le troisième (11) de ces derniers fournit les deux couches, et en ce que les couches susmentionnées de la caisse de tête sont fournies par leurs propres matrices d'actionneurs (10a, 10b) dans leurs zones d'alimentation différentes pour réguler les proportions combinatoires desdits circuits d'alimentation (11, 12; 11, 13).
  6. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1, 2 ou 3, caractérisé en ce que le procédé emploie quatre circuits d'alimentation différents (11, 12, 13, 14), dont deux circuits d'alimentation (11, 12) fournissent une caisse de tête (3a) et les deux autres circuits d'alimentation (13, 14) fournissent l'autre caisse de tête (3b), en ce que les différentes zones d'alimentation des deux caisses de tête (3a, 3b) sont munies de leurs systèmes d'actionneurs (10a, 10b) pour réguler les proportions combinatoires desdits circuits d'alimentation, et en ce que les feuilles de composant (5a, 5b) provenant desdites caisses de tête (3a, 3b) sont divisées en une feuille de combinaison (5) dont le ou les profil (s) de propriété de sens inverse sont mesurés par le système de mesure (40, 140).
  7. Machine à papier comprenant un agencement de contrôle pour contrôler un ou plusieurs profils de propriété de sens inverse d'une feuille de papier continue (5) fabriquée par la machine à papier, dans laquelle la machine à papier comprend le moyen pour fournir au moins deux circuits d'alimentation (11, 12) à la caisse de tête (3) ou aux caisses de tête (3a,3b) de la machine à papier, lesquels circuits d'alimentation contiennent des pâtes d'alimentation pour le papier à fabriquer suspendues dans une solution aqueuse, et le moyen pour diviser les circuits d'alimentation en zones d'alimentation dans les sections de machine croisée de la caisse de tête (3) ou des caisses de tête (3a, 3b), lesquelles zones d'alimentation sont chacune munies de circuits combinatoires desdits circuits d'alimentation (11, 12; 11, 12, 13; 11, 12, 13, 14) et dans laquelle l'agencement de contrôle comprend un système de contrôle (150) pour réguler la caisse de tête (3) ou les caisses de tête (3a, 3b) de la machine à papier, caractérisée en ce que l'agencement de contrôle comprend en combinaison les moyens suivants:
    un système de mesure (40, 140) pour mesurer ledit ou lesdits profil (s) de propriété;
    le moyen d'alimenter le signal de mesure obtenu à partir dudit système de mesure vers ledit système de contrôle (150);
    les moyens (21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26) pour échantillonner de façon continue ou par intervalle chacun des deux ou plusieurs circuits d'alimentation (11, 12; 11, 12, 13; 11, 12, 13, 14) fournis à la caisse de tête (3) ou aux caisses de tête (3a, 3b);
    les moyens de mesure (31, 32, 33, 34, 35,36, 130, 131) pour mesurer les propriétés desdits circuits d'alimentation (11, 12; 11, 12, 13; 11, 12, 13, 14), tels que, les concentrations des constituants dans et/ou la blancheur de et/ou la couleur desdits échantillons ;
    les moyens de régulation (10 ; 10a, 10b ; 110, 150; 110, 111, 150) pour réguler les proportions combinatoires desdits circuits d'alimentation (11, 12; 11, 12, 13; 11, 12, 13, 14) à chacune de la pluralité de zones d'alimentation de la caisse de tête (3) ou des caisses de tête (3a, 3b) dans le sens inverse de ces dernières; et
    le moyen (130) pour fournir les mesures des propriétés desdits circuits d'alimentation (11, 12; 11, 12, 13; 11, 12, 13, 14) ou des facteurs calculés à partir de ces dernières vers lesdits moyens de régulation (10; 10a, 10b; 110, 150; 110, 111, 150) sensibles à une ou plusieurs propriétés mesurée (s) de la feuille de papier continue (5) et pour moduler les proportions combinatoires susmentionnées pour réguler les propriétés susmentionnées de la feuille de papier continue (5).
  8. Machine à papier selon la revendication 7, caractérisée en ce que lesdits circuits d'alimentation (11, 12) sont agencés pour fournir chaque zone d'alimentation de la caisse de tête (3) en utilisant un agencement de soupape (10) et en ce que ledit agencement de soupape (10) est régulé par un ordinateur ou un autre instrument (110) capable de communiquer avec d'autres ordinateurs ou instruments.
  9. Machine à papier selon la revendication 7 ou 8, caractérisée en ce que le moyen d'échantillonnage (21, 22) de chacun des circuits d'alimentation (11, 12) est connecté aux dispositifs de mesure (31, 32) pour mesurer une concentration ou un équivalent, lesquels dispositifs de mesure sont connectés à un ordinateur ou autre instrument (130) qui communique lesdites concentrations ou lesdits facteurs calculé(e)s à partir de ces derniers aux autres ordinateurs ou instruments.
  10. Machine à papier selon l'une quelconque des revendications 7 à 9, caractérisée en ce qu'un circuit d'alimentation a deux moyens d'échantillonnage (21, 26), chacun avec un dispositif de mesure de concentration unique (31, 36) connecté à un ordinateur ou autre instrument (130) communiquant avec d'autres ordinateurs ou instruments.
  11. Machine à papier selon l'une quelconque des revendications 7 à 10, caractérisée en ce que deux ou plusieurs dispositifs de mesure de concentration (35, 36) sont connectés à un moyen d'échantillonnage (26), lesquels dispositifs de mesure (35, 36) sont connectés à un ordinateur ou autre instrument communiquant avec d'autres ordinateurs ou instruments.
  12. Machine à papier selon l'une quelconque des revendications 7 à 11, caractérisée en ce qu'elle emploie un agencement de modulation (15) pour moduler la lèvre de la caisse de tête (3) à des emplacements multiples à travers la feuille (5), en ce que l'agencement de modulation (15) est régulé par un ordinateur ou autre instrument (115) communiquant avec d'autres ordinateurs ou instruments.
  13. Machine à papier selon l'une quelconque des revendications 7 à 12, caractérisée en ce que ladite caisse de tête (3) est une caisse de tête de dilution pourvue de deux circuits d'alimentation (11, 12), l'un (11) desdits circuits d'alimentation fournissant une suspension de papier et l'autre circuit d'alimentation (12) fournissant un support de dilution.
  14. Machine à papier selon l'une quelconque des revendications 7 à 12, caractérisée en ce qu'elle comprend trois circuits d'alimentation (11, 12, 13) alimentés vers chaque zone d'alimentation de la caisse de tête (3).
  15. Machine à papier selon l'une quelconque des revendications 7 à 12, caractérisée en ce qu'elle comprend quatre circuits d'alimentation (11, 12, 13, 14) alimentés vers deux caisses de tête de dilution (3a, 3b) équipées de zones indépendamment modulées, les feuilles (5a, 5b) produites par lesdites caisses de tête (3a, 3b) étant divisées en une feuille unique (5) avec son dispositif de mesure du profil (40).
  16. Machine à papier selon l'une quelconque des revendications 7 à11, caractérisée en ce qu'elle emploie deux caisses de tête conventionnelles (3a, 3b), qui sont pourvues de circuits d'alimentation différents (11, 12) et deux desdits caisses de tête sont fournies avec un agencement de modulation pour moduler leur lèvre, ledit agencement de modulation étant régulé par un ordinateur ou autre instrument (115, 116) communiquant avec d'autres ordinateurs ou instruments.
EP98900864A 1997-01-24 1998-01-16 Procede et appareil de regulation de la caisse de tete d'une machine a papier Expired - Lifetime EP0970277B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
FI970294 1997-01-24
FI970294A FI100345B (fi) 1997-01-24 1997-01-24 Menetelmä ja laite paperikoneen perälaatikon säädössä
PCT/FI1998/000032 WO1998032916A1 (fr) 1997-01-24 1998-01-16 Procede et appareil de regulation de la caisse de tete d'une machine a papier

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0970277A1 EP0970277A1 (fr) 2000-01-12
EP0970277B1 true EP0970277B1 (fr) 2003-10-15

Family

ID=8547797

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP98900864A Expired - Lifetime EP0970277B1 (fr) 1997-01-24 1998-01-16 Procede et appareil de regulation de la caisse de tete d'une machine a papier

Country Status (10)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0970277B1 (fr)
JP (1) JP2001508839A (fr)
CN (1) CN1093201C (fr)
AT (1) ATE252179T1 (fr)
AU (1) AU5665198A (fr)
BR (1) BR9807110A (fr)
CA (1) CA2278647C (fr)
DE (1) DE69818982T2 (fr)
FI (1) FI100345B (fr)
WO (1) WO1998032916A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (24)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE19843727A1 (de) * 1998-09-24 2000-03-30 Voith Sulzer Papiertech Patent Verfahren und Stoffauflaufsystem zur Verbesserung des Konsistenzquerprofils einer Faserbahn
FI112961B (fi) 1998-11-26 2004-02-13 Metso Paper Inc Menetelmä ja laite paperikoneen/kartonkikoneen retentioprofiilin mittaamiseksi ja retention hallitsemiseksi
FI115647B (fi) * 1998-12-23 2005-06-15 Metso Paper Inc Paperikoneen/kartonkikoneen perälaatikon säätömenetelmä ja paperikoneen/kartonkikoneen perälaatikkorakenne
DE19906062A1 (de) * 1999-02-12 2000-08-17 Voith Sulzer Papiertech Patent Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Herstellung einer Materialbahn
US6294051B1 (en) 1999-04-13 2001-09-25 Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. Method for improving the edge strength of a fibrous mat
FI991108A (fi) * 1999-05-14 2000-11-15 Valmet Corp Menetelmä ja sovitelma kalanteroidun paperin tai kartongin valmistamis eksi
FI114224B (fi) * 2000-03-02 2004-09-15 Metso Paper Inc Menetelmä ja sovitelma syötettävän kuitumassaseoksen sakeuden säätämiseksi paperikoneen perälaatikolle
JP4913510B2 (ja) * 2006-09-05 2012-04-11 横河電機株式会社 シミュレーション方法、繊維配向制御方法、及び繊維配向制御装置
DE102007049775B3 (de) * 2007-10-17 2009-02-26 Siemens Ag Regeleinrichtung und -verfahren zur Flächengewichtsregelung sowie damit ausgestattete Papiermaschine
DE102007056499B4 (de) * 2007-11-22 2012-03-01 Norske Skog Walsum Gmbh Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Abrisserkennung an papierherstellenden und weiterverarbeitenden Maschinen
DE102008000778A1 (de) * 2008-03-20 2009-09-24 Voith Patent Gmbh Stoffauflauf für eine Papier- oder Kartonmaschine
FI121888B (fi) 2008-08-12 2011-05-31 Metso Paper Inc Menetelmä kuiturainan ominaisuuksien optimoimiseksi
FI126614B (fi) * 2009-04-07 2017-03-15 Valmet Automation Oy Paperin, kartongin tai pahvin ominaisuuden mallintaminen
FI122113B (fi) 2010-02-03 2011-08-31 Metso Paper Inc Menetelmä ja perälaatikko kuiturainan poikkisuuntaisen ominaisuusprofiilin parantamiseksi
US8728276B2 (en) * 2010-05-20 2014-05-20 Honeywell International Inc. Apparatus and method for controlling curling potential of paper, paperboard, or other product during manufacture
EP2784214B1 (fr) * 2013-03-28 2015-09-16 Valmet Technologies, Inc. Alimentation en eau pour caisse de tête multicouche
WO2016035313A1 (fr) * 2014-09-05 2016-03-10 セイコーエプソン株式会社 Dispositif de fabrication de feuille et procédé de fabrication de feuille
CN104480769B (zh) * 2014-11-04 2016-08-24 陕西科技大学 一种稀释水水力式流浆箱稀释水阀控制装置及控制方法
EP3088604B1 (fr) * 2015-04-28 2020-03-25 Valmet Technologies Oy Procédé et système pour l`optimisation des propriétés d'une bande de fibres multicouche pendant la fabrication de bandes de fibres
JP6481238B2 (ja) * 2015-07-02 2019-03-13 デュプロ精工株式会社 抄紙装置
SE540916C2 (en) * 2016-09-15 2018-12-18 Valmet Oy An apparatus for washing and dewatering pulp, a system for controlling such an apparatus, and a method for processing pulp in such an apparatus
CA3055434C (fr) * 2017-03-06 2022-03-08 Honeywell Limited Procede et appareil de conception d'une commande basee sur un modele presentant une robustesse spatiale pour des systemes de fabrication ou de traitement de bande transversale a r eseaux multiples (cd) ou d'autres systemes
CN109358585B (zh) * 2018-10-30 2020-06-19 上海交通大学 一种级联流浆箱纸机全局优化控制方法
DE102021124326A1 (de) 2021-09-21 2022-10-06 Voith Patent Gmbh Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Herstellung einer Faserstoffbahn

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FI85731C (fi) * 1989-06-01 1997-08-20 Valmet Paper Machinery Inc Reglersystem i en pappers- eller kartongmaskin
FI81848C (fi) * 1989-07-17 1990-12-10 Valmet Paper Machinery Inc Foerfarande foer reglering och on-line maetning av fiberorienteringen av en bana som framstaells pao en pappersmaskin.
FI92229C (fi) * 1993-07-01 1994-10-10 Valmet Paper Machinery Inc Menetelmä ja laite perälaatikon säädössä
US5771174A (en) * 1995-12-21 1998-06-23 Measurex Corporation Distributed intelligence actuator controller with peer-to-peer actuator communication

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP0970277A1 (fr) 2000-01-12
BR9807110A (pt) 2000-04-25
FI970294A0 (fi) 1997-01-24
AU5665198A (en) 1998-08-18
DE69818982T2 (de) 2004-08-12
ATE252179T1 (de) 2003-11-15
DE69818982D1 (de) 2003-11-20
JP2001508839A (ja) 2001-07-03
FI100345B (fi) 1997-11-14
CN1244225A (zh) 2000-02-09
CN1093201C (zh) 2002-10-23
WO1998032916A1 (fr) 1998-07-30
CA2278647A1 (fr) 1998-07-30
CA2278647C (fr) 2007-11-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0970277B1 (fr) Procede et appareil de regulation de la caisse de tete d'une machine a papier
US6491792B2 (en) Apparatus for controlling a headbox in a paper machine
US6398914B1 (en) Method and device for process control in cellulose and paper manufacture
US6187145B1 (en) Method for process management in paper and cardboard manufacture
CA2311550C (fr) Procede et appareil permettant de reguler les proprietes du papier
US6485571B1 (en) Paper manufacturing and processing machine with closed loop control system
EP1073789B1 (fr) Systeme de regulation d'une machine a papier
CA2282751A1 (fr) Systeme de regulation de machine a papier permettant de reguler la variation de la force du papier dans le sens de fabrication
FI115539B (fi) Menetelmä ja järjestelmä paperikoneen tai vastaavan lyhyen kierron säädössä
JP4377129B2 (ja) 一定の充填剤含量を有する紙の製造方法
US6993408B2 (en) Method for the control of quality in a paper web
US7763148B2 (en) Method and apparatus for producing a fibrous web
US6200423B1 (en) Method of controlling basis weight profile using multi-layer consistency dilution
EP1133597B1 (fr) Procede et dispositif destines a mesurer le profil de retention et de commander la retention dans une machine a papier / a carton
Chao et al. The development of dynamic color control on a paper machine
FI96895B (fi) Menetelmä päällystettävän paperin laadun optimoimiseksi
CA2294697C (fr) Methode de commande du profil de poids unitaire par dilution de consistance multi-couche
SU1164350A1 (ru) Способ автоматического управлени зольностью бумажного полотна
Sopenlehto On-line monitoring and control in the wet-end
Kunschert et al. Measurement and control of optical brighteners using inline sensor technology
WO2001065004A1 (fr) Procede et agencement de regulation de la consistance de la pate a papier
Laakso et al. Filling SC Paper with PCC; A Holistic Approach

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19990714

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: METSO PAPER, INC.

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20021122

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20031015

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20031015

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.

Effective date: 20031015

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20031015

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20031015

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20031015

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20031015

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69818982

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20031120

Kind code of ref document: P

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040115

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040115

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20040116

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20040116

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040126

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20040131

NLV1 Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20040716

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

EN Fr: translation not filed
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20040315

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20091223

Year of fee payment: 13

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20100121

Year of fee payment: 13

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: EUG

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20110116

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110116

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110117

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20150121

Year of fee payment: 18

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20150122

Year of fee payment: 18

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 69818982

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 252179

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20160116

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160802

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160116