EP0743999A1 - Structural frame - Google Patents

Structural frame

Info

Publication number
EP0743999A1
EP0743999A1 EP95937593A EP95937593A EP0743999A1 EP 0743999 A1 EP0743999 A1 EP 0743999A1 EP 95937593 A EP95937593 A EP 95937593A EP 95937593 A EP95937593 A EP 95937593A EP 0743999 A1 EP0743999 A1 EP 0743999A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
struts
tetrax
frame
cubic
points
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP95937593A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0743999B1 (en
Inventor
Charles R. Owens
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US08/338,408 external-priority patent/US5615528A/en
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Publication of EP0743999A1 publication Critical patent/EP0743999A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0743999B1 publication Critical patent/EP0743999B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E04BUILDING
    • E04BGENERAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTIONS; WALLS, e.g. PARTITIONS; ROOFS; FLOORS; CEILINGS; INSULATION OR OTHER PROTECTION OF BUILDINGS
    • E04B1/00Constructions in general; Structures which are not restricted either to walls, e.g. partitions, or floors or ceilings or roofs
    • E04B1/18Structures comprising elongated load-supporting parts, e.g. columns, girders, skeletons
    • E04B1/19Three-dimensional framework structures
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E04BUILDING
    • E04BGENERAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTIONS; WALLS, e.g. PARTITIONS; ROOFS; FLOORS; CEILINGS; INSULATION OR OTHER PROTECTION OF BUILDINGS
    • E04B1/00Constructions in general; Structures which are not restricted either to walls, e.g. partitions, or floors or ceilings or roofs
    • E04B1/18Structures comprising elongated load-supporting parts, e.g. columns, girders, skeletons
    • E04B1/19Three-dimensional framework structures
    • E04B2001/1924Struts specially adapted therefor
    • E04B2001/1927Struts specially adapted therefor of essentially circular cross section
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E04BUILDING
    • E04BGENERAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTIONS; WALLS, e.g. PARTITIONS; ROOFS; FLOORS; CEILINGS; INSULATION OR OTHER PROTECTION OF BUILDINGS
    • E04B1/00Constructions in general; Structures which are not restricted either to walls, e.g. partitions, or floors or ceilings or roofs
    • E04B1/18Structures comprising elongated load-supporting parts, e.g. columns, girders, skeletons
    • E04B1/19Three-dimensional framework structures
    • E04B2001/1978Frameworks assembled from preformed subframes, e.g. pyramids
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E04BUILDING
    • E04BGENERAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTIONS; WALLS, e.g. PARTITIONS; ROOFS; FLOORS; CEILINGS; INSULATION OR OTHER PROTECTION OF BUILDINGS
    • E04B1/00Constructions in general; Structures which are not restricted either to walls, e.g. partitions, or floors or ceilings or roofs
    • E04B1/18Structures comprising elongated load-supporting parts, e.g. columns, girders, skeletons
    • E04B1/19Three-dimensional framework structures
    • E04B2001/1981Three-dimensional framework structures characterised by the grid type of the outer planes of the framework

Definitions

  • This invention relates in general to structures such as load bearing frames and trusses and more particularly to structures that provide an enhanced trade off between the stress that can be safely carried in relation to the amount of material required for the structure.
  • This enhanced strength to weight ratio is a goal of a large number of designs including many of those proposed and constructed by Richard Buc minster Fuller.
  • failure occurs because of a failure in tension rather than in compression.
  • the loads imposed primarily induce compressive stress in the material, that stress is resolved within the material by vectors which introduce tension.
  • a dome subject to load will tend to deflect in such a fashion as to introduce tension along the trusses that constitute the dome. Failure will occur because of a failure in tension.
  • This invention is in a framework type of structure composed of a plurality of struts.
  • Each strut is ideally equal in length and is deployed in such a fashion as to cause the stress applied to the structure to be resolved within the structure in a way that minimizes the creation of tensile stress.
  • the set of struts can be analyzed as a plurality of interconnected sets of building blocks. These building blocks which when interconnected constitute the framework of this invention can be looked at in three different ways. That is, depending upon where one breaks apart the set of struts which constitutes the framework of the invention, one can end up with any one of three distinctly different sets of building blocks. Two of these sets are true building blocks. The other is a bit more abstract in that individual struts do double duty and are considered as constituting edges of two or more of the particular sub frames involved.
  • a first set is a twenty strut building block which is called by Applicant a "Unicube". It is a frame in which twelve struts define a cube. From each of the eight corners of the cube, a single strut extends outward in such a fashion as to form an equal angle with each of three adjacent edge struts of the cube. A plurality of these unicubes connected by the outboard ends of the struts which extend from the corners of the cube creates a framework or truss in accordance with the teachings of this invention.
  • a second set is composed of two buildings blocks. They are tetrax frames and cubic frames.
  • Each tetrax frame is the four struts which extend from the center point of a tetrahedron to the four corners of a tetrahedron.
  • Each cubic frame is the twelve struts that define the edges of a cube. The outboard end of each tetrax strut is connected to the corner of a cubic frame and, correspondingly, each corner of a cubic frame is connected to the outboard end of a strut of a tetrax frame.
  • eight tetrax frames will extend outwardly.
  • a third set is not exactly a building block.
  • the third set is the edge frame of the truncated rhombic dodecahedron (TRD) that is disclosed in detail in the referenced patent application.
  • TRD truncated rhombic dodecahedron
  • a structure composed of the edge struts defining a plurality of truncated rhombic dodecahedra will generate the frame of this invention.
  • each edge would be common to three of these TRDs.
  • the framework of this invention is a framework which constitutes the common struts so that the three edges of adjacent TRDs are represented by a single strut rather than by three parallel coincident struts.
  • FIGs. 1 through 6 illustrate these three sets or building blocks. FIGs.
  • FIGs. 1 and 2 show two views of a unicube.
  • FIGs. 3 and 4 show the tetrax and cubic frame, respectively.
  • FIGs. 5 and 6 show two views of a TRD frame.
  • FIG. 5 shows an opaque TRD representing only the visible edges of the TRD.
  • FIG. 1 is a perspective view of the unicube in which the center cube is in opaque form so that only visible struts can be seen.
  • FIG. 2 is a perspective view of the actual unicube showing all twelve struts of the center cube and the eight outwardly extending corner struts.
  • FIG. 3 shows two views of the four strut tetrax which is also referred to herein as the tetrax frame.
  • FIG. 4 is a perspective view of a cubic frame; this cubic frame being the center cube of a unicube.
  • FIG. 5 is a perspective view of an opaque truncated rhombic dodecahedron (TRD) thereby representing only the visible edges of an opaque TRD.
  • FIG. 6 is a perspective view of an actual TRD showing all edges thereof.
  • FIG. 7 is a two dimensional aggregation of the
  • FIG. 1 unicubes showing the connection of the outwardly extending struts 14 of adjacent unicubes in essentially a shell which is shallow with respect to the plane of FIG. 8
  • a unicube consists of twenty equal struts connected to one another. Twelve of the struts define the edges of a cube and thus are a cubic frame. Eight of the struts extend outward from the eight corners of the cube in a direction so that each of these outwardly extending struts forms an equal angle with each of the three cubic frame struts to which it is connected.
  • the twelve struts that define the cube are called cubic struts and the eight struts that extend outward from the corners of the cube are called outwardly extending struts.
  • the outwardly extending struts of a single unicube each have an outer end.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a unicube.
  • a cubic frame consists of a set of struts defining the twelve edges of a cube.
  • a cubic frame constitutes one of two building blocks of an optimum structure of this invention. The other building block is the tetrax, defined below.
  • a cubic frame is illustrated in FIG. 4. Tetrax.
  • the tetrax is the four equal sized axes extending from the center point of a tetrahedron to the four corners of the tetrahedron.
  • the mutual angle between any two of the struts or legs of the tetrax is 109.47°.
  • a plurality of tetraxes and a plurality of cubic frames can be combined to create an optimum structural frame of the invention.
  • This tetrax is also called a tetrax frame herein.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates a tetrax.
  • a tetrax structure is a four strut structure or building block that approximates a tetrax.
  • the four struts are all connected to a common point. But the struts may not be equal in length and may deviate somewhat from the 109.47° angle between any two of the struts.
  • a tetrax structure may be used as a building block in an embodiment of the invention which is less than optimum. The limits of how much a tetrax structure can deviate from a tetrax frame and still be usable in some embodiment of this invention is discussed in greater detail under the detailed description.
  • Truncated Rhombic Dodecahedron (TRD .
  • FIGs. l and 2 illustrate one form of the building block of this invention. It is referred to herein as a unicube 10. As shown in FIG. 1, there are twelve struts 12 which form the edges of a cube. There are eight struts 14 which extend outward from the eight corners of the cube. Each outwardly extending strut 14 forms an equal angle with each of the three cube edge struts 12 that form the corner from which the strut 14 extends. The struts 14 and 12 are all equal in length.
  • FIG. 1 shows the cube as opaque. Since the structure itself is a series of struts, FIG. 2 is the more accurate representation.
  • the outboard ends 14E of each of the struts 14 is attached to an outboard end 14E of three other unicubes.
  • FIG. 7 is designed to illustrate and suggest this arrangement. In FIG. 7 only three, not four, ends 14E are illustrated as being connected in order to provide a clearer presentation.
  • FIG. 2 unicubes 10 connected by their strut ends 14E to each other will create an optimum frame embodiment of this invention. It should be noted that each end 14E is connected to three other ends 14E of three other unicubes. Thus any set of four connected unicubes will share only one common point.
  • FIGs. 3 and 4 illustrate another form of the building blocks of this invention.
  • One of the building blocks is a cubic frame 16 shown in FIG. 4 and the other is a tetrax frame 18 shown in FIG. 3.
  • Each cubic frame consists of twelve struts 12 defining the edges of a cube.
  • Each cubic frame 16 has eight corners.
  • Each tetrax frame 18 is constituted by four struts 14 which comprise the corner axes of a tetrahedron.
  • the four struts are equal in length, extend out from a center point 14E to which all four struts are connected and in which any two of the struts have a mutual angle of 109.47°. That is, there are six angles involved in these four struts, taking two at a time.
  • Each angle has a value of 109.47°. If the four end points 14C of these four struts are considered to be the four vertices of a regular tetrahedron, then these four struts are the four lines which extend from the center of the tetrahedron to the four vertices of the tetrahedron.
  • each tetrax is connected to a corner of a cubic frame and the corner of each cubic frame is connected to an end point 14C of a tetrax. Since there are four end points 14C to each tetrax and eight corners to a cubic frame, there are twice as many tetrax frames as there are cubic frames in the structure of this invention.
  • the tetrax frame is a true tetrax in which each strut is equal in length and has internal angles of 109.47°.
  • the internal angle is the angle between any two of the four struts. Relation Between Unicube. Cubic Frame and Tetrax.
  • Each strut 14 of a tetrax is an outwardly extending strut of a unicube in the assembled structure.
  • FIG. 7 may aid in seeing this relationship.
  • the same reference number "14" is used for the struts.
  • the cubic struts 12 of the unicube are the cubic frame 16 in the assembled structure.
  • the end point 14E of the strut 14 in the unicube is the center point of the tetrax struts.
  • the end point 14C of the tetrax struts is the corner point of the cubic frame 16.
  • center point of the cubic frames 16 is the center point of the cubes of the unicube.
  • the center point of all of the cubic frames 16 is a set of points having a relationship to each other such that each member of this set of center points will be equal distant from the twelve neighboring members of the set of points. This relationship is important because that set of points must always be spaced from the set of struts 12, 14 so as to avoid transmission of forces along a strut through those points. By avoiding the transmission of forces through the set of center points, the forces are steered in such a fashion as to minimize the development of tension.
  • tetrax structure is used herein to refer to a four strut structure based on the tetrax 18 but having less than ideal equal length struts and/or less than ideal internal angles.
  • a tetrax structure is a tetrax modelled structure that provides a significant improvement in the stress steering.
  • FIG. 7 illustrates a panel approximately two unicubes deep constructed in accordance with the teachings of this invention.
  • This network of struts 12, 14 can be used to produce a number of a wide range of building structures such as a wall truss, a floor truss, a dome and an arch as well as many other structural components.
  • the structures can be made extremely light compared to comparable structures made by other techniques because they resolve loads in terms of compression rather than in terms of tension. Thus the structures take full advantage of the high compressive strength to weight ratios as opposed to much lower tensile strength to weight ratios.
  • the struts can be made of any suitable material such as steel, aluminum, fiber, reinforced plastic or ordinary plastic struts.
  • the strut material as well as its length and cross-sectional size will be a function of the particular design requirements of the structure, involved.
  • the struts can be joined to one another using any known technique such as bolting, welding, or being cast as integral cubic and tetrax building blocks.
  • the surface of the structural frame created in accordance with this invention would normally be closed and preferably smooth in some sense.
  • the struts 12 or 14 will connect to some structure that is not part of the structural frame of this invention.
  • the framework of this invention steers stresses due to loads in such a fashion as to minimize the development of tension and resolve these stresses as stresses in compression.
  • additional reinforcing struts that do not conform to the pattern of the struts described above will normally provide no useful benefit and will usually result in some degradation from optimum performance.
  • a diagonal strut along the surface of the cubic frame 16 might appear to provide additional rigidity and strength.
  • Applicant believes that the main result of such an additional strut would be to deflect the optimum force steering created by the struts 12, 14 of this invention and thereby increase the development of tension in certain strut members. At the best such additional struts would provide no improvement in reducing tension yet create additional cost and weight.
  • additional struts that go through the center of the cubic frames 16 or through points defined by the center of the cubic frames would undercut the objectives of this structure by causing forces to be resolved in a fashion that would tend to increase the tension developed rather than minimize the tension.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Architecture (AREA)
  • Electromagnetism (AREA)
  • Civil Engineering (AREA)
  • Structural Engineering (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Joining Of Building Structures In Genera (AREA)
  • Rod-Shaped Construction Members (AREA)
  • Buildings Adapted To Withstand Abnormal External Influences (AREA)
  • Panels For Use In Building Construction (AREA)
  • Door And Window Frames Mounted To Openings (AREA)
  • Photovoltaic Devices (AREA)
  • Audible-Bandwidth Dynamoelectric Transducers Other Than Pickups (AREA)

Abstract

A structural frame is composed of a series of struts (12, 14) which are arranged in a particular fashion that steers the stress applied to the frame so as to minimize development of tension and maximize the resolution of the stress in terms of compression. The frame is composed of a plurality of unicubes (10) which are twelve equal length struts (12) arranged to form the edges of a cube and eight additional equal length struts (14) extending out from each corner of the cube. Each of the eight outwardly extending struts (14) forming an equal angle with each of the three cube edge struts (12) to which it is connected. The outboard ends (14E) of these outwardly extending struts (14) are connected together so that sets of four such outboard strut ends (14E) are connected to form a network of these unicubes (10), which network constitutes the structural frame.

Description

STRUCTURALFRAME
Reference Related To Application This application is a continuation-in-part of patent application Serial No. 08/338,408 filed on November 14, 1994 and entitled "Stress Steering Structure".
Background OfThe Invention
This invention relates in general to structures such as load bearing frames and trusses and more particularly to structures that provide an enhanced trade off between the stress that can be safely carried in relation to the amount of material required for the structure.
This enhanced strength to weight ratio is a goal of a large number of designs including many of those proposed and constructed by Richard Buc minster Fuller. In most contexts where load bearing frames and trusses are employed, failure occurs because of a failure in tension rather than in compression. Although the loads imposed primarily induce compressive stress in the material, that stress is resolved within the material by vectors which introduce tension. For example, a dome subject to load will tend to deflect in such a fashion as to introduce tension along the trusses that constitute the dome. Failure will occur because of a failure in tension. Much attention has been paid to developing materials which have great tensile strength for use in load bearing structures in such a way as to employ the tensile strength of these materials so that loads supplied will be resolved, at least in part, by the tension created in these tension members. Such an approach is outlined in the Buckminster Fuller U.S. Patent No. 3,354,591 issued in 1967. A more recent improvement on that structure is set forth in U.S. Patent No. 4,207,715 issued in 1980. This combination of tension and compression members is also disclosed in the structure shown in U.S. Patent No. 4,711,062 issued in 1987.
BriefDescription
This invention is in a framework type of structure composed of a plurality of struts. Each strut is ideally equal in length and is deployed in such a fashion as to cause the stress applied to the structure to be resolved within the structure in a way that minimizes the creation of tensile stress. The set of struts can be analyzed as a plurality of interconnected sets of building blocks. These building blocks which when interconnected constitute the framework of this invention can be looked at in three different ways. That is, depending upon where one breaks apart the set of struts which constitutes the framework of the invention, one can end up with any one of three distinctly different sets of building blocks. Two of these sets are true building blocks. The other is a bit more abstract in that individual struts do double duty and are considered as constituting edges of two or more of the particular sub frames involved.
A first set is a twenty strut building block which is called by Applicant a "Unicube". It is a frame in which twelve struts define a cube. From each of the eight corners of the cube, a single strut extends outward in such a fashion as to form an equal angle with each of three adjacent edge struts of the cube. A plurality of these unicubes connected by the outboard ends of the struts which extend from the corners of the cube creates a framework or truss in accordance with the teachings of this invention.
A second set is composed of two buildings blocks. They are tetrax frames and cubic frames. Each tetrax frame is the four struts which extend from the center point of a tetrahedron to the four corners of a tetrahedron. Each cubic frame is the twelve struts that define the edges of a cube. The outboard end of each tetrax strut is connected to the corner of a cubic frame and, correspondingly, each corner of a cubic frame is connected to the outboard end of a strut of a tetrax frame. Thus from the eight corners of a cubic frame, eight tetrax frames will extend outwardly. Correspondingly at the outboard ends the four struts of a tetrax frame, there will extend four cubic frames each of which is connected at its corner to the strut of the tetrax. Since there are four outboard ends of a tetrax frame and eight corners of a cubic frame, this arrangement requires that there be twice as many tetrax frames as cubic frames.
A third set is not exactly a building block. The third set is the edge frame of the truncated rhombic dodecahedron (TRD) that is disclosed in detail in the referenced patent application. A structure composed of the edge struts defining a plurality of truncated rhombic dodecahedra will generate the frame of this invention. However, it has to be understood that in a packed set of TRDs each edge would be common to three of these TRDs. The framework of this invention is a framework which constitutes the common struts so that the three edges of adjacent TRDs are represented by a single strut rather than by three parallel coincident struts. FIGs. 1 through 6 illustrate these three sets or building blocks. FIGs. 1 and 2 show two views of a unicube. FIGs. 3 and 4 show the tetrax and cubic frame, respectively. FIGs. 5 and 6 show two views of a TRD frame. FIG. 5 shows an opaque TRD representing only the visible edges of the TRD.
Brief Description Of The Figures
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of the unicube in which the center cube is in opaque form so that only visible struts can be seen. FIG. 2 is a perspective view of the actual unicube showing all twelve struts of the center cube and the eight outwardly extending corner struts.
FIG. 3 shows two views of the four strut tetrax which is also referred to herein as the tetrax frame. FIG. 4 is a perspective view of a cubic frame; this cubic frame being the center cube of a unicube.
FIG. 5 is a perspective view of an opaque truncated rhombic dodecahedron (TRD) thereby representing only the visible edges of an opaque TRD. FIG. 6 is a perspective view of an actual TRD showing all edges thereof.
FIG. 7 is a two dimensional aggregation of the
FIG. 1 unicubes showing the connection of the outwardly extending struts 14 of adjacent unicubes in essentially a shell which is shallow with respect to the plane of FIG. 8
Definitions
Applicant hereby adopts the following terms. These terms are used in the specification and the claims in accordance with the following definitions.
Unicube.
A unicube consists of twenty equal struts connected to one another. Twelve of the struts define the edges of a cube and thus are a cubic frame. Eight of the struts extend outward from the eight corners of the cube in a direction so that each of these outwardly extending struts forms an equal angle with each of the three cubic frame struts to which it is connected. The twelve struts that define the cube are called cubic struts and the eight struts that extend outward from the corners of the cube are called outwardly extending struts. The outwardly extending struts of a single unicube each have an outer end. FIG. 2 illustrates a unicube.
Cubic Frame.
A cubic frame consists of a set of struts defining the twelve edges of a cube. A cubic frame constitutes one of two building blocks of an optimum structure of this invention. The other building block is the tetrax, defined below. A cubic frame is illustrated in FIG. 4. Tetrax.
The tetrax is the four equal sized axes extending from the center point of a tetrahedron to the four corners of the tetrahedron. The mutual angle between any two of the struts or legs of the tetrax is 109.47°. A plurality of tetraxes and a plurality of cubic frames can be combined to create an optimum structural frame of the invention. This tetrax is also called a tetrax frame herein. FIG. 3 illustrates a tetrax.
Tetrax Structure.
A tetrax structure is a four strut structure or building block that approximates a tetrax. The four struts are all connected to a common point. But the struts may not be equal in length and may deviate somewhat from the 109.47° angle between any two of the struts. A tetrax structure may be used as a building block in an embodiment of the invention which is less than optimum. The limits of how much a tetrax structure can deviate from a tetrax frame and still be usable in some embodiment of this invention is discussed in greater detail under the detailed description.
Truncated Rhombic Dodecahedron (TRD .
This is the term applied to a rhombic dodecahedron in which the six vertices that have four edges extending therefrom are truncated. Truncating each of the six four-edge vertices of each rhombic dodecahedron at approximately the midpoint of the edge and removing the truncated portions provides the TRD as defined herein. A more extensive discussion of the TRD appears in the related application Ser. No. 08/338,408.
Description OfThe Preferred Embodiments
FIGs. l and 2 illustrate one form of the building block of this invention. It is referred to herein as a unicube 10. As shown in FIG. 1, there are twelve struts 12 which form the edges of a cube. There are eight struts 14 which extend outward from the eight corners of the cube. Each outwardly extending strut 14 forms an equal angle with each of the three cube edge struts 12 that form the corner from which the strut 14 extends. The struts 14 and 12 are all equal in length.
In order to facilitate viewing this unicube 10 building block, FIG. 1 shows the cube as opaque. Since the structure itself is a series of struts, FIG. 2 is the more accurate representation. In building the framework of this invention from the FIG. 1 unicube, the outboard ends 14E of each of the struts 14 is attached to an outboard end 14E of three other unicubes. FIG. 7 is designed to illustrate and suggest this arrangement. In FIG. 7 only three, not four, ends 14E are illustrated as being connected in order to provide a clearer presentation.
A plurality of the FIG. 2 unicubes 10 connected by their strut ends 14E to each other will create an optimum frame embodiment of this invention. It should be noted that each end 14E is connected to three other ends 14E of three other unicubes. Thus any set of four connected unicubes will share only one common point.
FIGs. 3 and 4 illustrate another form of the building blocks of this invention. One of the building blocks is a cubic frame 16 shown in FIG. 4 and the other is a tetrax frame 18 shown in FIG. 3. Each cubic frame consists of twelve struts 12 defining the edges of a cube. Each cubic frame 16 has eight corners. Each tetrax frame 18 is constituted by four struts 14 which comprise the corner axes of a tetrahedron. The four struts are equal in length, extend out from a center point 14E to which all four struts are connected and in which any two of the struts have a mutual angle of 109.47°. That is, there are six angles involved in these four struts, taking two at a time. Each angle has a value of 109.47°. If the four end points 14C of these four struts are considered to be the four vertices of a regular tetrahedron, then these four struts are the four lines which extend from the center of the tetrahedron to the four vertices of the tetrahedron.
The end point 14C of each tetrax is connected to a corner of a cubic frame and the corner of each cubic frame is connected to an end point 14C of a tetrax. Since there are four end points 14C to each tetrax and eight corners to a cubic frame, there are twice as many tetrax frames as there are cubic frames in the structure of this invention.
In the preferred embodiment, the tetrax frame is a true tetrax in which each strut is equal in length and has internal angles of 109.47°. The internal angle is the angle between any two of the four struts. Relation Between Unicube. Cubic Frame and Tetrax.
Each strut 14 of a tetrax is an outwardly extending strut of a unicube in the assembled structure. FIG. 7 may aid in seeing this relationship. Thus the same reference number "14" is used for the struts. Similarly, the cubic struts 12 of the unicube are the cubic frame 16 in the assembled structure. Thus the end point 14E of the strut 14 in the unicube is the center point of the tetrax struts. And the end point 14C of the tetrax struts is the corner point of the cubic frame 16.
Similarly the center point of the cubic frames 16 is the center point of the cubes of the unicube.
The center point of all of the cubic frames 16 is a set of points having a relationship to each other such that each member of this set of center points will be equal distant from the twelve neighboring members of the set of points. This relationship is important because that set of points must always be spaced from the set of struts 12, 14 so as to avoid transmission of forces along a strut through those points. By avoiding the transmission of forces through the set of center points, the forces are steered in such a fashion as to minimize the development of tension.
The closer the arrangement is to the preferred embodiment, the less tension will be developed. However, some deviation in uniform length of struts 12, 14 and in the center angle of the tetrax 18 as well as in the right angle of the cube 16 can be tolerated while still obtaining much of the improvement of this invention which improvement is to minimize the development of tension in the struts of the structure. Accordingly, the term tetrax structure is used herein to refer to a four strut structure based on the tetrax 18 but having less than ideal equal length struts and/or less than ideal internal angles. Thus a tetrax structure is a tetrax modelled structure that provides a significant improvement in the stress steering.
FIG. 7 illustrates a panel approximately two unicubes deep constructed in accordance with the teachings of this invention. This network of struts 12, 14 can be used to produce a number of a wide range of building structures such as a wall truss, a floor truss, a dome and an arch as well as many other structural components. The structures can be made extremely light compared to comparable structures made by other techniques because they resolve loads in terms of compression rather than in terms of tension. Thus the structures take full advantage of the high compressive strength to weight ratios as opposed to much lower tensile strength to weight ratios. It might be noted that the struts can be made of any suitable material such as steel, aluminum, fiber, reinforced plastic or ordinary plastic struts. The strut material as well as its length and cross-sectional size will be a function of the particular design requirements of the structure, involved. The struts can be joined to one another using any known technique such as bolting, welding, or being cast as integral cubic and tetrax building blocks. The surface of the structural frame created in accordance with this invention would normally be closed and preferably smooth in some sense. Thus at the boundary, the struts 12 or 14 will connect to some structure that is not part of the structural frame of this invention.
Hypothesis as to Stress Steering.
The framework of this invention steers stresses due to loads in such a fashion as to minimize the development of tension and resolve these stresses as stresses in compression.
Applicant believes that an understanding of why this occurs may best be obtained from a consideration of the TRD arrangement shown in FIGs. 5 and 6. The TRD is a closed structure having six square frames and twelve hexagon frames. Pairs of these square frames and pairs of the hexagon frames are parallel to one another. All edges are exactly equal in length. The set of struts 12, 14 that form an optimum embodiment of this invention (that is, true cubic frames and tetraxes with all equal struts) will also define TRDs. The TRDs are not strictly building blocks because each strut 12 and 14 will be common to three TRDs.
It is believed significant that the volume of this truncated rhombic dodecahedron (TRD) is very nearly equal to the volume of a regular sphere which would be inscribed within the TRD. An aggregation of independent spheres would transmit forces only in compression. Of course, they would fly apart unless they were constrained at their ends. Viewing the frame of this invention as composed of interconnected TRDs is believed to suggest why the frame steers stresses in a fashion similar to that which would occur if they were independent spheres. But because of the interconnection of the TRDs, they do not fly apart.
It is believed that additional reinforcing struts that do not conform to the pattern of the struts described above will normally provide no useful benefit and will usually result in some degradation from optimum performance. For example, a diagonal strut along the surface of the cubic frame 16 might appear to provide additional rigidity and strength. Applicant believes that the main result of such an additional strut would be to deflect the optimum force steering created by the struts 12, 14 of this invention and thereby increase the development of tension in certain strut members. At the best such additional struts would provide no improvement in reducing tension yet create additional cost and weight. Furthermore, additional struts that go through the center of the cubic frames 16 or through points defined by the center of the cubic frames would undercut the objectives of this structure by causing forces to be resolved in a fashion that would tend to increase the tension developed rather than minimize the tension.
The tetrax and cubic frame strut building blocks are so connected that each end point of a tetrax leg or strut is connected to a corner of a cubic frame strut and each corner of a cubic frame strut is connected to an end point of a tetrax strut.
It should be noted that this description of combining cubic frame and tetrax building blocks does not literally apply to the surface zone of the framework. That is, the framework has to come to an end some place.

Claims

What Is Claimed Is:
1. A structural frame comprising: a plurality of spaced apart tetrax structures, said tetrax structures having four struts extending from a common origin, each of said struts in each of said tetrax structure having an end point, said end points of said struts of eight adjacent ones of said tetrax structures constituting a first set of eight points, there being a plurality of said first set of points, each of said first sets of eight end points interconnected by a predetermined structure, the envelope of said predetermined structure encompassing one of a second set of predetermined points in said structural frame, each of said second set of points spaced an equal distance from twelve and only twelve adjacent ones of said second set of points.
2. The structural frame of claim 1 wherein: said predetermined connecting structure is a set of interconnecting struts, each of said interconnecting struts connecting end points of struts from separate ones of said tetrax structures.
3. The structural frame of claim 1 wherein: each of said tetrax structure struts is substantially 109.47° from each of the three connecting tetrax structure struts.
4. The structural frame of claim 2 wherein: each of said tetrax structure struts is substantially 109.47° from each of the three connecting tetrax structure struts.
5. The structural frame of claim 1 wherein: each of said tetrax structure struts is substantially equal in length to one another thereby constituting a tetrax.
6. The structural frame of claim 3 wherein: each of said tetrax structure struts is substantially equal in length to one another thereby constituting a tetrax.
7. The structural frame of claim 4 wherein: each of said tetrax structure struts is substantially equal in length to one another thereby constituting a tetrax.
8. The structural frame of claim 2 wherein: said predetermined connecting structure is a cubic frame.
9. The structural frame of claim 4 wherein: said predetermined connecting structure is a cubic frame.
10. The structural frame of claim 7 wherein: saidpredetermined connecting structure is a cubic frame.
11. A structural frame comprising: a plurality of interconnected tetrax frames and cubic frames, each tetrax frame having four struts extending from a common origin and each cubic frame having twelve edge struts, all of said cubic frame and tetrax frame struts being substantially equal to one another, said cubic frames and tetrax frames being interconnected such that the outboard end of each tetrax strut is connected to a corner of a cubic frame and the corner of each cubic frame is connected to the outboard end of a tetrax strut, whereby four struts extend from the center point of each tetrax frame and four struts extend from the corner of each cubic frame, and whereby the set of points determined by the center point of each cubic frame are such that each member of said set of points is spaced an equal distance from twelve and only twelve adjacent members of said set of points.
12. A building block for a structural frame comprising: a twelve strut cubic frame having eight corners, and eight outwardly extending struts, one each extending outwardly from a separate one of said eight corners, each of said outwardly extending struts having an outer end.
13. The building block of claim 12 wherein each of said twelve struts is equal in length.
14. The building block of claim 12 wherein the angles between each of said outwardly extending struts and the three cubic struts to which it is connected are all equal.
15. The building block of claim 14 wherein each of said twelve struts is equal in length.
16. The structural frame comprising: a plurality of said building block of claim 12 wherein each outer end of each of said outwardly extending struts is connected to three other outer ends of said outwardly extending struts.
17. The method of constructing a structural frame comprising the steps of: selecting a set of struts having an appropriate strength and substantially equal in size to one another, creating a set of unicubes from said set of struts, each unicube having twelve cubic struts and eight diagonal struts extending outwardly from each of the eight corners of the cubic struts, each of said eight outwardly extending struts having an outboard end, assembling said set of unicubes by connecting said outboard ends of one outwardly extending strut of four separate unicubes such that the outwardly extending struts of each corner of each unicube forms one strut of a tetrax with three outwardly extending struts of three other adjacent unicubes.
18 The method of manufacturing a structural frame comprising: selecting an appropriate set of substantially equal structural struts, connecting a first subset of said struts into a set of cubic frames, connecting a second subset of said struts into a set of tetrax frames, there being approximately twice as many tetrax frames as cubic frames, connecting an end point of each strut of each tetrax frame to a corner of a cubic frame and connecting each corner of a cubic frame to an end point of a tetrax frame.
19. The method of manufacturing a structural frame comprising: selecting an appropriate set of approximately equal structural struts, assembling a first set of said struts into a set of tetrax structures, assembling a second set of said struts into a second set of predetermined structures, having eight predetermined corner points, and connecting an end of a strut of eight separate ones of said tetrax structures to said eight corner points of each of said second set of structures, said step of connecting including connecting each tetrax strut end to a corner point of one of said second set of structures.
AMENDED CLAIMS
[received by the International Bureau on 25 April 1996 (25.04.96); original claims 1,2,11,12,16-19 amended; remaining claims unchanged (6 pages)]
1. A load bearing structural frame comprising: a plurality of spaced apart tetrax structures, said tetrax structures having four rigid compression bearing struts extending from a common origin, each of said struts in each of said tetrax structures having an end point, said end points of said struts of eight adjacent ones of said tetrax structures constituting a first set of eight points, there being a plurality of said first set of points, each of said first sets of eight end points interconnected by a predetermined rigid compression bearing structure, said predetermined structure having an envelope encompassing one of a second set of predetermined points in said structural frame, each of said second set of points spaced an equal distance from twelve and only twelve adjacent ones of said second set of points.
2. The structural frame of claim 1 wherein: said predetermined connecting structure is a set of interconnecting rigid struts, each of said interconnecting struts connecting end points of struts from separate ones of said tetrax structures. 3. The structural frame of claim 1 wherein: each of said tetrax structure struts is substantially 109.47° from each of the three connecting tetrax structure struts.
4. The structural frame of claim 2 wherein: each of said tetrax structure struts is substantially 109.47° from each of the three connecting tetrax structure struts.
5. The structural frame of claim 1 wherein: each of said tetrax structure struts is substantially equal in length to one another thereby constituting a tetrax.
6. The structural frame of claim 3 wherein: each of said tetrax structure struts is substantially equal in length to one another thereby constituting a tetrax.
7. The structural frame of claim 4 wherein: each of said tetrax structure struts is substantially equal in length to one another thereby constituting a tetrax.
8. The structural frame of claim 2 wherein: said predetermined connecting structure is a cubic frame. 9. The structural frame of claim 4 wherein: said predetermined connecting structure is a cubic frame.
10. The structural frame of claim 7 wherein: said predetermined connecting structure is a cubic frame.
11. A load bearing structural frame comprising: a plurality of interconnected tetrax frames and cubic frames, each tetrax frame having four rigid compression bearing struts extending from a common origin and each cubic 5 frame having twelve rigid compression bearing edge struts, all of said cubic frame and tetrax frame struts being substantially equal to one another, said cubic frames and tetrax frames being interconnected such that the outboard end of each tetrax strut 0 is connected to a corner of a cubic frame and the corner of each cubic frame is connected to the outboard end of a tetrax strut, whereby four struts extend from the center point of each tetrax frame and four struts extend from the corner of each cubic frame, and 5 whereby the set of points determined by the center point of each cubic frame is such that each member of said set of points is spaced an equal distance from twelve and only twelve adjacent members of said set of points. 12. A building block for a load bearing structural frame comprising: a twelve rigid compression bearing strut cubic frame having eight corners, and eight outwardly extending rigid compression bearing struts, one each extending outwardly from a separate one of said eight corners, each of said outwardly extending struts having an outer end.
13. The building block of claim 12 wherein each of said twelve struts is equal in length.
14. The building block of claim 12 wherein the angles between each of said outwardly extending struts and the three cubic struts to which it is connected are all equal.
15. The building block of claim 14 wherein each of said twelve struts is equal in length.
16. A load bearing structural frame comprising: a plurality of said building blocks of claim 12 wherein each outer end of each of said outwardly extending struts is connected to three other outer ends of said outwardly extending struts. 17. The method of constructing a load bearing structural frame comprising the steps of: selecting a set of rigid compression bearing struts having an appropriate strength and substantially equal in size to one another, creating a set of unicubes from said set of struts, each unicube having twelve cubic struts and eight diagonal struts extending outwardly from each of the eight corners of the cubic struts, each of said eight outwardly extending struts having an outboard end, assembling said set of unicubes by connecting said outboard ends of one outwardly extending strut of four separate unicubes such that the outwardly extending struts of each corner of each unicube forms one strut of a tetrax with three outwardly extending struts of three other adjacent unicubes.
18. The method of manufacturing a load bearing structural frame comprising: selecting an appropriate set of substantially equal rigid compression bearing struts, connecting a first subset of said struts into a set of cubic frames, connecting a second subset of said struts into a set of tetrax frames, there being approximately twice as many tetrax frames as cubic frames, connecting an end point of each strut of each tetrax frame to a corner of a cubic frame and connecting each corner of a cubic frame to an end point of a tetrax frame. 19. The method of manufacturing a load bearing structural frame comprising: selecting an appropriate set of approximately equal rigid compression bearing struts, assembling a first set of said struts into a set of tetrax structures, assembling a second set of said struts into a second set of predetermined structures, having eight predetermined corner points, and connecting an end of a strut of eight separate ones of said tetrax structures to said eight corner points of each of said second set of structures, said step of connecting including connecting each tetrax strut end to a corner point of one of said second set of structures.
Statement Under Article 19
The claims 1, 2, 11, 12, 16, 17, 18 and 19 are amended primarily to call for the struts as "rigid compression bearing". The frame is also now referred to as "load bearing". These amendments are to distinguish from a rope net structure that may have the same or similar configuration but which is neither rigid nor compression bearing.
EP95937593A 1994-11-14 1995-10-20 Structural frame Expired - Lifetime EP0743999B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US08/338,408 US5615528A (en) 1994-11-14 1994-11-14 Stress steering structure
US338408 1994-11-14
US399048 1995-03-08
US08/399,048 US5660003A (en) 1994-11-14 1995-03-08 Structural frame based on plurality of tetrax structures
PCT/US1995/013614 WO1996015333A1 (en) 1994-11-14 1995-10-20 Structural frame

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0743999A1 true EP0743999A1 (en) 1996-11-27
EP0743999B1 EP0743999B1 (en) 2003-04-09

Family

ID=26991179

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP95937593A Expired - Lifetime EP0743999B1 (en) 1994-11-14 1995-10-20 Structural frame

Country Status (9)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0743999B1 (en)
JP (1) JP3773952B2 (en)
CN (2) CN1074490C (en)
AT (1) ATE237044T1 (en)
AU (1) AU700621B2 (en)
CA (1) CA2180638C (en)
DE (1) DE69530287T2 (en)
IL (1) IL115937A (en)
WO (1) WO1996015333A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP4108101B2 (en) * 2006-04-21 2008-06-25 積水化学工業株式会社 3D tube building structure
EP2716828B1 (en) * 2012-10-02 2017-08-23 FESTO AG & Co. KG Lightweight construction structure
CN109162347B (en) * 2018-10-12 2023-09-26 北京科技大学 Method for modularly constructing tension integral structure
CN109853725A (en) * 2018-12-12 2019-06-07 南京工业大学 Self-control energy dissipation element suitable for unbonded prestressed concrete frame

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3139959A (en) * 1961-06-12 1964-07-07 United Aircraft Corp Construction arrangement
US3354591A (en) * 1964-12-07 1967-11-28 Fuller Richard Buckminster Octahedral building truss
US3757476A (en) * 1970-12-17 1973-09-11 Nasa Expandable space-frames
WO1981000130A1 (en) * 1979-07-03 1981-01-22 Allied Chem Structural element,tetrahedral truss constructed therefrom and method of construction
US4809146A (en) * 1986-04-07 1989-02-28 Johnson David W Enclosure with interlocking frame joints
US5125206A (en) * 1987-08-27 1992-06-30 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Truss structure
US4903452A (en) * 1987-11-24 1990-02-27 Huang Yen T Modular space framed earthquake resistant structure

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO9615333A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN1074490C (en) 2001-11-07
ATE237044T1 (en) 2003-04-15
IL115937A (en) 1999-11-30
JP3773952B2 (en) 2006-05-10
DE69530287T2 (en) 2004-02-12
AU3965895A (en) 1996-06-06
CN1179104C (en) 2004-12-08
EP0743999B1 (en) 2003-04-09
CA2180638A1 (en) 1996-05-23
DE69530287D1 (en) 2003-05-15
CN1312419A (en) 2001-09-12
CN1140479A (en) 1997-01-15
IL115937A0 (en) 1996-01-31
CA2180638C (en) 2007-07-31
WO1996015333A1 (en) 1996-05-23
JPH09507889A (en) 1997-08-12
AU700621B2 (en) 1999-01-07

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5660003A (en) Structural frame based on plurality of tetrax structures
US5921048A (en) Three-dimensional iso-tross structure
US7992353B2 (en) Space frame hub joint
US2986241A (en) Synergetic building construction
US7013608B2 (en) Self-guyed structures
US4012872A (en) Geodesic dome-like panels
US3925941A (en) Modular curved surface space structures
US5331779A (en) Truss framing system for cluster multi-level housing
US3731450A (en) Metal structure and sections
EP0743999B1 (en) Structural frame
US4622795A (en) Space frames
US4438616A (en) Space frames
CA1100713A (en) Unit construction steel bridges
JPH06200563A (en) Construction method for trussed structure
JP3636495B2 (en) Tetrahedron module for tensegrity structures
AU593522B2 (en) Improvements in and relating to building structures
CA1101626A (en) Polyhedral structures
US3868760A (en) Method of orthogonally connecting long structural members of circular and rectangular cross-section
SU996660A1 (en) Joint of spatial framework rods
Saidani et al. Investigation into a new type of multi-reciprocal grid
JPH08270892A (en) Module for constructing structure body
KR900002277B1 (en) Structural modules
Rebielak Space structures—Proposals for shaping
Rębielak PROPOSALS FOR THE APPLICATION OF SPACE STRUCTURES IN THE DESIGN OF THE MAIN SUPPORT STRUCTURES OF TALL BUILDINGS.
JPH10205004A (en) Connector to be used in truss structural body or the like

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19960814

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IE IT LI NL PT SE

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19990922

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IE IT LI NL PT SE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20030409

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20030409

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.

Effective date: 20030409

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20030409

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20030409

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20030409

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20030709

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20030709

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20030709

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20030709

NLV1 Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20031020

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20031030

ET Fr: translation filed
PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20040112

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20091015

Year of fee payment: 15

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20091014

Year of fee payment: 15

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20091029

Year of fee payment: 15

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20101020

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20101102

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20110630

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20101020

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 69530287

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20110502

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110502