TECHNICAL FIELD.
This invention relates a method for cooling graphite electrodes used for metal melting
and refining, such as steel making, in an electric arc furnace and a ladle for receiving
a molten metal discharged from the electric arc furnace, and more especially to a method,
in which graphite electrodes, which participate in metal melting and refining by using
arc heating of the electric arc furnace or the ladle, are cooled by means of spraying directly
a cooling liquid, such as water or the like, onto the outer periphery surface of at least
one graphite electrode.
BACKGROUND TECHNIQUES
Conventionally, for me(ting and refining such as steel making in an electric arc
furnace and in a ladle in which molten steel discharged from an electric arc furnace is
received and further molten and secondarily refined, an arc heating by using a graphite
electrode has been used. The reduction of electric energy cost and reduction of electrode
consumption rate to the smallest possible degree by suppression of oxidative ablation of
the end and peripheral surface of a graphite electrode are desired for
the melting and refining, As a measure to suppress the oxidative ablation, there have been
proposed and applied some means, in which a graphite electrode heated to a high temperature
during melting and refining is cooled to suppress the oxidative ablation. One of the cooling
method is such that non -ablation electrode, permitted to be water-cooled, which is connected
to the upper parts of a graphite electrode train consisting of graphite electrodes successively
connected, is water-cooled and then the water cooling effect of the non -ablation electrode
is conducted to the graphite electrode connected through nipples to the bottom end of the
non-ablation electrode, thereby suppressing the oxidative ablation of the graphite electrodes
during melting and refining. For example, US Patent No. 4,416,014, No. 4, 417,344
and No. 4,451,926 disclose water-cooled non-ablation electrodes having therein an
aluminum-made hollow cylinder, in which cooling water is introduced to cool the surfaces
of the inner wall of the hollow cylinder and the bottom end of the non-ablation electrode
and finally to cool graphite electrodes connected to the bottom end of the non-ablation
electrode.
Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 60-501879 and Japanese Patent Laid-Open No.
60-501880 disclose a non-ablation electrode permitted to be water-cooled, which comprises
a graphite-made tubular body. The graphite-made tubular body has therein a central hole,
to which cooling water is introduced to cool the surface of a wall and bottom end of the
tubular body and finally to cool a graphite electrode connected to the bottom of
the tubular body,
By cooling a non-ablation electrode as described above, a graphite electrode connected
to the bottom end of the non-ablation electrode is cooled, thereby suppressing the oxidative
ablation to some extent.
However, though the graphite electrode is cooled through the non-ablation electrode
connected to the bottom end thereof, the zone, to which the cooling by non -ablation electrode
may be affected, is limited to only the connected end surface between the graphite electrode
and the non-ablation electrode to be connected, and therefore the cooling efficiency is
extremely low. Furthermore, the thermal conductivity of graphite itself decreases in a
temperature region above about 100°C, and therefore it is difficult to cool, as is expected,
even the lower portion of the graphite electrode which participates in melting and refining.
When a graphite electrode is disconnected from a non-ablation electrode, for example,
when a used electrode is to be transferred to an off-line place spaced from an arc electric
furnace, it needs to be detached from a nipple, and even the nipple is detached from the
non-ablation electrode at need.
For connecting a new graphite electrode, a nipple is fixed to a non-ablation electrode,
to which a new graphite electrode is fixed through the nipple already fixed, and thus the
new graphite electrode is connected.
Therefore, in the case where a non-ablation electrode permitted to be water-cooled
is used for cooling a graphite electrode, the graphite electrode is transferred to an off-line
place so as to be renewed, and
then hard labor for detaching and connecting works is required, and the operation is
consequently complicated. Repeated detaching and connecting of a graphite electrode causes
the deformation, collapse, and damage of screw threads of the graphite electrode, non-ablation
electrode, and nipple, with the result that connection failure and increase of electrical
resistivity, etc. will occur, and thus the melting and refining operation is affected adversely.
In view of these disadvantages, Japanese Utility Model Publication No. 59-23357
discloses a cooling apparatus which, without using a non-ablation electrode permitted to
be water-cooled, cools a graphite electrode by spraying cooling water onto the surface
of the graphite electrode projected upwardly from a furnace cover of an arc electric furnace,
in order to directly cool the graphite electrode connected through a nipple.
In the cooling apparatus shown in Fig. 1, a graphite electrode train is inserted
movably in the vertical direction through the furnace cover 1 which closes the top opening
of the arc electric furnace. The graphite electrode train has an upper electrode 2, the bottom
of which being connected successively to the lower graphite electrodes through nipples
(not shown in the figure).
In the one graphite electrode train, the lower graphite electrode is in the arc electric
furnace, and the graphite electrode in the arc electrode furnace takes part in a refining
melting for steel making.
Above the furnace cover 1, the upper graphite electrode 2 is held by an
electrode holder 3, and on the lower side of the electrode holder 3, an
annular tube 4 is provided surrounding the upper graphite electrode 2.
From the annular tube 4, a plurality of vertical pipes 5 are
projected vertically, the inside of which are provided with nozzles 6
facing to the surface of the graphite electrode 2 to be cooled. Therefore,
cooling water introduced in the annular tube 4 moves down along each
vertical pipe 5, and cooling water is sprayed from the nozzles 6 on the
inside of the pipe 5 onto the peripheral surface of the upper graphite
electrode 2.
However, in this cooling apparatus, cooling water is jetted from
each nozzle 6 to horizontal level or in the direction parallel to it.
For this reason, large amount of cooling water is mostly reflected and
splashed when it strikes on the peripheral surface of the graphite
electrode 2, and therefore splashed cooling water increases in a
remarkable amount. The splashed cooling water causes serious staining
and damage of the electrode holder 3 and furnace cover 1, and therefore
this method is can not be put to practical use. Particularly, the
furnace cover 1 consists mostly of refractory such as chamotte, and
therefore the refractory is stained and damaged seriously.
The colliding or striking cooling water 7 is mostly reflected and
scarecely flows down along the graphite electrode 2. Therefore, the
cooling space to be cooled by the cooling water 7 is limited to only the
portion of the graphite electrode where the cooling water collides, so
that it can not cool the bottom graphite electrode which takes part in
melting and refining in the electric furnace unless supply of cooling
water is increased extraordinarily. Furthermore, the electric power
consumption rate and electrode consumption rate are not reduced as desired,
and therefore the increased cooling water supply is very uneconomical.
The increased cooling water supply causes the entering of splashed
cooling water into the arc electric furnace, with the result that it
affects adversely on reaction in the furnace. Hydrogen gas generated by
water reaction in the furnace is apt to be dissolved in molten steel,
above all, in melting and refining of a type of steel which is apt to be
easily damaged by hydrogen embrittlement. Therefore, the apparatus shown
in Fig. 1 can neither be used for cooling of a graphite electrode in an
arc electric furnace, nor be used for cooling of a graphite electrode in
a ladle for receiving molten steel after steel making process.
The cooling efficiency of a graphite electrode 2 is low unless the
plurality of vertical pipes 5 projected downwardly from the annular tube
4 are extremely long. For this reason, when a cooling apparatus is
detached for replacement of electrodes, the long vertical pipes 5 causes
troubles and handling is extremely difficult, and therefore it is
impossible to put it to practical use.
Electromagnetic force generated around the periphery of the
graphite electrode 2 by the annular tube 4 is shielded, so that
a significant portion of a current which flows to the graphite electrode 2 is shut off, and
thereby an operational problem is caused.
In the case where cooling liquid is sprayed onto a graphite electrode to cool, the
method involves the problems described hereinafter.
At least a part of cooling water splashed out of cooling water sprayed onto a graphite
electrode enters inevitably a part of an arc electric furnace, and the cooling water which
enters the arc electric furnace is then subjected to a high temperature condition to generate
hydrogen by water gas reaction. Hydrogen dissolution in molten steel causes hydrogen
embrittlement. Such a problem is concerned from the beginning depending on a type of
steel to be molten and refined.
For this reason, for making of a type of steel for which high toughness is seriously
required, it is seriously desired to reduce electrode consumption rate. A cooling apparatus
shown in Fig. 1 has not been practically applied to an arc electric furnace for steel making,
though the cooling method in which cooling liquid is directly sprayed onto a graphite
electrode has been known as one of the effective measures meeting the above demand.
Further, though it is preferable to cool a graphite electrode by spraying cooling
liquid for prevention of oxidative ablation and reduction of electric power consumption
rate, excessive cooling of the graphite electrode causes accordingly a consumption of extra
electric power, causes increased electric power consumption rate, and causes
unpreferably significant cost-up,
In view of overcoming these disadvantages, the applicants had presented a method
for water-cooling the graphite train without loss of cooling water supply, as shown in
U.S patent No.4,941,149. The method concerns a method for refining metals, in which
a liquid coolant to be jetted on a peripheral surface of the graphite electrode train is directed
to the upward or downward direction at the inclination angle with a range from 10 degrees
to 35 degrees.
In the melting and refining method, when the cooling liquid is jetted on the outer
peripheral surface of the graphite electrode, the jetting rate of the cooling liquid is in a
range between 0.8 litres/min. and 6.0 litres/ min., and hence a film of the cooling liquid
can be formed by a manner, such that the film is in a state of adbering on the outer peripheral
surface of the graphite electrode, along which the film flows down.
The cooling liquid film enables the outer peripheral surface of the graphite electrode
to be cooled. The cooling space to be affected by the cooling liquid is not limited to a
local portion of the outer peripheral surface of the graphite electrode.
However, the recent steel making process has a tendency to utilize a high power
graphite electrode with large diameter, which necessiates a large amount of cooling liquid.
Accordingly, in the recent process, the flow rate ranging between 0.8 litres/ min. and
6.0 litres/min. is insufficient.
The shortage in view of flow rate of the cooling liquid causes an adverse affection on
the consumption due to the oxidative ablation of the graphite electrode.
DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is related to a method of cooling a vertical train of graphite
electrodes, which are utilized for arc-heating metal, such as steel or the like, in the electric
arc furnace or the ladle for receiving the metal discharged from the electric arc furnace.
The cooling of the graphite electrode train is conducted by spraying directly the
outer surface of the graphite electrode with a cooling liquid, which consists mainly of
water.
The graphite electrode train has a plurality of graphite electrodes vertically connected
to each other via nipples, and penetrates through a cover enclosing an opening of the electric
arc furnace with a vessel for melting and refining the metal, such as steel or the like.
The graphite electrode train extends into the vessel.
In the case of cooling the graphite electrodes of a furnace, the cooling liquid to
be sprayed is directed at the upward or downward inclination of 0 degree to 60 degrees
with respect to the horizontal, wherein the rate of spraying of the cooling liquid is kept
in a range between 0.8 liters/minute and 35 liters/minute.
The upward or downward inclination, in which spray of cooling liquid is inclined obliquely,
preferably ranges from 10 degrees to 35 degrees.
Alternatively, the upward or downward inclination ranges from 35 degrees to 60
degrees.
The upward or downward inclination may also range from the horizontal level
to 10 degrees, wherein the cooling liquid is sprayed by a divergent fashion.
The optimum flow rate of the cooling liquid is decided dependent on the diameter
of the graphite electrode to be used.
In the case of cooling the graphite electrodes of the ladle, with use of the cooling
liquid, the cooling liquid to be sprayed is directed at the upward or downward inclination
of 0 degrees to 60 degrees with respect to the horizontal level, while the rate of spraying
the cooling liquid is kept between 2 liters/minute and 10 liters/minute.
According to the invention, the metal, such as steel, is molten and refined by utilizing
an arc-heating of graphite electrodes, together with cooling the graphite electrodes by
spraying directly the cooling liquid onto the graphite electrodes connected successively
through nipples. The rate of the cooling liquid to be sprayed onto the peripheral surface
of graphite electrode in the upward or downward inclination from the horizontal level
is in an optimum range. Hence, at a position above the furnace cover, the graphite electrodes
with the lower portion extending into the arc electric furnace are cooled efficiently, though
the graphite
electrodes are affected on arc heating in the arc electric furnace.
Consequently, it is possible to suppress oxidative ablation of the graphite electrodes.
Futhermore, hydrogen gas reaction rising due to the dissolution of the cooling liquid,
which enters the electric arc furnace, happens scarcely and the consequent hydrogen gas
is scarcely generated in the electric arc furnace.
Namely, in the case, in which metal is molten and refined according to the present
invention, the cooling liquid to be sprayed onto the peripheral surface of a graphite electrode
in the upward or downward inclination with a prescribed inclination angle from the horizontal
level has an optimum flow rate. Therefore, most of cooling liquid sprayed in the upward
direction does not collide with the peripheral surface of the graphite electrode at the energy
when being jetted. To the contrary, only after the upward cooling liquid loops, it makes
contact with the peripheral surface of the graphite electrode, For this reason, while the
cooling liquid collides with the peripheral surface and flows down along the peripheral
surface, the cooling liquid has lost most of its collision energy, the cooling liquid which
is flowing down along the peripheral surface is always in contact with the peripheral.
surface of the graphite electrode, and thereby even the peripheral surface of the graphite
electrode in the arc electrode furnace is cooled.
In the case where cooling liquid is sprayed in the downward
direction onto the peripheral surface of the graphite electrode, unlike
the case where cooling liquid is sprayed in the horizontal level or in parallel to the horizontal
level, most of the cooling liquid makes contact with the peripheral surface of the graphite
electrode, the cooling liquid in contact with the peripheral surface of the graphite electrode
flows down along the peripheral surface, and the cooling liquid which is flowing down
along the peripheral surface is always in contact with the peripheral surface of the graphite
electrode, whereby even the peripheral surface at the end of the graphite electrode in the
arc electric furnace or ladle can be cooled.
In the arc electric furnace, the cooling liquid which enters the electric furnace or
the ladle always flows down along the peripheral surface of the graphite electrode and
is in contact with the peripheral surface of the graphite electrode. For this reason, the
cooling liquid which enters the electric furnace or the ladle is almost evaporated during
flowing down, and thus the generation of hydrogen gas due to dissolution of the cooling
liquid does not occur.
Containment of an anti-oxidant in the cooling liquid prevents effectively oxidative
ablation of the graphite electrode, because the anti-oxidant contained in the cooling liquid
is adhered to the peripheral surface of the graphite electrode during flowing down of the
cooling liquid along the peripheral surface of the graphite electrode, and accordingly an
anti-oxidant film is formed.
Further, the amount or rate of cooling liquid to be sprayed is
limited to a prescribed suitable range, For this reason, even if a part of cooling liquid
enters the arc electric furnace, most of cooling liquid is evaporated during flowing down,
the dissolution of the cooling liquid does not occur and no hydrogen gas is generated.
As described above, such cooling does not cause an entry of hydrogen gas into
molten metal, such as molten steel, and even a type of steel which is apt to be easily broken
or cracked due to hydrogen brittleness can be molten and refined easily.
Also even in the case where arc heating by a graphite electrode is used for melting
and refining in a ladle, cooling liquid flows down stratifiedly along the peripheral surface
of the graphite electrode. Even if cooling liquid enters the ladle through the furnace cover
of the ladle, the cooling liquid is evaporated and dissipated by the internal heat, there
is no room for occurrence of a dissolution of the cooling liquid, and hydrogen gas generated
from the dissolution of the cooling liquid will not enter so as to be dissolved in molten
steel.
In detail, the surface of molten steel in a ladle is covered with slag, and the end
of a graphite electrode is submerged into the slag layer existing on the molten metal pool
and served for arc heating of the slag layer, which cause to heating the molten metal pool.
In other words, the space between the slag layer and furnace cover is heated to a significantly
high temperature by radiant heat transfer resulted from the arc heating.
Therefore, even if a part of cooling liquid enters a ladle, the
cooling liquid is immediately evaporated and dissipated, and even if un
-dissipated cooling liquid remains, the cooling liquid remaining in the
ladle is protected by the slag layer, and thereby the cooling liquid will
never enter the molten steel pool. Further, hydrogen gas generated in
this case will never be dissolved into the molten steel pool owing to the
shield of the slag layer existing on the molten metal pool.
Further, when tight quality is required, molten steel in a ladle
can be thereafter subjected to de-gassing treatment as it is, and when de
-gassing treatment is applied in combination, cooling liquid is allowed
to enter during cooling of a graphite electrode to some extent.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE ATTACHED DRAWINGS
Fig. 1 is a perspective view showing a prior art cooling apparatus
used for cooling the graphite electrode;
Fig. 2 is an explanative view showing one example carrying out the
inventive process by using a prior art cooling pipe;
Fig. 3 is other explanative view showing other example carrying out
rhe inventive process by using the prior art cooling pipe shown in Fig. 2;
Fig. 4 is other explanative view showing other example carrying out
the inventive process by the prior art cooling pipe shown in Fig. 2;
Fig. 5 is a plan view showing the prior art cooling pipe shown in
Figs. 2, 3 and 4; and
Fig. 6 is an explanative view showing a ladle used for carrying out
the inventive process.
BEST FORMS OF CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
As to the best forms of carrying out this invention, the structure,
namely means, and operations of the present invention will be described
in detail hereinafter referring to the attached drawings.
Fig. 2 is a front view for illustrating one example of metal
melting and refining according to the present invention, in which metal
is molten and refined with cooling by spraying cooling liquid onto a
graphite electrode.
In Fig. 2, reference numeral 10 represents a graphite electrode,
which is connected successively through nipples (not shown) to form a
series of graphite electrode train, in other words, a vertical succession
of graphite electrodes. In the graphite electrode train, the top portion
of the graphite electrode 10 above a furnace cover 1 for enclosing an
opening of a vessel of the furnace is held by an electrode holder, which
is not shown in Fig. 2, but is shown as numeral 3 in Fig. 1. The
graphite electrode, which constitutes the lower part of a graphite
electrode of the graphite electrode train is inserted into an arc
electric furnace, which is not shown in Fig. 2 and is enclosed by the
furnace cover 1. In the arc electric furnace, arc heating is conducted
by supplying an electric current through the graphite electrode 10 and
melting and refining such as steel making are operated.
When an arc electric furnace is heated using three-phase AC
electric power, three graphite electrode trains formed by connecting
successively graphite electrode 10 through nipples corresponding to three
-phase electric power are provided with an interval on some circle with a
prescribed radius extending from the center to the circumference thereof.
When an arc electric furnace is heated by using DC power instead of
AC power, one graphite electrode train is disposed and utilized, which is
formed by connecting graphite electrode 10 through the nipples
successively. DC power heating by supplying the electric current enables
to supply a heavy current, and to achieve mass melting and refining.
Next, cooling liquid 11, for example, cooling water is sprayed
continuously onto the peripheral surface of a graphite electrode 10 above
the furnace cover 1 in the upward or downward direction at the
inclination in a range from 0 degree to 60 degrees from the horizontal
level L-L.
Namely, as shown in Fig. 2, cooling liquid 11 to be sprayed is
directed to the downward direction relative to the horizontal level L-L,
while, as shown in Fig. 3, cooling liquid 11 to be sprayed is directed to
the upward direction relative to the horizontal level L-L.
The amount of spray of cooling liquid in this case is prescribed in
relation to the upward or downward inclination and a diameter of the graphite electrode
10 as described hereinafter.
In the case where the upward or downward inclination for spraying cooling liquid
11 is in the range of 60 degrees, more suitably, the upward or downward inclination
is in the range from 60 degrees to 10 degrees, the amount of spraying of cooling liquid
is in the range from 0,8 to 35 liters/minute, preferably, from 6 liters/minute to 35
liters/minute.
Namely, if the cooling liquid 11 to be sprayed is directed upwardly in the upward
inclination exceeding 60 degrees, as shown in Fig. 3, a part of the cooling liquid 11
is partially splashed without looping, and a desired cooling effect can not be obtained
even if the amount of spraying of cooling liquid is maintained within the suitable range.
If the cooling liquid 11 to be sprayed is directed downwardly in the downward
inclination exceeding about 60 degrees, as shown in Fig. 2, the flowing down speed
of cooling liquid 11 is high, so that a partial separated cooling liquid may cause a water
gas reaction in the furnace to generate hydrogen gas and may cause a local explosion
unpreferably. If the downward inclination is about 70 degrees, the electrode consumption
rate increases by 10 to 20 %, and therefore this value is unpreferable in view of this electrode
consumption rate.
It is required to control the amount of spraying of cooling liquid 11 in the suitable
range corresponding to the diameter of the graphite
electrode 10 in the case where the upward or downward inclination is applied as described
above. In detail, even if the liquid coolant 11 is jetted at the upward or downward inclination
with the suitable range, the liquid coolant 11 should be jetted at a rate permitted for reducing
the consumption rate of the graphite electrode.
For reference, the suitable range of the amount or rate of spraying of cooling liquid
(liters/minutes) is preferably 6 to 11, 8 to 13, 14 to 18, 12 to 20, 14 to 24, 17 to 28,
20 to 33, and 23 to 40 for the diameter (inch) of one graphite electrode 2 of 16 inches,
18 inches, 20 inches, 22 inches, 24 inches, 26 inches, 28 inches, and 30 inches respectively.
If the amount of spraying of cooling liquid is in the above suitable range depending upon
the diameter of the graphite electrode, the electrode consumption rate (kg/t) decreases
by 12 to 17 %, and electric power consumption rate (kwh/t) decreases by 3 to 5 % in
comparison with a conventional example (in case of cooling with an ablation electrode).
If the amount of spraying of cooling liquid is in the suitable range, and in addition,
the upward or downward inclination is in the range described hereinbefore, the electrode
consumption rate decreases further.
In addition to this, as shown in Fig. 4, the liquid coolant 11 to be sprayed can
be directed in the inclination ranging from upwardly inclined angle 1, not exceeding 10
degrees to downwardly inclined angle 2 of 10 degrees or below.
In the case, in which the cooling liquid 11 is sprayed at the downward inclination of 10
degrees from the horizontal level and in the upward inclination of 10 degrees, the cooling
liquid 11 is required to be sprayed at an inclined angles 1, 2 of -10 degrees to +10 degrees
in inclination or at a divergent angle in a flared shape like a trumpet or a circular cone.
In the case of spraying the liquid coolant 11 in a flared shape, it is required to keep the
amount or rate of spraying of cooling liquid 11 in the suitable range from 8 to 40
liters/minute. In the suitable range, the suitable amount or rate of spraying of cooling
liquid 11 is determined to be in the optimum range in consideration of the diameter of
the graphite electrode to be cooled.
For reference, the optimum amount of cooling liquid is 6 to 11 liters/minute for
an electrode diameter of 16 inches, namely 400 mm ± 30 mm; 8 to 13 liters/minute for
an electrode diameter of 18 inches, namely 450 mm ± 30 mm; 10 to 18 liters/minute
for an electrode diameter of 20 inches, namely 500 mm ± 30 mm; 12 to 20 liters/minute
for an electrode diameter of 22 inches, namely 550 mm ± 30 mm; 14 to 24 liters/minute
for an electrode diameter of 24 inches, namely 600 mm ± 30 mm; 17 to 28 liters/minute
for an electrode diameter of 26 inches, namely 650 mm ± 30 mm; 20 to 33 liters/minute
for an electrode diameter of 28 inches, namely 700 mm ± 30 mm; 23 to 40 liters/minute
for an electrode diameter of 30 inches, namely 750 mm ± 30 mm.
If the melting and refining of metal, such as stell, is operated in
the suitable ranges described above, the electrode consumption rate (kg/t) decreases by
12 to 19 % and the electric power consumption rate (kwh/t) decreases by 3 to 5 % in
comparison with the conventional example (in case of cooling with a conventional
water-cooling ablation electrode).
Though the cooling liquid 11 can be sprayed by any conventional method and
apparatus under the conditions described above, the cooling liquid 11 can be sprayed by
a conventional apparatus 20, as shown in Fig. 5. The apparatus 20 is described in U.S
patent No,4,941,149, in which a cooling pipe 21 surrounding the periphery of the graphite
electrode 10 is provided and the cooling liquid 11 is jetted directly from the cooling pipe
21, as shown in Fig. 5.
In detail, the cooling pipe 21 is provided surrounding the periphery of the graphite
electrode 10 to which the cooling liquid 11 is sprayed, The cooling liquid 11 is supplied
to the cooling pipe 21, and the cooling liquid 11 is jetted from at least one spray nozzle
22 provided on the inside periphery of the cooling pipe 21 at the upward or downward
inclination, as shown in Figs. 2 and 3, The cooling pipe 21 is provided usually between
an electrode holder (shown as numeral 3 in Fig. 1) for holding the top of the upper portion
of the graphite electrode 10 and the furnace cover (shown as numeral 1 in Figs. 2 and
3) of the arc electric furnace.
Spray nozzles 22 provided on the inside periphery of the cooling pipe 21 are directed
in the radial direction toward the central axis of
the graphite electrode 10, as shown in Fig. 5, and each nozzle 22 is directed in the obliquely
upward or obliquely downward direction at the inclination , so that the cooling liquid
11 can be sprayed obliquely in the upward or downward direction.
By fixing the spray nozzles 22 so as to be directed in the obliquely upward direction,
as shown in Fig. 3, when cooling liquid 11 continuously supplied is jetted in the obliquely
upward direction from each nozzle 22 of the cooling pipe 21, the cooling liquid 11 contacts
smoothly without a problem on the peripheral surface of the graphite electrode 10 after
looping as shown in Fig. 3, and flows down along the peripheral surface of the graphite
electrode 10. During flowing down of the cooling liquid 11 from the peripheral surface
of the upper part of the graphite electrode 10 of the graphite electrode train, the cooling
liquid 11 reaches the lower part of the graphite electrode (not shown) which is affected
on the refing and melting in the vessel of the furnace, and even the graphite electrode
forming the lower part of the graphite electrode train is cooled.
When the spray nozzles 22 are fixed in the obliquely downward direction so that
cooling liquid 11 is sprayed in the downward direction, as shown in Fig. 2, the cooling
liquid 11 sprayed from the cooling pipe 20 is directed to the graphite electrode 10, which
is positioned at the center of the cooling pipe 20, and the cooling liquid 11 flows down
along the peripheral surface of the graphite electrode 10 as shown in Fig. 2,
and during flowing down of the cooling liquid 11, the cooling liquid 11 cools the graphite
electrode 10, and in addition even cools the graphite electrode 10 forming the lower part
of the graphite electrode train which is affected on the melting and refining in the vessel
of the furnace.
When the amount or rate of the cooling liquid to be sprayed at the upward or
downward inclination is kept in the optimal range, most of the cooling liquid 11 is free
from splashing thereof and in consequence most of the cooling liquid 11 flows down on
the peripheral surfaces of the graphite electrode train and enters the arc electric furnace
to cool even the end of the lower part of the graphite electrode train.
Further, if the flow rate of cooling liquid 11 is 6 liters/minute or below, particularly
0.8 liters/minute or less, the amount or rate of spraying of cooling liquid 11 is insufficient
even if the upward or downward inclination is in the optimum range described above,
and as a result a desired effect can not be obtained.
On the contrary, if the flow rate of cooling liquid 11 exceeds 40 liters/minute,
the graphite electrode train is provided along the whole length thereof with an excessive
cooling zone. Consequently, this causes a requirement for extra electric power for
compensational heating of excessive cooling zone. Thereby the electric power consumption
rate increases by a remarkable degree and this is unpreferable. The furnace cover is damaged
by excessive cooling liquid, and its durability is reduced significantly.
As described above, the example in which cooling liquid is sprayed from a plurality of
spray nozzles is shown. However, the cooling liquid may be sprayed from a single spray
nozzle so far as the cooling liquid is sprayed under the condition described above. In this
case, the cooling apparatus itself is allowed to be made compact.
In the case, in which the cooling liquid 11 is jetted in fan-fashion with spreading
in downward or upward inclination or divergent angle from -10 degrees to +10 degrees,
each spray nozzle 22 provided on the inside periphery of the cooling pipe 21 is structured
in such a manner as to spray the cooling liquid 11 by fan-fashioned style, such as a divergent
nozzle or the like. In case of spraying in this way, though cooling liquid 11 to be sprayed
includes partially parallel flow of the cooling liquid 11 at the jetting energy, most of the
energy generated during colliding with the graphite electrode 10 is lost owing to the fact
that it is overcome by the inclined flows enclosing the paralled flow of the cooling liquid
from opposit sides thereof. The cooling liquid 11 flows down slowly along the peripheral
surface of the graphite electrode 10 as shown in Fig. 4, and during flowing down of the
cooling liquid 11, the graphite electrode 10 is cooled, and even the lower end of the graphite
electrode 10, which corresponds to the lower part of the graphite electrode train and is
affected on the refining and melting in the furnace, is cooled.
In this case, also, it is required to maintain the amount or rate
of spraying in the suitable range of 8 to 40 liters/minute, and further the optimum rate
is determined in the suitable range corresponding to the diameter of the graphite electrode
to be used, and then the graphite electrode is cooled by spraying cooling liquid with the
optimum rate. When the graphite electrode is cooled as described above, the cooling liquid
11 is splashed partially, but the splashing is not so serious as to cause some problem.
The cooling liquid 11 flows down on the peripheral surface of each graphite electrode
10 of the graphite electrode train, and then enters the arc electric furnace, and cools even
the end of the graphite electrode, which forms the lower part of the graphite electrode
train. The graphite electrode is cooled suitably without cooling in excessive degree, and
the electrode consumption rate is reduced significantly.
In this case, the fan fashioned divergent angle or inclination is limited to the range
from -10 degrees to +10 degrees, because if the divergent angle is larger than this range,
the jetting pressure of the spraying from spraying nozzles decreases significantly, and
the flow rate of cooling liquid 11 can not be maintained in the range described above,
and further a holding effect for holding the central parallel flow by inclined flows is not
exhibited, resultin'g in the increased splashing of cooling liquid.
The lower limit of the suitable flow rate range of cooling liquid is 8 liters/minute,
because if the flow rate is less than 8 liters/minute,
the flow rate of cooling liquid is insufficient, resulting in an insufficient cooling effect.
If the flow rate of cooling liquid exceeds the upper limit of the suitable range of
40 liters/minute, cooling of the whole graphite electrode train is excessive even if the
diameter of the graphite electrode 10 is significantly large. Thereby, extra electric power
is needed for compensational heating of the excessive cooling, and thereby the electric
power unit requirement increases unpreferably. According to the invention, the graphite
electrode to be used for arc-heating of molten metal in the ladle may be cooled by spraying
the cooling liquid.
In Fig. 6, reference numeral 30 shows a ladle, which is put on a carriage 31 with
wheels 32. The ladle 30 receives a molten metal discharged from the electric arc furnace,
and moves to a secondarily melting and refining apparatus 34.
The apparatus 34 is provided with a furnace cover 35, which enables to move
upwardly and downwardly, and through which is penetrated a vertical train of graphite
electrodes 36 connected to each other by nipples.
The graphite electrode 36 consisting of a lower part of the graphite electrode train
has a lower end submerged into a slag layer 37 exisiting on a molten metal pool 33.
When the ladle 30 has a brief stop at a position beneath the
furnace cover 35, the furnace cover 35 moves downwardly so as to enclose an opening
of the ladle 30. The ladle 30 serves to conduct secondary melting and refining of the molten
metal pool 33, by utilizing the arc-heating due to the graphite electrodes 30.
During such secondary melting and refining, at least one graphite electrode 36
of electrode train is cooled by spraying the cooling liquid (not shown in Fig. 6) on the
peripheral surface of the graphite electrode 36 in the upward or downward inclination
with a angle not exceeding 60 degrees.
The rate of spraying of the cooling liquid is in a range from 2 liters/minute to 10
liters/minute, preferably 3 liters/minute to 9 liters/minute.
Namely, a spraying rate not exceeding 2 liters/minute can not carry out an efficient
cooling effect with a decrease, in a certain degree, of the electrode consumption rate,
even if the inclination of the cooling liquid to be sprayed is in an optimal range. On the
contrary, the spraying rate exceeding 10 liters/minute causes a cooling effect in excess
of the type necessary and/or possible for a graphite electrode used for secondarly melting
and refining by using the ladle, and a consequent rise of electric power consumption due
to a demand for excessive electric power.
EXAMPLE 1
Various samples of graphite electrodes as in Table 1 were used to
melt and refine scrap materials by electric arc heating in an electric
arc furnace. Each of the upper graphite electrodes of sample Nos. 1 to 8
was cooled by spraying the cooling liquid on the outer surface of the
graphite electrode in the downward inclination with angles of 15 and 20
degrees, by using the cooling pipe 21 as shown in Fig. 5.
The cooling liquid consists mainly of water and was sprayed at a
position upper the furnace cover.
The spraying rate of the cooling liquid was adjusted in accordance
with diameter of graphite electrode to be used. Thereby the electrode
consumption rate and electric power consumption rate with respect to the
electrode diameter and the spraying rate were obtained.
The results were shown in the Table 1.
Sample No. | A | B liters/min. | C kg/t | D kg/t | E (%) | F kwh/t | G kwh/t | H (%) |
| inch | mm |
1 | 16" | 400 | 6∼ 9 | 2.5 | 2.8 | 12% | 316 | 325 | 3% |
2 | 18" | 450 | 8∼12 | 1.9 | 2.2 | 16% | 411 | 431 | 5% |
3 | 20" | 500 | 10∼14 | 2.1 | 2.4 | 14% | 360 | 374 | 4% |
4 | 22" | 550 | 12∼17 | 1.9 | 2.2 | 16% | 370 | 389 | 5% |
5 | 24" | 600 | 14∼20 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 12% | 380 | 399 | 5% |
6 | 26" | 650 | 17∼24 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 12% | 360 | 378 | 5% |
7 | 28" | 700 | 20∼28 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 17% | 370 | 381 | 3% |
8 | 30" | 750 | 23∼32 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 13% | 350 | 368 | 5% |
Reference Numeral A ∼ E of table 1 is following.
A: Size of graphite electrode. B: Optimum spraying rate. C: Electrode consumption rate of optimum spraying rate. D: Electrode consumption rate of minimum spraying rate. E: Difference between two electrode consumption rates shown in
reference numerals C and D. F: Electric power consumption rate of optimum spraying rate. G: Electric power consumption rate of maximum spraying rate. H: Difference between two electric power consumption rates shown in
reference numerals F and G.
In the table 1, optimum spraying rate, minimum spraying rate and
maximum spraying rate are as followed.
As to each of 8 types of graphite electrodes with diameters
different to each other, the relation between electrode consumption rate
and electric power consumption rate was obtained.
In accordance with thus obtained relation, the spraying rate
enabling to obtain the optimum result in the consumption rates of
electrode and electric power was determined so as to meet the optimum
spraying rate.
The spraying rate not exceeding the optimum spraying rate was
determined as the minimum spraying rate.
The spraying rate exceeding the optimum spraying rate was
determined as the maximum spraying rate.
Next, in the range of optimum spraying rate of the cooling water,
electrode consumption rate in respect to each of 8 electrodes
(corresponding to Samples Nos. 1 to 8 of table 2 ) was obtained. The
results are shown in the table 2.
Sample No. | I inch | J kg/t |
1 | 16 | 2.5 |
2 | 18 | 1.9 |
3 | 20 | 2.1 |
4 | 22 | 1.9 |
5 | 24 | 1.7 |
6 | 26 | 1.5 |
7 | 28 | 1.2 |
8 | 30 | 1.6 |
The table 2 shows electrode consumption rate corresponding to the
optimum spraying rate, and has therein reference numerals I and J, which
are following.
I: Diameter of graphite electrode. J: Electrode consumption rate obtained by spraying the cooling
water in a downward inclination between 10 and 35 degrees.
The table 2 shows that the spraying rate beyond the range of the
optimum spraying rate cannot achieve a reduction in remarkable degree of
electrode consumption rate, i.e 2.5 to 1.2 kg / ton, even if the
inclination for spraying the cooling liquid ranges between 10 degrees and
35 degrees.
This shows one feature of this invention, because the cost of the
electric furnace operation consists mainly of the electrode consumption
rate.
EXAMPLE 2
Various samples of graphite electrodes shown in Table 3 were used
to melt and refine scrap materials by using electric arc heating in a
electric arc furnace.
Each of the electrodes corressponding to samples Nos. 1 to 8 was
cooled by spraying the cooling water on the outer surface of the
electrode in the downward inclination with angles shown in the table 3.
The cooling water consists mainly of water and was sprayed at a
position over the furnace cover.
The terms of spraying with the cooling water were shown in the
table 3.
Sample No. | B1 liters/min. | A1 inch | C1(kg/t) |
| | | 80° | 70° | 60 ∼ 35° |
1 | 6∼ 9 | 16 | 2.8 | 2.7 | 2.4 |
2 | 8∼12 | 18 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 1.9 |
3 | 10∼14 | 20 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 2.1 |
4 | 15∼20 | 24 | 1.9 | 1.8 | 1.6 |
5 | 12∼17 | 22 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
6 | 17∼24 | 26 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 1.5 |
7 | 20∼28 | 28 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.2 |
8 | 23∼32 | 30 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.5 |
Table 3 shows a relation between the inclination to be sprayed and
electrode consumption rate with respect to the optimum spraying rate of
the cooling water.
Reference Numeral A
1 ∼ C
1 of table 1 is following.
A1: Size of graphite electrode. B1: Optimum spraying rate of cooling water. C1: Downward inclination of the cooling water to be sprayed.
The optimum spraying rate in the table 3 was determined in same
manner as shown in Example 1.
In the range of optimum spraying rate, electrode consumption rate
with respect to diameter of graphite electrodes was obtained. The
results are shown in the table 3.
The table 3 teaches that the inclination angle exceeding 60 degree
makes an increase in the electrode consumption rate, even if the spraying
rate is in optimum range of each of electrodes with diameters different
to each other.
EXAMPLE 3
Melting and refining of the scrap materials by using electric arc
heating in the electric arc furnace employed a train of the graphite
eletrodes connected to each other by nipple.
The graphite electrode train was cooled by spraying the cooling
liquid, which was jetted in a divergent fashion with upward inclination
angle 1 and 2 of 0 degree to 10 degree.
Rate of spraying of the cooling liquid was adjusted so as to meet
diameter of the graphite electrode. The consumption rates of the
electrode and electric power with respect to electrode diameter and
spraying rate of the cooling liquid was obtained. The results are shown
in the table 4.
Sample No. | A3 | B3 liters/min. | C3 kg/t | D3 kg/t | E3 (%) | F3 kwh/t | G3 kwh/t | H3 (%) |
| inch | mm |
1 | 16" | 400 | 8∼11 | 2.5 | 2.9 | 17% | 322 | 335 | 4% |
2 | 18" | 450 | 11∼13 | 2.1 | 2.4 | 16% | 419 | 444 | 6% |
3 | 20" | 500 | 14∼18 | 2.2 | 2.5 | 14% | 367 | 385 | 5% |
4 | 22" | 550 | 16∼20 | 1.9 | 2.2 | 16% | 377 | 396 | 5% |
5 | 24" | 600 | 18∼24 | 1.6 | 1.9 | 19% | 388 | 411 | 6% |
6 | 26" | 650 | 22∼28 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 15% | 367 | 389 | 6% |
7 | 28" | 700 | 25∼33 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 16% | 377 | 392 | 4% |
8 | 30" | 750 | 28∼40 | 1.7 | 2.0 | 15% | 357 | 375 | 5% |
Reference Numeral A ∼ E of table 4 is following.
A3: Size of graphite electrode. B3: Optimum spraying rate. C3: Electrode consumption rate of optimum spraying rate. D3: Electrode consumption rate of minimum spraying rate. E3: Difference between two electrode consumption rates shown in
reference numerals C and D. F3: Electric power consumption rate of optimum spraying rate. G3: Electric power consumption rate of maximum spraying rate. H3: Difference between two electric power consumption rates shown
in reference mumerals F3 and G3.
The table 5 shows the optimum spray rate, the minimum spraying rate
and maximum spraying rate, which are determined by same manner as shown
in Example 1.
Sample No. | K3 liters/min. | I3 inch | J3 |
| | | -10° ∼ 0° | 0 ∼ +10° |
1 | 9 | 16 | 2.6 | 2.5 |
2 | 12 | 18 | 2.0 | 2.1 |
3 | 14 | 20 | 2.2 | 2.2 |
4 | 16 | 22 | 1.9 | 1.9 |
5 | 20 | 24 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
6 | 24 | 26 | 1.6 | 1.6 |
7 | 28 | 28 | 1.3 | 1.3 |
8 | 32 | 30 | 1.7 | 1.6 |
The table 5 shows K
3, I
3 and J
3 which are following.
K3: Spraying rate of cooling water. I3: Diameter of graphite electrode. J3: Electrode consumption rate obtained by spraying the cooling
water in a downward inclination of -10 degrees to 0 degree and
in an upward inclination of 0 degree to 10 degrees.
Next, the colling water in an optimum spraying rate was sprayed to
the graphite electrode in a divergent fashion with downward and upperward
inclination angles of 0 to 10 degrees, thereby obtaining a relation
between the electrode consumption rate and the inclination angle, which
is shown in Table 6.
EXAMPLE 4
The cooling test was conducted in same manner as shown in Example 1,
without spraying the cooling liquid in the downward inclination.
In the cooling test, the cooling liquid was sprayed in the upward
inclination with angles equal to 15 degrees and 20 degrees, respectively.
The cooling test had results shown in the tables 6 and 7.
Sample No. | A4 | B4 liters/min. | C4 kg/t | D4 kg/t | E4 (%) | F4 kwh/t | G4 kwh/t | H4 (%) |
| inch | mm |
1 | 16" | 400 | 6∼ 9 | 2.5 | 2.8 | 12% | 316 | 325 | 3% |
2 | 18" | 450 | 8∼12 | 1.9 | 2.2 | 16% | 411 | 431 | 5% |
3 | 20" | 500 | 10∼14 | 2.1 | 2.4 | 14% | 360 | 374 | 4% |
4 | 22" | 550 | 12∼17 | 1.9 | 2.2 | 16% | 370 | 389 | 5% |
5 | 24" | 600 | 15∼20 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 12% | 380 | 399 | 5% |
6 | 26" | 650 | 17∼24 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 12% | 360 | 378 | 5% |
7 | 28" | 700 | 20∼28 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 17% | 370 | 381 | 3% |
8 | 30" | 750 | 23∼32 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 13% | 350 | 368 | 5% |
Sample No. | K4 liters/min. | I4 inch | J4 kg/t |
1 | 9 | 16 | 2.5 |
2 | 12 | 18 | 2.0 |
3 | 14 | 20 | 2.2 |
4 | 17 | 22 | 2.0 |
5 | 20 | 24 | 1.7 |
6 | 24 | 26 | 1.6 |
7 | 28 | 28 | 1.3 |
8 | 32 | 30 | 1.6 |
Reference Numeral A
4 ∼ J
4 of tables 6 and 7 are following.
A4: Size of graphite electrode. B4: Optimum spraying rate. C4: Electrode consumption rate of optimum spraying rate. D4: Electrode consumption rate of minimum spraying rate. E4: Difference between two electrode consumption rates shown in
reference numerals C4 and D4. F4: Electric power consumption rate of optimum spraying rate. G4: Electric power consumption rate of maximum spraying rate. H4: Difference between two electric power consumption rates shown
in reference mumerals F4 and G4. K4: Spraying rate of cooling water in the optimum range. I4: Diameter of graphite electrode. J4: Electrode consumption rate obtained by spraying the cooling
water in an upward inclination of 10 degrees to 35 degrees.
EXAMPLE 5
The cooling test was conducted in same manner as shown in Example 1,
without spraying the cooling liquid in the downward inclination.
In the cooling test, the cooling liquid was sprayed in the upward
inclination with angles from 35 degrees to 80 degrees, respectively.
The cooling test had results shown in the table 8.
Sample No. | K5 liters/min. | I5 inch | J5(kg/t) |
| | | 80° | 70° | 60 ∼ 35° |
1 | 6∼ 9 | 16 | 2.9 | 2.7 | 2.4 |
2 | 8∼12 | 18 | 2.3 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
3 | 10∼14 | 20 | 2.4 | 2.3 | 2.1 |
4 | 15∼20 | 24 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 1.6 |
5 | 12∼17 | 22 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 1.9 |
6 | 17∼24 | 26 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 1.5 |
7 | 20∼28 | 28 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.2 |
8 | 23∼32 | 30 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.5 |
The table 8 shows K
5, I
5 and J
5 which are following.
K5: Spraying rate of cooling water in the optimum state. I5: Diameter of graphite electrode. J5: Electrode consumption rate obtained by spraying the cooling
water in a downward inclination from 80 degrees to 35 degrees.
EXAMPLE 6
The cooling test was conducted by using the ladle shown in Fig. 6.
The way of the cooling test is same as the combination of the ways shown
Examples 1 and 4.
The result of spraying the cooling liquid in the downward and
upward inclinations with an angle of 20 degrees is shown in Table 9.
Sample No. | A6 inch | L | M | N | O (liters/min.) |
1 | 12" | 0.50kg/t | 0.43kg/t | 14% | 4∼5 |
2 | 14" | 0.15kg/t | 0.12kg/t | 20% | 5∼6 |
3 | 16" | 0.35kg/t | 0.30kg/t | 14% | 6∼7 |
4 | 18" | 0.40kg/t | 0.35kg/t | 13% | 7∼8 |
In the table 9, terms A
6 to O are following.
A6: Size of graphite electrode to be used. L : Electrode Consumption Rate of the conventional ladle refining
process. M : Electrode Consumption Rate of the present invention. N : Inprovement of electrode consumption rate, by comparison
between this invention process and the conventional ladle
refining process. O : Spraying rate of the cooling water.