EP0838141B1 - Dispositif et procédé de contrôle pour véhicule - Google Patents

Dispositif et procédé de contrôle pour véhicule Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0838141B1
EP0838141B1 EP97307884A EP97307884A EP0838141B1 EP 0838141 B1 EP0838141 B1 EP 0838141B1 EP 97307884 A EP97307884 A EP 97307884A EP 97307884 A EP97307884 A EP 97307884A EP 0838141 B1 EP0838141 B1 EP 0838141B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
vehicle
implement
data
tractor
control
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP97307884A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP0838141A2 (fr
EP0838141A3 (fr
Inventor
Andrew James Scarlett
John Charles Lowe
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
CNH UK Ltd
Original Assignee
CNH UK Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by CNH UK Ltd filed Critical CNH UK Ltd
Publication of EP0838141A2 publication Critical patent/EP0838141A2/fr
Publication of EP0838141A3 publication Critical patent/EP0838141A3/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0838141B1 publication Critical patent/EP0838141B1/fr
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01B—SOIL WORKING IN AGRICULTURE OR FORESTRY; PARTS, DETAILS, OR ACCESSORIES OF AGRICULTURAL MACHINES OR IMPLEMENTS, IN GENERAL
    • A01B63/00—Lifting or adjusting devices or arrangements for agricultural machines or implements
    • A01B63/02—Lifting or adjusting devices or arrangements for agricultural machines or implements for implements mounted on tractors
    • A01B63/023—Lateral adjustment of their tools
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01B—SOIL WORKING IN AGRICULTURE OR FORESTRY; PARTS, DETAILS, OR ACCESSORIES OF AGRICULTURAL MACHINES OR IMPLEMENTS, IN GENERAL
    • A01B71/00—Construction or arrangement of setting or adjusting mechanisms, of implement or tool drive or of power take-off; Means for protecting parts against dust, or the like; Adapting machine elements to or for agricultural purposes
    • A01B71/02—Setting or adjusting mechanisms
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01B—SOIL WORKING IN AGRICULTURE OR FORESTRY; PARTS, DETAILS, OR ACCESSORIES OF AGRICULTURAL MACHINES OR IMPLEMENTS, IN GENERAL
    • A01B79/00—Methods for working soil
    • A01B79/005—Precision agriculture
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P60/00—Technologies relating to agriculture, livestock or agroalimentary industries
    • Y02P60/14—Measures for saving energy, e.g. in green houses

Definitions

  • This invention relates to an apparatus and method for controlling a land vehicle.
  • the invention relates to such an apparatus and method for automatically controlling a vehicle.
  • the invention relates to the controlling of on- and off-highway vehicles, especially excavators or agricultural tractors.
  • Mechanised tractors have been widely used in agriculture, approximately since the commercialisation of internal combustion engines.
  • the introduction of mechanised tractors revolutionised farming in the sense that a tractor permits a small number of workers to carry out what would otherwise be labour-intensive operations, at comparatively high speeds.
  • Patent no. GB 253566 discloses a closed loop control system for adjusting the position of a tillage implement such as a plough by altering the height of the implement on a four bar linkage.
  • the control strategy involved constantly adjusting the implement depth in order to maintain a constant draught (i.e. the force needed to pull the implement through the soil).
  • the basic principles of GB 253566 are found in virtually all modern tractor mounted implement combinations, albeit with the mechanical components originally proposed replaced by electro-hydraulics or, increasingly commonly, microprocessor based control hardware.
  • tractor control systems that attempt further to minimise the effects of the tractor operator's performance on the tractor's performance.
  • the primary need for such systems arises when tractors are required to carry out operations, such as tilling of soil, with high accuracy and as rapidly as possible.
  • a tractor is a complex machine that is required to carry out a variety of tasks in widely differing physical conditions.
  • any tractor control system to take account of variations in the sub-systems of the tractor/implement combination itself; variations in prevailing conditions; and the task required of the tractor/implement combination at any given time.
  • variable sub-systems of the tractor include the following:
  • variable elements of the implement will depend on the type of implement and the use to which it is put.
  • some relevant variables may include:
  • EP-A-0070833 Massey Ferguson Services NV discloses optimisation of the sub-systems of a tractor, using a central processor and a feedback loop.
  • a necessary passivity in the system in the sense that an operator must specify various parameters such as the implement position (depth); the throttle setting; and the mode of optimisation. (This can be selected eg. from a list including maximisation of work rate and minimisation of fuel consumption.)
  • EP-A-0070833 is not a fully automatic control scheme since the controller does not seek to maximise the tractor performance in dependence on measured values eg. of soil strength, etc; but instead seeks to maximise the performance criteria against set values input by the driver. Such set values may or may not represent optima under the conditions prevailing at the time of use of the tractor.
  • control scheme of EP-A-0070833 is not adaptive, since the apparatus cannot take account of changes in the field conditions over time.
  • the paper "Control Concept for a Tractor Management System” (LandTechnik, 50(2) 1995 pages 76 to 77) concerns a tractor optimisation system that is integrated in the sense of controlling the transmission, engine output and implement.
  • the arrangement disclosed employs a dynamic reference model of the optimisation criteria stored in eg. the non-volatile memory (NVM) of a CPU.
  • NVM non-volatile memory
  • the reference model in the LandTechnik paper includes higher order physical variables.
  • the model includes data on accelerations, inertias and how they change with e.g. changing vehicle speed; and so on.
  • US-A-4208929 discloses an electronically controlled transmission system suitable for use in a tractor. Although this control system takes account of some measurable aspects of tractor performance, the control scheme disclosed does not operate on all the sub-systems of the tractor/implement combination in an integrated way, to provide automatic operation of tractor control.
  • FR-A-2723792 discloses a control system for a tractor/implement combination that seeks to optimise the vehicle performance during, e.g ploughing operations.
  • the control program includes so-called "static" data, i.e. pre-recorded cartographical data on the field conditions likely to be encountered by the tractor/implement combination.
  • static data in FR-A-2723792 does not function as a reference model of the tractor/implement combination.
  • the control program in FR-A-2723792 is not capable of modifying the settable parameters of the tractor/implement combination in real time, in dependence on instantaneously prevailing field conditions.
  • US-A-4267569 discloses control of a motor vehicle diagnostic system.
  • US-A-4747301 discloses an automated performance monitor;
  • US-A-4594666 discloses a transmission control apparatus;
  • US-A-5260875 discloses an automated crop spraying system;
  • US-A-5305215 discloses an expandable microprocessor system for an off-highway vehicle.
  • none of the foregoing publications discloses what may truly be said to be an integrated control system for a vehicle such as a tractor/implement combination or an excavator.
  • US-A-4098346 discloses control of part of a tractor/implement combination sub-system (ie. the plough width); and US-A-4141419 discloses a control system for controlling the approach angle of a plough unit in response to speed variations.
  • DE-A-4113191 and DE-A-3720334 disclose methods of adjusting the widths of plough bodies to take account of localised conditions
  • US-A-4062410 discloses an adjuster for the plough bottom.
  • US-A-4646849 discloses an automatic controller for a reversible plough body, whereby the plough width is adjusted at the same time as the plough is reversed.
  • US-A-4778013 discloses an apparatus for adjusting the angle of the mould boards of a series of plough bodies in response to the tractive force required to drive the plough through soil.
  • apparatus for controlling an on- or off-road vehicle comprising:
  • a tractor control apparatus permits a tractor operator to relinquish control of all aspects (other than the steering) of operation of a tractor during a field operation.
  • the automatic operation can be arranged to commence after execution of a calibration or a data acquisition period during which control of the tractor is under the influence of a human operator.
  • the apparatus of the invention may be arranged to control a tractor/implement combination from the outset of operations, if necessary with the apparatus adaptively modifying the control thereof during use.
  • a "steady-state" reference model is herein taken to mean a reference model in which the physical characteristics of the tractor/implement assembly are regarded as fixed with respect to any particular instant in time.
  • parameters such as the mass of the vehicle and the moments of inertia of various subcomponents thereof are taken to be constant, even though such parameters will in reality vary during operation of the tractor.
  • the comparator of the invention may in preferred embodiments be implemented in hardware, in software, or in a combination of hardware and software.
  • model of the apparatus of the invention includes data representative of the effect on vehicle performance of parameters selected from the set of:
  • the set of possible parameters allows implementation of the apparatus as a hierarchical control scheme, with a principal microprocessor controlling a number of further microprocessors each associated with a sub-system of the tractor/implement combination.
  • the model includes data, representative of the effect on vehicle performance, of the entire aforementioned set of parameters.
  • the engine performance data includes engine torque-speed data and/or power-speed data.
  • Engine torque-speed data can be regarded as data on the torque developed by the engine at a given engine speed and governor or throttle setting, ie at a given fuelling level; and engine power-speed data can be regarded as an indication of the power developed by the engine.
  • the principal parameters of engine performance are the engine torque, the engine speed and the engine fuel consumption rate.
  • the engine performance data may advantageously include data on the setting of the engine governor, i.e. the setting of the governor made on installation of the governor in the engine in a factory.
  • the engine performance data is adjusted for vehicle driveline losses.
  • the model may also advantageously be tailored to a particular transmission, vehicle and engine combination.
  • the vehicle transmission data is adjustable for driveline losses dependent on the vehicle transmission ratio under consideration.
  • the model advantageously allows for variation of the transmission driveline losses with variation of the selected transmission ratio.
  • the vehicle tractive efficiency data includes data on the traction characteristics of a vehicle having a chosen wheel and tyre combination when moving on a selected land surface.
  • the vehicle tractive efficiency data may also optionally include data on the rolling resistance of a vehicle tyre; and data respectively on the efficiency of traction of the front and rear wheels of a wheeled vehicle. Such data allows generation of as accurate a steady-state model as possible.
  • the respective data on the tractive efficiency of the said front and rear wheels are combined to provide composite traction data during use of the apparatus.
  • no need for separate analysis of the front and rear wheel traction data This advantageously makes analysis of the tractive efficiency data computationally easier when the model is implemented in the non-volatile memory (NVM) of a microprocessor.
  • NVM non-volatile memory
  • the vehicle tractive efficiency data may optionally include data selected from the set of:
  • the data on the setting of a vehicle powered implement includes data representative of the setting of an adjustable implement operatively mounted on the implement (three point) hitch of a tractor.
  • data may include data representative of parameters selected from the set of implement width; and implement depth setting.
  • Such choices of data for use in the model of the apparatus advantageously permit the model to take account of a range of vehicle powered implements, and in particular a plough the working depth and width of which preferably are adjustable.
  • the apparatus includes a display device for indicating the performance of a vehicle to which the apparatus is connectable.
  • the programmable controller and each of the slave controllers is constituted as a microprocessor, the microprocessors being operatively interconnected. This also assists in providing the control apparatus as a hierarchical control system.
  • the apparatus is suitable for automating the control of a tractor/implement combination, especially when operating in field conditions.
  • the apparatus is suitable for automating the control of a tractor/implement combination including an agricultural implement secured to an implement hitch (e.g. a three point hitch) thereof.
  • an implement hitch e.g. a three point hitch
  • controllable sub-systems to which the apparatus is connectable are selected from the set of:
  • the aforesaid features advantageously permit manufacture of an apparatus that can readily be fitted either to new tractors, or, possibly, retro-fitted to existing tractors.
  • the invention is also considered to reside in an on- or off-road vehicle including an apparatus as defined hereinabove.
  • controllable sub-systems of the land vehicle are selected from the set of:
  • all four such controllable sub-systems are connectable to a said control apparatus.
  • adjustable implement controller is connected to one or more of the following classes of implement:
  • the class “cultivation implements” includes but is not limited to ploughs or other kinds of cultivation implement.
  • the class “crop establishment implements” includes but is not limited to seeders and drills.
  • the class “material application implements” includes but is not limited to crop spray booms or other crop spraying apparatuses; fertiliser distribution apparatuses; and manure or slurry spreaders.
  • the class “crop harvesting implements” includes but is not limited to mowers, tedders, harvester implements and bale wrapping and bale-forming apparatuses.
  • the class “materials handling implements” includes but is not limited to excavator buckets and excavator shovels.
  • the on- or off-road vehicle is in the form of an agricultural tractor/implement combination.
  • the invention is also considered to reside in any on- or off-road vehicle having a plurality of controllable sub-systems, including an implement or tool drawing power from the vehicle.
  • a method of controlling a land vehicle the vehicle including an adjustable, vehicle-powered implement.
  • the method comprises the steps of:
  • the method optionally includes the further step of:
  • the method of the invention permits eg. a tractor operator to ignore virtually all aspects of operation of his tractor/implement combination during field operations.
  • tractor 10 In common with such vehicles in general, tractor 10 has front 11 and rear 12 pairs of driven wheels. Tractor 10 also has an engine (not shown in the drawings), a transmission system including a gear box, transfer box and appropriate differentials for the driven wheels; an operator cab 13 and a three point hitch at the rear of the vehicle between the rear wheels for attachment of an adjustable implement.
  • engine not shown in the drawings
  • transmission system including a gear box, transfer box and appropriate differentials for the driven wheels
  • operator cab 13 and a three point hitch at the rear of the vehicle between the rear wheels for attachment of an adjustable implement.
  • the front carrier 14 of tractor 10 supports a tank 16 for a liquid such as an insecticide to be dispensed onto crops or soil by means of a pump, a delivery pipe 17 and a spray nozzle 18.
  • front carrier 14 is static relative to the tractor 10, but in alternative embodiments a front implement hitch could be provided that is adjustable relative to the tractor chassis.
  • the control apparatus of the invention is capable of controlling adjustable features of such a hitch, in a manner integrated with the other sub-systems of the vehicle/implement combination.
  • a cultivation/seeder implement indicated generally by the reference numerals 19 & 28 is secured to the implement hitch of tractor 10 in the Figure 1 embodiment.
  • Implement 19 includes first 24 and second 25 rotatable blade cylinders that engage the soil as the implement passes over it.
  • the height of cylinder 25 relative to the soil is adjustable by means of manually adjustable link 27 in order to adjust the overall depth to which the implement tills the soil.
  • a seeder unit 28 is towed behind the cylinders 24, 25 to seed the thus tilled ground.
  • Seeder 28 includes seed placement coulters 29 and the heights of which are adjustable by means of actuators (not shown in Figure 1). Seeder 28 also includes a following harrow 32 the height of which is adjustable using manually adjustable actuator 34.
  • An hydraulic actuator 33 is used when the tractor/implement combination is turning at the end of a furrow, in order to "piggy back" the seeder onto the top of the cultivating implement, thereby reducing the moment needed to lift the entire implement clear of the ground.
  • the overall depth of the implement relative to the soil is determined by the (hydraulically adjustable) setting of the three point hitch of the tractor.
  • the tractor/implement combination 10 may be regarded as comprising a plurality of controllable sub-systems, each of which influences the performance of the tractor in dependence on the prevailing conditions.
  • the sub-systems include the engine (adjustable in one of two ways, ie. by means of a throttle setting or by means of an engine governor setting, depending on the engine type); the transmission (adjustable by virtue of selection of gear ratios); the tank/sprayer assembly 16,18 adjustable in terms of control of the spray pump and associated valve gear; and the cultivation/seeding implement 19,28 adjustable by adjustment of the positions of the various actuators.
  • Tractor/implement combination 10 includes a plurality of slave controllers for the sub-systems, in the form of microprocessors 40, 41, 42, 43, 44 and 45.
  • Certain parameters of the engine performance are controlled by means of an engine management system including microprocessor 41 that optimises engine performance in dependence on the throttle or engine governor settings input either by the tractor operator using suitable control members, or from a programmable controller constituted as a further microprocessor 21 (described in greater detail below) located in the cab of the Figure 1 vehicle.
  • the engine management system operates by adjusting various parameters, such as the metering volume of a fuel injection system, the timing of the fuel injection system, the boost pressure of a turbocharger (if present), the opening of engine valves and the opening of portions of the vehicle exhaust system, via suitable powered actuators such as solenoids.
  • Engine management microprocessor 41 may also be linked to an engine power boost assembly, by means of which the maximum output of the engine may be boosted for short periods, depending on a history of use of the power boost facility.
  • the lengths and magnitudes of the respective power boosts are determined in part by the frequency with which power boost is requested in a period of tractor operation.
  • Tractor 10 includes a semi-automatic transmission system in which the transmission ratio selected is determined by a slave controller in the form of microprocessor 42 acting on one or more solenoids to engage and disengage gear sets of the gear box and/or gears of the transfer box, in dependence on the settings of a plurality of gear levers in the operator's cab or in dependence on signals from microprocessor 21.
  • a slave controller in the form of microprocessor 42 acting on one or more solenoids to engage and disengage gear sets of the gear box and/or gears of the transfer box, in dependence on the settings of a plurality of gear levers in the operator's cab or in dependence on signals from microprocessor 21.
  • Microprocessor (slave controller) 43 controls the positions of the elements of the implement (e.g three point) hitch. Again, the microprocessor 43 controls a number of actuators such as solenoids in dependence on the settings of control levers in the operator's cab 13 or on signals received from microprocessor 21.
  • actuators such as solenoids
  • Microprocessor 43 can be operated in three different modes, ie draught control mode, position control and TICS (Tractor Integrated Control System) mode, depending on command signals received from microprocessor 21.
  • tractor/implement In "draught control" mode, the tractor/implement is not controlled in an integrated, adaptive way.
  • the position of the implement hitch is adjusted in dependence on the implement draught detected by a transducer.
  • This control mode which is per se known, can be overridden by a wheel slip override algorithm.
  • This feature also known per se , serves to adjust the implement depth in order to prevent wheel slip from exceeding a predetermined maximum.
  • position control In so-called "position control” mode, the tractor/implement is again not controlled in an integrated way.
  • the implement hitch setting is notionally controlled in dependence on a demand implement depth input by the tractor operator.
  • many tractor manufacturers have previously offered a position or depth control feature for cultivation implements, in practice such control modes have not existed because of the absence hitherto of integrated control systems for tractor/implement combinations.
  • the engine output, transmission ratio and implement width are not automatically adjusted to take account of changing soil strengths and wheel slip characteristics from place to place in a field. Consequently the tractor performance is not optimised and therefore the implement depth is adjusted solely in dependence on the wheel slip override algorithm.
  • a constant implement depth is not maintained in practice in the prior art "position control” schemes.
  • the apparatuses of Figures 1 and 2 when integrated (TICS) mode is not engaged.
  • the depth or position of the implement is controlled to be constant, at a setting input by the tractor operator.
  • the engine output and transmission ratio are constantly adjusted automatically to permit optimisation of tractor performance whilst maintaining a truly constant implement depth setting. Only if wheelslip exceeds a predetermined amount (eg because of very localised conditions in the field) does a wheelslip control algorithm operate temporarily to adjust the implement depth and reduce the draught.
  • the pump and valve of the sprayer assembly 16,17,18 can similarly be controlled using microprocessor (slave controller) 40 and suitable actuators; and slave microprocessors 44 and 45 are present for controlling the actuators of implement 19 in a similar manner.
  • Microprocessor 21 in the embodiment shown lies within the cab 13 and is operatively connected to an operator interface/control unit 22.
  • Microprocessor 21 includes in its NVM or a removable memory module a steady-state reference model of the operation of the tractor/implement combination when carrying out a variety of tasks under a variety of different field conditions.
  • the reference model can be updated through use of the tractor/implement combination, in order to take account of contemporaneously prevailing field conditions such as soil strength and tractive efficiency.
  • the reference model may include some data that varies each time the vehicle is used; and some data, such as the mass of the vehicle hardware (i.e. those components whose masses do not alter during use of the tractor), the transmission ratios, the engine output at given engine speeds and torque loads, and so on, that are fixed.
  • a communication bus 23 interconnects the microprocessor 21 and all the microprocessors associated with the adjustable sub-systems.
  • controller 21 is able to control each of the microprocessors controlling the adjustable sub-systems, in an integrated, adaptive manner.
  • Microprocessor 21 may be regarded as hierarchically the primary microprocessor of the vehicle shown. However it is theoretically possible for the reference model and the control algorithms present in microprocessor 21 to be distributed among a number of microprocessors. In such an arrangement a specific, primary processor 21 may be dispensed with. The invention is considered to include such embodiments.
  • the mode of control may be adjusted, as desired.
  • the microprocessor 21 may include stored therein a control algorithm that seeks to optimise the workrate of the tractor 10 when carrying out a chosen task.
  • Another algorithm representing another control mode may seek to minimise the specific or actual fuel consumption of the tractor.
  • a further algorithm may be selected to return control of the tractor sub-systems to the operator, who may then use the conventional cab-mounted levers and controls of the vehicle.
  • a mode is necessary e.g. when the tractor 10 is driven on roads between field operations; and when turning in the headland at the end of a field, where it is thought that automatic control of the tractor 10 would offer no benefits.
  • the microprocessor 21 ceases to influence the microprocessors 40 - 45 until an automatic control mode is again engaged, but the microprocessors 40 - 45 may remain active throughout this period in order to provide independently controllable sub-systems.
  • the integrated (TICS) mode of control may be disengaged in this way e.g when the operator depresses the brake or clutch pedal of the tractor, or performs some other operation indicative of an emergency.
  • the TICS control mode may be automatically disengaged by the control software.
  • Such disengaging may be temporary (e.g. to permit turning at the headland) or may be a final disengagement that occurs when the field operation is complete.
  • the various modes of operation need not be stored in any of the microprocessors. Indeed, there may be some benefit in providing the software for the various control modes in removable memory devices such as diskettes, so that a tractor user can purchase only the software that is of use to him. Similarly, modified versions of the reference model may be supplied in removable memory devices so that the control apparatus may be tailored to a farmer's individual requirements.
  • FIG. 2 there is shown a second embodiment of the invention that is similar to the Figure 1 embodiment in that it comprises a tractor/implement combination 10 having a plurality of controllable sub-systems, including a vehicle powered, adjustable implement in the form of fully-mounted, reversible plough 60.
  • a vehicle powered, adjustable implement in the form of fully-mounted, reversible plough 60.
  • fully mounted is meant an implement the depth of which is adjusted by the tractor implement hitch, and not by actuators on the implement itself. (The latter class of implement is generally referred to as a "semi-mounted" implement.)
  • the Figure 2 implement is fully mounted notwithstanding the presence of a stabiliser wheel 49.
  • the ploughing depth may in alternative embodiments also be adjusted by virtue eg. of support wheels and/or remote actuators.
  • Such ploughs may include additional sensors as necessary.
  • the Figure 2 embodiment includes slave controllers in the form of engine management microprocessor 41, transmission microprocessor 42, hitch microprocessor 43 and plough control microprocessor 48.
  • the last-mentioned microprocessor is operatively connected to actuators, e.g hydraulic actuators, for adjusting the width of the plough and for reversing the plough at the end of each furrow.
  • the control system of the Figure 2 embodiment operates in ways analogous to the Figure 1 embodiment to control the tractor 10 during field operations, in order to achieve an optimal result according to the mode of operation selected.
  • the preferred mode of operation is one in which the engine and transmission are constantly adjusted to optimise performance while the implement and hitch microprocessors are commanded to maintain a constant implement depth.
  • C2 is derivable from C1, that in turn is available from sensor measurements.
  • the transmission ratio, engine speed and (optionally) the implement settings are adjustable to take account of variations in the draught value D in order eg. to optimise workrate, minimise fuel consumption or otherwise control the performance of the vehicle/implement combination.
  • the plough depth will be maintained constant throughout the ploughing operation.
  • the software preferably is such as not to permit width adjustments to occur while the plough tills the soil. This feature ensures that the resulting furrows do not vary in width from one end to the other.
  • a further embodiment of the invention may be similar to the Figure 2 embodiment except that the implement hitch has attached thereto a semi-mounted plough. Numerous other implements may equally well be secured to either the front or the rear of the tractor.
  • the tractor operator initially powers up the tractor 10. This simultaneously initialises the microprocessor 21 and those of microprocessors 40 - 45 and 48 that are present.
  • the NVM of one of the microprocessors includes an algorithm capable of identifying the type of implement(s) attached to the tractor, e.g by means of suitable encoding information stored within the microprocessors such as microprocessor 48 for controlling the implement. This information is likely to indicate to the microprocessor 21 the nature of the task to be undertaken. However, where the implement is capable of carrying out a number of tasks, or if the implement identification facility is absent, the operator can enter relevant data on the type of task to be completed via the display/operator interface 22.
  • the display 22 then prompts the operator to commence an operation, such as the ploughing of the first furrow of a field, in order to record in RAM of the microprocessor 21 the prevailing field conditions.
  • the control apparatus optimises the performance of the tractor/implement combination during ploughing of the first furrow, but may initially lack information (acquired during the first pass) on the soil strength and slip characteristics. Such data may be acquired during eg. the first and/or another predetermined pass along the field. These are then assumed by microprocessor 21 to be constant unless the various transducers on the vehicle detect changes in the prevailing conditions (as may occur e.g. if the weather conditions change part way through an operation).
  • the control apparatus of the invention is capable of adaptive learning.
  • the display/interface 22 may prompt the operator to input the desired mode of optimisation, e.g. minimum fuel consumption; maximum workrate, etc.
  • the operator will generally be prompted to input the implement depth that subsequently the software will maintain constant while adjusting the variable sub-systems as explained above.
  • the operator need take no further part in controlling the tractor, except to steer the tractor to ensure e.g straight furrows, and to engage and disengage the TICS control (if this is not accomplished automatically by the software) so that he may assume control during turning at each headland.
  • Figure 3 is a generalised flow diagram of a preferred embodiment of control software for use in apparatus and a method according to the invention.
  • the embodiment of Figure 3 concerns a tractor/implement combination in which the implement is a depth-adjustable plough, ie. an arrangement such as shown in Figure 2.
  • the engaging mode routine block 107b of Figure 3 calls a further subroutine (block 108) that automatically controls the depth of the plough to a constant level.
  • step 101 following selection (step 101) of software control of the tractor from the main menu (that may be displayed on the cab-mounted display device), the software functions (step 102) to initialise a Controller Area Network (CAN) network and the operator display.
  • CAN Controller Area Network
  • the control program acquires prevailing data from the various subsystem sensors, and records the settings of various adjustable parameters of the tractor/implement combination.
  • adjustable parameters may include, eg. the position of a switch for selecting and deselecting automatic (TICS) control of the tractor/implement combination.
  • control program processes the network data values and the operator commands, and updates the operator display as necessary. Subsequently (step 105) the software runs one of six subroutines, according to data input by the operator, and/or determined by progress through the control program.
  • Idle mode routine represented at block 107a, simply causes the control program to loop back to block 103 at which the readings of data and system settings are updated and subsequently processed again at block 104.
  • idle mode routine serves iteratively to check whether the operator has selected an automatic mode of control, thereby permitting implementation of such a mode without the need for further intervention from the operator.
  • Block 107b represents the "engaging mode" subroutine. This functions eg. before an initial pass of the tractor/implement combination along a field.
  • the engaging mode routine represents an automatic mode of operation of the tractor/implement combination, ie. a transition mode that permits adjustment of the engine speed (to avoid stalling and over-revving of the engine); and that also permits transfer of control of the implement from a conventional apparatus (such as an electronic depth controller (EDC)) to the apparatus of the invention.
  • EDC electronic depth controller
  • the engaged mode subroutine (block 107c) operates automatically.
  • the automatic control employs prediction algorithms in conjunction with the steady state reference model in order to provide accurate feedback data, permitting the depth of the implement (block 108) to be kept constant while optimising the other variable aspects of the vehicle.
  • Block 107d a forward speed limit routine. This is an alternative mode of control that serves to limit the forward speed of the tractor/implement combination.
  • the forward speed limit subroutine includes prediction algorithms that are used in conjunction with the steady state reference model; and the subroutine itself calls the depth control routine.
  • the engaging mode routine, engaged mode routine and forward speed limit routine all have a control loop back to block 103 (acquisition of data and systems settings) after iteration through the depth control routine.
  • the CPU 21 ( Figures 1 and 2) stores data on the prevailing field conditions (ie. soil strength data in the preferred embodiment), thereby progressively improving the predictive accuracy of the subroutine.
  • a disengaging mode routine bypasses the depth control routine 108, and returns control to the idle mode routine, when the operator de-selects the automatic control (TICS) mode of operation.
  • TIS automatic control
  • block 107f shows a subroutine designed to facilitate turning of the tractor/implement combination at the headland.
  • Subroutine 107f therefore permits bypassing of the depth control subroutine 108, and reversing the plough as necessary firstly to permit the tractor to turn safely at the headland; and secondly to ensure the correct direction of tilling of the soil as the tractor/implement combination commences a return pass along the field.
  • the subroutines 107a to 107f are called by the subroutine 105.
  • the setting of adjustable parameters of the tractor/implement combination may cause overriding of the automatic operation of the control software, eg. to permit instantaneous switching from engaged mode routine (block 107c) via disengaging mode routine (block 107e) to idle mode routine (block 107a).
  • Figure 4 shows the relationship between the subroutines 107a-107f. In other words, Figure 4 shows the order in which subroutines may be called by the software control block 105 of Figure 3.
  • the subroutine runs a performance prediction algorithm (block 112); and (block 113) searches stored data representative of engine/transmission performance curves to identify the "best" transmission gear to optimise the work rate at the chosen (ie. current) implement working width.
  • a prediction algorithm (block 114) is run to determine a theoretical (“check") soil strength value from the tractor/implement parameter values, ie. engine speed, actual speed, true forward speed.
  • the "check" soil strength value and the best gear value are used to calculate the theoretical engine speed/load in the "best” gear.
  • the subroutine loops in order to determine whether a power boost facility (present in preferred embodiments of the tractor/implement combination) is available, and at what level, depending on the previous usage of the power boost facility and the current engine speed detected by the appropriate sensor.
  • the subroutine determines in real time (blocks 121-129) whether the predicted "best" gear (derived at block 115) is the current, selected gear.
  • the engaged mode subroutine causes a transmission shift as necessary to ensure that the current selected gear is the same as the best gear predicted at block 115.
  • the subroutine iterates indefinitely until the engaged mode subroutine is de-selected.
  • FIG. 6 there is shown a flow diagram representative of the headland mode subroutine (block 107f of Figure 3).
  • headland mode is only run following operation of the disengaging mode subroutine.
  • the headland mode subroutine searches the soil strength histogram acquired during the previous pass in the direction about to be ploughed, and identifies the most frequently occurring soil strength range.
  • the software runs a prediction algorithm to identify the most frequently encountered soil strength over the potential transmission gear range and over the available implement working width range. This results in a set of performance curves (work rate versus implement width in each gear) that is stored in the memory of the CPU.
  • the performance curves are searched for the absolute best implement working width (ie. over the entire range of adjustment of implement working widths); and the best implement working width within operator-set limits (if they differ from the broad range referred to hereinabove).
  • the software calculates whether the loss of workrate, resulting from failure to use the "absolute best" working width, is greater than a predetermined percentage (block 150). If the result of this determination is negative, the software waits for the plough to turn over, checks for plough turn over, sets the plough width to the best within operator-set limits value and reverts to idle mode (blocks 146, 147, 151 and 149).
  • a warning indication is made (eg. via the operator display in the preferred embodiment) to the operator (block 152) that the potential performance loss is great.
  • the operator is then given the option of overriding the operator-set working width limits in order to optimise workrates.
  • steps 146, 147, 148 and 149 are repeated. If this results in an acceptable absolute best working width calculation, the subroutine reverts to idle mode preparatory to running of engaging and engaged modes.
  • the software waits for the plough to turn over (block 146), checks for plough turnover (block 147); sets the plough working width to the best available working width within the range of operator-set limits (block 151) and reverts to idle mode preparatory to engagement of engaging and then engaged modes.
  • FIG. 9 there is shown a further block diagram. This illustrates the relationship between the steady-state reference model (shown schematically as graph 200) and the various outputs from sensors positioned on the sub-systems of a tractor/implement combination such as that shown in Figure 2.
  • Figure 9 attempts to show how a mixture of variable (dynamic) and steady state inputs are processed for comparison against any modification of the steady state reference model.
  • the steady state reference model 200 is referred to in block 112 of Figure 5, as a set of performance curves relating workrate to implement width in each gear. Typical performance curves are shown in Figure 9. Of course in reality the performance curves are stored as bits of data in CPU 21.
  • Figure 9 shows an iterative loop around which data from the sensors are passed by the control software, following scaling as necessary by means of gain terms (represented by letters g1 - g11 in Figure 9) and combining in logical operations with other data.
  • the performance curves are, of course, updated with each pass around the loop of Figure 9, whereby to take account of changes in conditions experienced by the tractor/implement combination.
  • repeated updatings of the reference model do not in themselves mean that the model is dynamic. Rather, the control software is such that the model is invariant for any given iteration around the Figure 9 loop.
  • data on the vehicle ground speed are inputs to an implement draught subroutine 202, together with data on the implement depth (203) and width (204).
  • the output of this algorithm is an input to subsequent algorithm 206 that calculates the wheelslip of the vehicle.
  • the output of algorithm 206 after further mathematical processing, is combined with the outputs of further algorithms such as engine performance calculation algorithm 207, data on the powertrain reduction ratios of the vehicle (block 208) and the tyre rolling resistance (209).
  • the result of this processing is to render the vehicle performance data as measured by the sensors in a form suitable for comparison against the graphical model 200. Measured data on e.g. the implement width are processed in the Figure 9 embodiment in an analogous manner.
  • the pass around the Figure 9 loop is repeated using a revised value for the implement draught (taking account of the real time measurement eg. from the microprocessor 48 of Figure 2) whereby to modify the model.
  • This general process is repeated until the measured and reference ground speed values converge to within acceptable limits.
  • the reference model 200 then remains unchanged until in a subsequent clock period the software detects a significant different between the actual and reference (theoretical) ground speed values.
  • Steps (6) to (10) are repeated until successive ground speed estimates converge ie. only a small difference exists between them.
  • the implement width value is then incremented slightly (0.1m) and the calculation process repeated.
  • the transmission gear value is incremented and the prediction process repeated once more.
  • portion 212 of Figure 9 that represents processing of the implement width data can be modified as shown by portion 212' of Figure 10, to cater for constant implement width. This of course is likely to be the way that the apparatus of the invention is set up in practice, since most users are believed unlikely to accept a control apparatus that constantly varies the width of e.g. a tillage implement during operation.
  • FIG. 10 block diagram results in a model 200' that is a set of performance curves of workrate against soil strength, for a given (fixed) implement width (1.8 m in the example shown in Figure 10, although other constant implement width reference models could equally well be produced).
  • the performance curves constituting the steady state model define a series of set points corresponding to various soil strength values.
  • the control software determines which of the soil strength values stored in the model is closest to the actual soil strength measured by the relevant sensors attached to the vehicle/implement combination.
  • the performance curve corresponding to this soil strength value is used to define the set point of the system at a given instant, until a subsequent data input from the sensors indicates that a different soil strength value should be used. This process forms part of the sequence described e.g. in Figure 5.
  • TERM EXPLANATION ground speed tractor forward spood (km/h) torque load tractor engine torque load (N.m) Width plough working width (m) Engine engine performance calculation Depth plough working depth (m) Engine Speed tractor engine speed (rev/min) Impl Draught plough draft calculation routine PR powertrain reduction ratio tracsist wheelslip calculation routine RC rear type rolling circumference (m) Slp Limited excessive wheelslip trapping routine workrate tractor-implement workrate (ha/hr) slip traction interface wheelslip (%) $runCount transmission gear increment routine draught plough draught (kN) Gear tractor transmission gear Rolling Resistance tractor rolling resistance (kN) C1 static draught coefficient (kN/m 2 ) Powertrain Powertrain performance calculation Slip Limited manually - specified slip limit
  • test tractors differed only in as much as one was a standard production machine and the other was fitted with the experimental Tractor Integrated Control System (TICS) according to the invention, incorporating an electronic engine control system and hierarchical Central Control Unit (CCU) operating model-referenced control software to maximise tractor-implement workrate.
  • TICS Tractor Integrated Control System
  • CCU Central Control Unit
  • a microprocessor-based electronic diesel fuel injection control system was fitted to the TICS vehicle to permit remote control of engine speed and power output.
  • This control system also incorporated a software-selectable "power boost" feature, which enabled up to 10% additional fuel volume to be supplied to the engine for limited periods of time.
  • the standard Quad Mod Transmission/Hitch electronic control unit (ECU) was modified by the addition of a CAN interface, to allow communication with the Tractor Network.
  • TICS tractor As far as the operator was concerned, having specified some initial settings at the beginning of the day (target ploughing depth, minimum & maximum furrow width, size of plough), use of the TICS tractor was relatively conventional. Upon setting into a field at the headland furrow mark (assuming an open furrow already existed), having lowered the plough in the normal way (using the EDC fast raise/lower switch) and with the tractor in motion the TICS system was engaged (by means of a conveniently located switch). The tractor engine was then automatically accelerated to rated speed and the transmission gear incremented (within the powershift range) until the correct selection for maximum performance (as determined by the CCU) was achieved.
  • the working depth of the plough was maintained at the operator-selected level by means of the EDC system (which is operated automatically in "position control"), working depth being determined from a plough-mounted sensor. Only if wheelslip exceeded a maximum value specified by the operator (via the standard EDC control panel) was the plough depth reduced, and then by standard New Holland EDC wheelslip limitation software.
  • soil strength should increase the CCU responded by temporarily boosting the engine power output and/or selecting a lower transmission gear. Conversely a reduction in soil strength would usually result in an automatic up-shift. Only at the next headland turn, immediately after reversing the plough, was the furrow width adjusted to a value which, in the view of the CCU, was most likely to produce optimum workrate during the return pass back down the field. This particular value was determined by logging soil strength values during the initial pass up the field, analysing their distribution and selecting the most frequently occurring value.
  • Steps were taken prior to field testing, to ensure the test tractors were largely identical in terms of p.t.o. & drawbar power output, front / rear tyre sizes, inflation pressures, & ballast levels and front / rear weight distribution. Similar attention was paid to the ploughs provided for the investigation, to ensure similarity in terms of construction & weight distribution, and plough body & skim types fitted.
  • Figures 7 and 8 show the performance improvements attributed to the invention in graphical form.

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Soil Sciences (AREA)
  • Environmental Sciences (AREA)
  • Lifting Devices For Agricultural Implements (AREA)
  • Control Of Transmission Device (AREA)
  • Agricultural Machines (AREA)

Claims (52)

  1. Dispositif pour la commande d'un véhicule sur route et hors route, comprenant :
    un contrôleur programmable, incluant des données qui y sont enregistrées, représentatif d'un modèle de référence du rendement du véhicule ;
    plusieurs contrôleurs asservis pouvant être connectés activement à chacun des éléments d'un ensemble de sous-systèmes dudit véhicule ;
    un ou plusieurs capteur(s), connecté(s) activement au contrôleur programmable pour détecter le rendement des sous-systèmes commandables ; et
    un comparateur pour comparer le rendement détecté desdits sous-systèmes contrôlables et le modèle de référence ; le contrôleur étant en mesure de commander lesdits sous-systèmes en dépendance sur une sortie du comparateur, caractérisé en ce que le modèle de référence est un modèle statique actualisable ; le contrôleur programmable, chaque contrôleur asservi, le (ou chaque) capteur et le comparateur étant connectés activement et, le cas échéant, programmés de manière à permettre une commande coordonnée et automatisée de l'ensemble desdits sous-systèmes.
  2. Dispositif selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que le modèle comprend des données représentatives de l'effet sur le rendement du véhicule des paramètres sélectionnés à partir de l'ensemble comprenant :
    des données du rendement du moteur ;
    des données sélectionnées du rapport de transmission du véhicule ;
    des données d'efficacité de traction du véhicule ; et
    des données sur le réglage d'un outil mécanique du véhicule.
  3. Dispositif selon la revendication 2, caractérisé en ce que le modèle comprend des données, représentatives de l'effet sur le rendement du véhicule, de l'ensemble complet de données.
  4. Dispositif selon la revendication 2 ou 3 caractérisé en ce que les données du rendement du moteur comprennent des données régime-couple du moteur.
  5. Dispositif selon l'une quelconque des revendications 2 à 4, caractérisé en ce que les données du rendement du moteur comprennent des données régime-couple du moteur.
  6. Dispositif selon l'une quelconque des revendications 2 à 5, caractérisé en ce que les données du rendement du moteur comprennent des données de réglage du régulateur du moteur.
  7. Dispositif selon l'une quelconque des revendications 2 à 6, caractérisé en ce que les données du rendement du moteur sont réglées pour des pertes de transmission du véhicule.
  8. Dispositif selon l'une quelconque des revendications 2 à 7, caractérisé en ce que les données sur le rapport de transmission sélectionné du véhicule sont réglées pour des pertes du pignon d'attaque du différentiel du véhicule.
  9. Dispositif selon la revendication 8 caractérisé en ce que le réglage des données sélectionnées de transmission du véhicule dépend du rapport de transmission sélectionné auquel ce réglage se rapporte.
  10. Dispositif selon l'une quelconque des revendications 2 à 9, caractérisé en ce que les données sur l'efficacité de traction du véhicule comprennent des données sur les caractéristiques de traction d'un véhicule doté d'une combinaison roue-pneu sélectionnée lorsqu'il se déplace sur une surface agricole sélectionnée.
  11. Dispositif selon l'une quelconque des revendications 2 à 10, caractérisé en ce que les données sur l'efficacité de traction du véhicule comprennent des données sur la résistance au roulement d'un pneu du véhicule.
  12. Dispositif selon l'une quelconque des revendications 2 à 11 caractérisé en ce que les données sur l'efficacité de traction du véhicule comprennent des données sur l'efficacité de traction des roues avant et arrière d'un véhicule à roues.
  13. Dispositif selon la revendication 12 caractérisé en ce que les données sur l'efficacité de traction desdites roues avant et arrière sont combinées pour fournir des données de traction composite pendant l'utilisation du dispositif.
  14. Dispositif selon l'une quelconque des revendications 2 à 13, caractérisé en ce que les données sur l'efficacité de traction du véhicule comprennent des données sélectionnées à partir de l'ensemble :
    le type de sol ;
    les charges d'essieu initiales du véhicule ;
    les dimensions des pneus du véhicule ; et
    les coefficients de résistance au roulement des pneus du véhicule
  15. Dispositif selon l'une quelconque des revendications 2 à 14, caractérisé en ce que les données sur le réglage d'un outil actionné par un véhicule comprennent des données représentatives du réglage d'un outil réglable activement monté sur un dispositif d'attelage de l'outil d'un tracteur.
  16. Dispositif selon la revendication 15, caractérisé en ce que les données représentatives du réglage de l'outil comprennent des données représentatives des paramètres sélectionnés à partir de l'ensemble :
    largeur de l'outil ; et
    réglage de la profondeur de l'outil.
  17. Dispositif selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, comprenant un écran pour indiquer le rendement d'un véhicule auquel le dispositif peut être connecté.
  18. Dispositif selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce que le contrôleur programmable et chacun des contrôleurs asservis sont constitués comme un microprocesseur, les microprocesseurs étant activement interconnectés entre eux.
  19. Dispositif selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, approprié pour l'automatisation de la commande d'un tracteur/d'une combinaison d'outils.
  20. Dispositif selon la revendication 19, caractérisé en ce que le dispositif est approuvé pour l'automatisation de la commande d'un tracteur/d'une combinaison d'outils comprenant un outil agricole fixé à un dispositif d'attelage de l'outil.
  21. Dispositif selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce que les sous-systèmes commandables sont sélectionnés à partir d'un ensemble comprenant
       un contrôleur de sortie du moteur ;
       un sélecteur du rapport de transmission ;
       un contrôleur réglable de l'outil ; et
       un contrôleur du crochet d'attelage de l'outil d'un tracteur
  22. Dispositif selon la revendication 21 comprenant un dispositif amplificateur de puissance du moteur ou activement connecté à ce dernier.
  23. Dispositif selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, comprenant des moyens pour l'enregistrement de données en temps réel sur une ou plusieurs caractéristiques d'une surface sur laquelle un véhicule intégrant ce dispositif peut se déplacer.
  24. Dispositif selon la revendication 23, caractérisé en ce que les moyens pour l'enregistrement des données peuvent enregistrer des données sur la résistance du sol.
  25. Dispositif selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce que le modèle de référence statique correspond à un ensemble de courbes ou à un tableau de données indicatives du rendement du tracteur/de la combinaison d'outils dans les conditions prévalant in situ.
  26. Véhicule sur route et hors route comprenant un dispositif selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes.
  27. Véhicule sur route et hors route selon la revendication 26, caractérisé en ce que les sous-systèmes commandables sont sélectionnés à partir de l'ensemble :
    un contrôleur de sortie du moteur ;
    un sélecteur du rapport de transmission ;
    un contrôleur réglable de l'outil ; et
    un contrôleur du crochet d'attelage de l'outil d'un tracteur.
  28. Véhicule sur route et hors route selon la revendication 27,
    caractérisé en ce que le contrôleur de l'outil réglable est relié à une ou plusieurs des catégories suivantes d'outils :
    un outil de travail du sol ;
    un outil de mise en culture ;
    un outil d'application d'un produit ;
    un outil de récolte ; et
    un outil de manipulation de produits.
  29. Véhicule sur route et hors route, selon l'une quelconque des revendications 26 à 28, sous la forme d'un tracteur/d'une combinaison d'outils agricoles.
  30. Méthode de commande d'un véhicule sur route et hors route, comprenant un outil réglable, actionné par un véhicule, comprenant les étapes suivantes :
    initialisation d'un dispositif de commande, en particulier selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 25;
    introduction dans le dispositif de commande d'une valeur de consigne d'une caractéristique réglable de l'outil ; et
    fonctionnement du véhicule sous le contrôle du dispositif de commande, ce dispositif maintenant la caractéristique réglable de l'outil à ladite valeur de consigne tout en réglant automatiquement l'un ou plusieurs des sous-systèmes du véhicule afin d'optimiser un paramètre de rendement dudit véhicule.
  31. Méthode selon la revendication 30 adaptée, pour la commande d'un tracteur agricole dans lequel l'outil actionné par un véhicule est un outil de travail du sol, ladite caractéristique réglable de ou associée à l'outil étant la profondeur de travail de l'outil au-dessous d'un niveau de la surface du sol.
  32. Méthode selon la revendication 31, caractérisée en ce que l'étape de réglage d'un ou de plusieurs sous-systèmes du véhicule comprend l'étape de réglage de la largeur de travail de l'outil de travail du sol.
  33. Méthode selon la revendication 31 ou la revendication 32, pour la commande d'un tracteur/d'une combinaison d'outils pendant un labour, comprenant l'étape de désactivation partielle du dispositif de commande pendant le virage du tracteur à la tournière.
  34. Méthode selon l'une quelconque des revendications 30 à 33, caractérisée en ce que les paramètres de rendement du véhicule sont sélectionnés à partir de la vitesse de travail, de la consommation de carburant et du patinage.
  35. Méthode selon l'une quelconque des revendications 30 à 34 comprenant l'étape supplémentaire d'enregistrement, dans le dispositif de commande, d'une ou plusieurs caractéristique(s) opérationnelles du véhicule dans les conditions prévalant à ce moment-là.
  36. Méthode selon la revendication 35, comprenant l'étape de modification du comportement ultérieur du véhicule en fonction des caractéristiques enregistrées.
  37. Méthode selon la revendication 36 lorsqu'elle se rapporte à la revendication 33, caractérisé en ce que l'étape de modification du comportement ultérieur du véhicule inclut la sous-étape d'analyse des caractéristiques enregistrées pendant ladite désactivation partielle du dispositif de commande.
  38. Méthode selon l'une quelconque des revendications 31 à 37, caractérisé en ce que l'étape de commande du véhicule sous le contrôle du dispositif de commande a lieu après une autre étape d'activation de l'outil de travail du sol à une profondeur prédéterminée.
  39. Méthode selon l'une quelconque des revendications 31 à 38 comprenant une autre étape de désactivation de l'outil de travail du sol après le fonctionnement du véhicule sous le contrôle du dispositif de commande.
  40. Méthode selon l'une quelconque des revendications 30 à 39 comprenant, pendant le fonctionnement du véhicule sous le contrôle du dispositif de commande, l'étape d'amplification de la puissance utile du moteur du véhicule.
  41. Méthode selon la revendication 40, caractérisé en ce que l'étape d'amplification de la puissance du moteur a lieu en fonction de la charge prévalente du moteur et/ou de ma mesure dans laquelle la puissance du moteur a été amplifiée précédemment au cours d'une période précédente prédéterminée.
  42. Méthode selon la revendication 40 ou la revendication 41, caractérisée en ce que le degré d'amplification de la puissance du moteur est réglable.
  43. Méthode selon l'une quelconque des revendications 30 à 42, caractérisée en ce que l'étape de fonctionnement du véhicule sous le contrôle d'un dispositif de commande comprend les sous-étapes suivantes:
    (i) détermination d'un rapport de transmission théorique optimal pour le véhicule dans les conditions prévalentes et en fonction des caractéristiques du véhicule enregistrées dans le dispositif de commande ;
    (ii) détermination de la sélection du rapport de transmission optimal dans les conditions prévalentes; et, en fonction du résultat de la détermination de l'étape (ii) ;
    (iii) modification du rapport de transmission sélectionné selon les nécessités.
  44. Méthode selon l'une quelconque des revendications 30 à 43 comprenant les étapes suivantes : (i) un opérateur du véhicule spécifie les paramètres d'une caractéristique réglable du véhicule/de la combinaison d'outils ; et (ii) le dispositif de commande détermine un réglage optimal de ladite caractéristique, grâce à quoi, dans l'éventualité où le réglage optimal ne peut pas être atteint par lesdits réglages spécifiés par l'opérateur, ce dernier peut soit re-spécifier, soit neutraliser la demande du dispositif de commande pour modifier le réglage sélectionné sur le réglage optimal.
  45. Méthode selon la revendication 44, caractérisée en ce que ladite caractéristique réglable est la largeur d'une charrue.
  46. Méthode selon la revendication 45 comprenant l'étape du réglage automatique de la largeur de la charrue.
  47. Méthode selon la revendication 46, caractérisée en ce que l'étape de réglage de la largeur de la charrue se passe après le renversement de la charrue à la tournière.
  48. Méthode selon l'une quelconque des revendications 44 à 47, caractérisée en ce que l'étape consistant, pour l'opérateur, à respécifier le paramètre réglable ou à neutraliser le dispositif de contrôle s'effectue en fonction de la perte de rendement de la vitesse de travail du véhicule/de la combinaison d'outils, du fait de l'incapacité à atteindre ledit réglage optimal qui est supérieur à un maximum prédéterminé.
  49. Méthode selon l'une quelconque des revendications 30 à 48, caractérisée en ce que l'étape d'optimisation dudit paramètre de rendement comprend la sous-étape de comparaison entre le rendement en temps réel et/ou des caractéristiques du véhicule et/ou des conditions prévalant in situ et le modèle de référence statique du rendement et/ou des caractéristiques du véhicule.
  50. Méthode selon la revendication 37 ou toute revendication qui en dépend, y compris l'étape du traitement des données sur les caractéristiques enregistrées d'une manière itérative, afin de les rendre sous une forme acceptable pour une comparaison itérative avec et/ou modification du modèle de référence statique.
  51. Méthode selon la revendication 50, caractérisé en ce que le traitement itératif desdites données et que la comparaison itérative avec le modèle de référence statique comprend l'étape de comparaison entre l'avance réelle du véhicule et l'avance théorique, enregistrées actuellement dans le modèle.
  52. Méthode selon la revendication 51, comprenant l'étape de modification du modèle de référence statique dans le cas où les valeurs réelles et théoriques de l'avance diffèrent dans une mesure supérieure à une quantité prédéterminée.
EP97307884A 1996-10-23 1997-10-07 Dispositif et procédé de contrôle pour véhicule Expired - Lifetime EP0838141B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB9622087 1996-10-23
GB9622087A GB2318651A (en) 1996-10-23 1996-10-23 Integrated vehicle control system

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0838141A2 EP0838141A2 (fr) 1998-04-29
EP0838141A3 EP0838141A3 (fr) 2000-02-23
EP0838141B1 true EP0838141B1 (fr) 2003-12-17

Family

ID=10801861

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP97307884A Expired - Lifetime EP0838141B1 (fr) 1996-10-23 1997-10-07 Dispositif et procédé de contrôle pour véhicule

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (1) US6144910A (fr)
EP (1) EP0838141B1 (fr)
DE (1) DE69726818T2 (fr)
GB (2) GB2318651A (fr)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9826677B2 (en) 2014-12-16 2017-11-28 Cnh Industrial Canada, Ltd. Seed implement incorporating a down pressure sensing and adjustment system

Families Citing this family (96)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE19740346A1 (de) * 1997-09-13 1999-03-18 Claas Selbstfahr Erntemasch Selbstfahrende Arbeitsmaschine
NL1007487C2 (nl) * 1997-11-07 1999-05-10 Maasland Nv Middelen voor het regelen van een aangedreven grondbewerkingsmachine op basis van informatie ontleend aan een landkaart.
US6665601B1 (en) * 1998-12-22 2003-12-16 Case Corporation Communications system for managing messages across a vehicle data bus
US6292729B2 (en) * 1999-04-14 2001-09-18 Deere & Company Vehicle function management system
US6386985B1 (en) * 1999-07-26 2002-05-14 Guy Jonathan James Rackham Virtual Staging apparatus and method
US6816085B1 (en) 2000-01-14 2004-11-09 Michael N. Haynes Method for managing a parking lot
US7123166B1 (en) 2000-11-17 2006-10-17 Haynes Michael N Method for managing a parking lot
GB2362127B (en) 2000-05-13 2002-05-22 Ford New Holland Nv Method and apparatus for controlling a tractor/baler combination
US6317676B1 (en) * 2000-06-07 2001-11-13 Caterpillar Inc. Method and apparatus for controlling slip
GB0015465D0 (en) 2000-06-26 2000-08-16 New Holland Uk Ltd A method and apparatus for controlling a tractor/implement combination
DE10104517A1 (de) * 2001-01-31 2002-08-01 Ahwi Maschb Gmbh Verfahren zum Rekultivieren von Böden
WO2003017035A2 (fr) * 2001-08-16 2003-02-27 R. Morley Incorporated Commande d'une machine a travers le web
WO2003021365A2 (fr) 2001-08-31 2003-03-13 The Board Of Regents Of The University And Community College System, On Behalf Of The University Of Nevada, Reno Systeme de commande de mouvement d'articulation coordonne
DE10145643C1 (de) * 2001-09-15 2002-11-07 Case Steyr Landmaschinentechni Regelung für den Antrieb einer Zapfwelle an einem Landfahrzeug
DE10147688A1 (de) * 2001-09-27 2003-04-10 Poettinger Gmbh Geb Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Bestimmung von Feldbearbeitungsparametern
GB0130673D0 (en) * 2001-12-21 2002-02-06 New Holland Uk Ltd Tractor/implement combination control methods and apparatuses
SE521017C2 (sv) * 2002-01-11 2003-09-23 Saab Automobile Fordonstyrsystem och metod för styrning av detsamma samt förargränssnitt med instrumentbräda
EP1338934A1 (fr) * 2002-02-26 2003-08-27 Claas Saulgau Gmbh Méthode de réglage d'un tracteur agricole avec outil de travail de la terre
EP1344443B1 (fr) * 2002-03-12 2006-11-08 Lemken GmbH & Co. KG Outil pour le travail du sol
US6694242B2 (en) * 2002-03-20 2004-02-17 Clean Air Power, Inc. Dual fuel engine having multiple dedicated controllers connected by a broadband communications link
US6726559B2 (en) * 2002-05-14 2004-04-27 Deere & Company Harvester with control system considering operator feedback
US6928353B2 (en) 2002-08-01 2005-08-09 Caterpillar Inc. System and method for providing data to a machine control system
US20040034453A1 (en) * 2002-08-13 2004-02-19 Werner Funk Vehicle data display system and method
US7774117B2 (en) * 2003-10-31 2010-08-10 Komatsu Ltd. Engine output control via auto selection of engine output curve
US7859566B2 (en) * 2004-01-20 2010-12-28 Rheinmetall Landsysteme Gmbh Arrangement of a first and at least a second additional vehicle in a loosely couplable not track bound train
US20050246040A1 (en) * 2004-04-29 2005-11-03 Caterpillar Inc. Operator profile control system for a work machine
US7337054B2 (en) * 2004-07-29 2008-02-26 Caterpillar Inc. Systems and methods for controlling slip
US7431682B2 (en) * 2004-12-17 2008-10-07 Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation Smart accessories for power tools
US7226387B2 (en) * 2005-04-01 2007-06-05 Cnh America Llc Control system for regulating a ground speed of a vehicle
GB0507931D0 (en) * 2005-04-20 2005-06-01 Cnh Belgium Nv Agricultural vehicle performance maps
GB0507930D0 (en) * 2005-04-20 2005-06-01 Cnh Belgium Nv Settings control of an agricultural vehicle
US7899591B2 (en) * 2005-07-14 2011-03-01 Accenture Global Services Limited Predictive monitoring for vehicle efficiency and maintenance
US7953521B2 (en) * 2005-12-30 2011-05-31 Microsoft Corporation Learning controller for vehicle control
US8065060B2 (en) * 2006-01-18 2011-11-22 The Board Of Regents Of The University And Community College System On Behalf Of The University Of Nevada Coordinated joint motion control system with position error correction
DE102006042925A1 (de) * 2006-09-13 2008-03-27 Wabco Gmbh Wegfahrschutz für Anhängefahrzeuge
US7848865B2 (en) * 2007-02-09 2010-12-07 Tsd Integrated Controls, Llc Method and system for applying materials to crops
US20080269981A1 (en) * 2007-04-25 2008-10-30 Caterpillar Inc. System and method for tracking and categorizing machine efficiency
DE102007053436A1 (de) * 2007-11-07 2009-05-14 Claas Selbstfahrende Erntemaschinen Gmbh Motorregelung einer selbstfahrenden Arbeitsmaschine
FR2926436B1 (fr) 2008-01-18 2012-12-28 Kuhn Sa Procede de commande d'une action ou d'une sequence d'actions pour une machine agricole attelee a un tracteur agricole utilisant un tel procede de commande
FI20085501L (fi) * 2008-05-27 2009-11-28 John Deere Forestry Oy Työkoneen ja sen käyttäjän tuottavuuden arviointijärjestelmä
US8095280B2 (en) * 2008-06-02 2012-01-10 Caterpillar Inc. Method for adjusting engine speed based on power usage of machine
BE1018875A3 (nl) * 2009-09-01 2011-10-04 Cnh Belgium Nv Landbouwmachine met variabele toerentalregeling.
US8768577B2 (en) 2010-05-04 2014-07-01 Clark Equipment Company Implement interface display
GB2484282A (en) * 2010-10-04 2012-04-11 Agco Sa Agricultural Tractor Control System
DE102011076296B4 (de) 2011-05-23 2023-06-15 Zf Friedrichshafen Ag Verfahren zur Steuerung mindestens eines Hubwerks eines landwirtschaftlichen oder kommunalen Nutzfahrzeuges, sowie Nutzfahrzeug
US9031749B2 (en) * 2011-06-10 2015-05-12 Great Plaines Manfacturing, Inc. Cultivation air seeder having sequentially operated tools
GB201112569D0 (en) * 2011-07-22 2011-08-31 Agco Int Gmbh Tractor control/display systems
GB201112568D0 (en) * 2011-07-22 2011-08-31 Agco Int Gmbh Tractor control system
US8948975B2 (en) * 2011-10-28 2015-02-03 Agco Corporation Agriculture combination machines for dispensing compositions
DE102011121433A1 (de) * 2011-12-16 2013-06-20 Robert Bosch Gmbh Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Ansteuerung einer Landmaschine
JP5871612B2 (ja) * 2011-12-26 2016-03-01 株式会社クボタ 作業車
DE102012201333A1 (de) 2012-01-31 2013-08-01 Deere & Company Landwirtschaftliche Maschine mit einem System zur selbsttätigen Einstellung eines Bearbeitungsparameters und zugehöriges Verfahren
US9686902B2 (en) * 2012-12-18 2017-06-27 Cnh Industrial America Llc System and method for improving performance of an agricultural vehicle or implement
JP6284302B2 (ja) * 2013-04-02 2018-02-28 株式会社タダノ ブームの伸縮パターン選択装置
US9439340B2 (en) 2013-11-13 2016-09-13 Cnh Industrial America Llc Frame configuration for an agricultural tillage implement
RU2014144625A (ru) 2013-11-13 2016-05-27 СиЭнЭйч ИНДАСТРИАЛ АМЕРИКА ЭлЭлСи Система подъема качающегося рычага
CA2867274C (fr) 2013-11-13 2018-07-24 Cnh Industrial America Llc Commande de roue d'appareil agricole de travail du sol
US9661798B2 (en) 2013-11-13 2017-05-30 Cnh Industrial America Llc Agricultural tillage implement wheel control
CA2867278C (fr) 2013-12-11 2020-01-07 Cnh Industrial Canada, Ltd. Mise a niveau a distance d'instruments aratoires au moyen d'inclinometres
US9636955B2 (en) * 2014-06-11 2017-05-02 The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company Tire temperature predictive system and method
US9469972B2 (en) 2014-07-07 2016-10-18 Caterpillar Inc. Adaptive control system for cyclic excavation machine
US10420271B2 (en) 2014-11-10 2019-09-24 Cnh Industrial America Llc Fully adjustable lift system
US9888624B2 (en) 2015-06-30 2018-02-13 Cnh Industrial America Llc Individual row lift system for planters
US9968027B2 (en) * 2015-07-14 2018-05-15 Clemson University Automated control systems and methods for underground crop harvesters
US10112615B2 (en) * 2015-09-03 2018-10-30 Deere & Company System and method of reacting to wheel slip in a traction vehicle
US9845008B2 (en) 2015-09-03 2017-12-19 Deere & Company System and method of detecting load forces on a traction vehicle to predict wheel slip
US9994104B2 (en) 2015-09-03 2018-06-12 Deere & Company System and method of reacting to wheel slip in a traction vehicle
US10407072B2 (en) 2015-09-03 2019-09-10 Deere & Company System and method of regulating wheel slip in a traction vehicle
US9883626B2 (en) * 2015-10-02 2018-02-06 Deere & Company Controlling an agricultural vehicle based on sensed inputs
EP3243367B2 (fr) 2016-05-10 2022-08-24 CLAAS Selbstfahrende Erntemaschinen GmbH Combinaison d'appareil de véhicule de traction ayant un système d'assistance au conducteur
US10149468B2 (en) 2016-05-10 2018-12-11 Crinklaw Farm Services, Inc. Robotic agricultural system and method
DE102016118203A1 (de) * 2016-05-10 2017-11-16 Claas Selbstfahrende Erntemaschinen Gmbh Zugmaschinen-Geräte-Kombination mit Fahrerassistenzsystem
PL3243368T5 (pl) 2016-05-10 2022-10-31 Claas Tractor S.A.S. Połączenie urządzeń-ciągnika z systemem wspomagania kierowcy
JP6879677B2 (ja) 2016-05-26 2021-06-02 株式会社クボタ 作業車
MX2019001857A (es) 2016-08-29 2019-11-12 Crinklaw Farm Services Inc Sistema y metodo agricola robotico.
US10028428B2 (en) * 2016-12-07 2018-07-24 Deere & Company Control system and method for automatically determining characteristic for optimum machine performance
US11096323B2 (en) 2017-04-18 2021-08-24 CropZilla Software, Inc. Machine control system providing actionable management information and insight using agricultural telematics
US10561052B2 (en) 2017-04-25 2020-02-18 Cnh Industrial Canada, Ltd. Automatic fore/aft leveling trim function in a towable tillage implement
US20180363272A1 (en) * 2017-06-20 2018-12-20 KUBOTA DEUTSCHLAND GmbH Working machine
DE102017211329A1 (de) * 2017-07-04 2019-01-10 Robert Bosch Gmbh Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Regelung des Betriebs eines hydraulisch betätigbaren Anbaugeräts an einem Fahrzeug
US10517238B2 (en) 2017-09-18 2019-12-31 Deere & Company Implement optimization by automated adjustments
US10602653B2 (en) 2017-10-25 2020-03-31 Cnh Industrial Canada, Ltd. System and method for controlling the orientation of ground engaging elements on an agricultural implement
US10915076B2 (en) 2018-02-14 2021-02-09 Deere & Company Controlling an agricultural implement using a metric priority
US11234357B2 (en) 2018-08-02 2022-02-01 Cnh Industrial America Llc System and method for monitoring field conditions of an adjacent swath within a field
CN109121510A (zh) * 2018-08-28 2019-01-04 徐寒斌 一种牵引力控制系统
DE102018122018A1 (de) * 2018-09-10 2020-03-12 Claas Tractor Sas Landwirtschaftliches Arbeitssystem
DE102018124705A1 (de) * 2018-10-08 2020-04-09 Lemken Gmbh & Co. Kg Nachrüstkit zum Anbau an ein landwirtschaftliches Gerät
US11064645B2 (en) 2018-10-16 2021-07-20 Cnh Industrial America Llc System and method for controlling operation of a work vehicle towing an agricultural implement
DE102018128095A1 (de) 2018-11-09 2020-05-14 Lemken Gmbh & Co. Kg Verfahren zum gleichzeitigen Betreiben mehrerer für eine Anwendung zu einer Gerätekombination miteinander verbundener landwirtschaftlicher Geräte
US11224154B2 (en) 2019-03-19 2022-01-18 Cnh Industrial America Llc Headland turn planning for a work vehicle
US11178804B2 (en) 2019-06-04 2021-11-23 Cnh Industrial America Llc Ground engaging tool positioning system
US11980112B2 (en) * 2019-11-18 2024-05-14 Cnh Industrial Canada, Ltd. System and method for controlling the operation of a tillage implement based on crop row location
DE102019132547A1 (de) * 2019-11-29 2021-06-02 CLAAS Tractor S.A.S Zugmaschine
CN111133853B (zh) * 2020-01-17 2024-01-30 日照海卓液压有限公司 一种拖拉机耕深多参数联合自动调节系统及方法
DE102020102330A1 (de) * 2020-01-30 2021-08-05 CLAAS Tractor S.A.S Zugmaschine
DE102020105244A1 (de) * 2020-02-27 2021-09-02 Wacker Neuson Produktion GmbH & Co. KG System und Verfahren zum Individualisieren und Steuern eines Baugeräts

Family Cites Families (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4715012A (en) * 1980-10-15 1987-12-22 Massey-Ferguson Services N.V. Electronic tractor control
US4495577A (en) * 1982-08-06 1985-01-22 Deere & Company Model reference adaptive implement control
GB2178934A (en) * 1985-03-22 1987-02-25 Massey Ferguson Mfg Agricultural husbandry
EP0282639A3 (fr) * 1987-03-14 1989-08-30 Franz Kirchberger Procédé et dispositif de commande de machines agricoles en fonction de leur position sur une surface à cultiver
JPH04114203A (ja) * 1990-09-04 1992-04-15 Fuji Heavy Ind Ltd 車輌用電子制御システム
IT1249532B (it) * 1991-02-07 1995-02-27 Giovanni Sabbadini Aratro polivomere ambiversatile e portata variabile ad angolo, con dissodatore a lama incorporato
US5513107A (en) * 1992-12-17 1996-04-30 Ford Motor Company Methods and apparatus for controlling operating subsystems of a motor vehicle
US5445128A (en) * 1993-08-27 1995-08-29 Detroit Diesel Corporation Method for engine control
FR2723792B1 (fr) * 1994-08-22 1996-10-25 Renault Dispositif d'aide a la conduite d'un tracteur agricole.
US5751579A (en) * 1995-09-06 1998-05-12 Ford Global Technologies, Inc. Vehicle control system employing improved methods and apparatus for estimating applied wheel torque

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9826677B2 (en) 2014-12-16 2017-11-28 Cnh Industrial Canada, Ltd. Seed implement incorporating a down pressure sensing and adjustment system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB9622087D0 (en) 1996-12-18
DE69726818T2 (de) 2004-06-17
GB2318652A (en) 1998-04-29
GB9705132D0 (en) 1997-04-30
DE69726818D1 (de) 2004-01-29
EP0838141A2 (fr) 1998-04-29
US6144910A (en) 2000-11-07
EP0838141A3 (fr) 2000-02-23
GB2318651A (en) 1998-04-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0838141B1 (fr) Dispositif et procédé de contrôle pour véhicule
RU2749615C2 (ru) Сельскохозяйственный машинный агрегат
US6547012B2 (en) Method and apparatus for controlling a tractor/implement combination
US6666279B2 (en) Method and apparatus for controlling a tractor/implement combination
US10795372B2 (en) Automatic end of row turning control system for a work vehicle by learning from operator
Scarlett Integrated control of agricultural tractors and implements: a review of potential opportunities relating to cultivation and crop establishment machinery
US20080257569A1 (en) Electronic draft control for trailed implements
US20220000006A1 (en) Tractor and method for operating a tractor
AU7176600A (en) Hitch control system with adjustable slip response
US5992533A (en) Method and apparatus for controlling width-adjustable tillage implement
US20210259148A1 (en) Method for automating an agricultural work task
EP3424287B1 (fr) Dispositif et procédé de réglage du fonctionnement d'un outil porté hydraulique pour un véhicule
US11667326B2 (en) Automatic guidance performance improvement and transport with articulated machine form
US10918008B2 (en) System and method for generating a prescription map for an agricultural implement based on soil compaction
EP0838139B1 (fr) Procédé de cultivation amélioré
EP3837941B1 (fr) Procédé de commande d'un système agricole
EP0151323B2 (fr) Système de commande de la profondeur de travail pour véhicule équipé d'un outil de travailler du sol
RU2816600C2 (ru) Тягач, система помощи водителю и способ эксплуатации тягача
US20230320251A1 (en) Condition verification system for an agricultural system
US10813262B2 (en) System and method for generating a prescription map for an agricultural implement based on yield map and/or crop biomass
Jones et al. Status of agricultural electronics
Iida et al. A New Automatic Depth Control System for Rotary Tillers
IE55385B1 (en) Working depth control system for vehicle with ground working implement
POOL New Cultivating Methods
Sakai CIGR Handbook of Agricultural Engineering, Volume III Plant Production Engineering, Chapter 1 Machines for Crop Production, Parts 1.1. 18-1.1. 21 Tractors: Two-Wheel Tractors for Wet Land Farming

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Free format text: AL;LT;LV;RO;SI

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Free format text: 7A 01B 79/00 A, 7A 01B 63/111 B, 7A 01B 63/114 B, 7A 01B 63/10 B

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Free format text: AL;LT;LV;RO;SI

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20000331

AKX Designation fees paid

Free format text: DE FR GB IT

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20020424

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: CNH U.K. LIMITED

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRE;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.SCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20031217

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69726818

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20040129

Kind code of ref document: P

ET Fr: translation filed
PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20040920

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R084

Ref document number: 69726818

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: 746

Effective date: 20141008

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R084

Ref document number: 69726818

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20140929

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 19

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20151009

Year of fee payment: 19

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20151008

Year of fee payment: 19

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20151006

Year of fee payment: 19

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 69726818

Country of ref document: DE

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20161007

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20170630

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20161102

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170503

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20161007