EP0351771A1 - Non-chrome cleaner/deoxidizer system - Google Patents

Non-chrome cleaner/deoxidizer system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0351771A1
EP0351771A1 EP89113143A EP89113143A EP0351771A1 EP 0351771 A1 EP0351771 A1 EP 0351771A1 EP 89113143 A EP89113143 A EP 89113143A EP 89113143 A EP89113143 A EP 89113143A EP 0351771 A1 EP0351771 A1 EP 0351771A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
solution
hydrogen peroxide
aluminum
deoxidizing
cleaning
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP89113143A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0351771B1 (en
Inventor
Mark W. Mcmillen
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Henkel Corp
Original Assignee
Henkel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Henkel Corp filed Critical Henkel Corp
Publication of EP0351771A1 publication Critical patent/EP0351771A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0351771B1 publication Critical patent/EP0351771B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23GCLEANING OR DE-GREASING OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY CHEMICAL METHODS OTHER THAN ELECTROLYSIS
    • C23G1/00Cleaning or pickling metallic material with solutions or molten salts
    • C23G1/02Cleaning or pickling metallic material with solutions or molten salts with acid solutions
    • C23G1/12Light metals
    • C23G1/125Light metals aluminium

Definitions

  • This invention relates to a novel process for cleaning and deoxidizing aluminum prior to conversion treatment.
  • the process is based on an acid or alkaline cleaning system and a chromate-free deoxidizer system.
  • chromated deoxidizers have been used to enable aluminum samples to pass designated corrosion tests, as for example, MIL-C-5541C.
  • the aluminum is first cleaned in a relatively non-etching alkaline soak cleaner, deoxidized in an acidic chromate solution and subsequently chromated.
  • an alkaline etch or alkaline chemical milling solution was used.
  • This step was followed by a deoxidation step which usually employed a chromated deoxidizer, to remove "smut" produced by etching.
  • the aluminum was then chromated.
  • attempts to replace chromate in the deoxidizing step have generally involved the use of iron salts such as ferric sulfate.
  • iron based deoxidizers have never provided results equal to the chromate containing deoxidizer systems.
  • U.S. Patent 4,451,304 to Batiuk provides a treatment for aluminum which employs an alkaline cleaning step and a deoxidizer step.
  • the deoxidizer step employs a non-chromate deoxidizer which is an equeous solution of sodium or potassium nitrite.
  • the present invention is advantageous in that it eliminates the use of hexavalent chromium in the cleaning and deoxidizing step and further provides enhanced performance over previously disclosed non-chromium processes for the cleaning and deoxidizing of aluminum prior to chemical conversion treatments.
  • aluminum is cleaned in an aqueous acidic or alkaline solution.
  • the preferred acidulants are acids such as sulfuric acid, mitric acid, hydrofluoric acid, phosphoric acid, citric acid, oxalic acid, acetic acid, gluconic acid, hydroxyacetic acid and the like or mixtures of two or more such acids.
  • the acidic solution is a dilute solution which provides low etching.
  • the alkaline cleaning solutions useful in the present invention generally contain alkali metal hydroxides or other water soluble alkaline materials such as trisodium phosphate, alkali silicates, tetrasodium pyrophosphate and the like.
  • the etchants can also comprise acidic solutions of fluoride compositions such as hydrogen fluoride and fluoride salts, fluoride complexes and the like, such as ammonium bifluoride, fluorosilicic acid, fluorophosphonic acid, its salts, and the like.
  • fluoride compositions such as hydrogen fluoride and fluoride salts, fluoride complexes and the like, such as ammonium bifluoride, fluorosilicic acid, fluorophosphonic acid, its salts, and the like.
  • the aluminum is then immersed in an aqueous acidic deoxidizer solution containing at least one of the following deoxidizer compositions hydrogen peroxide or heteropoly vanadic acids or its salts.
  • the aluminum can be rinsed before contact with the deoxidizer solution. The use of a rinse is preferred.
  • the aluminum article can be cleaned and deoxidized in a single step by including a deoxidizer compound such as hydrogen peroxide in the acid cleaning solution.
  • a deoxidizer compound such as hydrogen peroxide
  • the term "aluminum" used in connection with the substrate metal to be treated includes aluminum metal per se and also those aluminum alloys which are generally subjected to a cleaning and deoxidizing treatment prior to chromating or other chemical or electrochemical conversion treatment.
  • impurity metals are copper, manganese, nickel, zinc, titanium, vanadium, sodium and gallium.
  • Aluminum alloys generally contain larger amounts of other metals.
  • Such alloying metals include silicon, chromium, lead, iron, copper, magnesium, manganese, zinc and the like.
  • Such metals in the form of ions as well as aluminum ions invariably are present in the deoxidizer solutions by virtue of the action of such solutions on the metal and smut. It is one aspect of the present invention that the deoxidizer solutions containing stabilizers can continue to function in the presence of such other metal ions, particularly iron, copper and manganese.
  • the multivalent metal ions tend to catalyze the decomposition of the hydrogen peroxide component. This is especially true with copper and manganese.
  • the aluminum substrate is subjected to cleaning and/or etching preferably with a dilute aqueous acidic solution at a pH of less than 2.
  • the pH is below 2 and most preferably below 1.5.
  • the cleaning solutions generally contain from 0.005% to 5% by volume or 10% by weight of the acids but can contain up to about 50% by weight, and preferably from about .2 to about 8% by weight and more preferably from about 0.4% to about 2.5% by volume. It is also preferred to employ a mixture of acids such as sulfuric acid and hydrofluoric acid.
  • suitable surfactants can be included in the cleaning solutions. They can be used in amounts of from 0% to 5% by weight, and preferably up to about 2% and most preferably up to about 0.5% by weight. Any suitable surfactants which are compatible with the cleaning solution and do not leave an undesirable film on the aluminum's surface can be used. Such surfactants include the cationic, anionic, amphoteric and nonionic surfactants.
  • the cleaning and/or etching step can be done in an alkaline cleaner etching solution.
  • alkaline cleaning solutions which contain alkali metal hydroxide, alkali metal carbonate, trialkali metal phosphate (such as trisodium phosphate) tetralkali metal pyrophosphate (tetrasodium pyrophosphate) alkali metal silicates and the like, alone or in combination can also be used in the cleaning step of the present invention.
  • Alkaline cleaning compositious such as Ridoline® 53, P3 Almeco® 18 and Ridoline® 322 can be used in the cleaning step.
  • an acid cleaning-etching step can be combined with the deoxidizer step by including hydrogen peroxide and a hydrogen peroxide stabilizer with an acid cleaning solution.
  • the combined cleaning and deoxidizing steps can be carried out at a temperature of from about ambient to about 170 o F and preferably from about 90 o F to about 150 o F.
  • the pH of the solution is preferably below about 3 and more preferably below about 1.5 and most preferably below about 0.5.
  • the cleaning-etching step can be conducted in a short period of time with substantially little etching or can be continued for a longer period of time if a deeply etched surface is desired.
  • the cleaning-etching step can be conducted at ambient temperatures but it is preferred to conduct the cleaning step at elevated solution temperatures. Higher temperatures increase the rate of cleaning and/or etching action of the cleaner solution and a certain degree of care must be exercised to ensure that the desired degree of cleaning or etch is obtained.
  • the temperature of the cleaning/etching solution is preferably from about 90 o F to about 175 o F and most preferably from about 100 o F to about 150 o F.
  • the deoxidizer bath be acidic and preferably be below a pH of 4, and more preferably at or below 2.
  • the heteroploy ions can be added to the bath as such or can be generated in situ from their components.
  • the deoxidizer comprises from 0.1 gram/liter to the solubility limit of the material and an acid to form a composition having a pH below 3.
  • mineral acids are used and nitric acid is preferred.
  • the solutions contain from 0.03 to 30% by weight hydrogen peroxide and it is further preferred that one or more stabilizers for hydrogen peroxide also be employed in the solution.
  • the pH is also preferable to adjust the pH to about 3 or less and preferably with nitric acid.
  • the pH is preferably not greater than 1.5 and most preferably 0.5 or below.
  • the deoxidizer solution is preferably maintained at a temperature from about ambient to about 150 o F depending on the time the aluminum article is in contact with the solution.
  • the aluminum article preferably is in contact with the deoxidizer solution from about 1 to about 25 minutes.
  • the contact time is generally shorter at higher temperatures.
  • Stabilizers for peroxides are well known and are exemplified in U.S. Patent 4,509,678. This patent is incorporated herein by reference.
  • Other suitable stabilizers for hydrogen peroxide are well known in the art and any of these can be conveniently used provided they are compatible with acidic solutions.
  • a preferred group of stabilizers is disclosed in U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 07/221,063 filed on July 19, 1988, in the name of Mark McMillen and entitled "Stabilization of Peroxide Solutions.
  • the treated aluminum substrate is then chromated by chromating treatments for aluminum, which are well known in the art. Chromating with chromating compositions such Alodine® 1200S or Alodine® 600 product of Parker + Amchem a division of Henkel Corporation are useful.
  • the aluminum substrates are preferably rinsed before being treated with the chromating compositions. Rinsing is preferred to reduce contaminatin of the chromating composition with the components of the deoxidizing treatment composition.
  • a cleaning solution was prepared as follows:
  • a deoxidizer solution was prepared as follows: A concentrate was first prepared by blending 3800 mls of 35% hydrogen peroxide and 200 mls of Dowfax® 241 (sodium dodecyl diphenyl oxide disulfonate).
  • Panels of aluminum alloy 2024-T3 were immersed in the cleaning solution at a temperature of 120 o F for a period of ten minutes. The panels were then removed, rinsed with deionized water and immersed in the deoxidizer solution at ambient temperature for 15 minutes. The panels were rinsed and subsequently chromated. The chromated panels successfully passed MIL-C-5541C test for neutral salt spray specifications.
  • the MIL-C-5541C specification and test methods are incorprated herein by reference.
  • a cleaner solution concentrate was prepared by blending 100 mls of 96% sulfuric acid and 416 mls of 75% phosphoric acid and diluting to one liter.
  • a cleaner solution was prepared by mixing 140 mls of cleaner solution and 70 mls of hydrfluoric acid solution concentrate as prepared in Example 1 and diluting to 7 liters.
  • the deoxidizer solution used in this example was identical to that used in Example 1.
  • Panels of aluminum alloy, 2024-T3 were immersed in the above cleaning solution at a temperature of 120 o F for a period of 10 minutes. Thereafter the panels were removed, rinsed with water and immersed in the deoxidizer solution at ambient temperatures for a period of 15 minutes. Thereafter, the panels were rinsed and chromated. These panels passed the MIL-C-5541C neutral salt spray specifications.
  • a cleaner concentrate solution was prepared by blending 256 mls of 96% sulfuric acid, 90 grams of Mirawet® B (amphoteric surfactant), 90 grams of Surfonic® LF-17 (ethoxylated alcohol) and diluting to one liter with water.
  • 40 milliliters of the hydrofluoric concentrate were added.
  • 21 milliliters of the hydrofluoric concentrate were added, and in respect to the 0.009%, 2 milliliters of the hydrofluoric acid concentrate were added.
  • a 4 liter deoxidizer bath was prepared in a manner similar to that of Examples 1 above.
  • the ingredients employed in the deoxidizer baths are set forth in Tables I and II below.
  • cleaning solution contains 0.3% by volume sulfuric acid (96%), 0.17% by volume hydrofluoric acid (70%), and up to 0.2% by volume sodium 2-ethyl hexyl sulfate surfactant for a strong etch cleaner.
  • This cleaner should be used for 5-10 minutes at temperatures of from about 110 o F to about 130 o F.
  • the aluminum panels prefferably to a deoxidiziang step for about 10-15 minutes by immersion in a deoxidizing bath of preferrably 8% by volume hydrogen peroxide (35%), 3% by volume (42 o Bé) nitric acid and up to 0.5% of a stabilizer for the peroxide (preferrably MIRATAINE® CBS (cocoamidopropyl hydroxy sultaine).
  • a deoxidizing bath of preferrably 8% by volume hydrogen peroxide (35%), 3% by volume (42 o Bé) nitric acid and up to 0.5% of a stabilizer for the peroxide (preferrably MIRATAINE® CBS (cocoamidopropyl hydroxy sultaine).
  • etching cleaner When it is desired to have an etching cleaner with lower etching properties, it is preferred to employ a cleaning solution of 0.5% by volume sulfuric acid (96%), 1.7% phosphoric acid by volume (75%), and up to 0.2% of a surfactant combination which is a mixture of Triton® N-100 and Surfonic® LF-17. This is used at a temperature of from about 110 o F to about 140 o F for 5 to 10 minutes followed by the same deoxidizer step as established above for from about 5 to 15 minutes.
  • a cleaning solution 0.5% by volume sulfuric acid (96%), 1.7% phosphoric acid by volume (75%), and up to 0.2% of a surfactant combination which is a mixture of Triton® N-100 and Surfonic® LF-17. This is used at a temperature of from about 110 o F to about 140 o F for 5 to 10 minutes followed by the same deoxidizer step as established above for from about 5 to 15 minutes.
  • a cleaner-etching-deoxidizer bath was prepared containing 8% H2O2, 2.5% HNO3, 1.5% phosphoric acid and 2 ml/liter of Triton® X-102 surfactant (octylphenoxy polyethoxy ethanol).
  • Aluminum panels were immersed in the cleaning-etching deoxidizer solution for 10 minutes at 120 o F. The panels were rinsed and then chromated in an Alodine® 1200S chromating solution according to manufacturer's recommendations. The chromated panels were then tested in neutral salt spray for 336 hours. There was no pitting or corrosion of the aluminum panels.
  • a cleaner-etching-deoxidizer bath was prepared containing 8% H2O2, 2.5% HNO3, 1 ml/liter of 79% HBF4 and 2 ml/liter Triton® X-102 surfactant.
  • Aluminum panels were immersed in the cleaner-etching-deoxidizer solution for 10 minutes at 120 o F. The panels were rinsed and then chromated in an Alodine® 1200S solution according to manufacturer's recommendations. The chromated panels were then tested in neutral salt spray for 336 hours. There was no pitting or corrosion of the aluminum panels.
  • the combining of the acid cleaning-etch step with the deoxidizer step into one treating step is an advance in the art.
  • the combining of two steps into a single step reduces the equipment necessary to provide a commerical process and in addition reduces the processing time for each aluminum piece.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Cleaning And De-Greasing Of Metallic Materials By Chemical Methods (AREA)
  • Chemical Treatment Of Metals (AREA)
  • Detergent Compositions (AREA)
  • Treatment Of Water By Oxidation Or Reduction (AREA)
  • Solid-Sorbent Or Filter-Aiding Compositions (AREA)
  • Compounds Of Alkaline-Earth Elements, Aluminum Or Rare-Earth Metals (AREA)
  • Processing Of Solid Wastes (AREA)
  • Photoreceptors In Electrophotography (AREA)
  • Organic Low-Molecular-Weight Compounds And Preparation Thereof (AREA)

Abstract

The invention is a metal treating process which uses a chrome-free deoxidizing bath. The process is useful for cleaning and deoxidizing aluminum substrates.

Description

    Related Application
  • This is a continuation-in-part of application Serial No. 221,065 filed July 19, 1988, which is incorporated herein by reference.
  • Field of the Invention
  • This invention relates to a novel process for cleaning and deoxidizing aluminum prior to conversion treatment. The process is based on an acid or alkaline cleaning system and a chromate-free deoxidizer system.
  • Background of the Invention
  • Traditionally, chromated deoxidizers have been used to enable aluminum samples to pass designated corrosion tests, as for example, MIL-C-5541C. The aluminum is first cleaned in a relatively non-etching alkaline soak cleaner, deoxidized in an acidic chromate solution and subsequently chromated. Alternatively, if etching was desired, an alkaline etch or alkaline chemical milling solution was used. This step was followed by a deoxidation step which usually employed a chromated deoxidizer, to remove "smut" produced by etching. The aluminum was then chromated. In the past, attempts to replace chromate in the deoxidizing step have generally involved the use of iron salts such as ferric sulfate. However, iron based deoxidizers have never provided results equal to the chromate containing deoxidizer systems.
  • U.S. Patent 4,451,304 to Batiuk provides a treatment for aluminum which employs an alkaline cleaning step and a deoxidizer step. The deoxidizer step employs a non-chromate deoxidizer which is an equeous solution of sodium or potassium nitrite. This patent, which is incorporated herein by reference, includes a detailed discussion of the prior art in this area.
  • Other than in the operating examples and claims, or where otherwise indicated, all numbers expressing quantities of ingredients or reaction conditions used herein are to be understood as modified in all instances by the term "about".
  • DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention is advantageous in that it eliminates the use of hexavalent chromium in the cleaning and deoxidizing step and further provides enhanced performance over previously disclosed non-chromium processes for the cleaning and deoxidizing of aluminum prior to chemical conversion treatments.
  • In accordance with the present invention, aluminum is cleaned in an aqueous acidic or alkaline solution. The preferred acidulants are acids such as sulfuric acid, mitric acid, hydrofluoric acid, phosphoric acid, citric acid, oxalic acid, acetic acid, gluconic acid, hydroxyacetic acid and the like or mixtures of two or more such acids. Preferably the acidic solution is a dilute solution which provides low etching.
  • The alkaline cleaning solutions useful in the present invention generally contain alkali metal hydroxides or other water soluble alkaline materials such as trisodium phosphate, alkali silicates, tetrasodium pyrophosphate and the like.
  • The etchants can also comprise acidic solutions of fluoride compositions such as hydrogen fluoride and fluoride salts, fluoride complexes and the like, such as ammonium bifluoride, fluorosilicic acid, fluorophosphonic acid, its salts, and the like.
  • Following the cleaning step, the aluminum is then immersed in an aqueous acidic deoxidizer solution containing at least one of the following deoxidizer compositions hydrogen peroxide or heteropoly vanadic acids or its salts. Optionally, the aluminum can be rinsed before contact with the deoxidizer solution. The use of a rinse is preferred.
  • In another embodiment of the invention the aluminum article can be cleaned and deoxidized in a single step by including a deoxidizer compound such as hydrogen peroxide in the acid cleaning solution.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • In the description of the invention, the term "aluminum" used in connection with the substrate metal to be treated, includes aluminum metal per se and also those aluminum alloys which are generally subjected to a cleaning and deoxidizing treatment prior to chromating or other chemical or electrochemical conversion treatment.
  • Aluminum metal per se invariably contains trace impurities of other metals. Exemplary of such impurity metals are copper, manganese, nickel, zinc, titanium, vanadium, sodium and gallium.
  • Aluminum alloys generally contain larger amounts of other metals. Such alloying metals include silicon, chromium, lead, iron, copper, magnesium, manganese, zinc and the like.
  • Such metals in the form of ions as well as aluminum ions invariably are present in the deoxidizer solutions by virtue of the action of such solutions on the metal and smut. It is one aspect of the present invention that the deoxidizer solutions containing stabilizers can continue to function in the presence of such other metal ions, particularly iron, copper and manganese. The multivalent metal ions tend to catalyze the decomposition of the hydrogen peroxide component. This is especially true with copper and manganese.
  • In respect to the first step of this invention the aluminum substrate is subjected to cleaning and/or etching preferably with a dilute aqueous acidic solution at a pH of less than 2.
  • Preferably the pH is below 2 and most preferably below 1.5. The cleaning solutions generally contain from 0.005% to 5% by volume or 10% by weight of the acids but can contain up to about 50% by weight, and preferably from about .2 to about 8% by weight and more preferably from about 0.4% to about 2.5% by volume. It is also preferred to employ a mixture of acids such as sulfuric acid and hydrofluoric acid.
  • While optional, suitable surfactants can be included in the cleaning solutions. They can be used in amounts of from 0% to 5% by weight, and preferably up to about 2% and most preferably up to about 0.5% by weight. Any suitable surfactants which are compatible with the cleaning solution and do not leave an undesirable film on the aluminum's surface can be used. Such surfactants include the cationic, anionic, amphoteric and nonionic surfactants.
  • The cleaning and/or etching step can be done in an alkaline cleaner etching solution. Known alkaline cleaning solutions which contain alkali metal hydroxide, alkali metal carbonate, trialkali metal phosphate (such as trisodium phosphate) tetralkali metal pyrophosphate (tetrasodium pyrophosphate) alkali metal silicates and the like, alone or in combination can also be used in the cleaning step of the present invention. Alkaline cleaning compositious such as Ridoline® 53, P3 Almeco® 18 and Ridoline® 322 can be used in the cleaning step.
  • In an alternate embodyment of the invention, an acid cleaning-etching step can be combined with the deoxidizer step by including hydrogen peroxide and a hydrogen peroxide stabilizer with an acid cleaning solution. The combined cleaning and deoxidizing steps can be carried out at a temperature of from about ambient to about 170oF and preferably from about 90oF to about 150oF. The pH of the solution is preferably below about 3 and more preferably below about 1.5 and most preferably below about 0.5.
  • It will be appreciated that the cleaning-etching step can be conducted in a short period of time with substantially little etching or can be continued for a longer period of time if a deeply etched surface is desired.
  • It will also be appreciated that the cleaning-etching step can be conducted at ambient temperatures but it is preferred to conduct the cleaning step at elevated solution temperatures. Higher temperatures increase the rate of cleaning and/or etching action of the cleaner solution and a certain degree of care must be exercised to ensure that the desired degree of cleaning or etch is obtained. The temperature of the cleaning/etching solution is preferably from about 90oF to about 175oF and most preferably from about 100oF to about 150oF.
  • In respect to the deoxidizing step, it is preferred that the deoxidizer bath be acidic and preferably be below a pH of 4, and more preferably at or below 2. When the heteroploy ions are employed in the deoxidizer bath, they can be added to the bath as such or can be generated in situ from their components.
  • When heteropoly vanadic acid or its salts are used, the deoxidizer comprises from 0.1 gram/liter to the solubility limit of the material and an acid to form a composition having a pH below 3. Generally, mineral acids are used and nitric acid is preferred.
  • When the deoxidizer is hydrogen peroxide, it is preferred that the solutions contain from 0.03 to 30% by weight hydrogen peroxide and it is further preferred that one or more stabilizers for hydrogen peroxide also be employed in the solution. With respect to hydrogen peroxide deoxidizer solutions, it is also preferable to adjust the pH to about 3 or less and preferably with nitric acid. The pH is preferably not greater than 1.5 and most preferably 0.5 or below. The deoxidizer solution is preferably maintained at a temperature from about ambient to about 150oF depending on the time the aluminum article is in contact with the solution.
  • The aluminum article preferably is in contact with the deoxidizer solution from about 1 to about 25 minutes. The contact time is generally shorter at higher temperatures.
  • Stabilizers for peroxides are well known and are exemplified in U.S. Patent 4,509,678. This patent is incorporated herein by reference. Other suitable stabilizers for hydrogen peroxide are well known in the art and any of these can be conveniently used provided they are compatible with acidic solutions. A preferred group of stabilizers is disclosed in U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 07/221,063 filed on July 19, 1988, in the name of Mark McMillen and entitled "Stabilization of Peroxide Solutions.
  • After the deoxidation treatment, the treated aluminum substrate is then chromated by chromating treatments for aluminum, which are well known in the art. Chromating with chromating compositions such Alodine® 1200S or Alodine® 600 product of Parker + Amchem a division of Henkel Corporation are useful. The aluminum substrates are preferably rinsed before being treated with the chromating compositions. Rinsing is preferred to reduce contaminatin of the chromating composition with the components of the deoxidizing treatment composition.
  • The examples which follow are intended to illustrate this invention and are not to be considered limiting.
  • EXAMPLE 1
  • A cleaning solution was prepared as follows:
    • A. 70 mls of a solution prepared by diluting 323 mls of 96% sulfuric acid with water to one liter.
    • B: 70 mls of hydrofluoric acid concentrate solution prepared by diluting 214 grams of 70% hydrofluoric acid to one liter. 70 mls A and 70 mls B were mixed and diluted to 7 liters with a mixture of 25% Ambler Borough (PA.) tap water and 75% deionized water. The mixture of tap water and deionized water had a conductance of 250 micromhos.
  • A deoxidizer solution was prepared as follows:
    A concentrate was first prepared by blending 3800 mls of 35% hydrogen peroxide and 200 mls of Dowfax® 241 (sodium dodecyl diphenyl oxide disulfonate).
  • 1610 mls of the hydrogen peroxide concentrate as prepared above and 475 mls of 70% nitric acid were diluted to 18.9 liters.
  • Panels of aluminum alloy 2024-T3 were immersed in the cleaning solution at a temperature of 120oF for a period of ten minutes. The panels were then removed, rinsed with deionized water and immersed in the deoxidizer solution at ambient temperature for 15 minutes. The panels were rinsed and subsequently chromated. The chromated panels successfully passed MIL-C-5541C test for neutral salt spray specifications. The MIL-C-5541C specification and test methods are incorprated herein by reference.
  • EXAMPLE 2
  • A cleaner solution concentrate was prepared by blending 100 mls of 96% sulfuric acid and 416 mls of 75% phosphoric acid and diluting to one liter.
  • A cleaner solution was prepared by mixing 140 mls of cleaner solution and 70 mls of hydrfluoric acid solution concentrate as prepared in Example 1 and diluting to 7 liters. The deoxidizer solution used in this example was identical to that used in Example 1.
  • Panels of aluminum alloy, 2024-T3, were immersed in the above cleaning solution at a temperature of 120oF for a period of 10 minutes. Thereafter the panels were removed, rinsed with water and immersed in the deoxidizer solution at ambient temperatures for a period of 15 minutes. Thereafter, the panels were rinsed and chromated. These panels passed the MIL-C-5541C neutral salt spray specifications.
  • EXAMPLE 3
  • A cleaner concentrate solution was prepared by blending 256 mls of 96% sulfuric acid, 90 grams of Mirawet® B (amphoteric surfactant), 90 grams of Surfonic® LF-17 (ethoxylated alcohol) and diluting to one liter with water.
  • 4 liter cleaning baths were prepared containing 50 mls of the cleaner concentrate to which varying amounts of hydrofluoric acid were added as shown in Tables I and II.
  • The amount of hydrofluoric acid added in the baths set forth in Tables I and II and based on the hydrofluoric acid concentrate as prepared in Example 1. In respect to the .17% solutions, 40 milliliters of the hydrofluoric concentrate were added. In respect to the .09% solutions, 21 milliliters of the hydrofluoric concentrate were added, and in respect to the 0.009%, 2 milliliters of the hydrofluoric acid concentrate were added.
  • A 4 liter deoxidizer bath was prepared in a manner similar to that of Examples 1 above. The ingredients employed in the deoxidizer baths are set forth in Tables I and II below.
  • In respect to the baths exemplified in Table 1, it should be noted that reagent grade 70% nitric acid was used and the stabilizer of Table I was Dowfax® 2A1 (sodium dodecyl diphenyl oxide disulfonate). Further in respect to the baths of Table I, 10.2 milliliters of the stabilizer were added to obtain the .255% stabilizer concentration and 0.4 milliliters of the stabilizer were added to get the 0.01% stabilizer concen­tration.
  • In respect to the peroxide, 400 milliliters of 35% hydrogen peroxide diluted to one liter with water, were used for the 10% concentrations and 240 milliliters were used for the 6% concentrations.
  • In respect to the deoxidizer baths of Table II, commerical grade nitric acid at 67.5% was employed and the stabilizer was Monofax® 1214 (alkyl phosphate ester). In respect to the nitric acidic 400 milliliters of the nitric acid were used for the 10% solution, 240 milliliters ofr 6% solutions and 80 milliliters for the 2% solutions. Furthermore in respect to the peroxide, 400 milliliters were used for the 10% solution, 240 milliliters for the 6% solution and 80 milliliters for the 2% solution were employed. TABLE I
    CLEANER DEOXIDIZER
    96% Sulfuric Acid 70% HF Surfactant 35% Peroxide Stabilizer pH Adj. w/HNO Time
    0.3% 0.17% 0.2% 6% 0.255% 0.5 10 Min
    0.3% 0.09% 0.2% 6% 0.01% 1.0 5 Min
    0.3% 0.09% 0.2% 6% 0.255% 0.5 15 Min
    0.3% 0.09% 0.2% 10% 0.255% 0.5 10 Min
    TABLE II
    CLEANER DEOXIDIZER
    96% Sulfuric Acid 70% HF Surfactant 35% Peroxide Stabilizer 42 o Be HNO Time
    0.3% 0.17% 0.2% 6% 0.1g/l 6% 15 Min
    0.3% 0.09% 0.2% 10% 2.55g/l 6% 15 Min
    0.3% 0.09% 0.2% 10% 2.55g/l 6% 15 Min
    0.3% 0.09% 0.2% 10% 2.55g/l 6% 5 Min
    0.3% 0.09% 0.2% 6% 2.55g/l 6% 10 Min
    0.3% 0.009% 0.2% 2% 5g/l 6% 10 Min
    0.3% 0.17% 0.2% 6% 2.55g/l 10% 10 Min
    0.3% 0.17% 0.2% 6% 2.55g/l 2% 10 Min
  • Aluminum panels of alloy, 2024-T3, were cleaned in a specified cleaner bath set forth in Table I and Table II above. The panels were then rinsed and immersed in the deoxidizer bath as indicated in Tables I and II above, each for a specified period of time listed. After the deoxidizing step, the panels were removed, rinsed and chromated. The chromated panels were then tested in neutral salt spray for 336 hours (twice as long as MIL-C-5541C requires). All panels showed no pitting and no corrosion after testing.
  • It has been found that preferred systems are those wherein the cleaning solution contains 0.3% by volume sulfuric acid (96%), 0.17% by volume hydrofluoric acid (70%), and up to 0.2% by volume sodium 2-ethyl hexyl sulfate surfactant for a strong etch cleaner. This cleaner should be used for 5-10 minutes at temperatures of from about 110oF to about 130oF.
  • It is preferred to then subject the aluminum panels to a deoxidiziang step for about 10-15 minutes by immersion in a deoxidizing bath of preferrably 8% by volume hydrogen peroxide (35%), 3% by volume (42oBé) nitric acid and up to 0.5% of a stabilizer for the peroxide (preferrably MIRATAINE® CBS (cocoamidopropyl hydroxy sultaine).
  • When it is desired to have an etching cleaner with lower etching properties, it is preferred to employ a cleaning solution of 0.5% by volume sulfuric acid (96%), 1.7% phosphoric acid by volume (75%), and up to 0.2% of a surfactant combination which is a mixture of Triton® N-100 and Surfonic® LF-17. This is used at a temperature of from about 110oF to about 140oF for 5 to 10 minutes followed by the same deoxidizer step as established above for from about 5 to 15 minutes.
  • EXAMPLE 4
  • A cleaner-etching-deoxidizer bath was prepared containing 8% H₂O₂, 2.5% HNO₃, 1.5% phosphoric acid and 2 ml/liter of Triton® X-102 surfactant (octylphenoxy polyethoxy ethanol). Aluminum panels were immersed in the cleaning-etching deoxidizer solution for 10 minutes at 120oF. The panels were rinsed and then chromated in an Alodine® 1200S chromating solution according to manufacturer's recommendations. The chromated panels were then tested in neutral salt spray for 336 hours. There was no pitting or corrosion of the aluminum panels.
  • EXAMPLE 5
  • A cleaner-etching-deoxidizer bath was prepared containing 8% H₂O₂, 2.5% HNO₃, 1 ml/liter of 79% HBF₄ and 2 ml/liter Triton® X-102 surfactant. Aluminum panels were immersed in the cleaner-etching-deoxidizer solution for 10 minutes at 120oF. The panels were rinsed and then chromated in an Alodine® 1200S solution according to manufacturer's recommendations. The chromated panels were then tested in neutral salt spray for 336 hours. There was no pitting or corrosion of the aluminum panels.
  • The combining of the acid cleaning-etch step with the deoxidizer step into one treating step is an advance in the art. The combining of two steps into a single step reduces the equipment necessary to provide a commerical process and in addition reduces the processing time for each aluminum piece.

Claims (23)

1. A process for treating an aluminum article which comprises: cleaning the aluminum article and deoxidizing the aluminum article by contact with an acidic deoxidizing solution selected from the group consisting of an acidic, stabilized hydrogen peroxide solution, an acidic heteropoly vandic acid solution or an acidic heteropoly vanadic acid salt solution.
2. A process of Claim 1 wherein the pH of the acidic stabilized hydrogen peroxide solution is at a pH below about 3.
3. A process of Claim 1 wherein the aluminum article is cleaned by contact with an alkaline cleaning solution, the aluminum article rinsed and then contacted with the acidic deoxidizing solution.
4. A process of Claim 3 wherein the cleaning solution is at a temperature of from about 90oF to about 175oF.
5. A process of Claim 3 wherein the deoxidizing solution is a stabilized hydrogen peroxide solution at a temperature of from about ambient to about 150oF and at a pH below about 3.
6. A process of Claim 5 wherein the pH is below about 0.5.
7. A process of Claim 1 wherein the aluminum article is cleaned by contact with an aqueaus acidic solution at a pH below about 2.
8. A process of Claim 7 wherein the aluminum article, after contact with the acidic cleaning solution, is contacted with a stabilized hydrogen peroxide solution at a pH below about 1.5.
9. A process of Claim 8 wherein the pH of the stabilized hydrogen peroxide deoxidizing solution is below about 0.5.
10. A process of Claim 7 which comprises:
a. Contacting an aluminum article with an acidic solution at a temperature of from about 90oF to about 175oF, at a pH below about 2 for from about 1 tc about 15 minutes to clean the aluminum article; and
b. Contacting the cleaned aluminum article with an acidic stabilized hydrogen peroxide solution at a temperature from about ambient to about 150oF for from about 1 to about 25 minutes.
11. A process of Claim 1 which comprises: Contacting an aluminum article with a cleaning-etching-deoxidizing solution at a temperature of from about 90oF to about 175oF for from about 2 to about 25 minutes, wherein the pH of the solution is below about 2.
12. A process of Claim 11 wherein the pH is below about 0.5.
13. A process of Claim 11 wherein the deoxidizing solution comprises:
a) a deoxidizing effective amount of hydrogen peroxide
b) a stabilizing amount of a stabilizer for the hydrogen peroxide
c) a pH adjusting amount of nitric acid
d) an etching effective amount of a source of fluoride ion
14. A process of Claim 11 wherein the deoxidizing solution comprises:
a) a deoxidizing effective amount of hydrogen peroxide
b) a stabilizing amount of a stabilizer for the hydrogen peroxide
c) an etching effective amount of phosphoric acid
d) a pH adjusting amount of nitric acid
15. Process of Claim 13 wherein the deoxidizer solution contains as the deoxidizing agent hydrogen peroxide in an amount from about 0.03% to about 30% by weight hydrogen peroxide.
16. A process of Claim 1 wherein the aluminum is cleaned by contact with a cleaning solution comprising about 0.3% sulfuric acid (96%), about 0.17% hydrofluoric acid (70%), and about 0.2% sodium 2-ethyl hexyl sulfate and wherein the aluminum substrate is cleaned in this solution for a period of about 5 to about 10 minutes at a temperature of from about 110oF to about 130oF.
17. A process of Claim 13 wherein the deoxidizing solution comprises about 8% by volume hydrogen peroxide (35%), about 3% by volume 42oBé nitric acid and wherein the aluminum is immersed in the deoxidizing solution for a period of from about 10 to about 15 minutes at ambient temperatures.
18. A process of Claim 1 wherein the aluminum is cleaned by contact with a cleaning solution which comprises about 0.5% sulfuric acid (96%), about 1.7% phosphoric acid (75%), and up to about 0.2% of a surfactant and the aluminum is treated in this solution for a period of from about 5 to about 10 minutes at a temperature of about 110oF to about 140oF.
19. A cleaning solution of Claim 13.
20. A cleaning of Claim 14.
21. A deoxidizer solution of Claim 1 wherein the deoxidizing agent is hydrogen peroxide in an amount of from about 0.03% to about 30% by weight wherein the solution contains a stabilizing amount of a stabilizing agent for hydrogen peroxide, aluminum and trace metal ions from the aluminum.
22. The deoxidizer solution of Claim 1 wherein the deoxidizing agent is hydrogen peroxide in an amount of from about 0.03% to about 30% by weight wherein the solution contains a stabilizing amount of a stabilizing agent for hydrogen peroxide, an aluminum and alloy metal ions from an aluminum alloy.
23. The deoxidizer solution of Claim 1 wherein the deoxidizing agent is hydrogen peroxide in an amount of from about 0.03% to about 30% by weight wherein the solution contains a stabilizing amount of a stabilizing agent for hydrogen peroxide, aluminum, copper and maganese.
EP89113143A 1988-07-19 1989-07-18 Non-chrome cleaner/deoxidizer system Expired - Lifetime EP0351771B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US22106588A 1988-07-19 1988-07-19
US221065 1988-07-19
US37499289A 1989-07-07 1989-07-07
US374992 1989-07-07

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0351771A1 true EP0351771A1 (en) 1990-01-24
EP0351771B1 EP0351771B1 (en) 1995-08-30

Family

ID=26915464

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP89113143A Expired - Lifetime EP0351771B1 (en) 1988-07-19 1989-07-18 Non-chrome cleaner/deoxidizer system

Country Status (9)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0351771B1 (en)
JP (1) JPH0277581A (en)
AT (1) ATE127167T1 (en)
AU (1) AU616776B2 (en)
BR (1) BR8903578A (en)
CA (1) CA1319591C (en)
DE (1) DE68924012T2 (en)
MX (1) MX170063B (en)
TR (1) TR28132A (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE4317544A1 (en) * 1992-06-04 1993-12-09 Micron Technology Inc Process for chemical mechanical polishing of metal layers containing aluminum and polishing slurry
EP0877833A1 (en) * 1996-01-29 1998-11-18 Henkel Corporation Aluminum deoxidizing inhibitor, composition and process
EP1674598A1 (en) * 2004-12-22 2006-06-28 The Boc Group, Inc. Solution for the selective removal of metal from aluminium substrates
US8398779B2 (en) 2009-03-02 2013-03-19 Applied Materials, Inc. Non destructive selective deposition removal of non-metallic deposits from aluminum containing substrates

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2100757A (en) * 1981-06-24 1983-01-06 Amchem Prod Fluoride-free, low-temperature aluminium-cleaning concentrates and solutions
US4451304A (en) * 1981-05-04 1984-05-29 Walter Batiuk Method of improving the corrosion resistance of chemical conversion coated aluminum
US4459216A (en) * 1982-05-08 1984-07-10 Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company, Inc. Chemical dissolving solution for metals
GB2186292A (en) * 1986-01-21 1987-08-12 Parker Chemical Co Process for cleaning aluminium

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4451304A (en) * 1981-05-04 1984-05-29 Walter Batiuk Method of improving the corrosion resistance of chemical conversion coated aluminum
GB2100757A (en) * 1981-06-24 1983-01-06 Amchem Prod Fluoride-free, low-temperature aluminium-cleaning concentrates and solutions
US4459216A (en) * 1982-05-08 1984-07-10 Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company, Inc. Chemical dissolving solution for metals
GB2186292A (en) * 1986-01-21 1987-08-12 Parker Chemical Co Process for cleaning aluminium

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE4317544A1 (en) * 1992-06-04 1993-12-09 Micron Technology Inc Process for chemical mechanical polishing of metal layers containing aluminum and polishing slurry
EP0877833A1 (en) * 1996-01-29 1998-11-18 Henkel Corporation Aluminum deoxidizing inhibitor, composition and process
EP0877833A4 (en) * 1996-01-29 1999-04-21 Henkel Corp Aluminum deoxidizing inhibitor, composition and process
EP1674598A1 (en) * 2004-12-22 2006-06-28 The Boc Group, Inc. Solution for the selective removal of metal from aluminium substrates
US7846349B2 (en) 2004-12-22 2010-12-07 Applied Materials, Inc. Solution for the selective removal of metal from aluminum substrates
US8389418B2 (en) 2004-12-22 2013-03-05 Applied Materials, Inc. Solution for the selective removal of metal from aluminum substrates
US8398779B2 (en) 2009-03-02 2013-03-19 Applied Materials, Inc. Non destructive selective deposition removal of non-metallic deposits from aluminum containing substrates

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE68924012D1 (en) 1995-10-05
MX170063B (en) 1993-08-05
BR8903578A (en) 1990-04-17
JPH0277581A (en) 1990-03-16
TR28132A (en) 1996-03-01
ATE127167T1 (en) 1995-09-15
CA1319591C (en) 1993-06-29
AU3823089A (en) 1990-01-25
AU616776B2 (en) 1991-11-07
DE68924012T2 (en) 1996-05-02
EP0351771B1 (en) 1995-08-30

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5052421A (en) Treatment of aluminum with non-chrome cleaner/deoxidizer system followed by conversion coating
EP0180908B1 (en) Aluminum surface cleaning agent
JP3278472B2 (en) Phosphate conversion coating compositions and methods
JPH0365436B2 (en)
US7384901B2 (en) Process for cleaning aluminum and aluminum alloy surfaces with nitric acid and chromic acid-free compositions
JPH07500378A (en) Stabilizing composition for inorganic peroxide solutions
EP0402084A1 (en) Compositions and method for applying coatings to metallic surfaces
EP0628092B1 (en) Process and composition for desmutting surfaces of aluminum and its alloys
US3140203A (en) Method of and composition for treating aluminum and aluminum alloys
JPH01259180A (en) Formation of phosphate film
CA2447355C (en) A process for cleaning metals comprising a step of contacting a metal with an aqueous solution comprising hydrogen peroxide, at least one mineral acid and at least one compound selected from the group consisting of 1-hydroxyethylidene-1, 1-diphosphonic acid, salts and degradation products thereof
EP0351771B1 (en) Non-chrome cleaner/deoxidizer system
EP0617144B1 (en) Use of an aqueous acidic cleaning solution for aluminum and aluminum alloys and process for cleaning the same
US20030121568A1 (en) Brightening/passivating metal surfaces without hazard from emissions of oxides of nitrogen
US6001186A (en) Acid cleaning/deoxidizing aluminum and titanium without substantial etching
EP1242651B1 (en) Brightening/passivating metal surfaces without hazard from emissions of oxides of nitrogen
US5637252A (en) Inhibitor for aqueous liquid deoxidizing composition and process for aluminum, with reduced etching of titanium
KR19990087077A (en) Zinc-phosphatizing method using low concentration of nickel and / or cobalt
EP1126048A2 (en) Pickling kit for aluminum substrates and method of pickling
JP2022100934A (en) Scale remover and manufacturing method of metal material
US6168674B1 (en) Process of phosphatizing metal surfaces
JP2005097701A (en) Antirust
WO1998020186A1 (en) Phosphate conversion coating composition and process
JPH0672311B2 (en) Zinc phosphate chemical conversion treatment method
SU883190A1 (en) Solution for pickling electroengineering alloys

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE ES FR GB GR IT LI NL SE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19900724

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19920507

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE ES FR GB GR IT LI NL SE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRE;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.SCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 19950830

Ref country code: AT

Effective date: 19950830

Ref country code: BE

Effective date: 19950830

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: THE PATENT HAS BEEN ANNULLED BY A DECISION OF A NATIONAL AUTHORITY

Effective date: 19950830

Ref country code: LI

Effective date: 19950830

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 19950830

Ref country code: CH

Effective date: 19950830

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 127167

Country of ref document: AT

Date of ref document: 19950915

Kind code of ref document: T

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 68924012

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19951005

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

ET Fr: translation filed
PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 19970625

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 19980618

Year of fee payment: 10

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 19980622

Year of fee payment: 10

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 19980625

Year of fee payment: 10

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 19980626

Year of fee payment: 10

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19990201

NLV4 Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee

Effective date: 19990201

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19990718

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: THE PATENT HAS BEEN ANNULLED BY A DECISION OF A NATIONAL AUTHORITY

Effective date: 19990730

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: THE PATENT HAS BEEN ANNULLED BY A DECISION OF A NATIONAL AUTHORITY

Effective date: 19990731

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 19990718

EUG Se: european patent has lapsed

Ref document number: 89113143.5

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20000503

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST