EP0465478A1 - Verfahren und vorrichtung zum klassifizieren von holz nach der realzeitmethode - Google Patents

Verfahren und vorrichtung zum klassifizieren von holz nach der realzeitmethode

Info

Publication number
EP0465478A1
EP0465478A1 EP90904214A EP90904214A EP0465478A1 EP 0465478 A1 EP0465478 A1 EP 0465478A1 EP 90904214 A EP90904214 A EP 90904214A EP 90904214 A EP90904214 A EP 90904214A EP 0465478 A1 EP0465478 A1 EP 0465478A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
data
level
board
processing means
imaging signals
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP90904214A
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Inventor
Carl Flatman
Will Bauer
Dan Kenway
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
VISIONSMART Inc
Original Assignee
VISIONSMART Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by VISIONSMART Inc filed Critical VISIONSMART Inc
Publication of EP0465478A1 publication Critical patent/EP0465478A1/de
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/04Forecasting or optimisation specially adapted for administrative or management purposes, e.g. linear programming or "cutting stock problem"
    • G06Q10/043Optimisation of two dimensional placement, e.g. cutting of clothes or wood
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B07SEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS; SORTING
    • B07CPOSTAL SORTING; SORTING INDIVIDUAL ARTICLES, OR BULK MATERIAL FIT TO BE SORTED PIECE-MEAL, e.g. BY PICKING
    • B07C5/00Sorting according to a characteristic or feature of the articles or material being sorted, e.g. by control effected by devices which detect or measure such characteristic or feature; Sorting by manually actuated devices, e.g. switches
    • B07C5/04Sorting according to size
    • B07C5/12Sorting according to size characterised by the application to particular articles, not otherwise provided for
    • B07C5/14Sorting timber or logs, e.g. tree trunks, beams, planks or the like
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N21/00Investigating or analysing materials by the use of optical means, i.e. using sub-millimetre waves, infrared, visible or ultraviolet light
    • G01N21/84Systems specially adapted for particular applications
    • G01N21/88Investigating the presence of flaws or contamination
    • G01N21/89Investigating the presence of flaws or contamination in moving material, e.g. running paper or textiles
    • G01N21/892Investigating the presence of flaws or contamination in moving material, e.g. running paper or textiles characterised by the flaw, defect or object feature examined
    • G01N21/898Irregularities in textured or patterned surfaces, e.g. textiles, wood
    • G01N21/8986Wood

Definitions

  • This invention relates to lumber grading systems. More particularly, the invention relates to automatic real-time lumber grading systems especially for dimension lumber lumber preferably including trim optimization for such lumber.
  • Grade mark reader machines may decrease trimmer man errors but if the grader man has made errors these will be perpetuated by either a trimmer man or a grade mark reader.
  • a trim optimizer may comprise board width sensors, length sensors and thickness sensors, a conveyor speed measuring device, a moveable fence, a platform to support measuring and lighting systems, a computer to handle data, control mechanical equipment, sequence events and record controller functions.
  • edger optimizers various scanning methods are possible including neon light, LED arrays for piece shape and laser and LED wane calipers and laser cameras and LED scanners for width measurement.
  • systems have been developed since 1983 and originating in Scandinavia, that can determine appearance characteristics of dry shop lumber.
  • Such appearance grading systems may alleviate the need for highly skilled human graders in hardwood lumber grading operations such as are common in Europe, for example, in the production of lumber for shop lumber or hardwood furniture.
  • the role of the human grader in dimension lumber grading is still very necessary since the principle use of such lumber is structural and strength and stress considerations are paramount.
  • Another problem has been the lack of a suitable scanning system to scan the lumber for knots, spike knots, etc., and the resulting structural weakness associated with them.
  • Another problem has been the lack of a system for evaluating the slope of grain of lumber being graded.
  • a sensor for knots a sensor for cracks and holes, a sensor for missing wood (wane), a sensor for colour (indicating stain perhaps rot), and a sensor for slope of grain.
  • a sensor for knots a sensor for knots
  • a sensor for cracks and holes a sensor for missing wood (wane)
  • a sensor for colour indicating stain perhaps rot
  • a sensor for slope of grain should scan each face of the lumber.
  • a real-time lumber grading and trim optimizing system for use with boards travelling past a monitor point, comprising means to generate imaging signals characteristic of features of a board; signal processing means to digitize the imaging signals; data reduction means to reduce the quantity of digitized signals to form a feature set; grading means to allocate a grade to the board in accordance with the feature set; and optimization means to produce optimization data for trimming the board to adjust its grade.
  • Board tracking means may be provided to track each board for which imaging signals are generated; and allocation means are provided for allocating optimization data to a tracked board appropriate to that board.
  • a "board” as defined herein means sawn lumber of whatever shape and thus is not limited to four sided rectangular lumber; whether or not it is further finished such as by planing or re anufacturered as diverse articles e.g. chopsticks, roof trusses, etc.
  • the imaging signals are line-by-line pixel-by-pixel signals across each board. The use of line-by-line operation may help reduce the amount of memory needed in the system.
  • a lumber grading system comprises a scanning region having a path therethrough for passage of a board, and a plurality of groups of linear scanning devices are provided, each group being adapted to detect different features of the board, the groups being located to scan the board on passage along said path and to form imaging signals in response thereto; means to digitize data from said scanning devices; hierarchical processing means for the resulting digitized data, comprising microprocessors at a plurality of levels, adapted to rationalize received data and to send a reduced data flow of rationalized data to the next level, the processing means of at least one level comprising a plurality of slave processors communicating with a processor of the next uppermost level as a master through a serial data bus, and the processing means of other levels interfacing through parallel interfacing; further processing means to receive rationalized data from the uppermost level and to provide lumber grading information and/or optimization data for trimming to adjust board grading,
  • Radiation from a small laser spot when reflected from the face of dimension lumber, is conducted far more strongly in the direction of the grain of the lumber than perpendicular to the grain. This direction of conducted light is largely independent of the incident angle.
  • the area of wood illuminated is thus, not a circle as would have been expected, but an ellipse having its major axis parallel to the true grain of the wood and not to the growth rings.
  • a further feature of the invention is a laser scanner which may be used in the system of the present invention and which establishes the above described phenomenon.
  • Such a scanner may comprise means to provide a focused beam of light to illuminate a face of dimensioned lumber to be reflected therefrom, linear scanning means to scan the reflected beam and adapted to detect the direction of the major axis of any elliptical spread thereof.
  • the invention includes a method of detecting the slope of the grain of dimension lumber using the above scanner.
  • the focused beam of radiation may suitably be a He-Ne beam produced in a conventional manner.
  • the means for detection of an elliptical spread of the reflected beam may be a charge coupled device (CCD) or a video camera.
  • CCD charge coupled device
  • CCD or video camera may be digitized and the orientation of the slope of grain may be calculated from the digitized data by processing with a computer.
  • the novel method for detecting the slope of grain may be utilized as a stand alone method.
  • the laser scanning means is used in a hierarchical processing system for real-time grading or optimizing of lumber as described herein.
  • the hold line of a microprocessor having a hold line may be used directly to suspend operation of any one slave while allowing local transfer of the slave's memory through an serial address bus shared with the master.
  • Such local transfer is, thus, not really a transfer at all but, rather, it is a change in memory mapping. It is effectively instantaneous.
  • the processors sequence communication to the matter in a certain segment of time, thus allowing maximum utilization of a simple serial link.
  • the processors generally operate in parallel, all having processing tasks, only one of which is to communicate processed data through the serial data bus. This allows the building of a hierarchical tree of microprocessors which may operate sufficiently fast to permit real-time monitoring- of production line processes which were previously considered too fast for such monitoring to be possible.
  • Such tree may comprise a plurality of levels for data processing, each level reducing the data flow to the next level.
  • a hierarchical tree for an automatic lumber grading system may, for example, comprise a level for accepting and processing data from data sensors and passing a reduced flow of relevant data to the next level.
  • the next level may correlate similar data from adjacent areas into regions representing single features of the lumber.
  • the next level may rationalize data received from different sensors so that if more than one of the sensors recognize a feature, data corresponding to only a single feature will be forwarded to the next level.
  • a further level may be used for converting the data into data in terms of dimensions. Alternatively, if sufficient processing power is available this may be carried out at the previous level.
  • a further level may correlate data from each face of the lumber. Typically, for four sided board the reduction in data flow from this level is four, representing the rationalization of information from each of four different faces of the lumber.
  • Any suitable processing equipment may be used to process this package to provide grading information and/or to send instructions to a trimmer for the lumber.
  • a console for operator input may be interfaced at this processing level, for example, for inputting information concerning market conditions, special problems etc.
  • the microprocessors may receive information from cameras or sensors from five groups, a camera or sensor of each group being located to scan each face of the lumber.
  • Scanning arrays may be provided, for example, for detecting x-ray capacity, e.g., denser features, such as knots, pitch-pockets, spike knots, etc.; for detecting slope of grain; for detecting missing wood, e.g., in board dimension, wane, skip, crook, bow, twist, cup, holes, pin-holes, grub-holes, etc.; for detecting shakes, through shakes, checks, through checks, splits, white speck, etc.; and for detecting colour indicating unsound wood, rot, stain and streaks.
  • Some scanners for most of these features may be regarded as conventional. Thus, scanners have been used to scan dry shop lumber for appearance and these may be incorporated in the system.
  • Reflected light scanners may be used to scan for various features depending on the positioning of the light sources and the sensors. Moreover, by use of suitable colour filters, particular surface features may be picked out for scanning. It is known to use x-ray scanning in various fields including that of scanning telephone poles for rot and for scanning tree trunks for density, x-ray scanning may be used in this invention for scanning for density, and, at least at present time, x-ray scanning is considered useful for use in scanning for density in the system of the present invention. However, the results of x-ray scanning are affected by the moisture content of the wood and it is thought that nuclear magnetic resonance scanning (NMR) , alternatively known as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may provide advantages.
  • NMR nuclear magnetic resonance scanning
  • MRI magnetic resonance imaging
  • Slope of grain scanning may be provided by utilizing characteristics of laser beam reflection for the surface of wood as described herein.
  • Further scanning techniques are envisaged, such as for example, acoustic scanning in response to noise generated at the surface of wood and altering in characteristics in response to surface features of the wood.
  • conventional and new scanners may be used in the present invention.
  • Some of the conventional scanning techniques, e.g., x-ray scanning have not previously been used either in real-time imaging or any production line. Real-time imaging the vast amount of data necessary for strength grading and optimization of boards in a production line in the lumber industry, has not hitherto been possible even when all the scanners used are individually known. Every scanner may suitably be a linear scanner and may scan across each board, generating line data.
  • the scanner may, for example, resolve a thirty second of an inch over a sixteen inch width. Boards pass through the system longitudinally at high speeds usually in the range of 700 feet/minute to 1,600 feet/minute. In order to achieve resolution of at least 0.25" per pixel row with boards moving at speeds of up to 1,600 feet/minute, pixel rows must be sampled at about 1,250 rows per second and 512 pixels per row, the scanners generate about 4,635 million pixels per second.
  • the hierarchical processor tree used in the present invention may be designed to handle this high data rate.
  • the scanners themselves may be conventional light beam scanners, white light scanners and spectrum specific scanners, respectively. Examples of suitable scanners for these groups are E9 & 9 1901 or 1902 line scan cameras.
  • Figure 1 is a sketch showing sequential lumber processing operations including scanning
  • Figure 2 shows the scanning system in more detail
  • Figure 3 shows an embodiment of the laser scanner
  • Figure 4 shows a cross section through a part of a board under laser scanning showing diving grain
  • Figure 5 is a block diagram of one system of lumber grading according to the 10 invention including an embodiment of a hierarchical tree illustrating computer architecture according to the invention
  • Figure 6 is a block diagram showing the 35 operation of Level 0 of Figure 5;
  • Figure 7 is a block diagram showing the operation of Levels 1, 2, 3, and/or 4 of Figure 5;
  • Figure 8 is a flow chart of the operation 20 of a master microprocess for
  • Figure 10A is a flow chart of the main level control process of Level 1;
  • Figure 10B is a flow chart of an interrupt level process for Level 1;
  • Figure 11 is a flow chart of a buffering 05 process in Level 2;
  • Figure HA is a flow chart of an interrupt process of Figure
  • Figure 11B is a continuation of the flow 10 chart of Figure HA;
  • Figure 11C is a flow chart of the window process referred to in Figure 11B;
  • Figure 11D is a flow chart of the Do 15 Xfer process referred to in
  • Figure 11B Figure HE is a flow chart of the output process referred to in Figure HA; Figure 11F is a continuation of Figure HE; 20
  • Figure 12 is a flow chart of the operations carried out at Level 3;
  • Figure 12' is a continuation of Figure 12;
  • Figure 12" is a continuation of Figure 12';
  • Figure 12A is a flow chart of processing 25 operations for the edge of a board, referred to in Figure 12";
  • Figure 12B is a flow chart of processing operations for x-ray, referred to in Figure 12' ;
  • Figure 12C is a flow chart of processing operations for the direct process referred to in Figure 12 • ;
  • Figure 12D is a flow chart of the interrupt referred to in Figure 12;
  • Figure 13 is a flow chart of the processing operations of Level 4A;
  • Figure 13' is a continuation of Figure 13;
  • Figure 13A is a flow chart of the main level process of Level 4A;
  • Figure 14 is a flow chart of Level 4;
  • Figure 14A is a flow chart of the main level process of Level 4;
  • Figure 15 is a flow chart of processing operations carried out in Level 5;
  • Figure 15' is a continuation of Figure 15;
  • Figure 15A is a flow chart of main level process of Level 5;
  • Figure 16 is a flow chart of the operations in Level 5A.
  • Figure 16' is a continuation of Figure 16; and Figure 16" is a continuation of Figure 16'.
  • FIG. 1 a system for automatic grading of lumber with trimming optimization and automatic trimming is illustrated.
  • Boards emerging from a planner 10 are passed through in a longitudinal direction by means of a roller drive 11 upstream of the scanning region 20 and a further belt drive 11' downstream of the scanning region 20.
  • an additional roller supports or other support surfaces 202 may be provided within the scanning region. These supports 202 should allow access for a scanning array 204 for each side of a board 13.
  • the arrangement of supports 202 and scanning arrays 204 has been illustrated schematically and simplistically. In fact, any suitable arrangement may be used for the scanning region provided that appropriate regions or surfaces on each board are exposed to appropriate scanners.
  • the boards may, in fact, have any number of sides and the number of directions in which scanners scan a board 13 is suitably equal to the number of sides of the board.
  • Information from the scanning is processed in real-time for each board in a manner hereinafter described to provide optimization data for each board which data is preferably used in operation of an automatic trimmer.
  • each board 13 may pass an inking station 14 for applying a mark, e.g., a bar code to the board.
  • board 13 passes to conveyor 15 travelling at right angles to drives 11 so that the boards 13 now travel laterally to a trimmer 16.
  • Conveyor 15 may be " any standard conveyor used in the art.
  • Various operations may be performed during carriage of a board 13 by conveyor 15.
  • the bar code is read by a bar code reader 114 to confirm that the board does indeed carry the bar code for which optimization data is being supplied to the trimmer 16.
  • a grade may be marked on the board by an ink sprayer 414 for the purposes of allowing a manual check on the grading and trim decisions before the trimming actually takes place.
  • Each saw of the trimmer 16 is arranged to cut in a direction perpendicular to the longitudinal axes of the board and saws are activated to cut the board in response to the optimization data computed using the scanning data.
  • a grading rule base may be used to designate a grade to boards having specific characteristics within grade ranges according to applicable rules.
  • a board 13 to be scanned passes scanner arrays 204 which scan it for various features.
  • scanner arrays 204 which scan it for various features.
  • Four scanning arrays are shown but by way of practical example, the number and type of the scanning arrays may be chosen according to the lumber characteristics about which information is required.
  • the four arrays are as follows:
  • Cameras 210 are arranged above and below the board 13 to receive light reflected by edges of board 13 which are not perpendicular, but which are angled to the perpendicular. Cameras 210 will detect wane and board dimension and other anomalies involving lack of straightness at the edge of the board.
  • a group of lights 208 is arranged above and below the board 13 travelling through a second scanning array 204.
  • Cameras 207 are arranged to each side to receive light reflected in those directions. Cameras 207 will detect thickness and related anomalies. If colour filters are used, chosen to mask visible marks on the surface specific to non-detrimental characteristics, the volume of data input to processing equipment may be somewhat reduced.
  • a source of x-rays 213 is positioned above the board travelling through a third scanning array 204. x-rays passing through the board are received by scanner 212 below the board to give an indication of density. This arrangement may detect knots, holes, cracks or any other differences in density.
  • a group of lights 214 above and below the board 13 and to direct light diagonally towards it will, by means of cameras 205 to detect, for example, cracks.
  • scanners are, for many purposes, sufficient to provide data for grading of the boards in relation to their strength and for optimizing trimming.
  • these scanning arrays are only exemplary.
  • Other options are a slope of grain scanning array (which will be later described with reference to Figure 3), a colour scanner for detecting rot, stain, etc., a position of knot scanner, and scanners for other i ageable features which may, from time to time, be the subject for grading requirements, for example, as set out in the National Lumber Grading Association rules for North America.
  • Some scanners have previously been used to scan rough dry shop lumber for appearance and these may be incorporated in the system. However, the system is primarily intended for use in automatically grading, for example, boards as hereinbefore defined.
  • the laser beam slope of grain scanner 216 is an important part of the invention for MSR lumber since regulations are envisaged by which evaluation of slope of grain in grading systems is mandatory.
  • One reason for the proposed regulation is that the conventionally used machine stress test only measures bending strength but does not measure ultimate yield in tension.
  • a combination of x-ray scanning for density, moisture content detection, and slope of grain scanning might produce the necessary information.
  • Figure 3 shows a diagrammatic sketch of suitable apparatus for the laser scanning of lumber to detect the slope of grain.
  • a light beam 500 is focused by lens 502 to focus on the face 504 of board
  • the apparatus will be located to scan board 13 in the same way.
  • an ellipse 508 is formed, the shape of which is dependent on the slope of grain of the wood.
  • the major axis 510 indicates the general direction of the slope of grain. The distance from the mid point of the major axis of the actual point
  • 507 of impingement of the beam will be an indication of the degree of bad slope of grain.
  • FIG 4 is a rough sketch of a cross section through lumber 506 indicating diving grain 522 (which is not a desirable slope of grain)
  • ellipse will be formed in which one part of 512 of the ellipse 508 is initially brighter than the other part 514. This difference in brightness is rapidly alternated but is measurable and sufficient to be indicated to the CCD or video camera.
  • diving grain may be sensed by the scanning means, a digitized signal produced and the computer may calculate the degree of diving of the grain in accordance with a program in accordance with tha flow chart of Figure 8.
  • Such a program may easily be devised by any one skilled in the art.
  • Boards pass through the system longitudinally at high speeds usually in the range of 700 feet/minute to 1,600 feet/minute. In order to achieve resolution of at least 0.25" per pixel row with boards moving at speeds of up to 1,600 feet/minute, pixel rows must be sampled at about 1,250 rows per second and 512 pixels per row, the scanners generate about 4,635 million pixels per second.
  • each camera irrespective of for which feature it is scanning has essentially similar processing in that, each line scan camera scans across each board generating line data.
  • Each line of data consists of a 512 pixel scan across the board.
  • the pixels are digitized and converted to digitized form and sent to level 0 of the processing system. From each camera sensor, only one or two features are detected.
  • the sensor itself in each case is designed specifically to sense reliably one feature using a simple algorithm. For example, narrow shadowy dip in direct light for cracks, white peaks in edge lighting for wane, dark shadows in the x-ray image for knots, changes in the red/blue ratios for stain.
  • each level of the hierarchical tree 400 reduces the data by a set amount, for example, by a factor of 10 so that after levels 0 through 4 several million pixels per board become several hundred categorized objects per board. With the exception of Level 34A, each level reduces the data volume passed to the next level up and requires fewer processors.
  • the levels of the hierarchical tree may be: 1. A scanning level 200 corresponding to scanning region 20 already discussed. Data from this level is digitized and passed directly to slave microprocessors of Level 0, 402 which share a data address bus. The data is analyzed and only data indicative of detected features is passed to the master of level 0, thereby reducing the relevant data and passing this to Level 1, 403.
  • a program for Levels 0 and 1 may be devised for example from the flow charts of Figures 8, 9, 10, 10A and 10B, respectively.
  • Level 2 which is used to buffer data.
  • Figures 11, HA, 11B, HC, 11D, HE and HF illustrate Level 2.
  • Level 3 which recognizes objects as features and arbitrates that if a feature is detected by one set of sensors then any information relating to the same feature from other sensors may be discarded. The resulting reduced data passes to the next level.
  • a program may be devised for example from the flow chart of Figure 12, 12', 12", 12A, 12B, 12C and 12D.
  • Level 4A, 406 is only optionally a separate level from Level 3.
  • Level 4A dimensions the data and scales the image. If sufficient computing power exists it may be combined with
  • Level 3 Data from this level passes to the next level.
  • a program may be devised for example from the flow chart of Figures 13 and 13A.
  • Level 4, 407 which brings together and correlates data from each side of the board reducing the data flow by about a factor of four when the number of sides is 4. Data then passes to the next level.
  • Programs for levels 4 and 4A may be devised from the flow charts of Figures 14 and 14A, respectively.
  • Level 5, 408 where it is used either merely in the production of grading information as to the lumber or, in the production of grading and optimization information to be passed to actuate the trimmer 16 and grade stamps. Thereafter, Level 6 coordinates grading information with board labelling and trimmer control programs for Levels 5 and 6 may be devised from the flow charts of Figures 15, 15' and 15", respectively.
  • Level 6, 409 is not part of the hierarchical tree but logs production statistics and system malfunctions. It is also serves as a repository of the grading rules and printing tables which are loaded into Level 5 when the system is first powered up. Programs may be devised from the flow charts of Figures 16, 16' and 16".
  • Figure 6 is a block diagram showing the configuration of Level 0 of the system.
  • Each line of digitized data from each sensor is analyzed by level 0 to find anomalies.
  • the anomalies searched for depend on the type of sensors. For example to find knots with the x-ray, the data is thresholded to detect the increased density of a knot.
  • Level 0 then reduces the data from a line of 512 pixels to 112 or fewer "events" 14 or fewer for each of the 8 slave processors. Each event being a specific trigger depending on the feature being looked for, and the sensor providing the data.
  • Level 0 comprises at least one group of eight slave microprocessors 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307 and 308 accepting partitioned data from the scanners and being in serial communication through a shared address bus 312 with a microprocessor 309 for local transfer of data therebetween.
  • a common data bus 312 is shared between the slave processors.
  • a common serial bus 313 allows the master processor 309 to transfer bytes to or from each slave's memory.
  • Microprocessors 301-309 may each conveniently be a Texas Instrument Digital Signal Processor 320C25. This microprocessor is especially convenient because it is fast in operation and has the advantageous feature of a hold line for a substantially instantaneous hold on any slave while its data is made available to the master 309.
  • the computer architecture of level 0 comprises a buffer 300 for A/D data from the sensors. Eight slave processors 301-308 share a data bus 312 from the buffer 300. There is no buffering of the slave processes which can only read from the data bus 312 and therefore can not address ROM 310. Slave processor 301, however is a lockstep processor, which can address ROM.
  • the master processor 309 synchronizes and resets all the slave processors 301 - 308 on the clock. A synchronizer pin ensures that all eight slaves 301-308 are so synchronized.
  • the slaves 301-308 once synchronized all run at the same time making it possible to use only one set of ROM to load programs into internal RAM of the slaves, the lockstep slave 301, being the only slave generating addressing for ROM 310. Because the data buses 15 are connected, the slaves 301-308 all read the same program. None of the slaves have any control of what goes on the data bus 312.
  • ROM is removed from the data bus 312 so that data from different sensors is available or the data bus.
  • the slaves 301-308 accept data from the sensors via the data bus 312 in timed bursts corresponding to a proportional number of pixels for the respective sensor.
  • each slave should receive 64 pixels.
  • a margin of plus or minus eight pixels is provided.
  • each slave handles 80 pixels of data.
  • the master 309 has a BIO line 313 available and, at timed intervals, corresponding with the processing of 80 pixels of data by a slave, each slave flags the BIO line requesting notice by master 309. On recognition of a flag, master 309 opens the serial data bus to the respective slave, which may then provide information to master 309 in, for example, 14 words .
  • Each slave 301-308 handles 80 pixels of data and passes to the master only that information relating to positive features of the board 13, thus reducing the data flow by a factor of about 10.
  • 1 million pixels/sec may output from each scanner and, for this output, it is found that a group of eight slaves and one master may be sufficient for each camera. It is probable that at least 14 and likely more than fifteen scanners will be used resulting in the use of around 135 microprocessors, probably more.
  • the level in data reduction at this level is dependent on the pixels noted which contain positive information, but is likely that the reduction will be at least by a factor of 10.
  • Two Level 0 arrangements may be provided so that alternating line scans from the scanning arrays may be by handled by different Level 0 arrangements, such as exemplified in Figure 6. Thus each level arrangement is given an opportunity to set up for the next alternate line while the other Level 0 arrangement is processing the current line. However, it may be more convenient for the master processor for Level 0 to overlap tasks to the slaves 301-308.
  • each master 309 passes the data up to the next level by means of a parallel interface.
  • FIG. 9 A flow chart for operations in Level 0 is illustrated in Figure 9.
  • Each Level 1 is a different arrangement of RAM 321-326. Operating at the full speed of a single master processor 329. The shared serial data bus with synchronized slave processors of Level 0 used to process pixel by pixel data is no longer necessary. At this stage, .the task is the stitching together of information into regionalized areas rather than the collection of a vast number of imaging signals.
  • the number of RAMs may, of course, be any convenient number. While six are illustrated, it is at least as convenient to use eight.
  • the master microprocessor 329 controls all data flow for that Level 2 board. It writes programs into the individual RAM space via direct bus connection 338. The processed information is read by the master, and new data is loaded; the process then repeats. Thus, memory is instantly available to the master 329.
  • RAMs 321-326 may each be associated with a slave microprocessor.
  • the master 329 After the master 329 has written to the respective RAM, via bus 338, it enables the associated slave to run and waits for the slave to signal completion.
  • memory is merged and shared between master and slaves through bus 343.
  • Each microprocessor may be a microprocessor having a hold line 342 such as the 320C25 previously referred to.
  • the master 329 can assert a hold through the direct hold line 342 for a period during which the slave's memory becomes part of the master's memory space. During this period the master 329 may allocate a block of instructions directly into the slave's memory form its own. The slave may thereafter be released from hold leaving the data bus 340 clear for the next operation by master 329.
  • the connection between master 329 and any of the slaves 321-326 may be by bus and the master and slaves may be located on separate boards.
  • the master 329 can address RAM 331-336 or respective slaves 321-326 through address bus 338. Thus, in addition to the direct access of master 329 to any of slaves 321-326 through hold line 342. Buffers are provided for each slave RAM 331-336.
  • the master 329 is provided with both ROM and RAM through which it may be programmed to carry on its operations in any suitable manner as may be convenient to one skilled in the art.
  • Board-to-board transfers are done by a single master board using a direct memory-to-memory move.
  • level 2 is the master board, and is in complete control of data flow from Level 1 to Level 3.
  • Level 1 The task that is being carried out by the arrangement of Level 1 may be regarded as the stitching together of information.
  • Level 0 forwards data from a plurality of pixels, each representing a detected event, then Level 1 correlates adjacency of the pixels and " recognizes a single object as a result of information of a plurality of pixels. Level 1 thus sends regional information regarding the number of pixels on line to Level 2.
  • row 1 pixel 10 might be triggered, row 2 pixel 11, row 3 pixel 12 etc. up to, row 50 pixel 59, all of which would be incorporated into a single linear object.
  • Level 1 Data flow is reduced by a considerable amount in Level 1. It may be by a reduction factor of around 10.
  • a flow chart for operation in Level 1 is illustrated in Figure 10.
  • Level 2 has a similar computer to that of Level 1 (as do also Levels 3, 4A, and 4).
  • Level 2 buffers the data output from Level 0 before it is processed on Level 3. This buffering is necessary to ensure that Level 1 may continue to process new data even before Level 3 has completed processing the previous data.
  • Level 3 has a similar computer architecture to that of Level 1 (as do also levels 2, 3, 4 and 4a).
  • Level 2 may be used to rationalize information received from different sensors. For example, if both the x-ray scanner detecting density and a light sensor indicating a surface feature both indicate a feature at a specific location, the information, only one set of information, for example will be passed to the next Level. Thus Level 3 generates as its output, the detected objects from each side of the board. Level 3 also serves to identify what each object is e.g. a knot. It does this by examining the source of data (e.g. the x-ray sensor), the shape of the object and whether or not any similar objects from other sensors occupy the same position on the board. A flow chart for operations in Level 2 is illustrated in Figure 11.
  • Level 4A converts the object data of Level 3 from rows and pixels to dimensioning in real world units.
  • Level 4A may also be used to scale the image. For example, if a board is warped, it may warp either towards or away from the camera thereby enlarging or diminishing the image. Provision may be made in Level 4A to compensate for this .
  • Level 3 has similar layout to that of Level 1.
  • a flow chart of its operations is illustrated in Figure 12.
  • Level 4 and 4A brings together data from each side of the board and is, again, of similar configuration to that of Level 1.
  • Level 4 merges the features from all four board sides. Features which run from one board side into one or more other sides can be identified as a single common feature.
  • Level 4 deals simply with all the sides of the board, there is a data reduction factor of 4 (for a 4 sided board) in Level 4.
  • Level 4 uses 4 sets of data, one for each side of the board, to get all the information together.
  • Level 5 Data from Level 4 is passed to Level 5 for use to grade the lumber and/or to produce optimization data which can be used to trim the lumber.
  • very great processing speed is no longer necessary since the data, at 512 pixels per line, from each camera or sensor has already been processed and reprocessed in real time.
  • processors would be used in setting up the systems of Levels 0 to 4 and 2 billion instructions per second (bips) would have been processed.
  • the microprocessor equipment for Level 5 may suitably be any standard personal computer provided with a sufficient amount of memory and speed. For example, a 16 MHz 80386 or a compatible computer would be suitable.
  • the computer required for Level 5 needs a relatively large memory to accommodate grading rules.
  • a simple manner of operation at this stage is to compare the information coming from Level 4 with information giving limits for grades according to local grading rules. If the information is within certain limits the relevant board will be accorded the grade designated for those limits. From the comparison, grading and optimization information is immediately available and it may be provided in the form of instructions for the trimmer saws and grade stamp machines in a conventional manner.
  • Level 6A is concerned with board tracking and coordinates grading information with board labelling and trimmer control Data acquired from any one board is associated with the bar code applied to that board by the bar code applicator 14.
  • the industrial applicability is at least in the use of the invention in lumber mills with a view to saving waste in overtrimming and general efficiency

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Textile Engineering (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Forests & Forestry (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Biodiversity & Conservation Biology (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Image Processing (AREA)
EP90904214A 1989-03-29 1990-02-23 Verfahren und vorrichtung zum klassifizieren von holz nach der realzeitmethode Withdrawn EP0465478A1 (de)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US33020489A 1989-03-29 1989-03-29
US330204 1989-03-29

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0465478A1 true EP0465478A1 (de) 1992-01-15

Family

ID=23288740

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP90904214A Withdrawn EP0465478A1 (de) 1989-03-29 1990-02-23 Verfahren und vorrichtung zum klassifizieren von holz nach der realzeitmethode

Country Status (4)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0465478A1 (de)
AU (1) AU5260090A (de)
CA (2) CA2050575A1 (de)
WO (1) WO1990011488A1 (de)

Families Citing this family (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE4223787C2 (de) * 1992-07-15 1995-08-17 Dimter Maschf Gmbh Anlage zur Bestimmung der Holzgüte von Schnitthölzern
FR2722573B1 (fr) * 1994-07-12 1996-10-04 Centre Techn Bois Ameublement Procede et dispositif de reconnaissance de particularites geometriques de pieces parallelepipediques de section polygonale
EP0820358A1 (de) * 1995-04-12 1998-01-28 Weyerhaeuser Company Messung und sortierung von holzkörpern auf grund ihres spezifischen gewichts
CA2215890C (en) * 1997-01-09 1999-02-23 Raoul Grenier A process for making a wood board and the wood board
CA2194793A1 (fr) * 1997-01-09 1998-07-09 Raoul Grenier Bois panneaute a haute resistance
US6272437B1 (en) 1998-04-17 2001-08-07 Cae Inc. Method and apparatus for improved inspection and classification of attributes of a workpiece
US6020957A (en) * 1998-04-30 2000-02-01 Kla-Tencor Corporation System and method for inspecting semiconductor wafers
WO2001020324A1 (en) * 1999-09-14 2001-03-22 Opti-Wood Aps Method for quality determination and handling of elongate wood items
US6701984B2 (en) 1999-12-15 2004-03-09 9069-0470 Quebec Inc. Wood board made of a plurality of wood pieces, method of manufacture and apparatus
ES2159267B1 (es) * 2000-02-17 2003-02-16 Ecoforestal Iberica De Maderas Sistema de cubicaje y analisis geometrico de madera en rollo para aserrado de la misma
US7854097B2 (en) 2004-01-16 2010-12-21 Jeld-Wen, Inc. Simulated divided light products and processes and systems for making such products
US7640073B2 (en) 2005-04-14 2009-12-29 Jeld-Wen, Inc. Systems and methods of identifying and manipulating objects
FI122331B (fi) * 2006-06-30 2011-12-15 Teknosavo Oy Menetelmä puun tilavuuden mittaamiseen ja laadun tarkkailuun
SE537956C2 (sv) * 2011-10-13 2015-12-01 Stora Enso Oyj Byggnadskomponent, fönsterram och trälamell med låg densitetsamt förfarande
US9678019B2 (en) * 2015-09-15 2017-06-13 Lucidyne Technologies, Inc. Check grader-actuatable interface for board lumber scanning
US10384235B2 (en) 2016-09-23 2019-08-20 Lucidyne Technologies, Inc. Method of facilitating check grader reaction to output produced by automatic board lumber grading system
CN108705641B (zh) * 2018-05-28 2023-07-04 中国林业科学研究院木材工业研究所 装配式木结构预制构件柔性加工生产线及柔性加工方法
FI20195615A1 (fi) * 2019-07-05 2021-01-06 Upm Kymmene Corp Menetelmä ja järjestely tietojen käsittelemiseksi puutavarankäsittelylinjalla

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB1445685A (en) * 1972-10-20 1976-08-11 Plessey Co Ltd Optical inspection arrangements
US4207472A (en) * 1975-12-05 1980-06-10 The Bendix Corporation Lumber inspection and optimization system
CA1043463A (en) * 1975-12-05 1978-11-28 Paul A. Mueller Lumber inspection and optimization system
US4221974A (en) * 1979-02-02 1980-09-09 The Bendix Corporation Lumber inspection and optimization system
US4286880A (en) * 1979-07-30 1981-09-01 The Bendix Corporation Scanning light beam lumber defect position system and method of using same
CA1253620A (en) * 1985-04-30 1989-05-02 Jon Claesson Method relating to three dimensional measurement of objects
EP0233970B1 (de) * 1986-02-22 1990-06-20 Helmut K. Pinsch GmbH & Co. Schnittholz-Prüfvorrichtung

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO9011488A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA2050575A1 (en) 1990-10-04
WO1990011488A1 (en) 1990-10-04
CA2509500A1 (en) 1990-10-04
AU5260090A (en) 1990-10-22

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0465478A1 (de) Verfahren und vorrichtung zum klassifizieren von holz nach der realzeitmethode
AU606015B2 (en) Lumber optimizer
US5986745A (en) Co-planar electromagnetic profile scanner
CA1271051A (en) Method and system for optically testing sawn timber
EP0917649B1 (de) Vorrichtung und verfahren zum feststellen von oberflächenfehlern
EP0198037B1 (de) Verfahren zur bestimmung eines lokalisierten faserwinkels in einem dreidimensionalen fasermaterial
US5960104A (en) Defect detection system for lumber
US5184733A (en) Apparatus and method for determining the volume, form and weight of objects
CA1043463A (en) Lumber inspection and optimization system
EP2041552B1 (de) Verfahren zur messung des volumens oder des endflächendurchmessers eines baumstamms sowie zur qualitätskontrolle
EP0580909A2 (de) Charakterisierung von Maserungsdefekten mittels Reflexion
US7227165B2 (en) System and method for classification of timber
CN107561091A (zh) 一种斜射式实木板材表面裂纹的检测系统和检测方法
US4891530A (en) Testing or inspecting apparatus and method for detecting differently shaped surfaces of objects
EP0765471B1 (de) Anordnung und verfahren zum nachweis von fehlern im holz
US8923599B2 (en) Method and arrangement in a measuring system
Wells et al. Defect detection performance of automated hardwood lumber grading system
EP0871008B1 (de) Vorrichtung zum Messen der Dimensionen eines langgestreckten Objektes mit einer im Durchschnitt gekrümmten Kontur
Skatter Determination of cross-sectional shape of softwood logs from three x-ray projections using an elliptical model
CA2237640C (en) Apparatus and method for detecting surface defects
Conners et al. A multisensor machine vision system for hardwood defect detection
Lee et al. Using an embedded-processor camera for surface scanning of unplaned hardwood lumber
Regalado Optimization of edging and trimming operations for red oak lumber
FI72616C (fi) Saett och anordning foer maetning av kvalitet och volym hos fibertraestockar.
Wells Automated Hardwood Lumber Grading

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19910927

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB IT LI LU NL SE

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19920615

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 19921027