EP0237110A1 - Direction-finding antenna system - Google Patents

Direction-finding antenna system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0237110A1
EP0237110A1 EP87200343A EP87200343A EP0237110A1 EP 0237110 A1 EP0237110 A1 EP 0237110A1 EP 87200343 A EP87200343 A EP 87200343A EP 87200343 A EP87200343 A EP 87200343A EP 0237110 A1 EP0237110 A1 EP 0237110A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
pattern
elements
array
sum
difference
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP87200343A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Inventor
Kelvin Cleophas Clarke
Percy William Hoare
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
EMI Group Electronics Ltd
Original Assignee
Thorn EMI Electronics Ltd
Philips Electronic and Associated Industries Ltd
Philips Gloeilampenfabrieken NV
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Thorn EMI Electronics Ltd, Philips Electronic and Associated Industries Ltd, Philips Gloeilampenfabrieken NV filed Critical Thorn EMI Electronics Ltd
Publication of EP0237110A1 publication Critical patent/EP0237110A1/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01QANTENNAS, i.e. RADIO AERIALS
    • H01Q25/00Antennas or antenna systems providing at least two radiating patterns
    • H01Q25/02Antennas or antenna systems providing at least two radiating patterns providing sum and difference patterns
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01QANTENNAS, i.e. RADIO AERIALS
    • H01Q19/00Combinations of primary active antenna elements and units with secondary devices, e.g. with quasi-optical devices, for giving the antenna a desired directional characteristic
    • H01Q19/10Combinations of primary active antenna elements and units with secondary devices, e.g. with quasi-optical devices, for giving the antenna a desired directional characteristic using reflecting surfaces
    • H01Q19/18Combinations of primary active antenna elements and units with secondary devices, e.g. with quasi-optical devices, for giving the antenna a desired directional characteristic using reflecting surfaces having two or more spaced reflecting surfaces
    • H01Q19/19Combinations of primary active antenna elements and units with secondary devices, e.g. with quasi-optical devices, for giving the antenna a desired directional characteristic using reflecting surfaces having two or more spaced reflecting surfaces comprising one main concave reflecting surface associated with an auxiliary reflecting surface
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01QANTENNAS, i.e. RADIO AERIALS
    • H01Q5/00Arrangements for simultaneous operation of antennas on two or more different wavebands, e.g. dual-band or multi-band arrangements
    • H01Q5/40Imbricated or interleaved structures; Combined or electromagnetically coupled arrangements, e.g. comprising two or more non-connected fed radiating elements
    • H01Q5/45Imbricated or interleaved structures; Combined or electromagnetically coupled arrangements, e.g. comprising two or more non-connected fed radiating elements using two or more feeds in association with a common reflecting, diffracting or refracting device

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a direction-finding antenna system comprising an array of antenna elements mutually spaced in at least one direction and further comprising feeder means for forming a sum radiation pattern and a difference radiation pattern from the elements.
  • the invention relates particularly but not exclusively to such a system wherein the array is curved in the plane including said one direction and the axes of the radiation patterns.
  • Antenna systems as set forth in the opening sentence of this specification are well known. They may be used in so-called monopulse systems for determining the direction of incidence of RF signals, typically microwave signals, in arrangements which compare the amplitudes and/or phases of the signals respectively received with the sum and difference patterns. In such an arrangement, it may be desirable to ensure that the magnitude of the difference pattern should exceed that of the sum pattern, except in the region of the central null of the difference pattern, when the magnitude of the sum pattern lies within a specified range from its peak value. This may not be especially difficult to achieve with, for example, a large array which extends over many wavelengths, in particular one wherein an amplitude distribution which is not uniform across the array in said one direction can be applied to the contributions of the elements to the sum pattern. However, it may be difficult to achieve in certain conditions, for example with a relatively small array wherein little or no amplitude tapering can be applied to the sum pattern because it is necessary to maximise the gain from the relatively few elements that are available.
  • a direction-finding antenna system as set forth in the opening sentence of this specification is characterised in that the contribution of outer elements which with respect to said direction lie beyond the phase centres of the sub-arrays from which the sum pattern is formed, relative to the contribution of inner elements which lie at or between said phase centres, is less to the difference pattern than to the sum pattern.
  • the term “contribution” may imply use of the array for reception, the array may additionally or alternatively be used for transmission.
  • Reducing the contributions of the outer elements to the difference pattern effectively reduces spacing between the phase centres of the sub-arrays and thus makes the difference pattern less directional than if the outer elements made the same contribution as to the sum pattern.
  • One effect of this is to increase the angular spacing between the peaks of the difference pattern and thus tend to raise the magnitude of the difference pattern at angles beyond these peaks.
  • a suitable reduction in the contribution of the outer elements may be determined empirically. (It may be noted that another effect is to broaden the central angular range over which the magnitude of the sum pattern exceeds that of the difference pattern; the extent of broadening that is acceptable may vary in different applications. A suitable compromise between this broadening and the desired raising of the difference pattern at larger angles may be achievable empirically.)
  • At least one outer element which lies beyond the phase centre of each sub-array makes no contribution to the difference pattern.
  • the invention may be particularly suited for embodiment in an array which is curved in the plane including said one direction and the axes of the radiation patterns; in such an array, it may otherwise be especially difficult to obtain a difference pattern with the desired breadth.
  • Such an array may be one wherein the elements are microstrip patch radiators supported on an antenna reflector which, in association with a feed radiator, operates at a substantially higher frequency than the array: the array may then have a relatively small extent in said direction which, as indicated above, may also make it particularly difficult to obtain a difference pattern with sufficient magnitude relative to the sum pattern.
  • An example of such an arrangement is an IFF (Identification Friend or Foe) array which may operate in L-band at around 1 GHz and which is supported on the reflector of a radar antenna operating, for example, in X-band at around 9 GHz; the IFF array may thus be mechanically scanned together with the radar antenna. Whilst the aperture of the radar antenna may typically amount to many wavelengths at the operating frequency of the radar (e.g. 30 wavelengths), this dimension (within which the IFF array is constrained to fit) may amount to only a few wavelengths at the IFF frequency.
  • Figure 1 depicts an array of antenna elements for a direction-finding system embodying the invention.
  • the elements of the array are in this instance formed as eight microstrip patch elements 1-8 and supported on a parabolic reflector 9 of a radar antenna.
  • the microstrip patch radiators are arranged in two rows, each of four patches, extending in a horizontal direction; two rows of elements are used (rather than one) to increase the gain.
  • the reflector is curved in a plane including the axes of the sum and difference radiation patterns of the array (i.e. the normal to the plane of the drawing) and the direction of extent of the rows, that is to say, the reflector is curved in a horizontal plane (as drawn); it is also curved in a vertical plane.
  • Figure 2 is a cross-section on the line II-II in Figure 1; for simplicity, only one row of elements is shown.
  • Figure 2 also shows schematically a feed horn radiator 10 operatively associated with the reflector 9. With respect to the horizontal direction normal to the axes of the radiation patterns, there is an element at each of four locations mutually spaced by the same distance D.
  • each of the patches comprises a thin conductive layer 11 which forms the radiator. This is disposed on a dielectric layer 12 which in turn is supported on the reflector 9.
  • the reflector may be of conductive material, or may be of dielectric material with a conductive coating on at least the surface facing the feed radiatior 10.
  • the front surface of the dielectric layer 12 supporting the conductive layer 11 of each patch element is planar whilst the rear surface conforms to the curved surface of the reflector 9.
  • the thickness of the patch element i.e. the spacing between the conductive layer 11 and the ground plane provided by the reflector 9 varies across the patch: this increases the bandwidth of the patch antenna element, which is advantageous for transmission and reception at different respective frequencies.
  • the whole array of eight elements is used.
  • the eight elements may be considered as forming two sub-arrays, comprising elements 1, 2, 5, 6 and 3, 4, 7, 8 respectively, on opposite sides of the phase centre 13 of the whole array.
  • the feeder network of this embodiment comprises phase delays for the outermost elements of the array so that, with respect to transmission or reception at an angle close to the axes of the sum difference patterns (boresight), the elements are effectively substantially collinear in the horizontal plane.
  • the phase centres, 14 and 15 respectively, of each of the two sub-arrays are thus mid-way between the horizontal locations of the elements of the respective sub-array.
  • Figure 3 depicts schematically a feeder network for forming the sum and difference radiation patterns from the array of elements 1-8.
  • the network comprises four 3 dB in-phase power dividers/combiners 17-20 which respectively combine the signals from each two adjacent elements, respectively in the two rows, at the same location in the horizontal direction.
  • the feeders for the outermost elements include phase delays, denoted schematically by ⁇ at 21, 22 respectively, so that the four elements in a row are effectively substantially collinear with respect to transmission or reception on boresight.
  • the feeders are denoted a and b respectively, and the feeders from combiners 18 and 19 are denoted c and d respectively.
  • the signals on lines a and b are added in a further 3 dB in-phase power combiner 23 to form the sum of the signals from the outer four elements, ⁇ O4 .
  • the signals from the inner four elements on lines c and d are respectively supplied to two ports of a hybrid junction 24 which at two further ports produces the sum and the difference of these signals, ⁇ I4 and ⁇ I4 respectively.
  • ⁇ I4 is added to ⁇ O4 in yet another 3 dB in-phase power combiner, 25, to produce the sum of the signals from all eight elements, ⁇ 8.
  • the difference signal ⁇ I4 is derived from only the inner elements which are spaced a distance D apart in the horizontal direction while the sum signal ⁇ 8 is derived from the two sub-arrays whose phase centres are a distance 2D apart, the difference pattern is less directional than if it had been derived from the two sub-arrays from which the sum pattern is derived. Consequently, whereas if the difference pattern were derived from said two sub-arrays, its magnitude would tend to fall below that of the sum pattern at angles fairly close to boresight (apart from the central null of the difference pattern), this need not be the case for the embodiment of the invention.
  • Figure 4 shows, in dB against the angle 0 in degrees with respect to mechanical boresight, a sum pattern (continous line) and a difference pattern (dashed line) measured on a constructed embodiment similar to that described above with reference to Figures 1 to 3.
  • This embodiment had to satisfy the criterion that, apart from the central null, the magnitude of the difference pattern should exceed the magnitude of the sum pattern if the magnitude of the sum pattern was within 20 dB of its peak value. As can be seen, this criterion was satisfied by a substantial margin.
  • phase delay ⁇ (21,22) between combiner 23 and combiners 17 and 20 respectively
  • a single phase delay ⁇ may be used between combiners 23 and 25.
  • Figure 5 shows schematically a modified portion of the feeder network of Figure 3 in which the one hybrid junction 24 and the two combiners 23 and 25 of Figure 3 are replaced by at least two hybrid junctions and two combiners.
  • the arrangement of Figure 5 uses the same four feeder lines a-d as in Figure 3.
  • Lines c and d are the inputs for a first hybrid junction 24 producing outputs ⁇ I4 and ⁇ I4 (as in Figure 3), while lines a and b are the inputs to a second junction 27 producing outputs (the difference between the signals from the two outer pairs of elements) and ⁇ O4 .
  • the sum signals ⁇ I4 and ⁇ O4 are applied to a 3 dB in-phase combiner 28 which produces the signal ⁇ 8.
  • the difference signal ⁇ O4 is supplied to an attenuator 29 whose output is added to the difference signal ⁇ I4 in a 3 dB in-phase combiner 30 which produces the signal ( ⁇ I4 + k ⁇ O4 ) where 0 ⁇ k ⁇ 1.
  • a combiner/divider giving unequal combination/division may be used.
  • the absolute magnitude of the contributions of the inner elements to the difference pattern may be increased by amplification, so that the contributions of the outer elements relative to the contributions of the inner elements is less to the difference pattern than the sum pattern.
  • the outer elements whose relative contributions are less to the difference pattern than to the sum pattern need not be the outermost elements with respect to said direction, but should nevertheless lie beyond the phase centres of the sub-arrays from which the sum pattern is formed (rather than between or at the phase centres) so as to achieve the desired broadening of the difference pattern.
  • the array may comprise elements at an odd number (rather than an even number) of locations spaced in the relevant direction.
  • the central element would not be used in forming the difference pattern but could be used in forming the sum pattern, and the contribution of the central element to the sum pattern could then notionally be divided equally between the two sub-arrays on opposite sides of the phase centre of the whole array.
  • the patches were 9 cm wide horizontally and 11 cm wide vertically. Their spacing was 17 cm horizontally (distance D) and 20 cm vertically.
  • the value of the phase delay ⁇ was of the order of 50-60 degrees; the power dividers/combiners were of the Wilkinson type, and the hybrid junction was a 180 degrees hybrid ring with a circumference of one and a half wavelengths.
  • These components were formed on alumina substrates of 0.635 mm thickness.
  • the thickness of the dielectric of the patches varied from 1.5 cm at the edges to about 2.0 cm at the centre of the patches; the dielectric material was P10 polyurethane foam available from The Plessey Co.
  • the radar antenna reflector was of conductive carbon fibre material; it had apertures of approximately 107 cm horizontally and 41 cm vertically, and had a focal length of 43 cm.
  • the patch array operated at 1.03 and 1.09 GHz, and the radar antenna operated in the range 9.0-9.5 GHz.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Electromagnetism (AREA)
  • Variable-Direction Aerials And Aerial Arrays (AREA)
  • Radar Systems Or Details Thereof (AREA)

Abstract

In a direction-finding antenna system comprising an array of elements (1-8) mutually spaced in at least one direction and feeder means for forming sum and difference radiation patterns, the contribution of outer elements (1,5;4,8) lying beyond the phase centres of the sub-arrays from which the sum pattern is formed, relative to the contribution of inner elements (2,6;3,7), is less to the difference pattern than to the sum pattern, in order that the magnitude of the difference pattern should exceed that of the sum pattern except in the region of the central null in the difference pattern. The invention is particularly applicable to a curved array of relatively small aperture, such as an IFF array mounted on a parabolic radar antenna reflector operating at a much higher frequency.

Description

  • The invention relates to a direction-finding antenna system comprising an array of antenna elements mutually spaced in at least one direction and further comprising feeder means for forming a sum radiation pattern and a difference radiation pattern from the elements. The invention relates particularly but not exclusively to such a system wherein the array is curved in the plane including said one direction and the axes of the radiation patterns.
  • Antenna systems as set forth in the opening sentence of this specification are well known. They may be used in so-called monopulse systems for determining the direction of incidence of RF signals, typically microwave signals, in arrangements which compare the amplitudes and/or phases of the signals respectively received with the sum and difference patterns. In such an arrangement, it may be desirable to ensure that the magnitude of the difference pattern should exceed that of the sum pattern, except in the region of the central null of the difference pattern, when the magnitude of the sum pattern lies within a specified range from its peak value. This may not be especially difficult to achieve with, for example, a large array which extends over many wavelengths, in particular one wherein an amplitude distribution which is not uniform across the array in said one direction can be applied to the contributions of the elements to the sum pattern. However, it may be difficult to achieve in certain conditions, for example with a relatively small array wherein little or no amplitude tapering can be applied to the sum pattern because it is necessary to maximise the gain from the relatively few elements that are available.
  • According to the invention, a direction-finding antenna system as set forth in the opening sentence of this specification is characterised in that the contribution of outer elements which with respect to said direction lie beyond the phase centres of the sub-arrays from which the sum pattern is formed, relative to the contribution of inner elements which lie at or between said phase centres, is less to the difference pattern than to the sum pattern.
  • It will be appreciated that whilst the term "contribution" may imply use of the array for reception, the array may additionally or alternatively be used for transmission.
  • Reducing the contributions of the outer elements to the difference pattern effectively reduces spacing between the phase centres of the sub-arrays and thus makes the difference pattern less directional than if the outer elements made the same contribution as to the sum pattern. One effect of this is to increase the angular spacing between the peaks of the difference pattern and thus tend to raise the magnitude of the difference pattern at angles beyond these peaks. A suitable reduction in the contribution of the outer elements may be determined empirically. (It may be noted that another effect is to broaden the central angular range over which the magnitude of the sum pattern exceeds that of the difference pattern; the extent of broadening that is acceptable may vary in different applications. A suitable compromise between this broadening and the desired raising of the difference pattern at larger angles may be achievable empirically.)
  • In a particularly simple embodiment, at least one outer element which lies beyond the phase centre of each sub-array makes no contribution to the difference pattern.
  • The invention may be particularly suited for embodiment in an array which is curved in the plane including said one direction and the axes of the radiation patterns; in such an array, it may otherwise be especially difficult to obtain a difference pattern with the desired breadth. Such an array may be one wherein the elements are microstrip patch radiators supported on an antenna reflector which, in association with a feed radiator, operates at a substantially higher frequency than the array: the array may then have a relatively small extent in said direction which, as indicated above, may also make it particularly difficult to obtain a difference pattern with sufficient magnitude relative to the sum pattern. An example of such an arrangement is an IFF (Identification Friend or Foe) array which may operate in L-band at around 1 GHz and which is supported on the reflector of a radar antenna operating, for example, in X-band at around 9 GHz; the IFF array may thus be mechanically scanned together with the radar antenna. Whilst the aperture of the radar antenna may typically amount to many wavelengths at the operating frequency of the radar (e.g. 30 wavelengths), this dimension (within which the IFF array is constrained to fit) may amount to only a few wavelengths at the IFF frequency.
  • Embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the diagrammatic drawings, in which:-
    • Figure 1 is a schematic front view of a radar antenna parabolic reflector supporting a direction-finding array of microstrip patch antenna elements;
    • Figure 2 is schematic sectional view of a row of microstrip patches and the supporting reflector, also depicting the feed horn of the radar antenna;
    • Figure 3 is a schematic diagram of a feeder network for the direction-finding array;
    • Figure 4 shows measured sum and difference radiation patterns for a constructed embodiment, and
    • Figure 5 shows a modified portion of the feeder network.
  • Figure 1 depicts an array of antenna elements for a direction-finding system embodying the invention. The elements of the array are in this instance formed as eight microstrip patch elements 1-8 and supported on a parabolic reflector 9 of a radar antenna. The microstrip patch radiators are arranged in two rows, each of four patches, extending in a horizontal direction; two rows of elements are used (rather than one) to increase the gain. The reflector is curved in a plane including the axes of the sum and difference radiation patterns of the array (i.e. the normal to the plane of the drawing) and the direction of extent of the rows, that is to say, the reflector is curved in a horizontal plane (as drawn); it is also curved in a vertical plane. The curvature in the horizontal plane is depicted in Figure 2, which is a cross-section on the line II-II in Figure 1; for simplicity, only one row of elements is shown. Figure 2 also shows schematically a feed horn radiator 10 operatively associated with the reflector 9. With respect to the horizontal direction normal to the axes of the radiation patterns, there is an element at each of four locations mutually spaced by the same distance D.
  • As shown in Figure 2, each of the patches comprises a thin conductive layer 11 which forms the radiator. This is disposed on a dielectric layer 12 which in turn is supported on the reflector 9. To provide the ground plane of the microstrip, the reflector may be of conductive material, or may be of dielectric material with a conductive coating on at least the surface facing the feed radiatior 10. In this embodiment, the front surface of the dielectric layer 12 supporting the conductive layer 11 of each patch element is planar whilst the rear surface conforms to the curved surface of the reflector 9. As a result, the thickness of the patch element, i.e. the spacing between the conductive layer 11 and the ground plane provided by the reflector 9, varies across the patch: this increases the bandwidth of the patch antenna element, which is advantageous for transmission and reception at different respective frequencies.
  • To form a sum radiation pattern, the whole array of eight elements is used. The eight elements may be considered as forming two sub-arrays, comprising elements 1, 2, 5, 6 and 3, 4, 7, 8 respectively, on opposite sides of the phase centre 13 of the whole array. As will be mentioned again with reference to Figure 3, the feeder network of this embodiment comprises phase delays for the outermost elements of the array so that, with respect to transmission or reception at an angle close to the axes of the sum difference patterns (boresight), the elements are effectively substantially collinear in the horizontal plane. The phase centres, 14 and 15 respectively, of each of the two sub-arrays are thus mid-way between the horizontal locations of the elements of the respective sub-array.
  • Figure 3 depicts schematically a feeder network for forming the sum and difference radiation patterns from the array of elements 1-8. The network comprises four 3 dB in-phase power dividers/combiners 17-20 which respectively combine the signals from each two adjacent elements, respectively in the two rows, at the same location in the horizontal direction.
  • As mentioned above, the feeders for the outermost elements (combiners 17 and 20) include phase delays, denoted schematically by Ø at 21, 22 respectively, so that the four elements in a row are effectively substantially collinear with respect to transmission or reception on boresight. Following these phase delays, the feeders are denoted a and b respectively, and the feeders from combiners 18 and 19 are denoted c and d respectively. The signals on lines a and b are added in a further 3 dB in-phase power combiner 23 to form the sum of the signals from the outer four elements, ΣO4. The signals from the inner four elements on lines c and d are respectively supplied to two ports of a hybrid junction 24 which at two further ports produces the sum and the difference of these signals, ΣI4 and ΔI4 respectively. ΣI4 is added to ΣO4 in yet another 3 dB in-phase power combiner, 25, to produce the sum of the signals from all eight elements, Σ₈.
  • Since the difference signal ΣI4 is derived from only the inner elements which are spaced a distance D apart in the horizontal direction while the sum signal Σ₈ is derived from the two sub-arrays whose phase centres are a distance 2D apart, the difference pattern is less directional than if it had been derived from the two sub-arrays from which the sum pattern is derived. Consequently, whereas if the difference pattern were derived from said two sub-arrays, its magnitude would tend to fall below that of the sum pattern at angles fairly close to boresight (apart from the central null of the difference pattern), this need not be the case for the embodiment of the invention. Figure 4 shows, in dB against the angle 0 in degrees with respect to mechanical boresight, a sum pattern (continous line) and a difference pattern (dashed line) measured on a constructed embodiment similar to that described above with reference to Figures 1 to 3. This embodiment had to satisfy the criterion that, apart from the central null, the magnitude of the difference pattern should exceed the magnitude of the sum pattern if the magnitude of the sum pattern was within 20 dB of its peak value. As can be seen, this criterion was satisfied by a substantial margin.
  • As an alternative to using two phase delays Ø (21,22) between combiner 23 and combiners 17 and 20 respectively, a single phase delay Ø may be used between combiners 23 and 25.
  • As an alternative to outer elements of the array making no contribution at all to the difference pattern, their contributions (relative to those of the inner elements) may merely be somewhat reduced. This has the possible advantages of increasing the gain of the difference pattern and of reducing the central angular range over which the magnitude of the sum pattern exceeds that of the difference pattern, but the disadvantage of being somewhat more complex. Figure 5 shows schematically a modified portion of the feeder network of Figure 3 in which the one hybrid junction 24 and the two combiners 23 and 25 of Figure 3 are replaced by at least two hybrid junctions and two combiners. The arrangement of Figure 5 uses the same four feeder lines a-d as in Figure 3. Lines c and d are the inputs for a first hybrid junction 24 producing outputs ΔI4 and ΣI4 (as in Figure 3), while lines a and b are the inputs to a second junction 27 producing outputs (the difference between the signals from the two outer pairs of elements) and ΣO4. The sum signals ΣI4 and ΔO4 are applied to a 3 dB in-phase combiner 28 which produces the signal Σ₈. The difference signal ΔO4 is supplied to an attenuator 29 whose output is added to the difference signal ΔI4 in a 3 dB in-phase combiner 30 which produces the signal (ΔI4 + kΔO4) where 0<k<1. As an alternative to the attenuator 29 and equal power combiner 30, a combiner/divider giving unequal combination/division may be used.
  • As an alternative to reducing the absolute magnitudes of the contributions of the outer elements to the difference pattern, the absolute magnitude of the contributions of the inner elements to the difference pattern (but not the sum pattern) may be increased by amplification, so that the contributions of the outer elements relative to the contributions of the inner elements is less to the difference pattern than the sum pattern.
  • Where the invention is embodied in an array comprising, for example, eight or more elements uniformly spaced in the relevant direction, the outer elements whose relative contributions are less to the difference pattern than to the sum pattern need not be the outermost elements with respect to said direction, but should nevertheless lie beyond the phase centres of the sub-arrays from which the sum pattern is formed (rather than between or at the phase centres) so as to achieve the desired broadening of the difference pattern.
  • The array may comprise elements at an odd number (rather than an even number) of locations spaced in the relevant direction. For example, there may be an element at the phase centre of the whole array. In that case, the central element would not be used in forming the difference pattern but could be used in forming the sum pattern, and the contribution of the central element to the sum pattern could then notionally be divided equally between the two sub-arrays on opposite sides of the phase centre of the whole array.
  • In the above-mentioned constructed embodiment, the patches were 9 cm wide horizontally and 11 cm wide vertically. Their spacing was 17 cm horizontally (distance D) and 20 cm vertically. The value of the phase delay Ø was of the order of 50-60 degrees; the power dividers/combiners were of the Wilkinson type, and the hybrid junction was a 180 degrees hybrid ring with a circumference of one and a half wavelengths. These components were formed on alumina substrates of 0.635 mm thickness. The thickness of the dielectric of the patches varied from 1.5 cm at the edges to about 2.0 cm at the centre of the patches; the dielectric material was P10 polyurethane foam available from The Plessey Co. The radar antenna reflector was of conductive carbon fibre material; it had apertures of approximately 107 cm horizontally and 41 cm vertically, and had a focal length of 43 cm. The patch array operated at 1.03 and 1.09 GHz, and the radar antenna operated in the range 9.0-9.5 GHz.

Claims (5)

1. A direction-finding antenna system comprising an array of antenna elements mutually spaced in at least one direction and further comprising feeder means for forming a sum radiation pattern and a difference radiation pattern from the elements, characterised in that the contribution of outer elements which with respect to said direction lie beyond the phase centres of the sub-arrays from which the sum pattern is formed, relative to the contribution of inner elements which lie at or between said phase centres, is less to the difference pattern than to the sum pattern.
2. A system as claimed in Claim 1 wherein at least one outer element which lies beyond the phase centre of each sub-array makes no contribution to the difference pattern.
3. A system as claimed in Claim 1 or 2 wherein the array is curved in the plane including said one direction and the axes of the radiation patterns.
4. A system as claimed in Claim 3 wherein the elements are microstrip patch radiators supported on an antenna reflector which, in association with a feed radiator, operates at a substantially higher frequency than the array.
5. A system as claimed in any preceding claim comprising, with respect to said direction, one or more elements at each of four mutually-spaced locations.
EP87200343A 1986-03-05 1987-02-26 Direction-finding antenna system Withdrawn EP0237110A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB8605457 1986-03-05
GB8605457 1986-03-05

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0237110A1 true EP0237110A1 (en) 1987-09-16

Family

ID=10594094

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP87200343A Withdrawn EP0237110A1 (en) 1986-03-05 1987-02-26 Direction-finding antenna system

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0237110A1 (en)
JP (1) JPS62272171A (en)
AU (1) AU610061B2 (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2248344A (en) * 1990-09-25 1992-04-01 Secr Defence Three-dimensional patch antenna array
US9350086B2 (en) 2012-11-09 2016-05-24 Src, Inc. Shaped lens antenna for direction finding at the Ka-band
CN106654595A (en) * 2017-02-08 2017-05-10 华南理工大学 High-gain and low-profile vehicle-mounted antenna
CN107645066A (en) * 2017-08-03 2018-01-30 东莞市云通通讯科技有限公司 Improve the communication base station antenna that secondary lobe suppresses
EP4195410A1 (en) * 2021-12-10 2023-06-14 Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy Antenna structure and radio device

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102015202801A1 (en) * 2015-02-17 2016-08-18 Robert Bosch Gmbh Antenna arrangement and method for producing an antenna arrangement

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3594811A (en) * 1968-02-09 1971-07-20 Thomson Csf Sum and difference antenna
EP0012055A1 (en) * 1978-11-24 1980-06-11 Thomson-Csf Microstrip monopulse primary feed and antenna using same
EP0013240A1 (en) * 1978-12-27 1980-07-09 Thomson-Csf Common antenna for primary and secondary radar
EP0021193A1 (en) * 1979-06-14 1981-01-07 CONTRAVES ITALIANA S.p.A. Combined antenna system
US4283729A (en) * 1979-12-26 1981-08-11 Texas Instruments Incorporated Multiple beam antenna feed
DE2737750C1 (en) * 1977-08-22 1985-10-31 Siemens AG, 1000 Berlin und 8000 München Aircraft antenna system for IFF boarding

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB1238424A (en) * 1969-07-10 1971-07-07

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3594811A (en) * 1968-02-09 1971-07-20 Thomson Csf Sum and difference antenna
DE2737750C1 (en) * 1977-08-22 1985-10-31 Siemens AG, 1000 Berlin und 8000 München Aircraft antenna system for IFF boarding
EP0012055A1 (en) * 1978-11-24 1980-06-11 Thomson-Csf Microstrip monopulse primary feed and antenna using same
EP0013240A1 (en) * 1978-12-27 1980-07-09 Thomson-Csf Common antenna for primary and secondary radar
EP0021193A1 (en) * 1979-06-14 1981-01-07 CONTRAVES ITALIANA S.p.A. Combined antenna system
US4283729A (en) * 1979-12-26 1981-08-11 Texas Instruments Incorporated Multiple beam antenna feed

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2248344A (en) * 1990-09-25 1992-04-01 Secr Defence Three-dimensional patch antenna array
GB2248344B (en) * 1990-09-25 1994-07-20 Secr Defence Three-dimensional patch antenna array
US9350086B2 (en) 2012-11-09 2016-05-24 Src, Inc. Shaped lens antenna for direction finding at the Ka-band
CN106654595A (en) * 2017-02-08 2017-05-10 华南理工大学 High-gain and low-profile vehicle-mounted antenna
CN106654595B (en) * 2017-02-08 2022-09-27 华南理工大学 Vehicle-mounted antenna with high gain and low profile
CN107645066A (en) * 2017-08-03 2018-01-30 东莞市云通通讯科技有限公司 Improve the communication base station antenna that secondary lobe suppresses
EP4195410A1 (en) * 2021-12-10 2023-06-14 Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy Antenna structure and radio device

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU610061B2 (en) 1991-05-16
JPS62272171A (en) 1987-11-26
AU6964487A (en) 1987-09-10

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1338060B1 (en) Group antenna with narrow main lobes in the horizontal plane
US5187489A (en) Asymmetrically flared notch radiator
US5359338A (en) Linear conformal antenna array for scanning near end-fire in one direction
US7212163B2 (en) Circular polarized array antenna
US3969730A (en) Cross slot omnidirectional antenna
US5894288A (en) Wideband end-fire array
EP0624919B1 (en) Multi-beam antenna apparatus
US3997900A (en) Four beam printed antenna for Doopler application
US5013979A (en) Phased frequency steered antenna array
US6124833A (en) Radial line slot antenna
US4283729A (en) Multiple beam antenna feed
KR101874103B1 (en) IFF antenna and Radiating element for implementation of symmetric elevation radiation pattern of IFF antenna
US4912482A (en) Antenna
EP0313623A1 (en) Microwave lens and array antenna
EP0237110A1 (en) Direction-finding antenna system
CN110635233A (en) Low sidelobe lens array antenna for ETC system
US6072432A (en) Hybrid power tapered/space tapered multi-beam antenna
US3430247A (en) Centerfed travelling wave array having a squinted aperture
GB2034525A (en) Improvements in or relating to microwave transmission systems
CN113823891B (en) Antenna module, millimeter wave radar and vehicle
US5142290A (en) Wideband shaped beam antenna
EP0966059B1 (en) Four quadrants array antenna
CN215816403U (en) Four-beam Doppler radar microstrip planar array antenna
US20240128638A1 (en) Twin-beam antennas having hybrid couplers
CN111786132B (en) Radar antenna design method based on MIMO system and radar antenna

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT SE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19880315

RAP3 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: N.V. PHILIPS' GLOEILAMPENFABRIEKEN

Owner name: PHILIPS ELECTRONIC AND ASSOCIATED INDUSTRIES LIMIT

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19890718

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: THORN EMI ELECTRONICS LIMITED

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 19920220

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: HOARE, PERCY WILLIAM

Inventor name: CLARKE, KELVIN CLEOPHAS