EP0565865B1 - Method and arrangement to allocate requested hall calls to the cabins of an elevator group - Google Patents

Method and arrangement to allocate requested hall calls to the cabins of an elevator group Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0565865B1
EP0565865B1 EP19930103915 EP93103915A EP0565865B1 EP 0565865 B1 EP0565865 B1 EP 0565865B1 EP 19930103915 EP19930103915 EP 19930103915 EP 93103915 A EP93103915 A EP 93103915A EP 0565865 B1 EP0565865 B1 EP 0565865B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
simulator
solution
equipment
situation
traffic
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP19930103915
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0565865A1 (en
Inventor
Patrick Chenais
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Inventio AG
Original Assignee
Inventio AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=4205803&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP0565865(B1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Inventio AG filed Critical Inventio AG
Publication of EP0565865A1 publication Critical patent/EP0565865A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0565865B1 publication Critical patent/EP0565865B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B66HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
    • B66BELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
    • B66B1/00Control systems of elevators in general
    • B66B1/24Control systems with regulation, i.e. with retroactive action, for influencing travelling speed, acceleration, or deceleration
    • B66B1/2408Control systems with regulation, i.e. with retroactive action, for influencing travelling speed, acceleration, or deceleration where the allocation of a call to an elevator car is of importance, i.e. by means of a supervisory or group controller
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B66HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
    • B66BELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
    • B66B2201/00Aspects of control systems of elevators
    • B66B2201/20Details of the evaluation method for the allocation of a call to an elevator car
    • B66B2201/211Waiting time, i.e. response time
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B66HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
    • B66BELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
    • B66B2201/00Aspects of control systems of elevators
    • B66B2201/20Details of the evaluation method for the allocation of a call to an elevator car
    • B66B2201/212Travel time
    • B66B2201/213Travel time where the number of stops is limited
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B66HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
    • B66BELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
    • B66B2201/00Aspects of control systems of elevators
    • B66B2201/20Details of the evaluation method for the allocation of a call to an elevator car
    • B66B2201/215Transportation capacity
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B66HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
    • B66BELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
    • B66B2201/00Aspects of control systems of elevators
    • B66B2201/20Details of the evaluation method for the allocation of a call to an elevator car
    • B66B2201/216Energy consumption
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B66HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
    • B66BELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
    • B66B2201/00Aspects of control systems of elevators
    • B66B2201/40Details of the change of control mode
    • B66B2201/403Details of the change of control mode by real-time traffic data

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method and a device for carrying out the method for allocating calls entered on the floors to the cabins of an elevator group, solutions for the call allocation being calculated by means of a calculation function and the best solution being used.
  • the calculation function is to be used to distribute the calls to the cabins according to certain optimization criteria, the optimization criteria or operation goals being, for example, based on a minimum average waiting time of all passengers or the highest possible transport capacity.
  • Another important aspect in the allocation of calls are the prevailing traffic conditions, whereby three, depending on this, traffic categories must be differentiated, namely interstore traffic, upward peak traffic and downward peak traffic.
  • EP-B-0 032 213 and EP-A-0 356 731 have disclosed group control devices for intermediate storey traffic, in which mathematical formulas are used to calculate a size corresponding to the waiting times of passengers and called service costs.
  • the calculation is mainly based on the waiting times of the passengers on the floors and in the cabins during a stopover, and the travel times of the passengers in the cabins.
  • the operating costs determined for each elevator in the group are compared with one another, the input call being allocated to the cabin which has the lowest operating costs. This is to minimize the average waiting time of all passengers.
  • the calculation formula for this type of control is based on an operationally defined goal from the outset. These facilities are not suitable for achieving another surgical goal, such as minimizing long waiting times.
  • Elevator group controls of the type described above are, as described for example in DE-A-18 03 648 or EP-B-0 091 554, often equipped with devices for controlling the downward and / or upward peak traffic.
  • the building can be emptied in a relatively short time in the event of an extreme accumulation of traffic towards a main stop, for example at the end of work in an office building.
  • the devices can be activated by means of a timer or by a measuring device which determines the flow of traffic in the direction of the main stop, and at the same time the operation of calls in the upward direction can be reduced or completely prevented.
  • the control algorithm and / or the calculation formula, especially in the case of the last-mentioned device are also based on minimizing the waiting time of the passengers and increasing the conveying capacity of the elevator group.
  • a considerable period of time may elapse before the time switch mentioned above or the measuring device which determines the traffic flow takes effect, during which both the intermediate storey traffic and the downward peak traffic have to be mastered. This can happen, for example, at the beginning of the lunch break, at the end of the office or due to a sudden increase in traffic at the end of a conference on one or more mezzanine floors. Few passengers occupy cabins for upward journeys, so that many passengers who want to go down have to put up with unbearably long waiting times. In addition, the transport capacity is poorly used in such a case.
  • the invention has for its object to propose a method and a device for performing the method of the type mentioned, by means of which avoidance of the disadvantages described above, behavior of the elevator control system that is adapted to the respective operation goals and traffic conditions is always used, so that an optimal call allocation is made possible.
  • a solution selection device calculates, based on a solution given for the first time, further possible solutions for the call allocation, which are fed to a simulator.
  • a traffic model device connected to the simulator provides information from which the simulator generates factors for the solutions that relate to passengers and / or elevator components.
  • the simulator is connected to a calculation module which evaluates optimization criteria contained in it by means of the calculation function using the factors, so that possible solutions corresponding to the optimization criteria and the traffic conditions are found.
  • the calculation module is connected on the output side to the solution selection device, by means of which the best solution for the call allocation is selected.
  • the advantages achieved by the invention are, in particular, that the elevator control system automatically adapts to the given operation goals or optimization criteria and changes in traffic conditions.
  • the optimization criteria contained in the calculation module can be modified easily and quickly, which has an advantageous effect on special requirements of the operator of the elevator system.
  • 1 denotes a traffic model device that is connected to a simulator 2 that generates factors related to passengers and / or elevator components.
  • the simulator 2 On the output side, the simulator 2 is connected to a calculation module 3, which is connected on the input side to an interface, not shown, via which optimization criteria can be entered.
  • the calculation module 3 On the output side, the calculation module 3 is connected to a solution selection device 4, to which data about the current situation of the booths and entered calls are supplied and which is connected to the simulator 2 on the output side.
  • a situation assessment module 5 is connected to the simulator 2 and to the solution selection device 4.
  • the x-axis is assigned to the waiting time and the y-axis to the travel time of passengers, the passengers being identified by points in a two-dimensional factor space, and the assignments shown being determined in the simulator 2. From these assignments, data relating to traffic density, for example, which is proportional to the number of points, are derived for the calculation.
  • a neural network can be used that is so adaptable after a learning process that a wide variety of patterns can be recognized. If factors relating to elevator components are required for the calculation, the procedure described above can be followed, for example factors such as energy consumption and number of door openings being projected into a factor space.
  • the The x-axis is assigned to the number of passengers who have entered downward calls and the y-axis has been assigned to the mean waiting time, 100% corresponding to the mean waiting time determined using conventional devices. If there are three passengers with upward calls, an improvement in the mean waiting time of approximately 10% (FIG. 3a) and up to 20% (FIG. 3b) is achieved during the change of the type of traffic (increasing number of passengers with downward calls).
  • the better mezzanine or down-peak traffic program was chosen as a reference in FIG. 3a. In Fig. 3b, the program for the reference is automatically switched when the number of passengers with down calls exceeds five (characteristic curve A) or eight (characteristic curve B).
  • possible solutions for the call allocation are determined depending on the current situation of the cabins and entered calls, starting from a first-time solution calculated according to conventional rules.
  • a method called "alpha pruning” can be used.
  • a “tree” is formed, the branches of which are assigned to the cabins and calls to be operated by them and thus represent the possible solutions sought.
  • the search for solutions to the given situation ends when the latter changes.
  • Probably the best solution is fed to Simulator 2.
  • the simulator 2 receives information from the traffic model device about the probable number of passengers waiting on a floor and estimates regarding their possible destinations. Factors for what is probably the best solution are formed from this information (FIG. 2) and transferred to the calculation module 3.
  • the optimization criteria are evaluated using the calculation function using the factors, so that a solution corresponding to the optimization criteria and the traffic conditions is found.
  • This solution will be the Solution selection device 4 is fed, in which it is checked whether it is the best solution for the call allocation. If it is not the best, then another one is sought from the set of possible solutions.
  • the situation assessment module 5 analyzes the present situation on the basis of information obtained from the simulator 2, and uses this to conclude the future situation, taking into account the best solution found. If a best solution found for the call allocation would now lead to an extreme situation, such as group formation of cabins (bunching), this solution is rejected on the basis of the assessment of the situation assessment module 5.
  • the device described above can be used for the allocation of floor calls as well as for the allocation of destination calls, i.e. of calls entered on the floors for the desired destination floors.

Description

Die Erfindung betrifft ein Verfahren und eine Einrichtung zur Durchführung des Verfahrens zur Zuteilung von auf den Stockwerken eingegebenen Rufen an Kabinen einer Aufzugsgruppe, wobei mittels einer Berechnungsfunktion Lösungen für die Rufzuteilung errechnet werden und die beste Lösung zur Anwendung kommt.The invention relates to a method and a device for carrying out the method for allocating calls entered on the floors to the cabins of an elevator group, solutions for the call allocation being calculated by means of a calculation function and the best solution being used.

Mittels der Berechnungsfunktion sollen bei Einrichtungen gemäss Oberbegriff die Rufe nach bestimmten Optimierungskriterien auf die Kabinen verteilt werden, wobei als Optimierungskriterien bzw. Operationsziele beispielsweise eine minimale durchschnittliche Wartezeit aller Fahrgäste oder eine möglichst hohe Transportkapazität zugrunde gelegt werden können. Ein weiterer wichtiger Gesichtspunkt bei der Rufzuteilung sind die jeweils herrschenden Verkehrsverhältnisse, wobei grundsätzlich drei, davon abhängige Verkehrskategorien unterschieden werden müssen, nämlich Zwischenstockwerkverkehr, Aufwärtsspitzenverkehr und Abwärtsspitzenverkehr.In the facilities according to the generic term, the calculation function is to be used to distribute the calls to the cabins according to certain optimization criteria, the optimization criteria or operation goals being, for example, based on a minimum average waiting time of all passengers or the highest possible transport capacity. Another important aspect in the allocation of calls are the prevailing traffic conditions, whereby three, depending on this, traffic categories must be differentiated, namely interstore traffic, upward peak traffic and downward peak traffic.

Mit der EP-B- 0 032 213 und der EP-A- 0 356 731 sind beispielsweise Gruppensteuerungseinrichtungen für den Zwischenstockwerksverkehr bekannt geworden, bei welchen mittels mathematischen Formeln eine den Wartezeiten von Fahrgästen entsprechende, Bedienungskosten genannte Grösse errechnet wird. Der Berechnung sind hierbei hauptsächlich die Wartezeiten der Fahrgäste auf den Stockwerken sowie in den Kabinen bei einem Zwischenhalt, und die Fahrzeiten der Fahrgäste in den Kabinen zugrunde gelegt. Die für jeden Aufzug der Gruppe ermittelten Bedienungskosten werden miteinander verglichen, wobei der eingegebene Ruf derjenigen Kabine zugeteilt wird, welche die kleinsten Bedienungskosten aufweist. Auf diese Weise soll die durchschnittliche Wartezeit aller Fahrgäste minimiert werden. Bei dieser Art von Steuerung ist der Berechnungsformel ein von vornherein fest definiertes Operationsziel zugrunde gelegt. Um ein anderes Operationsziel, wie beispielsweise die Minimierung langer Wartezeiten zu erreichen, sind diese Einrichtungen nicht geeignet.EP-B-0 032 213 and EP-A-0 356 731, for example, have disclosed group control devices for intermediate storey traffic, in which mathematical formulas are used to calculate a size corresponding to the waiting times of passengers and called service costs. The calculation is mainly based on the waiting times of the passengers on the floors and in the cabins during a stopover, and the travel times of the passengers in the cabins. The operating costs determined for each elevator in the group are compared with one another, the input call being allocated to the cabin which has the lowest operating costs. This is to minimize the average waiting time of all passengers. The calculation formula for this type of control is based on an operationally defined goal from the outset. These facilities are not suitable for achieving another surgical goal, such as minimizing long waiting times.

Aufzugsgruppensteuerungen der vorstehend beschriebenen Art sind wie beispielsweise in der DE-A- 18 03 648 oder der EP-B- 0 091 554 beschrieben, oft mit Einrichtungen für die Steuerung des Abwärts- oder/und Aufwärtsspitzenverkehrs ausgerüstet. Mittels derartigen Einrichtungen kann bei extremen Sammelverkehrsanfall in Richtung einer Haupthaltestelle, beispielsweise bei Arbeitsschluss in einem Bürogebäude, das Gebäude in relativ kurzer Zeit geleert werden. Hierbei können die Einrichtungen mittels Schaltuhr oder durch eine den Verkehrsfluss in Richtung Haupthalt ermittelnde Messeinrichtung aktiviert werden, wobei gleichzeitig die Bedienung von Rufen in Aufwärtsrichtung reduziert oder gänzlich unterbunden werden kann. Dem Steuerungsalgorithmus bzw. der Berechnungsformel liegen vor allem bei der zuletzt erwähnten Einrichtung ebenfalls das Minimieren der Wartezeit der Fahrgäste sowie die Steigerung der Förderleistung der Aufzugsgruppe zugrunde.Elevator group controls of the type described above are, as described for example in DE-A-18 03 648 or EP-B-0 091 554, often equipped with devices for controlling the downward and / or upward peak traffic. By means of such devices, the building can be emptied in a relatively short time in the event of an extreme accumulation of traffic towards a main stop, for example at the end of work in an office building. Here, the devices can be activated by means of a timer or by a measuring device which determines the flow of traffic in the direction of the main stop, and at the same time the operation of calls in the upward direction can be reduced or completely prevented. The control algorithm and / or the calculation formula, especially in the case of the last-mentioned device, are also based on minimizing the waiting time of the passengers and increasing the conveying capacity of the elevator group.

Bis die vorstehend erwähnte Schaltuhr oder die den Verkehrsfluss ermittelnde Messeinrichtung wirksam wird, kann eine beträchtliche Zeitspanne entstehen, während der sowohl der Zwischenstockwerkverkehr als auch der Abwärtsspitzenverkehr bewältigt werden muss. Dieser Fall kann beispielsweise bei Beginn der Mittagspause, bei Büroschluss oder durch plötzliche Zunahme des Verkehrs bei Ende einer Konferenz auf einem oder mehreren Zwischenstockwerken eintreten. Hierbei besetzen wenige Fahrgäste Kabinen für Aufwärtsfahrten, so dass viele Fahrgäste, die abwärts fahren wollen unerträglich lange Wartezeiten in Kauf nehmen müssen. Überdies ist in einem solchen Fall die Transportkapazität schlecht ausgenutzt.A considerable period of time may elapse before the time switch mentioned above or the measuring device which determines the traffic flow takes effect, during which both the intermediate storey traffic and the downward peak traffic have to be mastered. This can happen, for example, at the beginning of the lunch break, at the end of the office or due to a sudden increase in traffic at the end of a conference on one or more mezzanine floors. Few passengers occupy cabins for upward journeys, so that many passengers who want to go down have to put up with unbearably long waiting times. In addition, the transport capacity is poorly used in such a case.

Der Erfindung liegt die Aufgabe zugrunde, ein Verfahren und eine Einrichtung zur Durchführung des Verfahrens der eingangs genannten Art vorzuschlagen, mittels welcher unter Vermeidung der vorstehend beschriebenen Nachteile stets eine den jeweiligen Operationszielen und Verkehrsverhältnissen angepasstes Verhalten der Aufzugssteuerung zur Anwendung kommt, so dass eine optimale Rufzuteilung ermöglicht wird.The invention has for its object to propose a method and a device for performing the method of the type mentioned, by means of which avoidance of the disadvantages described above, behavior of the elevator control system that is adapted to the respective operation goals and traffic conditions is always used, so that an optimal call allocation is made possible.

Diese Aufgabe wird durch die in den Patentansprüchen 1 und 3 gekennzeichnete Erfindung gelöst. Hierbei berechnet eine Lösungsauswahl-Einrichtung ausgehend von einer erstmalig gegebenen Lösung weitere mögliche Lösungen für die Rufzuteilung, die einem Simulator zugeführt werden. Eine mit dem Simulator verbundene Verkehrsmodell-Einrichtung liefert Informationen, aus welchen der Simulator für die Lösungen Faktoren erzeugt, die auf Fahrgäste und/oder Aufzugskomponenten bezogen sind. Der Simulator ist ausgangsseitig an einem Berechnungsmodul angeschlossen, welches mittels der Berechnungsfunktion unter Anwendung der Faktoren in ihm enthaltene Optimierungskriterien bewertet, so dass den Optimierungskriterien und den Verkehrsverhältnissen entsprechende mögliche Lösungen gefunden werden. Das Berechnungsmodul ist ausgangsseitig mit der Lösungsauswahl-Einrichtung verbunden, mittels welcher die beste Lösung für die Rufzuteilung ausgewählt wird.This object is achieved by the invention characterized in claims 1 and 3. Here, a solution selection device calculates, based on a solution given for the first time, further possible solutions for the call allocation, which are fed to a simulator. A traffic model device connected to the simulator provides information from which the simulator generates factors for the solutions that relate to passengers and / or elevator components. On the output side, the simulator is connected to a calculation module which evaluates optimization criteria contained in it by means of the calculation function using the factors, so that possible solutions corresponding to the optimization criteria and the traffic conditions are found. The calculation module is connected on the output side to the solution selection device, by means of which the best solution for the call allocation is selected.

Die mit der Erfindung erzielten Vorteile liegen insbesondere darin, dass die Aufzugssteuerung sich automatisch an die jeweils gegebenen Operationsziele bzw. Optimierungskriterien und Änderungen der Verkehrsverhältnisse anpasst. Die im Berechnungsmodul enthaltenen Optimierungskriterien können einfach und schnell modifiziert werden, was sich vorteilhaft bei speziellen Forderungen des Betreibers der Aufzugsanlage auswirkt.The advantages achieved by the invention are, in particular, that the elevator control system automatically adapts to the given operation goals or optimization criteria and changes in traffic conditions. The optimization criteria contained in the calculation module can be modified easily and quickly, which has an advantageous effect on special requirements of the operator of the elevator system.

Im folgenden wird die Erfindung anhand eines auf der Zeichnung dargestellten Ausführungsbeipieles näher erläutert. Es zeigen:

Fig. 1
ein Blockschaltschema der erfindungsgemässen Einrichtung,
Fig. 2
ein Diagramm der Warte- und Fahrzeiten von Fahrgästen, und
Fig. 3a 3b
zwei Diagramme der Wartezeit in Abhängigkeit von der Anzahl Fahrgäste beim Übergang vom Zwischenstockwerkverkehr zum Abwärtsspitzenverkehr.
The invention is explained in more detail below with reference to an exemplary embodiment shown in the drawing. Show it:
Fig. 1
2 shows a block circuit diagram of the device according to the invention,
Fig. 2
a diagram of the waiting and journey times of passengers, and
3a 3b
two diagrams of the waiting time depending on the number of passengers during the transition from intermediate storey traffic to downward peak traffic.

In der Fig. 1 ist mit 1 eine Verkehrsmodell-Einrichtung bezeichnet, die mit einem Simulator 2 in Verbindung steht, der auf Fahrgäste und/oder Aufzugskomponenten bezogene Faktoren erzeugt. Der Simulator 2 ist ausgangsseitig an einem Berechnungsmodul 3 angeschlossen, welches eingangsseitig mit einem nicht dargestellten Interface verbunden ist, über das Optimierungskriterien eingegeben werden können. Das Berechnungsmodul 3 steht ausgangsseitig mit einer Lösungsauswahl-Einrichtung 4 in Verbindung, welcher Daten über die jeweils momentane Situation der Kabinen und eingegebenen Rufe zugeführt werden und die ausgangsseitig mit dem Simulator 2 verbunden ist. Ein Situationseinschätzungs-Modul 5 ist am Simulator 2 und an der Lösungsauswahl-Einrichtung 4 angeschlossen.In FIG. 1, 1 denotes a traffic model device that is connected to a simulator 2 that generates factors related to passengers and / or elevator components. On the output side, the simulator 2 is connected to a calculation module 3, which is connected on the input side to an interface, not shown, via which optimization criteria can be entered. On the output side, the calculation module 3 is connected to a solution selection device 4, to which data about the current situation of the booths and entered calls are supplied and which is connected to the simulator 2 on the output side. A situation assessment module 5 is connected to the simulator 2 and to the solution selection device 4.

Gemäss Fig. 2 ist die x-Achse der Wartezeit und die y-Achse der Fahrzeit von Fahrgästen zugeordnet, wobei die Fahrgäste durch Punkte in einem zweidimensionalen Faktorraum gekennzeichnet sind, und wobei die dargestellten Zuordnungen im Simulator 2 ermittelt wurden. Aus diesen Zuordnungen werden Daten, beispielsweise die Verkehrsdichte betreffend, welche proportional der Anzahl Punkte ist, für die Berechnung abgeleitet. Für die Erkennung und Erfassung der traubenförmigen Punkteanhäufung kann z.B. ein neurales Netzwerk eingesetzt werden, das nach einem Lernprozess derart anpassungsfähig ist, dass die verschiedensten Muster erkannt werden können. Wenn für die Berechnung Faktoren benötigt werden, die auf Aufzugskomponenten bezogen sind, so kann wie vorstehend beschrieben verfahren werden, wobei beispielsweise Faktoren wie Energieverbrauch und Anzahl der Türöffnungen in einen Faktorraum projiziert werden.2, the x-axis is assigned to the waiting time and the y-axis to the travel time of passengers, the passengers being identified by points in a two-dimensional factor space, and the assignments shown being determined in the simulator 2. From these assignments, data relating to traffic density, for example, which is proportional to the number of points, are derived for the calculation. For the detection and detection of the cluster of points, e.g. a neural network can be used that is so adaptable after a learning process that a wide variety of patterns can be recognized. If factors relating to elevator components are required for the calculation, the procedure described above can be followed, for example factors such as energy consumption and number of door openings being projected into a factor space.

In den Fig. 3a und 3b, mit welchen als Beispiel einige Vorteile der erfindungsgemässen Einrichtung aufgezeigt werden, ist die x-Achse der Anzahl Fahrgäste, die Abwärtsrufe eingegeben haben, und die y-Achse der mittleren Wartezeit zugeordnet, wobei 100% der mit konventionellen Einrichtungen ermittelten mittleren Wartezeit entsprechen. Bei Vorhandensein von drei Fahrgästen mit Aufwärtsrufen wird während des Wechsels der Verkehrsart (zunehmende Anzahl Fahrgäste mit Abwärtsrufen) eine Verbesserung der mittleren Wartezeit um ca. 10% (Fig. 3a) und bis zu 20% (Fig. 3b) erzielt. Als Referenz wurde in Fig. 3a jeweils das bessere Zwischenstockwerk- oder Abwärtsspitzen-Verkehrsprogramm gewählt. In Fig. 3b wird das Programm für die Referenz automatisch umgeschaltet, wenn die Anzahl Fahrgäste mit Abwärtsrufen fünf (Kennlinie A) oder acht (Kennlinie B) überschreitet.3a and 3b, with which some advantages of the inventive device are shown as an example, the The x-axis is assigned to the number of passengers who have entered downward calls and the y-axis has been assigned to the mean waiting time, 100% corresponding to the mean waiting time determined using conventional devices. If there are three passengers with upward calls, an improvement in the mean waiting time of approximately 10% (FIG. 3a) and up to 20% (FIG. 3b) is achieved during the change of the type of traffic (increasing number of passengers with downward calls). The better mezzanine or down-peak traffic program was chosen as a reference in FIG. 3a. In Fig. 3b, the program for the reference is automatically switched when the number of passengers with down calls exceeds five (characteristic curve A) or eight (characteristic curve B).

Die vorstehend beschriebene Einrichtung arbeitet wie folgt:The device described above works as follows:

In der Lösungsauswahl-Einrichtung 4 werden abhängig von der momentanen Situation der Kabinen und eingegebenen Rufe, ausgehend von einer nach konventionellen Regeln errechneten erstmaligen Lösung, mögliche Lösungen für die Rufzuteilung ermittelt. Zu diesem Zweck kann beispielsweise eine "alpha pruning" genannte Methode angewendet werden. Hierbei wird ein "Baum" gebildet, dessen Zweige den Kabinen und von diesen zu bedienende Rufe zugeordnet sind und somit die gesuchten möglichen Lösungen darstellen. Die Suche nach Lösungen für die jeweils gegebene Situation wird beendet, wenn letztere sich verändert. Die wahrscheinlich beste Lösung wird dem Simulator 2 zugeführt. Der Simulator 2 erhält von der Verkehrsmodell-Einrichtung Informationen über die wahrscheinliche Anzahl der auf einem Stockwerk wartenden Fahrgäste und Schätzungen betreffend ihrer möglichen Fahrziele. Aus diesen Informationen werden für die wahrscheinlich beste Lösung Faktoren gebildet (Fig. 2) und in das Berechnungsmodul 3 übertragen. Im Berechnungsmodul 3 werden mittels der Berechnungsfunktion unter Anwendung der Faktoren die Optimierungskriterien bewertet, so dass eine den Optimierungskriterien und den Verkehrsverhältnissen entsprechende Lösung gefunden wird. Diese Lösung wird der Lösungsauswahl-Einrichtung 4 zugeleitet, in welcher geprüft wird, ob sie die beste Lösung für die Rufzuteilung ist. Wenn sie nicht die beste ist, so wird eine andere aus der Menge der möglichen Lösungen gesucht.In the solution selection device 4, possible solutions for the call allocation are determined depending on the current situation of the cabins and entered calls, starting from a first-time solution calculated according to conventional rules. For this purpose, for example, a method called "alpha pruning" can be used. Here, a "tree" is formed, the branches of which are assigned to the cabins and calls to be operated by them and thus represent the possible solutions sought. The search for solutions to the given situation ends when the latter changes. Probably the best solution is fed to Simulator 2. The simulator 2 receives information from the traffic model device about the probable number of passengers waiting on a floor and estimates regarding their possible destinations. Factors for what is probably the best solution are formed from this information (FIG. 2) and transferred to the calculation module 3. In the calculation module 3, the optimization criteria are evaluated using the calculation function using the factors, so that a solution corresponding to the optimization criteria and the traffic conditions is found. This solution will be the Solution selection device 4 is fed, in which it is checked whether it is the best solution for the call allocation. If it is not the best, then another one is sought from the set of possible solutions.

Das Situationseinschätzungs-Modul 5 analysiert die jeweils vorliegende Situation anhand von aus dem Simulator 2 gewonnenen Informationen, und schliesst daraus unter Berücksichtigung der gefundenen besten Lösung auf die zukünftige Situation. Wenn nun eine für die Rufzuteilung gefundene beste Lösung zu einer extremen Situation, wie beispielsweise Gruppenbildung von Kabinen (bunching) führen würde, wird diese Lösung aufgrund der Einschätzung des Situationseinschätzungs-Moduls 5 verworfen.The situation assessment module 5 analyzes the present situation on the basis of information obtained from the simulator 2, and uses this to conclude the future situation, taking into account the best solution found. If a best solution found for the call allocation would now lead to an extreme situation, such as group formation of cabins (bunching), this solution is rejected on the basis of the assessment of the situation assessment module 5.

Die vorstehend beschriebene Einrichtung kann sowohl für die Zuteilung von Stockwerkrufen als auch für die Zuteilung von Zielrufen, d.h. von auf den Stockwerken eingegebenen Rufen für gewünschte Zielstockwerke, verwendet werden.The device described above can be used for the allocation of floor calls as well as for the allocation of destination calls, i.e. of calls entered on the floors for the desired destination floors.

Claims (5)

  1. Method for the allocation of calls, which are registered at storeys, to cages of a lift group, wherein solutions for the call allocation are completed by means of an equation and the best solution is used,
    characterised in that
    - the instantaneous situation of the cages and registered calls are fed to solution selection equipment (4),
    - the solution selection equipment (4) computes further possible solutions for the call allocation starting from an initially given solution,
    - the possible solutions are fed to a simulator (2),
    - data obtained from a traffic modelling equipment are transferred to the simulator (2),
    - the simulator (2) generates factors, which are referred to passengers and/or lift components, for the respective solutions,
    - the factors are fed to a computing module (3),
    - optimising criteria are input into the computing module (3),
    - the computing module (3) weights the optimising criteria by means of the computing function and with use of the factors so that possible solutions appropriate to the optimising criteria and the traffic conditions are found, and
    - the found possible solutions are delivered to the solution selection equipment (4), by means of which the best solution for the allocation of a call is selected.
  2. Method according to patent claim 1, characterised in that
    - data are fed to a situation estimation module (5) from the simulator (2),
    - the situation estimation module (5) analyses the respectively present situation on the basis of the data and estimates the future situation with consideration of the best solution for the call allocation, and
    - in the case of an unfavourable result of the estimation the found best solution is rejected.
  3. Equipment for carrying out the method according to patent claim 1, characterised in that the traffic modelling equipment (1) is connected with the simulator (2), which stands in connection at the output side with the computing module (3), and in that the computing module (3) is connected at the output side to the solution selection equipment (4) and at the input side with an interface, and the solution selection equipment (4) stands in connection at the output side with the simulator (2).
  4. Equipment for carrying out the method according to patent claim 2, characterised in that the situation estimation module (5) is connected to the simulator (2) and to the solution selection equipment (4).
  5. Method according to claim 1, characterised thereby that data, which has been obtained from the traffic modelling equipment (1), about passengers probably waiting and estimates about destinations are transferred to the simulator (2) and that the solution selection equipment (4) selects the best solution with consideration of the future situation.
EP19930103915 1992-04-14 1993-03-11 Method and arrangement to allocate requested hall calls to the cabins of an elevator group Expired - Lifetime EP0565865B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CH124292 1992-04-14
CH1242/92 1992-04-14

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0565865A1 EP0565865A1 (en) 1993-10-20
EP0565865B1 true EP0565865B1 (en) 1996-12-27

Family

ID=4205803

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP19930103915 Expired - Lifetime EP0565865B1 (en) 1992-04-14 1993-03-11 Method and arrangement to allocate requested hall calls to the cabins of an elevator group

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0565865B1 (en)
DE (1) DE59304851D1 (en)
FI (1) FI112789B (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2288675B (en) * 1994-04-22 1998-09-09 Hitachi Ltd Elevator system
FI102268B1 (en) * 1995-04-21 1998-11-13 Kone Corp A method for allocating external calls to an elevator group
DE102014114821A1 (en) * 2014-10-13 2015-12-17 Thyssenkrupp Ag A method for processing a call for an elevator system and corresponding elevator system

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0613390B2 (en) * 1981-10-07 1994-02-23 株式会社日立製作所 Elevator group management control device
JPH07110748B2 (en) * 1989-06-14 1995-11-29 株式会社日立製作所 Elevator group management control device

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP0565865A1 (en) 1993-10-20
FI112789B (en) 2004-01-15
FI931640A0 (en) 1993-04-13
DE59304851D1 (en) 1997-02-06
FI931640A (en) 1993-10-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0443188B1 (en) Method and arrangement to directly allocate destination call requests for elevator groups on the basis of service costs and variable bonus/penalty factors
EP0356731B1 (en) Grouped control affording instantaneous attribution of destination calls
DE3611173C2 (en) Elevator system with several double compartment cabins
DE69632750T2 (en) Method and device for elevator group control
DE3820568C2 (en)
DE69833880T2 (en) GENETIC METHOD FOR ALLOWING THE ELEVATION TARGET
EP0091554B1 (en) Lift groups control comprising a device for the down peak traffic control
EP0440967B1 (en) Group control for elevators with direct allocation of calls from a call input register located on the floor
DE112007001577B4 (en) Elevator group control device
EP0365782B1 (en) Method and device for the group control of double-compartment lifts
DE69838204T2 (en) Integrated overload control for distributed real-time systems
DE69818080T2 (en) METHOD FOR ELEVATOR GROUP CONTROL IN VIRTUAL PERSONAL TRANSPORTATION
DE3738891A1 (en) ELEVATOR SYSTEM WITH ADAPTIVE CABIN CALL ASSIGNMENT
EP1418147A1 (en) Controller for elevator with multi-deck car
DE2459887A1 (en) CONTROL DEVICE FOR ELEVATORS
DE102015102563A1 (en) Method for operating an elevator system with several shafts and several cabins
EP0312730A1 (en) Group control for lifts with load dependant control of the cabins
EP0134892B1 (en) Lift group control for double-compartment cars
DE2517514A1 (en) LIFT CONTROL SYSTEM
DE2512950A1 (en) ELEVATOR CONTROL
EP0378834B1 (en) Group control for lifts affording instantaneous attribution of destination calls
DE2503658A1 (en) ELEVATOR CONTROL DEVICE
DE69825118T2 (en) Autonomous overload control for distributed real-time systems
DE60203514T2 (en) METHOD FOR ALLOCATING SURFACES
EP0308590B1 (en) Group control for lifts affording instantaneous attribution of destination calls

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): CH DE FR LI

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19940318

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19950530

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): CH DE FR LI

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 59304851

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19970206

ET Fr: translation filed
PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20110610

Year of fee payment: 19

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20120403

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20120323

Year of fee payment: 20

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120331

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20120331

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R071

Ref document number: 59304851

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20130312