EP0373279A1 - A process to manufacture "in situ" safety barriers for roads - Google Patents
A process to manufacture "in situ" safety barriers for roads Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP0373279A1 EP0373279A1 EP88500124A EP88500124A EP0373279A1 EP 0373279 A1 EP0373279 A1 EP 0373279A1 EP 88500124 A EP88500124 A EP 88500124A EP 88500124 A EP88500124 A EP 88500124A EP 0373279 A1 EP0373279 A1 EP 0373279A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- mould
- concrete
- roads
- barrier
- manufacturing
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E01—CONSTRUCTION OF ROADS, RAILWAYS, OR BRIDGES
- E01F—ADDITIONAL WORK, SUCH AS EQUIPPING ROADS OR THE CONSTRUCTION OF PLATFORMS, HELICOPTER LANDING STAGES, SIGNS, SNOW FENCES, OR THE LIKE
- E01F15/00—Safety arrangements for slowing, redirecting or stopping errant vehicles, e.g. guard posts or bollards; Arrangements for reducing damage to roadside structures due to vehicular impact
- E01F15/02—Continuous barriers extending along roads or between traffic lanes
- E01F15/08—Continuous barriers extending along roads or between traffic lanes essentially made of walls or wall-like elements ; Cable-linked blocks
- E01F15/081—Continuous barriers extending along roads or between traffic lanes essentially made of walls or wall-like elements ; Cable-linked blocks characterised by the use of a specific material
- E01F15/086—Continuous barriers extending along roads or between traffic lanes essentially made of walls or wall-like elements ; Cable-linked blocks characterised by the use of a specific material using plastic, rubber or synthetic materials
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E01—CONSTRUCTION OF ROADS, RAILWAYS, OR BRIDGES
- E01F—ADDITIONAL WORK, SUCH AS EQUIPPING ROADS OR THE CONSTRUCTION OF PLATFORMS, HELICOPTER LANDING STAGES, SIGNS, SNOW FENCES, OR THE LIKE
- E01F15/00—Safety arrangements for slowing, redirecting or stopping errant vehicles, e.g. guard posts or bollards; Arrangements for reducing damage to roadside structures due to vehicular impact
- E01F15/02—Continuous barriers extending along roads or between traffic lanes
- E01F15/08—Continuous barriers extending along roads or between traffic lanes essentially made of walls or wall-like elements ; Cable-linked blocks
- E01F15/081—Continuous barriers extending along roads or between traffic lanes essentially made of walls or wall-like elements ; Cable-linked blocks characterised by the use of a specific material
- E01F15/083—Continuous barriers extending along roads or between traffic lanes essentially made of walls or wall-like elements ; Cable-linked blocks characterised by the use of a specific material using concrete
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E01—CONSTRUCTION OF ROADS, RAILWAYS, OR BRIDGES
- E01F—ADDITIONAL WORK, SUCH AS EQUIPPING ROADS OR THE CONSTRUCTION OF PLATFORMS, HELICOPTER LANDING STAGES, SIGNS, SNOW FENCES, OR THE LIKE
- E01F15/00—Safety arrangements for slowing, redirecting or stopping errant vehicles, e.g. guard posts or bollards; Arrangements for reducing damage to roadside structures due to vehicular impact
- E01F15/02—Continuous barriers extending along roads or between traffic lanes
- E01F15/08—Continuous barriers extending along roads or between traffic lanes essentially made of walls or wall-like elements ; Cable-linked blocks
- E01F15/081—Continuous barriers extending along roads or between traffic lanes essentially made of walls or wall-like elements ; Cable-linked blocks characterised by the use of a specific material
- E01F15/085—Continuous barriers extending along roads or between traffic lanes essentially made of walls or wall-like elements ; Cable-linked blocks characterised by the use of a specific material using metal
Definitions
- the invention refers to a process to manufacture "in situ" safety barriers for roads and highways, being applicable also to the manufacturing of special kerbs.
- Another way of manufacturing of such safety barriers is based on concrete blocks (3) in mass prefabricated (see Fig. 2), in a shape more or less arched and joined together semirigidly and with a mass enough to bear the shock of a vehicle. These blocks have on their underside projections or legs (4) to allow the passage of water.
- the safety barrier is manufactured when the road is quite finished, including in said finishing the rolling layer, road borders, etc.
- the concrete must be white, by using white cement or cements from some quarries of special materials that give a light-coloured texture.
- the typical strength is between 150 and 175 Kg/cm2.
- each block is 700 cm2 (100 x 70cm), being the height with legs aprox. 77 to 85 cm.
- the minimum number of operations at work is two, stacking on road edge and mounting in the final location in the middle of the road.
- the process of the present invention has been designed so to have a barrier manufacturing system much more rational and more advantageous than those known and above-mentioned.
- the process of the invention is based in achieving a mould which, after being placed in the definitive location on the road, will be filled with a mass of suitable material, being this material any product that has a density similar to concrete.
- the said negative mould can be made of polyester, sheet, rigid plastics, etc., or of any other light, resistant material.
- the weight of the mould per meter must not be higher than 30 Kg; while the shape of the mould will be the suitable one for each application; that is for each requirement.
- the dimensions of said mould will be the suitable ones for each requirement.
- the storage of the moulds, forming part of the invention will require an area lower than required to store the known blocks, because the former can be stacked.
- handling will be easier, because of lightness of moulds, which can be carried to work after terminating the road, to store them in a suitable place, requiring no more than a worker to fill them with the material, from a concrete mixer, through a gravity device.
- the transport of the moulds is made easier, because owing to their less weight, it can be carried more units than in the case of concrete blocks.
- the recommended method is base on a mould (5) that can have any geometric configuration, being provided, on the top, with a filling hole (6) and air exit holes (7), while on the bottom has the projections (8) acting as support legs.
- the mould so made can be manufactured in factory and carried later to work, locating it in the definitive place of the road, so to be filled then with a material whose density is similar to for the concrete.
- the filling can be performed direct form the concrete-mixer through a gravity density coupled to the former and, at the opposite end, in front of the filling mouth (6) of the mould (5), allowing that a sort of funnel can be placed on the filling mouth.
- the block made according to the method of the invention referred as and 9a in those Figures, has side coupling means to have the barrier finished on the road; being this coupling means formed by a side projection (10-10a) mating in a recess (11-11a) provided in the opposite side, so to have the blocks matched, which include besides their relative lower projections or legs (12-12a).
- Fig. 6 is illustrated another block similar to 9b, in which the means to engage an adjacent block is a pair of rods (13) encased in the concrete.
- the rods (13) are metallic and rigid, and are housed in tubes of suitable diameter, which are integral with the block.
- the rods (13) project a short distance through the top and the bottom, being provided in the top some grooves (14) to arrange relative strips and nuts that will screw in the projecting and threaded ends of the rods (13), forming so the fixing between the blocks or moulds 9b.
- the projections of the rods ab can have a transverse hole, to attach the ends of the spring that, in this case, will constitute the fixing.
- the block 9b has also the relative lower projections or legs 12b.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Architecture (AREA)
- Civil Engineering (AREA)
- Structural Engineering (AREA)
- Refuge Islands, Traffic Blockers, Or Guard Fence (AREA)
- Road Paving Structures (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The invention refers to a process to manufacture "in situ" safety barriers for roads and highways, being applicable also to the manufacturing of special kerbs.
- In making the present roads and as a member of separation and safety between opposite traffic ways, it is necessary the invention or installation of a protecting member intended to fulfill two main objects:
- a) To avoid that a vehicle that has suffered an accident in one way inuades the opposite way.
- b) To allow the passage of water in case of rain or flood, being the this passage under said protecting member, so that there is no stagnation of the water flooding a given way, interrupting the traffic or at least causing an accident.
- One of the ways of manufacturing of said safety barriers consists in some sheet strips (1) coupling rigidly to small metal pillars (2) nailed to the ground (see Fig. 1). This safety barrier performs the required functions of limiting, absorbing the Kinetic energy of the mass of the vehicle and it allows to pass the water, although an important problem arises, like the permanent deformation in case of shocks, causing high maintenance costs.
- Another way of manufacturing of such safety barriers is based on concrete blocks (3) in mass prefabricated (see Fig. 2), in a shape more or less arched and joined together semirigidly and with a mass enough to bear the shock of a vehicle. These blocks have on their underside projections or legs (4) to allow the passage of water.
- The usual minimum dimensions of these blocks are 70 cm wide, 80 cm high, 100 cm long, a volume of aprox. 500 cm³. Taking into account the concrete density (0 = 2, 35) the mass of each member or block will be 1, 175 Kg aprox. With regard to the previous system, it has the advantage that its maintenance is practically null.
- In both cases, the safety barrier is manufactured when the road is quite finished, including in said finishing the rolling layer, road borders, etc.
- As the process referred in the invention is intended to replace the barriers made from prefabricated concrete members mentioned below, the features of this manufacturing way are going to be analysed; that is, the features of the barriers made of prefabricated concrete blocks, which have the following characteristics:
- The concrete must be white, by using white cement or cements from some quarries of special materials that give a light-coloured texture. The typical strength is between 150 and 175 Kg/cm².
- It is performed in factories duly provided with moulds enough. The process is as follows : filling of the concrete moulds, vibrating, setting and subsequent unmoulding.
- Because of the weight of each block, loading and unloading for storage is through a crane.
- The area of each block is 700 cm² (100 x 70cm), being the height with legs aprox. 77 to 85 cm.
- From the foregoing, it is easy to note the great difficulty to store the blocks, because they cannot be stacked and must remain near -by. Let us consider the required area for storage. Let us suppose a road of 10 Km that requres the manufacturing of 10. 000 blocks, so that the minimum storage area must be 7.000 m², that is, an area bigger than a football field.
- It always require a crane or the assistance of one or more workers.
- By using a truck of 2, 50 m x 10 m, the amount of 1 mm long blocks that the truck can carry will be 35 units maximum, being this limitation caused by their area and mass.
- The minimum number of operations at work is two, stacking on road edge and mounting in the final location in the middle of the road.
- At present, publick works depend on the economic factor, and besides on the termination term, so that the time required to finish a road through concrete barriers must be necessarily long, because there are four main disadvantages:
- 1) Slow manufacturing.
- 2) Big stacking areas.
- 3) High costs, because the expenses for the concrete is made since the early step of manufacturing, resulting high storage costs or delay in supplies because of slow making.
- 4) Great difficulty in handling, being required cranes and personnel, resulting in a slow handling.
- Taking into account the aforesaid features and disadvantages showing the system of manufacturing protection or safety barriers in roads, the process of the present invention has been designed so to have a barrier manufacturing system much more rational and more advantageous than those known and above-mentioned.
- More precisely, the process of the invention is based in achieving a mould which, after being placed in the definitive location on the road, will be filled with a mass of suitable material, being this material any product that has a density similar to concrete.
- As for manufacturing, this will be based on performing the mould through a base mould that constitutes the negative member, which later, it will be filled with the aforesaid material.
- The said negative mould can be made of polyester, sheet, rigid plastics, etc., or of any other light, resistant material. In any case, the weight of the mould per meter must not be higher than 30 Kg; while the shape of the mould will be the suitable one for each application; that is for each requirement.
- As for the dimensions of said mould, they will be the suitable ones for each requirement. In any case, as compared with the blocks used in above-mentioned conventional systems, it is seen that for the same dimensions, the storage of the moulds, forming part of the invention, will require an area lower than required to store the known blocks, because the former can be stacked.
- Likewise, handling will be easier, because of lightness of moulds, which can be carried to work after terminating the road, to store them in a suitable place, requiring no more than a worker to fill them with the material, from a concrete mixer, through a gravity device.
- The transport of the moulds is made easier, because owing to their less weight, it can be carried more units than in the case of concrete blocks.
- The advantages that affords the method of the invention can be summarized as follows:
- Manufacturing speed.
- Making in ann colour.
- Handling easiness.
- Marking speed.
- Replacement easiness.
- Minimum and economic maintenance.
- Posibility to incorporate soft strip to limit the mould. - Possibility to use the mould or moulds as a marking means, combining units with different colours, for instance, red and white.
- Economy and terms.
- Higher finishing quality
- Possibility to use any semi-rigid fixing system between moulds.
- Possibility to make the moulds in any geometric shape, adapting so to the requirements of each application. - Front the comparative picture illustrated below, can be seen the aforesaid advantages and others that ilustrates the new system or method to make safety barriers with regard to the conventional or present system in which the barries are made of prefabricated concrete blocks.
COMPARISON OF SYSTEMS Concept Presente system : prefabricated concrete New system Weight in shop 1.100 Kg/m 30 Kg/m Weight, finished on the road 1.100 Kg/m 1.130 Kg/m Finishing, texture coarse smooth Stability to agents atmospheric good good Base material concrete only any, with density 2,1Possibility of smooth and bright colours No Yes Possibility of writing, marking, stripping,.. No Yes Handling at work Bad Excellent Supply Slow Quick Execution at work Slow Quick Transport Difficult-expensive Easy-cheap Manufacturing Slow Quick Stacking-storage Bad Excellent New designs Difficult Easy Maintenance Good Excellent Spare parts Good Excellent Can save markings? No Yes - From the drawings appended to the present specification, which form part of the same, the scope of the invention can be easily understood, as well as the barriers made according to the recommended method, being all this illustrated for an orientative and non-limiting end
- The drawings show:
- Fig. 1 ilustrates an schematic view of a protection or safety barrier relative to the state of the art defined at the beginning of this specification. As it was discussed, the barrier is made from sheet strips (1) attached to small pillars (2) nailed to the ground.
- Fig. 2 shows another schematic view of a second safety barrier relative to the state of the art previously defined. This barrier is made of concrete blocks (3), mass fabricated, joined together, semi-rigidly, and provided with under projections or legs (4).
- Fig. 3 shows a perspective view of a mould made of sheet, plastics or any suitable material, in one of the manufacturing shapes which is intendend to be filled with material to form the barriers made according to the present invention.
- Fig. 4 shows another perspective view of a new model of block already manufactured, corresponding also to the object of the invention. In this model can be seen side coupling means.
- Fig. 5 shows another embodiment similar to the preceding one, but with a different side coupling system.
- Fig.6 shows another embodiment similar to the preceding ones, with a different coupling system, consisting, in this case, in two metal bars embedded inside the vertical-shaped block, which project from its ends so that fixing is performed through these, by nuts and pletine, or by springs.
- Referring to the above-mentioned Figs 3,4,5,6 and 7, the recommended method is base on a mould (5) that can have any geometric configuration, being provided, on the top, with a filling hole (6) and air exit holes (7), while on the bottom has the projections (8) acting as support legs.
- The mould so made can be manufactured in factory and carried later to work, locating it in the definitive place of the road, so to be filled then with a material whose density is similar to for the concrete. The filling can be performed direct form the concrete-mixer through a gravity density coupled to the former and, at the opposite end, in front of the filling mouth (6) of the mould (5), allowing that a sort of funnel can be placed on the filling mouth.
- So the road barriers can be made quickly, requiring, on the other hand, a reduced stacking surface and having the advantage of storing all the required moulds for a road without big costs, because the mould is cheap and the concrete will not be used till the last moment.
- It must be noted too that through this system a lot of filling can be performed "in situ", since the filling is made at work, what is not the case for the system of prefabricated blocks, because to be able to fill the mould in shop, it is necessary to wait that the concrete sets and to unmould before making another filling.
- As illustrated in Figs 4 and 5, the block made according to the method of the invention, referred as and 9a in those Figures, has side coupling means to have the barrier finished on the road; being this coupling means formed by a side projection (10-10a) mating in a recess (11-11a) provided in the opposite side, so to have the blocks matched, which include besides their relative lower projections or legs (12-12a).
- In Fig. 6 is illustrated another block similar to 9b, in which the means to engage an adjacent block is a pair of rods (13) encased in the concrete. The rods (13) are metallic and rigid, and are housed in tubes of suitable diameter, which are integral with the block. The rods (13) project a short distance through the top and the bottom, being provided in the top some grooves (14) to arrange relative strips and nuts that will screw in the projecting and threaded ends of the rods (13), forming so the fixing between the blocks or
moulds 9b. - Besides, it has been foreseen that the projections of the rods ab can have a transverse hole, to attach the ends of the spring that, in this case, will constitute the fixing.
- The
block 9b has also the relative lower projections or legs 12b.
Claims (3)
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AT88500124T ATE103652T1 (en) | 1988-12-15 | 1988-12-15 | PROCEDURE FOR BUILDING BUDGET IN PLACE. |
DE19883888844 DE3888844T2 (en) | 1988-12-15 | 1988-12-15 | Procedures for creating guide walls on site. |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
ES878702657A ES2005324A6 (en) | 1987-09-15 | 1987-09-15 | A process to manufacture "in situ" safety barriers for roads. |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP0373279A1 true EP0373279A1 (en) | 1990-06-20 |
EP0373279B1 EP0373279B1 (en) | 1994-03-30 |
Family
ID=8252501
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP19880500124 Expired - Lifetime EP0373279B1 (en) | 1987-09-15 | 1988-12-15 | A process to manufacture "in situ" safety barriers for roads |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP0373279B1 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2005324A6 (en) |
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0639674A1 (en) * | 1993-08-18 | 1995-02-22 | Guenter Adolf Baatz | Rubber vehicular impact barrier |
EP0641893A1 (en) * | 1993-09-07 | 1995-03-08 | Peter Rausch | Barrier element |
EP0666376A2 (en) * | 1994-02-04 | 1995-08-09 | Adolf Nissen Elektrobau GmbH + Co KG | Guide wall for motor vehicles |
GB2407837B (en) * | 2003-11-04 | 2007-07-11 | Corus Uk Ltd | Traffic control barriers |
EP2472006A2 (en) | 2010-12-30 | 2012-07-04 | In novo d.o.o. | Fence able to be made in situ, and method for making it |
CN103103936A (en) * | 2012-12-13 | 2013-05-15 | 朱春梅 | Padding type roadblock |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
ES2316266B1 (en) * | 2007-01-03 | 2009-12-03 | Joan Gerard Nadal Cloquell | MOLD FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF CONCRETE BARRIERS FOR THE CONTAINMENT OF VEHICLES. |
Citations (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
FR1430536A (en) * | 1964-03-12 | 1966-03-04 | Protective barrier for roads, comprising elastically connected concrete or stone blocks | |
GB1327687A (en) * | 1971-08-14 | 1973-08-22 | Mead P R | Building block |
DE7439889U (en) * | 1976-06-03 | Basalt-Actien-Gesellschaft, 5460 Linz | Concrete road separator for multi-lane motorways | |
GB1497860A (en) * | 1973-10-30 | 1978-01-12 | Charcon Ltd | Traffic safety barriers |
WO1982004272A1 (en) * | 1981-06-01 | 1982-12-09 | Bengt Oennert Almer | An improved concrete block |
US4406563A (en) * | 1981-03-30 | 1983-09-27 | Urlberger Hermann Hans | Protective barrier provided with at least one longitudinal side bar |
EP0125817A1 (en) * | 1983-04-18 | 1984-11-21 | Quick-Steel Engineering Pty Limited | Transferable lane dividers |
FR2585047A1 (en) * | 1985-07-22 | 1987-01-23 | Tech Special Securite | Safety device for roads, motorways and urban ways, for separating two lanes of traffic |
DE8708908U1 (en) * | 1987-06-27 | 1987-08-20 | Zirec Zieringer GmbH & Co Recycling, 6140 Bensheim | Separating device or protective device for traffic areas |
-
1987
- 1987-09-15 ES ES878702657A patent/ES2005324A6/en not_active Expired
-
1988
- 1988-12-15 EP EP19880500124 patent/EP0373279B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Patent Citations (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE7439889U (en) * | 1976-06-03 | Basalt-Actien-Gesellschaft, 5460 Linz | Concrete road separator for multi-lane motorways | |
FR1430536A (en) * | 1964-03-12 | 1966-03-04 | Protective barrier for roads, comprising elastically connected concrete or stone blocks | |
GB1327687A (en) * | 1971-08-14 | 1973-08-22 | Mead P R | Building block |
GB1497860A (en) * | 1973-10-30 | 1978-01-12 | Charcon Ltd | Traffic safety barriers |
US4406563A (en) * | 1981-03-30 | 1983-09-27 | Urlberger Hermann Hans | Protective barrier provided with at least one longitudinal side bar |
WO1982004272A1 (en) * | 1981-06-01 | 1982-12-09 | Bengt Oennert Almer | An improved concrete block |
EP0125817A1 (en) * | 1983-04-18 | 1984-11-21 | Quick-Steel Engineering Pty Limited | Transferable lane dividers |
FR2585047A1 (en) * | 1985-07-22 | 1987-01-23 | Tech Special Securite | Safety device for roads, motorways and urban ways, for separating two lanes of traffic |
DE8708908U1 (en) * | 1987-06-27 | 1987-08-20 | Zirec Zieringer GmbH & Co Recycling, 6140 Bensheim | Separating device or protective device for traffic areas |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
Title |
---|
CIVIL ENGINEERING-ASCE, vol. 41, no. 10, October 1971, pages 77-80; E.C. LOKKEN: "Concrete median barrier safely redirects impacting cars" * |
STRASSEN- UND TIEFBAU, vol. 35, no. 12, 1981, pages 16-19; E. JAKUBEIT: "Betongleitwände als abweisende Schutzvorrichtung" * |
Cited By (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0639674A1 (en) * | 1993-08-18 | 1995-02-22 | Guenter Adolf Baatz | Rubber vehicular impact barrier |
EP0641893A1 (en) * | 1993-09-07 | 1995-03-08 | Peter Rausch | Barrier element |
EP0666376A2 (en) * | 1994-02-04 | 1995-08-09 | Adolf Nissen Elektrobau GmbH + Co KG | Guide wall for motor vehicles |
EP0666376A3 (en) * | 1994-02-04 | 1995-09-20 | Nissen Adolf Elektrobau | |
GB2407837B (en) * | 2003-11-04 | 2007-07-11 | Corus Uk Ltd | Traffic control barriers |
EP2472006A2 (en) | 2010-12-30 | 2012-07-04 | In novo d.o.o. | Fence able to be made in situ, and method for making it |
CN103103936A (en) * | 2012-12-13 | 2013-05-15 | 朱春梅 | Padding type roadblock |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
ES2005324A6 (en) | 1989-03-01 |
EP0373279B1 (en) | 1994-03-30 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US5137391A (en) | Process to manufacture "in situ" safety barriers for roads | |
US5106554A (en) | Method of manufacturing barriers | |
EP0373279A1 (en) | A process to manufacture "in situ" safety barriers for roads | |
US20070110517A1 (en) | Multi-component road barrier | |
US5284326A (en) | Resilient road-guard post, and method of manufacture thereof | |
US4925333A (en) | Sectional shock absorbing and motorist warning highway barriers | |
US20040057791A1 (en) | Modular securing device and process of laying such a device | |
GB2566062A (en) | Surface mount security barrier | |
CN212670357U (en) | Mountain area highway rockfall protection canopy | |
EP2356285B1 (en) | Water-ballasted protection barrier | |
AU2019207522A1 (en) | A barrier | |
CN215714365U (en) | Curb monomer and curb | |
US20150132055A1 (en) | Lane separator | |
DE3888844T2 (en) | Procedures for creating guide walls on site. | |
CN2474578Y (en) | Impact proof guard bar | |
CN215485181U (en) | Safety protection frame is used in highway engineering construction | |
CN219032978U (en) | Safety island for station card | |
CN214530800U (en) | Explosion-proof well lid | |
CN212506013U (en) | Rural highway crash barrier | |
CN110952481B (en) | Cast-in-place concrete guardrail structure and construction method thereof | |
CN221276449U (en) | Anticollision mound | |
CN212742223U (en) | Overpass bridge construction protection platform | |
CN213952023U (en) | Highway safety warning isolating device | |
CN212533794U (en) | Safety warning roadblock is used in highway engineering construction | |
CN220183902U (en) | Anti-collision barrel for road traffic |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE FR GB GR IT LI LU NL SE |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 19901205 |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 19910611 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE FR GB GR IT LI LU NL SE |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 103652 Country of ref document: AT Date of ref document: 19940415 Kind code of ref document: T |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 3888844 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 19940505 |
|
ITF | It: translation for a ep patent filed |
Owner name: ING. A. GIAMBROCONO & C. S.R.L. |
|
ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GR Ref legal event code: FG4A Free format text: 3012389 |
|
EAL | Se: european patent in force in sweden |
Ref document number: 88500124.8 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed | ||
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Payment date: 19951213 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Payment date: 19951215 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Payment date: 19951219 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Payment date: 19951229 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Payment date: 19951230 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Payment date: 19960101 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Payment date: 19960130 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 19961215 Ref country code: AT Effective date: 19961215 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Effective date: 19961216 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LI Effective date: 19961231 Ref country code: CH Effective date: 19961231 Ref country code: BE Effective date: 19961231 |
|
BERE | Be: lapsed |
Owner name: GARCIA BALLESTEROS ANGEL Effective date: 19961231 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: THE PATENT HAS BEEN ANNULLED BY A DECISION OF A NATIONAL AUTHORITY Effective date: 19970630 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Effective date: 19970701 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GR Ref legal event code: MM2A Free format text: 3012389 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
NLV4 | Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee |
Effective date: 19970701 |
|
EUG | Se: european patent has lapsed |
Ref document number: 88500124.8 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20011212 Year of fee payment: 14 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20011219 Year of fee payment: 14 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: IF02 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20020109 Year of fee payment: 14 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20021215 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20030701 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20021215 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20030901 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED. Effective date: 20051215 |