EP0591854B1 - Dispositif pour neutraliser une mine marine - Google Patents
Dispositif pour neutraliser une mine marine Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP0591854B1 EP0591854B1 EP19930115860 EP93115860A EP0591854B1 EP 0591854 B1 EP0591854 B1 EP 0591854B1 EP 19930115860 EP19930115860 EP 19930115860 EP 93115860 A EP93115860 A EP 93115860A EP 0591854 B1 EP0591854 B1 EP 0591854B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- mine
- charge
- sea
- water
- destructive charge
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B63—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
- B63G—OFFENSIVE OR DEFENSIVE ARRANGEMENTS ON VESSELS; MINE-LAYING; MINE-SWEEPING; SUBMARINES; AIRCRAFT CARRIERS
- B63G7/00—Mine-sweeping; Vessels characterised thereby
- B63G7/02—Mine-sweeping means, Means for destroying mines
Definitions
- the invention relates to a device according to the preamble of claim 1.
- a device for incapacitating a localized sea mine by means of a destruction charge brought into its vicinity by a carrier vehicle is known from WO 90/01445.
- the annihilation charge is intended for the detonation pressure effect from below the sea mine.
- the device mentioned is intended for combating an anchor mine.
- An underwater drone maneuvers the device, which is designed as a mine clearing device, onto the anchor rope of the anchor mine.
- a controllable eyelet device ensures the slidable mounting of the mine clearing device on the anchor rope.
- the mine clearance device rises up along the anchor rope to the mine.
- the anchor mine is destroyed by detonating an explosive charge on the mine clearance device.
- the explosive charge of the anchor mine is laterally offset to guide the anchor rope on the mine clearing device, so that the detonation pressure effect occurs from the side below the anchor mine.
- Combating a sea bed mine silted up in the ground is not very effective with this mine clearing device.
- the mine hunting flotilla can verify the actually triggered detonation of the extermination charge carried by the remote-controlled carrier vehicle through underwater listening systems, as well as visually on the basis of the water fountain raised during the detonation - but whether the object (located with a greater or lesser degree of uncertainty than an intact seabed mine) really became inoperable as a result of our own explosion, or at least as a result of severe equipment damage, is very uncertain.
- the invention has for its object to provide a device of the generic type, which provides partially or entirely in the soft ground seabed mines a much greater probability of destruction than can be achieved with destruction charges that are conventionally close to one located mine on the ground and ignited.
- At least one blowing nozzle is provided on the underside of the structure of the extermination charge.
- the extermination charge is brought by means of a remote-controlled carrier vehicle to the location at which a seabed mine was previously identified with sufficient probability, for example by using a mine hunting sonar, as described in DE-OS 32 21 013.
- the precise localization of the remote control vehicle designed in the manner of an underwater drone is carried out using on-board means, which can also be a sonar, or simply a metal sensor.
- the annihilation charge is placed close to or above the sea mine, whereupon at least one blowing nozzle oriented downward on the structure of the annihilation charge is activated in order to drive the soil under the annihilation charge laterally in the case of a soft bottom of the water and thereby flush it in. So the extermination charge comes to lie laterally below the sea mine, and from this position the sea mine can be fought particularly reliably with the upward-oriented effect of the extermination charge, especially since the sediment beneath the bottom of the body of water has a performance-enhancing effect in the direction of the overlying mine .
- an annihilation charge 11 is brought as close as possible to a sea mine 13, which rests on or in the water bottom 14, by means of a carrier vehicle 12.
- the extermination charge 11 is intended for the warhead 15 of the sea mine 13 detonate or in any case damage the sea mine 13 in terms of its essential functional parts in such a way that it can no longer be detonated by the signature of a passing vehicle, ie no longer represents an effective mine block.
- the position of the sea mine 13 on the body of water 14 is usually first recorded and measured by mine hunting units, in order to then carry the carrier vehicle 12 - typically an underwater drone - remotely controlled via this position for the actual combat.
- the carrier vehicle 12 has a sensor system 16, for example a sediment sonar or a metal detector, in order to be able to detect sea mines 13 that have been fully sent in at the bottom of the water 14.
- the remote control of the carrier vehicle 12 is expediently carried out via a cable 17 in order to transmit the classification and position information present on the command ship to the sensor system 16 at a high data rate and to be able to send current sensor information to be correlated therefrom.
- the cable remote control has the advantage of greater intrinsic safety because it can reliably prevent the carrier vehicle 12 from being oriented against an escort from the mine hunting flotilla due to inaccuracies in the location specification.
- the destruction charge 11 is dropped or deposited at the location of the relocalized sea mine 13 above the water bed 14.
- it is provided according to FIG. 2 to place the carrier vehicle 12 on the water bed 14 and open it after charging the electrical ignition circuits for the destruction charge 11 in such a way that the destruction charge 11 remains exactly in the right position.
- the carrier vehicle 12 with respect to its drive part 18 (rear area) and with regard to its navigation part 19 (front area), for example, by means of to lift pyrotechnically activated force elements in the longitudinal direction of the vehicle from the destruction charge 11 so that it is then exposed.
- the carrier vehicle 12 as such is a loss if these structural parts 18, 19 are not equipped with buoyancy chambers 20, from which ballast water is displaced, for example, by means of pyrotechnic reaction gases in order to cause the parts 18, 19 to rise hydrostatically from the body of water 14 so that they then can be salvaged on the water surface for new equipment with a destruction charge 11.
- At least one blowing nozzle 21 oriented downwards is activated.
- This can be a water jet effect, but preferably the reaction gas jet of a pyrotechnic incendiary device. If the sea mine 13 rests on a solid surface, the function of the blowing nozzle 21 has no special effect. However, if the sea mine 13 has sunk into compliant subsoil (in particular sand or silt), then this soil 22 is blown away by the nozzle 21 under the deposited destruction charge 11, so that it is washed into the water bed 14 to a certain extent (as illustrated in FIG. 3) .
- the blowing nozzle 21 In terms of equipment, it is entirely sufficient for the blowing nozzle 21 to be effective over a predetermined period of time, which is given, for example, by the capacity of a fire. Because the dimensions of the annihilation charge 11 are significantly smaller than those of the sea mine 13, it is more than likely that the annihilation charge 11 will have sunk deeper into the bottom of the water 14 than the closely adjacent sea mine 13 itself at the end of the effectiveness of the blowing nozzle 21. With the burning out of the blowing nozzle 21 is therefore then the detonator 23 of the annihilation charge 11 is initiated and the sea mine 13 is thus strained from below by the detonation pressure waves.
- the pressure wave propagation is bundled in the direction of the still open flushing funnel 24, so that it has an increased performance against the sea mine 13 and disables it by detonation or in any case serious equipment damage. Because of the detonation pressure of the extermination charge 11, which detonation pressure 11 acts against the mine 13 with a performance-enhancing effect from below, this is reliably achieved even when the stretched-cylindrical mine 13 is more or less upright partially sunk into the soil 22 and only partially out of the water bed 14 is a constellation that is often encountered in practice, but which offers too little of an attack surface for the mechanisms of action of the conventional control methods.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
- Geophysics And Detection Of Objects (AREA)
- Earth Drilling (AREA)
Claims (6)
- Dispositif de désarmement d'une mine marine (13) localisée, au moyen d'une charge de destruction (11) placée à proximité depuis un véhicule porteur (12), la charge de destruction (11) ayant été optimisée pour obtenir un effet de pression de détonation à partir d'un point situé latéralement et au-dessous de la mine marine (13) et la charge de destruction présentant une tête militaire constituée d'explosif, caractérisé en ce que la charge de destruction (11) est équipée d'une buse de soufflage (21) orientée vers le bas, destinée à souffler dans le sol (22) meuble du fond marin (14), à proximité de la mine marine (13).
- Dispositif selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que le principe de fonctionnement de la buse de soufflage (21) repose sur l'effet d'une projection d'eau.
- Dispositif selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que le principe de fonctionnement de buse de soufflage (21) repose sur l'effet d'une projection de gaz.
- Dispositif selon la revendication 3, caractérisé en ce que la buse de soufflage (21) est équipée d'une charge combustible pyrotechnique destinée à envoyer des gaz de réaction.
- Dispositif selon l'une des revendication précédentes, caractérisé en ce que la charge de destruction (11) est susceptible d'être sortie du véhicule support (12), une partie entraînement (18) et/ou une partie navigation (19) étant séparées de la charge de destruction (11).
- Dispositif selon la revendication 5, caractérisé en ce que les parties de logement (18, 19) séparées de la charge de destruction (11) sont équipées de chambres de force portante.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE19924233444 DE4233444A1 (de) | 1992-10-05 | 1992-10-05 | Einrichtung zum Außer-Gefecht-Setzen einer Seemine |
DE4233444 | 1992-10-05 |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP0591854A1 EP0591854A1 (fr) | 1994-04-13 |
EP0591854B1 true EP0591854B1 (fr) | 1996-03-06 |
Family
ID=6469673
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP19930115860 Expired - Lifetime EP0591854B1 (fr) | 1992-10-05 | 1993-10-01 | Dispositif pour neutraliser une mine marine |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP0591854B1 (fr) |
DE (2) | DE4233444A1 (fr) |
DK (1) | DK0591854T3 (fr) |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6951138B1 (en) * | 2000-11-01 | 2005-10-04 | Westerngeco L.L.C. | Method and apparatus for an ocean bottom seismic acquisition technique |
Family Cites Families (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3117518A (en) * | 1947-04-15 | 1964-01-14 | Louis F Porter | Apparatus for cutting encased explosives |
DE2314772C3 (de) * | 1973-03-24 | 1984-08-30 | Messerschmitt-Bölkow-Blohm GmbH, 8000 München | Unterwassersprengkörper |
FR2479129B1 (fr) * | 1980-03-27 | 1985-08-02 | Eca | Liaison sous-marine par fil |
DE3826653C1 (fr) * | 1988-08-05 | 1989-12-07 | Rheinmetall Gmbh, 4000 Duesseldorf, De | |
DE3915577A1 (de) * | 1989-05-12 | 1990-11-15 | Rheinmetall Gmbh | Vorrichtung zur vernichtung von ankertauminen |
-
1992
- 1992-10-05 DE DE19924233444 patent/DE4233444A1/de not_active Withdrawn
-
1993
- 1993-10-01 EP EP19930115860 patent/EP0591854B1/fr not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1993-10-01 DE DE59301787T patent/DE59301787D1/de not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1993-10-01 DK DK93115860T patent/DK0591854T3/da active
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP0591854A1 (fr) | 1994-04-13 |
DK0591854T3 (da) | 1996-07-22 |
DE59301787D1 (de) | 1996-04-11 |
DE4233444A1 (de) | 1994-04-07 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP1791754B1 (fr) | Procede et systeme pour detruire une mine localisee | |
EP2607226B1 (fr) | Appareil de stockage de moyens de combat pour stocker des moyens de combat, comme des mines sous-marines, sous l'eau, combinaison de stockage de moyens de combat avec un véhicule sous-marin non habité et un tel appareil de stockage de moyens de combat, et procédé associé | |
EP2930099B1 (fr) | Drague de munitions non explosées, comme des mines sous-marines, véhicule sous-marin non habité doté d'une telle drague de munitions non explosées et procédé associé | |
DE69503915T2 (de) | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur vernichtung von unterwassergegenständen, insbesondere von seeminen | |
DE3626434C2 (fr) | ||
DE69202045T2 (de) | Verfahren zur Zerstörung eines Unterwassergegenstandes, insbesondere einer Seemine. | |
EP3527928B1 (fr) | Dispositif et procédé d'élimination d'un matériel militaire non explosé sous l'eau | |
EP0591854B1 (fr) | Dispositif pour neutraliser une mine marine | |
EP0211149B1 (fr) | Dispositif pour la destruction de mines marines, notamment de mines à câble d'ancre | |
DE102005062109A1 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Abwehr von unter Wasser eindringenden Personen | |
DE2211524A1 (de) | Panzermine | |
DE2128147A1 (de) | Vorrichtung zum Kappen der Ankertaue oder dergleichen von Seeminen | |
DE68911685T2 (de) | Vorrichtung und verfahren zur entdeckung und vernichtung von unterseeboten aus einem plugzeug. | |
DE69911884T2 (de) | Munition für gegenmassnahmen | |
DE60107181T2 (de) | Verfahren zum neutralisieren einer nutzlast | |
DE69102429T2 (de) | Verfahren zum bekämpfen von torpedos. | |
EP3007966B1 (fr) | Dispositif et procédé servant à neutraliser des moyens de combat | |
DE3624409C1 (en) | Sea-mine destroyer device | |
DE69909220T2 (de) | Unterwasserschutzladung | |
DE3921491C2 (fr) | ||
EP0963907B1 (fr) | Dispositif de retenue pour neutraliser des mines | |
DE3147866C1 (en) | Underwater mine for attacking surface ships | |
DE19619571B4 (de) | Verfahren zur Vernichtung von Treibminen | |
DE2123229C1 (de) | Sprengkörper zum Schutze eines Objektes gegen Angreifer | |
DE977744C (de) | Einrichtung zum Schutz von Seeminensperren, insbesondere von solchen, die aus Fernzuendungsminen bestehen |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 19931218 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): DE DK FR NL |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 19950310 |
|
GRAH | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): DE DK FR NL |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 59301787 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 19960411 |
|
ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: T3 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed | ||
NLT1 | Nl: modifications of names registered in virtue of documents presented to the patent office pursuant to art. 16 a, paragraph 1 |
Owner name: DIEHL STIFTUNG & CO. |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20030828 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Payment date: 20031027 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20031030 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20031217 Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20041101 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20050501 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20050503 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: EBP |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20050630 |
|
NLV4 | Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee |
Effective date: 20050501 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST |