EP0188995B1 - Hochchromhaltiger Gussstahl für ein Hochtemperaturdruckgefäss und Verfahren zu seiner thermischen Behandlung - Google Patents

Hochchromhaltiger Gussstahl für ein Hochtemperaturdruckgefäss und Verfahren zu seiner thermischen Behandlung Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0188995B1
EP0188995B1 EP19850730139 EP85730139A EP0188995B1 EP 0188995 B1 EP0188995 B1 EP 0188995B1 EP 19850730139 EP19850730139 EP 19850730139 EP 85730139 A EP85730139 A EP 85730139A EP 0188995 B1 EP0188995 B1 EP 0188995B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
steel
steels
temperature
cast
strength
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired
Application number
EP19850730139
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0188995A1 (de
Inventor
Makoto Nagasaki Technical Institute Nakamura
Yorimasa Nagasaki Technical Institute Takeda
Akitsugu Nagasaki Technical Institute Fujita
Yusaku Nagasaki Technical Institute Takano
Kazunari Japan Cast.& Forg.Corp. Takebayashi
Mitsuo Japan Cast.& Forg.Corp. Minami
Yasuhiro Japan Cast.& Forg.Corp. Tashiro
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Japan Casting and Forging Corp
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd
Original Assignee
Japan Casting and Forging Corp
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from JP21632284A external-priority patent/JPS6196062A/ja
Priority claimed from JP59216323A external-priority patent/JPH0696741B2/ja
Application filed by Japan Casting and Forging Corp, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd filed Critical Japan Casting and Forging Corp
Publication of EP0188995A1 publication Critical patent/EP0188995A1/de
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0188995B1 publication Critical patent/EP0188995B1/de
Expired legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22C—ALLOYS
    • C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/40—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel
    • C22C38/48—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel with niobium or tantalum
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22C—ALLOYS
    • C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/001—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing N
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22C—ALLOYS
    • C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/40—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel
    • C22C38/44—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel with molybdenum or tungsten
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22C—ALLOYS
    • C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/40—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel
    • C22C38/46—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel with vanadium

Definitions

  • This invention relates to a method for the thermal treating of a cast high temperature pressure vessel with a composition as given in the first part of the claim.
  • the cylinder or valve chest of steam turbines usually suffers high temperature and high pressure and should have high hot strengths such as, for example, creep rupture strength and load bearing capacity.
  • These parts have such a complicated, thick structure that when hot steam is flown therein at the time of starting, they are locally heated, where a compression strain takes place. When these portions are cooled, a great tensile stress may be left in the portions. In these portion, cracks are apt to initiate due to the fatigue by the heat. The crack initiation or the presence of the defects may lead to serious crackings by brittle failure.
  • the steel for these parts should have high ductility and toughness. If the parts are made by casting, the repair by welding is necessary. For the assembling and work, welding is necessary. In this sense, good weldability is essentially required, which, in turn, requires good ductility and toughness.
  • austenite steels which have relatively high hot strength and good oxidation resistance, are so-called austenite steels.
  • austenite steels Although austenite steels have high creep rupture strength at high temperatures, the load bearing capacity at low temperatures or normal temperatures is poor. In addition, there is the high tendency toward greater thermal stress because of the small heat transfer efficiency.
  • the austenite steels are used to make cylinders or valve chests of steam turbines, they are liable to deform by the thermal stress at the time of starting or load variation. Thus, this will place an additional burden when the parts are designed. Since the austenite steels do not undergo the so-called transformation, it is not possible to control the structure by heat treatment. If these steels are made by casting, the cast structure remains as it is.
  • 12 chromium steels comprising about 8-15% of chromium.
  • the 12 chromium steels have such a high chromium content that they have better oxidation resistance than the afore-described low alloy steels, and have practical utility as a good hot strength steel as obtained by rolling or forging on a relatively small scale. This type of steel has been expected as having good hot strength even when obtained by casting.
  • GB-A-10 15 043 discloses a large size forged steel essentially for a turbine rotor material with a composition and a thermal treating which are comparable to those mentioned in the claim but differs partly in respect to the range of some of the components.
  • a method for thermal treating of a cast high temperature pressure vessel which consists of, on the weight basis, 0.08-0.12 of carbon, not larger than 0.7% of silicon, not larger than 0.8% of manganese, 0.4-0.7% of nickel, 9-11 % of ch romium, 0.65-1.00% of molybdenum, 0.13-0.20% of vanadium, 0.03-0.07% of niobium, 0.03-0.07% of nitrogen, and the balance of iron and inevitable impurities.
  • the cast steel may further comprise not larger than 0.7% of cobalt.
  • the method comprises heating the vessel to a temperature of 1000-1100°C for normalization, cooling the steel down to a temperature not higher than 250°C, tempering the steel once in a temperature range of 550-750°C, cooling down to not higher than 150°C and tempering the resulting steel at 680-750°C.
  • the present invention is accomplished based on the following test results. We found that in order to obtain desirable properties of high chromium cast steels, the respective components contained in the steels had to be defined in specified ranges.
  • test steels used in the tests.
  • Each test steel was prepared by melting 50 kg of a steel material in a 50 kg vacuum high frequency blast furnace and casting the melt in a sand mold.
  • the resultant test steels were divided into two groups, which were each heated to 1030°C for 10 hours, cooled down to 300°C at a rate of 73°C/hr. After cooling in air, the respective groups were tempered at 650 and 700°C for 10 hours, respectively, and then subjected to tensile strength, impact strength, high-temperature tensile and creep rupture tests.
  • the reason why the test steels were kept at the respective temperatures for 10 hours and the cooling rate from 1030°C to 300°C was determined at 73°C/hour is that large-sized parts such as a steam turbine cylinder are assumed for the application of these steel materials.
  • Fig. 1 shows the drawability rate, which is considered to typically represent ductility, in relation to tensile strength, on the basis of the results of tensile strength at normal temperatures.
  • Fig. 2 shows the results of an impact strength at normal temperatures, which typically represents toughness, in relation to tensile strength, in which the impact strength shown is a 2 mm V-notched Charpy impact strength.
  • Fig. 3 shows the results of a creep rupture strength, which is typical of high-temperature strength, in relation to tensile strength.
  • the steel Nos. 1 to 8 were tested in order to determine components of the cast steel of the present invention and careful attention was paid to the suppression of delta-ferrite and the hardenability. In other words, the test results were obtained under conditions where formation of delta-ferrite was suppressed and the hardenability was sufficiently ensured.
  • so-called 12 Cr cast steels show such a tendency as described above when small-sized articles were made at a large cooling rate.
  • various problems are presented due to the difference between the cases of the small large-sized articles. In order to avoid such problems, the test was conducted while taking the heat treatment into due consideration, from which the above fact was found.
  • Fig. 2 reveals that the impact strength also tends to decrease with an increase in content of carbon though not prominent as compared with the drawing rate.
  • the impact strengths of steel Nos. 8 and 12 are low. This is because of the formation of delta-ferrite.
  • Fig. 3 reveals that at the same tensile strength, the steels tested tend to have increasing creep rupture strengths with a decrease in content of carbon.
  • the carbon content should be low from the standpoint of the ductility, toughness and high-temperature strength and is determined to be in the range of 0.08 to 0.12% according to the above test results. Less amounts are unfavorable because delta-ferrite is liable to produce with the lack of hardenability, making it difficult to ensure toughness. This is why the lower limit is determined as 0.08%.
  • the upper limit of 0.12% is as follows: the test results reveal that larger amounts of carbon still keep good ductility and toughness, but are obtained merely from the test where relatively small-sized test materials, which are obtained under good ingotting conditions, are used; with large-sized actual materials, there is the possibility that the lowerings of ductility and toughness with an increase of the carbon content become more pronounced; and when the carbon content is large at a tensile strength ranging from 700-800 N/ mm 2 (70 to 80 kgf/mm 2 ) which is a practical range for the cast steel, there is the tendency of lowering the creep rupture strength.
  • the reason why the silicon content is determined to be not larger than 0.7% is as follows: when this type of steel is used as a cast steel, it is the usual to use a rather high content of silicon so as to ensure good forgeability and the silicon content is determined to be within the allowable range according to the usual practice. Higher silicon contents have effects of ensuring good fluidity of molten metal and killing molten metal and may be effective in preventing so-called cast defectives, but will tend to cause micro and macrosegregations, making it difficult to obtain steels of stable properties.
  • the upper limit of 0.7% is a range where the above problem does not appear pronouncedly.
  • manganese content is not larger than 0.8%.
  • manganese serves to mitigate the adverse influence of sulfur, prevents formation of delta-ferrite and improves the hardenability.
  • the content is allowed to such an extent.
  • higher contents may be used, there may be the fear that the properties of the cast steel may vary.
  • 0.8% is determined as the upper limit.
  • Nickel is used in a content of from 0.4 to 0.7%. With this type of cast steel, a smaller amount of nickel is preferred in order to improve the creep rupture strength. Too small amounts will tend to form delta-ferrite and precipitate pro-eutectoid ferrite, so that the toughness lowers to such an extent as not to be used as a cast steel material. Accordingly, the range of from 0.4 to 0.7% is determined around 0.5% which is ordinarily used for these purposes.
  • Chromium is determined in the range of 9 to 11 %. This is because with this type of cast steel, higher contents of chromium result in more improved creep rupture strength. However, too higher contents tend to form delta-ferrite and precipitate pro-eutectoid ferrite, which makes it difficult to ensure high toughness. This is why the above range is used.
  • molybdenum content is determined in the range of from 0.65% to 1.00% is that molybdenum gives a well-balanced effect with regard to an improvement of the creep rupture strength when added in an amount of approximately 1 %.
  • it too large contents are used, the resultant steel becomes embrittled on heating at high temperatures for a long time and there are tendencies toward the formation of delta-ferrite and precipitation of pro-eutectoid.
  • the content is determined in a slightly smaller range.
  • Vanadium is determined to range from 0.13% to 0.20%. In general, it is accepted that the creep rupture strength is improved when vanadium is added in an amount of about 0.25%. However, according to our experiment, it was confirmed that the creep rupture strength tended to be improved when the amount of vanadium was smaller similar to the case of carbon. Therefore, the content of vanadium was lowered within a range not impeding hardenability. Taking a controllable range into consideration, the above- defined range is determined. When vanadium is added to the type of cast steel, to which the present invention is directed, in such an amount as recited above, it is considered necessary to determine the content as having a range by 0.06%.
  • Niobium prevents the growth of crystal grains by interaction with nitrogen and serves to improve ductility and toughness. When used in combination with vanadium, it acts to improve the creep rupture strength. Similar to vanadium, too large amounts result in a lowering of the creep rupture strength with the case of large-sized materials. It was also experimentally confirmed that too large amounts caused carbon nitride to precipitate in segregated portions. The above range is determined while taking in view a controllable range about 0.055% at which its effect was experimentally confirmed.
  • Nitrogen is determined in a range of from 0.03 to 0.07%. As described before, the ductility and toughness lower at larger amounts of carbon when large-sized materials are made. Nitrogen has not such undesirable effects, but an effect of improving the creep rupture strength by increasing precipitation of carbon nitride similar in quality to the carbide when coexisting with carbon. In coexistence with vanadium and niobium, nitrogen has advantages of suppressing the growth of crystal grains and preventing the formation of delta-ferrite and the precipitation of pro-eutectoid ferrite. Nitrogen has also the effect of improving the hardenability with the attendant effect of imparting good ductility and toughness. However, too large a content of nitrogen has the tendency toward a lowering of the creep rupture strength similar to carbon. The above range is determined as a controllable range around 0.05% at which the effect nitrogen was confirmed.
  • cobalt may be added in order to prevent the formation of delta-ferrite and precipitation of pro-eutectoid and increase the hardenability.
  • Cobalt has similar effects as nickel but is different from nickel in that it gives little adverse influence on the creep rupture strength. If the nickel content is limited for some reasons by which there arise problems in the formation of delta-ferrite, the prevention of pro-eutectoid and the hardenability, it is favorable to add cobalt. However, if cobalt is added in too much an amount, the balance of the steel properties may be lost. The allowable range of cobalt is up to 0.7%, which is controllable range around 0.5% at which the effect was confirmed.
  • the steels having the above components correspond to steel Nos. 1, 2 and 3 in Table 2.
  • the results of Figs. 1 to 3 demonstrate that these steels are better in ductility, toughness and creep rupture strength than similar steel Nos. 4 to 7. This is mainly due to the effect of carbon.
  • steel No. 8 has a better creep rupture strength, ductility and toughness are not so high. This is attributed to the influence of nitrogen.
  • the high chromium cast steel used with the invention has been made according to test results and the knowledge obtained therefrom and can solve the problems of lowering ductility and toughness involved in large-sized materials, which impedes practical utility of this type of cast steel.
  • the creep rupture strength is also improved.
  • the cast steel used with the invention has high utility as a high chromium cast steel for high-temperature pressure containers such as a cylinder or valve chest of a steam turbine. Thus, it has a very high industrial value.
  • the cast steel of the type described above has to be used after proper thermal treatment in order to attain the purposes of the invention.
  • the ductility and toughness of the cast steel material used with the invention tend to decrease with an increase of the tensile strength.
  • a certain limitation should be placed on the tensile strength.
  • the materials used in the test are of the small size and ingotted under well-balanced conditions. In practical applications as large-sized articles, there is the high possibility that the lowerings of the ductility and toughness by improving the tensile strength becomes much more pronounced. Moreover, when the tensile strength is lowered to an extent, the creep rupture strength lowers. In view of these facts, the tensile strength was set in the range of from 700-800 N/mm 2 (70 kgf/mm 2 to 80 kgf/mm 2 ). In the thermal treatment of the invention, consideration was first given to the tensile strength.
  • the steel used with the invention has to be normalized in orderto impart desired properties thereto.
  • the normalizing temperature should be 1000°C or higher. Too high temperatures may cause coarse crystal grains, presenting a problem with regard to ductility and toughness.
  • the upper limit of the temperature should be approximately 1100°C. Accordingly, the normalizing temperature is determined within the above range.
  • the steel After the normalization, the steel is cooled. When it is cooled down to normal temperatures, there is the fear of causing cracks as mentioned above. On the contrary, if the cooling is insufficient, residual austenite remains in large amounts. This austenite remains, as it is, even when the steel is subsequently tempered. After the tempering, hardened martensite is formed, with the tendency that cracking will occur as well. Accordingly, the steel should be cooled down to a temperature at which martensite transformation in adequate amounts takes place and non-transformed austenite is reduced in amount. With the steel of the invention, the steel is cooled to 250°C or below.
  • Subsequent tempering should be effected at temperatures not lower than 550°C, at which not cracks produce. However, if the temperature increases to high a level, the tensile strength cannot be maintained at 700-800 N/mm 2 (70 to 80 kgf/mm 2 ). The upper limit for this is about 750°C. Accordingly, the temperature ranges from 550 to 750°C.
  • the cooling temperature after the first tempering is not low enough the austenite transformation, non-transformed austenite is left. This austenite remains as it is after the second tempering and is changed into hardened martensite upon subsequent cooling.
  • the cooling should be carried to a satisfactory extent before the second tempering or after the first tempering. This cooling temperature should be 150°C or below in the practice of the invention.
  • the second tempering temperature should be determined to control the tensile strength in the range of 700-800 N/mm 2 (70 to 80 kgf/mm 2 ).
  • the temperature should be in the range of from 680 to 750°C.
  • a one ton ingot material was made as shown in Fig. 4 and tested.
  • the dimension in the figure is expressed in terms of mm.
  • Table 5 shows the results of tensile strength at normal temperatures and an impact test using a 2 mm V-notched test specimen.
  • Figs. 5, 6 and 7 there are shown the results of high-temperature tensile strength, creep and creep rupture strengths, and high-temperature low cycle fatigue.
  • the method of the invention is effective in imparting good properties to the high-temperature pressure containers.
  • the present invention has industrially great merits.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Heat Treatment Of Articles (AREA)

Claims (1)

  1. Verfahren zum Wärmebehandeln eines gegoßenen Hochtemperaturdruckgefäßes bestehend (nach Gewicht) aus 0,08-0,12 Kohlenstoff, nicht mehr als 0,7% Silizium, nicht mehr als 0,8% Mangan, 0,4 bis 0,7% Nickel, 9 bis 11% Chrom, 0,65 bis 1,00% Molybdän, 0,13 bis 0,20% Vanadium, 0,03 bis 0,07% Niobium, 0,03 bis 0,07% Stickstoff, dem Rest Eisen und unvermeidlicher Verunreinigungen sowie als Option nicht mehr als 0,7% Kobalt, gekennzeichnet durch Erwärmen des Gefäßes auf eine Temperatur von 1000 bis 1100°C zur Normalisierung, Abkühlen auf eine nicht höher als 250°C betragende Temperatur, einmaliges Temperieren im Temperaturbereich von 550 bis 750°C, Abkühlen auf eine nicht höher als 150°C betragende Temperatur und nochmaliges Temperieren bei 680 bis 750°C.
EP19850730139 1984-10-17 1985-10-11 Hochchromhaltiger Gussstahl für ein Hochtemperaturdruckgefäss und Verfahren zu seiner thermischen Behandlung Expired EP0188995B1 (de)

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP21632284A JPS6196062A (ja) 1984-10-17 1984-10-17 高温圧力容器用高クロム鋳鋼
JP59216323A JPH0696741B2 (ja) 1984-10-17 1984-10-17 高温圧力容器用高クロム鋳鋼の熱処理方法
JP216323/84 1984-10-17
JP216322/84 1984-10-17

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0188995A1 EP0188995A1 (de) 1986-07-30
EP0188995B1 true EP0188995B1 (de) 1991-01-23

Family

ID=26521367

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP19850730139 Expired EP0188995B1 (de) 1984-10-17 1985-10-11 Hochchromhaltiger Gussstahl für ein Hochtemperaturdruckgefäss und Verfahren zu seiner thermischen Behandlung

Country Status (2)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0188995B1 (de)
DE (1) DE3581527D1 (de)

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS62103344A (ja) * 1985-07-25 1987-05-13 Nippon Kokan Kk <Nkk> 低温割れおよび高温割れ感受性が低く、靭性に優れ且つ溶接継手部のクリ−プ強度が高い９％クロム系耐熱鋼
SE9002276D0 (sv) * 1990-06-28 1990-06-28 Abb Powdermet Ab Saett att framstaella fulltaeta kroppar av varmhaallfast martensitiskt cr-staal
JPH0959747A (ja) * 1995-08-25 1997-03-04 Hitachi Ltd 高強度耐熱鋳鋼，蒸気タービンケーシング，蒸気タービン発電プラント及び蒸気タービン
DE69818117T2 (de) * 1997-01-27 2004-05-19 Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. Hochchromhaltiger, hitzebeständiger Gussstahl und daraus hergestellter Druckbehälter

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2848323A (en) * 1955-02-28 1958-08-19 Birmingham Small Arms Co Ltd Ferritic steel for high temperature use
US3139337A (en) * 1962-05-31 1964-06-30 Gen Electric Alloys
GB1108687A (en) * 1966-03-29 1968-04-03 Hitichi Ltd Ferritic heat-resisting steel
BE855896A (fr) * 1977-06-20 1977-10-17 Centre Rech Metallurgique Ameliorations apportees aux aciers resistant au fluage et a l'oxydation a chaud
JPS5837159A (ja) * 1981-08-26 1983-03-04 Hitachi Ltd マルテンサイト系耐熱鋼
JPS58110661A (ja) * 1981-12-25 1983-07-01 Hitachi Ltd 耐熱鋼

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP0188995A1 (de) 1986-07-30
DE3581527D1 (de) 1991-02-28

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0639691B1 (de) Rotor für Dampfturbinen und Verfahren zu seiner Herstellung
US5798082A (en) High-strength and high-toughness heat-resistant cast steel
EP0867523B1 (de) Hochfester, hochzähiger wärmebestädiger Stahl
EP0806490A1 (de) Warmebeständiger Stahl und Dampfturbinenrotor
US5108699A (en) Modified 1% CrMoV rotor steel
EP0770696B1 (de) Hochfester, hochzaher warmebestandiger stahl und verfahren zu seiner herstellung
US8025746B2 (en) Turbine casing
US5283032A (en) Controlled thermal expansion alloy and article made therefrom
US4897132A (en) Turbine casing formed of a heat resistant austenitic cast steel
US4857120A (en) Heat-resisting steel turbine part
US4585478A (en) Heat resisting steel
JP3483493B2 (ja) 圧力容器用鋳鋼材及びそれを用いる圧力容器の製造方法
JPH08333657A (ja) 耐熱鋳鋼およびその製造方法
US3650845A (en) Method of manufacture of steel turbine blades
EP0188995B1 (de) Hochchromhaltiger Gussstahl für ein Hochtemperaturdruckgefäss und Verfahren zu seiner thermischen Behandlung
US6007767A (en) High chromium heat resistant cast steel material
JP3649618B2 (ja) 圧力容器用鋳鋼材及びそれを用いた圧力容器の製造方法
JPH11350076A (ja) 析出強化型フェライト系耐熱鋼
JP3576234B2 (ja) 蒸気タービン車室又は圧力容器用鋳鋼材
JP2948324B2 (ja) 高強度・高靭性耐熱鋼
JPH07118812A (ja) 耐熱鋳鋼タービンケーシング及びその製造法
JPS6260845A (ja) 高温用蒸気タ−ビンロ−タ
KR100290653B1 (ko) 650℃급 증기터빈 로터용15Cr 26Ni 1.25Mo 내열강
WO1990004659A1 (en) MODIFIED 1% CrMoV ROTOR STEEL
JPS6196062A (ja) 高温圧力容器用高クロム鋳鋼

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): CH DE FR GB IT LI

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19860722

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19870803

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): CH DE FR GB IT LI

ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed

Owner name: BARZANO' E ZANARDO MILANO S.P.A.

ET Fr: translation filed
REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 3581527

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19910228

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: IF02

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20041006

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20041007

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20041008

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20041015

Year of fee payment: 20

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20051010

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: PE20

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL