EP0710050A1 - Randstrahlenstruktur - Google Patents

Randstrahlenstruktur Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0710050A1
EP0710050A1 EP95307381A EP95307381A EP0710050A1 EP 0710050 A1 EP0710050 A1 EP 0710050A1 EP 95307381 A EP95307381 A EP 95307381A EP 95307381 A EP95307381 A EP 95307381A EP 0710050 A1 EP0710050 A1 EP 0710050A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
cap
edge emitter
film
edge
active film
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP95307381A
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Inventor
Regina Mueller-Mach
Gerd O. Mueller
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
HP Inc
Original Assignee
Hewlett Packard Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Hewlett Packard Co filed Critical Hewlett Packard Co
Publication of EP0710050A1 publication Critical patent/EP0710050A1/de
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H05—ELECTRIC TECHNIQUES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • H05B—ELECTRIC HEATING; ELECTRIC LIGHT SOURCES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS FOR ELECTRIC LIGHT SOURCES, IN GENERAL
    • H05B33/00—Electroluminescent light sources
    • H05B33/12—Light sources with substantially two-dimensional radiating surfaces
    • H05B33/22—Light sources with substantially two-dimensional radiating surfaces characterised by the chemical or physical composition or the arrangement of auxiliary dielectric or reflective layers
    • H05B33/24—Light sources with substantially two-dimensional radiating surfaces characterised by the chemical or physical composition or the arrangement of auxiliary dielectric or reflective layers of metallic reflective layers
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H05—ELECTRIC TECHNIQUES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • H05B—ELECTRIC HEATING; ELECTRIC LIGHT SOURCES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS FOR ELECTRIC LIGHT SOURCES, IN GENERAL
    • H05B33/00—Electroluminescent light sources
    • H05B33/02—Details
    • H05B33/04—Sealing arrangements, e.g. against humidity
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H05—ELECTRIC TECHNIQUES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • H05B—ELECTRIC HEATING; ELECTRIC LIGHT SOURCES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS FOR ELECTRIC LIGHT SOURCES, IN GENERAL
    • H05B33/00—Electroluminescent light sources
    • H05B33/12—Light sources with substantially two-dimensional radiating surfaces

Definitions

  • the present invention relates generally to light generated by electroluminescence, and particularly to edge emitters for emitting light generated by electroluminescence.
  • an edge emitter emitting light through electroluminescence has a structure with multiple films, known as a thin film electroluminescent stack.
  • the stack typically includes five films, a conductive electrode, an insulating film, an active film, another insulating film and another electrode.
  • the basic idea is to excite dopant ions in the active film. When the excited dopants relax, light is generated. Voltages on the top and bottom electrodes create electric fields for excitation.
  • FIG. 1 shows a representation of the top view of this structure.
  • the intersection of the two strips defines a pixel.
  • the pixel has a length of 1 and a width of w.
  • the width w is much smaller than the length 1.
  • the film stack is fabricated so that one of the width sides is exposed to form the edge of the edge emitter. The idea is to have a large area generating light, and a small edge to define the size of a small beam of emitted light.
  • Light is generated in the active film between the two strips. After generation, most of the light propagates laterally in the film stack across the entire sheet through total internal reflections. Preferably, all the light generated should be directed to the narrow edge. However, due to the geometry of the film stack, only a small percentage of the light comes out from the edge.
  • the edge emitter is used for the print head of a 600 dots-per-inch (dpi) printer, there should be many pixels on a line, one adjacent to the other. Each pixel is responsible for one dot of the printer. In this embodiment, the width of each dot is about 0.035mm. Based on a pixel length of 3 mm and common edge emitter materials, a light power of 20,000 nW can be generated under each pixel. Although the power generated is high, probably, only about 70 nW will be coupled out through the edge. This gives a 0.35% optical efficiency.
  • One approach to increase the optical output is to increase the area of the pixel to generate more light. To keep the light beam from the edge small, the width has to be small. Therefore, the way to increase the area is to increase the length of the pixel.
  • the film stack has attenuation. Measured attenuation lengths of a typical film stack lie in the range of 0.07 to 0.5 mm. Further increasing the length of a pixel will not increase the power emitted.
  • the present invention seeks to provide an improved edge emitter.
  • an edge emitter as specified in claim 1.
  • the present invention can provide an edge emitter with significantly higher optical efficiency and in which a significantly higher percentage of light generated by each pixel can be directed towards its corresponding edge instead of propagating along the sheet in undesirable directions.
  • a cap is provided on top of a thin film electroluminescent stack which gathers, guides and re-directs a significant portion of generated radiation into the direction of the edge of the edge emitter.
  • the preferred embodiment has a stack with a top transparent electrode, a bottom reflective electrode and an active film in between; the top electrode is directly under the cap, which is preferably thicker than the thin film electroluminescent stack.
  • the cap is made of a material with a lower attenuation than the film stack, and a refractive index substantially matched to that of the active film.
  • At least the top surface and all the side surfaces of the cap, except the side surface adjacent to the edge, are preferably smooth and reflecting surfaces. Generated radiation is preferably coupled out from the surface adjacent to the edge or the emitting side surface.
  • the optical efficiency still showed a 100% improvement.
  • the cap is preferably about 10 times thicker than the active film.
  • the elements of the emitter are preferably chosen such that the wavelength of the electroluminescent radiation is larger than the thickness of any one element selected from the group of the electrode and the films, except the active film.
  • the radiation may be light.
  • the invention also extends to a printer incorporating an edge emitter of the type specified herein.
  • Figure 2 shows a system 100 with an array 106 of preferred edge emitters 108.
  • the array 106 is on a glass substrate 102.
  • the system also shows a driver with multiplexers 104 running the edge emitters.
  • the driver with multiplexers 104 will not be further described because they should be obvious to those skilled in the art. With the appropriate drive, each edge emitter would emit electromagnetic radiation, such as the radiation 109.
  • Figure 3A shows a cross-section of a preferred embodiment of an edge emitter 110.
  • the emitter is made of a cap 112 situated on top of a thin film electroluminescent stack to form a modified edge emitter.
  • this modified edge emitter is simply referred to as an edge emitter.
  • the thin film electroluminescent stack preferably includes a transparent electrode 114; two insulating films, 116 and 120, sandwiching the active film 118; and a reflective electrode 122.
  • the electrodes are conductive.
  • Electric fields are applied across the active film 118, such as by connecting a voltage source 124 on the two electrodes.
  • the electric field across the active film excites dopant ions in the active film 118; and ther the excited dopants relax to generate radiation.
  • the fabrication processes of the preferred embodiments will not be described because such processes should be obvious to those skilled in the art.
  • the preferred embodiment 110 shows the transparent and the reflective electrodes well registered, with one directly on top of the other.
  • one electrode can be much wider than another. It is only in the regions of overlap that there will be excitation and recombination.
  • the reflective electrode 122, the two insulating films, 120 and 116, and the transparent electrode 114 are quite thin; the active film 118 is thicker, but the cap 112 is even thicker than the active film.
  • the insulating film 120 on top of the reflective electrode fills in the gap between adjacent reflective electrodes, such as in the region 140.
  • the reflective electrode 122 is much wider than the transparent electrode 114.
  • the refractive index of the active film 118 is different from the refractive indexes of the insulating films.
  • the insulating films are quite thin relative to the wavelength of the radiation generated in the active film. Thus, the effect of the mismatch in refractive indexes between the active film and the insulating films is very small.
  • Materials for the cap should be selected according to their electromagnetic properties. This includes their refractive indexes, which should be similar to the index of the active film so as to enhance coupling of the radiation generated in the active film 118 into the cap 112.
  • the cap should be made of a material with less attenuation per unit length of the generated radiation than the active film 118. Other factors to consider are the manufacturability of the cap on the transparent electrode in the desired dimensions. This includes the achievable smoothness of the surfaces, which is important, as will be explained.
  • the cap 112 has four side surfaces 132, 134, 136, 138, and a top surface 130.
  • radiation is directed to go out from one of the side surfaces (the emitting side surface 132) and from the edge 142 of the active film 118.
  • the radiation is emitted along the x-direction.
  • the emitting side surface 132 is made to have a higher transmission than the other side surfaces (the reflecting side surfaces 134, 136 and 138) and the top surface 130.
  • Figure 3B shows another preferred embodiment 150 of edge emitter. It has two capped structures, 152 and 154.
  • the reflective electrode 156 is common for both structures.
  • each cap structure has its own transparent electrode, such as the cap 154 has the transparent electrode 158, and the cap 152 has the electrode 162.
  • a first method is to have a smooth top surface and reflecting side surfaces; optically, this means that those surfaces have high finesse.
  • the emitting side surface is roughened, such as by sandblasting it.
  • a second method is to metallize the top surface and the reflecting side surfaces.
  • a third method is to coat a film of material with a refractive index much lower than that of the cap on the reflecting side surfaces and the top surface. The mismatch in refractive indexes reflect incident radiation on those surfaces.
  • a fourth method combines the second and the third method by first forming the low refractive index material on those surfaces and then metallize them.
  • the emitting side surface 132 of the cap may not have to coincide with the edge 142 of the stack; it may extend beyond the edge. This may improve the ease in manufacturability of the edge emitter.
  • the transparent electrode 114 also extends beyond the edge with the cap.
  • Figure 4 shows another preferred embodiment of edge emitter showing a sixth method to increase the reflection of the top surface.
  • the top surface 170 of a cap 172 is grooved to redirect light penetrating through the transparent electrode 174 of a thin film electroluminescent stack under small angles towards the emitting side surface 176. If the top surface is just smoothed, without other enhancement on its reflectivity, most of the incident radiation, except those within a cone, will still be reflected.
  • the angle of the cone is the critical angle of the cap material.
  • a cap material with refractive index of 2.3 would reflect about 90% of the incident light.
  • the grooved structure further redirects a significant portion of the radiation within the cone towards the emitting side surface. Thus, radiation penetrating through the transparent electrode under small angles is also re-directed towards the emitting side surface.
  • Figure 5 shows a ray diagram comparing the paths of the generated radiation between the prior art and one perspective of the preferred embodiment of edge emitter 110.
  • the perspective is a cross-section parallel to the reflecting side surface 134.
  • radiation generated at 200 is directed across the active film 118 before it is radiated out of the edge emitter 110.
  • the guiding is done through numerous total internal reflections, as shown by the path 202.
  • radiation generated at 200 propagates to the cap 112.
  • the cap is thicker than the active film 118. This leads to fewer total internal reflections before the radiation hits the emitting side surface 132.
  • radiation 200 follows the path 204 with one total internal reflection before it goes out of the emitting side surface 132.
  • the attenuation per unit length of the cap 112 is less than that of the active film 118.
  • a higher percentage of the light generated radiates out of the emitter 110.
  • a thicker cap improves the guiding of the radiation towards the emitting side surface because a thicker cap reduces the number of internal reflectionsbetween the top surface and the thin film electroluminescent stack before emission.
  • the cap should not be too thick. This is because a thick cap increases the size of the beam of radiation coming out of the emitter.
  • Figure 6 shows a ray diagram comparing the paths of the generated radiation between the prior art and another perspective of the preferred embodiment of edge emitter 110. This perspective is the cross-section parallel to the emitting side surface 132.
  • radiation generated at 250 is guided along the plane of the active film through the path 252 by numerous total internal reflections. Such a radiation just propagates along the thin film electroluminescent stack and is typically lost and will not radiate from the edge 142 of the active film 118.
  • the radiation generated follows the path 254 in the cap.
  • the emitting side surface is more transmissive than all the side surfaces and the top surface.
  • the radiation path 254 is not absolutely parallel to the emitting side surface 132, ultimately, if the radiation is not attenuated, the radiation would go out of the emitting side surface 132. This is achieved by internal reflections along "spiralling" paths.
  • the reflecting electrode 122 is made of aluminum.
  • the two insulating films are made of siliconoxinitride, with a refractive index of about 1.7.
  • the active film is made of zinc sulphide doped with manganese.
  • the refractive index of the active film is about 2.3.
  • the transparent electrode is made of indium tin oxide, with a refractive index of about 2. Zinc oxide may also be used as the transparent electrode.
  • the cap is made of acrylics with a refractive index of 1.56.
  • the reflecting electrode has a thickness (y-direction) of about 100nm (1000 Angstroms); the two insulating films have thicknesses of about 200nm (2000 Angstroms); the active film is about 1 micron thick; and the transparent electrode is about 200nm (2000 Angstroms) thick.
  • the cap is about 10 micrometres thick (y-direction), 0.07mm wide (z-direction) and 3mm long (x-direction).
  • the reflecting side surfaces and the top surface are metallized by aluminum with a thickness of about 100nm (1000 Angstroms).
  • the reflective performance can be further improved if there is a film with a refractive index lower than that of the cap, such as cryolite, between the cap and the metallized surface.
  • Cryolite has a refractive index of 1.33.
  • the electroluminescent radiation is yellow, with a wavelength of 600 nm.
  • the optical efficiency of the above structure increases by about 100%, as compared to a similar structure without the cap 112. Note that in the above structure, the cap material is not perfectly matched to the active film material.
  • the preferred thin film electroluminescent stack described is made of five films, the transparent electrode, the first insulating film, the active film, the second insulating film and the reflective electrode.
  • the stack may only have the first insulating film or may only have the second insulating film.
  • the reflective electrode is not reflective, but is just an electrode; for this embodiment, the edge emitter may not be as efficient because some of the radiations propagate through the "reflective electrode.”
  • cap such as a chalcogenide glass, with a refractive index of 2.1 to 2.6, and BCB, a commonly known plastic material, with a refractive index of 1.5. Similar to the acrylics, BCB is relatively easy to form cap structures. Different materials with different refractive indexes can be used. In general, a better match in refractive index between the cap and the active film would provide an edge emitter with a higher efficiency.
  • chalcogenide glass with a refractive index of 2.1 to 2.6
  • BCB a commonly known plastic material, with a refractive index of 1.5. Similar to the acrylics, BCB is relatively easy to form cap structures. Different materials with different refractive indexes can be used. In general, a better match in refractive index between the cap and the active film would provide an edge emitter with a higher efficiency.
  • the preferred embodiments have an emitting side surface having a higher transmission than the other side surfaces.
  • the emitting side surface has a higher transmission than at least one side surface, such as the surface 136, which is directly opposite to the emitting surface 132 in Figure 3A. This is achieved, for example, by roughening the emitting side surface, or by making one side surface reflective.
  • radiations generated have a certain preferred directivity; more radiations emit from the roughened surface than from the reflecting surface, or more radiations propagate along directions away from the reflecting surface.
  • Another improvement to the preferred embodiment is to curve the emitting side surface of the cap into a lens structure to generate lens action, improve outcoupling and/or the angular distribution of the emitted radiation. Similar results may be achieved by Fresnel grooving the emitting side surface. Methods to achieve such curving or grooving are well-known to those skilled in the art and will not be further described.
  • the preferred embodiments have a cap which is a rectangular block.
  • the cap may be made of other structures with more side surfaces or curved surfaces; an example is shown in Figure 7, with the cap 402 having a curved top surface sitting on a thin film stack 404.
  • the side surface 404 has a higher transmission coefficient than other surfaces.
  • Figure 8 shows another preferred embodiment in which a cap 502 encapsulates an electroluminescent film stack 504; both the cap and the film stack sits on a substrate 506.
  • the bottom surface 508 of the cap 502 is also a reflecting surface.
  • the preferred embodiments can be used in a printer 600, as shown in Figure 9, with the thin film electroluminescent sources as pixel illuminators.
  • the cap gathers, guides and re-directs radiations generated into the direction of the edge. This, in turn, significantly increases the optical efficiency of an edge emitter.

Landscapes

  • Electroluminescent Light Sources (AREA)
EP95307381A 1994-10-27 1995-10-17 Randstrahlenstruktur Withdrawn EP0710050A1 (de)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US33015294A 1994-10-27 1994-10-27
US330152 1994-10-27

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0710050A1 true EP0710050A1 (de) 1996-05-01

Family

ID=23288523

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP95307381A Withdrawn EP0710050A1 (de) 1994-10-27 1995-10-17 Randstrahlenstruktur

Country Status (2)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0710050A1 (de)
JP (1) JPH08213167A (de)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0748145A2 (de) * 1995-06-07 1996-12-11 Hewlett-Packard Company Elektrolumineszente Vorrichtung als Scannerquelle
EP0794688A1 (de) * 1996-03-04 1997-09-10 Hewlett-Packard Company Lateraler Lichtstrahler mit Kappe

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0515174A1 (de) * 1991-05-23 1992-11-25 Westinghouse Electric Corporation TFEL-Randstrahlenmodul mit hermetisch abgedichteter fester Bedeckung, die über eine lichtemittierende Seite angeordnet ist und einen angepassten Brechungskoeffizient aufweist

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0515174A1 (de) * 1991-05-23 1992-11-25 Westinghouse Electric Corporation TFEL-Randstrahlenmodul mit hermetisch abgedichteter fester Bedeckung, die über eine lichtemittierende Seite angeordnet ist und einen angepassten Brechungskoeffizient aufweist

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0748145A2 (de) * 1995-06-07 1996-12-11 Hewlett-Packard Company Elektrolumineszente Vorrichtung als Scannerquelle
EP0748145A3 (de) * 1995-06-07 1998-10-14 Hewlett-Packard Company Elektrolumineszente Vorrichtung als Scannerquelle
EP0794688A1 (de) * 1996-03-04 1997-09-10 Hewlett-Packard Company Lateraler Lichtstrahler mit Kappe
US5811931A (en) * 1996-03-04 1998-09-22 Hewlett Packard Company Capped edge emitter

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPH08213167A (ja) 1996-08-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5131065A (en) High luminance and contrast flat display panel
US5910706A (en) Laterally transmitting thin film electroluminescent device
US20060081858A1 (en) Light emitting device with omnidirectional reflectors
US6160273A (en) Diode pumped solid state edge emitting light source
JP2003257227A (ja) 照明装置およびそれを備える表示装置ならびに導光板
WO1995000974A1 (en) Blue light-emitting diode with high external quantum efficiency
US20060267485A1 (en) Organic light emitting diode (oled) with contrast enhancement features
US7548371B2 (en) Optical film, illuminator and display
US5907160A (en) Thin film organic light emitting diode with edge emitter waveguide
KR19990020920A (ko) 플라즈마 표시장치
US5811931A (en) Capped edge emitter
KR101543672B1 (ko) 백라이트 유닛
EP0710050A1 (de) Randstrahlenstruktur
JPH0262847B2 (de)
US20040066123A1 (en) Organic electroluminescene display
EP4246600A1 (de) Resonanzhohlraumstruktur mit wellenlängenumwandlungsmaterial
JPS6391998A (ja) Ｅｌ発光アレイ
JPH08293382A (ja) 指向性線光源としてのエッジエミッタ
JP2003168553A (ja) 有機ｌｅｄ素子
JP2814784B2 (ja) 端面発光型薄膜ｅｌ素子
GB2296378A (en) Guiding light in electroluminescent devices
KR20030044822A (ko) 전방 라이트용 도광판
JP2003217824A (ja) 有機発光素子、並びに該有機発光素子を用いた発光素子アレイ、投光機、光書き込み装置、表示素子、および電子写真方式のプリンター
JPH0897514A (ja) 半導体発光素子
JP2002131747A (ja) 反射型液晶表示装置及びそれに用いられる光学多層膜

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): DE FR GB

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: MUELLER, GERD O.

Inventor name: MUELLER-MACH, REGINA

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 19961105